cause of iustification by which our sinnes are formally remitted is as if we should aske one of their young pupils what were Latine for manus Iustification taken as we doe it for remission of sinnes not by inherent righteousnesse or ought within vs immediatly incompetible with them but by the externall merits of Christ is a forme or entity as simple as any formall cause can be and simple or vncompounded entities can neither haue formall causes or ought in proportion answearing to them Wherefore as I said it is either the follie or knauery of our aduersaries to demaund a formall cause of their iustification that deny themselues to beformallie iust in the sight of God For so to be iust and to bee iust onely by acceptance or non-imputation of vniustice are tearmes as opposite as can bee imagined Hee alone is formallie iust which hath that forme inherent in himselfe by which he is denominated iust and so accepted with God as Philosophers deny the same to be formally hot because it hath no forme of heate inherent in it but onely produceth heat in other bodies To be formally iust we for these reasons attribute onely vnto Christ who alone hath such righteousnesse inherent in himselfe as by the interposition of it betweene Gods iustice and sinfull flesh doth stop the proceeding of his iudgements as Phinehas zeale did stay the plague otherwise ready to deuoure the host of Israell Our aduersaries in that they acknowledge inherent righteousnesse to be the sole formall cause of iustification doe by the same assertion necessarily graunt it to be the sole true immediate cause of remission of sinnes of absolution from death and admisâ—ion to life This is the onely point from which they cannot start at which neuerthelesse whiles they stand they may acknowledge Christ come in the flesh crucified dead and buried or perhaps ascended into heauen but denie they doe the power of his sitting at the right hand of God the vertue of his mediation or intercession and more then halfe euacuate the eternity of his Priesthood as shall be shewed after this briefe explication of our assertion 2. When we teach iustification by faith and not by workes our meaning is by the doctrine of faith wee are bound to acknowledge and confesse that CHRIST IESVS by his eternall Priesthood whose offices in their seuerall places shall bee expressed is not onelie the sole meritorious cause of all graces or righteousnesse inherent requisite to finall absolution but these supposed in the party to bee absolued hee is likewise the sole immediate cause of finall absolution or iustification The latter part of this assertion may admit this ilustration Suppose a man not destitute of other senses yet ready euery moment to droupe or fall into some deadly fit vnlesse his spirits were refreshed by pleasant musicke we might truely say one in this case did liue by the sense of hearing for deafe hee should quickly die yet were musicke the sole immediate cause of his preseruation without actuall application of whose sound euen this sense it selfe by whose meanes his spirits refreshed better enable his other senses to their proper functions would foorthwith faile him In this sort doe sinfull men drawe life from CHRIST by faith alone by which likewise and not by workes wee are sayd to abide in him as being vnited in spirit to him albeit by abiding so vnited our other faculties are strengthened and viuificated to bring forth the fruits of righteousnesse The former instance notwithstanding doth not exemplifie the first part of our Assertion for musicke only continues life naturall which is supposed to haue another originall But if we speake of life spirituall maintained by saith and of which faith it selfe is a part it was originally and wholly deriued from CHRIST on whom faith and all other graces whatsoeuer tam in fieri quam infacto as well in the first production as during the time of their continuance and preseruation depend as essentially and perpetually as the light of the moone or other participated or reflected splendor doth on the brightnesse of the Sunne Nor may wee imagine that this borrowed and variable righteousnesse in vs though thus depending on the Sonne of righteousnesse is or can be euen whiles it remaines without eclipse or in such fulnesse as in this life the best men at any time are capable of sufficient for the time being to acquit or absolue vs if God should enter into iudgement with vs. This strict dependence of such righteousnesse as we haue on CHRISTS righteousnesse presupposed faith is said to iustifie vs not by any effects in vs deriued from him but by its transeunt acts reciprocally lifting vp our hearts to the fountaine whence grace and spirituall life doth flow and reflecting the beames or raies of our mindes thus illuminated vnto our mysticall head still deâ—iuing vertue from his crucified body to stint the deadly issues of sinne not vtterly to expell all reliques of vnrighteousnesse For when we take the eyes of faith of him albeit the habite of faith and other graces remaine as intire in vs as euer they were the very memory of transgressions past or the sight of sinnes inherent whilest we look on them deiect vs. According to this disferent aspect euen the best men liuing whilest this brittle glasse of mortality and mutability is in running may bee subiect to the like subalternation of hopes and feare the exiled Poâ—t hath expressed Spes mihi magna subest dum te mitissime Caesar Spes mihi respicio dum mea facta cadit Strength to my hopes doth still accrewe whil'st Caesars mildnesse I do vie we But mine owne facts whilest I beholde my heart doth faile my hopes growe colde But though sinne may often sting vs by fits and bring vs almost to deaths dore by vicissitude of despaire or dismaâ— yet we recouer as presently by faithfull looking on the glorious author as the Israelites did by beholding the visible signe of saluation 3. The controuersie hitherto proposed and declared in as scholasticke forme as our English tongue well can beare may be reduced in fewest tearmes and fittest for popular instruction vnto the right vse and immediate end of faith and other sanctifying graces We of reformed Churches with vnanimous consent of heart and minde belieue and teach and thou O CHRIST our Lord our life and strength giue iudgement out of thy throne of Maiestie whether not more agreeable to thy minde then shee which sits as Queene of heauen and brags as if she were thy best beloued Spouse or her children do That our Faith our Hope and Charitie or whatsoeuer pledges of thy fathers loue and fauour towards vs we through thy merits haue obtained were giuen vs not to alter but to better that plea we made before we had them Being by nature the sonnes of wrath and groning vnder the heauie burden of our sinnes with teares and sighes by thy precious blood by thy death and passion wee daily besought Him for
CHRIST as we doe but terminated his beliefe vnto the generall mercie and prouidence of God whereof the great mystery of the incarnation was the principall branch and CHRIST IESVS in the fulnesse of time exhibited in our flesh the visible fruit of life which that other IESVS did but hope for as yet in the roote not distinctly knowing it nor the vertue of it but ready actually to embrace it and feed vpon it whensoeuer it should be brought forth For as much as I haue obserued out of this speech is implied in the exegeticall repetition of it He that belieueth the Lord taketh hâ—ed to the Commaundements and hee that trusteth in him shall not be hurt there shall no euill happen vnto him that feareth the Lord but in temptation euen againe he will deliuer him 3. That wee may practice what is commaunded and yet not keepe the commandement Saint Iames hath put out of all question If yee fulfill the râ—iall Law according to the Scripture thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe ye doe well But if ye haue respect to persons ye commit sinne and are conuinced of the Law as transgressors For whosoeuer shall keepe the whole Law and yet offend in one point is guilty of all This fulfilling of the Law or keeping of the commaundements which as Solomon saith is the whole man or the whole duty whereunto man was ordained the complete and perfect Christian vertue consists of two parts a bodie and a soule The bodie is the doing of what the written Law commaunds whether by acts positiue or inhibitiue the soule is the reason or internall law of the minde which impels seuerall faculties to such acts or workes For to speake properly and scholastickely all performance of good workes commaunded or forbearance of things forbidden spring not immediately out of faith as the truncke out of the roote the branches out of the truncke or the fruit out of the branches But as the fruits of righteousnesse are of seuerall kindes and qualities so haue they seuerall faculties or affections for their proper stockes out of which they grow The auoidance of adultery fornication or whatsoeuer pollutions of the flesh with the fruites of holines contrary to these vices spring immediately from the vertues of temperance and chastity Abstinence from murder with the acts of mercy opposite to the seuerall branches thereof flourish out of the affection or vertue of humanity courtesie gentlenesse or the like So haue the acts of the affirmatiue precept contained in that negatiue thou shalt not steale as of euery other Commaundement whether positiue or inhibitiue a peculiar habite or inclination out of which they bud yet as all motion is inspired from the head albeit we goe vpon our feete or moue our hands or other member to defend our selues or serue the necessities of nature So although we are truely said to walke in Gods waies to fight his battailes or doe him seruice when we vse any facultie or affection to his glory yet is our firme assent vnto his good will and pleasure reuealed vnto vs by the doctrine â—f faith as the animall faculty which impels vs to these exercises Hence as we gather the body is dead if it want spirit or motion so as Saint Iames implies the image of God and his goodnesse or to vse another Apostles words the forme or fashion of CHRIST IESVS in vs is without life vnlesse our faith and assent vnto them haue this soueraigne commaund to impell and moue euery faculty to execute that part of Gods will whereto by the doctrine of faith it is designed And yet as the exercise of outward members increaseth internall vigor and strength and refresheth the spirits by which we moue so doe the acts of euery faculty vertue or affection righly imploied perfect faith not by communication or imputation of their perfection to it as the Romanist out of his doting loue to his faithlesse charitie dreames but by stirring vp exercising or intending its owne naturall vigor or perfection Vnlesse euery practique facultie receiue this influence from liuely faith or from the image of God or Christ which it frameth in our mindes and proposeth as a visible patterne for ouâ— imitation in all our workes thoughts and resolutions dâ—cimur vt neruis alâ—enis mobile lignum we may be operatiue as puppets are nimble in outward shew but our seeming workes of charity or best other we can pretend will be as a pish and counterfeit as their motions neither in their kinde truely vitall But as puppets are mooued wholly at his direction and bent that extends or slackes the strings whereon they dance so are our soules carried hither and thither as the diuell the world and flesh or our owne foolish affections â—osse them vsually excessiue where they should be sparing and there most sparing where they should exceed This difformity was most apparent in their workes whose reformation Saint Iames seekes for destitute of all good workes most of them were not but onely of vniformity in working They had learned to giue honour not verball but reall where honour was due duty and good respect to whom such offices belonged The rich and men of better place and fashion they did friendly and louingly entertaine which was a worke in it nature good and commendable but their abundant kindnesse towards equals or superiours became as a wen to intercept that nutriment which should haue descended to other inferiour members of CHRISTS body and by these outward exercises of magnificence their internall bowels of compassion become colde towards their poore brethren whom principally they should haue warmed and refreshed Yet such defects or difformities in their actions these halfe Christians halfe gentiles true hypocrites hoped to couer with the mantle of faith whose nature vse and properties they quite mistooke That they were not without workes the world might witnesse and no question but these enterteinments were intended as feasts of charity and with purpose to winne the fauour of the great ones with whom they liued to their profession in which respect their kindnesses might well seeme vnto themselues exercises of religion as the like doe to many of the best sort amongst vs when there is any ground of hope for gaining furtherance and countenance to good purposes as indeed with such references they are if done in fath but that this difformity in these mens workes did proceed from a precedent defect in faith is manifestly implied in that the Apostle seekes their reformation by reducing them to such an vniformity in working as can proceed onely from such true and liuely faith as hath beene described For the rectifying of faith it selfe he expresseth vnto them the exemplary forme or patterne first of the imitable perfection of the godhead then of that which is in CHRIST of both which as hath beene obserued true faith in the minde is the liue operatiue image and must imprint the like character vpon inferior faculties or affections ere their
as true and good whilest considered onely in themselues without oppositions of such matters as they much value So our Sauiour telleth vs that some when they haue heard receiue the word with ioy and for a while belieue but in time of tentation depart and Saint Iohn that euen amongst the Rulers many belieued on him By true and liuely faith rooted in the heart So Bellarmine would perswade vs or otherwise wee might make the Scriptures as a nose of waxe or alter the nature of sacred phrase as wee do counters in accompts Yet if they had in heart belieued vnto righteousnesse they had confessed with their mouth vnto saluation but sayth the Euangelist because of the Pharisees they did not confesse him least they should be put out of the synagogue And was not this to be ashamed of him and of his Gospell before men And whosoeuer is so affected belieueth not in that sense the Prophet speakes whosoeuer belieueth on him shall not be ashamed for vnlesse he acknowledge them in that day they shall not only bee ashamed but confounded with vnbelieuers yea the very reason the Euangelist giues why they did not confesse him condemns the Cardinals glosse either of great folly or impietie For sayth he they loued the prayse of men more then the prayse of God vnto which latter they had assented as much better had they so belieued as our Sauiour meanes when hee demaunds of the Iewes How can ye belieue which receiue honour one of another and seeke not the honour vvhich commeth from God onely Ere our faith become such as layes sure hold on life for of such in that place he speakes wee must Assent vnto the honour that comes from God alone as so much better then that we receiue of men that the later must seem as nothing in coÌ„parison of the former The same word beliefe oft-times is taken not only as it includes these last degrees or proper differences of Assent vnto diuine truthes but as it is accompanied with it essentiall properties or with such works as impulsiuely are from it though proper acts or exercises of other vertues faculties or affections whence they spring as from their naturall roote wherein they reside as in their natiue subiect The places are obuious to euerie one conuersant in Scriptures The like latitude of perfection whether from difference of essence or diuersitie onely in degrees knowledge or vnderstanding in the vse of sacred writers admits Nor did Saint Iohn in that speech He that sayth hee knoweth God and keepeth not his Commandements is a lyar contradict our Sauiour where he supposeth that many know their masters will and do it not For the disciple speakes of true and perfect knowledge the Lord of knowledge externall or imperfect The same analogie the Fathers retaine in the vse of beliefe or faith That the Pontificians can alledge their testimonies to proue faith may bee separated from works or charity is as little pertinent to the point in question betwixt vs and them as it would bee in the schooles to vrge the authority of late Philosophers that stones and mettals did not growe or that trees and plants had no locall motion against him that out of Aristotle did maintaine all bodies endued with life were capable of growth and diminution or all with sense of locall motion He that holds the former conclusions would account stones and mettals amongst bodies inanimate and trees and plants amongst vnsensitiue Now our question is not of euery sort or degree of faith but of that by which the Iust doe liue That no Father did affirme it should be without fruites or workes of holinesse is more then my small reading in them can secure me to affirme albeit reason I haue none to thinke otherwise but iust cause so to presume by the places our aduersaries alleadge so idle they are and impertinent Howsoeuer I dare vndertake for our assertion to bring three Fathers for one or testimonies thrice as many out of the best approued as any Iesuite shall do for his And because some of them scramble at some scattered sentences in Cyprians vvorkes or others fathered vpon him I will instance at this time in him especially the rather because he sealed the truth of his profession with his blood and had least reason to bee partiall for Faith against Charitie of whose abundance in his heart euery letter in his writings almost is a character yea so he esteemed of it that hee thought it impossible for him to prooue a true witnesse of Christ though dying in his cause if hee had liued without brotherly loue How doth hee say he belieues in Christ that doth not vvhat Christ hath giuen him in charge to doe Or how shall hee ataine to the reward of faith vvhich vvill not faithfullie keepe his Commaundements And againe Seeing to see Christ is our ioy nor can our ioy haue being vntill we see him what blindnesse of heart what mad nesse is this to loue the grieuances the paines and miseries of this world not rather to make hast vnto that ioy which neuer can be taken from vs Yet all this beloued brethren comes to passe because wee haue no faith because none belieues the truth of what God hath promised who is true whose word is eternally sure to belieuers If a graue man and of good note should promise thee any thing thou wouldst rely vpon his promise thou wouldst not belieue thou shouldst be deceiued or disappointed by him whom thou knowest to be constant in his words and deeds Behold God speaks to thee and â—ost thou perfidiously wauer through incredulity of minde God hath promised thee at thy departure out of this world immortality and eternity and dost thou doubt This is to be altogether without the knowledge of God this is to offend Christ the master of the faithfull vvith the sin of incredulity this is to haue a place in the Church and to be without faith in the house of faith The like hath Bernard who speaking of the victory that is by faith thus resolues flesh and blood moouing doubts to the contrary Perchance it may tempt some in that they see so many acknowledging Christ to bee the Sonne of God still entangled with the lusts of this world How sayth the Apostle then who is he that ouer commeth the world but he which belieues that IESVS is the Sonne of God vvhen as the world it selfe belieues this truth yea do not the very diuels belieue as much and tremble but I reioine Dost thou imagine that he reputes CHRIST for the sonne of God whosoeuer hee be that is not terrified with his threats that is not allured with his promises which obeies not his commandements and rests not satisfied with his aduise doth not such a one albeit he professe he knowes God deny him by his deeds Valentian notwithstanding would perswade vs that the Fathers when they say faith without works is dead would onely giue vs to
all that he held faith without workes to be altogether vaine and vnable to iustifie in the sight of God if with them it were in his iudgement not sufficient he had denied all iustification in Gods sight either by faith alone or by workes and faith so as no meanes of saluation could be left vs. More arguments I need not vse for euery obseruant Reader may furnish himselfe with plenty all demonstratiue that workes taken as Saint Iames meant not for the act or operation onely but either for the act or promptitude to it are necessary to iustification not before men but before God and in order of nature precedent 2. But the Readers minde as for a while mine was may be held in suspense that albeit we must be operatrue ere we can be iustified yet the first operation of that faith which iustifies is alwaies seen in the busines of iustification as that of Saint Austen may necessarily seeme to imply Bona opera sequuntur iustificatum non praecedunt iustificandum If we be not iustified as all agreed without some operation or worke of faith and all other good workes as this Father affirmes are not precedent but subsequent to iustification those operations of faith which belong to the worke of iustification must of necessity in order of nature if not of time be of all others the first This golden sentence notwithstanding will not abide ihe touch vnlesse we take iustification as Saint Austen doth for the first infusion of that grace wherby we are iustified and enabled to bring forth works truely good That the habite of grace whereof faith is the principall part or foundation should in order of nature be precedent to workes done in faith for vnlesse so done they are not truely good is a case excluded by it clearenesse from all controuersie But the workes by which as Saint Iames affirmes we are iustified must needs goe before the iustification which he speaks of yet not before the first infusion of faith vnlesse we affirme which no protestant must or any intelligent Papist doth that wee may bring foorh good workes ere faith bee planted in our soules The infallable consequence of these deductions is that betweene Saint Pauls faith and Saint Iames his iustification there must be workes intermediate of what kind it skils noâ— so they be done in faith Of workes so done to question which are in time and nature first were as if you should demaund what meates such as after a long sickenesse haue well recouered their tast and appetite vse first to feed vpon Curiosity of methode or nice prescriptions would in this case be offensiue to good stomaches which should not doe much amisse in falling to such wholsome food as first comes to hand Thus much in generall is not vnfitting to our present purpose That the internall eliâ—itiue or formall acts are in order of nature and time precedent to the impulsiue acts of faith to wit such operations or exercises of other vertues faculties or affections as are inspired by it as wee most firmely assent to Gods mercy wisdome truth and iustice before we can be faithfully mercifull iust or true or doe the workes of righteousnesse mercy or truth in faith Of the internall or proper acts or exercises of faith such as flow directly from it are before such as are conceiued by way of reflexion Such as flow immediately from the essence are at least in order of nature before such as proceed from the properties of it In both rankes these are before others of the same kinde which are of more generall or abstract points as we actually assent vnto diuine reuelations first as true then as good lastly as good to vs and yet we must so assent vnto them ere we can firmely or confidently relie vpon them nor can our reliance or trust whether on Gods prouidence in generall or vpon his mercies in CHRIST be more firme and faithfull then is our precedent deniall of our selues and renunciation of all trust in worldly meanes which property as was before obserued immediately results from our direct assent vnto Gods wisdome power and mercy and vnto our owne misery ignorance and imbecillitie From assent to both these and vnfaigned deniall of our selues thence resulting as from ioint rootes springs true confidence in Gods prouidence alwaies in order of nature precedent to stedfast and inseperable adherence vnto CHRIST which is the end of all our working and as it must for this reason be first intended so can it hardly be accomplished without some intermediate acts or exercises of Gods graces in vs vnto all which faith necessarily is concurrent If we shall then compare the acts or operations of faith amongst themselues according to the same strength or equall degrees of fidelity in doing Gods will the effectuall application of CHRISTS merits is but a branch of the former vniformity in working required by Saint Iames neither necessarily nor ordinarily the first either in order of nature or time whether we speake of application actuall and expresse or of implicit and potentiall that faith which is of strength sufficient for firme and faithfull application of Christs righteousnes or conceiuing sure trust in Gods mercie offred in him is as immediatly operatiue of other workes as powerfull to bring forth deedes of mercy alwaies vniformely prompt to doe any part of Gods will that first whereunto it is first called It was an act of that faith by which Abraham liued an act commendable in the sight of God to forsake his Countrey when God called him yet an act in time long precedent to that which was imputed vnto him for righteousnes and in his legend the holy Ghost would instruct vs that the safest way to get full assurance of our heauenly inheritance is to execute Gods will without delay first to renounce the world father and mother natiue Countrey c. that we may be ready when he shall call and on these foundations surely laid to raise our confidence in CHRIST Know saith the Apohle they which are of faith the same are the children of Abraham but euery one is not the sonne of faith that saies or thinkes he belieues as his father Abraham did vnlesse he haue such an operatiue faith as Abraham had well trained to euery point of seruice that shall be enioined This speech of Saint Paul is but equiualent to that of our Sauiours If ye were Abrahams children ye would doe the workes of Abraham what were these faithfully to assent vnto the truth reuealed by God and louingly to entertaine his messengers but now saith our Sauiour You goe about to kill me a man that hath told you the truth which I haue heard of God this did not Abraham The nature and vniformity of faith supposed such as hath been often inculcated Saint Gyprians collections in this point are as strong and sound as the point it selfe is orthodoxall Christ cals them Abrahams children whom he sees operatiue in
the dead from whence also he receiued him in a figure And as hee staggered not at the first promise concerning his birth through vnbeliefe so neither did he now dispute with God about the lawfulnesse of his act nor reason how he should be raised againe Iustified he was at both instants by his beliefe not as terminated to his worke or to the possibilitie of Isaacks birth and resurrection but as through them it found accesse to his birth death and resurrection whom Isaac prefigured Hauing performed Gods will in obeying his Commaund to sacrifice his onely sonne hee patiently expected the promise concer-cerning his Redeemer whose incarnation whose sufferings and exaltation are obiects of Faith not of works effected by God and not by man although to the like application of their benefits the right works as were in Abraham be most necessary seeing true beliefe of this promise as in the first section was declared virtually includes the same minde in vs that was in CHRIST a readinesse to doe workes of euery kinde which notwithstanding are no associates of Faith in the businesse of iustifycation Not to bee weake in faith not to doubt of the promise through vnbeliefe to be strengthened in faith to be fully perswaded that bee which had promised was able also to performe were pure acts of faith though virtually including works as proper thereto as forcibly excluding all other vertues from sharing with it in this businesse as can possibly bee conceiued yet sayth the Apostle euen for these acts late mentioned it was imputed to him for righteousnesse How preposterous then and basely shuffling are the glosses put by Bellarmine vpon the Apostle in this place as if his purpose had been to shew that the impious and vniust could not be iustifyed by workes onely because Abraham though iust before was not made more iust by meere workes without faith when as he leuels his whole discourse to the cleane contrarie point maintained by vs That seeing righteousnesse was imputed to Abraham by faith and not through works none after him should in this life at any time whether before or after the infusion of grace or inherent righteousnesse presume to seeke or hope for like approbation from God otherwise then onely by faith Thus much the Apostle hath as fully and plainly expressed as any ingenuous Reader can desire Now it was not written for his sake alone that it to wit the strength and full assurance of his faith was imputed to him sorrighteousnesse but also for vs to whom it the like faith shall be imputed for righteousnesse if wee belieue in him that raised vp IESVS our Lord from the dead The ground of the Apostles reason or similitude here mentioned wherein the force and strength of our argument is included supposeth all our righteousnesse whether actuall or habituall should bee as vnapt to attaine euerlasting life or saluation which is the end of all graces bestowed vpon vs as Abrahams decrepit body was to produce so many nations yet as he onely by belieuing God who was able to effect thus much and more obtained the promise and was blessed with more children from Sarahs dead wombe then the most fruitfull Parents that liued before or should come after them so wee onely by like firme beliefe in the same God which raised vp our Lord IESVS CHRIST from the dead shall bee partakers of the promise made in him heires of eternall life whereto seeing our inherent rightcousnesse hath no proportion it must for this reason still be sued for as a meere gift of God farther exceeding all desert of any supernaturall grace in vs then the mighty increase of Abrahams seed did the strength of his decaied nature 6. The first spring of all Romish errors in this argument issues out of their generall ignorance of Saint Pauls phrase amongst many of whose sayings seeming hard and incompatible with their schoole conceits that Rom. 4. of Gods iustifying the impious and vngodly ministers greatest offence and causeth them to inuert the course of their diuinitie quite contrary â—o the Apostles methodâ— To pronounce him iust that is internally impious and vniust cannot in their schoole learning stand with Gods truth but to make him which ere while was by nature vniust and impious inherently and perfectly iust by plentifull infusion of grace is an argument as they deeme of his goodnesse no disparagement to his iustice as perchance it were not might wee iudge of his purpose to saue sinners by the rules of humane reason neuer consulting the Canons of life But if wee conceiue of Gods grace by his comments in whom it dwelt in great abundance this verie conceipt of being iustified by its inherence includes extreame antipathy to the nature and vtterly peruerts the right vse of it as to restraine thâ—â— same Apostles speeches to the first iustification or prime infusion of inherent righteousnesse which is the necessarie consequent of the former error is coÌ„tradictiously to contest with the spirit by which he vttered these diuine Oracles For if belieuing him which iustifies the impious were imputed for righteousnesse vnto Abraham after he had been for a long time more righteous then the ordinarie sort of Gods Saints or Elect Abraham all this while vnfaignedly belieued himselfe to be a sinner no way iustified in himselfe but seeking to be iustified by him who if he shew not mercie vnto sinners whiles they are sinners all mankind should vtterly perish Against this poisonous leauen wherewith the Pharisee first and the Romanist his successor since hath infected the bread of life and tainted the first fruites of Gods spirit S. Paul prescribes that Catholick antidote There is no difference all haue sinned and are depriued of the glory of God and are iustified freely by his grace through the redemption which is in CHRIST IESVS Abraham was all his life time comprehended in this catalogue and is made by the Apostle as a perpetuall so a principall instance of that finall resolution Therefore we conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Lawe Was hee then in no sort iustified by workes Yes hee might boldly contest as Iob did and euery godly man yet safely may with others for integrity of life and plenty of workes in which hee might iustly reioice or glorie yet with men not with God In this sense their resolution which say we are iustified by workes before men not before God is most true and warranted by that place of Saint Paul let them nothence deny or occasion others to forget that such integritie or comparatiue rightcousnesse to inherent is necessarily presupposed to iustification in the sight of God and doth not only declare our faith or iustification to men seeing it implies a contradiction in the vnanimous tenent of all reformed Churches to admit faith precedent and workes onely subsequent to the iustification whereof Paul here speakes His drift and scope in that third and fowrth to the Romans