Selected quad for the lemma: virtue_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
virtue_n	act_n	grace_n	habit_n	906	5	9.7429	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A92141	Influences of the life of grace. Or, A practical treatise concerning the way, manner, and means of having and improving of spiritual dispositions, and quickning influences from Christ the resurrection and the life. By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the Vniversity of St. Andrews in Scotland.	Rutherford, Samuel, 1600?-1661.	1659 (1659)	Wing R2380; Thomason E971_1; ESTC R207742	387,780	467

are the influences of saving grace and though there be no promise made to the chosen do this and ye shall be converted yet Christ hath by his blood merited conversion and influences for conversion to them and as in Christ all providences are redemptory providences so hath the Lord ordained according to the decree of predestination and of redemption that hearing coming to such a place where Acts 2. Peter preaches where the Gaoler heares Paul Acts 16. to the well of Jacob where the woman confers with Christ beyond her intention are means of the conversion of such as are ordained to salvation so as providences of themselves natural are sometimes through the intention of God made redemptory providences for the conversion of the chosen 3. There is no connexion promissory betwixt natural or literal acting begun and spiritual acting and heat of the life of Christ As these actings are considered in themselves they seem to be one web but the one part of the web is course and grosse cloth the other is silk and cloth of gold they depend one upon another as some providential and general means and are intended of God 2. there is a coevistence betwixt them by a practise of grace not by a promise of grace 3. There is an order of priority and posteriority betwixt them 4. There is a vicinity material betwixt them as five is a number nearer to seven then three and yet three five seven all differ among themselves in nature and essence to hear is nearer to hearing in faith then no hearing at all or obstinate turning away the ear they are knit together as a piece of institution watered if I might so speak with a command and a heavenly acting of God for as was said before the literal acting some way falls under a commandm●nt he who commands hearing in faith commands hearing also 4. If there be a literal fixedness of consideration in looking to the duty and some literal missing and sense of deadness it puts the man in the borders of a spiritual duty and hardly wants the soul so acting the saving flowings of the Spirit the very bulk and body of a promise may give some literal wakening to a dead soul and the skaddings of a threatning ma● put the dead soul in some motion 2 Sam. 12. 1 2 3 4. David gives a literal hearing by the light of a natural conscience to Nathans general parable At length when the Spirit sets it on by application thou art the man David v. 10 11 12 13. comes to some life of confession I ●ave sinned and there begin the spiritual seeds of Psalm 51. Indeed these two the literal part and the spiritual part make as it were in gross one bulk or body of a work but they are conjoyned as the clay and the gold in Nebuchadnezzars image they are joyned by God not by congrui●y or decency on the Lords part but of free grace not by promise not by merit nay not as work and wages but accidentall as touching their natures yet the wise Lord intends the one ●or the other it 's therefore good to be about means the waiting at the tyde is not sailing yet it makes way for sailing What connexion is there betwixt Saul's journey in seeking his fathers asses and Samuel's anointing him King of Israel none at all but a providential union there is but no man can say that there is here either a divine institution or a gracious promise yea or a congruity of means and end of work and wages though there be something of a marred institution in dead and dull hearing tied to saving believing here the same sweet breathing that falls on the rose acts on the hemlock which to me is some mystery to others merit of congruity which is detestable to others a free promise but it being examined well is but merit to others half a promise however the dispensation forbids laziness and commands all even though yet in nature to go about duties as creatures rational covenanted externally with God CHAP. XIII Q. 13. What the unrenewed and the renewed can do in the respective dead condition at the use of means 2. Influences work as God sets them on 3. A gracious heart reflects upon it self 4. We may do more by the habit of grace then we do 5. Divers cases of renewed and unrenewed 7. No promise is made to using of external means only yet a sad threatning is made to the not using of them 8. The opposition by unbelief that reprobates make to the Gospel IT is a matter of difficulty to determine because of the various cases what we may here do in the using of means 1. Unrenewed men and renewed both can do less in using of means when two mountains and two rivers are in the way then when one only is before them an unrenewed having both his natural corruption and a strong temptation against him can do no less So Naaman by his office being obliged to go to the house of the Idol-God Rimmon and not yet converted could more hardly abstain from that outward Idolatry then now when to natural corruption fear of offending his master the King of Assyria is added No doubt Pilate naturally loathed and hated Christ as Herod Acts 12. did the Apostles and the Gospel but when Pilate is afraid to offend the people and to seem an enemy to Caesar and Herod willing to pleasure the Jews it 's no wonder then both be not only weakned in using the means to believe in Christ but also positively oppose Christ and the Gospel and if both had been engaged in a profession of Christ as many now are they might have used means more largely to believe and preferred Christ not in their heart and real estimation of mind to men pleasing but in some externals also but that should be no concludent argument that they really loved Christ because a name may put men to hazard court and means and life rather then deny Christ 2. This seems a considerable difference the earth cannot plow and sow wheat of it self yet when it is plowed and laboured and seeded it can enlive and nourish the sown corn but though we can do much more in the using of means then we do yet means work upon us if they be only external by no necessity of nature but according as he stirs who hath mercy on whom he will though men run and will Nor can we deny but the child of God indued with an habit of grace hath actu primo a power to draw life from the head as the living members can draw nourishment from the stomach through the liver and veins yet the Sun and heaven hath influence in all actings of nature the necessity of actual grace doth not remove any of the vertue and power of the habit of grace so doth the renewed heart lie fair to a Gospel-command and as actions vital are immanent and received often on themselves so here the heart renewed can work upon

cause 1. His strong decree of Predestination must carry him to it 2. The same power of God that raised Christ from the dead acts here Elsewhere this is proved by famous D. Tuisse by Learned Amesius and many of our worthy Divines Obj. He who gives an insuperable influence to a free and contingent effect must render that effect necessary and not free 2. He who with mans free-will does insuperably produce the effect must doe violence to mans free-will Answ He who with mans free-will doth insuperably produce the effect by his alone and only physical and real motion and no other way as the Lord causeth the Sun to rise and goe down and the fire to give heat ●e doth or must doe violence to mans free-will True But now the Assumption is false for the Lord doth not so and by such an only physical motion insuperably produce the effect He who with mans free-will does insuperably produce the effect with both an insuperable physical and real motion and also with a moral perswasive and legal motion flowing from a command he must doe violence to mans free-will This is most untrue for the physical and moral influences of God though both be insuperable yet neither the one exceeds the other in degrees of necessity nor doe they both joyntly exceed the necessity which free-will will impose on itself If any object He who insuperably moves free-wil to act he doth infer violence to free-wil But God doth insuperably move free-will Therefore Answ The proposition is false 1. The Lord by casting an ague of love-sickness in the soul moves the free-wil of the Spouse and of the Martyrs to die for Christ rather then deny him because love of it self considered as separated from the Lords physical motions on the soul works upon the will more strongly and insuperably then many floods upon a fire and is hard 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as hell or the place of the dead and marriage-love is cruel as the grave Cant. 8. 6. yet love infers no violence to the will 2. Commands the Sun and it riseth not Job 9. 7. and commandeth the Sun and it riseth Psalm 104. 19 22. And the Sun cannot but obey him for all creatures are his servants Psal 119. 91. and he moves all natural causes to act and so to act insuperably and yet he doth no violence to the natures of Sun fire and second causes in moving them He who contributes an insuperable influence with free-will if that influence be contemperated and sweetly accommodate to the nature and elective and rational way of working of free-wil acting out of judgment as our free-wil acts here He is not a cause inferring violence to free-will Should he indeed over-drive and over-act the free inclination contrary to the reason light and judgment of the mind and to the moral and free elective inclination of the will he should constrain and force free-will But this he does not but inclines the heart of David to the Lords testimonies sweetly strongly insuperably and this David prays for Psalm 119. Psalm 5. Psalm 19. and the Saints in many places and neither David nor the Saints in such prayers suit of God to destroy free-will also the Lords command and not the Lords influence is our rule of obedience But since we know not the Lords actual denying of his influence because we are willing he should deny it our sinful non-acting is no less our guiltiness then if we had the dominion and commandment of the Lords influences in our power A Master commands his servant to come to such a place where his Master useth to be yet neither is the Master obliged to be in the place hic nunc neither passes he any promise to be there if the servant come not to that place and willingly absent himself and willingly consent that the Master be not in the place the servants not coming is a manifest contravening of his Masters command So the Lord commanding me to pray though he concur not by his Spirit interceding to help me as he useth to doe my not praying is a contravening of his command who calls to me pray hic nunc under this trouble For 1. The Spirits helping or not helping me to pray is not my rule but the commandement is my rule 2. The Spirit is not obliged hic nunc 3. I pray not 4. My willing not praying is a sinful virtual consent to want the help of the Spirit Obj. Then should the Suns not moving but standing still in the firmament be a contravening of the command of God given in the Creation when he gave to the Sun a power to move Answ No ropes of Logick can draw the conclusion and antecedent together The Lords command to the Sun is not moral but natural 2. It 's not absolute The power of moving in the Sun is not to be acted but according to the soveraignty of God concurring or not concurring with the Sun so as the Sun is under onely to speak so a physical mandate of omnipotency not under an Ethical Moral Legal or obediential commandement to move or to shine under peril of sin and punishment as man is by the holy moral mandate and commandement of God Obj. A free cause hath more liberty not to act or to act then the Sunne hath to give light and the fire to give heat Therefore the Lord must have given to free-will a power of nilling and willing and must tie his influences to await and be ready concur or not concur as free-will shall think fit Answ The free will of Angels or men hath no more freedome and exemption from the dominion of providence then the Sun or the fire hath but all causes natural or free are equally under the Lords dominion 2. Free will hath no more a dominion over the Lords dominion and his influences that are given out or withdrawn according to this soveraign dominion then the Sun or the pismire Yea free-wil is under his dominion and also Prov. 21. 1. all the free actings of the creature as well as the necessary actings of Sun and fire as is proved Free-will hath indeed a more dominion over its own acts being a rational and free agent then the Sun over its acts 3. This is considerably comfortable that the Lord is chief Master of work Not ye but your Fathers Spirit speaketh in you Matth. 10. 19. Not I but the grace of God in me 1 Cor. 15. 10. I live not but Christ lives in me Gal. 2. 20. And yet Paul lives Paul labours but let God reign in us 4. The actings of God in all created effects especially his influences of grace are letten out immediately both immediatione virtutis immediatione suppositi by immeate concurring of his power and vertue and by the personal as it were concurrence of himself so the Lord works not in us to will and to doe by a Deputy or Lieutenant as a King rules and governs another Kingdome not by