Selected quad for the lemma: virtue_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
virtue_n	blood_n	sacrifice_n	shed_v	848	5	10.4950	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A13884	Vindiciæ Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ: or A iustification of the religion now professed in England VVherein it is prooued to be the same which was taught by our Sauiour Iesus Christ, and by his holy Apostles; written for their vse that haue desired such proofe. By W.T.	Travers, Walter, 1547 or 8-1635.; A. B.; Travers, Walter, d. 1646, attributed name.	1630 (1630)	STC 24188; ESTC S118507	48,208	86

reall body of Christ which being flesh and bones it followeth by their Doctrine that there is no bread left in the Sacrament as it is ministred by them which errours of the reall and bodily presence and of the change and transubstantiation of the bread into the flesh of Christ are conuicted to be most absurd and erroneous both by the Scriptures and by common sence and reason For the Scripture euen after the consecration and setting apart of the bread to that sacred and holy vse to bee a Sacrament of the Lords Body doth often call it bread as it appeareth in the first Epistle to the Corinthians Chap. 11. where it is said The Bread that wee breake is it not the Communion of the body of Christ Pillip 2.6.7 Heb. 4.15 And in the Chap. 11. As oft as yee shall eate of this bread and after diuers times This appeareth also in that the Scriptures teach that Christ became Man hauing the true nature of man like to vs in all things sinne only excepted Which prooueth that his body cannot bee in the small compasse of a wafer cake hauing the dimensions and measures of length breadth and thicknesse which other mens bodyes haue And whereas it is pretended to bee so by miracle this is disproued two waies First in that the Scriptures which make expresse mention of Christs miracles doe neuer make mention nor obseruation of any miracle to haue bene done by him in this changing bread into his body Secondly the Scriptures making mention of any miraculous change of one substance into another doe declare that the change hath beene such as was to bee iudged discerned and perceiued by all meanes of vnderstanding both of sence and reason As for example when Christ changed water into wine Iohn 2.9 10 11. the wine was perceiued to be wine by the sight and tast so discerning of it But in this case neither doth the eye see any flesh nor the tast discerne of any but contrariwise that the bread remaineth bread still in substance appeareth by the sight smelling sauour and the taste thereof by the effect of nourishing by the place where it is on earth and by the accidents of whitenesse smalnesse roundnesse and by that it becometh in time to bee subiect to bee mouldy and that it may bee eaten by Mice and Vermine But it is most false erronious and blasphemous to affirme that the body of Christ which is most glorious in heauen can bee subiect to any of these accidents Besides how great is that blasphemy whereby it is said vnder pretence of this transubstantiation that the Priest is the Creator of his Creator maker of his maker But it would aske a long time to lay out the arguments reasons that confute this absurd damnable error and this labour is already partly bestowed in answer to another question of this kinde Therefore thus much may heere suffice to shew that by the errour of transubstantiation there is not left any bread vpon the Lords table by them that affi●me the bread to bee changed into flesh and therefore that this part of the Sacrament is wanting in the Masse Now for the other the same may bee said concerning the wine which they doe likewise teach to bee turne● into the very blood of Christ But it appeareth also further in that they haue sacrilegiously robbed the Lords table of that blessed cup that belongeth to it For although they suff●r the Priest to drinke of the cuppe and the people also to drinke wine yet the wine that they giue the people is not consecrated nor any part of the Sacrament Therefore in such administration is committed a sacrilegious abuse in robbing the Lords table and his people of the cuppe of blessing which is the communion as the Apostle Paul speaketh of the blood of Christ and contr●riwise our administration of the Lord Supper in both kinds of bread and wine is according to the Doctrine practice and commandement of our Sauiour Christ and of his Apostles Furthermore as by this meanes the Sea of Rome hath abolished both parts of the Sacrament so hath it peruerted the right end and vse for which it was instituted For t●at being as hath beene declared and as it is made knowne to the people in our administration of it to bee a S●cram●nt whereby wee celebrate the memory of the death of Christ for our sinnes to the signing and confirming vnto vs our spirituall communion with him to the participation of all his giftes euen to life euerlasting The Church of Rome hath transfigured this Sacrament into a sacrifice propitiatory for the sinnes of the liuing and of the dead And to this end they haue brought into the Church of Christ contrary to his word a Priest and an Altar that nothing might bee wanting to the offering of their sacrifice In which sacrifice they teach that the Priest doth off●r Christ euery day vnto his Father as a sacrifice to take away sinnes Of which propitiatory Sacrifice our Sauiour Christ his Apostles haue made no mention at all but onely of a commemoration of the death of Christ in the celebration whereof wee magnifie God and our Sauiour for such vnspeakeable mercy and goodnesse and so offer as it were a Sacrifice of thanksgiuing pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ Iesus But of offering a sacrifice propitiatory to take away our sinnes and that daily and by the Priest there is no word in the Scripture for it Contrariwise the Scriptures teach directly the contrary and declare this Doctrine to bee full of errour and Blasphemy For the Scriptures teach vs that there is but one only Sacrifice that taketh away the sinnes of men which is that holy Sacrifice which our Sauiour Christ offered of himselfe that is of his humane nature assumed for that purpose and that by his eternall Spirit and that also once for all Heb. 9.14.25 26 28. namely dying vpon the Altar of the crosse and by the Sacrifice so offered he hath obtained an euerlasting redemption Wherefore to affirme that the Priest offereth Christ daily in Sacrifice for sinnes derogateth highly from the death of Christ wh reby the sinnes of the faithfull are taken away as if that had not beene sufficient contrary to the whole course of the Scripture attributing our redemption to his death and blood shed vpon the Crosse Secondly This Doctrine highly derogateth from the vertue of the death of Christ in that it teacheth that Christ must bee daily offered for sinne whereas the Scriptures teach expresly the contrary saying that Christ was to dye but once Rom. 3.24 25. Rom 5.8.9 Gal. 2.14 Heb. 9.25 and to be off●red but once and so to enter into heauen and not as the High-Priest in the Law once euery yeare offered sacrifice and so entered into the holy place For then as the Apostle there teacheth he should haue suffered often since the beginning of the world But now saith he in the end and consummation of