Tenements aforesaid and their names in the Writ and that you have then there the names of those Reviewers and this Writ Witness c. The return of the same Writ remains in a certain panell to this Writ annexed the answer of L. H. and R. W. Sheriffs The Return of the Writ of Habeas Corpus Jur ' The names of the Reviewers c. and then the names of the Reviewers in the Panell c. and then thus each of the Reviewers aforesaid severally by himself is attached by I. D. and R. R. Note for a Rule Generall that the Inrolment of the Writ of Habeas Corpus ought alwaies to be in the Roll of Pleas and not elsewhere and ought to be enrolled as in the Plea following ss THe Assize came to be Revised whether G. Houghton Middlesex A Declaration in Assize of novell disseisin upon the originall Writ aforesaid March 19. Hen. 7. Roll. 69. One of the Defendants sayes that the Father of his Wife was seised of the Tenements in view put in Fee and dyed and the Defendant entred in right of his Wife and had issue and the Wife dyed and as Tenant by the Law of England hold himself in c. W. H. and R. A. unjustly c. have disseised I. R. and H. L. of their Freehold in H. after the first c. And whereupon the same I. and H. by G. C. their Attorney complain that they have disseised them of one Messuage and 18. Acres of Land with the appurtenances c. and the aforesaid G. H. by T. L. his Attorney comes and answers as Tenant of the Tenants aforesaid and sayes that the Assize thereupon between him and the aforesaid I. H. ought not to be had Because he saith that one W. B. was seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances put in view of the revisement of the Assize aforesaid and in the Plaint aforesaid specified in his Demesn as of Fee and he being thereof seized dyed of such his estate thereof seized after whose death the Tenements aforesaid did discover to one I. the Wife of the aforesaid G. as to the Daughter and Heir of the aforesaid W. B. by which the same G. and I. in right of her the said I. as Daughter and Heir of the aforesaid W. into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances did enter and were thereof seized in their Demesn as of Fee in right of her the said I. And they being so thereof seized the aforesaid G. and I. had issue between them one W. H. and afterwards the aforesaid I. L. in the Parish of St. B. in the Ward of A. London dyed and the aforesaid G. over-lived her and held himself in the aforesaid Tenements with the appurtenances and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Freehold as holding thereof by the Law of the Land of this Kingdom of England And that the aforesaid I. R and H. clayming the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by colour of a certain deed of Demise to them thereupon made for term of their life by the aforesaid W. B. in his life time Whereas nothing of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances into the possession of them the said I. and H. by that Deed ever passed into the Tenements aforesaid entred upon whose said I. and H. their possession thereupon one D. D. in the same Tenements with the appurtenances entred upon whose said D. D. his possession thereupon the aforesaid G. in the same Tenements with the appurtenances did reenter as it was lawfull for him to doe and this c. Whereupon he demands judgement whether the aforesaid I. and H. the Assize aforesaid thereupon against him ought to maintain c. The other Defendants say they made no disseâ—sin And the aforesaid W. H. and R. A. in their proper persons say that they have done no injury nor dissesin to the aforesaid I. R. and H. of the Tenements aforesaid And of this they put themselves upon the Assize And the aforesaid I. R. and H. in like manner Therefore the Assize is to be taken thereupon between them c. The Plantiff says that one was seised of the Tenements and Enfeoffed the Plaintiffs to hold for ever and traverses the dying feised of the Father of the Defendants Wife The Traverse And the aforesaid I. R. and H. say that they by any thing by the aforesaid G. prealleged ought not to be debarred from having the Assize aforesaid against him because they say that one R. A. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid in view c. and in the Plaint c. specified in his Demesn as of Fee And being so thereof seized did Enfee of them the said I. R. and H. To have and to hold to them and their Heirs for ever By vertue of which said Feoffment they the said I. and H. were thereof seized in their Demesn as of Fee untill they the said I. W. and R. A. in the Writ named them the said I.R. and H. of those Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances unjustly c. they disseised Without that that the aforesaid W. B. dyed seized in his Demesn as of Fee of the aforesaid Tenements put in view of the revisement of the Assize aforesaid in the Plaint above specified as the aforesaid G. hath above by pleading alleged And this c. Whereupon he prayes judgment and that the Assize aforesaid may be proceeded in to the taking thereof between them c. Issue taken upon the traverse And the aforesaid G. as formerly saith that the aforesaid W. B. dyed seised in his Demesn as of Fee of the aforesaid Tenements with the appurtenances as he above by pleading hath alleged and of this he puts himself upon the Assize The Assize remains to be taken for want of Reviewers and the aforesaid I. R. and H. in like manner c. Therefore the Assize is to be taken between them c. And the Reviews of the Assize aforesaid being called some of them came and the Assize aforesaid remains to be taken before the Lord the King at Westminster untill Thursday next after the morrow of St. Martyn for want of Reviews c. Therefore the Sheriff is to have them there the bodies of the Reviewers c. And in the mean time c. So that c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. At which day before our Lord the King at VVestminster came as well the aforesaid I.R. and H. as the aforesaid G. by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid VV. H. and R. A. in their proper persons in like manner came and the Reviewers of the Assize aforesaid being called in like manner came who to speak to the truth of the premises being chosen Verdict in Assize for the Plaintiff tryed and sworn say upon their oaths that the aforesaid R. B. dyed not seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the aforesaid I. R. and H. above by pleading
his Reign amongst other things it was ordained and firmly remaineth that aswell the said late King his Heirs and Successors as all and singular such person and persons their Heirs and Assigns who then had or from thence afterwards should have any Monasteries Abbeys Priories Nunneries Colleges Hospitalls Fryer houses or other Ecclesiasticall houses or places Sites Circuits and Precincts of them or any of them or any Mannors Messuages Rectories appropriate Tythes Pensions Portions or other Hereditaments whatsoever they should be which belonged or appertained or which then that is to say at the time of the publishing of that Statute did belong or appertain unto the said Monasteries Abbeys Priories Nunneries Colleges Hospitalls Fryers houses or other Religious and Ecclesiasticall houses or places or unto any of them they should have hold retein keep and enjoy aswell the said Rectories appropriate Tythes Pensions and Portions as the said Monasteries Abbeys Priories Nunneries Colleges Hospitalls Fryer houses and other Religious and Ecclesiasticall houses and places Sites Circuits Precincts Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever they should be and every of them according to their Estates and Titles discharged and acquitted from the payment of Tithes as freely and in as large and ample manner as the said late Abbots Priors Abbesses Prioresses and other Ecclesiasticall Governours and Governesses or any of them had held occupied possessed used reteined or enjoyed the same or any parcell thereof at the dayes of their dissolution suppression renouncing dissertion forfeiture giving up or comming to the Highness of the late King of such Monasteries Abbeys Priories Nunneries Hospitalls Friers houses or other Religious or Ecclesiasticall houses or places or at the day of dissolution suppression renuntiation desertion giving up or comming to the hands of the said late King of any of them by the said Act or any thing in the same conteined to the contrary thereof notwithstanding as by the said Statute among other things more fully it doth and may appear Giving up of the Abbey land by the Abbot unto the King The foresaid late Abbot as well of the said Rectory as of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns from the payment of the said tithes was discharged as afore is said in form aforesaid being seized the said late Abbot the 28. day of January in the said 31. year of the Reign of the said late King H. 8. at Westminster aforesaid by the assent of the said late Monastery then called together by his certain Writing then sealed with the Conventuall Seal of the said late Monasterie and in the Chancery Court of the said late King at Westminster aforesaid then held and being and in due manner inrolled of Record bearing date the same day and year gave granted and gave up unto the said late King H. 8. the said late Monastery and also the said Rectory and the said Tenements called the Demesns with th' appurtenances amongst ather things To have and to hold unto the said late King his Heirs and Successors amongst other things for ever by virtue of which and by force of the said Statute the said late King H. 8. was of that Mannor Rectory and Tenements with th' appurtenances amongst other things seized in his Demesn as of Fee in the right of his Crown of England and so thereof being seized the said Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns and every parcell thereof held and enjoyed and ought to hold and enjoy discharged and acquitted from the payment of any Tithes aforesaid above in this behalf recited of in or upon the said Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns and every or any parcell thereof yearly in manner and form aforesaid above in this behalf alleged in any manner growing happening sheering milking or renewing by pretence of the said Act of the rest of the premisses and the foresaid late King of the same Tenements with th'appurtenance called the Demesns from the payment of the said Tithes in that manner aforesaid discharged in form aforesaid being seized the said late King Intailment made by Letters Patents of the King the 20th day of April in the 34th year of his Reign at Westminster aforesaid by his Letters Patents sealed with his great Seal of England and in due manner made and to the Court of the said now Queen here proffered bearing date the same day and year gave and granted the said Tenements with th'appurtnances called the Demesns unto one E.R. Knight and unto the Lady V. then his Wife To have and to hold to them the said E. and V Form of pleading of a Deed in the tayl and the Heirs males of the body of him the said E. lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the Remainder thereof unto one F. R. Esquire brother of the said E. and to the Heirs males of the body of him the said E. lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the Remainder thereof unto the right Heirs of one R. R. Knight then deceased late Father of the said E. for ever To hold of the said late King his Heirs and Successors in Chief by the Tenth part of one Knights fee As by those Letters Patents amongst other things more plainly it doth and may appear By pretence of which said Letters Patents they the said E. and V. into the same Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns entred and were thereof seized that is to say the said E. in his Demesn as of Fee tayl in form aforesaid and the said V. in her Demesn as of Free-hold for term of her life the Remainder thereof as aforesaid is remaining and the said E. and V. of the same Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns in that manner afore-spoken of being seized they the said E. and V. the same Tenements with th'appurtnances likewise held and enjoyed of and from the payment of the said Tithes before in this behalf alleged in whatsoever manner growing happening sheering milking or renewing By right of increase altogether discharged by pretence of the said Act and of the rest of the Premisses and so thereof being seized the said E. afterwards at B. with N. aforesaid dyed without Issue male of his body lawfully begotten and the said V. him survived and held her self in into the said Tenemenes with th'appurtences called the Demesns and was thereof solely seized in her Demesn as of Freehold for term of her life the remainder thereof in form aforesaid being And the said V. of the same Tenements with th' appurtenances in that manner afore spoken Note whensoever any doth allege land to be discharged from the paying of Tithes and the same land was conveyed from the King to divers persons the Plaintif in Prohibition ought to allege the same lands to be held and discharged by whatsoever persons using the same lands being seized She the said V. likewise held and enjoyed the said Tenements with th' appurtenances altogether discharged of and from the
payment of any the said Tithes above in this behalf specified in or upon the same Tenements with th'appurtenance called the Demesns yearly in manner and form aforesaid before in this behalf alleged in whatsoever manner growing happening comming sheering milking or renewing by pretence of the said Act and of the rest of the Premisses and so thereof being seized she the said V. afterwards at B. with N. aforesaid dyed of her said estate thereof seized after whose death the said F. R. in the said Letters Patents named in the said tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee-tayl that is to say to him and the Heirs males of his body lawfully begotten according to the form of the said Gift and so thereof being seized the same Tenements likewise held and enjoyed from the payment of any Tithes aforesaid above in this behalf specified in or upon the same Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns yearly in manner and form aforesaid above in this behalf alleged in whatsoever manner growing happening comming sheering milking or renewing altogether discharged by pretence of the said Act and of the rest of the Premisses and so thereof being seized the said F. afterwards at B. with N. dyed of the said estate thereof seized after whose death the same Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns according to the form of the said Gift descended unto one V. R. Esqiure as Son and Heir male of the said F. R. in the Letters Patents as it is aforespoken mentioned by virtue of which the said V. R. into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee-tayl according to the form of the said Gift And so thereof being seized the same Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns likewise held and enjoyed from the payment of any of the said Tithes above specified in and upon the same Tenements with th'appurtenance called the Demesns yearly in manner and form aforesaid above in this behalf alleged in whatsoever manner growing happening coming sheering milking or renewing altogether discharged by pretence of the said Act and the rest of the Premisses and so thereof being seized the said V. R. the first day of May in the 21. year of the Reign of the said now Queen at B. with N. at B. with N. aforesaid Lease for years demised the said Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns unto the said V. R. the now Plaintif to have and occupy to him and his Assigns from the Feast c. then last past untill the end and term of 21. years from thence next ensuing and fully to be compleat and ended by virtue of which said Demise the said V. R. the now Plaintif into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances entred and was and as yet is thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the same Tenements with th' appurtenances unto him as aforesaid Demised had and occupied and as yet hath and doth occupy and should and ought to have and occupy from the payment of any the said Tithes above in this behalf specified in or upon the said Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns yearly in manner and form aforesaid above in this behalf alleged in whatsoever manner growing happening coming sheering milking or renewing discharged by pretence of the said Act and of the rest of the Premisses And whereas farther by the Statute in Parliament held at Westminster aforesaid the fourth day of November Statute of 2. Ed. 6. that no person should sue for the payment of Tiths where c. in the second year of the Reign of the Lord Edward the sixt King of England among other things it remaineth enacted by Authority of that Parliament that no person should be sued or otherwise compelled to render give or pay any Tithes for any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments which by the Lawes and Statutes of this Kingdom of England or by any Privilege or Prescription were not chargeable with the payment of any such Tithes or which were discharged by any open Composition as by that Act amongst other things more fully it doth and may appear And whereas also the said Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns and every part and parcell thereof from the whole time abovesaid of which the memory c. hitherto hath been and every part and parcell thereof was by the Lawes and Statutes of this Kingdom of England altogether discharged and acquitted of and from the payment of any the said Tithes above in this behalf recited of in or upon the same Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns and of in or upon every or any parcell thereof in whatsoever manner by the whole time aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid before in this behalf alleged growing happening coming sheering milking or renewing And whereas also the Cognizance of such like Causes or Businesses and the Pleas of the same of Tithes against the form of the said Act and Statute desired in such Case Cognizance of a Plea in Prohibition in no manner do pertain to the Ecclesiasticall Court Notwithstanding which the said Defendant not being ignorant of the premisses Imagining unjustly to grieve oppress and weary the said V. the now Plaintif against the due form of the Lawes of this Kingdom of England and against the form and effect of the said Acts and Statutes and also against the said now Queen and her Regall Crown and it doth not belong to the Court Christian to another Tryall in the Court Christian to draw the said V. the now late Plaintif in the Court Christian before the Worshipfull and learned Master Bartholmew Clark Addition of the Judge of the Arches of London Doctor of Law lawfull Deputy Officiall of the Court of Canterbury of the Arches of London of and for the substraction and not payment of the Tithes following That is to say of the Tithes of Wheat of Marsklyn of Barley of Oats Beans Tares of Hay and Wood in the year of our Lord 1589. now comming and also four other years the next preceding of the said years and moneths in the same concurring whatsoever more one than another of in or upon the said Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns growing happening and comming by the said V. the now Plaintif in those years of the Lord had and received And of and for the Substraction and not payment of Tithe of Calves Milk and Piggs in those years of the Lord falling milked brought forth and happening of Cowes and Sows of him the said V. now the Plaintif in and upon the same Tenements with th' appurtenances called the Demesns in those years of our Lord pasturing feeding and lying And of and for the Substraction and not payment of the Tithe of Wooll in those years of our Lord shorn of the sheep of him the said V. the now Plaintif in and upon the Tenements called the same Demesns with th'
the said Tenements with th' appurtenances intruded himself and by that intrusion was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised made the foresaid Demise unto the said J. A. in form aforesaid And the said T. A. afterwards dyed without Heir of his body begotten after whose death the right of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances descended unto one E. then the Wife of him the said I. A. as Sister and Heir of him the said T. him the said I. A. being then possessed of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances by vertue of the sayd Demise And the said I. and E. immediately after the death of the said T. claimed the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in the right of her the said E. And the said I. A. further saith that at the said time the said T. was nothing in arrear of the said Lease unto the said R. And this he is ready to prove whereof from which the said R. before acknowledging the taking of the said Cattell prayeth Judgement and his Damages by that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant saith that true it is that N. was seized c. and thereof infeoffed him the Defendant and one R. C. who afterwards dyed by pretence of which the Defendant was alone scized by right of Incroachment and after that made a Demise c. Right of Encroachment without this ss AND the said R. R. saith that well and true it is that the said N. was seized of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof seized thereof infeoffed him the said R. and one R. C. to have to them and their Heirs for ever by vertue of which said Feoffment they the said R. and R. were thereof seized in their Demesn as of Fee and the said R. C. afterward dyed of such estate thereof seized And the said R. above joyned himself and of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances was alone seized in his Demesn as of Fee by right of Incroachment and so thereof seized the said Demise unto the foresaid I. A. in form aforesaid made in which form the said R. the said R. by his said Avouchment before supposeth without this that the said R. into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances after the death of the said N. intruded himself in which form the said A. before in pleading hath alleged And this he is ready to prove whereupon as formerly he prayeth Judgement and the retorn of the said Cattell to be adjudged unto him c. ss AND the said I. A. saith Issue upon Intrusion c. that the said R. into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances after the death of the said N. intruded himself in what form the said above in pleading hath alleged And this he prayeth may be inquired of c. ss AND the said R.R. and T. G. by W. H. their Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when Defendant as Servant acknowledgeth the taking of the Cattell and parcell of the Rent so in arrear by the name of Distresse Par. 18. H. 7. ro ' lxxv c. all Caption and whatsoever And saith that the said A. T. his said Action against them ought not to maintain because he saith that one G. B. long before the said time in which c. was seized of a certain Tenement with th' appurtenances heretofore of I. H. in the said Parish whereof the said place in which c. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell in his Demesn as of Fee And saith that one E. Prior of the Church of St. George of Cambridge and all his Predecessors Priors of that Monastery from time out of mind were seized of a certain annuall Rent of two shillings four pence issuing out of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances whereof the said place in which c. is and then was parcell in his Demesn as of Fee as in right of that Monastery at the Feasts of St. Michael the Arch-Angel and of the Annuntiation of the blessed Virgin Mary to be paid by equall portions and that the said Prior and all his Successors from the said time out of mind Prescription pleaded to distrein for Rent used to distrein for the said Rent of 2. shillings four pence as often as at any Feast of the said Feasts it was in arrear in part or in the whole not paid upon the said Tenements with th' appurtenances whereof the said place in which c. is and then was parcell and the Distresses so there taken to lead drive and in possession to keep them untill full satisfaction should be unto him of the said annuall Rent and the Arrerages of the same if any were And further that they the said R. and T. say that for 23. shillings 4. pence being behind for ten years parcell of 6. pounds 6. shillings 8. pence being behind at the Feast of St Michnel in the 18th year of the Reign of the now King for 40. years next before the said Feast the said R. and T. as Servants of him the said now Prior and by his Command at the said time in which Inquire if it should not be whereupon he prayeth Judgment and the return of the said Cattell c. c. doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. by the name of Distresse and the said 23. shillings 4. pence so being behind as it was lawfull for them And this he is ready to prove as c. whereupon he prayeth Judgement if the said Agnes her foresaid action thereupon against him ought to have or maintain c. Plaintif allegeth a demise made to him by one S. and prayeth Aid of the said S. ss AND the aforesaid A.T. saith that she by any matter before alleged from her said action had ought not to be precluded because she saith that one S. W. before the said time in which c. was seised of the said tenements with th' appurtenances whereof the said place in which c. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell in his demesn as of fee and he so thereof seised long before the said time that is to say in the feast of St. Michael the Archangell in the 12 year of the reign of the said Lord the now King at W. in the said County demised the said tenements with th' appurtenances Prayer of Aid Note that in the Voucher the defendant may pray Aid before Issue joyned but in other action doth not pray Aid unless after Issue joyned whereof the said place in which c. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell unto the foresaid A. to have and occupy to him and his Assignes from the said feast of St. Michael untill the end of the Term of five year from thence next following fully to be compleat by vertue of which said demise she the said
I. N. by pretence of the said Demise unto him made put the said Cattell there to feed Upon which the said R. S. of L. and T. then upon and in those Closes being the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others those Cattell then that is to say at the said time in which c. they took and deteyned and the Ewe-sheep as yet they unjustly detein of which said taking and deteyning the said I. N. hath now brought his said Action thereupon against them And this he is ready to prove whereupon he prayeth Judgement and his Damages by that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant maintains his Plea without this they disseized the other Plaintif And they the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others say that the said Closes at the said time in which c. was the ground and Freehold of the said R. S. of L. and T. and that the said Cattel at the same time were in those Closes c. feeding and there doing Damage by which they the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others as Bayliffs of the said R. S. of L. and T. those Cattell at the said time in which c. they took and deteyned as unto them it was lawfull as they before have alleged Without this that the said R. S. of L. and T. have disseised the said W. H. of the said Close Without this with th' appurtenances as the said I. N. before hath alleged And this they are ready to prove whereupon as before they pray Judgement c. and for the said R. S. of L. and T. the retorn of the said Oxen Steers Calf Heifer and living goods to be adjudged unto him to be adjudged unto her c. And the said I. N. saith that the said R. S. of L. and T. have Disseised the said W. T. of the said Closes with th' appurtenances in manner and form as he before hath alleged And this he prayeth that it may be inquired of by the Countrey c. ss AND they the said R. A. and W. D. by A. B. their Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and wrong when One of the Defendants avoweth and the other Justifies as Servant for rent-charge behind c. all taking and whatsoever c. And the same R. doth well arow and the said W. D. doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. And justly c. because he saith that the said R. G. Gent. long before the said time in which c. was seized of one Tenement and C. acres of land in C. whereof the place in which c. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell in his Demesn as of Fee and he so thereof seized long before the said time in which c. by his certain Deed which the said R. here in Court profereth whose Date is the fourth day of the month of July in the nineteenth year of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the Fourth To have hold and receive that annuall Rent unto the said R. and his Assigns at the Term of his life of and in the said Lands and Tenements with th' appurtenances every year at the Feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell the Birth of our Lord Easter and the Nativity of St. John the Baptist equally to be paid And the said R. A. further saith that the said R. G. by his said writing further granted that if it should happen the said yearly Rent to be behind in part or in all by one moneth next after any Feast of the said Feasts in which it ought to be paid unto the said R. A. or his Assigns unpaid that then it should be lawfull unto the said R. A. and his Assigns into all the said Lands and Tenements and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances to enter and distrein and the Distresse so there taken to lead carry away impound and in Pound to keep untill to him of that annuall Rent so being behind together with the Costs and Charges if any should be were fully satisfied and paid And for twenty six shillings eight pence being behind at the end of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist next before the said time in which c. the said R. A. doth well avow and the said W. D. as Servant of the said R. A. and by his Command at the said time in which c. doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. by the name of Distresse for 26. shillings and 8. pence so being behind as in the Lands and Tenements unto the Distresse of him the said R. A. with the said yearly Rent in form aforesaid charged as to them were lawfull And this c. whereupon c. And the said I. not acknowledging any the matrers by the said R. A. and W. D. before alleged to be true saith that the said R. G. long before the said time in which c. was seized of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and he so thereof seized long before the said time that is to say the first day of October in the fourteenth year of the Reign of the said now king at A. in C. aforesaid demised those Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the said I. H. to have and occupy to him and his Assignes from the feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell then last past untill the end and Term of seven years then next following and fully to be compleated by virtue of which Demise the said I. H. long before the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so the same I. saith that she hath nothing in the said Tenements with th' appurtenances unles at the Term of the said seven years in forme aforesaid thereupon after that term compleated belonging unto the said R.G. his heirs and Assignes without which said R. G. the same I. H. saith that she cannot answear to the said Plea of the said R. A. and W. D. And prayeth Aid of him the said R. G. and she hath Aid prayed c. Therefore the said R. H. is summoned that he before the Lord the King from the day of Easter in Eight weeks wheresoever c. to answer to the said Plea of the said R. A. and W. D. together with the said R. H. if c. the same day is given to the said parties c. At which day before the said King at Westminster cometh aswell the said I. H. as the said R. A. and W. D. by their said Attorney being summoned c. by A. B. his Attorney likewise cometh and joyneth himself with the aforesaid I. H. to avow and acknowledge the said c. and aswell the same I. as the said R. G. who joyneth himself c. Say that the said R. A. the taking of the said
Freehold of him the said I. he did break and enter and the said R. from the possession of the said House expelled and amoved and him the said R. from the possession thereof by the time aforesaid withheld and kept as to him it was lawfull And this c. whereupon c. ss AND the said R. B. saith that he by any thing Replication c. ought not to be precluded because he saith that the said House in which the Trespass aforesaid was done is and at the time in which c. was the ground and Freehold of him the said R. and not the ground and Freehold of him the said I. in manner and form as the said T. above in pleading hath alleged and this he prayeth may be enquired c. Defendant pleads to part property in himself and to the residue that he did not take ss AND the said G. and E. by I. B. his Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and Injury when c. and prayeth Judgement of the said Writ because as to the taking and detention of three of the Topsail of the Tapestry and other things c of the aforesaid goods and chattells in the said Declaration above specified parcell they the said G. and E. say that the property of the same goods and chattells parcell c. at the said time of the taking aforesaid above supposed to be done was in them the said G. and E. and not in the said I. in manner and form as the said T. himself doth now Complain and this c. whereupon he prayeth c. and that the said Declaration as to the taking and deteining of the said goods and chattels parcell may be made void c. and as to the residue of the goods and chatteâ—ls in the said Declaration above specified they the said G. and E. say that they did not take those goods and chattells residue c. in manner and form as the said T. above in his Declaring hath all god And of this he putteth himself upon the Countrey and the said T. likewise c. Replication for other parcell ss AND the said T. saith that the Declaration aforesaid as to the taking and deteining of the said goods and chattells parcell c. by any matters by the said G. and E. above by pleading hath alleged ought not to be made void because he saith that the property of the said goods and chattells parcell c. at the said time of the said Caption done was in the said T. and not in them the said G. and E. in manner and form as they the said G. and E. above in pleading have alleged And this he prayeth c. and the said c. likewise therefore as to the Tryall of that Issuâ— as the aforesaid other Issues between the said parties above likewise joyned Cometh thereupon the Jury c. and upon this the Plaintif findeth Pledges to deliveâ— the goods and chattells of the Defendant c. Defendant just fiâ—th as Tenant of the Plaintif by Copy of Court Roll of the Mannor of Foaley ss AND the said Defendant by I. S. his Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and injury when c. and as to the comming with force and arms c. not guilty and as to the rest of the Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done the said Defendant â—aith that the said Plaintif ought not to have an action because he saith that the Close and house aforesaid and also the places in which the Trespass aforesaid is supposed to be done are and at the time of the said Trespass above supposed to be done were one Messuage and two acres of Land with th' appurtenances in Foxley aforesaid which said Messuage and two acres of Land with th' appurtenances at the time of the said Trespass above supposed to be done and also from the time of the Memory of man were parcell of the Mannor of Foxley of which said Mannor with th' appurtenances aforesaid which is and at the said time in which c. and also long before the said time in which c. was seized in his Demesn as of Fee and that the same Messuage and two acres of Land with th' appurtenances are and by all the said time were and are Customary Land and from the whole time aforesaid of which the Memory of men is not to the contrary were Demised and Demiseable by Copy of Court-Roll of the Mannor aforesaid by the Lord of that Mannor or his Steward of that Mannor for the time being unto whatsoever person or persons would be willing to take the same in Fee-simple Fee-tayl at Term of life or of years at the will of the Lord according to the Custome of the said Mannor and the said Plaintif of the said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. as aforesaid being seized the said Plaintif before the time aforesaid in which c. that is to say the twelfth day in the thirty sixt year of the Reign of H. 8. late King of England at F. aforesaid at the Court of that Mannor then there held at the said Mannor by one I. W. then his Steward there by Copy of Court Rolls of that Mannor granted the Tenements aforesaid with th' appurtenances in which c. the said Defendant to have to himself and his Heirs for ever To hold of the said Plaintif by a Rod at the Will of the Lord of that Mannor by the Rent and Service thereupon due and accustomed by virtue of which Grant the said Defendant into those Tenements with th' appurtenances in which c. before the foresaid time in which c. he entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee at the Will of the Lord of the said Mannor according to the Custome of the said Mannor and he the Defendant being so thereof seized the said Defendant the foresaid time in which c. the Close and House aforesaid with th' appurtenances in which c. as the proper Close and House of him the Defendant did break and enter and the aforesaid Oak in and upon the said two acres of Land then growing as the proper Oak of him the Defendant did cut down and carry away as to him it was lawfull and this c. whereof c. ss AND the said Plaintif saith Plaintif confesseth the Defendant to be his tenant by Copy of Court Roll but saith that the same Defendant forfeited his estate to him by doing waâ—â— in cutting down an Oak of the age of ten years that he ought not to be precluded because he saith that well and true it is that he the said Plaintif is and at the time of the said Trespas done and long before was seized of the Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. in his Demesn as of Fee and that the aforesaid Messuage and two acres of Land with th' appurtenances are and at the foresaid time in which c. and also from the time of the memory c.
were the customary Lands and parcell of the Mannor aforesaid and Demised and Demiseable by the Lord of that Mannor and by the Steward of the Court of the same Mannor for the time being to whatsoever person or persons were willing to take the same in Fee-simple Fee-tayl for term of life or years or otherwise at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor aforesaid and that he the said Plaintif of the Mannor aforesaid with th' appurtenances whereof c. so being seized before the said time of the foresaid Trespass done at his the said Court of the Plaintif of his said Mannor holden the said twelfth day of October in the thirty fift year abovesaid by the aforesaid I. W. at that time his Steward of his Mannor aforesaid granted the aforesaid Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the foresaid Defendant to have and to hold to the said Defendant and his Heirs by a Rod at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor by vertue of which said Grant the said Defendant into the aforesaid Tenements with th' appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor in manner and form as the said Defendant above in pleading hath alleged And that the said Defendant being so thereof seized before the time of the said Trespass done that is to say the tenth day of November in the first and second year of the Reign of the now Lord the King and the now Lady the Queen made waste in the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in felling and cutting down one Oak of the age of Ten years and more and by Destroying the branches of the stem of the same Oak thereout growing with his Cattell under pretence of which the said Plaintif before the said time in which the said Trespass was done into the Tenements aforesaid with th' appurtenances in which c. entred as into the Tenements unto him the Plaintif by the said Defendant forfeited and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee untill the said Defendant the said first day of October in the second and third year abovesaid with force and arms c. the Close and House aforesaid at F. aforesaid brake and the aforesaid Oak to the value c. there lately growing cut down and carried away against the peace of the said now King and Queen as he above against him complaineth and this he is ready to prove whereof from which the said Defendant the said Trespass aforesaid above acknowledging the said Plaintif prayeth Judgement and his Damages by reason of that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant pleads the Custome of the Mannor to give the customary Tenants liberty to cut down Trees growing upon their Tenements ss AND the said Defendant by Protestation not acknowledging any matters in the said Replication above to be true for Plea saith that within the Mannor aforesaid it hath from the time of which the memory of men is not to the contrary it had such a Custom that is to say that every Costomary Tenant of the Mannor aforesaid who held any Customary Tenements within that Mannor unto him and his heirs at the Will of the Lord of the Mannor by Copy of Court-Roll of that Mannor according to the Custome of the same Mannor could and might cut down whatsoever Trees and Wood growing in or upon the Customary Tenements without forfeiture of such Customary Tenements unto the Lord of that Mannor for the time being for such waste by which the said Defendant being seized of the Tenements aforesaid with th' appurtenances in which c. in his Demesn as of Fee at the will of the Lord of the said Mannor that Oak the said first day of October in the years of the Reign of the now King and Queen the second and third abovesaid then and there growing did cut down as to him it was lawfull and this he is ready to prove whereof as before he prayeth Judgement and that the said Plaintif from his action aforesaid against him the Defendant had may be precluded c. ss AND the said Plaintif as formerly he saith Plaintif maintains the Replication without this that there is such a Custom as the Defendant in his Rejoynder allegeth c. that he the said Plaintif is and at the time of the said Trespass done and long before was seized of the said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. in his Demesn as of Fee and that the said Messuage and two acres of Land with th' appurtenances are and at the time in which c. and also from the time c. were Customary Lands and parcell of the said Mannor and Demiseable and demised by the Lord of that Mannor and by the Steward of the Court of the same Mannor for the time being unto whatsoever person or persons is or are willing to take them in Fee-simple Fee-tayl for term of life or years or otherwise at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor And that the Plaintif of the said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. before the said time of the said Trespass done that is to say at the said Court of him the Plaintif of his said Mannor holden the twelfth day of October in the thirty fift year abovesaid by the aforesaid I. W. then his Steward of his said Mannor granted the said Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the foresaid Defendant to have and to hold unto the said Defendant and his Heirs by a rod at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor by vertue of which said grant the said Defendant into the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor in manner and form as the said Defendant above in pleading hath alleleged and that the said Defendant so being thereof seized before the said time of the said Trespass done that is to say the tenth day of November in the years 1. 2. abovesaid he made waste in the same Tenements with th' appurtenances that is to say in cutting and felling down one Oak of the age of ten years and more by destroying the branches of the stem of the same Oak thenceforth growing with his Cattell under pretence of which before the said time in which the said Trespass was done into the Tenements aforesaid with th' appurtenances in which c. he entred as into the Tenements unto him the Plaintif by the said Defendant forfeited and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee untill the said Defendant the said first day of October in the years second and third abovesaid with force and arms c. the said Close and House at Foxley aforesaid did break and the Oak aforesaid to the value c. there lately growing
the same Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the said Defendant to have unto the said Defendant from the same Feast of Saint Michael to the end of the Term of four years from thence next following and fully to be Compleated By vertue of which said Demise the said John was of the said Tenements possessed And the said Plaintif claimed the said Tenements with th' appurtenances by Colour of a certain Deed of Demise unto him thereof made for Term of his life by the said Thomasine Colour before the said Demise unto the said Defendant in form aforesaid made where nothing of those Tenements with th' appurtenances in the possession of them the Plaintifs by that Deed ever passed into the said Tenements before the said time in which c. they entred upon which said possession of the Plaintifs thereupon the said Defendant into the said Tenements in which c. at the same time in which c. claiming his said Term re-entred and the said Close in the same Tenements in N. did break and the grass upon the same Tenements then growing with the said Cattell did eat up and tread down as to him it was lawfull And this c. Whereupon c. And they the said Plaintifs say Plaintif allegeth a certain Conveyance unto him by the said T. Chelyn made for and in consideration of a certain Marriage that they by any matter before alleged from his said Action against him the said Defendant had ought not to be precluded because they say because that long before the said Trespass done the said T. Chelyn was seized of the said thirty acres of Land in N. aforesaid and of the hundred and thirty acres of wood with th' appurtenances in D. and N. aforesaid called the Mannor of Sholand in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof seized long before the said Trespass done that is to say the sixt day of July in the Third year of the Reign of the said now King at Lynsted in the said County between the said T. C. and one William Morgan the then Son and Heir apparent of the said Thomasine and A. Hett it was agreed and covenanted that the said W. Morgan should take to VVife and marry the said A. and the said A. should take to Husband the said W. Morgan and the same Thomasine for Matrimony between them to be solemnized then and there covenanted and granted unto the said W. M. and Alice that they from the day of Matrimony between them to be solemnized should have and hold unto them and their Assigns for Term of their and either of their life as long as they live the said Tenements in D. and N. aforesaid and that the same Thomasine and all and singular other persons which then were or then afterward should be seized of and in those Tenements should stand and be thereof seized immediatly after the Matrimony between the said W. M. and Alice solemnized to the use of them the said W. M. and Alice to the Term of their or either of their life so long as they live and after the death of them the said W. and A. to the use of the said T. C. and her heirs and that the same Thomasine should make or procure to be made all and singular the said Tenements to be secured unto the said W. M. and Alice according to the form of the said Concord and Agreement when she should be thereunto requested And the said Plaintifs say that after the said Concord and Agreement in form aforesaid made that is to say the twenty sixth day of the said Moneth of July in the third year aforesaid the said Alice at Hern in the said County of Kent took to Husband the said W.M. and he took to wife the said Alice that the Matrimony solemnized and celebrated between them was according to the form and effect of the said Concord and agreement by and after which said Matrimony solemnized and consummated the said Thomasine was of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in her Demesn as of Fee seized to the use of the said W.M. and Alice for the Term of their and either of their life so long as they live and she so therof being seized the said VV. M. and A. according to the form of the said Concord and Agreement the issues and profits of the said Tenements by the Sufferance of the said Thomasine from the said 26. day of July in the third year abovesaid until the 15. day of July the said W. M. at Feversham in the said County of Kent dyed and the said Alice him survived by which the said Thomasine was of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances seized in her Demesn as of Fee to the use of the said Alice for the term of her life and she the said Thomasine so thereof to that use being seized the said Alice after the death of the said VV. M. and long before the said Trespass done into the said Tenements entred and those Tenements with th' appurtenances afterwards that is to say in the day of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist in the twelfth year aforesaid an Hern aforesaid the said Plaintifs demised To have to them and their Assigns from the same day untill the end and Term of three years from thence next following and fully to be compleat by vertue of which Demise the said Plaintifs were of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances possessed untill the said Defendant at the time of the said Trespass done the said Close did break and the said grass in that Close then growing with the said Cattell did eat up tread down and consume in manner and form as they the said Plaintifs by their said Bill before against him doe Complain All and singular which matters they the said Plaintifs are ready to prove whereupon from what the said Defendant the said Trespass in N. aforesaid before hath acknowledged pray Judgement and their said Damages by occasion of the said Trespass to be adjudged unto them c. And the said Defendant protesting that it was not consented Protestation agreedâ— and covenanted between the said Thomsine and the said W.M. and Alice that the said VV. M. should take to VVise the said A. H. protesting also that the said Thomasine for the Matrimony between the said W. M. and A. to be solemnized did not Covenant nor grant to and with the said W. M. and Alice that they from the day of Marriage to be solemnized between them they should have and hold to them and their Assigns for the Term of their and either of their life so long as they live the said Tenements nor that the same Thomasine and all and singular other persons which were or then afterwards should be seized of and in those Tenements should stand and be thereof seized after the Matrimony between them the said W. M. and A. solemnized to the use of them the said W.M. and A. for the Term of their and either of their life
own Horse possessed And afterwards and before the said time in which c. that is to say the 24. day of July in the 20. year of the Reign of the said now King the said Horse by certain Malefactors unto the said R. unknown out of the possession of him the sayd R. feloniously was taken and led away and afterward the said Horse came to the possession of him the said I. And because the said R. at the same time in which c. found the same Horse in the possession of him the said I. the same R. the said Horse of him the said R's own out of the possession of him the said I. did take and lead away as to him it was lawfull And this c. Whereupon c. The Plaintif saith that one I. R. being of the said Horse possessed at B. in the Fair there sold that Horse that he paid unto the Bailiff of the Fair toll c. Protestation And the said I. saith that he by any matter before alleged c. ought not to be precluded c. because protesting that the said Horse was never the Horse of the said R. as the said R. in his said barre before hath alleged for a Plea notwithstanding the said I. saith that before the said time of the said Trespass done the said I. R. was possessed of the said Horse and so possessed in the Feast day of the Body of Christ in the 21. year of the Reign of the said now King abovesaid at Canbury in the County of Oxon ' in a certain Fair or Market there then held did bargain and sell unto the said I. W. the said Horse for the sum of 31. shillings six pence of lawfull c. which the said I. W. then and there unto the said I. R. paid And further the said I. W. saith that he then and there paid unto one R. C. the then Bailiff of the said Fair one penny by the name of Toll for the said Horse by which the said W. was of the same Horse possessed untill the said R. W. the day and year in the Declaration of him the said I. W. before specified at W. aforesaid in the County aforesaid the same Horse with force and arms aforesaid did take and lead away in manner and form as the said I. W. in his said Declaration before against the said R. W. doth Complain And this c. Whereupon from what the said R. the said Trespass before hath acknowledged to have done he prayeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. The Defendant saith that I. R. did not sell unto the Plaintif in the Fair nor the Plaintif paid the Tol. Without this And the said R. W. as before saith that before the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done the same R. W. of the said Horse as of his own Horse was possessed untill the same Horse by the said Malefactors unto the said R. unknown out of the possession of him the said R. feloniously was taken and led away as the said R. in his Bar before hath alleged Without this that the said I. R. did bargain and sell unto the said I. W. the said Horse in the Market or Fair aforesaid Nor the same I. W. unto the aforesaid R. C. the then Bailiff of the said Fair one penny in the name of Toll for the said Horse did pay as the said I. in his Replication before hath alleged And this c. whereupon he prayeth Judgement and that the said I. W. from his said Action against him the said R. had may be precluded c. And the said I. W. saith that the said I. R. did bargain and sell unto the said I. W. the said Horse in the said Market and unto the said R. C. the then Bailiff of the said Fair one penny by the name of Toll for the said Horse did pay as the same I. in his Replication before hath alleged Ven ' fac ' to the Sheriff of Oxoâ— And this he prayeth that it may be enquired of the Countrey And the said R. likewise c. Therefore Command is to the Sheriff of Oxon. that he cause to come before the Lord the King at Westminster the day c. twelve c. of the Visn of B. in the said County of Oxon. by whom c. and who neither c. To Recognize c. Because aswell c. The same day is given to the said parties there c. ss AND the said I. M. by R. M. his Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and wrong when Staff Justific ' in Trespass for that that the Tenements in which c. were Customar ' c. and as to the Comming with force and arms c. Not guilty And as to the residue of the said Trespass before supposed to be done the same I. M. saith that the said I. S. No action because he saith that the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in the said Declaration before specified are and from the time whose contrary c. were Customary Tenements and Lands and parcell of the Mannor of Harnedesworth with th' appurtenances in the County aforesaid of which said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. long before the said time in which the said Trespass is supposed to done one T. late Earl of Ormond was seized in his Demesn as of Fee and that the same Tenements with th' appurtenances are and from all the time aforesaid were Demised and demiseable by Copy of Court-Roll of the said Mannor by the Steward of the said Court of that Mannor for the time being unto any person or persons willing to take the same in Fee-simple Fee-tail to Term of life or years or otherwise at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor and him the said Earl of the said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. so as before is said being seized the same Earl afterwards and before the said time in which c. that is to say at the Court of him the said Earl of his said Mannor held at that Mannor the tenth day of October in the twentieth year of the Reign of the said now King of England the seventh after the Conquest by one W. H. the then Steward of him the said Earl of the said Mannor according to the Custom of the said Mannor Demised by Copy of Court-Roll the said Tenements with th' appurtenances amongst other things by the names of one Messuage By names and a certain parcell of Land unto the aforesaid Tenement with th' appurtenances belonging unto one R. M. To have and to hold unto him and his heirs for ever according to the Custom of the said Mannor by vertue of which said Demise the same R. was of those Tenements with th' appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Fee according to the Custom of the said Mannor And he the said R. of those Tenements with th' appurtenances
Trespasse done into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in which c. entred And the said T. and J. of those Tenements with the Appurtenances in which c. wholly expelled and amoved by which the said C. was thereof possessed untill the said T. and J. at the said time in which c. with Force and Armes aforesaid the Close of him the said C. in the said place in which c. did breake and his said Grasse there then growing with the said Cattell did eat up tread and consume and the said Ground there with a Plow did rip up and also his said Wood there then growing they did cut down and carry away against the Peace c. in manner and form as the same C. before against them himselfe now complaineth And this c. whereupon from which the said T. and J. the said Trespasse before acknowledging the same C. prayeth Judgment and his said Damages by occasion of that Trespasse unto him to be adjudged c. AND they the said T. and J. say that they the said T. and J. by the said space of one yeare that is to say from the said two and twentieth day of Aprill in the fourth yeare of the said Reigne of the said now King above said untill the said foure and twentieth day of Aprill in the fifth yeare of the Reigne of the said now King aforesaid did inhabit within the said Mannor of B. and not without in manner and form as the said C. before in replying hath alledged and this c. Whereupon as before he praieth Judgment and that the said C. from his said Action thereupon against them had may be procluded c. AND the said C. as before saith that the said T. and J. by the space of one yeare and a day that is to say from the said two and twentieth day of Aprill in the fourth yeare of the Reigne of the said now King untill the foure and twentieth day of Aprill in the fifth yeare of the Reigne of the said now King did inhabit without the said Mannor of B. that is to say at C. aforesaid and within the Mannor of the said C. in manner and form as the same C. before in replying hath alledged And this he prayeth that it may be inquired of by the Country c. WILLIAM Attersale Kent Declaration upon the Statute of the eighth year of H. 6. of forcible entryes by Deeds complaineth of John Fuller and M. his wife and VV. Parker in the custody of the Marshall c. Of a Plea wherefore whereas in a Statute in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the sixth after the Conquest at VVestminster in the eight yeare of his Reigne held established amongst other things it should be continued that if any person of any Lands or Tenements with main strength be expulsed and disseised or peaceably is put out and afterward is held out with force or any Feoflment or discontinuance thereof after such entry for the Right of the Possessor to defraud and take away in any manner is made the party in this behalfe grieved may have against such disseisor an Assise of new disseisin or a writ of Trespasse and if the party grieved by Assise or by Action of Trespasse shall recover and by Verdict or in other manner by due form of Law it shall be found that the party Defendant in the Lands and Tenements was by force of entry or after his entry should hold by force the Plaintiff shall recover his treble Damages against the Defendant And further shall make Fine and Redemption as in the same Statute more fully is contained Notwithstanding they the said J. M. and W. P. the said Statute little weighing and the Penalty in the same little fearing the first day of October in the sixth yeare of the now King Edward the sixth into two parts of one Messuage and twelve Acres of Land with the Appurtenances of him the said VV. A. in J. in the County aforesaid with main force that is to say with Swords Staves Clubs Bowes and Arrowes they entred and the said VV. A. with main force expulsed and disseised and him so expulsed and disseised of the same two parts of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances with the said main force withheld and as yet doth withhold from the same to the contempt of the said now King and to the Damage of him the said W. A. 20 l. and against the form of the said Statute and against the Peace of the Lord the now King And thereupon he bringeth his Suit c. Defendant iustifies by vertue of a certain demise unto them at will by one made his own Right the rest as his Servants peaceably and quietly entry into the Tenements c. AND they the said J. F. M. and W. P. by I.C. their Attorney come and defend the force and wrong when c. all Contempts and whatsoever c. And say that long before the said Entry into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances before supposed to be done one I. G. was seized of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and him the said I. G. so being thereof seized the same I. G. afterward and before the said time in which c. that is to say the eighth and twentieth day of October in the yeare of the Lord 1541. at I. aforesaid made his last Will and by the same Will that I. then his Wife should have the said Tenements with the Appurtenances to the Tearm of the life of her the said J. so that after the Discease of her the said J. have those Tenements with the Appurtenances should remain unto one J. K. and his Heires for ever And afterwards and before the said time in which c. the said J. at I. aforesaid died after the death of which said J. G. by vertue of the said last Will the same J. into the Tenements with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesne as of Free-hold and she the said J. so thereof being seized the same J. long before the said time in which c. that is to say the twentieth day of September in the sixth yeare of the Reigne of the now Lord King Edward the sixth at J. aforesaid demized the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the said J. F. one of the aforesaid Defendants to have and to hold those Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the said J. F. his Executors and Assignes from the Feast of Saint Michaell the Arch-angell Lease at will from thence next following and fully to be compleat and so from yeare to yeare as long as both parties should please By vertue of which said Demise the same J. F. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances entred Colour by demise and was thereof possessed and the said W. A. claiming the said Tenements with the Appurtenances by colour of which Deed of Demise unto him thereof made by the said
J. G. in his life for tearm of his life where nothing of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances into the Possession of him the said W. A. by that Deed ever passed into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances entred Upon the Possession of which said W. A. thereupon the said J. F. in his proper Right claiming his said Tearme and the said M. and W. P. as Servants of him the said J. F. and by his command at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances peaceably and quietly now have entred Verification of a Lease for anothers life as unto them it was lawfull without this that they the said J. F. M. and W.P. will prove that the said J. have in her full life remaineth that is to say at T. in the County aforesaid without this that they the said I. F.M. and W. P Traverse to the Delaration upon the Statute of forcible entry that it was not with force against the form of the Statute c. Plaintiff faith that certaine strangers were seized c. and so seived by fine acknowledged before the Justices of the said Lord the Kings Bench acknowledged the Tenements to be of his the plaintifs by pretence of which the Plaintiff entred and was thereof seized c. untill c. Fine acknowledged of the moiety of a messuage c. Conveyance of a Title by fine at the said time in which c. into the said tenements with the appurtenances with Force and armes aforesaid entred against the form of the said statute in manner and form as the said W. A. before against them complaineth and this c whereupon they pray Judgement if an Action c ANd the said W. A. saith that he by any matter by the said I. F. M. and W.P. c. not to he precluded c. because he saith that long before the said time of the said entry made one I.H. and I. his wife and T. C. and B. his wife were of the moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances seized in their Demesne as of Fee and them the said I.H. and I.T.B. and B. of that moiety of the said tenements with the appurtenances so being seized they the said I. H. and the rest afterwards that is to say from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes in the sixth yeare of the Raign of the now King Edward the sixth before E. Mountaine C.I. H. and E.M. Justices of the said Lord the King personally came and acknowledged the moiety of the said Lands with the appurtenances by the name of the moiety of one messuage of one Garden and fourteen acres of Land with the appurtenances in I. aforesaid to be the right of him the said W. A. as those which the said W. A. had of the gift of the said I.H. and I T B. and B. and they remised and quite claimed from them the said J. J. T. and B. and the heirs of them the said I. and B. unto the said W. A. and his heirs for ever by pretence whereof the said W. A. of the moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his demesne as of Fee untill the said I. E. into the said tenements with the appurtenances entred and him the said W. A. of the moiety of the same Tenements with the appurtenances unjustly and without judgement unjustly disseised by which the same I. was of the moiety of those Tenement aforesaid with the appurtenances seized by disseisin and shee the said I by that disseisin so thereof being seized the same I. before the said time of the said entry made that is to say the said twentieth day of September in the sixth year of the Raign of the said now King Edward the sixth at J. aforesaid demised the said Tenements with the appurtenances unto the said I. F. now one of the Defendants to have and to hold unto the same I F. his Executors and assignes from the said Feast of Saint Michaell the Arch-Angell from thence next following untill the end and tearm of one year from thence forth next following and so from year to year as long as the said both Parties should please by virtue of which said Demise the said I. F. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof Possessed in manner and form as the said I. F.M. and W P above in Pleading have alleadged upon the Possession of which said I. F. thereupon the said W. A. before the said time of the said Entry made into the Moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesne as of Fee untill by the said I. F.M. and W.P. of the said moiety of the said Tenements Avermenn that 2 parties and one moiety of those said lands are one and not diverse with Force and Armes and with the said main strength in form aforesaid was disseized in manner and form as the same W. A by his said declaration before against them have declared and this he is ready to prove together with this that the said moiety of the said Tenements in the said Fine contained and the said two Parts in the said Declaration specified in which the said Entry is supposed are one and the same and not others nor divers whereupon from which the said I. M. and W.P. the said Entry and disseisin before done acknowledging the same W.A. as well for the King as for himself prayeth judgement and his damages by occasion of that Entry and disseisin to be adjudged unto him c. ANd they the said I. F.M. and W.P. as formerly say that long before the said time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done the said J. G. in the said Barr before named was seized of the said Tenements with the appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and he the said I. G. so of those Tenements with the appurtenances being seized the same I G. before the same time in which c that is to say the said twenty eighth day of October in the year of our Lord one thousand five hundred forty and one at I. aforesaid made his last will and by the same willed that the said I. his Wife should have the said Tenements with the appurtenances to the tearm of the life of her the said Iohanne so that after the decease of her the said Johane those Tenements with the appurtenances should remain unto the aforesaid I. R. and his heirs for ever and afterwards and before the said time in which c. the same I G. at I. aforesaid dyed after the death of which said I. G. the said I. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances by virtue of the said last wil entred and was thereof seized in his demesne as of free-hold And she the said I. so thereof being seized the same I. before the said time in which c. that is to say the said 20 day of September in the
sixth year of the Raign of the said Lord King Edward the sixth above said at I. aforesaid demised the said Tenements with the appurtenances unto the aforesaid I. now one of the said Defendants to have and to hold the said Tenements with the appurtenances unto the same I. F. and his Assignes from the Feast of Saint Michaell the Arch-Angell from thence forth next following and fully to be compleat and so from year to year as long as the said both parties should please by vertue of which said Demise the said J.F. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed in manner and form as the said J. F.M. and W.P. before in pleading have alleadged Without this Without this that the said J.G. disseized the said W.A. of the said moiety of the said tenements with the appurtenances in manner form as the same W.A. before in pleading hath alledged this c. Whereupon as before prayeth judgement and that the said W. A. from his said Action against them had may be precluded c. ANd the said W.A. as before saith that the said J.G. disseised him the said W.A. of the said moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances in manner and form as the same W. A. before in replying hath alleadged and this he prayeth may be inquired of by the country c. ANd the said S.R. by Richard Heywood his Attorney Kent Justification in Trespasse for taking of Cattell in an open pound by vertue of a demise made by one unto whom it was granted by will untill a hundred and eighty pound should he levied thereupon for the preferment of his Daughters cometh and defendeth the force and and injury when c. And as to the coming with force armes c. not guilty c. And as to the residue of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done the same S. saith that the said J. no action because he saith that the said close and also the place in which it is supposed the said Trespasse to be done are and at the said time of that trespasse supposed to be done were eight and forty acres of marsh with the appurtenances called Platters marsh at Alhallowes aforesaid whereof long before the said time of the said time before supposed to be done one R.W. Citizen and Merchant Taylor of London was thereof seized in his demesne as of fee and he the said R. of the said Tenements with the appurtenances so being seized the same R. before the same time in which c. That is to say the twenty fifth day of June in the year of the Raign of the said H. 8. late King of England Father of the Lord the now King 36. at London that is to say in the parish of Saint Augustines in the ward of B. London made and declared his last will in writing and by his said will willed amongst other things that one J the then wife of him the said R.W. the Executors and Assignes of the same J. should have and injoy the said eight and forty acres of land with the appurtenances amongst other things by the name of all his lands By the name Tenements and hereditaments within the Hundred of Howe in the county of Kent untill she the said I should have levy and receive of the Rents Revenues and profits thereof issuing and increasing the full and whole summe of a hundred and eighty pound Sterling for and to the preferment of the marriage of L.A. and T Daughters of the said R.W. that is to say unto every one of them the summe of sixty pound Sterling and afterwards and before the said time in which c. the said R W. at London in the Parish and ward aforesaid dyed after the death of which said R. and before the said time in which c. the said I. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed by virtue and pretence of the said last will and she the said J. so thereof being possessed the same J. before the said time in which c. that is to say the fifth day of March in the second year of the Raign of the said now King at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid by a certain Indenture between the said Jane of the one part and the aforesaid S. of the other part made with the seal of the same J. sealed did grant and to farm let unto the said S. the said Tenements with the appurtenances to have hold and occupy those Tenements with the appurtenances unto the said S.R. for the tearm of eleven years from thenceforth next following and fully to be compleat by pretence of which said Grant and Demise the aforesaid S.R. at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed And the said J.W. claiming the said Tenements with the appurtenances by colour of a certain deed of Demise unto him thereof made for the Tearm of the rest of the years as yet during by the said J. long before the said Demise by the same J. thereof as afore is said unto the said S. made where nothing of the said Tenements in the possession of him the said John by that deed ever passed into the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred upon the possession of which said John thereupon the said S. at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances claiming his Tearm then to come of and in the same re-entred and because the same S. then and there found the said cattell in the same place in which c. the grasse of him the said S. then and there growing For damage doing eating up and there damage doing the said S. those Cattell at the said time in which c. did take and the same at Alhallowes aforesaid in the county aforesaid in the common and publick pound Averment there put and impounded as unto him it was lawfull with this that the said S. will prove that the said J. W. or his Assignes not as yet had levied or received the said full and whole summe of a hundred and eighty pound Sterling according to the form and effect of the said last will of the said R.W. her late Husband and this c. whereupon he prayeth Judgement if action c. NOt to be precluded because he saith The Plaintif replies that one A.B. was seized of the moiety of the Tenements in Barr specified who demised that unto him without this that the Testator was seized of the whole Tenements that long before the said time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done one A. B.R. was seized of the moiety of those tenements with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee and he the said A. B. of the moiety of those tenements with the appurtenances so being seized the same A B before the said time of the said Trespasse done that is
to say the first day of August in the first year of the Reign of the said now King Edward the sixth at Alhallowes aforesaid demised the moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances unto the said John Wood to have and to hold the same moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances unto the said J.W. and his Executors from the said first day of August untill the end and tearm and for the Tearm of twelve yeares from thence forth next ensuing and fully to be compleated by vertue of which said demise the said J.W. into the moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed untill the said S. him the said J. W of the moiety of those Tenements with the appurtenances thrust out and the said A. B. of the same unjustly and without judgement disseised upon the possession of which said S. thereupon the said J. Wood before the said time of the said Trespasse done claiming his said tearm of and in the same into those Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed by virtue of the said Demise untill the said S. afterwards that is to say at the said time of the said Trespasse done the said Close did break Without this and the said Cattell then and there did take and the same in form aforesaid impounded in manner and form as the same J. Wood before against him himselfe complaineth without this that the said R S. was seized of the said whole tenements with the appurtenances in manner and form as the said S. above in his said Barr hath alleadged and this c. whereupon from which the same S. the said trespasse before acknowledging prayeth judgement and his damages by occasion of that trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. ANd the said S. as before saith that the said R.W. was seized of the said whole tenements with the appurtenances in manner and form as the same S. before in pleading hath alledged and of this he putteth himself upon the Country c. Justification of Trespasse for Lands in Gavel-kinde AND the said G. W. by R.H. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and wrong when Kent Justification in Trespasse for that that the Tenements were of nature of Gavel-kind in the County of Kent c. and as to the coming with force and armes c. not guilty and as to the residue of the said Trespass before supposed to be done the same G. saith that the said E. and A. no action because he saith that the said Close called R. otherwise B. doth contain and at the said time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done did contain eighteen acres of land and wood with the appurtenances of which said Tenements with the appurtenances long before the said time in which c. one E.W. the Elder Grand-Father of the said G.W. the now defendant was seized in his demesne as of fee and him the said G.W. the grand-father of those Tenements with the appurtenances so being seized the same G.W. the Grand-Father before the said time in which c. died thereof by protestation seized after th death of whichsaid G.W. the G-F those Tenements w th the appurtenances for that they are of the tenure and nature of gavelkind in the said county and that all Lands and tenements of the same Tenure and nature in the same county from the time the contrary of which memory c. were parted and partable between the heirs males did discend to T W. as Son and Co-heir of the said G. the Grand Father and unto the aforesaid G. the now Defendant and R.W. his Brother and Margery Bedell as Kinne and Co-heir aforesaid of the said G. W. their Grand-Father that is to say unto the aforesaid G. the now Defendants and to the said R. his Brother as Sonnes and heirs of one R.W. one of the Sons and Co-heirs of the said G. W. the elder and unto the aforesaid T.W. as another of the sons and Co-heirs of the said G. the said G.W. the now Defendants Grand-Father and unto the said Margery as the Son of A. another of the Sons and Co-heirs of the same G.VV. the Grand-Father Discent By vertue of which the said G.VV. the now Defendant and the said R. VV. his Brother into the said Tenements with the appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and were and as yet do thereof remain thereof seized in their demesne as of Fee and the same Tenements with the appurtenances do hold In common and undivided and at the time of the said Trespasse supposed to be done and at the day of the filing of the said Bill that is to say the tenth day of October in the sixth year of the Reign of the said now King held in common and undivided with the said Edward and Alice who the pur-party of the said Margery of and in the said Tenements do hold from the said Day of filing of the said Bill they have holden for tearm of years then during from the demise of the said Margery and one John Bedell her husband And this c. Whereupon he prayeth Judgment if an Action c. NOt to be precluded because he saith Plaintiff saith that the said G.W. the Grand-Father infeossed one A.W. his Sonne which said A. had issuee Margery W. and dyed unto which said Margery the Tenements discended in the right of an heir and the same Margery tooke to husband one J.B. and the said J.B. and M. demised the Tesements unto S.S. and A. his wife now one of the Defendants and afterwards the same S.S. dyed and the same A took to husbanb the said E. now one of the plaintiffs by vertue of which said demise they the said E. entred that well and true it is that the said G.VV. the Grand-Father in the said Barr before named was seized of the said Tenements with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee in manner and form as the said G. the now Df. before in pleading hath alleadged and that the same G.VV. the Grand-Father so thereof being seized before the said time of the said trespas done of the said tenements with the appurtenances infeoffed the said A.VV. his Son to have the same Tenements with the appurtenances unto the same A. and his heirs for ever by vertue of which said Feoffment the same A.VV. was seized of the said Tenements with the appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and him the said A. of the said Tenements with the appurtenances so being seized the same A. of those Tenements with the appurtenances died seized after the death of which said A. the said Tenements with the appurtenances discended unto Margery VVallis Daughter and heir of the same A. by vertue of which the same M. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances long before the said time of the said trespas done entred and was thereof seized in her demesne as of fee and she the said
M. of those Tenements with the appurtenances so being seized the same M. before the said time of the said Trespas done at C. aforesaid took to her husband the said J.B. by vertue of which they the said J. and M. were seized of those Tenements with the appurtenances in their demesne as of fee in the right of her the said M. and them the said J. and M. of those tenements with the appurtenances so being seized they the said J. and M. afterwards and before the said time of the said trespas done that is to say at the Feast of Saint Michael the Arch-Angell in the thirty seventh year of the Raign of the Lord Henry the eighth late King of England at C. aforesaid demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto one S.S. and unto the aforesaid A. now one of the Plaintiffs the then wife of the same S. to have and to hold the same Tenements with the appurtenances unto the same S. and A. their Executors and Assigns from the same Feast of Saint Michael the Arch-Angel untill the End and Tearm of seven years from thence next insuing and sully to be compleat by vertue of which said demise they the said S. and A. so thereof being possessed the same S. before the said time in which c. at C. aforesaid dyed and the said Allice him survived and held her self in in the said Tenements with the appurtenances and was thereof possessed by the Right of increase and she the said A. so thereof being possessed the same A. before the said time in which c. at C. aforesaid took to her Husband the said E. H. by virtue of which they the said E. and A. were possessed of the said Tenemenrs with the Appurtenances By the Right of increase untill the said G. W. the now Defendant at the said time of the said Trespasse done the said Close with Force and Armes aforesaid did breake and enter and the said Grasse to the value c. with his feet walking did tread down and consume and the said Cattell in the said Declaration before specified then and there found he did take and chase in manner and form as they the said E. and A. before against him themselves now complaineth And this c. whereupon from which the said G. W. the now Defendant the said Trespasse before acknowledging prayeth Judgment and his Damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant maintains the plea without this that G.W. Grand-Father infeoffed the said A.W. his Sonne c. AND the said G. W. the now Defendant as before saith that the said G. VV. the now Defendant was of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances seized in his Demesne as of Fee and he the said G. W. the Elder of those Tenements with the Appurtenances so being seized the same G. W. the Elder of those Tenements with the Appurtenances died thereof by protestation seized after the death of which said G. W. the Elder the said Tenements with the Appurtenances for that that the same Tenements are of the Tenure and Nature of Gavel-kinde in the said County and that all Lands and Tenements of the same Tenure and Nature in the same County from the time the contrary of which c. were parted and partable between the Heires Males did discend unto the said G. W. as Son and Heire of the said G. W. the Grand-father of the said G. W. the now Defendant and unto the same G. the now Defendant and to the said R. W. Brother of the same G. the now Defendant and unto the aforesaid Margery as Kinne and Co-heire of the said G. their Grand-father that is to say unto the aforesaid G. the now Defendant and Richard his Brother as Sons and Heires of the said R W. one of the Sons and Co-heires of the said G. W. the Elder and unto the aforesaid T. as another Son and Co-heire of the said G. W. the Grand-father of the said G. the now Defendant and unto the aforesaid Margery as Daughter of the said Alexander another of the Sons and Co-heires of the said G. W. the Grand-father by virtue of which the said G. W. the now Defendant and the said R. W. his Brother into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and were and as yet are thereof seized in their Demesne as of Fee and the same Tenements with the Appurtenances do hold and at the time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done and at the day of fyling the said Bill did hold and as yet doth hold in common and undivided with the said Edward and Alice who the Pur-party of the said Margery Bedell of and in the said Tenements with the Appurtenances do hold and at the said day of fyling of the said Bill did hold for tearm of yeares Without this from the demise of the said I. B. and Margery in manner and form as the said G. the now Defendant before in pleading hath alledged without this that the said G. W. the Grand-father infeoffed the said A. W. his Son of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in Manner and Form as the said E. and Alice before in replying have alledged And this c. whereupon as before prayeth Judgment and that the said E. and A. from their said Action against him had may be precluded c. And they the said E. and A. as before saith that the said G. W. the Grand-father infeoffed the aforesaid A. W. his Son of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in Manner and Form as they the said E. and A. before in replying have alledged and this they pray that it may be inquired of c. AND the said W. W. by R. C. his Attorney Devon Defendant Justifies that the Tenements in which c. was the ground of another man and iustifies the Trespasse as his Servant doing damage cometh and defendeth the Force and Wrong when c. And as to the coming with Force and Armes c. not guilty and as to the residue c. the same W. W. saith that the said W. S. no Action because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which c. the said Trespasse is supposed to be done are and at the time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done were thirty six Acres of Land with the Appurtenances in V. aforesaid in a certain place there called W. which are and at the said time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done were the Ground and Free-hold of one R. M. by which the same W. W. at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances as Servant of the said R. and by his Command entred and the said Close as the proper Close of him the said R. did breake And the same W. W. found the said Colt there the Grasse of him the said R. upon the Ground of him the said
R. that is to say upon the said thirty six Acres of Land growing eating up and Damage there unto the said R. doing the same W. W. that Colt for that Damage then and there as afore it is said done took and lead away as unto them it was lawfull And this c. whereupon c. Not to bee precluded because he saith that long before the said time in which c. the said R. M. in the said Bar before named was seized of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and so thereof being seized before the said time in which c. that is to say the twelfth day of August in the first yeare of the Reigne of the said now King Edward the sixth at A. in the said County of D. demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the aforesaid W. S. to have to him and his Assignes from the Feast of Saint Michaell the Arch-angell from thence next ensuing untill the end and tearm of three yeares from thence forth next following and fully to be compleat by virtue of which said Demise the same W. S. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and was thereof possessed and he the said W. S. of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances so being possessed the same W. S. before the said time in which c. the said Colt into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances to the Grasse there growing as the proper Grasse of him the said W. S. put to feed which said Colt was there the Grasse there growing feeding upon untill the said W. W. at the said time in which c. upon the Possession of him the said W. S. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances entred and the said Close in the said place in which c. did breake and the said Colt then and there did take and lead away in manner and form as the same W. S. before against him complaineth And this c. whereupon from which the said W. W. the said Trespasse in form aforesaid done before acknowledging prayeth Judgment and his Damages by occasion of the said Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant maintaineth Plea without this that the said stranger demised the said Tenements AND the said W. W. as before saith that the said Tenements with the Appurtenances are and at the said time in which c. were the Ground and Free-hold of the said R. M. by which the same W. W. at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances as Servant of the said R. and by their Command entred and the said Close as the proper Close of him the said R. did breake and for that he the same W. W. found the said Colt the said Grasse of the said R. upon the Ground of him the said R. that is to say upon the said thirty six Acres of Land growing eating up Damage thereunto the same R. doing the same W. that Colt for that Damage Without this then and there as before is said done did take and lead away as to him it was lawfull without this that the said R. M. demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the aforesaid W. S. in manner and form as the said W. S. before in replying hath alleadged And this c. whereupon as before prayeth Judgment and that the said W. S. from his said Action against him the said W. W. had may be precluded c. And the said W. S. as before saith that the said R. M. demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the said W. S. in manner and form as the said W. S. before in replying hath alleadged and this he prayeth that it may be inquired of c. AND the said S. S. by W. D. his Attorney Suff. ss Defendant iustifies Trespasse by virtue of a Demise made by a Master of a Colledge cometh and defendeth the force and wrong when c. And as to the coming with force c. not guilty and as to the residue of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done the same S. saith that the said R. no Action because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which it is supposed the said Trespas before to be done are and at the said time of the said trespas before supposed to be done were a hundred Acres of Lands and Pasture with the Appurtenances in E. aforesaid parcell of the Mannor of E. with the appurtenances in the County aforesaid of which said mannor with the appurtenances long before the said time in which c. one G. W. Clark late Master of the late Colledge of R. in the County of Norffolke and the Fellowes of the same late Colledge were seized in their demesne as of fee in the right of their said Colledge and them the said late Master and fellowes of the said late Colledge of that Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c so thereof being seized they the said late Master and fellowes of the said late Colledge before the said time in which c. that is to say the twentieth day of December in the year of the Raign of the Lord Henry the eighth late King of England 30. at R. in the said County of Norffolke by their certain writing indented with the common seal of them the late Master and fellowes sealed and unto the Court of the Lord the now King here shewed whose date is the same day and year by their unanimous assent and consent did demise and to farm let unto the aforesaid S. his heirs Executors and Assignes the said mannor of E. with the appurtenances in the laid county of Suffolke with all arrable Lands and pasture of Sheep with all their appurtenances and other commodities unto the said Mannor and preimses belonging as well within the town E. aforesaid as within other towns unto the same adjacent with the Lands and Pastures lying at Dead-mans Grave to have and to hold the same Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c and other the premises unto the aforesaid S. his Executors and Assigns from the Feast of the invention of the holy Crosse last past before the date of the said writing indented untill the end and tearm of fifty years from thence forth next insuing and fully to be compleat by virtue of which said demise the said S. into the said mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. before the said time in which c. entred and was thereof possessed and the said R. claiming the said mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. by colour of a certain deed of demise unto him thereof made for the tearm of his life by the said late Master and fellowes of the said late colledge long before the said demise unto the aforesaid S of that mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. as afore is said made where nothing of that Mannor with the appurtenances whereof
alleadged And this c. Whereupon for that the same VV. and T.C. the taking of the Oxe aforesaid above acknowledge they pray judgement and their damages upon that occasion to be adjudged unto them c. Issue upon the Herriot custome AND the aforesaid W. and T. say that the aforesaid Bishop and all his Ancestors and all they whose estates he the said Bishop hath in the Mannor aforesaid with the Appurtenances hath had and from the whole time aforesaid were used and accustomed to have of all and all manner of Tenants of every Tenant of the Mannor aforesaid who held Lands or Tenements from the Lord of the Mannor c. as of the same Mannor and doe alien those lands and Tenement or any parcel thereof to any person or persons in Fee Notice thereof in the life time of him who shall so sell those Lands or Tenements by them or by him to which or to whom those Tenements shall be sold to the Lord of the same Mannor for the time being not being given and made after the death of such Tenant so alienating the best living beast which was his the said Tenant so alienating at the time of his death in the name of a customary Herriot as the same W. and T. above have alleadged And of this they put themselves upon the Country c. AND the aforesaid R.J. A.E. J.C. and R.L. by R. G. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury Some of the Defendants plead not guilty and others justifie for that the place in which c. is the Kings highway Trin. 16. Hen. 7. Rol. 35. whom c. And the aforesaid R.I. A.E. and R. say that they are in nothing guilty c. And of this c. And the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner c. And the aforesaid J.C. as to the comming with force and Armes c. as also the whole trespasse aforesaid besides the breaking of the Close aforesaid saith that he is in nothing guilty c. And as to the Trespasse aforesaid of breaking the Close aforesaid supposed to be done the same I.C. saies that the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he sayes that the place in which the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be made is and at the time wherein c. was seven Acres of Land called Otefield-brook with the Appurtenances in W. aforesaid whereof the said I. C. at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made and long before the said time was seized in his Demesne as of Fee Over which said seven Acres of Land with the Appurtenances is and from time out of minde was the Kings common high-way tending and leading from the Kings way there called the Ashford high-way unto the Village of Adelsford in the County aforesaid containing in breadth eight foot that is to say as well for horsemen as for foot-men there by the same way willing to ride or journey And further he the same I.C. saies that he the aforesaid time wherein c. did ride and travell from the aforesaid Kings way called Ashford high-way unto the village of A. aforesaid over the aforesaid seven Acres of Land using that high-way of the Kings there as it was lawfull for him to do which said riding by that high-way of the Kings over the aforesaid seven Acres of land is the same breach of the Close whereof the aforesaid I. C. above complaines c. And this c. whereupon he prayes judgement whether the action c. And the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes that he ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against the aforesaid I. C. because hee saith that the foresaid I. C. together with c. the day and yeer aforesaid by Force and Armes aforesaid of his proper injury the Close aforesaid in the aforesaid seven Acres of land did breake and also his grasse upon the same seven Acres of Land then growing with the cattell aforesaid did eat up tread down and consume in manner and forme as the same I. C. above now complaineth VVithout that that there is The Traverse or from the aforesaid time out of minde c. there was a common Kings high way tending and leading from the Kings high-way there called Ashford high-way unto the village of Adelsford as well for horsemen as for footmen over the aforesaid seven Acres of Land in manner and forme as the aforesaid I. C. above by pleading hath alleadged And this c. VVhereupon for that the same I. C. the Trespasse aforesaid of breaking the Close aforesaid above acknowledgeth he prayes judgement and his damages by that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid I.C. as formerly saith that there is Issue upon the Traverse and from the said time out of minde c. there was a common Kings high-way tending and leading from the aforesaid high-way called Adelsford high-way unto the village of Adelsford aforesaid as well for horse-men as for footmen over the aforesaid seven acres of Land with the appurtenances in manner and forme as the aforesaid I. C. above by pleading hath alleadged And of this hee puts himselfe upon the Country and the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner c. The Defendants plead that a stranger was seized c. And Enfeoffed certaine c. And justifie the Trespasse as servants to the Feoffees Paschae 19. Hen. 7. Rol. 60. AND the aforesaid T. and VV.B. by T.S. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes or whatsoever c. not guilty And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done the same T.A. and VV. say that the aforesaid T.R. ought not to have his action aforesaid against them because they say that the place in which the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be done is and the aforesaid time wherein c. was one Garden three Crofts of Land containing twelve acres of Land and one Pagholl in L. aforesaid whereof one E.B. long before the said time wherein c. was seized in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized by his certaine Deed indented long before the said time enfeoffed F.A. and I.R. to have and to hold to them and their heires for ever By vertue of which said Feoffement they the said R. and I. long before the aforesaid time Colour by Feoffement wherein c. were thereof seized in their demesne as of Fee And the aforesaid T.R. claiming the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by colour of of a certaine demise to him thereupon made for terme of his life by the aforesaid Edmond long before the aforesaid Feoffement to them the said F. and I. made where nothing of the aforesaid Tenements with the appurtenances into the possession of him the said T.B. by that Deed ever passed into the same Tenements with the appurtenances long before the said time of the
acre of Land with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee in right of his Vicaridge aforesaid And being so thereof seized before the same time of the Trespasse aforesaid made to wit the first day of June in the 33 yeare of the Reigne of our Lord the King that now is at E. aforesaid in the County aforesaid demised the same Tenements with the appurtenances to him the said Plaintiffe To have and to occupy to him the said Plaintiffe and his assignes from the feast of the Nativity of St. John Baptist then next following untill the feast of St. Michael the Arch-angel in the 35 yeare of the Reigne of our Lord the King that now is By vertue of which demise hee the said Plaintiffe of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances was possessed untill the aforesaid Defendants the day and yeare aforesaid in the Declaration aforesaid above specified by force and armes c. the close and house of him the said Plaintiffe at E. aforesaid they did break against the peace of our Lord the King that now is as he above against them complaineth And this c. Wherefore for that the aforesaid Defendants the breaking of the close and house aforesaid above acknowledgeth he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. The Defendants maintain their plea and traverse their Dâ—mise AND the aforesaid Defendants as formerly say that the aforesaid I.R. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee in right of his Vicaridge aforesaid as they above have alleadged Without that that the aforesaid I.R. demised the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Plaintiffes as the same Plaintiffe above alleadgeth And this c. Whereupon as formerly he prayes judgement and that the aforesaid Plaintiffe may be debarred from having his action aforesaid of the breach of the close and house aforesaid against them c. Issue upon the Traverse AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe as formerly sayes that the aforesaid I. R. demised to him the said Plaintiffe the same Tenements with the appurtenances as he above hath alleadged And this bee prayes may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Defendants in like manner c. Iustification in Trespasse by vertue of a demise made to the Testator who bequeathed the same to his wife AND the aforesaid R.F. by R. M. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes and whatsoever c. not guilty c. And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be done the aforesaid R.F. sayes that the aforesaid R.R. and I. ought not to have their action aforesaid against him c. because hee sayes that the close and house aforesaid as also the place in which the trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done was and the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made were one Messuage and one close of Land containing in it fifteen acres of Land with the appurtenances in S. aforesaid whereof before the said time wherein c. one I. A. Esq was seized in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day year and place did demise the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to one R.W. of c. To have and to hold to him and his Assignes from the feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following unto the end and terme of forty years from thence next following and fully to be compleat and ended By vertue of which Demise the same R. W. was thereof possessed And so being thereof possessed before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day year and place made his last Will and Testament And by the same willed and declared that Elizabeth his wife immediately after the decease of him the said R. W. should have and enjoy his state terme and interest which he then had to come in the Tenements aforesaid The forme of pleading where the Lease accrued to the husband under the wifes title with the appurtenances And afterwards and before the said time wherein c. the same R.VV. dyed After whose death the aforesaid E. was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and so being thereof possessed before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day year and place took to husband him the said R. F. By which he the said R. F. was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and the aforesaid Plaintiffes claiming the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by colour of a certaine Deed of Demise to them thereupon made for terme of their life by the aforesaid I.A. long before the aforesaid Demise by the same I. A. to the aforesaid R. W. thereupon in forme aforesaid made where nothing of these Tenements with the appurtenances into the possession of them the said Plaintiffes by that Deed ever passed into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances before the said time wherein c. did enter Upon whose the said Plaintiffes possession thereupon the same Defendant afterwards to wit the same time wherein c. into the same Tenements with the appurtenances did re-enter and the grasse aforesaid then there growing which the aforesaid Cattell did eat up tread down and consume and the ground aforesaid in the aforesaid fifteen acres of Land with his ploughes aforesaid he did break up as it was lawfull for him to do And this c. Wherefore he prayes judgement whether the action c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes The Plaintiffe pleads that before the domâ—se c. the aforesaid Feoffee enfeoffed the Plaintiffe and others to the use of a stranger that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against the aforesaid Defendants because he sayes that before the aforesaid time of the Trespass aforesaid made the aforesaid I.A. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee and so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. and before the aforesaid foure and twentieth day of September in the year c. of the same Tenements with the appurtenances enfeoffed them the said Plaintiffes and one R. E. Knight and W. L. to hold to them and their heires for ever to the use of one T. A. son and heir apparent of the aforesaid I. A. and Mary the wife of him the said T.A. and the heires of their bodies of them lawfully begotten By vertue of which said Feoffement they the said Plaintiffes and R. and W. were thereof seized in their demesne as of Fee to the same use And the said Plaintiffes and R. and W. to that use being so thereof seized the aforesaid J.A. the aforesaid foure and twentieth of September in the eighteenth year aforesaid with the appurtenances
to the aforesaid R.W. To have and to hold to him and his assignes from the aforesaid feast of St. Michael the Arch-angel from thence next following unto the end and terme aforesaid By vertue of which demise hee the said R. W. was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the aforesaid such a day and year and place made his last Will and Testament in writing and by the same willed and declared that the aforesaid Elizabeth his wife immediatly after his decease should have and enjoy his state terme and interest which he then had to come in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and after the same R.VV. dyed after whose death the aforesaid E. into the Tenements aforesaid entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed afterwards to wit the aforesaid tenth day of M. in such a yeare aforesaid the same E. tooke to husband the aforesaid Defendant By which the same Defendant was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed as he above hath alleadged and hee being so thereof possessed the aforesaid R.E. and VV.L. before the time wherein c. at London in the Parish c. dyed after whose death the same Plaintiffes before the said time wherein c. into the Tenements aforesaid with their appurtenances did re-enter and were thereof seized in their demesne as of fee to the use aforesaid by right accruing c. And further the same Plaintiffes say that the Trespasse aforesaid whereof they now complaine was made in the Mid-time between the aforesaid Feoffement by the aforesaid I. A. to them the said Plaintiffes and the aforesaid R.E. and VV.L. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in forme aforesaid made and the said Re-entry of them the said Defendants in the same and this c. VVhereupon for that the aforesaid Defendants the Trespasse aforesaid in the Tenements aforesaid above acknowledged they the said Plaintiffes pray judgement and their damages by occasion of that Trespasse to bee adjudged unto them c. The Defendant maintaines his Plea and tracurses the Feoffeoment AND the aforesaid Defendant sayes that before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made the aforesaid I. A. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. to wit the aforesaid three and twentieth day of S. in the aforesaid such a year at S. aforesaid demised the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the aforesaid R.VV. to have and to hold to him the said R.W. and his assignes from the aforesaid feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following unto the end and terme aforesaid By vertue of which demise he the said R.W. was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the aforesaid such a day year and place made his last Will and Testament and by the same willed and declared that the aforesaid Elizabeth his wife immediately after the decease of him the said R.W. should have his whole state terme and interest which he then had to come of and in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and afterwards the same R.W. at S. aforesaid dyed after whose death the aforesaid Elizabeth was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and so being thereof possessed before the said time wherein c. at S. aforesaid took to husband the same Defendant By which the same Defendant before the said time wherein c. into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances did enter and was thereof possessed as hee above hath alleadged Without that that the aforesaid I. A. before the aforesaid such a day and year enfeoffed the aforesaid Plaintiffes and others of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances The traverse of the Feoffement To hold to them and their heires for ever to the use of the aforesaid T.A. and M. and the heires of their bodies lawfully begotten as the aforesaid Plaintiffes above have alleadged And this c. VVhereupon he prayes judgement And that the aforesaid Plaintiffes may be debarred from having their action aforesaid against him c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffes as formerly Issue upon the Traverse say that the aforesaid I.A. before the aforesaid foure and twentieth day of S. in the aforesaid such a yeare enfeoffed them the said Plaintiffes and the aforesaid R.E. and W. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold to them and their heires to the use of the aforesaid T.A. and M. and the heires of their bodies lawfully begotten as they above have alleadged And this they pray may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Defendants in like manner c. Therefore it is commanded the Sheriffe that he cause to come c. AND the aforesaid T.P. by R. F. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when Iustification in Trespasse for the taking of goods by pretext of gift from the Plaintiffe to the Defendants wife while she was sole c. And as to the coming by force and arms c. not guilty And as to the residue c. the same T. not acknowledging himselfe to have taken and carried away so many goods or chattels nor that the goods or chattels were of so much value as by the Writ and Declaration aforesaid is supposed saith that the aforesaid I. E. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that the aforesaid I. before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be made to wit such a yeare and place gave to one A. the wife of the aforesaid T. the goods and chattels aforesaid to hold to him and his assignes for ever By vertue of which said gift the same A. was thereof possessed and afterwards tooke to husband the same Defendant And that the aforesaid A. was possessed of the goods and chattels aforesaid at the time wherein the aforesaid Defendant took her to wife By which the same Defendant the goods and chattels aforesaid as his own proper goods and chattels at the time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to bee done at R. there found tooke and carried away as it was lawfull for him to doe And this hee is ready to averre Whereupon hee intendeth not any injury in that behalfe should be assigned to his person c. The Plaintiffe said that the wife of the Defendant while she was sole give backe to him the goods AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid Defendant before alleadged to be true sayes that he by any thing pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against him c. because he saith that before the aforesaid time wherein c. there was certaine communication had between him the said Plaintiffe and the aforesaid A. of Matrimony between them to be contracted And thereupon the aforesaid A. him the said Plaintiffe treated with such flattering and dissembling
aforesaid saies that he is nothing thereof guilty c. and as to the breaking of the Closes and Houses and the assault aforesaid the same S. sayes that the Plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid against him Because he saith that the Closes and Houses as also the places in which the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to bee made are and the aforesaid time wherein c. were seven Messuages and four Gardens with the appurtenances in the parishes of St. Sepulchers and St. Martins and St. Brigets aforesaid in the Ward aforesaid of which said seven Messuages and foure Gardens before the said time wherein c. one I.S. was seized of his demesne as of fee and so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. thereof enfeoffed the aforesaid S.P. to hold for him and his Heires for ever By vertue of which Feoffement the same S. was thereof seized in his demesne as of Fee and the aforesaid E. claiming the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by colour of a certaine Deed or Demise to him thereupon made for terme of his life by the aforesaid J.S. long before the said Feoffement of the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the aforesaid S. in forme aforesaid made were nothing of the same Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the possession of her the said E. ever passed into the same Tenements with the appurtenances before the said time wherein c. and enter upon whose said E. her possession thereupon the aforesaid time wherein c. peaceably re-entred and the Houses and Closes brok and upon the same E. then being there softly laid his hands and commanded her the said E. then and there to goe out of the Messuages and Gardens aforesaid under the danger which by the Law otherwise might come to her the said E. as it was lawfull for him to doe Which said soft laying on of hands and entry and breach of Closes and houses aforesaid out of the house aforesaid is the same assault whereof the aforesaid E. above now complaineth and this hee is ready to aver whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid E. ought to have her action aforesaid against him c. And the aforesaid E. sayes that she by any thing before pre-alledged ought not to be debarred from having her action aforesaid against him because she saith that as to the aforesaid Plea of him the said D. of the assault c. aforesaid above pleaded the same E. saith that the aforesaid S. the day and year in the said Declaration of her the said E. above specified at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid of his proper injury and without any such cause by him the said S. in his barre aforesaid above alleadged on her the said E. made an assault and her then and there beat c. in manner and forme as the same E. above by her Writ and Declaration above against him hath declared And this she prayes may be enquired of by the country And the aforesaid S. in like manner c. And as to the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid S. to the breaking of the Closes and houses aforesaid above pleaded the same E. sayes that long before the said I. S. had any thing in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances the same E. was of the same Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances seised in her demesne as of Fee Until the aforesaid S. her the said E. long before the trespasse aforesaid made unjustly and without judgement disseised by which the same S. was of the same Tenements with the Appurtenances seized in his demesne as of Fee by disseisin and he by that disseisin being so c. The same S. before the said time wherein c. thereof enfeoffed the aforesaid I. S. to hold to him and his heires prove By vertue of which said Feoffement the said I.S. was thereof seized in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. thereof enfeoffed the aforesaid S. to hold to him and his heires for ever By vertue of which said Feoffmenent the same S. was of the same Tenements with the appurtenances seized in his demesne as of Fee in manner and form as the same S. above by pleading hath alleadged Upon which the said S.P. his possession thereupon the aforesaid E. before the said time wherein c. did enter and was thereof seised in his demesne as of Fee Untill the aforesaid S. the aforesaid time of the trespasse aforesaid made by Force and Armes c. the Closes and houses of her the said E. with the appurtenances hee did break in manner and forme as the same E. by her Writ and Declaration aforesaid above against him hath complained And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid S. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth she prayeth judgement and her damages by reason of that Trespasse c. to be adjudged unto her c. The Defendant maintaines his plea and traverses the disseizin AND the aforesaid S. as formerly saith that long before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be made the aforesaid I.S. was of the same Tenements with the appurtenances seized in his demesne as of fee and he being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. thereof Enfeoffed him the said S. to hold to him and his Heires for ever by vertue of which Feoffement the same S. was of the same Tenements with the appurtenances seized in his demesne as of Fee in manner and form as the same S. in his aforesaid above hath alledged Tranverse Without that that the same S. dis-seized the aforesaid E. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the aforesaid E. in her replication aforesaid above hath alledged And this c. whereupon hee prayes judgement and that the aforesaid E. may be debarred from having her action aforesaid against him c. ANd the aforesaid E. as formerly saith Issue upon the Traverse that the aforesaid S. dis-seized her the said E. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the same E. in her replication aforesaid above hath alledged and this she prayes may be inquired of by the Country and the aforesaid S. in like manner c. ANd the aforesaid W.S. in his proper person comes and defends the force and injury when c. and as to the coming by force and armes c. as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid Iustification by vertue of a Justices of peaces warrant besides the assault aforesaid sayes that he is in nothing thereof guilty c. and as to the assault aforesaid the same W. sayes that the aforesaid plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid against him Because he saith that before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to bee made to wit such a day and yeare at C. in the County of N. before T. C. Earle of Devonshire then one of the Justices
An exact Collection of choice DECLARATIONS WITH Pleas Replications Rejoynders Demurrers Assignement of Errours AND THE ENTRIES OF JUDGments thereupon affirmed Collected by VV. S. one of the Clerks of the Vpper Bench Office In the Reignes of Queene ELIZABETH King JAMES and the late King CHARLES DILIGENTLY PERUSED AND TRANslated into English for the benefit and helpe of young Clerkes With an exact TABLE wherein may be found the Principall matters contained in the whole Book LONDON Printed by T. W. and T. R. for John Place and are to be sold at his Shop at Furnivalls Inne Gate in Holborne 1653. TO THE READER Courteous Reader I Know that this painefull Worke by the Authors own hand was diligently composed not imagining that these ensuing Presidents collected for his private use should ever have worn an English Garment or be seen without a Court-Character but being very aged and knowing that the Ports and safe Harbors of good Declarations Pleadings Replications Rejoynders Sur-rejoynders Demurrers Assigning of Errours with divers other matters incident appertinent to an Vpper Bench Clerk an Index whereof in this little of great you may finde and more particularly knowing with what ardency and fervour of affection the Author by these his practical observations for wel nigh 60 years past have by his cautious Marginal Notes in this Book comprised prevented the many irrevocable downefals of Causes that young Clerks to their owne dishonour and the ruine sometimes of their Clyents for want of good and learned Presidents have suffered a miserable shipwrack and for that the Author during all the time aforesaid have had and as yet hath the favourable aspect of the Judges in the upper Bench and the approbation of the lest Clerks in the said Court now living and is reputed for a good Just learned and painfull Attorney and that in his old age he might live in his Works and be some help and furtherance to young Clerks who intend to be Attorneys and declare themselves in English as they are and shall be obliged by the late Act of Parliament and the Supream Authority of this Nation he doth lovingly admonish them to make use of these if they cannot frame better which I think impossible I am confident the Author if God permit will recollect some other scattered Papers which have layn a long time in darknesse but will without doubt when they come forth illuminate their Judgements and abolish some Errors which are daily committed for want of well declaring and pleading Some ancient Clerkes may be offended but I care not Non nobis solum nati sumus c. The few Vitia Scriptor ' in the Author are amended what oversights or neglects you may impose upon the Printers you shall have thankes to amend which is all that I expect and more then the Collector of these Presidents hath yet had And so I conclude in the words of a grave Lawyer Nihil aliud in his reportare cupio quam ut eruditior quispiam istis provocatus doctiora scriberet promulgetque Farewell J. W. ACTIONS OF ABATEMENT ABATEMENT AND the aforesaid I. T. and I. D. by R. D. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury The Defendants plead in Abatement to the Writ that the Plaintif and another Stranger are Tenants in Common and the other not named in the Writ when c. and pray Judgement of the Writ aforesaid because they say that the aforesaid T. G. the aforesaid fourteenth day of August whereon as is supposed the Entrie aforesaid to be made had nothing in the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances unlesse in common and undivided with â—ne W. C. Esquire which said W. as yet is alive and remains in perfect Health and is not named in the Writ aforesaid And this they are ready to averre whereupon they pray Judgement of this Writ AND the aforesaid T. G. saith that his Writ aforesaid The Defendant pleads the sole seisin in himself and traverses c. for the reason prealleged ought not to be abated because he saith that long before the aforesaid fourteenth day of August wherein the Entrie aforesaid was made one I. G. Father of him the said T. whose Heir he is was seized of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and so being thereof seized of such his Estate died seized After whose death the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances did descend to him the said T. G. as to the Son and Heir of him the said I. G. by vertue whereof the same T. into that Mannor with the appurtenances after the death of the aforesaid I. G. as Son and Heir of the aforesaid I. did Enter and was thereof sole seized in his Demesn as of Fee at the time of the Entrie aforesaid made and afterwards Without that that the same T. G. the same fourteenth day of August Traverse the Tenute in Common held the Mannor aforesaid in common and undivided with W. C. aforesaid in the form wherein the aforesaid I. and I. above have alleged And this c. whereupon he prayes Judgement whether his Writ aforesaid for the reason before alleged ought to be abated c. Issue upon the Traverse And the aforesaid I. and I. say that the aforesaid T. G. the aforesaid fourteenth day of August held the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances in common and undivided with the aforesaid W. C. in the form wherein the same I. and I. have above alleged And of this they put themselves upon the Country And the aforesaid T. G. in like manner c. Misnomer of the Town wherein the Entrie and Trespass is supposed to be Committed pleaded in Abatement AND the aforesaid I.F.I.W. and I.P. by W.F. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And all contempt and whatsoever c. And pray Judgement of the Originall Writ of the Plaint aforesaid Because whereas the aforesaid T. L. by the same Writ supposeth that the aforesaid I.F. I.W. and I.P. into the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in F. O. and other Villages as in the Writ c. were entred The same I. F. I.VV. and I. P. say that within the County of N. aforesaid there is not had nor at the time of the obtaining the aforesaid Writ was there had any Town any Hamlet or place known out of any Town and any Hamlet known or called by the name of Odnoggo And this c. Whereupon they pray Judgement of that Writ c. The Plaintif replies that there is no Misnomer and thereupon takes issue And the aforesaid I.VV. sayes that his Writ aforesaid for the Reason prealleged ought not to abate because he sayes that at the aforesaid time of the obteining of the Originall Writ of the Plaint aforesaid to wit the twelfth day of in the twenty fourth year of the Reign of our Lord the King that now is within the City aforesaid was had and as yet is had a certain Town known and
said Rent in his Demesn as of Fee And that the said R. afterward dyed after whose death the said Services descended unto the said I. T. as Cozen and Heir of him the said R. that is to say Son of the fifth son of M. the Daughter of G. Son of the said R. of whom the said N. the Estate in the said Tenements with th' appurtenances one I. L. now hath And because aswell the Homage of him the said I. L. unto the said I. T. after the death of the said R. remained due and as yet remaineth as the said Rent by 6. years next before the day of the said taking unto the said I. T. was behind and as yet being unpaid the said I. T. well avoweth the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. as parcell of the said Tenement of him the said I. T. in form aforesaid held and above the said I. L. as above his true Tenant and within his Fee c. And this he is ready to prove Whereupon he prayeth c. and the retorn of the said Cattell to be adjudged unto him c. Plaintif saith that he hath nothing in the Tenements unless a certein Demise by one I. L. made at the term of three years the Reversion thereof unto the said I. L. and his Heirs expectant and therfore prayeth aid of the said I.L. which said I. L. after sumons thereupon made unto him likewise commeth and joyneth himself with the Plaintif and saith that the said R. never was seized unless of the service of Fealty onely and the Rent of 10. shillings Without this that the said R. was seized of homage Fealty Escuage and the rent of twenty shillings in manner and form c by the hand of N.L. c. ss AND the said T. Wilde not acknowledging any matter in the Avowment of the said I. T. before alleged to be true saith that the said I. L. before the day of the said taking was seized in his Demesn as of Fee of the said Messuage with th' appurtenances whereof the said place in which c. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell and the said I. L. so thereof seized long before the said time that is to say in the Feast of St. Michael the Arch-Angel in the nineteenth year of the Reign of the now King at W. in the said County Demised unto the aforesaid T. W. the said Messuage with th' appurtenances To have to him and his Assignes from the said Feast of St. Michael untill the end and Term of three years from thence next following and fully to be Compleat by virtue of which the said T. long before the said time in which c. was thereof possessed Which said Term as yet indureth And so the said T. saith that he hath nothing in the said Messuage with th' appurtenances unless at the Term of three years in form aforesaid the Reversion thereof after that Term ended being expectant to the foresaid I. L. and his Heirs Without which said I. L. the said T. saith that he cannot answer unto the said Avowment of the said J. T. and prayeth Ayd of him the said I. L and hath c. Therefore the Sheriff is commanded that he * Summons in Ayd prayer of ayd Summon by good Summons the aforesaid I. L. that so before the said King from Easter day in three weeks wheresoever c. to answer to the said Avowment of the said I. T. together with the said T. W. if c. the same is given unto the said parties c. At which day before the said King at Westminster came as well the said T. W. as the said I. T. by their said Attorney And the said I. L. being summoned c. by T. H. his Attorney likewise commeth and joyneth himself with the aforesaid T. to answer unto the said I. T. together with the said T. W. to the said Avowment c. * Joyn in aid and traverse the tenure And aswell as the said T.W. the said J. L. who joyneth himself c. saith that the said J. T. the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. for the reason before alleged ought not to avow just because * Protestation protesting that the said N. did not hold the said Tenements with th' appurtenances of the said R. by the said Services in the said Avowment specified Neither that the said R. ever was seized of the said Services or of any parcell thereof besides Fealty and the Rent of ten shillings of the said 20. shillings by the hands of the said N. or of any other Tenant of that Tenement for Plea saith that the said N. L. held the said Tenements with th' appurtenances of the said R. B. by Fealty and the Rent of 10. shillings of the said 20. shillings unto the said R. and his Heirs at the said Feasts of Easter and St. Michael the Arch-Angel by equall Portions yearly to be paid of which Services the said R. was seized by the hands of the said N. as by the hands of his true Tenant that is to say of the said Fealty as of Fee and right and of that Rent in his Demesn as of Fee And the said T.W. and L. saith that the said Rent of ten shillings or any parcell thereof was not behind unto the said J. T. at the time of the said taking unpaid And they the said T. W. and J. L. say that the said R. or any of his Predecessors never was seized of the said ten shillings residue of the said 20. shillings nor any parcell thereof by the hands of the 〈◊〉 N. nor of any other Tenant of the said tenements with th' appurtenances after the Limitation of Assize of new disseisin that is to say after the first of the Lord King H. son of King Iohn in Vaston without this that the said N. held the said tenements Without this with th' appurtenances of the said R. by homage fealty and at the Escuage of the Lord the King and by the rent of twenty shillings by the year as by the said Avowment is supposed and this he is ready to prove whereupon from which the said I.T. the taking of the said Cattel before acknowledging prayeth judgement and his dammages by that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. Issue in prayer of Aid ss AND the said I.T. saith that the said N. tenant of the said tenements with th' appurtenances of the said R. by homage fealty and Escuage of the said Lord the King and the said rent of twenty shillings by the year in the form which the said I. T. before hath alleged And of this putteth himself upon the Country and they the said T.W. and I.L. who joyned themselves c. likewise c. therefore c. Declaration in replevin parcell in the detinuit and parcell in the detinet and the plantif prayeth that the defendant may be bound to
late King Father of the Lord the now King neither in the actuall or reall possession of the Lord the now King neither excepted in the foresaid Act of the said late King or by any Commission of the Lord the now King altered otherwise disposed neither changed by pretence of which said Act of the said Lord the now King the same Lord the now King from the said Feast of Easter in the said Act specified was of the Messuage aforesaid with th' appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Fee and so being thereof seized the said Lord the now King afterwards and before the said time of the aforesaid Trespass done by his Letters Patents the Date whereof is at Westminster the twentie first day of May in the third year of his Reign gave and granred and by his the said Letters Patents confirmed unto one I.H. B.B. the foresaid Messuage with th'arpurtenances among other Lands and Tenements to have hold and enjoy unto them the said I. and B. their Heirs and Assigns for ever by vertue of which said Grant they the said I. and B. were of the said Messuage with th' appurtenances seized in their Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized they the said I. and B. afterward and before the said time of the foresaid Trespass done that is to say sixth day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lord now King third at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid they gave and granted the said Messuage with th' appurtenances unto the same R. H. To have hold and enjoy the aforesaid Messuage with th' appurtenances unto the said R. H. his Heirs Trespas granted by Letters Patents of the King and Assigns for ever by pretence of which said Gift and Grant the said R. H. long before the said time in which c. into the said Messuage with th' appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee untill the said I. the day and year abovesaid in the said Declaration above specified with force and arms c. into the said Messuage with th' appurtenances broke in manner and form as he above c. against him complaineth Without this Without that that the said R. C. Demised Granted and to Farm let unto the foresaid I. R. the said Messuage with th' appurtenances in manner and form as the said I. above in pleading hath alleged and this c. VVhereupon from which the said I. the said Trespass above done acknowledged prayeth Judgement and his Damage by that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. And the said as I. before saith that the said Richard C. Demised Granted and to farm let unto the aforesaid I. R. the said Messuage with th' appurtenances in manner and form as she hath alleged and of this putteth her self upon the Countrey c. ss AND the said G. B. by W. W. his Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and Injury when Defendant justifies that the place is parcel of the M. of R. and that he as Servant of the Lord of the Mannor broke the Close and so justifies c. and as to the coming with force and arms c. and also the whole Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done besides the breaking of the said Close saith that he is not guilty and as to the breaking of that Close the said G. saith that no Action c. because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which the said Trespass is supposed to be done are and at the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done were two hundred and fifty acres of Heath and Furzes with th' appurtenances in W. aforesaid called Waldringfield Heath which said two hundred and fifty acres of Heath and Furzes lye between a certain way called the Procession way of Mertlesham dividing the said Furzes of W. Heath and certain Furzes called Marlad Heath in part and Land called Ringland late J. Kingbils in part of the Furzes called Brightwill Heath Abâ—ttals and Dapdalewey in part upon the South and Land called Colecroft in part and Land lying in the Town of Martlesham and the Heath in Martlesham and the Dâ—tch called Fexall Ditch of the North part and one head of the said Heath called Waldringfield Heath abutting upon the terre Tenements appertaining to the Mannor of Rivershall and Waldringfield against the east and other two hundred and fifty acres of Heath and Furzes are and at the said time in which c. were parcell of the Mannor of Rivershall in W. aforesaid Which said Mannor is and at the aforesaid time in which c. was the ground and Freehold of one I. and M. by which the Defendant as the Servant of them said I. and M. and by their Command the Close aforesaid as the proper Close and ground and freehold of them the said I. and M. did break as to him it was lawfull and this c. whereof c. Plaintif saith that the place c. is not parcell of the M. of R. but that one I. P. was seized and so seized Demised two hundred acres of oâ— Land parcell of the hundred and fifty acâ—es in bar specifies the Plaintif to hold unto the Plaintiff at the Will of the Lessor ss NOT to he precluded because he saith that the said Close and also the places in which the said Trespass whereupon the said R. himself above in manner Complaineth was done are and at the time of that Trespass were two hundred acres parcell of the said two hundred and fifty acres of Heath and Furzes in barre aforesaid before specified whereupon long before the said time of the foresaid time done one I. P. was seized in his Demesn as of Fee and the said I. so being thereof seized the said I. before the said time of the said Trespass done that is to say such a day and year at N. in the County aforesaid Demised the said two hundred acres of Heath and Furzes with th' appurtenances unto the said R.W. To have and to hold the said two hundred acres of Heath and Furzes with th' appurtenances unto the said R. at the will of her the said Jane by vertue of the same Demise the said R. into the said two hundred acres of Heath and Furzes with th' appurtenances before the foresaid time of the said Trespass done entred and was thereof possessed untill the said G. B. at the time of the said Trespass done the foresaid Close did break in manner and form as the said R. himself above Without this and in manner complaineth Without this that the said two hundred acres of Heath and Furzes are and at the time of the said Trespass done were parcell of the Mannor of Rivershall in manner and form as the said G. B. before in pleading hath alleged and this c. Whereupon from that the said G. the Trespass aforesaid before acknowledging the said R. prayeth Judgement and his Damages by reason of that
such Grant or Demise then had there being or continuance or after that time should have their being or continuance and then were not determined ended or expired or within one yeare next before the first day of the aforesaid Parliament had made or afterwards should make any Demise or Grant for tearm of life or for tearm of yeares of any Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements Meadowes Pastures Woods Rectories appropriate Tithes Pentions Portions Churches Chappels or other Hereditaments whatsoever upon which Demises and Grants the usuall and old Rents and Formes accustomed to be rendred and reserved by the space of twenty yeares next before the aforesaid first day of the same Parliament were not or should not be or afterwards had not been thereupon reserved and rendred or if any such Governor or Governesse of any such Monastery Abbey Priory House of Monks Colledge Hospitall House of Friers or other Religious or Ecclesiasticall House or Place which from that time should happen to be dissolved suppressed renounced lost forfeited surrendred or come to the Kings Highnesse within one yeare next before the aforesaid first day of the aforesaid Parliament had made or afterwards should make any Bargain or Sale of their Woods which Woods were then growing or standing that then all and every such Demise Grant Bargain and Sale of Wood or Woods should be altogether void and of none Effect as in the same Act amongst other things more fully appeares And further the same R. saies that the aforesaid late Master and the then Brotherhood of the Mannor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seized before the said time wherein c. to wit the sixth day of the Month of December in the three and thirtieth yeare of the aforesaid late King Henry the eighth at the Colledge aforesaid by their certain Writing with the common Seale of them the said late Master and then Brother-hood sealed And in the Court of Chancery of him the said late King at Westminster in the County of Middlesex inrolled of Record whose Date is in the Chapter House of them the said late Master and then Brother-hood there the same day and yeare wâ—th their unanimous Assent and Consent and Deliverance of Mind certain knowledge and meer motion for certain just and reasonable causes them the said late Master and then Brotherhood conscientiously moving their Soules voluntarily and of their own accord they gave and granted and by that Writing did give grant render deliver and confirm to the aforesaid late King Henry the eighth their whole Colledge with their Appurtenances and the aforesaid Mannor of E. and other the Premisses with the Appurtenances whereof c. and the Reversion and Reversions of the same Mannor amongst other things to have hold and injoy the aforesaid Colledge with all their Appurtenances and the aforesaid Manner of E. and other the Premisses with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things to the aforesaid late King his Heires Successors and Assignes to the sole proper behoofe use and profit of the same late King his Heires Successors and Assignes for ever as by the same Writing amongst other things more plainly appeares By virtue of which said Gift Grant and Act aforesaid the same late King was seized of the Mannor aforesaid and other the Premisses with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his Demesne as of Fee and Right in right of his Crown of England and being so thereof seized the same late King afterwards and before the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid made to wit the tenth day of December in the thirty fourth yeare of his Reigne by his Letters Patents which he the said R. brings here into Court whose Date is at Westminster the same day and yeare did give and grant unto Henry then Earle of Surrey the Mannor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things And the Reversion of the same Mannor to have and to hold to him the said Earle his Heires and Assignes for ever By virtue of which said Letters Patents the same late Earle was seized of the aforesaid Mannor with the Appurtenances whereof c. in his Demesne as of Fee and Right and so being thereof seized after and before the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid made the same late Earle the twentieth day of May in the thirty sixth yeare of the aforesaid late King by his Indenture at E. between him the said Earle by the name of the Honorable Henry Earle of Surrey Knight of the Honorable Order of the Garter on the one part and the aforesaid Richard by the name of Richard Filmerston Gentleman of the other part which other part with the Seale of the aforesaid Earle signed he the said R. brings here into Court whose Date is the same day and yeare did bargain and sell to him the said R. the Mannor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things by the name of the whole Mannor of E. with the Appurtenances in Suffolke and all Lands and Tenements Meadowes Feedings Pastures Woods Under-Woods Possessions and Hereditaments accepted reputed or taken as part parcell or Member of the aforesaid Mannor or to that Mannor in any manner pertaining as also all other Lands Tenements and Hereditaments being of the aforesaid Earles in E. or elsewhere in the County of S. which the aforesaid Earle had of the Gift and Grant of the aforesaid late King or which pertained or belonged or were part parcell or member or unto the aforesaid Colledge or of the Possession thereof within three yeares next before the dissolution of the same Colledge to have and to hold the aforesaid Mannor and all other the Premisses with their Appurtenances to the aforesaid R. his Heires and Assignes for ever as by the same Indenture amongst other things it more fully appeares Which sayd Indenture before Sampson Michell Clerke one of the Masters of the Court of Chancery of the aforesayd late King afterwards the same twentieth day of May in the thirty sixth yeare aforesayd as the Deed of him the sayd Earle by him the Earle was acknowledged and in the Chancery aforesayd the same day and yeare according to the forme of the Statute in that case published and provided was inrolled by which the same R. was seized of the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. in his Demesne as of Fee untill the aforesayd S. afterwards to wit the aforesayd time wherein c. into the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. did enter and the Close aforesayd then and there broke and the Grasse aforesayd then and there growing with the Cattell aforesayd did eate up trod downe c. in manner and forme as the aforesayd R. above against him complaines And further the same R. sayes That the aforesayd Demise of the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. by the aforesayd late Master and the Brotherhood to the aforesayd E. Bestroy and S. in forme aforesayd made had
his Continuance and being at the aforesayd time of the aforesayd Demise of the same Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesayd S. by the aforesayd late Master and Brotherhood in forme above in the Barr aforesayd specified was supposed to be done By which the same Demise in the Barr aforesayd pleaded in the same manner and forme made is voyd and of none effect And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesayd S. the Trespasse aforesayd in the aforesayd hundred Acres of Land with the appurtenances above acknowledgeth the same R. prayes Judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid S. as formerly saith The Defendant maintaines his Plea and traverseth the demise of the Master and Brother-hood to T. Bostnay and S. That the aforesaid late Master and Brotherhood aforesayd of the late Colledge long before the aforesayd time of the Trespasse aforesayd above supposed to be done were seized of the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. in their Demesne as of Fee in right of their Colledge aforesayd And the said late Master and Brotherhood of the same late Colledge of that Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. being seized the same late Master and Brotherhood of the aforesayd late Colledge before the aforesayd time wherein c. to wit the aforesaid twentieth day of December in the thirtieth yeare of the Raign of the aforesayd late King at R. aforesayd by their aforesayd Writing indented with the Seale of them the sayd Master and Brotherhood sealed and to the Court of our aforesayd late Queen shewen as aforesayd whose date is the same day and yeare by their unanimous assent and consent did demise and to Farme let unto the aforesayd S. his Heires Executors and Assignes the aforesaid Mannor of E. with the appurtenances to have and to hold the aforesaid mannor with the apuptenances whereof c. to the aforesayd S. his Executors and Assignes from the aforesayd Feast of the Intention of the holy Crosse last past before the date of the said indented Writing unto the end and terme of fifty yeares from thence next following and fully to be compleat and ended By vertue of which sayd Demise the aforesayd S. into the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances did enter and was thereof possessed in manner and forme as the aforesayd S. above by pleading hath alledged Without that that the aforesayd late Master and Brotherhood aforesayd of the late Colledge demised the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesayd E. Bestnay and S. in manner and forme as the aforesayd R. above by Replication hath alleadged And this c. Whereupon he prayes Judgment and that the aforesayd R. may be debarred from having his Action aforesayd against him c. AND the aforesayd R. F. as formerly saith That the aforesayd late Master and Brotherhood of the aforesayd late Colledge did demise the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesayd E. B. and S. in manner and forme as the aforesayd R. above by Replication hath alledged and this hee prayes may be inquired of by the Countrey And the aforesaid S. in like manner c. Therefore command is to the Sheriff of Norfolke A Justification in Trespasse by a Prescription for a Procession way in another place then in the declaration with a traverse that he is guilty in the place in the declaration that he cause to come here twelve c. AND the aforesayd T. A. R. T. M. and others by W.H. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And the aforesayd T. M. sayes That he is in nothing thereof guilty And of this c. and the aforesaid Prior in like manner c. And the aforesaid T. A. R. and others as to the coming by Force and Armes say that they are in nothing thereof guilty And of this c. and the aforesaid Prior in like mannor c. And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made they the said T A.R. and others say that the aforesaid Prior ought not to have his action aforesaid against them Because they say that long before the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be done one E. M. was seized of one Marsh called forty acres containing forty acres of Marsh land with the appurtenances lying in the Parish of H. in the County aforesaid in his demesne as of fee and being so thereof seized before the said time wherein c. at H. aforesaid demised the aforesaid forty acres of Marsh Land to the aforesaid Prior to hold to him at the will of him the said E. By vertue of which demise hee the said Prior the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made was thereof possessed further say that the same T. A. is and the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done was Vicar of the Parish Church of H. aforesaid and that they the said R. and others at the same time of that Trespasse supposed to be made were Parishioners of the same Parish of H. and dwelling within the same Parish and further say that the aforesaid T.A. and all his predecessors Vicars of the Parish Church of H. aforesaid and whomsoever Parishioners of the same Parish from the time being from time out of minde were used and accustomed yearly at their pleasure on the Eve of Ascention day within the Rogation dayes to go and walk about through the Marsh aforesaid with solemne procession of the aforesaid Parish of H. By which the aforesaid T. A. the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made then being Vicar of the same Church And the aforesaid R. and others then Parishioners of the same Parish of H. and dwelling within the same Parish on the Eve of Ascention day within the Rogation daies in the aforesaid first year of the Reign of our Lord the King that now is with other Parishioners of the same Parish with the solemne procession of the same Parish did goe and walke about the aforesaid forty acres of Marsh The aforesaid Prior then of the Marsh aforesaid being possessed by vertue of the demise aforesaid to him made and in that walking about the grasse aforesaid in the same Marsh then growing by walking with their feet they did tread down and consume as it was lawfull for them to doe Without that that the aforesaid T. A. R. and others are guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid in S. aforesaid supposed to be done in the forme which the aforesaid Prior above against them complaineth and this c. Whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid Prior ought to have his action aforesaid against them ANd the aforesaid Prior sayes Issue upon the Traverse that he ought not be debarred from having his Action aforesaid against c. Because he saith by Protestation that the aforesaid
Marsh called forty acres is in Seasalton aforesaid and not in the parish of H. by protestation also that the aforesaid E. was not seized of the aforesaid forty acres of Marsh nor demised them to him the said Prior in form aforesaid and not acknowledging any thing by the said T. A. R. and which is above alledged to be true For plea saith that the said T. A. R. and others are guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid in Seasalton aforesaid in the form wherein he the same Prior above against them complaineth and this he praies may be enquired of by the Country and the aforesaid T. A. R. and others in like manner c. ANd the aforesaid W.T. and T.C. by W.R. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. Justification in Trespasse for a â—erriot Custome And as to the coming by force and armes c. or whatsoever c. not guilty And as to the taking of the Oxe aforesaid they the said W. and T. say that the aforesaid Administrator ought not to have his Action aforesaid against them Because they say that long before the aforesaid time wherein the aforesaid I. the Testator c. was seized of twenty acres of Lands with the appurtenances in B. aforesaid in his demesne as of Fee And being so thereof seized held the same twenty acres of Land with the appurtenances of Thomas Bishop of London as of his Mannor of Boughton Aylusse in the County aforesaid by fealty and rent of 12 d. by the year that is to say at the Feast of St. Andrew the Apostle 3 d. thereof and at the feasts c. 3 d. thereof residue by equall portions yearly to be paid And by the service of doing Suit to the Court of the said Bishop of his Mannor aforesaid from three weekes to three weekes at Boughton A. aforesaid to be held and by the service of rendring after the death of each Tenant dying thereof seized and after each alienation of the same twenty acres of Land in fee made by way of releife three pence one farthing and the third part of one farthing And by the service of rendring to the aforesaid Bishop after the death of each Tenant dying of the aforesaid twenty acres of Land seized the best living beast of the same Tenants at the time of his death in the name of a Herriot of which said services the same Bishop was seized by the hands of the aforesaid Testator as by the hands of his true Tenant and otherwise thus That the aforesaid Bishop and all his Ancestors and all they whose estate the same Bishop hath in the aforesaid Mannor of B A. with the appurtenances have had and time out of minde were accustomed to have of all and all manner of Tenants of the Mannor aforesaid and of each Tenant of the same Mannor whose Lands or Tenements of the Lord of the Mannor aforesaid as of the same Mannor holdeth and these Lands or Tenements or any parcell thereof so held he alienateth to any person or persons in fee notice thereupon in the life time of him who alienateth those Lands or Tenements by them or by him to which or to whom such Lands or Tenements should be sold to the Lords of the said Mannor for the time being being not given or made after the death of such Tenant so alienating the best living beast which was his the said Tenants so alienating at the time of his death by the name of a customary Herriot And the aforesaid W. and I. say that the aforesaid I.S. the Testator c. was seized of the aforesaid twenty acres of land with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee and being so thereof seized enfeoffed T.S. and I.S. of the same twenty acres of Lands with the appurtenances of the aforesaid Bishop in forme aforesaid then being held to hold to them their heirs and assigns for ever By vertue of which said Feoffment they the said T.S. and I.S. were thereof seized in their demesne as of Fee and the aforesaid J.S. the Testator afterwards dyed No notice by the same T.S. and I.S. or either of them of that Feoffement to the aforesaid Bishop at the time of the said Feoffement then as yet being Lord of the Mannor in the life of the aforesaid J.S. the Testator being given or made and the aforesaid W. and T. further say that the aforesaid I. S. the Testator at the time of his death was possessed of the Oxe aforesaid as of his proper Oxe which then was his best living beast at the time of his death By means whereof they the said W. and T. as the servants of the same Bishop and by his command the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made The Oxe aforesaid as the best living Beast which was the aforesaid I.S. the Testator at the time of his death in the custody of the aforesaid Administrators at B. A. aforesaid there found in the name of a customary Herriot they took and led away as it was lawfull for them to doe And this c. whereupon c. AND the aforesaid I.T.S. and I. Administrators c. say The Plaintiffe sayes by Protestation that the Lands were 〈◊〉 held by such or so many services put c. for Plea that they did the Trespasse de injuria propria and traverse the custome that they levy any thing c. ought not to be debarred from having their action aforesaid against them because by Protestation that the aforesaid twenty acres of Lands are not sold of the aforesaid Bishop by such nor so many services as the aforesaid W. and T. above have alleadged for Plea they say that the aforesaid W. and T. the day and year aforesaid by force and armes of their proper injury the Oxe aforesaid out of the possession of the Administrators aforesaid at B. aforesaid found they tooke and led away as the same I. T. S. and I. above against them complaine without that that the aforesaid Bishop and his Ancestors and all they whose estates the same Bishop hath in the aforesaid Mannor with the appurtenances were and from the whole time aforesaid were used and accustomed of all and all manner of the Tenants and of every Tenant of the Mannor aforesaid who holds Lands or Tenements of the Lord of the Mannor aforesaid as of the same Mannor And those Lands or Tenements or any parcell thereof so held shall have sold to any person or persons in Fee notice thereof in the life of him who shall so have alienated those Lands and Tenements by him or them to which or to whom these Tenements shall be sold unto the Lord of the same Mannor for the time being not being given or made after the death of the Tenant so alienating the best living beast which was of his the said Tenants so alienating at the time of his death in the name of a customary Herriot as the aforesaid W. and T. above hath
Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done entred upon which said T.B. possession thereupon the aforesaid T. A. and W. as the servants of them the said F. and I. and by their commandement the aforesaid time wherein c. into the same Tenements with the appurtenances re-entred and the close aforesaid then there broke and the corne and grasse then there growing did tread downe and consume continuing that treading downe and consumption in forme aforesaid as it was lawfull for them to do And this c. Whereupon c. Whether action c. The Plaintiffe Assigns Trespasse anew AND the aforesaid T.R. sayes that he by any thing by the aforesaid T.A. and VV. pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against them of the Trespasse aforesaid made because he saith that the place in which the Trespasse aforesaid whereof he above now complaineth is and the said time wherein c. was two hundred acres of Lands in R aforesaid called Fatherfeild Thistlecrosse and Churchfield other then the Tenements aforesaid in the aforesaid barre of them the said T.A. and VV. specified VVhereupon for that the aforesaid T.A. and VV. to the Trespasse aforesaid in the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land answer not he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. ANd the aforesaid T.A. and W. as to the trespasse aforesaid in the aforesaid two hundred acres of land anew assigned supposed to be done The Defendants justifie the Trespasse in the lands anew assigned for certain way from their houses to the Church say that the aforesaid T.R. ought not to have or maintain his action aforesaid against them c. because they say that the aforesaid T.A. and W. are and the aforesaid time wherein c. were seized of one Messuage with the appurtenances in R. aforesaid in their demesne as of Fee and that they and all those whose estate the same T.A. and W. have in the same Messuage with the appurtenances were accustomed to have a certaine way from the said Messuage unto the Parish Church of R. over and upon the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land from the time out of mind c. By which the same T.A. and W. the aforesaid time wherin c. into the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land entred using their way aforesaid in the same as it was lawfull for them to doe which is the same trespasse of breaking the Close aforesaid and treading downe and consuming the grasse aforesaid in the same two hundred acres of Land whereof the aforesaid A. B. above against them complaineth And this c. whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid T.B. ought to have and maintaine his action aforesaid against them c. ANd the aforesaid T.B. saies that he by any thing before alledged ought not to be debaâ—red from having his action aforesaid against them The Plaintiff by protestation saies the Defendant had no way for plea that they trod down the grasse out of the way because by protestation that the aforesaid T. A. and W. and all they whose state the same A.T. and W. have in the Messuage aforesaid have not had nor were accustomed to have the way aforesaid from the Messuage aforesaid to the Church aforesaid over and upon the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land in the aforesaid last bar specified from the time out of mind c. as they above by pleadings have alledged for plea he sayes that he the same T.B. was of the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land with the appurtenances long before the said time wherein c. seized in his demesne as of Fee untill the aforesaid T. A. and W. by force and armes aforesaid the Close aforesaid in the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land did breake and the come and grasse aforesaid out of that way growing did tread downe and consume in manner and forme as the same T. B. above by pleading hath alledged and this c. whereupon he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. ANd the aforesaid T.A. and W. as to the trespasse aforesaid out of the way aforesaid in the aforesaid two hundred acres of Lands supposed to be made say that they are nothing thereof guilty And of this they put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid T.B. in like manner c. The Defendants justifie the taking of a Mortuary by vertue of a Demise to them of the Rectory c. Trin. 21. Hen. 7. Rol 62 ANd the aforesaid R. P. and W. P. by A. B. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. and as to the coming by force and armes or whatsoever c. not guilty c. and as to the residue c. the same R. and W. say that the aforesaid plaintiffe ought not to have his action c. because they say that one L. Prior of the house and Church of the blessed Mary and St. Thomas the Martyr of the now place near Guilford is and the said time wherein c. was Parson imparsonate of the Church of Ewel aforesaid and that he and all his Predecessors Priors of the house aforesaid from the time out of minde c. were Parsons of the same Church imparsonate in the same And that he and all his Predecessors aforesaid Parsons of the Church aforesaid by the whole time aforesaid were used and accustomed to have of every person within the Precinct of the Parish of Ewel aforesaid dying to whom the Sacraments and holy things at the time of his death are administred or administrable one living Beast of the same so dying person if the same dying man have beasts at the time of his death or before or the best thing of him the said so dying man if he have no living beasts at the same time in the name of a Mortuary for the holy things to him so dying to be celebrated And that the aforesaid Prior and all his Predecessours aforesaid Parsons of the Church aforesaid from the whole time aforesaid were used and accustomed to take and seize such Mortuary so happening to whose hands soever they should come And the same R.P. and VV. say that the aforesaid now Prior long before the said time wherein c. that is to say such a day and yeer at Ripley in the County aforesaid demised to the aforesaid R.P. the Rectory of Ewel aforesaid with all fruits oblations offerings glebes lands and other their appurtenances whatsoever To have and to hold to him the said R.P. and his Assigns untill the end and terme of one and twenty years from thence next following and fully to be compleat By vertue of which Demise the aforesaid R.P. long before the said time wherein c. was of the Rectory aforesaid and other the premises with their appurtenances possessed And hee being so thereof possessed after and before the said time that is to
any compleat summe of money to the damage of her the said Lady A. five hundred pounds and thereupon shee brings her Suit c. Action of the Case against the Bayliffe of a Liberty in the nature of an escape E W. complaines of J. Pelson Bayliffe of the Liberty of Thomas Wentworth Knight Lord Wentworth of his liberty of Stepney in the County aforesaid in the custody of the Marshal c. for that that is to say whereas one R.E. Citizen c. was indebted to him the said E.W. in 9 l. 13 s. and 4 d. of lawful money of England for nine pound of black stitching silk to him the said R E. by the aforesaid E. W. formerly delivered to be paid to him the said E.W. upon such a day then next following And whereas also the aforesaid E.W. for the recovery of the debt aforesaid for that the aforesaid R.E. the aforesaid such a day and year the aforesaid 9 l. 13 s. and 4 d. to the aforesaid E. W. had in no wise paid or contented out of the Court of her the said Lady the Queen before her the said Lady the Queen at Westminster in the County of Middlesex had procured a certain precept of her the said Lady the Queene directed to the Sheriffs of Middlesex By which the same Lady the Queen commanded the aforesaid Sherifs that they should take the aforesaid R. E. if c. And safely c. So that they might have his Body before our Lady the Queen at Westminster such a day to answer the aforesaid E.W. of a Plea of Trespasse By vertue of which said precept A. Avenon and H. Baskerfield at that time Sheriffs of the said County of Middlesex afterwards to wit such a day and yeare and place on the behalfe of our Lady the Queen commanded the aforesaid I. then Baylife of the Liberty aforesaid that he should take the aforesaid R. E. if c. And safely c. So that he might have his Body before our Lady the Queen at Westminster the aforesaid Friday next after the Morrow of the holy Trinity to answer the aforesaid E. W. of the Plea aforesaid Which said Bayliff by vertue of the Precept aforesaid afterwards to wit such a day and yeare aforesaid at Mile-end in the aforesaid County of Middlesex within the Liberty aforesaid took and Arrested the aforesaid R.E. And him the said R. E. under that Arrest by the space of five daies thence next following he then and there had and kept And whereas also in the aforesaid Court of our Lady the Queen held before her the said Queen there was and time out of minde was had such a Custom that every party appearing a Defendant in the same Court under Arrest of any Sheriff or Minister by vertue of any such like precept should be bound to answer as well the Plaintif in the same precept specified as all and singular other the Subjects of our Lady the Queen complayning against such person of and in all and singular Actions Suits and Playnts of Debt or Trespasse which any such like Subjects of our Lady the Queen would prosecute against any such like Defendant so appearing in the same Court yet the aforesaid I. not ignorant of the premises plotting the aforesaid E.W. of his debt aforesayd to defraud hath neither returned the Warrant aforesayd of the aforesayd Sheriff nor hath brought in the Body of the aforesaid R E. but the same I. afterwards to wit such a day yeare and place permitted the aforesayd R.E. to go at large whether he would without any appearance had or made in the said Court he the sayd E. W. being in no wise satisfied of his Debt aforesayd And the aforesayd R. E. afterwards fled to places to the aforesayd E. W. altogether unknown by which the aforesayd E. W. is wholly defrâ—uded of the Recovery of his Debt aforesayd to the damage of him the sayd E.W. of 20. l. And thereupon he brings his Suit c. T D. Esquire Complaines of G. S. in the custody of the Marshall Action of the Case against one for hindring the Steward from keeping Court. c. for that that is to say whereas the aforesaid T. such a day year was seised yet remaines seised in his demesne as of see of and in the Mannor of R. with the Appurtenances Scituate and being at R. in the aforesaid County of D. And the same T. D. and all they whose Estate the same T. now hath of and in the Mannor aforesaid with the Appurtenances have had and held and of right ought to have and hold a Court Baron at that Mannor from three weeks to three weeks By vertue whereof the aforesaid T. D. not only diverse gaines profits and Commodities by reason of the Court aforesaid from time to time got and obteyned but also diverse Neighbourly agreements and friendships which between the Tenants and Suitors of the Court aforesaid and the aforesaid T. interchangeably by the keeping of that Court diverse wayes did increase arise and were preserved And whereas also the aforesaid T. D. such a day and yeare and place so being seised of the Mannor aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his demesne as of fee intended and endeavoured to hold a certaine Court Baron by one W.M. then being his Stuard of the Mannor aforesaid for that within three weeks then last past no Court Baron had there been held and by publick Proclamation in the presence of E. D. and I. B. Tenants of the Mannor aforesaid and of diverse other Tenants of him the said T. of the Mannor aforesaid at that Mannor in the Court there endeavoured to proceed the aforesaid G. S. plotting him the said T. D. to hinder from all the profits advantages and Commodities of the Court aforesaid by force and Armes that is to say with Swords c. By contumelious words and threatnings such and so great threats of danger of their lives of them the said Steward and Tenants and of mayming them the said Steward and Tenants in their Members so then and there gave out That the same Steward and Tenants durst not any further to proceed in the same Court there to be held for feare of those threats but the same Steward and Tenants upon that occasion were caused to depart from the same Court leaving the businesse thereof undone by which he the same T. all the profit gaine and Commoditie of his Court aforesaid did wholly lose and was deprived of to the damage of him the sayd T. 100. And thereupon c. Declaration in Trespas upon the Case for cancelling a Bond. A. A. Widdow complaines of R. F. in the Custody of the Marshall c. for that that is to say whereas the aforesaid A. such a day and year at L. c. had delivered to the aforesaid R. her certaine writing Obligatory in which was contained that one I.F. was bound and obliged to her the said A. in 24. l. of lawfull mony of England to be
have alleged and that the aforesaid I. R. and H. were of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances seised in their Demesn as of Fee untill the aforesaid G. W. and R. them the said I. and H. thereof unjustly and without judgement but not by force nor Arms they did disseize and they Assess the damages of them the said I. and H. by occasion of the premises aforesaid above their expences and costs by them about the prosecution of this Assize layd out to thirteen shillings and four pence Judgement upon the verdict and for those expences and costs to twenty shillings Therefore it is considered that the aforesaid I. R. and H. shall recover the seisin of the Tenements aforesaid in the Plaint aforesaid specified by the view of the Reviewers of the Assize aforesaid and their damages and costs aforesaid above assessed which said damages in the whole amount unto thirty three shillings and four pence and the aforesaid G.VV. and R. in mony c. Mony c. SIr Iohn Knill and Hugh Lochard have arraigned an Assize of novell disseisin against G. H. and others The charge given to the Jury upon the foregoing assize and supposeth them to be disseised of their Free-hold in H. and have made their claim for a Messuage and eighteen Acres of Land with the appurtenances thereunto hath come the same G. by his Attorney and saith that the Assize thereof between him and the said I. R. and H. L. ought not to be for that he saith as in his Plea and the aforesaid W. and others Defendants say that they have done no wrong nor no disseisin unto the said Plaintiff of the aforesaid Tenements and of that they have put them upon the Assize and the Plaintiff also and then rehearse further the title of the Plaintiff in his reputation and the issue that is joyned thereupon and then thus so your charge is whether that W. B. dyed seised in his Demesn as of Fee of the Messuage and eighteen acres of Land put in view and specified in the Plaint as the said G. H. hath alleged in his Bar or not and also whether the said W. H. and other Defendants disseised the Plaintiffs of the Tenements aforesaid or not if you find that the same W. B. dyed not seised as the Plaintiff hath alleged you shall enquire whether the Plaintiffs were seised of the Tenements put in view and specified in the Plaint in their Demesn as of Freehold and disseised by all the Defendants or any of them and whether the disseisin was done with force or not and if you find the said A.B. dyed not seised and that the Plaintffs were seised of the Tenements and disseised by the Defendants or some or any of them you shall enquire what damage the Plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the disseisin and also for the costs about the sute of this Assize and if you find that W. B. dyed seised in his Demesn as of Fee and that the Defendant disseised not the Plaintiff you shall enquire no further and this is your charge c. ACTIONS OF AUDITA QUERELA AUDITA QUERELA ss THE Lady the Queen hath sent to her Justices of the Pleas assigned to be held before her Audita Querela upon an Escape by a Bailiff of a Libertie her Writ in these words ss Ellzabeth c. To our Justices of Pleas in our Court before us assigned to be held Greeting Wee have received by the grievous complaint of Thomas Boyton of c. in the County of Suffolk Clerk otherwise called c. That whereas one William Andrews Citizen c. and Lewis Simpson Citizen c. London lately in our Court before us at Westminster by Bill without our Writ and by the judgement of the same Court had recovered against him the said Thomas aswell a certain debt of 100. pounds as 10. pounds for their Damages which they susteined aswell by occasion of the detention of that debt as for their Expences and costs c. layd out whereof he is Convict And although after the rendring of that Judgement to wit the second day of July in the the 31. year of our Reign at Saint Edmonds Burie in the County of Suffolk that is to say within the Libertie and Franchise then of Roger Townsend Knight and Willam Drue Esquire of St. Edmonds Bury in the aforesaid County of Suffolk the same Thomas by John Pridie and Henry Doy by vertue of a certain Warrant lately before to the aforesaid John Pridie and Henry by the aforesaid Roger Townsend and William Drue made and directed by vertue of a certain Warrant to them the said Roger and William Dixie by one Philip Tilvey Esquire then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Suffolk under the Seal of his Office made of and upon a certain VVrit of Capias ad fatisfaciendum o' the aforesaid William Andrews and Lewis Sympson of the Debt and Damages aforesaid lately before at the prosecution of them the said W. A. and L. from our said Court before us issued and to the Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Suffolk lately before directed and delivered VVhich said Roger Townsend and William Dixie then that is to say the aforesaid second day of July in the aforesaid 31. year of our Reign and before and after had full Retorn of all and all manner of Writs and Warrants within the Libertie aforesaid to be Executed and the Execution of them In Execution of and for the Debt and Damages aforesaid was then taken and arrested And in Execution deteined untill afterwards to wit the third day of November in the 31 year aforesaid the aforesaid K. T. and W D. the same T. B. at Lamby hath in this County of Surrey the Debt and Damages aforesaid to the aforesaid William Andrews and Lewis Sympson being in no wise satisfied permitted him to goe whether he would at large As the same Thomas by divers wayes and means which are convenient is ready to make appear yet the same W. and L. by reason of the judgement aforesaid for the Debt and Damages aforesaid against him the said Thomas in our said Court before us now lately prosecuteth And him upon that occasion to take and in our Prison under the Custodie of our Marshall of our Marshalsees before us to be deteined most unjustly have procured to his the said T. B. no little loss and grievance and against the Law of our Realm of England Whereupon he hath humbly implored us to provide for him in that behalf a fit remedie And because we would not that the aforesaid T. B. should in that behalf be in any manner injured and being willing to doe what is just VVee Command you that having heard the Complaint of the aforesaid T. B. in this behalf and calling before you the parties aforesaid and hearing hereto thereupon their severall reasons to him the said T. B. you should cause to be had full and speedy Justice as of right and according to the Law
and Custom of our Realm of England ought to be done VVitness our self at Westminster the twenty sixth day of October in the thirty second year of our Reign The Declaration of the Plaintifs After to wit on Munday next after the morrow of All Souls in the self-same Term before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster came the aforesaid T. B. under the Custody of the Sheriff of the County aforesaid in Execution for the debt and Damages aforesaid to the Bar here brought in his proper person who is committed to the Marshal c. and presently sayes that he in person in Execution for the Debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be deteyned because that he sayes that the aforesaid I. Pridie and Henry Day the aforesaid T.B. the second day of July in the thirty first year of the Reign of our said Lady the Queen that now is at St. Edmonds Bury in the County of Suffolk that is to say within the Libertie and Franchise then of Roger Townsend Knight and Dix Esquire of St. Edmonds Burie in the County of Suffolk aforesaid which said Roger and VVilliam Dix then and before and after had full retorn of all and all manner of VVrits and Warrants within the Liberty aforesaid to be executed by vertue of a certain Warrant lately before to the aforesaid I. P. and H. by the aforesaid R. T. and W. D. made and directed by vertue of a certain Warrant to them the said R. T. and W. D. by one Philip Tilney Esquire then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Suffolk under the Seal of his Office made of and upon a certain Writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum of the aforesaid W. A. and L. S. of the debt and damages aforesaid lately before at the prosecution of the said W. A. and L. in the aforesaid Court of the said Lady the Queen before her the said Queen issued and to the Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Suffolk lately before directed and delivered they took and arrested And him the said T. B. then and there in Execution for the Debt and Damages aforesaid under their custodie had Untill the aforesaid R. T. and W. D. the same T. B. so taken and arrested in Prison in Execution for the Debt and Damages aforesaid being afterwards to wit the third day of November in the thirty first year of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England aforesaid at Lamby Heath in the County of Surrey out of the Prison there they did permit to escape and go at large by reason whereof the same T. B. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid was clearly discharged And prays that he from the Prison aforesaid in which by the aforesaid occasion he is now deteined for the Debt and Damages aforesaid he may be delivered And because the Court of our Lady the Queen here are unknowing whether the allegation of him the said T. B. be true or no It is Commanded the Sheriff that by honest men Scire facias awarded c. he make known to the aforesaid W. A. and L. S. that they be before our Lady the Queen in eight dayes of St. Hillary wheresoever c. to shew if they have any thing for themselves or know what to say wherefore the aforesaid T. B. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be discharged and from the Prison aforesaid in which by the aforesaid occasion he is deteined to be set free c. if c. And further c. The same day is given to the aforesaid T. B. in the Custody of the Marshall c. And upon this comes such Manuceptors Recognizance entred into c. in their proper persons and so recite the Recognizance At which day here before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid T. R. in his proper person The Sheriff Retorns a Scire fac ' And the Sheriff Retorns that by vertue of the aforesaid VVrit to him thereupon directed he hath made known to the aforesaid W. A. and L.S. of being before our Lady the Queen at the aforesaid Town in the aforesaid VVrit conteined by I. Donne and R. Fenne honest men c. as by the same Writ it was Commanded him And the aforesaid H. A. and L. so warned c. On the fourth day of the Plea being solemnly called The Defendants approve by Attorney and imparl by Edward Wemmo their Attorney came and prayed thereupon day of imparting and it is granted unto them c. And upon this day thereupon is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Queen from the day of Easter in Fifteen dayes wheresoever c. That is to say to the aforesaid W. A. and L. to impart and then to answer c. At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came aswell the aforesaid T. R. in his proper person as the aforesaid W. A. and L. by their Attorney aforesaid And the aforesaid W. A. and L. further pray day thereupon of imparting And it is granted unto them c. And upon this day is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen to the Morrow of the Holy Trinitie from thence next following wheresoever c. that is to say c. as before At which day c. as before And so to imparl unto Eight dayes of St. Michael then next following At which said eight dayes of St. Michael before our same Lady the Queen at Westminster came aswell the aforesaid T. B. in his proper person as the aforesaid W. A. and L. by their Attorney aforesaid The Defendants plead Escape And the aforesaid VV. A. and L. S. say that by any thing before alleged the aforesaid T. B. ought not to be discharged from the Execution aforesaid Because they say that the aforesaid R. T. and VV. D. did not permit the same T. B. to Escape and goe at large in manner and form as the same T. B. hath above alleged Issue joyns thereupon And upon this they put themselves upon the Countrey and the aforesaid T. B. in like manner c. Therefore the Jurie thereupon is to come before our Lady the Queen in eight dayes of St. Hillary wheresoever c. And who neither c. to Recognize c. Because aswell c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid Jury put in respite c. From which day the Jurie aforesaid between the parties aforesaid was put in respite thereupon between them before our Lady the Queen at Westminster untill from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes from thence next following for want of Jurors c. At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came aswell the aforesaid T. B. in his proper person as the aforesaid VV. A. and L. S. by their Attorney aforesaid And the Jurors called in like manner came who to speak to the truth of the Premisses being chosen tried and sworn say upon their Oaths that the aforesaid T. B.
was taken and arrested in Execution for the Debt and Damages aforesaid as in the Record aforesaid above is specified And that the aforesaid R.T. and VV. D Bayliffs of the Libertie and Franchise aforesaid in the County of Suffâ—lk aforesaid did bring the aforesaid T. B. to VVestminster in the County of Middlesex on Monday before the retorn of the Writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum in the Record aforesaid above mentioned The day of the Retorn of the aforesaid Capias ad satisfaciend ' being on Monday next after the morrow of All Souls in the thirty first year of the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England And that before the retorn thereof the aforesaid Bayliffs of the Libertie and Franchise aforesaid the aforesaid T. B. at the request of him the said T. B. to the Village of Lambeth in the County of Surrey did carry which said Village of Lombeth is a Village neer adjoyning to Westminster aforesaid but out of the way and not in the way from the County of Suffolk aforesaid unto VVestminster aforesaid nor is between the County of Suffolk aforesaid and VVestminster aforesaid And that the aforesaid Bayliffs of the Liberties and Franchises aforesaid afterwards at the aforesaid day of the aforesaid Retorn of the aforesaid Writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum did bring the aforesaid T. B. to VVestminster aforesaid And him the said T. B. in the Court of our Lady the Queen before her the said Queen at VVestminster aforesaid into the Prison of the said Court of our Lady the Queen called the Kings Bench by vertue or colour of the aforesaid Writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum they did deliver And further the Jury say that the aforesaid T. B. from the time of the arrest of him the said T. B. aforesaid unto the retorn of the aforesaid Writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum and the delivery of the aforesaid T. B. into the Court of her the said Lady the Queen before her the said Queen as is aforesaid remained and continued with the aforesaid Bayliffs by vertue or colour of the aforesaid Writ or Warrant But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid Speciall Verdicts in form aforesaid found the bringing of the aforesaid T. B. to Lambeth aforesaid c. in manner and form aforesaid be an Escape out of Prison and a permission to goe at large in Law nor no the Jury aforesaid are altogether ignorant Whereupon they pray the advisement and discretion of the Court of our Lady the Queen now here before her the said Lady the Queen being And if it shall seem to the said Court of our said Lady the Queen that the aforesaid bringing of the aforesaid T. B. to Lambeth aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid be an Escape out of Prison and a permission to goe at large in the Law then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid that the aforesaid R. T. and T. D. the aforesaid T. B. at Lambeth in the County of Surrey aforesaid out of the Prison aforesaid to Escape and to goat large they did permit in manner and form as the aforesaid T.B. he hath above alleged and if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Court of the Lady the Queen that the afore bringing of him to the said T.B. to Lambeth aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid be not an Escape out of Prison and a permission to go at large in the Law Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that the aforesaid R.T. and W.D. did not permit the same T.B. out of Prison aforesaid to Escape and to goe at large in manner and form as the aforesaid T. B. hath above alleged ACTIONS OF CONSPIRACIE CONSPIRACIE Norfolk Declaration in Conspiracie for procuring one to be Endicted for Witchcraft ss NIcholas Stockdale complains of William Skippon of Hiâ—cham c. John Green of c. William Waters of c. and John Hitch of c. in the custodie of the Marshall c. for that that is to say that whereas they the aforesaid William Skippon Iohn Green William Waters and Iohn Hitch the 12. day of July in the 44. year of the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England at Fakensam in the County aforesaid by Conspiracy fore thought between them the aforesaid Nicholas for that he the first day of December in the year of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 44. and diver other dayes after the said first day of December should practise and exercise Witchcraft and Sorcery wickedly and Feloniously at Hitcham aforesaid in upon and against one Mary Skippon then the Wife of the aforesaid William Skippon by which said practices and exercises of the said Witchcraft the aforesaid Mary from the aforesaid first day of December in the 44. year aforesaid untill the 20. day of the month of February in the 44. year aforesaid most dangerously and mortally was sick and languished and the same 20. day of February in the 44. year aforesaid the same Mary by the said practise and exercise of the aforesaid Witchcraft at Hitcham aforesaid in the County aforesaid dyed and that the aforesaid Nicholas Stockdale to the same Mary at Hitcham aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid of his malice fore thought willingly devillishly wickedly and feloniously by the practise and exercise of the Witchcraft aforesaid did kill and murder against the peace of our said Lady the Queen and against the form of the Statute of our said late Lady the Queen held at Westminster in the County of Middlesex in the 5. year of her Reign in that case published and provided Before our then very beloved and faithfull Counsellour of our said Lady the Queen Iohn Popham Knight chief Justice of the said late Queen of the Pleas in the Court of her the said late Queen before her the said Queen assigned to be held and Robert Clark one of the Barons of the Exchequer of the same late Queen Justices of the Assizes of the said late Queen in the aforesaid County of Norfolk then assigned to be taken held at the Castle of Norwich the twelfth day of July in the 44. year aforesaid as also the Justices of the same late Queen for the keeping of the Peace in the County aforesaid and assigned to hear and determine of divers Felonies Trespasses and other misdemeanours in the same County then committed at the Castle of Norwich in the County aforesaid to be endited and him the said Nicholas upon that occasion then and there to be taken and in the Gaol of the said Castle of our late said Lady the Queen be ore the aforesaid John Popham Knight and Robeâ—t Clark Justices of our said late Queen at the Gaol aforesaid to be delivered to be held falsly and maliciously they conspired and procured against the form of the Statute in that case lately published and provided after which said Conspiracie Inditing taking and imprisoning and detension of him the said Nicholas
he in form by them the said William Skippon Iohn Green William Waters and Iohn Hitch had and procured the same Nicholas for making his purgation in that behalf according to the Law and cuâ—â—om of this Râ—alm of England being asked then to wit at the Gaol delivery aforesaid whether he were guilty of the Felony aforesaid whereof in form aforesaid he was endicted or no and thereupon he had sayd that he was not thereof guilty and of this had then put himself upon the Country as by the Record thereupon before the Justices remaining it is fully manifest and appears the aforesaid William Skippon John Green William Waters and Iohn Hitch by Conspiracie between them at Fakenham aforesaid in form aforesaid came before the aforesaid Justices at the Assizes aforesaid and to prove him the said Nicholas guilty of the Felony aforesaid before the same justices gave in evidence upon their oath to the Jury at the Assizes aforesaid impanelled charged and sworn to enquire of the good and ill That the same Nicholas the aforesaid Mary in form aforesaid had killed and murdered according to the form effect of the Endictment aforesaid by them in form aforesaid procured which said Jury more fully understanding the truth and the Conspiracie aforesaid as is aforesaid afore had then to wit at the Assizes aforesaid said upon their oath that he the said Nicholas was not guilty of the Felony aforesaid in manner and form as the same Nicholas was endicted and he the same Nicholas then before the Justices aforesaid at the Gaol delivery aforesaid according to the Law and custom of this Reaâ—m of England was acquitted By vertue of which said Conspiracie Endictment taking giving in evidence and detension in the Prison aforesaid of him the said Nicholas by them the said William Skippon Iohn Green William Waters and Iohn Hitch in form aforesaid had and procured the same Nicholas not only in great scandall and infamy as also in danger of his life and also of the loss of all his Goods and Chattels Lands and Tenements he was fallen and elapsed unto But also divers great sums of mony for the making of himself clear in that behalf was constrained and compelled to the Damage of him the said Nicholas two hundred pound c. Lincoln Declaration in Conspiracie brought by one who was Endicted together with others c. before the Justices of the Peace and afterwards acquit by the Justices of Assizes March 14. Hen. 6. Roâ— 6. ss T. G. lately of R. in the County aforesaid Gentleman I. P. of S. in the County aforesaid Husbandman and A.B. of the same in the County aforesaid Husbandman were attached to answer A. P. lately of S. in the County aforesaid Gentleman Wherefore by Conspiracie forehad between them the aforesaid A. P. together with E. P. lately of S. in the County aforesaid Gentleman I. G. of the same in the County aforesaid Yeoman T.C. of the same in the same County Yeoman T.S. of S. in the same County Husbandman A. H. of S. in the County aforesaid Husbandman and G.P. of B. in the County aforesaid Husbandman for that he such a day and year by force and Arms that is to say with Swords Staves and Knives and other â—urtfuâ—l weapons at S. aforesaid in the County aforesaid the Close and House of R. B. did break and enter and one Cart load of Hay of the price of six shillings and eight pence of the Goods and Chattels of him the said R. B. then and there found riotously took and carried away against the Peace of our Lord the King aforesaid at C. aforesaid to be Indicted and him the said A. upon that occasion to be taken and in the Priâ—on of the Marshalsee of our Lord the King in the Court of him the said Lord the King before him the said King held untill the same A. before Humphry Coningsbie Knight and Iohn Carrill Justices of our Lord the King at the Assizes in the County aforesaid assigned to be taken on Friday the Feast of St. Anne last past at the Castle of Lincoln in the County aforesaid according to the Law and custom of the Realm of our Lord the King of England he was thereof acquitted to be deteined falsly and maliciously at C. aforesaid they did procure to the great damage of him the said A. and against the form of the provision in that case provided And whereupon the same A. by VV. V. his Attorney complains that the aforesaid T.G. I.P. and R.B. by Conspiracie forehad between them at C. aforesaid in the County of Lincoln aforesaid on Tuesday next before such a Feast such a year aforesaid the aforesaid A. together with E. P. lately of S. in the County aforesaid Gent. and the rest as before for that he the seventh day of October in the tenth year of the Reign of our Lord the King aforesaid with force and arms that is to say Swords Staves and Knives and other most hurtfull weapons at S. aforesaid in the County aforesaid the Close and House of R. B. did break and Enter And one Cart-load of Hay to the value of six shillings and eight pence of the 〈◊〉 and chattells of him the said R. B. then and there found rioâ—â—â—â— he took and carried away against the Peace of our said Lord the â—â—ng at C. aforesaid on Tuesday next before such a feast such a year aforesaid before W. Tirwhit R. Terwhit and W. H. Knights and their Companions Justices of our Lord the King for the Peace as also assigned to hear and determine of divers Felonies Trespasses and other misdemeanours in the parts of Lindsey in the County aforesaid committed to be Indicted and him the said A. upon that occasion on Wednesday next after Fifteen dayes of Easter in such a year at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex to be taken and in the Prison of the Marshall of our Lord the King in the Court of him the said Lord the King before him the said King had untill the same A. before H.C. and I.C. Justices of our Lord the King at the Assizes in the said County of Lincoln assigned to be taken on Friday the Feast of St. Anne last past at the Castle of Lincoln in the County aforesaid according to the Law and Custom of the Realm of our Lord the King of England he was thereof acquitted to be deteined falsly and maliciously at C. aforesaid they procured against the form of the provision aforesaid Whereupon he saith that he is damnified One of the Defendants Iustifies as a Counsellour at Law and the other as Witnesses to testifie a Riot before the justices of the Peace which is the same Conspiracie whereof c. and hath damage to the value of forty pounds And thereupon he brings his Sute c. And the aforesaid T.G. I.P. and R. B. by I. L. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And all Conspiracie c. And say that the aforesaid A.
ought not to have his action against them c. because by protestation they say that the aforesaid A. was never taken and deteined in Prison of the Marshalsee of our Lord the King before him the said King by reason of the Indictment aforesaid in manner and form as he above hath declared yet for Plea they say that long before the Conspiracie aforesaid supposed to be made the aforesaid E.P. I.G. T.C. T.S. and A.H. the aforesaid seventh day of October in the tenth year of our Lord the King that now is aforesaid by force and arms that is to say with Swords Staves and Knives at S. aforesaid in the aforesaid County of Lincoln the Close and House of the aforesaid R. B. they did break and enter and one Cart-load of Hay to the value of six shillings eight pence of the goods and chattels of him the said R. B. then and there found they riotously took and carried away And for that that the aforesaid A. P. was there present at S. aforesaid at the said time of the Riot and Trespasse aforesaid committed And in like manner that the common voice and fame was that the Riot and Trespass aforesaid was done and committed by the Command of the aforesaid A. and the aforesaid R. B. after the Riot and Trespass aforesaid committed and before the Conspiracie aforesaid supposed to be made came to the aforesaid T. G. unto B. in the County aforesaid for that the same T. G. was learned in the Law of 〈◊〉 Land And to him the said T. G. reported the whole matter 〈◊〉 Riot and Trespass aforesaid And prayed Counsell of him the 〈◊〉 T. what in that matter was fit to be done And the foresaid T. G. then and there demanded of the aforesaid R. B. whether he had any testimony of the Riot and Trespass aforesaid And the same R. R. said that the aforesaid I. P. was present at the same time of the Riot and Trespass aforesaid committed and knows to testifie all the premisses said by the said R. B. to be true By reason whereof they the same T. G. I. P. and R. B. had suspition that the aforesaid A. was guiltie of the Riot and Trespass aforesaid Upon which the same T.G. I.P. and R. B. after and before the time of the Conspiracie aforesaid supposed to be made at C. aforesaid in the County aforesaid had conference together of the Riot and Trespass aforesaid in form aforesaid committed and what was further more fit to be done for the punishment and reformation of the aforesaid Riot and Trespass Upon which the aforesaid T. G. then and there Counselled the aforesaid R. B. and I. P. that they should be at C. aforesaid in the County aforesaid at the next Generall Sessions of the Peace there to be held to shew the Justices of the Peace of our Lord the King of the Riot and Trespass aforesaid to that intention that the same Justices at the same Sessions of the Peace may be able to make Enquirie of the same Riot and Trespass amongst other things By which they the same R. B. and I. P. on the said Tuesday next before c. at C. aforesaid before W. Tirwhit R. Tirwhit and W. H. Knights and other Justices of our said Lord the King of the Peace as also assigned to hear and determine of divers Felonies Trespasses and other misdemeanors in the parts of Lindsey in the County aforesaid committed they came and to the same Justices then and there in full Court sitting they gave information of the Riot and Trespass aforesaid And to them a certain Bill conâ—eining the Riot and Trespass aforesaid by the aforesaid A.E. I.G. T.E. T.S. c. committed then and there did exhibite and deliver which said Bill the aforesaid Justices of the Peace there to certain persons of the same County then and there to enquire of the Riot and Trespass aforesaid amongst other things there sworn they did deliver thereupon to declare the truth of the premisses And further the same R. B. and I. P. say that they before the aforesaid Justices at their Command were sworn to declare true information and evidence to the aforesaid Jurie to the matter conteined in that Bill By vertue whereof they the said R. B. and J. P. to the same Jurie of the Riot and Trespass aforesaid gave Evidence Which said Conference of the aforesaid T.G. R.B. and I.P. of the premisses in form aforesaid and the exhibition of the aforesaid Bill to the aforesaid Justices of the Peace as also the information and declaration of the Evidence aforesaid to the aforesaid Jury in form aforesaid are the same Conspiracie whereof the aforesaid A. P. now complains of And this c. whereupon he prayes Judgement whether the aforesaid A. should have his action c. And the aforesaid A. sayes that he by any thing The Plaintif replies that they Conspired of their proper injurie without any such cause c. ought not to be debarred c. because he saith that they the said T.G. R.B. and I. P. the aforesaid time of the Conspiracie aforesaid made of their proper injurie and malice and without such cause by them the said T. G. R. B. and I. P. above by pleading alleged him the said A. together with the aforesaid E. P. I. â— T.C. T.S. A.H. and E. P. of the Riot and Trespass aforesaid to be indicted and him the said A. upon the occasion to be taken and in Prison aforesaid to be deteined falsly and maliciously they procured in manner and form as the aforesaid A. above against them complaineth And this he prayeth may be Enquired of by the Countrey And the aforesaid T.G. R.B. and I. P. in like manner c. Therefore c. N. L. lately of Trucleston in the County aforesaid Knight Declaration in a Writ of Conspiracie upon the Statute of 8. Her 6. where one of the Defendants approves upon the Distringas and the other upon the attachment Mich. 15. Hen. 7. Roll. 35. in mony for many defaults c. the same N. and R. A. lately of I. in the Parish of H. Yeoman and I.S. lately of A. in the County aforesaid Yeoman and I.H. lately of M. in the County aforesaid Taylor were attached to answer aswell our Lord the King as Y. M. lately called T. M. of Westminster in the County of Middlesex Spinster of a Plea wherefore whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of our Lord Henry the sixth late King of England at Westminster in the eighth year of his Reign hold It is Ordeined and established that every of the Liege people of our Lord the King of treason felony or Trespass by any Indictment or appeal before Justices of the Peace or any other having power to take the same Indictments or Appeals or any Commissioners or Justices in any County Libertie or Franchise of England to be taken Indicted or appelled dwelling in any County other than where the same Indictment or appeal was taken and afterwards
thereupon by Verdict should be duly acquitted should have his Writ and Action upon the Case against every procurer of such Indictment or appeal And that there be such Process in and upon the same Writ as of Trespass by force arms made And if such Procurer shall be convict in that behalf the Plaintif shall recover his Damages to the treble Provided alwayes that the said Ordinance extends not it self to an Indictment or Appeal taken or to be taken in the County of Chester as in the aforesaid Statute more fully is conteined The Indictment for breaking a House and Chest and taking away of goods Yet the aforesaid N. R. I. and R. at Winchester falsly and maliciously have procured the aforesaid T. for that he and T. L. lately of I. in the County aforesaid Labourer and others such a day and year by force and arms that is to say with Swords Staves Bowes and Arrows the House and Chest of R. A. at I. aforesaid they did break and enter and three Girdles Embroidered with Silk and Gold to the value of 40. shillings of the goods and chattels of the aforesaid R. A. then and there found feloniously they took and carried away against the peace of our said Lord the King before W. F. and I. H. and their Companions Justices of our said Lord the King of the peace as also assigned to hear and determine of divers Felonies Trespasses and other Misdemeanors in the aforesaid Countie of Southampton to be indicted although the same T. at the time of the taking of the Indictment aforesaid at Westminster in the County of Middlesex dwelled and as yet dwells by which procurement the same T. so indicted by divers labours and Expences untill before the beloved and faithfull of our Lord the King T. Wood and I. Reed Justices of our Lord the King at the Assizes in the aforesaid County of Southampton assigned to be taken by the form of the Statute thereupon lately published and provided by Vertue of the Writ of our Lord the King of Nisi prius at Winton taken thereupon according to the Law and Custom of the Realm of our Lord the King of England was duly acquitted was grievously troubled and vexed in the Contempt of our said Lord the King that now is and his the said T. great damage and against the form of Statute aforesaid c. And whereupon the same T. who aswell c. by W. F. her Attorney complains that the aforesaid N. R. I. and I. the twelfth day of September such a year at Winton falsly and maliciously procured the aforesaid T. for that she and T. L. lately of H. in the County aforesaid Labourer and others the twenty sixth day of August in the second year of the Reign of our Lord the King that now is with force and arms that is to say with Swords c. the House and Chest of R. A. at I. aforesaid they did break and Enter and three Girdles embroydered with Silk and Gold to the value of forty shillings of the goods and chattells of the aforesaid R. A. then and there found feloniously they took and carried away against the Peace of our said Lord the King before W. F. and I. H. and their Companions then Justices of our said Lord the King of the Peace as also assigned to hear and determine of divers Felonies Trespasses and other misdemeanours in the aforesaid County of Southampton such a day and year at W. in the County of S. aforesaid to be Endicted although the same T. at the time of the taking of the Indictment aforesaid at Westminster in the County of M. dwelt and as yet dwells By which procurement the same T. so indicted by divers labours and Expences untill before the faithfull and beloved c. T.W. and R. R. Justices of c. in the aforesaid County of S. assigned to be taken by the form of the Statute c. by vertue of the Writ of our Lord the King of Nisi prius on Monday next after the Teast c. such a year at Winton taken according to the Law c. then there was duly acquitted c. was grievously troubled and vexed in the Contempt of our Lord the King that now is and his the said T. great damages And against the form of the c. Whereupon he saies that he is worsted and hath damage to the value of 100. pounds And thereupon aswell c. he brings his Sute c. Southampton ss N. L. lately of c. Knight I. H. lately of The same by the man and the wife for Felonie supposed to be done by the wife where she was indicted before the Justices of the Peace and acquitted by the Justices of Assize by a Writ of Nisi prius c. Taylor and I. W. lately of c. Yeoman were attached to answer T. M. and T. his Wife lately called T. M. at Westminster in the County of Middlesex Spinster together with I. Waterman lately of T. in the County aforesaid Teoman of a Plea wherefore by Conspiracie at Winchester between them forehad the foresaid T. for that she and T. L. lately of T. in the County aforesaid Labourer and others such a day and year with force and arms that is to say with Swords Staves and Knives the House and Chest of H. at T. they broke and Entred and three Girdles Embroydered with Silk and Gold to the value of forty Shillings and two Table clothes to the value of twenty shillings of the goods and chattells of the said H. then and there found feloniously they took and carried away against the Peace of our Lord the King to be indicted and her the said T. upon that occasion to be taken and in the Prison of the Gaol of our Lord the King of Winchester untill the same T. in the Court of our Lord the King before the beloved and faithfull of him the said Lord the King T. W. and R. R. Justices of the Assizes of him the said Lord the King in the County aforesaid assigned to be taken by the form of the Statute thereupon published and provided by vertue of the Writ of our Lord the King of Nisi prius at Winchester according to the Law and Custom of the Realm of our Lord the King of England she was thereof acquitted to be detained falsly and maliciously they procured to the great damage of them the said T. M. and T. And against the form of the Ordinance in that case provided c. And whereupon the same T. M. and T. by VV. F. their Attorney complain that the aforesaid N.I.H. and I.VV. of I. c. together with c. by Conspiracie between them forehad such a day year and place the aforesaid T. for that she and T. L. lately of c. and others such a day and year by force and arms c. as before against the peace c. before VV.F. and I. H. and their Companions Iustices of our said Lord the King of the
a Plea of Debt put in respite before our Lord the King at Westminster untill such day c. unless c. first c. at such a place c. by the form of the Statute c. Come for default of Jurors At which day before our Lord the King at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorney aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices before whom c. have sent here the Record of the Jury aforesaid before them had in these words Afterwards at the day and place aforesaid reciting the Record untill came as well the within named c. as the within written c. And the Jury likewise called some of them came and some of them came not as appears in the Panell c. Therefore as formerly the Jury aforesaid is put in respite before our Lord the King c. untill c. Therefore the Sheriff c. is to put ten such c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c AT which day before our Lord the King at Westminster Continuance upon a matter in Law and Verdict came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And because the Court of our Lord the King here aswell of their judgement upon the Verdict aforesaid as of their judgement of the matter in Law above pleaded to be rendred are not as yet advised Day is thereupon further given to the said parties in the state wherein they are now before the Lord the King at Westminster untill eight dayes of St. Hillary wheresoever c. of hearing thereupon their judgement c. for that the Court of our Lord the King here is not as yet c. Continuance in Attaine where the Sheriff Retoâ—â—s not the Writ and out of the assent of the parties the Jury is not taken AT which day before our Lord the King at Westminster came as well the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid as the aforesaid seven Jurors of the first Inquisition aforesaid formerly appearing in proper person And the Sheriff Retorns the Writ to our Lord the King thereupon in all things prepared and executed But the Jurors of those twenty four Knights aswell of the assent of the parties aforesaid and the aforesaid seven Jurors of the former Inquisition aforesaid as of the Jurors aforesaid of the twenty four Knights remains to be taken before our Lord the King untill the Morrow c. wheresoever c. And Command is to the Sheriff that he distrein the Jurors of the same Jury of twenty four Knights by all their lands c. And that of the Issues c. And that he have their bodies c. before our Lord the King at the same Term c. the same day is given aswell to the parties aforesaid as to the aforesaid seven Jurors of the first Inquisition aforesaid now appearing c. Continuance by a Writ of adjournment BEfore which day the Plaint aforesaid was adjourned by the Writ of our Lord the King of Common adjournment untill eight dayes of St. Hillary then next following wheresoever c. At which said eight dayes of St. Hillary the Plaint aforesaid was further adjourned by the Writ of our Lord the King of Common adjournment untill from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes unto the Castle of Hertford At which day c. Continuance of the Jurata where the Plaintif acknowledgeth one of the Defendants to be dead AT which day came aswell the aforesaid P. as the aforesaid R. by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid P. sayes that the aforesaid A. is dead c. Therefore against him nothing is further thereupon to be done c. And thereupon the parties aforesaid now appearing The Sheriff thereupon sent not the Writ c. Therefore as formerly the Jury aforesaid is put in respite before our Lord the King untill in eight daies c. wheresoever c. for default of Jurors c. Therefore the Sheriff is to have their bodies c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid now appearing c. Continuance of a Jurata by the assent of the parties THe Jury between I. S. Esquire Plaintif and T. W. of c. of a Plea of Trespass put in respite here untill such a day c. aswell of the assent of the parties aforesaid as of the Iurors of the same Iury now here at this day to wit from the day of Easter c. appearing Therefore the Sheriff is to have their bodies c. THe Iury between T. W. Gent. by his Attorney Plaintif Jurata which serves either for debt trespass or Ejectione firme And G.D. of c. of such a Plea put in respite before our Lord the King at Westminster untill Tuesday next after Eight dayes of Saint Michael unlesse the Iustices of the Assizes of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid assigned to be taken first on Monday the eighth day of August at Newark upon Trent in the County aforesaid by the form of the Statute c. Come for default of Iurors c. Therefore the Sheriff is to have the bodies c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. And it is to be known that the Writ of our Lord the King thereupon the fourth day of July in this self-same Term before our Lord the King at Westminster is delivered of Record to the Deputie of the Sheriff of the County aforesaid in form of Law to be Executed under a penaltie c. UNless the beloved and faithfull c. John Popham Knight This difference in Guild-hall London before the Chief Justice Chief Iustice of our Lord the King of the Pleas in the Court of him the said Lord the King before him the said King assigned to be held first on Saturday next after c. at Gild-hall London by form of the Statute c. as in the next before ACTIONS of COMMITTITVR COMMITTITUR Committitur of a Prisoner to the Marshall being under the Custodie of the Sheriff by a Case AFterwards to wit the twenty fifth day of May then next following before our Lord the King at Westminster came W. R. in his proper person under the Custody of the Sheriff of the County aforesaid in Execution for the damages aforesaid by vertue of the Writ of our Lord the King of Capias ad satisfaciendum to him the said Sheriff of and upon the Premisses directed which said R. is committed to the Marshall c. there to remain untill c. according to the form of the judgement aforesaid c. Committitur of a Prisoner upon a Case COmmand was to the Sheriff that he should take c. Whereof he is Convict And now here know aswell the aforesaid A. by his Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Defendant in his proper person by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid brought to the Bar And the Sheriff now retorns that he took the bodies of him the said Defendant And
that he had him now here ready upon which the same Defendant is Committed to the Prison c. by occasion of the Premisses to stay untill c. Commitment after Iudgement AFterwards to wit such a day then next following before c. Came the aforesaid I. in his proper person and rendred himself to the person of the Marshall of the Marshallsee of our Lord the King for the debt and damages aforesaid Upon which the same I. is committed to the Marshall of the Marshalsee c. in Execution for the debt and damages aforesaid There to remain untill c. ACTIONS OF ERROR ERROR AFterwards to wit such a day c. Error alleged in assault and batterie in the judgement that the Entrie was that the partie be taken when the cause of action was before a general Pardon in this self-same Term before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid Nicholas Stoddard by William Man his Attorney And sayes that in the Record and Processe aforesaid as also in the rendring of the judgement aforesaid it is manifestly Erroneous in this That whereas in every judgement Entred or to be Entred in Trespass and Assault after the generall pardon of our Lady the Queen that now is by Act of Parliament of Trespass and assault made before the same act of Parliament the judgements so Entred and to be Entred ought to be Entred And nothing of fine of the aforesaid Defendant because he is pardoned and not that he should be taken yet after the generall Pardon of our Lady the Queen that now is had and Enacted in the Parliament of our Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the twenty fifth day of October in the thirty ninth year of the Reign of our Lady the Queen that now is the Judgement aforesaid was Entred against the aforesaid Nicholas in the Plea aforesaid that he the said Nicholas should be taken for the Trespass and Assault aforesaid made the aforesaid tenth day of September in the thirty seventh year aforesaid in the Record aforesaid specified which was long before the aforesaid act of Parliament of the generall Pardon aforesaid And so that Judgement is void in Law Also it is Erronious in this for that whereas the aforesaid John S. the aforesaid Term of Easter Error also for want of admission by Procâ—â—in amy the partie being within age in the aforesaid forty first year of the Reign of the Queen had prosecuted by John Mallows and William Evoring as the next kinsmen of him the said John yet there is not had any Record of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. being an Infant in form aforesaid to prosecute the Plea aforesaid by his next kinsmen aforesaid under the names of any of the Prothonotaries of the Common Bench Entred as by the Law and Custom of the Court of our Lady the Queen of Common Bench aforesaid it ought to be Entred And prayes a Writ of our Lady the Queen to the aforesaid Edmond Anderson Knight Chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of the Common to whom it belongs to make Certificates in that behalf to certifie our Lady the Queen thereupon more fully the truth And it is granted unto him c. By which it is Commanded the aforesaid E. Anderson Chief Justice of the Bench aforesaid That having searched the Rolls Certiorare to the Chief Justice awarded to certifie c. under the names in the Offices of the Prothonotaries aforesaid of the admission of Infants to prosecute by their next kinsmen of the Term and year aforesaid And what of the admission aforesaid in the same he shall find he should certifie forthwith to our Lady the Queen wheresoever c. together with the Writ to him directed The Certificate of the Chief Justice c. Which said Chief Iustice of our Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon directed certified to her the said Lady the Queen that having searched the Rolls of the Entries of every of the Prothonotaries aforesaid in the aforesaid County of Suffolk of the Term and year aforesaid in his Custody of Record remaining he found not in the same any Entrie of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. to prosecute by I. M. and W. E. the next kinsmen of him the said I. being within age against the aforesaid N. S. of the aforesaid Plea as by the aforesaid Writ it was Commanded unto him which said Writ is Filed amongst the Records without day of this Term Upon which the aforesaid N. S. prayes a Writ of our Lady the Queen to warn the aforesaid I. S. of being before our Lady the Queen to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid And it is granted unto him c. By which it is Commanded to the Sheriff that by honest men c. he make known to the aforesaid I. S. that he be before our Lady the Queen from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid if c. And further c. The same day is given to the aforesaid N. S. c. Denâ—rrer in Law to the first matter of the Errors And the aforesaid I. S. by T. Bland his Attorney comes and as to the aforesaid first matter by the aforesaid Nicholas above for Error in form aforesaid assigned For that that after the Generall Pardon of our said Lady the Queen that now is had and enacted in the aforesaid Parliament of our Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster aforesaid the aforesaid twenty fifth day of October in the thirty ninth year of her Reign aforesaid the judgement aforesaid was entred against the aforesaid N. in the Plea aforesaid that he the same N. should be taken for the Trespass and Assault aforesaid made the aforesaid tenth day of September in the thirty seventh year aforesaid which was long before the aforesaid Act of Parliament of Generall pardon aforesaid The same I. by Protestation that that matter for that Error in form aforesaid assigned is insufficient in the Law to maintain the aforesaid Writ of Error of him the said N. in that behalfe To the which he the said I. hath no necessitie nor by the Law of the Land is bound in any manner to rejoyn for Plea yet he saith that in the aforesaid Court of Bench aforesaid there is had The Custom of the Common Bench alleged for the manner of Entring judgment in the Case and time out of mind there hath been had such a Custom used and approved That is to say that the Clerks of the same Court who for the time being are assigned and allowed to enter and Record any Iudgements in the same Court from time to time rendred and to be rendred were used and accustomed in the Entries of the Rolls and Records of the same Court of the Judgements rendred in the same Court upon any action of Trespass against the Defendant
in the same action named for any Trespass committed before any Generall Pardon to Enter aswell in the end of such Judgement And nothing of Fine of the aforesaid Defendant because he is pardoned As in the End of such Judgement And the aforesaid Defendant is to be taken and to note in the Margent of the same Rolls directly opposite to the word Capiatur in the 〈◊〉 Judgement this word Pardoned by that means giving direction 〈◊〉 the Clerk of the Estreats of the same Court where he may find them amongst the Rolls of the same Court against whom he the said Clerk doth send out and direct Writs of our Lord the King of Capias pro fine to compell them to render themselves and come under their Fines in the same Court for their Trespasses and other causes fineable according to the Custom and Law of the Land of this Kingdom of England And against whom he should omit and forbear to send forth the like Writs And that the same Entrie of Pardon in the Margent of the Record aforesaid is and for the whole time aforesaid was as sufficient a discharge of the aforesaid partie against whom the Judgement in the same Record is rendred that he should be taken as if within the same Record it had been Entred nothing of the Fine of that partie because he is pardoned And the aforesaid I. S. in fact saith that in the Record aforesaid sent before our Lady the Queen the aforesaid word Pardon'd in the Margent of the same Record is entred and noted according to the Custom aforesaid as by that Record above appeareth And as for the other matter by the aforesaid N. for his last Error in form aforesaid assigned the same I. S. sayes that in the aforesaid Court of the Bench aforesaid there is had and time out of mind there hath been had such a Custome used and approved The Plaintif sets form the Custom to Enter the admâ—ssion upon the Roll wherein the Declaration is Entred that is to say that every admission of any Infant to prosecute in the same Court of Bench aforesaid by his next kindred in any Plea to be entred and inrolled were used to be Entred and inrolled in the Roll wherein the Declaration in that Plea was Entred and inrolled And the same I. further faith that the Declaration aforesaid of him the said I. in the Plea aforesaid against him the said N. was Entred amongst the Rolls of Robert Bernors Gent. Phillizer of the County of Suffolk to wit in the Roll 386. as in the Record aforesaid sent here to the Court of our Lady the Queen more fully appears And the same I. S. further saith that although the aforesaid Chief Justice of the Common Bench hath certified to the Lady the Queen that having searched the Rolls of the Entries of every the Prothonotaries of the aforesaid County of S. of the Term and year aforesaid in his Custodie remaining of Record he had not found in the same any Entrie of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. to prosecute by the aforesaid I. M. and W. E. next of kindred to him the said I. S. being within age against the aforesaid N. S. of the aforesaid Plea yet there is had such a Record of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. so being within age to prosecute in the aforesaid Court of Bench by the aforesaid I. M. and W. E. his next kindred against the aforesaid N.S. of the aforesaid Plea Entred in the same Bench in the aforesaid Roll 386. on which the Declaration aforesaid as is aforesaid remains Entred â—â—â—ording to the Law and Custom of the said Court of Bench aâ—â—â—â—said Which said Record as yet remains before the aforesaid Justices of the Common Bench under the Custodie of the aforesaid Chief Justice omitted as yet to be certified to our Lady the Queen Certiâ—rare awarded to Certifie the full truth And the same I. S. prayes a Writ of Certiorare of our Lady the Queen to the aforesaid Chief Justice of the Common Bench to be directed to whom the certifying aswell of the omission aforesaid as of the Customs aforesaid rests to be made to Certifie our Lady the Queen more fully of the truth thereof and it is granted unto him c. By which it is Commanded to the aforesaid Chief Justice of the Common Bench that searching the Rolls of the Entries of the aforesaid Phillâ—zor of the aforesaid County of Suffolk of the aforesaid Term of Easter in the sixteenth year aforesaid And what in the same Rolls of the omission aforesaid he shall find as also the whole and full certaintie and truth of the aforesaid severall Customs of the said Court of our Lady the Queen of the Bench from the day of the holy Trinity in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. he do certifie together with the Writ of our Lady the Queen to him thereupon directed The same day is given to the parties aforesaid c. At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of her Bench aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon in form aforesaid directed certified to her the said Lady the Queen at Westminster at the same day That in the Court of the Lady the Queen of Common Bench There is had such a custom used and approved that the Clarks of the same Court who for the time being are assigned and allowed to enter and Record in the Rols and Records of the same Court any judgements in the same Court from time to time rendred and to be rendred were used and accustomed in the entry in the Rolls and Records of the same Court the judgements rendred in the same Court in and upon any action of Trespass against the Defendant in the same action named for any Trespass committed before any generall pardon to enter aswell in the end of such judgement And nothing of Fine of the aforesaid Defendant because he is pardoned as in the end of such judgement And the aforesaid Defendant is to be taken And to note in the Margent of the same Roll direct opposite to those words in the judgement this word pardon for that reason to give direction to the Clark of the Extreats of the same Court where he shall find amongst the same Rolls of the same Court against whom he the said Clark doth send or direct Writs of our Lord the King of Capias pro fine to compell them to render themselves and to undergoe their fines in the same Court for their Trespasses and other causes fineable according to the custom and Laws of this Kingdom of England And against whom he is to omit and forbear to send forth and direct such Writs And that such entry of pardon in the Margent of the Record aforesaid is and by the whole time aforesaid was as sufficient a discharge of the party aforesaid against whom
the judgement in the same Record was rendred that he should be taken as if it were entred in the same Record within And nothing of Fine of that party because he is pardoned as the aforesaid I.S. by his Plea aforesaid above hath alleged And further the aforesaid chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of her Bench aforesaid by vertue of the aforesaid Writ of our Lady the Queen further certifies that having serched the Rolls of Robert Berners Phillizer of the County of S. of the Term of Easter in the 41. year of the Reign of our Lady the Queen that now is he finds as within in these words appears That is say Pleas at Westminster before Edmund Anderson Knight and his fellows Justices of our Lady the Queen of her Bench here of the Term of Easter in the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God c. the 41. Roll 386. The Entry of the Warrant of admission with the Phillizer ss IOhn Mallows and W. E. are admitted by the Court of our Lady the Queen here to prosecute for I. S. who is within age as the next of Kindred of him the said I. S. against N. S. lately of c. Gentleman of a Plea of Trespass and assault Which said Writ so as aforesaid returned amongst the Records of this Court is filed Upon which the aforesaid I. S. sayes that in the Record and Process aforesaid nor in the rendring of the judgement aforesaid there is nothing erroniouâ— and prayes that the Court of our Lady the Queen here may proceed unto examination aswell of the Record and Process aforesaid as of the matters aforesaid above for errors assigned and that the judgement aforesaid may be affirmed And because the Court of our the Lady the Queen here of their judgement of and in the premises to be rendred are not as yet advised day thereupon is given to the parties aforesaid before our Lady the Queen untill eight dayes of St. Michael wheresoever c. of hearing thereupon their judgement for that the Court of our Lady the Queen here thereupon are not as yet At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and upon this all and singular the premises being by the Court of our Lady the Queen here seen and fully understood and mature deliberation thereupon had for that that it seems to the Court of the Lady the Queen here that aswell the aforesaid Writ of Certiorare to the aforesaid chief Justice of the Common Bench in form aforesaid issued and directed as the aforesaid answer of the same chief Justice of the Bench unto that Writ as now it remains filed upon Record before our Lady the Queen does not sufficiently and fully agree and answer the aforesaid allegation of the aforesaid I. S. as to the aforesaid custom oâ— the said Court of Bench for the entring of an admission of an Inâ—ant to prosecute by his next of Kindred in any his Pleas in the Rolls of the same Court where the Declaration of such infant is entred and enrolled by the aforesaid I. S. above a leged so that the same Court of our Lady the Queen before her the said Queen here for the incertaintie of the truth of such custom of the said Court of Bench in that behalf in form aforesaid alleged to their judgement of and upon the premises aswel on the part of the aforesaid N. S. in deniall as on the part of the aforesaid I. S. in affirmation to the judgement aforesaid above alleged cannot proceed Without more full information of the consciences of the Justices And that the Court of our Lady the Queen here before her the said Queen of the truth of the custom of the said Court of Bench in that behalf above alleged An Alias Cerâ—orare warded Therefore it is commanded the aforesaid chief Justice of the Bench aforesaid that he the full and whole certaintie and truth of the aforesaid custom of the said Court or Bench of the entrie of the admission of Infants to prosecute by their next of Kindred in personall Pleas in the same Court by the aforesaid I. S. above alleged to our Lady the Queen aforesaid from the day of St. Hilary in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. doe certifie together with the Writ thereupon to him directed c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid c. At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid Chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon in form aforesaid directed to her the said Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid at the same day certified The Return of the Cerâ—â—rare that in the said Court of our Lady the Queen of the Bench is had and from the time out of mind there hath been had such a custom used and approved in the same Court of Bench that every admission of any Infant to prosecute in the same Court of Bench aforesaid by his next of Kindred in any Plea entred and inrolled and to be entred and inrolled have been used and accustomed in the Roll where the Declaration in that Plea is entred and inrolled Which said Writ so as aforesaid returned together with the return thereupon amongst the Records of this Court is filed And upon this the aforesaid I. S. further prayes that the Court of our said Lady the Queen here may proceed to the Examination aswell or the Record and Process aforesaid as of the aforesaid matters above for errors assigned and that the judgement aforesaid may be affirmed and because the Court of our said Lady the Queen here are not as yet advised of and upon the rendring their judgement of and upon the premises day is thereupon further given to the parties aforesaid before our Lady the Queen Mich. Term 41. 42. Judgement was affirmed in this cause Roll. 417. untill from the day of Easter in fiftteen dayes wheresoever c. of hearing thereupon their judgement For that the Court of our said Lady the Queen here thereupon as yet have not c. ss AFterwards to wit on Saturday the 9. The affirmation of a judgment upon a Wâ—t of Error out of the Kings Bâ—â—ch into the Exchequer Chamber day of February in the 2. year of the Reign of our Lord the King that now is The transcript of the Record and Process aforesaid between the parties aforesaid with all things touching them by reason of a certain Writ of our Lord the King of correcting error by them the said Thomas Scot Elizabeth and Thomas Forn of and upon the premises prosecuted before the Iustices of our said Lord the King of his Common Bench and the Barons of the Exchequer of our said Lord the King in the Exchequer Chamber aforesaid according to the form of the Statute in the Parliament of the
aforesaid R. ought not to have her action aforesaid against them because they say that they did not take nor Arrest the aforesaid G. in the manner and form as the aforesaid R. above against them complaineth And of this they put themselves upon the Country And the aforesaid R. in like manner c. Therefore the Jury is to come c. R. S. complains of John Chaunroy Bayliff of the Liberty of the Bishop of London in the County of Middlesex Escape upon a Bill of Middlesex where the Plaint and attachment is mentioned for that whereas the aforesaid R. S. on Tuesday next after a month of Easter such a year before our Lady the Queen at Westminster had prosecuted a certain Bill against I. T. For that that he the same I. T. such a day and year by force and arms the Close of him the said R. S. at Westminster in the County of Middlesex he had broke And other harms to him he had done against the Peace of our Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of him the said R. S. of 20. l. And he found pledges of prosecuting his Plaint aforesaid to wit John Dee and Richard Row by force of which said Bill it was commanded to the Sheriffs of Middlesex that they should attach the aforesaid I. T. so that he might be before our Lady the Queen at Westminster on Thursday next after a month of Easter then next following to answer the aforesaid R.S. of the Plea aforesaid the same day was given to the aforesaid R. here c. At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid R.S. in his proper person And Christopher Hawks and T.G. Sheriffs of the said County of Middlesex by vertue of the precept aforesaid before our Lady the Queen at Westminster returned that the aforesaid I. had nothing within their Balywick by which he could be attached Upon which it was commanded to the same Sheriffs that they should take him if c. And him safely c. So that they might have his body before our Lady the Queen at Westminster on Monday next after eight dayes c. from thence next following to answer the aforesaid R.S. of the aforesaid Plea The same day was given to the aforesaid R. here c. And the aforesaid Sheriffs of Middlesex by vertue of the precept aforesaid commanded a certain Warrant to the aforesaid I. E. Bayliff of the Liberty of the Bishop of London in the County of Middlesex who had full return of all Writs Precepts and Warrants c. And so recite the return untill for that Execution thereupon elsewhere in the County aforesaid out of the Liberty aforesaid could not be made Which said I.C. by vertue of the Warrant aforesaid such a day and year at S. aforesaid in the County aforesaid took and arrested the aforesaid I. T. And the aforesaid I. C. plotting to defraud the aforesaid R. S. and to defer him from the recovery for his Trespass aforesaid he the said I.T. so taken and Arrested the aforesaid I.C. such a day year and place aforesaid suffered to go at large by which he the same R. S. is deprived altogether of the recoverie for his Trespass aforesaid To the damage of him the said R. twenty pounds And thereupon he brings his Sute c. Escape against a Sheriff for not having the body of one by him arrested at the retorn of the Writ ss HEnry Appleton latly Sheriff of Essex was attached by a Writ of Privilege of our Lord the King from the Couâ—t here issuing to answer H.C. one of the Attorneys of the Court of our Lord the King of his Bench here according to the Liberties and Privileges of the same Court for the like Attorneys and other Ministers of the same Bench from time out of mind used and approved in the same of a Plea of Trespass upon the Case And whereupon the same H.C. in his proper person Complains wherefore whereas one T.D. a forreign Merchant was indebted to him the said H. C. in a hundred pounds of lawfull money c. To be payd to him the said H. C. when he should be thereunto required And for that that the aforesaid T. D. had not payd the same hundred pounds to him the said H.C. he the said H. C. for the more speedy recovery of that debt such a day and year then being one of the Attorneys of the Court of the Bench of our Lady the Queen here according to the Liberties and Privileges of the same Court from the whole time aforesaid used and approved in the same out of the same Court of Bench here prosecuted a certain Writ of Privileges of our Lady the Queen against the aforesaid T. D. to the then Sheriff of the aforesaid County of Essex being directed By which said Writ our aforesaid Lady the Queen Commanded him the then Sheriff that the same Sheriff should attach the aforesaid T.D. so that he might have him before the Justices of our Lady the Queen here on Tuesday next after the Morrow of all Souls then next following to answer unto him the said H. C. of a Plea of Debt Which said Writ he the said H.C. afterwards to wit such a day and year to the aforesaid H. A. then being Sheriff of the aforesaid County of E. at London that is to say in the Parish c. delivered in form of Law to be executed by Vertue of which said Writ the aforesaid H. A. the same day and year c. then being Sheriff of the aforesaid County of E. Commanded the Bayliff of the Libertie of our Lady the Queen of her hundred of B. in the aforesaid County of E. which said Bayliff had Execution of all Writs within the same Liberty for that no Execution of that Writ could be made within his Bailiwick else-where That he should attach the aforesaid T. So that he might have his body before the aforesaid Sheriff before the retorn of that Writ So that the same sheriff might have him before the Justices of our Lady the Queen here at the aforesaid day of Wednesday next after c. to answer the aforesaid H. C. of the aforesaid Plea By vertue of which said Warrent the aforesaid Bayliff afterwards to wit such a day year and place in the aforesaid County of E. within the Libertie aforesaid he took and arrested the aforesaid T. And the same Bayliff after that taking and arresting and before the said day of Wednesday c. to wit the second day of N. in the twenty seventh year aforesaid the aforesaid T. to one H. C. then Deputie of the aforesaid H. A. authorized by the same H. A. in that behalf he delivered to be safely kept as the aforesaid H. A. retorned to the aforesaid Justices of our Lady the Queen here at the aforesaid day of Wednesday c. The aforesaid H. A. his Office of a Sheriff in the just and true Execution of the Writ aforesaid little caring but
to say in such a day and year at c. by his certain Writing obligatory sealed with the Seal of him the said R.N. in his life and unto the Court c. whose Date c. acknowledged himself to be holden and firmly bound unto the said R.B. in his life in the aforesaid 60. l. to be paid unto the said R.B. his Executors or Administrators on the Feast of St. Michael the Arch-Angel from thence next ensuing notwithstanding the aforesaid R.N. in his life and the aforesaid A.N. after the death of him the said R.N. although often requested c. the aforesaid 60. l. unto the said R.B. in his life and the said W.B. unto whose Administration of all and singular the Goods and Chattels Rights and Credits which were of the said R.B. at the time of his death by T. Watts Arch-Bishop of Middlesex lawfully deputed 25. day of May in the year of our Lord 1577. at London was committed have not hitherto paid nor either of them hath paid but the same unto the said R.B. in his life and the said W.B. after the death of him the said R.B. have altogether denyed to pay and the aforesaid A.N. doth deny to pay and the same unto said W. as yet doth unjustly detain to the damage of him the said W. 40. pounds and in delay of the Execution of the Administration aforesaid and thereupon he bringeth his Sute and profereth here in Court the aforesaid Letters of Administration of the said W. by which it plainly makes appear unto the Court of the said Lady the Queen here him the said W. to be Administrator of the Goods and Chattels aforesaid c. An Action upon the Statute of Maintenance ss I. F. Who aswell for the Lady the Queen as for himself prosecuteth and complaineth of H.B. in the custody of the Marshall c. of a Plea that he render unto the said Queen and unto the said I. 10. l. of lawfull c. which unto the said Lady the Queen and to the said I. who aswell c. doth owe and unjustly detein for that that is to say That whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord H. the 8. late King of England at Westminster in the County of Middlesex 28 day of April in the one and thirtieth year of his Reign began to be held and there through divers prorogations untill to the 25. day of May in the two and thirtieth year of his Reign prorogued and continued The words in pleading that the Parliament is prorâ—gued and then and there held by the said Lord the King with the assent of the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and of the Commons there it was enacted that no person or persons of whatsoever State degree or condition he or they should be or were from thenceforth hereafter he or they should unlawfully maintain or cause or procure any unlawfull Maintenance in any Action Demand Sute or Complaint in any Court of the said Lord the King of the Chancery Star-Chamber Whitehall or else-where within any the Dominions of the Kingdom of England or of Wales or in the Marches of the same where any person or persons hath or then hereafterwards should have authority by virtue of a Commission of the Lord the Kings Letters Patents or Writ to hold a Plea of Land or to examine hear or determine any Title of Land or any matter or Witnesses concerning the Title Right or Interest of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments and also that no person or persons of whatsoever state degree or condition he or they be or were from thenceforth in time to come should unlawfully retein for maintenance of any Sute or Plea any person or persons to imbrace any Freeholders or Jurors or should suborn Witnesses by Letters reward promise or any other sinister labour or means to maintain any matter or cause to the disturbance or hindrance of Justice or to the procuration or occasioning of any Perjurie by false Verdict or otherwise in any Court aforesaid under the pain of forfeiting for every such offence 10. l. of which one moity thereof should be unto the said late King his Heirs or Successors but the other unto him who therefore will prosecute by action of Debt Bill Plaint or information in any Court of the said late King where no Essoin Protection wager of Law injunction shall be allowed as in the same Statute amongst other things is more fully contained notwithstanding the said H. the aforesaid Statute no wise regarding nor the penalty in the same contained any manner of way fearing a certain Bill of plaint before her the said Lady the Queen at W. as yet hanging undetermined between one R.K. Plaintif and the aforesaid I.F. of a Plea of Trespass on the behalf of the said R.K. against the aforesaid I.F. in such a day and year at c. hath maintained and upheld to the manifest disturbance and hindrance of Justice and in Contempt of the Lady the now Queen and against the form of the aforesaid Statute by which an Action did accrew unto the said I.F. aswell for the Lady the Queen as for himself to require and have of the said H.B. the aforesaid ten pounds notwithstanding the aforesaid H. although he hath been often requested c. the aforesaid 10. l. unto the said I.F. who aswell c. hath not as yet paid but the same to him hitherto hath altogether denyed to pay and as yet doth deny to the damage of him the said F. five pounds and thereupon he bringeth his Sute c. ss P. S. Who aswell for the Lady the Queen as for himself A Declaration upon the Statute of Perjury prosecuteth and complaineth of W. O. in the custody of the the Marshall of a Plea that he render unto the said Lady the now Queen and unto the said P. 20. l. of lawfull c. which unto the said Queen and unto the said P. who aswell c. doth owe and unjustly detein for that that is to say that whereas in a Statute in Parliament of the Lady the now Queen at W. in the County of Middlesex on the 12. day of January in the fifth year of her reign holden published amongst other things it was firmly Ordained and Enacted by the Authority of that Parliament that if any person or persons after the 10th day of April then next following either by subordination unlawfull procuration sinister perswasion or means of any other by their proper Act consent or agreement voluntarily and corruptly should commit any voluntary perjury by his or their deposition in any the Kings Chancery Courts of the Star-chamber Whitehall or elsewhere within the Kings Dominions of England or Wales or in the Marches of the same where any person or persons hath or have authority by virtue of the Kings Commission of Paâ—ent or Writ to hold Plea of Land or to examine or determine any Title of land or any matter or Witnesses concerning the Title Right and Interest of
ACTIONS OF PROHIBITION PROHIBITION ss MEmorandum England Suggestion where the Suggestor affirmeth the Tenement whereof the Tithes are required to be held parcel of a Priory that the Tuesday next after the Month of Easter in that same Term before the Queen at Westminster cometh W. C. in his proper person and giveth unto the said Queen here to be understood that whereas M.W. late Prioresse of the late Priorship of P. in the County of W. was of late seized of and in the same late Priorship of and in one Orchard one Close called the Barn-yard containing by estimation half an acre of Meadow and Pasture of one Close and Meadow called Mott Meadow conteining by estimation sixteen acres of Pasture in P. in the said County unto the same late Priory lately belonging and apperteining and parcell of the possessions thereof and from the time of which the Memory of men is not to the contrary untill the time of the Dissolution or suppression of the said late Priory and also at the time of the dissolution or suppression of the same for himself his Farmers or Tenants thereof for the time being amongst other things they had held and occupied discharged of and from the payment of any Tythe of Hay of in or upon those Tenements with th' appurtenances or any parcell thereof yearly in whatsoever manner by the whole time aforesaid growing renewing comming forth or happening and the said late Prioresse of the said late Priory and of the sayd Tenements with th' appurtenances so as it is beforesaid from the payment of the Tythe of Hay thereupon growing renewing or taken being seized discharged the said late Priory and all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments unto the same late Priory lately belonging whereupon c. by force of a Statute in Parliament at Westminster in the County of Middlesex in the 27th year of the Reign of H. 8. Statute of â—7 year of H. 8. for suppression of land belonging unto religious houses late King of England held published were suppressed or dissolved and to the hands of the same late King by virtue of that suppression came by virtue of which the said late King was seized of and in the said late Priory and the said Tenements called M. Meadow and R. Close in his Demesn as of Fee in right of his Crown of England And whereas in the Statute in Parliament of the said late King H. 8. Statute of 31. year of H. 8. for the discharge of their land for the payment 〈◊〉 Tithes c. held at VVestminster aforesaid the 28. day of April in the year of his Reign the 31th amongst other things It was firmly Ordeined that as well the said late King his Heirs and Successors as all and singular other Persons their Heirs and Assigns who then had or from thenceforth afterwards should have any Monasteries Abbeys Priories Nunneries Colleges Hospitalls Fryer houses or other Ecclesiasticall houses or places Sites Circuits and Precincts of them or any of them or any Mannors Rectories Appropriations Tythes Pensions Portions or any Hereditaments whatsoever which before then did belong or appertein or which then did belong or appertein unto the said Abbeys Monasteries Priories Nunneries Colleges Hospitalls Fryer houses or other Religious and Ecclesiasticall houses or places or unto any of them they should have hold reteyn keep and enjoy aswell the said Rectories Appropriations Tythes Pentions Porsions as the said Monasteries Abbeys Priories Nunneries Colleges Fryer houses and other Religious and Ecclesiasticall houses Sites Circuits and Precincts Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever and all of them according to their estates and every of their Titles discharged and acquitted from the payment of Tythes so freely and in as ample manner and form as the said late Abbots Priors Nuns Prioresse and Ecclesiasticall Governours or Governesses or of any of them they should have hold occupy possesse use or enjoy the same or any parcell thereof at the dayes of their dissolution suppression dissertion forfeiture Surrender or comming to the hands of the said late King of such Monasteries Abbeys Priories Nunneries Colleges Hospitalls Fryer houses or other Religious houses or places or at the day of Dissolution Surrender or be comming to the hands of the said Late King of any of them by the said Act or any thing in the same conteined to the contrary thereof notwithstanding by force of which said Statute or by pretence of the rest of the Premisses the said late King H. 8. held the said Premisses with the appurtenance called M. Meadow and R. Close by himself his Farmees and Tenants thereof had and held discharged from the payment of the Tyth of Hay of in and upon the same tenements with th'appurtenance or any parcell thereof yearly in whatsoever manner growing renewing comming or happening and so thereof being seized the said late King afterwards that is to say _____ day _____ in the year of his Reign _____ at Westminster in the County of Middlesex by his Letters Patents sealed with his great Seal of England and in due manner executed bearing date the same day and year gave and granted the said Tenements with th' appurtenances called M. Meadow and R. Close with th'appurtenance unto the aforesaid W.C. To have to him and his Heirs for ever To hold of the same late King as of _____ by pretence of which said Letters Patents the said W.C. into the said tenements called M. Meadow and R. Close with th'appurtnance entred and was thereof seised in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized the same tenements with th' appurtenances by himself his Farmers or Tenants had and held discharged from the payment of any Tyth of Hay of in or upon the said Tenements called M. Mead and R. Close or any parcell thereof yearly in whatsoever manner growing renewing comming or happening by pretence of the said Act and of the rest of the Premisses And whereas also in the Statute in Parliament of the said late King H. 8. Statute 31. H. 8. that no person should be sued or constrained to pay Tythes where c. The like Statute of the second year of Edw. the 6th held at Westminster aforesaid in the 31. year abovesaid It was enacted that no person nor persons should be sued or constrained to render give or pay any Tythes for any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments which by the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom of England or by any Privilege or prescription were not chargeable with the payment of Tythes And further whereas in the Statute of the late King Edw. the 6th in the second year of his Reign amongst other things firmly it remaineth that no person should sue or otherwise Compell to render give or pay Tyths for any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments which by the Lawes and Statutes of this Kingdom of England or by any Privilege or Prescription were not chargeable with the payment of any such Tythes of Hay thereupon growing taken
A. long before the said time in which c. was thereof possessed which said Term doth as yet indure And so the said A. saith that she hath nothing in the said tenements with th' appurtenances unles to the end of five years in form aforesaid the reversion whereupon being expectant after that term unto the aforesaid S. W. and his heires without which said S. she the said A. saith that she to the knowledge of the said R. and T. cannot answer and prayeth Ayd of him the said S. and hath c. Therefore the Sheriff is commanded that he summon by good summons the said S. that he be before the said King in Eight dayes of the Holy Trinity wheresoever c. to answer to the said knowledge of the said R. and T. together with the said A. if c. The same day is given to the said parties c. Cornub. Declaration in a writ of recaption of Cattle and that they were taken hanging another Plea for the same Cattle undetermined and for which Cause they were before taken M. 20. h. 7. to 75. ss I. C Esquire T.C.J.H.J.D.J.W. and W. A were attached to answer aswel unto the Lord the King as unto J.G. Esquire of a Plea wherefore whereas the said J.C. and the others were formerly summoned to be in the Court of the said King before him the said Lord the King on the Morrow of all Souls last past wheresoever c. to answer unto the aforesaid J.G. of a Plea wherefore they took the Cattle of him the said J.G. and them unjustly detained against the Sureties and pledges which the Sherif of the said Lord the King of the said County had made to replevy to him the said J.G. as the King had accepted which said Plea between him the said J.G. and J.C. in the Court of the Lord the King here as yet doth hang undetermined Notwithstanding the said J.C. and others hanging the said Plea the Cattle of him the said J.G. again took for the same occasion which before they had taken the same c. Which thing is manifest against the Law and Custome of the Kingdom of the Lord the King of England And whereupon the said J.G. who aswell for the Lord the King as for himself prosecuteth by J. H. his Attorney Plaintif that whereas the said J.C. and the others formerly that is to say in the Term of St. Hillary in the year of the reign of the now King ninteenth were summoned to be in the Court of the Lord the King here before his Justices assigned to hold Pleas before him the Lord the King to answer unto the said J.G. and them unjustly detained against the sureties and pledges which the Shreif of the said Lord the King of the said County had made unto the said J.G. to replevy and the King had accepted which said Plea between him the said J.G. and the said J. C. and the others in the Court of the said King here as yet doth hang undetermined Notwithstanding they the said J. C. and the others hanging the said Plea the Cattle of him the said J. G. that is to say ten Oxen Eight heyfers two horses and a hundred sheep again that is to say the twentieth day of May in the nintteenth year of the Reign of the Lord the now King at E. neer Moreball in which the Cattle in a place called the Widl-Park they took for the same occasion which before they had taken them c. Which is manifestly in Contempt of the said King and against the Law and Custome of the Kingdom of him the said King of England whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of forty pounds And thereupon he bringeth his sute c. ss AND the said I. Copleston T. Colpeston I. Horn I. Davy Some of the defendants plead that they did not take the Cattle As c. I. Welch and W. Atwood by W. Fisher his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And the said I. Davy I.W. and W. A. say that they did not take the said Cattle as the said I.G. before against them Complaineth And of this they put themselves upon the Countrey And the said I.G. likewise c. And they the said I.C.T.C. and I.H. as to the taking and detention of the said Cattle supposed to be done they say that the said I. G. ought not to maintain his action because they say that the place in which that trespas is supposed to be done is and at the said time in which c. was one messuage a hunded The rest of the defendants plead that they took the Cattle in the name of a distress for dry Rent in arrear as servants of the other and justifie perscridtion acres of land six acres of meadow six acres of wood and twenty acres of Heath and furzes with th' appurtenances in G. aforesaid called Wilpark of which said messuage land and tenements the said J. E. is and at the said time in which c. was seised in his demesn as of fee And that the said I. Colshill and all his Predecessours whose heir he is long before the said time in which c. were seised in their demesn as of fee of a certain Annuall rent of forty shillings coming forth of the said tenements to be perceived yearly to him and his heirs at the feasts of the Nativity of St. Iohn the Baptist of St. Michael Arch-angell the Nativity of our Lord and of Easter with equall portions to be paid from the time of which the memory of man is not extant And the said I.C. and all his Predecessors whose heir he is from all the said time of which the Memory of man is not extant used to distrein in the said tenements with th' appurtenances for the said Rent as often as that Rent at any feast of the said Feasts should be in arrear and the Distresses thereupon to take lead drive away and wholly to themselves to retein untill the said yearly Rent and the Arrearages thereof if any there were should be satisfied And the said I. C. so thereof seized dyed of such estate thereof seized after whose death the said Annuall Rent long before the said Retorn in which c. descended unto one Agnes Wife of the said I. Broker Descent Esquire as Cosin and Heir of the I. Colshill that is to say Daughter of Ranfrid son of Iohane sister of I. Colshill by which the said I. Broker and Agnes long before the said time in which c. were of the said Annuall Rent of 40. shillings seized in their Demesn as of Fee in Right of the said Agnes And because 30. shillings of that Rent after the death of the said I. Colshill at the Feast of the Nativity of St. Iohn the Baptist of St. Michael the Arch-Angell and the Nativity of our Lord next before the said taking supposed to be done that is to say next before the 20. day of
deliver ss W Burton of L. Chaplain and B.W. were summoned to answer unto I.I. of a Plea wherefore they took the Cattel of him the said I.I. and them unjustly detained against the sureties and pledges c. And whereupon the said I. I. by I. C. his Attorney complaineth that the said W. and B. the day c. in the year c. In the Town of H. in a certain place called they took four score sheep of him the said Iohn and seaventy sheep thereof they unjustly detained untill c. And ten sheep residue thereof of the price of twenty shilling as yet unjustly detain against the sureties and pledges c. Whereupon he saith that he is the worse And hath dammage to the Value of twenty pound And thereupon he bringeth his Sute c. And prayeth that the said W. and B. may secure the delivery of the said Ten sheep unto him c. Defendant acknowledgeth the taking of the sheep as bailiffes of the Dean and Chapter c. of Lincoln with which the Dean and Chapter c. one annuall Rent of the burthen of a certain Mannor whereof the place is parcell thereout going was granted and liberty for not payment thereof to distrain c. And as to the rest of the sheep c. the defendant saith that the Plaintif hath deliverance there upon in the Countrey ss AND they the said W.B. and B.W. by T.S. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And as Bayliffes of I. M. Dean c. Doth well acknowledg the taking of the said sheep in the said place in which c. And justly c. Because he saith that one R. S. knight son and heir of the Lord R. of S. in the County of L. was lately seised of the Mannors of H. and B. with th' appurtenances whereof the said place in which c. is parcell in his demesn as of fee and so thereof seized by his certain writing indented whose other part is signed with the Seal of him the said R. they the said W. and B. profer here in Court the date of which is at L the second day of June in the fourth year of the reign of the Lord the now King gave and granted and by his said Writing indented confirmed unto J. S. then Dean of the Church c. By the names of Dean and Chapter of the Cathedrall Church of the blessed Mary of Lincoln and his Successors forever to the use and augmentation of the Support of five Chaplains of one Church and six singing boyes for the * Justification for the burthen of Rent Souls of the most illustrious Prince Lord Edward the third late King of England deseased and B. and the Souls of his Predecessors and of all the faithfull in the Chapell of St. Katherine founded in the Church aforesaid and also to the Aid of Sustentation of one Chaplain divine services for the said Souls and for the Soul of B. is to be celebrated by them the said five Chaplains and their Successors of a new Maintenance by Licence of the said Lord King Richard late had and obtained by the Chapter of him the said king dated at Westminster the 23. day of February in the aforesaid twentyth year of his Reign one yearly perpetuall Rent of twenty marks to be perceived yearly of all and singular his Mannors or Cattel Lands and tenements with th' appurtenances in H. to be paid unto them the said late Dean and Chapter and their Successors every year forever at two terms of the year that is to say at the feasts of Easter and St Michael th'arch-Angell by equall portions in the Court Chamber of the said Cathedrall Church At which said payment of the said perpetuall Rent of twenty mark unto the said late Dean and Chapter and at the said feasts faithfully as it was preadvised to be done obliged all and singular the said Mannors by the name of all and singular the said Mannors or Lordships lands and tenements of H. and B. with th' appurtenances in whosoevers hands they should be or come from thenceforth to come that if the said perpetuall annuall Rent of twenty marks should be behind in part or in all after any Term before assigned for the payment whereof then it should be lawfull for the said late Dean and Chapter Claim of distress for the Rent Charge and their Successors in all and singular the Mannors Lordships lands and tenements of him the said R. aforesaid with th' appurtenances in whatsoever hands they should come from thence in future for the said yearly Rent and the Arrearages thereof if any should be and the distresses taken to drive or carry lead away impound and retain aswell within the County as without wheresoever it should please the said Dean and Chapter and their Successors untill themselves of the said perpetuall yearly Rent together with all and singular the Arrearages of the same and the dammages which they should sustain and expend which they should lay out by reason of the not payment of the said continuall annuall Rent at the said Terms should be fully satisfyed By vertue of which gift and Grant of the said I. S. late Dean of the said Cathedrall Church chief of the same were late seized of the said Rent of twenty marks by the hands of the said R. S. then tenant of the said Mannor and tenements and because the said Rent unto them the said Dean and Chapter of the said Church Command to the Sheriff to deliver the Cattel whereupon the Plaintif desireth Security and the Defendant saith that he hath the deliverance in the Country A special Writ shall issue unto the Sheriff to deliver them c. Plaintif saith that he hath nothing in the Tenements unless a certain Demise unto him by one W. J. made and the Freehold and Fee thereof in the person of the said W. J. being and prayeth of the same W. aid and hath c. Prayer of Aid Summons in Aid by one year next before the day of the said taking was in arrear unpaid they the said W. and B. as Bailiffs of the said Dean and Chapter for 20. Marks of the said annuall Rent so being behind they doe lawfully acknowledge the taking of the said Sheep in the said place in which c. as in parcell of the said Mannors of the said now Dean and Chapter of the yearly Rent in form aforesaid charged with Distresse c. And as to the Sureties of the said Sheep He saith that he had deliverance thereof in the Country c. therefore the Sheriff is commanded that if the said I. I. had not the Deliverance of the said Sheep then the said Sheep he should cause to be delivered unto the said J. J. and whatsoever c. he should make known unto the Lord the King from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. ss AND the said I. I. not acknowledging any matter by the said W. B.
I.G. and W. by I.B. their Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and injury when c. and as to the taking and deteyning of the said five Cart-â—oad of Wheat in Sheaves ten Cart-load of Barley in Sheaves ten Cart-load of Oats in Sheaves and eight Cart-load of Hay they the said R.S. I.N. Y. I. G. and VV. prayeth Judgement of the Writ c. because they say that the property of those Chattel's at the time of the said taking supposed to be done was unto R. S. of I. c. and T. H. by which they the said R. the now Defendant I.N. Y. I.G. and W.V. Servants of him the said R. S. of L. c. and T. H. and by their Command at the said time in which took and deteyned the Chattels and the same as yet they detein as unto them it is lawfull And this they are ready to approve whereupon as to the taking and detension of those Chattels they pray Iudgement of that Writ c. And as to the taking of the said Cattell they the said R. S. the now Defendant I. N. Y. I. G. and W. as Bailiffs of the said R. S. of L. and T. doe well acknowledge the taking of those Cattell in the said place As to the taking of the Cattell the Defendants justifie as servants of another doing damage in which c. and justly c. because they say that the said in which c. is supposed the taking of those Cattell to be done is and at the said time in which c. was the ground and Free-hold of the said R. S. of L. and T.H. And that those Cattell at the same time were in the same place eating the grass there then growing and Damage there doing by which they the said R. S. the now Defendant I. N. Y. I. G. and VV. as Bailiffs of the said R. S. of L. and T. at the said time in which c. took and deteyned those Cattell and the said Ewe-sheep as yet they detein as to them it was lawfull and this they are ready to prove whereupon they pray Judgement if the said I. his Action thereupon against them ought to have c. And the said R. S. of L. and T. pray retorn of the Oxen Steers Cows Calf Heifers and the said Living goods to 〈◊〉 adjudged unto them The Plaintif prayeth that the Defendant may secure unto him of some of the Cattell for that he hath not claimed any property Defendant as to parcell saith that he put them in an open Pound and in default of the Plaintif with hunger they perished to find pledges of deliverance for the residue And upon this the said I. N. saith that the said R. S. the now Defendant I. N. Y. I. G. and VV. of the said Ewe-Sheep whereof out of which they the said R. S. the now Defendant I. N. Y. I. G. and VV. have claymed no property in the same Ewe-sheep prayeth that they the said R. S. the now Defendant I.N.Y.I.G. and VV. may put in Security here in Court unto the said I. N. for the Delivery of the same Ewe-sheep Upon which they the said J.S. the now Defendant J. N. Y. J. G. and VV. as to the Security and Delivery of two Ewe-sheep of the said three Ewes say that the Delivery thereof unto the said I.N. they ought not to secure because they say that immediatly after that they the said Cattell in form aforesaid took those Cattell they put in a certain open Pound at C. in the County aforesaid and afterwards the said two Ewe-sheep with hunger and for want of Sustenance in default of him the said I. M. there perished And this they are ready to prove whereupon they pray Judgement if they ought to secure the Deliverance of those two Sheep unto the said I. N. c. which said matter to the securing of the Deliverance of those two Sheep the said I. N doth not gainsay and as to the Deliverance of that one Ewe-sheep as is before said deteyned they the said R.S. the now Defendant I. N. Y. I. G. and W. they have found pledges of the Deliverance thereof to be made unto the said I. N. namely I. Hercum and J. Beuning Plaintif saith that the property of the Chattels was his and not anothers as to the residue pleads a certain Demise unto him made by virtue of which he entred and was thereof possessed until another disseised him and after that the Plaintif put Cattell in the place in which c. And that the Defendant took the same Def. pleads a Demise at will c. therefore the said I. N. may have the Deliverance thereof c. ss AND the said I. N. saith that his said Writ as to the taking and Detension of the said Chattels for the reason before alleged ought not to be made void because he saith that the property of those Chattels at the said time in which c. was unto the said I. N. and not unto the said R. S. of L. and T. as the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others above have alleged and this he prayeth may be inquired of by the Countrey and the said R. S. the now Defendant and others likewise c. And as to the taking of the said Cattell the said I. N saith that the said R.S. the now Defendant and the others the taking of those Cattell ought not acknowledge just because he faith that the said place called W. in which c. is and at the time of the said taking was three closes conteining Ten acres of Land and eight acres of Pasture in L. aforesaid whereof the said W. H. long before the said time was seized in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof seized before that time in which c. that is to say the Tenth day of January in the Tenth year of the Reign of the said now King at G. in the County aforesaid those Closes with th' appurtenances amongst other Lands Tenements in G. aforesaid demised unto the said I.N. to have and occupy unto the said I. N. from the same Tenth day of January from thence next following and so from year to year at the will of him the said W. H. paying therefore yearly unto the said W. H. as long as the said I. N. those Closes and also the said Lands and Tenements by reason of that Demise should have and occupy 26. shillings 8. pence to be paid at the Feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell by virtue of which Demise the said I. N. of the said Closes together with those Lands and Tenements was possessed untill they the said R. S. of L. and T. H. the aforesaid W. H. of those Closes before the said time in which c. Disseised and from those Closes of him the said I. N. expelled and amoved by which they the said R. S. of L. and T. were seized in those Tenements with th' appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee by Disseisin And after that the said
of the said Queen to take the said W. so as is premised Outlawed Cap ' utl to the Sheriff of Surrey directed Speciall Cap ' Utl. directed to the Sheriff of Surrey by which said Writ of the said Queen unto the then said Sheriff of Surrey is commanded that he should not omit for any Liberty of hiâ— County but that by the Oath of honest and lawfull men of his County he should diligently enquire what Goods and Chattels Lands and Tenements the said W. had in his Bayliwick on Monday next after the end of St. Luke the Evangelist aforesaid in the thirtieth year abovesaid or ever after that day he was Outlawed in London at the Sute of the said E. of a Plea of Trespas upon the Case whereupon he was convicted as the said Sheriffs of London unto the Justices of the said Queen at Westminster at a certain day then past had sent And he by their Oath should cause to be extended and apprised according to the true vaâ—ue of the same and those things which by that Inquisition should be found he should take into the hands of the said Queen and should cause the same to be safely kept so that out of the true value and profits thereof he should answer unto the said Queen and the same so extended and appraised what therupon he should do he should make known unto the then Justices of the said Queen at Westminster from Easter day to one Moneth next following distinctly and plainly under his Seal and under the Seals of them by whose Oath he should make that Extent and Appraisement And for that the said W. lay Out awed and did run into the said County of Surrey in Contempt of the said Queen and prejudice of her the said Queens Crown the Queen thereupon commanded the said Sheriff of Surrey that he should take the said W. wheresoever in the Bayliwick aswell within a Liberty as without he should happen to find him and cause him to be safely kept so that he should have his body before the Justices of the said Queen at Westminster at the said Term to do and receive what the Court of the said Queen of that shall consider in this behalf and that he should have then there that Writ And although the said E. after the issuing forth of the same Writ and before the said Moneth of Easter that is to say the second day of March in the year of the Reign of the now said Queen thirty two abovesaid at Southwark in the said County of Surrey in the presence of the said W. then being at large and whom the said T. by vertue of any Writ of the said Queen lawfully and safely might take delivered unto the said Thomas Pelham then being Sheriff of the said County of Surrey that writ in form of Law to be executed and the same Edward then and there offered to pay unto the said Sheriff the Fee due unto him for the Execution of the same Writ and then and there required the said Sheriff that he should execute the said Writ as to him by that Writ it was commanded notwithstanding which the said T. P. then and continually afterwards untill the said Moneth of Eastet and after the said Moneth of Easter the said Sheriff of the said County of Surrey being the Command of the said Queen little weighing and his office of Sherivaâ—ty in the true and just execution of that Writ to him directed as by the bond of his Oath he was bound nothing regarding cunningly imagining not onely the said Queen of that which belongeth to the said Queen by reason of the Outlary aforesaid to defraud and him the said E. from the obtaining of the said Damages in form aforesaid recovered very much to hinder And also the Court of the said Queens Bench in this behalf to deceive and mock the said W. so as is Premised Outlawed as contemning the said Queens Crown and Dignity and the Law of her the said Queen continually from day to day after the Receipt of the same Writ and before the Retorn of the same at large in his Bayliwick going and there remaining altogether refused to take and arrest and that Writ at the aforesaid Moneth of Easter before the Justices of the said Queens Bench had not neither did Retorn nor any thing thereupon did but that Writ altogether concealed to the Contempt of the said Queens Command and manifest deceiving and mocking of the said Court and also not to the small damage and grief of him the said E. and the manifest hindrance and delay of the recovery of his said Damages Not guilty pleaded to the Damage of him the said E. one hundred pounds And thereupon he bringeth his Sute c. Declaration upon an Assumpsit to save one harmless upon an Obligation ss E. B. complaineth of R. C. in the custody of the Marshall c. for that to wit that whereas the aforesaid E. such a day and year at H. in the County aforesaid at the speciall instance and request of the aforesaid R. by his writing Obligatory bearing Date the same day and year was bound together with the aforesaid R. and for the sole Debt of the said R. unto one P. B. upon condition thereupon Indorsed that if the aforesaid R.C. should pay unto the aforesaid P. B. at a certain day in the same Condition contained eight pounds of lawfull c. that then that Writing should be void and of none effect otherwise to remain in his strength and vertue the aforesaid R. afterwards that is to say in such a day and place in Consideration aforesaid assumed upon himself and the aforesaid E. B. then and there faithfully promised that he the said R. at all times then afterwards should discharge the aforesaid E. against the aforesaid P. from the aforesaid Writing Obligatory yet nevertheless the aforesaid R. his promise and assumption aforesaid not regarding hath not hitherto discharged the aforesaid E. from the aforesaid Writing Obligatory although he hath been often required by him the said E. to doe it whereupon the said E. saith that he is very much the worse c. ACTIONS OF TRESPASS TRESPASS AND the said T. S. by F. S. his Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and injury when Defendant justifies as his ServaÌ„t which had the Freehold c. And as to the comming with Force and arms c. not guilty as and as to the rest of the Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done the said T. saith that the Action he ought not c. because he saith that the house aforesaid in the said Declaration above specified in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be done is and at the foresaid time in which c. was the ground and Freehold of the said I. B. by which the said T. as Servant of him the â—â—id I. and by his command at the same time in which c. the foresaid house as the house and ground and proper
so long as they live Protesting also that the said Alice did not Demise unto the said Plaintifs the said Tenements in manner and form as the said Plaintifs in their said Replication before have alleged for Plea as before saith that the said Thomasine was seized of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in N. in her Demesn as of Fee And so seized demised the same Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the said Defendant To have to him from the Feast of St. Michael th'Archangell untill the end of the Term of four years from thence next following and fully to be Compleat By vertue of which Demise the said Defendant was of those Tenements possessed in manner and form as the said Defendant in barre before hath alleged Without this Without this that the said Thomasine at the time of the said Demise by the said Alice unto the said Plaintiffs of the said Tenements supposed to be done was seised of the said Tenements with the appurtenances to the use of the said Alice in manner and form as the said Plaintiffs before in pleading have alleged And this c. whereupon he prayeth Judgement and that the said Plaintiff from his said Action against him the said Defendant had may be precluded c. And the said Defendants say that the said Thomasine at the time of the said Demise by the said Alice unto the said Plaintiffs in form aforesaid made was seized of the said Tenements with the appurtenances to the use of the said Alice in manner and form as they the said Plaintiffs before in pleading have alleged And this they pray that it may be enquired of by the Country c. â—uff Declaration in Trespass wherfore they broke the Close against two Defendants who plead severally Parl. 32. H. 8. Rot. 111. One of the Defendants pleads that he is seised of certain Lands c. in Fee by reason of which hee ought to have Common in the place in which c. and that he put the Cattle c. for using the CoÌ„mon c. which is the same Common and so justifies ss R. B. late of Levistost in the said County Yeoman and W. H. late of L. c. were attached to answer unto Edward B. together with R. H. late of c. of a Plea wherefore with force and Arms the Close of him the said E. at G. they did break and his Grass to the value of 10. l. there late growing with certain Cattle they did eat up tread and consume And other Wrongs c. To the great Damage c. and against the Peace c. And the said R. B. and W.C. by R. B. their Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and wrong when c. And as to the comming with force and Arms c. Not guilty and as to the residue of the said Trespass before supposed to be done the said R. B. saith that the said E. no Action because he saith that the place in which the said Trespass is supposed to be done is and at the said time of that Trespass supposed to be done was a certain place called the Dens conteining in it self D. Acres of Land in G. aforesaid extending it self from the South from a certain place called G. in L. aforesaid unto a certain place called H. in G. aforesaid against the North-West and so extending from the foot of the Rock of the Cliff untill the Sea against the East and that he at the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done and long before of 3. Messuâ—ges and 16. Acres of Land with the appurtenances in L. aforesaid was seised in his Demesn as of Fee And that he and all those whose estate he hath in the said 3. Messuages and 16. Acres of Land with the appurtenances from the time of which c. had were accustomed to have common of Pasture of and in the said places caâ—led the Dens within the said Bounds and Limits with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever at all time of the year by which the said R. B. at the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done his said Cattle into the said Close in the said place called the D. in G. aforesaid within the said Bounds and Limits to the said Grass there then growing to feed in using his said Common by the time aforesaid did put as to him it was lawfull which things are the same breaking of the Close treading consuming and eating up of the said Grass whereof the said G. before himself doth now complain And this c. Whereupon he prayeth Judgement if an Action c. And the said W.C. saith that the said E. No Action The other Defendant saith that he likewise is seized of certain other Lands c. in Fee by reason of which he hath Common of pasture in the place in which c. and that he put in Cattle c. in using the Common c. which is the same Trespass c. and so justifies because he saith that the place in which the said Trespass supposed to be done is and at the said time of that Trespass before supposed to be done was the said place called the Dens and that he at the time of that Trespass before supposed to be done and long before was likewise seised in his Demesn as of Fee of and in two Messuages and 2. Acres of Land with the appurtenances in L. aforesaid and that he and all those whose estate he hath in the said two Messuages and two Acres of Land with the appurtenances from the time of which c. had and were accustomed to have Common of Pasture in the said place called the Dens within the said bounds and limits with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever at all time of the year by which the said W.G. at the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done his said Cattle into the said Close in the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid within the said bounds and limits to the said Grass there then growing to feed in using his said Common by the said time put as to him it was lawfull which matters are the same breaking of the Close treading consuming and eating up of the said Grass whereof the said E. before himself how complaineth And this c. whereupon c. And the said E. B. saith To the Plea of one of the Defendants the Plantiff saith that the Trespass done was aswell in the said place called the Dens as in another place called the East Heath and because the Defendants to the Trespass in the same place called East Heath of new assigned doe not answer prayeth Judgment c. New Assignment that he by any matter before alleged from his said Action against the said R. B. and W.C. had ought not to be precluded because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which the said Trespass whereof the said E.
paid that horse to him the said A. hee sold And the same horse to him the said A. then and there delivered By vertue of which said sale and delivery of that horse as of his proper horse was possessed and as yet is And the aforesaid C. the horse aforesaid out of the possession of him the said B. took and was thereof possessed untill the same A. the same horse as his proper horse at S. aforesaid at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made out of the possession of the aforesaid B. by means of the sale and delivery aforesaid he againe took and led away as it was lawfull for him to do And this c. Whereupon hee demands judgement c. AND the aforesaid C. sayes that he by any thing before alleadged The Plaintiffe pleads the property in another stranger who sold to him and traverses the sale made to the Defendant ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against him c. because by protestation that the aforesaid propriety of the horse aforesaid was never the aforesaid B. for Plea he saith that long before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid made the propriety of the horse aforesaid was one T.H. which said T. of that horse as of his proper horse then being possessed that horse to him the said C. long before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was made to wit such a day and yeare and place and County for a 100 s. to him the said T. in hand paid sold to him the said C. the horse aforesaid And that horse to him the said C. then and there delivered By vertue of which said sale and delivery the same C. of that horse as of his proper horse was possessed untill the aforesaid A. the horse aforesaid at S. aforesaid at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid made by force and arms out of the possession of him the said C. he took and led away as he by his aforesaid Writ and declaration above against him complaineth Without that A Traverse of the sale to the Defendant that the aforesaid B. the horse aforesaid to the aforesaid A. at D. aforesaid the aforesaid such a day and yeare sold in manner and forme as the aforesaid A. above alleadgeth And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid A. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth hee prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespasse aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. Issue upon the Traverse AND the aforesaid A. sayes that the aforesaid B. the horse aforesaid to the aforesaid A. at D. aforesaid the day and year aforesaid sold in manner and form as he above hath alleadged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Country And the aforesaid C. in like manner c. Therefore the Jury is to come c. Institutions in trespasse for want of reparation of the hedges by the Plaintiffs Trin. 22. Hen. 6. Rol. 89. AND the aforesaid T. and I. by I.H. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury where c. And as to the coming by force and armes c. not guilty And as to the breaking of the close aforesaid and the eating up treading downe and consuming of the grasse aforesaid the same T. and I. say that the aforesaid N. ought not to have his action aforesaid against them because they say that they at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made were and are seized of a certain close of pasture near adjoyning to the said close of the aforesaid N. in which the grasse aforesaid grew in K. aforesaid in their demesne as of Fee Between which said closes there is a certaine hedge separating each from other the aforesaid closes Which said hedge the aforesaid N. and all they whose estate the same N. hath in the close aforesaid from time out of minde were accustomed to make repaire and sustaine and say that that hedge for want of reparation and sustaining of the same was at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made broken downe and laid prostrate to the ground and that the Cattell of them the said T. and I. in their close aforesaid put to depasture into the said close of the aforesaid N. by the breach and decay of the said hedge did enter against the will of them the said T. and I. and the grasse aforesaid did eat up tread downe and consume the same T. and I. their Cattell aforesaid freshly pursuing into the said close of the said N. by the breach and decay aforesaid did enter to drive backe their cattell into the said close of them the said T. and I. and into that close speedily drove them as it was lawfull for them to doe which is the same Trespasse and breach of close and feeding treading downe and consuming the grasse aforesaid whereof the aforesaid N. above against them complaineth And this they are ready to aver c. whereupon c. The Defendants plead that the Vicar was seized in right of his Vicaridge and justifie as his servants Essex AND the aforesaid H.T.R. and VV. by T. G. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid besides the breaking of the close and how aforesaid say that they are not guilty c. And as to the breaking of the close and house aforesaid they the same H.R. and VV. say that the aforesaid C. ought not to have thereof his action aforesaid against them because they say that the close and house aforesaid and also the place in which it was supposed the same Trespasse to be made The form of pleading where the quantity of the close is not ascertained in the Declaration was one house acre of Land with the appurtenances in Eastham aforesaid which are and the aforesaid time wherein c. were parcel of the Mannor of Eastham in the County aforesaid whereof before the said time wherein c. one I.R. Vicar of the Church of Eastham aforesaid was seized in his demesne as of Fee in right of his Vicaridge aforesaid by which the same H. R. and W. as the servants of him the said I. R. and by his command the aforesaid time wherein c. the close and house aforesaid did break as it was lawfull for them to doe And this c. Whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid C. ought to have or maintaine his action aforesaid against them c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes The plaintiffe replies that the Vicar demised to him c. that he by any thing before pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against them of the breach of the close and house aforesaid because he saith that it is well and true that before the said time of the Trespasse aforesaid made the aforesaid I.R. was seized of the aforesaid house and one
speeches that the same Plaintiffe beleeving that she would give her consent to such Matrimony The goods and chattels aforesaid to her the said A. the aforesaid day year and place did give And afterwards the aforesaid A. turning her heart from the aforesaid Plaintiffe on the aforesaid Defendant to have him for her husband after the gift aforesaid the aforesaid A. coming to the Village of R. aforesaid such a day and yeare the goods and chattels aforesaid to him the said Plaintiffe then and there gave backe againe what time the aforesaid A. was sole By pretext whereof the same Plaintiffe was thereof possessed until the aforesaid Defendant by force and armes the goods and chattels aforesaid at R. found took and carried away against the peace of our Lord the King that now is and the same Plaintiffe above against him complaineth And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid Defendant above acknowledgeth the Trespasse aforesaid he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to bee adjudged unto him c. Issue upon the giving back of the goods AND the aforesaid Defendant not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid Plaintiffe before alleadged to be true sayes that the aforesaid A. after the Gift aforesaid to her by the aforesaid Plaintiffe of the goods and chattels made did not give backe againe the aforesaid goods and chattels to him the aforesaid Plaintiffe as the same Plaintiffe above hath alleadged And of this hee puts himselfe upon the Country c. And the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner c. The Defendant justifies for that the goods were pawned to the Plaintiffe and be pawned them to another who delivered them to the Defendant to be safely kept and to whom the Defendant afterwards the same re-delivered AND the aforesaid W.B. by I.C. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid besides the taking and carrying away of one bolle of Gold and one bolle of Silver and gilt and one cup of Gold sayes that in nothing thereof guilty c. And as to the taking and carrying away of the aforesaid one bolle of Gold one bolle of Silver and gilt and one cup of Gold the same Defendant not acknowledging these goods and chattels to have been of such value as by the Declaration aforesaid is supposed sayes that the aforesaid W.C. ought not to have his action c. because he saith that one R.C. was Proprietor of these goods and in the possession of them long before the aforesaid Plaintiffes had any thing in them And so being Proprietor and possessed such a day yeare and place pawned to the aforesaid Plaintiffe those goods and chattels for forty Marks of him the said Plaintiffe by him the said R.C. of loan received under such a condition that if the aforesaid R. C. should pay to the said plaintiffe the aforesaid forty Marks before the feast of the Birth of our Lord then next following Then he the said Plaintiffe should re-deliver to the aforesaid W. those goods and chattels otherwise he should keep them safe until he should be fully satisfied and paid the aforesaid forty Marks By vertue of which said pawnings the said Plaintiffe was possessed of these goods and chattels under the condition aforesaid And so being thereof possessed the same goods and chattels further pawned to one W. G. for other forty Marks of him the said W. by him the said Plaintiffe of loan received under such condition that the aforesaid W.G. those goods and chattels to them the aforesaid R.C.W.C. who should pay and deliver those forty Marks to him the said W.G. should re-deliver and sayes that these forty Marks to the aforesaid W.G. at the time when the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made were not paid and fearing and supposing the same goods and chattels could not be kept secure in the house of him the said VV. G the same goods and chattels before the aforesaid feast of the Birth of our Lord at C. aforesaid delivered to him the said Defendant to be safely kept And to him the said VV. G when he should bee thereunto required to bee re-delivered and sayes that he contemned the keeping of those goods knowing them to be his by wicked profit and being unwilling for that cause to keep them any longer the same goods and chattels at the time when the Trespasse aforesaid was above supposed to bee made from a certaine chest where in his house at C. aforesaid they lay hee took and to the house of the aforesaid VV. G. in the same Village he carried and the same to him the said VV. G then and there delivered which said taking and carrying of the goods and chattels aforesaid by the cause aforesaid are the same taking and carrying away of the aforesaid goods and chattels of which the aforesaid Plaintiffe above now complaineth And this c. VVhereupon he prayes judgement whether the Plaintiffe ought to have or maintaine his action aforesaid against him c. The Plaintiffe pleads that I.C. pawned the goods unto him and payed not the summe for which they were pawned and traverses that she pawned them in mannor and forme c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid Defendant before alleadged to be true sayes that hee by any thing afore alleadged ought not to bee debarred from having his action aforesaid against him for the aforesaid taking and carrying away the aforesaid goods and chattels which the aforesaid Defendant above acknowledgeth because he saith that the aforesaid R.G. the aforesaid such a day and yeare at C. aforesaid pawned to him the said Plaintiffe these goods and chattels for forty Marks of him the said Plaintiffe by him the said R. of loan received under such condition that if the same R. should pay to him the said Plaintiffe these forty Markes before the feast of the birth of our Lord then next following then the same goods and chattels to him the said R. should be delivered otherwise to the same Plaintiffe they should remaine as his proper goods and chattels to him by the aforesaid R. sold for the aforesaid forty Marks and sayes that the aforesaid R. paid not to him the said Plaintiffe the aforesaid forty Marks before the aforesaid feast of the birth of our Lord By which the same goods and chattels the taking and carrying away whereof the aforesaid Defendant above acknowledgeth to him the said Plaintiffe as his proper goods and chattels did remaine And the aforesaid Defendant the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done by force and armes of his proper injury the same goods and chattels at C. found took and carried away as the same Plaintiffe above against him complaineth Traverse Without that that the same Plaintiffe pawned to the aforesaid W.G. these goods and chattels for forty Marks as the aforesaid Defendant above alleadgeth And
thing pre-alledged ought not to bee debarred from having his action aforesaid of the breach of the house aforesaid against the aforesaid Defendant because he saith that the same Defendant of his owne proper injury the said time wherein c. by force and armes aforesaid the house aforesaid he did in manner and form as the same Plaintiffe above against him complaineth Without that that the same Plaintiffe licensed the aforesaid Defendant to enter the house aforesaid Traverse as the same Defendant above by pleading hath alledged And this c. Whereupon for that the same Defendant the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth he prayeth judgement and his Damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid Defendant as formerly saith Issue upon the Traverse that the aforesaid Plaintiffe licensed him the said Defendant to enter into the house aforesaid in the forme wherein he the Defendant above by pleading hath alleadged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Country And the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner c. Therefore the Jury is to come between them c. AND the aforesaid R.P. and I.R. by L.S. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. Iustification for that the Plaintiffe was suspected for a Felâ—â— And as to the coming by force and armes and whatsoever which is against the peace of our Lord the King that now is as also the Trespasse aforesaid of woundings supposed to be made sayes that he is in nothing thereof guilty And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be done the same R. and I. say that the aforesaid W. ought not to have his action aforesaid against them because they say that long before the said time wherein the trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made to wit the tenth day of January in the eighth yeare of the reigne of our Lord the King that now is one I.S. at Norwich aforesaid in his house there was feloniously spoiled and robbed of two silver Spoons to the value of 10 s. And that the aforesaid W. divers daies and times before the felony aforesaid made frequented the house of him the said I.S. aforesaid suspiciously without any reasonable cause there to be had And that the aforesaid W. R. the said time of the felony aforesaid done was in the house of the aforesaid I.S. by which the same R. and I.R. had suspicion the aforesaid W.R. to have committed the felony aforesaid And that the aforesaid R. and I.R. the same time wherein c. being then Sheriffes of the City aforesaid softly laid their hands upon him the said W.R. the same time wherein c. And the same W. R. for suspicion of the Felony aforesaid the same time wherein c. they tooke and him the said W. to the Goale of our Lord the King within the City aforesaid there to be safely kept for the same Felony the said time wherein c. they lead and imprisoned as it was lawfull for them to doe which said softly laying on of their hands of them the said R. and I.R. upon the aforesaid W.R. and the taking of him the said W. R. and the leading and imprisoning of him out of the cause aforesaid are the same assault beating and imprisonment whereof the aforesaid W.R. above complaineth And this they are ready to aver whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid W.R. ought to have his action aforesaid against them c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes that he by any thing before alledged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against them because he saith that the aforesaid R. and I. R the day and yeare aforesaid of his own proper injury by force and armes without any such cause by them the said R. and I.R. above by pleading alleadged on him the said W.R. at Norwich aforesaid they made an assault and him did beate wound imprison and evill intreate in the manner and forme as the aforesaid W.R. above against them complaineth And this he prayeth may be enquired of by the Country c. Iustification upon imprisonment and assault by vertue of a Warrant of the Peace Mich. 8. Hen. 8. Rolle 77. Staff ss AND the aforesaid H.W. by W.F. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. and as to the coming by force and armes or whatsoever is against the peace c. not guilty and as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be done the same H. sayes that the aforesaid R. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that long before the said time wherein the trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done on I.W. at Stafford in the County aforesaid came before R W. then one of the Justices of the Peace of our Lord the King assigned in the County aforesaid to be kept and there tooke his corporall oath that he grievously and manifestly went in danger of his life and maiming of his members by the aforesaid R.C. By which he the same I.W. long before the said time wherein c. at Stafford aforesaid at the Petition of the aforesaid I.W. directed a certaine precept of our Lord the King to the aforesaid H. W. then being Bailiffe of R. and to the Constable of R. aforesaid and to either of them joyntly and divided commanding them by that precept that they cause to come the aforesaid R. C. before the aforesaid R. W. or one of his Companions Justices of the peace of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid to find sufficient security of the peace of our Lord the King towards the Lord the King and all his people and cheifly against the aforesaid H.W. to be given And if the same R.C. should refuse to doe this then the same H. and the aforesaid Constable the same R.C. unto the next Goale of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid should cause to bee led or one of them should cause to be led there to stay untill he would freely doe this By reason of which precept the aforesaid H.W. before the said time wherein c. did repair to the aforesaid R.C. at R. aforesaid and shewed to the aforesaid R.C. there the precept aforesaid then and there further requiring the same R. to find before the said R. W. or one of his companions Justices of the peace of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid then being to find security for bearing the peace of our Lord the King in form aforesaid and the same R. this to do then at R. aforesaid upon which the same A.W. him the said R. then and there the said time wherein c. arrested and him in bringing towards the prison of our Lord the King at the Castle of Stafford in the County aforesaid imprisoned by the time aforesaid and his hands upon him the said R. in that arresting and leading did softly lay as it was lawful for him
to do which said arrest and leading to the prison aforesaid and laying hands upon him the said H. are the same taking imprisoning and ill handling whereof the aforesaid R. above complaines And this c. whereupon he prayes judgement whether the action c. AND the aforesaid R. saies that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against the said H. W. Because by protestation not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid H. above alleadged to be true for plea he saith The Plaintiffe replies that he offered security that he before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid made and the time wherein c. offered the aforesaid H. to finde sufficient security before T. Partridge then one of the Justices of the peace of our Lord the King for the same County assigned to be kept according to the form of the aforesaid precept by the said I.W. to him directed which to doe the same H. refused Without that that the same R.C. refused to come before the Justices of the Peace in manner and form as the aforesaid H. hath above alleadged Traverse the denying to come before the Iustices And this c. whereupon for that the aforesaid H. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth he prayeth judgement and his damages by that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid H sayes Issue upon the Traverse that the aforesaid R. refused to come before the Justices of our Lord the King to find sufficient security in manner and forme as the same H. above hath alleadged and of this he puts himselfe upon the Country And the aforesaid R.C. in like manner c. Justification by vertue of a common Watch according to the forme of the Statute of Winchester AND the aforesaid G. by I.W. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And as to the comming by force and armes and whatsoever is against the peace of our Lord the King as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid besides the assault and imprisonment above supposed to be made sayes that hee is not guilty c. And as to the assault and imprisonment supposed to be made the same G. sayes that the aforesaid T. ought not thereupon to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that in the Statute in the Parliament of Edward the first late King of England Progenitor of our Lord the King that now is at Winchester in the thirtieth yeare of his Reigne held published amongst other things It was ordained and established that watches should be made as more anciently they were wont to be that is to say from the day of the Ascension of our Lord unto the feast of St. Michael the Arch-angel that is to say in each City by six men at each Gate of the same and in every Town by twelve men and in every entire Village by six or foure men according to the number of the people inhabiting in them And that the Watches should be kept by the whole night from the Sun-set to the rising of the Sun so that if any stranger should make his journey through them he should be arrested until the morning following And if no suspicion should be then found of him that then hee should from thence goe quit as in the same Statute more fully is contained And further the same G. sayes that he at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be made was dwelling in the said Village of W. together with other the inhabitants his neighbours about him in the same Village were assigned to keep the Watches there and sayes that the aforesaid T. the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made to wit such a day year and place came suspiciously to the Village aforesaid after Sun-set and before the rising of the same that is to say about the houre of eleven in the same night By which the same G. then came to the aforesaid T. and him at the same time wherein c. he arrested and detained him with him untill the morning following and compelled him to stay there according to the forme of the Statute aforesaid as it was lawfull for him to doe which said coming unto and detention by the cause aforesaid in form aforesaid is the same assault and imprisonment whereof the aforesaid T. above now complaineth And this he is ready to aver VVhereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought to have his action aforesaid against him c. Middlesex AND the aforesaid C. Crips Iustification by a Constable for taking a Where Mich. 2. Hen. 8. Rot. 103. and E. by T.R. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes And whatsoever which is against the peace c. as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid besides the assault beating evill handling and imprisonment by the space aforesaid supposed to be made the same C. and E. say that they are in nothing thereof guilty c. And as to the assault beating evill handling and imprisonment the same E. and C. say that the aforesaid M. ought not to have her action aforesaid against them because they say that the aforesaid M. long before the said time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made was a publick notorious and common Whore and had carnall knowledge with many and divers common men unknowne to him the said C. at many and divers times And the same C. and E. say that at the time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made and long before the same C. was Constable of our Lord the King in the aforesaid Parish of St. Andrews and that before the said time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to bee done was given to understand by certaine of his neighbours very carefull of keeping the peace of our Lord the King and willing to avoid ill government he being then Constable of our Lord the King as aforesaid that the aforesaid M. at the aforesaid Parish of St. Andrews then lay and lodged in bed with a certaine man unknowne to the same neighbours and also that divers loose men and vagabonds and very many unknowne persons made many brawlings scoldings cryings out uproars there between themselves and strove together which of them should first have the carnall knowledge of her the said M. and should then use her as their Whore By reason of which information he the said C. then there being Constable as he was by oath bound for the preservation of the peace of our Lord the King and the avoyding of the premises and the ill government aforesaid repaired to a place in the Parish aforesaid where then the aforesaid M. and other the men vagabonds aforesaid then were supposed to be as to see if the same M. and the rest of the aforesaid men vagabonds behaved themselves there as hee was given to understand the aforesaid time wherein the
Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done And the aforesaid Vagabonds perceiving afarre off the coming of him the said C. then being Constable before he could approach unto them they fled away so that the said C. could not arrest them but the aforesaid M. with a certain man to whom unknown in bed there the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done he found lying like a whore at the Parish aforesaid And because the same M. behaved her selfe then and sometimes before so evilly and for that cause very many evill persons and disturbers of the peace of our Lord the King there had often disturbed the Constable and very many of the neighbours there And she the said M. although oftentimes thereupon then and before to desist from the premises by him the said Constable had been required would not reforme or justifie herself thereupon neither by the law of God nor the King by which the same C. then being Constable of our Lord the King and the aforesaid E. with the same C. her husband by his command coming to his help their hands upon the aforesaid M. there so lodging in bed with the aforesaid unknowne man softly laid hand on and took her from that bed and her the said M. as well for her punishment as to the terrour of other the like whores whereas by the consideration and distinction of him the said C. then and there in the Stocks according to the Law of the Land they put and kept by the space aforesaid as it was lawfull for them to doe which said laying on of their hands of them the said C. and E. on the aforesaid M. and the taking out of the bed aforesaid as also the putting into the Stocks of the said M. are the aforesaid assault beating evill handling and imprisonment whereof the aforesaid M. by her bill above against them complaineth And this they are ready to aver whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid M. ought to have or maintaine her action aforesaid in this behalfe against them c. The Plaintiffe replies that it was done of their proper injury without any such cause AND the aforesaid M. sayes that shee by any thing before pre-alledged ought not to be debarred from having her action aforesaid against them the said C. and E. of the aforesaid assault beating evill handling and imprisonment because she saith that the aforesaid C. and E. the day and yeare above written by force and armes aforesaid of their proper injury without such cause by them the said C. and E. above alleadged on her the said M. at the aforesaid Parish of St. Andrews they made an assault and so did wound evill intreat and imprison by the space aforesaid in manner and forme as shee the same M. above against them complaineth And this shee prayes may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid C. and E. in like manner c. Iustification of an imprisonment by vertue of the Statute of Vagrants and Vagabonds of Rich. the second the 7. year of his reign Hil. 34. Hen. 8. Rolle 60. AND the aforesaid I.H. in his proper person comes and defends the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid besides the Imprisonment of the aforesaid R.S. the same I. H. sayes that he is not guilty c. And as to the Imprisonment of the aforesaid R. the same I. H. sayes that the aforesaid R. ought not thereupon to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that by the Statute of the Lord the King Richard the second late King of England at Westminster in the seventh yeare of his reigne by authority of the same Parliament amongst other things it was Enacted that all and singular Bailiffes of Liberties Constables and other Officers of Villages where Vagrants and Vagabonds frequent should have power diligently to examine them and of compelling them to finde sufficient pledges by sufficient manucaptors for their good behaviours And that if default be made in those Vagrants and Vagabonds and that they cannot finde pledges that then it shall be very lawfull for the aforesaid Bailiffes of Liberties Constables and other Officers of Villages the same Vagrants and Vagabonds to commit to the next Goale of our Lord the King within the County aforesaid where such Vagrants and Vagabonds frequent there to remain til the coming of the Justices of our Lord the King for the Goal Delivery within that County where such Vagrants and Vagabonds are imprisoned and that the same Justices shall doe with these Vagrants and Vagabonds as to them shall seem expedient And the same I. sayes that he at the aforesaid time of the Imprisonment aforesaid above supposed to be made was Bayliffe of our Lord the King of St. Edmonds Bury aforesaid And for that that the same I. the aforesaid time of the imprisonment aforesaid above supposed to be made found the same R. a Vagrant and Vagabond at and within the Village of St. Edmonds Bury frequenting The same I. being then Bayliffe of the Liberty aforesaid according to the forme of the Statute aforesaid the aforesaid R. then and there did diligently examine And as well for that upon the examination of the aforesaid R. it did sufficiently appear to him the said I. the said R. to be a Vagrant and Vagabond as for that that the same R. the same time wherein c. could not finde pledges and sufficient Manucaptors for his good behaviour according to the forme of the Statute aforesaid The same I. as Bayliffe of our Lord the King of the Liberty aforesaid according to the form of that Statute the aforesaid R. the aforesaid time wherein c. to the aforesaid Goale of our Lord the King of St. Edmunds Bury aforesaid he did commit there to remaine untill c. which said Goale is the next Goale of our Lord the King near the aforesaid Village of St. Edmunds Bury aforesaid which is the same Imprisonment of the aforesaid R. whereof the same R. above now complaineth And this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid R. ought to have his action aforesaid in this behalfe against him c. The Plaintiffe sayes that he dwels in the County of W. his Trade there exercising AND the aforesaid R. sayes that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against the aforesaid I. because he saith that he the aforesaid time of the imprisonment aforesaid above made was dwelling conversant and Inhabiting at W. in the County aforesaid daily exercising the art called a Taylors craft Traverses the being a Vagrant Without that that the same R. the aforesaid time of the Imprisonment aforesaid above made was a Vagrant and Vagabond in manner and forme wherein the same I. in his bar by pleading above hath alleadged And this he is ready to averre whereupon for that
of the peace of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid assigned to be kept came the same W. S. then and there before the same Earle having taken his corporall oath upon the holy Evangelist that he the same W. S. damage and corporall hurt to him the said W.S. by him the said W. C. and his companions upon him the said W. S. to be brought he did grievously dread and feare the same W.S. then and there supplicating that the same Earle him the said W. C. might be bound to put in sufficient security of the peace keeping towards him the said W.S. and all and every the leige people of the Kings one in form of law by pretext whereof the same Earl a certain warrant under his scale to the Constable and Bailiffes of the Hundred of M. as also to R.N.H.H. and T.F. directed he made and delivered commanding them the said Constable and Bayliffes and the aforesaid R.H. and T. joyntly and severally by the same warrant on the behalfe of our Lord the King commanding them that the same Constables Bayliffes R.I. c. and every one of them that they should cause to come the aforesaid W.C. before the aforesaid Earle or any other Justice of the peace of our Lord the King in the aforesaid County of S. assigned to be kept immediately for the finding sufficient security of the peace in forme aforesaid And if the same W.C. so to doe should refuse then the same Constables Bayliffes and the aforesaid R.I. c. or either of them the same R. C. should cause to be brought to the Goale of our Lord the King of Y. in the same County of D. by force of that warrant there to stay until the aforesaid WC should find the security aforesaid according to what law requires in that behalfe By which meanes the same R. carrying with him the warrant aforesaid to him the said W. C. at H. aforesaid the same day the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made And to him the said W. of the same warrant and of the matter and effect of the same warrant then and there before the same assault made gave notice by vertue of the same warrant then and there requiring the same W.C. that he the said W.C. before the said Earle or other Justice of peace of our said Lord the King assigned to be kept in the same County to find sufficient security of the peace in forme aforesaid together with him the said R. he would goe which said W. C. to doe this then and there refused for which cause the same R. him the said W.C. then would have taken and arrested but the same W.C. would not stay nor obey that arrest but at the same arrest then and there drew his sword and also what in him lay offered to rescue himselfe from that arrest By which the aforesaid R. and N. and the aforesaid VV.S. as the servant of him the said R. and by his command at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be made by laying their hands upon him the said VV. C. and compelling him the said VV. C. to stand to that arrest him the said VV. C. then and there they took and arrested as it was lawfull for them to doe which said laying on of hands out of the cause aforesaid is the same assault whereof the same VV.C. above against him complaineth And this he is ready to averre whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid VV. C. ought in this behalfe to have his action aforesaid against him c. AND the aforesaid W.C. not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid W.S. before alleadged to be true sayes that he by any thing therein before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid because hee saith that the aforesaid W.S. by force and armes of his owne proper injury on him the said W.C. did make an assault and him did beate wound and evill handle in manner and form as he the said W.C. above by his bill hath declared Traverses the notice of the Warrant Without that that the same R. to him the said W.C. of the warrant aforesaid or of the matter and effect of the same warrant before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid made did give notice as the aforesaid W.S. above by pleading hath alledged And this he is ready to averre whereupon for that the aforesaid W.S. the Trespasse and Battery aforesaid above acknowledgeth he the said W.C. prayeth judgment and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid W.S. sayes Issue upon the Traverse that the aforesaid R. to him the said W.C. of the Warrant aforesaid and of the matter and effect of the same Warrant long before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made did give notice in manner and forme as he the said W. S. above by his pleading hath alleadged And of this hee puts himselfe upon the Country And the aforesaid W. C. in like manner c. Middlesex R.M. complaines of I. H. in the custody of the Marshall Declaration in assault and battery c. for that he such a day and year by force and armes on him the said R. at Westminster in the County aforesaid hee made an assault and him the said R. then there beat wounded evil handled so that of his life he did despair and also so grievous a wound upon the upper part of the left shoulder of him the said R. then and there put on him so that the same R. by reason of the extraordinary effusion of blood out of the same wound flowing and arising fell into great sicknesses and weaknesses of his body then and there and stood in great danger of losing of his life by reason thereof for a great time that is to say for the space of one month then next following As also divers great summes of mony for his healing and curing there in that behalfe to lay out and spend then and there was forced and compelled And divers difficult businesse of him the said R. then to be done and finished by the aforesaid space of one month remained undone And other harmes c. Against the peace c. to the damage c. AND the aforesaid I. H. by W. Astrie his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. Concord pleaded And as to the coming by force and armes c. sayes that he is in nothing thereof guilty c. And as to the residue c. sayes that the aforesaid R. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that after the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made to wit such a day and year I.E. in the County of Norfolk there was such an agreement had between the aforesaid R. and him the said J. to wit that he the said I. should give to the aforesaid R. one Gallon of Sack in recompence and
ought to have her action aforesaid against them c. AND the aforesaid E. sayes that shee by any thing before alleadged by them the said W. and R. ought not to be debarred from having her action aforesaid against them because by Protestation that the aforesaid sixty acres of wood with the appurtenances are and the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid made were the sole and freehold of the aforesaid E. Traverse of the Prescription Without that that the aforesaid W. and all they whose estate the same W. now hath and the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid made had of and in the aforesaid Messuage and twenty acres of Land with the appurtenances have had and time out of minde were accustomed to have for themselves their Farmers and Tenants of the same Messuage and twenty acres of Land with the appurtenances reasonable Estators in the aforesaid sixty acres of wood with the appurtenances for their proper and necessary fireboot in the said Messuage of him the aforesaid W. to be spent and burnt as unto the same Messuage and twenty acres of Land with the appurtenances belonging in manner and forme as the said VV. and R. above by pleading have alleadged And this he is ready to aver VVhereupon for that that the aforesaid VV. and R. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledge he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to bee adjudged unto him c. Issue taken upon the Traverse of the Prescription AND the aforesaid Prior I.L. and I.F. by VV.C. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. The Defendants all plead not guilty as to the force and armes and one as to the rest And the other justifie by vertue of a Warrant And as to the coming by force and armes not guilty c. And the aforesaid Prior as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid sayes that he is in nothing thereof guilty And of this he puts himselfe upon the Country c. And the aforesaid J.L. and J.R. say that the aforesaid J. B. ought not to have his action aforesaid against them because they say that long before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made our Lord the King that now is was seized of the Mannor and Lordship of Leeds in his demesne as of Fee within which said Mannor our Lord the King that now is held his Court called a Court-Baron as in right of his Mannor aforesaid from three weeks to three weeks before his Steward for the time being there to be held And sayes that our Lord the King so being seized by his Letters Patents whose date is the tenth day of October in the seventeenth yeare of his Reigne granted unto the aforesaid Prior and Covent the custody of the Mannor and Lordship of Leeds aforesaid with the appurtenances and the joysting of the Parke there To hold to him and his successours from such a day next to come unto the end of twenty years from thence next following fully to be compleat and ended rendring therefore yearly to our said Lord the King in his Exchequer at the feasts of Easter and St. Michael the Arch-angel by equall portions for the custody and joysting aforesaid 24 l. of lawfull money of England as they before had paid and also sustaining the Closes and Edifices and also supporting all other charges to the same Mannor belonging appertaining so long as they should have the custody and joysting aforesaid By vertue of which said Grant the same Prior and Covent were thereof possessed long before the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made and at the day of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to bee made And they say also further that long before the trespass aforesaid was supposed to be made that is to say such a day and year one J.S. Knight before R.C. then Steward of the same Prior of his Court aforesaid in the same Court brought a certaine plaint against the aforesaid I.B. of a plea of Trespasse by force of which said plaint the same Steward then and there commanded a certaine precept to one VV.R. then Bayliffe of the Mannor aforesaid directed to attach the aforesaid I.B. by his goods and chattels within the Precinct of the same Mannor to appeare before the aforesaid Steward at the next Court there to be held that is to say the second day of September then next following to answer the aforesaid I. S. in his plaint aforesaid by force whereof the same Bayliffe the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made And the aforesaid I.L. and I.F. as the servants of the same Bayliff and by his command the aforesaid I B. by two Horses and six Oxen aforesaid then in the place in which c. which is within the Precinct of the Mannor aforesaid found they did attach And the same Oxen and Horses then there they impounded and held impounded as it was lawfull for them to do which said taking impounding and detaining of the Cattel aforesaid out of the cause aforesaid are the same Trespasse taking c. of which the same I.B. conceives his action aforesaid c. Which all and singular they are ready to aver Whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid I. B. ought to have his action aforesaid against them c. The Plaintiffe replies that they did it of their proper injury without such a cause AND the aforesaid J.B. sayes that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against them because he saith that the aforesaid I. L. and I.F. of their owne proper injury and without such cause by them the aforesaid I.L. and I F. above alleadged with force and armes aforesaid have made in manner and forme as he the said I. B. above against them complaineth And this he prayes may be inquired of by the Country And the aforesaid I. L. and I.F. in like manner c. Issue upon the Traverse AND the said I. M. as before saith That the said Tenements with the appurtenances are and from the time of the memory of man were customary Tenements and Lands and demised and demisable by Copy of Court Roll of the said Mannor in manner and forme as the said I.M. before in pleading hath alleadged And of this hee putteth himselfe upon the Country And the said I. S. in like manner Therefore c. Trespasse upon the Case Midd. ss BOnaventure Ashby Gentleman Declaration in Trover of a reclaymed Falcon Pasch 19. Eliz. Rol. 499. complaines of John Gifford Gentleman in the custody of the Marshall c. for that that is to say whereas the aforesaid B. such a day year and place in the County aforesaid was possessed of a Falcon reclaimed and tamed of the price of 40 l. with two Belles to the value of 12 d. and two Varvils in which the name of the aforesaid B. was inscribed to the value of 5 s. as of his proper goods and chattels
lost afterwards to wit such a day yeare and place to the hands and possession of the aforesaid I. C. by finding came yet the aforesaid I. C. knowing the writing aforesaid to bee the proper writing of him the said R. and to him the said R. of right to belong and pertaine plotting and contriving him the said R. wholly to debarre and exclude from the recovery of the aforesaid two hundred pound That writing to him the said R. although afterwards to wit such a day yeare and place hee hath beene thereupon required hee hath not delivered but that writing to deliver to him the said R. hitherto hee hath altogether refused and the writing aforesaid and the profit thereupon comming afterwards to wit such a day yeare and place to his the said I. C. proper use and profit hee hath converted and disposed to the damage of him the said R. three hundred pound And thereupon hee brings his Suit c. Trâ—ver for a Ring Sur. I. G. complaines of G. C. in the custody of the Marshall c. for that that is to say whereas the same I. such a day yeare and place was possessed of a certaine gold Ring and one precious Stone called a Puffyn set and infixed in the same Ring as of his owne proper Ring And so as in other Actions of Trover The Defendant pleads he bought it in open Market AND the aforesaid G.C. in his proper person comes and defends the force and injury when c. And sayes that the aforesaid I. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because by protestation that the aforesaid Ring the aforesaid time wherein c. was worth but seven shillings and no more And that the aforesaid I. was not thereof possessed as of his proper goods and chattels in manner and forme as the same I. above against him complaineth For Plea he saith that the City of London is an ancient City of our Lady the Queen and of her Progenitors late Kings of England And that within the same City there is had and from time out of minde there hath been had a certaine publicke and open Market in every open place within the same City weekly every day in the week the Lords day onely excepted for all manner of persons to buy and sell whatsoever matters and merchandizes within the City aforesaid in every part of the same City in all open places and shops of the City aforesaid every day in the week the Lords day onely excepted from the rising of the Sunne to the setting of the same And that long before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day and yeare one R.A. was possessed of the Ring aforesaid at the City of London in the Parish of St. Botolphs in the Ward of Aldersgate London And so being thereof possessed afterwards to wit such a day and yeare at such a place in the Parish and Ward aforesaid that is to say about ten of the clocke before noon of the same day in a certaine open shop there in a certaine place called Little-Britain in the Parish and Ward aforesaid the same Ring then there being sold to him the said G. for seven shillings to him then by the aforesaid G. paid By vertue of which said sale in forme aforesaid made the aforesaid G. was of the Ring aforesaid possessed as of his proper Ring By which he the said G. the Ring aforesaid the time wherein c. to his owne proper use and profit as it was lawfull for him to doe And this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid I. ought to have his action aforesaid against him ANne Lady G. complaines of M. N. in the custody of the Marshall c. for that that is to say Action of the case for scandalizing of a title whereas the same Lady A. such a day and yeare and long before and continually after hitherto was seized in demesne as of Fee of and in the Mannor of S. with the appurtenances in the County of C. whereof a great peece of Land containing a hundred acres called the Warren is and time out of minde was parcell And whereas also the same Lady A.G. and all they whose estate she now hath of and in the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances from time out of minde were used to have a free Warren of Conies in the aforesaid hundred acres of Land called the Warren And the aforesaid Lady A. of the Mannor aforesaid and the aforesaid hundred Acres of Land called the Warren being seized as aforesaid had conference with divers persons of and for the sale of the Mannor aforesaid and Warren aforesaid with the appurtenances and thereupon might have had divers great summes of money for the Mannor and Warren aforesaid yet the same M. not ignorant of the premises plotting and contriving her the said Lady A. greatly to disturbe and vexe And to bring into scandall and ignominy the right title and interest of her the said Lady A. of and in the Mannor and Warren aforesaid with the appurtenances such a day yeare and place to very many of the faithfull subjects of our Lady the Queene and chiefly to I.P. Esquire who had conference with the same Lady A. of and for the purchasing of the Mannor and Warren aforesaid with the appurtenances and who then intended to buy the same Mannor and Warren with the appurtenances of the same Lady A. falsely and maliciously spoke pronounced and published that one R.G. then was the true Lord and Proprietor of the third part of the aforesaid hundred acres of Land and Warren aforesaid with the appurtenances And that she the Lady A.G. had no good right state title or interest in the same third part of one hundred Acres of Land and Warren aforesaid Whereas in truth the aforesaid R. G. then was not Lord or Proprietor of the aforesaid third part of the one hundred Acres of Land and Warren aforesaid nor of any parcell thereof but the same Lady A. was and yet is the true and sole Lady and Proprietor of the whole hundred Acres of Land and Warren aforesaid with the appurtenances and thereof sole seized in her demesne as of Fee By reason of which said false speaking asseveration and publication the aforesaid state title and interest of her the said Lady A. in the Mannor and Warren aforesaid with the appurtenances are fallen into great scandal and ignominy And the aforesaid I. P. who would have given for the Mannor and Warren aforesaid with the appurtenances to be purchased from the aforesaid Lady A. two thousand pounds and had offered to purchase the Mannor and Warren aforesaid of the same Lady A. hath thereupon now refused to give any manner of summe for the same to her the said Lady A. and as yet refuseth nor by that meanes can the same Lady A. the same Mannor and Warren aforesaid with the appurtenances nor any parcell thereof be able to sell to any person for
And sayes that he at and by the request of the aforesaid I. B. and W. T. in the Bill aforesaid named before the maintenance aforesaid supposed was reteyned at F. in the County of B. to be of Counsell with them the said I and W. in the Bill aforesaid named Taking therein for his Counsell as then and there between them was agreed By virtue of which Reteynder the same B was of Counsell of the aforesaid I and W. as well in the matter in the plaint aforesaid contained as in all other their Law matters and them counselled according to the best of his understanding knowledge and conception of the Law at the time of the maintenance aforesayd supposed and had Communication with other persons of their Counsell and them he requested and laboured to be of their Counsell as it was lawfull for him to do which is the same maintenance whereof the aforesaid Plaintiffe in his Bâ—ll aforesaid complaines Which all and singular the same Defendant is ready to averre Whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought to have his Action aforesaid against him c. The Plaintife sayes that the Defendant was a Lay man and not a Counsellor AND the aforesaid A. sayes that he by any thing before pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his Action aforesaid because he saith that at the time of the maintenance aforesaid the aforesaid Defendant was a Lay man and not a Counsellor learned of and in the Law aforesaid as the aforesaid Defendant hath above alleadged And this he prayes may be enquired of by the Countrey And the aforesaid Defendant in like manner c. Iustification in mayntenance as an Attorney by warrant of Attorney AND the aforesaid I. B. in his proper Person comes and having heard the Bill aforesaid defends the force and injury when c. and all contempt and whatsoever c. by Protestation that the Bill aforesaid containeth not in it sufficient matter to enforce him the sayd I. to answer the same matter for Plea he saith that he presumeth not that our Lord the King will impeach or molest him the said I. of the maintenance aforesaid by occasion of the Bill aforesaid because he saith that the aforesaid R.P. before the time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made that is to say such a day and year in the Court of our Lord the King before him the said King at Westminster the aforesaid plaint then depending in the same Court by Writ of Attaint by a certaine Warrant of Attorney residing here in Court constituted and ordained and put in his place him the said I.B. to prosecute for him the said R.P. the aforesaid Writ of Attaint or to gaine or loose in that plaint and the same I. B. was to this admitted by the same Court as it appears here in the same Court amongst the Warrants of Attorney of the Term of the Holy Trinity in the 34th yeare aforesayd By which the same I.B. the said Writ of Attaint for the aforesaid R. P. prosecuted and for him the said R. P. apeared in the same plaint as Attorney of him the said R. P. by vertue of the Waâ—â—ant aforesaid the said time wherein c. as it was lawfull for him to do which said prosecution and appearance are the same maintenance whereupon the said Lord the King prosecutes his Action And this he is ready to averre as the Court c. whereupon he presumeth not that the said Lord the King him the said I. B. of the maintenance aforesaid by occasion of the Bill aforesaid in this case will impeach or molest and prayes that he may be quietly therefrom dismissed c. And the aforesaid R. F. by G.L. his Attorny comes and defends the force and injury when c. and all contempt and whatsoever Iustification in Maintenance by cause of Consanguinitie c. And sayes that the aforesayd W. C. ought not to have his action aforesayd against him because he saith that he the same R. F. is and the sayd time wherein the Maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made was Cosen of the aforesaid R. M. that is to say Son of Margaret Sister of Alice mother of the aforesaid R.M. for whose part the aforesaid W.C. supposeth him the said R.F. to have maintained the plaint aforesaid And the same R. F. sayes further that the aforesaid R. M. for whose part c. before the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made at S. aforesaid came unto him the sayd R. F. and requested him the said R. F. that he the said R. F. would procure a certaine man learned in the Law of the Land to be of Counsell of him the said R. M. in the playnt aforesaid And that the same R. M. would well and sufficiently reward him for his Counsell By virtue of which request he the said R.F. the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made at S. aforesaid came unto one E. L. learned in the Law of the Land and requested him the said E. that he would be of Counsell with him the said R. M. in the playnt aforesaid and told him the said E. that the aforesaid R.M. would well and sufficiently reward him the said E. for his Counsell Which said coming to the aforesaid E. requesting and speaking to him the said E. out of the cause aforesaid are the aforesaid maintenance whereof the aforesaid W. C. brings his action aforesaid And this c. as the Court c. Whereupon he prayes judgment whether the aforesaid W.C. ought to have his Action aforesaid against him c. And the aforesaid W. C. not acknowledging that the aforesaid R.F. is a Cosen of the aforesaid R. M. in the form wherein the same R. F. above supposeth The Plaintife replies that the Defendant gave money to the Iurors of his own to give a Verdict for Plea he saith that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his Action aforesaid because he saith that the aforesaid R. F. the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was made at S. aforesaid gave oâ— his own proper Money to one I. P. 6 s. 8 d. being one of the Jurors who were impannelled on the aforesaid Writ of Novell desseisin to be arraigned and before the aforesaid I. P. and R. L. Justices of Assizes of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid assigned to be taken returned between the aforesaid R. M. and the aforesaid W.C. the now Plaintiff And unto T. R. 3 s. and 4 d. another of the Jurors on the aforesaid Writ of Assize of Novel desseisin in like manner impannelled and before the aforesaid Justices between the same parties in the playnt aforesaid named to speak their verdict with the aforesaid R.M. in the same plaint Which said gifts are the same mayntenance upon which the same W. C. conceiveth his action aforesaid And this c. as the Court
c. whereupon he prayes judgment c. And the aforesaid R.F. sayes that he gave not of his own proper mony to the aforesayd I.P. the aforesaid 6 s. and 8 d. nor any penny thereof nor to the aforesaid T.R. the aforesaid 3 s. and 4 d. nor any penny thereof to speak their verdict for the aforesaid R. M. Defendant in the playnt aforesaid as the aforesaid W.C. above by pleading hath alleadged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Countrey And the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner c. AND the aforesaid T.W. by L.D. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. and all contempt and whatsoever c. And sayes that the aforesaid I. H. ought not to have his Action aforesaid against him because he saith that the aforesaid I. W. the said time wherein c. and long before and after was the servant of him the said T. W. reteyned with him in the service of a Common Labourer at D. in the County of R. And further saith that the aforesaid I. W. for whose part and long before the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made at D. aforesayd came unto him the said T.W. and requested him that he in the name of him the said I.W. would ask a certaine man learned in the Law of the Land to be of Counsell with him the said I.W. in the plaint aforesaid And that the said I.W. would well and sufficiently reward him for his labour By virtue of which request the same T.W. the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid is supposed to be made at W. in the County of Middlesex came unto one W. F. a learned man in the Law of the Land and asked him the said W.F. to be of Counsell with him the said I. W. in the plaint aforesaid and told him the said W.F. that the aforesaid I. W. him the said W. F. would well and sufficiently reward him for his labour Which said comming to the aforesaid W.F. asking and speaking to him the said W. F. out of the Cause aforesaid are the aforesaid maintenance whereof the aforesaid I. H. above complaines And this c. whereupon c. AND the aforesaid I. H. sayes The Plaintife replies be was not his servant that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his Action aforesaid because he saith that the aforesaid I. W. the said time wherein c. was not the Servant of him the said T W. now retained in Service with him the said T.W. as the same T.W. above by pleading hath alleadged and this he prayes may be enquired of by the Countrey and the aforesaid Defendant in like manner therefore Command is given to the Sheriffe that he cause to come before our Lord the King at W. such a day twenty foure as well Knights c. of the Visenage of D. aforesaid by whom c. SVffolk ss T. A. who prosecutes as well for our Lady the Queen is for himself Declaration upon the Statute of mayntenance for buying of a title of Land complaines of John Calfe in the custody of the Marshall c. of a plea that he render to her the sayd Lady the Queen and the aforesaid T. A. two hundred marks for the value of one Messuage and eight Acres of Land Scituate and lying in the fields of C. in the County of Suffolk which to them the said Lady the Queen and the aforesaid T. he owes and unjustly detaines for that that is to say whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of our Lord King Henry the 8th late King of England Father of out Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of M. the 28th day of Aprill in the 11th yeare of his Raign held and there begun and from thence unto the 23 day of July then next following by diverse proroguings then and there held amongst other things it was enacted that no person or persons of whatsoever state degree or condition soever they should be of who should from thence following bargain buy or sell or by any wayes obtaine gaine or have any right or title of any person or persons in or to any Mannors c. And so recite the Statute untill One Moyetie of the said forfeitures to be to her the said Lady the Queen and the other Moyety to the party who thereupon should prosecute in any of the Courts of our Lady the Queen of Record as in the Statute aforesaid amongst other things more fully is contained yet the aforesaid I. little weighing the Statute aforesaid nor seating the punishment contained in the same the 24 day of June in the 4th yeare of our Lady the Queen one Messuage and eight Acres of Land with the Appurtenances in C. at C. in the County aforesaid of one R.F. by him the sayd I. then and there paid and afterwards to be payed bought obtained and had to him and his Heirs for ever knowing that the same R. F. nor any of his Ancestors had any right or claime to the aforesaid Messuage and eight Acres of Land with the Appurtenances nor were thereupon ever possessed of the same Messuage and eight Acres of Land nor of any reversion or remainder thereof And knowing also that he the same R. F. received not the Rent or profit thereof by the space of one whole year next before the said bargain grant and provision so between them as is aforesaid made Which said Messuage and eight Acres of Land aforesaid with the Appurtenance are worth to be sold two hundred Marks at the least By which the Action accrued to her the said Lady the Queen and to the aforesaid T. A. to require and have of the aforesaid I. the aforesaid two hundred Marks for the value of the Messuage and the aforesaid eight Acres of Land with the Appurtenances yet the aforesaid I. although often required c. the aforesaid two hundred Markes to her the said Lady the Queen nor to the aforesaid T. hitherto he hath not paid but the same to them the said Lady the Queen and to the aforesaid T. hitherto to pay he hath denied and as yâ—t denieth and the same to them the said Lady the Queen and the aforesaid T. as yet unjustly detaineth Whereupon he saith that he is worsted and hath damage to the value of 200 s. And thereupon aswell for our Lady the Queen as for himselfe be brings his Suit c. The Defendant pleads he bought not the Land against the forme of the Statute AND the aforesaid I P. by T.S. his Attorney comes and defends the force injury when c. and all contempt whatsoever c. And by Protestation not acknowledging any thing in the Declaration aforesaid specified to be true for Plea he saith that the same I. bought not obtained or had to him and his Heires of the aforesaid R. F. the aforesaid Messuage and 8 Acres of Land with the Appurtenances against the
heer and by the Court here fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had for that that it seemes to the Court of our Lady the Queen here that the Plea aforesaid by the aforesaid Defendants above pleaded and the matter in the same contained are not sufficient in the Law to have returne of the cattell aforesaid or to debarre him the said Plaintife from having his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid Defendants It is considered that the aforesaid Plaintife ought to recover his damages against the same Defendants by occasion aforesaid But because it is not known to the Court of our Lady the Queen here what damages the aforesaid Plaintife hath sustained by occasion of he premises therefore it is commanded to the Sherife that by the Oath of honest and lawfull men of his County he diligently enquire what damages the aforesaid Plaintife hath sustained as well by occasion of the premises as for his Costs and Charges A writ of Enquiry of Damages awarded by him about his Suit in that behalfe layd out And the Inquisition which he shall thereupon make to our Lady the Queen from the day of Easter in fifteen daies wheresoever c. under the Scale c. and Seales c. he shall send together with the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon directed The same day is given to the aforesaid Plaintiff here c. At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid Plaintiff by his Attorney aforesaid and the Sheriff to wit P. T. Esquire returned a certain Inquisition taken before him at G. in the County aforesaid the tenth day of Aprill in the thirtieth yeare of our Lady the Queen that now is by which it is found that the aforesaid Plaintiff had sustained Damages by occasion of the Premisses besides his Cost and Charges c. to six and twenty shillings and eight pence and for those Costs c. unto twelve pence therefore it is considered that the aforesaid Plaintiff should recover against the afore-Defendant his Damages aforesaid by the Inquisition aforesaid The Judgment for the recovery of the damages in form aforesaid assessed as also sixteen pounds for his Costs and Charges aforesaid to him the said Plaintiff by the Court of our Lady the Queen here of his assent of increase adjudged which Damages in the whole amount unto seventeen pounds seven shillings and eight pence And the aforesaid Defendants in mercy c. E. D. by his Attorney Withernam and Retorno Habendo in one writ offereth himselfe the fourth day against I. M. Gentleman of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattell of him the said E. and them unjustly detained against Sureties and Pledges and he came not and was sought for Therefore it is considered of that the aforesaid I. should go without day and the aforesaid E. and his Pledges of prosecuting to wit John Doe and Richard Roe should be in mercy and the aforesaid I. should have returne of his Cattell aforesaid c. and in what manner that Writ should be executed he should make known to the Keepers c. from the day of Saint Martin in fifteen daies At which day before the Keepers c. at Westminster came the aforesaid I.M. in his proper person And the Sheriff to wit W. N. Esquire returned the Writ aforesaid in all things served and executed in these words The Cattell formerly taken and in this Writ mentioned to the within named I. M. I could not return therefore by virtue of the same Writ I have taken in Withernam of the Cattell of the within named E. that is to say six and twenty Ewes to the value of the Cattell within mentioned formerly taken and the same to the within named I. M. I have caused to be delivered to be held untill the same I. should have return of the Cattell aforesaid by him formerly taken and the aforesaid E. is attached by the Pledges I. D. and I. F. afterwards to wit on Friday next after fifteen daies of the holy Trinity then next following before c. at Westminster came the aforesaid E. in his proper person and rendred himselfe to the Prison c. who by occasion of the Premises is committed to the Marshall c. and he praies that he may be admitted to the making of his Fine with the Keepers c. by occasion of the contempt aforesaid And he is fined by the Court of the Keepers c. to three shillings and foure pence which by commandement of the Court here he payed to D. W. Coroner and Attorney of the Keepers c. in the Court of the Keepers c. before c. for necessary Reparations in the Court here to be made and done therefore the same E. is to be thereof quit And upon this before c. at VV. came S. C. and R. S. and became Pledges and each of them became Pledge for the aforesaid E. as well for the Prosecuting his Complaint as of the Cattell aforesaid which to the aforesaid I. M. in the Court here before c. were adjudged by the default of him the said E. to be returned if the return of them should be adjudged each of the Pledges aforesaid under the pain of ten pounds which said Sum of ten Pounds the Pledges aforesaid and either of them by himselfe acknowledges to be made of his Lands and Chattels and to the use of the aforesaid I. to be levied if it shall happen that the aforesaid E shall not deliver the Cattell aforesaid to the aforesaid I. c. upon which the same E. by the Statute praies the Writ of the Keepers Second Deliverance granted c. of second deliverance and it is granted unto him c. By which Command was given to the Sheriff that the Cattell aforesaid to the aforesaid E. without delay he should cause to be delivered and that he should put by sure and safe Pledges the aforesaid I. M. that he be before c. in eight daies of Saint Michaell c. to answer the aforesaid E. of the aforesaid taking and detaining of the Cattell aforesaid the same day is given to the aforesaid E. c. at which day the Plaint aforesaid was adjourned by the Writ of the Keepers c. of common adjournment before c. at W. unto the Morrow of all soules At which day before c. at W. aforesaid came the aforesaid E. in his proper person And the Sherife returnes that before the comming of the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon directed those Cattell by him in Withernam taken were removed afarre of to places unknown unto him by the aforesaid I. M. And therefore after the receipt and before the returne of that Writ the Cattell aforesaid to the aforesaid E.D. he could not cause to be delivered according to the purport of the Writ aforesaid And that the aforesaid I. is attached by pledges to wit I. D. and R.R. And upon this Command is given to the Sheriff that he take in
any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments or in any Courts of Record or in any Leet or View of Frank-pledge in a Court day called Law-day or in any Court in antient Demesn Hundred Court Court Barron or in the Court or Courts of the Stannery in the County of Devon and Cornwall or being examined to the perpetuall memory of a thing that then whatsoever person and persons so offending and being duly convicted or attainted by the Laws of this Kingdome of England for his or their said offences shall lose and forfeit unto the said Lady the Queen 20. pounds and should have Imprisonment by the space of six moneths without Bail or Mainprise and that the Oath of such person or persons so offending from thenceforth afterwards in any Court of Record should not be taken within this Kingdom of England or Wales or Marches of the same till what time the Judgement given against the said person or persons should be made void or revoked by Attainder or otherwise that upon every such kind of Revocation the parties grieved shall recover his or their Dammage against all and singular such person and persons as should procure the said Judgement so revoked to be rendered against him or them or any of them by Action or Actions to be prosecuted upon his or their Case or cases according to the course of the Common Lawes of this Kingdome of England and if it should happen the said offendor or offendors not to have any goods or chattells to the value of 20. pounds that then he or they should be put upon the Pillory in any Market place within the County City or Burrough where the said offence should be committed by the Sheriff or his Officers if they should happen to be without any City or Town Corporate then by the chief Officer or Officers of such City or Town Corporate or by his or their Officers And there should have both his ears nayled and from thenceforth should be discredited and disabled for ever to be sworn in any the Kings Courts of Record aforesaid untill the Judgement should be reversed and thereupon to recover his Damages in manner and form before mentioned one Moity of which said sum of Money to be forfeited in manner and form aforesaid should be to the said Lady the now Queen her Heirs and Successors and the other Moity thereof unto such person or persons as should be grieved hindred or molested by reason of the offence or offences before mentioned who therefore would prosecute by action of Debt Bill Plaint Information or otherwise in any the Kings Courts of Record in which no Wager of Law Essoin Protection or Injunction should be allowed as in the said Statute amongst other things more fully it is manifested and it appeareth And where also c. ss A. B. Late of London Taylor Declaration in Debt after Verdict and Judgement in Trespas in the Kings Bench upon Recognizance there against one of the Bayl. Easter 6. H. 8. Roll. 432. was Summoned to answer R.H. of a Plea that he render unto him 100. pounds of lawfull money of England which c. And thereupon the said R. by R. I. his Attorney saith that whereas he the Monday next after fifteen dayes of the holy Trinity in the fourth year of the Reign of the now King before him the said Lord the King at Westminster in his proper Person came and appeared and then and there in the Court of the said King brought his Bill against one W.G. Mercer in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsea of the Lord the King before him the King then and there being of a Plea of Trespass and the Pledges to prosecute are Philip Mason and John Wicham by which said Bill the said R. Complained of the said W. of that that he the second day of July in the third year of the said now King with force and arms that is to say with Swords c. the house of him the said R. at London in the Parish c. had broke and other wrongs to him had done against the Peace c. to the damage c. and the aforesaid W. by T.C. his Attorney appearing commeth and defendeth the force and Injury when c. and saith that he in no wise was thereof guilty concerning the Trespass aforesaid as the said R. above against him Complained And of this he put himself upon the Countrey And the aforesaid R. likewise c. therefore thereupon commeth the Jury before the Lord the King at Westminster the Monday next after eight c. of St. Michael And who neither c. to Recognize Entrie of Recognizance after Issue ioyned c. because aswell c. the same day was given to the parties aforesaid there c. And upon this before the said Lord the King at Westminster in the said County of Middlesex personally then and there commeth I.G. of London Gent. and L.G. of London Gent. and the aforesaid A. the Manucaptors for the said W.G. that is to say under the pain of 100. pounds which they acknowledged and every of them for himself acknowledged of his Lands and Chattels and of every of them to be done And to the use of the said R. to be levyed and likewise the said W.G. assumed for himself under the pain of 100. pounds which he acknowledged of his Lands and Chattels to be executed and to the use of the said R. to be levyed if the said W. all such Damages Costs and charges in which it should happen him the said W. in the Plea aforesaid in any manner lawfully to be overthrown doth neither pay or himself to the Prison of the Marshall of the Lord the King before him the King in that occasion not to render c. At which said day of Monday next after eight c. of St. Michael before him the Lord the King at Westminster commeth aswell the aforesaid R. in his own person as the said W.G. by his foresaid Attorney And the Sheriff then sendeth a Writ of Venir ' fac ' 24. c. in all Services and Executions together with the Pannell of the names of the Jurors thereupon impannelled upon which the Jurors of that Jury being called likewise come who being chosen tryed and sworn to speak to the truth of the Premisses Say upon their Oath that the said W. was guilty of the Trespass aforesaid even as the said R. had above Complained And they Assessed the Damage of him the said R. by reason of the Trespass as in the Verdict for which it was considered at that time in the same Court before him the Lord the King that the said R. should recover against the said W c. as in the Record even as in that Record it more fully appeareth And the said R. saith that afterwards the said W.G. in Damage Costs and charges aforesaid was convicted and after Judgement was thereupon given hitherto the said W.G. the Damage Cost and Charges unto the said R. hath not paid
debarred from having his action aforesaid against them AND the aforesaid E. G. as formerly saith Issue upon the Traverse that within the Parish c. and so word for word as in the Traverse before untill as he the same E.G. above by pleading hath alleadged And this he prayes may be enquired of by the country c. Aid Prior after issue made And upon this the aforesaid R. P. sayes that he that Averment aforesaid above pretended without the aforesaid Prior cannot make good or maintaine And prayes aid of him the said Prior And he that c. Therefore the same Prior is to bee summoned by good Summons c. that he be before our Lord the King from the day of St. Michael in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. to joyne himselfe in aid unto the aforesaid R.P. and to make good and maintaine the issue aforesaid with the aforesaid A. and W. if he will And as to the trying of the issue aforesaid above between the parties aforesaid joyned Issue and the Ve. fac The Jury are thereupon to come before our Lord the King at the aforesaid Terme And who neither c. to Recognise c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. Middlesex AND the aforesaid J.L. by W.L. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. The Defendant pleaded the goods taken as a pawne for mony lent c. And as to the coming by force and armes he saith he is in nothing thereof guilty And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done the same I. sayes that the aforesaid Plaintiff ought not to have his action c. because he saith that the same S. long before the said time wherein c. was indebted unto him the said I. in 46 s. and 8 d. for divers sums of mony by him the said S. of the aforesaid I. formerly borrowed And afterwards and long before the said time the same S. by one A. his wife delivered to the aforesaid I. the aforesaid goods and chattels as a pawne for the aforesaid 46 s. and 8 d. to be held to him the said I. in pledge untill the said S. to the aforesaid l. the same 46 s. and 8 d. had paid And the same I. in fact saith that the aforesaid S. hath not as yet paid to him the said I. the aforesaid 46 s. and 8 d. Which is the same Trespasse and taking and carrying away the aforesaid goods and chattels whereof the aforesaid S. above now complaines And this c. Whereupon he prayes judgement whether the Action c. AND the aforesaid S. sayes that he by any thing before alleadged The Plaintiffe replied that he took them injuria sua propria without such a cause ought not to be debarred from having his Action aforesaid because he saith that the aforesaid I. as of his proper injury and without such a cause above by him the said I. alleadged the day and yeare aforesaid the aforesaid goods and chattels at St. John street aforesaid found hee took and carried away as the same S. by his Bill aforesaid above supposeth And this he prayeth may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid I. in like manner Therefore the Jury is to come before our Lord the King c. Justification in Trespasse for taking Cattel as a stray AND the aforesaid R. by T.B. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes and also the whole Trespasse aforesaid besides the taking and leading away of two horses of the aforesaid three horses the same R. sayes that he is in nothing guilty c. And as to the taking and leading away of two of those horses the same R. sayes that the aforesaid T. Poultrey ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because hee saith that the place in which the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done is and the said time wherein c. was eight acres of Meadow in Shouley aforesaid called Salmons Meade parcel of the Mannor of S. otherwise C. within which said Mannor the same R. and all his antecessours whose heire he is And all others whose estate hee the said R. now hath in the said Mannor have had view of Franke Pledge Wayfes and Strayes within the same Mannor from time out of minde And the same R. sayes that the aforesaid two horses before the said time wherein c. came within the Mannor of S. aforesaid and there remained before the said time wherein c. by the space of one yeare and one day as Strayes And the aforesaid R. made publicke Proclamation in the Market of the Village of St. Albans and in divers Churches and Markets being neer there according to the laudable custome of that Country used And none came to claime the property of the said two horses within the aforesaid one year and one day By which the same R. in the aforesaid eight acres of Meadow seized and took the aforesaid two horses as his proper goods and chattels Traverse the place of taking Without that that the same R. took those two horses within the Precinct of the aforesaid Mannor of Shouley Berry in manner and form as the aforesaid T. above against him complaineth And this c. Whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid T. ought to have his action aforesaid against him c. Issue upon the traverse AND the aforesaid T. sayes that he by any thing before c. ought not to be debarred c. Because he saith that the aforesaid R. took the aforesaid two horses within the Precinct of the aforesaid Mannor of S. M. in manner and forme as the same T. above against him complaineth And this he prayes may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid I. in like manner Therefore the Jury is to come before our Lord the King c. AND the aforesaid A by G. T. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And sayes The Defendant pleads the property of the horse in a stranger who in publick Market fals to the Defendant that the aforesaid C. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because hee saith that before the property of the horse aforesaid was the aforesaid C. the property of the same horse did belong unto one B. And sayes that the Towne of Dorton is and from the time out of minde was an ancient Burrough within which said Burrough there hath been and from the whole time aforesaid was had a certaine Market on each Thursday weekly And sayes that the aforesaid B. of the aforesaid horse as of his proper horse being possessed long before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done that is to say such a day and year at D. aforesaid in full Market there for 6 l. to the aforesaid B. in hand