first day of the weeke from the worke of our Redemption and re-creation therefore did he blesse and hallow it by his example to his Apostles whom he had extraordinarily called that they by their example should doe the like to others with those many manifestations of himselfe and admirable blessings which he then bestowed on them Which practice of Christ doth wonderfully make good both the Morality of the Sabbath and justifieth the alteration of it also to the first day of the weeke For whereas God at the first blessed it that is appointed it to be a day wherein he would especially confer spirituall blessings We see Christ accordingly doth still on this day blesse and enlighten his Apostles by appearing to them being together glorifying God Now if you will say that Adams posterity whom in your first Chapter you say it is probable had they continued in Innocency should alwayes have followed Gods example in working sixe dayes and resting the seventh should have sanctified the last of seven by Tradition from God and Adâ—ms examples I will easily yeeld you that by the like tradition from Christ and his Apostles example we doe now keep the first day of the weeke Broad CHAP. II. The latter Opinion maintained THe Primitive Christians for the most part held the latter opinion as I gather by this that followeth Iustin Martyr in his second Apologie writeth after this manner * Apol. ad calcem We hold these assemblies on the Sunday because on that day God began to make the world and also our Saviour Iesus Christ arose from the dead Hereby it is manifest that Iustin knew not of a Commandement from Christ or his Apostles for should a Rabbin yeeld a reason of their meeting on the Sabbath would it not be because God had so commanded it who on that day rested after the Creation and sanctified it And so would Iustin no doubt had he tooke their meeting to be enjoyned by Christ or his Apostles we hold these Assemblies on the Sunday because Christ hath so commanded who on that day rose againe from the dead Thus I am sure some would be ready to write in these dayes Answer The opinion of the Ancients how-ever you may force them to speake was that one day in a weeke or the seventh day was still of force by vertue of the fourth Commandement and that the individuall first day of the weeke was from Christ or his Apostles or both as appeareth in that they call the sanctifying of the Lords-day a keeping of the Sabbath So Ignatius who ad Magnes chargeth those Christians to worke on the Iewes seventh day doth yet say Let every of us keepe Sabbath spiritually * 〈…〉 ad Magnâ—s 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speaking in opposition to the Iews manner of superstitious Sabbatizing so that he cryeth down both their day and manner of hallowing it * 〈…〉 of this page 50. in margin 〈…〉 temp â—51 if his and yet maintaineth the Sabbath to be yet still on foot and exhorteth them to the right keeping it S t. Augustine also saith So we also sanctifie the Sabbath the Lord saying Ye shall not doe any worke therein And as M t. Richard Byfeild saith The Apostle to the Heb. 4. 9. Doubted not to apply the name of Sabbath to the Christian people and our Reâ—â— saying That the people of God have their Sabbatisme left unto them For humane authorities in this point I further referre you to the 21 and 26. Chap. of M r. Richard Byfeild But to shew your leger-de-maine I proceed to that of Iustin Martyr In which I say he doth as Paul sometimes doth concerning his Apostleship Demonstrating it by such arguments as do properly constitute an Apostle So Iustin in his Apologie for Christians doth first shew the reason of the Christian Sabbath i. e. Our new Creation by Christ who by his resurrection brought light out of darknesse in the first day of the Creation But had you looked further as no doubt you did you might have seen his opinion to be more then you make it even witnessing Christ to have taught it to his Apostles as you shall finde it quoted by M r. Richard Byfeild Chap. 21. pag. 124. So that you deale with Iustin Martyr as men deale with Mag-pyes cut their tongues shorter to teach them to speake what they would have them And yet a Râ—bbin might have laid down the Reason and concealed the Commandement without solloecisme or errour unlesse you will say it was a fault in Rabbi Moses for so he proscribeth the Israelites to answer their children when they should aske them concerning the Passeover as you may see in the 12. Chap. of Exod. 26. 27. so also in the 13 Exod. 13 14 15 16. You shall see the reason of a dutie delivered from the parent to the children by precept from Moses without any specification of the Commandement it self Broad Si dies observare non licet menses 〈◊〉 lib. Com. 〈◊〉 Eâ—â—st ad Gâ—â— tempora annos nos quoque simile crimen incurrimus quartum Sabbati observantes parascenem diem dominicum ieiunium Quadragesima See the place and note that he doth not yeeld a peculiar reason for the observation of the Lords-day Constantinus imperator concessit rusticis Euseb. de vita Coâ—st lib. 4. Cap. 19. ut diebus dominicis agrorum culturae pro ut ipsi viderint fore necessarium inservirent Idoneum vero precationi tempus salutarem diem dominicum constituebat quippe qui tum verè praecipuâ—s est tum haâ—d dubie primus Note the reason Eusebius rendereth of this constitution of Constantine and consider withall that Constanâ—ine would not have so constituted if in his judgement our Saviour Christ had before appointed the Lords-day to this end Did ever a Christian Prince simply decree that the Lords Supper should be administred As many Christian Princes and Councels as have simply decreed the observation of the Sunday were doubtlesse of this opinion Answer For answer to this I referre you to M r. Richard Byfoild Chap. 29. where the Reader may herein receive satisfaction Broad As touching moderne writers Calvin saith 〈◊〉 lib. 2 cap. 8. sect 34. Veteres subrogarunt diem dominicum in locum Sabbati Zanchius saith In 4 Preceâ—t that the Lords-day Nullum habet Domini mandatum D r. Feild saith Book 4. Church Chap. 20. that the Lords-day is an Apostolicall tradition not precept The Book of Homilies not to stand upon other saith Homily of the place and time of prayâ—r That Christian people chose the first day which is as much in effect as that it is not Christs Commandement Will any man say that the people of Israel chose the seventh day Now of this opinion I am and these are my reasons 1. Had Christ or his Apostles commanded to sanctifie the Lords-day mention should have been made thereof in Gods word for the Scripture containeth in it all things
regard of their superstitious resting which they used upon the Sabbath as that they would rather endure to dye then fly especially considering the Religion they put in that tradition of a Sabbath daies journey which was but two miles as they accounted it So that had they fled â—ut two miles further then their stint they would have thought themselves more to have violated the Sabbath then if they had spent the whole day in contentions and seditions within the City For of such force is zeale when it is not according to knowledge of Scripture as that through our corrupt nature it bindeth the conscience more straight then any command of God rightly understood As we may see by those souldiers who when they were besieged rather then they would drinke of the well into which a dog was throwne they would starve or render the City * Turkish History And so doubtlesse would many of the Iewes chuse to dye before they would fly further then their superstitious tradition gave them leave But as I have given truth its due in commending your exposition so give me leave to discover the fallacy of your marginall sophisme by comparing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 already spoken of in the 2 Col. 16. There because it maketh for your advantage you will have it to be meant the weekly Sabbath and yet the Article is not prefixed and in this place you will have it to be meant the lewish Sabbath because the Article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not prefixed This is scarce good dealing But I pray you let one and the same defect beget one and the same sense in both places and so let them both passe alike for the Iewish extraordinary festivals and so your Argument shall not only prevaile with us but evince the truth Broad CHAP. VIII VVHat would follow were the fourth Commandement morall or perpetuall Such as give a different sense of the same Law at sundry times make it like a nose of waxe Were the fourth Commandement morall or perpetuall it would follow that we Christians ought to keep the Iewes Sabbath for the meaning of this Commandement must needs be the same as heretofore it was A Law cannot say one thing to day and another to morrow though a Law-giver may And now the meaning of the fourth Commandement heretofore was * God sanctified the seventh day Gen. 2. not one day of seven or the like the fourth commandement enjoyned the same that the seventh day wherein God rested should be sanctified other meaning this Commandement could have none as the words thereof doe manifestly declare they import this and nothing else Such I know among us as urge the perpetuity of the fourth Commandement will have it bind now to sanctifie the Lords-day but they cannot agree among themselves show this strange matter â—hould come to passe I say this strange matter for there being an old statute for fasting on the Friday if it should be said that hence forward we should be bound thereby to fast upon Saturday would it not seeme wonderfull strange A strange matter it is that the fourth Commandement should bind to sanctifie the Lords-day and how it may come to passe many strange opinions there are which I thinke needfull here briefly to examine 1. Opinion There are who teaching that the fourth Commandement bindeth to sanctifie the Lords-day will have it thus to come about They say that those words in the beginning Remember to sanctifie the Sabbath are for substance the whole fourth Commandement that which followeth being only an explication and a reason and here they take the word Sabbath in a generall sense so that this with them is a more generall Commandement then if God had said Remember to sanctifie the seventh day Ans. I acknowledge that these words are for substance the whole fourth Commandement as you teach but whereas you put a difference betweene Sabbath and seventh day Consider further 1. That once onely before mention is made of the Sabbath and that Sabbath was the seventh day 2. Remember saith God to sanctifie the Sabbath and what Sabbath should they remember to sanctifie but that before mentioned 3. That the word Sabbath is not to be taken againe in such a generall sence throughout tâ—e Scripture this I cannot approve of for these reasons 1. Because then the word Sabbath should be taken in one sense in the beginning of the Commandement and in another towards the end for towards the end by Sabbath must needs be meant the seventh day onely And rested the seventh day wherfore the Lord blessed the Sabbath and sanctified it Here Gods resting on the seventh day is the reason why he sanctified the Sabbath and can it be a reason of sanctifying another day besides the seventh day especially seeing he laboured on all the other Suppose that we had the like speech in the new Testament as thus He rose again on the first day wherefore he blessed the day of resurrection and sanctified it Who would not take the day of resurrection here for the first day only Reas. 2. By this your Doctrine the fourth Commandement should be of larger extent then that Commandement in the beginning suppose it were a Commandement as you would have it for there it is said God blessed the seventh day not the Sabbath Answer In stead of answer to this in this place I referre you to a review of your first Chapter and mine where the selfe same point is largely discoursed Onely a word or two more 1. Touching your consequence of the unchangeablenesse of the Iews day into ours if the fourth Commandement be admitted morall See for this Eatâ—nus de Sabbato pag. 40. de Moralitate Sabbathi Neque enim saith he mutâ—bile cum ceremoniâ—li bene est coniunctum aut cum eo convertendum Quamvis enim omne ceremoniale sit mutabile non é contra tamen Multa enim sunt positiva â—â—â—tabilia quae non sunt Ceremoniâ— huius generis sunt leges Iudiciales Exod. 21. c. Sic etiam totuâ— Decaloguâ— aliquo modo mutabilis fuit ut disertè Apostolus expriâ—it in 3 ad Gal. 13. Christus redemit nos ab execratione legis cap. 4. 30. Ejice ancillam filium eius quâ— ancilla ut vers 25. apparet moâ—â— Sicai erat qui est in Arabia Hoc est lex quae ibi pronunciata fuit Hisce liquet quod lex maleâ—â—ctio eius in Christo sunt abrogata quatenus aliquo modo erant murabilia totam autem legem ceremonialem esse nemo est qui dixerit 2. And touching your instance or similitude of fasting Friday by Statute I answer That indeed it were strange to turn Friday into Saturday by vertue of the letter of the same law Rebus sic stantibus but put case we had some extraordinary Deliverance fell out on Friday as the Gun-powder Treason and were to keepe it weekely as we are the Sabbath then if either
the day of resurrection For the Apostle saith that if Christ bee not risen wee are yet in our sins And so againe whereas hee saith pag. 298. This great worke of humane redemption was not effected by the resurrection of Christ but by his obedience and sacrifice on the crosse and it was fully wrought and finished upon the passion friday after our Saviour had said consummatum est I aske how wee had beene redeemed from and how hee had conquered our last enemy death if hee had not risen And againe put case it were so so was the worke of creation fully finished on the sixth day and yet God sanctified the seaventh day and on that day 2. Gen. 2. it is said Hee ended his worke which hee had made because that day gave manifest declaration of his compleating the works of creation and so did the day of Christs resurrection manifest the compleating of the worke of our redemption And this day thus prophetically extolled by David was answerably honoured by Christ himselfe and kept by his Apostles So that in answer to Bishop White pag. 302 there was at least an implicite vertuall and interpretative command in the act of Christs resurrection For why should not wee thinke that Christ had a significant meaning in prolonging his resurrection to the third day which was the first of the weeke as well as God had in spinning out his creation to the seaventh day which was the last of the weeke seeing Christ could have raised himselfe out of the grave so soone as hee was in it like as God could have created all things in the twinckling of an eye So that then seeing God by this his resting from the worke of our redemption hath given us a new reason in respect of eminency of a new day and by the example of his Apostles preserving still the number wee in doing the like obey his good pleasure and his Law which is not destroyed by the comming of Christ for not one tittle of it shall passe away till Heaven and Earth passe which is the time of the Sabbaths period but fulfilled and explained by him according to the will of God and his purpose though not according to our carnall reasonings and opinions For thus is all kept whole The reason of the commandement hereby standing still good but not in cheife For Gods resting from his worke is now the occasion of our Sabbath not from the worke of his creation but from the worke of his redemption wherein hee was most remonstrated and even redoubled in the manifestation of all his attributes to our view and therefore worthy of a select day which yet altereth nothing of the substance of the Sabbath Alexander tertius Pontifex Rom. affirmat tam veteris quam novi testamenti paginam septimam diemad humanam quietem specialiter deputâ—sse id est Interprete suarez de diebus festis cap. 1. utrumque testamentum approbavit moreâ— deputandi ad quietem humanam septimum quemque diem hebdomadis quâ—d est formaliter deputare septimum diem licet materialiter non idem dies fuerit semper deputatus hoc modo verum est septimum â—llum diem in lege vâ—teri esse Sabbathum in nova vero esse diem Dominicum For as our changing of the bounds of the Sabbath which in the Iewes time was from evening to evening and now in our time is from morning to morning in relation to the time of Christs resurrection is no materiall change but that still the day remaines entire even so the change of the Iewes seaventh day to our seaventh day altereth not any whit the substance of the Sabbath or fourth commandement But you will say Obj. why was the day translated and not rather both the dayes celebrated Because that would have crossed the good pleasure of God Answ. who from the beginning thought it a meetâ— proportion to afford man sixe dayes for his necessary labour and to exact one of seaven for his more solemne worship which also is the reason why the Lords day was continued in the same number but not in the same order so that it was not transpâ—sed to bee observed in any other number but onely in another order in the same number that so the will of God in that commandement might bee observed and yet his resting from the wonderfull worke of our redemption worthily celebrated And therefore whereas Bishop White saith pag. 277. that if the fourth commandement concerning the keeping of the seaventh day bee morall and perpetuall then it is not such in respect of the first and eight dâ—y but of that one onely day which it specifieth in the commandement I answer Neither of both is morall and perpetuall as considered in the order but occasionall and changeable as the event hath shewne and that each of both is morall and perpetuall as considered in their number being unchangeable to any other number and therefore still so continueth by vertue of the morality of the Law of the Sabbath given to Adam and re-given in the fourth commandement Now whereas you urge the appointed day of the Passeover to bee unalterable in paralel to the day of Gods rest from the creation wee clearely see the contrary for upon occasion the precise individuall day of the Passeover was altered as in the 9. of Numb where hee that was uncleane or in a journey was not to eate it till the fourteenth day of the second month where the number is preserved entire whereof God was ever curious but the day is changed even thus upon occasion is the Sabbath altered the number of seaven being kept entire in this as in the other the number of fourteene and yet a change made and so both the Sabbath and Passeover for substance preserved notwithstanding the circumstantiall alteration upon occasion Yea Hezekiahs great Passeover was kept in the second month upon the exigency of the times 2 Chro. 30. 2 3. And now that you have made mention of the Passeover besides this foresaid livâ—ly illustration which it affords to set forth my meaning in this thing I would commend it as a notion worthy your consideration whether Gods ordaining the first and seaventh day of the Passeover as also of other feasts to bee kept holy might not propheâ—yâ—â—â—â— Sabbath of the true Paschall lambe Christ Iesâ—â— after his being slaine as well as theirs under the typicall the one to bee the first of the seaven as the other was the last Broad 2. When in likely hood God sanctified the seaventh day VVHen God sanctified the seaventh day Some conâ—idently teach that Adâ—a kept the first seaventh day whereas it is probable that God sanctified it not till about the end thereof I meane whether as soone as it began or about the end thereof is doubtfull of the two the latter sâ—emes most probable for God blessed and sanctified the seaventh day because therein hee had rested not would reâ—â— and was refreshed It is the manner of men to blesse
that wee should ever after use the seaventh day to a blessed and holy end and expect a blessing from God thereon in so doing for els to what use was it that God did thus reveale himselfe and his resting and not rather conceale it if hee had meant it onely for a bare narration But it is evident by the second giving of the Law what and how hee meant it at the first thus Master Breerewood in his second tract pag. 9. The Sabbath saith hee is called holy not formally for any peculiar inherent holines it hath above other dayes but finally because it was ordained and consecrated to holy exercises in the service of God which gives answer to Bishop White pag. 40 who saith that the second Gen. 2. 3 expresseth not the manner how the Lord sanctified this day whether by imparting any speciall vertue to it above other dayes or by dedicating the same to any religious service to bee performed by Adam in the state of innocency c. You onely affirme that it is one thing for God to sanctifie a day and another to command man to sanctifie it but shew not the difference But you would imply as if the sencible refreshment of that day in a grosse sence were the cause that made God fall so farre in love with it where as both you and every man knowes that there are no passions of wearisomnes and refreshment in God that they should bee meant by his resting but that it is spoken ad captum vulgi for our better understanding 1. To exemplarize unto us how that spirituall and heavenly employments should bee a refreshing unto us in comparison of earthly imployments and so farre wee were capable of wearisomnes even in innocency at to have found other manner of refreshment in divine and spirituall things then in worldly affaires 2. To signifie the sensible refreshment and happy alteration that wee should have had in our heavenly rest from the state and condition that wee were in here on Earth But perchance you are of opinion with some that thinke Adam should not have beene translated but have lived immortally upon Earth had hee not falne But to this I answer that by the curse which was annexed to the tree of knowledge wee may know è contrario what manner of blessing was promised and intended by the tree of life now the curse involued both the first and second death here and in hell so c. * For a further argument I wish them to consider and compare Rom. 3. 23. with Rom. And they indeed that are of this opinion must prove the Sabbath not to signifie our rest in heaven nor to bee given in innocency As for your criticisme in the Margin it is not worth the weighing The substance of Gods institution in those words being thus much Hee blessed the seaventh day Pag. 202. that is saith Master Richard Bifield hee appointed it to bee a fountaine of blessing to the observerâ— of that day and sanctified it that is commanded it to bee set apart by men from common businesses and applied to holy uses Thus Calvin on the place this blessing saith hee Calvinâ— was nothing els but a solemne consecration whereby God claines to himselfe the studies and imployments of men on the seaventh day Thus Master Hildersham in his lectures upon the 51. Psalme pag. 704. saith it is worth the observing that our Saviour saith Marke 2. 27. That the Sabbath was at first made for Man for the great beneâ—it and behoofe of Man Man could not no not Adam in innocency have beene without it but with great danger and losse unto him So that the holy Ghost saith that twice of the Sabbath Gen. 2. 3. and Exod. â—0 11. that hee never said of any other day That the Lord blessed that day that is appointed it to bee a meane of a greater blessing to man if hee keepe it as God hath commanded him to doe then any other day or any of the ordinary workes of any other day can possibly bee So Marius on Gen. Marius 2. Hee blessed it that is hee consecrated it to his blessing to bee kept of men and sanctified it that is not as if hee stamped holines upon it as you would imply but because hee appointed it to his sanctification and praise and to the holy conversation of men In short Hee blessed the seaventh day and hallowed it that is hee digniâ—â—ed it with this priviledge above the sixe dayes that it should bee exempted from their prophane and civill actions and negotiations and dedicated to holy and sacred imployments And now whereas you say that Adam should have observed Gods example in innocency had hee stood I thinke so too Wherein you mightily contradict your selfe for why should Adam imitate that which even now you would have to bee onely an action in God but of no exemplary use to man But why should the Sabbath bee usefull to Adam in innocency who was so perfect and not much more usefull to Adam in innocency who was so perfect and not much more usefull to the Church of God after I would faine know But you goe on and say that Adam was thrust out Paradise what then God had his Church still which was principally respected by God in the giving of the Sabbath * As appeares in that as soone as God had taken and selected to himselfe a noted Church of the Israelites out of the World he renewes his institution and command of the Sabbath to them As it is said in the 4. Hebr. 9. There remaineth a Sabbatisme to the people of God that is to his Church for they are they which in the Scripture sense shall rest from their labours and therefore was the Sabbath still in force though pethaps not in use although they then and wee now ought to bee so much the more carefull to keepe it by how much wee stand in need of the blessing of God since the curse falne upon our selves and the whole creation Broad Neither did hee or his posterity sanctify any Day in an holy rest a long time after for ought that wee doe certainly find or may probably conjecture 1 The Iewes acknowledge that they doe not read of Abrahams keeping the Sabbath and I may adde neither of any others keeping or breaking it both before and a good while since Abrahams time although wee doe read of Circumcision Sacrifices and the breach of other Commandements together with punishments for the same 2 Before the Israelites comming out of Egypt I find no mention of Weekes which distinction of time the Sabbath causeth as of Dayes Moneths and Yeares whereas after their comming forth and institution of the Sabbath mention is made as well of Weekes as of any other 3 Tertullians judgment is that Adam Lib advers Iâ—d Noah Abraham c. kept not the Sabbath and of the same opinion are many others so Peter on Gen. 2. After that God had delivered the
our praying that prayer in a literall sense now in our times doth force no such conclusions Not to keepe the Sabbath of the Iewes For though the commandement expresse a seaventh day for number yet it doth not in terminis expresse the order saying Thou shalt keepe the last day in the weeke or of seaven and not the first c. though I acknowledge from other reasons proper to these times the commandement had then that meaning onely so that now the letter of the commandement is intended in our prayer onely with a circumstantiall variation according to the practice of the Church derived from the Apostles which explaines it to the meanest Againe not the seaventh day precisely from the Worlds creation for that hath suffered many variations nor did Adam keepe it but he meanes the seaventh day from the first gathering of Mannah Nor yet in the selfe same manner that the Iewes once did If by once hee meane in the strict time of the wildernes for reasons aforesaid So that by the letter of the commandement wee now may pray the Lord to encline our hearts to keepe holy a Sabbath and not the Iewes a seaventh day and not the last of seaven For the Law in the letter respecteth properly and principally the number implying onely the order occasionally for the season sake because the creation was then the greatest good which number it still retaines in the same letter and upon a new season implies a new order the reason whereon the order was built being circumstantiall as I have proved before nor the day that God rested on after the creation nor the extraordinary rest in the wildernes I say wee may ejaculate this prayer in a literall sense to the fourth commandement as well as to the fifth where weepray Lord encline our hearts to honour our parents that according to thy promise the dayes may bee long in the Land which thou givest us Now wee all knew that by Land there and then is implicitely meant the promised Land or Land of Canaan Yet the manner of expression which God useth in the penning of that Law as of that of the Sabbath admits a latitude Ephes. 6. 2. 3. not appropriating the promise to the Land of Canaan onely by saying that thy dayes may be long in that Land of Canaan which the Lord thy God giveth thee so that the Tribe and the halfe which planted on this side Iordan might have prayed this prayer at the reading of the fifth commandement as well as they with in the Land of Canaan by vertue of the letter of that Law and so in like manner may wee now So excellent is the wisedome of the Lawgiver That though in some temporary implicite circumstantiall sense his Lawes might more properly belong to those people to whom they were immediately given then to us and our times yet hee hath so ordered it that the Law is still usefull and binding for the substance of it even in the letter And therefore they that pray this ejaculation with understanding hearts doe not pray Lord encline our hearts to keepe a Sabbath which 〈◊〉 no Sabbath but Lord encline our hearts to keep a Christian Sabbath a Christian seaventh day and a Christian rest But in the conclusion Doctor Heylyn saith wee may thus expound this prayer viz. to pray unto the Lord to encline our hearts to keepe that Law as farre as it containeth the Law of Nature c. which yet Master Broad his partizan will not allow a pitifull shift to keepe all whole And such is Bishop Whites pag. 159. 160. The generality of whose conclusion there upon this ejaculation saving his private exposition may well serve to set forth the use of it now For saith hee our prayer to God prescribed in the Liturgy is not to beseeth him to encline our hearts to keepe the Law according to the speciall forme and circumstance of time commanded in the old Law which say I is the last day of seaven in memory of our creation but in such a manner as is agreeable to the state of the Gospell and time of Grace which say I is the first day of seaven in memory of our redemption and not as hee interprets it to wit according to the equity and mistery of the fourth commandement and according to the rule of Christian liberty which hath freed Gods people under the Gospell from the observation of dayes months times and yeares saith hee upon legall and ceremoniall principles true if hee meane judaicall ones and then hee cannot meane the Sabbath For to bee freed from it is no part of Christian liberty because not yet fulfilled by Christ Hebr. 4. 9. 10. But to returne to Master Broad by your Marginall note it seemes you could allow the Sabbath not in respect of the Iewes weakenes but of its owne worth and greatnes to bee of longer continuance then the holy-dayes but not perpetuall wherein you exceedingly wrong your cause for if of longer continuance why not perpetuall and if not perpetuall why of longer continuance the Holy-dayes and Iewish Sabbaths say you expired in Christ and if this common Sabbath be no other then a Iewish Holy-day why doth not it expire with the rest and if you can allow it beyond Christ I pray you what should hinder it for being perpetuall neither is it incredible to thinke that the common Sabbath and Iewish Holy-dayes bee of different natures when as they had different institutions different significations different locations and different extensions Broad ARG. I. No morall Commandement may be broken in case of necessity but the fourth Commandement may Ergo it is not morall THe Major is evident for a man may not Ly Steale or the like to save his Life The Minor is no lesse evident In case of necessity the whole Rest may be broken and not the strict only for to save the Life of his Cattle a man may labour all the Sabbath in seeking them covered with Snow in lifting them out of Pits c. Workes of necessity are not forbidden in the intention of the Lawgiver Obj. and therefore such do not breake the fourth Commandement Suppose the King by a generall Law shall forbid the eating of Flesh in Lent Answ. a sicke Man eating Flesh breaketh the Law though no doubt it be in the Kings intention that in such case Flesh may be eaten as it is in the Lawgivers intention that Worke in case of necessity may bee done David brake the Law of shew-bread Math 12. so is it in the Lawgivers intention that the fourth Commandement in case of necessity may be broken as other Ceremoniall precepts might in the time of the Law The whole Rest not the strict Rest only is Ceremoniall Obj. so that if a Man labour all the Sabbath in lifting his Cattle out of Pits in saving his goods from Burning in Fighting against the Enemy c. Yet he breaketh only the Ceremoniall part of the fourth Commandement Vnlesse such breake the
the 31. of Exod. wee read thus Verely my Sabbaths yee shall keepe for it is a signe betweene mee and you throughout your generations that yee may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctifie you The like was signified by cleane meats Levit. 〈◊〉 24 25 26. Act. 〈◊〉 12 13 14 15 20. Here by sanctifying is meant separating from other Nations to bee a peculiar people to himselfe In this sense Aaron and his Sons are said to bee sanctified Exod. 29. 44. Aaron and his Sons were sanctified and severed from the other Levites to bee the Lords Priests and the Israelites were sanctified and severed from other Nations to bee the Lords people of which sanctifying the Sabbath was a signe in as much as it was a day sanctified and seperated from other dayes of the weeke for the Lords service Now if God gave the Sabbath for a signe to the Israelites the Sabbath could not bee common to other Nations and consequently was a meere ceremony as was circumcision Abraham received the signe of circumcision and the Israelites received the signe of the Sabbath Hence I thus argue such as is the Sabbath such is the precept thereof The Sabbath is a signe therefore the precept thereof is significative or ceremoniall and is abrogated Here consider that if Noah had taught his household and Lot his Sons Abraham his Sons by Hagar and Keturah Isaack his son Esau and Melchisedech his people to keepe the Sabbath the Sabbath could have beene no signe to the Israelites for the World would have beene replenished with Sabbath-keepers at that time and a long time after so that no doubt wee should often read of this matter in Heathen writers Answer You say the Sabbath was given to the Israelites as a signe of their peculiar sanctifying or seperating to bee the people of God from all others and hence you fallaciously conclude that therefore it cannot bee common to others * See this confuted in Master Richard Bifield pag. 87 88. where hee sheweth how every signe of separation or consecration is not ceremoniall Nor doth every seperating or sanctifying marke oblige onely those that haâ—e that marke pag. 1 â—0 For though it be true that as a signe it was proper to them onely in their times and so also was the whole Law as it was renewed and given of God for a covenant betweene him and them * The giving them to the Israelites was a signe the Lord was nigh to them and therefore in vaine doth Master Dow alledge pag. 15. That in that the Sabbath is called a signe betweene God and the Israelites that hee was their Sanctifier and Deliverer out of Egypt which it could not bee if it were given to all Nations in Adam seeing the Law was the like and therefore doth hee say Psalme 147. 19 20. Hee hath shewne his word to Iacob and to Israel his judgements and statutes and that hee hath not dealt so with every Nation that is with any Nation neither have they knowne his judgements so that the Sabbath and the whole Law are alike significative and indeed have somewhat of signification in them in this second exhibition For as the Church it selfe was then typicall signifying the Church of Gods elect So was the Law as given to them as may appeare in that it was twice written to shew the double writing of it by nature and grace in the hearts of the elect So that both the Sabbath and the rest of the Decalogue as they are morall Lawes are forever common to the universall Church of God being not onely bare signes but of a double nature For the same thing may bee both proper and common in diverse respects As the Land of Canaan was proper to the Iewes as it was the Land of promise and yet it was common to many Nations in the use thereof to wit as it was a place of commerce and habitation and so is to this day And so the whole Decalogue wee know was common as it was the Law of nature to all Nations and People even in those times of the Iewes but yet is it in the fourth Chap. of Deut. 13. verse appropriated to the Iewes because it was given in a speciall manner as a Covenant betweene God and them and in that respect it is opposed to things that are common to all People in the 19. verse of that Chapter as the thing wherefore and whereby God will bee especially worshipped even for that very cause because as hee himselfe layeth downe the reason there they are distributed unto all People under the whole Heaven And yet is this Law no man will deny in the morall sense of it common to us now 〈◊〉 whereof the Sabbath is a part nay * For though wee refuse the Law as a Covenant yet wee entertaine and honour it as a rule of obedience Nor surely are wee to say that the Law because it was given to the Iewes must bee in the same respect to us as to the Iawes else it bindeth not at all if so bee it bee qualified according to our times and turned from a covenant to a rule Then granting this change and yet retention of the whole why not also of that part thereof which concernes the Sabbath and was also common to them that were not Iewes even in the time of the Iewes though not in nature of a speciall Covenant yet so as it was a Law of nature which the precise Sabbath I confesse is none but onely made equivalent by revelation and therefore did they then observe though set times of worshipping God yet happily not the whole day or at least not every seaventh for that most properly is the Churches right and rite Moreover the very Sabbath it selfe was of force by vertue of the fourth commandement to all that came with in the cognizance of it as well stranger as Iew And therefore could it not bee meant a signe of separation in your sense so as to appropriate it solely to them and thereupon to create it a meere ceremony Many things there were indeed among the Iewes that bare this sense expressely as the Paschall-Lambe whereof by expresse words no stranger was to eate untill hee was made as one that was borne in the Land by circumcision Exod. 12. 48. But it was other wayes in the commandement of the Sabbath for the stranger quatenus stranger was â—o observe it if they were within their gates * Nehem. 13. 16 19 20 21. Iubebantur feriari eo die qâ—emadmodum Iudaei indigenae saith Zanchy And not as the Antisabbatarians of our age would perswade that it belonged to the proselite stranger onely Againe I argue against you out of your owne place 31. Exod. That if God menat it as a bare signe peculiar to the Iewes why then doth hee fly backe to the primitive institution of it in the seaventeenth verse re inforcing the commandement there upon that reason which is common to all mankind The words are these
commanded to build them Some call the Church Gods house whose meaning is not that it is Gods expresse Commandement to build Churches now as it was to build the Temple heretofore The most that can be gathered from these Texts is that after a time Christians used to assemble on the first day of the weeke and that Christ and his Apostles approved this manner which I acknowledge but that Christ or his Apostles would have the observation of the Lords-day be a matter of Religion in the time of the Gospell Excepting the two sâ—craâ—ets there is no outward thing required to make a good Christian. M. Fox in the page before the Acts Monuments as the keeping of the Sabbath was in the time of the Law is not to be beleeved God is a spirit and the time is come wherein he will be worshipped in spirit and truth The kingdome of God consisteth of a matter of another nature Rom. 14. 17. Answer From these Texts may wellbe gathered the laudable and Evangelicall practice of the Apostles and the excellent confirmation countenance and authority that God gave thereto in this point of sanctifying the Lords-day so that God bare witnes thereto by signes and wonders and gifts of the holy Ghost according to his owne will besides the benefits and fruits of it at this day to every mans experience that observeth it conscionably of peace of Conscience Ioy in the holy Ghost and sensible increase of knowledge grace do also make it good according to that where it is said That it is a signe that the Lord doth sanctifie you as also according to that promise Isai. 58. 13 14. It was by these two Arguments of Christs speciall appearing to him and the fruits thereof that Paul proved his Apostleship and so may we prove the Sabbath For the name Lords day and force of that argument to prove Christ the instituter thereof see Eatonus pag. 73. saith he Arguinus ex appellatione eius Apocal. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. sic autem dici non potuit nisi eam Dominus instituisseâ— ut in Câ—na 〈◊〉 oratione â—actum est Hic respondetur doâ—inicâ—â— diem dici potuisse quia in commemoratione domini licet non â— domino fuerit instituta Sed assertionis 〈◊〉 racionâ—â— non videâ—â—s Cum eâ—im Ecclesia 〈◊〉 ascensionis eius memoriam retinuerit dies tamen illos 〈◊〉 non voâ—â—it Lastly the Iewish superstition we disclaime but the true spirituall worship of God we retaine as it is requisite in the present state of the Church and why a solemne day should be prejudiciall to solemne service and why wee stand lesse need of rest and opportunity to serve God then the Iewes or Adam in Innocency I see not Broad CHAP. IIII. ENough hath been said to make it appeare that we are not bound to sanctifie the Lords-day by vertue of that Commandement in the Decalogue neither by any expresse Commandement from Christ or his Apostles and now if any thinke though this doctrine be true yet happily it were better that it were not taught publikely Answ. Be the truth alone preached the greatest good doubtlesse will follow thereupon Doe not we know that though Paul plant and Apollos water yet it is God alone which giveth the increase Indeed if any man were able to give increase it were another matter but shall I fetch water from the devils well and looke that God should give increase after such watering neither is the Church now in the infancy that we should feare to make knowne the abrogating of Moses Law Broad The truth being taught this good will follow 1. Thou shalt not Iudaize The good will come of this doctrine as they will be found to doe who observe the Lords-day in obedience to the precept of the Sabbath 2. That thou shalt not doe any thing doubtingly on the Sunday which doubtlesse many in England doe and if he which eateth doubtingly be damned shall not he which worketh doubtingly be damned likewise Rom. 14. 3. That we shall not have such building on the foundation hay and stubble hence forwards as hath been heretofore especially of late yeres Answer You will not say he Iudaizeth that upon his obedience to father and mother shall now in the time of the Gospell expect the fulfilling of that promise in the first Commandement of the second Table because that now we live not in the land of Canaan And why pray you may not this Commandement concerning the Sabbath stand good now as well as that promise and challenge obedience as well as that doth faith If we observe the one or beleeve the other as the Iewes did * As in offering double sacrâ—â—ces c. which yet in the Analogy is now also proper then I confesse we Iudaize but if according to the present state of the Church we obey the one and put trust in the other this must needs be free from Iudaisme and yet be good Christianity For the secoÌ„d Good Call you that Good to work on the Sabbath-day which yet anon you make to be the property of such as belong not to God but are the children of the devill so a mans conscience accuse him not or so he doe it not doubtingly â—ndeed you salve the soare well but take heed of dawbing with untempered morter M r. Byfeild giveth a good rule If we must needs doubt it is better to doubt and obey then to doubt and disobey And for your third Good That we shall not have such building on the foâ—ndation hay and stubble Be you aware betime lest you bring an old house over your head For you know what is threatened to him that breaketh one of these least â—ommandements and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdome of Heaven Broad As touching the hurt which in some mens imaginations may come of the publishing of this truth No â—urt can coâ—e of this 〈…〉 It is not to be doubted but that when Luther preached Iustification by faith such as were not good trees brought forth lesse good fruit in shew and be the truth taught concerning the Lords-day it is I confesse likely enough that such as belong not to the Lord will serve the Lord the lesse in outward shew too But shall I conceale any good thing from the children of God because the children of the devill will shew themselves more in their colours He that is unjust let him be more unjust still 〈…〉 If a man had not the feare of God before his eyes and any should preach as formerly they have done he would not forbeare as formerly he hath not to follow his worldly businesse to haunt the Alehouse and the like on the Lords-day If a man truly feareth God as I hope gentle Reader thou doest enough may soone be said to make him spend the Lords-day in the holy exercises of Religion as 1. Though in this time of the Gospell God would not have any part