Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	work_v	world_n	write_v	64	3	4.6951	4	false

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A16567	A defence of that most ancient and sacred ordinance of Gods, the Sabbath day Consequently, and together with it. 2. A defence of the iiijth commandement. 3. A defence of the integrity and perfection of the Decalogue, morall law, or X. commandements. 4. A defence also of the whole and intire worship of God, in all the partes thereof, as it is prescribed, in the first table of the Decalogue. 5. A discouery of the superstition, impurity and corruption of Gods worship; yea, and idolatry, committed by multitudes, in sanctifying the Lords day, for a Sabbath day, by the iiijth commandement. Vndertaken against all anti-Sabbatharians, both of Protestants, Papists, Antinomians, and Anabaptists; and by name and especially against the X ministers, ... by Theophilus Brabourne.	Brabourne, Theophilus, b. 1590.	1632 (1632)	STC 3473; ESTC S120442	538,800	670

themselues no neither can man else vse them vnto the day we now keepe for God did moue vnto the obseruation of the Saturday 7th day 1. Because him selfe at the Creation rested on it 2. Because he had blessed that day hallowed it so made it an Holy day now these two reasones neither are nor can be applied to our Lords day for God at the creation did not rest on our Lords day no neither did he then blesse sanctify the Lords day for the Lords day was not then knowne Thus you see how they baue made cleere worke for they haue taken away both the body of the 4th com the reasone annexed to it by God thus they haue taken away the whole 4th com head taile roote branch it stands for vs now onely to looke vpon Loe now we may say with the Prophet Dauid It is time for thee Lord to worke for they haue destroied thy Law Psal 119.126 Thus since I haue faithfully plainly discouered this Notoriouse errour I haue done what in me lyeth towards a reformation onely this remaineth that with the residue of the congregation I make this prayer vnto God That it may please him to bring into the way of trueth all such as haue erred are deceiued CHAPT V. This Chapter conteineth sondry substanciall arguments out of the word of God proueing that the Lords Sabbath day written in the Morall Law is still in force so ought to be vnto the worlds end like as are the other morales I Haue now finished the fowre first partes of my booke the first whereof was in defence of the Morall Law The second was an exposition of the 4th com with a discouery of the corrupt expositiones thereof The third was an answer vnto those Scriptures reasones wich are vsually brought to proue the Lords day the Sabbath day The fowrth was an answer vnto those abused Scriptures which are brought against the Lords Sabbath day And now by order I am come vnto the fith parte of my booke and herein I am to proue vnto you the perpetuity of the Lords Sabbath and that it is still in force and so ought for euer to be Touching the Sabbath I note two things 1. I see many lerned and greate Diuines of late prime men and of the formost ranke in the Vniuersities both on this side and beyond the Seas disclaiming and wrighting against the Lords day Sabbath but I see none of them shew vs where we shall haue an other Sabbath in the absence of this as the former bewrayed their learning and iudgement so this latter bewrayed their forgetfulnesse what shall the Church of God be left without a Sabbath now shall we turne from Superstition to Anabaptistry I ioyne with them in throwing downe the Lords day for a Sabbath but I dare not put an end to the worke when it is but halfe done 2. As those Iewes of old cried the Temple of the Lord the temple of the Lord so I obserue the Patrons of the Lords day to cry out of the prophanation of the Lords Sabbaths the prophanatioÌ„ of the Lords Sabbaths as if they were the onely friends to Gods Sabbaths whereas in deed in trueth they are the chiefe enemies to them and are foulely mistaken in their iudgement for they are the Lords dayes which they meane not the Lords Sabbath dayes if therefore any man may in a right accompt be said to be a true friend to Gods Sabbaths it is not they it is hee that writeth for them and defendeth them against the world and corruptiones of the time hee may indede say with Eliah I haue bene very Ielouse for the Lord of hostes for they haue forsaken thy Couenant broken downe thy Sabbaths and I onely am left The Lords Sabbaths are still in force or Gods ancient 7th day Saturday Sabbath is still in force SECT I. IN defending the Lords Sabbath I purpose to obserue this method first I will proue the point by arguments lesse forcible and then by arguments more forcible first by arguments shewing that it is a thing meete convenient and very befiting vs to keepe the Lords Sabbath then by arguments shewing that it is a thing very necessary in regard of Gods appointment ordination By the way whereas there are many light and triuiall obiections vsually brought against the Lords Sabbath and some place would be reserued to answer them I think it vnfit to place them after the point is proued by necessary arguments for when Gods will is once knowne there is no place left for carnall and triuiall obiections against it and therefore I hold it better to place these obiections next after the point is proued by probable arguments and arguments of conveniency and so these triuiall obiections shall rather come in by way of opposition vnto arguments of conveniency then vnto arguments deriued from Gods ordination Wherefore I purpose to spend the first Section about arguments of conveniency and the second Section in answer vnto sondry obiections and then the third Section in arguments prouing the point necessarily from Gods ordination To begine with the first of these namly conveniency and arguments lesse forcible in handling of this point first I will proue by sondry arguments that it is meete we should keepe a Sabbath day one or other indefinitly and then I will proue that it is most meete fitest to keepe the Saturday or 7th day Sabbath before any other One reason mouing me to handle these two points is to preuent Prophane and carnall men thus to thinke why you haue throwne downe the Lords day Sabbath now therfore what need we any more Sabbaths c I procede therfore to giue such reasones as may take place in a carnall mind For the former of these I proue that it is meete we should keepe a Sabbath day because it is a worke of mercy that this may the better appeare we will consider of it in respect of man beast touching man we will consider of him generally and then particularly and first for man in generall it is a greate comforte and worke of mercy vnto all men to keepe a Sabbath day for therein their bodies are exceedingly refreshed and comforted for looke as the Bedd at night is a greate refreshment vnto man that hath bene occupied all the day before in his painfull calling so is the Sabbath day a sweete refreshment vnto men after that they haue bene exercised Sixe dayes one after an other in continuall laboures the trueth of this point euery man findeth by good experience We haue a prouerb that men must worke to day as they may worke too morrow that is that men doe not so ouerworke themselues in one day as they be vnfit for worke the next day this prouerb may well be applied to our present occation that men must worke this weeke so as they may worke the next weeke also that is they must not so worke and tyre out their

did so for in six dayes the Lord made heauen and earth and rested the seuenth day vvhich is our Saturday Exo. 20.11 It is as you see the very reason and president vvhich God himselfe hath set before our eyes and if vve like to doe as God did and to treade in his steppes then must vve speake as God spake in our account and doe as God did in our practise This is that which Musculus hath in his exposition vpon the fourth comm fol. 66. The imitation of the example of God saith hee standeth in this that in the same six dayes in which God wrought all his workes we worke ours and in the seuenth day when hee rested from his we doe rest also from our works according to his example It is to be noted that hee saith that our imitation of God standeth in this that we vvorke on the same six dayes in which God vvrought and that we Rest on the same seuenth day in vvhich God himselfe rested This is the true exposition of this fourth comm Here then is discouered the errour of many vvho thus pleade for themselues Doe not vve according to the Commandement vvorke six dayes rest the seuenth day this is a trueth they say indeed but it is not Gods trueth they labour six dayes indeed but they labour not on those same six dayes which God spake of and which God set them a sample of in his ovvne person nay they profanely labour vpon that day for one vvhich God set them a patterne to rest on and that is vpon the Saturday T is true as they say also they rest the seuenth day but not on that seuenth day vvhich God counted for the seuenth day but on that seuenth day vvhich God euer counted for the first day of the weeke vvhich is our Sunday Novv no maruaile God set himselfe out for our patterne that vve shold imitate him see hovv nere vve follovv him on our Saturday God rested from vvorke and sanctified it and vve in imitation of him vvorke on that day and profane it againe on our Sunday God vvrought as vpon the first of his six working dayes and vve in imitation of God doe cease from vvorke and sanctify it thus vvhen God rest vve vvorke and vvhen hee vvorketh then vve rest is this to imitate God or can vve oppose and thvvart him more and yet these men vvold thinke vve doe them vvrong to say they doe not imitate God but rather mocke God pretending indeed to imitate him according to his fourth comm vvhen in very trueth vve cold not deuise on the suddaine hovv to thvvart and crosse Gods example more then vve doe Now vvhence comes this erronious practise amoÌ„g the people but from the erronious doctrine of some Ministers vvho besides other errours touching the Sabbath doe falsly expound the fourth command to the people by nicknaming of dayes as if the six dayes mentioned in the Comm. might be vnderstood of other six dayes then God euer spake of or vvrought in or then the Church for thousands of yeeres vnderstood the fourth comm to speake of and as if the seuenth day might be attributed to some other day then the seuenth day from the creation vvherein God rested and for this purpose they haue inuented a distinction of a seuenth day and the seuenth day making the ignorant people beleeue that the fourth com speaketh not of the seuenth day but of a seuenth day that is of any day of the seuen whereby God is plainly defeated of his purpose which vvas to haue that one seuenth day sanctified vvhich he had therefore blessed and sanctified and which himselfe rested on and left vs for a patterne and hereby an other day is foisted in and intruded into its roome This idle distinction giues vs to learne novv that there is a first day of the vveeke and the first day of the vveeke that there is a Lords day and the Lords day and that there might haue beene in the Church of the Iewes had they beene so skillfull as vve are become a eigth day for circumcision and the eigth day and a fourteenth day of the moneth for the passouer and the fourteenth day and these vnderstood not of one and the same day but of diuers dayes and vvhy not all these as vvell as a seuenth day the seuenth day and if they please too vve may haue a Christ and the Christ a Mathevv and the Mathevv a Iohn and the Iohn a Paul and the Paul and sometimes these shall be expounded in one of these senses and aftervvard at an other time in the other of these senses Distinctions they be more fit for children then for men of yeeres for Iesuites then Protestants for Iuglers then honest meaning men A second thing out of our generall suruey of the partes of this com is that vve haue proued that the time and day specified in the fourth com is no lesse commanded by God then the dueties of rest and holinesse which being so here cometh to be reproued an other errour of our Ministers they vse to Answer it thus vvhen the duety of the very day and time is vrged vpon them oh say they the time that 's but an adiunct but an accident but a circumstance and t is not the circumstance so much vvhich God lookes at but it is the substance which God regardeth novv see hovv these men haue learned an arte to extenuate Gods commandements by calling them lightly and regardlesly but an accident but a circumstance who could thinke that Ministers yea Puritane Ministers vvho shold back Gods commandements and reuerence the things commanded shold but at them and as it were push at them vvith a but saying t is but a circumstance c is not this a contempt offered to the Holy one of Israel thus to sleight him in his ordinance durst euer the Church of the Ievves thus but at the eigth day appointed of God for circumcision saying the strict day is but time but a circumstance what if we neglect it and circumcise on the nineth day the day after it is the Substance of cutting off the foreskine which God lookes at might they then haue thus sleighted the time ordeined of God for the passouer to be eaten on the 14th day of the moneth by saying the precise time was but a circumstance and so be we eate the passouer it matters not if we eate it on the 15th or 16th day of the moneth were any of vs bound in a bond to paie vnto his Maiestie a certaine some of mony vpon the seuenth day of May durst we aduenture it to sleyght the precise day of payment vpon this idle pretense that the day and time in the bond it is but an adiunct but a circumstance all will be well enough therefore if I tender the some of mony vpon the eigth day or ninth day of May vvere this but a common bond betwixt subiect and subiect sure I am no Lawyer no Iudge no nor any common man but vvold

doth ratify and confirme all the lawes of God written in the Tables of stone as they are rehearsed by the Minister without mutilating or curtailing of any of them they are no children of the Church therefore who deny my Major and thus I haue abundantly proued the point by humane Testimony and so I come to proue it also by Diuine Testimony But me thinke euer anone as I am writing that some body should wonder at me that I should spend so many words to proue a point so plaine as this that all Gods commandements are now to be obeyed why may they say it is a point we neuer till now heard doubted of we euer tooke it as an Article of our faith that all things commanded in the Morall Law did binde vs to the obedience thereof and is it now become a question amongst Diuines if this principle be doubted of now we shall scarce know what to doe in Religion what not to doe what to beleeue what not to beleeue but surely Sir you are mistaken ther 's no Minister that hath any feare of God before his eyes that will doubt of this point and for common people they are as farre from doubting of it as the heauens are from the earth Wherevnto I answer that when I seriously enter into the consideration of it it maketh my very heart to tremble within me to thinke that any man that professeth godlinesse should be so farre in loue with old errour as to deny so cleere a trueth as this neuerthelesse not onely Ministers but puritane Ministers goe about to doubt of and deny this trueth for by their distinctiones they will deny that all the commandements written in the Decalogue doe binde vs to obedience which if they did not deny I should saue this labour they must imbrace that most ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbath day wherefore good Reader wonder not at me but rather wonder at such your Ministers who are become so vnfaithfull to God as that rather then they will confesse an old errour they will stifly deny a manifest trueth My first argument then of Diuine authority is this that euery thingonce commanded in the Morall Law standeth still vnrepealed is therefore still in force For these enemies to Gods Sabbaths they cannot proue that any one thing once commanded in the Decalogue was euer since reuoked abolished now whatsoeuer thing God hath once commanded in his 10 comman that thing is to staÌ„d euerlastingly vnlesse it can be showne that God hath reuoked reuersed it like as Statute Lawes in our Realme though made long since are neuerthelesse in force still vnlesse it can be showne that they haue bene repealed since by the same Authority that first inacted them For the further strengthening of which argument let these Scriptures be perpended What soeuer things are written aforetime are written for our lerning that we through patience comforte of the Scriptures might haue hope Rom. 15.4 and againe For the whole Scripture is giueÌ„ by inspiratioÌ„ of God is proffitable to teach to convince to correct to instruct in righteousnesse c. 2. Tym. 3.16 In which two portiones of Scripture you see the Apostle doth ratify an vninersallity of things written in the old Testament and an Integrity and wholenesse of the Scriptures of the old Testament now if we shall not apply these ij textes to the maintenance of the Morall Law or 10 commandements to maintaine the vniuersallity of all things written in the 10 commandements and to maintaine the Integrity perfection wolenesse of the 10 commandements then wherevnto shall we apply them for what portion of Scripture is there besids this Law in all the old Testament whereof it cane besaid that all things therin written concerne our practise that that whole Scripture is proffitable to teach vs to convince vs to correct vs and to instruct vs What scriptures of the old Testament I say can be the adaequate Subiect or Obiect of these ij Scriptures but the morall Law My 2d argument to proue that all the 10 commandements and euery commandement therin doe bind vs still to the obedience of them is this that the Apostle S. Paul doth ratifie this Law in the new Testament saying Doe we then make the Law of none effect through faith God forbid yea wee establish the Law Rom. 3.31 Where you see the Apostle affirmeth that hee did establish the Law now the word Law in this text is not to be restrained to some partes of it onely but to be taken in the largest sense seeing thers nothing in the context to hinder it now this Law is knowne to containe 10 commandements Then he wrote vpon the Tables according to the first writing the tenne commandements Deut. 10.4 the which were numbered by God least the number thereof should be diminished by meÌ„ againe Cursed is euery man that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 Here againe all things written in the Law are ratified Furthermore S. Iames thus writeth whosoeuer shall kepe the whole Law yet faileth in one point hee is guilty of all Iam. 2.10 In which words S. Iames ratifieth all the Law or the whole Law so then S. Paul hath ratified the Law in its generality S. Iames in its Integrity yea S. Iames goeth further ratifieth all and euery parte pointe of the Law in as much as he would not haue vs faile in any one point of it as the text speaketh yet further see what our Sauiour Christ saith touching this matter whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commandements teach men so he shall be caled the least in the Kingdome of heauen Mat. 5.19 Here then our Sauiour ratifieth that to the worlds end as you may see in the verse before v. 18. the very least thing commanded in the 10 commandements In all which Scriptures you haue seene 1. That the Law is still inforce 2. That all things written in this Law are still in force 3. That the wholl Law is still in force 4. That the very least thing commanded in the law is still in force what can be desired more My 3d argument to proue that euery commandement in the Decalogue doth bind vs to obedience is because God hath ioyned the commandements togeather now that which our Sauiour saith in an other case is true in this also Let no man put a sunder that which God hath coupled together Mat. 19.6 Now behold how God hath coupled all these 10 commandements together 1. They were câ—upled together when God spake them all together Then God spake all these words saying Exod. 20.1 2dly they were coupâ—ed together when God wrote them together in the Tables of stone Deut. 10.4 3dly they were coupled together by number Thus God Almighty coupled them when he teld vs that wrote Tenn coÌ„mandements Deut. 10.4 4thly Our Sauiour Christ coupled them together when he

it shall we haue no Law now against working on the Sabbath day 4. If these words But the 7th day is the Sabbath be not morall but abolished then this absurdety followeth that we are not tied by the 4th com to giue God a Sabbath once a weeke or one in 7 daies but it is enough if God hath a Sabbath once a moneth once a yeere one in 7 daies or one in 700 daies for in what parte of the commandement will you find on what day in 700 you shall keepe your first Sabbath if you abolish those words But the 7th day is the Sabbath c. were it not for these words might you not begine your first Sabbath at the 700th day as well as at the 7th day 5. If no more of the 4th com be morall but these words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it then is the commandement Sixe daies thou shalt labour and doe all that thou hast to doe Exod. 20.9 a bolished also now I maruaile what offence these words are vnto any that this command must be rased out too were these wordes typicall or ceremoniall at any time that they must be also abolished is it Judaisme too to obserue this commandement yet further take away the latter parte and words of the 4th com and then 1. you abolish the cause grownd of the Sabbath institution noted in these words And rested the 7th day wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it Exo 20.11 Genes 2.2.3 now it is very absurd to retaine the Sabbath and to reiect the grownd cause of its Institution 2. You abolish also that Matchlesse example and perswasiue president reason which God gaue vs taken from his owne example to moue vs to keepe the Sabbath Exod. 20.11 what is Gods example now become Jewish and to treade in his steppes Iudaifme may not Christians be followers of God as deere children as well as Iewes 3. You blot out the memory of the CreatioÌ„ in remembrance of which Myracle the 7th day Sabbath was solemnized Exod. 31.17 6. I alleage the Testimony of M. Perkins against him for of all the other words in the coÌ„ M. Perkins did iudge these words to be morall see his Comentary on the Galatians Chap. 4. v. 9. pag. 286. Jt may be saith he the first words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it and these words In it thou shalt doe no manner of worke are spoken of the Iewes Sabbath But the words sixe daies thou shalt labour c. And the 7th day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God are morall and containe a perpetuall trueth And againe see M. Perkins in his Cases of Conscience pag. 106. D. vpon these words for in sixe daies c. where he thus writeth The second reason is taken from Gods example That which the Lord himselfe hath done in persoÌ„ the same must maÌ„ doe But the Lord himselfe rested the 7th day Therefore man must doe the same This reason made by God to the creature must stand in force till he reuerse it which yet he hath not done Thus M. Perkins doth expresly affirme it that this reason annexed to the 4th commandement is still in force In a word I might be infinite in alleaging Authores this way for what writer but holdeth these latter words of the Com. to be still in force as appeareth in that in theire Expositions on the 4th com they vnderstand by these words the 7th day is the Sabbath one day of 7 to be meant to be morall but M. Greenwod will be contrary to all Authores rather then God shall haue his Sabbaths againe 7. If onely those first words of the commandement Remember the Sabbath day be morall then is the 4th com vtterly abolished for they alleage these texts Exod. 31.15.16 Col. 2.16 where is mention made expresly of the Sabbath day for the abolishing of the Sabbath day in the 4th com as a signe and shaddow wherefore since by these textes they abolish the Remembrance of the Sabbath day mentioned in the begining of the 4th commandement it must nedes follow that those words in the begininge of the com Remember the Sabbath day are abolished and so if no other words be morall in the 4th com but those then are none at all morall but all abolished Now whereas some say all but the first words of the com are Application it is more likely that they are Explication now they will not reiect J trust the Explication of the commandement 2. to say they are application it doth imply that the words Sabbath day in the begining of the commandement are certaine generall words which may be applied vnto any day and so the latter parte of the commandement should apply them to the 7th day but their foundation is sandy for they cannot shew where at any time these words in the 4th commandement Sabbath day were taken generally or for any other day then Saturday the 7th day 3. Since that these words Sabbath day at the begining of the commandemeÌ„t these the 7th day is the Sabbath towards the end of the commandement are promiscuously vsed in Scripture the one for the other as hath bene proued it is absurd to suppose the one of these to be the Application of the other 4. Since that we are commanded to sanctifie the Sabbath day Exod. 20.8 and probibited to worke on the 7th day Exod. 20.10 It is absurd to say that this latter is an Application of the former is it not rather an Addition and that of one parte of the commandement to an other 5. If the after partes of the commandement be but Application and belonge not to vs why then doe all Diuines out of these after partes of the commandement determine that one day in 7 is morall And whereas some say that all the latter words of the com are appurtenaÌ„ces to the com I reply if they be but such appurrenaÌ„ces as may safely be seuered from the com then 1. we haue no neede now as those Iewes had of Gods insample reason mentioned in the 4th commandement Exod. 20.11 to moue vs to sanctifie the Sabbath day 2. Then need we not giue God a Sabbath once in 7 daies or once in 700 daies c. 3. Then doe we abolish Gods expresse prohibition of doeing seruile workes on the Sabbuth day Exod. 20.10 fourthly then why haue Diuines and Expositers affirmed that one day of 7 is morall out of these words the 7th day is the Sabbath 5. that these words the 7th day is the Sabbath are no appurtenances but of higher nature I haue proued in my 5th argument in defence of the Lords Sabbaths where I proued that these words are a parte of the 4th com and so cannot be seuered from the commandement as appurtenances may be To conclude there is a Tradition among vs that these words the 7th day is the Sabbath c. in it thou shalt doe no worke is but Application and Appurtenances

Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Text snippets containing the quad