the Term of the Holy Trinity in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England France and Ireland the 7th and of Scotland the 42 d. Rott 3642. It is contained thus Somers ss It was commanded to the Sherriff Whereas of the grievous Complaint of Owen Bray of Cobham in the County aforesaid Gent. to the Lord the King grievously complaining It was shewed That whereas John Drury Doctor of Law in the Court of the Lord the King of the Bench here That is to say In the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King of England the 5th before the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Bench aforesaid here that is to say at Westminster by Judgement of the said Court had recovered against the said Owen as well a certain debt of 200. pounds as 33. shillings 4. pence which to the said John in the Court aforesaid of the said Lord the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of the said debt whereof he is convicted And whereas also the said Owen for that that he did not come unto the said Court of the Lord the King here to satisfy the aforesaid John of the debt and damages aforesaid was put in exâ—gent in the County of the Lord the King of Sussex to Outlawry and for that occasion afterwards that is to say the 19th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is was Outlawed And notwithstanding the said Owen in execution for the Debt and Damages aforesaid by virtue of a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum thereof to the late Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Surry by Herbert Morley Esq then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Surry at the Sute of the said Iohn was taken and imprisoned And after he was so taken and imprisoned was by the said Sheriff out of the same Prison at large where he would freely and voluntarily suffered to go and from the execution aforesaid was delivered as the said Owen by ways and means convenient was ready to shew Yet the aforesaid Iohn sueth forth Execution of the Debt and Damages aforesaid against him the said Owen by reason of the Recovery aforesaid and endeavoureth and threatneth unjustly him the said Owen to be taken and imprisoned to his no smal Damage Whereupon he had supplicated the Lord the Kings congâ—uous remedy for him to be provided The said Lord the King Willing what is just to be done to the said Owen in this behalf sent to the Justices here That the Complaint of the said Owen in this part being heard and calling before theâ— the Parties aforesaid and other which in this behalf they shall see to be called and their reasons thereof here being heard To the said Owen full and speedy Justice they should cause to be done in this behalf which of right and according to the Law and custom of the Kingdom of the Lord the King of England should be done And that they cause to come here at this day that is to say from the Holy Trinity in 15. dayes the aforesaid Iohn to answer of and upon the premises and further to do and receive what the Court the said Lord the King here shall consider in that behalf And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid Owen by Otho Gayer his Attorny as the aforesaid Iohn by Iohn Nye his Attorny And upon this the said Owen saith That whereas the aforesaid Iohn in the Court of the said Lord the King that now is here that is to say in the Term of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England c. the 5th before Edward Coke Kut and his Companions then Justices of the said Lord the King of the same Bench here that is to say at VVestminster by the consideration of the said Court recovered against the said Owen as well the aforesaid Debt of 200. pounds as the aforesaid 33. shillings and 4. pence which to the said Iohn in the same Court of the said Lord the King here was adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of detaining the same Debt whereof he is convicted And whereas also the said Owen for that he did not come into the same Court of the said Lord the King here to satisfie the said Iohn of his Debt and Damages he was put in Exigent in the aforesaid County of Sussex to be Outlawed and for that occasion afterwards that is to say the 9th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th was Outlawed upon the said Outlawry the aforesaid Iohn Drury afterwards that is to say in the Term of the Holy Trinity in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid sued forth out of the Court of the Lord the King of the Bench here a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Capias utlagatum against him the said Owen then to the Sherriff of the aforesaid County of S. directed By which Writ the said Lord the King then commanded the said Sherriff of S. that he do not omit for any Liberty within his County but that he take the said Owen Outlawed in the said County of Sussex the said 19th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid At the Sute of the said Iohn Drury of the plea of Debt whereof he is convicted of c. And him safely keep c. So as he have his body before the Justices of the said Lord the King here in the morrow of All Souls then next comming to do receive what the Court of the said Lord the King thereof should consider in that behalf By virtue of which Writ the said Owen afterwards that is to say the 7th day of October in the 6th yeer aforesaid at Guildford in the aforesaid County of Surry by the aforesaid Rob. Morley then being Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Surry was taken and imprisoned And after he was so taken and imprisoned the said Owen by the said Sherriff the same day and yeer c. At Guildford aforesaid out of that Prison at large where he would freely and voluntarily to go was suffered and from the execution aforesaid was delivered And this he is ready to aver Whereupon he prayeth Judgement And that the aforesaid John from having his execution aforesaid by colour of the Judgement aforesaid be barred and that the said Owen thereof be discharged c. And the aforesaid John prayeth licence thereof to imparl here until 8. dayes of St. Michael c. And hath it c. And the same day is given to the aforesaid Owen here c. At which day the plea aforesaid was adjorned by Writ of the Lord the King of Common adjornment
the said Richard Mauser and John Mauser his Son and their Heirs and the Heirs of either of them do at all times hereafter upon request to them or any of them made at the costs and charges of the said William Paynter his Heirs and Assigns make seal deliver acknowledge and do all and every such further reasonable Act and Acts thing and things devise and devises in Law as shall be reasonably devised or required to be done by the said William Paynter his Heirs or Assigns or his or their Counsel learned in the Law for the further assurance surety and sure-making of the aforesaid parcel of Woodland with the appurtenances unto the said William Paynter his Heirs and Assigns That then this present Obligation to be void or otherwise to remain in his force and vertue Which being read and heard The said Richard saith That the said William ought not to have his Action against him because he saith That the aforesaid William from the time of the making of the writing aforesaid untill the day of the bringing of the Original Writ of the said William that is to say the 16th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 24th had held and enjoyed all the said parcell of Wood with the appurtenances called Southwood in the Condition aforesaid above specified kept free of and from all and singular former Bargains sales gifts grants demises rights joyntures dowers rent charges and from all other charges and incumbrances whatsoever had made or suffered to be made by the said Richard Mauser his Heirs or Assigns according to the form and effect of the Endorsment thereof And the said Richard Mauser further saith That after the making of the writing aforesaid and before the day of the bringing of the Original Writ aforesaid That is to say The 10th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th The aforesaid William Paynter at Gillingham in the County of Kent devised in writing a certain writing of Release between the said William Paynter and him the said Richard Mauser and the before said John Mauser and then and there required the said Richard and the said John that they would deliver the said writing as their Deed whereupon the said Richard the said writing at Gillingham aforesaid sealed and delivered as the Deed of the said Richard to the aforesaid William And further the said Richard saith That the said John Son of the said Richard in the condition aforesaid named upon the request of the said William made to the said John to Seal and deliver that writing as his Deed upon the shewing of the said writing of Release so devised because the said John was not lettered and could not read nor discern the contents or matter of the said writing at Gillingham aforesaid then required of the said William Paynter the writing aforesaid to be delivered unto him to shew the same to a man learned who could read the said writing to him so that he upon the reading of the contents of the writing aforesaid might inform himself whether that writing were made according to the Tenor of the Condition aforesaid or not and the said John said then and there That he would Seal and deliver that writing if that writing were according to the Tenor of the Condition aforesaid But the said William then and there refused to deliver to the said John the writing aforesaid to shew to a man learned in the Law who could read the same to the â—aid Iohn By reason of which The said Iohn did not seal nor deliver the writing aforesaid to the said William upon the request of the said William in manner and form aforesaid made And the aforesaid Richard Mauser saith That from the time of the making of the writing aforesaid untill the day of the bringing of the Writ aforesaid there were not any other farther Act or Acts devise or devises by the said William or his Counsel learned devised and required to be done to the aforesaid William Paynter for the further assurance security and sure making of the aforesaid parcell of Wood with the appurtenances by the said Richard Mauser and Iohn Mauser or any of them to the aforesaid William Paynter his Heirs and Assigns according to the form and effect of the Condition aforesaid to be done And this he is ready to averr whereupon he prayeth Judgement if the said William his Action aforesaid against him ought to have And the said William saith That the Plea of the said Richard in manner and form above pleaded is not sufficient in Law to Barr the said William to have his Action aforesaid against the said Richard and that he to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded needeth not by the Law of the Land to Answer and this he is ready to averr Whereupon for default of a sufficient Plea in this party The said William demandeth Judgement and his debt aforesaid together with his damages by occasion of deteining his debt to be adjudged unto him c. And the said Richard for as much as he sufficient matter in Law to barr the aforesaid William of having the Action aforesaid against the said Richard above hath alleged which he is ready to averr And which matter the said William doth not deny nor to the same in any manner Answer but the same averment to admit doth altogether refuse as before he demandeth Judgement and that the said William from his action aforesaid having against him the said Richard be barred c. And because the Justices here will advise of and upon the premises before they give Judgement day is given to the parties aforesaid untill the day after the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement c. Because the said Justices hereof not yet c. At which day here come as well the said William Paynter as the said Richard Mauser by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further advise of and upon the premises before they give Judgement further day is given to the parties aforesaid untill in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement because the said Justices here hereof not yet c. At which day come as well the said William Paynter as the said Richard Mauser by their Attorneys aforesaid and upon this the premises considered and by the Justices here fully understood It seemed to the Justices here That the aforesaid Plea of the said Rich. Mauser above in Barr pleaded is not sufficient in Law the said Rich. as to barr the said Wil. to have his ActioÌ„ aforesaid against the said William Paynter above hath alleged Therefore it is granted that the said William Paynter recover against the said Richard Mauser his debt aforesaid and his damages by occasion of deteining of his debt to 20. pounds to the said William with his assent by the Court here adjudged and the aforesaid Richard in mercy c. Afterwards that is
the Queen that now is the 29th day at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex before Christopher VVray Knight then Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of Pleas before the said Queen holden Assigned by their certain writing Obligatory Sealed with their Seals had granted themselves to be bounden and did acknowledge themselves to owe to the aforesaid Titus by the name of Titus VVestbie Citizen Merchant Taylor of London or to his certain Attorny shewing the said writing his Heirs or Executors in the feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following and if they should make default in the payment of the debt aforesaid Then the said Thomas Smith Edward VVinter and Anthony Bastard they willed and granted that then there should run upon the said Thomas Edward and Anthony and every of them their Heirs and Executors the penalty in the Statute staple of debts for Merchandizes in the same bought to be recovered ordained and provided and whereas also the said Thomas Edward and Anthony the said 440. pound by them in the form aforesaid acknowledged in the Feast aforesaid to the aforesaid Titus had not payed nor any of them had paid By which afterwards that is to say the Eleventh day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Queen that now is the 30th One Iohn Chomley Esquir the Clark of then said Lady the Queen that now is the Recognisance for debts to be recovered according to the form of the Satute in the like case provided deputed by his writing Sealed with his Seal the Recognisance aforesaid in the Chancery of the said Queen that now is at VVestminster aforesaid then being at the request of the said Titus did Certifie And the said Titus thereupon afterwards that is to say the 31th day of August in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid sued forth out of the said Court of Chancery at VVestminster aforesaid then being a certain Writ of the said Lady the Queen to the then Sheriffs of London directed By which Writ reciting Because the aforesaid Thomas Smith Edward VVinter and Anthony Bastard the 20th day of Ianuary in the year of the Reign of the said-Lady the Queen that now is the 29th before Christopher VVray Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of Pleas before the said Queen to be holden assigned did acknowledge themselves to owe to the abovesaid Titus 440. pound which he the same Titus they ought to have paid in the Feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following and the same day of issuing out of this Writ had not payed nor any of them then had paid as was said The said Lady the Queen by the said Writ the then Sheriffs of London commanded That the bodies of the said Thomas Smith Edward VVinter and Anthony Bastard if they were Lay-men to take and in the prison of the said Lady the Queen that now is untill the said Thomas VVestbie of the debt aforesaid of the debt aforesaid safely to be kept and all the Lands and Chattels of the said Thomas Edward and Anthony in the Bailywick of the said Sheriffs by the Oaths of honest and lawful men of their Bailywick they should diligently extend and apprize and seize into the Lands of the said Lady the Queen that the same to the beforesaid Titus untill to him of his debt aforesaid he should be fully satisfied they should make delivery according to the form of the Statute at VVestminster for the like debts to be recovered thereof made unprovided and how the said Sheriffs aforesaid should execute the same they should make known to the said Lady the Queen in her Chancery in 15. dayes of Saint Martin then next coming wheresoever it should then be by their Letters Sealed and that they should have there the said Writ which said Writ the said Thomas VVestbie afterwards and before the said 15. day of Saint Martin that is to say the 8th day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid at London that is to say in the Parish of Christ-Church in the Ward of Farrington within delivered to the said Themas Skinner and Iohn Catcher then being Sheriffs of London in form of Law to be executed And the said Titus further saith That the said Anthony Bastard at the same time of the delivery of the said Writ to the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher as before is said made was a Layman and yet is a Layman And that by virtue of rhe said Writ after and before the Retorn thereof that is to say The said 8th day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid the aforesaid Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher then being Sheriffs of London the aforesaid Anthony Bastard at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid by virtue of the Writ aforesaid took and arrested and the said Anthony in Execution for the said aforesaid 440. pound then and there had according to the exigencie of the said Writ and the said Anthony under the Custody of the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher Sheriffs in execution in the form aforesaid being The said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher Sheriffs The said Anthony Bastard afterwards that is to say the 20th day of October in the 30th year aforesaid at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid from the Custody of the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher Sheriffs at large where he would go did suffer the said Titus of the aforesaid 440. pound not being satisfied Be which Action acrued to the said Titus to require and have of the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher the aforesaid 440. pound for his debt aforesaid by the said Anthony in form aforesaid acknowledged yet the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Gatcher although often requested c. the aforesaid 440. pound to the said Titus have not yet rendred but have hitherto denyed to render the same unto him and do yet deny so to do Whereupon the said Titus saith that he is the worse and hath Damage to the value of 400. pounds and thereof he bringeth his Sute c. And now at this day that is to say Monday next after 8 bh of St. Hillary the self same Term until which day the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher had license to imparle to the said Bill and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the said Titus Westbie by his Attorny aforesaid as the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher by Christopher Rust their Attorny And the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher defend the force and injury when c. And say That they do not owe to the aforesaid Titus the aforesaid 440. pounds or any penny thereof in manner and form as the said Titus above against them delareth And of this
in Execution being The said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher then being Sheriffs of London within written the 8th day of September the 30th year aforesaid by virtue of the Writ aforesaid at London aforesaid took and arrested the within named Anthony Bastard in manner and form as the said Titus within likewise against the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher declared And that the said Anthony Bastard so taken and arrested under the custody of the said Thomas Skinner and John Cacther then Sheriffs of London aforesaid in form aforesaid being The said then Sheriffs of London the said Anthony Bastard in Execution for the aforesaid 440. pounds then and there had according to the Command of the said Writ And moreover the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Anthony Bastard so in custody of the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher for the aforesaid 440. pounds for the aforesaid other Debt of 240. pounds to the said Robert Dighton in form aforesaid being The said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher afterwards that is to say the within written 20th day of October in the 30th year aforesaid in the going out of their Office aforesaid the said Anthony Bastard by Indenture delivered to Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall in Execution for the aforesaid Debt of the said Robert Dighton without any other mention of the said Execution of 440. pounds made to the aforesaid Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall or to any of them given or notified And fuâ—ther the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That then That is to say The 20th day of October in the 30th year aforesaid The said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher from their Office aforesaid were discharged And further the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That after that the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher from their Office aforesaid in form aforesaid were discharged That the said Anthony Bastard without payment of any of the aforesaid Debts in the Custody of the aforesaid Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall in form aforesaid being for the said 240. pounds the said Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall the said Anthony Bastard having none nor any of them ever having any Notice to them or either of them given of the said Execution of the aforesaid 440. pounds at London aforesaid out of the Prison aforesaid suffered to go at large where he would But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found The said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher ought to be charged for the aforesaid said Debt of 440. pounds in Law or not the Jurors aforesaid are altogether ignorant And they pray the Advice of the Court of the said Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being And if it shall seem to the said Court That the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher ought not to be charged for the said 440. pounds in Law upon the whole matter above found The said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Cacther do owe to the said Titus VVestbie the said 440. pounds in manner and form as the said Titus within against them declared And they do also assesse the damages of the said Titus Westbie by occasion of detaining of the said Debt besides his charges and costs by him about his Sute in this part expended to 20. pounds and for his charges and costs to 53. shillings and 4. pence And if it shall seem to the Court aforesaid That the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher do not owe to the said Titus Westbie the said 440. pounds in manner and form as the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher within pleading have alleged c. And because the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here of their Judgement of and upon the premises to be given are not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael for to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plaint aforesaid was Adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Queen at Westminster until the day of St. Michael in a moneth At which day the Plaint aforesaid was further adjorned by another Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Queen until the next of All Souls then next following at the Castle of Hartford in the County of Hartford At which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford came the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady here of their giving of their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford aforesaid untill Tuesday next after 8 th of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. And so from Term to Term until Thursday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement c. cause the Court of the Lady the Queen here c. At which day be-before the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which Seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here all and singular the premises looked into and understood and mature deliberation be thereof had because that it seemes to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here That the said Tho. Skinner and John Catcher ought to be charged for the said 440. pound It is granted That the said Titus Westbie shall recover against the aforesaid Tho. Skinner John Catcher his debt aforesaid his damages aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed as also 10. pound 13. shill and 4. pence for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said Titus by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here with his assent of increase adjudged Which damages in the whole do amount to 33. pounds 6. shillings 8. pence and the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher in mercy c. Afterwards that is to say Upon Monday the 10 th day of February in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37 th The Transcript of the Record and proceedings between in the parties aforesaid with all things touching the same by a certain Writ of the Lady the Queen of Errors correcting by the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher in the premises was brought to the Justices of the Lady of the Queen of the Common Pleas and the Barons of the Exchequer of the Lady the Queen In the Chamber of the Exchequer aforesaid according to the form of a Statute in the Parliament of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster the 23 th day of November in the year of her Reign the 27 th holden and made in the same
done in his behalf command you that if Judgement be thereof given then the Record and Process aforesaid with all things touching the same before our beloved and faitfull Councellor Thomas Egerton Knight Keeper of our Great Seal of England and you you the aforesaid Tresurer in the Chamber of Councel nigh the Exchequer aforesaid called the Councel Chamber upon Tuesday that is to say the 15th day of February next comming cause to come that the same Keeper of our Great Seal and you the aforesaid Tresurer the Record aforesaid seeing and the process aforesaid and hearing your Informations you the aforesaid Barons cause to be done what of right according to the form of the statute aforesaid was to be done Witnesse my self at Westminster the 29th day of January in the yeer of the Reign the 42th Symons And at the aforesaid 5th day of February in the aforesaid Writ mentioned The aforesaid Thomas Egerton Knight Keeper of the Great Seal of England and Thomas Lord Buckhurst Lord Tresurer of England caused to come before them the Record aforesaid in the aforesaid Chamber nigh the Exchequer aforesaid called the Council Chamber And at the same day and place come before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer the aforesaid Attorny of the Lady the Queen and for the said Lady the Queen saith That in the Record and processe and also in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid It is diversly erred in manner and form as by the aforesaid Articles of Errors by him first alleged and assigned above it is alleged And for the said Lady the Queen prayeth another Writ of the Lady the Queen to warn the aforesaid Richard Bushopp to be before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer at a certain day to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid and also the Errors aforesaid c. and it is granted unto him And it is commanded to the Sherif of the County of Worcester That by good and lawful men of his Balywick he warn the said Richard Bushopp that he be before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster the first Tuesday in the Term of Easter next following to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid as also the Errors aforesaid above alleged and further c. What to the Court c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid the Sherif of the County of Worcester aforesaid that is to say William Childe Esquire Retorned the Writ aforesaid endorced thus ss By virtue of this Writ to me directed I gave warning to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by John Jolley John Harris Thomas Penington and John Wemb good and lawful men of my Balywick to be before the said Keeper of the Great Seal at the day and place within contained as within to me is commanded And upon this the aforesaid Richard Bushop by Arthur Salway his Attorny at the same day in the Chamber aforesaid likewise cometh and demands the hearing of the Record and Processe as also of the Errors aforesaid and they are read unto him c. Which being read and heard the said Richard saith That in the Record and processe aforesaid in nothing it is erred And prayeth That the aforesaid Lord proceed to the Examination aswel of the Record and Processe aforesaid as of the businesse aforesaid for Errors by the said Attorny of the said Lady the Queen above alleged according to the form of the aforesaid Statute thereof made And the aforesaid Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen saith as before he had said and prayeth likewise c. And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday next to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the said Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday to hear their Judgment thereof c. At which day before the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at VVestminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer are not yet a vised of the giving of their Judgment of and upon the premises further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid until the first Tuesday in the Term of Holy Trinity then next comming to hear Judgement thereof At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the third day of June the same Term of Holy Trinity to hear Judgment thereof At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Gâ—eat Seal and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the Premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday the 10th day of June next the same Term of the Holy Trinity to hear their their Judgment thereof At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh Rchard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid And upon this the premises being seen by the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England and the aforesaid Tresurer and mature deliberation thereof amongst them being had and taking to them the aforesaid John Popham Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen for Pleas before the Queen her self to be holden assigned and Edmond Anderson Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench as also of Francis Gawdy one of the Justices to Pleas before the aforesaid Lady the Queen to be
Court the very same Term in his proper person And the aforesaid David Howell although he be then sollemnly called doth not come back but in despight of the Court departeth and maketh default wherefore then it was granted in the said Court here That the said Roger should recover his seisin against the aforesaid David Bulward and Robert Ham of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances and that the said David Bulward Robert Ham should have of the Lands of the aforesaid William Cary to the value c. And that the said David Howell should be thereof in mercy c. Upon which the aforesaid Roger then in the same Court demanded the Writ of the Lady the Queen to have to him full seisia and possession of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid to the Sheriff of the County aforesaid to be directed and to him it was granted retorunable here in the morrow of the Holy Trinity then next following At which day here cometh the aforesaid Roger in his proper person and the then Sheriff of the County of Suffolk The aforesaid Philip Tilney Esquire then sent here That he by virtue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed the 16th day of May then last past gave to the aforesaid Roger seisin of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances as by the said Writ to him it was Commanded c. Which Fine in the Barr of the aforesaid Agnes above specified in form aforesaid levyed and the Recovery aforesaid in form aforesaid had were levyed and had To the use of the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes for the Term of their lives and the longer liver of them and after the decease of them the said Iohn Gardiner and Agnes to the use of the said William Cary and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten By virtue of which Fine and Recovery in form aforesaid had and by force of the aforesaid Act of transferring of uses in possession The aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes were seised of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in their demesn as of Freehold for the term of the lives of the said Iohn and Agnes and the longer liver of them the remainder thereof after the death of the aforesaid Iohn and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten expectant and the said Iohn Gardiner and Agnes so thereof being seised the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid William Cary in form aforesaid expectant The aforesaid Fine in the Conusans of the said William Bredon and Iohn Bredon above specified in form aforesaid was levyed in the aforesaid Court of the said Lady the Queen here from the aforesaid day of Easter in 15. dayes in the 32th year aforesaid before the aforesaid then Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid here Between the aforesaid Io. Higham and Thomas Turner Plaintiffs and the aforesaid VVilliam Cary and Martha and the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes deforceants of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. And the aforesaid Iohn Higham and Thomas by the same Fine granted to the said Martha the aforesaid annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound to be issuing of him the aforesaid Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. And the same to her in the said Court here in form aforesaid Rendred To have and to hold the same Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound to the aforesaid Martha at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by even portions yeerly to be paid all the life time of the said Martha if the aforesaid John Cardiner and Agnes the first payment thereof to Martha if the aforesaid J. Gardiner Agnes or either of them should so long live the first paymēt therof to begin at the Feast of the Feasts aforesaid next after the decease of the aforesaid VVil. Cary should first happen to be with the aforesaid clause of distress in the Fine mētioned And the aforesaid VVil. Cary afterwards that is to say the 24th day of March in the yeer 35th aforesaid at Stow-market aforesaid dyed After whose death by virtue of the Fine aforesaid The aforesaid Martha was and as yet is seized of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40 p. in her demesn as of Freehold for Term of her life if the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes or either of them shall so long live And this they are ready to aver Wherefore they demand Judgement and Retorn of their Cattel aforesaid together with their damages to be to them adjudged c. And the aforesaid Agnes as at first saith That the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee and he the said Iohn so thereof being seized the Fine aforesaid in the Conusance of the aforesaid William Bredon and Iohn Bredon first above mentioned was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Queen here in the aforesaid 8. dayes of Saint Michael in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th abovesaid before the aforesaid then Justices and others the said Lady the Queens faithful people then there present Between the aforesaid Edmond Cary Knight and Robert Cary Esquire Plaintiffs and the aforesaid William Cary Esquire Iohn Gardiner and her the said Agnes now Plaintiff then the Wife of the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and the aforesaid George Totty and Elizabeth his Wife Deforceants of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenancs whereof c. And of the aforesaid Tenements and Rents with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Fine in the Conusance aforesaid first mentioned And that the said Fine in form aforesaid levied was had and levied To the use of the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner anc her the said Agnes for the Term of their lives and the longer liver of them and after the decease of the aforesaid Iohn and Agnes To the use of the aforesaid VVilliam Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of Robert Cary Knight and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of the aforesaid Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever By virtue of which Fine and by force of the aforesaid Statute of transferring uses into possession holden and made The aforesaid Iohn and Agnes were seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in their demesn as of Freehold for the Term of the lives of them the said Iohn and Agnes and the longer liver of them the Remainder thereof after the death of them the said Iohn and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid
maintain Or them the said William and John from the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. justly acknowledged to bar as the aforesaid William and John above have alleged Therefore it is granted that the aforesaid Agnes take nothing by her Writ aforesaid but be in mercy for her false claim And the aforesaid William and John go thereof without day c. And that they have retorn of the Cattel aforesaid to be holden to them irreplegiable for ever And how c. the Sheriff make it appear from the day of Easter 15. dayes c. And it is also granted That the said William and John ought to recover their damages by the occasion aforesaid against the aforesaid Agnes But because it is not known what damages the said VVilliam and John have sustained by that occasion It is commanded the Sheriff that by the Oaths of good and lawful men of the County aforesaid he diligently enquire what damages the said VVilliam and John have sustained aswel by occasion of the premises as their costs and charges by them about their Sute in this behalf expended And the Enquiry which c. They send here at the aforesaid Term under Seal c. and the Seals c. At which day here come the a-aforesaid VVilliam Bredon and John Bredon By their Attorny aforesaid And the Sheriff therof did nothing nor sent the Writ thereoâ— Therefore that an other Writ be made in form aforesaid retornable here from the day of Holy Trinity 15. dayes At which day here came the aforesaid VVilliam and John by their Attorny aforesaid And the Sheriff that is say Thomas Edon Esquire now sent That before the comming of the Writ aforesaid The Cattel aforesaid were esloyned out of his Balywick to places to him unknown By which the Cattel aforesaid to the said VVilliam and John he could not retorn as to him it was commanded Also the same Sheriff sent here a certain Inquision taken before him at Bury Saint Edmonds in the County aforesaid the 30th day of May last past by the Oaths of 12. men c. by virtue of the Writ aforesaid taken by which it is â—ound That the a-aforesaid VVilliam and John sustained damages by the occasion aforesaid above their costs and charge by them about their Sute in this behalf put unto 5. ponnd And for their costs and charges to 10. shillings Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff That of the other Caâ—tel of the aforesaid Agnes to the value of the Cattel aforesaid first taken he take in Withernam and them to the aforesaid William and John without delay he do deliver to be deteined to them until the Cattel aforesaid first taken were retorned And how c. that he make it appear here in 8. dayes of St. Michael c. And also that the aforesaid Agnes be attached that she be here at the aforesaid Term to answer aswel to the Lady the Queen of her Contempt aforesaid as to the aforesaid VVilliam and John of the damages and injuries to them in this behalf offered c. And also it is granted That the aforesaid William and John recover against the aforesaid Agnes their damages aforesaid to 5. pound and 10. shillings by the Enquiry aforesaid in form aforesaid found as also 2â— pound 3. shillings and 4. pence to them the said William and John at their requests for their Costs and Charges by the Court here of Encrease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 26. pound 13. shillings and 4. pence Replevin Hillary Term Anno 35 Eliz. Rot. 498. in the KINGS-BENCH C. 1. part Ann Mayowes Case Fol. 141. Kent GEorge Mason and Francis Easterley were Attached by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Second Deliverance to Answer to John Kettel of a Plea wherefore they took the Cattel of the said John and them unjustly deteined against Gages Pledges c. And whereupon the said Joh. Kettel by Edward Willan his Attorny complaineth That the aforesaid George and Francis the 18th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 33th at Sutton Atthone in the County aforesaid in a certain place there called Abrahams Land took Cattel that is to say 7. Cowes and One Bull of the said John and them un justly deteined against Gages and Pledges until c. Whereupon the said John Kettel saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 30. pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterley by Michael Low their Attorny come and deâ—end the force and injury when c. And justly c. Because they say That the aforesaid Plea in which it is supposed the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to have been done doth contein and at the time of the taking aforesaid above supposed to be done did contein in it self by Estimation 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Sutton Atthone aforesaid and that long before the aforesaid time in which c. One Dionisius Mayow Gentleman was of the aforesaid place in which c. amongst other seized in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized The same Dionisius afterwards that is to say before the time of the taking aforesaid above supposed to be done that is to say The 30th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said â—ady the Queen that now is the 19th at Sutton Atthone aforesaid by his Writing sealed with his Seal and to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is brought bearing date the same day and yeer gave and granted to the aforesaid Ann by the name of Ann Maxey of Chigwell in the County of Essex One Annuity or yeerly Rent of 20. pound of lawful Mony of England to be issuing out of the aforesaid place in which c. Amongst other by the names of all Lands and Tenements of him the said Dionisius in Sutton Atthone aforesaid and in Willington in the aforesaid County of Kent To have and perceive the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 20. pound aforesaid to the aforesaid Ann and her Assignes for the time of the natural life of her the said Ann at the Feast of the blessed Lady Mary the Virgin St. Michael the Archangel by equal portions yeerly to be perceived And if it should happen the aforesaid yeerly Rent or Annuity of 20. pound at any Feast of payment in which it is said ought to be paid within 40. dayes after any Feast of the Feasts in part or in whole be behind and not paid that then it be lawful to the aforesaid Ann or her Assignes in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to enter and distrein and the distresses there found or taken to carry away lead and drive and with her to keep until of the whole aforesaid yeerly Rent or Annuity together with all the Arrerages thereof if any should be to her she
be to him adjudged c. And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties c. REPLEVIN Trinity Term Anno 6 to of King James Rot. 1611. in the COMMON-PLEAS C. 9. part Henry Conneys Case BArtholmew Colpit was summoned to answer to Iohn Crane of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of the said John and them deteined against Gages and Pledges and whereupon The said Iohn by Thomas Ganton his Attorney complaineth that the aforesaid Bartholmew the 19th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 5th at Fidde St Giles in a certain place there conteining in it two Acres of Pasture the Cattel that is to say 3. Steers of the said Iohn c. them unjustly deteined against Gages Pledges untill c. whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Bartholmew by William Dany his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury c. and as Bayliff to Iohn Welby Esquire doth well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the place in which c. and justly c. Because he saith that the said place in which it is supposed the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to be done doth contein aforesaid time in which it is supposed the aforesaid taking to be done did contein in it self 2. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in Fidde Saint Giles aforesaid lying there in a certain Field called South graftfield neer the Lands foot of Richard Welby Gent. sometimes Richard Delaland on the part of the North and the Kirkland on the part of the West and that one Henry Conny Esquire before the time in which was seised of the aforesaid 2. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and held the same of one William Stermin Esquire as of his Manor of Richards with the Appurtenances in Tidde St. Giles aforesaid by Fealty and the Rent of 13d yeerly at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel to be paid as also by the Service of doing Sute at the Court of the said William Stermin of his Manor aforesaid from 3. weeks to 3. weeks upon seasonable warning at the Manor aforesaid to be holden Of which Services the said William Stermin was seised by the hands of the aforesaid Henry Conny as by the hands of his very Tenant that is to say Of the Fealty and Sute of Court aforesaid as of Fee and Right and of the Rent aforesaid in his demesn as of Fee Of which Manor with the Appurtenances the aforesaid William Stermin was seised in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised the aforesaid William Stermin before the time in which c. Of the aforesaid Manor with the Appurtenances the aforesaid John Welby enfeoffed To have and to hold to the said Joh. Welby his Heirs Assigns for ever To which Feoffment by the aforesaid VVilliam Stermin to the aforesaid John VVelby in form aforesaid made the aforesaid Henry Conny afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of Lord the King that now is the first then of the aforesaid two Acres of Lands with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being seised at Fidde St. Giles aforesaid attorned By colour of which Feoffment and attorment aforesaid The said John VVelby was and yet is seised of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and because 40. shillings and 4 pence of the Rent aforesaid for 4. whole yeers was at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 5th and after the Attornment aforesaid in form aforesaid had to the aforesaid John Welby the aforesaid time in which c. behind not paid The said Bartholmew as Bayliff of the aforesa Jo. Welby doth well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which for the aforesaid 4. shillings and 4. pence of the Rent aforesaid so being behind and justly c. as within his Fee and Lordship And the aforesaid John Crane saith That the aforesaid Bartholmew as Bayliff of the said John Welby for the cause above alleged the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which ought not avow to be just Because by Protestation that the aforesaid Henry Conny held not the aforesaid 2. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances of the aforesaid William Stermin as of his Manor of Richards aforesaid by Fealty and the Rent of 13. pence for every yeer at the Feast of Saint Michael to be paid as also by the Service of doing Sute at the Court of the said William Stermin of his Manor aforesaid from 3. Weeks to 3. Weeks upon reasonable warning at that Manor to be holden as the said Bartholmew above hath alleged And for Plea he saith That the aforesaid Henry before the time of the taking aforesaid done at the time of the taking c. was yet is seized of the aforesaid 2. Acres of Pasture with their Appurte in his demesnas of Fee held the same of Martin by Divine Providence then Bishop of â—ly as of his Manor of Fidde St. Giles with the Appurtenances in Fiddy Saint Giles aforesaid by Fealty only for all Services Without that that the aforesaid Henry at Fidde Saint Giles aforesaid to the aforesaid John Welby attorned Tenant in manner and form as the said Bartholmew above hath alleged And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for as much as the aforesaid Bartholmew the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. above acknowledgeth The said John demandeth Judgement and his damages by the occasion of taking of the said Cattel to be to him adjudged c. And the aforesaid Bartholmew as at first saith That the said Henry did attorn Tenant to the aforesaid John Welby in manner and 〈◊〉 as the said Bartholmew above hath alleged And oâ— this puts 〈…〉 lf upâ—â— the Country and the said John likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of the Holy Trinity in 3. Weeks 12. c. By whom c. And who neither c. Because as well c. And afterwards the day and place within conteined before Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and William Daniel Knight one of the Justices of the Lord the King of the Bench aforesaid Justices of the said Lord the King to Assizes in the County of Cambridge to be taken assigned by the â—orm of the Statute c. this turn associated the presence of the aforesaid William Daniel not expected by virtue of the Writ of the said Lord the
King Henry the 8th afterwards at Westminster aforesaid died the said Edward late Prince being the Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th And the said Edward late Prince to the said King Henry the 8th in the aforesaid Kingdom of England by right of Inheritance succeeded and King of the aforesaid Kingdom of England by the name of Edward the 6th King of England came to be And afterwards the said Edward the 6. late King of England at Westminster aforesaid dyed without Heir of his body begotten the Lady Mary late Queen of England being his Sister and heir of the said late King Edward the sixt and the aforesaid Lady Mary to the said late King Edward the sixt in the aforesaid Kingdom of England by right of Inheritance succeeded and became Queen of the aforesaid kingdom of England and afterwards the said Queen Mary at Westminster aforesaid died without heir of her body begotten the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England being Sister and Heir of the aforesaid late Queen Mary the aforresaid Lady Elizabeth to the said late Queen Mary in the aforesaid kingdom of England by right of Inheritance Succeeded and became Queen of the kingdom of England And afterwards the said Queen Elizabeth at Westminster aforesaid dyed without Heir of her Body begotten We then and yet being Cosin and Heir to the said late Queen Elizabeth and we succeeded the late Queen Elizabeth in right of Inheritance in the same Kingdom of England and became and now are King of England and now the most Excellent Prince Henry our Eldest Sonn now Duke of Cornwell hath requested us that whereas the aforesaid Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England by her letters Patents Sealed with the great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the second day of May in the yeer of her Reign the 37th granted at Gellio Merick then Esquire now Knight now deceased and Henry Lindley then Esquire now Knight the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances to have and to hold to them the said Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley and their Heirs for ever as in the Letters Patents thereof more fully it is conteyned And whereas the aforesaid Manors of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph to the aforesaid Dutchy as is said annexed and united to the same now Duke by Colour of the gift grant and union aforesaid by the authority of Parliament aforesaid belonged and yet ought to belong and were member and parcel of the same Dutchy and yet are as the said pious Prince and Duke by waies and means convenient is ready to shew That we would the said Letters Patents aforesaid of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph as before is said made revoke and annull and the said Manors with their appurtenances seize into our hands that we cause the said Manors to the said now Duke as members and parcel of the Dutchy aforesaid to have and to hold according to the form and effect of the guift grant and union aforesaid to be delivered We willing to do in this behalf what is Just Command you that by good and Lawfull men of your Bayliwick you give warning to the aforesaid Henry Lindley Knight and John Hele Knight Serjeant at Law Tenants of the said Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph and also to whosoever other or others are Tenants of the said Mamors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph or any of them that they be before us in our Chancery in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary next coming whensoever it shall be to shew what for us and themselves they have or can say Wherefore the Letters Pattents aforesaid of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the appurtenances as before is said made ought not to be revoked and annulled and the said Manors with the appurtenances into our hands be seised as before is said to the now Duke as members and parcel of the Dutchy aforesaid according to the form and effect of the gift grant and union aforesaid to have and to hold to be delivered and to do and receive what our said Court then and there shall further grant in this behalf Witness my self at Westminster the 18th day of November in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the third and of Scotland the 39th and now at this day that is to say the aforesaid 8 dayes of Saint Hillary before the said Lord the King that now is in his said Court of Chancery here cometh Edward Coke Knight Attorny General of the said Lord the King that now is who prosecuteth in his behalf for the said Lord the King in his proper person And Francis Godolphin Knight being Sheriff of the County of Cornwell now sendth here the Writ aforesaid served executed in form following the 21. day of Dec. in the 3d. yeer aboves by virtue of the writ afores to him directed that he gave warning by Joh. Edgecombe Wal. Blant good Lawfull men of his Bayliwick to the afores Hen. Lindley Kt. and also the same day and yeer by the said good and Lawfull men he gave warning to the aforesaid John Hele Knight and to one Warwick Hele Knight Tenants of the aforesaid Manors of West Taunton Trelowia and Landalph above mentioned to be before the said Lord the King that now is here at this day to shew do and receive what that Writ in it requireth and demands And the aforesaid Henry Lindley Knight John Hele Knight and Warwick He le Knight the 4th day of pleas being called by Richard Wilkinson their Attorny come and pray Licence to Imparl and it is graunted to them c. and upon this day is given to the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele before the said Lord the King in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid until in 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary then next c. wheresoever c that is to say to the aforesaid Henry John and Warwick to imparl and then to answer c. The same day is given to the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight the Atorney General of the Lord the King that now is who c. then to be here c. At which 8. days from the Purification of the blessed Lady Mary before the said Lord the King in the said Court here that is to say at VVestminster aâ—oresaid come as well the aforesaid Edward Coke Knight who c. in his proper person as the aforesaid Henry Lindley John Hele and Warwick Hele by their Attorney aforesaid and upon this the said Henry John and Warwick by their Attorney aforesaid pray farther License thereof to imparl before the said Lord the King that now is in the said Court here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid until in 15. days of Easter then next following c. wheresoever c. and then to answer c. and have it c. and the same
Then he summon by good Summoners the aforesaid Rowland Corbet that he be before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in 8. dayes of the Purification of the Blessed Mary then next following to shew why he had not done it and that the then Sheriff should have then there the summons and that Writ c. At which 8. dayes from the Purification of the Blessed Mary before Edmond Anderson Knight and his Companions then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid cometh as well the aforesaid Robert Greenhurst by Thomas Lane his then Attorny as the aforesaid Rowland in his proper person And Willam Turpin Esquire then Sheriff of the County aforesaid retorned the Writ aforesaid to him in form aforesaid directed in all things served and executed that is to say that the aforesaid Robert Greenhurst found Sureties to him the said Sheriff to prosecute his Writ aforesaid that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo and that the aforesaid Rowland Corbet was summoned by John Den and Richard Fen upon which the aforesaid Robert Greenhurst by his Attorny aforesaid in the same Court here declaring against the aforesaid Rowland upon his Writ aforesaid demanded against the said Rowland Corbet the Manor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the said Writ of Entry specified as his Right and inheritance and in which the said Rowland Corbet had not Entry but after Disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the aforesaid Robert Greenhurst within 30. yeers last past c. And whereupon he said That he himself was seized of the Manor and Tenements aforesaid in the aforesaid Writ of Entry specified in his Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking thereof the profits to the value c. And in which c. And thereof brought Sute c. And the aforesaid Rowland Corbet then defended his Right when c. And then vouched to warranty John Howell who likewise was then present here in Court in his proper person and freely the said Manor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the said Writ of Entry specified to him did warrant And upon this the said Robert Greenhurst then demanded against the said John Howell then Tenant by his warranty the Manor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the said Writ of Entry specified in form aforesaid c. And whereupon he then said That he himself was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Writ of Entry specified in his Demesn as of Fee and Right in time of Peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the Profits thereof to the value c. And in which c. And thereof then brought his Sute c. And the aforesaid John Tenant by his Warranty then defended his Right when c. And then said That the said Hugh Hunt did not disseise the aforesaid Robert Greenhurst of the Manor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Writ of Entry specified as the said Robert by his said Writ and Declaration aforesaid above supposeth And of this puts himself upon the Country c. And the aforesaid Robert then prayed leave to imparl c. And had it c. And afterwards the said Robert retorned back hete in the Court of the Bench aforesaid the self same Term by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid John although he was solemnly called did not come back but in contempt of the Court departed and made default By which then it was granted that the aforesaid Robert Greenhurst should recover his Seisin against the aforesaid Rowland of the Manor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Writ of Entry specified And that the said Rowland Corbet should have of the Lands of the aforesaid John to the value c. And that the said John should be in Mercy c. And upon this The aforesaid Robert demandeth a Writ of the Lady the Queen to the Sheriff of the County aforesaid to be directed to give him full Seisin of the Manor Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the said Writ of Entry mentioned and it is granted to him retornable here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid from the day of Easter 15. dayes then next following c. At which day here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Robert by his Attorny aforesaid and then the Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Leicester That is to say the aforesaid William Turpin then here sent that he by virtue of the Writ to him directed the 25th day of March then last past gave to the said Robert full seisin of the Manor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Writ of Entry specified as by the Writ he was commanded as by the Record and Processe thereof in the Court of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here remaining manifestly appeareth By virtue of which Recovery the aforesaid Robert into the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee And further the said Arthur saith That the Recovery aforesaid in form aforesaid had was to the use and behoof of the said Rowland Corbet and his Heirs for ever And that the said Rowland the aforesaid time of the Recovery aforesaid had or ever after had no issue of his Body lawfully begotten After which Recovery so as before is said had in and to the Disinheriting of the said Arthur of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. And before the aforesaid time in which that is to say the 30th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 36th abovesaid The said Arthur into the aforesaid Manor of Stokefaston with the Appurtenancs whereof c. entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee Tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body lawfully begotten By virtue of the Proviso aforesaid and by force of the aforesaid Act of transferring uses into possession the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant until the aforesaid Rowland the aforesaid time in which c. The Close aforesaid in the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. brake and the grass aforesaid then and there growing with the Cattel aforesaid eat trod and consumed against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is as he above against him complaineth And this he is ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the aforesaid Rowland the Trespass aforesaid above acknowledgeth the said Arthur demandeth Judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespass aforesaid to him to be adjudged c. And the aforesaid Rowland saith That the aforesaid Plea
of the aforesaid Arthur in manner and form aforesaid above by Replication pleaded is not sufficient in Law to maintain the said Arthur to have his Action aforesaid against him and that he to that Replication in form aforesaid pleaded needeth not nor is bound by the Law to Answer And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Replication in this behalf The said Rowland demandeth Judgement and that the aforesaid Arthur from having his Action aforesaid against him be barred c. And the aforesaid Arthur in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to have and maintain his Action aforesaid against the said Rowland above by Replication hath alleged which matter the aforesaid Rowland doth not deny nor to the same any wayes answereth but that averment utterly refuseth to admit as at first demandeth Judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespass aforesaid to him to be adjudged And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the said Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties here until from the day of Faster 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises further day is given to the parties here until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judement thereof Day is given to the parties here in 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day further is given to the parties here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet At which day here cometh as well the said Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this the Plea aforesaid being seen as also the Plea of the aforesaid Arthur above by Replication pleaded and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the same Justices here that that Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded is not sufficient in Law to maintain the said Arthur to have and maintain his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid Rowland Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid Arthur take nothing by his Writ aforesaid but be in Mercy for his false clamour and that the aforesaid Rowland thereof go without day c. Afterwards that is to say the 30th day of Aprill in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 42th The Record and Processe of the Plaint aforesaid with all the same by virtue of a Writ of the said Lady the Queen for Correcting Errors whose date is at Westminster the 12th day of Aprill in the 42th yeer aforesaid to Edmond Anderson Knight directed and the aforesaid Defendant touching before the said Lady the Queen wheresoever c. are sent c. TRESPAS Easter Term Anno 21. ELIZABETH Rot. 58. in the KINGS-BENCH C. 1. part Shelleys Case fol. 88. b. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say in Hillary Term Sussex last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came Nicholas Wolfe by Nicholas Mosley his Attorny And brought in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there his Bill against Henry Shelley Esquire of a Plea of Trespass are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo Ric. Roo which Bill followeth in these words that is to say ss Sussex ss Nicholas Wolfe complaineth of Henry Shelley Esquire in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Lady the Queen her self being of that That he the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is of England the 20th with force and Arms c. The Close and House of him the said Nicholas called Barhamwick otherwise Barhamweek at Augmering in the County aforesaid broke and entred and his grass there to the value of 100. Marks there late growing with certain Cattel that is to say Horses Oxen Cows Hoggs and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said Nicholas 100. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute c And now at this day that is to say Wednesday next after 18. dayes of Easter this Term until which day the said Henry Shelley had leave to the Bill aforesaid to imparl and then to Answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid Nicholas Wolfe by his Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Henry Shelley by Richard Best his Attorny and the said Henry doth defend the force and injury when c. And saith He is not thereof guilty And of this puts himself upon the Country And the said Nicholas likewise c. Therefore a Jury thereof is to come before the Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Friday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. Afterwards the Processe thereof is continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors put thereof between them in respite before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until the day of June next after 3. Weeks of Easter then next following for default of Jurors c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid being called likewise come who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That long before the time of the Trespass supposed to be done The Lord Henry late King of England the 8th Father of the Lady the Queen that now is amongst other things was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the Declaration aforesaid above specified in his Demesn as
a sufficient replication on his part the said William prayeth Iudgement and that the said Robert from his action aforesaid against him to have be barred and the said Robert in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to him the said Robert his action aforesaid against the said William to have and maintain above by replying hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid William doth not deny nor to the same in any wayes answereth but the averment aforesaid to admit doth altogether refuse as at first prayeth Iudgement and his debt aforesaid together with his damages by occasion of detayning his debt to be adjudged unto him c. And because the Iustices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here on 8 dayes of Saint Michael to â—ear their Iudgment thereof because the Iustices here thereof not yet c. Debt Trinity Term. Anno 10. of King James Rott 2413. In Brownlow the Common Pleas. The Case of the Mayor and Burgesses of Kings Lynne Concerning Misnaming of Corporations C. 10. part fol. 120. a. IOhn Payn late of Catton in the County aforesaid Gent. Executor of Norff. the Testament of John Payne late called John Payne of Kings Linne in the County of Norffolk Esq was summoned to Answer to the Mayor and Burgesses of Kings Lynne in the County of Norfolk of a Plea that he render to them 3000. pound which he unjustly deteineth from them c. And whereupon the said Mayor and Burgesses by Henry Bastard their Attorney say That whereas the aforesaid John Payne the Testator in his life the 27 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is c. The 6 th at Gaywood by his writing Obligatory had granted himself to be bounden to the said Mayor and Burgesses in the aforesaid 3000. pound to be paid to the said Mayor and Burgesses when thereof he was required yet the said John Payne the Testator in his life time the aforesaid John Payne the Executor after the death of him the Testator John Payne although often required the aforesaid 3000. pound to the said Mayor and Burgesses rendred not but the same denyed to them to render and the aforesaid John Payne the Executor doth deny the same yet to render to them and unjustly deteineth the same whereupon they say that they are the worse and have damage to the value of 100. pound and thereof bring Sute and bring here into Court the writing aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid testifieth c. whose date is the same day and year aforesaid c. And the aforesaid Iohn Payne Executor by Thomas Blofield his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And saith that hee of the debt aforesaid by virtue of the writing aforesaid ought not to be charged Because he saith That it is not the Deed of the said Iohn Payne the Testator and upon this puts himself upon the Countrey and the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesses likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of Holy Trinity in 3. weeks â—2 c. By whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. At which day the Jurors between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid were put between them in respite here untill this day that is to say in 8. dayes of Saint Michael then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lord the King to Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. upon Monday the 27 th of day Iuly next following at the Castle at Norwich in the County aforesaid first shall come And now at this day comes as well the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesses as the aforesaid Iohn Payne the Executor by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices to Assises before whom c. Send here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within conteined before Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and Iohn Croke Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Justices of the said Lord the King to Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. come as well the within named Mayor and Burgesses as the within written Iohn Payne the Executor by their Attorneys within written and the Jurors of the Jury wherefore within is made mention being called likewise come who to say the truth of the within conteined chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That long before the making of the writing Obligatory within written The Lord Henry late King of England the 8 th the 7 th day of Iuly in the year of his Reign the 29 th By his Letters Patents under his Great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the same day and year and to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed Reciting by the said Letters Patents That whereas the said late King by his Letters Patents whose date was the 27 th day of Iune in the 16 th year of his Reign of his special grace and of his meer motion late had granted and by the said his Letters Patents confirmed for him his Heirs Successors to the Mayor and Burgesses and Inhabitants of his Borough of Lynn Bishop in his County of Norfolk that they for ever should be one body Corporate and one Cominalty perpetually in thing and name and that they should have perpetual succession and the name of the Mayor and Burgesses of the Borough of aforesaid Bishops Lynne in the County of Norfolk should have and bear and by the same name should be persons able and capable in Law to have purchase Lands Tenements Goods and Chattels other possessions whatsoever and to plead and to be impleaded answer and answered defend and might and could defend before any Justices whatsoever whether spiritual Judges or temporal in whatsoever Courts and in all and singular Actions Causes Matters Plaints and Demands of whatsoever kind they should be or nature in the same manner as the other the Leige people of the said late King persons able and capable in Law to plead and be impleaded to answer and to be answered defend or might defend and that the said Mayor and Burgesses and their Successors should have or might have one Common Seal for their businesses and others to be done within the Borough aforesaid happening or arising with divers other Liberties Franchisles Grants Articles and immunities in the said Letters Patents conteined and specified as in the said Letters Patents more fully and manifestly is appeared And whereas afterwards by a certain Statute late in Parliament of the said late King at London holden the third day of November in the 21
Son that he be before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here at VVestminster aforesaid from the day of Holy Trinity in 15. dayes then next following to shew wholly he did not c. And that the said Sheriff should have here the summons and the said Writ At which 15. dayes of Holy Trinity before Edmond Anderson Kt. and his Companions then Justices of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench here come as well the said John Godfrey as the said Thomas VViseman the Son in their proper persons And Thomas Lucas Kt. then Sheriff of the County of Essex aforesaid returned then here the Writ aforesaid to him in form aforesaid directed in all things served and executed That is to say That the said Iohn Godfrey found to the said Sheriff pledges to prosecute his Writ aforesaid that is to say Iohn Doo and Richard Roo And that the said Thomas VViseman the Son was summoned by Iohn Den and Richard Fen Whereupon the said Iohn Godfrey in his proper person in the said Court here declaring upon his Writ aforesaid then demanded against the said Thomas VViseman the Son the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances as his right and his inheritance And into which the said Thomas had not entry but after Disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the said John within 30. years then last past And whereupon then he said That he himself was seised of the Mannors Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances as of Fee and Right in the time o◠Peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the Profits to the value c. And into which c. And thereupon he then brought Sute c. And the said Thomas VViseman the Son in his proper person then did defend his Right when c. And thereof vouched to Warranty David Howel who then was present in Court in his own person and freely the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances to him did then warrant upon which the said John Godfrey then demanded against the said David then Tenant by his Warranty the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid c. And whereupon he then said That he himself was seised of the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and Right in time of peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the Profits to the value c. and in which c. and thereupon he brought his Sute c. And the said David Howel Tenant by his Warranty then defended his Right when c. And then said That the aforesaid Hugh did not disseise the said John Godfrey of the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances as the said Iohn by his Writ and Declaration aforesaid above supposed And upon that then put themselves upon the Country And the said John Godfrey then demanded license thereof to imparle And he then had it c. And the said Iohn retorned back unto the same Court in the said Term in his proper person And the said David although solemnly demanded then came not again but in contempt of the said Court departed and made default Wherefore it was granted in the same Court That the said Iohn Godfrey should recover his seisin against the said Thomas Wiseman the Son of the Mannor Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances and that the said Thomas should have of the Land of the said David to the value c. And that the said David should then be in mercy c. And thereupon the aforesaid Iohn Godfrey then demand-the Writ of the said Lady the Queen to the said Sheriff of the County aforesaid to be directed to gve him full seisin of the Mannors Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the appurtenances And which was to him then granted retornable here without delay c And afterwards that is to say The 8th day of Iuly the self same Term came unto the said Court the aforesaid Iohn Godfrey in his proper person And the said Thomas Lucas then Sheriff of the County of Essex then here sent That he by virtue of the said Writ to him directed The 4th day of Iuly then last past delivered to the said J. Godfrey full seisin of the Mānor Tenements Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances as by the said Writ he was cōmanded Which Recovery and Execution thereupon in form aforesaid prosecuted and had was to the use of the said Thomas Wiseman the Son and his Heires for ever By virtue of which and of the said Statute in Parliament of the said Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster aforesaid the 4th day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th of transferring of uses into possessions held published and provided The said Thomas VViseman the Son was seised of the said Reversion of one Moyety of the Island aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things in his Demesn as of Fee and Right and so being thereof seized at great Totham aforesaid dyed of such his estate so thereof seised after whose death The aforesaid Reversion of the one Moyety of Island aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things to Elizabeth now the Wife of Richard Jeunius and Dorathy VViseman as Sisters and Heires of the said Thomas VViseman the Son which Elizabeth and Dorathy are yet above and in full life that is to say at great Totham aforesaid and this he is ready to aver whereupon he demandeth Judgement If the said Iohn VViseman his Action aforesaid against him ought to have c. And upon this The said Iohn VViseman prayeth license to imparle here until the next day after the Holy Trinity and hath it c. And the same day is given to the said Richard here c. And the said Iohn VViseman saith That he by any thing before alleged to have his Action aforesaid ought not to to be barred because he saith That long before the Recovery aforesaid of the Tenments aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid had By a certain Act of Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the most Dear Father of the Lady the Queen that now is at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex the 22d. day of Ianuary in the year of his Reign the 34th begun and there then holden and afterwards by divers progations continued untill the 12th day of May in the year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the 8th the 35th held amongst other Kings It was enacted by authority of the said Parliament That whereas divers of the Noble Progenitors of the said late King Henry the 8th and especially the said late King chiefly liberally above all others had given granted or otherwise had provided to his and their loving and good Servants Subjects as well Nobles as others Mannors Meases Lands Tenements Rents Services and Hereditaments to
the aforesaid Tuesday that is to say the 27 th day of January and before this day That is to say the 15 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32d. The said Edward by the name of Edward Griffin of London Haberdasher At London in the Parish of St. Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap London by his certain Writing of Release which the said Henry with the seal of the said Edward sealed here into Court brought whose date is the said 15 th day of January in 32 d. year aforesaid released and quit claimed to the said Henry Page by the name of Henry Page of London Merchant-Taylor All manner of Actions Sutes Errors Writs of Error Quarrels Plaints and Demands whatsoever which the aforesaid Edward against the said Henry then had depending or which at any time then after he might or ought to have against the said Henry his Executors or Administrators for any matter or thing whatsoever from the beginning of the world unto the day of the date of the said Writing of Release as by the said Writing here in Court shewed plainly appeareth And this the said Henry is ready to aver Whereupon he demands Judgement if the said Edward his aforesaid Writ for correcting of Errors against the said Writing of Release of the said Edward further against the said Henry he ought to maintain or prosecute A Tenant for Life the Remainder in Tail the Remainder in Fee Bargains and sels the Land in Fee to one who before the Statute of 14. Eliz. suffers a Recovery in which A. is vouched and voucheth over and he in the Remainder enters and the Entry adjudged Lawful and a Writ upon that is sued and the Plaintif doth release the Errors Michaelmass Term 38. 39. Elizabeth in the KINGS BENCH Rot. 551. Ejectione Firme The Rector of Chedingtons Case C. 1. part fol. 148. b. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say in Easter Term last Buck. ss past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came David Loyd Clerk by Stephen Worley his Attorny And brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then and there his Bill against William Wilkinson in the custody of the Marshal c. of a Plea of Trespasse and Ejectment of him out of his Farm And are Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followes in these words ss Buck. ss David Loyd Clerk complaineth of Wil. Wilkinson in the custody of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that that is to say That whereas David Roberts Clerk Rector of the Parish Church of Chedington in the County aforesaid the 26th day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 38 th at Chedington aforesaid by his Indenture sealed with his Seal and to the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is shewed bearing date the same day and year demised granted and to Farm Let to the aforesaid David Loyd The Rectory of the Parish Church of Chedington aforesaid and 60. Acres of Lands with the Appurtenances in Chedington aforesaid To have and to hold the Rectory and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said David Loyd and his Assignes from the day of the date of the Indenture aforesaid unto the end and Term of 3. years then next following and fully to be compleated By virtue of which demise The said David Loyd into the Rectory and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances aforesaid did enter and was thereof possessed untill the said William afterwards that is to say the 10 th day of Aprill in the year abovesaid at Chedington aforesaid with force and armes c. into the Rectory and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said David Loyd thereof did enter and the said David Loyd from his Farm aforesaid thereof his Term aforesaid not yet ended ejected expelled and amoved and him the said David Loyd from his possession aforesaid held out and doth yet hold out and other wrongs did unto him against the peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said David Loyd of 20. pounds and thereof he produceth sute c. With this that the said David Loyd will aver That the aforesaid David Roberts then Rector of the Parish Church aforesaid is living and is in full life c. at Chedington aforesaid c. And now at this day Saturday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael this same Term until which day the said William had license to the Bill aforesaid to imparle and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid David Loyd by his Attorny aforesaid as the said William by Richard Bedfield his Attorny And the said VVilliam defendeth the force and injury when c. And saith that he is not thereof guilty and of this he putteth himself upon the Countrey And the said David likewise c. Therefore a Jury before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster Saturday next after 1. moneth of St. Michael and who c. And because c. the same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. Of which day The Jury aforesaid between the parties aforesaid was put between them in respite before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster unto Thursday next after the moneth of Ester then next following for want of Jurors c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come as well the said David Loyd as the said VVilliam VVilkinson by their Attornies aforesaid and the Jurors of the said Jury being called also appeared Who to say the truth of the premises being chosen tryed and sworn As to the said 60. Acres of Lands above in the Declaration aforesaid specified say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said VVilliam VVilkinson is not thereof of the Trespasse and Ejectment aforesaid guilty as the said VVilliam above in pleading hath alleged And as to the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the Declaration aforesaid likewise specified The Jurors aforesaid likewise say upon their Oath aforesaid That long before the time in which it was supposed the Trespasse and Ejectment aforesaid to be done That is to say The second day of March in the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th the second One Nicholas Fitz-williams Clerk was Rector of the Parish Church of Chedington otherwise Chettington foresaid And that the said Nicholas being Rector of the said Church before the time in which c. that is to say the second day of March in the second year aforesaid at Chedington aforesaid by his Indenture made at Chedington aforesaid between the said Nicholas by the name of Nich. Fitz-williams Rector of the Parish Church of Chedington in the County of Buck. of the one party and Elizabeth Elderker Widow Ralph Elderker VVilliam Elderker and
Thomas Elderker by the name of Elizabeth Elderker Widow late Wife of VVilliam Elderker Gent. deceased Ralph Elderker VVilliam Elderker and Thomas Elderker Sons of the Body of the first named VVilliam and Elizabeth lawfully begotten of the other part which part with the Seal of the said Nicholas sealed to the Jurors aforesaid here was shewed in Evidence gave granted and to Farm had letten to the said Elizabeth Elderker the Rectory and glebe Lands of the Church aforesaid To have and to hold the said Rectory and glebe Lands with all Fruits Oblations Obversions Tithes Rights with the Appurtenances and Commodities whatsoever to the said Rectory in any manner belonging or appertaining to the said Elizabeth from the aforesaid second day of March in the second year aforesaid untill the end and during the Term of 80. years from thence and immediately following the date of the said Indenture if the aforesaid Elizabeth should so long live and should not allien grant or give the said Demise or Term And if it should happen the aforesaid Elizabeth within the said Term of 80. years to dye or to alien give or grant the Premises That then the Estate of the said Elizabeth should cease And then the said Nicholas by his Indenture aforesaid gave granted and demised all and singular the premises for so many years as then should remain unexpired after the death of the said Elizabeth or the alienation of the said Elzabeth to the aforesaid Ralph for and during the residue of the said Term of the said 80. years if he should so long live without making any alienation grant or gift of the said Term And if it should happen he to dye or to alien the premises within the Term aforesaid that then his Estate should cease And then the said Nicholas by his Indenture aforesaid gave and granted all and singular the premises to the aforesaid VVil. for and during so many years of the said Term of 80. that then should remain if he should live so long and should not alien the said Term and if it should happen the said VVilliam to dye or to alien the Premises within the aforesaid Term that then his Estate should cease And then the said Nicholas by his Indenture aforesaid gave and granted all and singular the premises for and during so many years of the aforesaid 80. years as then should continue and remain unexpired to the aforesaid Thomas his Executors and Assignes as by the said Indenture shewed to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence amongst other things it more plainly appeareth And further the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oath aforesad say That the aforesaid Lord Edward late King of England afterwards and before the time in which c. That is to say the 12th day of September in the 3d. year of his Reign the aforesaid Nicholas then being Rector of the Câ—urch aforesaid by his Leters Patents under his great Seal of England and in due manner made bearing date at Westminster the said 12th day of September in the 3d. year of his Reign aforesaid the aforesaid Lord the King then being true Patron of the said Rectory Seeing Reading and Examining the Indenture aforesaid of his speciall Grace certain Knowledge and meer mention as also with the Advice and Consent of the Beloved Uncle of the aforesaid Lord the King the Duke of Somerset Governour of the person of the King and Protector of the Kingdoms Dominions and Subjects of the said King and of other of the Council of the said King before and especially in Consideration of the most excellent present service then to the King in his Warrs then and sole in the beating back of the Scots which then late happened at Naseborough in which War the aforesaid William Elderker of fore-thought Malice was slain the said Indenture and all in the same specified and all the Right Title and Interest of the same Elizabeth Elderker Ralph Elderker William Elderker and Thomas Elderker in the said Rectory Gleable Lands Fruits and other things in the same Indenture expressed with the Appurtenances To have and to hold the said Rectory to the said Elizabeth Ralph William and Thomas and their Assignes had confirmed and ratified and in all things as much as in him was had approved for him and his Successors And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that afterwards that is to say the 21 day of January in the Reign of the said Lord Edward the 3d. aforesaid the said Nicholas being then Rector of the Church aforesaid One Henry by Divine Providence Bishop of Lincolne and of the Rectory and Church aforesaid of Chedington aforesaid Ordinary the Demyse or Grant aforesaid by the said Nicholâ—â— as before is said made all singular in the same contained for him and his Successors confirmed ratified as much as in him was approved To have hold and enjoy to the aforesaid Eliz. Ralph Wil. Elderker Th. Elderker during the Term aforesaid as by the said several Confirmations in due manner made and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed more fully appeared By colour of which Demyse and several Confirmations aforesaid in form aforesaid made the aforesaid Elizabeth Elderker into the Rectory aforesaid and the Glebe Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances did enter and was thereof possessed And she thereof being so possessed The said Nicholas Fitz-williams afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 10 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lady Mary late Queen of England the first at Chedington aforesaid then being Rector of the Parish Church of Chedington aforesaid dyed And the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that the said Thomas Elderker afterwards that is to say the 10 th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 16 th at Greenwich in the County of Kent dyed intestate the said Elizabeth of the Rectory aforesaid and of the Glebe Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being possessed And the said Elizabeth being thereof so possessed the aforesaid VVilliam Elderker afterwards that is to say the 8 th day of July in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 17 th likewise dyed And the aforesaid Elizabeth Elderker so of the Rectory and Glebe Lands aforesaid possessed as is said afterwards That is to say The 20 th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 17 th aforesaid at Chedington aforesaid the said Eliz. Elderker likewise dyed and the said Ralph Elderker did over-live her and into the Rectory aforesaid and the Glebe Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances By virtue of the Demyse aforesaid likewise entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the said Ralph Elderker afterwards that is to say the 10th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18
th at Chedington aforesaid dyed intestate And the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that after and before the time in which c. that is to say the 19 th day of January 1576. Administration of all and singular the goods Chattels Rights and Credits which were of the aforesaid Thomas at the time of his death by William South Doctor of Law Commissary and Official of the Arch of Buckingham to one Anne Hethrington then wife of Ralph Hethrington and then the late Widow of the said Ralph Elderker at Chedington aforesaid was committed By virtue of which committing of the Administration aforesaid the aforesaid Ralph Hethrington and Ann his wife into the Rectory aforesaid and the glebe Lands aforesaid with their appurtenances did enter and were thereof possessed and the said Ralph Hethrington and Anne his wife so thereof possessed the said Ralph Hethrington and Anne afterwards that is to say the 28 day of March in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19. at Chedington aforesaid by a certain Indenture made between the aforesaid Ralph Hethrington and Anne his wife by the names of Ralph Hethrington of Sheale in the County Lecester Gentleman and Anne his wife late wife of Ralph Elderker deceased of the one parte and one Ralph Celey by the name of Ralph Celey of London Mercer of the other parte one parte whereof sealed with the Seaâ—s of the said Ralph Hetherington and Anne sealed to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence likewise shewed for the Consideration in the said Indenture specified had bargained sold â—ssigned and set over to the said Ralph Celey his Executors Administrators and assignes all the Interest Title Estate and Term of years then to come and unexpired in and to the Rectory aforesaid and the gleabe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances to have and to hold to the onlie and proper behoof and use of the said Ralph Celey his Executors and assignes for ever By virtue of which Assignement the said Ralph Celey into the Rectory aforesaid and the glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed And the Juros aforesaid farther say upon their Oath aforesaid that after and before the time in which c. that is to say the 16th day of May in the year of our Lord 1577 for that the said Thomas Elderker while he lived and at the time of his death had diverse goods and Chattels rights and Credits in diverse Diocesses or Jurisdictions administration of all and singular the goods Chattels rights and Credits which were of the said Thomas at the time of his death by Edmund by divine providence Arch Bishop of Canterbury of all England Primat and Metropolitan aforesaid to the said Ann Hethrington then the wife of the said Ralph Hethrington and then late late the widow of the said Ralph Elderker deceased late natural and lawfull Brother of the said Thomas Elderker at London that is to say in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap London was committed And the Jurors aforesaid farther say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Ralph Celey so being possessed the said Ralph Hethrington Ann his wife and the said Ralph Celey afterwards that is to say the 20th day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th at Chedington aforesaid by their certain Indenture with the Seal of the said Ralph Celey sealed and to the Jury aforesaid given and shewed in evidence bearing date the said 20 day of May in the 19 year aforesaid for the Considerations in the said Indenture specified gave granted bargained and aliened to one John Eden all the Interest Title Estate their Term of years then of in the aforesaid Rectorie gleabe Lands with the appurtenances to come and unexpired to have and to hold to the said John Eden his executors and assignes during the residue of the aforesaid Term of the aforesaid 80 years as before is said granted By virtue of which assignment the said John Eden into the Rectory aforesaid and the gleabe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and the Jurors aforesaid further upon their Oath aforesaid say that the said John Eden being so seised of the Rectorie aforesaid and of the gleabe Land aforesaid with the appurtenances afterwards that is to say the 12 day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Queen that now is the 29 at Chedington aforesaid in the County aforesaid by his Indenture Sealed with his Seal and to the Jurors aforesaid likewise shewed in evidence whose date is the same 12 day of May in the 29 year aforesaid bargained sold and assigned to one Thomas Tarsburgh Esquire all his Interest and Term of years then to come and unexpired of and in the Rectorie aforesaid and the gleabe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances by reason of which the said Thomas Tarsburgh into the Rectorie aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed And the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that the said Thomas Tarsburgh being thereof so possessed afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 23 day of November in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 36 at Chedington aforesaid in the County aforesaid by his Indenture with the Seal of the said Tarsburgh Sealed and to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence likewise shewed granted bargayned alliened and assigned all his Right Title Interest and Term of years then to come of and in the Rectory aforesaid and the glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances to one John Agmondesham Esquire By virtue of which the said John Agmondesham into the Rectory aforesaid and the gleabe lands aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed And the Jurors aforesaid farther say upon their Oath aforesaid that the said John Agmondesham so being thereof possessed afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 27 day of November in the year of the Reign of the said Queen that now is the 36th at Chedington aforesaid by his Indenture Sealed with the Seal of the said John Agmondesham and to the Jurors aforesaid here in Evidence likewise shewed demysed the Rectorie aforesaid and the glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Thomas Tarsburgh Esquire to have to the said Thomas and his assignes from the said 27th day of November in the 36th year aforesaid until the 26th day of March which then should be in the year of our Lord 1595. By virtue of which demise the aforesaid Thomas Tarsburgh into the Rectorie aforesaid and glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenance entred and was thereof possessed And the said Thomas Tasburgs thereof being so possessed and the said John Agmondesham so as is said of the residue of the said Term of 80 years then to come being possessed The said John
Agmondesham afterwards that is to say the 17th day of February in the 36th year aforesaid at Chedington aforesaid demised granted and to Farm let the Rectorie aforesaid and the glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances to one Michael Weston To have and to hold unto the said Michael and his assigns from and immediately after the end expiration and determination of the said demise to the said Thomas Tasburgs by the aforesaid John Agmondesham as is said made until the end and Term of 21 years from thence next following fully to be compleated if the said Michael Weston and one Margaret Bromley or any of them should so long live By virtue of which demise the said Michael Weston afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 26 day of March in the year of our Lord 1595 at Chedington aforesaid into the Rectory aforesaid and glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the said Michael afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 22 day of May in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 37 at Chedington aforesaid by his Indenture with the seal of the said Michael sealed and to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed Granted and assigned all his Interest Estate Term of years and demand then to come and unexpited of and in the Rectorie aforesaid and gleabe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said William Wilkinson now defendant By virtue of which grant the said William into the Rectorie aforesaid and the glebe Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and the said William so being possessed the said David Roberts Clerk afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 11 day of January in the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 38th to the Rectory of Chedington aforesaid was lawfully presented admitted instituted and Inducted By virtue of which the said David Roberts into the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred was thereof possessed in his Demesn as of Fee in the right of his Church of Chedington aforesaid And so being seized afterwards before the time in which c. that is to say the 26th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 38th aforesaid by Indenture in the Declaration aforesaid specified Demised the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the Declaration likewise mentioned to the aforesaid David Loyd To have and to hold to the aforesaid David Loyd from the day of the date of the same Indenture unto the end and Term of three yeers then next following and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which Demise the said Dav. Loyd afterwards that is to say the 27th day of March in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 38th into the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed untill the said William Wilkinson afterwards that is to say the said 10th day of April in the 38th yeer aforesaid into the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said David thereof entred and him the said David from thence his Term aforesaid not yet ended did eject expell andamove as the said David Loyd above against him complaineth And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That as well the said David Roberts as the said Michael Weston are yet alive and in full life that is to say at Chedington aforesaid But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the re-entry of the said VVilliam VVilkinson into the Rectory aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the Declaration aforesaid above specified upon the possion of the said David Loyd thereof in manner aforesaid made be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good and lawfull re-entry in Law or not the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant Whereupon they pray thereof the advice and discretion of the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is before the said Lady the Queen her self being And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the said Court of the said Lady the Queen That the aforesaid re-entry of the aforesaid VVil. VVilkinson into the said Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances in which c. upon the possession of the said David Loyd be not a good lawful re-entry in Law then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their oath aforesaid That the aforesaid VVilliam VVilkinson the said David Loyd from his Farm aforesaid of the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances in which c. unjustly did eject And that the Ejectment aforesaid the Trespass in the Declaration aforesaid specified as unto the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances the said VVil. VVilkinson is guilty in manner and form as the said David Loyd above declaring hath alleged And then they assesse the damages of the said David by the occasiō of the Ejectment and Trespass in the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances besides his charges and costs by him in the Sute aforesaid in this behalf expended to 3. shillings and 4. pence and for his costs and charges to 12. pence And if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the said Court of the said Lady the Queen here that the said entry of the said VVilliam VVilkinson into the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said David thereof in the from aforesaid made be a good and lawful re-entry in Law Then the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said VVilliam VVilkinson is not guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment of the Farm aforesaid as to the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances as the aforesaid VVilliam VVilkinson above in pleading hath alleged And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here of their Judgement of and upon the premises to be given are not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill Fryday next after the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here are not yet c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of their Judgement of and upon the premises to be given is not yet avised Further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster untill Monday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgemen thereof c. because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof yet c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminst come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court o◠the said Lady
thereof to the value c. and in which c. and thereof they bring sute c. and the said David Tenant by his warranty defendeth his right when c. and saith that the said Hugh did not dissess the aforesaid John Popham George and Edward of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the said John George and Edward by their writ and declaration aforesaid above suppose and of this puts himself upon the Country c. and the aforesaid Iohn Popham George and Edward pray Licence thereof to imparle and have it c. and afterwards the said Iohn George and Edward return here into Court the same Term in their proper persons and the said David although solemnly called doth not come but departed in despight of the Court and made default Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid Iohn Popham George and Edward recover their seisin against the aforesaid Iohn Horsey of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and that the said Iohn have of the Lands of the said David to the valew c. and the said David in mercy c. and upon this the aforesaid Iohn Popham George and Edward pray a writ of the Lady the Queen to the Sherif of the County aforesaid to be directed to give them full seisin of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and it is granted unto them retorneable here from Easter day in 5 weeks c. At which day here came the aforesaid Iohn Popham George and Edward in their proper persons and the Sheriff that is to say Robert Frampton Esquire now sent that he by virtue of the said writ to him directed the 29th day of April last past gave to the said Iohn Popham George and Edward full seisin of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as by the said writ to him it was Commanded c. Which recoverie in form aforesaid had was had to the use of the said Iohn Horsey and Dorothie then his wife and to the heirs males of the body of the said Iohn lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of the aforesaid Iasper Horsey and the heirs males of the said Iasper Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of the right heirs of the said Iohn Horsey for ever by virtue whereof and force of the said Act of Parliament of transferring uses into possession made the aforesaid Iohn Horsey and Dorothie were seised of that Mannor with the appurtenances that is to say the said John Horsey in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the heirs males of his body lawfully begotten and the aforesaid Dorothy in her demesn as of freehold for and during her life the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant and the said John and Dorothie so thereof being seised the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant the said John Horsey afterwards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 7th day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31th at Melcum aforesaid of such his estate dyed thereof seised without issue male of his body lawfully begotten and the aforesaid Dorothie him overlived and held her self in in the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances and was thereof sole seised in her demesn as of freehold for the term of her life by way of survivor the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant And that Mary Arnald wife of Richard Arnald Esquire was one Sister and Co-heir of the said John Horsey and Reginald Moon Knight was another Co-heir of the aforesaid John Horsey that is to say Son and heir of William Moon Knight and Elizabeth his wife other Sister of the said John Horsey and the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Dorothie of the aforesaid Mannor of Over Melcum otherwise Horseys Melcum otherwise Sturges Melcum with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being seised after and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the first day of September in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32th at Melcum aforesaid dyed of such her estate so seised after whose death the aforesaid Ralph Horsey and Edith unto the aforesaid Mannor of Over Melcum otherwise Horseys Melcum otherwise Sturges Melcum with the appurtenances did enter and were thereof seised as the Law requireth and the said Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid that the said Robert Bingham the Elder and Iane of the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. so as is before said for the term of their lives being seised the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant the said Robert Bingham the Elder after and before the time in which c. that is to say the 11th day of Ianuary in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 36 at Melcum aforesaid dyed of such his estate thereof seised the said Richard Bingham being Cousen and heir of the said Robert Bingham the Elder that is to say Son and heir of the aforesaid Robert Bingham the Younger Son and heir of the said Robert Bingham the Elder and within the age of 21 years that is to say of the age of 8 years and no more and that the aforesaid Richard Bingham is yet living and in full life that is to say at Melcum aforesaid and that the aforesaid Iane the aforesaid Robert Bingham the Elder overlived and held her self in the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. And was thereof sole seised in her demesn as of freehold for the term of her life by right of survivor the remaynder thereof in form aforesaid as the Law requireth that the aforesaid Iane of the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams w th the appurtenances whereof c. in her demesn as of Freehold for the term of her life in form aforesaid being seised the aforesaid Iaue afterwards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the second day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 41 th at Melcum aforesaid died of such her Estate thereof seised after whose death and before the within written time in which c. The aforesaid Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor into the Tenements within written with the appurtenances entred and that after and before the within written time in which c. The aforesaid Iohn Stroud and Ann his wife and Richard Bingham into the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. entred in the right of the said Richard Bingham By virtue of which the aforesaid Richard Bingham was of and in the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof
c. seised and so thereof being seised after and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 7 th day of April in the Reign of said Lady the Queen that now is the 41 th aforesaid the aforesaid Iohn Stroud and Ann his wife and the said Richard Bingham upon the Tenements within written By their writing sealed with their seals bearing date the second day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 41 th aforesaid to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed at Melcum aforesaid demised the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. to the within named William Albert To have and to hold to him and his assignes from the Feast of the Anunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then last past before the date of the said writing for the Term of 7 years from thence next and immediately insuing fully to be complete and ended yielding therefore yearly during the term aforesaid 140 pound per. An. at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by equal portions to be paid By virtue of which demise the aforesaid William Albert the aforesaid 7 th day of April in the year 41 aforesaid into the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof possessed as the Law requireth and so being thereof possessed after and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the aforesaid 7 th day of April in the year 41 aforesaid the said William Albert upon the Tenements within written entred and demised the Tenements within written with the appurtenances in which c. to the aforesaid George Stroud as in the declaration within written above is specified By virtue of which the aforesaid George Stroud the aforesaid 7 th day of April in the 41 th year aforesaid into the Tenements within written in the Declaration within written mentioned in which c. entred and was thereof possessed as the Law requireth until the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor the within written 11 day of April in the 41 year aforesaid upon the possession of the said George Stroud his term aforesaid not yet ended did eject expel and amove But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found the entrie of the said George into the Tenements within written with the appurtenances be lawful or not the said Jurors altogether do not know and pray thereof the advice of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here c. That the Entry of the said George Stroud into the Tenements within written with the appurtenances be lawful Then the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor are guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment within written as the aforesaid George Stroud within against them complaineth And then they assesse the damages of the said George by occasion of the Trespasse and Ejectment within written above his charges and costs by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 2. shillings and for his costs and charges to 20. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here c. That the Entry of the said George Stroud into the Tenements within written with the appurtenances be not lawful Then the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor are not guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment within written as the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor thereof within alleged And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised Day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Q. at Westminster Untill Fryday next after the morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving her Judgement of and upon the premises are not avised Day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster Untill Thursday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary to here their Jugement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Q. here of their Judgement to be given of upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid untill Wednesday next after the 18 th day of Easter to hear their judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill Friday next after the morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day come the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which seen And by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation being thereof had It is granted That the said George Stroud shall recover against the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal and Edward Goor his Term aforesaid of and in the Tenements aforesaid in the Declaration aforesaid specified yet to come and his damages aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed As also 12. pound for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said George Sroud by the Court of the said Lay the Queen here with his assent of encrease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 13. pound and two shillings And the said Ralph Horsey Richard Veal
of the Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Edward Fenner one of the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of pleas before the Queen her self to be holden assigned Justices of the Assiise of the Lady the Queen in the County of Wilts to be taken Assigned by the form of the statute came aswell the within named James Linche as the said within written William Spencer and Tho. Spencer by their Attorneys within mentioned and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them that is to say William Garret of Shaw Gentleman William Bury of Crickland Thomas Puckley of Nether Haven Gentleman William Marse of Haydon John Noyse of Graston Richard Legge of Nether Haven Thomas Smith of Kinnett Thomas Stoper of Moanton and VVilliam Gouldesborough of the same came and are sworn of the same Jury and because that the rest of the Jurors of the Jury did not appear therefore other of the standers by chosen by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid at the request of the said James and by the command of the Justices aforesaid were new put whose names to the Panâ—nel within written are filed according to the statute in such case lately made and provided And the Jurors so of new put that is to say Thomas Stringer VVilliam Bundy and VVilliam Hascal likewise called came who to the truth of the matter within conteined together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impannelled chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the aforesaid VVilliam Spencer is not guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment within written as the said VViliam hath within alleged and further the said Jurors as to all the Trespass Ejectment aforesaid within written besides the Trespass and Ejectment in the Messuage within conteined and 26 Acres of the Tenements within written by the aforesaid Thomas Spencer within supposed to be done they say upon their Oath that the said Tho. is not thereof guilty as the said Tho. likewise therof within allegeth and as to the Trespass and Ejectment within written into the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land within supposed to be done the same Jurors say upon their Oath that long before the within written time in which it is supposed the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid to be done one Richard Bridges Knight was seised as well of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land with the appurtenances as of the other Tenements within written residue with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised the said Richard long before the time aforesaid in which c. by his certain writing of Feoffment Indented in Consideration of a certain Ioynture of one Iohanna the wife or Daughter of VVilliam Spencer Knâ—ght deceased from thence after to be had and ended gave and granted and in his said writing Indented confirmed to Iohn VVinchcomb the Elder of Newberry in the County of Berks. and John Knight of Newbery aforesaid the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to have and to hold the said Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to the said John VVinchcomb and John Knight their heirs and assignes for ever under this Condition following that is to say That the said John VVinchcomb and John Knight within one moneth next ensuing after the date of the said writing by their sufficient writing in Law as by the learned Councel in the Law of the said Richard â—ridges it should be avised should give grant and deliver the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to the said Richard and the said Johanna his wife to have and to hold the said Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to the said Richard and the said Johanna and to the heirs of the bodies of the said Richard and the said Johanna his wife betwixt the said Richard and the said Johanna Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the right heirs of the aforesaid Richard for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services therefore due and of right occasioned as by the said writing of Feoffment Indented Sealed with the Seal of the said Richard Bridges and bearing date the 23 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8 th the 32 th to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed more fully appeared and that by virtue of the said Feoffment the aforesaid John Winchcomb and John Knight were seised of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Lands in which c. amongst other in their demesn as of Fee upon the condition aforesaid And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath That the said John Winchcomb and John Knight being so thereof seised long before the aforesaid time in which c. and within the said one Moneth next insuing after the date of the said writing of Feoffment Indented at Walcot aforesaid in performance of the condition aforesaid and at the request of the said Richard Bridges by their certain writing Indented of Feoffment delivered enfeoffed and delivered and by the said their writing Indented they did confirm to the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna his Wife the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to have and to hold the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other to the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna his Wife and the heirs of the bodies of them the said Richard and Johanna betwixt them Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remaynder thereof to the right heirs of the said Richard Bridges for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services thereof due and of right accustomed as by the said writing of Feoffment Indented with the Seals of the said John Winchcomb and John Knight Sealed and bearing date the 6th day of February in the year of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8 th the 32 th aforesaid and to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed it more fully appeareth And that by virtue of the said Feofment the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna were seised of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other in their demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to the said Richard and Johanna and the heirs of their bodies between them Lawfully begotten the remaynder thereof to the right heirs of the said Richard as above is said And the said Richard and the said Johanna so thereof being had issue of their bodies between them Lawfully begotten one Anthony Bridges his Son yet living and in full life being that is to say at West Shefford in the County of Berks and that afterwards and before the time in which c. the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna of the aforesaid
against Iohn Lambert in the custody of the Marshal c. of a plea of Trespass and Ejectment of him out of his Farm and are pledges of sute Iohn Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss Buck Theophilus Adams Gentleman complayneth of Iohn Lambert in the custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that that is to say That whereas one Robert Snelling Gentlemâ—n and Thomas Butler Gentleman the 23 th .. day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen Elizabeth that now is of England the 36. at the Town of Buckingham in the County aforesaid had demised and to Farm Letten to the said Theophilus 1 Messuage and 10 Acres of Land to the said Messuage neer lying called the Conigree situate lying and being in the Town of Buckingham aforesayd in the County aforesaid To have to the said Theophilus and his assigns from the aforesaid 23 day of May in the 36 year aforesaid untill the end and Term of 10 years from thence next following and fully to be compleat and ended by virtue of which demise the same Theophilus afterwards that is to say the 16 day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 39 into the aforesaid Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed until the aforesaid Iohn Lambert afterward that is to say the same 16 day of April in the 39 year aforesaid with force and Arms c. into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Theophilus thereof entred and him the said Theophilus from his Farm thereof his Term aforesaid not yet ended ejected expelled and amoved and from his possession thereof held out and yet holdeth out and other harms to him did against the peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said Theophilus of 20 pound and thereof he bringeth sute c. and now at this day that is to say Monday next after 8 dayes of Saint Michael this Term until which day the aforesaid Iohn Lambert had licence to imparl to the Bill aforesaid and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came aswel the aforesaid Theophilus Adams by his Attorny aforesaid as the said Iohn Lambert by Iohn Harborn his Attorny and the said Iohn Lambert defendeth the force and Injury when c. and saith that he is not there of guilty and of this putteth himself upon the Country and the said Theophilus likewise c. and therefore a Jury thereof was to be before the Queen at Westminster upon Monday next after the morrow of the Purification of the blessed Lady Mary by whom c. and who neither c. Because aswel c. Day is given to the parties aforesaid thence c. of which day the Jurors aforesaid between the parties aforesaid of the plea aforesaid were put in respit before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after the Month of Easter in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 41 th for default of Jurors c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the Jurors of the same Jury being called come likewise who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath that long before the time of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid that is to say the 5 day of the month of June in the year of our Lord 1431 and in the year of the Reign of King Henry the 6 after the conquest the 9 one Iohn Barton the Elder was seised of the aforesaid Messuage and of 6 Acres of Pasture parcel of the aforesaid 10 Acres of Pasture in the Declaration aforesaid specified in which it is supposed the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid to be done amongst other in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof of the Messuage aforesaid and of the said 6 Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances parcel c. seised c. Enfeoffed William Brampton to have and to hold to him and his heirs to the behoof and use of the aforesaid Iohn Barton the Elder and his heirs By virtue whereof the aforesaid William Brampton was seised of the Messuage and 6 Acres of Land parcel c. with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee to the use of the aforesaid Iohn Barton and his heirs and the aforesaid William Brampton so thereof being seised the aforesaid Iohn Barton afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 5 day of the Moneth of June in the year of our Lord 1431 in the said year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the 6. the 9 aforesaid at Buckingham aforesaid made his Testament and last will within written of the aforesaid Messuage and 6 Acres of pasture parcel c. amongst other things in these words c. In the name of God Amen ss The 5 day of the Moneth of June 1431 of the late Reign of King Henry the 6 after the Conquest of England the 9 I Iohn Barton the Elder being of perfect minde and good memory do make and ordein my present Testament Indented conteyning my last will in this manner Imprimis I give and recommend my soul to God and my omnipotent Creator and Saviour and to the blessed Mary the Virgin his Mother and to all the Saints and my body to be buried in the Church of the blessed Peter the Apostle of Buckingham that is to say in the Church of Saint Romwold in the same place wherein a Marble stone for my burying I have ordeined and appointed and for this my burial there to be had I give to the building of the body of the said Church 40 shillings also I will and Ordain that speedily after my death there be celebrated for my soul 4000 Masses for the celebrating of which I give 16 pound 13 shillings 4 pence and for his payns who about this shall imply him self that fully faithfully and speedily it be performed 6 shillings 8 pence Item I give to the religious men under written that they as soon as by my Executors or their deputies they be acquainted of my death so speedily as conveniently it may be done every order of them say a Placebo and Dirige by note and the day following the Mass of Requiem with note for my soul the souls of my Father and Mother my friends and Benefactors and for the souls of all the faithfull departed that is to say to the Master and Brethren of the house and Church of Saint Thomas the Martyr of Canterbury called of Acons London 40 shillings to the Master and Brethren of the Hospital of Saint Bartholemew in west Smithfield London 40 shillings to the Abbot and Covent of Bethesden in the County Buckingham 100 shillings to the Prior and Covent of Luffeild 40 shillings to the
now is the 35 to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed amongst other things it more fully appeareth By colour of which said Indenture and the inrolment thereof the aforesaid Robert Snelling and Thomas Butler were of the aforesaid Messuage and of the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances in which c. amongst other seised in their demesn as of Fee if the Law of England in this case requireth it and the aforesaid Robert Snelling and Thomas Butler so thereof being seised if the Law of England this requireth after and before the time in which c. that is to say the 23 day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 36. aforesaid into the aforesaid Messuage and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in their demesn as of Fee if the Law of England requireth and so thereof seised the aforesaid John Lambert continuing his possession aforesaid if the Law of England this requireth the said Robert Snelling and Thomas Butler the aforesaid 23 day of May at the said Town of Buckingham demised and to Farm let the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other to the aforesaid Theophilus Adams to have to the said Theophilas Adams his executors and assigns from the aforesaid 23 day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 36 aforesaid until the end and Term aforesaid of 10 years fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which the said Theophilus Adams into the Messuage aforesaid and into the aforesaid 6 Acres of pasture parcel c. with their appurtenances amongst other things afterwards that is to say the 16 day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 39 entred and was thereof possessed if the Law in this case requireth upon whose possession of the said Theophilus thereof the aforesaid John Lambert afterwards that is to say the same 16 day of April in the 39 year aforesaid into the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances entred and the same Theophilus Adams from his Farm aforesaid thereof his Term aforesaid thereof not yet ended ejected expelled and amoved and him the said Theophilus from his possession thereof held out and yet holdeth out as the said Theophilus before against him declared But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid found in form aforesaid It shall seem to the Court here that the aforesaid John Lambert is guilty of the trespass and ejectment of the said Theophilus Adams of and in the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture c. with the appurtenances or not the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant of and thereof they pray the advice of the Court here c. and if upon the said whole matter in form aforesaid found it shall seem to the Court here that the aforesaid John Lambert is guilty of the Ejectment and Trespass to the said Theophilus of the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. w th the appurtenances then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid that the aforesaid John Lambert is guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment thereof as the aforesaid Theophilus above against him thereof complaineth and then they assess the damages of the same Thophilus by the occasion of the Trespass and Ejectment besides his charges and Costs by him about his sute in his behalf put unto to 12 pence and for his charges and costs to 12 pence and if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid â—ound It shall seem to the Court here That the aforesaid John Lambert is not guilty of the Ejectment and Trespass aforesaid of and in the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances then the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Lambert is not thereof guilty as the said John for himself above in pleading hath alleged and farther the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid that the aforesaid John Lambert in nothing is guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid in 4 Acres of Pasture of the said 10 Acres of Pasture residue above supposed to be done as the said John Lambert above in pleading hath alleged c. and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster until Friday next after the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because that the Court of the said Lady the Queen here are not yet c. And so from Term to Term untill Tuesday next after the morrow of All Souls to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the said Lady the Queen are not yet c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid in their proper persons upon which seen and by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation thereupon had for that it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen here that the aforesaid John Lambert is guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment of the said Theophilus Adams of and in the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances therefore it is considered that the aforesaid Theophilus Adams shall recover against the aforesaid John Lambert his Term aforesaid yet to come of and in the aforesaid Messuage and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture the aforesaid 10 Acres of Pasture parcel with the appurtenances and his damages aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed as also 25 pound for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said Theophilus Adams by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here with his assent of increase adjuged which said damages in the whole do amount to 25 pound 2 shillings and the said John Lambert be taken c. and likewise the aforesaid Theophilas Adams in mercy for his false clamor against the aforesaid John Lambert for the rest of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid whereof the said John Lambert is acquitted therefore the said John Lambert as to the rest of the said Trespass and Ejectment go thereof without day c. Ejectione Firme Mich. 10. of King James It begun Easter Term 1 of King James Rott 1639 in the Common pleas Arthur Legats Case C. 10. part fol. 109. a. Norff. EDward Cockel late of Wimondham in the County aforesaid Husbandman was attached to answer to Arthur Legat Gent. of a plea wherefore with force and Arms 6 Acres of Pasture and
Humphry Lee Richard Westcot William Fairbrother Edward Faweet and Thomas Smith good and lawful men of the City aforesaid It is presented That whereas upon Saturday the 17th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King defender of the Faith c. the 8th and of Scotland the 44th in the Court of the Lord the King before Richard Pyot Alderman then and as yet one of the Sherifs of the City of London aforesaid in his Compter situate in the Parish of St. Michael in VVoodstreet London aforesaid according to the Custom of the City aforesaid then holden one Robert Radford had leeved a certain Plaint upon a Plea of Debt of demand of 500. hundred pounds against one John Murray of London Esq The Tenor of which Plaint followeth in these words that is to say Iohn Murray summon against Robert Radford Salter in a Plea of Debt upon demand 500. hundred pounds And thereupon the aforesaid Robert Radford demanded processe against the said Iohn Murray according to the Custom of the City aforesaid to be seved Upon which at the Request of the said Robert Radford in this sort in the same Court it was proceeded That the aforesaid Richard â—yot then and yet one of the Sherifs of the City aforesaid To one Richard Fells then one of the Sergeants at Mace of the Sherif and Minister of the Court aforesaid by word of mouth according to the Custom of the City aforesaid Commanded that he the said Sergeant at Mace should take and arrest the aforesaid Iohn Murray by his Body if he should be found within the Liberties of the City aforesaid so as he have the Body of the said Iohn Murray at the next Court of the said Lord the King at the Guild-hall of the City aforesaid situate in the Parish of St. Lawrence in the Old Iury in the Ward of Cheap London aforesaid upon Wednesday the 21. day of November in the 8. and 44th aforesaid to be holden to answer the aforesaid Robert Radford in the Plea of his Plaint aforesaid By virtue of which Command The said Richard Fells The said Iohn Murray afterwards that is to say the 18th day of the said moneth of November in the said yeers of the Lord the King that now is the 8th and 44th abovesaid between the hour of 5. and 6. in the Afternoon of the same day At London aforesaid That is to say in the Parish of St. Martin Bowyer Row in the Ward of Farrington within London aforesaid in the Common Kings high Way there by his Body took and arrested and then and there had in his custody And the aforesaid Iohn Murrey so under the custody of the said Richard Fells by virtue of the Command aforesaid then and there as before is said being It so then and there happened That the said Iohn Murray late of London Esquire otherwise called John Murray of London Esquire one Iohn Mackall late of London Yeoman otherwise called Iohn Maokallay late of London Yeoman one Iohn Engles late of London Yeoman otherwise called Iohn English late of London Yeoman and one Archibald Miller late of London Yeoman not having the Fear of God before their eyes but moved and seduced by the instigation of the Devil with Force and Armes that is to say with Swords c. to the intent him the said Iohn Murray from his arrest aforesaid then and there to rescous in and upon the aforesaid Richard Fells then there made an assault affray in which said affray The aforesaid Iohn Mackall otherwise called Iohn Mackalley with a sword is called a Rapier made of Iron and Steel of the value of 12. pence wherehe the said Iohn Mackall otherwise called Iohn Mackalley in his right hand then and there had and held the said Richard Fells in and upon the left part of his Body under the left shoulder-blade of the said Richard feloniously voluntarily and of malice forethought then and there struck and thrust in giving to the said Richard Fells then and there with the sword aforesaid called a Rapier in and upon the left part of his Body under the left shoulder one blow and wound mortal of the length of half an Inch and of bredth of half an Inch and of depth 6. Inches of which said stroak and mortal wound aforesaid the aforesaid Richard Fells then and there that is to say in the Parish and Ward last aforesaid presently dyed And further The Jurors aforesaid present That the aforesaid John Murray late of London Esquire otherwise called John Murry late of London Esquire The aforesaid John Engles late of London Yeoman otherwise called John English late of London Yeoman and the aforesaid Archibald Miller late of London Yeoman the said 18th day of November in the yeers 8th and 44th abovesaid between the Hours aforesaid in the Parish Ward and place last aforesaid felonionly voluntarily and of their forethought malice were present fighting procuring helping abetting and comforting the aforesaid John Mackall late of London Yeoman otherwise called John Mackalley late of London Yeoman to the aforesaid Richard Fells in manner and form aforesaid to be killed and murthered And so the Jurors aforesaid say That the aforesaid John Mackall late of London Yeoman otherwise called John Mackalley late of London Yeoman John Murray late of London Esquire otherwise called John Murry late of London Esquire John Engles late of London Yeoman otherwise called John English late of London Yeoman and Archibald Miller late of London Yeoman the aforesaid Richard Fells at London aforesaid that is to say in the Parish and Ward last aforesaid feloniously voluntarily and of their forethought malice in manner aforesaid killed and murthered against the peace of the Lord the King that now is his Crown and dignity c. And upon this at the self same Sessions before the aforesaid Justices the aforesaid John Murray otherwise Murry John Mackal otherwise Mackalley Io. Engles otherwise English Archibald Miller in the Custody of the said Richard Pyot and Francis Jones Sherifs of the City aforesaid being in the Gaol of Newgate aforesaid to the barr there brought in their proper persons came and severally being asked how of the Felony and Murther aforesaid they would acquit themselves Every one of them for himself severally said that he is not thereof guilty And thereof for good and ill severally put himself upon the Country And Richard Langley Esq who in this behalf followeth for the Lord the King likewise Therefore immediatly came a Jury thereof and the Jurors of that Jury by the Sherifs aforesaid of the City aforesaid Impannelled being called that is to say VVil. Morgan Tho. Dalbit Tho. Evans Tho. Austin Solomon Green VVil. Chewn VVilliam Ellil Metcalse Allington Iohn Drake VVil. Taylor Owen Dames and Tho. Damport appeared who to speak the truth of and upon the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the City of London is and all
the time whereof the memory of men is not to the contraryâ— was an antient City And that within the City aforesaid all the time aforesaid there was a Court of Record holden in the Compter situate in the Parish of St. Michael in VVoodstreet aforesaid before one of the Sherifs of the City aforesaid for the time being And that within the City aforesaid there is such and from the whole time aforesaid there was such a Custom That in the aforesaid Court All and singular persons from the whole time aforesaid were used to levy Plaints of Pleas of Debt amounting to whasoever sum against any person whomsoever and to cause the same Plaints to be entied in a Book of the Porter of the Compter aforesaid and that from the whole time aforesaid there was and is a Porter of the Compter aforesaid which Porter of the Compter aforesaid for the time being from the whole time aforesaid was an Officer of one of the Sherifs of the City aforesaid to enter Plaints in form aforesaid levyed in the book of the Porter of the Compter aforesaid against any person whasoever at the sute of any person whatsoever in Pleas of Debt amounting to what sum soever in a certain short and summary manner And that the Plaints aforesaid in the Book of the Porter aforesaid entred from the whole time aforesaid used to be transferred and entred of Record in the Rolls of the Court aforesaid in due form of Law within reasonable and convenient time after the entry of the same in the Book of the Porter aforesaid And that in the City aforesaid there is and for the whole time aforesaid there was a Custom That any person being a Sergeant at Mace of the said Sherif and Minister of the Court aforesaid at the request of the party whose Plaints so are levied of Office it was used after the Entry of the same Plaints in the Book of the Porter aforesaid aswell before the Entry of the same Plaints in the Rolls of the Court aforesaid as after the Entry thereof in the Rolls of the Court aforesaid to take and arrest by his Body any such person against whom such Plaints was levied to answer to the Plaint of such person without any other Command by word of mouth or otherwise to such Sergeant at Mace and Minister of the Court aforesaid in that behalf directed or to be directed And the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Saturday the 17th day of November in the yeer of our Lord 1610. The aforesaid Robert Radford Citizen of London requested the aforesaid Richard Fells then one of the Sergeants at Mace of the said Richard Pyot then one of the Sherifs of the City aforesaid That he the said Richard Fells would cause to be levied a Plaint of Debt of 500. pounds in the Comptor aforesaid at the Sute of the said Robert Radford against the aforesaid John Murray Esquire and thereupon would arrest the aforesaid John Murray to answer to the aforesaid Robert Radford in the Plaint aforesaid And the said Richard Fells thereupon was at the said Compter in the Parish of St. Michael in Woodstreet aforesaid and there the said 17th day of November in 8th and 44th years aforesaid caused to be levied a Plaint of Debt of 500. pounds against the aforesaid John Murray at the Sute of the aforesaid Robert Radford which Plaint then was entred in the Porters Book of the Compter aforesaid as in the like cases usually it is and according to the Custom aforesaid in these words ss John Murray Esquire against Robert Radford Salter Debt 500. pounds Pledges Fleat Streat by Robert Fells Sergeant Which Plaint afterwards was entred of Record in the Rolls of the Court of the Compter aforesaid in these words ss Saturday the 17th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of King James of England France and Ireland 8th and of Scotland the 44th John Murray Esquire S. against Robert Radford Salter in a Plea of Debt upon demand 500 pounds Pledges of following the Sute John Fleat and Richard Streat by Fells Sergeant c. But the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oath say That the Entry aforesaid in the Rolls of the Court aforesaid made was upon Monday the 19th day of November in the yeers 8th and 44th aforesaid and not before And that the said Richard Fells upon Sunday the said 18th day of November with 3. other Officers in his Company stayed about the Gate called Ludgate within the Liberties of the City aforesaid by virtue of the Plaint aforesaid to arrest the aforesaid John Murray as he should passe by And afterwards when the said John Murray between the hours of 5. and 6. in the Afternoon of the said 18. day of November walked and passed by and through Ludgate aforesaid in the Common Kings High-way with 6. other Persons in his Company the said Persons being armed The said Richard Fells then being one of the Sergeants at Mace of the said Richard Pyot then one of the Sherifs of the City aforesaid sworn and known and Minister of the Court aforesaid neer Ludgate in the said Common Kings High-way in the aforesaid Parish of St. Martin Bowyer Row in the aforesaid Ward of Farrington within London aforesaid came to the said John Murray and him the said John then and there within the Armes of the said Richard by virtue of the premises took and held and to the said John Murray as in the words following presently said I him the said Richard Fells meaning Arrest you meaning the said J Murray in the Kings Name at the sute of Mr. Radford the said â— Radford in the Plaint aforesaid named meaning But the said Jurors say That the aforesaid Richard Fells at the time of the Arrest aforesaid did not shew to the said John Murray any Warrant or his Mace but say That the aforesaid Richard Fells then carried and had at the back of the said Richard his Mace and that none of the Officers aforesaid who came in the Company of the said Richard Fells any Weapen then had And the said John Murray looking about him and striving with the said Richard â—ells theâ— and there said to those persons who came in the Company of the sâ—id John Murray in these English words Draw Draw Rogues upon which the said John Mackal otherwise Mackalley and John Engles otherwise English then and there being in the Company of the said John Murray drew their Rapiers And the said Richard Fells then being fallen upon the ground and the said Richard Fells lying uppermost The said Joh. Mackall otherwise Mackalley with his Rapier drawn run to the said Richard Fells then and there to rescue the said Murray from the Arrest aforesaid and with his Sword aforesaid the said Richard Fells struck and thrust in giving unto the said Richard Fells in and upon the left part of his Body under the left shoulder blade of the said Richard the stroak and mortal wound in the Indictment aforesaid
is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing the Reversion thereof to the aforesaid Countess sometimes Wife of the aforesaid Richard Earl of Warwick and the Heirs of the said Countess expectant And the said late King so thereof being seized and the Reveâ—sion thereof to the said Countess in form aforesaid expectant The said Countess afterwards and before the time aforesaid in which c. At Abbotâ—sley othewise Abberly in the aforesaid County of Worcester dyed so as before is said of the Reversion aforesaid seized After whose death the Reversion aforesaid with the appurtenances descended to one Edward Earl of Warwick as Cousin and Heir of the said Countess that is to say Son and Heir of Isabel Daughter of the said Countess By which the said Earl was seized of the Reversion of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. as of Fee and Right And the said Edward Earl of Warwick so thereof being seized By an Act in Parliament of the said late King holden at Westminster the aforesaid 25th Day of January in the Yeer of his Reign the 19th amongst other things It was Enacted by him the said late King by the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in the said Parliament assembled and by the Authority thereof That whereas Peter Warbeck with others of the aforesaid late Kings Rebellious Enemies and Traytors in a great multitude and number to him associated entred and arrived in this Kingdom in a certain place called VVhitessonbay in the Parish of St. Bercie in the County of Cornwall the 7th day of September in the Yeer of the Reign of the said late King the 13th and levied Warr against the aforesaid late King Notwithstanding the aforesaid Peter in his Journey and issue to the said false and malicious purpose was overthrown and was taken and by the same late King committed to the Prison of the Tower of London where and in which place the aforesaid Edward Earl of Warwick confederated with the aforesaid Peter imagining and intending falsely and trayterously the death and destruction of the said late King and the overthrowing of this Kingdom of England intending to make the aforesaid Peter King of the same Kingdom by divers devises amongst them conceived and inspired endeavoured with divers his Adherents speedily by diverse false Messages and Notes to set him at liberty and at large to the intent to Execute his false and Trayterous purpose to aid and assist him to his utmost endeavour for which the aforesaid Edward Earl of VVarwick by due course of Law of the said late King out of his own Confession was convicted and attainted of High Treason as his deserts in that behalf required That the said Earl for his offences aforesaid by Authority of Parliament aforesaid should be convicted adjudged and attainted of High Treason And that he should forfeit to the aforesaid late King and his Heirs All his Honours Castles Mannors Lordships Hundreds Franchises Liberties Privileges Advowsons Nominations Presentations Rights Fees Tenements Rents Services Reversions Remainders Portions Annuities Pensions Rights Possessions Hereditaments Goods Chattels and Debts whereof the said Earl or any other to his use was seized or possessed of the day of the Treason either committed or done or at any time after within the Kingdom of England Ireland VVales Calice or the Counties thereof in Fee simple Fee tail for Term of life or lives Or in which the said Earl then or at any time after had lawful cause of Entry within England Ireland Wales Calis or the Counties of them And further that the aforesaid Edward Earl of VVarwick should forfeit to the said late King and his Heirs All Honours Castles Mannors Lordships Hundreds Franchises Liberties Privileges Advowsons Nominations Presentations Rights Fees Lands Tenements Rents Services Reversions Remainders Portions Annuities Pensions Rights Possessions Hereditaments Goods Chattels and Debts whereof the said Earl or any other person seized to his use or was possessed of the second day of August in the Yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King the 14th or at any time then after as by the said Act amongst other things more fully appeareth And the said Richard saith That the aforesaid Edward Earl of VVarwick Cousin and Heir of the said Ann Countess of VVarwick in the Fine aforesaid named and the aforesaid Edward Earl of VVarwick in form aforesaid attainted and in the Act aforesaid named are one and the same person and not other or diverse By colour of which Conviction and Attainder and by force of the aforesaid Act of Parliament The aforesaid late King Henry the 7th was seized of the Reversion of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. as of Fee and of Right in the Right of his Crown of England And so thereof being seized and of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee tail in form aforesaid being seized The said late Lord the King afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. At VVestminster aforesaid dyed of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. And of the Reversion aforesaid in form aforesaid seized After whose death the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. and the Reversion aforesaid discended to the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th as Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th By which the said late King Henry the 8th was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing and of the Reversion of the said Mannor with the appurtenaÌ„ces as of fee right And the said late King Hen. the 8th so being thereof seized By a certain Inquisition taken at the Castle â—â— VVorcester in the aforesaid County of VVorcester the 5th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th the 23th before Roger VVinter Esquire then Escheator of the said late King the same County by virtue of his Office by the Oathes of Richard Frier Gent. Richard â—helton Gent. VVilliam Andrewes Gent. Richard Dedick Gent. Richard Hill of Leigh Edward Enolt Henry Dison Roger â—bud Henry VVoodward John Porter of Claynes John Brodford VValter Solli Roger Aldern of Martley and Richard VValter taken It was found amongst other things That the aforesaid Ann Countess of VVarwick in the Fine aforesaid named was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in her Demesn as of Fee and that she being thereof so seized the Fine aforesaid in form aforesaid was levied By which the aforesaid King Henry the 7th was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in his Demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing And that the said Countess was seised of the Reversion of the said Mannor as of Fee and
of her Exchequer Greeting Because in the Record and process and also in giving of Judgement in the plaint wch was in our Court before you the aforesaid Barons of our Exchequer aforesaid in the yeers of our Reign the 37th By Bil between us and Richard Bushopp of certain trespasses and intrusions in certain of our Woods with the appurtenances called Alton otherwise Aluington Woods conteyning by estimation 3000 Acres of Wood manifest Error hath entervened to our great damage And whereas in the statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 3d. our progenitor at Westminster and in the year of his Reign the 31th holden made amongst other things It is agreed and established that in all cases the King or other persons touching where any one complaineth of Error made in the process in the Exhequer The Chancellor and Tresurer cause to come before them in some Chamber of Counsel nigh to the Exchequer the Record of the process of the same out of the Exchequer and taking to them the Justices and such like sages as to them shall seem fit to be taken They cause to be called before them the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid to hear their Informations and the causes of their Judgement and the business thereupon to be duly examined And if any Error was found the same to be corrected and the Rolls to be amended and afterwards them in the said Exchequer to do execution thereof to be remitted as belongeth as in the said Statute it is conteyned We therefore willing Errors if any such were according to the form of the statute aforesaid to be corrected and speedy Justice to be done in that behalf Command you that if Judgement thereof be given then the Record and process aforesaid with alll things concerning the same before our beloved faithful Counsellor Tho. Egerton Kt. keeper of our great Seal of England and how the aforesaid Tresurer in the Councel Chamber next to the Enchequer aforesaid called the Councel Chamber upon Tuesday that is to say the 21th day of the moneth of April you cause to come And to the same Keeper of our great Seal and you the aforesaid Tresurer the Record being seen and examined and the process aforesaid and your informations being heard and you the aforesaid Barons further in this part with the Councel of the Justices and other sages aforesaid Cause to be done what of right and according to the form of the Statute was to be done Witnesse my self at Westminster the 11th day of April in the yeer of our Reign the 39th Symons At the said 29th day of the said Moneth of April the aforesaid Worthy Man Thomas Egerton Kt. Keeper of the great Seal of England and VVilliam Lord Burghley Lord Tresurer of England caused to come before them the Record aforesaid in the aforesaid Chamber next to the Exchequer aforesaid called the Councel Chamber and at the said day and place came before the Lord Keeper of the great Seal and the Lord Tresurer the aforesaid Atorney General of the Lady the Queen and for the said Lady the Queen said that in the Record and process aforesaid and in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid of and upon the aforesaid demurrer in Law it is diversly Erred that is to say that the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his plea in barr of the information aforesaid pleaded doth suppose that the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th was seised of the reversion of the manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. As of Fee and Right in the right of his Crown of England by colour of the Attainder of the aforesaid Edward late Earl of VVarwick and by the force of the aforesaid Act of Parliament in the yeer of the Reign of the said late King the 19th in the Barr aforesaid mentioned by which Act it was enacted that the aforesaid Edward late Earl shâ—uld forfeit to the said late King all his Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments whereas the aforesaid late King by vertue of the Attainder and Act of Parliament aforesaid as before is said made could not be seised of the Reversion aforesaid before inquisition thereof taken and of record remaining by which it should be sound that the aforesaid Earl at the time of the treason aforesaid by him committed or ever after was seised of the said Reversion as of Fee and right and in this that the aforesaid Richard doth suppose that the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th dyed seised of that Reversion and that the said Reversion descended to the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th as Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th Whereas in fact the said Reversion did not descend to the said late King Henry the 8th nor by the Lawes of this Kingdom could descend before the Inquisition thereof for the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th thereof to be found and of Record to remain And in this that the said Richard Bushopp supposeth that by a certain Inquisition taken at the Castle of VVorcester the 5th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th the 23th before Roger VVinter Esquire then Escheator of the said late King in the said County by virtâ—e of his office It was found that the aforesaid Edward late Earl of VVarwick was seised of the Reversion of the Manor aforesaid as of Fee and Right and so thereof being seised the aforesaid Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th in the 19th yeer of his Reign aforesaid was made in Manner and form aforesaid and that by Colour of the said Act of Parliament aforesaid the late King Henry the 7th was seised of the Reversion aforesaid as by the Inquisition aforesaid in the Court of Chancery of the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster in due manner reserved and here of Record remaining more fully appeareth Whereas every Inquisition taken upon whatsoever Attainder of High-Treason taken before the Escheator by virtue of his Office ought to be retorned into the Court of the Kings Exchequer and there ought to be filed and not in the Court of Chancery And if in the Court of Exchequer retorned and there of Record it be not filed then the said Inquisition is void and of no force in Law And in this That whereas the aforesaid Richard Bushopp supposeth That the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th the 3d. day of November in the yeer of his Reign the 23th by his Letters Patents under his great Seal of England sealed bearing date the same day and yeer reciting That whereas the said late King the 12th day of October in the 12th yeer of his Reign had given and granted to the abovesaid Walter Walshe the Mannor of Grafton Fleuard with the appurtenances for the Term of the life of the said VValter and whereas the same late King the 6th day of December in the yeer of his Reign the 21th by other his Letters
unto him Which being read and heard The said Richard saith That in the Record and Processe aforesaid and in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid it is in nothing erred and prayeth That the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer do proceed aswell to the Examination of the Record and Processe as to the aforesaid matters for Errors alleged according to the form of the Statute aforesaid And the aforesaid Attorny of the said Lady the Queen saith as above and prayeth likewise c. And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurey will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given here to the abovesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the next day after Tuesday falling the 3d. day of May to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer into the Chamber aforesaid the said Richard Bushop comes by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the abovesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the first Tuesday following the Term of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the abovesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the second Tuesday in the Term of Michael next comming to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid did not come But John Popham Knight and Edward Anderson Knight Chief Justices of each Bench come at the same day and then are there present according to the form of the Statute in such case made And the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid comes by his Attorny aforesaid before the said Justices And the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors by the said Justices is adjorned and continued by virtue of the said Statute until Tuesday next And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop to hear their Judgement thereon c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday falling the 8th of November following to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Treasurer and the aforesaid Chief Justices present in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid and because for the absence for the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal in the aforesaid Businesse and Sute of Error it cannot be proceeded the same cause is continued and adjorned by them the Lord Treasurer and Chief Justices by virtue of the Act aforesaid made until Tuesday falling the 22th day of November then next following in the Chamber aforesaid And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the same Chamber to hear his Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the aforesaid Justices in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid the aforesaid Lord Treasurer there then not comming the Business and Sute of Errors aforesaid is continued and adjorned by them the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Chief Justices by virtue of the aforesaid Act thereof made until the second Tuesday in the Term of St. Hillary then next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement thereof At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer came not in the Chamber aforesaid but the aforesaid Chief Justices of each Bench came into the same Chamber and are there present And the aforesaid Richard Bushop at the same day in the Chamber aforesaid before the said Justices likewise cometh by his Attorny aforesaid and the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned further by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made until the first Tuesday in the Term of Easter next following And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the aforesaid Chief Justices comes here the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid by his Attorny aforesaid and the said Lord Treasurer then and there not comming the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by the Statute aforesaid thereof made further until the last Tuesday of the aforesaid Term of Easter in the Chamber aforesaid and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesa to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer aforesaid come not But the aforesaid Chief Justices come into the same Chamber and are there present And the aforesaid Richard Bushop likewise cometh by his Attorny aforesaid and the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors by them is continued and adjorned further by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made until the first Tuesday in the Term of the Holy Trinity then next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer then and there come not the aforesaid Business and Sute of Erors is continued and adjorned according to the form of the Statute thereof made further until Tuesday the 4th day of July in the same Term of the Holy Trinity the same day is given to the aforesaid Ric. Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear his Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Ric Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal Lord Treasurer come not therfore the aforesaid Business Sute of Errors is
continued and adjorned according to the form of the Statute aforesaid further until the third Tuesday in the Term of St. Michael next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber afores to hear their Judgment therof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer come not therefore the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made further until the 21th day of November in the same Term of St. Michael and the same day is given to th aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesa to hear their judgment thereof c. â—At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer come not therefore the aforesaid Businesse and Sute of Errors is adjorned and continued according to the form of the Statute aforesaid until the second Tuesday of the Term of St. Hillary next following And the same day is given to the afores Rich. Bushop to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer come not therefore the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made further until the first Tuesday in the Term of Easter then next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal and the Lord Treasurer come not therefore the Business and Sute of Errors aforesaid until the first Tuesday in the Term of the Holy Trinity next following And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber afores to hear their Judgement thereof At which day before the aforesaid Thomas Egerton Knight Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Thomas Lord Buckherst now Lord Treasurer of England in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen as at first prayeth c. And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer will further avise of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises before c. Further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the second Tuesday in the term of St. Michael then next following to hear their Judgement therof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer are not avised yet of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the 23th day of October the same Term of St Michael to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorney aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgment of and upon the premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the 30th day of the said Moneth of October the same Term of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer do not come in the Chamber aforesaid but the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid come and the aforesaid Richard Bushopp at the same day in the same Chamber and before the same Justices likewise cometh by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid business and sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made further untill Tuesday the 6th day of November the same Term of Saint Michael and the same day is given unto aforesaid Richard Bushopp to hear their Judgement therof c. At which day neither the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal nor Lord Tresurer nor the aforesaid Chief Justices come unto the Chamber aforesaid Afterwards the said Lady the Queen that now is sent here another her writ close under her Great Seal out of her Court of Chancerie to the Tresurer and Barons of this Exchepuer directed the Tenor of which writ followeth in these words ss Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. To the Tresurer and her Barons of her Exchequor Greeting Because in the Record and Process and because of giving of Judgement in the plaint which was in our Court before you the aforesaid Barons of our Exchequer aforesaid in the Term of the Holy Trinity in the yeer of our Reign the 37th by Bill between us and Richard Bushopp of certain Trespass and Intrusion in certain Woods with the appurtenances called Alton otherwise Aluington Wood conteyning by estimation 3000 Acres of Wood in Alton otherwise Aluington and Rock in our County of Worcestor manifest Error intervened to our great damage and because in the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 3d. our Progenitor at Westminster in the 31th yeer of his Reign holden made amongst other things it is agreed unto and established that in all cases the King or other persons concerning where any one complaineth of Error done in process in the Exchequer the Chancellor and Tresurer cause to come before them in some Chamber of Councel nigh unto the Exchequer the same Record and process out of the said Exchequer and taking to them the Justices and other sages such as to them they shall seem to be taken to call before them the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid to hear their Informations and the causes of their Judgement and upon this business duly cause to be examined and if any Error should be found the same cause to be mended and the Rolls amended and after them into the Exchequer to do execution therof to be sent back as belongeth as in the said Statute it is conteyned We therefore willing Error if any such were according to the form of the Statute aforesaid to be corrected and full and speedy Justice to be
holden assigned and calling before them the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid and the reasons of the Judgement aforesaid of the said Barons being heard Because it seemeth to the aforesaid Keeper of the Great Seal of England and to the aforesaid Tresurer with the Counsel of the Justices aforesaid That in the Record and Processe aforesaid and also in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid it is manifestly erred Therefore it is granted by the said Keeper of the Great Seal of England and the aforesaid Tresurer That the Judgement aforesaid be conversed and annulled And that the aforesaid Richard Bushopp of the Entry Intrusion Trespasse and Contempt aforesaid be convicted And that the aforesaid Richard Bushopp be amoved from the possession of the premises And be Attached by his Body wheresoever c. To make fine with the Lady the Queen for the aforesaid his Trespass and Contempt whereof in form aforesaid he is convicted And that the Record aforesaid be sent back into the Exchequer aforesaid for the Execution therof for the aforesaid Lady the Q. to be done according to the form of the Statute aforesaid thereof made Therfore it is agreed by the Barons here That the Writ of the Lady the Queen that now is issue forth out of the Court here to amove the aforesaid Richard Bushopp from the possession of the premises aforesaid And to attach the aforesaid Richard by his body wheresoever c. to make fine for the Trespass aforesaid and contempt whereof in form abovesaid he is convicted retorneable here in 8 dayes of Saint Michael and it is commanded to the said Sheriff of the said County of Worcester that him the said Richard he amove attach in the form aforesaid Monstrans de Droit C. 1. part Digges Case fo 157. a. England ss Memorandum That Thomas Egerton Knight Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England Tuesday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster by his own proper Hands delivered here into Court a certain Record before the Lady the Queen in her Chancery had in these words Pleas before the Lady the Queen in her Chancery at Westminster in the County of Middlesex of the Term of Easter in the veer of the Reign of our said Lady Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the Faith c. the 40 th THe Lady the Queen that now is sent her writ closed to the Sheriff of Sussex directed in these words Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. To the Sheriff of Sussex greeting c Whereas by a certain inqusition Inacted taken at Dartford in our County of Kent the 8th day of November in the year of our Reign the 35th before Edward Fenuer one of our Justices to pleas before us to be holden assigned William Sydley Justinian Champnes Edward Cook Esquiers and William Kneaplock Gent. Deputy of our Escheator of our County aforesaid by virtue of our Commission to them and others in that behalf directed to enquire after the death of Thomas Digges Esquire by the Oaths of good and lawfull men of the County aforesaid amongst other things It is found that the aforesaid Thomas Digges in the same commission named was seised in his demesn as of Fee amongst other things of and in the Manor of Owtelmestone with the appurtenances and in all Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances to the same belonging and appertaining lying and being in the said County of Kent and of 110 Acres of Land Meadow Pasture and Wood with the appurtenances called Estendown and Beacondown lying and being in Barham and Kingstone in the said County of Kent and of and in the Manor of Yoke and Yokes Court and Fokeham and in all Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments to the said Manors belonging and appertaining lying and being in the said county of Kent and of 40 Acres of Land Wood and Pasture called Throuhgly Close and Tyllers in Barham aforesaid which late were purchased of William Boyes Gentleman by way of Exchange and of 2 Acres of Land and Wood lying and being in Wemingswold in the aforesaid County and farther by the Inquisition aforesaid it is found that Thomas Arch. Bishopp of Canterbury being seised in his demesn as of Fee as in the right of his Arch Bishoprick of Canterbery aforesaid of and in the Manor of Bishopps Born with the appurtenances in the said County of Kent by an Act of Parliament at Westminster in the County of Middlesex in the yeer of the Reign of Henry late King of England the 8th the 34th made and provided amongst other things it is enacted established that one Thomas Culpeper Esq should have hold and enjoy by authority of the said Act aforesaid to him and his heirs of the bodie of him the said Thomas of the bodie of one Elizabeth somtimes his wise deceased lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the Heirs of the bodie of the aforesaid Elizabeth and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the right Heirs of one William Hante for ever the aforesaid Manor of Bushops born with the appurtenances in the said County of Kent and then parcel of the possessions of the said Arch-Bishop to hold the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things of the aforesaid Lord the King his Heirs and Successors in Capite by the 20th part of a Knights Fee and the Rent of 38 shillings by the yeer By virtue of which Act of Parliament the said Thomas Culpeper entred into the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances and was thereof seised as the â—aw required and so being thereof seised the same Thomas Culpeper by sufficient conveyance and assurance in Law conveyed and assured the aforesaid Manor of Bishopsborn with the appurtenances to one Anthony Awcher Knight to have and to hold to him and his heirs By virtue of which the said Anthony Awcher Knight in the aforesaid Manor of Bishopsborn with the appurtenances entred and was there of seised in his demesn as of Fee the estate of which Anthony Awcher of and in two parcels of Land and Wood with the appurtenances called the Haute and Reed conteyning by estimation 60 Acres of Land late were purchased by Christopher Digges Father of the aforesaid Thomas Digges in the said Commission named lying and being in Barham aforesaid and in Bourn of which he died seised the said Thomas Digges was of the aforesaid parcels of Land Wood with the appurtenances seised in his demesn as of Fee which parcel of Land and Wood with the appurtenances called the Haute and Reed at the time of the making and ordeyning of the said Act of Parliament time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary were parcel of the said Manor of Bishopsborn the said Tho. Digges of the Manors Lands and Tenements other the premises aforesaid with the
Lands whereof the aforesaid Christopher the father dyed seised in 3 parts to be divided that is to say of 416 Acres of Lands which to them for their purpart by the death of the aforesaid Christopher Digges their Father by the Custom aforesaid thereof to them due and belonging are and to them of right descended and ought to descend be amoved and that they to their said purparts of the premises together with the Issues and profits thereof and of every parcel thereof from the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid and in the mean time received be restored c. And wheras we by our letters Patents under our Great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the 7th day of September in the yeer of our Reign the 38th have committed to Margaret Digges the late Wife of the aforesaid Thomas Digges and now the Wife of Thomas Palmer Esquire the Wardshipp of the body and the Mariage of the said Thomas Posthumus Digges To have enjoy and possess the wardshipp and Mariage of the said Thomas Posthumus Digges to the said Margaret her Executors and assigns until the said Margaret her Executors and assigns the effect of the Mariage of the said Thomas Posthumus Digges receive or have or should receive or have By virtue of which the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret as in the right of the said Margaret are of the Wardship aforesaid possessed and because it seemeth expedient to us that the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret be warned before it be further proceeded in the said plea We command you by good and Lawfull men of your Bayliwick you warn the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret that they be here before us in our said Chancery in 16 dayes of Easter next following wheresoever it then shall be to Inform us and our Council wherefore our hands from the aforesaid two parts of the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and so much of the Demesn Lands of the said Manor of Owtelmestone next adjoyning to the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown as should amount to the third part of the aforesaid Manors Lands and Tenements whereof the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seised in 4 parts to be divided that is to say of 416 Acres of Land which to the aforesaid Christopher and Edward for their purpart after the death of the Christopher their Father according to the Custom aforesaid thereof to the aforesaid Christopher and Edward are due and belonging and which to them of right descended and ought to descend be amoved and that the said Christopher and Edward to the said purparts of the said premises together with the Issues and profits thereof and each parcel thereof from the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid in the mean time received ought not to be restored according to the said plea and petition of the said Christopher and Edward and farther to do and receive which our Court shall consider in this behalf Witness my self at Westminster the 23th day of January in the yeer of our Reign the 40th And have here the names of them by whom you gave warning and this writ And now at this day that is to say the aforesaid 15. dayes of Easter before the Lady the Queen in her Chancery here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by John Rotherham their Attorny of themselves the 4th day against the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret of the Plea aforesaid and George More Knight Sherif of the said County of Sussex before the said Lady the Queen in her said Chancery here sent the said Writ executed and retorned that is to say that he by virtue of the said Writ to him directed the 12th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 40th abovesaid by John Byrstie Gent. and Thomas Wolfe Gent. good and lawful men of his Balywick gave warning to the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret to be here at this day to in form the said Lady the Queen and her Council as the Writ aforesaid in it importeth and requireth and as by the said Writ to him it was commanded At which day the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret before the aforesaid Lady the Queen in the said Court here at Westminster aforesaid according to the warning aforesaid to them as before is said given come likewise and pray licence with the Queens Council thereof to imparl before the said Lady the Queen in the said Court here until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity then next following c. Wheresoever c. And then to Answer c. And have it c. And the same day is given to the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges then and there c. At which Morrow of the Holy Trinity before the said Lady the Queen in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid come aswel the aforesaid Christophâ—r Digges the Son and the said Edward Digges as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret by their Attornies aforesaid And upon this the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret pray licence further with the Queens Council thereof to iâ—parl before the said Lady the Queen in the said Court here until 8. dayes of St. Michael then next coming c. wheresoever c. and then to Answer c. and have c. And the same day is given to the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges then and there c. At which 8. dayes of St. Michael before the aforesaid Lady the Queen in the said Court here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid came aswel the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this the said Thomas and Margaret pray the hearing of the Writ aforesaid and it is read unto them c. Which being read and heard The said Thomas and Margaret say That the Hands of the said Lady the Queen from the said two parties of the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and so much of the Demesn Lands of the aforesaid Manor of Outelmeston next adjoyning to the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown as amount to the third part of the aforesaid Manors Lands and Tenements in 4. parts to be divided nor from any part thereof ought to be amoved nor the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges to the aforesaid purparts of the premises above demanded together with the Issues and Profits of the purparts of the premises in the mean time aforesaid received ought not to be restored Because protesting that the aforesaid Manors and Tenements of which it is supposed the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father to have dyed seized or any part thereof are not of the nature of Gavelkind in the said County of Kent protesting also that the said Christopher Digges the Father by his last Will and Testament did not Will and Devise the Manors and
use thereof in the abovesaid Fine in form abovesaid to be levyed and acknowleged before by this Indenture not limited or appointed the Rent of 10 quarters of Barley only except to be to the only use and behoof of the said Christopher Digges his Heirs and Assignes for ever and to no other use or uses purpose or intent and that the said Fine or use and execution thereof as to the abovesaid 10 Quarters of Bâ—rley to be to the only use and behoof of the abovesaid Richard Gaunt and his Heirs for ever In witness whereof the parties abovesaid to these present Indentures their Seals enterchangeably have set dated the day and yeer first above wriâ—ten And the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as afore is said of the Manors Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances in the Monstrans de droiâ— within written specified as the Law requireth being seised Afterwards and before the bringing of the Monstrans de droit within written that is to say from the day of Saint Martin within writen in 15 dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th abovesaid A Fine was levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middleâ—ex before James Dyer Richard Weston John Welsh and Richard Harper then Justices and afterwards in 8 dayes of Saint Hillary in the yeer of the same Lady the Queen that now is the 14th abovesaid there then granted and recorded before the said Justices and oâ—hers of the Queens faithfull people then and there present between the aforesaid Richard Gaunt Gentleman and Lawrence Applegate plaintiâ—s and the aforesaid Christopher Digges and Martha his Wife deforceants of the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the Monstrans de droit within written with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Manors of Owtelmestone Mayton Nackington and Yokes Court with the appurtenances and 40 Messuages 20 Tofts one Mil 3 Dovehouses 20 Gardens 12 Orchards 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 700 Acres of Pasture 600 Acres of Wood 100 Acres of Furze and Heath and 100 shillings of Rent and the Rent of 10 Quarters of Barley with the appurtenances in Barham Kingstone Bishopsborn Bridge Patricksborne Littleborne Wellborne Sturrey Saint Stephens Nackington Netherherds Lenham Harisham Frinsted Sutton Ripple and Shalden whereupon a plea of Covenant then was summoned between them in the said Court That the aforesaid Christopher Digges and Martha do acknowlege the aforesaid Manors and Rents with the appurtenances to be the Right of the said Richard and those which the said Richard and Lawrence then had of the gift of the aforesaid Christopher and Martha and these then remised and quit claimed from them the said Christopher and Martha their Heirs to the aforesaid Richard and Lawrence and the Heirs of the the said Richard for ever and moreover the said Christopher and Martha then had granted for them Heirs the of the said Christopher that they warrant to the aforesaid Richard and Lawrence and the Heirs of the said Richard the aforesaid Manors Tenements and Rents with the appurtenances against all men for ever and for this Recognition Release Quit claim warranty Fine and Concord the said Richard and Lawrence gave to the aforesaid Christopher and Martha 8 pound Sterling which Fine was levied with proclamations according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And further the Jurors say upon their oath aforesaid that the aforesaid Fine in form aforesaid levyed was had and levyed to the uses and intents in the Indenture aforesaid bearing date the 26th day of October in yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th as abovesaid above specified By colour of which Fine Indenture and Statute aforesaid the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father was seised of the Manors Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances as the Law requireth And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as before is said of the Manors and Tenements above written as the Law requireth being seised the said Christopher Digges the Father and the aforesaid John Brook Richard Brook and Richard Horewood afterwards that is to say the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th came into the Court of the said Lady the Queen of her Chancery and then and there acknowleged the Indenture aforesaid bearing date the 20th day of September in the 13th yeer aforesaid to be their deed and upon that the said Indenture afterwards that is to say the 7th day of November in the 14 yeer aforesaid in the said Court of Chancery in due Maner of Record was Inrolled By virtue of which and force of the Statute aforesaid the said Christopher Digges the Father was of the Manors Lands and Tenements within written seised as the same Law requireth and so thereof being seised the said Christo Digges the Father afterwards and before the day of the bringing of the shewing of right within written that is to say the first day of February in the yeer of our Lord 1576 and in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th made his Testament and last Will in writing of which said Testament and last Will the Tenor amongst other followeth in these Words In the Name of God Amen The first day of February in the yeer of our Lord God 1576 and in the 19th yeer of the Reign of our Sovereign Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. I Christopher Digges of Saint Gregories without the Walls of the City of Canterbury Esquire Son and Heir of William Digges late of Barham in the County of Kent deceased being sick in body but of good and perfect remembrance thanked be the Almighty God Revoking and making void all other my former wills ordayn and make this my present Testament and last Will in manner and form following That is to say this is the last Will of me the abovesaid Christopher Digges made the day and yeer abovesaid touching the disposition of all my Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the County of Kent and Canterbury or elsewhere in the Realm of England First touching the thirds and third part of my Land to be due unto the Queens Majesty or any other for Wardship Primer seisin Livery or otherwise my Will and meaning is to leave to descend to Thomas Digges my Son to have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever All these my Lands and Tenements called or known by the name of Eastendown containing by estimation 10 Acres of Land and all these Lands Tenements Hereditaments which I had by descent after the death of Thomas Digges of Newington next Sittingborn Esquire deceased and if the
in the Spiritual Court after the Queens Prohibition to the contrary thereof directed and delivered for that that is to say whereas all and singular Pleas and Conusans of Pleas of whatsoever grants demyses or conttacts arising within this Kingdom of England made and had and the validity of such grants and demyses in Law and other such Pleas and Conusance of Pleas so as they be not Testamentary or Matrimonial to the said Lady the Queen that now is and her Royal Crown do especially appertain and by the Laws of the Land of this Kingdom of England and not by the Laws or Sentences Ecclesiastical ought to be tryed determined and discussed and ever heretofore accustomed and ought to be And whereas Stephen by Divine Providence late Bishop of Winchester the 4th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 38th was seized in his demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Bishoprick of and in the Manor of Eastmeon in the County aforesaid whereof one capital Messuage called the Scite of the Manor of Eastmeon 800. Acres of Lands 50. Acâ—es of Meadow 1000. Acres of Pasture and 400. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Eastmeon in the County aforesaid being demesn Lands of the Manor aforesaid then and time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary was and yet are parcel and also of and in one Messuage with the Appurtenances being in Eastmeon aforesaid being to the Mansion house of the same Manor And whereas the said Stephen and all his Predecessors Bishops of the Bishoprick aforesaid for the time being seized of the Manor aforesaid and other the premises with their Appurtenances The Scite of the Manor aforesaid and the capital messuage aforesaid and the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances by himself his Farmers and Tenants thereof and every parcel thereof for Term of yeers or at Wiil held and were injoyed exonerated acquitted freed discharged and privileged of and from the payment of Tithes whatsoever of in or upon the capital messuage aforesaid and the demesns aforesaid with the Appurtenances and of every and any parcel thereof yeerly what way soever for the whole time aforesaid growing happening renewing or arising And the aforesaid Stephen late Bishop aforesaid of the capital Messuage aforesaid and the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized and the same having and holding exonerated acquitted freed and discharged and privileged of and from the payment of Tithes whatsoever of in and upon the capital Messuage aforesaid and other the premises with the Appurtenances or any parcel thereof growing renewing or any wise happening The said Stephen the 4th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said late King Henry the 8th the 38th at Eastmeon in the County aforesaid By his Indenture with his Seal Episcopal sealed and to the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here brought bearing date the same day and yeer demised to one Robert Wright Grandfather of the said Robert that now is plantif The Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances By the name of all the Demesn Lands oâ— the Mannor of Eastmeon aforesaid anciently belonging with all Houses Stables Barns and Buildings upon the Moyety aforesaid then and of old time situate lying and being with the Appurtenances which Moyety then lay in the fields on the South side of the Town of Fastmeon aforesaid Together with the Meadowes Feedings and Pastures Enclosures Wayes Pathes and other their Appurtenances together with the Farm of 40. Muttons called Weathers the highest price 16. pence 40. Ew Sheep the highest price 16. pence To have and occupy the said Moyety of the TenemeÌ„ts aforesaid with the AppurtenaÌ„ces in form aforesaid demised To the aforesaid Ro. Wright the GraÌ„dfather his Assignes from the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer of our Lord God 1575. until the end and Term of 40. yeers then next following and fully to be compleat and Ended Yielding therefore yeerly during the Term aforesaid to the aforesaid Stephen late Bishop aforesaid or his Successors at his Exchequer of Woluesloy in Winchester in the County of Southampton then being 10. pound and 10. shillings of lawful mony of England at the Feasts of Easter and St. Michael by even and equal portions to be paid and for the farm of the aforesaid 40. Weathers and 40. Ew Sheep 11. pound 13. shillings and 4. pence to be paid at the Feast of St. Martin the Bishop Ad vincula for the chief Weathers 3. pence and for the chief Ews 4. pence as by the same Indenture amongst other things it more fully appeareth Which Indenture of demise to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid made and all and singular therein contained Afterwards that is to say the 20th day of July in the 38th yeer abovesaid William Kingsmill then Dean of the Cathedral Church of the Holy Trinity of Winchester aforesaid and the Chapter of the same place at Winchester aforesaid that is to say in their Chapter-house there by their Writing of Confirmation with the Seal of the Chapter sealed in the life time of the aforesaid Stephen then being Bishop of Winchester aforesaid and in the life time of the said Robert Wright the Grandfather now deceased ratified and confirmed as by the Writing of Confirmation thereof bearing date the day and yeer last aforesaid amongst other things it appeareth By virtue of which demise and Confirmation The same Robert Wright the Grandfather was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid in the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid demised possessed and the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather of the Interest of the Term aforesaid in the Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid demised being possessed The said Robert Wright the Grandfather the 14th day of August in the yeer 1558. at Eastmeon aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in Writing and by the said his Testament made and ordained Margaret then his Wife and Nicholas Wright his younger Son to be Executors of his last Will And by the said his last Will gave and bequeathed all his Interest aforesaid of and in the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid so as is said demised with the Appurtenances then to come to Edward Wright the Eldest Son of the aforesaid Robert the Grandfather and afterwards the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather at Eastmeon aforesaid dyed of his Interest aforesaid of and in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Robert the Grandfather in form aforesaid demised possessed After whose death the aforesaid Margaret and Nicholas took upon them the burthen of Execution of his last Will Testament aforesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid And the said Executors at Eastmeon aforesaid gave their consent that the said Edward Wright should have and enjoy to him and his
from the day of Easter in 15. dayes under his Seal c. And the Seals c. At which day here cometh the aforesaid Iohn Hunt by his Attorney aforesaid And upon this The same Iohn Hunt acknowledgeth here in the Court here that he would not further prosecute the same Thomas Gateley for any damages to him for the occasion of the taking and unjustly deteining of the Cattel aforesaid to be adjudged but all the said damages to him so to be adjudged willingly here in Court to the said Thomas Gateley doth remise and release Therefore the said Thomas Gateley of those damages be acquitted c. REPLEVIN Trinity Term Anno 36. Eliz. Rot. 1676. in the Common Pleas C. 1. part Archers Case Fol. 65. IOhn Smith Gent. was summoned to Answer to William Baldwin of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of the said William and them unjustly detained Essex against Gages and Pledges c. And whereupon The said William by Isaac Hamond his Attorney complaineth That the aforesaid John the 9th of January in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 36th at Bocking in a certain place called the Meadow abutting upon the Common High-way leading from Braintree unto Pantforld in the County aforesaid against the North-East and upon the Lands of John Mott towards the South West took Cattel that is to say 26. Sheep of him the said William and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. Whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath loss to the value of 40. pound and thereof he bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid John by Tho. Reynolds his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and Injury when c. And as Bayliff of Joh. Kent gent. Son of Joh. Kent gent. deceased well acknowledgeth the taking of the Cattel aforesa in the place aforesa in which c. and justly c. Because he saith That the same place in which it is supposed the taking the Cattel aforesaid above to be done conteineth in it self 4. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Bocking aforesaid which 4. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances at the time aforesaid in which c. Was the Soil and Freehold of the said John Kent the Son and because the Cattel aforesaid the time aforesaid in which c. were in the same then eating the grass and doing damage there The said John Smith as Bayliff of the aforesaid John Kent the Son doth well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the place aforesaid in which c. and justly there so damage feisant c. And the aforesaid William Baldwin saith That the said John Smith as Bayliff of the said Iohn Kent the Son for the reason before alleged ought not to make Conusance of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to be just Because he saith That long before the said taking aforesaid had One Iohn Archer Gent. was seised of the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and he the said Iohn being thereof so seised before the aforesaid time of the taking aforesaid done that is to say the 8th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 36th aforesaid gave license unto the said William to put his Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid place in which c. to eat the grass there growing By vertue of which license the said William afterwards that is to say the said aforesaid 9th day of Ianuary in the 36th year aforesaid put his Cattel aforesaid in the place in which c. to eat the grass there growing which Cattel were in the said place in which c. eating the grass then growing in the same untill the said Iohn Smith the aforesaid 9th day of Ianuary in the year of the Lady the Queen that now is the 36th aforesaid at Bocking aforesaid in the aforesaid place called the Meadow took the Cattel aforesaid of him the said William and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. As he above him complaineth without that that the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. the time of the taking aforesaid done was the Soil and Freehold of the said John Kent the Son as the said William above hath alleged And this he is ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the said John Smith acknowlegeth the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which The said William demands Judgement and his damages for the occasion of the taking and unjustly detaining of the same Cattel to be adjudged to him c. And the aforesaid John Smith as at first saith That the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c the time aforesaid in which c. were the Soil Freehold of the said J. Kent the Son as he before hath alleged And of this puts himself upon the Country and the said VVilliam Baldwin likewise And therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of Holy Trinity in 3. Weeks 12. c. by whom c. and who neither c. to Recognize c. Because as well c. And afterwards the Process was continued between the aforesaid parties of the aforesaid Plea by juries put between them in respite here until this day that is to say from Easter-day in three Weeks in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37th And now here at this day cometh as well the aforesaid William as the aforesaid John Smith by their Attornies aforesaid and the Jurors thereof impannelled being called likewise come who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That one Francis Archer was seized of the said 4. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and held the same of one Thomas Wilson as his Manor of in the County aforesaid in Free Socage and that the said Francis Archer had issue one Robert Archer which Robert had then issue the aforesaid John Archer the Son and his Right and next Heir apparant Which aforesaid Francis Archer so of the aforesaid 4. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances being seized before the time in which c. that is to say the 25th day of November in the yeer of our Lord 1578. made his last Will and Testament in Writing and by the same his last Will Willed and Bequeathed the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things as followeth Item I give and bequeath to Robert Archer my Son All that my Messuage or Tenement with the appurtenances called the Grey-hound with all and singular the Lands and Grounds which and whatsoever I had purchased and bought of one John Palmer as they are set lying and being in Bocking aforesaid To have and to hold the said
Messuage or Tenement and other the premises late purchased and bought of the said John Palmer as is aforesaid to the said Robert Archer my Son from and after the day of my death forthwards during his natural life and after the death of Robert Archer my Son I will my said Messuage or Tenement called the Grey-hound together with all the Lands and Grounds which I lately purchased of the said John Palmer shall wholly remain to the Right and next Heir of the same Robert Archer and to the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten for ever And afterwards the aforesaid Francis Archer dyed of the aforesaid 4. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances amongst other in form aforesaid seized And the said jurors further say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Francis Archer purchased the aforesaid 4. acres of Pasture with their appurtenances of the aforesaid John Palmer in the aforesaid last Will of the aforesaid Francis named And the jurors further say upon their Oath That after the death of the said Francis Archer the aforesaid Robert Archer being Son and Heir apparent of the aforesaid Francis into the aforesaid 4. acres of Pasture with their appurtenances entred and was thereof seized of such estate as the Law in this case requireth And the said Robert so thereof being seized before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the 21th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 26th by his deed of Feoffment with the Seal of the said Robert sealed and to the jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed Enfeoffed one John Kent Father of the said John Kent in the Conusance aforesaid above named of the aforesaid 4. acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. amongst other By the name of all that his Messuage or Tenement and all Houses Buildings Barns Orchards Gardens with the appurtenances sometimes called or known by the name of the Grey-hound or otherwise or by what other name or names the same were called or known situate lying and being in Bocking aforesaid in a street there called Bocking haud and of all those Lands Meadowes and Pastures to the same belonging or appertaining or with the same at any time then before demised used or occupyed lying and being at Bocking aforesaid To have and to hold to the aforesaid Iohn Kent the Father his Heirs and Assignes for ever to the proper use and behoof of the said John his Heirs and Assignes for ever And further the said Robert Archer and his Heirs by the deed aforesaid all and singular the aforesaid Messuages or Tenements Houses Buildings Meadowes Pastures and other the premises aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid John Kent the Father his Heirs and Assignes to the use in the said deed mentioned against all men did warrant as by the said Charter of Feoffment to the Jurors aforesaid given in Evidence it more fully appeareth By virtue of which Feoffment the aforesaid John Kent the Father was seized of the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee And further the Jurors afore say upon their Oath That after the Feoffment aforesaid in form aforesaid made The aforesaid John Archer Son and right and next Heir apparent of the aforesaid Robert Archer in the lives of the aforesaid Robert Archer and John Kent the Father into the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. Upon the possession of the aforesaid John Kent the Father thereof entred upon whose possession of the said John Archer thereof the said John Kent the Father afterwards re-entred and was of the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. seized as the Law in this case requireth and the said John Kent the Father so thereof being seized before the aforesaid time in which that is to say the 16th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 27th made his Testament and last Will in Writing and by the same his last Will gave and bequeathed to the aforesaid John his second Son and his Heirs the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. amongst other and afterwards and before the time in which c. the aforesaid John Kent the Father of such estate of the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. dyed seized After whose death The aforesaid John Kent the Son into the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with their Appurtenances entred and was thereof seized of such estate as the Law in this case requireth And afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. The aforesaid Robert Archer dyed After whose death The aforesaid John Archer Son and right and next Heir of the aforesaid Robert Archer into the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. upon the possession of the said John Kent the Son thereof entred and was thereof seized as the Law in this case requireth And the said John Archer so thereof being seized the aforesaid 8th day of November in the 36th yeer aforesaid gave licence to the said William Baldwin to put his Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid place in which c. the grass in the same then growing to eat By virtue of which licence the said William afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 9th day of January in 36th yeer abovesaid put his Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid place in which c. to eat the grass then and there growing which Cattel were in the same place in which c. the grass in the same then eating until the aforesaid John Smith as Bayliff of the aforesaid John Kent the Son the aforesaid 9th day of January in the 36th yeer abovesaid in the aforesaid place called the Meadow to the use of the said John the Son entred and took the aforesaid Cattel of the aforesaid William and them detained against Gages and Pledges Until c. as the aforesaid William Baldwin above against the aforesaid John Smith complaineth And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found it shall seem to the Justices and Court here That the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. the aforesaid time in which c. were not the Soil Freehold of the aforesaid John Kent the Son Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid 4. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. the aforesaid time in which c. were not the Soyl and Freehold of the aforesaid John Kent the Son as the aforesaid William Baldwin above hath alleged And then they assess the damages of the said William Baldwin by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the aforesaid Cattel above his costs and charges by him about his sute in this behalf expended to 14. pence
keep until of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound with the Arrerages thereof if any were they should be satisfied and paid as by the Record of the said Fine in the Court of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid here remaining amongst other things more fully appeareth And the aforesaid VVilliam Cary afterwards that is to say the 4th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 35th at Stow market aforesaid dyed After whose death By virtue of the Fine a-aforesaid last recited The aforesaid Martha was and yet is seized of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound in heâ— demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life if the said Iohn Gardiner and Agnes his Wife or either of them should so long live And because 40. pound of the aforesaid yeerly Rent to the said Martha at and after the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 35th as also the aforesaid time in which c. were behind not payd The said VVilliam Brâ—don and Iohn Bredon as Bayliffs of the said Martha acknowledged the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. And justly c. for the said 40. pound of the Annual Rent aforesaid to the said Martha so being behind as in the Lands to the distresse of the said Martha of the Rent aforesaid in form aforesaid charged and bound c. With this that the said Iohn Bredon and VVilliam will aver That the aforesaid Martha is yet living and is in full life that is to say at Littlewrating in the aforesaid County of Suffolk c. with this also That the said William Bredon and John Bredon will aver That the aforesaid Agnes now Plaintiff and the aforesaid Agnes one of the Deforceants in the aforesaid several Fines named are one and the same person and not others or diverse c. And the aforesaid Agnes as to 20. pound of the yeerly Rent aforesaid at the Feast of the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin in the 35th yeer abovesaid payable saith That she cannot deny but that the said 20. pound at the said Feast were behind to the aforesaid Martha not paid as the aforesaid William Bredon and John by their Conusance aforesaid supposed And as to the aforesaid other 20. pound of the aforesaid 40. pound Residue which the aforesaid William and John by this Conusance aforesaid suppose to have been behind not paid to the aforesaid Martha at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael in the 35th yeer abovesaid It is said That the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon by reason of the aforesaid taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. For the same 20. pound ought not acknowledge it to be just for it is said That well and true it is That the said John Gardiner was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee And the said John so thereof being seized The said Fine in the Conusance of the said William Bredon and John Bredon above first mentioned was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Queen here in the aforesaid 8. dayes of Saint Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 29th above written before the aforesaid then Justices and other the Lady the Queens faithful people then there present Between the aforesaid Edmond Cary Knight and Robert Cary Esquire Plaintiffs And the aforesaid VVilliam Cary Esquire and John Gardiner and the said Agnes now Plaintiff then Wife of the aforesaid John Gardiner And the aforesaid George Totty and Elizabeth his Wife Deforceants of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. And of the aforesaid Tenements and Appurtenances in the Conusance aforesaid above mentioned and that the said Fine in form aforesaid levied was had and levied to the use of the aforesaid John Gardiner and of her the said Agnes for the Term of their lives and the longer liver oâ— them And after the decease of the aforesaid John and Agnes To the use of the aforesaid VVilliam Cary and the Heirs his body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue To the use of the aforesaid Robert Cary Knight and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue To the use of the aforesaid Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever By virtue of which Fine and by force of the aforesaid Act of transferring uses into possession holden made The aforesaid John and the said Agnes were seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in demesn as of Freehold for the Term of the lives of them the said John and Agnes and the longer liver of them the Remainder thereof after the death of them the said John and Agnes to the aforesaid VVilliam Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever as the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon by his Conusance aforesaid above supposeth But the said Agnes further saith That the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes so of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. for the Term of the lives of them the said Iohn and Agnes and the longer liver of them in form aforesaid being seized the Remander thereof after the death of the aforesaid Iohn and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Henry â—ary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs expectant before the levying of the aforesaid second Fine in the Conusance of the said William Bredon and John Bredon above mentioned Another Fine was levied in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid from the day of Easter in 15. dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31th before the aforesaid Edmond Anderson Francis Windham and William Periam then Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench here and other of the Queens faithful people then and there present Between David Bulward and Robert Ham by the names of David Bulward and Robert Ham Plaintiffs And the aforesaid William Cary by the name of William Cary Esquire Deforceants of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. And of 20. Messuages one Dove-house 20. Gardens 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture
30. Acres of Wood and 1. pound 6. shillings 4. pence Rent and of the Rent of 4. Capons and 1. pound of Wax with the Appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House by the name of the Mannor of Collumbine-hall otherwise Thorney Collumbers with the Appurtenances and 20. Messuages one Dove-house 20. Gardens 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture 30. Acres of Wood and 1. pound 6. shillings 4. pence Rent and the Rent of 4. Capons and 1. pound of Wax with the Appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House whereof a Plea of Covenant was sued between them in the said Court That is to say That the aforesaid William acknowledge the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents and premises with the Appurtenances to be the Right of the said David as those which the said David and Robert had of the gift of the aforesaid VVilliam and those released and quit claimed from him and his Heirs to the said David and his Heirs for ever And besides the said VVilliam granted for him and his Heirs That they warrant to the said David and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Dazid the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents with the Appurtenances against the aforesaid VVilliam and his Heirs for ever as by the Record of the same Fine in the Court of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here remaing more fully appeareth Which Fine in form aforesaid levied and had was levied and had to the use of the aforesaid David and Robert and their Heirs to the intent and until a perfect Recovery by Writ of the Lady the Queen of Entry for Deseisin of the Post of the Manor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances were sued against the said David and Robert by one Robert Peirson Gentleman according to the course of Common Recoveries used to be had And the aforesaid Iohn Gardiner and Agnes his Wife of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof for the Term of the lives of them the said John Gardiner and Agnes and the longer liver of them so as before is said being seized the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid David and Robert Ham and their Heirs in form aforesaid expectant The said Fine in the Conusance of the said William Bredon and John Bredon above second mentioned in form aforesaid was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Lady the Queen here from the day of Easter in 15. day in the yeer 32th abovesaid before the aforesaid then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench Between the aforesaid John Hâ—gham Knight and Thomas Turner Esquire Plaintiffs and the aforesaid â—illiam Cary and the aforesaid Martha then his Wife Deforceant of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenance whereof c. And the aforesaid John Higham and Thomas by the same Fine granted unto the said Martha the aforesaid Annuitity or yeerly Rent of 40. p. to be issuing out of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances and those to her in form aforesaid rendred To have and perceive the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound at the aforesaid Feasts of Saint Michael the Archangel and the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by equal portions yeerly to be paid all the life time of the said Martha if the aforesaid John and Agnes or any of them should so long live the first paymeÌ„t therof â—o begin at thaâ— Feast of the Feasts aforesaid which next after the decase of the said VVilliam Cary should happen to be with the aforesaid clause of distresse in the said Fine mentioned As the aforesaid William Bâ—edon and John Bredon by their Conusance aforesaid above suppose By virtue of the levying of which Fine last mentioned so had and levied The aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes Forfeited their Estate aforesaid for the Term of their lives the life of the longer liver of them in the aforesaid Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. And afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 24th day of March in in the 35th yeer abovesaid the aforesaid William Cary at Stow-market aforesaid dyed without issue of his Body lawfully begotten After whose death and before the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer of 35th abovesaid The aforesaid Robert Cary Knight by reason of the aforesaid Forfeiture of the Estates of the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes and and in the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seized in Feetail that is to say to him the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And so thereof being seized The said Robert afterwards and before the aforesaid time of the taking aforesaid made that is to say the 17th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 37th abovesaid At Stowmarket aforesaid gave licence to the said Agnes to put her Cattel into the aforesaid place in which c. to eat the grasse in the same then growing By virtue of which licence the said Agnes after and before the aforesaid time in which c. put her Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid place in which c. to eat the grasse in the same Which Cattel were in the aforesaid place in which c. Until the aforesaid VVilliam Bredon and John Bredon the day and yeer above in the Declaration aforesaid above specified At Stow market aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which called the â—arkwood took the aforesaid Cattel of the said Agnes and them unjustly detained against Gages Pledges until c. as she above against them complaineth And this she is ready to aver wherofore in as much as the said William Bredon and John Bredon the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. above acknowlegeth The said Agnes demands Judgement and her damages for the occasion of taking and unjustly deteining of her Cattel aforesaid to be adjudged unto her And the aforesaid VVilliam Bredon and John Bredon as to the aforesaid Plea of the Agnes to the Conusance of the said William and John for the aforesaid 20. pound Residue made in Bar pleaded say That well and true it is that the aforesaid Fine in the Bar of the aforesaid Agnes second specified in the aforesaid Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid here in the aforesaid 15. day of Paster in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 3â—th abovesaid before the said Edmond Anderson Francis VVindham and VVilliam Periam then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid here and other of the said Lady the Queens then Faithful People then here present Between the aforesaid David Bulward and Robert Ham Plaintiffs and the aforesaid VVilliam Cary Deforceant of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. And of the aforesaid Tenements and Rents with the Appurtenances in the said Fine in the Bar of the aforesaid Agnes second specified and mentioned in form aforesaid was
levied as the aforesaid above hath alleged But the said VVilliam Bredon and John Bredon further say That the aforesaid Fâ—ne in the Bar of the aforesaid Agnes second specified in form aforesaid levied was had and levied To the use of the said David Bulward and Robert Ham and their Heirs to the intent and until a Recovery by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Entire Sur-disseisin in the Post of the Manor with the appurtenances whereof c. And of the Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances against the said David and Robert should be had and afterwards unto the use of Iohn Gardiner and the aforesaid Agnes for the Term of their lives and the longer liver of them And after their decease to the use and behooâ— of the aforesaid VVilliam Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten By which Afterwards that is to say the â—th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31th the aforesaid Roger Pierson in the Court of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen that now is the said Court at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex then being brought and prosecuted a Writ of the said Lady the Queen that now is of Entry upon disseisin in the Post against the aforesaid David and Ro. Ham of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Suffolk directed the said David and Robert then being Tenants of the Freehold of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances by virtue of the Fine in the Bar of the aforesaid Agnes second specified By which Writ the said Lady the Queen that now is sent to the said Sheriff That the said Sheriff command the aforesaid David and Robert Ham by the names of David Bulward and Robert Ham that they justly and without delay render to the aforesaid Roger Peirson by the name of Roger Pierson The Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances by the names of the Manors of Cullumbine-hall otherwise Thorney Cullumbers with the Appurtenances and 20. Messuages one Dove-house 20. Gardens 300. Acres of â—and 100. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture 30. Acres of Wood and 1. pound 6. shillings 4. pence Rent and the Rent of 4. Capons and one pound of Wax with the Appurtenances in Stow maket Newton Gipping and One-House which he claimeth to be his Right and Inheritance And in which the said David and Robert had not Entry but after disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Iudgement did to the aforesaid Roger within 30. yeers then last past as he said And whereupon he complained that the aforesaid David and Robert him unjustly deforced and if they did not c. And if the aforesaid Roger should secure the said Sheriff of the prosecuting of his claim Then the said Sheriff summon by good summoners the aforesaid David and Robert that they should be before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here that is to say at VVestm from the day Easter in one Moneth next following to shew wherefore they had not done it And that the said Sheriff should then have here the summons and that Writ c At which Moneth of Easter here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid cometh as well the said Roger as the said David and Robert in their proper persons And then the Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Suffolk that is to say Philip Tâ—lney â—squire then retorned here the Writ aforesaid in him in form directed served and executed in form following That is to say That the aforesaid Roger had found to the said Sheriff sureties for the prosecuting of his said Writ that is to say Iohn Doo and Richard Roo c. And that the aforesaid David and Robert were summoned to be then here by Iohn Den and Rich. Fen c. Upon which the aforesaid Roger declaring against the aforesaid David and Robert then Tenants of the Freehold of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid upon his Writ aforesaid in his proper person aforesaid demanded against the said David and Robert of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances as his Right and Inheritance And in which the said David and Robert had not Entry but after disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the aforesaid Roger within 30. yeers now last past c. And whereupon he said That he himself was seized of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee in time of Peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking thereof the Profits to the value c. And in which c. And thereof then brought Sute c. And the aforesaid David and Robert Ham then defended their Right when c. And vouched thereof to warranty the said VVilliam Cary by the name of VVilliam Cary Esquire who then likewise was present in the same Court in his proper person And willingly the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances to him did warrant c. And upon this the aforesaid Roger demanded against him the said VVilliam Cary Tenant by his warranty The Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid c. And whereupon he then said That he himself was seized of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee in time of Peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the Profits thereof to the value c. And the aforesaid VVilliam Cary Tenant by his warranty aforesaid came and defended his Right when c. And further thereof vouched to warranty David Howel who then likewise was present in the same Court in his proper person and freely the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances to him did warrant c. And upon this The aforesaid Roger demanded against the said David Howell Tenant by his warranty the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid c. And whereupon then he said That he himself was seised of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and right in time of peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the profits thereof to the value c. And in which c. And thereof his brought sute c. And the aforesaid David Howell Tenant by his warranty defended his Right when c. And then said That the aforesaid Hugh had not disseised the aforesaid Roger of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenance as the said Roger by his Writ and Declaration above supposed and of this put himself upon the Country c. And the aforesaid Roger then prayeth license thereof to imparl and had it c. And afterwards the aforesaid Roger comes again here into
â—remling 10. shillings of good and lawful Mony of England in the Condition of the Feoffment aforesaid above mentioned in full satisfaction and performance of the Condition aforesaid By which The said Thomas Mayow afterwards and before the aforesaid time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other entred and was thereof seized that is to say in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized The said Thomas Mayow before the time in which c. that is to say the 3d. day May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th abovesaid at Sutton Atthone aforesaid by his Writing sealed with his Seal and to the Court of the said Lady the Queen now here brought bearing date the same day and yeer enfeoffed one Thomas Waller amongst other of the aforesaid 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. by the name of Abrahams Land containing by Estimation 9. Acres more or less lying in Sutton Atthone aforesaid To have and to hold the same Close called Abrahams Land with the Appurtenances amongst other to the aforesaid Thomas Waller his Heirs and Assignes To the only proper use and behoof of the said Thomas Waller his Heirs and Assignes for ever as by the said Writing amongst other things more fully appeareth By virtue of which â— coffment the said Thomas Waller of the aforesaid Close with the Appurtenances in which c. was seized in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized The aforesaid Dionise Mayow afterwards and before the aforesaid time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 20th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is 29th at Sutton Atthone aforesaid dyed as the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterley above in pleading have alleged After whose death and before the aforesaid time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 29th day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32th The a-a-aforesaid Thomas Waller at Sutton Atthone aforesaid demised and to farm set to the aforesaid John Kettel the aforesaid Close with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other To have and to hold to the aforesaid John Kettell and his Assignes from the aforesaid 29th day of September in the 32th yeer abovesaid unto the end and Term of one whole yeer then next following and fully compleat and ended By virtue of which demise the aforesaid John Kettell afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the 30th day of September in the 32th yeer aforesaid in the Close aforesaid in which c. entred and was thereof possessed And so thereof being possessed The same John Kettell afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the 17th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 33th put his Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid Close to eat the grass there as it was lawful for him to do which Cattel were in the aforesaid Close c. there the grass there late growing eating until the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterley the aforesaid Cattel the aforesaid time in which c. unjustly took and deteined in manner and form as the aforesaid John Kettell above against them complaineth And this he is ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the said George and Francis the taking of the Cattel aforesaid above acknowledgeth The said John Kettel demands Judgement and his damages aforesaid for the occasion of the taking and unjust deteining of the said Cattel to be adjudged to him c. And the aforesaid George Mason and Fracis Easterlâ—y say that well and true it is that before the aforesaid time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid above supposed to be done and before the grant of the aforesaid Annuity of 20. pound and before the said Dionise had any thing in the aforesaid 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. The aforesaid Thomas Mayow in the Bar aforesaid to the Conusance aforesaid named was seized of the aforesaid 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized That the said Thomas the aforesaid 15. day of January in the 19th yeer aforesaid of the said 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances enfeoffed the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John Fremling in the Bar named To have to them and their Assignes for ever To the use of the said Dionise his Heirs and Assignes for ever upon the Conditions aforesaid in the Bar above in this part specified And that by virtue of the same Feoffment and by force of the aforesaid Statute the said Dionise was seised of the aforesaid 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other in his demesn as of Fee in manner and form as the aforesaid John Kettel in the Bar aforesaid to the Conusance aforesaid above in pleading alleged And the said George and Francis now Defendants further say That the aforesaid Dionise before the aforesaid time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid above supposed to be done that is to say the aforesaid 30th day of May in the 9th yeer aforesaid by his Writing aforesaid gave and granted to the aforesaid Ann the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 20. pound to be issuing out of the aforesaid place in which c. Amongst other in manner and form as the aforesaid John Kettell in his Bar aforesaid to the Conusance aforesaid above in pleading hath alleged To have and to hold the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 20. pound to the aforesaid Ann and her Assignes for the Term of the natural life of the said Ann at the Feasts aforesaid above in this behalf specified by equal portions yeerly to be perceived with the aforesaid clause of distresse in that Writing contained in the Conusance above in this behalf specified And the said George and Francis Fasterly also in Facto say That the aforesaid Thomas Mayow the aforesaid Grant of the Rent aforesaid and the Estate of the said Ann in the said Rent then and there that is to say the aforesaid 30th day of May in the 19th yeer abovesaid at Sutton Atthone aforesaid by the name of Thomas Mayow of Sutton Atthone in the County of Kent Gentleman by his Writing sealed with the Seal of him the said Thomas and to the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here brought bearing date the same day and yeer to the aforesaid Ann by the name of Ann Maxey of Chigwel in the County of Essex ratified and confirmed as by the said Writing amongst other things more fully appeareth By colour of which the said Ann was of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid seized
defendeth the force and injury when c. And doth well avow the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. And justly c. Because he saith That the said place in which it is supposed the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to be done contained in it self One Acre and half of Land with the Appurtenances in Ipping aforesaid And that long before the aforesaid time in which c. One John Bettisworth was seized of and in One Messuage and a Garden 12. Acres of Land and one Acre of Wood with the Appurtenances in Ipping aforesaid whereoâ— the aforesaid place in which c. is and the aforesaid time in which c. from the time whereof the Memory of Men is not to the contrary was parcel in his demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized the said John long before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the 20th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 11th at Ipping aforesaid by his Indenture made between the aforesaid John Bettisworth of the one part and the aforesaid John Hayward by the name of John Hayward of the same Parish and County Husbandman of the other part demised granted and to farm let to the aforesaid John Hayward the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. To have and to hold the sâ—id Tenements with the Appurtenances to the said John Hayward and his Assignes from the Feast of the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following until the end and Term of 21. years from thence next following and fully to be compleat and ended Yielding and paying therefore yeerly during the sayd Term to the aforesaid Iohn Bettisworth and his Assignes 12. pence at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel or within 10. dayes next after the said Feast By virtue of which Demise the said John Hayward in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed the Reversion thereof to the said John Bettisworth and his Heirs expectant And the said John Hayward so of the Tenements aforesaid with the Apputtenances whereof c. being possessed and the aforesaid John Bettisworth of the Reversion thereof and of the Rent aforesaid being seized in his demesn as of Fee The said Iohn Bettisworth before the time in which c. that is to say the 3d. day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th At Ipping aforesaid dyed of such his Estate of the Reversion and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. seized without issue of his Body begotten After whose death the said Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. descended to the said Thomas Bettisworth as Brother and Heir of the said John Bettisworth By which the said Thmas was seized of the aforesaid Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. and of the Rent aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee And because 12. pence of the Rent aforesaid for one whole yeer after the death of the aforesaid John Bettisworth ended at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 19th to the said Thomas the aforesaid time in which c. was behind and not paid the said Thomas doth well avow the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. as in parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with their Appurtenances to the aforesaid John Hayward in form aforesaid demised and justly c. for the said 12. pence of the Rent aforesaid to him the said Thomas so being behinde c. And the aforesaid John Hayward saith That the aforesaid Thomas for the reason before alleged ought not avow the taking of the cattel aforesaid in the place aforesaid in which c. to be just because he saith That well and true it is That the aforesaid John Bettisworth was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized demised to the said John Hayward the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. To have and to hold to the said John Hayward for the aforesaid Term of the aforesaid 21. yeers as the aforesaid Thomas above alleged But the said John Hayward saith That the aforesaid John Bettisworth of the Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee in form aforesaid being seized before the aforâ—said time in which c. into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. upon the possession of him the said John Hayward thereof entred and him the said John from his possession did expel and amove And immediatly after of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances whereof c. enfeoffed one William Bettisworth To have and to hold the said Tenements with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the said William and his Hers and Assignes for ever By virtue of which Peoffment the aforesaid William was seized of the same Tenements with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee upon the which possession of the said William Bettisworth thereof the said John Hayward afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. claiming his Term aforesaid of and in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances whereof c re-entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed The said John Hayward before the aforesaid time in which c. put the Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid place in which c. to eat the grasse in the same then growing Which Cattel were in the said place in which c. eating the grasse in the same then growing until the aforesaid Thomas the Day and Yeer in the Declaration aforesaid above specified At Ipping aforesaid in the aforesaid place called Raynolds took the Cattel of him the said John Hayward and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges until c. as he above against him complaineth Without that that the aforesaid John Bettisworth dyed of the Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. and of the Rent aforesaid seized as the aforesaid Thomas above hath alleged And this he is ready to aver wherefore in as much as the aforesaid Thomas the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. above acknowledgeth The said John Hayward demandeth Judgement and his damages by the occasion of the taking and unjust deteining of the said Cattel to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid Thomas as at first saith That the aforesaid J. Bettisworth dyed of the Reversion of the TenemeÌ„ts aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. and of the Rent aforesaid seized as he above alleged and of this puts himself upon
the Country and the said Iohn Hayward likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of Easter in 5. weeks 12. c. by whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as wel c. At which day here came the Parties c. And the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore as before It is cmmanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here 12. c. in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity To recognize c. At which day here cometh the parties And the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore it is commanded the Sheriff as at first That he cause to be here the morrow of Saint Martin 12. c. to Recognize in the form aforesaid At which dayes come the Parties and the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore as at first it is commanded the Sheriff that he cause to come here 12. c. 8. dayes of St. Hillary c. To Recognise c. in the form aforesaid c. At which day the Parties come c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therefore as at first it is commanâ—ed to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from Faster day 15. dayes 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. at which day here come the Parties c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therefore as at first it is commanded the Sheriff that he cause to come here in the morrow of the holy Trinity 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. At wch day the parties come here c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therefore as at first it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here in the morrow of Saint Martin 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. At which day the Parties come here c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore it is commanded the Sheriff that he cause to come in 8. days of Saint Hillary 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid At which day the Parties come and the Sheriff sent not the Writ And so several Venire Facias were award to the Sheriff from Term to Term to return Jurors at a day every of the said Term as at first and the parties come at the said dayes and the Sheriff sent not the Writ as in the Rolls upon Record appeareth And Process was continued between the Parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors put in respite untill this day that is to say in days of St. Michael in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 31. Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. upon Wednesday the 27th of Iune at East Greinstead in the County aforesaid first should come And now at this day as wel the aforesaid John Heyward as the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth come by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Robert Clarke one of the Barons of the Lady the Queen of her Exchequer and Iohn Puckering one of the Serjeants at Law of the Queen Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County of Sussex Assigned by the form of the Statute c. come as well the within named Iohn Hayward by William Siday his Attorney as the within written Thomas Bettisworth by John Lyons his Attorney And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them that is to say Edward Pickham William Ayles Thomas â—etley William â—revet Edmond Gray Iohn Lock Iohn Capron and John Andrew appeared and was sworn Jurors in the said Jury And because the rest of that Jury did not appear others of the standers by chosen by the Sheriff at the request of the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth And by the command of the Justices aforesaid were new put to them whose nâ—mes to the Pannel within written are filled according to the form of the Statute in such case of late made and provided The names of which Jurors so put to that is to say John Pitte Thomas Bayley William Leefe and Thomas Aglewyn come and to say the truth of the matter within contained together with the Juros first impannelled and sworn chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That one John Bettisworth was seized in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the within written Messuage and Garden witht the Appurtenances in Iping within written whereof the within written place in which c. and at the within written time in which as also time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary was parcel And further the Jurors say upon their Oaths aforesaid that the aforesaid place in which c. doth contain and the aforesaid time in which c. did contain in it â—elf one Acre and half an Acre of Land and called by the name of Rainolds and is and the aforesaid time in which c. as also time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary was a several Close by it self separately inclosed and further the Iurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid John Bettisworth so thereof as before is said being seized Afterwards that is to say the 20th day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 11th at Iping afoâ—esaid By his Indenture within written made between the aforesaid John Bettisworth of the one part and the aforesaid John Hayward of the other part demised granted and to farm let to the aforesaid John Hayward the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. To have and to hold the said Tenements with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesaid John Hayward and his Assigns from the Feast of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following unto the end and term of 21. years then next following fully to be compleat and ended Yielding and paying therefore yearly to the aforesaid John Bettisworth and his Assigns 12. d. At the Feast of St. Michâ—el the Archangel or within 10. days next after the said Feast By vertue of which Demise the said John Hayward into the Tenents aforesaid with the Apurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof possessed the reversiâ—n thereof to the aforesaid John Bittesworth and his Heirs expectant And he the said John Heyward of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. being possessed and the aforesaid John Bettisworth of the Reversion thereof and of the Rent aforesaid being seisâ—d in Demesn as of Fee The said Iohn Bettisworth into the aforesaid Close in which c. called Rainolds in the possâ—ssion of the said Iohn Heyward entred and there immediatly after sealed and delivered as his Deed a certain Deed containing a Feoffment
his Writ aforesaid but be in mercy for his false clamour c. And the aforesaid Thomas go thereof without day c. And that he have retorn of the Cattel aforesaid to be kept by him irreplegible for ever And how c. The Sheriff make it here appear in 8. dayes of Saint Michael c. It is also granted That the aforesaid Thomas recover against the said Iohn his damages aforesaid by the Jurors in form aforesaid assessed as also 11. pound and 9. shillings and 6. pence to the said Thomas at his request for his costs and charges aforesaid by the Court here of encrease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 12. pound REPLEVIN Michaelmass Term Anno 27. and 28. Eliz. Rot 1739. in the COMMON PLEAS Co. 4. part Cornwal Bevils Case fol. 6. a. NIcholas Francis was Attached by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Second Deliverance to answer to Walter Parker of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of him the said Walter and them unjustly detained against Gages and Pleges c. And whereupon the said Walter by Francis Eyrman by his Attorny complaineth That the aforesaid Nicholas the 30th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Lady the Queen that now is the 15th at Tallan in a certain place called Newton took the Cattel that is to say Two Oxen of him the said Walter and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges until c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pound And thereof he bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Nicholas by William Leigh his Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And as Bayliff of John Bevill Esquire doth well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. And justly c. Because he saith That the same place called Newton in which it is supposed the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to be done doth contain and the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid supposed to be done did contain in it self 20. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances in Tallon aforesaid and that long before the aforesaid time in which c. One Robert Smith the Elder Esquire was seized of the said 20. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and held the said 20. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances of the aforesaid John Bevill as of his Manor of Kalâ—gath in the County aforesaid by Knights Service that is to say by Homage Fealty and Escuage to the Lady the Queen when it should happen â—2 shillings And when more more and when lesse lesse and also by the Service of doing Sute at the Court of him the said John at his Manor aforesaid twice by the yeer that is to say once within a Moneth next after the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and again within a Moneth next after the Feast of Easter every yeer at that Manor holden of which Services the aforesaid John Bevill was seized by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Elder as by the Hands of his very Tenant that is to say of the Homage Fealty Escuage and Sute of Court as of his Fee and Right And that afterwards the aforesaid Robert Smith the Elder dyed of the aforesaid 20. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances seized After whose death the aforesaid 20. Acres of Land with their Appurtenances discended to one Robert Smith Son and Heir of the aforesaid Robert Smith By which the said Robert Smith the Son before the time in which c. in the aforesaid 20. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his demesn as of Fee And because the Homage of the aforesaid Robert the Son the aforesaid time in which c. to the aforesaid John Bevill behinde not done the said Nicholas as Bayliff of the said John Bevill doth well avow the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. And justly c. for that Homage so undone in the Lands of the said John in form aforesaid holden c. And upon the aforesaid Robert the Son as upon the very Tenant of the aforesaid John Bevill and within his Fee and Lordship And the aforesaid Walter saith That long before the said time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid done The sâ—id Robert Smith was seized of the aforesaid 20. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances in Tallon aforesaid called Newton in his demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized before the time of the taking aforesaid done thâ—t is to say the 24th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said â—â—dy the Queen that now is the 13th at Tallon aforesaid Leased the afore 〈◊〉 20 Acres of Land with the Appurtenances to him the said Walter To have to the said Walter his Assigns from the aforesaid 24th day of January in the yeer afores unto the end of the Term of 5. yeers then next following to be compleat and ended By virtue of which Lease the said Walter into the aforesaid 20. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances entred and was and yet is thereof possessed the Reversion thereof after the Term aforesaid ended to the aforesaid Robert Smith the Son and his Heirs expectant Without which Robert the Son the said Walter cannot answer to the avowry aforesaid of the said Nicholas nor the Plea thereof bring into Judgement And prayes aid of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Son who is present herein Court in his proper person and willingly joynes himself in aid against the aforesaid Nicholas in the Plea aforesaid c. And upon this as well the said Walter as the aforesaid Robert Smith the Son who c. say that the aforesaid Nicholas for the reason before alleged ought not avow the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to have been just For by Protestation that the aforesaid Robert Smith the Son did not hold the aforesaid 20. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances called Newton in Tallon aforesaid of the aforesaid J. Bevill as of his Manor of Keligath by Knights Service that is to say by Homage Fealty and Escuage to the Lady the Queen when it should happen 42. shillings and to more more and less less c. As also by the Service of doing Sute at the Court of the said John Bevill of his Manor aforesaid twice by the yeer that is to say once within one Moneth after the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel and again within one Moneth after the Feast of Easter every yeer at that Manor to be holden as the aforesaid Nich. above hath alleged For Plea he saith That the aforesaid John Bevil never was seized of the aforesaid Services as the said Nicholas above hath alleged And this they are ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the said Nicholas above acknowledgeth the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place
the death of every Tenant of the said 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. dying thereof seised the best Beast which should be of such Tenant at the time of his death in the name of a Heriot of which services the aforesaid John Talbot was seised by the hands of the aforesaid John Chapman the Father as by the hands of his very Tenant that is to say of the Fealty and sute of Court aforesaid as of Fee and right and of the Heriot aforesaid in his demesn as of Fee And the said John Chapman the Father of the three Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee in form aforesaid being seised afterwards and before the time in which c. At Albrighton aforesaid of such his Estate dyed thereof so seised And the said John Pendleton further saith That the aforesaid John Chapman the â—â—ther at the time of his death at Albrighton aforesaid was possessâ—d oâ— an Ox of the price of 100 shillings as his proper Ox which Ox was the best Beast of the aforesaid Iohn Capman the Father at the time of his death whereupon sell the Heriot thereof to the aforesaid Iohn and because the Heriot aforesaid after the death of the aforesaid Iohn Chapman the Father thâ— said time in which c. was behind not delivered the said said Iohn Pendleton as Bayliff of the aforesaid Iohn Talbot doth well avow the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. and justly c. for the Heriot aforesaid not delivered as within his Fee and Lordship c. And the said Iohn Chapman now Plaintiff saith That the aforesaid Iohn Pendleton as Bayliff of the aforesaid Iohn Talbot in the cause above before alleged ought not avow the taking oâ— the Cattel aforesaid to be just Because he saith That long beâ—ore the aforesaid time of the taking aforesaid done and before the aforesaid Iohn Chapman the Father had any thing in the said 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. One â—ohn â—arny was seised of a Messuage and of half a Yard Land of Meadow and Pasture with the appurtenances conteining by estimation 50. â—cres in Albrighton aforesaid whereof the said 3. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. were parcel in his demesn as of Fee and the said Messuage and one half Yard of Land Meadow and Pasture wholy with the appurtenances whereof c. held of the aforesaid Iohn Talbot as of his Manor of Albrighton aforesaid by Fealty and doing sute at the Court of the said Iohn Talbot of his Manor aforesaid from 3. weeks to 3. weeks at that Manor yearly to be holden as also by the service of rendring after the death of every Tenant of the said Messuage and half Yard Land of Meadow and Pasture wholy with the appurtenances whereof c. dying thereof seised the best Beast that was to such Tenant at the time of his death in the name of a Heriot And the said John Barny of the Messuage and half Yard Land of such Meadow and Pasture with the appurtenanceâ— wholly in form aforesaid being seised long before the time of the taking c. that is to say the first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 32th of the said 3. Acres of â—and parcel of the aforesaid half Yard Land of Land Meadow and Pasture with the appurtenances whereof enfeoffed the aforesaid â—ohn Talbot To have and to hold to the said John Talbot his Heirs and Assigns for ever By vertue of which Feoffment the aforesaid Iohn Talbot was and yet is seised of the aforesaid 3. Acres of Lands parcel c. in his demesn as of Fee and he the said Iohn so being thereof seised and the aforesaid Iohn Barny of the Messuage aforesaid and the rest of the aforesaid half Yard-Land of Meadâ—w and Pasture with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seised The said Iohn Barny afterwards and before the time of the taking aforesaid done that is to say the first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 36th of the aforesaid 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. Enfeoffed the aforesaid Iohn Câ—apman the Father and his Heirs for ever By virtue of which Feoffment the said Iohn Chapman the Father was seised of the said 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised the said Iohn Chapman the Father after and before the time of the taking c. At Albrighton aforesaid of such his Estate of and in the same 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. dyed thereof seised after whose death the said 3. Acres of Pasture with their appurtenances in which c. discended to the said Iohn Chapman now Plaintiff as Son and Heir of the said Iohn Chapman the Father By which the said Iohn Chapman now Plaintiff into the 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. entred and was and yet is thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised The said Iohn Chapman the now Plaintiff before the time of the taking c. put his Cattel into the aforesaid Place in which c. to eat the Grass in the same then growing as it was lawful for him to do which Cattell were in the place aforesaid in which eating the Grass there growing untill the said Iohn Pendleton the aforesaid second day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th abovesaid at Albrighton aforesaid in the afores place called Bromley VVake the Cattel of him the said Io. Chapman aforesaid them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. as he above against him complaineth this he is ready to aver wherefore in as much as the aforesaid Iohn Pendleton the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. to Barr and that he to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bound to answer wherefore for want of a sufficient Plea in Barr in this behalf the said Iohn Pendleton demands Judgement and Return of the Cattle aforesaid together with his damages to be adjudged unto him And the aforesaid Iohn Chapman now Plaintiff in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to Bar the aforesaid John Pendleton from justly avowing the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the place in which c. above hath alleged which he is ready to averr which matter the aforesaid John Pendleton doth not deny nor to the same any wayes answereth but refuse to admit the same averment as at first demandeth Judgement and his damages by the occasion of the taking and unjust deteining of the same Cattel to
Acres parcel of the said 20. Acres the said Thomas saith That long before the time in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be done one Francis Bunny was seized of the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture in which c. in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say The first day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 20th by his Deed of Feoffment here into Court brought bearing date the same day and year enfeoffed one Miles Hilycock of the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. To have and to hold to the said Miles and his heirs for ever to the use of the said Francis for the term of the life of the said Francis and after the death of the said Francis to the use of one David Bunny and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten and for lack of such issue to the use of Nicholas Bunny and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten and for lack of such issue to the use of Walter Bunny and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten and for lack of such issue to the use of Stephen Bunny and his heirs for ever By vertue of which Feoffment and by force of certain Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th of transferring uses in possession holden made The aforesaid Francis was of the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Freehold the remainder thereof after the death of the aforesaid Francis to the aforesaid David and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Nicholas and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Walter and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Stephen and his heirs for ever exptctant and the aforesaid Francis so of the aforesaid 20. acres with the appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized the remainder thereof to the aforesaid David in form aforesaid expectant The said Francis afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 21th enfeoffed one Richard Tomson of the aforesaid 20. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances To have and to hold to the said Richard his heirs and assigns for ever By vertue of which the said Richard was of the said 20. acres of Pasture with their appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Fee by colour whereof and for that the said Feoffment was made to the disinheriting of the said David the said David in the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Feertail the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Nicholas and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the said Walter and the heirs of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Stephen and his Heirs for ever And the aforesaid David so thereof being seized the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant the said David afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 22th at Willesdon aforesaid demised the aforesaid five acres of Pasture of the aforesaid 20. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. parcel To one Adam Blunt to have and to hold to the said Adam from the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel last past until the end and term of one year from thence next following and fully to be compleat By vertue of which the said Adam Blunt into the said five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and the said Adam so being thereof possessed afterwards and before the time in which enfeoffed the aforesaid Thomas Albany of the said five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances To have and to hold to the said Thomas his heirs and assigns to the proper use and behoof of him the said Thomas his heirs and assigns for ever By colour of which the said Thomas was of the said five arces of Pasture with the Appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid John Grendon claiming the said five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances by colour of a certain Deed of Demise to him thereof made for the term of his life by the aforesaid Miles Hitchcock whereas nothing of the said five acres of Pasture in the possession of the aforesaid John Grendon by the said Deed ever passed in the aforesaid five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances before the time in which c. entred upon whose possession of the said John thereof the said Thomas Albany afterwards that is to say the aforesaid time in which c. into the aforesaid five acres of Pasture with the appurtenances entred and the grass there then growing with the cattel aforesaid fed trod and consumed as it was lawfull for him to do and this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayeth judgement if the aforesaid John Grendon his action aforesaid against him ought to have or maintain c. And as to any Trespass in the aforesaid 15. acres of Pasture residue the said Thomas Albany saith that the aforesaid John Grendon his Action aforesaid thereof against him ought not to have or maintain because he saith That the aforesaid David long before the Trespass aforesaid supposed to be done being seized of the aforesaid 15. Acres of Pasture in his Demesn as of Fee tail as before is said before the time in which c. that is to say the second day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 22th aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid by a certain Indenture between the said David and the aforesaid Thomas Albany made bearing date the same day and year and in the Court of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid within six moneths then next following in due manner of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided one part of which sealed with the Seal of the said David the said Thomas Albany brings in Court bargained and sold to the said Thomas the aforesaid 15. acres of Pasture residue To have and to hold to the said Thomas and his Heirs for ever by colour of which Bargain Sale and Inrollment the said Thomas Albany of the aforesaid 15. acres of Pasture was seized in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid John Grendon claiming the said 15. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances by colour of the said Deed of Demise to him thereof
afore of new are added whose names in the Pannel within written are filed according to the form of the Statute in such case late made and provided And the Jurrors so new added that is to say George Snell John Barnacott John Shate George Slade William Killard and Christopher Cheek being called likewise came who to say the truth of the within contained together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impanelled and sworn chosen tryed sworn say upon their Oath That before the within written time in which it is supposed the Trespass within written to be done one Joh. Arundell Esq was seized of the TenemeÌ„ts within written with their AppurtenaÌ„ces in which it is supposed the Trespass within written to be done in his demesn as of fee so therof being seized Afterwards before the within written time in which c. that is to say the third day of July in the year of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 30th Demised to one John Tooker and to the within named Will. Rud the Tenement within written with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other things To have and to hold to the said John Tooker and William Rud for the term of their lives and the life of the longest liver of them the said John and William By vertue of which Demise the said John Tooker and William Rud were seized of the Tenements within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in their Demesn as of Freehold for the term of the lives of them the said John and William and the longest liver of them and so being thereof seized and the said John Arundel of the Reversion of the Tenements within written with the Appurtenances in which c. being seized the said John Arundel afterwards and within the time in which c. At Morthoe within written of such estate died seized after whose death the Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other things descended to one John Arundel Knight as Son and Heir of the aforesaid John Arundel By which the said John Arundel Knight was seized of the aforesaid Reversion of the Tenements within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized afterwards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 20th day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 10th At Morthoe within written by his writing Indented one part of which sealed with the Seal of the said John Arundel Knight was shewed to the said Jurors in evidence whose date is the same day and year granâ—ed the Reversion of the Tenements within written with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other things to the same Edward Tooker for the term of his life when after death surrender or forfeiture of the aforesaid John Tooker and William Rud it should happen as by the said Writing Indented amongst other things more fully appeareth To which grant of the Reversion of the Tenements within written with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other things to the same Edward by the aforesaid John Arundel Knight in form aforesaid made the aforesaid John Tooker being Tenant of the Tenements aforesaid within written with the Appurtenances in which c. for the term of his life joyntly with the aforesaid William Rud afterwards and before the within written time in which c. At Morthoe within written to the aforesaid Edward thereof Attorned and agreed By colour of which Grant of the Reversion aforesaid and of the Attornment and Agreement aforesaid the aforesaid Edward was seized of the Reversion of the Tenements within written with the Appurtenances in which c. as the Law requireth as of Freehold for the term of his life and so thereof being seized and the aforesaid John Tooker and William Rud of the Tenements within written with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other things being seized The said John Tooker afterwards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 14th day of December in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31th at Morthoe aforesaid made to the said Edward Tooker a certain Writing of Surrender of the Tenements within written with the Appurtenances in which c. amongst other things which to the Jurors aforesaid was shewed the Tenor of which followeth in these words To all Christian people to whom this present writing shall come I John Tooker of Morthoe in the County of Devon Yeoman sendeth greeting in our Lord God everlasting Whereas I the said John Tooker and William Rud do hold joyntly for term of their lives and the life of the longest liver of them All the Capital Messuage and Lands Tenements and Hereditaments called Barton Lands in the Mannor of Sprecombe or parcel of the said Mannor and all those Lands Tenements and Hereditaments with the Appurtenances in Hokesmil with the Pasture of Hokeswood and Common of Pasture upon Hokesdown parcel of the said Mannor of the Demise and grant of John Arundel Esquire as by the Deed of Demise and Grant thereof made by the said John Arundel at large and plainly it doth and may appear Now know ye that the said John Tooker for divers and sundry causes and considerations him moving doth by these presents suâ—render and yield up unto Edward Tooker the son of the said John Tooker to whom the Reversion of all and singular the premises is granted and doth belong or the term of the life of the said Edward All his Estate Title and Interest in and to the premises and in and to every part and parcel thereof in as large and ample manner as he the said John Tooker can or may surrender the same In Witness whereof the said John Tooker to these presents hath set his Seal Given the 14th day of December in the 31th yeer of the Reign of our Soveraign Lady Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. And further the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Tooker afterwards and before the within written time in which c. At Morthoe aforesaid dyed And that the said Edward afterwards that is to say the within written first day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 36th aforesaid claiming to have and occupy the Tenements within written with the Appurtenances in which in Common with the said William Rud by virtue of the aforesaid Writing of Surrender by the aforesaid John Tooker in form aforesaid made into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. entred and the Grass within written to the value c. in the Close aforesaid then growing with the Cattel within written fed trod and Consumed as the aforesaid William Rud
said VVilliam take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false clamour he be in Mercy c. And the aforesaid Edward go thereof without day c. TRESPAS Trinity Term Anno 70. of King JAMES Rot. 2612. in the COMMON-PLEAS C. 9. part The Earl of Shrewesburies Case fol. 42. RObert Spencer late of Maunsfield in the County aforesaid Esquire and Brownl Thomas Woodward late of Maunsfield in the Couty aforesaid Gentleman were attached to Answer to Roger Earl of Rutland of a Plea Wherefore Whereas The Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 14th day of July in the 42th yeer of her Reign at Westminster in the County of Middlesex By her Letters Patents sealed with the Great Seal of England had given and granted to the said Earl from the time of the full age of the said Earl of 21. years To the Term and for and during the Term of his natural life The Office of Steward of the Lordships or Manors of her the late Queen of Maunsfield in the County aforesaid and Bolsover and Horseley in the County of Derby with the Wages Fees to the said Office anciently due and accustomed To have and yeerly to receive the said Wages during the Term aforesaid of the Issues Profits Farms and Revenews of the aforesaid Lordships or Manors by the Hands of the Farmers Receivers or any other Occupiers thereof for the time being at the Feasts of St. Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portions Together with all other Profits Rights Commodities Jurisdictions Privileges Preheminences and Emoluments to the said Offices arising or in any wayes belonging And whereas the said Earl before the making of the said Letters Patents that is to say the 19th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the aforesaid late Queen the 40th had attained unto his full age of 21 years and by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid was seized of the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield as of Freehold for the Term of his life And the same Offine from the aforesaid 14th day of June in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen the 42th aforesaid for one whole year then next after well and faithfully had executed and the Wages Fees and Profits to the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield of old due and accustomed by that time had had and received The aforesaid Robert and Thomas intending manifoldly to molest him the said Earl and him the said ' Earl to disturb from the Execution of the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield and him the said Earl of the Wages Fees and Profits which by reason of the execution of the said Office which he could and might of Right to have and receive wholy to frustrate and hinder of his own wrong without any Right of lawful authority without the leave of the said Earl the 16th day of February in the year of the Reign of the said late Queen the 44th at Maunsfield aforesaid The aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid exercised and from thence hitherto do exercise and occupie and all and singular the Wages Fees Commodities and Profits to the said Office due and by reason of the exercising of the Office aforesaid within the Manor aforesaid of right belonging to their own proper use had and received and the said Eearl to exercise the said Office within the aforesaid Manor aforesaid and the Wages Fees Commodities and Profits to the said Office of right to have and receive with force and Arms then and there hindered and yet do hinder and other harms to him did to the great damage of him the said Earl and against the peace of the said Lord the King that now is c. And whereupon the said Earl by John Muscott his Attorny complaineth for that whereas the aforesaid late Queen the 14th day of June in the year of the Reign the 42th abovesaid at VVestminster aforesaid by her aforesaid Letters Patents which the said Earl under the great Seal of England Sealed here in Court bringeth whose date is the same day and year had given and granted unto the said Earl from the time of the full age of the said Earl of 21 years to the term and for and during the whole term of the natural life of him the said Earl the aforesaid Offices of Steward of the aforesaid Lorsships or Manors of the aforesaid late Queen of Maunsfield Bolsover and Horsley with the Wages and Fees to the said Offices of old due and accustomed to have and receive yearly the said Wages during the term aforesaid of the Issues Profits Farms and Revenues of the said Lordships or Manors by the hand of the Farmers Receivers or other Occupiers of the same for the time being at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Arch-Angel and Easter by equal portions tegether with all other Profits Rights Commodities Jurisdictions Privileges Appurtenances Emoluments to the said Offices belonging or any waies appertaining and whereas the said Earl before the making of the aforesaid Letters Patents that is to say the 19th day of November in the year of the Reign of the aforesaid late Queen the 40th aforesaid had attained unto his full age of 21. years and by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid was seised of the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield as of his free-hold for the term of his life and that Office from the aforesaid 14th day of June in the year of the Reign of the aforesaid late Queen the 42th abovesaid for one whole year then next following well and truly had exercised and the Wages Fees and Profits to the aforesaid Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield from of old due and accustomed for that time had had and received the aforesaid Robert and Thomas endevoring him the said Easl from the exercising of the said Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Mauasfield greatly to disturb the said Earl of the Wages Fees Profits that is to say of 100. s. yearly to be paid for the exercising of the afores office of Steward of the the ancient Fees due for the entring of playnts and pleas for Coppies of Court Rolls for Replevins for proving of Wills for granting of administrations of all persons whatsoever dying within the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield for the entring of surrendors and admission of all Tenants whatsoever of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield for the Entry of of the Fealty of all Tenants of the said Manor of Maunsfield which of right he ought or might have and receive utterly to frustrate and hinder of his own wrong without any right or Lawfull authority without the leave of him the said Earl the aforesaid 16. day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the said late Queen the 42th abovesaid at Maunsfield aforesaid the aforesaid Office of Steward of the said Manor of
of the same Earl of Rutland from the Treasury of us our Heirs and Successors at the Receipt of our Exchequer arising by the Hands of our Treasurer and Chamberlains or any of them for the time being or from our Meadows near the Castle of Notington aforesaid called the Kings Meadows and of the profits of Pannage and Herbage of our Park of Beskwood as also of all the Rents and profits of the Forest aforesaid coming oâ— growing by the Hands of the Bayliffs Farmers Receivers or other Occupiers of the said Meadows out of the Rents and profits aforesaid or any of them for the time being at the Feasts aforesaid by equal portions We also give and for us our Heirs and Successors we grant to the said Roger Earl of Rutland from the time and full age of 21. years of the same Earl to the Term and for and during the whole Term of the natural life of the same Roger Earl of Rutland The Office of Steward of our Lordships or Manors of Maunsfield Bolsover and Horseley with the Wages and Fees to the said Office of old due and accustomed to be taken To have and yearly to take the said Wages during the Term aforesaid of the Issues Profits Farms and Revenews of the said our Lordships or Manors of Maunsfield Bolsover and Horseley or any of them by the Hands of the Farmer Receivers or other Occupiers of the same or any of them for the time being at the said Feasts of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portion together with all other Profits Rights Commodities Jurisdictions Privileges Preheminences and Emoluments to all and singular the said Offices with other the pâ—emises or any of them coming or any wayes belonging and as fully freely and wholy and in as ample manner and form as Thomas Manners Knight or John Manners Esquire or John late Earl of Rutland or before in Edward late Earl of Rutland deceased or before them Thomas and Henry late Earls of Rutland deceased Anthony Brown or Richard Southwell Knights deceased or any other or other Officer or Officers aforesaid or any of them before this time occupied had and perceived or ought to have had and received in and for the same or any of them And moreover of our further Grace certain Knowledge and meer Motion we have given and granted and by these for us our Heirs and Successors we give and grant to the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland The Office of Keeper of our Park of Nottingham with all and singular Wages Fees Profits Commodities and Emoluments whatsoever to the Office aforesaid due and accustomed or belonging in as ample manner and form as the aforesaid Thomas Manners Knight or John Manners Esquire or the aforesaid John or Edward late Earls of Rutland now deceased or before them one Richard Manners or Francis Leak Knight now deceased or any other or others Officer or Offices aforesaid exercised had and took To have use and exercise the Office aforesaid to the said Roger Earl of Rutland by him or his sufficient Deputy or Deputies from the time of the full age of 21. years of the same Earl to the Term and for and during the whole Term of the natural life of the said Roger Earl of Rutland together with the Wages Fees Profits Commodities Advantage and Emoluments whatsoever to the said Office of old due and accustomed or part or by reason thereof by any person whatsoever before taken and had by the Hands of the Receivers Farmers Bayliffs Occupiers or our Officers for the time being of the Issues Revenews and Profits of the same at the Feasts of Easter and Saint Michael the Archangel by equal portions to be paid Which Offices and Fees and all and singular the premises above by these presents given and granted by our Letters Patents under our Great Seal of England made bearing date at Westminster the 23th day of July in the year of our Reign the 23th to one John Manners Esquire during the minority of the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland lately were given and granâ—ed Which Ro. Earl of Rutland is now of full age as we have certain Knowledge Willing and also firmly enjoyning and coÌ„manding by these presents to all and singular our Officers Ministers and Subjects as well within Liberties as without by the Tenor of these presents That to the said Roger Earl of Rutland and to his Deputy or Deputies in all the premises to be done executed they be aiding assisting as it ought to be Notwithstanding that express mention of the true yearly value or of the certainty of the premises or any of them or of other gifts or gants by us or by any of our Progenitors to the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland before this time made are not in being or any other Statute Act Ordinance Provision or Restraint to the contrary thereof before this had made done ordained or provided or any other thing cause or matter whatsoever in any wise notwithstanding In witness whereof we have caused these our Letters to be made Patents Witness my self at Westminster the 14th day of June in the yeer of our Reign the 42th And that the said Roger Earl of Rutland before the making of the said Letters Patents that is to say the 10th day of November in the year of the Reign of the aforesaid late Queen the 40th came unto his full age of 21. years By virtue of which Letters Patents aforesaid he was seised of the aforesaid Office of Sâ—eward of the Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid in the Declaration above specified as of Freehold for the Term of his life and that the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland at the time of the making of the said Letters Patents did exercise the Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield in the Declaration aforesaid mentioned by his Deputies and not by himself in his own person And that afterwards that is to say the 17th day of December in the year of the Reign of the said late Queen Elizabeth the 44th The said late Lady the Queen of the said Manor of Maunsfield sO as before is said being seised By her Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England sealed bearing date the same day and year and to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed had granted the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield amongst other things to William Hamond and Ralph Catterell To have and to hold the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid William Hamond and Ralph Cotterell their Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which the aforesaid William Hamond and Ralph Cotterell into the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield with the Appurtenances entred and were thereof seised in their Demesn as of Fee And that the aforesaid William Hamond and Ralph Cotterell so thereof being seised Afterwards that is to say the 23th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 44th abovesaid By their certain Indenture bearing date the
said Lady the Queen of the Bench here at Westminster in Easter Term in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen the 30th abovesaid before the then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here as the deed of the said William Haw by him the said William acknowledged and within 6. Moneths then next following that is to say the same Easter Term in due manner in the said Court of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided for and in consideration of 120. pound to the said William by the said Richard before that time paid bargained and sold to the said Richard amongst other things the Reversion aforesaid To have and to hold to him and his Heirs for ever By Colour of which Bargain and Sale and Inrollment aforesaid and by force of a certain Statute made in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th holden at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer his Reign the 27th Of transferring of uses into possession the aforesaid Richard was and yet is seised of the Reversion aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee And the said Richard so thereof being seised and the aforesaid Elizabeth of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to her in form aforesaid granted being possessed The said Elizabeth did waste spoyle and destruction of the Lands that is to say in digging in 10. Acres of Land in Goring aforesaid parcel of the Tenements aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert demised 100. loads of Clay taking for the price of every load of Clay thereof 8. pence and cutting down and selling of the Woods also in a certain Wood called Heighgrove containing 10. Acres of Wood with the Appurte in Goring aforesaid and parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said Robert above in form aforesaid demised 20. Oaks the price of every Oak 5. shillings through the said whole Wood here and there growing and in a certain other Wood called the Hedge Row lying in Goring aforesaid near the aforesaid Wood called Heighgrove in Goring aforesaid parcel of the Tenement aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert demised 40. Oaks the price of each of them 6. shillings through the said whole Wood here and theregrowing and in a certain Coppice called Home Coppice in Goring aforesaid parcel of the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances to the said Robert in form aforesaid above demised 100. Oaks price of each of them 10. shillings in the said Coppice called Home Coppice late growing here and there And in 20. Acres of Pasture called the Hanging in Goring aforesaid lying there bebetwixt a certain Close called High grove hill and another Close called Dicker grove hill that is to say parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert in form aforesaid demised 10. Oaks price of each of them 6. shillings Six Ashes price of each of them 5. shillings and 10. Beeches price of each of them 6. shillings in the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture likewise late here and there growing and in a certain Hedge of a certain Close called Home field in Whitchurch aforesaid that is to say parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert in form aforesaid demised lying near unto a Wood called Hawes Coppice 3. Oaks price of each of them 10. shillings and one Beech price 10. shillings and in a certain other Hedge of the Close aforesaid called Home field in VVhitchurch aforesaid that is to say parcel of the Tenements aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert in form aforesaid demised lying near to the aforesaid Wood called Home Coppice 10. Oaks price of each of them 20. shillings and also in suffering the sprouts of the Roots of 20000. other little Oaks called Oakesciapling of 20000. Beeches and 200. Ashes to the value of 20. pound in the said Wood called Heigh grove and 10000. of other little Oaks called Oakesapling 10000. of Beeches and 100. of Ashes to the value of 20. pound in the aforesaid Wood called the Hedge Row and 10000. of Oaks 10000. of Beeches and 200. of Ashes in the aforesaid Coppice called Hawe Coppice by the said Elizabeth through the whole Woods here and there growing to be cut and to be eaten and utterly destroyed and wasted with Cattel to the dissenherisin of the said Richard and against the form of the Provision aforesaid Whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 200. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute c. And the the aforesaid Elizabeth by Ralph Burges her Attorny cometh and desendeth the force and injury when c. And whatsoever c. And saith that the aforesaid Richard his Action against her ought not to have Because she saith That well and true it is That the aforesaid William Haw was seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and being thereof so seised the aforesaid 4th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th abovesaid By his Indenture demised to the aforesaid Robert the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances except before excepted To have and to hold to him and his Assigns from the aforesaid Feast of the birth of our Lord then last past until the end and Term of the aforesaid 16. yeers then next following and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which demise the aforesaid Robert into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid 20th day of August abovesaid granted all his Estate Interest and Term of yeers which he had then to come of and in the aforesaid premises with the Appurtenances above demised to the aforesaid Elizabeth Hynde By virtue of which grant the aforesaid Elizabeth into the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances above demised entred and waâ— thereof possessed as the aforesaid Rich. by his Declaration above supposeeth But the said Elizabeth further saith That the said Elizabeth of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above demised in form aforesaid being possessed and the said William Haw of the Reversion thereof being seised in his Demesn as of Fee after the aforesaid 7th day of May in the 30th yeer aforesaid and before the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale Between the aforesaid William of the one part and the aforesaid Richard of the other part made in the Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench in form aforesaid was inrolled A Fine was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench here that is to say at WESTMINSTER aforesaid from the aforesaid day of Easter in 15. days in the yeer of her Reign the 30th abovesaid before Edmond Anderson Francis Windham William Periam and Francis Rodes then Justices of the said
at Westminster in the County of Midd. was holden at Westminster aforesaid unto the Castle of the Lady the Queen c. is adjorned c. and their holden c. Afterwards the said Lady the Queen By other Letters Patents Constituted John Clench and Francis Rodes one of her Serjants at Law Justices to Assizes in the a-a-aforesaid County of York c. And the said Justices by virtue of the said Lett. Patents Afterward that is to say Monday in the 4th week of Lent in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th At the Castle of York came before whom then and there come the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorney aforesaid and pray a Writ of Reattachment to the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats c. that they be before the Justices of the Lady the Queen at the next Assizes in her County of York to be taken assigned to be holdē at the afores Castle of York to hear the Record and their Judgement of the Assize aforesaid w hc was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at the Castle aforesaid so that that Assize then be here in the State as it was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy Justices to Assizes c. At the aforesaid Castle of York the aforesaid Monday the 6th day of August in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th in which day the Assize aforesaid was adjorned before the said John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices c. from the aforesaid Castle of York unto the aforesaid Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London untill the aforesaid Saturday next after the aforesaid morrow of All Souls then next following c. At which next Assizes holden at the Castle of York aforesaid Monday the 29th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices to Assizes c. came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert by the aforesaid Thomas Hill their Attorny And the Sheriff that is to say Thomas Wentworth Esq now sent That the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert c. And upon this day is given to them before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench in the Bench at Westminster in the morrow of All Souls next comming to hear and receive what to the said Justices should seem in this behalf because the said Iohn Clench and Francis Rodes Justices to Assizes c. thereof not yet c. And the Assize aforesaid with all touching the same to the said Justices of the Bench is sent c. The Warrant of Attorny followes and the Writ of Resummons in the Roll and the Tenor of the Writ of Reattachment and Retorn of the said Writ Elizabeth c. To the Sherriffs of York greeting Reattach Edward Vavasor Esq George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert or their Bailiffs if they shall not be found before our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned at the Castle of York in your County upon Monday the 22d. day of Iuly then next to come to hear the Record and Judgement of the Assize of Novel disseisin which was in our Court at the Castle aforesaid which Assize Thomas Dowman Esq and Elizabeth his Wife there arraigned against them of 6. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow and 200. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Spaldington VVillytoft and Southcone So as they that Assize then be there in the same state as it was in our Court before Iohn Clench third Baron of our Exchequer and Francis Gawdy one of our Serjants at Law our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned At the aforesaid Castle of York Monday the 6th day of August last past which day the assize aforesaid for certain causes was from thence adjorned before the same our Justices unto the Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London Untill Saturday next after the morrow of All Souls then next following And have here the names of the Pledges and this Writ Iohn Clench at the Castle of York the 11th day of March in the yeer of our Reign the 25th Frankland Cresly The within named Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert hath not any thing nor any of them have any thing in my Baliwick by which they can be attached or any of them can be attached nor have they nor any of them hath a Bailiff or Bailiffs nor are they or any of them to be found in the same Thomas VVentworth Esq Sheriff And now here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid at this day that is to say at the aforesaid morrow of All Souls came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by the aforesaid Henry Cressy their Attorny as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by Tho. Algar their Attony And because the Justices of the Bench here will avise themselves of and upon the premses before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties here until 8. dayes of St. Hillary and so it is continued in 8. dayes of St. Hillary the yeer following At which day here come as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the said Justices here That the aforesaid Indenture by the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq after the aforesaid Recovery in form aforesaid made and had was good and sufficient in the Law to lead the uses of the Recovery aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenunces so that the same Recovery of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the view of the Recognitors of the Assize aforesaid put and in the Plaint aforesaid specified by the aforesaid Andrew VVindsor VVilliam Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundere against the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq in form aforesaid had was to those uses in the aforesaid barr of the aforesaid Edward above specified in manner and form as the said Edward in his bar aforesaid above alleged Therefore it is considered That the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth take nothing by their Writ aforesaid but in mercy for their false clamour c. And the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert go thereof without day c. Audita Querela Easter Term Anno 80. of King JAMES Doctor Druries Case C. 8. part Fol. 139. a. AT another time as appeareth in
life And afterwards there dyed of such estate thereof seised After whose death the said Zachary into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Freehold for the Term of his life by virtue of the bequest aforesaid and the Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. after the death of the said Thomas did descend to one Thomas Nash as Son and Heir of the aforesaid Thomas Nash sometimes Husband c. By which the said Thomas the Son was seised of the said Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as of Fee and Right And the said Thomas so thereof being seised and the aforesaid Zachary of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. So as before is said being seised The aforesaid Marcy after the death of the said Thomas Nash sometimes her Husband c. in the Widdowhood of the said Marcy whilest she was single that is to say The 27 th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 35 th at Gosfield aforesaid by her writing of Release which the said Edward and Margaret with the seal of the said Marcy sealed here in Court bring whose date is the same day and yeer by the name of Marcy Nash the Widdow of Thomas Nash late of Feringe in the County of Essex deceased remised released and altogether for her her Heirs Executors and Administrators for ever quit claimed to the aforesaid Thomas Nash Son and Heir of the aforesaid Thomas Nash sometimes the Husband of the said Marcy by the name of Thomas Nash of Wetherfield in the County aforesaid Yeoman Son and Heir of the said Thomas Nash late her Husband All and all manner of Actions as well Real as Personal all Sutes Quarrels and Demands whatsoever which she the said Marcy or her Executors against the said Thomas Nash Son and Heir Executors ever have or had then had or ought to have or any wayes then might or would have by reason of any thing cause or deed whatsoever from the beginning of the world unto the day of the date of the same Writing of Release After which Writing of Release to the aforesaid Thom. the Son as before is said made The aforesaid Thomas the Son of the Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenance whereof c. in form aforesaid being seised At Gosfield aforesaid dyed of such his estate thereof seised After whose death the said Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. did descend to the aforesaid Margaret as Daughter and Heir of the aforesaid Thomas the Son By which the said Margaret was seised of the said Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as of Fee and Right and she the said Margaret so of the same Reversion as before is said being seised And the aforesaid Zachary of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seised The said Zachary afterwards at Gosfield aforesaid dyed of such his estate thereof seised After whose death the said Margaret into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised in their Demesn as of Fee and Right and so thereof being seised The said Margaret afterwards and before the day of bringing the Original Writ as aforesaid of the said Thomas and Lawrence and Marcy at Gosfield aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid Edward Altham By which the said Edward and Margaret were and yet are seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof in their Demesn as of Fee in the Right of the said Margaret And this they are ready to aver and demand Judgement if the aforesaid Thomas Lawrence and Marcy Dower of the said Marcy of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. Of the Endowment of the said Thomas Nash sometimes the Husband c. against them ought to have c. And the aforesaid Thomas Lawrence and Marcy demand the hearing of the aforesaid Writing of Release And it is read unto them in these words To All Faithful People to whom this present Writing shall come Marcy Nash the Widow of Thomas Nash late of Feringe in the County of Essex greeting in our Lord God everlasting Know Me the aforesaid Marcy being in my pure Widowhood and â—ull power to have Remised Released and altogether for Me my Heirs Executors and Administrators for ever quit claimed to Thomas Nash of Wetherfield in the County aforesaid Yeoman All and all manner of Actions as well real as personal Sutes Quarrels and Demands whatsoever As also all my Dower and Title and Action of Dower to me appertaining by the death of the said Thomas my Husband of any of his Lands and Tenements in Wetherfield aforesaid what or which I the said Marcy or my Executors against him the said Thomas Nash the Son or his Executors I ever had have or any wayes hereafter may have we have or may have by reason of any thing cause or deed whatsoever from the beginning of the World unto the day of the Date of this present Writing of Release And further know ye Me the aforesaid Marcy to have given and Remised to the said Thomas Nash the Son All the Goods late of the said Thomas my Husband which were in the possession of the said Thomas the Son or his Assignes at the time of the making of this deed of Release In Witnesse whereof to this my present Writing I have set my Seal Dated the 27 th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defendor of the Faith c. the 35 th Which being read and heard The said Thomas Lawrence and Marcy say That they for any thing before alleged for having the Dower of the said Marcy ought not to be barred because they say That the aforesaid Thomas Nash sometimes Husband c. in his life time and at the time of his death was seised as well of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid As of Two Messuages and 200. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances in Wetherfield aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seised at Gosfield aforesaid by his Last Will and Testament in Writing devised the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid to the aforesaid Zachary Nash younger Son of the said Thomas Nash sometimes Husband c. And afterwards at Gosfield aforesaid dyed After whose death the said Thomas Nash the younger as Son and Heir of the said Thomas Nash sometimes Husband c. into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in VVetherfield aforesaid entred and was thereof seised in his Demesn as of Fee and Right And the said Zachary into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof
to say the 10 th day of June in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 28 tâ— came into Court the said William Paynter by the aforesaid Thomas Antrobas his Attorney by a special Warrant to him made in this behalf and acknowledged That he is satisfied of the debt and damages aforesaid Therefore the said Richard of the debt and those damages be acquitted c. Trinity 27o. Eliz. Rott 1354. in the Common Pleas. Wisemans Case Co. 1. part Fol. 1. a. AT another time as it appeareth Easter Term in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 27 th Rott 1056. it is conteined thus Essex ss Richard Bernard of great Braxsted in the County aforesaid Yeoman was summoned to Answer to Iohn Wiseman of a Plea that he render to him 18. pound which he oweth him and unjustly deteineth c. And whereupon the said Iohn by Apollo Playne his Attorney saith That whereas one Thomas Wiseman was seised of and in the Island of Osee with the appurtenances in great Totham in the County aforesaid in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised The said Island with the appurtenances held of the Lady the Queen â—hat now is as of her Manor of East Greenwich in the County of Kent in free Socage that is to say by Fealty only The said Thomas so thereof being seised the 15 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 19 th at Great Totham aforesaid demised the one moyety of the said Island to the aforesaid Richard To have and hold the said moyety with the appurtenances to the said Richard from the feast of St. Michael the Archangel then last past untill the end and Term of 21. years from thence next following fully to be compleated Yielding and paying therfore yearly to the aforesaid Thomas his Heirs and Assigns 36. pound of Lawful Money of England at two Terms of the year That is to say at the Feast of the Nativity of Saint Iohn the Baptist and the Birth of our Lord by equal portions to be paid By virtue of which demise the aforesaid Richard in the moyety aforesaid with the appurtenances did enter and was and yet is thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed and the said Thomas of the reversion of the said moyety as of Fee and Right and of the other moyety of the Island aforesaid being seised in his demesn as of Fee the said Thomas had issue William his Son and Heir apparent and the said William had issue John his Son and Heiâ— apparent and afterwards the said William at Great Totham aforesaid dyed and the aforesaid Thomas of the Reversion of the one Moyety of the Island aforesaid of the othâ—r Moyety of the said Island with the appurtenances in form foresaid being seised The said Thomas so thereof seised the 20th day of November in the 23th year of the Reign of the Queen that now is at Great Totham aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in writing and by the same willed and bequeathed to one Thomas Wiseman his Son the said Reversion of the aforesaid Moyety of the Island aforesaid and the other Moyty of the said Island To have to him and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remainder to the right Heirs of the said Thomas Wiseman the Father for ever And afterwards The said Thomas Wiseman the Father at Great Totham aforesaid dyed of such Estates of the aforesaid reversion of the one Moyety of the Island aforesaid and of and in the aforesaid other Moyety of the said Island with the appurtenances seised After whose death the aforesaid Thomas Wiseman the Son into one Moyety of the Island aforesaid entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee-tail and seised of the aforesaid Reversion of the other Moyety of the said Island as of Fee-tail that is to say to him and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten the reversion thereof to the said John as Cosin and Heir of the said Thomas Wiseman the Father belonging that is to say as Son and Heir of William Wiseman deceased Son and Heir of Thomas Wiseman the Father And the aforesaid Thomas Wiseman the Son so thereof being seised and the said John Cosin and Heir of the aforesaid Thomas the Father of the Reversiâ—n thereof as of Fee and Right being seised The said John the 16th day of May in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 24 th at great Totham aforesaid By his Indenture baring date the same day year made between him the said John VViseman by the name of John VViseman of the Inner Temple London Gent. Cosin and next Heir of Thomas VViseman late of Norhead within the Parish of Muchwaltham in the County of Essex Esq deceased of the one party and Anthony Everard John Mead and John Sorrel by the name of Anthony Everard of the Inner Temple London Gent. Iohn Meade of Great Easton in the County of Essex Gent. and Iohn Sorrel of Stylsted in the aforesaid County of Essex Gent. of the other party and in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of Pleas holden before the Queen her self within 6 Moneths then next following according to the form of the Statute in such case late had and provided in due manner of Record enrolled and of which one part with the seals of the said Anthony Iohn Meade and Iohn Sorrel Sealed the said Iohn VViseman here in Court brings whose date is the said 6 th day of May in the 24 th yeer aforesaid testifying That the aforesaid Thomas VViseman as well in consideration and to the intent That all and all manner the Manors Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments with all and singular their appurtenances should and might for ever after continue remain and be at the will and good pleasure of God in the Stock Name or Bloud of the said Iohn VViseman as for divers other good causes and considerations him the said Iohn VViseman then especially moving had Covenanted and Granted for himself his Heirs Executors Administrators and Assigns To and with the said Anthony Everard Iohn Meade and Iohn Sorrel their Heirs Executors and Administrators and the Heirs Executors and Administrators of every of them by the said Indenture That he the said Iohn VViseman his Heirs and Assigns should and would immediatly from henceforth stand and be seised of and in the Reversion and Reversions Remainder and Remainders of all and singular the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments before mentioned To the use of the said Iohn VViseman and the Heirs males of his body lawfully to be begotten and for default of such issue To the use of VVilliam VViseman Brother of the said Iohn VViseman lawfully begotten and for default of such issue To the use of Thomas VViseman another Brother of the said Iohn VViseman and the Heirs males of the body
of the said Thomas lawfully to be begotten And for default of such issue To the use of the Heirs of the body of VVilliam VViseman Father of the said Iohn VViseman and the Heirs of their bodies lawfully to be begotten and for default of such issue To the use of the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid Thomas VViseman deceased and the Heirs of their bodies lawfully to be begotten and for default such issue To the use of the Lady the Queen that now is and the Heirs and Successors of the said Lady the Queen Kings and Queens of this Realm of England for ever as by the said Indenture amongst other things it more fully manifest and doth appear By vertue of which Indenture and by force of a certain Act in Parliament of the late King Henry 8. at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4 th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27 th of transferring of uses in possession then holden set forth The said John VViseman was seised of the Reversion of the whole Island aforesaid as of Fee tail and right and for default of such issue the remainder to the aforesaid VVilliam VViseman Brother of the said John VViseman and the heirs males of the Body of the said VVilliam lawfully to be begotten And for default of such issue To the use of the said Thomas VViseman another Brother of the said John VViseman and the heirs males of the Body of the said Thomas lawfully to be begotten And for default of such issue the remainder thereof to of the heirs of the body of the aforesaid VVill VViseman the Father and the heirs of their bodies lawfully to be begotten And for default of such issue the Remainder thereof to the heires males of the Body of the said Thomas VViseman desceased and the heirs males of their Body lawfully to be begotten And for default of such issue The remainder there to the said Lady the Queen that now is her Heirs and Successors Kings and Queenes of this Kingdom of England belonging And the beforesaid John of the aforesaid Reversion of the whole Island aforesaid as of Fee tail and right in form aforesaid being seised the remainder thereof further in the form aforesaid belonging The said Thomas VViseman the Son afterwards that is to say the 15 th day of July in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 26 th at great Totham aforesaid dyed without heir male of his body lawfully begotten After whose death the said John into one Moyety of the Island aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred was and yet is thereof seised in his Demesn as of Fee tail And likewise the said John was and yet is seised of the aforesaid Reversion of the other Moiety of the said Island as of the Fee tail and of right And thereof being seised And the said Richard of the said other Moiety of the aforesaid Island with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being possessed The aforesaid 18. pounds of the Rent aforesaid for half a yeer ended at the Feast of the Birth of our Lord in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 27 th to the said John was behind and do yet remain unpaid For which Action accrued to the said John to require and have of the said Richard the aforesaid 18. pounds Yet he the said Richard although he was often required the said 18. pounds to the said John hath not yet rendered but hitherto to render to the same to him hath denyed and yet doth deny Whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pounds And thereof he bringeth Sute c. And the said Richard Barnard by John Cook his Attorny comes and doth defend the force and injury when c. And saith That the aforesaid John Wiseman his Action aforesaid against him ought not to have because he saith That well and true it is That the aforesaid Thomas Wiseman the Father was seised of the Island aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee And that the said Thomas demised unto the said Richard Barnard the Moiety of the Island aforesaid with the Appurtenances And that the said Thomas Wiseman the Father by his aforesaid Testament and last Will willed and bequeathed to the abovesaid Thomas Wiseman the Son the aforesaid Reversion of the said aforesaid one Moiety of the said Island aforesaid and the other Moiety of the said Island in form aforesaid And that the said Thomas Wiseman the Son By virtue of the bequest aforesaid was seised of the one Moiety of the Island aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee tail and of the Reversion of the other Moiety thereof in Demesn as of Fee tail and Right that is to say to him and the heirs males of his Body lawfully begotten as the aforesaid John Wiseman by his Declaration aforesaid above supposeth But the said Richard Barnard further saith That the said Thomas Wiseman the Son of the one Moiety of the Island aforesaid and of the Reversion of the other Moiety in â—orm aforesaid being seised One John Godfrey the 9 th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 26 th sued forth out of the Court of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen that now is in the said Court of Chancery at Westminster aforesaid then being a certain writ of the said Lady the Queen of Entry upon Disseisin in the Post against the said Thomas Wiseman by the name of Thomas VViseman Gent. of the Island aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things to the Sheriff of the County of Essex directed by which Writ the said Lady the Queen that now is then commanded the said Sheriff that the said Sheriff should command the said Thomas VViseman the Son that truly and without delay he should render to the said John Godfrey the Island aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things by the name of the Mannor of Mockinghall with the Appurtenances and 22. Messuages 3. Dove-houses 23. Gardens 430. Acres of Land 162. Acres of Meadow 460. Acres of Pasture 22. Acres of Wood 110. Acres of Furrs and Heath 400. Acres of Marsh as of 50. shillings of Rent with the Appurtenances in Barlinge the great Staubrigge great Wakeringe little Wakeringe Leigh Shopland Rochford Prtâ—lewell Benflâ—â—t Foulnes Althorpe Thundersley Hadley Great Baddowe Great Totham and Gouldhanger which he claimed to be his Right and his inheritance And into which the said Thomas Wiseman then had not entry but after the Disseisin which Hugh Hunt unjustly without Judgement did to the said John Godfrey within 30. yeers then last past as he then said And whereof he then Complained That the said Thomas VViseman the Son him then did deforce And unlesse he should do it and the aforesaid John Godfrey should then make the said Sheriff secure his clamour to prosecute then he summon by good summons the aforesaid Thomas Wiseman the
they put themselves upon the Country And the said Titus likewise c. Therefore a Jury came before the Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Saturday next after 15. dayes of Easter And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. Afterwards the proceeding thereof was continued between the parties aforesaid of the plea aforesaid by Jurors put thereof between them in Respite before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill Monday next after three Weekes of Holy Trinity then next following Unlesse the Beloved and Faithful of the said Lady the Queen Iohn Popham Kâ— Chief Justice of the Lady of Pleas in the Court of the said Lady the Queen to be holden assigned first upon Saturday next after 15. dayes of Holy Trinity at Guildhall London by form of the Statute c. cometh for default of Jurors c. At which Monday next after three Weekes of Holy Trinity before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and the before said Chief Justice before whom c. sent here his record before him had in these words That is to say Afterwards the day and place within contained before Iohn Popham Kâ— Chief Justice within written associating to him Thomas Povey by the form of the Statute c. came as well the within named Titus VVestbie as the within written Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher by their Attornies within contained and the Jurors sworn whereof within is made mention some of them came and some of them did not come as it appeareth in the Pannel and some of the said Jurors now appeared that is to say Iohn Sly Thomas VVorship Arthur Parkins William Tegoe Iohn VViggenton appeared and were sworn in the Jury aforesaid and because that the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear Therefore others of the Standers by chosen by the Sheriffs of London at the request of the said Titus VVestbie and by the command of the Chief Justice aforesaid were new put whose names are fyled to the Pannel within written according to the form of the Statute in that case made and provided Which Jurors so a new put appeared that is to say Iohn Patson George Clarke Alexander Sharp Edward Flory Thomas Chapman Emanuel Trambel and Henry Field appeared who being sworn to the Truth of the matters which is contained with the other Jurors chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the within written Thomas Smith Edward Winter and Anthony Bastard the within written 21th day of Ianuary the 29th year within written at Westminster in the County of Middlesex within written before the within named Christopher Wray Kâ— then chief Justice of the Lady within written of Pleas before the Queen holden assigned by their writing Obligatory within written sealed with their Seales granted themselves to be bounden and acknowledged that they did owe to the aforesaid Titus the within written 440. pounds To be paid to the same Titus or his certain Attorney shewing that writing their Heirs or Executors in the within written Feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following and if they should make default in payment of the said Debt That then the said Thomas Smith Edward Winter and Anthony Bastard willed and granted that then should run upon them the said Thomas Edward and Anthony and every of them their Heirs and Executors the penalty in the Statute of Debts for Merchandizes in the same bought to be recovered ordained or provided in manner and form as the said Titus likewise within against them declared And that the said Statute by the said Thomas sueth Edward Winter and Anthony Bustard in form aforesaid acknowledged Afterwards that is to say the within written 11th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th within written by the within named Iohn Chomley Esq then Clark of the said Lady the Queen that now is of Recognizances of Debts to be recovered according to the form of the Statute in the like case provided deputed by his Writing within written sealed with his seal into the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen within written it was certified in manner and form as the said Titus within likewise against the said Thomas Skinner Iohn Catcher alledged And that thereupon the said Titus afterwards that is to say the within written the 31th day of August the 30th year within written sued forth out of the said Court of Chancery within written the Writ aforesaid within specified of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the Sheriffs of London directed By which Writ the said Lady the Queen that now is then commanded the Sheriffs of Lond. That the bodies of the within named Thomas Smith Edward Winter and Anthony Bastard if they were Laymen to be taken and in the Prison of the said Lady the Queen until the said Titus Westbie of the Debt aforesaid fully satisfied they should cause safely to be kept And all the Lands and Chattels of the said Thomas Edward and Anthony in the Balywick of of the said Sheriffs by the oath of honest and lawful men of their said Balywick by whom the truth of the matter may best be known according to the true value thereof they diligently cause to be extended and apprized and into the hands of the said Lady the Queen they make to be seised that the same to the aforesaid Titus until he should be fully satisfied of the Debt aforesaid they might be delivered according to the form of the Statute at Westminster for the like Debts to be recovered thereof made and provided And how the said Sheriffs have executed the said Command that they make known to the said Lady the Queen in the Chancery within 15. dayes of St. Martin then next wheresoever it should then be by their Letters sealed and that they should have here that Writ which said Writ the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Titus Westbie afterwards that is to say the within written 8th day of September in the 30th year aforesaid at London aforesaid that is to say in the within written Parish of Christ Church in the Ward of Farrington within delivered to the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher then being Sheriffs of London in form of Law to be executed in manner and form as the aforesaid Titus within likewise against them declared And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their oath aforesaid That the said Anthony Bastard then that is to say the aforesaid 8th day of September in the 30th year aforesaid was in the Goale of the said Lady the Queen that now is of Newgate under the Custody of the said Tho. Skinner and J. Catcher then Sheriffs of London aforesaid in Execution at the sute of one Robert Dighton for the Debt of 240. pounds and the said Anthony Bastard so there
said 8. Messuages and other the premises by these presents bargained and sold And that he hath full power and perfect lawful good authority to bargain fell and assure the same in manner form aforesaid And further that he the said Thomas Bowes and the Heirs of the said Thomas Bowes and all and every other person and persons and their Heirs having or lawfully claiming any lawful estate or interest of or in the premises or any part or parcell thereof shall and will at the costs and charges in the Law of the said VVill. Petham his Heirs and Assignes at all and every time and times hereafter during the Term of Four years next insuing the date thereof at the reasonable request of the said William Pelham his Heirs or Assignes do cause procure and suffer to be done All and every such reasonable and further act or acts thing or things devise or devises assurance and assurances whatsoever for the further and better assurance and sure making and for the clear and absolute having and enjoying of all and singular the aforesaid premises with their Appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof to be injoyed conveyed and assured to the said VVilliam Pelham his Heirs and Assignes be it by Fine Feoffment Recovery Deed or Deeds Inrolled Inrolement of these presents Recovery with single or double Vouchers and with warranty against all men or without warranty or otherwise as shall be reasonably devised or avised by the said VVilliam Pelham or by the Council learned in the Lawes of this Realm of the said VVilliam Pelham his Heirs or Assignes And that the said 8. Messuages and other the premises by these presents bargained and sold now are of the cleer yearly value of 67. pounds 13. shillings and 8. pence of lawful money over and above all charges and reprises And after the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel which shall be in the year of our Lord God 1688. of the cleer yearly value of 71. pounds 13. shillings and 4. pence of lawful Money of England over and above all charges and reprises In witness whereof the parties aforesaid to these Indentures sunderly have set their seals Given the day and year first above written Memorandum that afterwards that is to say the 21. day of December in the year abovesaid came the aforesaid Thomas Bowes before the said Lady the Queen in her Chancery at Westminster in his proper person And did acknowledge there the Indenture aforesaid all and singular in the same contained and specified in the former above written By Colour of which bargain sail and Inrollment aforesaid as also by force of a certain Act of transferring of uses into possession in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the 27th year of his Reign holden made and provided The said William Pelham was seised of the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things in which c. as the Law requireth And the said VVilliam so being thereof seised before the time in which c. A certain Recoverie was had in the Court of Hustingâ— of Pleas of Lands holden in the Guild-hall London before the Mayor and Sheriffs of the same City according to the custom of the aforesaid City by Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke demandants against the said Willi. Pelham then Tenant of the said Messuage with the Appurtenances amongst other things in which c. in and upon a Writ of the Lady the Queen of Right Patent by the aforesaid Nicholas and Simon brought out of the Court of Chancery of the said Lady the Queen and in the said Court of Hustings and according to the custom of the City afore said prosecuted The Tenors of which Writ and the return and the proceedngs thereof as also of the Recovery aforesaid with all things touching the same follow in these words ss Pleas of Lands holden in the Hustings in the Guild hall London Monday next the feast Perpetue feliatatis In the year of the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith the 14th At this Hastings came here in their proper persons Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick and brought here in Court a Writ of the Lady the Queen of Right Patent to the Mayor and Sheriffs of London directed in these words ss Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. To the Mayor and Sherifs of London greeting We command you full Right you do to Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke of 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances in London which they claim to hold of us by the free service of 1. penny by the year for all service which VVilliam Pelham Esquire deforced them that no more clamor thereof we hear for defect of Right Witnesse my self at VVestminster the last day of February in the year of our Reign the 14 th And they found Pledges to prosecute the said Writ that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo And then and there the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick put in their place VVilliam Dalby their Attorny against the aforesaid VVilliam Pelham by the said their Attorny then there demanded Process c. according to the Custom of the City aforesaid and it is granted unto them c. Upon which then it was Commanded then and there by the said Court to the Sheriffs of London according to the Custom of the said City That they summon by good summoners the said VVilliam Pelham that he be here at the next Hastings London of Pleas of Lands in the Guild-hall of the City aforesaid according to the Custom of the said City to be holden to Answer to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke in the same plea here c. At which day that is to say at the Hastings London of Pleas of Lands holden in the Guid-hall London Monday next before the Feast of St. Edward King and Martyr in the year of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth c. the 14 th aforesaid The said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick by the said VVilliam Dalby their Attorny came and appeared here c. And the Sheriffs of London that is to say Henry Mills and John Branch now sent and retorned here upon the Precept aforesaid to them directed That they by virtue of the said Precept sommoned the said VVilliam Pelham to be here at this Hastings to Answer to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke in the plea aforesaid as to them c. by John Doo and Richard Roo summoners c. Which VVilliham at this Hastings put in his place Roger Coys and Robert Hogeson their Attornies joyntly and severally against the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke in the Plea aforesaid c. by VVilliam Fleetwood Esquire Recorder of the City aforesaid c. And upon this the said Nicholas
Parker and Simon Patricke by the said VVilliam Dalby their Attorny demand against the said William Pelham 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances situate lying and being in the Parish of St. Mary Woolnotb in the Ward of Langborn London as their Right c. By the Writ of the said Lady the Queen that now is of Right Patent c. And to hold of the said Lady the Queen by the free service of 1. penny by the year for all service c. And whereupon they say That they themselves were seised of the aforesaid 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances c. in their Demesn as of Fee and Right c. in time of peace in the time of the said Lady the Queen that now is c. taking the Profits thereof to the value c. And that such is their Right they offer c And the said VVilliam Pelham by his Attorny aforesaid cameth and defendeth the right of the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke when c. And the seisin of the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke of which seisin c. and all c. and whatsoever c. as of Fee and Right c. and especially of the said 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances c and vouch thereof to warranty Thomas Bowes of London Esquire And demand summons in London by the aid of this Court to warrant to the said Wiliam Pelham the said 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances which the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke claim against the said VVilliam Pelham as their Right c. And the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke by their Attorny aforesaid willingly grant That the said William Pelham have his voucher aforesaid Whereupon upon the Petition of the said Nicho. Parker and Sim. Patricke It was commanded by the Court to the Sheriffs of London that they summon by good summons the said Thomas Bowes that he be here at the next Hustings London of Pleas of Lands at the Guild-hall of the City aforesaid to be held c. to warrant to the said VVilliam Pelham the said 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances c. against the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke c. And the same day was then and there given as well to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke as to the said VVilliam Pelham in the Plea aforesaid here c. At which day that is to say at the Hustings London of Pleas of Lands in the Guild-hall of the City of London upon Monday next before the Feast of St. Alphege Bishop in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen c. the 14 th come as well the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke by the said VVilliam Dalby their Attorny as the said VVilliam Pelham by his Attorny aforesaid And the Sheriffs of London that is to say Henry Mills and John Braunch now sent and retorned here upon the Precept to them directed that they by virtue of the said Precept summoned the said Thomas Bowes to be here at this Hustings to warrant to the said William Pelham the said 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances c. as to them c. by John Doo and Richard Roo Summoners And upon this The aforesaid Thomas Bowes whom the said William Pelham vouched to warranty c. at this Hastings put in his place Roger Coys and Robert Hogeson his Attornies joyntly and severally against the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke in the Plea aforesaid c. By William Fleetwood Esq Recorder of the City aforesaid c. And now here at this Hustings The said Thomas Bowes by the aforesaid Roger Coys and Robert Hogeson came and freely the aforesaid Messuages with the Appurtenances c. To the said Willi. Pelham against the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick did warrant c. And thereupon the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke by the said William Dalby their Attorny demanded against the said Thomas Bowes Tenant by his warranty aforesaid the said 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances c. as their Right c. by the Writ aforesaid c. in form aforesaid c. And whereupon they said That they were seised of the Messuages aforesaid with the Appurtenances c. in their Demesn as of Fee and Right c. in the time of Peace in the time of the said Lady the Queen that now is c. taking the profits thereof to the value c. And that such is their Right they offer c. And the said Thomas Bowes Tenant by his warrantty aforesaid by the said Roger Coys and Robert Hogeson their Attornies came and denyed the Right of the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke when c. And the seisin of the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke of which deseisin c. and all c. and whatsoever c. as of Fee and Right c. and chiefly of the said 8. Messuages with the Appurtenance c. And vouched thereof to warranty Richard Horsted of London Iremonger who now is present here in Court in his proper person and freely the said 8. Messuages with the Appurtentnces c. to the said Thomas Bowes did warrant c. And upon this at the Hustings aforesaid The said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke by the said VVilliam Dalby their Atterny demanded against the said Richard Horsted Tenant by his warranty then and there being in his proper person the said 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances c. by the Writ aforesaid c. in form aforesaid c. as their Right c. And whereupon they say That they were seised of the aforesaid 8. Messuages with the Appurtenances c. in their Demesn as of Fee and Right c. in time of peace in the time of said Lady the Queen that now is taking thereof the Profits to the value c. and that such is their right offer c. and the said Richard Horsted Tenant by his warranty aforesaid in his proper person cometh and resendeth the right of the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke when c. and the seisin of the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patricke of which seisin c. and all c. and whatsoever c. and chiefly of the said 8 Messuages with the appurtenances c. as of fee and right and saith that he hath more right to hold the said 8 Messuages with the appurtenances as Tenant thereof by his warranty aforesaid to him and his heirs as he now holdeth then the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick have to demand the said 8 Messuages with the appurtenances c. as they above demand c. and demand Recognition to him hereupon to be done according to the custome of the City aforesaid c. and hereupon the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick by their Attorny aforesaid prayeth Licence thereof to imparle and they have it c. and afterwards the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick by their Attorny aforesaid come again at the self same Court of Hastings ready
to the plea of the said Richard Horsted Tenant by his warrant aforesaid in form aforesaid pleaded to reply c. and the said Richard Horsted Tenant by hâ—s warranty aforesaid although sollemnly called came not again but in contempt of the Court departed and made default Therefore It is considered by the said Court That the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick shall recover seisin against the said William Pelham of the aforesaid 8 Messuages with the appurtenances c. to hold to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick and their heirs acquitted from the said William Pelham and his heirs and also from the said Thomas Bowes and his heirs as also from the said Richard Horsted and his heirs for ever and that the said William Pelam have of the Lands and Tenements of the said Thomas Bowes to the value c. and that the said Thomas Bowes have of the Lands and Tenements of the aforesaid Richard Horsted to the value c. and that the said Richard Horsted be in mercy c. and hereupon at the self same Hastings at the petition of the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick it was commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick and their heirs for ever of the Messuages aforesaid with the appurtenances give full and peaceable seisin and how the said Command was executed that they make known unto the Court here at the next Hastings of London of pleas of Lands in the guildhall of the City aforesaid to be holden c. at which day that is to say â—t the Hustings of pleas of Lands holden in the Guild-hall London Monday next before the feast of Saint Philip and James in the year of the said Lady the Queen the 14 th aforesaid the Sheriff of London that is to say Henry Mils and John Branch retorned and certified to the Court here c. That they by virtue of the precept to them directed full and peaceable seisin to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick of the 8 Messuages with the appurtenances c. made to have according to the effect of the precept aforesaid as it was above commanded unto them c. as by the said recovery aforesaid under the seal of the office of the Mayraltie of the City aforesaid to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in evidence fully appeacheth And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their oath aforesaid that the said William Pelham in the Indenture aforesaid named and the said William Pelham against whom the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick sued forth the writ of Right aforesaid is one and the same person and not another nor diverse And that the said Thomas Bowes Son and heir of the said Martin Bowes Knight and the said Thomas Bowes in the recovery aforesaid specified whom the said William Pelham vouched thereto warranty and the said Thomas Bowes above named is one and the same person and not another nor divers By colour whereof the said Nicholas and Simon afterwards and before the 8 th day of May in the year of the raign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14 th that is to say the first day of May in the 14 th year aforesaid in the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things entred and were thereof amongst other things seised And farther the said Jurors say upon their oath aforesaid that the recovery aforesaid of the aforesaid Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things in form aforesaid had was had with the assent and agreement of the said Nicholas and Simon William Pelham Thomas Bowes Son of the aforesaid Martin Bowes Knight and Richard Horsted and without any just title of the said Nicholas and Simon to the use of the said William Pelham his heirs and assigns for the farther his assurance of and in the aforesaid Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things according to the form and effect of the Covenants and agreements of the said indenture of bargain and sale specified by the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight to the said William Pelham as before is said made by colour of which recovery as also by force of the aforesaid Act of Parliament of transferring of uses into possession the said William Pelham was seised of the aforesaid Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things as the Law requireth and that afterwards that is to say the first day of December in the year of the raign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 16 th the said Martin Bowes Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight then being within the age of 21 years that is to say of 17 years dyed without issue of his Body Lawfully begotten And that the aforesaid William Pelham of the said Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things as before is said recovered in form aforesaid being seised before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the 10 th day of September in the year of the Raign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 27 th demysed the said Messuage with the appurtenances in the declaration aforesaid above specified to the aforesaid Edward Griffin to have to him and his assigns from the feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then next ensuing until the end and Term of 21 years then next following By virtue of which demyse the said Edward Griffin was of the said Messuage with the appurtenances possessed and that afterwards that is to say the 10 th day of January in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th the aforesaid Thomas Bowes Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son and heir of the said Martin Bowes Knight into the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances in the declaration aforesaid above specified upon the possession of the said Edward Griffin thereof entred and then and there demysed granted and to farm let to the said Henry Page the said Messuage with the appurtenances to have to him his executors and assignes from the within written feast of the birth of our Lord then last past unto the end and Term of the within written Six years and that the said Edward Griffin afterwards that is to say the within written 11th day of January in the 29th year abovesaid into the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Henry Page thereof did reenter and the said Henry from the possession of the Messuage aforesaid did expel and amove and that the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight and Father of the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts yet living and being in full life that is to say at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the entry of the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight into the messuage aforesaid with the
within conteyned before Thomas Walmsley one of the Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Edward Fennes one of the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of pleas before the Queen her self holden assigned Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assises in the County of Dorset assigned by the form of the statute c. came aswell the within named George Stroud Esquire by Thomas Clayton his Attorny as the within named Ralph Horsey Knight Richard Veal and Edward Goor by Henry Collier their Attorny and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made some of them appeared and some of them did not appear as it appeareth in the pannel c. and some of the Jurors now appearing that is to say Richard Ham Thomas Tooner John Burt Henry Hâ—rbyn Gentleman John Young Gentleman John Butler Gentleman William Withington John Payn and Christorher Dolling in the Jury aforesaid are sworn and some of the said Jurors now appearing that is to say Thomas Heal Edward Carter Robert Chippe Henry Squib and George Frome because they between the parties aforesaid are found to be suspicious from the pannel aforesaid they were utterly drawn out and because the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear therefore others of the standers by by the Sheriff aforesaid to that being chosen at the request of the said George Stroud and by the Command of the Justices aforesaid were of new put whose names to the pannel within written are fyled according to the form of the statute in such case thereof late made and is provided and the Jurors so nâ—w put that is to say Clement Jay Nicholas Brown and Thomas Eyres being called likewise appeared who to say the truth of the matters within conteyned together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impanelled Chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath aforesaid that the Tenement within written in which it is supposed the Trespass and Ejectment within written to be are and time whereof the memory of men is not to the Contrary were parcel of the Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise called Melcum Bingham with the appurtenances and that the said Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Melcum Biugham with the appurtenances whereof c. lyeth within the Parish of Melcum in the County aforesaid and that before the time within written in which the Trespass and Ejectment within written was supposed to be done one Robert Bingham the elder was seised for the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham with the appurtenances whereof c. in his demesne as of Fee and so thereof seised held the said Mannor with the appurtenances of one John Hrosey Knight as of his Mannor of Melcam otherwise Horseys Melcum otherwise Starges Melcum in the County aforesaid by Knight service that is to say by Homage and Fealty and Escuage to the Lady the Queen of 40. shillings when it should happen 2. shillings and for more more and less less c. and the said Robert Bingham being so seised before the time within written in which c. that is to say the morrow of the Holy Trinity in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 12 a sine was levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster in the County of Middlesex before James Dyer Richard Weston Richard Harper then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench and other the Queens faithfull people then present between Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen Gentlemen plaintifs and the said Robert Bingham the Elder Deforceant Of the Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. by the names of the Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham aforesaid with the appurtenances and 5 Messuages 4 Tofts 4 Barns 5 Gardens 2 Orchards 120 Acres of Land 30 Acres of Meadow 300 Acres of pasture 8 Acres of Wood and 20 Acres of Furze and Heath with the appurtenances in Nether Melcum other wise Binghams Melcum whereupon a plea of Covenant was between them in the said Court that is to say that the said Robert Bingham did acknowlege the said Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances to be the right of the said Thomas Buckley as that with the said Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen had of the gift of the said Robert Bingham and then released and quit claimed from him and his heirs to the said Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen and the heirs of the said Thomas for ever And afterwards the said Robert Bingham granted for him and his heirs that they would warrant to the said Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen and to the heirs of the said Thomas the aforesaid Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances against all men for ever the Tenor of which Fine followeth in these ss Dorset ss This is a final concord made in the Court of the Lady the Queen at Westminster in the morrow of the holy Trinity in the year of the Reign of Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. from the Conquest the 12th before James Dyer Richard Weston and Richard Harper Justices and other the Queens faithfull people there present Between Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen Gentlemen plaintifs and Robert Bingham Esquire Deforceant of the Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Binghams Melcum with the appurtenances and of 5 Messuages 4 Tofts 4 Barns 5 Gardens 2 Orchards 12â— Acres of Land 30 Acres of Meadow 100 Acres of pasture 8 Acres of wood and 20 Acres of Furz and Heath in Nether Melcum otherwise Binghams Melcum whereupon a plea of Covenant was between them in the said Court that is to say that the said Robert acknowledged the aforesaid Mannor Tenements with the appurtenances to be the right of the said Thomas and those which the said Thomas and Henry had of the gift of the aforesaid Robert and the same released and quit claimed from him and his heirs to the said Thomas and Henry and the heirs of the said Thomas for ever And farther the said Robert granteth for him and his heirs that they warrant to the aforesaid Thomas and Henry and to the heirs of the said Thomas the aforesaid Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances against all men for ever and for this Recognition remission and quit claym warranty and Concord the said Thomas and Henry give to the said Robert 150 pound sterling which said Fine of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid whereof c. in form aforesaid Levied was had and Levyed to the use of the said Robert Bingham the Elder and Jane his wife and the heirs of the said Robert for ever by virtue whereof and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of transferring of uses into possession made at Westminster in the year of the Reign of the late King Henry the 8th of England the 27th made and provided the said Robert Bingham the elder and Jane were
seised of the Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Binghams Melcum aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. that is to say to the said Robert and Jane and the heirs of the aforesaid Robert for ever And the said Jurors farther say upon their Oath aforesaid that the said Robert Bingham the Elder then was seised in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the Mannor Lands and Tenements called Melcum Binghams situate in Tollor Porcoram in the said County of Dorset and the said Robert so of the Mannor and the said Tenements and of the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. being seised A Fine was Levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster aforesaid before the within written time in which c. that is to say in the morrow of the holy Trinity in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 20th before Iames Dyer Roger Manwood and Robert Mounson and Thomas Mead then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench and other of the said Lady the Queens faithfull people then present Between Richard Rogers Knight Nicholas Furbervile and John Williams Esquires then plaintifs and the aforesaid Robert Bingham the Elder Esquire then deforceant of the said Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams whereof c. and of the said Mannor of Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances by the names of the Mannor of Melcam Bingham and Melcum Bingham with the appurtenances as also of 6 Messuages 2 Tofts 1300 Acres of Lands 300 Acres of Meadow 50 Acres of Pasture 20 Acres of Wood and 1000 Acres of Furz and Heath with the appurtenances in Neither Melcam Toller Porcoram Magouder and Haselberry Brion in the County of Dorset and of 3 Messuages 6 Gardens 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 300 Acres Pasture 300 Acres of Furz and Heath with the appurtenances in Codford Mary Codford Peter Ashton Geffery Bardchalk Alderbery East Grimsted and West Grimsted in the County of Wilts whereupon a plea of Covenant was summoned between them in the said Court That is to say that the said Robert Bingham the Elder acknowleged the said Mannors and Tenements with the appurtenances to be the right of the said Richard Rogers as those which the said Richard Rogers Nicholas Turbervile and John Williams had of the gift of the said Robert Bingham and released and quit claymed from him and his heirs to the said Richard Rogers Nicholas Turbervile and John williams and the heirs of the said Richard Rogers for ever And further the said Robert Bingham granted for him and his heirs that the warrant to the aforesaid Richard Rogers Nicholas Turbervile and John Williams and to the heirs of the said Richard Robers the aforesaid Mannors and Tenements with the appurtenances against the said Roqert Bingham and his heirs for ever the Tenor of which fine followeth in these words This is the final Concord made in the Court of the Lady the Queen at Westminster in the morrow of the holy Trinity in the year of the Reign of Eliz by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the Faith c. from the Conquest the 20th before James Dyer Roger Manwood Robert Mounson and Thomas Meade Justices and other of the Lady the Queens faithfull people then and there present between Richard Rogers Knight Nicholas Turburvile Esquire and Iohn Williams Esquire Complaiâ—ants and Rober Bingham the elder Esquire deforceant of the Mannors of Melcam Bingham and Wolcomb Bingham with the appurtenances as also of 6 Messuages 2 Tofts 1300 Acres of Land 300 Acres of Meadow 50 Acres of pasture 20 Acres of wood and 1000 Acres of Furz and Heath with the appurtenances in Nether Melcum Toller Porcorum Mapowder and Haseberry Bayan in the County of Dorset and of 8 Messuages 3 Tofts 6 Gardens 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 300 Acres of Pasture and 300 Acres of Furz and Heath with the appurtenances in Codford Mary Codford Peter Ashton Gyfford Burdchalke Alderbury East Grimsted and West Grimsted in the County of Wilts whereof a plea of Covenant was summoned between them in the said Court that is to say That the said Robert acknowleged the Mannors and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to be the right of the said Richard as those which the same Richard Nicholas and Iohn had of the gift of the said Robert and those released and quit claymed from him and his heirs to the said Richard Nicholas and Iohn and to the heirs of the said Richard the aforesaid Mannors and Tenements with the appurtenances against the said Robert and his heirs And further the said Robert graunted for him and his heirs that they warrant to the said Richard Nicholas and Iohn and to the heirs of the said Richard the aforesaid Mannors and Tenements with the appurtenances against the said Robert and his heirs for ever And for this Recognition release quit claym warranty fine and Concord the same Richard Nicholas and Iohn gave to the said Robert 826 pound Sterling Which fine aforesaid levyed and had was levyed of the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham with the appurtenances whereof c. to the use of the said Robert Bingham the Elder for the Term of his life and after his decease then to the use of the aforesaid Robert Bingham than Son and heir apparent of the said Robert Bingham the Elder and the heirs of his body upon the Body of Ann then wife of the said Robert Bingham the Son to be begotten and for default of such issue to the use of the right heirs of the aforesaid Robert Bingham the Elder for ever And of the aforesaid Mannor and Tenements called Wolcumb Binghams with the appurtenances to the use of the said Robert Bingham the Son and the aforesaid Ann and the heirs of the body of the said Robert Bingham the Son upon the body of the aforesaid Ann Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such issue to the use of the right heirs of the aforesaid Robert Bingham the Elder for ever By virtue of which Fine and by force of the aforesaid Act of Parliament of transferring uses into possession made and provided the aforesaid Robert bingham the Elder was seised of the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of freehold for the Term of his life the remainder thereof to the said Robert Bingham the Younger in Fee tayl that is to say to him and to the heirs of his body to be begotten upon the Body of the said Ann the remainder to the right heirs of the said Robert Bingham the Elder for ever And besides the said Robert Bingham the Younger Ann his wife were seised of the said Mannor Land and Tenements called Wolcum Binghams with the appurtenances that is to say to the aforesaid Robert Bingham the
and the Advowson aforesaid against all Men for Ever And for this Recognitition release quit claim Warranty Fine and Concord the said Viscount Richard Henry Thomas George John Strange-wayes John Williams Richard Thomas Henry John Fitz-James and George gave to the aforesaid John Horsey 2680. pounds Sterling Which Fine aforesaid in form aforesaid levied and had was levied of the Mannor and Tenements called Over-Melcomb otherwise Horseys-Melcomb otherwise Sturges-Melcomb with the Appurtenances To the use of the said John Horsey and the Heirs males of the body of the said John Horsey lawfully begotten and for default of such issue To the use of Edith now Wife of the said Ralph Horsey for the Term of her life And after the decease of the said Edith To the use of the aforesaid Ralrh Horsey and his heirs males of his body Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue To the use of Iasper Horsey Brother of the said Ralph Horsey and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of the right Heirs of the aforesaid Iohn Horsey for ever By virtue of which and of the aforesaid Act of Parliament of Transferring of uses into possession made and provided The aforesaid Iohn Horsey was seised of the aforesaid Mannor and Tenements called Over-Melcombe otherwise Horseys-Melcumb otherwise Sturges-Melcomb with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee Tail that is to say to him and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Edith for the Term of her life the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Ralph Horsey in Fee Tail that is to say to him and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Jasper Horsey in Fee Tail that is to say to him and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten the remainder over to the right Heirs of the said John Horsey for ever And the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That afterwards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 20th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th The aforesaid Robert Bingham the younger and Ann at Melcumb aforesaid had issue between them lawfully begotten Richard Bingham Son and Heir apparent of the said Rob Bingham the younger And that the aforesaid Robert Bingham and Ann of the said Mannors Lands and Tenements called Wolcomb Binghams so as before is said being so seised the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant And the said Robert Bingham the Elder and Jane his Wife so as before is said of the aforesaid Mannor of Nether-melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham with the Appurtenances whereof c. being seised of the Mannor thereof to the aforesaid Robert Bingham the younger and the Heirs of his body upon the body of the said Ann lawfully begotten the remainder thereof to the right Heirs of the said Robert Bingham the elder expectant The said Robert Bingham the younger afterwards and before the time within written in which c. that is to say the 11th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th at Melcomb aforesaid dyed of such estate of and in the premises as is said seised And the said Ann did survive him and held her self in the Mannor aforesaid and Tenements called Wolcombe Binghams and was thereof sole seised in her Demesn as of freehold for the Term of her life by right of survivor and that after the death of the said Robert Bingham the younge the remaynder of the aforesaid Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham with the appurtenances whereof c. in fee tail descended to the said Richard Bingham as Son and Heir of the body of the said Robert Bingham the Younger upon the body of the said Ann begotten the said Richard Bingham at the time of the death of the aforesaid Robert Bingham the younger his Father being within age that is to say of the age of one yeer and 9. moneths and no more And that the said Ann of the aforesaid Mannor and Tenements called Wolcombe Binghams in form aforesaid being seised And the said Robert Bingham the elder and Jane his Wife of the aforesaid Mannor of Nether-Melcum otherwise Melcombe Binghams with the appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seised the remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant The said Ann afterwards and before the within written time in which c. at Melcombe aforesaid took to Husband one John Sroud Esquire And the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That at the time of the death of the said Robert Bingham the younger and before the within written time in which c. The aforesaid John Horsey was seised of the said Mannor of Over-Melcum otherwise Horseys-Melcum otherwise Sturges-Melcum with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee Tail that is to say to him and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof over in form aforesaid expecting And the said John Horsey so thereof being seised one John Popham Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of Plea before the Queen her self to be held assigned by the name of John Popham Esquire George Trenchard Esquire and Edward Gorge Esquire before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 26th day of March in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31.th Out of the Court of Chancery of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster in the County of Middlesex then being sued forth a certain Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Entry in the Disseisin in the Post against the said John Horsey then Tenant of the Freehold of the said Mannor of Over Melcum otherwise Sturges-Melcum with the appurtenances of the said Mannor by the name of the Mannor of Horseys-Melcum otherwise Sturges Melcum with the Appurtenances And 10. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 200. Acres of Meadow 5000. Acres of Pasture 300. Acres of Wood and 300. Acres of Furz and Heath with the Appurtenances in Horseys-Melcum otherwise Sturgis-Melcum to the then Sherifs of the aforesaid County of Dorset directed By which Writ the said Lady the Queen that now is to the then Sherif of Dorset commanded that the said then Sherif should command the said John Horsey that justly and without delay he should render to the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge the said Mannor of Horseys-Melcum with the appurtenances and 10. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 200. Acres of Meadow 5000. Acres of Pasture 300. Acres of Wood and 300. Acres of Furz and Heath with the appurtenances in Horseys-Melcum otherwise Sturges-Melcum which the said George Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge claimed to be their Right and Inheritance And in which the said Iohn Horsey had not entry but after the Disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement made to
the said John Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge within 30. years then last past as they said And whereupon they complained that the aforesaid Iohn Horsey did them deforce and if he should not do And the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge did secure the said Sherif for the prosecution of his clamour That then the said Sherif summon the aforesaid Iohn Horsey that he be before the then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench at Westminster aforesaid from Easter-day in 15. dayes then next following to shew why he had not done it At which 15. day of Easter before Edward Anderson Knight and his Companions then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench at Westminster aforesaid came as well the aforesaid Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge by Iohn Willis their Attorny and Robert Frampton Esquire then Sherif of the County of Dorset aforesaid then and there returned the Writ aforesaid to him in form aforesaid directed in all things served and executed that is to say that the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge had found to the said Sherif Pledges to prosecute the said Writ that is is to say Iohn Doo and Richard Roo And that the said Iohn Horsey was summoned by Iohn Den and Richard Fen And thereupon the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge declaring against the said Iohn Horsey upon the Writ aforesaid in their proper persons And demanded against the said Iohn Horsey the Mannors and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as their Right and Inheritance And into which the said Iohn Horsey had not entry but after the Disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge within 30. yeers then last past c. And whereupon they then said That they themselves were seised of the Mannor and those Tenements with the Appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee in Right in time of peace in the time of the said Lady the Queen that now is taking thereof the profits to the value c. And in which c. And thereof they bring sute c. And the said Iohn Horsey then and there defendeth the force and injury when c. And voucheth thereof to warranty David Howel who was then present in the same Court in his proper person and freely the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances then to him did warrant And upon this the aforesaid Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge then demanded against him the said David Tenant by his warranty the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid c. And whereupon they said that they they themselves were seised of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in time of peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the profits therof to the value c. And in which c. And thereof then brought Sute And the aforesaid David then tenant by his warranty defendeth the force injury when c. And said That the aforesaid Hugh Hunt did not Disseise the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge by their Writ and Declaration aforesaid above supposed And of this put himself upon the Country And the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge then prayed licence thereof to imparl and had it And afterwards the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge came back in the same Court the same Term in their proper persons And the said David although he was solemnly called did not come back but departed in contempt of the said Court and made default Therefore then by the same Court it was granted That the aforesaid Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge should recover their seisin against the said John Horsey of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances And that the said John Horsey should have of the Tenements of the said David to the value c. And the said David should be in mercy c. And upon this the aforesaid Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge then prayed a Writ of the Lady the Queen to the Sherif of Dorset aforesaid to be directed to give them full seisin and possession of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and it was then granted unto them retornable there from the day of Easter in 5. Weekes then next following c. At which day before Edmond Anderson Knight and his Companions then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench that is to say at Westminster aforesaid came the aforesaid Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge in their proper persons And the aforesaid Robert Frampton Esq then Sherif of the aforesaid County of Dorset then sent that he by virtue of the said Writ to him directed made to the said Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge full seisin of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as by the said Writ he was commanded the Tenor of which Recovery followeth in these words ss Dorset ss Iohn Popham Esquire George Trenchard Esquire and Edward Gorge Esquire in their proper persons demand against Iohn Horsey Knight the Mannor of Horseys-Melcumb otherwise Sturges-Melcumb with the appurtenances and 10. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 200. Acres of Meadow 5000. Acres of Pasture 300. Acres of Wood and 300. Acres of Furz and Heath with the appurtenances in Horseys-Melcumb otherwise Sturges-Melcumb as their Right and Inheritance And in which the said Iohn Horsey had not entry but after Disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the said Iohn Popham George and Edward within 30. yeers now last past c. And whereupon they say That they themselves were seised of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee in Right in the time of Peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the profits to the value c. And in which c. And thereof bring sute c. And the aforesaid Iohn Horsey by Iohn Willis his Attorny cometh and defendeth his right when c. And voucheth thereof to warranty David Howel who is present here in Court in his proper person and freely the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to him doth warrant and upon this the aforesaid Iohn Popham George Trenchard and Edward Gorge demand against the said David Tenant by his warranty the Mānor Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid c. And whereupō they say That they themselves were seised of the Mānor Tenemēts aforesaid with the appurtenāces in their demesn as of Fe Right in the time of peace in the time the Lady the Queen that now is taking the profits
and Edward Goor be taken c. Ejectione Firme Hillary Term 290. Elizabeth Rott 790. in the KINGS BENCH Barastons Case C. 3. part fol. 19. a. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say Michaelmass Term last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came Richard Hynde by James Long his Attorny and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there his Bill against William Ambry in the Custody of the Marshal c. Of a Plea of Trespasse and Ejectment of his Farm and are Pledges of Sute that is to say Iohn Doo and Richard Roo Which Bill followeth in these words ss Hartford Richard Hynde complaineth of William Ambry in the custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that that is to say That whereas one Thomas Brand and Constance his Wife and Milliam Davyes and Margaret his Wife the 4 th day of Iuly in the yeer of Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 28 th at Aldenhan in the County aforesaid Demised and granted and to Farm let to the aforesaid Richard Hynde amongst other things 10. Acres of Land with the appurtenances called the upper part of a Close named Reddings in Aldenham aforesaid in the County aforesaid To have and to hold the aforesaid 10. Acres with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Hynde and his Assignes from the Feast of St. Iohn the Baptist then last past until the end and Term of 7. years from thence next insuing and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which demise The said Richard Hynde into the aforesaid 10. Acres of Land with the appurtenances the aforesaid 9 th day of Iuly in the 28th yeer aforesaid with Force and Armes c. into the aforesaid 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Richard entred and him the said Richard from his Farm aforesaid the Term thereof not yet ended did eject expel and amove and then the said Richard from his possession thereof held out and as yet holdeth out And other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Queen to the damage of the said Richard of 10. pounds and thereof he bringeth Sute c. And now at this day that is to say Monday after 8. dayes of St. Michael this Term until which day the said William had license to the Bill aforesaid to imparl and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Richard by his Attorny aforesaid as the said William by Richard Belfield his Attorny and the same William doth defend the force and injury when c. And saith That he is not guilty thereof and of that he puts himself upon the Country And that said Richard likewise Therefore a Jury thereof before the Lady the Queen at Westminster Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter who neither c. Because as well c. the same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. Afterwards the processe thereof was continued between the parties aforesaid in the Plea aforesaid by Juries put between them in respite before the said Lady the Queen until Wednesday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael then next following Unlesse the Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County aforesaid assigned First upon Friday the 12 th day of July at Hartford in the County aforesaid by form of the Statute c. come for default of Jurors c. At which VVednesday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid Richard Hynde by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place within contained before Thomas Gawdy Knight one of the Justiceâ— of the Lady the Queen of Pleas before the Lady the Queen her self to be holden assigned and Robert Clark one of the Barons of the said Lady the Queen of her Exchequer Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County of Hartford assigned by form of the Statute c. came as well the within named Richard Hynde by Henry Brantwayte his Attorny as the within written William Ambry by his Attorny within mentioned and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made some of them that is to say Richard Penifather Thomas Glascock Iohn Harmer and Stephen Nebbes came and in the said Jury are sworn And because the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear Therefore other of the Standers by chosen by the Sherif at the Request of the said Richard Hynde and by the Command of the Justices aforesaid are of new put whose names to the Pannel within written are filed according to the form of the Statute in such Case late made and provided and some of the Jurors so a new put that is to say Edward Vyall Thomas Cooker Thomas Trow Edward Asher Iohn Dermer William Tiverton Edward Iorden and Robert Carpenter came who to say the truth of the matters within contained togeether with the Jurors aforesaid first unpannelled and sworn chosen tryed and sworn Say upon their Oath That long before the Trespass and Ejectment of the Farm within supposed to be done One Thomas Boraston was seised of and in the within written 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances called the upper part of a Close called Reddings in Aldenham within written in his demesn as of see the said 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances held of one Robert Stepnigh Esq as of his Mannor of Aldenham in his free socage And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Tho. Boraston had issue of his body lawfully begotten Hum Boraston his Elder Son Hen. Boraston his Younger Son and the aforesaid Hum. Boraston had issue of his body Lawfully begotten Constance Boraston now the wife of the within named Thomas Brand and the within named Margaret wife of the within named William Davis and that afterwards Humphrey Boraston dyed living the said Thomas Boraston and that the aforesaid Constance and Margaret were and are Daughters and Co-heirs of the aforesaid Humphry Boraston and farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the aforesaid boraston so of and in the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances being seised as before is said afterwards that is to say the 12 th day of the moneth of August in the year of our Lord 1559 in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen the first made his Testament and last Will in writing in these English words following In the name of God Amen Item I give unto Thomas Amerie and Amphillis his wife all that my upper part of my close called Redding for the Term of 8 years after my decease in recompence of one yearly Annuity of 46
shillings 8 pence due unto the said Thomas Amerie upon one obligation of certein years yet during and upon farther Condition that the said Thomas Amerie shall bring in the said Obligation to my Executors to be cancelled and utterly discharged upon this consideration before such time as the said Thomas Amerie shall make any entry upon the premises and that the said Thomas Amerie neither his assignes shall not during the said 8 years fell any of the Woods Timber nor Undrwoods in nor uppon the said upper part but shall preserve the Woods hawts and Springs to the behoof of the Heir in remainder and after the Term of the said 8 years the said upper part to remayn to my Executors until such time as Hugh Boraston shall accomplish his age of 21 years and the mean profits to be imployed by my Executors towards the performance of this my last will and Testament and when the said Hugh commeth unto twenty and one yeares of age then I will that he shall enjoy the said upper part to him and his heirs for ever Provided alwaies that if the said Thomas Amerie do refuse to bring in his Obligation or to preserve the Woods upon the said upper part then my Executors to enjoy the premises during the said Term of 8 years paying the said Amerie his 46 shillings 8 pence during the said Term of 8 years as by the Tenement and last will aforesaid amongst other things it appeareth And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Boraston so of the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances being seised afterward that is to say the 14 th day of the aforesaid Moneth of August in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the first at Aldenham aforesaid of such his estate dyed seised and farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the aforesaid Hugh Boraston in the said Testament and last will named was Son and heir of the said Henry Boraston and that the said Hugh Boraston dyed before that he came to the age of 21 years that is to say about the age of 9 years And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that the Interest of the premises aforesaid in the said Testament and last will mentioned and devised aswell to the said Thomas Amry and Amphillis his wife as to the Executors of the said Testament before the day of the bringing of the Bill within written ended and determined And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath That Philip Boraston was and is Brother and next heir of the said Hugh Boraston by colour whereof the said Philip Boraston after the aforesaid Interest of the premises to the said Thomas Amerie and Amphillis his wife and the exetors aforesaid by the aforesaid Testament and last will given and devised was ended and determined unto the aforesaid 10 Acres of Lands with the appurtenannces as brother and next heir of the said Hugh entred and was thereof sâ—ised as the Law requireth and so therof seised the said Philip boraston afterwards and before the time of the exhibitage of the Bill aforesaid that is to say the 20 day of June in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 28 demised granted and to Farm let to the aforesaid William Ambry now defendant the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in which c. To have and to hold to the said William Ambry and his assignes for a whole year from thence next following to be fully compleat and ended and so from year to year as long as both parties should please By virtue of which â—â—â—ise The aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid Thomas brand and Constance his wife William Davis and Margaret his wife as in the right of the said Constance and Margaret afterwards that is to say the 9 day of July in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 20 aforesaid into the aforesaid 10 Acres of land with the appurtenances in upon the possession of the said William Ambry entred and were thereof seised as the Law requireth and so thereof being seised at Aldenham aforesaid the said Thomas Brand and Constance his wife William Davis and Margaret his wife afterwards that is to say the said 9th day of July in the year 28 aforesaid by their Indenture bearing date the same day and year demised granted and to Farm let the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Hynde to have and to hold the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances unto the said Richard Hynde and his assigns from the Feast of Saint John the Baptist then last past until the end term of 7 years from thence next ensuing fully to be complete ended By virtue of which demise the said Richard Hynde into the aforesaid 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances the aforesaid 9th day of July in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 28th aforesaid entred and was thereof possessed until the aforesaid William Ambry afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 9 th day of July in the 28 year aforesaid with force and Armes c. into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said Richard Hynde thereof by the precept and command of the aforesaid Philip Boraston re-entred and him the said Richard Hynde from his possession thereof held out and yet hold out But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the re-entry of the aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good or lawfull re-entry the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant and thereof pray the advice of the Court of the Lady the Queen and if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court of the said Lady the Queen that the Re-entry of the aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Richard Hynde be not nor in Law ought to be adjudged a good and Lawfull Re-entry Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid William Ambry is guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment within specified in manner and form as the aforesaid Richard Hynde within against him complaineth and then they Assesse the damages of the said Richard Hynde by occasion of the Trespass and Ejectment out of his Farm besides his charges and costs by him about his sute in his behalf expended to 8. shillings and for his Charges and Costs to 30. shillings and 4 pence but if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court of the Lady
the Queen that the re-entry of the aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the said Richard Hynde be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good and Lawfull re-entry then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the said William Ambry is not guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment of the farm aforesaid as he before for himself hath alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement further of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state that now it is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill thursday next after 8 dayes of Saint Hillary to heare their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet have avised c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state it now is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until wednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. And so from Term to Term until the plaint aforesaid was farther adjroned by another writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common adjournment before the Queen until the morrow of All Souls at the Castle of Hartford in the County of Hartford at which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is farther given to the parties aforesaid in state as it is now before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford until Tuesday next after 3 dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement c. because c. Before which day the plaint aforesaid was adjorned by a writ of the Lady the Queen of common adjornement before the said Lady the Queen untill 8 dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster at which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgment of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill VVednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Upon which seen by the Court of the Lady the Queen here and the premises diligently looked into and thereof mature deliberation being thereof had Because it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen here that the entrie of the aforesaid VVilliliam Ambry above specified into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the aforesaid Richard Hynde was a good and lawfull re-entry therefore It is granted that the aforesaid Richard Hynde take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but that he for his false clamour be taken c. and the aforesaid VVilliam Ambry be thereof without damage c. Ejectione Firme Hillary Terme 36. Eliz. Rott 440. in the Kings Bench. Sir George Browns Case C. 3. part fo 45. WIlliam Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman and Thomas Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman were attached to answer to James Linche of a plea wherefore with force and armes one Messuage one Barn 80 Acres of Land 80 Acres of Meadow and 80 Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in Swindon which George Brown Knight to the aforesaid James demised for a Term which is not yet ended they entred and him from his Farm aforesaid did eject and other harms did unto him to the grievous damage of the said James and against the peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. and whereupon the said James by Thomas Cooper his Attourny Complaineth That whereas the aforesaid George Brown the 22 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 35 th at Swindon aforesaid had demised to the said James the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to have and to hold the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the said James and his assigns from the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then last past until the end and Term of 4 years from thence next ensuing and fully to be compleated By virtue of which demise the said James into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid William and Thomas afterwards that is to say the 22 th day of October aforesaid in the 35 th year aforesaid with force and armes c. the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances which the said George Brown to the said James in form aforesaid demised for the term aforesaid which is not yet ended entred and him the said James from his Farm aforesaid held out and other harms c. To the grievous damage c. and against the peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20 pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid William and Thomas by John Paxton their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And say that they in nothing are guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid as the aforesaid James above against them complaineth and of this put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid James likewise c. Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he have here in 8 dayes of the Purification of the blessed Lady 12 good and Lawfull men c. by whom the truth c. and who neither c. Because aswell c. afterward the process between the parties aforesaid was continued of the plea aforesaid by Jurors put between them put in respite here until this day that is to say in 8 dayes of Saint Michael in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 37 th Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen for Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the statute upon Thursday the 17 day of July last past at New Sarad in the County aforesaid first came And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid James Linche as the aforesaid William Spencer and Thomas Spencer by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices of Assise before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Thomas Walmesley one
Tenements Rents Rectorie Warren Liberties and Fishing with the appurtenances in the same conteined and the same to him did render in the same Court to have and to hold and perceave the said yearly Rent of 100 pound to the said Edward the whole life of the said Johanna by the name of the Lady Johanna Bridges Mother of the said Anthony at the Feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist Saint Michael the Archangel and the birth of our Lord by equal portions yearly to be paid the whole life of the said Johanna the first payment whereof to begin at the Feast of the Feasts aforesaid which next after the decease of the said Anthony should happen to be And if it should happen the said yearly Rent of 100 pound or any part thereof to be behind in part or in all after any of the aforesaid Feasts in which as before is said it ought to be paid not paid by the space of 30 dayes That then and so often the said George and his heirs forfeit to the said Edward 4 pound and 15 shillings Nomine paenae as often as the said yearly Rent of 100 pound or any parcel thereof so to be behinde should happen and that then and so often it should be well lawfull to the said Ed. all the life time of the said Johanna into the aforesaid Mannors Tenements Rents Rectorie Warren Liberty and Fishing with the appurtenances in the said Fine conteined and every part and parcel thereof to enter and distreyn and the distressess so here taken and had Lawfully to lead carry away and drive and the same to keep until as wel of the aforesaid yearly Rent of 100 pound with the areaâ—ages thereof if any should be as of the aforesaid 4 pound 15 shillings Nomine Paenae as before is said he should be fully satisfied and paid Also the aforesaid George granted to the aforesaid Anthony and Barbara the aforesaid Mannors of Baddesden and Fally otherwise great Fally with the appurtenances and 20 Messuages 10 Tofts 10 Gardens 6 Orchards 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 1000 Acres of Pasture 100 Acres of Wood 500 Acres of Furz and Heath and 50 shilling Rent with the appurtenances in Baddesden Lugershall Fally otherwise great Fally and West Shefford and the Rectorie of great Fally with the appurtenance and Free Warren and Liberty of a Park in West Shefford otherwise great Shefford aforesaid parcel of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Fine conteyned and then did render in the same Court To have and to hold to the said Anthony and Barbara of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services which to those Mannors Tenements Rents Rectories Warren and Liberty of Park do belong the whole life of the said Anthony and Barbara and to the longest liver of them without impeachment of any waste the whole life of the said Anthony And after the decease of the said Anthony and Barbara the same Mannor Tenements Rents Rectories Warren and Liberties of Park with the appurtenances wholly to return to the said George and his heirs To be holden of the Lords of the Fee by the services which to those Mannors Tenements Rents Rectory Warren and liberty of Park belonging for ever And the aforesaid Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid that the said Johanna in the said Messuage and 26 Acres of Land amongst other with the appurtenances in form aforesaid being seised the said Johanna afterwards and before the within written time in which c. the 7th day of October in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32 th at Swindon aforesaid by her certain Indenture of demise between the same Johanna by the name of Jane Harcourt of Lugershall in the County of Wilts Widdow of the one party and Edward Bridges Esquire William Bridges and Anthony Bridges Sons of the sayd Edmond and their assignes of the other party made which Indenture is dated the 21 th day of August in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32 th aforesaid aswell for and in Consideration of the surrender of one Indenture of Demise before then granted of all and singular the premises in the said Indenture to the aforesaid Johanna then after demised or to be demised of 19 years and more then to come and not expired which the aforesaid Edmond before that time had and injoyed As of a former Indenture of Demyse at or before the sealing and deliverie of the said Indenture now in Evidence shewed the aforesaid Edward Bridges had surrendred and delivered unto the hands and possession of the said Johanna as for divers other good causes and considerations the same Johanna specially moving Demised granted and to Farm let to the said Edmond Bridges William Bridges and Anthony Bridges Sons of the said Edmond the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land with the appurtenances amongst other things to have and to hold the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land amongst other to the aforesaid Edmond William and Anthony Bridges the aforesaid 2 Sons of the said Edmond Bridges for the Term of their natural lives and for the Term of the life of the longest liver and every of them successively to be injoyed Yielding and paying therefore yearly during the said Term to the aforesaid Johanna under by the name of Jane Harcourt her heirs assigns 4 pound and 2 pence of good and Lawfull mony of England at two usual Feasts or Terms of the year that is to say at the Feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin 40 shillings and 1 penny and at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel the like sum of 40 shillings and 1 penny residue of the aforesaid 4 pound 2 pence as by the said indenture of Demise to the said Jurors in Evidence shewed more fully appeared by virtue of which demise the said Edmond Bridges William Bridges and Anthony Bridges Sons of the said Edmond were seised of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land within written as the Law requireth And farther the said Jurors say upon their Oath that the aforesaid Messuage 26 Acres within written and the rest of the Tenements in the said Indenture of Demise by the said Johanna under and by the name of Jane Harecourt to the said Edmond William and Anthony Sons of the said Edmond in form aforesaid demised were not usually demised for the greater part of 20 years next before the same demise as before is said made for so little rent as by the aforesaid Indenture thereof now in evidence shewed in form aforesaid was reserved And the aforesaid Jurors farther say upon their Oath that the aforesaid Johanna afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 29th day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now
possession then held made the aforesaid Edward Fowler was seized of and in the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee Tail And so thereof being seized the issues and profits thereof all his life took and had and the same to the uses and intents in the Testament of the said John Barton the Elder above expressed applyed and converted And that the aforesaid Edward so thereof being seised afterwards that is to say the 28 th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the late King Henry the 8th the 32. at Buckingham aforesaid of such his estate dyed thereof seized After the death of which Edward Fowler The said Messuage and 6. Acres of Pasture parcel c. descended to the said Gabriel Fowler as Son and Heir of the body of the said Edward Fowler lawfully begotten By virtue of which the aforesaid Gabriel into the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture parcell c. with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten the reversion in Fee simple thereof to the right Heirs of the said John Barton the Testator expectant unto the uses in the said last Will of the said John Barton the Testator expressed to be performed and the aforesaid Gabriel Fowler the issues and profits thereof to the uses and intents in the said Testament of the aforesaid John Barton the Testator to be performed limitted received disposed and converted from the time of the death of the said Edward Fowler within 5. years next before the first year of the Reign of King Edward the 6 th that is to say untill the 4 th day of May in the year of the Reign of the late King Henry the 8 th the 37 th By colour of which aforesaid premises and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of the said King Edward late King of England the 6 th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of November in the year of his Reign the first begun and from thence continued untill the 24 th day of the same November then next following then and there holden concerning Colleges Free Chapels Chauntries Fraternities Guilds and other spiritual promotions made and provided The aforesaid late King Edward the 6th immediatly after the Feast of Easter next following after the making of the said Act of Parliament was seised of and in the aforesaid Messuage and the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other things in the said Testament as is aforesaid given and appointed in his demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Crown of England if the Law so in this case requireth and that afterwards the said late King dyed of the said Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture so seised if the Law of England so requireth without Heir of his body begotten after whose death the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other descended to the Lady Mary late Queen of England as Sister and Heir of the said late King Edward the 6 th If the Law of England in this case requireth By which the said late Queen Mary was seised of the Messuage aforesaid and of the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. amongst other in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England if the Law this requireth and he said late Queen Mary afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. dyed so hereof seised if the Law of England in this case requireth without heir of her body issuing after whose death the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other descended to the said Lady the Queen that now is as Sister and Heir of the aforesaid late Queen Mary if the Law of England in this case requireth By which the said Lady the Queen that now is was of the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other seised in her demesn as of Fee in the right of her Crown of England if the Law of England so thereof requireth And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oaths aforesaid That after the aforesaid Act of Parliament aforesaid in the year of the Reign of the late King Edward the 6th the first made The aforesaid Gabriel Fowler occupied the aforesaid Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture with the appurtenances parcel c. continâ—ed and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail if the Law of England in this case requireth it having issue of his body lawfully begotten one Richard Fowler and so thereof seised continued the occupation aforesaid if the Law of England requireth it and afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18 th at Buck. aforesaid of such his estate dyed thereof seised if the Law of England requireth By colour of which the Messuage aforesaid and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. descended if the Law requireth to the aforesaid Richard Fowler as Son and Heir of the said Gabriel By colour of which the said Richard Fowler afterwards and before the time in which c. into the Messuage and 6. Acres of Lands aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail that is to say to him and the Heirs of his body lawfully begotten if the Law of England this requireth and the said Richard Fowler of the Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. so being seised if the Law of England this requireth The said Richard after and before the time in which c. that is to say the 10th day of March in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 33th at Buckingham aforesaid By his writing bearing date the same day and year with the Seal of the said Richard sealed and to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed for a certain sum of money in the said writing specified if the Law of England this requireth enfeoffed Francis Dayrell and Edward Dayrell Gen. of the Messuage and 6. Acres aforesaid with the appurtenances parcel c. amongst other To have to the said Francis and Edward their Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which the said Francis and Edward in the Messuage and 6. Acres of pasture aforesaid parcel c. entred and were thereof seised in their demesn as of Fee if the Law of Engl. this requireth so being thereof seised if the Law of Engl. this requireth The said Francis and Ed. afterwards before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say
exceeding the yeerly value of 12. pound notwithstanding the Statute of Alienation in Mortmain And that they by the name of President of the College or CoÌ„minalty of the faculty of Physicians Lond. might plead or might be impleaded before whatsoever Judges in all Courts and Actions whatsoever And that the aforesaid President and College or Comminalty and their Successors lawful assemblies and honest of themselves and Statutes and Ordinances for the wholesom Government Oversight and Correction of the College or Comminalty aforesaid and of all Men the same faculty in the same City or within 7. Miles circuit of the said City exercising according to the exigence or necessity as often and when need was might lawfully and without peril make without the hindrance of the said late King his Heirs or Successors whatsoever his Justices Escheators Sherifs and other his Bayliffs and Ministers his Heirs and Successor whatsoever He also granted to the said President College or Comminalty and their Successors That none in the said City or 7. Miles in Circuit thereof do exercise the said faculty unlesse to this by the said President or Comminalty or their Successors who for the time should be he be admitted by the Letters of the said President and College with their Common Seal sealed upon the penalty of 100. shillings for every Moneth that not being admitted he should exercise the same faculty half thereof to the Lord the King and his Successors and half thereof to the said President and College to be applyed He besides willed and granted for him and his Successors as much as in him was That by the President and College of the aforesaid Comminalty for the time being and their Successors for ever Four every yeer by them should be chosen should have the Overseeing searching Correction and Government of all and singular the Physicians of the said City exercising the faculty of Physick within the said City and so of other Physicians forein whomsoever the said faculty of Physick any wise frequenting and using within the said City and the Suburbs thereof or within 7 miles in Circuit of the said City and the punishment of them for their offences in not well exercising doing and using the same as also the oversight and searching of all Medicines and the reception of them by the said Physicions or any of them to the Leige people of the said late King for curing and healing their infirmities to be given put and used as often and when need shall be for the Commodity and profit of the said Liege people of the said late King So as the punishments of the said Physicians using the said faculty of Physick in the Premises offending by Fines Amercement and Imprisonment of their Bodies and by other wayes reasonable and fitting be executed He also willed and granted for him and his Heirs and Successors as much as in him was That neither the President nor any of the College aforesaid of Physicinas nor their successors nor any of them exercising the same faculty any way in future within the City aforesaid and the suburbs thereof or elce-where should be summoned or put nor any of them should be summoned or put in any Assises Juries Inquisitions Attachments and other Recognitions within the said City the Suburbs thereof for ever before the Mayor or Sherifs or Coroners of the said City or by any Officer or Minister or Officers or Ministers although the said Juries Inquisitions or Recognitions were summoned upon the Writ or Writs of the said late King or his Heirs of Record But that the said Masters or Governours and Comminalty of the faculty aforesaid and their Successors and every of them the said faculty exercising against the said late King his Heirs and Successors and against the Mayor and Sherifs of the said City aforesaid for the time being and whatsoever their Officers or Ministers should be thereof acquitted and discharged for ever as by the said Letters Patents amongst other things more fully appeareth And the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William further say That by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid the aforesaid John Chambre Thomas Linacre Ferdinand de Victoria Nicholas Hatswell John Franciscâ—s and Robert Yaxley Physicians and all men of the said faculty in the City aforesaid were one body and Comminalty perpetual or College perpetual And that afterwards by a certain Act of Parliament of the said late King Henry the 8th holden at London the 15th day of April in the yeer of his Reign the 14th and from thence adjourned unto Westminster in the County of Middlesex the last day of July in the yeer of the said late King the 15th and then there holden amongst other things It was Enacted by Authority of the same Parliament That for that that the making of the said Corporation of Physicians was meritorious and very good for the Common-wealth of this Kingdom of England and besides it was expedient and necessary to provide That no person of the said body politick and Comminalty aforesaid should be suffered to exercise and to practise Physick but onely such persons as should be profound sad and discreet groundedly learned and deeply studied in Physick In Consideration whereof and for the further authorizing of the said Letters Patents and also for the enlarging and amplifying of further Articles for the aforesaid Common-wealth to be had and made by the said late King with the consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Comminalty in the said Parliament assembled It is Enacted amongst other things That the aforesaid Corporation of the Comminalty and fellowship of the faculty of the Art of Physick aforesaid and all and every Grant Article and other things contained and specified in the said Letters Patents should be approved granted ratified and confirmed in the aforesaid Act and should cleerly be authorized and admitted by the same good lawful and available to the aforesaid bodie corporate and their Successors for ever in as ample and large manner as it might be taken thought and construed by the said Letters Patents And further It is enacted ordained and established by the said Act That the aforesaid 8. persons in the aforesaid Letters Patents named as principal and first named of the aforesaid Cominalty and Fellowship should choose to them two other of the said Comminalty who from thenceforth should be called and named Elects and the aforesaid Elects yeerly should choose one of them to be President of the said Comminalty and as often as any of the Rooms and place of the said Elects should happen to be void by death or otherwise then the Supervisors of the said Elects within 30. or 40. dayes next after their deaths or of any of them should choose name and admit one or more as need should requite of the most learned and expert men of and in the aforesaid faculty in London to supply the place and number of 8. persons so that he or they who should be choseâ— be first
the causes aforesaid should be arrested and delivered into custody And the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden further say That afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 24th day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid The said Thomas Langton President of the College aforesaid at London in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid dyed After whose death and before the time in which c. That is to say the 25th day of October in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid The said Henry Atkins a diligent man and skilful in the faculty of Physick and one of the Comminalty of the College aforesaid and one of the then 8. Electors of the College aforesaid then being at the College aforesaid within London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid was in due manner chosen and into the office of President of the College aforesaid for one whole yeer then next following and then and there held the said Office of President of the College aforesaid And the said Henry Atkins being President of the College aforesaid and the aforesaid George Turner William Dun Thomas Moundford and John Argent being Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid at an Assembly of the College aforesaid holden at the College aforesaid within London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid the 7th day of November in the yeer of our Lord 1606. abovesaid before the aforesaid Henry Atkins then President of the College aforesaid and the aforesaid George Turner William Dun Thomas Moundford and John Argent then Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid came the aforesaid Thomas Bonham in his proper person Of which Thomas Bonham when the aforesaid Henry Atkins then President of the College and the aforesaid George Turner VVilliam Dun Thomas Moundford and John Argent then Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid they asked whether he would satisfie to the College aforesaid for his disobedience and contempts aforesaid and again submit himself to be examined and to obey the Judgement of the College aforesaid And the aforesaid Thomas Bonham then and there answered that he before that had within London aforesaid done and practised and then after within Loedoâ— aforesaid would do and practise Physick no leave being asked of the said College and that he would not in any thing to the President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid yield obedience And then and there affirming the aforesaid President and Censors or Governours aforesaid to have no authority over those who are made Doctors in the University By which the said Censors or Governours for the offences and disobedience aforesaid Then and there Ordained and Decreed That the aforesaid Thomas Bonham should be sent to Prison there to remain until from thence by the President and Censors or Governours for the College aforesaid for the time being he should be delivered as by the said Letters Patents and the Statutes aforesaid it is Ordained and Established and then and there made their Warrant with the Common Seal of the College or Comminalty sealed And to the Keeper of of the Prison of the Lord the King in the Compter London in the Poultry in the Parish of St. Mildred directed commanded by the said Warrant to the Keeper of the Prison aforesaid That the said Keeper of the Prison aforesaid should receive the Body of the said Thomas Bonham and him in the Prison aforesaid of the said Lord the King there should safely keep without Bail or Main-prise at the proper costs and charges of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham until the aforesaid Thomas Bonham by the command of the President and Censors or Governours aforesaid or their Successors he should be delivered Which Thomas Bonham for his offences and disobedience aforesaid together with the Warrant aforesaid in form aforesaid made the said Henry Atkins then being President of the College aforesaid the aforesaid George Turner William Dun Thomas Moundford and John Taylor then being Censos or Governours of the College aforesaid by virtue of the Letters Patents and Statutes aforesaid and the aforesaid William Bowden and John Taylor as Servants of the said Henry Atkins President and of George William Dun Thomas Moundford and John Argent and by their the said President and 4. Censors or Governours aforesaid Warrant the aforesaid time in which c. to one Richard Ware then Keeper of the said Prison of the Lord the King of the Compter aforesaid at London in the Parish of St. Mildred in the Poultry in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid as to them it was lawful to do Which commitment of the aforesaid Thom. Bonham for the causes aforesaid in form aforesaid done is the same Trespass and Imprisonment whereof the aforesaid Tho. Bonham above complaineth And this they are ready to averr and demand Judgement if the said Thomas Bonham his Action aforesaid against them ought to have c. And the aforesaid Thomas Bonham saith That he for any thing before alleged to have his Action ought not to be barred Because by protestation he saith That he the said Thomas Bonham was not insufficient not was found by the aforesaid President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid to practise Physick nor unfitly or insufficiently to the aforesaid President and Censors or Governours of the College aforesaid in the Art of Physick did answer as the 〈◊〉 Henry Atkins George Turner John 〈…〉 dford John Argent John Taâ—lor and William Bowdâ—n above hath alleged For Pleâ— the said Thomas Bonham saith That by the aforesaid Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th holden at London aforesaid the aforesaid 5th day of April in the yeer of his Reign the 14th and from thence adjorned to VVestminster in the aforesaid County of Middlesex until the last day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said King the 15th and there then holden It was further Enacted by Authority of the same Parliament That whereas in the Diocesse out of London it was not then very like always to find men able sufficiently to examine according to the Statute such as should be admitted to exercise Physick in them That no person then after be suffered to exercise Physick through England until the said person should be examined at London by the aforesaid President and three of the aforesaid Electors and should have from the said President and Electors Letters Testimonials of their Approbation and Examination except he should be a Graduate of Oxford or Cambridge who had accomplished all things for his form without any Grace And further the said Thomas Bonham saith That he the said Thomas the second day of July in the year of our Lord 1595 in the University of Cambridge aforesaid took the Degree and Dignity of a Doctor in Physick and then and there that is to say the said second day of July in the
the said Edward then being Tenant of the Freehold of the said Mannors with the appurtenances By which Writ the said late King commanded the said Sherif That the said Sherif should command the said Edward Chamberlain by the name of Edward Chamberlain Esquire that justly and without delay he render to the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop Clerk The Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances and of 6. Messuages 200. Acres of Land 20. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture and 100. shillings of Rent with the appurtenances in Pettesho Eckney and Emberton which the said Nicholas and Thomas then claimed to be their Right and Inheritance and into which the said Edward Chamberlain had not entry but after the disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop after the first passage of the Lord King Henry Son of King John into Gascoign as they said and whereupon they complained the said Edward Chamberlain did them disseise And if the aforesaid Nicholas and Thomas Hartop secure him the said Sherif to prosecute their Claim Then he summon by good summoners the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain that he should be before the Justices of the said late King Henry the 8th here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in the Morrow of St. John the Baptist then next following to shew why he did not do it And that he have then here the summons and that Writ At which Morrow of St. John the Baptist before Robert Read Kt. and his Companions then Justices of the said late King Henry the 8th of the Bench here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid came aswell the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop by John Cowper then their Attorny as the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain by Thomas Palmer then his Attorny And the Sherif that is to say Ralph Verney Esq then returned here the Writ aforesaid in all things served and executed that is to say that the aforesaid Nicholas and Thomas found to the then Sherif sureties to prosecute his Sute aforesaid that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo And that the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain was summoned by John Den and Richard Fen And upon this the said Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop by declaring against the said Edward Chamberlain upon the Writ aforesaid Demanded against the said Edward Chamberlain The Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances as their Right and Inheritance and in which the said Edward Chamberlain had not Entry but after the first passage of the Lord King Henry Son of King John into Gascoign c. And whereupon then they said that they themselves were seised of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the said late King Henry the 8th taking thereof the Profits to the value c. And unto which c. And thereof then they brought sute c. And the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain by the aforesaid Thomas Palmer his Attorny then defended his right when c. And then vouched thereof to warranty Thomas Fish who was then present in Court in his proper person and willingly the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid to him did warrant and thereupon the said Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop demanded against him the said Thomas Fish then Tenant by his Warranty The Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid c. And whereupon they then said That they were sâ—ised of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th taking the profits thereof to the value c. And the aforesaid Thomas Fish Tenant by his Warranty aforesaid then defended his Right when c. And then prayed licence thereof to imparl and had it c. And afterwards the very same Term the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop returned back here into the Court aforesaid of the said late King Henry the 8th by their Attorny aforesaid and the aforesaid Thomas Fish Tenant by his warranty aforesaid did not come back but in despite of Court departed and made default Therefore then it was granted by the aforesaid Court here That the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop should recover their seisin against the said Edward Chamberlain of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances and that the said Edward should have of the Lands of the aforesaid Thomas Fish to the value and that the said Thomas Fish should be in mercy c. as by the Record and Processe thereof here in Court remaining more fully appeareth Which Recovery in form aforesaid had was had to the use and to the intent That the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances should enfeoff the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martiâ— John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor To have and to hold to them and their Heirs for ever By Colour of which Recovery The aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop into the Mannors aforesaid with their appurtenances entred and were thereof seised in their Demesn as Fee and so being thereof seised The said Nicholas and Thomas Hartop of the said Mannors with the appurtenances did 〈…〉 off the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin Liâ—sâ—y John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor To have and to hold to them and their Heirs for ever By virtue of which Fâ—â—ffment the said Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton VVilliam Hogeson and Robert Taylor were seised of the same Mannors with the appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised The aforesaid Sibil in the life of the said Edw. for the better security of the said Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances according to Agreement between the same Edward and Sibil first before the aforesaid Recovery had by her Writing aforesaid of Release Remised and Released to the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor all her Right Claim Title State Use Interest and demand of and in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in 〈…〉 ner and form as they above have alleged And this they are ready to aver Whereupon they demand Judgement And that the said Robert Chamberlain from having his Action aforesaid against them â—e baâ—â—ed And the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain â—y Protestation taking it That the Recovery aforesaid was not had to the use and intent That the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop should infeoff the said Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor of the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances By Protestation also that
the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed The same Alice before the time in which c. that is to say the 4th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the late Queen Mary the First at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid took to Husband one Thomas Wilcox by which the said Thomas and Alice in the right of the said Alice were of all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and of other the premises with their appurtenances possessed And so thereof being possessed The said Thomas Wilcox and Alice before the time in which that is to say the 16th day of November in the yeers of the Reign of the Lord Philip and the Lady Mary late King and Queen of England the First and Second at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid by their Writing sealed with their seals and here into Court brought whose Date is the same Day and Yeer Gave and Granted all their Right Title Interest and Term of Yeers which they the said Thomas and Alice then had to come of and in all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and the rest of the premises aforesaid with their appurtenances by reason of the execution of the Testament of the aforesaid Bartholmew Gibbs aforesaid to one Iohn Haynes By virtue of which Gift and Grant The same John Haynes before the time in which c. into all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed so being thereof possessed the said I. Haynes before the time in which c. that is say the 21. Day of Decem. in the Yeer of our Lord 1559. at Lond. aforesaid in the Parish aforesaid made his Test Last Will in Writing by the same devised and bequeathed the premises to one Joice then his Wife and thereof made and constituted c. Joice then his Wife his Executrix and afterwards the same Day and Yeer there of all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances dyed possessed After whose Death and before the time in which c. the aforesaid Joice taking upon her the Charge of Execution of the Testament and will of the aforesaid John Haynes into all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed by virtue of Execution of the same Testament and Last Will of the aforesaid Iohn Haynes and so being thereof possessed the said Joice before the time in which c. that is to say the 6th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31. at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid John Porter By which the said John Porter was and yet is thereof possessed By Colour of which the same John Porter in his own Right and the aforesaid Henry Cockain as Servant of the said Iohn and by his Commandment unto all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances in the said Information specified the said time in which c. Entred and the Issues and Profits thereof by the whole time in the said Information specified took and had and do yet take and have as to them it was and is lawful Without that that the said Iohn Porter in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the aforesaid Key and Wharf with the appurtenances in the said Information mentioned or any part thereof intruded or either of them did intrude in manner and form as in the said Information above is supposed And without that that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances in the said Information mentioned or any parcel thereof the said 26th Day of Ianuary in the Yeer 34th aforesaid in the same Information mentioned or ever before or after stood or were or was in the Hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is in manner and form as in the said Information is before supposed And also without that that there is any Record Roul or Remembrance in the Court of the Exchequer here besides the Record of the Information aforesaid by which it may appear the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises or any parcel thereof with the appurtenances to be or of Right to be in the hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is All and singular which the said John Porter and Henry Cockain are ready to aver as the Court here c. Whereupon they pray Judgement and that they as to the premises from this Court be dismissed c. and each of them be dismissed And because the Court will avise of the Plea aforesaid until further c. Day is given here to the aforesaid John Porter and Henry Cockain in the same state as now it is until to 15. Dayes of Faster at which Day the aforesaid Iohn and Henry came here as before And the aforesaid Iohn Popham Esquire Attorny General of the Lady the Queen that now is and who followes for the said Lady the Queen present here in Court the same Day in his proper Person By Protestation not acknowleging any thing in the Plea of the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain by them before pleaded to be true in manner and form as the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain in the Plea of the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain by them above pleaded to be true in manner and form as the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain in their Plea aforesaid above have pleaded Yet for Replication The same Attorny of the said Lady the Queen that now is for the said Lady the Queen saith as he formerly said That the aforesaid Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is in the aforesaid Key and Wharf called the Old Woolkey and other the premises in the Information aforesaid specified entred intruded and made entry in manner and form as in the Information aforesaid above it is alleged And of this The Attorny of the said Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayeth that it may be inquired of the Country And the said Desendants say as before and pray likewise Therefore that inquiry be made thereof c. And it is commanded to the Sherifs of London that they do not omit c. And that they cause to be here from Easter in one Moneth the same Term 12. free and lawful men of our Balywick of the Neighbourhood of the Parish of All Saints Barking in the City of London aforesaid c. whereof each c. by whom c. and who neither c. And the same Day is given here to the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain at which day the said Iohn and Henry come here as before and the Sherifs that is to say William Rider and Benedict Burnham returned the Writ aforesaid together
and in the 22d year of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord King Henry the 8th as by the said Will more fully appeareth And afterwards the said Nicholas Gibson at London in the Parish of St. Dunstan in the East aforesaid the 6th Day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Henry late King of England the 8th the 32th aforesaid dyed of such his estate so seized of the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with appurtenances without issue of his â—ody begotten After the death of which Nicholas The aforesaid Avice in the aforesaid Parish of St. Dunstan took upon her the charge of Execution of the Testament aforesaid And before the aforesaid time of Intrusion aforesaid supposed that is to say the 13th Day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th the third At London in the Parish of All Saints Barking aforesaid demised the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to one Bartholmew Gibbs To have and to hold to him and his Assignes from the Feast of the Birth of our Lord which then should be in the yeer of our Lord 1566. until the full end of 40. yeers from thence next following and fully ended By virtue of which demise The same Bartholmew was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid possessed and so thereof being possessed The said Bartholmew before the time in which c. that is to say the first Day of January in the yeer of our Lord 1522. at London in the Parish of All Saints aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in Writing and constituted and ordained one Alice then his Wife his Executrix of his said last Will and Testament And afterwards the said Bartholmew then and there dyed of such his estate possessed of the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances After whose death and before the time in which c. the said Alice took upon her tharge of the Execution of the Testament aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of All Saints and was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid of 40. yeers possessed as Executrix of the Testament of the said â—artholmew and so thereof being possessed The said Alice Before the time in which c. at London in the Parish of All Saints aforesaid took to Husband one Thomas Wilcox By which The said Thomas and Alice before the time in which c. were of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of 40. yeers of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and the said Thomas and Alice so thereof being possessed before the time in which c. that is say the 16th Day of December in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady Mary late Queen of England the second At London in Parish of All Saints Barking aforesaid granted all their Estate Interest and Term of years which they then had of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to one Iohn Haynes By virtue of which Grant The said Iohn Haynes was of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of 40. yeers of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed And so thereof being possessed The same Iohn Haynes before the time in which c. that is to say the 21. Day of September in the yeer of our Lord 1559. at London in the Parish of All Saints Barking aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in Writing made ordained one Joyce his then Wife his Executrix of hiâ— said last Will and by the same his Will willed and bequeathed all his Estate Interest and Term of yeers which he then had of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Joyce And afterwards the said Iohn Haynes at London in the Parish of All Saints Barking aforesaid of such his Estate of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances dyed possessed After whose Death the said Joyce took upon her the charge of the Execution of the Testament aforesaid and was of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of 40. yeers of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed And so thereof being possessed the said Joyce before the time in which c. At London in the Parish of All Saints aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid Iohn Porter By which the said Iohn Porter and Joyce were of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of 40. years of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed And the Jurors aforesaid further say upon their Oath That one Iohn Gibson is Cosen and Heir of the said Nicholas Gibson that is to say Son and Heir of Hugh Gibson deceased Brother and Heir of the said Nicholas Gibson And that the said Iohn Gibson before the time in which c. that is to say the 24th Day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 34th into the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by force of the Testament and last Will of the said Nicholas Gibson by colour of Forfeiture and by reason of the Condition in the said last Will before specified by the aforesaid Avice in her life forfeited and broken entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The said John Gibson before the time in which c. that is to say the 25th Day of Janbary in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 34th By his Writing indented bearing Date the same Day and yeer in the Court of the said Lady the Queen of her Chancery at Westminster being in due manner inrolled and to the Jurors in Evidence shewed Bargained Granted and Sold the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Lady the Queen that now is To have and to hold to the said Lady the Queen that now is her Heirs and Successors for ever By Colour of which Grant Bargain Sale and Inrollement The said Lady the Queen that now is was of the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances seized in her Demesn as of Fee in the Right of the Crown of England and the said Queen that now is so thereof being seized The aforesaid John Porter claiming the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid in his own Right and the aforesaid Henry as Servant of the said John Porter and by his Commandment the aforesaid time in which c. into the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is thereof entred and made ingresse But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by them the Jurors in form aforesaid found the aforesaid entry of the aforesaid John Porter and Henry into the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances be an Intrusion upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid or not The said Jurors thereof pray the
Memorandum That Edward Coke Esquire The Attorny General of the Lady the Queen that now is who prosecutes for the said Lady the Queen present here in Court the 20th Day of June this Term in his own person for the said Lady the Queen gave the Court here to understand and be informed That whereas a Wood with the appurtenances called Alcon otherwise Aluington Wood containing by estimation 3000. Acres of Wood in Alton otherwise Aluington and Rock in the aforesaid County of Worcester in the Hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is the first Day of October in the first yeer of her Reign and long before and continually after were and stood and of Right ought to be and yet ought as in the Right of her â—rown of England as in very many Records Roules and Remembrances of this Exchequer it is evident and appeareth upon Record Yet one Ann Countess of Warwick Humphry Hill Richard Bushopp and Edward Bushopp little regarding the Lawes and Statutes of the said Lady the Queen that now is but intending the Disenherism of the Lady the Queen in the premises with Force and Armes c. the first Day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 27th and diverse Dayes and turns between the same first Day of October in the 27th yeer and the Day of Exhibiting of this Information in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the premises Entred Intruded and made Entry and the Issues and Profits thereof coming perceived to their own uses and had and as yet do perceive and have the same Trespass continuing and as yet continuing in contempt of the said Lady the Queen that now is and against her Lawes Whereupon the aforesaid Attorny of the said Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayes the Advise of the Courâ— in the premises And the aforesaid Ann Countess of Warwick Humphry Hâ—ll Richard Bishopp and Edward Bishopp come here to answer the said Lady the Queen of and in the premises as it is contained there And now that is to say From the day of Holy Trinity in three Weekes this Term came here the aforesaid Richard Bishopp by Arthur Salwaie his Attorny to this by special favour of the Court admitted and prayeth the hearing of the Information aforesaid and it is read unto him c. Which being read and heard and by him the said Richard fully understood The said Richard complaineth by colour of the premises in the Information aforesaid above specified to be troubled and unquietted and that not justly Because By Protestation that the Information aforesaid and matter in the same contained is not sufficient in Law and to which the said Richard is not necessitated nor by the Law of the Land bound to answer in any manner By Protestation also That the Wood aforesaid in the Information aforesaid above mentioned doth not contain nor the aforesaid time of the Trespass and Intrusion aforesaid above supposed to be done did contain in it 3000. Acres in manner and form as by the Information aforesaid above is supposeed Yet for Plea The said Richard as to the Force and Armes or whatsoever is against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is As also the whole Trespass Contempt and Intrusion in the Information aforesaid above specâ—fied supposed to be done besides the Entry and Ingresse into the Wood aforesaid called Alton Wood otherwise Alvington Wood the 21th Day of February in the Yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 32th and from the same Day until the Day of Exhibiting of the Information aforesaid and besides the perceiving the Issues and Profits thereof by that time comming above supposed The said Richard saith that he in nothing thereof is guilty in manner and form as by the Information aforesaid above is supposed and upon this puts himself upon the Country And the aforesaid Attorny General of the said Lady the Queen that now is who for the said Lady the Queen in this behalf prosecutes likewise c. Therefore an Inquisition be made thereof c. And as to the Entry and Ingress into the Wood aforesaid the aforesaid 21th Day of February in the 32th Yeer aforesaid and from that Day until the Day of Exhibiting of the Information aforesaid as also to the taking of the Issues and Profits thereof by the time thereof comming above supposed to be done the said Richard saith That the said Lady the Queen that now is him the said Richard ought not any wayes to impeach or trouble because he saith That long before the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the Entry Intrusion and Ingress aforesaid to be done One Ann Countess of Warwick Widow sometimes Wife of Richard sometimes Earl of Warwick was seized of the Mannor of Abbotesley otherwise Abberley otherwise Abbedeley with the appurtenances in the aforesaid County of Worcester whereof the aforesaid Wood in which c. then and until the time of the grant here after specified made to Robert Earl of Leicester the third Day of July in the 30th Yeer of Queen Elizabeth here after mentioned whereof the Memory of Man then was not to the contrary was parcel in her Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized a Fine was levied in the Court of the Lord Henry late King of England the 7th at Westminst in the County â—f Middlesex from the Day of St. Hillary in 15. Dayes in the 3d Year of his Reign before Thomas Brian Roger Townsend and Iohn Haugh Justices and other the said late Kings Faithful Subjects then there present Betwâ—en him the Lord the King plantiff and the aforesaid Ann sometimes Countess sometimes Wife of the aforesaid Richard Earl of Warwick by the Name of Ann Countess of Warwick deforceant of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other c. whereof a Plea of Covenant was sued between them in the same Court that is to say That the said Countess granted to the said Lord the King the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. And the same rendred back to him in the same Court To have and to hold to the said Lord the King and the Heirs Males of his Body begotten and if it shall happen That the said Lord the King should die without Heir Male of his Body begotten then after the decease of the said Lord the King the aforesaid Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. should wholly Revert to the same Countess and her Heirs quieted from the other Heirs of the aforesaid Lord the King as by the Record of the aforesaid Fine in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench at Westminster aforesaid remaining more fully appeareth By virtue of which Fine the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as Fee tail that
after was Servant of the said late King Henry the 8th and one of the Grooms of the Privy Chamber of the said late King and many good laborious and laudable Services to the said late King Henry the 8th before the making of the said Letters Patents did and performed and that he said VValter the aforesaid other Letters Patents of the aforesaid Mannor of Grafton Fleuard and the said VValter and Elizabeth the aforesaid other Letters Patents of the said Mannor of Charleton with their several members and appurtenances in form aforesaid made to the said late King Henry the 8th before the making of the said other Letters Patents to them in form aforesaid made and here in Court shewed forth in his Chancery aforesaid at VVestminster aforesaid had surrendred and procured to be cancelled as in the said Letters Patents here in Court shewed forth it is alleged and testified By virtue of which Letters Patents here in Court shewed forth The said VValter and Elizabeth were seized of the said Mannor of Abottesly with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other that is to say The said VValter in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing and the aforesaid Elizabeth in her demesn as of Free hold for the Term of her Life and the said VValter and Elizabeth so being thereof seized the said Elizabeth afterwards and before the time in which c. at Abottesly aforesaid dyed And the aforesaid VValter over-lived her and held himself in the aforesaid Mannor of Abottesly with the appurtenances whereof c. and was thereof seized in his demesn of Fee tail in form aforesaid by right of Survivour And the said VValter so thereof being seized By an Act of Parliament of the same late King Henry the 8th at VVestminster aforesaid the 8th day of July in the yeer of his Reign the 28th holden made reciting by the said Act Whereas the aforesaid Ann Countess of VVarwick in the Fine aforesaid above named in the yeer of the Reign of the late King Henry the 7th the â—â—ihrd by Fine then levied before the Justices of the King of Common-Pleas at VVestminster had given granted unto the said late King Henry the 7th amongst other things The Lordship and Mannor of Abottesly with the appurtenances in the County of VVorcester To have to the said King and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing as by the same Fine remaining on Record amongst other things it more fully appeared By virtue of which the said late King was seized of the said Mannor with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee tail and so thereof being seized The said Countess dyed After whose death the Reversion of the said Mannor with the appurtenances in Fee simple did descend and come to Edward late Earl of Warwick which Reversion and Fee simple of the said Mannor amongst other Castles Honours Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments then after escheated and came into the Hand and possession of the aforesad late King Henry the 7th and his Heirs by the Attainder of High Treason of the said Edward Earl of Warwick as by the Record therefore more fully appeareth And the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th so thereof being seized dyed After whose death the same Castles honours manors lands tenements and Hereditaments and other the premises in the Fine aforesaid contained amongst other Lands Manors Tenements and Hereditaments descended came to the said late K. Hen. the 8th as Son Heir of the aforesaid late K. Hen. the 7th by due course of Inheritance By virtue wherof the said late K. Henry the 8th had been and was then thereof seised And because the aforesaid Castles Manors Lordships Lands Tenements and other the premises were of great value and had many great and ample Liberties Preheminences Commodities â—â—d delights to the same belonging Therefore then and there It was Enacted by Authority of the same Parliament That the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors from hence after should have hold and injoy for ever all and singular the aforesaid Castles Mannors Tenements Lands and Hereditaments with the Appurtenances and all and singular the premises and that the said Castles Manors Tenements Lands and Hereditaments with the Appurtenannances and all and singular other the premises by Authority of the said Parliament should be adjudged in the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors in Fee simple for ever without the aforesaid or any other thing or things before then had made or used or to be allowed to the contrary in any thing notwithstanding as by the same Act more fully appeareth Saving alwayes to all and singular person and persons Bodies politique and corporate their Heirs and Successors and to the Heirs and Successors of every of them other than the aforesaid late Countess of Warwick and her Heirs and the Heirs of the said Richard late Earle of Warwick Father of the late Countesse all such Rights Titles Uses Interests terms of years Demise Demises Rents Fees Annuities Possessions Reversion Remainder Distresses Entries Actions Grants Offices Commons Commodities Liberties Profits Sutes in such manner form conditions as they or any of them their heirs successors or the heirs or succes of any of them had could might or ought to have had if the Act aforesaid never had bin made any thing in the said Act of Parliament to the contrary notwithstanding as by the said Act amongst other things it more fully appeareth By colour of which Act the Reversion aforesaid to the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley otherwise Abberley and the Manor aforesaid in Reversion after the Estate and Interest of the aforesaid Walter Walsh and Elizabeth his wife so as before is said granted to the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors in Fee simple did belong according to the form and effect of the Act aforesaid By which the said late King Henry the 8th was seised of that reversion as of Fee and right and the said late King so being thereof seised and the said Walter of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seised The aforesaid Walter at Abbottesley aforesaid before the aforesaid time in which c. died of such his Estate so seised After whose decease The said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. descended to one Walter Walsh his Son as Son and Heir Male of the body of the same Walter Walsh his Father Issuing By which the said Walter Walsh the Son after and before the time in which c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his body issuing and the aforesaid late King Henry the 8 th was seised of the Reversion thereof as of Fee and Right and so thereof being seised The said late King afterwards and before the time in which c. at
and singlar the premises whereof the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father was before seized due to us or to any other for Wardship Primer-seisin Livery or any other manner That his last Will and meaning was to leave that there might descend all those his Lands and Tenements called and known by the name of Eastendown containing 110. Acres of Lands and all those Lands and Tenements and Heditaments which the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father had by descent after the death of Thomas Digges of Newington neer Sittingâ—orn Esquire then deseased And if the Lands and Tenements as above is said left to descend should not be sufficient to satisfie to us for the 3d. part was due to us then his Will meaning was That so much of the other of his Lands next adjoyning to Eastendown aforesaid should descend and should be to his said Son Thomas Digges as should be sufficient to satisfie and fulfil to us the third part And by the said his Testament expresly gave and bequeathed the other two parts of the aforesaid Mannors Lands and Tenements and other the premises before mentioned with their appurtenances whatsoever to the use of the payment of his Debts and maintainance of Martha Digges then his Wife And that afterwards the said Christopher Digges of all and singular the premises aforesaid as is before said being seized the 14th day of the moneth of March in the yeer 1566. dyed leaving after him issue Five Sons then living in full life being that is to say the said Thomas Digges in the said Commission named and the aforesaid Christopher Edward Reginald and John Digges which said John dyed in the life of him the said Thomas without issue And that the said Christopher and Edward for further shewing of their Right in the premises said and are ready to aver That the aforesaid Christopher their farther ever in his time had held or enjoyed any of the Lands and Tenements by descent of Inheritance of the said Thomas Digges of Newington aforesaid By which the third part of the said Lands and Tenements of him the said Christopher be limitted and appointed to descend to satisfie us for the Wardship of the Heir of the said Christopher according to the intent of the same Testament and last Will remained to be made and taken out of the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and of other the Lands and Tenements of the same Christopher to the said Lands called Eastendown next adjoyning And further the said Christopher and Edward Sons of the aforesaid Christopher in Facto said That the demesn Lands of the said Mannor of Outelmeston at the time of the death of the said Christopher the Father were next adjoyning to the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown And that the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father at the time of his death had not any Lands or Tenements next situate and adjoyning to the said Lands called Eastendown than the demesn Lands of the Mannor of Outelmeston with their Rights and Members By which the third part by the aforesaid Testament and last Will left to descend ought to be taken out of the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and of the demesn Lands of the said Mannor of Outelmeston aforesaid called Eastendown next adjoyning And also said That the aforesaid Mannors Lands and Tenements whereof the aforesaid Christopher dyed seized contained in them 2500. Acres of Lands And that the third part of the 2500. Acres of Lands is 833. Acres of Lands by which to make the Lands called Eastendown a full third part of all the Mannors and Tenements whereof the said â—hristopher Digges dyed seized ought to be taken out of the demesn Lands of the said Mannor of Outlemeston next adjoyning to the said Lands called Eastendown 733. Acres Which third part of the Mannors and Lands aforesaid after the death of the said â—hristopher Digges Father of the said Thomas Christopher Edward Reginald and John as Sons of the said Christopher descended and of Right ought to descend And that the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown as also the aforesaid demesn Lands of the aforesaid Mannor of Outlemeston are and time whereof the Memory of Man is not to the contrary are and were of the Tenure and nature of Gavelkind and for all that time parted and partable between Heirs Males By which the said Thomas Christopher Edward Reginald and John into the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and so much of the aforesaid demesn Lands of the aforesaid MaÌ„nor of Outelmeston aforesaid called Eastendown next adjoyning as with the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown amounted to the third part of all the aforesaid MaÌ„nors Lands TenemeÌ„ts whereof the said Christ-Digges aforesaid dyed seized entred and were thereof seized in their demesn as of Fee in Copercenery And so thereof being seised The said John Digges dyed without issue of his body of his purpart thereof seised after whose death the aforesaid Thom. Christopher Edward Reginald were seised of the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and of so much of the demesn Lands of the aforesaid Manor of Owtelmestone aforesaid called Estendown next adjoyning as with the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown did amount to the third part of all the aforesaid Manor Lands and Tenements whereof the aforesaid Christopher dyed seised and were thereof seised in their demesn as of Fee in Copercenerie they being thereof so seised the aforesaid Thomas Digges dyed thereof seised and further the said Christopher and Edward said that afterwards the aforesaid Thomas Digges in the aforesaid Commission named so thereof as is said of his purpart of the premises being seised dyed thereof seised after whose death the said Christopher and Edward together with the aforesaid Reginald into the aforesaid Lands and Tenements being as before is said of the nature and tenure of Gavelkind entred and were by virtue of the said Custome of Gavelkind thereof Lawfully seised in Copercenerie as of their purparts until after the birth of thesaid Thomas Posthumus Digges and by Colour of the Inquisition aforesaid the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and the aforesaid Manor of Owtelmestone amongst other things were totally and wholly seised into our hands And the aforesaid Christopher and Edward utterly thereof and of their aforesaid purparts thereof to them as before is said due and belonging they were amoved and expelled unjustlie with this that the said Christopher and Edward will averr that the aforesaid Manor of Owtelmestone and the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown in the aforesaid last Will of the aforesaid Christopher the father mentioned and left to descend as afore is said are the same Lands called Eastendown and the said Manor of Owtelmestone in the Inquisition aforesaid mentioned whereof the said Christopher and Edward demand Judgment and that our hands from the two parts of the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and so much of the Demesn Lands of the aforesaid Manor of Owtelmestone next adjoyning to the aforesaid Lands called Easten as do amount to the third part of the aforesaid Manors and
Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and the said Edward Digges in their Declaration above have alleged For Plea say That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father in his life time was seized of all the Manors and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his Demesn of Fee and so thereof being seized the 6th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 10th at Owtelmeston aforesaid by a certain Indenture between him the said Christopher of the onâ— part And Henry Crispe of Tennet in the aforesaid County of Kent Knight John Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leveson and Richard Horewood Gent. of the other part made and with the Seal of the said Christopher the Father sealed bearing date the same day and yeer Aswel in the consideration of a Mariage between the said Christopher the Father and Martha Sister of the aforesaid John and Richard Brook before that time had and solemnized as in the consideration of the sum of 200. pounds of good and lawful Mony of England before the solemnization of the Mariage aforesaid to the said Christopher the Father paid and also for the preferring and sure advancing of the aforesaid Thomas Digges then Son and Heir aparent of the said Thomas begotten As also for diverse other good causes and considerations the said Christopher the Father moving Covenanted Granted and Agreed to and with the aforesaid Henry Crisp John Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leveson and Richard Horewood their Executors and Administrators in form following That aswell the said Christopher Digges the Father and his Heirs and every other person and persons their Heirs who then stood or were seized or that at any time then after should stand or should be seized of and in all and singular the Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments of the said Christopher Digges the Father whatsoever with the Appurtenances situate lying and being in the aforesaid County of KENT from thence forward should stand and be seized of and in all and singular the said Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments and other the premises in the said County of KENT with all and singular their Appurtenances to the onely uses and intents afterwards in the said Indentures mentioned and expressed and to no other use intent or purpose That is to say To the use of the said Christopher Digges the Father for the Term of his life And after the decease of the said Christopher the Father to the use of the said Thomas Son of the said Christopher the Father and the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Thomos lawfully begotten or to be begotten and for default of such issue to the use of the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Christopher the Father upon the Body of the said Martha lawfully to be begotten as by the said Indenture amongst other things it more fully appeareth By virtue whereof and by force of a certain Statute of tranferring of uses into possession in the Parliament of the late King HENRâ— the 8th the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex holden made The said Christopher Digges the Father was seized of the Mannors and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Free-hold for the Term of his life the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid Thomas in form aforesaid expectant And the said Christopher the Father being thereof so seized the Remainder thereof in form aforesaid expecting The said Christopher the Father at Owtelmeston aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seized After whose Death The said Thomas Digges the Son into the Mannors and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenancesentred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee-tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body begotten by virtue of the Indenture aforesaid and by force of the Statute aforesaid And so being seized of all and singular the Mannors and Tenements aforesaid The aforesaid 10th day of April in the yeer of the Reignof the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32th At Owtelmeston aforesaid of such his Estate dyed seized Thomas Posthumus Digges being Son and Heir of his Body within Age and in the Ward of the said Lady the Queen as by the said Inquisition it is found without that that the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seized of the Mannors and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as Fee as the aforesaid Christopher the Son and Edward in the Monstrans de droit aforesaid above have alleged And this they are ready to aver Whereupthey demand Judgment If the Hands of the said Lady the Queen from the aforesaid two parts of the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown and so much of the Demesn Lands of the Mannor of Outelmeston next adjoyning to the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown as amount to the third part of the aforesaid Mannors Lands and Tenements whereof it is supposed that the said Christopher the Father dyed seized in 4. parts to be divided or of any part thereof ought to be amoved Or the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward to the aforesaid purparts of the premises in the mean time aforesaid received ought to be restored And the aforesaid Christopher the Son and Edward as at first say That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seized of the Mannors and Tenements aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee as in their Monstrans de droit aforesaid above they have alleged And this they are ready to aver And pray that it be inquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret likewise c. And therefore day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary wheresoever it should be to do and receive what shall be just in the premises And that it is commanded to the Sherif of KENT that he cause to come before the said Lady the Queen at that day 12. good and lawful men of the Neighbourhood of Barham Lenham Frensted Harrisham Sturrey Hackington and the Parish of Saint Stephens and of the Mannor of Netherhard in his Balywick whereof every one have 4. l. per Annum in Lands Tenements or Rents at the least by whom the truth of the matter might best be known And who neither c. To Recognize c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come aswel the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by Thomas Westbie the Elder their Attorny as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons And the Sherif of KENT retorned the names of the Jurors c. Whose names c. Whereof none c. Therefore it is commanded to the said Sherif of KENT that he have their Bodies afore the Lady the Queen in 8. dayes of the
Assignes the interest aforesaid of the aforesaid Term of years of and in the Moyety of the demesn Lends aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said Robert Wright the Grandfathe in form aforesaid demised By virtue whereof the said Edward was of the interest of the Term aforesaid possessed and being so thereof possessed The said Edward the 11th day of July in the yeer of our Lord 1563. at Eastmeon aforesaid made his Testament and last Will in Writing and by his said Testament constituted and appointed Agnes then his Wife to be sole Executrix of his said last Will And by the said his last Will gave and bequeathed all his interest aforesaid in the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid so as before is said with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright now the plantiâ— one of the Sons of the said Edward And afterwards the said Edward Wright at Eastmeon aforesaid dyed of his Interest aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid demised possessed After whose death the aforesaid Agnes took upon her the burden of Execution of the last Will of the said Edward aforesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid and the said Executrix at Eastmeon aforesaid gave her consent that he the said Robert Wright should have and injoy to him and his Assignes the interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid demised By virtue of which the said Robert Wright now plantif was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances possessed until the morrow of the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer of our Lord 1575. in which morrow of the aforesaid Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer 1575. aforesaid The said Robert Wright now plantif into the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed And so thereof being possessed the said Moyety with the Appurtenances had held and injoyed and now hath and occupieth and ought to have and occupy of and from the payment of Tithes whatsoever of in or upon the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances or any parcel thereof yeerly any manner of wayes growing and appertaining renewing or arising for the occasion aforesaid in this behalf alleged utterly exonerated acquitted freed and privileged by reason of the Prescription and Privilege aforesaid And whereas by the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th holden at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of November in the second yeer of his Reign amongst other things It is enacted by authority of that Parliament That no person be sued or otherwise compelled to yeeld giue or pay any manner of Tithes for any Manors Tenements or Hereditaments which by the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom of England or by any Privilege or Prescription were not chargeable with the payment of any such Tithes by any Composition reall as by the said Act amongst other things it more fully appeareth Yet the aforesaid Nicholas Wright in his life time pretending himself to be Farmer of the Rectory of the Parish Church aforesaid and by colour of a demise to him thereof made by Thomas by Divine Providence then Bishop of Winchester for the Term of 21. yeers supposed to be made upon that occasion falsely supposing Tithes whatsoever in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid demised arising and happening to the said Nicholas Wright by virtue of the demise aforesaid to him in form â—foresaid supposed to be made to belong and appertain whereas in truth The said Robert now plantif the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid by virtue of the Demise aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid made and by reason of the immunity of the Privilege and Act aforesaid above specified was exonerated acquitted freed and privileged of and from payment of Tithes whatsoever thereupon growing to have and injoy ought during the Term aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather in form aforesaid granted of the premises not ignorant endeavouring the Queens Majesty that now is and her Regal Crown to desinherit and to draw the conusance of her Pleas which do belong to her Royal Crown and not to the spiritual Court to another Jurisdiction and Examination in the spiritual Court supposing the Indenture of demise aforesaid to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Granfather made and the Writing of Confirmation aforesaid as also the Estate of him the said Robert now plantif of and in the Moyety aforesaid of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert the Grandfather from the Tithes aforesaid in form aforesaid discharged had and made to be void and of no validity in Law whereas in truth The Indenture of demise aforesaid and the Writing of Confirmation theâ—eof and also the Estate of the said Robert aforesaid the now plantif of and in the Moyety of the aforesaid demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert the Grandfather in manner aforesaid demised so as before is said discharged of Tithes is good and effectual in the Law And whereas in truth the same demise to the aforesaid Nicholas in form aforesaid alleged to be made if any such waâ— was utterly void and insufficient in Law as to any Tithes of in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid growing is The said Robert Wright now the plantif in the spiritual Court before the Reverend and worthy Man Mr. William Awbray Doctor of Law in the Court of Audience of causes and businesse in the Court of Canterbury lawfully deputed to hear of and for the withdrawing and not payment of Tithes of Wheat Barly Pease and Beans of in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid in the yeer of our Lord 1590. growing renewing arising and happening as also of and for the withdrawing and non payment of the Tithes of the Wool of Lambs and Sheep of the said Robert now plantif of in and upon the aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid in the yeer of our Lord aforesaid kept shorn and arising as also of the Tithes of the Aples of the said Robert Wright the plantif of in and upon the said aforesaid Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid in the yeer aforesaid growing gotten and arising the 8th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Eastmeon aforesaid in the County aforesaid drew into sute And the aforesaid Nicholas the same Robert now plantif before the aforesaid spiritual Judge for that occasion aforesaid to appear and to the said Nicholas of and upon the premises to
demesn â—ands aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized and the same having and holding exonerated acquitted freed and privileged of and from the payment of Tithes whatsoever in and upon the capital Messuage aforesaid and other the premises with their Appurtenances or any part thereof growing renewing or in any wise happening the aforesaid 4th day of July in the yeer of the reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th the 38th aforesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid by his aforesaid Indenture with the Seal of his Bishoprick sealed bearing date the said day and yeer demised to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather of the aforesaid Robert The Moyety of the demesn Lands aforesaid with the Appurtenances by the name of all the demesn Lands of the Manor of Eastmeon aforesaid of old appertaining with all Houses Stables Barns and Buildings upon the Moyety aforesaid then and of old situate lying and being with the Appurtenances which Moyety then lay in the Fields on the South part of the Town of Eastmeane aforesaid To have and to hold the said Moyety with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather and to his Assignes from the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel which then should be in the yeer of our Lord God 1575. until the end and Term of 40. yeers from thence next following and fully to be ended And that afterwards that is to say The aforesaid 20th day of July in the 38th yeer aforesaid the aforesaid William Kingsmill then Dean of the aforesaid Cathedral Church of the Holy Trinity of Winchester and the Chapter of the same place at Winchester aforesaid in their Chapter-house aforesaid by their Writing aforesaid sealed with the Chapter-Seal aforesaid in the life of the aforesaid late Bishop and in the life time of the aforesaid Robert Wright the Grandfather confirmed and ratified And that the said Robert Wright by virtue of the demise and confirmation aforesaid was of the interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid 14th day of August in the yeer of our Lord 1658. aforesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid made his Will in Writing and by his said Will constituted the aforesaid Margaret and Nicholas Wright his Executors and by the said his Will gave and bequeathed all his interest aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Edward Wright Son of the said Robert the Grandfather And afterwards at Eastmeon aforesaid dyed of his Interest aforesaid in form aforesaid possessed After whose death the aforesaid Edward by the assent of the Executors aforesaid was of the Interest of the aforesaid Term of yeers of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances possessed And that the said Edward so being thereof possessed the aforesaid 11th day of July in the yeer of our Lord 1563. abovesaid at Eastmeon aforesaid made his Will in Writing and by his said Will constituted one Agnes then his Wife his Executrix of his Will aforesaid And by the said his Will gave and bequeathed all his Interest aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Robert Wright the now plantif and afterwards there dyed of such his interest aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid possessed And that the said Robert now plantif by the consent of the said Agnes the burden of the Execution of the Will aforesaid upon her taking was of the Interest of the Term aforesaid of and in the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances possessed until the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer of our Lord 1575. immediately after which Feast the said Robert into the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and that the aforesaid Robert thereof so possessed the said Tenements with the Appurtenances likewise had and occupyed and ought to have and occupy of and from the payment of Tithes whatsoever of in and upon the Moyety aforesaid with the Appurtenances or any part thereof yeerly any wayes growing happening renewing or arising by the occasion aforesaid alleged utterly discharged acquitted freed and privileged by reason of the Prescription and Privilege aforesaid and by force of the said Statute aforesaid in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Edward the 6th at Westminster aforesaid the aforesaid 4th day of November in the second yeer of his Reign of the payment of Tithes then made as the aforesaid Robert VVright now plantif above alleged But the said John VVright further saith That the aforesaid Judges Delegates in the aforesaid Court before them the Plea and Allegations of the aforesaid Robert Wright now plaintif allowed and the Proofs thereof by him the said Robert brought accepted and admitted Without that that the aforesaid Judge Delegates in the aforesaid spirituâ—l Court before them the Plea Allegations and Proofs of the aforesaid Robert VVright now plan if â—foresaid refused to admit in manner and form as the aforesaid Robert now plantif above hath alleged And this he is ready to aver whereupon he demands Judgement and the Writ of the Lady the Queen of consultation to him in this behalf to be granted And the aforesaid Robert VVright now Plantif saith That he for any thing by the aforesaid John VVright above in pleading alleged The said Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Consultation ought not to have because he saith That the Plea aforesaid by him the said John VVright in form aforesaid above pleaded the matter therein contained is insufficient in Law to the aforesaid Writ of the Lady the Queen of Consultation to be brought to which the said Robert needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bound in any wise to answer wherefore for default of sufficient answer in this behalf The said Robert demandeth Judgement and his damages aforesaid for the occasion aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid John VVright saith That the Plea aforesaid by him the said John in manner and form aforesaid above pleaded and the matter in the same contained is good and sufficient in Law to the aforesaid Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Consultation to have and demand which Plea and the matter in the same contained the said Iohn is ready to aver and prove as to the Court c. And because the said Robert to that Plea doth not Answer nor the same hitherto any wise denyeth the said Iohn as at first demandeth Judgement the Writ of the said Queen of Consultation in this behalf to be granted unto him c. And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgemen of and upon the premises is not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until the same next after to hear their Judgment oâ— and upon the premises c. Because the Court of the Lady the
c. into the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances wherof c. amongst other entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail that is to say to him and his Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten and that the aforesaid William Capel the Son of the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other in form aforesaid being seised The said Richard Capel Son of the aforesaid Edward Capel the 22th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18th at Howcaple aforesaid by the aforesaid his Writing granted to the aforesaid Anthony Capel the aforesaid annuity or yeerly Rent of 50. pound to be going out of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. as the aforesaid Thomas Gately above alleged But the said John Hunt further saith That the aforesaid William Capel of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seised That the Fine was levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here at Westminster aforesaid from the day of Saint Martin in 15. dayes in the yeer of her Reign the 19th before James Dyer Richard Harper Roger Manwood and Robert Mounson then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here and afterwards in the 8th day of Saint Hillary in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th aforesaid there granted and Recorded before the same Justices and other the said Lady the Queens faithful people then there present Between Richard Wooton and Richard Shawley Plaintiffs and the aforesaid Will. Capel defendaÌ„t of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other By the names of the Manors of Capel otherwise Hugh Capel Showle and Okeridge with the Appurtenances and 20. Messuages 10. Tofts 20. Cottages 2. Mills 3. Dovehouses 800. Acres of Land 260. Acres of Meadow 1700. Acres of Pasture 200. Acres oâ— Wood 1000 Acres of Furz and Heath and 5. pound Rent with the Appurtenances iâ— Capel otherwise Hugh Capel Showle Okeridge â—â—rkell and â—edbary As also of the Advowson of the Church of Capel otherwise Hugh Capel whereof a Plea of Covenant was summened between them in the said Court That is to say That the aforesaid William acknowleged the aforesaid Manors Tenements and Rents with the Appurtenances and the Advowson of the Church aforesaid to be the Right of the said Richard as these which the said Richard and John had of the gift of the aforesaid William and those remised and quit claimed from him and his Heirs to the aforesaid Richard and John and the Heirs of the aforesaid Richard forever And further the said William granted for him and his Heirs That they warrant to the aforesaid Richard and Iohn and to the Heirs of the said Richard the aforesaid Manors Tenements Rents with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid against all Men forever And for that Recognition remise quit claim Warranty Fine and Concord The said Richard and Iohn gave to the aforesaid William 700. pound Sterling Which Fine in form aforesaid levied was levied and had to the use of the said Iohn Hunt and his Heirs By virtue of which Fine and by force of the Statute aforesaid the said Iohn was seized of the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee And the said Iohn so thereof being seized Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin Castleton before the aforesaid time of the taking c. that is to say the 4th day of Iunuary in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th abovesaid sued forth out of the Court of the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middlesex then being A certain Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Entry upon Disseisin in the Post against him the said Iohn Hunt of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other by the names of the Manor of Capel otherwise Hugh Capel otherwise How Capel with the Appurtenances and 20. Messuages 10. Toâ—ts one Mill 2. Dovehouses 500. Acres of Land 200. Acres of Meadow 600. Acres of Pasture 100. Acres of Wood 700. Acres of Furz and Heath and 4. pound Rent with the Appurtenances in Capel otherwise Hugh Capel otherwise How Capel Brocherton and Sellershop as also of the Advowson of the Church of Capel otherwise Hugh Capel otherwise How Capel To the then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Hereford directed By which Writ the said Lady the Queen that now is To the said then Sheriff commanded That the said Sherif should command the said Iohn Hunt that justly and without delay he render to the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid which the said Thomas and Baldwin to be their Right and Inheritance and in which the said Iohn then had not Entry but after Disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin within 30. yeers then last past as they said And if he should not do and the aforesaid Thomas Spencely and Baldwin should secure him the said Sheriff for the prosecuting of their claim Then he summon by good Summoners him the said John Hunt that he should be before the then Justices of the said Lady the Queen here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in 8. dayes of St. Hillary then next following to shew wherefore he did not do it And that the said then Sheriff should have there the summons and that Writ At which 8. dayes of St. Hillary before the aforesaid Janes Dyer Knight and his Companions then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here came aswel the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin as the said John Hunt in their proper persons And James Warnecome Esquire then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Hereford then and there retorned the Writ aforesaid to him in form aforesaid directed in all things served and executed that is to say That the said Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin had found to him the said Sheriff sureties for to prosecute that Writ that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo And that the said John Hunt was summoned by John Den and Richard'â—en and upon that The aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin declaring against him the said John Hunt upon the Writ aforesaid demanded against him the said John Hunt the Manor Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid as their Right and Inheritance and in which the said John had not then Entry but after the Deseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgment did to the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin within 30. years c. And whereupon they then said That they themselves were seized of the Manor Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances in
Rent of 1. pound of Wax and 4. Capons with the appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House as also of the view of Frank Pledge and whatsoever to view of Frank Pledge doth appertain in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House whereof a Plea of Covenant was summoned between them in the said Court that is to say That the aforesaid William John Agnes George and Elizabeth acknowledge the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge with their appurtenances to be the right of him said Edmond as those which the said Edmond and Robert had of the gift of the aforesaid William John Agnes George and Elizabeth and them released and quit claim from them the said William Iohn Agnes George and Elizabeth and their Heirs to the aforesaid Edmond and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Robert for ever And besides the said William granted for him and his Heirs That they would warrant to the aforesaid Edmond and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Edmond the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge against him the said William and his Heirs forever And further the said John and Agnes granted for them and the Heirs of him the said Iohn that they would warrant to the aforesaid Edmond and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Edmond the Manor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge with the appurtenances against him the said John Agnes and the Heirs of the said John for ever And moreover the said George and Elizabeth granted for them and the Heirs of him the said George that they would warrant to the aforesaid Edmond and Robert and to the Heirs of the said Edmond The Mannor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge with the appurtenances against them the same George and Elizabeth and the Heirs of the said George forever Which Fine of the Manor Tenements Rents and view of Frank Pledge aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid levied was had and levied To the use of them the said John Gardiner and Agnes then his Wiâ—e for the Term of their lives and of the longest liver of them without impeachment of waste in any the Woods and Underwoods And aâ—ter the decease of the same John Gardiner and Agnes To the use of the aforesaid William Cary the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue To the use of the aforesaid â—ob Cary then Esq and now Knight and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue To the use of Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever By virtue of which Fine And by â—orce of a certain Act of Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th At Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th of transâ—erring of uses into possession The said John Gardiner and Agnes were seized of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in their demesn as of Freehold for the Term of the lives of them the said John and Agnes and the longer liver of them without impeachment of waste the aforesaid remainder thereof after the death of them the said John and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawâ—ully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue To the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten And for default of such issue the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs for ever And the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes his Wife so thereof being seized Another Fine was levied in the said Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench here At Westminster aforesaid from the day of Easter 15. dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32th before Edmond Anderson Francis Windham William Periam and Thom. Walmâ—sley then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here and other the said Lady the Queens faithful people then there present Between John Higham Knight and Thomas Turner Esquire By the names of John Higham Knight and Thomas Turner Esquire Plaintiffs and the aforesaid William Cary and the aforesaid Martha then his Wife and the aforesaid John Gardiner and the aforesaid Agnes then his Wife Deforceants of the aforesaid Manor of Collumbine-hall otherwise Thorney Collumbers with the appurtenances whereof c. By the name of the Manor of Collumbine-hall otherwise Thorney Collumbers with the appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One House whereof a Plea of Covenant was sued between them in the said Court that is to say That the aforesaid William Cary and Martha John Gardiner and Agnes acknowledged the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances whereof c. To be the Right of the said John Higham as that which the said John Higham and Thomas and of the gift of the aforesaid William Cary and Martha Iohn Gardiner and Agnes and the same released and quit claimed for them the said William Cary and Martha Iohn Gardner and Agnes and their Heirs to the aforesaid John Higham and Thomas and the Heirs of the said John Higham for ever And further the said William Cary and Martha and Iohn Gardner and Agnes granted for them and the Heirs of the said William Cary that they would warrant to the aforesaid John Higham and Thomas and to the Heirs of the said Iohn Higham the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances against all Men for ever And for the same Acknowledgement Release Quit claim Fine and Concord The said Iohn Higham and Thomas granted to the aforesaid Martha a certain Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound of lawful Mony of England to be issuing out of the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances and that to her rendred in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen To have and perceive the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound to the said Martha at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and the Annuntiation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by equal portions yeerly to be paid all the life time of the said Martha if the aforesaid Iohn Gardner and Agnes or any of them so long should live the first payment thereof to begin at that Feast of the Feasts aforesaid which next after the decease of the aforesaid William Cary should happen And if it should happen the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent of 40. pound to be behind in part or in all after any of the Feasts of the Feasts aforesaid in which as before it ought to be paid and not paid That then it should be lawful to the said Martha all her life if the said Iohn Gardiner and Agnes or either of them should so long live into the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances to enter and distrein and the distresses so there taken and had lawfully to lead away carry and drive and with them to
should be fully satisfied and paid as by the said Writing amongst other things more fully appeareth By virtue of which Gift and Grant the said Ann was of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid seized in her demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life And so thereof being seized The said Ann afterwards and before the time in which c. at Suâ—ton Atthone aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid Dionisius And afterwards and before the time in which it is supposed the taking aforesaid of the Cattel aforesaid to be done that is to say the 20th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th the aforesaid Dionisius at Sutton Atthone aforesaid dyed and the aforesaid Ann him over lived and was of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid seized in her demesn as of Freehold for the Term of her life And because 20. pound of the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid by one whole yeer ended at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th and within the space of 40. dayes then next following were not paid to the said Ann but were behind The said George Mason and Francis as Bayliffs of the said Ann do well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. as in parcel of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the distresse of the said Ann in form aforesaid charged and bound And this they are ready to aver Whereupon They demand Judgement and Retorn of the Cattel aforesaid together with their damages costs and charges by them about their Sute in this behalf put unto to be adjudged unto them c. And the aforesaid John Kettel saith That the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterly by any thing before alleged the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which to be just ought not to acknowledge For he saith that long before the aforesaid time of taking of the aforesaid Cattel done and long before the grant of the aforesaid Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 40 pound And long before the said Dionisius Mayow had any thing of and in the aforesaid 8. Acres of Pasture with their Appurtenanes One Thomas Mayow was thereof seized in his demesn as of Fee And so being thereof seized The said Tho-Mayow before the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid long before the Grant of the aforesaid Annuity that is to say the 15. day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen the 19th at Sutton Atthone aforesaid of the said 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. Enfeossed one Thomas Scot of Sutton Atthone aforesaid Gentleman and John Fremling of Dartford in the said County Baker amongst other things By the name of all those his Two Manors of Sawters and Sawley with the Barns Stables Dove-houses and all other the Houses and Buildings to the said Manors belonging Orchards Gardens with the Appurtenances situate lying and being in Sutton Atthone aforesaid then in the Tenure or Occupation of the said Thomas Mayow and also by the name of all other his Houses and Buildings Lands and Tenements Meadow Pasture Woods and Underwoods Rents and Reversions situate lying and being within the Towns Parishes and Fields of Sutton Atthone aforesaid Wilmington and Dartford or elsewhere in the aforesaid County of Kent as also the Reversion and Remainder of all and singular the premises Rents and yeerly profits reserved upon whatsoever Demises or Grants of the premises or any parcel thereof before then made To have and to hold the aforesaid Manors and other the premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. To the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John Fremling their Heirs and Assignes for ever to the only use and behoof of the aforesaid Dionise Mayow Son and Heir Apparent of the said Thomas Mayow his Heirs and Assignes for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services thereof first due and of right accustomed upon the Conditions following That is to say That the aforesaid Dionise Mayow or his Heirs should pay or cause to paid to Petronill Martin of Mylton in the aforesaid County of Kent Widow the yeerly Rent of 10. pound for the Term of the life of her the said Petronill Which yeerly Rent of 10. pound the aforesaid Thomas Mayow to the aforesaid Petronill before had granted for and in consideration of a Mariage to be had and solemnized between the aforesaid Thomas Mayow and the aforesaid Petronill after the death of the aforesaid Thomas Mayow And upon Condition That if the aforesaid Thomas Mayow at any time during the natural life of the said Thomas should pay or cause to be paid to the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John Fremling or to either of them or to the Heirs of the longer liver of them 10. shillings of good and lawful Mony of England that then the Feoffment aforesaid should be void and of no force in Law And that then it should be lawful to the aforesaid Tho. Mayow into the aforesaid Two Manors and all the premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. to re-enter and the same to have again in his former Estate and Condition any Act Thing Cause or Matter whatsoever to the contrary thereof notwithstanding By virtue of which Feoâ—fment and by force of a certain Act in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th of transferring uses into possession The said Dionise Mayow was seized of the aforesad 8. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which in his demesn as of Fee upon the Conditions aforesaid And so thereof being seized The said Dionise before the aforesaid time of taking the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 30th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th abovesaid at Sutton Atthone aforesaid by his Writing â—ealâ—d with his Seal bearing date the same day and yeer Gave and Granted to the aforesaid Ann by the name of Ann Maxey of Chigwel in the County of Essex the Annuity or yeerly Rent aforesaid of 20. pound to be issuing out of the aforesaid place in which c. amongst other in manner and form as the aforesaid George Mason and Francis Easterley above in their Conusance abovesaid have allâ—ged And the said Ann afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. At Sutton Atthone aforesaid took to Husband the said Dionise and afterwards and before the time of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid that is to say the 30th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th The aforesaid Thomas Mayow at Sutton Atthone aforesaid payed to the aforesaid Thomas Scot and John
of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof to one William Bettisworth his Heirs and Assigns for ever And further the Jurors say upon thier Oath aforesaid that immediatly after the sealing and delivery of the Deed of Feoffment aforesaid possession and seisin upon that Deed of Feoffment was gâ—ven and delivered by the aforesaid Iohn Bettisworth to the aforesaid William Bettisworth in and upon the aforesaid Close called Raynolds in which c. neither the aforesaid John Hayward nor any other at the said time of the delivery of the said possession or seisin of the said Close being By virtue whereof the said William Bettisworth into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and thereof was seized as the Law requireth And the Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Hayward at the time of the giving and delivery of the possession and seisin in the Close aforesaid was in the Messuage and the Residue of the Tenements aforesaid by virtue of the Lease aforesaid to him made and that afterwards and before the time in which c. the aforesaid John Hayward into the aforesad Close called Raynolds with the Appurtenances in which c. re-entred claiming the same Close to the Lease aforesaid to him in form aforesaid made And further the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That afterwards before the time in which c. that is to say the 3d. day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 19th the said John Bettisworth at Ipping aforesaid dyed without issue of his Body begotten And that the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth is his Brother next Heir But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found â—he possession and seisin in manner and form aforesaid given and delivered of and in the aforesaid Close called Raynolds in which c. be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good and lawful possession and seisin of the aforesaid close called Raynolds in which c. the Jurors are utterly ignorant and thereof they pray the advice of the Justices here of the Lady the Queen and if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the said Justices of the Lady the Queen That the aforesaid possession and seisin in form aforesaid given and delivered of and in the aforesaid Close called Raynolds be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good and lawful possession and seisin of the aforesaid Close called Raynoldâ— in which c. with the Appurtenances c. Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said John Bettisworth did not dye seized of the Reversion of all the Tenements within written with their â—ppurtenances c. nor of the Rents within written seized as the said John Hayward within for him allegeth And then they assesse damages of the said John Hayward for the ocasion within writteh above his costs and charges by him the said John Haward about his Sute expended to 4. pence and for his costs and charges to 2. pence But if upon the whole matâ—er aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the said Justices of the said Lady the Queen That the aforesaid possession and seisin in form aforesaid given and delivered of and in the aforesaid Close called Raynolds in which be not nor in Law ought to be adjudged a good and lawful possession and seisin of the aforesaid Close called Raynolds in which c. Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Bettisworth dyed of the Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof and of the Rents aforesaid seized as the said Thomas Bettisworth within for him allegeth And then they assesse damages of the said Thomas Bettisworth for the occasion within written above his costs and charges mentioned about his Sute expended to 4. pence and for his costs and charges to 2. pence And because the justiceâ— here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid John Hayward as the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises further day is given to the parties aforesaid here until from the day of Easter 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here come as well the aforesaid John Hayward as the said Thomas Bettisworth by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid John John Hayward as the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof further day day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the said John Hayward as the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid John Hayward as the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof further day iâ— given to parties aforesaid here until from the day of Easter 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid John Hayward as the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid John as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It is granted that the aforesaid John take nothing by
within the Borough aforesaid there is and time whereof the Memory of Man is not to the contrary there was a Usage and Custom That the Mayor and 12. chief Burgesses of the same Borough stood and were of the private Council of the Borough aforesaid and 24. of the other most discreet Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid for the time being to this chosen and sworn stood and were together with the aforesaid Mayor and 12. Chief Burgesses of Common Council of the Borough aforesaid for the regulating and government of the same Borough And that every such Burgesse who was chosen into the fellowship of the 24. Burgesses of the Common Council aforesaid before he was to be admitted to the said fellowship should take corporal Oath before the Mayor of the same Borough for the time being that he should carry himself well and honestly as well towards the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid for the time being and to them from time to time should shew Reverence and that he should maintein and uphold the Liberties and common Profit of the Borough aforesaid with his best Counsel and Advice And further we Certifie That every one of the aforesaid 12. Chief Burgesses from time to time chosen should be preferred by the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid or the rest of the aforesaid 12. Chief of the Burgesses or by the greater part of them for the time being only without the consent or assent of the aforesaid 24. the other Burgesses who are as before is said of the Common Counsel of the Borough aforesaid to this required And further we Certifie That the aforesaid James Bagg the first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 32th was duly chosen and appointed one of the aforesaid 24. of the Burgesses of the Common Council of the Borough aforesaid then being and the said first day of May in the 32th yeer aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid took Corporal Oath before the Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid according to the antient Custom aforesaid That he the said James would carry him well honestly as wel towards the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid for the time being as towards the other 12. chief Burg. of the said Borough for the time being and to them from time to time would shew Reverence and the Liberties and Common profit of the Borough aforesaid would maintain and uphold with his best Counsel and advise And further to the Lord the King we Certifie That the aforesaid Borough of Plymouth is situate so neer to the shore and Sea Coasts That by reason thereof and by reason of the daily meeting there of Ships and Vessels there coming as well from the parts beyond the Seas as from elsewhere many ill minded men as well Allens within born of evil and perverse conversation contemners of good Government and disturbers of the Peace in the Ships and Vessels aforesaid thither coming in the Borough aforesaid and within the Liberties and Precincts of the same staying and remaining are daily found who can hardly be there brought to the obedience of good Rule and Government unlesse the Authority of the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid for the time being and of the other Chief Burgesses aforesaid with due reverence of the other Burgesses and Inhabitants of the said Borough be fortified and the Persons of the said Chief Burgesses and of the Mayor from the contempt of the vulger be preserved And further to the said Lord the King we certifie That the aforesaid James Bagge not ignorant of the premises little regarding his Oath aforesaid and the Authority as well of the Mayor of the Borough aforesaid for the time being as his late Predecessors aforesaid as the other the Chief Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid setting naught by and labouring and intending to bring the same Authority into contempt The first day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 6th the said James being then one of the Common Counsel of the Borough aforesaid and one of the Chief Burgesses of the same Burough in the presence of one Robert Trelawny then being Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid and of many other of the Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid within the Burrough aforesaid contemptuously and malapartly carried himself as well in gesture as in words toward the Mayor aforesaid and then and there to the aforesaid Robert Trelawny contemptuously and scoffingly without any reasonable cause these words following openly and publickly said and spake that is to say You the aforesaid Robert Trelawney intending are some Prince are you not And further to the said Lord the King we certifie That afterwards that is to say the first day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 7. the aforesaid James Bagge continuing his evil disposition and intention aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid in the presence and hearing of the aforesaid Robert Trelawny then being a Justice of the Peace of the aforesaid Lord the King within the Burrough aforesaid to be kept by reason of Mayrolty of the Burrough aforesaid the yeer then last past by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid and in the presence and hearing of very many other of the Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid openly publickly and with a loud voice without any reasonable cause these words following contemptuously falsly and scandalously said and spake that is to say you the aforesaid Trelawny intending are a Cosening Knave whereas in truth the said Robert Trelawny all his life time honestly and from all suspition of any falsity fraud or deceit lived altogether unspected and in the Offices as well of the Mayriolty as of Chief Burgesse of the Burrough aforesaid with praise carried and governed himself And further to the said Lord the King we do Certifie That the 20th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 7th The aforesaid James Bagge continuing his evil disposition and intent aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid seditiously and malitiously stirred up and perswaded one Thomas Shervil then being of the Chief Burgesses of the Burrough aforesaid That he the said Thomas would joyn himself with the aforesaid James Bagge in a conspiracy to amove and depose One John Battersby then being Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid from his Office of Mayriolty without any reasonable or lawful cause and then and there malitiously and contemptuously spake to the aforesaid Thomas Shervill of the aforesaid Thomas Battersby these words following that is to say Master Mayor the aforesaid John Battersby intending carrieth himself foolishly in this place And if you will joyn with me we will turn him out of his Mayriolty and choose a wiser Man in his place Whereas in truth the aforesaid John Battersby during the whole time of his Mayriolty aforesaid in the executing of his Office aforesaid carried himself well and discreetly and with great
Integrity and gravity And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That afterwards that is to say the first day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 8th the aforesaid James Bagg continuing in his evil disposition and intent aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid in the Guild-hall of the Borough aforesaid in the presence of one Thomas Fowens then being Mayor of the Borough aforesaid in the presence and hearing as well of the Chief Burgesses as of the other Inhabitants of the Borough aforesaid scornfully and without reasonable cause spake to the aforesaid Thomas Fowens these false and injurous words following that is to say Thou the aforesaid Thomas Fowens then Mayor intending art an Insolent Fellow whereas in Truth the said THOMAS in the whole course of his Life bore himself towards all Men Honestly Civily and with Praise And further to the said Lord the King we certifie that the afterwards that is to say the first day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th at Plymouth aforesaid in the presence and hearing of the aforesaid Thomas Fowens and of very many other of the Burgesses of the Burough aforesaid being gathered together in the Guild Hall of the Burough aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg continuing his evil disposition and intent aforesaid divers contemptible words of the aforesaid Thomas Fowens then being Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid with a loud voice spake and uttered upon which the aforesaid Thomas Fowens with mild words admonishing the aforesaid James Bagg that he would desist from uttering such contemptible words aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg thereupon then and there that is to say the 10th day of August in the 9th yeer abovesaid at Plymouth aforesaid and in the presence and hearing of the aforesaid Thomas Fowens then Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid and very many other of the Burgesses and Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and in contempt and disdain of the said Thomas Fowens then Mayor turning the hinder part of his Body in an unhumane and uncivil manner towards the aforesaid Thamas Fowens scoffingly contemptuously and uncivily with a loud voice said to the aforesaid Thomas Fowens these words following that is to say come and Kâ—ss And further to the said Lord the King we certifie that afterwards that is to say the 20th day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 19th at Plymouth aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg with most arrogant words threatned the said John Fowens then being Mayor oâ— the Burrough aforesaid without any reasonable cause and then and there to the said John Fowens threatningly and malitiously spake the words following that is to say I will make thy neck crack And further to the said Lord the King we certify that afterward that is to say the third day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 12th A certain Order and friendly Instrument of admonition was made by Iohn Scobb Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid and the greater part of the Chief Burgesses of the same Burrough in these words that is to say The 9th day of May 1614. the day and year above written It was agreed by John Scobb Mayor and such other of the Maisters here under written that if Mr. Iames Bagg the Elder do not before the next sâ—ssions to be holden within the Burrough of Plymouth Reconcile himself to the said Mayor and his brethren for such wrongs as he hath committed against them and withall faithfully promise to demean himself more orderly temperately for the time to come that then he shall be clean removed from the Bench and a new Master chosen in his Room which Order or Instrument was made and subscribed by the said Mayor and other of the Chief Burgesses of the Burrough aforesaid And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That the aforesaid James Bagg before the aforesaid next sessions in the Order aforesaid mentioned did not make any such reconciliation or promise of Conformity as in the Order aforesaid is specified although full notice of the aforesaid Order immediately after the making thereof before the aforesaid next sessions was given to him at Plymouth aforesaid And further to the said Lord the K. we Certifie that afterwards that is to say the 20th day of Febr. in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the K. that now is the 12th the afores Jam. Bagg continuing his evil dispositioÌ„ in his intent aforesaid at Plymouth afores in the Guild-hall of the Borough aforesaid in the presence hearing of John Scobb one of the Chief Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid And then being a Justice for the keeping of the Peace within the Borough aforesaid by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid by reason of his Mayralty of the Borough aforesaid the yeer then next before and in the presence and hearing of the then Mayor of the Borough aforesaid and of diverse other of the Burgesses and Inhabitants of that Borough contemptuously these words following spake uttered of the aforesaid John Scobb openly and publickly falsely and scandalously that is to say You the aforesaid John Scobb intending are a Knave whereas the aforesaid John Scobb honestly and with praise carried and governed himself And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That afterwards that is to say the 10th day of December last past then the Mayor of the said Borough and diverse of the Chief Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid being assembled together in the Almes-house of the said Borough to require and receive an Account of the Overseers of the Borough of the Borough aforesaid as in times past and time whereof the Memory of Man is not to the contrary it was used the aforesaid James Bag then and there in the presence and hearing of the said Mayor and other of the Chief Burgesses aforesaid without any reasonable cause openly and publickly sayd to the said Thomas Shervill there then present and one of the Chief Burgesses of the Burrough aforesaid and for the space of 10. yeers then last past being these false and scandalous words following that is to say You the said Thomas Shervill intending are a seditious Fellow whereas in Truth the aforesaid Thomas Shervill alwaies lived not suspected of any such crime of Sedition and from time in the Office of Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid as in the place and Office of Chief Burgesse Honestly Discreetly and with great Integrity carried and governed himself And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That whereas the said Lord the King the day of January in the 12th yeer of his Reign aforesaid at Westminster in the Counâ—y of Middlesex with the Advise of the Lords of his Privy Council of this his Realm of England Ordained and Commanded by publick Proclamation and by Letters written under
said Honour of Wallingford And that the like process sutes and pleas should be for ever holden received and should be used in the said Honour of Newline otherwise Eweline as at the first day of the same Parliament were used or exercised in the said Honour of Wallingford And that the said late King Henry the 8th should have to him his Heirs and Successors for ever the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford and all Lordships Mannors Lands Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever appertaining to the said Honour or Castle or reputed or taken to be any part of the possessions or parcel or member of the said Honour and Castle from thence for ever to be severed and divided from the aforesaid Dutchy And that the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford from thence for ever should be named and called the Castle and Mannor of Wallingford And also that the said Castle and Mannor of Wallingford and all Lordships Mannors Lands Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever which then should be belonging or appertaining to the said Mannor or reputed or taken to be any part parcel or member thereof and all manner of Liberties Franchises Privileges Royalties and Jurisdictions before that used within the said Honour of Wallingford from thence for ever should be united annexed knit adjudged deemed accepted reputed and called part parcel and member of the said Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm in the aforesaid County of Oxford And further it was enacted by Authority of the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th That all and singular person and persons who then held any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th and of the most excellent and undoubted Prince Edward the Son and Heir apparent of the said late King Henry the 8th as of the said Honour of Wallingford or of any other Lordships or Mannors being parcel or member of the said Honour of Wallingford from thence for ever after should hold their said Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of the said late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors as of the aforesaid Mannor and Castle of Wallingford or of the said Lordships or Mannors being parcel and members of the said Honour of Wallingford parcel of the said Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm by the said Rents Sutes Customs and Services as they and every of them held payed or did before the making of the said Act of Parliament and not by more or other Rents Sutes Customs or Services Saving to every person and persons Bodies Corporate Politick their Heirs and Successors and to every of them other than the most excellent and undoubted Lord Prince Edward which then was and his Heirs and to any other who from thence for ever should happen to be the Kings Eldest Son and new Heir of the Crown of this Kingdom of England All such Right Title Interest Possession Fees Offices Annuities Rents Commons and all other Commodities and Hereditaments whatsoever which they or any other of them lawfully held had could or ought to have had if the said Act of Parliament had never been made And further It was Enacted by the Authority of the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th That the aforesaid Excellent and undoubted Prince Edward which then was and every other who from henceforth for ever should happen to be Eldest Son of the King and next Heir of the Crown of this Kingdom should have hold and enjoy for ever annexed united and knit to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall for and in full Recompence of the aforesaid Honor Castle of Wallingford and other the premises in the said Act before mentioned to the said Honor of Wallingford then before belonging as part and parcel of the said Dutchy of Cornwall The Manor of VVest Taunton Trelowia and Landalph with the Appurtenances in the County of Cornwall amongst other things in such manner and form and of such like Estate as the sayd Excellent and undoubted Prince before the making of the same Act of Parliament had held or enjoyed the aforesaid Honour and Castle of Wallingford and all the premises parcel of the said Honour And that all and singular the aforesaid Manors with all and singular their Appurtenances then amongst other limitted and assigned by the said Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th to the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall and every of them from thence for ever should be reputed deemed adjudged accepted and taken by authory of the same Parliament as part parcel and member of the said Dutchy of Cornwall in such and the like manner and form to all purposes and intents as the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford and the members and parcels of the same were before the making of the same Act any Act Law Custom or use to the contrary notwithstanding As by the said Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late K. Hen. the 8th made amongst other things it more fully appeareth And whereas before until the time of the making of the aforesaid Act of Parliament made in the afores Parliament of the afores late K. H. the 8th The aforesaid Honour Castle of Wallingford members parcel thereof were part parcel and members of the aforesaid Dutchy of Cornwall according to the form and effect of the aforesaid Charter and Grant by the aforesaid late King Edward the third with the common assent aforesaid and Authority of his Parliament aforesaid as before is said made and as in the aforesaid Charter are mentioned and above recited and the aforesaid excellent and undoubted Prince Edward in the aforesaid Act made in the aforesaid Parliament of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th before the time of making of the aforesaid Act made in the Parliament aforesaid of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th had and enjoyed in the aforesaid Honour and Castle of Wallingford and other the premises parcel of the same Honour in such manner and form and of such estate as is enacted and limited in the aforesaid Charter and Grant aforesaid of the aforesaid late King Edward the third in the year of his Reign the 11th aforesaid by the Authority of Parliament made as before is said And the aforesaid Castle of Wallingford with the Hamlets and Members thereof And the aforesaid Honour of Wallingford with the Appurtenances in the aforesaid Charter and Grant by the aforesaid late King Edward the third as before is said made specified are one and the same and not others or divers By vertue of which the said late Prince Edward eldest Son of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th and Duke of Cornwal was seised of the aforesaid Manors of West Tannton Trelowia Landalph with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee as parcel of his Dutchy of Cornwal aforesaid according to the form and effect of the aforesaid Act of Parliament and he thereof so being seized the aforesaid late
c. By virtue of which the aforesaid Gellio Merick and Lindley into the aforesaid Manors with their Appurtenances entred and were thereof seized in their demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized By their Writing indented made between the aforesaid late Earl of Essex Gellio Merick and Henry Lindley of the one part and Augustine Steward and Michael Corsellis on the other part bearing date the 26th day of Decem. in the yeer of the Rign of the said late Lady Q. Elizabeth the 38th in the Court of Chancery of the aforesaid late Queen at VVestminster aforesaid within 6. Moneths then next following according to the form of the Statute thereof made and provided in due manner of Record inrolled as well in Consideration of the sum 3500. pounds to the aforesaid late Earl of Essex by the aforesaid Augustine Steward and Michael Corsellis paid as for 20. shillings to the said Gellio and Henry by the aforesaid Augustine and Nicholas likewise paid bargained and sold to the aforesaid Augustine and Michael the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances To have and to hold to the said Augustine and Michael their Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which Bargain and Sale and Inrollment and by force of a certain Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 4th day of February in the yeer of his Reign the 27th Of transferring uses into possession at Westminster aforesaid holden made and provided the aforesaid Augustine and Michael were seized of the Manors aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The said Augustine and Michael in consideration of the sum of 3500. pound to the aforesaid Augustine and Michael by the aforesaid John Hele paid afterwards of the said Manors with the Appurtenances enfeoffed them the said John Hele then Serjant at Law and the aforesaid Warwick He le then Esquire now Knight To have and to hold to the said John and VVarwick and to the Heirs and Assigns of the aforesaid John to the sole and proper use and behoof of the aforesaid John and Warwick and the Heirs and Assignes of the said John Hele for ever By virtue of which Feoffment The aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Hele were and yet are seized of the aforesaid Manors with the Appurtenances that is to say The said John Hele in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid Warwick in his Demesn as of Free hold for the term of his life And the aforesaid John Hele and Warwick Hele further say That afterwards in and by a certain Act of Parliament of the aforesaid late Queen at VVestminster aforesaid the 27th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said late Queen Elizabeth the 43th holden made amongst other reciting That whereas the said late Queen from the 8th day of February in the yeer of her Reign the 25th as well for diverse and great sums of Mony as for diverse other several considerations had bargained sold given and granted by diverse her Letters Patents Indentures or other Writings under the great Seal of England sealed or the Seal of the Dutchy of Lancaster or the Seal of the County Palatine of Lancaster as well to Bodies Politick and Corporate as to diverse and several other Subjects of the said Lady the Queen diverse and several Honors Manors Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and other Hereditaments in Fee Simple Fee Tail for Term of Life Lives or Yeers as by the said several Letters Patents Indentures and other Writings are mentioned and declared It was enacted by Authority of the same Parliament To the intent that the said Letters Patents Indentures and other Writings should be of good available and perfect force and effect to all and singular the said late Queens Subjects according to the true intent and effect of the same That as well all and singular Letters Patents Indentures and other Writings sealed under the great Seal of England or under the Seal of the Dutchy of Lancaster or the Seal of the County Palatine of Lancaster before then made and granted by the aforesaid late Queen for any sum or sums of Mony whatsoever or for or upon any other considerations whatsoever from the aforesaid 8th day of February in the 25th yeer aforesaid as all other Letters Patents then after by the said late Queen to be made for any sum or sums of Mony or other considerations before the last day of the said then present Session of the said Parliament And moreover All other Letters Patents within the space of one yeer then next following to be made by force or according to the true puport or true meaning of a Condition under the great Seal of England then in being for the Sale of the Land of the said late Queen to any Body Politick or Corporate or to any other person or persons whatsoever of any Honors Castles Manors Lordships Granaries Messuages Lands Tenements Meadows Pastures Rents Reversions Services Woods Advowsons Nominations Patronages Annuities Rights Interests Entries Conditions Leases Courts Liberties Privileges Franchises or of any other Hereditaments with the Appurtenances or of any part or parcel thereof with or under the Great Seal of England or under the Great Seal of the Dutchy of Lancaster or the Seal of the County Palatine of Lancaster of whatsoever Kind Nature or Quality they or any of them are or were reputed known or taken with the Appurtenances or any part or parcel thereof should be good perfect and effectual in Law and should stand be taken reputed esteemed and should be adjudged to be good certain perfect available and effectual in the Law against the said late Queen her Heirs and Successors according to the tenor and effect of the aforesaid Letters Patents and Indentures or other Writings and that the same should be expounded construed esteemed and should be adjudged most beneficially for those to whom the aforesaid Letters Patents and Grants thereof so are made the Heirs Assigns Executors Administrators of them according to the words and purport of the said Letters Patents Indentures or other Writings without any Confirmations Licenses or Tollerations of the said late Queen her Heiâ— or Successors any ill naming ill reciting or not reciting of the said Honors Castles Manors Lands Tenements or other the premises or of any part thereof or any defect in finding of Office or Inquisition of and in the premises or any part thereof by which the Title of the said late Lady the Queen of and in the premises ought to be found before the publishing of the aforesaid Letters Patents Indentures or other Writing or any ill reciting or not reciting of Demises thereof made as well of Record as not of Record or any ill reciting or not reciting or not true mentioning in any such Lettets Patents Grants or Writings of the Estate or Estates of the said late Queen of Freehold or Inheritance of and in the premises or any part thereof to which the
the Queen that now iâ— to serve in his Office aforesaid By virtue of which License of the said Lady the Queen to the aforesaid Mark as afore is said the said Mark by the whole time of his absence specified in the Inquisition aforesaid And 〈◊〉 the â—â—â— Mark for further shewing of his Right saith That he now is and alwâ—â—â—â—om the aforesaid time of removing him from the Exercising of his Offiâ—â— aforesaid was ready and often time offered himself to serve in his Office aforesaid And that as yet from the time of the License of the said Lady the Queen of absenting himself to the said Mark made the said Lady the Queen that now is had not commanded him to serve in his Office aforesaid Without that that the said Lady the Queen that now is hath any other Right or Title in or to the Office aforesaid than as before above it is alleged And without that That there is any such Record besides the Record of the Inquisition aforesaid which makes or shewes or can make or set forth any Title of the said Lady the Queen that now is in or to the Office aforesaid All and singular which the said Mark is ready to aver as the Court here shall award and therefore he demandeth Judgement and that to the possession and exercising of his Office aforesaid together with the Wages and Fee aforesaid and to the issues and profits to the said Office due and belonging from the time of his removing from the said exercising of his Office aforesaid be restored c. And Gilbert Gerrard Attorny General of the Lady the Queen that now is who prosecuteth for the said Lady the Queen in this behalf saith That by any thing by the said Mark Steward above in pleading alleged The said Lady the Queen of her Right and Title in or to the Office aforesaid ought not to be barred Because he saith That the said Lady the Queen did not give License to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid at the pleasure of him the said Mark until he were Commanded by the said Lady the Queen to serve in his said Office aforesaid in manner and form as the aforesaid Mark in his shewing of his Right to the Office aforesaid above alleged And this the said Attorny of the said Lady the Queen that now is for the said Lady the Queen prayeth it be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Mark likewise Therefore day is given before the said Lady the Queen that now is in the Morrow of the Ascension of our Lord wheresoever she should be in England to do and receive what was just in the premises And it is commanded to the Sheriff of Middlesex That he cause to be here before the Lady the Queen at that day 12. good and lawful men of the Vicinage of the City of Westminster who are not of Kindred or Affinity of the said Mark To Recognize upon their Oath more fully the truth of the premises At which Morrow of the Ascension of our Lord before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Geâ—rad who prosecutes c. as the aforesaid Mark Steward by John Manning his Attorny And the Sheriff retorns the names of 12. whereof none c. Thtrefore it is commanded to the Sheriff That he do not omit c. but that he destrein them by all their Lands c. And that of the Issues c. And that he have their Bodies before the Lady the Q. in 8. dayes of the Holy â—rinity wheresoever c. To Recognize in form aforesaid c. And the same day is given as well to the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as to the aforesaid Mark Steward c. At which 8. dayes of the â—oly â—rinity before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as the aforesaid Mark by his Attorny aforesaid And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid being called likewise come And upon this publick Proclamation is made for the Lady the Queen as the use is That if there be any one who will inform the Justices oâ— the Lady the Queen here the Serjeant at Law of the Lady the Queen or the Attorny General of the Lady the Queen or the Jurors aforesaid oâ— the premises that he come and should be heard And Edward Anderson one of the Serjeants of the Lady the Queen at Law to do this offered himself By which it is proceeded to the taking of the Jury aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid now there appearing who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed sworn say upon their Oath That the Lord Philip and the Lady Mary late King Queen of England by their Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England made bearing date at Westminster the 23th day of September in the yeers of the Reigns of the said late King and Queen the 3d. and 4th Gave and granted to the said Mark the Office of Serjeant at Arms attending upon their Chancellor of England for the time being and made him the said Mark their Serjeant at Arms aforesaid made Ordained and Constituted by the said Letters Patents for the term of his life To have and enjoy the said Office to him the said Mark for the term of his life And moreover the said late King and Queen gave and granted by the Letters Patents aforesaid for them the Heirs and Successors of the said Queen for the exercising and holding of the Office aforesaid the Wages and Fee of 12. pence per diem To have hold and perceive yeerly the said Wages and Fee of 12. pence the day to the said Mark for the term of his life of the issues and profits of their Hamper of their Chancery by the Hands of the Clerk or Keeper of the said their Hamper and the Heirs of the aforesaid late Queen for the time being At the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portions yeerly to be paid together with all other Profits Commodities Emoluments Allowances and Advantages to the said Office any way anciently belonging due and accustomed And the said Mark Steward brings here in Court the Letters Patents aforesaid which followes in these words Philip and Mary by the Grace of God King and Queen of England Spain France both Cicilies Jerusalem and Ireland Defenders of the Faith Archdukes of Austria Dukes of Burgondy Milain and Brabant Earl of Haspurge Flanders and Tiroll c. To All to whom these present Letters shall come Greeting Whereas our most dear Brother Edward late King of England the 6th by his Letters Patents made under the Great Seal of England bearing date at Greenwich the 8th day of April in the 4th yeer of his Reign of his special Grace certain Knowledg and meer Motion as also with the Advice and Consent of his Council had given and granted to his well-Beloved Richard Hatchman Gentleman the Office
of Fee in the Right of his Crown of England And the said late King so thereof being seized before the time in which c. By his Letters Patents with the Great Seal of England sealed bearing date at Westminster the 14th day of May in the yeer of his Reign the 32th had given and granted the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things to Ann Cobham Widow To have and to hold the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things to the said Ann Cobham and her Assigns for the term of the life of the said Ann rendring therefore to the said late King his Heirs and Successors 3. pound 2. shillings 8. pence Sterling at the Court of Augmentation and Revenew of his Crown at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel yeerly to be paid and after the decease of the aforesaid Ann The said late King by his Letters Patents willed and granted That the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things to one Edward Shelley Esquire and Johan his Wife and to the Heirs of the Bodies of them the said Edward and Johan between them lawfully to be begotten To be holden of the aforesaid late King his Heirs and Successors by the Service of the 20th part of a Knights Fee And yeelding therefore yeerly to the said late King his Heirs and Successors 3. pound 2. shillings 8. pence Sterling at the Court of Augmentation and Revenew of his Crown aforesaid at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel every yeer to be paid for all Services and demands whatsoever to the said late King his Heirs and Successors any wayes to be rendred payed or done And if it should happen the said Edward and Johan his Wife to dye the without issue of their bodies lawfully by them begotten The the said late King willed and granted by his said Letters Patents that the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things should wholly remain to the right Heirs of the said Edward Shelley for ever to be holden of the aforesaid late King his Heirs and Successors by the Rent and Services aforesaid for all Services and demands as by the said Letters Patents amongst other things more fully appeareth By vertue of which gift and grant the said Anne Cobham into the Tenements aforesaid with their Appurtenances amongst other entred and was thereof seized in her Demesn as of Freehold the remainder thereof in form aforesaid And the said Anne so thereof being seized afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the day in the year of the Reign of the said late King Henry the 8th At Worminghurst in the said County of Sussex died After the death of which Anne the aforesaid Edward Shelley and Joham his wife into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things entred and were thereof seized in Demesn as of Fee-tail that is to say to them and the heirs of the body of them the said Edward and Joham the remainder unto the said Edward and his Heirs in form aforesaid And so thereof being seized the said Edward and Johan had issue of their bodies Henry Shelley father of the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant his eldest Son and Richard Shelley his second Son which Richard Shelley is yet living and in full life and that the said Edward and Johan being thereof so seized the said Johan afterwards and before the time of the Trespass aforesaid died and the aforesaid Edward her overlived and held himself in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee-tail the remainder thereof to him and his Heirs for ever as before is said And the said Jurors also say upon their Oaths aforesaid That the said Henry Father of the aforesaid now Defendant had issue of his body lawfully begotten Mary Shelley his daughter and that the said Henry Shelley died in the life of the said Edward his Father one Anne then wife of the said Henry being quick and great with childe with the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant in the Declaration named And the said Edward Shelley so being thereof seized afterwards the 25th day of September in the years of the Reigns of Philip and Mary late King and Queen the first and second by his Indenture sealed with his Seal bearing date the said day and year first delivered the sixth day of October then next following made between him the said Edward Shelley by the name of Edward Shelley of Worminghurst in the County of Sussex Esquire of the one part and Richard Cooper and William Marten of the other part the tenour of which Indenture followeth in these words ss This Indenture made the 25th day of September in the first and second years of the Reigns of our Soveraign Lord and Lady Philip and Mary by the grace of God King and Queen of England France Neapolis Jerusalem and Ireland Defenders of the Faith Princes of Spain and Cicil Archdukes of Austria Dukes of Millain Burgundy and Brabant Earls of Haspuag Tirol and Flanders between Edward Shelley of Worminghurst in the County of Sussex Esquire of the one part and Richard Cooper and William Martin of the other part Witnesseth That it is fully Covenanted Granted Condescended and Agreed between the said Parties in manner and form following That is to say first the said Edward Shelley for and upon divers great and urgent causes and considerations him moving doth Covenant Grant Condescend Promise and Agree for him his Heirs and Executors to and with the said Richard Cooper and William Martin and their Executors by these Presents That he the said Edward Shelley shall permit cause and suffer the said Richard Cooper and William Martin or the survivor of them at the proper costs and charges of him the said Edward Shelley his Heirs and Executors Administrators or Assigns on this side the Feast of All Saints next ensuing the date of these presents to recover against him the said Edward his Heirs or Assigns by Writ of Entre sur Disseisin enle Post The Mannors oâ— Worminghurst Barhamwick and Fyndon with the Appurtenances in the said County of Sussex and all other his Lands Tenements Possessions and Hereditaments with the Appurtenances set lying and being in Fyndon Worminghurst Barhamwick Patching Eastangmering Westangmering Wyginholt Sterington Washington Ashington Grensted Ashhurst Stening Wilston Thackham and Shopley in the said County Except only the Manors of Sillington and Cobden with the Appurtenances in the said County and except also all those Lands Tenements and Hereditaments called or known by the name of Cobden Pullets Firses and Palmerishcomb with all and singular their appurtenances And the said Edward Shelley covenanteth Granteth and Promiseth by these presents to and with the said Richard Cooper and William Martin that at the time of the said Writ of Entry brought against him of the Premises and at the time of the said Recovery had he the said Edward shall be sole Tenant of the Freehold of
made for the term of his life by the aforesaid Miles Hitchcock where nothing of the said 15. acres of Pasture in the possession of the said John so passed into the said 15. acres of Pastures with the appurtenances before the time in which entred into the aforesaid 15. acres of Land with the Appurtenances re-entred and the grass there then growing with the Cattel aforesaid fed trod and consumed as it was lawfull for him to do And this he is ready to aver whereupon he demandeth Judgement if the said John Grendon his Action aforesaid against him ought to have or maintain c. And the aforesaid John Grendon aswell unto the aforesaid first Plea as to the aforesaid second Plea of the said Thomas Albany above in Bar pleaded saith That he for any thing in the said Pleas before alledged ought not to be barred from having his Action against the said Thomas Because he saith That in the aforesaid Deed of Feoffment of the aforesaid Francis Bunny in the Bar aforesaid above specified It was provided That if it should happen one Peter Penruddock to die without issue Male of his body lawfully begotten not leaving his wife with Child by him in the life of the said Francis That then and from thenceforth it should be lawfull for the said Francis at all times at his will during his natural life by his Writing Indented by him the said Francis to that intent made sealed and subscribed in the presence of four credible and honest Witnesses at the least to alter change determine diminish or to amplifie any use or uses limmitations intentions or purposes limited mentioned or appointed in and by the aforesaid Deed of Feoffment made by the aforesaid Francis Bunny as before is said or any use or uses of every of any part or parcel of the premises remainder or remainders rendition or renditions to any person or persons after the death of the said Francis as by the said Deed of Feoffment aforesaid it more fully appeareth And that afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say The first day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 23th at Willesdon aforesaid the aforesaid Peter died without issue Male of his body lawfully begotten and at the time of his death had not any wife By which the aforesaid Francis afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 20th day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 24th at Willesdon aforesaid By his Indenture between the aforesaid Francis of the one part and the aforesaid David Bunny of the other part sealed subscribed and delivered by him the said Francis to the aforesaid David Bunny in the presence of John Frome William Cuersie Thomas Waltham and John Gostles four credible and honest Witnesses which Indenture the aforesaid John Grendon with the seal of the aforesaid Francis sealed and with his hand underwritten here in Court brings whose date is the same 20th day of March in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th abovesaid changed the uses in the aforesaid Deed of Feoffment above expressed And by the same Indenture the said Francis Covenanted and agreed with the aforesaid David Bunny that from thenceforth the said Michael Hitchcock in the aforesaid Deed of Feoffment named and his Heirs and all others who then were or should be seized of the aforesaid 21. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. should be seized to the use of the said John Grendon and his Heirs for ever as by the same Indenture more fully appeareth By colour whereof and by vertue of the Statute of transferring of uses in possession made the aforesaid John Grendon in the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. entred and was thereof possessed in his Demesn as of Fee until the said Thomas Albany the day and year abovesaid in the Bill aforesaid above specified the Close of the said John Grendon in the aforesaid 20. Acres of Pasture broke and his grass to the value c. then their growings with his Cattel aforesaid was fed trod and consumed as he above against him complaineth And this he is ready to aver Whereupon in as much as the aforesaid Thomas Albany doth acknowledge the Trespass aforesaid in the aforesaid 20. acres of Pasture with the appurtenances to be done The aforesaid John demandeth Judgment and his dammages by occasion of the Trespass aforesaid to be to him adjudged c. And the aforesaid Thomas Albany saith That well and true it is That in the aforesaid Deed of Feoffment of the aforesaid Francis Bunny It was Provided That if it should happen the said Peter Penruddock to dye without issue Male of his Body lawfully begotten not leaving his Wife with Child of a Son in the life of the said Francis that then and from thence forth it should be lawful to the aforesaid Francis at all times at his will during his natural life by his Writing by him the said Francis to that intent made in the presence of 4. Credible and Honest Witnesses at the least to alter change determine or amplifie any use or uses Limitations Intentions or purposes limited or appointed by the aforesaid deed of Feoffment by the said Francis Bunny as before is said made or the use or uses of any part or parcel of the premises Remainder or Remainders Reversion or Reversions limitted to any person or persons after the death of the said Francis And that afterwards and before the time in which c. the aforesaid Peter dyed without issue Male of his Body lawfully begotten the aforesaid Francis at the time of the death of the aforesaid Peter being in full life But the said Thomas Albany further saith That the said Francis in the life time of the said Peter Penruddock that is to say the first day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 23th at Willesdon aforesaid By a certain Writing indented made between him the said Francis of the one part and the aforesaid Miles Hitchcock and Tho. Albany of the other part one part of which the said Thomas Albany sealed with the Seal of the said Francis here in Court brings whose date is the same day yeer renounced relinquished and surrendred all manner of such Liberty Power and Authority which he the said Francis by force and virtue of the aforesaid Proviso above recited or any Liberty in the aforesaid deed of Feoffment mentioned and exppressed of and from the death of the aforesaid Peter Penruddock then had or ought to have of touching and concerning the Alteration Changing Determination Diminishing or Amplifying of such use or uses Intentions and Limitations as are in the said Indenture limited expressed and declared And further the said Francis by the said Writing Remised Released and
quit claimed to the aforesaid Miles Hitchcock and Thomas Abany all the aforesaid Condition Proviso Covenant and Agreement before mentioned and all and all manner of such Power Liberty Authority Right Title or Demand which the said Franc. after the death of the said Peter had or could have claim or challenge or demand by force and virtue of the same Condition and Proviso in the aforesaid deeâ— of Feoffment contained So that the said Francis of and from the death of the aforesaid Peter Penruddâ—â—k should not claim challenge demand exercise use or have any power liberty or authority to alter change determine diminish or amplifie any use or uses limitations or declarations in the aforesaid deed of Feoffment contained expressed limited or appointed but that the said FRANCIS from the death of the said Peter of and from all such liberty power and authority as before is said should stand and remain utterly barred excluded and discharged for ever And further the said Francis by that Writing granted to the aforesaid Miles and Thomas and their Heirs that from thenceforth the aforesaid Condition Proviso Covenant and Agreement and the aforesaid Power Liberty and Authority should cease and be utterly void to all Intents Constructions and Purposes And this he is ready to aver Whereupon as at first he demandeth Judgement and that the aforesaid John Grendon from having his action aforesaid against him the said Thomas Albany be barred c. And the aforesaid John Grenden saith That the Plea aforesaid by the aforesaid Thomas Albany in form aforesaid above by Rejoynder pleaded and the matter in the same contained is not sufficient in Law to bar him the said John Grendon from having his Action aforesaid against the said Thomas Albany To which the said John Grendon needeth not nor is bound any wayes by the Law of the Land to Answer Wherefore for want of a sufficient Rejoynder in this Plea The said John Grendou demandeth Judgement and his damages by the occasion aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid Thomas Albany saith That the Plea of him the said Thomas in manner and form aforesaid above by Rejoynder pleaded and the matter in the same contained is good and sufficient in Law to bar the said John Grendon from having his Action aforesaid against him the said Thomas Albany which Plea and the matter in the same contained the said Thomas is ready to aver and prove as the Court c. And because the said John Grendon to that Plea doth not answer nor doth the same any wayes deny The said Thomas Albany as at first prayeth Judgement and that the said John Grendon from having his Action aforesaid against the said Thomas Albany be barred c. And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid here before the Lady the Queen at VVestmin until Thursday next after the Morrow of the Purification of the Blessed Mary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here is not yet c. TRESPAS Hillary Term Anno 31o. ELIZABETH Rot. 65. in the KINGS-BENCH C. 1. part Chudleighs Case fol. 113. b. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say Hillary Term Devon last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came William Dillon Esquire by Edward Hall his Attorny And brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there his Bill against John Frayne in the Custody of the Marshal of a Plea of Trespass and are Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss William Dillon Esquire complaineth of John Frayne in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that That he the 6th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th with force and Arms c The Close of him the said William called Sedan Close at Tawestock in the County as aforesaid brake and entred and his grass â—â—ere to the value of 5. pound then and there growing with his Cattel that is to say with Horses Oxen Cows Hoggs and Sheep fed trod and consumed continuing the Trespass aforesaid as to the treading and consuming the grasse from the aforesaid 6. day of November the yeer 29th aforesaid until the bringing of this Bill that is to say the 8th day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 30th divers dayes continuing and diverse other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said VVilliam 40. Marks And thereof he bringeth Sute c. And now at this day that is to say Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary this Term until which day the said John Frayne had license to imparl to the said Bill and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh as well the said William Dillon by his Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid John Frayne by John Halstaf his Attorny and the said John Frayne defendeth the force and injury when c. And saith that he is not thereof guilty and of this puts himself upon the Country and the said VVilliam Dillon likewise c. Therefore a Jury was to come before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster upon Tuesday next after 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. Afterwards the processe thereof was continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors put thereof between them in respite before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned first upon Monday the 7th day of July at the Castle of Exeter in the County aforesaid by the form of the Statute c. câ—me for default of Jurors c. At which Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael befoâ—â— the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices to Assizes before whom c. sent their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place within contained before Edmond Anderson Knight Chief Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Thomas Gent one of the Barons of the Exchechequer of the Lady the Queen Justices of the said Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County of Devonshire assigned by the form of the Statute c. came as well the within named VVilliam Dillon by Morrice Evans his Attorny as the aforesaid John Frayne by Thomas Felton his Attorny
male by the aforesaid Christopher Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid 6th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten And for default of such Issue to the use of the 7th Issue male by the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the Body of the aforesaid 7th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use of the 8th Issue male by the aforesaid Christopher Chudley Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid 8th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten And for default of such Issue to the use of the 9th Issue male by the aforesaid Christopher Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the Body of the aforesaid 9th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use of the 10th Issue male Lawfally to be begotten and the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid 10th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten And if it should happen the aforesaid Christopher to dy without Issue male of his body Lawfully to be begotten then the aforesaid Feoffees and every of them their Heirs and Assigns should stand and be seised of and in the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things to the use and behoof of the aforesaid Thomas Chudleigh another Son of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh and the Heirs of his body Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use and behoof of the aforesaid Oliver Chudleigh another Son of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh and the Heirs of his body Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use and behoof of the right Heirs of the said Richard Chudleigh Knight for ever as by the said Indenture Quadrupartite amongst other things more fully it appeareth By colour of which Feofment and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 4th day of February in the 27th yeer of his Reign at Westminster in the County of Middlesex of transferring uses in possession there holden made and provided the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh was seised of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof amongst otherthings as the Law requireth And the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. so being seited the same Richard before the within written time in which c. that is so say the 17th day of November in the yeers of the Reigns of the aforesaid late King and Queen Philip and Mary the 5th and 6th dyed and that neither at the time of the death of him the said Richard Chudleigh and before the day of the bringing of the Bill within written there was any Heir of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh of the bodies of any the aforesaid Mary Elizabeth Emlem Johan and Lawrence Lawfally begotten And that after the death of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh and before the time in which the aforasaid John Sentleger Giles Strangewaies John Wadham John Gilbert Themas Carew Richard Bampfield John Bridgway Robert Fulford Thomas Williams John Eveleigh and William Hole into the Manors aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things entred and were thereof possessed or seised as upon the whole matter aforesaid the Law requireth and so thereof being possessed or seised Christopher Chudleigh after the death of the aforesaid Richard before the within written time in which c. took to wife Christian Sracheley and that the aforesaid John Sentleger Giles Strangewaies John Wadham John Gilbert Thomas Carew Richard Bampfield John Ridgeway Robert Falford Thomas Williams John 〈◊〉 and William Hole of the aforesaid Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things in form aforesaid possessed or being seiâ—â—â— before the within written time in which c. that is to say The â—ath day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that nâ— was the first the said Oliver Chudleigh then living being in full life by their writing sealed with their Seals and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence whose date is the same day and yeer freely and without any Consideration amongst other things enfeoffed the aforesaid Christopher Chudleâ—gh then and before having notice of the making of the aforesaid Qâ—â—dâ—upâ—tite Indenture and of the uses in the same conteined To have and to hold the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things To the said Christopher his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the only â—â— behoof of the said Christopher his Heirs Assigns for ever By virtue of wâ—â— Feoffment The said Christopher Chudleigh was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof amongst other things as the Law requireth And so thereof being seized The said Christopher Chudleigh before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 20th day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the third had issue of his Body lawfully begotten one Stretchlâ—y Chudley his first Son And that the said Christopher Chudleigh afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 30th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is had another issue of his Body lawfully begotten that is to say one John Chudleigh his second Son And the aforesaid Christo Chudleigh of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seized The said Christopher afterwards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the first day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 6th by his writing indented sealed with his seal and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence whose date is the said first day of July in the 6th yeer abovesaid And afterwards that is to say the â—th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 6th abovesaid before Robert Dennis Knight one of the 〈◊〉 of the said Lady the Queen for the County aforesaid and George 〈◊〉 Esquire Clerk of the Peace of the said County to be kept assigned â—s the deed of the said Christopher acknowleledged and according to the form of the Statute in such such case made and provided inrolled in consideration of 220. pound to him by one John Chichester Knight before then paid bargained and sold to the said John Chichester the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. To have to hold to the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns forever to the only use and behoof of the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever And that the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh moreover before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 6th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that
now is the 6th abovesaid by his deed sealed with his Seal and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence whose date is the said 6th day of July aforesaid of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. Enfeoffed the aforesaid John Chichester To have and to hold the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. To the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the only use and behoof of the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever And by the said deed aforesaid The said Christopher granted for him and his Heirs That he and his Heirs the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesaid John Christopher his Heirs and Assigns to the only use and behooâ— of the said John Christopher his Heirs and Assigns against all Men would warrant and defend by the said deed as by the said deed more fully appeareth By virtue of which Fefeoffment and of which aforesaid Bargain and Sale the aforesaid John Chichester was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as the Law requireth And so living thereof seized The aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh aftewards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the first day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 12th dyed being the aforesaid Stretchly Chudleigh Eldest Son and Heir of the said Christopher and John Chudleigh his second Son And afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said â—ady the Queen that now is the 13th The said Stretchley Chudleigh dyed without issue of his Body begotten the said John Chudleigh Brother and Heir of the said Strechley then living and in full life being that is to say at Tawstock aforesaid in the County aforesaid And that the aforesaid John Chudleigh after the death of the aforesaid Stretchley his Brother was and yet is Heir of the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh his Father And the said John Chudleigh of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seized The said John Chichester before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 6th day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 7th of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. enfeoffed one Philip Chichester Gentleman To have and to hold the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the said Philip Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the only use of him the said Philip Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which Feoffment the said Philip Chichester was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as the Law requireth And that the Close aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. is and the within written time in which c. as also from the whole time aforesaid was customary Land of the Manor aforesaid and demised and demisable by Copy of Court Roll of the Manor aforesaid by the Lord or his Steward of the Manor aforesaid for the time being to any person or persons who were willing to take the same for Term of Life or Lives at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of the Manor aforesaid And the aforesaid PHILIP Chichester of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. as the Law requireth c. Being seized before the time within which c. That is to say the 8th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 15th At the Court of his Manor aforesaid then holden at the said Manor of Hescot aforesaid of his own delivery the Close aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things to the aforesaid John Frayne granted for the Term of his Life at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the Manor aforesaid By virtue of which grant the said John Frayne before the time in which c. entred and was thereof seized as the Law requireth c. And so thereof being seized the said John Chudley being Heir as before is said of the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh before the within written time in which c. That is to say the 11th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 28th in the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid Philip Chichester thereof entred and was thereof possessed as the Law requireth c And so being possessed before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 11th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is Of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof enfeoffed the aforesaid William Dillon To have and to hold that Manor with the Appurtenances whereof to the said William Dillon his Heirs and Assigns for ever By virtue of which Feoffment before the time in which c. The said William Dillon into the Close aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said John Frayne thereof entred and him the said John Frayne from his possession thereof expelled and amoved and was thereof seized as the Law requireth until the aforesaid John Frayne the within written 16th day of November into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the said William Dillon thereof entred and the Grasse then and there growing with the Gattel within written fed trod and consumed and continued the same from the aforesaid 16th day of November in the 29th yeer aforesaid until the within written 8th day of February the 30th yeer within written But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the aforesaid John Frayne be guilty of the Trespasse within written or not the Jurors aforesaid are ignorant And thereupon pray the Advise and Discretion of the Court c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John Frayne into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in and upon the possession of the aforesaid William Dillon thereof be not a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Frayne is guilty of the Trespasse within written as the aforesaid VVilliam Dillon above against him complaineth And then they assesse the Damages of the said VVilliam by occasion of that Trespasse above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this part expended to 4. pence And for his costs and charges to 20. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court here
to the value of 20. l. growing with certain cattel trod and consumed and other harms to him did to the grievous damage of him the said William Thoroughgood and against the Peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. And whereupon The said William Thoroughgood by William Aylesbury Attorney complaineth That the aforesaid William Cole the 12th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 23. with force and arms the Close and House of him the said William Thoroughgood at great Paringdon aforesaid brake and his grass to the value c. there late growing with certain cattel that is to say Horses Cows Hogs and Sheep fed trod and consumed the Trespass aforesaid as to the feeding treading and consuming of the grass aforesaid from the aforesaid 12th day of October in the 23th year abovesaid until the day of the bringing of this Writ Original of him the said William Thoroughgood that is to say the 6th day of November then next following diverse dayes and terms continuing and other harms c. To the grievous damage c. and against the Peace c. and whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 40. l. and thereof he bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid William Cole by Thomas Reynolds his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And as to the coming with force and arms he saith That he is not guilty thereof and of this puts himself upon the Country and the aforesaid William Thoroughgood likewise And as to the rest of the Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done The said William Cole saith That the aforesaid William Thoroughgood ought not to have his Action against him because he saith That the Close and House aforesaid as also the places in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be done are and at the time of the Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done were one Messuage and two Acres of Meadow with the Appurtenances called Nichols Tenement in great Paringdon aforesaid which Tenements with the apturtenances are and the aforesaid time of the Trespass aforesaid above-supposed to be done were the soyl and Freehold of him the said William Cole for which the aforesaid William the aforesaid time in which c. the Close and House aforesaid as his Close and soyl and Freehold of him the said William into the same Messuage and two Acres of Meadow with the appurtenances brake and the grass of him the said William Cole there of his own there growing with his Cattel did feed tread and consume as it was lawfull for him to do And this he is ready to aver whereupon he demandeth Judgemēt whether that the aforesaid Wil. Thoroughgood his action aforesaid against him ought to have c. And the aforesaid William Thoroughgood saith That he for any thing before alledged from having his Action aforesaid ought not to be barred because he saith That the Close and house and also the places in which the Trespass aforesaid whereof he above maketh complaint was are and at the time of the Trespass aforesaid done were one Messuage called Burrowes 8. Acres of Land called the great West field four Acres of Land called Diggins Holme and six Acres of Land called Grove field with the Appurtenances in great Paringdon aforesaid others then the aforesaid Messuage and two Acres of Meadow with the Appurtenances called Nichols Tenements in the Bar of the aforesaid William Cole above specified and this he is ready to aver wherefore in as much as the said William Cole to the Trespass aforesaid in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances new assigned over doth not Answer the aforesaid William Thoroughgood demandeth Judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespass to be to him adjudged c. And the aforesaid William Cole as to any Trespass in the aforesaid Tenements now assigned supposed to be done he saith That the aforesaid William Thoroughgood his action against him ought not to have because he saith That long before the aforesaid time of the Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done That the aforesaid William Thoroughgood was seized of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances new assigned in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being sized before the aforesaid time in which c. A Fine was Levied in the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here that is to say at Westminster in 8. days of St. Hillary in the 10th year of her Reign before James Dyer Richard Weston John Welsh and Richard Harper then Justices and afterwards from the day of Easter in 14. days then next following granted and recorded before the same Justices and other the Queens faithfull peuple then and there present between William Chicken and Elizabeth his wife Plaintiffs and the aforesaid William Thoroughgood and Agnes his wife Defendants of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances amongst other things by the names of one Messuage one Garden 45. Acres of Land 5. Acres of Meadow 10. Acres of Pasture and four Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in great Paringdon and Avydon whereof a Plea of Covenant was sued between them in the said Court here That is to say that the aforesaid Will. Thoroughood Agnes his wife acknowledged the Tenements aforesaid to be the Right of the said VVilliam Chicken as those which the said VVilliam and Elizabeth had of the gift of the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood and Agnes and them remised and quit claimed from them the said VVilliam Agnes and their Heirs to the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth the Heirs of the said VVilliam forever which Fine in form aforesaid levied and had was levied to the use of the aforesaid William Chicken and Elizabeth and the Heirs of the said William forever By vertue of which Fine the aforesaid William Chicken and Elizabeth were seized of the Tenements aforesaid that is to say The said William Chicken in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid Elizabeth in her Demesn as of Freehold for the term of her life And the said William and Elizabeth so thereof being seized before the aforesaid time in which c. Of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances enfeoffed one Edward Turner Esauire To have to him and his Heirs for ever By vertue of which Feoffment the aforesaid Edward was of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances seized in his Demesn of Fee By which the said William Cole as servant to the said Edward and by his Commandment the aforesaid tim in which c. the Close and House aforesaid as the Close and House soyl and Freehold of the said Edward his own brake and the grass aforesaid as the proper grass of him the said Edward in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances new assigned then growing with his Cattel aforesaid fed trod and consumed as it was lawfull for him to do And this he is ready to aver whereupon he
demandeth Judgement if the aforesaid William Thoroughgood his Action aforesaid against him ought to have c. And the aforesaid William Thoroughgood as to the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid VVilliam Cole to the Trespass aforesaid in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances of new Assignment done above in Bar thereof pleaded saith That he for any thing in the said Plea before alledgeth from the having his action aforesaid ought not to be barred Because he saith That the aforesaid Fine was had and levied to the use and behoof of the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth and the heirs of the said VVilliam upon the Condition that the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth and the Heirs and Assigns of the said VVilliam Chicken well and truly should deliver and pay to the said VVilliam Thoroughgood and Agnes and their Executors and Assigns 8 l. of good and lawfull money of England and four Quarters of Malt at the Mansion house called Barrowes in Paringdon aforesaid yearly during the natural lives of them the said VVilliam Thoroughgood and Agnes and the longer liver of them at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel and the Feast of the Anunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin by equal portions and also upon condition That the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth and their Heirs or Assigns should pay to the said VVilliam Thoroughgood and Agnes their Executors Administrators or assigns 76. l. 13. s. and 4. d. of like lawfull money of England at the aforesaid Mansion house called Barrows in form following that is to say at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the year of our Lord God 1568. three pound six shillings eight pence and so at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangels at the Mansion House aforesaid three pound six shillings eight pence yearly untill the aforesaid summ of seventy six pound 13. s. and 4. d. should be fully satisfied and paid and for the not payment doing and performing of the aforesaid Conditions according to the true intents and meanings of the same Condition the aforesaid Fine and other the conveyance aforesaid to be made were to the use and behoof of them the said William Thoroughgood and Agnes as in their former estate by colour of which Fine the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken and Elizabeth were seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the Apurtenances of new assigned amongst other things that is to say the aforesaid VVilliam in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid Elizabeth in her Demesn as of Freehold for term of her life upon the Conditions aforesaid And further the said VVilliam Thoroughgood by Protestation that the said William Chicken and Elizabeth did not pay do or perform any thing according to the form and effect of the Conditions aforesaid For Plea saith That the aforesaid William Chicken and Elizabeth or either of them did not pay or either of them pay to the said William Thoroughgood and Agnes or either of them 3. l. 6s 8d of good and lawful money of England at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel on the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18th Which to them at the said Feast of St. Michael they ought to have paid according to the form and effect of the aforesaid first Condition by which the aforesaid William Thoroughgood by vertue of the Fine aforesaid and by force of a certain Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th at VVestminster the fourth day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th holden made and provided of transferring uses in possession was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances of new assigned amongst other things in his Demesn as of Fee and in the Tenements aforesaid of new assigned entred and the aforesaid William Cole the day and year in the Declaration aforesaid above specified with force and Arms c. the Close and House of him the said William Thoroughgood in the aforesaid Tenements of new assigned broke and the grass aforesaid there then growing with his cattel aforesaid was fed trod and consumed as he the said William against him complaineth and this he is ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the said William Cole doth acknowledge the Trespass aforesaid in the same Tenements of new assigned done as abovesaid The said William Thoroughgood demandeth Judgement his damages by the occasion of that Trespass to be to him adjudged c. And the aforesaid William Cole by Protestation That the Fine aforesad was not levyed to the use of the said William Chicken and Elizabeth upon the Conditions aforesaid as the aforesaid William Thoroughgood above alledgeth For Plea saith That after the Fine aforesaid Levied that is to say the second day of September in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 18th at Great Paringdon aforesaid the aforesaid VVilliam Thoroughgood by his Writing of the Lease which the said VVilliam Cole with the Seal of the said VVilliam Thoroughgood Sealed here in Court brings whose Date is the same day and year by the name of VVilliam Thoroughgood of Hansdon in the County of Hertford Yeoman Remised Released and for him and his Heirs for ever quit claimed to the aforesaid VVilliam Chicken by the name of William Chicken of Hansdon aforesaid Yeoman All and all manner of Conditions Entries for Conditions broken and demands whatsoever from the beginning of the World unto the day of the Date of the said Writing of Release and this he is ready to aver whereupon as at first he demandeth Judgement and that the aforesaid William Thoroughgood be barred from having his Action aforesaid against him c. and the aforesaid William Thoroughgood saith That he is a Layman and unlearned and that at the time of the making of the Writing of Release supposed to be done divers arrerages of the aforesaid yeerly payments above recited in form aforesaid to be paid were behind and that the aforesaid Writing of Release was then read and declared to him as a Writing of Acquittance of all arrerages of monies to him in form aforesaid to be paid then to the said William Thoroughgood being behind and not paid only By which the said William Thoroughgood believing that Writing to be a Writing of Acquittance of the arrerages of the monies aforesaid only sealed and delivered the said Writing to the aforesaid William Chicken and said William Thoroughgood saith That the said Writing in Court here brought containing in self him the said William Thoroughgood to have Remised Released and for him and his He is for ever quit claimed to the aforesaid VViliam Chicken all and all manner of Conditions Entries for Conditions broken and Demands whatsoever from the beginning of the world until the day of the date of the said Writing of Release is not his Deed And he prayeth that this may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid William Cole likewise Therefore it is commanded
done are and the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be done were 10. Acres of Land called Bromfield with the appurtenances in Marton aforesaid which 10. acres of Land with the appurtenances are the Soil and Freehold of the said Christopher And that the said Christopher the aforesaid time in which c. the Close aforesaid as his own Close Soil and Freehold of him the said Christopher in the said 10. acres of Lands with the appurtenances brake and the Corn there as his own Corn there growing in the aforesaid 10. acres with the Appurtenances as in his own Soil and Freehold there trod and consumed as it was lawful for him to do and this he is ready to aver Whereupon he demandeth Judgement if the aforesaid Anthony his Action aforesaid against him ought to have c. And the aforesaid Anthony saith that he by any thing before alleged ought not to be barred from having his Action aforesaid Because he saith That the Close aforesaid as also the places in which the Trespass aforesaid above complaineed of was done are and the time aforesaid of the Trespass aforesaid done were 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances called Scarhill Set and VVatersey Mire in Marton aforesaid others than the aforesaid 10. acres of Lands called Bromfield with the Appurtenances in the Bar of the said Christopher above specified And this he is ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the aforesaid Christopher to the Trespass aforesaid in the aforesaid 4. acres of Lands with the Appurtenances above new assigned done doth not answer The said Anthony demandeth Judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespass to be to him adjudged c. And the aforesaid Christopher as to any Trespass in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the appurtenances new assigned above supposed to be done saith that he thereof is not guilty as the aforesaid Anthony against him complaineth And of this puts himself upon the Country And the aforesaid Anthony likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff That he cause to come here in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity 12. c. by whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. At which day here come the parties And the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therfore as at first it is commanded to the Sheriff That he cause to come here from the Holy Trinity in 3. Weeks 12. c. To Recognize in form aforesaid c. At which day the Jurors between the parties aforesaid of the aforesaid Plea between them were put in respite here until this day that is to say in 8. dayes of Saint Michael then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County aforesaid assigned by the form of the Statute c. Upon Monday the 14th day of July last past at the Castle of York in the said County should first come And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid Anthony as the aforesaid Christopher by their Attornies aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices to Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within written within contained before John Clench one of the Justices of the Lady the Queen to Pleas before the Queen her self to be holden assigned And Shomas Walmesly one of the Justices of the said lady the Queen of the Bench Justices of the said Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County of York to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. came as well the within named Anthony Baldwin as the aforesaid within written Christopher Marton by their Attornies within mentioned And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within is made mention some of them that is to say William VVharton of Dunkeswick Gentleman Adam VVyre of Ayrton Yeoman John Brown of Pathorn Yeoman Ralph VValker of Bolton Gentleman Thomas Preston of Whengille Yeoman and Henry Laycock of Felliface Yeoman come And the Jurors aforesaid are sworn And because that the rest of the Jurors of that Jury did not appear Therefore others of the Standers by to this chosen by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid are at the request of the said Anthony and by the Commandment of the Justices new added whose names to the Pannel within written are filed according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And the Jurors so a new added now appearing that is to say Gabriel Green William Newby John Hawton John Brorcey John Craven and WILLIAM RICHARDSON come who to say the truth of the within contained together with theother Jurors aforesaid first impannelled and sworn to say chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That before the within written time in which it is supposed the Trespass within written to be done The aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances in which c. were parcel of the possessions of the late Monastery or Priory of Bolton in Craven and that one Richard late Prior of the Priory or Monastery aforesaid was seized of one Tenement Messuage or Farm called Vngthorpe in the Parish of Marton in Craven whereof the aforesaid four Acres of Land with the Appurtenances within new assigned are and the within written time in which c. were parcel in his Demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Monastery aforesaid and so thereof being seized The said late Prior with the assent of the Covent of the same place the 26. day of December in the year of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 25th By an Indenture sealed with the Common Seal of the aforesaid Prior and Covent to the Jurors in evidence shewed demised the aforesaid Tenement Messuage and Farm whereof the within written 40. Acres of Land with the appurtenances then were and yet are parcel to one Hugh Baldwin and Agnes his Wife To have and to hold to the said Hugh Baldwin and his Assigns from the date of the Indenture aforesaid unto the end and term of 31. years fully to be ended By vertue of which Demise The said Hugh and Agnes in the aforesaid four Acres of Land with the appurtenances in which c. entred and were thereof possessed the Reversion thereof to the aforesaid Prior and his Successors And the aforesaid Hugh and Agnes of the aforesaid four Acres of Lands with the appurtenances in which c. for the Term aforesaid being possessed the Reversion thereof to the aforelate Prior in form aforesaid ezpectant By a certain Act in Parliament of the said late King Henry the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 28th day of April in the 31. year of his Reign begun and continued until the 28th day of June then next following and there then holden amongst other things it is Ordained and established by the said late King and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in the said Parliament
same day and year and afterwards that is to say the 27th day of the same Moneth of January in the year 44th aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen in her Chancery of Record inrolled for and in Consideration of 10. shillings to the said William and Ralph By the Right Honourable Gilbert Earl of Shrewesbury and Mary his Wife paid granted aliened bargained and sold the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Mary his Wife To have and to hold the said Manor with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Countesse and to their Heirs for ever By virtue of which as also by force of an Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th in the year of his Reign the 27th holden made the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Countess were of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield with their Appurtenances seised in their Demesn as of Fee And the Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Countess so as before is said being seised Afterwards that is to say the 16th day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the said late Queen the 44th in the Declaration above specified One Simon Stern then being Deputie of the aforesaid Earl of Rutland for the exercising the said Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield came to the Town of Maunsfield to the usual place there where the Court of the Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid was commonly holden and kept to keep the Court Baron of the said Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid And the aforesaid Thomas Woodward came thither to keep the Court of the said Manor as Steward for the aforesaid Gilbert Earl of Shrewsbury and that the aforesaid Thomas Woodward as Steward of the aforesaid Earl of Shrewsbury and the aforesaid Simon Stern as Deputy of the aforesaid Earl of Rutland to the place aforesaid both together came And the said Simon Stern as Deputy of the said Earl of Rutland Commanded the Bayliff of the same Manor to make Proclamation for the holding of the Court Baron of the said Manor by him the said Simon Stern as Deputy of the aforesaid Earl of Rutland then to be holden And the aforesaid Thomas VVoodward as Steward of the aforesaid Earl of Shrewsbury likewise Commanded the Bayliff of that Manor that he make Proclamation for the holding of the Court Baron of the Manor aforesaid by him the said Thomas VVoodward as Steward of the aforesaid Earl of Shrewsbury But no Court then was holden but by the said Thomas VVoodward it was then adjorned And from thence until the bringing of the aforesaid Original Writ The aforesaid Thomas VVoodward and Steward of the aforesaid Gilbert Earl of Shrewsbury kept the Courts of the Manor aforesaid and allwayes from thence he the said Thomas Woodward and the aforesaid Robert Spencer Received all the Fees belonging to the Steward there as they became due And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It sahll seem to the Court here that the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas VVoodward are guilty of the Trespass within written Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas Woodward are guilty of the Trespasse within written as the said Roger Earl of Rutland within against them complaineth And then they assesse the Damages of the said Roger Earl of Rutland above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to Forty pound and for his costs and charges to Twelve pence And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here that the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas Woodward are not guilty of the Trespasse within written Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas Woodward are not guilty of the Trespass within written as the said Robert and Thomas within have alleged And because c. TRESPAS Michaelmass Term Anno 10. of King JAMES Rot. 574. in the KINGS-BENCH Co. 10. part The Case of Suttons Hospital Fol. 1. MEmorandum that at another time that is to say Trinity Term Middle past before the Lord the King at Westminster come Simon Baxter Gent. by George Cuppledick his Attorney and brought here in the Court of the said Lord the King then and there his Bill against Richard Sutton Esq and John Law Gentleman in the custody of the Marshal of a Plea of Trespass and are Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss Middlesex ss Simon Baxter Gentleman complaineth of Richard Sutton and John Law in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey being before the King himself For that That they The 30th day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lord JAMES now King of England the 10th with force and Arms the Close and House of him the said Simon that is to say A Capital Messuage with the Appurtenances called The late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-Field at the Parish of Saint Sepulchre in the County aforesaid they brake and entred and other harms to him did against the Peace of the Lord the King that now is to the damage of the said Simon 40. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute And now at this day That is to say Friday next after 8. days of Saint Michael this Term until which day the aforesaid Richard and John had license to imparl to the said Bill and then to answer c. before the Lord the King at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Simon by his Attorny aforesaid as the said Richard and John by Thomas Heyward their Attorny And the said Richard and John defend the force and injury when c. And say that they are not guilty and of this put themselves upon the Country and the said Simon Baxter likewise Therefore a Jury was to come thereof before the Lord the King at Westminster Saturday next after 8. days of Saint Hillary And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors were put by them in respite until Monday next after the Morrow of the Purification of the blessed Mary then next following for default of Jurors c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Simon Baxter as the aforesaid John Sutton and John Law by their Attornies aforesaid And the said Jurors being called come who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That one Thomas Sutton Esquire long before the time in which the Trespass aforesaid is supposed to be done was seized of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Southminster Norton Little Hallingbury otherwise Hallingbury Bowchers and Muchstanbridge in the County of
whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found The aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law be guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid or not the said Jurors are utterly ignorant And pray the advise of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid as the said Simon Baxter against them complaineth Then they assesse the damages of the said John Baxter by occasion of that Trespasse of costs and charges by him about his Sute in his part expended to one penny and for his costs and charges to 12. pence And it upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are not guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are not thereof guilty as the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law above for them have alleged And because the Court of the Lord the King here is not yet avised of and upon the premises day thereof is given to the parties before the Lord the King at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. days of Easter to hear their Judgemēt of upon the premises because the Court of the L. the K. here therof not yet c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westm come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lord the King here is not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day thereof is further further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lord the King at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lord the King here thereof not yet c. Upon which The premises by the Court of the Lord the King that now is here seen and all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had For that it seemeth to the Court of the Lord the King that now is here upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law are not guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid as the said Richard Sutton and John Law above for them have alleged It is granted that the aforesaid Simon Baxter take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false clamor thereof be in mercy c. And that the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law go thereof without day c. And that the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law recover against the aforesaid Simon Baxter 24. pound for their costs and charges by them about their defence in this part expended to the said Richard Sutton and John Law with their assent by the Court of the Lord the King here according to the form of the Statute in such case late made and provided adjudged And that the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law have Execution thereof c. WASTE Hillary Term 340. ELIZABETH in the COMMON-PLEAS Rot. 2380. Co. 4. part Hyndes Case Fol. 68. ELizabeth Hynde was summoned to Answer to Richard Libb Esquire of Oxon. a Plea Wherefore Whereas of the Common Counsell of the Realm of the Lady the Queen of England it is provided That it shall not be law-for any one waste spoyle or destruction to do in Lands Houses Woods or Gardens to him demised for Term of life or yeers The said Eliza. of Lands and Woods in Goring and Whitchurch which she holdeth for Term of yeers of the demise of Robert Garrard of the aforesaid Richard of the Assignment of William Haw who those to the said Robert demised for the said Term thereof made to the said Richard did waste spoyle and destruction to the dissenherisin of him the said Richard and against the form of the Provision aforesaid c. And whereupon the said Richard by Thomas Lane his Attorny saith That whereas the aforesaid William Haw was seised of a Messuage called Haw Place 200. Acres of Land 10. Acres of Meadow 100. Acres of Pasture and 50. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Goring and Whitchurch aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seised the 4th day of January in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 28th at Goring aforesaid By Indenture between the aforesaid William Haw of Haw Place in the Parish of Goring in the County of Oxon. Yeoman of the one part and the aforesaid Robert Garrard by the name of Robert Garrard of Hedsor in the County of Buckingham Gentleman made One part of which sealed with the Seal of the aforesaid Robert the said Richard here in Court brings whose date is the same day and yeer demised to the said Robert the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances Except during the life of Agnes Haw Mother of the said William such part of the Messuage aforesaid parcel of the premises Orchard and Garden One Close called Reaves Dean and one Close called Bell Close and one Orchard called the Orchard Pedel parcel of the premises which the said Agnes then occupied and then had taken and agreed to receive for her Dower of in and for the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances To have and to hold the said Tenements with the Appurtenances except before excepted to the said Robert and his Assigns from the Feast of the Birth of our Lord God then last past until the end and Term of 16. yeers from thence next insuing and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which Demise the said Robert in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the 20th day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th at Goring aforesaid granted all his Estate Interest and Term of yeers which he had then to come of and in the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised to the aforesaid Elizabeth Hynde By virtue of which grant the aforesaid Elizabeth into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances above in form aforesaid demised entred and was thereof possessed And the aforesaid Elizabeth being thereof so possessed and the aforesaid VVilliam Haw of the Reversion thereof in form aforesaid being seised the said William the 7th day of March in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th at Goring aforesaid By his Indenture of Bargain and Sale made between him the said William of the the one part and the aforesaid Richard of the other part one part of which sealed with the Seal of the said William the said Richard here in Court brings whose Date the is same day and yeer and in the Court of the
Lady the Queen of the Bench and other of the said Lady the Queens leige People then there present Between the aforesaid Richard by the name of Richard Libb Gentleman Plaintiff and the aforesaid William Haw and Ellen his Wise Deforceants of the Tenements aforesaid above in form aforesaid demised amongst other things by the name of One Messuage One Cottage Two Gardens 70. Acres of Land One Acre of Meadow 10. Acres of Pasture 60. Acres of Wood and 10. Acres of Furz and Heath with the Appurtenances in Goring and Whitchurch aforesaid in Maple Decam in the County aforesaid whereupon a Covenant was summoned betwixt them in the said Court that is to say that the aforesaid Williliam and Ellen acknowledged the Tenements aforesaid to be the Right of him the said Richard as those which the said Richard had of the gift of the aforesaid William and Ellen and them remised and quit claimed from them the said William and Ellen and their Heirs to the aforesaid Richard his Heirs for ever And further the said William and Ellen granted for them and the Heirs of the said William that they warrant to the aforesaid Richard and his Heirs the aforesaid Tenements with the Appurtenances against all men for ever as by the said Fine here in Court of Record Remaining more fully appeareth Which Fine in form aforesaid had and levied was to the use of the aforesaid Richard and his Heirs After which Fine so as afore is said levied that is to say the 20th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid the aforesaid Indenture to the aforesaid Richard as before is said made before the aforesaid Justices of the said Lady the the Queen of the Bench here was inrolled And the said Elizabeth further saith That she to that grant of the Reversion of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances above as afore is said demised by virtue of which Fine aforesaid the aforesaid Richard did not attorn or agree And this she is ready to aver Whereupon she demandeth Judgement if the aforesaid Richard his Action aforesaid against her ought to have c. And the aforesaid Richard saith That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Elizabeth above in Bar Pleaded and the matter in the same contained is insufficient in Law to bar him the said Richard to have his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid Elizabeth And that he to that Plea in form aforesaid pleaded needeth not nor by the Law of the Land is bounden to Answer And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Plea in Bar in this behalf made the aforesaid Richard demandeth Judgement and his damages by the occasion of the Waste aforesaid to be to him adjudged And the aforesaid Elizabeth in as much as she hath alleged sufficient matter in Bar of the Acton aforesaid which she is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Richard doth not deny nor to the same any wayes answereth but to that averment altogether refuseth demandeth Judgement and that the aforesaid Richard be barred from having his Action aforesaid against her c. And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here until from the day of Easter 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet FINIS THE TABLE A. AButtals of Acres set forth Folio 271 Action upon the Case for turning the Course of a water from a Mill 1 Vpon Assumpsit by a Woman Exâ—cutrix to pay mony upon forbearance not to molest her 7 Act of Parliament special to erect and found an Hospital 368. with the particulars of a foundation 368. 369 Adjornment of an Assize and for what Cause 18 19 Of Pleas 18 22 161 232 257 337 Of the Term 161 232 257 337 338 Agreement to pay Rent if it amount to an Attornment 271 Aid 266 Administration of goods committed 72 73 Alien born one born in Scotland since 1 Jac. nor Alien 10 Amoveas Manum 190 Arrests upon the Sabboth day 148 whereupon Arrest the Sergant is to shew his Mace c. 148 149 Arbitrament 25 Attornment 271 Two Joynts for life upon a grant of the Reversion one attorneth and good 354 355 Of one Joyntment is the Attornment of both 354 Audita Querela the form of it 21 To discharge the party out of Execution being taken upon a Capias ut lagaâ—um after juâ—gement 21 â—2 Averâ—ment 190 20â— 213 217 226 266 2â—0 â—26 Of Plea 10 24 26 Where it is Collateral of a thing out of the deed â—3 Authority of the Presidâ—nt and â—ensors of the Colledge of Physicâ—ans in London and the extent of it 131 Where it doth not extend to Doctors of Physick in the Vniverslties 134 135 Avowry 220 237 238 259 268 For Arrerage of a Rent charge granted by Tenant in tail â—n remainder 222 The taking of an Ox for a Heriot 269 For Arrerages of Rent 271 B. BAil 220 153 Bar 11 12 144 154 163 221 251 252 269 271 19â— 233 238 241 242 301 345 Fine annd Recâ—â—ery by Tenant in tâ—il is a Barr of a Rent granted by him in the remainder 224 In Avowry 260 In Audita Querela 22 In Dower 31 32 33 A grant of the King a Barr in a Scâ—re Facias to repeal Letters Pâ—â—ents 287 288 In Trespass 307 324 340 Of Conusance 252 Bargain and Sale 119 288 325 154 Of Lands to the Queen 160 Of Lands to Vses 171 172 By Tenant in tail 170 Of aterm for yeers 73 Of the Charter-house and of Lands belonging to it 372 373 374 Of Deeds Charters and Evidences 374 Of Lands to the Governours of an Hospital 390 391 392 Where it shall not relate to avoid a Fine 398 399 C. CErtificate of the Causes of disfranchising a Citizen or Burgess and removing him from his place and Office 274 to 279 Conditions to stand to an Award and Arbitrament 25 Not to alien a Term for years 70 Where broken because the thing is not done within convenient time 161 Where broken because the partâ— hath dissabled himself to perform it 161 Not to alien or discontinue Lands intailed 311 312 313 Colour 308 325 Common Recovery 244 312 The form of pleading it 41 59 320 86 141 Vses of it declared by a deed subsequent to the Recovery 12 In the Court of Hustings in London in a Writ of Right Patent 57 58 Where a Bar of an Estat 〈…〉 l 42 43 By Tenant in tail an 〈…〉 Release with warranty where shall bind the issue in tail 138 139 140 141 142 Vpon a Writ of Right Patent 138 Suffered by Tenant in tail 312 313 To Vses 86 87 88 89 139 Considerations 86 What good to ground an Assumpsit upon 6 7 What good to raise Vses 39 40 102 308 Confess and avoid 215 223 Confirmations 255 Of the King of a Lease
the said Sheriff Pledges for prosecuting that is to say John Doo Richard Roo and that the aforesaid Edward was summoned by John Den and Richard Fen. And the said Edward Shelley according to his summons aforesaid to him in form aforesaid made by Thomas Ingler his Attorny came And upon this the aforesaid Richard Cooper and William Martin by their Attorny aforesaid demanded against the aforesaid Edward Shelley the Manors of Worminghurst Barhamwick and Fyndon with the Appurtenances as also 30. Messuages 10. Tofts one Water-Mill 2. Dove-houses 30. Gardens 400. Acres of Land 60. Acres of Meadow 400. Acres of Pasture 120. Acres of Wood 500. Acres of Furz and Heath and 8. pound 10. shillings Rent with the Appurtenances in Fyndon Worminghurst Barhamwick Patching Estangmering Westangmering Wighenholt Sterrington VVashington Ashington Grenested Asherest Stening Wiston Thackham and Shipley As also the Advowson of the Chutch of VVorminghurst as his Right and Inheritance and which the said Edward had not Entry but after Disseisin with Hugh Hunt unjustly and without Judgement did to the aforesaid Richard and William within 30. yeers then last past c. And whereupon they said that they themselves were seized of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and Right and also of the Advowson of the Church aforesaid as of Fee and Right in time of Peace in the time of the said late King and Queen taking the Profits thereof to the value c. And in which c. And thereupon brought Sute c. And the said Edward by the aforesaid Thomas Ingler his Attorny cometh and defendeth his Right when c. And voucheth thereof to warranty Henry Siliborn who present here in his proper person in Court freely the Manors and Tenements and Rents aforesaid to him doth warrant c. And upon that The aforesaid Richard and William demanded against him the said Henry Tenant by his warranty the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid in form aforesaid And whereupon they said That they themselves were seized of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with their Appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and Right and also of the Advowson aforesaid as of Fee and Right in time of Peace in the time of the said late King and Queen taking thereof the Profits to the value c. And in which c. And thereof brought Sute c. And the aforesaid Henry Tenant by his warranty defended his Right when c. And said That the aforesaid Hugh did not disseise the aforesaid Richard and William of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances And also of the Advowson aforesaid as the said Richard and William by their Writ and Declaration above supposed And of this put himself upon the Country c. And the aforesaid Richard and William prayed leave to imparl and had it c. And afterwards the said Richard and William Retorned back hither into Court the same Term by their Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid Henry although solemnly called did not retorn but in Contempt of the Court departed and made default Therefore it was granted by the Court in the aforesaid 8. dayes of Saint Michael That the said Richard and William should recover their seisin against the aforesaid Edward of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances And also of the Advowson aforesaid And that the said Edward should have of the Lands of the said Henry to the value c. And the said Henry should be in Mercy c. And upon this immediatly the aforesaid Richard Cooper and William Martin in the aforesaid Court prayed the Writ of the Lord and Lady the Queen to the then Sheriff of Sussex to be directed to give them full seisin of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and also of the Advowson aforesaid and the Writ was granted unto them bearing date the 9th day of October in the yeers of the Reigns of the aforesaid late King and Queen Philip and Mary the first and second abovesaid Retornable here from the day of Saint Michael in one Moneth then next following And further the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the Tenements aforesaid called Rarhamwick in the Declaration aforesaid specified and the Tenement aforesaid called Barhamwick in the Record of the Recovery aforesaid above mentioned are one and the same Tenements and not others nor divers And that the Recovery aforesaid was for the intentions in the aforesaid Indenture specified And that the said Edward Shelley dyed the 9th day of October in the yeers of the Reigns of the said late King and Queen the first and second between the hours 5. and 6. in the Afternoon of the same day And that afterwards that is to say the 19th day of October then next following the then Sheriff of the said County of Sussex That is to say Thomas Saunder Knight by virtue of the VVrit aforesaid gave full seisin to the aforesaid Richard Cooper and William Martin of the Manors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and also of the Advowson aforesaid And further the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That one Richard Belchamber the aforesaid time of the death of the aforesaid Edward and at the time of the Recovery aforesaid and the Execution thereof and long before the bringing of the aforesaid VVrit of Entry Sur Disseisin in the Post was Tenant of the Tenements aforesaid and possessed of the Tenements aforesaid in the Declaration aforesaid specified for the Term of divers yeers then to come by reason of a Demise thereof made to the aforesaid Richard Belchamber by the aforesaid Edward Shelley long before the bringing of the aforesaid VVrit of Entry Sur Disseisin in the Post And afterwards that is to say the 4th day of December in the yeers of the Reigns of the aforesaid late King and Queen the first and second the aforesaid Henry Shelley the now Defendant was born of the said Ann his Mother late the VVife of the aforesaid Henry Shelley Father of the said Henry Defendant which said Henry the Father was the Eldest Son of the aforesaid Edward Shelley And that the aforesaid Mary Shelley was then alive and in full Life And that the aforesaid Richard Shelley afterwards after the Expiration of the said Term of yeers Demised to the aforesaid Richard Belchamber by the aforesaid Edward Shelley as before is said that is to say the 9th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Augmering aforesaid into the Tenements aforesaid in the Declaration aforesaid specified entred and then and there demised the Tenements aforesaid in the Declaration mentioned to the aforesaid Nicholas Wolfe To have and to hold to the said Nicholas and his Assigns from the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then last past until the end and Term of 21. yeers
from thence next following fully to be compleated By virtue of which Demise The said Nicholas into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed until the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant the aforesaid 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 20th aforesaid with force and Arms c. the Close and House aforesaid brake and entred and the Grasse aforesaid with his Cattel was eaten trodden and consumed in manner and form as the aforesaid Nicholas above against him declared And they pray the Advise of the Lady the Queen here And if upon the whole matter aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court of the Lady the Queen here That the Entry of the aforesaid Henry into the Tenements with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said Nicholas be a good and a lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Henry is not guilty of the Trespass aforesaid in manner and form as the said Nicholas Wolfe now Plaintiff above in pleading hath alleged And if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Court of the Queen here That the Entry of the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the aforesaid Nicholas be not a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant is guilty of the Trespass aforesaid in manner and form as the aforesaid Nicholas Wolfe above against him complaineth And they assesse the damages of the said Nicholas by occasion of that Trespass above his Costs and Charges by him about his Sute in this part expended to 20. shil and for his costs and charges to 40. shil And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to â—ear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement is not yet avised of and upon the premises Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at WESTMINTER until Monday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here is not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises Day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after 18. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 18. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Friday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here all and singular the premises fully understood mature deliberation thereof being had For that it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen here upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid Henry Shelley now Defendant into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said Nicholas is a good and lawful Entry in Law Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid Nicholas Wolfe take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false Clamour be in Mercy And the aforesaid Henry Shelley go thereof without day c. TRESPAS Michaelmasse Term Anno 27. 28. ELIZABETH in the KINGS-BENCH Rot. 58. Co. 1. part Albanyes Case fol. 107. MEmorandum That upon Saturday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael Middles this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came John Greendon Gentleman by William Goldsmith his Attorny and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen there his Bill against Thomas Albany in the Custody of the Marshal c. of a Plea of Trespass and are Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss Middlesex ss John Greendon Gentleman complaineth of Thomas Albany in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey before the Queen her self being For that That he the first day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 27th with force and Arms c. the Close of him the said John at Willesdon broke and entred and his Grass to the value of 10. pound there then growing with certain Cattel that is to say Horses Oxen Cows and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms to him did to the great damage of the said John and against the Peace of the Lady the Queen that now is whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pound and thereof bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Thomas Albany cometh by Anthony Felton his Attorny and defendeth the force and injury when And as to the coming with force and arms and whatsoever is against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is saith That he is not thereof guilty and of this puts himself upon the Country And the said John likewise c. And as to the rest of the Trespass supposed to be done The said Thomas saith ought not to have or maintain his Action against him because he saith That the place in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be done containeth and at the time in which c. did contain in it self 20. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenaaces in Willesdon aforesaid and as to any Trespass in five