THE WONDERFVLL VVOORKMANSHIP OF THE WORLD wherin is conteined an excellent discourse of Christian naturall Philosophie concernyng the fourme knowledge and vse of all thinges created specially gathered out of the Fountaines of holy Scripture by Lambertus Danaeus and now Englished by T. T. ⧠Imprinted at London for Andrew Maunsell in Paules Church-yard at the signe of the Parret 1578. To the right honorable Syr Francis walsingham Knight one of the principall Secretaries to the Queenes Maiestie and of her most honourable priuie Counsell I Haue bin desirous Right honorable and that of long tyme vvith many other to vvhom your most godly disposition hath bin often reported not only to congratulate but also to honor the same vvith some poore testimonie of myne vnfeined good vvill And novv occasion sumdeale fauourably grauntyng vnto my request hope hath also pricked mee forevvarde to myne attempt that no studie or traueill vvherby the true knovvledge feare of God is to bee learned can come vnvvelcome or seeme dishonorable vnto your honour If noneother examples yet the vndoubted vvord of life vvorthily Englished and set foorth vnder your Right Honorable protection doth sufficiently prooue beesides your most feruent zeale in embracing true Religion and aduauncing the syncere vvorshipping of Almightie God by meanes vvhereof your fame is spread far among forreine nations Thus am I not discouraged but rather hartened semblably vvith duetie to offer this my simple trauell vnto your honour beeing the vvoorthy vvoorke of the learned Diuine M. Lambert Danaeus of Geneua concerning Christian Naturall Philosophie the vvonderfull vvoorkemanship of this vvorld A vvoorke doubtlesse of great auaill to the knovvledge of God in his creatures A vvorke of vvonderfull efficacie to set foorth the honour and glorie of God the Creator A vvoorke of merueilous force to stirre vp mens mindes to the contemplation of true knovvledge and learning vvhiche is gathered out of the holy Scriptures only A vvoork of rare effect to declare the prayse of God the vvoorkman and to establishe assured fayth and true religion To bee short a vvoorke so farre surpassing all other vvoorkes of like argument vvriten either by Christian or Heathen Philosophers as the proofes and auctorities vsed by them both bee differing the one beeyng founded vppon the assured ground of Gods vvoord and holy Scriptures the other established vpon the fickle foundation of mans reason iudgement This vvoorke therefore Right Honorable so profitable so pleasant so necessarie so full of varietie of Godly matter so substancially grounded by vvarrant of Scriptures so surely confirmed by auctoritie of Doctours and Fathers in most humble and duetifull maner I present vnto your honor Hoping that as in the Latine it hath bin generally liked of the learned so likevvise you vvill not mislike that it novv go abroad in the Englishe tōgue vnder the protection of your Right Honorable name by him vvho resteth your honours most hūble at cōmaundement Thomas Twyne To the right honourable the Lord Friderike of Nachod Lorde of Danouiz and of Beske c. his verie good Lorde and Patrone AVncient and noble is the question concernyng the originall of the worlde and firste beeginning of all things Right honorable Baron which hath not only long tyme and much troubled the wittes of the Philosophers but also of Christians in the end by reason of the diuerse iudgements of men hath rested so doubtfull that many graue writers coulde not tell what to determine therin For amōg the Christiās Origen in his bookes of the beginnings which bookes aboue the residue most men do iudge to bee his woorthy woork and they which after him wrote the Examera are so diuided in opinions that nothing may seeme certeinly to bee gathered out of their writinges But among the Philosophers men ignorant of God and his trueth there is farre more diuersitie of opinions so that concernyng this matter a man may better gheasse than vnderstand by their doctrine what hee hath to follow Now touchyng these Philosophers perhaps there is no such cause to wonder at their blindnes in so great a matter and that thei were so deepely drowned in darknes forasmuch as they were destitute of Gods woord that is to say the true light of knowledge But among Christians suche disoorde and disagreement cannot with like vprightnes bee excused for that there is but one way of the trueth wherof they might haue found most assured groundes in the woord of God if they had had regard therto What was thā the cause of so greate disagreement among the Christians concernyng this matter Forsooth it was the Heathen Philosophie with the preceptes wherof they were not onely then instructed and infected but many also of them beeing stuffed bee witched and deceiued therwith in respect that they ascribed mostvnto this art would graunt and admit nothyng whiche they supposed to bee repugnant to the principles thereof And this mischeif did not onely continue in the tyme of our forefathers and the firste age of the Churche whiche many hauing learned in the schooles of the Philosophers euen in their tender yeeres and afterward beeing conuerted to the faith of Christ could not easily lay doune and chaunge those opinions whiche they had receiued beefore and of long tyme most studiously embraced Yea now since the name of the Philosophers is extinguished it cannot bee plucked out of the minds of many that would bee called Christians so deepely forsooth the admiration and reuerence of this Heathen Philosophie is imprinted within the mindes of some men and of so great a force it is as the Prouerbe fayeth in tender youth and as it were with the Mothers milke to accustome a mans self vnto errour as it were vnto the preceptes of trueth And therefore I doe not doubt but that this my woorke concerning Christian Naturall Philosophie that is to say how to refourme the opiniōs of the Philosophers by the woord of God shal bee reprooued of many and therfore hath need of some noble and great personage that is welbecloued among all estastes to bee patrone vnto it by whose auctoritie beeing defended and fauour cōmended it may safely and acceptably come abroade into mens hands to bee read You only right honorable are hee vnto whose name therefore I dedicate the same how far soeuer I bee disioyned from you by distance of place And as for your honour there wanteth nothyng in you that may suffice to discomfite the force of all enemies if so bee that you can well like of this woork and doe accept it vnto your protection For if it might please you to oppose that same your moste singulare and true Christian godlines of minde against the old and stubburne crue of heathen men concerning this part of Philosophie in respect that you do syncerely and purely woorshippe God by direction of his vndoubted woord weighyng and examinyng euery thing accordyng to that as a most certeine rule there is no man that doubteth but that there is more credite to be giuen vnto your
truliest talke and dispute in his owne Art and that hee is rather to bee beleeued therin than any other But what woorkmans woorkmanship thincke you is thys worlde Is it any others than Gods onely so that wee ought to beleeue none rather than him who in hys woorde teacheth vs the maner and order of framinge his woorke that is to saye the worlde To bee shorte who knoweth seeth and vnderstandeth more truely the causes of all things their properties effectes the maner of their beeing the times when first they began then hee who is the maker of them all and the perpetuall gouernour of them all who beeing GOD and sence hee him selfe telleth these thinges what man will at anye time bee so mad but to thinke that hee is rather to bee harkened vnto in thys respect and all other writers to bee neglected Truely wee as also all other Philosophers howsoeuer surpassing in wit abounding in leasure what soeuer diligence they employed in study yet could neuer neither wee nor they attayne vnto certaine obscure slender sparkes of naturall Philosophie And whatsoeuer we define coÌ„cerning these matters without the woorde of God it is so vncerteine doubtfull variable and contrarie to it selfe and many times so contrarie to the trueth that in the ende wee are ashamed that wee either learned so or taught so which may appeare to be true if it wer but only out of Plutarchus booke De Placitis Philosophorum Of the opinions of Philosophers whereas that excellent learned man and great Philosopher sheweth that neuer two of them agreed in the knowledge of the things that are created S. Can you confirme the trueth of your opinion by the auchoritie of Gods woord to wit that this knowledge may well and safely bee learned out of the holy scriptures M. Yeas verily S. Recite them I pray you M. The first testimonie is that which is writen euidently in the epistle to the Hebrues in these woords Through Faith wee vnderstande that the worlde was made by the woorde of God. Wherefore wee vnderstande these thinges by Faith. If by Faith then by the holy scripture for ther can bee no faith without the scripture And therfore wee must certainely conclude that the true and certeine knowledge concerninge these matters is declared vnto vs by the holy scripture The seconde aucthoritie is the 1. chapter of Genesis For Moses who at the commaundement and appointment of God wrot that historie of all other most excellent and wounderfull of the beginninge of the worlde and creation of all thinges is either a vaine fellowe or a lier if the knowledge of naturall Philosophie be not conteined in the holy Scripture For what other thing doth hee in that booke than briefly howbeit truely and orderly set downe the originall of thinges and theyr vertues natures and effectes that is to say Naturall Philosophie The thyrde is a place in the Prouerbes the viii Chapiter and the 20. verse the nexte folowinge where it is saied that all thinges were created by the wysdome of God and afterwarde as they were created so are they preserued The fourth aucthoritie is alleaged out of the 42. Chapiter and 17. verse of Ecclesiast This wisdome hath God giuen to his Sainctes saith hee that they might recoumpt all his miracles and workes and search them all yea hell it selfe c. wherevnto wee may adde that which is written in the vii chapiter of the booke of VVisedom the 22. verse and the next folowing Finally let vs heare the moste holye Martyr of God and good Father Irenaeus who in his seconde booke and 2. Chapter saithe thus To whom therefore shall wee giue more credit concerning the framing of the worlde to those that wee spake of beefore so iangling in folly and inconstancie or to the Disciples of the Lorde and the seruant and Prophet of God Moses who first reuealed the creation of the worlde The selfe same thing S. Basell and S. Ambrose and S. Chrisostome in the prefaces of their Exameron or Six dayes woorke doe with one consent and plainely confirme so that whoso shall deney that the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie may not truely and commodâ—ously bee learned out of holy scripture gainsaith the sacred woorde of GOD and openly repugneth against the learned Fathers In conclusioÌ„ hearken to â—ertullian who in the 46. chapter of hys Apologet doth truely and plainly pronounce that the sacred woorde of God which is most auncient was as it were the treasurie and stoarehouse vnto all later wisdom From thence saith hee the Philosophers haue quenched the thirst of their wits But as men that were ouer riotous in the study onely of glorie and eloquence if they found any thyng in holy scripture when they had digested it according to the purpose of their curiositie they conuerted it to their owne woorkes S. Doe they that are of the contrarie opinion bring nothing against thys M. Yeas two argumentes especially S. What bee they M. This is the first That the ende of euery art ought to bee distinguished and that Naturall Philosophie is one thing and Diuinitie another whereof thys last is conteined in holie write but the other is not so S. Is that consequent and assertion true M. No verily S. Howe so M. For that although they gather that truly that artes ought to bee distinguished and that Diuinitie which conteineth the promises of euerlastinge lyfe teaching also the waye thervnto and the causes thereof ought to bee separated from Naturall Philosophie whiche entreateth of the framinge of this visible worlde and the natures of all thinges in the same yet doe they not say truely in denyinge that the order of the creation of this world the sundrie kindes of things their natures manifold sortes are taught distinguished and orderly set downe in holy Scripture All these thinges are copiously declared there which are the peculiar subiect matter of the Art of Natural Philosophie Wherefore Naturall Philosophie is comprehended in holy scripture The same also you may learne by another example are not Diuinitie and the morall parte of Philosophie both of them as they differ in kinde discerned in the holy scriptures And yet who is so rasbe and folishe that he dare deny that the Ethike or moral Philosophie yea and that most truly and generally is deliuered vnto vs in holie scripture wherefore the distinct endes of Artes and treatises are no impediment but that the Generall Naturall Philosophie and also Diuinitie are conteined in the holy Scriptures forsomuch as Natural Philosophic is as it were a parte of Diuinitie and an handmaideÌ„ vnto the same For it is a notable meane to knowe God by which thing also S Ambrose confesseth with mee What shall I saye more The Heathen Philosophers them selues when they dispute of the worlde and the creation of the partes therof and when they intreat of the nature of thinges they saye that thei play the Diuines and enter into discourse of Diuinitie as Aristotle speaketh in his booke de mundo of
the worlde so that it is no maruaile that wee haue iudged that the true and Christian Diuinitie is partly busied also in matter of Naturall Philosophie and the settinge foorth thereof and that for that cause also the holie Scripture is in part occupied in settinge foorth of these things forasmuch as this knowledge also maketh to the aduauncement of gods glory For in these visible thinges the power wisdome and eternitie of God is to bee seene liuely S. What is the other argument of theirs that are of the contrarie opinion M. This forsooth that those thynges which Moses hath written are most plainely and simply set downe and in such kinde of stile which is fitted to our capacitie and applied to the weakenesse of mans sence and not truely and exactly expressed according to the truth of thinges and finally that Moses doeth neither throughly neither subtily search out or set downe the thinges themselues and their natures wherefore they conclude that the true distinct and perfect knowledge of the naturall part is other whence to bee drawne and learned S. What answere you vnto these thinges M. Uerily I confesse that these matters concerning Naturall Philosophie are not gloriously in a filed style set foorth by Moses although hee were the beste learned man that euer lyued but rather in a bare and simple kinde of writinge striped out of all ornament as it were out of apparrell wherby that which hee writeth may the more easily bee vnderstood But as it is to bee graunted that hee spake simply so can it not bee prooued that hee spake or wrote lyingly falsely and ignorantly of those thinges It is one thing therfore to acknowledg that Moses stile is bare simple which kinde of vtterauÌ„ce is meet for the truth and another thing to say that hee is a false man and a lyar which no man can affirme but whoso is of a corrupt conscience Wherfore simply but truely barely but rightly commonly but purely doth hee deliuer vnto vs those thinges which hee writeth concerning the worlde of the principall partes therof of the causes and effectes of thinges to bee beleeued holden and taughte among menne Uerily I confesse that Moses applyed himselfe to the capacitie of our seÌ„ses Howbeit I deney that which they affirme that therfore hee did not roue at the trueth of the matter or had not regarde vnto it for it was his purpose to set downe those things in wrâ—tinge easily barely and truely S. But some are of opinion that all those things which hee wrote in the first chapter of Genesis are to bee interpreted allegorically So neither do they think that those six dayes are the space of time neither that the woman in deede was made of Adams ribbe neither that all the residue are so to bee taken as Moses words doe pretende and sownde Which opinion if it be true what shall bee sure or certeine in all that whole chapter and such like writinges of other Prophetes as apperteining to the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie or that maye teache vs the same M. You saye well Indeede some haue benne of that opinion which notwithstanding S. Augustine confuteth in his 1. booke in the Proheme also in the 8. booke and 2. chapter de Genesiad Literam of Genesis vpon the letter S. Peter likewyse in the 3. chapter and 5. verse of hys seconde Epistle and in the epistle to the Hebrues the 11. chapter and 3. verse doth openly impungne this errour of the Allegorists affirminge that those things which Moses hath reported concerning the creation of the worlde are spoken naturally and plainly and not allegorically or figuratiuely S. And what at the length doe you conclude of all these thinges which you haue recited M. That forsooth which S. Augustine concludeth in hys 5. booke and 8. chapter of Genesis That those things which Moses wrot are true although they can be established by no other reasons For if a man will dispute to proue that these thinges are false or hee himselfe can say no certentie concerning the estate and gouerment of creatures or if hee saye not true will hee suppose these thinges to bee false in that hee himselfe vnderstandeth them not Who will beleeue that Aristotle or Plato did knowe any thinge concerninge the creation of the worlde and the causes of thinges whereof Moses was ignorant who first receiued the thinges which he wrote by most secret reuelation from god Secondly who was wel learned in all liberall artes specially in the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie and Phisick which two artes were at that tyme specially had in price amonge the Aegyptians as it appeareth in the Scripture Actes the 7. chap. and 22. verse And to conclude forasmuch as those that were the chiefest Philosophers amonge the Grecians traueyled into Aegypt to the intent to learne Naturall Philosophie as histories doe rport of Plato and Pithageras And most certeine it is as Diogenes Laertius writeth in hys first booke de vitis Philosophorum of the lyues of the Philosophers that all that parte of Philosophie whiche intreateth of the nature of thinges was deriued to the Grecians froÌ„ strange nations and from the Syrians that is to saie from the Jewes Shal we say theÌ„ against the assured faith of the scripture that any one of the cheifest Philosophers to wit Plato or Aristotle whiche were heathen men were called by GOD to counsell when hee went to framinge and creatinge of the worlde that they shoulde knowe more than Moses the seruaunt of GOD whom God himselfe taught and shewed vnto him such things as hee should commit to writinge to the behoofe of Posteritie and especially for the instruction of his moste deerely beeloued Church Surely this cannot bee thaught muchlesse spoken without notorious blasphemie against God himselfe But rather as S. Augustine teacheth in his 5. booke and third Chapter de Genesiad Literam of Genesis vpoÌ„ the letter that in that Moses speaketh so plainly hee doth it by the assured counsell and iudgemente of the holy Ghost to the intent that by the hight of the thynges hee maye terrifie the proude by the deapth hee may hold them attentiue by the trueth hee may feede the great ones and by hys affabilitie hee maye nourishe the little ones The fourth Chapter The difference beetween Christian and heathen Naturall Philosophie S. WHat differeÌ„ce therfore is ther betwen Moses Aristotle y is to say betweene ChristiaÌ„ and Heathen Natural Philosophers in thys kinde of learninge M. Uery great which notwithstanding maye bee especially perceiued in three poyntes S. Which bee they M. The firste is in the ende of this knowledge whiche thei bothe doe respecte and followe S. Declare thesame M. The Christian Naturall Philosophers whiche intreate of the thinges that are created dooe referre the summe of their disputatioÌ„ to this ende that our greate and good God who is the auctour Father and creatour of them all maie bee knowne praised and extolled and finally woorshipped the more ardently and more feared But
104. 136. in the Prouerbes the 8. chapter verse 23. 24. and in the next folowinge the 4. of Esdras the 6. chapter verse 38. and the next folowinge in the songe of the three children verse 53. and the next folowinge yet doe they euermore acknowledge that that is the true order and meane of the creation of all thinges which Moses hath discribed But the Philosophers imagininge of the beeginninge of this worlde accordinge to their owne inuentions can by no meanes agree amonge themselues whence to begin their disputation concerninge naturall thinges Some of them therefore beegin it from a certaine first matter which they bringe in amongst vs others from the foure Elements onely othersome from a confusion and the distinction therof certaine from Heauen and some from a bottomlesse deapth alwayes boylinge foorth to bee shorte looke howe many heades so manie meanings and in this point also euery seuerall sect of Philosophers defendeth somethinge wherein they dissente not onely from other but also manye times frō sundry of their owne profession The fifth Chapter What and howe greate the certentie is of the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie S. HEtherto nowe concerninge these matters discourse I praye you also of some other thinge M. Of what S. What is the certentie surenes of this knowledge M. Uerily there is not one onely meane of defininge and determininge of all the partes therof For those thinges which in this art and knowledge wee learne out of Gods woorde are most sure most true as grounded vpon a most certaine foundation whiche whoso will gainsay wee must deale no farther with him but giue him quite ouer But whatsoeuer other things are recited touching Naturall Philosophie they are not so sure and firme bycause they bee onely established by mans sence and reason which two thinges are no vndoubted and assured groundes For mans reason is many times and his senses are most times deceiued Wherefore they doe thincke well who will haue the foundation of that knowledge of Naturall Philosophie which is not learned out of Gods word chiefly to reste vpon these two grounds to wit mans coniecture and historicall experience in whiche two poyntes also as S. Augustine writeth in the 9. chapter of his Enchiridion Naturall Philosophers doe suppose more than they knowe S. That parte therfore of Naturall Philosophie which is taught without warrant of Gods woorde is it vaine and altogither vncertaine and is it as some suppose to bee contemned M. No not so S. Why M. Bicause GOD hath not giuen those two partes of iudgement vnto men in vaine to wit reason of the minde and sense of the body as wee bee taught in the 12. Chapter of Iob the 12 verse and 34. chapter and 3. verse the iudgement of both which althoughe it bee not most certaine in al things and suffeciently subtile and expacte yet is it not lyinge and deceiued in althinges So that all handlinge of matters which is established and confirmed vppon those twaine ought not to bee condemned as altogither vaine and false For who will saye that the knowledge of so manye notable things and artes is worthily to bee dispised which GOD besydes the Scripture of his woorde hath giuen vnto men yea vnto Ethnickes suche as Plato Aristotle Galene and many other Philosophers both auncient and of later tymes haue founde out and taught Whoso despiseth these despiseth the gifts of GOD Wherwith somtime godly men also haue bene indued and blessed by God vnto the notable testimonie of Gods goodnesse towardes vs and miracle of mans nature such as was Moses himselfe and Iob and those foure whiche talked with him Solomon the kinge Ethan the Ezraelite Heman Calcol Dorda Ionathan vncle to Dauid all whom the Scripture commendeth and namely maketh mention of thē to the intent wee shoulde imitate them Actes the 7. Chapter verse 22. Firste of the Kinges the 4. Chapter verse 30. and 31. Psalme 88. and 89. First of the Cronacles the 27. Chap. and verse 32. The vi Chapter The endes of the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie S. I Haue hearde enough concerninge the certentie of this science declare nowe what endes and measure wee ought to respecte in that knowledge M. These two ought to bee the endes The first is that accordinge to S. Paules aduertisement whatsoeuer shall bee disputed of in this kinde of science all maye bee referred to the onely glory and knowledge of our great and good god For that is the chiefest and truest ende of humaine Philosophie that through it wee may attaine to the vnderstandinge of the trueth and the nature of GOD like as also Plutarch writeth The seconde is that wee folow not and affirme vncerteine thinges in the steede of certeine For since to erre and bee deceiued is alwayes shamefull then it is most shamefull to erre in those thinges which oftentimes are of great importāce and in which a man maye honestly and sittingly enough for him confesse that hee is ignorant Wherfore in my iudgement S Augustine said very well in his bookes de Genesiad Literam vpon Genesis accordinge to the letter There bee manye things saith he of this vniuersall creature which wee know not either bicause they bee higher in heauen than our vnderstanding is able to attaine vnto them or perhaps are in vnhabitable regions of the earth or lie hidden very low in the bottom of the deapthes And this rasshnes in pronouncinge certainely of vncertaine things hath ministred occasion that Naturall Philosophers haue beene mocked by many frō which wee ought to absteine as frō a moste stronge poison of humaine ambition Wherfore in this Arte especially curiositie is to be auoided sobriety embraced Let vs acknowledge our selues to bee farre inferior to GOD and that wee are not able to finde out the reason and cause of all thinges that hee hath made as saith S. Irenaeus in his 2. booke 43. and 45. Chapters The vii Chapter The subiect of the knowledge of Naturall Philosophie is a creature visible and that can bee seene and first how farre and in what respect the worlde is a certaine vniuersalitie vnto them all S. I Haue alredy learned what natural Philosophie is and how manifolde from whence also it is to bee learned likewise what is the truthe and certentie of this knowledge and what bee the endes therof I praie you wade now more deepely into the matter and declare vnto mee what is the obiecte of this science about whiche it is busied M. I wyll doe so and that willingly S. Then tell mee what is the matter of this arte and knowledge M. A creature and not euery one but that onely whiche maye bee seene that is to saye the same which maye bee perceiued by some one or by all our bodily senses S. Howe prooue you this M. Especially by two places of holy Scripture whereof the first is in the 1. chapter to the Romanes and 20. verse where Naturall thinges are called visible creatures and are distinguished from those things which
proper and naturall force and signification of this woorde Create For in the 43. chap. and 13. verse of Isay the Lorde calleth himselfe the creatour of Israell which people notwithstandinge are knowne to haue beene borne of seede And againe in in the 65. Chapter and 18. verse of the same Prophet he saith Beeholde I create Hierusalem Whiche place whether it bee vnderstoode of the citizens or of the citie it selfe it is certayne that God made neyther of them without seede or matter but the men of the one and the Citie of the other For this woorde Barah is vsed in both places so that I am of opinion that wee ought not to sticke to religiously or percisely to the interpretation of one poore woorde Likewise they alleage this saying of the same Prophete Beeholde I create a newe heauen and a newe earth When as indeede the Lorde will onely renue these bodyes which nowe are heauen and earth and not make theÌ„ again of nothing M. It is writen in Isay as you say But these places doe plainly confirme mine opinion much lesse confute it For the woorde create is taken Metaphorically and wrested a litle from the proper significatioÌ„ wherby the power of God may appeare the greater more excellent in restoringe his people and holy Citie beesides al hope and other thinges beesides all ordinarie meanes For lyke as the thinges that are created are beesides the course of nature made of nothinge so likewise bycause the Lord promiseth that hee will restore and renue his people and Citie hee vseth properly the woorde of creating for that this which the Lord will woorke is as it were a new creation and a certayne wonÌ„derfull bringing foorth and generation out of nothinge Althoughe I will not deney but that the signification of this word Barah is ofteÌ„times translated and vsed more largely as when it is sayd Create a cleane hart within mee O God the 51. Psalme and 12. verse and againe The seat of the frowarde createth iniquitie Psalme 94. and 20. verse Of this sayinge and opinion of Sainct Augustine that I maye saye so much by the licence of so woorthy a man I doe not well alowe Who in his first booke against the aduersaries of the lawe and the Prophetes the 23 chap writeth thus And when there is anye difference made beetweene makinge and creatinge this maye bee the oddes beetwene those two woordes as I sayde that that is made which beefore was not at all and that created which is ordeyned of sumthinge that was beefore Hee distinguished those two woordes Make and Creat toto subtily whiche oftentimes are vsed one for an other S. How then should it bee M. Thus the Scripture plainly defineth to wit that God is the creatour of the world that is to say of all thinges that are who made framed brought foorth them all out of nothing and not out of any matter preexisting or made to his hande or whiche is coeternall with God himself or ministred vnto him by some other woorking God as the Manichees doe suppose For that opinion induceth two Goddes and in making twayne it leaueth none For either there is no God or there is but one Finally as saith S. Ambrose God should bee onely the diuiser of the figure and not the maker of Nature and hee had founde and receiued more than hee had made if there had bin any matter readie to his hande S. But there bee some that saie that this matter is signified in the scripture by this woorde Tohu where vpon afterward the Grecians and the Philosophers who receiued those thinges first of the Hebrues and of the Phenicians neere borderers to the Hebrues whiche thei haue written concernyng the beeginnyng of the worlde thei deuised this woorde Hyle by a small alteration of certein letters made according to the vse and proprietie of their tongue For this woorde Hyle saiethei signifieth among the Grecians as muche as a rude heape vnformed and as it were a certein moiste and waterishe yearth or quagmire or dregges out of whiche many thinges are engendred through the force of the heate whiche commeth vnto it From the whiche woorde Hyle is the woorde Hilys deriued which signifieth dregges and froath that is to saye a dirtie and moyst earth out of whiche many thinges doe growe in the Sea. M. I doubted not but those that goe about to defend the same errour of theirs concerning a firste matter pre-existing as though it were verie necessarie and they that haue throughly receiued the same doe deuise many suche foolishe fantasies But how small or none at all the affinity of these two woordes is Tohu and Hyle in writing of the Letters or rather how farre this is from the trueth your selfe doe see and it shall not bee needefull to seeke farther forasmuch as God is openly called the creatour of heauen and earth S. Yea God is termed Gosâ—he Ioâ—ser that is to say the maker and the fourmer as it is written in Isay the 66. chapt and 10. verse and Iob the 35. chap. and 10. verse and Isay the 54. chap. 8. verse as also in the 90. Psalme the 2. verse M. That was doone not rashly nor in vaine but to the intent to take awaye sutch errours as the spirite of God foresawe would grow afterward amongst men For there are twoo errours among men concernyng the beeginning of all thinges beesides the errour of the materiare heretikes For some thinke that first and alwaies there was existing a certein whole masse and that rude and confused whiche was the heape of all the principall partes and thinges of the worlde whiche now are existing and fourmed but then disorderly mingled togither which they call Chaos And this opinion Hesiodus folowed in his Theogonia whiche Ouid describeth in his Metamorphosis in these wordes Beefore the sea and lande were made the heauen that all doth hide In all the worlde one onely face of nature did abyde Whiche Chaos hight an huge rude heape and nothinge else but eeuen An heauie lumpe and clottred clod of feedes togither driuen Of thinges at strife amonge themselues for want of order due No sunne as yet with lightsome beames the shapelesse worlde did viewe c. This muche therefore they doe attribute vnto God that hee is the distinguisher trimmer and setter foorth of this so confused a Chaos mole and heape and not the creatour of it in time giuinge vnto it the first meanes of beeinge And therefore the Poet sayde There was as it were from euerlasting and not the same Chaos was made and created by god And for this cause they doe not call God the Creatour of the world but onely the beutifier and as Sainct Ambrose sayeth the deuiser of the shape and fourme thereof as though hee hadde giuen a certeine comlinesse and order vnto thinges that existed before and which had of themselues their owne proper strength and nature whiche hee accomplished by a certaine wise and apt distinction of them and by separating