Selected quad for the lemma: virtue_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
virtue_n blood_n sacrifice_n shed_v 848 5 10.4950 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A49796 An exposition of the Epistle to the Hebrewes wherein the text is cleared, Theopolitica improved, the Socinian comment examined / by George Lawson ... Lawson, George, d. 1678. 1662 (1662) Wing L707; ESTC R19688 586,405 384

There are 16 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

and heavenly things principally intended are the Consciences and immortal Souls of men which being purged make up the Body of the Church which is Militant first on Earth and after that to be Triumphant in Heaven 2. The better Sacrifice above the former is the Sacrifice of Christ and the pure unsported Blood of him who offered himself by the eternal Spirit to God The purifying vertue of this Sacrifice was in this that Christ the Son of God innocent holy righteous as Surety and Hostage of Man-king appointed to be so by God did deny himself took up the Cross shed his Blood for to expiate the Sin of Man and was obedient unto death the death of the Cross For him so excellent to suffer death so willingly for so glorious an end and that at the Command of God was the highest and purest degree of Obedience that ever was performed unto God and was highly accepted and did fully satisfy divine Justice so far as was required In the offering of this Sacrifice he gave himself wholly to his heavenly Father and became as it were a whole Burnt-Offering being wholly consumed with the Zeal of his Father's Glory and the Love of Man-kind And here it is to be noted upon the By That though in the Text we read Sacrifices in the plural number yet this one Sacrifice of Christ is onely meant Estius thinks it's an Enallage of number the Plural for the Singular for the Sacrifice whereby heavenly things are purified is but only one once offered Yet it may be called Sacrifices because it had more vertue than all other purifying Sacrifices and also because it was one of those expiating Sacrifices which were offered unto God yet more excellent than all the rest It 's like that expression of J●phtah's Butial for it 's said he was buried in the Cities of G●lead that is one of the Cities of that Country which was Mizpeh as some think Judg. 12. 7. 3. For the heavenly things and the Consciences of men to be purified is to be freed from Sin that is from the Guilt and Dominion of Sin which is to be justified and sanctified as these words are usually taken This Purification is vertual or actual for when the Blood of Christ was shed offered and accepted for the Sins of men then they may be said to be purified virtually as upon the death of Christ we are said to be reconciled because made reconcilable And when by Faith this Blood is sprinkled upon our Consciences and pardon obtained by Christ's Intercession for peni●ent and believing Sinners then they are said to be actually purified and when they are wholly freed from all the Guilt and Power of Sin then they are perfectly purified 4. This Purification by this Sacrifice was necessary for supposing God's Will and Decree concerning the eternal Happiness of sinful Man in Communion with his God it was necessary Man should be purified for otherwise he could have no fellowship with God so as to derive eternal Happiness from him For as God is Light and just and holy so they must be Light just and holy who shall see and enjoy him And because no Sacrifice but this of Christ could thus qualify him therefore it was necessary both that he should be purified and purified with this Sacrifice § 22. Thus far you have heard of the necessity of the death of Christ for the Confirmation of the Covenant illustrated by Similitudes taken from the Law of Nature and the Ceremonial Law of Moses Therefore the Jews except they were very ignorant could have no cause to be offended with this death upon the Cross seeing it was so necessary to the purchasing of the eternal Inheritance and the purging of mens Consciences that they might be capable of the Possession and have a Title unto it for the ground of the Promise from whence the Title is immediately derived is this Sacrifice without which the Promise was never made neither if it had been made could it without this have been valid But let 's consider what follows for he saith Ver. 24. For Christ is not entred into the Holy places made with hands which are Figures of the true but into Heaven it self now to appear before God for us THese words considered absolutely in themselvs seem to be plain and easily understood but the coherence is doubtful Some and amongst the rest Es●ius takes little notice of it as not much material Many others finding the causal Conjunction For do agree that in these words the Apostle gives a Reason of something that went before but they differ much in the particular Explication of the Reason Dr. Gouge conceivs that the Apostle's intention is to prove that the Sacrifice of Christ is more excellent than the Sacrifices of the Law and this is true but yet imperfect Beza thinks that the Author in this Text begins another and a new Collation or Comparison to prove the excellency of this Offering and this cannot be denyed Dr. Lushington who is said to be the Translator of Crellius tells us that here is proved That the Heavenly places are purified by better Sacrifices and that because Christ entred not into the earthly Sanctuary but into Heaven it self This doth presuppose that Heaven it self is purified by the Blood of Christ and that Christ entred thereinto for that end But this is difficult to understand and supposeth that which few will grant him A Lapide differs from all these and saith that the Apostle gives in this Text a Reason why he called the Church heavenly or heavenly things and that is because Christ entred into Heaven to unlock the Gates and open the Doors thereof that the faithful might enter thereinto This is not so clear and satisfactory though it hath something of Truth To find out the Connexion we must observe 1. That the Conjunction for or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sometimes expletive and redundant 2. Sometimes the same that but or moreover is 3. That though it be called by the Grammarians a Causal yet it doth not alwayes imply a Cause but it 's used to bring in any other Reason or Argument and therefore might be called a rational Conjunction Yet Whittington in his Grammar saith that a Causal Conjunction signifies the Cause or Order of that which goe● before where he implies that it doth not alwayes joyn the Cause and the Effect 4. Let it be taken for a Conjunction which joyns these words to the former so as to contain a Reason we must consider what was formerly ●ffi●med and how it 's here proved To this end let us remember that the Subject of the former discourse was Purification or Expiation of things by Blood of Sacrifices and these things are earthly and carnal or spiritual and heavenly Of these latter he affirmed that it was necessary they should be purified with better Sacrifices The manner how he proves this is this He presupposing that these heavenly things must be purified proves 1. That they were purified by
and divine and that 's evident from the effect which is Salvation he is able to save This Salvation is not natural or temporal but spiritual and a full deliverance from sin the greatest evil and the most woful Consequents thereof for he so delivers that he makes the parties saved fully happy and blessed 3. He might save Man and that spiritually and yet but for a time but he is able to save for ever and this is full and compleat Salvation indeed and it 's indifferent whether the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be turned to the uttermost or for ever for both are intended Neither could Christ save fully and to the uttermost except he should save for ever with an everlasting Salvation 2. The subject and parties whom he thus saves are not all and every one but such as come to God by him Some will not come to God at all some will come to God but not by him But they who will be saved must 1. Come to God and none else And 2. Must come to God by him and by none else This is the qualification and right disposition of the subject without which it 's not capable of Salvation For Actus activorum sunt in passo unit disposito may be applyed here For as this rule is true in natural so it 's true in supernatural Phisophy To come to God some times is to turn from Sin and Satan to God and Righteousness and the further we depart from Sin the nearer we come to God For this coming is a spiritual and divine motion between the terms of Sin and God it 's from Sin and to God Sometime it 's to worship God which if done aright presupposeth the former motion When a man doth worship God he turns his back upon all other things and leaves all other business and company and turns his face the face of his Soul to God as Supream Lord and the fountain of all happiness One part of Worship is to pray and present our petitions unto God wherein as we seek for many things so amongst others we sue for pardon This is a principal Suit which sinful man hath to his God therefore to come to God in this place is by prayer to sue earnestly for pardon of Sin everlasting Salvation and the more sensible of Sin we are the more powerful is our prayer Yet we may come to God and sue earnestly for mercy and not speed except we take the right way We must therefore not only come but come by Him that is by Christ God is not accessible to sinful guilty man without a Mediatour who may and can satisfy his justice merit his favour and mercy and will effectually intercede for him and plead his Cause These things only Christ can and will do and if we will speed we must believe that he alone is our Mediatour and rely upon him alone as our only Propitiatour and Intercessour And all such as live under the Gospel must rely upon him as having suffered Death already offered his great Sactifice obtained eternal Redemption hath ascended Heaven and is set at the right hand of God where he is made an everlasting King and interceding Priest They who thus come to God by him renounce all righteousness in themselves acknowledg themselves guilty and miserable Wretches plead the Blood of Jesus Christ and cast themselves wholly upon his infinite mercy which he hath merited and God hath promised with a resolution to subject their selves wholly to him and obey him for ever Thus the Saints of God did come to him by Faith 1. In the Seed of the Woman who should bruise the Serpents Head Then 2. In Christ as the Seed of Abraham in whom all Nations should be blessed 3. In the Son of David who should sit upon his Throne and reign for ever and ever 4. In him as exhibited and glorified The faith of the former was but implicite the faith of these last is more explicite clear and distinct This is his ability to save wholly and to the uttermost 2. The reason of this is Because He ever liveth to make Intercession for then Where we must consider 1. What it is to make Intercession 2. For whom this Intercession is made 1. To intercede is to sue plead and sollicite for another and so in generall it 's taken here This Intercession presupposeth that he is immortal is in Heaven appears continually before his Father's Throne for all his Clients in the Court of Heaven He hath great interest in the supream Judge as a most beloved Son before a Father sitting in the Throne of Grace He sues for Pardon and Salvation He pleads his own Blood and Propititation his Father's Promise his Clients Faith and except he should plead his Propitiaion he could not make the cause of his Client good Therefore we have his Intercession and Propitiation joyned together for he is our Advocate with the Father and the propitiation for our Sins 1 Joh. 2. 1 2. This is directly against the Socinian 2. The parties for whom he pleads are they who come to God by him for it 's in vain and against the rules of that Court to plead for any others who are impenitent and unbelieving For though the Scripture saith He died for all to make their sin 's re●sissible yet it no where saith He makes Intercession for all to obtain actual Remission and Salvation For his Blood and Sacrifice doth merit Remission the Covenant doth promise it to Believers Faith makes us immediately capable and justifiable and by virtue of the Promise gives us right Christ's Intercession obtains actual pardon These who come to God by him are his Clients and he undertakes their cause and is alwayes ready to carry it for them The reason why Advocates were appointed by the imperial Laws as Civilians tell us was to supply the defects of such Clients as could not alwayes be present were ignorant of the Law and could not manage their own cause before the Judge So the imperfection of our prayers our unworthiness and our many defects gave occasion to the supream and universal Lord and Judge out of his abundant mercy to appoint Christ Jesus Advocate-General in the Court of Heaven and to make our Justification to depend not only upon his death suffered on Earth but his intercession made in Heaven He is that Angel which John saw in Heaven who came and stood by the Altar having a Golden Censer and there was given unto him much Incense which he should offer or add unto it the prayers of all Saints upon the Golden Altar which was before the Throne Rev. 8. 3. This is an allusion to the Levitical Priest offering Incense in his Golden Censer upon the Golden Altar before the Throne or Mercy-seat of God and praying for the People And in this he was a Type of Christ making such Intercession in Heaven as that the prayers of penitent Sinners perfumed with the Incense of his merits and offered unto God the
People as a third part 1. In making the Covenant in signifying God's Will unto the People and returning the People's Answer unto God Exod. 19. 2. 2. In confirming it by Blood as an indifferent distinct person Exod. 24. To which place the Apostle doth allude as we shall understand hereafter in the illustration This is the meaning of the first Proposition The second may be divided for explication and made two 1. Christ by means of Death expiated Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. By means of this Death the Called receive the promise of eternal Inheritance The first implies 1. That there were Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. That there was a Redemption of these Transgressions 3. This Redemption was by the Death of Christ. The first is clear enough for Moses Aaron David and the Saints of God from the times of Moses till the exhibition of Christ had their sins much more others not sanctified The second cannot be doubted of for if there was no Redemption of those Sins and Transgressions then they could not be saved they must suffer eternal punishments as they did temporal By Redemption here is meant Expiation and Propitiation whereby their sins were made remissible and upon certain terms and conditions performed actually to be remitted The third will be granted in general that the Expiation was by Death and Blood but that they were expiated by the Blood of Christ many of the Jews denied Yet if they had understood the Books of Moses they might have known that the Blood of Bulls and Goats could not expiate the Sin of Man a rational and immortal Creature not free from the eternal Punishment Some Legal frailties and infirmities they might expiate and avert some temporal penalties Therefore there must of necessity be some other Death and Blood that must do it And this was the Blood of Christ which all their Ilastical Sacrifices and Lustrations did typify Yet this is not so to be understood as though their Sins were not remissible and remitted till Christ dyed and offered his Sacrifice for by vertue of this Death fore-seen and fore-accepted they were in their Life-time upon their Repentance Faith in Christ to come and their fervent Prayers pardoned They did not rely upon their Legal Sacrifices nor expected Remission from them but relyed upon this Death of Christ to come according to the Promise That in him all Nations should be blessed This Proposition is not to be understood exclusively as though Christ's Death did expiate no Sin but that which was committed under the first Covenant but emphatically to singnify 1. That there was no Expiation for Transgressions under the Law 2. That if Christ's Death expiate former Transgressions under the Law much more will it expiate such as are committed under the Gospel 3. That there was no reason as some observe why they should be offended with the Death of Christ seeing without his Death and Blood neither they nor their Fathers could be saved but must suffer eternal penalties The second part of this second Proposition informs us that 1. There is an eternal Inheritance 2. There is a Promise of it 3. The called receive this Promise 4. By means of Christ's Death they receive this Promise For in the words we have an Inheritance the Heirs the Conveyance the Purchase or rather the price whereby it 's purchased The Inheritance is eternal Happiness the Heirs are the called the Conveyance is by Promise and Covenant the price of the purchase is Christ's Death and Blood 1. The Inheritance is that blessed and glorious Estate which is to be enjoyed upon the Resurrection for the full possession and enjoyment is reserved for Heaven where it 's said to be laid up and reserved It 's said to be eternal in opposition to the Land of Canaan which was the temporal Inheritance of them and their Fathers and to be enjoyed with the Blessings thereof so long as they kept the Covenant of their God and this was the Inheritance promised in the former Covenant and to this which formerly was called God's Rest the Apostle seems to allude as a Type of this which was far more excellent and glorious of eternal continuance in respect of the Inheritance it self the parties enjoying it and the enjoyment thereof 2. This eternal Inheritance was promised there was a Promise of it It was God's and the disposal of it was at his Will Man for his sin was cast out of Paradise and forfeited Heaven with the eternal Bliss thereof yet it was in his mind to give it sinful Man who deserved it not so great was his mercy and bounty and Man must know this For this end he promised it and by his Promise bound himself to give it and in it did signify his Will The Effect of this Promise was Obligation on God's part and a Right unto it on Man's part an Hope to obtain it and a Comfort upon this Hope And here it 's to be observed that our Title to eternal life depends immediately upon the Promise and is derived from it for as the Israelites had the Land of Canaan and held it by Covenant and Promise so do all the Children of God expect the heavenly Canaan and hope to have it by Promise of the new Covenant Some do ' understand by the Promise of eternal Inheritance this Inheritance promised yet there must be a Promise received before we receive the thing promised 3. After the Inheritance and the Promise and Conveyance follows the Heirs which are here said to be the called Some are not called at all these have no Promise of the Inheritance Such were the Gentiles before the Gospel was preached unto them they were Strangers from the Covenants of Promise having no Hope and without God in the World Ephes. 2. 12. Some are called and have the means of Conversion but reject the terms of the Covenant and refuse to enter into it and engage themselvs such were the unbelieving Jews and many others Some are called enter the Covenant and solemnly bind themselvs to the observation of it yet do not observe it In respect of these two last it is that Christ saith Many are called but few are chosen Matth. 22. 14. None of these are Heirs Some are called and are obedient to the heavenly Call and keep the Covenant these receive the eternal Inheritance promised and first acquire the Title and after that the Possession Some were called before the Exhibition of Christ some after the former are here principally meant though the latter with them receive the Inheritance 4. These called Ones of former times with us receive this Promise by vertue of Christ's Death expiating their sins and of his Blood purging their Conscience To understand this you must consider that none but such whose Sins are expiated and their Consciences purged can be Heirs for they must be regenerated and acted by the Spirit and adopted Sons before they can be Heirs For as the Apostle argues If Sons then Heirs
Rom. 8. 17. so may we likewise say If no Sons then no Heirs None can be Sons that are not justified none can be justified which believe not in the Death and Blood of Christ there can be no Belief in this Blood if not shed This Death and Blood of Christ 1. Expiates sin and makes it remissible 2. Merits the eternal Inheritance promised and the Promise too 3. It merits the Spirit to enable Man to keep the Covenant so as to obtain and receive the Inheritance 4. It merits a Power in Christ 1. To reveal the Gospel and give the Spirit to work Repentance and Faith in sinful Man's heart 2. Upon Repentance and Faith and his Intercession a Power to give Remission and the eternal Inheritance Take away this Death this Blood there is no Expiation of Sin no Inheritance no Covenant and suppose a Covenant and a Promise yet it 's ineffectual invalid without this Blood this Death For all the heavenly Promises are made for and in consideration of this Blood satisfying his Justice and meriting his Favour so that without it they are all nothing to purpose neither without it can the called though obedient to the heavenly Call ever have any Right unto or Possession of eternal Life So that the whole strength and efficacy of the Covenant doth depend upon this Blood for by it our Sins are expiated and our Consciences purged so as to be capable of the Inheritance This is a most clear Text to prove that the Saints even under the Law were called and saved and that not by the Ministry and Sacrifice of the Levitical Priests but by the Blood of Christ the vertue whereof extended to former times even the times of Adam Neither did they trust in their Sacrifices and their Priests and the Blood of Bulls and Goats and their Water of separation but in the Blood of Christ yet their Faith was very implicit The third Proposition is Christ is the Mediator of the new Covenant for this Reason and for this End An excellent Covenant must have an excellent Priest and Mediator and seeing this Covenant doth promise eternal Remission and an eternal Inheritance it requires such a Priest as shall be able by his Ministry and Service to obtain this Remission and Inheritance This no Priests by their Sacrifices or any other Service could do but Christ could and therefore not they but He and He alone was made the Mediator of this new Covenant For by his Death he expiates sin and purgeth the Conscience so that the called receive the Promise of eternal Inheritance and the vertue of this Death is universal in respect of time and persons called The Sum of all this is That Christ by reason of his Death and Blood expiating Sin and purging the Conscience is the Mediator of the new Testament or Covenant to confirm and make it effectual to the Heirs of the Promise § 15. This Confirmation of the new Covenant is illustrated from a two-fold Similitude the one is taken a Jure Naturali the other a Jure Ceremoniali The first is taken from the Law of Nature for to it the Civilians refer the Rules of Testaments and Wills and is delivered Ver. 16. For where a Testament is there must also of necessity be the death of the Testator Ver. 17. For a Testament is of force after men are dead otherwise it is of no strength at all whilest the Testator liveth THis is an imperfect and contract Similitude for the parts thereof as of all Comparisons are two 1. The Proposition 2. The Reddition And yet the Proposition is only expressed and the Reddition is only implyed and to be supplied from the antecedent Context In the Proposition we may observe two things 1. The necessity of the Death of the Testator barely asserted Ver. 16. 2. The Reason thereof rendred Ver. 17. The Argument in Form may be this That which is not of force whilest the Testator liveth that necessarily requireth the Death of the Testator to make it of force But a Testament is not of force whilest the Testator liveth Therefore it requireth to make it of force the Death of the Testator The Assumption is expressed 1. Affirmatively A Testament is of force after men who are Testators are dead 2. Negatively It 's of no strength whilest the Testator liveth The Comparison at large is this As the Death of the Testator is necessary to make the Testament of force so the Death of Christ is necessary for to make the new Covenant of force For though Christ might in some respect be a Mediator of the new Covenant yet he could not make it valid firm and effectual without his death neither we under the Gospel nor the Fathers under the Law could without this Death be saved by it And as the death of the Testator gives full force and efficacy to the Testament and this Confirmation is an Effect of his Death so the Death of Christ gives full force to the new Covenant and makes ●● effectual and this validity and efficacy is an Effect of this Death of Christ and manifests the excellency of this Sacrifice and of Christ the Priest who offered it The things compared as like are the Death of Christ and the Death of a Testator The things wherein they agree are 1. The like Effect of both which is to confirm and make effectual some Instrument 2. The necessity of both for that end to confirm and make effectual § 16. The Propositions in the first part of the Comparison are these 1. There are Testaments of men 2. These are not of force whilest the Testators live 3. They are of force upon the Death of the Testators 4. The Death of the Testators is necessary to make them of force 1. The matter of all Testaments is a temporal estate of these earthly Goods which God hath given Man to preserve this temporal Life The Testator is one that hath a just Title unto these Goods so that he hath power to dispose of them The Testament it self is the manner of disposing these Goods so as to give the same Right which he had in them unto other Persons after his Death and therefore it must signify his Will concerning these Goods and nominate the Persons who must succeed him so as to have them And because it 's an Act of Reason so to do therefore the Testator when he makes his Will must be Compos mentis and have the Use of his Reason and also sui Juris and not under the power of another The end of it is to prevent future suits and dissensions and Injustice about his Estate The Light of Nature doth teach men thus to dispose of their temporal Goods and therefore they are of ancient and universal Use. 2. These are not in force whilest the Testators live and the Reason of this is not only because whilest they are living they have need of or do use their Goods and though they make their Will in their life-time yet they
better Sacrifices because they were purified by the Sacrifice of Christ. This Reason 1. Presupposeth and taketh for granted that Christ's Sacrifice is better than those of the Law but not content to suppose he proves it to be better because Christ by it entred Heaven and it once offered was of eternal vertue 2. He proves the necessity implicitly for here it 's implyed that no other Sacrifice in the World could purify them For earthly Sacrifices could not purify spiritual and heavenly Persons Or more briefly thus It was necessary that the heavenly things should be purified by the Sacrifice of Christ but that was better than all the Levitical Sacrifice It was better because by the Blood thereof Christ entred Heaven and it once offered had vertue to purify not here expressed for ever This Reason implies several things as 1. That it was the Will of God that the Types and Anti-Types should be purified 2. That though the Types and Figures might be sufficiently purified by the Blood and Sacrifice of Bulls and Goats yet heavenly things which were the Anti-Types could not 3. That only the Sacrifice of Christ was sufficient and fit to purify these heavenly things 4. That it was God's Will that this this alone should purify them From all this it 's evident how these words come in upon the former and also what they add unto them For formerly the Author had made a Comparison whereof there were two parts 1. The Proposition 2. The Reddition The Proposition was this That under the Law there was no Purification and Expiation of the Types and Figures without the Blood of Legal Sacrifices The Reddition this So there is no Purification and Expiation of the Anti-Types of heavenly things without the Blood of some better Sacrifice which is the Sacrifice of Christ. So that these words belong unto the Reddition which formerly affirmed only in general That the heavenly things must be purified with some better Sacrifice and here it 's added that the only better Sacrifice was the Sacrifice of Christ to which the Author by vertue of the Comparison must needs be understood to add a singular vertue of purifying heavenly things § 23. But to enter upon the Text absolutely considered in it self the Subject whereof is Christ and his Sacrifice we find in it 1. An Act of Christ which is entrance into a Sanctuary 2. The end of that Act which is to appear before God for us To understand this we must note 1. That what is here done by Christ was done in Figure by the Levitical High-Priest 2. That this High-Priest after he had slain and taken the Blood of Bulls and Goats enters into the Sanctuary within the second Veil 3. That b●i ge●tred he appears before God for the People 4. That appearing before the Mercy-Seat which was said to be the Throne of God he sprinkles the Blood upon the Ark and the Mercy-Seat 5. That by this and Prayer he expiates the Sins of the People and procures a Legal Remission These things give Light to the Text For here 1. Christ must be considered as a High-Priest 2. To be slainand crucified upon the Cross. 3. Having shed his Blood to enter into Heaven 4. Being entred to appear before the Throne of God the Supream Judg. 5. By his Blood and Death presented to God to expiate our sins and procure Remission But here it may be doubted Whether the first or second Entrance and Appearance be intended or rather both For Christ first entred and appeared with his Soul separated from his Body when the Veil of the Temple was rent to signify the Entrance of the great High-Priest having sacrificed himself into Heaven Of this you heard before He entred the second time when risen again and made immortal he ascended into the Heaven of Heavens where as a King he fits and reign at his Father's right hand and as a Priest appears as an Advocate before his Father's Tribunal and pleads his Blood for all his penitent Clients on Earth Both may be meant both purify and the latter presupposeth the former The former purifieth vertually and by way of Merit the latter actually by obtaining actual Remission So that in these words we have 1. A Sanctuary 2. An Entrance into it 3. An Appearance before God 4. An Appearance for certain Persons 1. The Sanctuary is described negatively affirmatively Negatively It was not any Holy place or places made with hands which are the Figures of the true For the Levitical Holy places were made by the Art and hands of men and were true Sanctuaries but they were not the true but the Figures of them They were ●laces Holy places and Figures for so the word Anti-Types doth sometime signify of far more holy and glorious places where God did manifest his presence in a far more glorious manner Affirmatively It was Heaven it self the highest and most holy and glorious place of all sanctified by the special presence of God Therefore this Sanctuary is not earthly but heavenly not the Figure but the place figured the supernatural celestial and eternal Bethe● 2. Christ entred not into the figured Sacrary but into Heaven it self both the first and second time and it was expedient that so he should do For that was the place where God had appointed a special piece of Service to be done even there and no where else 3. He did not onely enter but being entred did appear and appear as a Priest having offered his great Sacrifice and now presenting himself as slain for the Sin of Man and after this appears again as immortal and as a Priest to plead his Sacrifice for his People And he as a Priest must appear first as Mortal secondly as Immortal and present himself before the Supream Lord and Judg or else his Sacrifice is not compleat and actually effectual 4. He dyed he entred he appeared for us sinful men and guilty First that Sin our Sin might be remissible and then the second time for us though sinful yet penitent that our Sins might be actually remitted and both Souls and Bodies sanctified § 24. But it might be said If Christ must expiate Sin by Sacrifice as the High-Priest did he must often offer often enter as he did For every Year once at least he entred and appeared with Blood before the Mercy-Seat To this the Apostle answers by way of Anticipation That as Christ entred not into the earthly Sanctuary so neither had he need as the Levitical High-Priest to offer himself and often to enter into Heaven for one Offering in the end of the World and one Entrance upon that Offering with his Blood was sufficient to take away Sin The Apostle's words are these Ver. 25. Nor yet that He should offer Himself often as the High-Priest entreth into the Holy place every Year with Blood of others Ver. 26. For then He must have often suffered since the Foundation of the World but now once in the end of the World hath He appeared to
Assumption to sone former Proposition 2. There was in these yearly Scrifices a Remembrance of Sin for when this great Sacrifice was to be offered God d● command That Aaron the High-Priest should lay both his hands upon the Head of the Scape-Goat and confess over him all the Iniquities of the Children of Israel and all thir Transgressions in all their Sins Levit. 16. 21. Where we learn what Remembrance of Sin is it 's the Confession of Sins Now Confession presupposeth Remembrance and is ●n outward Expression and Declaration of the sins remembred To confess sins is to aknowledg the Confessors guilty notwithstanding Sacrifices had been offered and Expia●on made and from hence it follows that those Sacrifices had no vertue to take away sin Some vertue they had and some Legal Expiation was made yet the Offering was ● sooner made but the expiating vertue vanished and their new sins must have a new C●nfession and a new Sacrifice which had been needless if the former Sacrifices had been sufficient And whereas it may be said that although many Sacrifices severally could 〈◊〉 yet all joyntly might purge the Worshippers The Answer is they could not ●o not any nor all had Power to purge the Conscience that must be purged by some bette Sacrifice whereof they were but Types and Shadows This is the third Argument § 5. The fourth we find Ver. 4. For it is not pssible that he Blood of Bulls and Goats should take aw●y Sins THE force of the Reasons in this That seeing the Effect is to take away sin it must have a Cause sufficent to produce it but the Blood of Bulls and Goats which was the princi●l thing in the Legal Annual Sacrifices was no such Cause it had no such vertue the Effet was so far above it that there was no possibility that such a Cause should reach it For ●ery Cause doth work according to it's Power as it is greater or less but if there 〈◊〉 power at all in respect of any particular Effect in respect of that it can do nothing● all The Blood of Buls and Goats might be a sign of that Blood that could take away sin but take it away or any wayes actively concur to the taking away thereof it could ●o In the words we have 1. An Effect 2. The Impotency of Legal Sacrifices in respect of this Effect 1. The Effect is taking away of sin Where by Sins we must understand sins as past yet remaining in their Guilt For though the sins be past and not in being yet the Effect abides for the party that hath sinned is liable to Punishment and must suffer it if it be not prevented Therefore to take away Sin is to make it remissible and that by some Sacrifice and Satisfaction This is to make the Guilt removable which yet is not actually removed but by the Sentence of the Judg passed upon the Sinner rightly disposed and qualified by Faith in a right Sacrifice And here you must observe that the Guilt is an Obligation not only to some temporal but also to spiritual Punishment because sin is from the Soul an immortal substance and against a Law of God which binds the Conscience and immortal Soul and promiseth Rewards and threatneth Punishments not only temporal but spiritual and eternal And the taking away sins in this place is a freeing of the party from this Obligation 2. Such an Effect so great and glorious and so beneficial to sinful Man must have some excellent and powerful Cause such the Blood of Buls and Goats cannot be Where we must know that the things sacrificed on the great day of Expiation were Buls or Bullocks and Goats and with the Blood of these shed and taken and sprinkled in the Holy place within the second Veil the Legal Expiation was made As the Beasts so the Blood was morally neither bad nor good but indifferent And though offering and sprinkling of this Blood was a rational Act in the High-Priest yet it could give no moral spiritual or supernatural Power to the Blood Neither could the Priest have had any warrant to have made this use of this Blood if God hadnot commanded him and that to signify some better and far more excellent Blood Therefore if we look upon the Blood and consider what it was we cannot rationally inagine any Power in it either placare or piacere either to satisfy divine Justice or to merit any Acceptation for that end from the supream Judg Therefore well might the Apstle say That it was not possible for the Blood of Buls and Goats to take away Sins and thence conclude that the Legal Sacrifices could not perfect or purge the Worshippers § 6. Hitherto the Apostle hath proved the insuiclency and impotency of the chiefest Legal Sacrifices for to take away sins and this he●ath done by Artificial Arguments taken from the Nature of the Sacrifices themselvs ad the Reiteration of them and now he goes further to manifest that they could not perect any and that by an inartificial Argument and a Testimony The Testimony is ●ivine and of infallible Authority and such in the Judgment of these Hebrews so that th● could not deny it The End of it is to prove that they could not purge or perfect th Worshippers because God never intended to do any such thing by them He argueso this purpose That if God intended to expiate Sin and perfect sinful Man by anothe and a more excellent Sacrifice even the Sacrifice of Christ and by that alone then they ould not expiate and take away Sin and so purge the Worshippers But he intended to ● this great Work by another more excellent which was the Sacrifice of Christ and thaalone Therefore they could not do that great Work of Expiation This was so strong a Proof that it did evince that though the Legal Sacrifices might have had some expiatig Power yet they could never expiate Sin because that Effect was and that by God's ntention reserved for another and a better Cause And this may be said to be a fifth argument ●istinct from all the former Seeing this is an inartificial Argument we must consider the Nature of the Testimony it self and the matter or thing testified The Testmony as yo heard before is divine for it 's taken out of the Old Testament and out of that part whih is called The Book of Psalms and out of one of those Psalms which by the Title is said o be David's The Pen-men of the whole were Prophets and inspired from Heaven ad amongst the rest David of whom it 's said The Spirit of the Lord spake by me and his Vord was in my Tongue 2 Sam. 23. 2. And not only he but all the men of God spake assey were moved by the Holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. 21. As they spake so they wrote thefore their Writings are called The Scriptures by way of Eminency and The Holy Scripres and the words written therein are all the words of God who spake in them
Christ's Priest-hood in respect of the Constitution and now proceeds to prove his excellency in respect of the Ministration For if he be a Priest he must minister and officiate and his ministration is two-fold or there be two parts thereof The first whereof Which is his great Offering was performed on Earth The second Which is his Intercession is performed in Heaven He was a Priest elect when he offered on Earth He was a Priest constituted and confirmed before he did intercede in Heaven These things premised the Author doth 1. Sum up briefly the substance of his former Discourse Concerning the constitution of Christ's Priest-hood ver 1. 2. Proceed to set forth his excellency in respect of his Ministration 1. More generally in this Chapter 2. More particularly hereafter That he may do this the better he takes it for granted that the due ministration of a Priest requires 1. A Tabernacle or Temple 2. A Sacrifice or something to be offered 3. A Covenant whereof he must be Mediatour These things presupposed he proves the excellency of Christ's ministration in respect 1. Of the Tabernacle which is not made with hands but pitched by God ver 2. 2. Of the thing offered and the service both which are supernatural and divine not after the pattern of heavenly things ver 3 4 5. 3. Of the Covenant which he did confirm and make effectual as Mediatour which is better then that of Works whereof the Levitical High-Priest was Mediatour ver 6. That it was better he proves because it was established upon better Promises Where two things are observable 1. That the Promises of the Covenant were better 2. That it's stable and firm Ibid. To make both these evident he 1. Recites the words of the Prophet Jeremy concerning both the Covenants 2. In the words he 1. Informs us 1. Of the deficiency of the former ver 8 9. 2. Of the excellent Promises of the latter ver 10 11 12. 2. From the word Now he inferrs the abolition of the former to bring in the latter ver 13. CHAP. IX VVHerein the Apostle proceeds farther to evidence the excellency of Christ's ministration and this he doth more particularly by setting forth the excellency of his great Sacrifice and Offering That he may do this the better he singles out from all the other legal Services the anniversary Sacrifice of Expiation with the Blood whereof the High Priest alone once in the year only entred into the Holiest of all and proving Christ's Sacrifice upon the Cross to be far more excellent than this he doth clearly evince the excellency of Christ's Priest-hood The parts of the Chapter are two The first is concerning the Typical Tabernacle Priests Service The Tabernacle is described ver 1 2 3 4 5. The Priests ver 6 7. The Service Ibid. The imperfection of their Service ver 8 9 10. The principal part of the Tabernacle was the Holy of Holies The principal Priest the High Priest The principal Service the presenting of the Blood of the Expiatory Offering in the Holiest place Where the Apostle observes 1. That because none but the High Priest alone might enter within the 2d Veil therefore the way into the Holiest was not yet made manifest 2. That because the Services and so the Ministration were but carnal therefore they could not perfect the Performers The second part is concerning the Antitypical Tabernacle Priest Service and especially the Service of Christ's great Offering which he proves to be far more excellent then the legal great Sacrifice of expiation and so than all other legal Sacrifices from the Effects and Consequents thereof For by it Christ entring the Holy place 1. Obtained eternal Redemption ver 11 12. 2. Purgeth the Conscience from dead Works to serve the living God ver 13 14. 3. Confirms the new Covenant makes it effectual and unalterable ver 15. This Confirmation is illustrated 1. From the Testaments of Men confirmed by the Death of the Testator ver 16 17. 2. From the Sanction and Confirmation of the former Covenant by Blood ver 18 19 20. The former purifying and expiating Virtue of Christ's Sacrifice is illustrated from the Purification Expiation and Consecration of most things under the Law by Blood And hence inferrs That heavenly and spiritual things must be purified by better Sacrifices ver 21 22 23. 4. Entring Heaven he appears before God for us making Intercession and needs not come out of that Holy place again to re-iterate his Death and Sacrifice as the High Priest under the Law did but he stayes there pleading his One Offering of eternal Virtue untill he come to Judgment and give the actual possession of eternal life to all such as wait for him and this is the ultimate benefit of this Great Offering ver 24 25 26 27 28. CHAP. X. VVHetein 1. The Doctrine of Christ's Sacrifice is continued 2. The same Doctrine is applied Of this Doctrine there be two parts 1. Concerning the imperfection of the legal Offering● 2. Concerning the perfection of Christ's The imperfection of the former was in this They could nor sanctify because 1. They were but shadows ver 1. 2. They were re-iterated and left a conscience of sin ver 2 3. 3. They were but carnal and the Blood of Bulls and Goats could not take away the spiritual stain and guilt of Sin to purge the immortal Soul 4. God did reject them as insufficient for that purpose and did accept Christ's one Offering This is proved out of Psal. 40. 7 8 c. and here 1. The words are cited ver 5 6 7. 2. The principal thing intended thence concluded that not by them but this Sacrifice of Christ we are sanctified ver 8 9 10. 3. They being many offered many times by many Priests could not take away sin but this one Sacrifice offered but once and by one Priest doth consecrate the Sanctified for ever ver 11 12 13 This he proves out of Jer. 31. 1. Citing the words ver 15 16 17. 2. Thence concluding the eternal Virtue of this Offering ver 18. Thus far the Doctrine now follows the Application continued from this place to the latter end of the last Chapter In this Application we may consider 1. The Duties exhorted unto which are many but the principal is Perseverance 2. The Motives 3. Sometime the Means The first Duty exhorted unto is To draw near with a sincere Heart in assurance of Faith 2. The Motives The holy place is open A new way is made We have an High Priest ver 19 20 21 22. The second Duty is To hold fast our Profession and persevere ver 23. The Means 1. To stir up one another ver 24. 2. Not to forsake the Assemblies ver 25. The Motives 1. God is faithful who hath promised ver 23. 2. The time is near at hand ver 25. 3. If we fall away after we have received the Truth the Sin will be very hainous the punishment very grievous and unavoidable ver 26 27 28 29 30
power to purge the Conscience To proceed unto particulars the parts of the Comparison are two 1. The Proposition 2. The Reddition The first Ver. 13 the second Ver. 14. In the first we have the Cause the Blood of Bulls and Goats and the Ashes of an Heifer then the Effect sanctifying to the purifying of the Flesh. Of the Blood of Bulls and Goats which is the same with the Blood of Goats and Calvs Ver. 12. you have heard before for that was the Expiatory Blood wherewith the Priest entring the most Holy place did sprinkle the Mercy-Seat and the Effect of this was the Expiation of the Sins of the Priest and the People whereby they were freed from such penalties as the Law imposed upon persons for some Legal and Ceremonial Offences The second purifying was by the Ashes of a red Heifer mixed with running Water and sprinkled upon Persons or things polluted by touching or being near the dead Of this you may read at large Numb 19. The Effect of both was sanctifying by cleansing from some Legal pollution and Guilt but neither of these could free any person from the Obligation to eternal penalties nor spiritually purify and make holy the Spirit and Soul of Man Some think that the Blood did signify the Death and bloody Sacrifice of Christ the Water the sanctifying Spirit Yet both are here compared with the Blood of Christ as Shadows of it This is the Proposition § 13. The Reddition followeth Ver. 14. Where we have two absolute Propositions and part of the Comparison 1. That Christ offered himself through the eternal Spirit without Spot unto God 2. That the Blood of Christ who thus offered himself doth purge the Conscience from dead Works to serve the Living God 3. The Comparative part is that it hath much more Power or doth much more purge the Conscience The first Proposition is Christ through the eternal Spirit offered himself without Spot unto God Where we may consider 1. The Priest 2. The thing offered 3. The manner how 4. The thing by which 5. The Person to whom the Offering was made 1. The Priest was Christ the Word made Flesh and the Son of God designed a Priest by God 2. The thing offered by this Priest was Himself that is his own Life his own Body and some add his own Soul This was spoken in opposition to such things as the Levitical High-Priests offered as Buls and Goats for none of them offered either other men or themselvs 3. The manner how this was offered is this that it was offered without Spot The thing offered and the Offering and the manner of offering were all pure 4. That by or through which he made this Offering was the eternal Spirit By Spirit some understand the Soul which is said to be eternal because it 's immortal And certainly in respect of his Body he may rather be said to be the thing offered and in respect of his Soul the Priest offering For this offering is said to be the doing of God's Will and an Act of Obedience unto death the death of the Cross and this is a proper Act of his immortal Soul and Spirit Yet this Soul and Body too were united to the Word which as God was an eternal Spirit in which respect some understand by eternal Spirit the Word and Divine Nature of Christ And both Soul and Body were in the highest degree sanctified and supported especially in suffering death by the Holy Ghost which some think is here meant It 's certain he did offer himself by his immortal Spirit sanctified and supported by the Holy Spirit and united to the Word which with the Father and the Holy Ghost are one God and eternal spiritual Substance 5. The party to whom he offered himself was God as supream Lord of Life and Death Law-giver and Judg of Man-kind For he alone had power to appoint him to be Priest to be Offering and to offer and also to accept this Offering in behalf of sinful Man and thereupon to justify him believing and reward him with eternal Life All these are expressed and joyned together to set forth the Excellency and the immanent and internal Vertue of Christ's Blood For How excellent and of what rare vertue and causality must that Blood Death Sacrifice be which was the Blood of Christ who was by God's own immediate Commission and Designment made the highest and the greatest Priest and offered Himself the best Sacrifice that ever was and that through the eternal Spirit purely spiritual and most holy and impolluted and that unto God the supream Lord and Judg and in that manner that the very Act of offering from first to last was most exactly conformable to his Will It had all the perfections of a Sacrifice and in the highest degree The Levitical High-Priest was a Priest but far inferiour to Christ he offered Goats and Calvs but not himself and if he had offered himself yet the thing offered had been nothing to this he offered indeed to God yet he had not that near Relation unto Agreement with and Interest in God as this Priest had He offered by or through his own Spirit which was very imperfect and the imperfections of his very Act of Offering were very many and great Therefore it was no wonder that it should not have the like rare efficiency with this The second Proposition in this Verse is That Christ's Blood doth purge the Conscience c. This is the outward Efficacy and Working of this Blood upon a certain Subject rightly disposed In the words we may observe 1. The Conscience which is the Subject 2. The pollution of the Conscience 3. The purging and cleansing of it 4. The ●ind and Consequent of this cleansing 1. The Conscience is the Spirit and immortal Soul of Man which is Intimum Hominis the in most and most excellent part yet this is not here considered meerly as a spiritual immortal intellective and free Substance created and preserved by God but as subject unto his Power bound by his Laws conscious to it 's own Disobedience and sensible of it For the Blood of Christ doth actually purge no other Soul nor any Soul but thus qualified neither without this Qualification is the Soul immediately capable of this Purgation 2. The Pollution of the Soul is from dead Works where by dead Works it 's generally granted are meant Sins and that not only of Commission but Omission All the Works of Man should be living Works and issue from a Soul endued with a spiritual and supernatural Life have a spiritual and supernatural Form which is Conformity to Divine Law and should tend unto a supernatural and spiritual end When they either issue from a Soul destitute of this heavenly Life or want this Conformity they are dead Works base and such as becomes not so excellent a Creature The ordinary Reasons given by Authors why Sins are called dead Works are because they are the Works of men dead in sin want the Life and
Form of Holiness and merit death and Punishment or because men are dead and sensless of them and so continue in them Yet the Apostle seems to allude in this to the Pollutions by the dead whereof we read Num. 19. 18. For he that touched a Bone or one slain or one dead or a Grave was legally unclean and polluted In every sin we commit our Soul doth come too near unto or morally and spiritually doth touch something that is base vile and far below it self and so debaseth and defileth it self and makes it self not only guilty but unholy and unfit for having any Communion with God 3. To purge this Conscience is to free this Soul thus conscious of sin from the Guilt and the Impurity and other sad Consequents of Sin so that thereupon the Sinner is neither liable to Punishment or debarred from Communion with God This purging is not only Justification but that which is called Sanctification and inherent Holiness without which no Man shall see God the want whereof if we consider it as following upon a former demerit is the greatest Punishment of all other For if we could imagine a Man pardoned and freed from the Guilt of former sin and left inherently polluted and unsanctified he must needs remain in a sad condition But we cannot truly thus imagine if want of the sanctifying Spirit be a Punishment for former Sin If we be once thus purged there is no more Conscience of Sin once pardoned no fear of God's wrath nor of the eternal penalty for we being once purged have peace with God quiet of Conscience and hope of Glory 4. To serve the true and living God following upon the purging of the Conscience is a special priviledg To understand this more distinctly we must know that under the Law whosoever was polluted by the presence or touch of the dead could not enter into the Congregation with the rest of God's sanctified People for to worship or have any Communion with God If he should dare and presume to enter before he was purged or purified he defiled the Tabernacle and Sanctuary of God and that Soul must be cut off Numb 19. 13 20. That which answers unto this Priviledg is the liberty of free access with boldness and confidence unto the Throne of Grace to offer up our Prayers Thanks-giving and other Services unto God propitiated and reconciled so as to be accepted and receive Mercies and Blessings from him For being justified and sanctified we do not fear God as a severe Judg we do not stand at a distance or fly from him but come near unto him as Children to a loving Father This same Service of the true and living God who is Light most pure and holy doth presuppose us justified sanctified reconciled adopted There are degrees as of this cleansing so of this serving God for we are not cleansed fully from all Sin in this Life but we shall be in the Life to come and then we shall have full Communion with our God and serve him far more perfectly in the glorious Temple and Sacrary of Heaven This is the purging of the Conscience in it self Now we must consider it as an Effect predicated of the Blood of Christ the Cause for it being so noble and excellent an Effect must have some rare and noble Cause The Cause therefore must be Blood yet no Blood but this Blood of Christ with which he entred into the Holy place of Heaven after it was shed will serve the turn or reach this Effect yet this is not an immediate but a mediate Effect of this Blood thus shed and presented to God For one immediate effect antecedent to this is expiation and satisfaction of God's Justice whereby Sin became pardonable And if Christ had not obtained and found eternal Expiation by this blood he could never by it have purged the Conscience Yet this blood hath this power first and then doth exercise it when he finds a Subject rightly disposed which is a Conscience sensible of sin and appealing to the Throne of Grace where it pledges this blood of Christ. So that this purging actually considered presupposeth the blood of Christ shed offered accepted as a sufficient propitiation and the Sinner to be purged penitent and believing This seems to be signified by that Ceremony of purification described and prescribed Numb 19. For he that was once polluted and unclean must be willing desirous and careful to be cleansed with the ashes mixt with water sprinkled upon him The blood of some Sacrifice did expiate the ashes with water sprinkled did cleanse So the blood of Christ shed and offered doth expiate sin so far as to make it remissible and the sprinkling of that by the Spirit upon the penitent and believing doth purge The third Proposition in this verse is that much more doth the blood of Christ purge the conscience that is 1. It purgeth the conscience 2. It purgeth it effectually and fully But joyn this with the former and then we have the substance of the whole in one proposition which you heard before and the Apostle in the words argues to this purpose If the blood of Bulls and Goates c. had power of sanctifying the Flesh then much more the blood of Christ doth purge the Conscience But the blood of Bulls and Goates c. did sanctify the Flesh. Therefore much more the blood of Christ c. doth purge the Conscience c. This place implies that the expiations by Blood and purifications of the Law could neither satisfy God's Justice nor purge the Conscience from spiritual filth and guilt of sin yet the blood of Christ could do both And here we must seriously consider the excellency of the blood of Christ the wonderful purging efficacy thereof and the unspeakable mercy of God in providing this remedy and setting open this fountain to wash and cleanse away our sin O blessed blood O happy man O come to this Fountain wash and bathe thy self here every day Here the wrath of God is quenched the tormenting conscience quieted the filthy Soul washed and prepared for the communion with her God But we are ignorant of the virtue of this blood sensless of our sins careless of our purification and so presume to enter into God's presence and defile his Tabernacle and bring his wrath upon us But before I leave this Text something further must be said concerning the efficacy of the blood of Buls and Goates and the ashes of an Heifer also of the efficacy of the blood of Christ. For it must be enquired whether the efficacy of both depend meerly upon divine Institution o● upon the nature of the Causes 1. That neither is Physical will be granted 2. That the purifying efficacy of the blood of Goates and Bulls and the ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean did depend meerly upon the will and positive Institution of God will not be denyed For neither the blood nor ashes nor sprinkling had any moral spiritual intrinsecal virtue
put away Sin by the Sacrifice of Himself THE Subject of these words is the Sacrifice of Christ whereby he entred Heaven it self and of this it 's affirmed That it was but once offered and that by the one Offering of this one Sacrifice the heavenly things were purified by taking away Sin for ever This single Offering of this single Sacrifice is set forth by way of Dissimilitude and Opposition to the Levitical Sacrifices and that 1. Negatively 2. Affirmatively Negatively Ver. 25. wherein we have two Propositions the one concerning the Levitical the other concerning Christ's Sacrifice The first concerning the former is That the Levitical High-Priest entreth into the Holy place every Year with the Blood of others This is meant of the great Anniversary Sacrifice of Expiation which in the beginning of this Chapter the Author singled out as the greatest and highest piece of Service that was performed under the Law with this design to prove the Sacrifice of Christ to be far more excellent in many things especially in the vertue and effects thereof In this we have 1. The entrance of the Priest into the holy place 2. This entrance made with the blood of others 3. This entrance yearly or every year 1. The holy place was that within the second Veil the holiest of all for into that the High-Priest alone might enter and that but once every year 2. Yet he might not enter without blood and this blood was the blood not of the High-Priest himself but of others that is the blood of Bulls and Goats 3. The principal thing in the Proposition to be noted is the frequency of his entrance and offering for he entred and offered every year God thereby signifying that it was not of eternal virtue The second Proposition is That Christ did not offer himself often He must offer and offer himself and by his own Blood enter Heaven yet he must not do this often his offering must be single and individual both in respect of the Sacrifice and the oblation thereof He must not once entred come out again and offer a new and another Sacrifice or the same again So that the thing that is denyed of this Sacrifice is frequency of offering § 25. In the latter part of the Text ver 26. we may observe 1. The reason why this Sacrifice must not be reiterated 2. The affirmative part of the principal point Yet the whole verse may be said to give a reason of the former Negative proposition and the same is two-fold The first is ab absurdo The second ab inntili ●●●-necessario For Christ's offering must not be reiterated 1. Because it was inconvenient and absurd 2. Because it was no wayes profitable or necessary I will sum up the whole in two Propositions The first If Christ should offer himself often then must he often have suffered since ●●●● the foundation of the World The second But now once in the end of the World hath he appeared to put away sin o●●●●● by the Sacrifice of himself The first Proposition implyes 1. That where there is offering there must be suffering for in sacrificing living Creatures the thing sacrificed must be sl●in as well as offered For mactation and oblation are essential to such as Sacrifice 2. That seeing there was Sin since the beginning of the World and Sacrifice for Sin appointed by God there must be suffering and offering from the beginning of the World or at least some Sacrifice offered which once presented to God should be of eternal Virtue 3. Because the offering of Christ requires necessarily his suffering therefore if Christ's own offering of himself once could not expiate Sin for ever then he must suffer often The absurdity and inconvenience of Christ's frequent offering of himself was this that if he must often offer he must often suffer and this was thought unreasonable to divine wisdom to put his Son so often to such a cruel Death For by Suffering is meant suffering of Death in that manner as Christ Suffered Yet it seemed good unto God to appoint the Levitical High-Priest often to offer and often with blood to enter into the holy place to signify the imperfection of the Legal Expiation that the People might expect a far more excellent sacrifice In the second Proposition concerning Christ's once offering we may observe 1. Christ's appearing 2. The time of his appearance 3. The end 1. Christ's appearance is 1. His Incarnation 2. The manifestation of him incarnate 3. The presenting of himself as a Priest having Sacrificed himself unto his heavenly Father without which his Incarnation and Manifestation had been to no purpose He appeared from the foundation of the World in the Word of the promise and in Types and Figures yet this was but obscure At length he appeared really and far more clearly when the Word was made Flesh dwelt and lived amongst men dyed and as a Priest offered himself unto God the Supream Judge for the Sin of Man 2. The time of his appearance was the end of the World which is opposed to the foundation of the World Yet as this end is not the last so the foundation is not the first day of the World therefore end and foundation must be taken with a Latitude Christ appeared to Suffer a thousand six hundred years ago and upward and yet the World is not ended therefore End signifies the last times of the World which may be many years yet to come as many years of these last ●in●es as parts thereof are past already And so the foundation of the World may be the beginning thereof and this beginning may be so far extended as to comprehend many hundred and 〈◊〉 thousands of years This end of the World is called the fulness of the time Gal. 44. because as some tell us the time appointed by God was fully come all things which were decreed to be before his coming were fully accomplished And though we understand not the reasons yet the end of the World was the fi●●ell of all others for this appearance and though the last times seem to have the greatest benefit of his Exhibition yet the first times were not without it for the virtue of this Sacrifice extended to all times 3. The end of this appearance was to put away sin by the Sacrifice of himself Where we have two ends the one subordinate to the other The first was the Sacrificing of himself The second by this Sacrifice to put away Sin Christ was the Priest and the thing Sacrificed was himself and the blood by which he entred Heaven was his own blood and he himself was slain and suffered and he himself did offer himself slain The end and so the effect of this Sacrifice once offered was the putting away of sin This putting away was not the abrogation of the Law transgressed but a taking away the moral effects and consequents of Sin committed against that Law and principally of guilt For one certain and perpetual effect of Sin in
respect of the prohibition and commination of the Law is guilt and rendring of the Sinner obnoxi●us unto vindicative Justice of the Law-giver and Judge This guilt can no waye he taken away but either by suffering or pardon or both as here it 's put away by Christ's suffering and God's pardon for Christ suffers for Sin God pardons it so Christ's sake and in consideration of his suffering and offering The effect of Sin is to render the party sinning obnoxious and liable to punishment and God's vindicative Justice and by this virtue of the commination of the Law God to make way for pardon by a trans●endent extraordinary power makes Christ man's Surety and Christ voluntarily submits himself out of love to his Brethren to God's will so far as to suffer Death for man's Sin and offers himself as being ●lain to the Supream Judge Upon his submission he becomes one person with sinful man as a Surety with the principal and so is liable to that punishment which sinful man should have suffered as a Surety becomes liable to pay the debt of the principal From all this it 's evident that Sin is an efficient moral cause of Christ's suffering and Christ's suffering is a punishment in proper sense though both these be denied without any reason by the Socinian By this Legal substitution of Christ and the offering of himself Sin is made remissible and the way is made open to pardon and upon the penitency and faith of the Sinner actual pardon follows That Sin is pardonable and pardoned is the end and effect of Christ's Suffering To put away Sin is first to make Sin pardonable and the consequents of Sin removable For this is the work and immediate effect of Christ's Sacrifice of himself and the same not often but once offered in the end of the World In all this we may observe the difference between Christ and the Levitical High-Priest Christ suffers and offers himself and enters Heaven with his own Blood but the Levitical High-Priest offers often and enters with the blood of Bulls and Goats The virtue of the High-Priest's offering was but for a little time but the virtue of Christ's extends to all time In these respects Christ's Sacrifice is far more excellent and more purifying § 25. This discourse of Christ's once offering and once suffering is continued and enlarged for the Apostle informs us that the reason why Christ suffered but once in the end of the World was the Decree of God which had determined of Christ as he had done of other men and this decree was regulated by Divine Wisdom which alwayes dictates that which shall be best and fittest This Decree is two-fold 1. Concerning other men 2. Concerning Christ. And because there is some agreement between the lot of Christ and other Men in respect of Death and that which followeth Death therefore the singularity of Christ's Death is set forth comparatively And of the comparison we have 1. The Proposition Verse 27. And as it was appointed unto Men once to dye but after that the Judgment IN which words we have 1. Something 's ordained 2. The ordination The things ordained are two 1. That men once dy 2. Come to Judgment The words absolutely considered may be reduced to two Propositions 1. That it 's appointed unto men once to dye 2. But after Death follows Judgment The first tells us 1. That men dye and this we certainly know 2. That they dye but once 3. That this is appointed yet though men must dye and it 's so certain and so evident and easily known yet men little consider it but their hearts are strangely taken up with the things of this life and they admire the vanities of this World and promise unto themselves long life and certain enjoyment of these earthly things They do not remember that they are mortal and that there is no assurance that they shall live one hour before Death arrest them and seise upon their estates and all earthly comforts in that day their thoughts perish and their pride and glory are laid in the dust Oh inconsiderate Wretches are ye able to conquer Death turn Mortality into Eternity and Earth into Heaven Be wise and never forget that you must dye 2. Men dye but once there is no return into this World again neither any recovery of what man once dead hath lost As no man can keep alive his Soul so no man can raise his Body and re-unite the Soul unto it This is a work proper to God who made us and far above the power of any Creature When it 's said That men must dye it 's to be understood of the generality of mankind that all must dye because all are obnoxious to Death and Mortal even Enoch and Elias and all those who shall be found alive when Christ shall come to Judge the World And though the two Prophets did not and they who remain till Christ's coming shall not dye as others do yet the former suffered and the latter shall suffer a change equivalent to Death though in both there seems to be some exception from the general rule So to dye but once is the general rule and the ordinary fate yet Lazarus and others may dye twice because God reserved an arbitrary power to himself to raise some unto a mortal life so that they became obnoxious to a double Death and he did exercise this power to manifest his Glory in some particular persons Yet this was an extraordinary case and this reservation did not take away the general and ordinary rule according to which the Apostle is to be understood 3. This is appointed for so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is understood and translated and it 's capable of that signification by a Trope The party who appointed decreed and ordained both that all men shall dye and dye once and but once is not expressed but it 's easily understood For the Supream Lord of Life and Death who hath an Universal Power over all Men is God and none else and therefore this must be a Decree of God as Supream Lord and a Sentence of him as Judge and the same irrevocable yet dispensable in some particular and extraordinary Cases as should seem good unto him Death is a punishment and therefore men being obnoxious unto it must be guilty of some Crime and condemned thereunto for some Offence against some Law threatening Death And that was the positive Law which God gave to Adam saying But of the Tree of Knowledg of Good and Evil thou shalt not eat of it for in the Day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely dye Gen. 2. 17. This Law was transgressed and the Sentence followed in these words Dust thou art and to dust thou shalt return Gen. 3. 19. Whereas the Socinian saith That Death is natural and not from any Decree of God his Opinion is not reconcileable with that of the Apostle As by one man Sin entred into the World and by Sin Death
his Body the Veil of the Temple was rent from the Top to the bottom to signify that Christ the great High-Priest was ready by his own Blood being shed to enter the Holy place of Heaven to procure eternal Redemption or Remission for sinful Man and by this means divine Justice being satisfied God was made accessible And no Man now can have actual access into his presence but by this Blood and through this Veil of the Flesh by him who was crucified and whose Body was separate from his Soul § 16. Thus the Way is made and consecrated The next thing is the Liberty which we have to enter into the Holiest through this way by the Blood of Christ where three things are to be observed 1. The place into which this way doth lead us 2. The Liberty to enter through this Way into this place 3. The means whereby we obtain this Liberty 1. The place is the Holiest for into that the High-Priest entred once a Year with the Blood of Expiation There was the Mercy-Seat which must be sprinkled with Blood We need not here enquire Whether that Holiest place on Earth signify Heaven or some other thing for it 's certain the Mercy-Seat did signify that which this Apostle calls The Throne of Grace Chap. 4. 16. The Throne of Grace is the Throne of God propitiated by the Blood of Christ so that to enter into the Holiest is to come to God as Supream Lord first offended by the Sin of Man and then made propitious by the Death and Sacrifice of Christ which was so acceptable unto him that for and in consideration of the same he is willing to admit Man into his presence graciously to receive his Petitions and bless him The Throne of God might be said to be three-fold 1. Of Justice 2. Of Grace 3. Of Glory To the Throne of Justice strict Justice no sinful guilty Man can approach To the Throne of Grace every penitent Sinner may have access The Throne of Glory is inaccessible to mortal Man We need not locally ascend into Heaven for to come unto the Throne of Grace it stands in the midst of God's People as the Tabernacle did in the midst of Israel For God is alwayes in all places nigh to such as call upon him in truth Christ stood before the Throne of Justice when he suffered for our Sins Penitent Sinners stand before the Throne of Grace when they worship him in Faith And after the Resurrection we shall all stand before the Throne of Glory and ever abide in his presence Yet this way lyes by the Throne of Grace and we pass by it to the Throne of Glory There is one way to both 2. We have Liberty to enter into the Holiest The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as you have heard signifies Freedom and Boldness of Speech it signifies also Liberty The Vulgar and the Sy●iack turn the word Confidence which is the same with Boldness though some what more The Arabick and Arias Mortan●● Liberty The Aethiopick Grace or Licence All agree for they signify 1. That we have a Licence and Liberty graciously granted unto us 2. A Right 3. This Liberty and Right is so full that we may come with Boldness and Confidence to be admitted and accepted This is a great Priviledge and Favour which God doth graciously vouchsafe unto Believers and denies to all others which are not admitted to come so near him 3. We have this Right Liberty and Confidence by the Blood of Christ for the Blood and Death of Christ satisfied God's Justice and merited his Favour and made him accessible and upon the same he promised to admit penitent Believers And upon our Repentance and Faith we have actual Right and Liberty so that we who could not come near him for our sins may come near him by Faith in his Blood This Priviledg is more fully expressed in these words of the Apostle In whom we have boldness and access with Confidence by Faith of him Ephes. 3. 12. Where 1. We have access and may enter into God's blessed presence Yet 2. Because one may come with fear and doubt here we may come with boldness and confidence 3. There is no such access but by Christ the Blood of Christ. 4. Neither is there any such access granted but by Faith in that Blood that is to such as believe The sum of all is That Sin had made God as the fountain of goodness inaccessible to Sinners as Sinners Christ by his Death had made him accessible to Sinners as believing § 17. We have 1. A way 2. A liberty to enter into the Holiest And 3. We have an High-Priest over the House of God Where by the House of God we must understand the Church which is the Society and Corporation of Believers and by this High-Priest Christ Jesus as exalted at the right hand of God No man under the Law could come to God without the High-Priest he must present their Offerings their Incense their Prayers and the Blood of Expiation unto God and make Intercession for them So Christ is ever ready before his Fathers Throne to bring us into his presence as the Admissional of Heaven to make Intercession for us and as our Advocate to plead our Cause by his Blood and make all our Services acceptable and effectual without all which neither way nor liberty to enter could be beneficial and to purpose § 18. Thus the words are explained and inform us of a way made through the Veil of liberty to enter of Christ set over the House of God as an High-Priest to bring us unto God to make our prayers effectual and to procure for us all things necessary to make us happy Now it remains we consider the words 1. As a recapitulation of some former Doctrine 2. As a ground of the consequent exhortations and both these I will make clear in a few words 1. They are a brief abridgment of the former Doctrine concerning Christ's Priest-hood For in the 5th and 7th Chapters he had not only asserted but proved That Christ was an High-Priest for ever after the Order of Melchizedec That he had made a way to God by his Blood and procured us liberty to enter into God's presence before the Throne of Grace so that we might boldly come with confidence to obtain all mercies necessary to our everlasting happiness he had made evident by the rare virtue and excellent effects of Christ's Sacrifice partly Chapter 9th partly in the former part of this For Christ as a Son is over his own House Chap. 3. 6. And this House is the Church We have a great High-Priest who is passed into the Heavens and sensible of our Condition Chap. 4. 14 15. And he is the Minister of the Sanctuary and the true Tabernacle which the Lord p●tched and not Man Chap. 8. 2. From all this you easily understand that the former Doctrine is repeated and briefly contracted in these words 2. As it is a Recapitulation of the former
his transcendent Gifts nor his heavenly Wisdom nor his Glorious Work● nor his rare Virtues nor his great work of Expiation nor his Glory and Power which he enjoyes at the right hand of God could any wayes move him but he vilifies him and debaseth him that was higher then the Heavens as low as the dust and dirt under his feet yet this debasement was only an act of his base mind but could not in the least degree diminish or obscure the Glory and Excellency of Christ This is the first aggravation of Apostacy 2. He counteth the Blood of the Covenant whereby he was sanctified an unholy thing Where we have 1. The Blood of the Covenant 2. The sanctifying Power of this Blood 3. The counting of it unholy 1. By the Blood understand the blooddy Sacrifice of Christ so much magnified in the former Chapter for it 's that Blood by which Christ entring the holy place of Heaven obtained eternal Redemption that Blood which purgeth the Conscience from dead Works to serve the living God that Blood which confirmed the everlasting Covenant in which respect it 's called the Blood of the Covenant This Covenant is called the Conant of Grace wherein for and in consideration of the unspotted Blood of Christ once shed God promiseth Remission of Sins and the eternal Inheritance of Glory upon condition of Repentance and Faith in Christ. And it 's called the Blood of this Covenant because upon it the Covenant was grounded and by virtue of it all the Promises thereof are made unalterable firm and effectual 2. This was the Blood by which this Apostate upon his receiving the knowledg of the Truth was sanctified For 1. This Blood as offered and accepted of God made his Sin remissible 2. Upon the profession of his Faith and his Baptism his Sin was at least conditionally pardoned and purged 3. So long as he continued in his profession and so far as he proceeded according to certain degrees in Faith and the profession of it so far he might be said to be in a state of Justification or at least in the way to Justification and not only to Justification but Sanctification as it 's made distinct from Justification though Sanctification be taken in this Epistle for Justification For this Blood of Christ is more beneficial to those which receive the Gospel are baptized believe with some degree of Faith than to others who either never heard the Gospel or if they heard did reject it And all the power against sin that any professing baptized Christian receives all the hope joy comfort which follows upon their profession are from the Blood of Christ. And how far some men may proceed in Christianity and what benefit they may receive by Christ and yet after fall away you have heard something in this sixth Chapter And such is the benefit which such do receive by the Blood of Christ that in a fair sense they may be said to be sanctified and have their sins purged by it Yet the meaning of the Apostle may be not only that they were some wayes sanctified by it but that it was the Blood and the Blood alone which could sanctify them and from which alone they could expect Sanctification 3. Yet this sanctifying Blood the Apostate counts unholy or common To be common Blood may be understood 1. Such as hath no expiating and purging power 2. Such as is no better then the Blood of Bulls and Goats sacrificed 3. Such as differs not from the Blood of other men 4. Such as is the Blood of a Malefactor guilty and vicious person and that is impure and unholy Blood So that the Apostate though he had received some kind and measure of Sanctification from it yet ascribed no more virtue and excellency to it then to common Blood denyed the sanctifying power of it nay did account it unholy and polluted Yet you must note that though it be so vile in his conceit and judgment yet it 's really in it self the onely sanctifying Blood and effectually sanctifying to all such as do sincerely believe This is the second aggravation 3. The Apostate doth despite unto the Spirit of Grace where we must enquire 1. What this Spirit is 2. Why he is called the Spirit of Grace 3. What it is to do despite unto this Spirit 1. This Spirit is not the spirit of Man neither is it any Angel nor any created Person or Substance but it 's an uncreated Spirit the Spirit of God so as that it is God therefore the perfections and operations of God are predicated of it It 's that Spirit which with the Father and the Son is the Supream object of our Faith that Spirit by which God made the World preserves and governs the same that Spirit whereby he regenerates and sanctifies his People and animates the whole Body of the Church 2. This Spirit is said to be the Spirit of Grace Thus he may be called in opposition to the Spirit of bondage and fear which is the Spirit proper to the Law For the Spirit by the Law which had no Expiation for Sin no Blood to purge the Conscience no promise of power to keep it nor of pardon if transgressed could work nothing but fear which was a continued slavery and bondage The Spirit of the Gospel which is the Spirit of Christ promised and given in the Gospel is a Spirit of comfort and confidence a Spirit of Adoption which manifests the special love of God in Christ our Justification Reconciliation and gives us power to keep the Covenant Some understand it to be called the Spirit of Grace because he is given out of Grace and free Mercy Others think that this Name is given to this Spirit because by it God gives us Grace For by Grace they understand those spiritual and supernatural Graces which sanctify the Soul and dispose it for communion with God and all those supernatural comforts which issue from that Communion And it 's very true that as God by this Spirit works all things so especially by him he produceth these heavenly Virtues which tend so much unto eternal life 3. They do despite unto this Spirit In this despight there are Injury Reproach Contempt and the greater the Person to whom the despite is done the more hainous it is This here meant is not done to Man but God because done to that Spirit which is so the Spirit of God that he is God This is committed 1. By resisting the sanctifying Power of God 2. By undoing all that God by his Spirit had done in him for his Salvation 3. By accounting the Gifts Notions Motions of this Spirit the Works Delusions and Impulses of the Devil and that not only in himself but in others sanctified by this Spirit and endued with his Gifts This is the more hainous because done not out of ignorance or infirmity but out of pure malignity of the Will with malice to Christ and de●estation of Christian Religion and all this after upon conviction
Slaughter of the Person to be sacrificed and he trust be offered as a burnt Offering upon the Altar This Offering once consummate would be the total Destruction of Isaac as to this mortal Life and that before he had any Issue Abraham is said to have offered him though he did not consummate and compleat the Oblation For 1. In his heart he had parted with him and given him wholly unto his God and was resolved to slay him and burn his Body upon the Altar So that this Oblation was finished in his heart 2. He proceeded further began really to do what he had resolved came to the place of Offering had prepared the Wood bound Isaac laid him upon the Altar and had lift up his hand to give the fatal blow and had done all the rest of his Work if God by the Voice of his Angel had not instantly staid his hand This was a difficult piece of Service and the more difficult the more excellent his Obedience for it was Isaac his only begotten of Sarah whom he was commanded to offer § 18. The next thing to be considered is his Faith for by Faith he offered Isaac This Faith was high and excellent because having so many difficultie to encounter yet conquered all and became finally victorious so that nothing could stand before it The difficulties may be reduced to two sorts 1. Such as seemed to be contrary to Reason 2. Such as were contrary to dear and tender Affection 1. Reason might doubt whether the Revelation was from God or a delusion of Satan and this was the first debate Yet upon serious consideration he knew assuredly that it was from God and as from him he by Faith receives it 2. But suppose it were from God and as from him he by Faith receivs it 2. But suppose it were from God yet he might scruple whether it was a Command and of absolute Obligation 3. Let it be so He might question the matter of the Command as contrary to an express Law against the Light of Nature and against all Justice and Equity to slay an innocent Person seemed so to be 4. Reason would most of all plead the Promise of God which was to be fulfilled in Isaac and would alledg that if Isaac be slain offered burnt then the Performance would be impossible and God would not prove faithful But Abraham in all these particulars wholly resigned up and sacrificed his reason to the Wisdom of God and by Faith was perswaded that the Commandment was from God was just did absolutely bind him and rested upon God's Almighty Power as able to raise him again out of the Ashes as he created the first man out of the Dust. And he had an Experiment of this Power which in his very Generation and Conception and Birth did above the Power of Nature as it were raise him from the dead according to those words From whence he received him in a Figure whereby is signified that his Generation was a kind of Resurrection from the dead and was very like unto it For his Body when he begot him and Sarah's Womb when she conceived him were in respect of generative Power both dead So that the Knowledg and Experience of God's Almighty Power and his full Assurance of God's fidelity in fulfilling his Promise did wholly silence and refuse the debates of Reason natural and not enlightned 2. As his Reason so his dear and tender Affection not only natural but moral was hardly and sorely put unto it For 1. God did not command him to offer his Bullocks Goats Rams or Lambs but his Son not his Son Ismael but Isaac the Son of his Joy the Son of his Love whom he loved as his own Son as his only Son by Sarah as a dutiful and pious Son as a Son given him extraordinarily from Heaven as the Son of Promise and which is more than all a Son from whom he expected Christ and in whom all the Promises were to be fulfilled To part with a Son with such a Son to have him slain to slay him himself and embrue his hands in the innocent Blood of so dearly beloved a Child whom he prized above any thing in the World for whose life he would have given his greatest Estate in whose Person so many of his Comforts were treasured up was grievous to Flesh and Blood and a Service and Work above the Power of Nature yet Faith was strong and overcame his Affection By this Act of Obedience we learn that Faith is a rare vertue and a great gift from Heaven that when God requires hard and difficult things from us as to forsake Father Mother all our dearest Relations Life it self and to bear the Cross we must deny our Reason and our Affections and resign our selvs wholly up to God's Wisdom and Will and the more we love our God the more we love our selvs in God This Isaac in this particular was a lively Type of Christ whom God gave for us For Christ was the only begotten and the dearly beloved Son of God better than all the World yet God to manifest his Love unto us sent him into the World and made Him a Burnt-Offering for us And he suffered most cruel pains was slain indeed and suffered a cruel and ignominious death In this Example which we are all bound to follow we may observe God's great Mercy unto Abraham in that he put him not to this hard Trial till his Faith was highly improved and was taught to love nothing above his God § 19. The Apostle observing the Order of time descends from Abraham to Isaac of whom it 's written thus Ver. 20. By Faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau concerning things to come BEfore I enter upon the Example I will put you in mind of some things only hinted and darkly implyed or not mentioned formerly As 1. Though God commanded Isaac to be sacrificed upon which Sacrifice and burnt-Offering once consummate the Performance of God's Promise seemed impossible yet God did fulfil in Isaac what he promised in that manner that the Command was no wayes contrary nor prejudicial to the Performance of the Promise 2. That though Abraham thought that the raising of Isaac from the dead might he a way for God to shew his faithfulness yet that was not God's way but another for when Abraham was ready to give the fatal and mortal blow God stayed his hand prevented his death and saved his Life Yet this was till that very moment concealed from Abraham that he might fully try him and manifest his total Resignation of himself to God 3. That though Abraham was willing yea resolved and ready to sacrifice his Son and for this was highly accepted of God yet this doth no wayes warrant or justify such as sacrificed their Children or were ready to offer the fruit of their Body for the Sin of their Soul For 1. They had no Commandment or Warrant from God as Abraham had 2. They offered their Children to Idols and
uncloathed and divested of their Bodies Yet there were Millions upon Millions of separated Souls before their times and many of these the Souls of men dying in their Sins but these were the Souls and Spirits of just men who in their mortal Life upon Earth were upright walked with their God and endeavoured an universal Obedience yet they were not perfectly righteous in themselvs but were justified sanctified and cleansed from all Sin by their Faith in Christ before they departed this World For they were the Spirits of Patriarchs Prophets Martyrs and the Saints of God who lived in former times which were made perfect To be made perfect is to be washed in the Blood of Christ and consecrated as many in this Life are yet these had finished their time of Consecration and were made capable of a nearer Communion with God than we Mortals are Though these were removed out of the Church Militant yet they had not attained an Estate of full Perfection for they had not received their full Reward though they were secure of it as of the Resurrection of their Bodies and were nearer unto God and eternal Bliss than we on Earth can be These were the Spirits of just men made perfect and to these the believing Hebrews were come For wheresoever or howsoever God had disposed of them yet they were within the Verges of his Kingdom and not only in but of this society and fellow-Members of the same Body They were come unto them though not in the same place with them and must expect to be by Death removed and more nearly associated with them when the time of their Consecration should be finished and then they should be freed from all Sin and Temptation and their condition would be comfortable and most certain Our Converse with Saints departed is very little or none though some Communion there is between them and us living upon Earth We and they have the same God and Sovereign the same Head Jesus Christ the same Charity the same desire and hope of Resurrection § 22. They were also come Ver. 24. To Jesus the Mediator of the new Covenant and to the Blood of Sprinkling that speaketh better things than that of Abel THis Text informs us 1. That Jesus is the Mediatour of the New Covenant by his Blood 2. This Blood of Sprinkling speaks better things than that of Abel 3. They were come to this Mediatour and this Blood of Sprinkling 1. Christ is the Mediatour of the New Covenant by his Blood Of this Covenant and of Christ the Mediatour of it you have formerly heard Chap. 8. 6. Cap. 9. 15. It 's written that the Law was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator Gal. 3. 19. This Mediatour was Moses who 1. Signifies the mind of God to Israel in his stipulation of Subjection and Obedience and his Promise to be their God and make them his peculiar People and return the Promise and Restipulation of that People unto God Exod. 19. 5. 6 7 8. 2. He confirms this Covenant by sprinkling of the Blood of the Sacrifice Exod. 24. 34 5 6 7 8. In this he was a Type of Christ who is the Mediatour of the new and better Covenant to procure it confirm it make it effectual Some inform us that he procure it by his Blood and Sacrifice satisfying God's Justice and meriting his Mercy for sinful Man He makes it effectual 1. By proposing it unto Man and pressing the keeping of it upon powerful Motives and this is done by the Word of the Gospel 2. He enables Man by the Spirit to keep it 3. Upon his keeping of it by his Repentance and Faith he makes Intercession for Man repenting and believing and obtains Pardon of his Sins and Defects and Acceptation of his endeavours and in the End he as a Judg gives Possession of eternal Life So that after once the Covenant is procured by his Blood as a Prophet he proposeth and declareth it as a Priest he makes Intercession as a King and Judg he gives Possession Yet according to the Scripture Christ is a Mediatour in proper and more strict sense as a Priest and his Blood and Death is the Foundation of this Covenant for all the Promises thereof are made for and in consideration of this Blood and Death without which there is no Expiation of Sin or hope of Pardon And though the Promises were made from the beginning and that upon condition of Faith in his Blood yet they had been vain and unprofitable to Man if Christ in fulness of time had not shed his Blood and by his Death made this Covenant firm and unalterable for ever And as this Blood satisfying divine Justice and meriting his favour and all Mercies necessary for our happiness is the Foundation of this Covenant so this Blood by Christ's Intercession sprinkled upon our Souls makes this Covenant effectual So that as this Blood being shed procures and confirms this Covenant in it self so this Blood pleades before the Throne of Grace in our behalf confirms this Covenant to us and makes it effectual to our Salvation Therefore though Christ as a Prophet and a King may do something about this Covenant yet it mainly depends upon Christ as a Priest and as a Priest he is a Mediatour Take away this Blood shed and there is no Covenant take away the pleading of this Blood before the Judgment-Seat of God and there is no efficacy of this Covenant to us in particular And here as we must distinguish of this Blood as shed as pleaded and as sprinkled so we must of this Covenant as procured as made as confirmed as likewise of it as kept and as made effectual unto us In all these respects it depends upon Christ as a Priest and upon his Blood and by and in respect of this Blood he is a Mediatour And it is further to be observed that a Mediatour is one that deals and acts between two Parties and is distinct from both at least so to be considered The Parties here are God and sinful Man Christ as a Priest is different from both for though he agrees with both yet in this business he is neither The End of this Mediation is Reconciliation of God and Man of the Sovereign offended and the Subject offending God offended will not hear of Reconciliation but upon certain terms as the satisfaction of his Justice by Blood the Repentance of Man offending casting himself wholly upon his Mercy and the Intercession of a just Party which had shed his Blood for Sins Christ therefore being the Word made Flesh offers his pure and unspotted Blood in behalf of Man to satisfy Justice and this Blood is accepted he makes Intercession for Man repenting and relying upon this Blood and God's Mercy and so the Reconciliation is made and the Covenant proves effectuall on both sides and that by vertue of a Mediatour coming between God angry and Man guilty and interposing between Man repenting and God sollicited by this
High-Priest ascended into Heaven 2. This Blood of Sprinkling speaketh better things thau the Blood of Abel This Blood is the Blood of Christ and the End and so the principal Effect is to cleanse away Sin yet this it cannot do except it be first shed and then sprinkled Once shed it hath a cleansing Power and Vertue yet actually cleanseth and purifieth no man till it be sprinkled upon him The Blood of sprinkling is Blood to be sprinkled and it is to be sprinkled upon the unclean to make clean and therefore the Blood of Sprinkling is by a Metonymy cleansing and purifying Blood Yet there was a sprinkling of Blood in the Sanction and Confirmation of the Old Covenant and so Blood of Sprinkling here may be the Blood of Confirmation for as you heard Chap. 9. 16 17. a Testament is of force after men are dead so upon and by the death of Christ the new Covenant was made firm valid and in full force and power for that end God intended it If Christ had not dyed God might have abrogated or altered his Covenant but upon his death he was bound to stand to it for ever and the Title to the heavenly Inh●r●tance is good to all such as observe the terms and conditions yet in this Expression it is very probable the Apostle alludes to the Legal Purifications by Water Ashes Blood which being sprinkled upon such as were Legally unclean or upon the Lepers did purify them The like Effect Christ's Blood hath upon all such as are capable of it therefore do we read that the Blood of Christ doth cleanse us from all Sin 1 Joh. 1. 7. and to cleanse is to forgive to be cleansed is to be pardoned as is implyed in that Text If we confess our Sins he is faithfull and just to forgive us our Sins and to cleanse us from all Unrighteousness Ver. 9. This Blood is sprinkled upon such as confess repent believe pray receive the Sacraments The means of sprinkling is the Word Sacraments and principally the Spirit or whatsoever worketh or increaseth and strengthneth Faith and then it 's sprinkled when it 's so applyed as that the Person receiveth the benefit of Christ's Passion one Effect and the principal is Remission of Sin and Sanctification whereby we are freed from Sin and the woful Consequents thereof for this Blood speaketh better things than that of Abel Abel's Blood was shed so was Christ's Abel's Blood shed speaketh so Christ's Blood shed speaketh Abel's Blood speaketh to God so Christ's speaketh to him likewise they both speak loud and cry so that God hears Abel's Blood was precious Christ's far more precious and the Cry of both is heard in Heaven Thus far they agree yet differ much for the one cryes for Mercy the other for Judgment the one cryes against Man that did shed it the other for Man though his Sins did cause it to be shed The meaning is that Cain's Murther of his Brother Abel did so much offend God that it moved him to revenge it Christ's death as caused by the cursed cruel impenitent Jews did so far provoke God that he fearfully punished them and their Children according to their own words Let his Blood be upon us and our Children yet as suffered for the Sin of Man and offered unto God it was so pleasing so precious and so highly accepted that for and in condsieration of it God was effectually moved both to reward him and pardon all penitent and believing Sinners and that for evermore This Blood spake when it was shed and speaks effectually when pleaded before the eternal Judg. 3. They were come to this Mediator to this Blood They were not come to the Mount of Fire Smoak Darkness Terrour Death where there was no Mediator to make their peace with God no blood to cry for Metcy and cleanse them from their Sin and free them from eternal Death But they were come into that Society where Christ was their Mediator and Priest where they were freed from the Law of Sin and Death and under the Covenant of Free Mercy Grace and Life where the Blood of Christ sprinkled upon their Souls did cry aloud to Heaven for Mercy and did cleanse them from all Sin for ever And now since they were received into an heavenly Society where Angels and the best of men both living and dead were their fellow-Subjects God Redeemer sitting in the Throne of Grace their Soveraign Christ the Son of God their Priest who shed his Blood to wash away their Sins and though they had many Offences yet upon their Repentance would make Reconciliation for them and though they had many failings yet he was a righteous Advocate with their Father and would plead their Cause with his own Blood procure their pardon according to the Covenant of Grace so that they should be justified and live for ever there was no Reason in the World to return to Sinai and the Law again and forsake the best and happiest Kingdom that ever was a Kingdom of eternal Righteousness and Peace If they did Heaven might be astonished and Earth amazed at their Folly In this with that which follows the Apostle seems to sum up briefly in a few words all the former Arguments taken from the excellency of the Prophetical Office of the Covenant of the Priest-hood of Christ and he doth this in that manner that he clearly takes away all colour of excuse from such as should incline to Apostacy § 23. Therefore he further argues thus Ver. 25. See that ye refuse not him that speaketh for if they escaped not who refused him that spake on Earth much more shall not we escape if we turn away from him that speaketh from Heaven THE words are a Dehortation wherein we have 1. The Sin dehorted from 2. The Reason why we should take heed of it 1. The Sin is to refuse him that speaketh 2. The Reason is taken from the greater Punishment to be suffered if they do refuse 1. To refuse him that speaketh implyes 1. That Christ doth speak and God by him To speak is not only to reveal the Doctrine of the Gospel which is the thing spoken but also to command Repentance and Faith in Christ with a Promise of Righteousness and eternal Life and a Commination of eternal Death unavoidable To refuse him that thus speaketh is either to reject this Doctrine and not receive it or if they have once received it to renounce it so that this Refusal includes both Unbelief and also Apostacy from the Christian Profession But they who had made Profession of this Doctrine must not refuse to continue in it nor renounce it to the dishonour and Contempt of God who out of greatest Mercy had tendred Salvation upon fairest terms 2. The Reason is taken from the hainousness of the Sin and the grievousness of the Punishment both which are set forth by a Comparison in Quantity And this Comparison presupposeth many things as 1. That God did speak in former times