Selected quad for the lemma: virtue_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
virtue_n	writ_n	write_v	year_n	143	4	4.8465	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A48960	Analogia honorum, or, A treatise of honour and nobility, according to the laws and customes of England collected out of the most authentick authors, both ancient and modern : in two parts : the first containing honour military, and relateth to war, the second, honour civil, and relateth	Logan, John, 17th cent.; Blome, Richard, d. 1705.	1677 (1677)	Wing L2834; ESTC R17555	244,594	208

Adversaries in this manner viz. The Writ of Summons to the Parliament whereby the Baron by Writ hath his Original is to call that Honourable and Worthy Person so summoned to the number of that Right High and Honourable Assembly and to be a Judge to sit hear and determine Life and Member Plea and right of Land if there shall come occasion likewise to give Counsel and Advise in the most mighty Affairs of the Realm But these things are convenient for the quality and condition of men unfitting and altogether unbeseeming the Sex of women Ergo having respect unto the scope and final purpose of such Writs such Inheritances should only descend unto the Heir Female The Second Argument contra Secondly If it shall be answered That although the Heir Female to whom such Inheritance is descended be unfit in her own person for the accomplishing of these things yet she may marry with one sufficiently able for her and in her behalf to execute the same This Answer will neither satisfie nor salve the inconveniences For admit that such an Heir Female were at full Age at the death of her Ancestor unmarried for it doth lye in her own choice then whom shall be her Husband The Third Argument contra Thirdly If such Husband shall be called by the right of his Wife the Writ shall make some mention thereof for otherwise it may well be taken that the Husband was chosen in his own person and in behalf of himself and not in regard of his wife or such pretended Dignity descended unto him But there was never such a Writ of Summons seen wherein the wife was mentioned And if the husband of such a wife have been called to the Parliament which is always by General Writ not mentioning his wife he is thereby made a Baron of himself by virtue of the said Writ Having thus heard both sides to dispute place it doth now require to interpose Opinion to compound the Controversie This point in que●tion is somewhat perplexed by means of difficult Presidents For first it is observed That some Presidents do prove that Baronies by Writ have descended unto Heirs Female whose husbands have been called to Parliament whether in regard of themselves or in respect of their wives right it maketh no matter but since it is that the marriage of such Ladies gave that occasion to be summoned and such husbands and their Po●●erity have and do lawfully bear the same Title of Dignity which the Ancestors of such a wife did before rightfully bear For by this Controversie the●e is no purpose to call the right of such Noble Houses into question Howbeit Secondly this is to be observed out of the Presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutiful Subject That the King's Majesty is nevertheless at liberty to call to his High Council of Parliament whom he shall in his Princely Wisdom think fit which by his Majestie 's Noble Progenitors have in former Ages likewise observed And therefore whereas Ralph Lord Cromwell being a Baron by Writ died without Issue having two Sisters and Coheirs Elizabeth the eldest who married Sir Thomas Nevile Knight and Ioan the younger who married Sir Humphrey Butcher Knight who was called to Parliament as Lord Cromwell and not the said Sir Thomas Thirdly It is to be observed That if a Baron by Writ die without Heir Male having his Daughter Sister or other Collateral Heir Male that can challenge the Land of the said Baron deceased by any ancient entail or otherwise the Title of such an Heir Female hath heretofore been allowed as by the honourable Opinions and Relations of the Right Honourable the late Commissioners in the Office of Earl-Marshal signified unto the late Queen upon Petition of the Sister and Heir of Gregory Lord Dacres deceased may appear Moreover in the same Pedigree of the Lord Dacres it was expressed That Thomas sometimes Lord Dacres had issue Thomas his eldest Son Ralph his Second and Humphrey his third Thomas the eldest died in the life of his Father having issue Ioan Daughter and Heir who was married to Sir Richard Fines Knight and after Thomas Lord Dacres his Grandfather and Father to the said Ralph and Humphrey died after whose death Henry the Sixth by his Letters Patents bearing date at Westminster the Seventh of November in the Seventh year of his Reign reciting the said Pedigree and Marriage doth by his said Letters Patents accept declare and repute the said Richard Fines to be Lord Dacres and one of the Barons of the Realm But afterwards in the time of Edward the Fourth the said Humphrey Dacres after the attainder of the said Ralph and himself by an Act of Parliament which was the first of Edward the Fourth And after the death of the said Ralph and the Reversal of the said Act by another Act in the Twelfth of Edward the Fourth the said Humphrey made challenge unto the said Barony and unto divers Lands of the said Thomas his Father whereupon both parties after their Title had been considered of in Parliament submitted themselves to the Arbitrement of King Edward the Fourth and entred into Bond each to other for the performance thereof whereupon the said King in his Award under his Privy Seal bearing date at Westminster the Eighth of April Anno Regni sui decimo tertio did Award that the said Richard Fines in the right of Ioan his wife and the Heirs of his body by the said Ioan begotten should keep have and use the same Seat and Place in every Parliament as the said Thomas Dacres Knight Lord Dacres had used and kept and that the Heirs of the body of the said Thomas Dacres Knight then late Lord Dacres begotten should have and hold to them and to their Heirs the Mannor of Holbeach And further That the said King Edward did Award on the other part that the said Humphrey Dacres Knight and the Heirs Males of the said Thomas late Lord Dacres should be reputed had named and called the Lord Dacres of Gillesland and that he and the Heirs Males of the body of the said Thomas then late Lord Dacres should have use and keep the place in Parliament next adjoyning beneath the said place which the said Richard Fines Knight Lord Dacres then had and occupied And that the Heirs of the body of the said Ioan his wife shall have and enjoy and that the Heirs Males of the said Thomas Dacres late Lord Dacres should have to them and the Heirs Males of their bodies begotten the Mannor of Iothington c. And so note that the name of the ancient Barony namely Gillesland remained unto the Heir Male to whom the Land was entailed Moreover this is specially observed If any Baron by Writ do die having no other Issue than Female and that by some special entail or other assurance there be an Heir Male which doth enjoy all or great part of the Lands Possessions and Inheritances of such Baron deceased the Kings have used to call to the

of Nature which he hath vouchsafed unto us because in truth in the Succession of Children a mortal man is made as it were immortal neither unto any mortal men at leastwise unto Princes not acknowledging Superiors can any thing happen in worldly causes more happy and acceptable than that their Children should become notable in all vertuous Goodness Manners and Increase of Dignity so as they which excel other men in Nobleness and Dignity endowments of Nature might not be thought of others to be exceeded Hence it is that we that great goodness of God which is shewed unto us in our felicity not to pass in silence or to be thought not to satisfie the Law of Nature whereby we are chiefly provoked to be well affected and liberal to those in whom we behold our Blood to begin to flourish coveting with great and fatherly affection that the perpetual memory of our Blood with Honour and increase of Dignity and all praise may be affected our well beloved Son Charles Duke of Albony Marquis of Ormond Count of Ross and Lord of Ardmannoth our second begotten Son in whom the Regal form and beauty worthy Honour and other gifts of Vertue do now in the best hopes shine in his tender years We erect create make and ordain and to him the Name Style State Title and Dignity and Authority and Honour of the Duke of York do give to him that Name with the Honour to the same belonging and annexed by the girding of the Sword Cap and Cirtlet of Gold put upon his Head and the delivery of a Golden Verge we do really invest To have and to hold the same Name Style State Dignity Authority and Honour of the Duke of York unto the aforesaid Charles our second begotten Son and to the Heirs male of his Body lawfully begotten for ever And that the aforesaid Charles our second begotten Son according to the decency and state of the said Name of Duke of York may more honourably carry himself we have given and granted and by this our present Charter we confirm for us and our Heirs unto the aforesaid Duke and his Heirs for ever out of Farms Issues Profits and other Commodities whatsoever coming out of the County of York by the hands of the Sheriff of the said County for the time being at the times of Easter and Michaelmas by even portions For that express mention of other Gifts and Grants by us unto the said Duke before time made in these Presents doth not appear notwithstanding these being Witnesses The most excellent and most beloved Henry our Firstbegotten Son Ulrick Duke of Hellet Brother of the Queen our beloved Wife and the Reverend Father in Christ Richard Archbishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England and also our beloved and faithful Counsellor Thomas Lord Elsmere our Chancellor of England Thomas Earl of Suffolk Chamberlain of our Houshold and our dear Cosin Thomas Earl of Arundel our welbeloved Cosins and Counsellors Henry Earl of Northumberland Edward Earl of Worcester Master of our Horse George Earl of Cumberland and also our welbeloved Cosins Henry Earl of Southampton William Earl of Pembroke and also our welbeloved Cosins and Counsellors Charles Earl of Devonshire Master of our Ordinance Henry Earl of Northampton Warden of the Cinque Ports John Earl of Warwick Robert Viscount Cranborne our Principal Secretary and our well-beloved and faithful Counsellor Edward Lord Zouch President of our Council within the Principality and Marches of Wales and also our welbeloved and trusty Robert Lord Willoughby of Eresby William Lord Mounteagle Gray Lord Chandois William Lord Compton Francis Lord Norris Robert Lord Sidney our welbeloved and faithful Counsellor William Lord Knowles Treasurer of our Houshold and our welbeloved and faithful Counsellor George Dunbar Lord of Barwick Chancellor of our Exchequer Edward Bruce of Kinloss Master of the Rolls of our Chancery and also our welbeloved and faithful Thomas Eareskine of Birketon Captain of our Guard James Lord Barmermoth and others Given by our Hand at our Palace at Westminster in the Second year of our Reign of England c. King Edward the Third in the third year of his Reign by his Charter in Parliament and by Authority of Parliament did create Edward his eldest Son called the black Prince Duke of Cornwal not only in Title but cum feodo with the Dutchy of Cornwal as by the Letters Patents may appear in Coke's Eighth Part in the Pleadings Habendum tenendum eidem Duci ipsius haeredum suorum Regum Angliae filiis Primogenitis dicti loci Ducibus in Regno Angliae ei haereditarie successuris So that he who is hereditable must be Heir apparent to the King of England and of such a King who is Heir to the said Prince Edward and such a one shall inherit the said Dukedom which manner of limitation of Estate was short and excellent varying from the ordinary Rules of the Common Law touching the framing of any Estate of Inheritance in Fee-simple or Fee-tayl and nevertheless by the Authority of Parliament a special Fee-simple is in that case only made as by Judgment may appear in the Book aforesaid fol. 27. and 27 Ed. 3.41 b. And ever since that Creation the said Dukedom of Cornwall hath been the peculiar Inheritance of the King 's eldest Son during the life of the King his Father so that he is ever Dux natus non creatus and the Duke at the very time of his Birth is taken to be of full and perfect Age so that he may send that day for his Livery of the said Dukedom And the said black Prince was the first Duke of England after the Conquest For though Bracton who made his Book in the Reign of King Henry the Third saith sunt sub rege Duces as appeareth that place is to be understood of the ancient Kings before the Conquest For in Magna Charta which was made in the Ninth of King Henry the Third we find not the name Duke amongst the Peers and Nobles there mentioned for seeing the Norman Kings themselves were Dukes of Normandy for a great while they adorned none with this Honour And the eldest Son of every King after his Creation was Duke of Cornwall as for example Henry of Monmouth eldest Son of King Henry the Fourth Henry of Windsor eldest Son of King Henry the Fifth Edward of Westminster eldest Son of King Edward the Fourth Arthur of Winchester eldest son of King Henry the Seventh and Edward of Hampton first Son of King Henry the Eighth But Richard of Burdeaux who was the first Son of Edward the black Prince was not Duke of Cornwall by force of the said Creation For albeit after the death of his Father he was Heir apparent to the Crown yet because he was not the Firstbegotten Son of a King for his Father died in the life of King Edward the Third the said Richard was not within the limitation of the Grant and Creation by

Baron which always stands afterwards for the head place of the Barony whereof the said Baron and his Heirs shall be surnamed and called and shall continue that name of place although he do alien away the same as aforesaid Some others are named with the Title of Lord as Sir Hugh Bramsteed by Writ of the 27 th of Henry the Sixth was styled Lord Veysey Iohan. Beauchamp Domino de Beauchamp Iohanni Domino de Clynton To some others the Writ is directed only by their Name without any addition of place or dignity as William de Lovell Mil. William Devereux Mil. c. But the Nature Quality and Addition of those Barons by Writ is aptly discovered by the debate of a Question moved often amongst men and spoken of concerning the continuance and descent of a Barony by Writ which Question for the more orderly disposition thereof I shall divide into these Heads or Points Question First Whether a Barony by Writ may descend from the Ancestor to the Heir or not Secondly Admit such a Barony may descend then Whether it doth descend to the Heirs although not so near as the Heir Female Thirdly Admit it doth descend to the Heirs Female then Whether may the Husband of such an Heir Female take upon him the Name Style and Dignity of such a Barony in right of his Wife or no Those therefore that maintain the Negative that such a Barony shall not descend do strengthen themselves with these or the like Arguments viz. The first Argument Whether a Barony by Writ may descend Nobility and Honour which are given in respect of Wisdom Connsel and Advise cannot extend to any other person or descend from one man to another for it is a Rule in Law That Privilegium personae personam sequitur extinguitur cum persona But such is the Dignity of a Baron therefore it is reason that it should not descend from the Ancestor to the Heir The second Argument Again If the calling of the Parliament by Writ be the sufficient instrumental cause of such Nobility to the Ancestor the not calling of the Heir is a loss of that Nobility For if the Heir have defects of Nature in him as Idiotsie Frensie Leprosie or the like whereby he is become unfit for Counsels and Conversations for what reason should he enjoy that Dignity whereof he is either unworthy or uncapable for the effect hath no place where the cause faileth and hereof they conclude that such Dignities of Baronies by Writ should not descend If on the contrary part the Affirmation is thus proved Honour which is given in respect of Wisdom and Vertue of him on whom it was first bestowed is not only a due recompence for himself whilst he lived but also a memorable Reward thereof to Posterity The words of Cicero to this effect are most excellent Homines bonos semper nobilitate favimus quia utile republicae est nobiles esse homines dignos majoribus suis quia valere debet apud nos claros hujusmodi senes fuisse è republica moveretur memoria mortucrum Honor. Therefore this kind of Honour is Patrimonial and Hereditary for things which are once granted unto a man by the King for his Honour are not again to be returned to his loss and disgrace or to his Heirs The second Argument Secondly If the Infamy of the Father be a blot to the Posterity as the Wiseman Solomon affirmeth The Children complain for an ungodly Father they are reproved for his sake and for that also the Law of the Realm doth corrupt the blood of the Posterity by and upon the Offence of the Ancestor Reason would also be that the Honour of the Ancestor should be likewise Honour to the Posterity for contraries do also carry their contrary Reason For the determination whereof 't is to be noted that diversity of Reason hath bred diversity of Opinion Some there are that do speak That the Dignity of a Baron by Writ is not discendable from the Ancestor unto the Heir unless the Heir be likewise called by Writ to Parliament and that then it becometh an Inheritance and not before But this Assertion is repugnant to the nature of Descent which for the most part doth carry a Patrimony descendable by act of Law presently upon the death of the Ancestor unto the Heir not at all Wherefore the Custom of the Country and the manifest Presidents do prove that this kind of Baronies doth descend from the Ancestor to the Heir and there needeth not any word of Heir in the Writ of Summons only one President there is in a special Writ sometime directed to Sir Henry Bromfleet in the 27 th of Henry the Sixth wherein he was styled Lord Veysey and wherein there are these words inserted Volumus tamen vos haeredes vestros de corpore vestro ligitime enatos Barones de Veysey existentes Wherefore it is very true that when the Heir of any such Baron by Writ is called to the Parliament that his Descent of Honour is thereby established and approved of by the gracious Judgment of our Sacred Sovereign So it is also true that if it shall stand with his Majesties pleasure that such an Heir shall not be summoned at all then that Nobility is much impaired and in a manner extinguished in the censure of all men for that it hath no other original but by a Writ of Summons from the which by the Judgment of the Supream Sovereign he is excluded As to the second principal point Whether the Barony by Writ may descend to the Heir Female it shall not be amiss likewise to shew the Reasons on either part that by conflict of Argument the truth may the better be discovered Those that maintain the Affirmative part do say That in reason the Sex of the Heir Female ought no more to barr her Dignity than the Nonage of the Heir Male ought to barr him though during his Nonage he be unable to do the Service But as the Service of the one is for time forborn so the Sex of the other may at all times be supplied by the maturity of her Husbands Offices of Honour which do much import the Commonweal being passed by Inheritance do descend to the Heir Female as the Office of the High Constableship of England which descended unto the Daughter of Hum. de Bohun Earl of Hereford and Essex Also the Office of the Lord Steward descended to Blanch Daughter of Henry Earl of Lancaster The like may be said of the Office of Earl-Marshal which descended by an Heir Female to the House of Norfolk All which Offices are as unsit to be exercised by a woman as for a Woman to be summoned by Writ to the Parli●ment as a Baroness c. Many Noble Houses also in England do support and lawfully bear the Dignity of a Baronage unto them descended by a Woman The first Argument contra They which stand of the Negative part in this Controversie do encounter their

Nobleman and his Progenitors have for a long time been called to Parliament and be a Baron either by Tenure or Writ and have had in regard thereof a place certain in Parliament if afterwards the said Nobleman should be created a Baron of that Barony and by the same name by Letters Patents whether shall he and his Heirs retain his old place in Parliament which he had according to his former Dignity or whether shall he lose his old place and take a new one according to the time of his Creation Answer The Case of the Lord Delaware lately erected a Resolution somewhat answerable to this Question Thomas Delaware in the third of Edward the Sixth being in some displeasure with William West his Heir and Nephew who was Father to Thomas late Lord Delaware and Grandfather to Henry Lord Delaware that Nevis procured by Act of Parliament by which the said William West was during his natural life only clearly disabled to claim demand or have any manner of Right Title or Interest by Descent Remainder or otherwise in or to the Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments Title and Dignity of Thomas Lord Delaware his Uncle c. After the said Thomas Delaware died and the said William West was in the time of Queen Mary attainted of Treason by Verdict but pardoned by the said Queen and afterwards by Parliament in the time of Queen Elixabeth was restored and in the fourth year of her Reign was created Lord Delaware by Patent and took place in Parliament accordingly for that by the said Act of Parliament of Edward the Sixth he was excluded to challenge the former ancient Barony and after he died Now whether Thomas Delaware should take his place according to the ancient Barony by Writ or according to his Father's Creation by Patent was the Question The Opinions of the late Queens Council being his Majestie 's Attorney General and Solicitor were That the acceptance of the new Creation by the said William West could not extinguish the ancient Dignity for that he had not the ancient Dignity in him at that time of his Creation but the Dignity was by the Act of Parliament 3 Edw. 6. in the ballance of suspence or consideration of Law and he thereby utterly disabled to have the same during his life only so as other acceptance could not extinguish that Dignity which he then had not nor could not conclude his Heir who was not disabled by the Parliament 3 Edw. 6. to claim the ancient Barony which Opinion of theirs was seen and allowed by the then Chief Justice of England and Lord Chief Baron and so signified to the Lord Keeper But this to be noted by the Reasons made for the said Resolution though if the said Sir William West had been Baron and entituled and in possession of the ancient Dignity when he accepted the ancient Creation the Law perchance might have been otherwise but that remains as yet unresolved Nevertheless the Rule is Eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur But by a Grant which is but a matter of Fact a man cannot transfer his Title of Honour And thus much concerning the Degrees of Barons within this Realm upon this occasion for the better understanding and direction of that which followeth to be handled And in this place I think it not impertinent to mention one Case which I met with in our Books of Common Law concerning the Descent of a Title of Honour whereof the Ancestor had Estate in Feesimple there is a Maxim in the Law Possessio fratris in feodo facit sororemesse haeredem But if a man by any of the three means aforesaid be created into a Title of Dignity to him and his Heirs for ever and so have Issue by one wife a Son and a Daughter and hath also a Son by a second wife afterwards the Father dieth and his eldest Son entreth into all his Father's Inheritances and also enjoyeth the Titles and Dignities which his Father had but dieth without Issue In this Case the Dignity shall descend upon the younger Son though he be but of the half blood to him that last enjoyed that Name and Title of descent and shall not descend to his Sister of the whole blood And yet in this case he shall only be her Brother's Heir of all his Feesimple Lands and the reason thereof is because possessio fratris is the name and sole cause which may give Title to her his Sister which faileth in this case of Dignity for it cannot be said that her elder brother was in possession of his Title of Honour no more than of his blood so as neither by his own act nor any act to be done by any other did gain more actual possession if so it may be termed then by the Law did descend to him and therefore the younger brother may well by the Law make himself Heir unto his Father of the Honour that he cannot be heir unto his brother So that this word Possession which is no other than pedis positio extendeth only unto such things of which a man may by h●s entry or other act be possessed and doth require actual possession Coke's third part 92. Having thus much treated concerning the Creations and other things incident to the degrees of Nobility I cannot omit some things concerning the sufficiency and ability of Estate which the Law doth require to be in every of them according to their several Dignities The Common Law which always will decorum and conveniency be observed considering the Charges and Dignities appertaining to these Degrees and Dignities being Offices of principal Service to the King and Realm both in War and Peace hath ordered that each of them ought to have a convenient Portion and Inheritance in Land to support the said Dignity which Supplies are as Sinews conjoyned in the same For in Vertue and Riches as Aristotle confesseth all the old Nobility consisted and which two Properties maketh a good Complement for utilior est sapientia cum divitiis conjuncta Therefore a Knight's Fee which he ought to have is Twenty pounds Land by the year a Baron's thirteen Knights Fees and a quarter and an Earl's twenty Knights Fees For always the fourth part of each Revenues which is by the Law held requisite for the Dignity shall be paid to the King for the Relief As for Example the Relief of a Knight is five pounds which is the one fourth of his Revenue according to the Statute of the first of Edward the Second The Relief of a Baron is One hundred Marks which is also the fourth part of his Revenue And the Relief of an Earl is One hundred pounds al●o the fourth part of his Revenue And it appears by the Records of the Exchequer that the Relief of a Duke amounteth unto Three hundred pounds And this is the reason in our Books that every of the Nobility is presumed in the Law to have sufficient Freehold ad sustinendum nomen onus And to what value