Selected quad for the lemma: virtue_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
virtue_n	body_n	soul_n	unite_v	970	5	9.6533	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A96477	Six sermons lately preached in the parish church of Gouahurst in Kent. And afterwards, most maliciously charged with the titles of odious, blasphemous, Popish, and superstitious, preaching. / Now published by the author, I. W.	Wilcock, James, d. 1662.	1641 (1641)	Wing W2118; Thomason E172_30; ESTC R16426	70,070	78

Rem terrenam C●lestem we come now to the Communion or their coming into one to make up the Sacrament though the one part be on earth the other in heaven and look how high the heaven is from the earth yet they may meet they must meet else there will be no Sacrament at all Nulla virtus Sacramento saith Cyprian they must be in Common or there will be no Communion and then the Text will not be true which saith The Cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of the Bloud of Christ The Bread which we break is it not the Communi●n of the Body of Christ Communion is ever cum unione when two or more meet in one 2 The Co●●●en there is a Communion It is divers wayes either by nature which is Physicall as when soul and body are united into one person there is Communion between them by reason of tha● union Secondly by miracle which is Metaphysicall as when two Natures God and man were united into one Christ There is also Communion between them by virtue of that Union neither of these is this heer for it is no substantiall no Hypostaticall V●ion and yet the Fathers have used both these to illustrate this Commun●on Thirdly by locall coberence as when many stones are in one heap Fourthly by actuall inexistence as where accidences as colours c. are in one ubject none of these yet for the body and bloud of Christ may not be thought to be Locally Actually any where but in Heaven The Heavens must contain him till his second and last coming There is yet another way Fiftly Intellectually Sacramentally which consists in meer relation which is the nature of Communion Sacramentall Union is that Communion we speak off and it consists in a Mysticall and Mutuall relation between the signes and the things signed Sacramentum est rei Sacrae signum is Saint Austins definition and allowed and approved by all when the signe comes to signifie the sacred thing it comes to be a Sacrament and this coming is the Communion We look to two things 1. The cause of it 2. The effects First Divine institution is the cause The Rain-bow it is generally 1 The cause agreed upon was before the floud yet was not any signe of the promise of God of not destroying the world with a deluge till after the floud it was in nube to be seen there but not signum in nube till God first appointed it his signe to No●h The Wine in the Cup the Bread on the Table were in use before blessed in their creation for temporall food but not in any use to a spirituall life till blessed again at their institution they were not signes of any sacred things till God appointed them his signes to his Apostles and as words which come to the ears are signa rerum of those things which the minde means to expresse if aptly appointed and do conveigh the very things to the understanding of the Auditor if he be quick you would wonder at it to see how soon at a word speaking a thing of never so great distance can come to his knowledge so these earthly things which are signa rei sacrae which come unto the eyes and the other senses being aptly appointed by the first institutor do conveigh unto the faith of the worthy receiver the very things themselves and though they were before at never so much distance they come to be present to our faith as other things expressed by words are to our reason and sence To make signes of such belongs only unto him which can give the things and his body and bloud none can give but himself none can make a signe to be a means to conveigh it to be apledge to confirm it but he the Elements are empty and non significant Accedat verbum ad Elementum saith Austin his word his work that comes and it becomes a Sacrament the signe is made effectually to signifie the sacred thing and that making a signe is the cause of the Relation of the Communion first Secondly being so made by the virtue of the Divine Institution 2 The effects the effects of Sacramentall Communion follow The signes themselves have a Communication of the Proprieties of the things signes Communicatio Idiomatum is the chief effect As by the Hypostaticall Union of the two natures in Christ the humane nature is invested into the Divine the manhood being assumed is allowed to carry away the properties of the Godhead in the person of Christ And thence comes it that the Son of God is called the Son of man and the Lord of life was crucified and slain The Mother of God the Bloud of God are usuall speeches with the Fathers so in this Sacramentall Union by virtue of that Communion in the words of institution the Bread is called the Body of Christ the Wine his Bloud When we give the Bread we say The Body of our Lord Jesus Christ c. the Cup we say The Bloud of our Lord Jesus Christ The Bread though it be res terrena is called Panis vitae the food of Angles the Bread which came down from Heaven The food of the soul Panem Dominum S Cyprian calls it and not only Panem Domini and all this per Metonymiam signi because of the Communion it hath with the things signed with the Body of Christ Neither is this Communion only nominall but also reall the very substance of Christs Body and Bloud is by it communicated to worthy receivers they are verily and indeed taken and received of the faithfull saith our Church Not in the signes essentially but by the signes effectually for we must hold us to this that the Union is not Physicall nor Metaphysicall not Essentiall nor Locall but Intellectuall and Sacramentall and yet reall and not only nominall Ask what the Bread and Wine is I answer the Body and Bloud of Christ Ask me how or which way I answer Sacramentally because they are the Communion of the Body and Bloud of Christ and not that properly neither for a substance cannot be a Relation but by a Metonymy of the effect because they make us partakers of the Body and Bloud of Christ they are called the Communion of his Body and Bloud And being Communis substantiae they are also Communio efficaciae they make us partakers of the merit of Christs Body and Bloud those things ever bring their worth and dignity with them remission of sins redemption sanctification salvation all graces come along with Christ in quo est omnis gratia Habent omnia qui habent deum habentem omnia St August And as there is Communion with them so there is communition from them we may not amisse take the word Communio a Communiendo that is to be reckoned among the benefits we receive so our Church reckons it the strengthening of our souls Vis semper fortior in Vnione nothing can prevail against earth when heaven

unitur corpus Christi sicut panis though the manner differ This corporally the bread is that spiritually Christ is It concerns us much then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that we may be of the other 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 esse participes ut simus consortes to be of the Communion that which is Sacramentall to be of it to be at it to eat to eat often that we may be of this union with Christ here quae justificat which will bring us to that quae glorificat our blessed union with God hereafter Whither he bring us all Amen THE FIFTH SERMON 1 COR. 10. 17. We that are many are one Bread and one Body WE are still upon this theam Bonum est nobis esse hic therefore what the Apostles would we have done Aedificavimus tria Tabernacula We have staid a time in two of them we must not dwell there Tents are not for mansions we must remove to the third Communio corporis which is mysticall will now take up our Communio Corpor●s employment Yet we pitch this upon the same ground we did the other 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is still causa 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 our spirituall Communion which is capitis our mysticall Communion which is corporis spring from thence from the Sacramentall which is calicis we are one bread and one body because we are all partakers of one bread One body there it is we need not seek it by induction from the Text which is there literally as we did the other our Communion with Christ cum capite that was as much intended as truly effected as this though not so fully expressed And that must have been first if not for honour which is ever due to the head yet for necessity we must have premised that there could be no talk of the members growing into one body if they be not first united into one head and in this sence Christ is caput Ecclesiae because all begin there as the branches at the root if they be not held to it by Ligaments and Nerves the skin the flesh and the veins never grow to them never feed and nourish them But we have done with that and now the body in its right place comes next to be thought on One body is but one term of the Communion duas oportet esse essentias ad minus ut sit Communio seu unitio two at least are required to all relation the Relatum is one but the correlata are many as many as we are many there are many members but one body though we retain unity there for the body can be but one yet we must admit of Multiplicity here the members must be many Si omnia essent unum membrum ubi corpus saith the Apostle and so they are in the Text. We that are many are one Body The ground of this Relation is necessarily to be thought on to make it up and it comes into the Text one Bread that is it the Sacramentall Communion is the cause of the Mysticall that hath ever been considered in all the parts of the Text and the Apostle will not have it left out here two wayes it comes to be considered 1. As it is the signe of it bread of the body one bread of one body signum unitatis Saint Austin calls it for many grains go to make up that many members to make up this Bread and Wine both of them ex multis rediguntur in unum so we that are many are one body this is Sacramentall and if we read the Text right as both the Originall hath it and all the Ancient both Translators and Expositors render it t is thus for there is one bread we also that are many are one body one as that is one say Chrysostome and Ambrose c. Yet I doubt not but a good Spirit moved our modern Translators to render it as my Text reads it We that are many are one bread and one body one bread first because we all eat of one bread and vi fidei are in a manner become one with that as alimentum Alitum are one and one body by virtue of that one bread spiritually one body mystically yet the other is easier lesse strained and therefore we will keep to that 2. It is not only as a signe but also as a cause of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a causall because that is but one the bread as the Paschall Lamb was but one to all the house of Israel one in a Mysticall and Spirituall sence though Numerically many and we all partake of this one all the Church of God all over the world partakes of one and the same bread in civill commerce to eat of one bread at one board hath ever been a pledge of unity and concord so it is in our mysticall society we are all of one Corporation one body 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because we all partake of one bread All these will come to be considered in their places We begin with the Text The Correlatives We that are many To the Church at Corinth are the words directed but may be assumed by us by all that are in the Church of God wheresoever they be place and time matter not in this matter nos illi multi so Beza reads it we are those many We the Jews and Turks cannot read this Text illi multi t is true too many they are but such which come together into one they are not materialls of this building not sheep of this flock not grains of this bread not members of this body at the best they are but of those other sheep our Saviour speaks of Qui non sunt hujus Ovilis or nondum sunt in Gods good time they may be brought but as yet are not Besides them the Schismatiques cannot read it illi multi many they are so many as that the world wonders at it The Arians and Donatis●s never overspread the East and West part of the Church more in their times then these in ours Like Egypts frogs the whole Land is full of their croakings But yet they are many still there is some good in that they come not into one Quot homines tot sententiae their perpetuall differences among themselves shew they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not animated with one Spirit they would be fearfull to the whole Church if they could be that and like the Cake of Barly in the seventh of Judges they might tumble down into the Hosts and Armies of Israel and overturn them but that they cannot be their Cake which a flash of zeal hath heated will prove dough or rather like grains not ground they will not be kneaded or knit into one Loaf if at any time they come together it is with the sowre leaven of malice and uncharitablenesse or of hereticall and Pharisaicall doctrines the Leaven of the Law which was to be cast out not with the Leaven of the Gospel the