these allegations out of the Scripture Another allegation about the matter aforesaid is taken out of auncient writers Park Polit eccles p. 236. c. shewing that in some churches heretofore there were two Bishops or Pastors in one and the same office in one church at once As namely that there vvas in the church of Ierusalem at once Narcissus and Alexander and in the church of Hippo Valerius and Augustine in Rome Felix Liberius in Nazianzum Gregorie the father Gregorie the sonne c. Euseb l. 6. c. 7.9.10 Sozomen l. 4. c. 14. August epist 110. Gregor Nazianz. epist ad Gregor Nyssenum Whereabout may be considered I. Whether this vvas ordinarie or extraordinarie If ordinarie how is it then that the same other auncient vvriters doe usually still make mention but of one in one church at one time as in their vvritings everie vvhere may be seen If extraordinarie and upon some speciall occasions what then vvas the ordinarie course that vvas otherwise kept and observed usually II. By the instances alledged it appeareth that there were but two of these Bishops in these churches at those times Whereas by the Scriptures alledged and the generall acknovvledgement almost of all there may be many Elders or Bishops in a church and far moe then tvvo Yea if there were but one pastor one teacher one ruling Elder in a church there vvould yet be moe Elders or Bishops then two at once III. The tvvo aforesaid also vvere both of them teaching Elders and Ministers of the vvord and Sacraments vvhereas the Scriptures shevve that there vvere and should be in the Church both teaching and ruling Elders IIII. The vvriters vvhich mention these note some special occasions thereof as that it was in case of old age or sicknes or special good liking and approbation of the parties and returning to the churches and places from which through troubles or otherwise they had some vvhile ben absent or other the like and some difference vvithall observed betvveene some of them Which is also duly to be regarded For vvhich see the â—â—ters and places aforesaid V. The time moreover is to be noted when this vvas done Which by the instances alledged appeareth to be some good vvhile after the Apostles dayes Whereas the question is concerning the primitiue institution and practise from the beginning VI. Also if such examples in later times so recorded by these writers should be respected vvhy should not then the other examples of former times recorded by the same and other Writers likewise VII And finally the onely sure ground of truth and end of controversies in Religion is the word of God vvherevvith so far as the auncient Writers accord their testimonies vvritings may in their place well be regarded According to it therefore I leaue these things vvith the other before alledged out of the Scriptures to be considered discussed And hitherto of the latter braunch of this question Novv furthermore note withall that how ever it be for the matter in hand touching the Pastors and other Elders of particular churches yet still it lyeth on them who receiue or plead for Diocesan and Provinciall churches Pastors or Bishops that they shevv such churches and Pastors planted by the Apostles at the beginning For if it cannot be shevved that the Apostles by vertue of their commission from Christ established such Diocesan and Provincial churches and Bishops who then may establish or submit unto them If they vvho were the Master-builders under Christ did not set them up vvhat povver then is there under heauen that may erect them and what homage is it that a Christian soule can with good conscience yeeld unto them in this behalf 2. The churches must be such and so established as the Lord appointeth and approveth in his vvord Revel 1 12 20. And everie officer in the church must in a due regard be counted a meÌ„ber in the body of Christ Rom. 12 3 8. 1 Cor. 12 12 28. Ephes 4 4 16. And none may set members in the body of Christ but the Lord himself 1 Cor. 12 18 28. c. Euen as on the coÌ„trarie none may keep out despise or abandon those vvhom the Lord hath appointed to be in his church and to continevv therein to the end of the vvorld Rom. 12.6.7.8 Ephe. 4 11 12. with Esa 66 21. 1 Tim. 3.1 15. and 5 3 9 17. with 6 13 14. and with Mat. 28.18.19.20 Luke 10.16 and 12 42 43. Ioh. 13 20. 1 Pet. 5 1 4. Rev. 1 16 20. and 2 1 8 c. 3. Moreover the functions duties of such Prelates if they be members of the body of Christ are to be shewed out of the word of God as vve see done for the Officers of particular churches Rom. 12 6 7 8. Ephes 4.11.12 vvith Esa 66.21 1 Thes 5.12.13.24 1 Tim. 5.17 Rev. 2.1.8 c. and as vvas in Israell for the hy Priest and for the other Priests and Levites besides that vvhich was in their cities and Synagogues Exod. 28. and 29. Lev. 1 16 chap. c. Num. 3 and 4 and 8. Deut. 16 19 chap. Josh 21 chap. 1 Chron. 23 26 ch Luke 4 16 20. Act. 13.14.15 c. 4. The place also and manner vvhere and hovv such Bishops doe and can meet together with the rest of the body whereof they are members that is with their Diocesan and Provinciall churches is to be shewed in their practise agreable to the Scriptures as may be done for the Pastors of particular churches and their assemblies Rev. 1 20. and 2 and 3 ch vvith Acts 20.17.28 Rom. 12.4 8. Col. 4.16.17 1 Thes 5.12.13.14.27 Heb. 13.7.17.24 Jam. 2.2 vvhere the Apostle calleth the assemblies of Christians Synagogues vvhich as I noted before may haue reference to the Synagogues of the Ievves Mat. 4 23. Luke 4 16 20. Acts 13.5.14.15.42 and 14.1 and 17.1.2 and 18.4.7.8 c. As also Ierusalem was the place whither the Iewes were bound to come thrise a yere and where the high Priest and the other Priests and Levites that ministred there were bound to sacrifice and performe the other duties of their callings for the vvhole church from time to time according as the Lord particularly appointed in his word 5. Yea the higher and greater that the members and functions are which the Lord hath set in his church the more undoubted it is that they are specially described in his word and the more needfull both for the church and the Officers themselues to haue certain knowledge and assurance thereof As was for the chief Priests other officers of the church of Israell Necessarie therefore it is that the Diocesan and Provinciall Churches if any such vvere planted by the Apostles and the office entrance administration of Diocesan and Provinciall Bishops vvhich challenge to be chief in the church and distinct from the Pastors and Bishops of particular churches should be shewed out of the Scriptures by such as hold would uphold them if they
their assertions into the same transgression and impietie Other things more might be observed and answered about the particulars aforesaid but these are ynough more then here I would haue noted but that their owne dealing and the regard of others and of the truth it self did urge me thereunto And hitherto of the Shifts errors contradictions abuse of Scriptures vaine distinctions and Anabaptisticall assertions found in these fewe lynes What abundant store of such stuffe he hath about his and other matters besides in this treatise of his vvhich vvere endles â—o insist upon in particular may euen by this litle sufficiently appeare to such as are judicious unpartiall Now here I wil onely proceed to one or two moe objections that are much urged about the matter in hand OBJECTION IIII. But Israell in their defection from whom divers of the former reasons answers are taken becomming Apostate M.A. c when Ieroboam set up the golden Calues Animad v. p. 68 70. 81 82 88 89 90 91 92 c. and Israel committed Idolatrie with them were not in their apostaste the people of God or his church but were cast off by the Lord and divorced from him the covenant was broken not onely on their part but also on his so as now he gaue them a bill of divorce and ceased to be their God and they to be his people And as touching circumcision or any such ordinances reteyned among them * Animad pag. 70. seeing they then were fallen †2 Chr. 15 3. froÌ„ God and from his church and so were ‡ Ier. 3 8. divorced from the Lord and were ‘ Hos 2 2. not his wife but * Hos 13 1 dead in their sinnes the ordinances of God which they in shew reteyned could not be unto them the signes and seales of forgiuenes of sinnes of life eternall and therefore were in their use of them false and deceitfull as were also the ordinances of God reteyned in other nations as “ Numb 23.1 Pompon Laetus de sacerdo c. Altars Sacrifices Priests tithes first fruits incense meat offrings drink offrings feasts baptismes or washings anoyntings excoÌ„munications prayers vowes many the like wherof al histories do beare record that the Gentiles did reteyn theÌ„ ANSWER Very erroneous and ungodly assertions are here againe such as are directly contrary to the Scriptures in the true meaning intendement thereof For the Lord was yet stil their God they his people church both in the account of the Lord himself and of his holy Prophets as †Advert p. 59 63. in another treatise I haue shewed heretofore Which being still so erroneously denyed and colourably oppugned by them I will therefore novv againe insist hereupon And that also the more largely considering the waight of the matter and their abuse of the Scriptures about it Yet will I but treat of some speciall particulars of the exceeding many testimonies of Scripture and reasons that might from thence be deduced about this matter 1. The Prophet that annoynted Iehu King over Israell spake thus unto him in the Name of the Lord ‡ 2 Kin. 9 6. c. Thus saith the Lord God of Israell I haue annoynted thee King over the people of the Lord euen over Israell c. 2 King 9 6. Where first obserue that there vvas almost an hundred yeeres in that time “ Ieroboam Nadab Baasha Elah Zimri Tibnâ— Omri Ahab Abaziah Iehoram Iehu tenne kings from the defection of Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat who set up the calues unto Iehu now anointed to reigne over Israel Al which time the Lord was yet still their God and they his people as the Prophet here affirmeth in the Name of the Lord. Which that it may the better appeare I vvould aske of these Opposites first whether this Prophet spake trueth or falsehood vvhen now he said Thus saith the Lord God of Israell Secondly whether the Lord himself spake trueth or falsehood when he said to Iehu by the Prophet I haue anoynted thee King over the people of the Lord over Israell And thirdly vvhether Iehu was anoynted a true King in deed and not supposedly onely over Israel the people of the Lord Fourthly let us coÌ„pare herewith the like speach of the Lords concerning David vvhen he said * Chro. 6 5 6. with 2 Sam. 5 2. 2 Kin. 20 5. I haue chosen David to be a ruler over my people Israell 2 Chron. 6 5 6. And vvas not this so in trueth and in deed Finally marke that in this speach †Gen. 17 7 Esa 63 19 the vvords of the covenant are still reteyned and expressely used vvhen the Prophet saith not onely The Lord but The Lord God of Israell and againe the people of the Lord euen Israell Now if the Lord and his Prophet spake the trueth as the thing was in deed then these Opposites teach falsehood and so if the Scripture be true their vvritings and assertions are false Yea they deale farre worse then the Captaynes that vvere then vvith Iehu who how ever in a svvaggering veyne they called the Prophet ‡ 2 King 9 11. a mad fellowe afore they knevv vvhy he came to Iehu yet vvhen they knevv the man the matter they presently shevved by their deeds and words that they esteemed his message as the vvord and work of the Lord and himself as the Lords Prophet and not as a mad fellow much lesse as a false fellow that spake leasing of the Lord and of Israell or any othervvise then as the case then stood in deede and in truth 2 Kin. 9 1 13. with 1 King 19 15 16. This dealing of those Captaines vvill rise up in judgment against these men if still they goe on in despising the word of God and reviling his servants will not upon knowledge of the will of God shewed unto them yeild thereunto as these Israelites now in apostasie did in the matter aforesaid Which I note the rather because ‘ 2 Kin. 9 6. this Scripture with some other hath ben “ Adver pag. 59. shewed them heretofore and yet they cease not but set theÌ„selues purposely to oppugne us herein Now to proceed after Iehues time also the Scripture sheweth that when Hazael king of Syria had oppressed Israel al the daies of Jehoahaz the sonne of Iehu * 2 Kin. 13 22 23. the Lord was gracious unto them and had compassion on them and had respect unto them because of his covenant with Abraham Isaac and Jacob and would not destroy them neyther cast he theÌ„ froÌ„ his presence as yet where marke these things first how the Lord of his free grace holp and preserved Israel in their misery because of his covenant with Abraham and the Fathers vvherein he had promised to be not onely their God but the God also of their seed after theÌ„ Gen. 17 7. Secondly that God had not cast them from his presence as
yet And this was aboue an hundred yeres after the time of Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat as the historie sheweth So as this Scripture alone sufficiently declareth that Israell vvas yet still under the covenant of the Lord and that both in the Lords own account and in the estimation of the Prophets that recorded these things Moreover the Scripture recordeth that †2 King 14 23 25. Jeroboam the sonne of Ioash the thirteenth king from Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat that made the calues restored the coast of Israell from the entring in of Hamath unto the sea of the plaine according to the word of the Lord God of Israells which he spake by the hand of his servant Ionah the sonne of Amittai the Prophet Where againe obserue those termes the word of the Lord God of Israell vvhich he spake by his servant Ionah the Prophet Was this then the vvord of a supposed Lord God of Israel or of him that vvas in deed and in trueth the Lord God of Israel Was Ionah the servant and Prophet of an imaginarie God or of him that was indeed both in the Lords account and in his owne persvvasion the Lord God of Israell Or was it any other God then this to whom Ionah prayed in his distres when he saith he prayed to the Lord his God c. Jon. 2 1 9 Or did he pray to any other God then the onely true God that was the God of Israel by his covenant of grace made vvith the Fathers 2 Kin. 13 23. Many the like sayings might be produced out of the historie of Israell and books of the Prophets which were long to note and urge in particular there vvill be occasion to speak more hereafter about this matter Here therefore I vvill but cite some places vvhich the Reader may turne unto and obserue about the point in hand 1 King 14 7 13. 16 33. and 17 1 12 14 18 20. 2 King 5 15 17. 2 Chron. 30 6 9. Hos 4 6 8 12. and 5 4. and 12 8 9. and 13.4 5 13 16. and 14 1. Amos 7 15 17. and 9 10. Mich. 2 3 9. with 1 1. and Amos 3 1. and 8 2. Where the Prophets expressely call and with a joint consent account Israell in their defection as they did Iudah also in their apostasie to be the people of the Lord and the Lord to be their God and this also in deed and in trueth as the places themselues and the matters spoken off with the circumstances thereabout doe plainely manifest And that these termes Thy God and my People and the like so often used both touching Israell and Iudah are termes and notes of the covenant is so evident throughout the Scriptures as it is straunge that any should offer to denye it For vvhich see Gen. 17 7. Exo. 3 15 16 18. and 6 7. Lev. 2 13. Num. 10 9 10. Deut. 1 21. and 4 23 24. and 7 16. and 8 2. 26 17 18 19. and 29 10 15. 1 King 14 7 13. 2 King 20 5. with 1 Chron. 11 2. and 2 Chro. 6 5 6. and 20 7. and 36 16. Neh. 1 10. Esa 35 2 4. and 37 16 21. Jer. 2 13 17. 7 28. and 19 3. and 23 2. and 28 14. and 29 4. c. Ezech. 13 10 18. Hos 2 23. Mich. 6 3 5. Zach. 2 11. and 13 9. Joh. 20 17. Act. 3 22 25. Rom. 9 25 26. 11 1 2. 2 Cor. 6 16. Heb. 4 9. and 8 10. and 10 30. and 11 25. 1 Pet. 2 10. Rev. 4 11. and 5 10. and 7 3 10 12. and 12 10. and 18 4. and 21.3 .. 2. Otherwise the tribe of Iudah vvhich is also called the people of the Lord and God said to be their God vvhen they †2 Kin. 21 22. 22. 17. 2 Chr. 12 1 5. 21 10 11. 24 20.24 Esa 1 4 21. Ier. 1 16. 2 13. c. forsook the Lord and became Apostates and Idolaters committed other notorious sinnes besides and that in such sort ‡ Ezec. 16.2.51 23 2 11. c. as they justified Israel and became more corrupt then shee for which the Lord punished them seveerely cast them out of his land into captivitie in Babylon should not indeed and in trueth be accounted the people church of God Neither should those termes My people Thy God and the like spoken concerning them by the Prophets in such estate imply and teach us that yet notwithstanding they were then still under the covenant of God and so both by the Lord himself and by his Prophets esteemed to be his church and people Jer. 2 11 13 17 31 32. and 3 20 21. and 4 11 22. and 5 31. and 6 14 27. and 7 2. 12 28. and 8 7 19 21 22. 15 6 7. 18 15. and 23 2 13 22 27 32. and 28 14. and 29 4 8. c. Ezech. 13 10 18. with 8 9 10 11 chap. and 16 ch and 23 ch Obad. ver 12 13. Micah 1 9. and 2 3 5 7 8 9. and 3 3 5. and 6 3 5 8. 7 10 14. Zeph. 2 7. and 3 2. 3. And if we look to former times the children of Israel all the tribes of old both Iudah and Israel together in the times of the Iudges c. should not be the people and church of God if the exceptions aforesaid were of vvaight For they also then forsook the Lord and fell into defection and became great idolaters vvere for that other their sinnes often and sore punished of the Lord. As in the book of Iudges may be seen Iudg. 2 11 12 13 19. and 3 5 6 7. and 6 1 10 25 30. and 8 27. 10 6. 17 chap. 18 30 31. with 1 Sam. 7 3 4. 12 9 10. Psa 78 56 57 58 59. c. and 106 34 39 c. 1 Kin. 11 33. Besides that Ezekiel and others note the like also concerning them when they were in Egypt in the wildernes and in the land of Canaan Ezec. 20 7 8 9 10 27. c. 23 2 3 c. Amos 5 2◠26 27. with Act. 7 38 43. 4. But to insist on the tenne tribes more particularly yet further to obserue some moe things out of the Prophets and other Scriptures concerning them let us first of al remember that the Lord vvhen he brought Israell out of Egypt and gaue them his Lavv spake these vvords said I am the Lord thy God vvhich haue brought thee out of the land of Egypt Exo. 20 1 2 3 c. out of the house of bondage Thou shalt haue no other Gods before me c. This I suppose they will not deny to be spoken by the Lord to his church and people indeed and in truth Now Hoseah the Prophet in his time about two hundred yeares after Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat had set up the calues at Dan Bethell and caused Israel
to sinne speaking unto Ephraim who had novv ben so long in defection saith unto them in the Name of the Lord * Hos 13 4. Yet am I the Lord thy God from the Land of Egypt and thou shalt knovv no God but me c. Hos 13 4. vvith v. 1 2 3. Where obserue that in †Exo. 20 2 Hos 13 4. in both places the words of the covenant are used and in the same termes I am the Lord thy God c. Which shevveth plainely that they vvere now still the Lords people under his covenant and were so esteemed by the Lord himself and by his Prophets in deed and in truth 5. By the ‡ Hos 13 4 same Scripture appeareth also that they were accounted now still not onely the Lords people but euen as the same people of Israell whom the Lord brought out of Egypt notwithstanding that they lived now so many generations after and had gone through so many chaunges of their estate and were also fallen into great defection had so long continued in that apostasie vvere not yet cast out of the land of Canaan c. Which appeareth yet further by the next vvords in the same place where the Lord also sayth ‘ Hos 13 5 6. I did knovv thee in the vvildernes c. And According to their pasture speaking of the land of Canaan so vvere they filled Hos 13 6. and by divers other like speaches of the Prophets which vvere long to insist upon in particular as namely when the Prophets say “ Hos 10 9. and 9 9. they had sinned from the dayes of Gibeah which vvas ’.’' Iud. 19. c. in the time of the Iudges and * Hos 13 10 11 12. with 1 Sā 8. c. from the dayes of King Saul and had yet still ben partakers of Gods mercies †Hos 11 1 4. with 13 4 5. from the comming out of Egypt vvhence he brought them and guyded and fed them in the vvildernes yea euen †Hos 11 1 4. with 13 4 5. from the birth of Iacob ‡ Hos 12 3 4 5 9 10 11 12. c the Lords speaking vvith him at “ Gen. 3◠6-11 c. Bethell Whereabout those words of the Prophet are remarkable The Lord found Jacob in Bethell and there he spake vvith us With us saith the Prophet Hosea speaking of Israell and himself together now at that time Hos 12 4. The like testimonies may be observed also in other of the Prophets as in Amos 2 6 8 9 10 c. and 3 1 2. and 9 7. with 6 8 and 8 7. and Mich. 2 7. and 6 2 5. compared with Ier. 2 6. c. By all vvhich appeareth how the Prophets esteemed them stil to be the Lords people whom he brought out of Egypt and to be under his covenant c. 6. Moreover the land where Israell novv dwelt in Canaan was “ Hos 9 3 the Lords land like as was that of Iudah also Ioel 1 6 7. In respect whereof the land of other nations as of Assyria and the like was a polluted land whither to be driuen and there to dye was also threatned as a punishment Amos 7 17. vvhereas Israell was not yet driuen out of the Lords land and so had not yet a bill of divorement when Hoseah and Amos prophecied Hos 9 15. with ver 3. and Amos 7 and 8 chap. 7. Neither was the Lord yet departed from them nor they as yet cast of by him Hos 9 12 17. vvith 2 King 13 23. All which shevveth hovv they were still the Lords people and under the Lords covenant made with Abraham Isaac and Iacob as is expressely mentioned 2 King 13 23. how greatly therefore they erre vvho doe not in this behalf make other or better account of Israell in their defection then of the heathen nations c. Of which more hereafter 8. To the same purpose may be noted how the Lord blameth Israell for not observing * Amos 8 2 5 c. the New moones and Sabbaths as they should Which were ordinances of the church of God for vvhich the heathen nations are never blamed Which also were part of the partition vvall then standing betvveen the Iewes Gentiles and plainly sheweth how the Lord still accounted them for his church and people although they had now fallen into great backsliding from him 9. The like may be noted in that the Prophets rebuke Israell aswell as Iudah for making covenants with the Assyrians and Egyptians relying on them and seeking help at their hands not of the Lord in their distresse Ezech. 23 2 5 6. with ver 11.12 13. Also Hos 5 13. and 7 11. with Esa 30 1 7. and 31 1 8. Ier. 2 36. c. and with Deut. 7 1 2. c. 10. Also in that they reckon it among the sinnes of Israell that †Hos 5.7 and 7 8. they begate straunge children being mixed in mariage with the people of other natiōs Like as it is reckoned among the sinnes of the Israelites generally Judg. 3 5 6. with Psal 106 34 35. and of Iudah also particularly and is noted as a breach of the covenant among them Mal. 2 11. Ezra 9 and 10 cha Neh. 13.1 2 3.4 23 c. Which could not so haue ben to Israell as it was to Iudah had they not ben now still the people of God and under his covenant as Iudah vvas notwithstanding this and their other manifold iniquities so much and sharpely reproved by the Prophets Or doth God ever blame the nations or any persons that were not his people and under his covenant for mixing themselues in mariages covenants with other people for begetting strange children for seeking help at their hands c. So as these things also shevv Israell still to be the people and church of God to whom these lawes vvere giuen and of vvhom was required obedience thereunto for not marying and covenanting in such sort with the heathen of other nations together with the rest of the lawes of God Exod. 34 15 16. Deut. 7 1 6 c. with 1 King 11 1 2. and Hos 5 7. and 7 8. 11. And generally that * Hos 8.12 the Lord wrote unto them the great things of his law Which he shewed not to other nations as he did to Israell to whom he gaue his statutes and judgments Psal 103 7. and 147 19 20. with Deu. 4 5 8. 12. Also that †Amo. 2 6 7. the Name of God is said to be profaned by Israel aswel as by Iudah whō these men themselues I think wil not deny to be the church and people of God remayning then still under his covenant c. Amos 2 6 7. compared with Esa 52 5. and 63 19. Ezech. 36 20 23. 13. ‡ Hos 13 12 13. Yea Ephraim is acknowledged for “ a sonne though an unwise sonne being novv in defection And Israell is
being desirous that the trueth and vvill of God herein may vvhat in us is be found out and observed I am not unvvilling to note downe some fevv things that I haue observed from the word of God hereabout leaving them to be examined by the Scriptures and both other things also to be annexed and these things withall to be further or otherwise observed as shal be found to be most according to God and godlynes And these they are viz. That no churches of God are to be left though having or falling into errors and corruptions 1. If their constitution be such as the Churches and Pastors thereof stand as touching their ecclesiasticall estate immediately under Iesus Christ as did each of the churches of Asia with the Angels thereof and all the other Primitiue Churches planted by the Apostles c. Rev. 2 1 7 12 18. and 3 1 7 14. Act. 14 23. and 20 17 28. with the churches at Rom. Cor. Gal. Eph. Phi. Col. Thes c. 2. If they also haue and reteyne povver vvithin themselues to redresse any errour or corruption and to receiue any truth of God as it shal be revealed unto them and they perswaded thereof by the vvord of God As may be seen also in the Churches aforesaid 3. And if the Ministers and other members of the church be not urged in their owne persons to any thing wherein they should sinne and transgresse the lavv of God but be left free for themselues and their owne practise to keep the lavves and ordinances of God according to their places and occasions As may be seen in the church of the Iewes wherein vvere corruptions sundry times and of sundry sorts vvhere yet the Prophets and other godly persons in divers ages and Christ himself his disciples thus lived among theÌ„ See 1 Kin. 14 21-24 and 15 1 2 3. c. with 2 Chron. 12. 13. and 14 ch c. For vvhich see the historie and estate of the Iewes in the time of the Judges and of Rehoboam Abiiah c. Also Esa 1 1. c. Ier. 1 1 2 3. c. Ezech. 1 and 2 and 3 and 16. and 20 ch c. Dan. 1 1 8. and 9 23. Mic. 1 1 11. c. Zeph. 1 1 c. Hag. 1 1 c. Zach. 1 1. c. Mal. 1 1. c. with the historie in Ezra and Nehemiah And Matt. 3 ch and 4 23. and 23 ch and 26 17 20. Luke 1 5 6 8 9 10 21. and 2 21 22 23 24. and 4 16 20. and 21 37 38. Joh. 2 13 23. and 6 4. and 11 55. and 13 1. Act. 13 14 14. and 17 1 2 3. 4. Lastly if they doe not obstinately refuse the truth way God wheÌ„ it is manifested unto them perversely withstanding it themselues speaking evil thereof before others reviling persecuting such as teach or receiue it c. As may be seen in the said Church and Synagogues of the Ievves vvhich were not left untill they came to this untoward and perverse estate and condition For which see the historie of the Euangelists and Acts of the Apostles particularly Act. 2 40. and 7 51 52. and 13 14 45 51. and 18 6. and 19 8 9. and 28 23 28. 1 Tim. 6 3 4 5. and 2 Tim. 3 1 5 11. c. But if any churches fall into apostasie and become so degenerate as they their Pastors come to stand under an Antichristian hierarchie or popular anarchie and reteyne not power vvithin themselues according to the word of God to receiue any trueth shewed unto them and to redresse any error or corruption arising among them but that the ministers and members are urged in their ovvn persons to such actions and duties as they cannot performe without sinne neyther can be suffred to keepe vvhatsoever Christ hath commaunded them but must hold such a faith performe such a worship obserue such an order as is prescribed or allowed by Princes Prelates people c. that now any vvho knowe the trueth and discern the corruptions of such churches should still remaine Ministers or members thereof in such estate and so liue and dye I wish that such as are thus mynded or inclining this vvay vvould plainely set downe their opinions and reasons from the Word of God concerning this matter Or if they like not of this maner of propounding of it as here I haue done that themselues vvould distinctly set down their owne opinions hereabout alvvaies keeping to the points in controversy and insisting upon the things called in question omitting to speak of such things whether touching faith worship or order as are agreed upon on all hands And thus much for the present touching the Objection aforesaid novv I proceed to the next and last concerning these matters OBIECTâ—ON VII But †The Anabapt The Charact of the bapt p. 48. M. Ains Animad p 98-76 98. c. the Church of Rome whereunto many things are applyed that are taken from Israell is not the Church of God nor under the covenant of God nor hath any of the Lords posts or ordinances left in it but is divorced from the Lord c. Neyther is the church of England the Church of God having his covenant but is likewise divorced from the Lord c. Therefore also the baptisme had in those Churches and the like is not true baptisme but an idoll Iustif p. 121 278. 461. others a fiction a lying and deceitfull signe a cursed and detestable sacrament c. ANSWER This objection is of much like sort with those which we had before touching Israell and the circumcision thereof Whereunto therefore like ansvver may be giuen in sundry respects so as the former answers and reasons many of them may hither likewise be referred Neyther the things onely that are spoken of Israel but those also vvhich concerne Iudah in her apostasie and defection whereunto the estate of the Christian apostate church may fitly haue reference in divers respects Which would be long to rehearse and insist upon in particular The indifferent Reader vvill carefully obserue it And the point it self is plaine ynough and undenyable by the reference vvhich the Scripture in sundry things maketh thereunto 2 Thes 2 4. 2 Pet. 2 1. Rev. 11 1 6. and 12 5 6 14. and 13 5 6. and 14 1 15. and 16 12 16. and 19 1. c. Yet considering the objection here made together with the continuall urging thereof and how piteously the Anabaptists and others are by this meanes overcaried with prejudice and drawen from the vvay of trueth to great error and iniquitie I haue thought it not amisse to note also somevvhat hereabout And first to speak of the church of Rome in particular I pray all to take knowledge that my mynd and desire in my self is and I trust shal be alway to plead against the present estate of that church and not for it acknovvledging it to be fallen into most sinful and deep defection and
cast out the Court vvhich is without the temple not measure it for it is giuen to the Gentiles Hence doeth M. Sm. gather that the Israelites which were woont to worship in the courts of the Lord did signifie the Gentiles that is the Antichristians and consequently the court must betoken Antichrists church and the vvorship Antichrists worship Thus one darke Scripture is alledged to overthrow the cleare doctrine that shineth throughout all the Prophets Yet euen this place it self mought haue taught him better For first the commandement †Rev. 11 1. to measure the Temple Altar and worshippers signified the restoring or repayring of Gods church and people after some destruction and desolation as the like visions shewed “ Ezec. 40 3 5. Zach. 2 1 2. to Ezekiell and Zacharie after the destruction of Salomons temple doe manifest Secondly whenas the Court and holy City was not measured here by Iohn as before by ‡ Ezec. 40 47. 48 30. Zach. 2 2. the other Prophets they were and as afterward †Rev. 21 15. Iohn did see it may teach us that as yet there was not a full restauration of Gods church and worship from the defection of Antichrist Thirdly in that the court is here said to be †Rev. 11 2 giuen to the Gentiles and the holy city should be troden under foot of them and a time limited how long two and fourty moneths this argueth that the court was not made nor the city builded for them but by Gods permission for â—â—e chastisement of men was giuen unto them for a season during vvhich time his two witnesses should prophecy against them And thus it is said of the figure the first temple city “ Ier. 12 7 I haue giuen the dearly beloved of my soule into the hands of her enemies So all Iudah “ Jer. 20 4 was giuen into the hand of the king of Babell and ‡ Esa 63 18. Esaias complaineth how the adversaries had troden downe Gods sanctuarie as here “ Rev. 11 2. they tread downe the holy city And if the court of the Temple must needs signifie Antichrists court because it was giuen to the Gentiles then must the holy city by which name ‡ Neh. 11 1. Esa 48.2 and 52 1. Matt. 4 5. Ierusalem is often called signifie also Antichrists city church because it was troden downe of the same Gentiles but all the Prophets shew †Psal 51 18. 87. and 122. Esa 60. Rev. 21. that it signified the Church of God M. Ainsw defence of Script p. 12 15. Hitherto are M. Ainsworths vvords when he wrote for the trueth against M. Smith vvhom he sharpely blameth for teaching that the Court without the Temple did signify Antichrists Court or assemblies and for that he vvould make the Lords Courts to signifie the Synagouue of Sathan and place where Sathan dwelleth c. whereas novv himself writing another treatise synce against the trueth taketh up M. Sm. termes and manner of exposition to teach that the Temple of God spoken off by the Apostle 2 Thes 2 4. is ‘ Animad p. 78 c. Antichrists Church †Note this vvell Antichrists Temple Antichrists body an idoll like Antichrist himself the Synagogue of Sathan such as is no more the Temple of God * Ibid. pa. 94 c. then the divel which appeared to the witch at Endor was Samuel such as the type thereof should be set not from the Temple of God at Ierusalem but from Bels Temple in Babylon or the Samaritanes Temple builded by Sanballat c. Would any think that this were M. Ainsw his writing or opinion that had written so earnestly and with so sharp reproofs against M. Smith before if he had not set his ovvne name thereunto Or may it not be thought if M. Sm. were aliue and savv this latter treatise of M. Ainsw that he would now turne his ovvne speaches and reproofs upon himself where he saith that his eye fight fayled him and his heart was blynded that he abused the Scripture to great impiety that Sathan deceived him that the place it self mought haue taught him better c. But of this more hereafter Now for the present it shall suffice touching the point in hand to obserue hovv by M. Ainsw his ovvne graunt the Church of God is signifyed both by the court of the Temple though unmeasured and giuen to the Gentiles and by the holy city though troden dovvn also of the same Gentiles Rev. 11 2. And this moreover to agree with the doctrine of al the Prophets Novv vve know that the Prophets and Apostles are not caryed about vvith everie vvynde They are not as reeds shaken hither and thither but their doctrine is firme and abideth the same for ever So as if this vvas the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles when M. A. vvrote against M. Sm. as here himself saith then there is no question but it is so still And so let it still remaine For the further declaration whereof better exposition of this Scripture let us also compare herevvith that which is written in the Prophet Esay vvhere the Lord saith I haue nourished and brought up children and they haue rebelled against me The oxe knovveth his ovvner and the asse his masters cribibut Israell doeth not knovv my people doth not consider Ah sinfull nation a people laden vvith iniquity a seed of evil doers children that are corrupters they haue forsaken the Lord they haue provoked the Holy one of Israell to anger they are gone avvay backvvard c. Heare the vvord of the Lord ye rulers of Sodome giue eare unto the Lavv of our God ye people of Gomorrah To vvhat purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me saith the Lord When ye come †Heb. to be seen to appeare before me vvho hath required this at your hand to tread my Courts Hovv is the faithfull city become an harlot c. Where obserue first vvhat a fit reference there is betvveen the perfidious Ievves here called the rulers of Sodome and people of Gomorrah and betvveen the insolent Christians called in the Revelation the Gentiles Secondly how the very like phrase of treading the Courts of God is used by the Prophet as is in the other place by the Apostle of treading the holy city Rev. 11 2. and may here signify besides a treading downe or under foot a frequent and continuall conversing in the outward and visible Church of God with their bodies though their hearts vvere far removed from God and they served not the Lord syncerely according to his word Esa 1 12 15. vvith 29 13 14. Thirdly that the Princes and people of Iudah thus transgressing the faithful city of Ierusalem becomming an harlot yet they are still the people of God and the Lord is their God and the Courts and city are the Lords Other things that might here be observed I omit And for the terme of the Gentiles
that shal dominere in the church Ibid. chap. 2 p. 642. And the like he hath often othervvhere M. Robbinson also saith The constitution euen of Rome as now it stands is not simply false but onely in this and that respect Iustif of Separat pag. 88. And many moe I might alledge of all sorts of Writers and Witnesses but these may suffice Yea it is ynough alone that Gods Word doth so teach and confirme it as before is manifested The Conclusion HItherto of these things concerning the Church of Rome Whereabout I haue vvritten the more largely to help forvvard what in me is the better searching out and more clearing of the truth both against Poperie on the one hand and Anabaptistrie on the other For with the Papists there is nothing more common in pleading for the estate of that church then thus to reason and aske Seeing it is granted that the church of Rome was the church of God in the Apostles times when vvas it since that she ceased so to be In which of the Centuries after Christ In what Popes dayes c. Whereunto some answer about 300 yeres after Christ vvhen at the Nicene Councell the primacie of that Sea vvas so and so acknovvledged some think sooner straight after the Apostles dayes some later about four hundred yeeres after Christ others about fiue some about six hundred after Christ c. Hereupon the Papists insult and both harden themselues and trouble others very much hereabout On the other hand the Anabaptists taking it for graunted that the church of Rome is not the church of God they cast avvay the baptisme there received and professe to begin all anevv and therefore are againe baptized anevv and so proceed on in their course as best liketh themselues being therein more hardened by others vvho also say that the Church of Rome is not the church of God neither their baptisme true baptisme but an Idoll and lying signe a cursed and detestable Sacrament c. Thus errors and evils increase on all hands whereas the way both soundly to ansvver the Papists and rightly to prevent the Anabaptists errors and evil courses is to ansvver that the church of Rome is yet stil the church of God but in apostasie the temple of God but wherein the Man of sinne sitteth c. And therefore as it is the church Temple of God to acknowledge it to reteyn the baptisme and vvhatsoever ordinance or truth of God they haue yet among them but as it hath the man of sinne set therein as it is in apostasie from the faith vvorship order and government wherein at first it vvas set as may sufficiently appeare by comparing their present estate with the Epistles vvritten by the Apostle to the Romanes and the other Primitiue Churches c so to leaue and vvitnesse against all the apostasie iniquitie mixtures and corruptions thereof and to returne to the auncient and good vvay vvherein the Church of Rome with the other Churches aforesaid were first planted by the Apostles Of vvhich point I shall God willing by other occasion speak more hereafter In the meane time as I noted before remember stil to distinguish betvveen the Temple of God and the man of sinne set therein between the church it self and the apostasie thereof like as betvveene the Temple at Ierusalem and the idols of abomination that were set therein betvveen the church of Israell and the defection thereof Which did not hinder but that yet still it vvas the Temple and church of God though corrupted and defiled so as none could lawfully in that estate eyther minister there or bring their sacrifices thither but the godly chose rather that Ierusalem should be filled vvith their innocent blood then that they vvould sinne and defile themselues vvith the worship and abomination there used and urged upon them 2 King 21 1 16. and 24 4. Remember also still to apply unto Antichrist what the Scripture hath otherwhere of the Beast of the Gentiles of Sodome Egypt Babylon c. And refer what it hath of the temple of God of the court of the temple of the holy City and the like to the church of God either more syncere or more corrupt in defection or othervvise Consider withall if whereas the termes of a true or false Church are commonly used and many times not rightly understood or applied it would not be good and profitable for discerning of the different estate of Churches aright to use the termes of syncere Esai 1 21. or corrupt pure or impure intire or apostate faithfull or adulterate c. And these also vvith degrees as some more syncere and some lesse some more corrupt and some lesse c. Which being vvell observed vvould giue great light for understanding and observing things aright both for judgement and practise to eschevv the errors and evils into vvhich so many fall some on the right hand and some on the left Finally the due observation of these things vvil shew us both vvhy and how to leaue the present estate and apostasie of the church of Rome to returne to the auncient estate and integrity thereof reteyning vvhatsoever they haue that is the Lords according to his vvord and renouncing vvhatsoever mixtures or corruptions they haue brought in of their own vvhether concerning the faith or the order of the church This also I trust may be a meanes by the blessing of God to stirre up both Papists Anabaptists and others that are any vvay so inclined more carefully to consider their vvaies and estate in their heart and speedily to turne their feet into the vvay and testimonies of the Lord. Psal 119 59 60. Which grace the Lord in mercy vouchsafe unto them And thus much touching the church of Rome and the matters aforesaid perteyning thereunto Touching the Church of England NOvv whereas our opposites hold also that the church of England is not the church of God nor hath the covenant of God and the Baptisme there received is not true baptisme but an idol lying signe c. their opinions are here again in many respects far more erroneous and ungodly then before For hovv ever some heretofore not regarding aright the faith there professed and lothing the corruptions there reteyned haue misconceived some things concerning them and their estate Yet now that there hath ben longer time and more occasion further to consider thereof seeing also into vvhat extremities divers of our countreymen that are become Anabaptists haue by this meanes the more run themselues and specially considering the doctrine of faith which they professe in Christ alone unto salvation it should teach al more advisedly and heedfully to regard their estate in this behalf to acknowledge them to be the people and churches of God having the covenant baptisme of the Lord c. To insist further upon particular reasons hereabout I need not divers haue ben noted †Pag. 30 c. 58 c. and 121. c. here before where vve
shevv them their sinnes and aberrations to teach them the truth vvay of Iesus Christ in all things more and more c. But of these things now I treat not Onely I thought here to note these heads in generall which may giue occasion to others and my self to consider more thereabout although that of some of them I shall hereafter speak somewhat more particularly in the Treatise following concerning the Reformed Churches And thus much here of the Church of England by this occasion This suit we intreat such as take knowledge hereof and haue accesse to his Majestie their Honours to motion for us and to further what in them is Prov. 24 10 11 12. 31 8 9. Ier. 38 7 13. 30 15 18. Mat. 25 31. c. Novv to conclude with suit to his Majestie the honourable LL. my humble suit is as heretofore it hath ben to the Kings most Excellent Majestie that it vvould please him now after our long exile and other manifold afflictions to vouchsafe us that gracious sufferance that we may be permitted to liue in peace under his Majesties government in our ovvne natiue countrey there to obserue all the ordinances of Christ giuen to his Church vvithout being urged to the use or approbation of any remnants of the apostasie of Antichrist or other humane traditions whatsoever vve carying our selues in all loyaltie peace and godlines as becometh all faithfull subjects in the Lord. Whom vve dayly pray to stablish his Highnes throne in peace vvith much blessing as he did to the good kings of Iudah vvho rejecting the inventions and commixtures of Man in the faith and vvorship of God vvere careful to admit of no religion nor any other thing in religion but that onely vvhich was warranted by the word of God that so his Majestie may alvvay find as they did and as Salomon that vvise king observed and hath left recorded that †Prov. 20 28. mercy and truth preserue the king and that his throne is upholden with mercy and †Prov. 29 14. A king that faithfully judgeth the poor his throne shal be established for ever Which mercie the Lord God who is King of Kings vouchsafe unto his Majestie and his Royall seed with all increase of glory peace and happines in this life and for ever Amen Ier. 6 16. Thus saith the Lord Stand ye in the waies and see and aske for the old paths where is the good vvay and walk therein and ye shall find rest for your soules Sal. Song 1 7 8. The church speaketh and asketh of Christ Tell me O thou whom my soule loveth where thou feedest where thou makest thy flock to rest at noone for why should I be †Or as one that is vayled as one that turneth aside by the flocks of thy companions Christ answereth If thou knowest not O thou fairest among women goe thy way forth by the footsteps of the flock and feed thy kiddes beside the Shepheards tents Rom. 15.4 Whatsoever things were written aforetime they were afore-written for our learning that we through pacience and comfort of the Scriptures might haue hope THE SECOND TREATISE Of some things concerning them that are called Remonstrants Hitherto of these opinions of the Anabaptists and the assertions of others withall thereabout Now I come to some other points which concerne not onely the Anabaptists but such other Christians also as are called Remonstrants or Arminians CHAPTER I. Touching Gods decree of Election WHether God hath not in Christ before the foundation of the world according to the good pleasure of his wil foreordeyned some to eternall life to be accomplished through Christ the Mediatour to the praise of the glorie of his grace Ephes 1 3 14. Act. 13 48. Matth. 25 34. 2 Tim. 1 9. 1 Pet. 1 2 5 19 20. Revel 13 8. and 21 27. 1 Thes 5 9. Amos 9 9 11 12. Mal. 1 2. compared with Rom. 8 28 29 30. and 9 11 12 13 23. Where for the speciall point now in controversie let us consider whether the originall fountaine and onely cause moving God in himself hereunto be not the good pleasure of his will not the vvill of man neyther our faith or vvorks foreseen nor any other thing from without God himself vvhatsoever 1. Because the Scripture thus teacheth in these places and the like Ephes 1 5 9 11. Exod. 33 19. vvith Rom. 9 11 15 16 21 23. Matt. 11 26. 20 15. Jam. 1 18. 2 Tim. 1 9. Luk. 12 32. compared with 1 Sam. 12 22. Rom. 11 1 2 5 6 33 34 35 36. 2. And otherwise Gods election should rely and be grounded partly on man and not onely on God himself that he may be all in all And so Gods decree of election frō everlasting should not be onely of his owne free grace but partly of our selues or by reason of our faith works or vvorthynes foreseen Contrarie to the Scriptures aforesaid 3. Then also part of the glorie of our salvation should be ascribed to man not the whole to God alone Neyther should we haue such cause of being humbled in our selues and of renouncing all confidence in any vvorthynes of our ovvne that so vve may in deed giue all glorie to God as novv vve haue Ephes 1 3 6. Rom. 9 11 16 23 36. 1 Cor. 3 26 31. 4 7. with Ier. 9 23 24. Joh. 16 14. 4. Othervvise also our election should not be altogether certaine and unchangeable as novv it is inasmuch as it is grounded onely upon God vvith vvhom is no chaunge or shadow of turning and not upon man vvho is subject to chaunge and alteration Rom. 9 11. and 11 2 5 29. with Hos 13 14. Ioh. 10 16 29. 1 Pet. 1 2 5. 2 Tim. 1 12. and 2 19. Rom. 8 29 30 33 38 39. Mal. 3 6. Iam. 1 17. Numb 23 19. 1 Sam. 15 29. Psal 102 13 14 27 28. Exod. 3 14. Esa 46 10. Which is the more to be observed because they themselues also write that the Saincts and faithfull may fall avvay wholy from the grace of God and perish for ever So as their owne opinions being layd together they seem to deale in this matter much like as the Anabaptists doe in the other aforesaid Who vvhen the Lord himself hath giuen us a sure ground for the ministration of Baptisme to the faithfull and their children to wit Gods gracious covenant and commandement they to exclude children from the participation thereof vvould bring us to an uncertain ground of Mans profession of faith and repentance Hos 6 4. Matth. 13 20. Act. 8 13 23. 2 Tim. 4 10. For although there may be good use made of such profession about other questions touching Baptisme and the ministration therof yet vvhen we inquire of the right and sure ground hereof we must carefully keep unto that which God hath laid himself for the administring of his ovvne signe and seale of his covenant of grace and not admit
heard him that spake unto me c. Eze. 2.1.2 vvith chap. 1 28. and 3 23 24. The like againe may be observed in the Lords dealing with Daniel and so is noted by himself Dan. 10.8 19. And in Christs dealing with Lazarus vvhen he raised him up from death Ioh. 11.43.44 vvith ver 40 41 42. And as touching the preaching and ministerie of the word vvhereabout the objection is much urged we read in the Acts of the Apostles hovv vvhen Luke had noted that Lydia being together vvith other vvomen assembled heard the Apostle speak unto them he presently annexeth that the Lord opened her heart that she attended to the things spoken by Paul And so she became a Christian and was baptised and her houshold Act. 16 14 15. Which likewise shevveth that instruction and exhortation is a meanes vvhich it pleaseth God to use and yet that the fruit thereof dependeth upon the Lords ovvne gracious and powerfull vvorking in us thereby as he pleaseth Whereupon it was that the vvord spoken by the Apostle vvas more fruitfull in Lydia then in the other persons that were there also met together to vvhom Paul spake asvvell as unto her Act. 16.13.14 Without vvhich vvork and blessing of the Lord no increase followeth whatsoever meanes be used as vvas shewed here before Whereunto may be referred that the Apostle saith I haue planted Apollo vvatered but God gaue the increase 1 Cor. 3 6. It is God saith the Apostle that giveth the increase He saith not I haue planted Apollo vvatered but it is of men themselues vvhen the grace is offered to receiue or to refuse it and so to haue some increase or none at all as pleaseth themselues The Apostles teach not so but their doctrine leadeth us to acknovvledge the meanes used by God and yet thereupon neyther to debase the vvork of God nor to advance the vvill or povver of man vvho is dead in sinne and alienated in mynd 〈…〉 the flesh and of the mynd till vve be quickned converted and renevved by the Lord. Ans 3. Besides God may vvell so speak unto man as he made him at first in holynes and righteousnes having free vvill and abilitie unto that vvhich vvas good and holy Whereof novv being deprived by his ovvne voluntarie fall and transgression the blame therefore lyeth upon our selues that vve are not able to performe the commandements exhortations giuen unto us unlesse it please God to renevv us and to vvork in us both to vvill and to doe of his good pleasure Gen. 1 26. and 3.1 7. and 5.3 Eccl. 7.29 vvith Ephes 4.20 24. Phil 2.13 Ans 4. Othervvise in this our corrupt estate vve find that the Lavv vvorketh vvrath and increaseth sinne and maketh it more appear vve being in our selues miserably corrupted since the fall and more and more hardned in evill vvithout the grace of God and povverfull vvorking of his spirit in us as is aforesaid Rom. 4.14.15 and 7.8.9 c. Ans 5. And thus also may be observed hovv the commandements and exhortations spoken off shevv our dutie rather then our abilitie As the Lavv shevveth us vvhat vve ought to doe not vvhat vve are able to doe Whereof vve may likewise make good use to know our own weaknes and sinfulnes the more that so being humbled in our selues we may pray unto God for his grace and mercie that he would work in us his owne good vvork with power to the praise and glorie of his name in Iesus Christ Which is another good use of the commandements and exhortations giuen unto us 10. Finally the contrarie doctrine derogateth greatly from the glorie of God and giveth unto man part of the glorie of our conversion and salvation For look how much we ascribe to the will and power of man so much in very deed vve take from the grace and work of God And if it be in our selues and in the power of our own vvill to turne unto God to exempt our selues from others that doe it not then should we haue so far forth whereof to glorie But most sure it is that we haue not where of to glorie vvith God herein vvho vvill haue the full and vvhole glorie to himself of our conversion and salvation in Christ Therefore in this respect also the contrarie doctrine is erroneous not according to the truth of the gospell 1 Cor. 1 26 31. and 4 7. Ephes 2 8 9. 2 Thes 1 11 12. compared vvith Joh. 7 18. and 16 13 14. Herewith also agree some sayings of the auncient Writers As vvhen Augustine saith Free will to loue God vve haue lost by the greatnes of the first sinne August tom 2. epist 107. ad Vitalem And againe Man using free vvill yll lost both it and himself Ibid. tom 3. Enchiridio ad Laurentium cap. 30. Petrus Diaconus and others What could or can be borne of a servant but a servant For Adam when he was free begate not children but after he vvas made the servant of sinne Therefore as everie one is of him so also everie man is the servant of sinne through him Petr. Diac. c. de incarnatione gratia Christi seu de gratia libero arbitrio cap. 6. And Fulgentius Hold firmely and doubt not at all that no man can come to repentance but whom God inlighteneth and converteth of his gracious mercy compassion Fulgent or August lib. de fide ad Petrum Diaconum cap. 31. And thus much concerning free vvill or power in our selues unto good since the Fall CHAPTER V. Touching the perseverance of the Saints that are truely godly and syncerely beleeue in Jesus Christ VVHether the Saints of God such as faithfully beleeue being made partakers of the spirit of adoption ingrafted into Iesus Christ by true and living faith are not by the grace povver of God in Christ so guided susteyned and preserved as they shall not and in respect of God can not wholly and for ever fall avvay from the Lord utterly be rejected by him and loose that his quickning spirit and saving faith in Iesus Christ Although they be subject still in this life through infirmitie of the flesh in themselues to fall into sinne sometimes also into great and grievous sinnes As may be seen in Noah David Peter c. 2 Cor. 1 19 22. Ephes 1 13 14. and 3 16 20. and 5 23. Rom. 8 15 23. 1 Joh. 5 1 13 1 Cor. 1 4 9. Esa 54 8 9 10. and 55 3. with Act. 13 34. Ier. 31 31 37. and 32.40 Amos 9 9. Habak 2 2 3 4. vvith Rom. 1 16 17. and Heb. 11 ch with 10 38 39. and 13 20 21. Mat. 24 24 31. Ioh. 4 14. and 5 24. and 6 35 37 39 40 54-55 and 10 27.28 29. and 17 24. Rom 8 28 39. and 11 29. Phil. 1 6. Heb. 6 17 20. cōpared with Gen. 9 8 16.21 2 Sam. 11 3 4. Mat. 26. 69 75. 1 Cor. 10 13. 2 Tim. 1 12. 1 Pet. 1 3 4
of God wholly and onely on the good pleasure of his vvill but upon the faith holines unbelief or wickednes of men foreseen In the third by extending the redemption of Christ further then the intendement of God yea euen to the reprobate them selues In the fourth by ascribing our conversion and salvation in part to our selues our owne free vvill not vvholly and onely to the free gift of God and povverfull vvork of his grace in us In the first and last by debasing in deed the unchangeable decree and firme promises of God the mightie power and faithfull custodie of Christ our Lord the comfortable presence assured pledge and gracious vvork of the holy Ghost in his Saints and faithfull people Therefore such doctrines and opinions of theirs are erroneous and greatly disagreeing from the truth vvhich is according to godlines Let him that readeth consider And the Lord giue us aright to understand his vvord humbly to obey his vvill and faithfully to hold his truth unto the end Amen Now unto him that is able to keep us from falling and to present us faultlesse before the presence of his glorie with exceeding joy to the onely wise God our Saviour be glorie and majestie dominion and power now and ever Amen Jude v. 24.25 THE THIRD TREATISE Of some things which concerne the worship of God and order of the Church especially concerning the Reformed Churches HAving now briefly treated of these points of Religion which are called in question betvveen the Remonstrants and others of the Reformed Churches I will here also annexe some other things concerning the Reformed Churches themselues Which I acknowledge to be the Churches of Christ and with whom I agree both in the faith of Christ and in many things concerning the order and government of the church Yet because there are some particulars of vvaight touching the vvorship of God and policie of the Church wherein I think they are not as yet come to the synceritie of the Primitiue Churches constitution and am persvvaded that the Lord is now bringing his churches and people thereunto from the apostasie and corruptions of Antichrist the man of sinne and that he vvill in time accomplish this his work already begun vvhether before or together with the conversion of the Iewes to the Christian faith the Lord knovveth and time vvill manifest therefore haue I thought it good herevvithal to note some few things thereabout The particulars are not all of them of like waight or evidence in mine ovvne perswasion but some of them such as far more may be said and borne vvith about them then about others of them Neyther doe all of them concerne al the Reformed churches alike but some of them more and some lesse inasmuch as their estate in divers Churches and places doth diversly differ hereabout Yet notvvithstanding I thought it not amisse thus to propound thē here together desiring of al that they would seriously consider these things in the fear of God and according to his word hoping that the due consideration thereof wil through the blessing of God become profitable for the furtherance of the truth and further building up of the church to the praise of his name in Iesus Christ CHAPTER I. Touching Book prayer VVHether it be the Lords ordinance that his churches servants should vvhen they pray read their prayers out of a book euen certaine set vvords imposed by men and so use a forme and manner of prayer and leitourgie devised and prescribed by man for their spirituall sacrifice of prayer and vvorship of God And consequently vvhether it be lavvfull for us in such maner to vvorship the Lord. Exod. 20 4 5 6. and 30 9. compared with Psal 141 2. Esa 29 13. vvith Mat. 15 9. Lev. 10 1 Mal. 1.8 14. Rom. 8 26. Ephes 4 8 12. 1 Pet. 2 5. Rev. 8 3 c. I. Seeing that the book-prayer aforesaid being not appointed by the Lord or approved in his word is an invention of Man in the vvorship of God And mens inventions in Gods vvorship are transgressions of the second commandement Exod. 20 4 5. vvith Lev. 10 1. Judg. 8 27. Psa 119 113 128. Esa 29 13. and 30 21 22 II. Thus also it is as an image similitude of spiritual prayer which yet it is not And so these books and stinted prayers prescribed by man in the vvorship of God come in deed to be idols supplying the place of the vvord and spirit of God vvhich ought not to be In vvhich respect such manner of worship becommeth idolatrous superstitious forbidden of the Lord and not to be communicated vvithall For vvhat agreement hath the temple of God vvith Idols 2 Cor. 6.16 Exod. 20 4 5 6. compared vvith Rom. 8 26. Ephes 6 18. 1 Pet. 2 5. and vvith the other Scriptures aforesaid and the like III. The incense offred by the Priests upon the golden Altar in the time of the Lavv vvas a type of prayer offred up unto God by the mediation of Christ Psal 141 2. Rev. 8 3 4. And therefore as it vvas not lavvfull to use any straunge incense but that onely vvhich God appointed so neither is it lavvful to use any straunge manner of prayer but such onely as the Lord requireth Exod. 30 9. vvith Psal 141 2. Now that the Lord did ever ordeyne in his vvorship the book-prayer aforesaid vvho can shevv Yea or that any of the godly either the Patriarks Prophets Apostles or other men or vvomen recorded in the Scriptures when they vvould pray unto God did ever take a book in their hands to read out of it some stinted prayers prescribed by men for their sacrifice of prayer and supplication to God Or can vve think if this vvere the manner of prayer and worship vvhich God required that the Scripture would be silent in it or that none of the servants of God set before us for examples in the Scriptures should ever use it or that vve should prescribe or use such manner of prayer in the worship of God as never any of the godly mētioned in the Scripture did use If then in the time of the Legall shadovves under Moses God vvould not admit of any straunge thing in his worship but did severely punish it as may be seen in the example of Nadab and Abihu Levit. 10 1. hovv shall vve thinke that he vvill novv admit of any straunge manner of prayer for his worship in the time of the Gospel under Christ whenas Christ the sonne is vvorthy of more honour then Moses the servant Heb. 3 3 5 6. IIII. It derogateth from the honour fruit and benefit of the ascension of Christ vvho ascending up on high hath giuen gifts unto men for the worke of the ministerie and therefore as vvell for prayer as for doctrine and preaching c. Eph. 4 8 12. vvith Act. 6 4. If any be not indued vvith such gifts there is no vvarrant to chuse them to be ministers of Christ If they be so
office and function nor the same or like equall authoritie in the church of Israel and in the administration of the holy things of God Num. 16 8 9 10 40. and 18 1 2 3. vvith 3 4 chap. 2 Chron. 29 16 34. II. Secondly the Offices of the Pastors and Teachers are themselues divers functions giuen to the church by Christ the Lord and accordingly had in the Primitiue churches Eph. 4 11. 1 Cor. 12 5 8. with Rom. 12 7 8. Object But the Apostle in Ephes 4 11. seemeth rather to joyne them together as one by the conjunction copulatiue KAI And then to distinguish them as being severall the one from the other Answ This conjunction also is sometimes used for a discretiue in divisions and in the shutting up of distributions As the same Apostle useth it otherwhere Gal. 3 8. when he saith There is neither Jew nor Greek there is neither boâ—d nor free there is neither male nor female c. vvhere vvord for word it is neither male and female But and is used here distributiuely and so is understood and translated neither male nor female according to the distributions used before in the same sentence And thus in the place to the Ephesians the Syriack translation vvhich is most auncient useth a distributiue particle distinguishing asvvell between Pastors and Teachers as between Apostles Prophets and Euangelists Ephe. 4 11 in Syriâ—â— translat Not to speak of the Hebrew conjunction VAU And which the Scripture also ofteÌ„ useth for a discretiue as in Exo. 21 15 17. Deu. 17 9 12. Besides that the like maner of speach is used in Gen. 1.14 and Hos 3 4. c. III. Thirdly the holy Ghost bestowing the gifts of God and dividing them to every man severally as he vvill distributeth divers distinct gifts unto men for the performance of the dueties of these offices aforesaid 1 Cor. 12 4 8 11. IIII. Fourthly God worketh diversly by these offices and gifts bestowed on his church 1 Cor. 12 6 7 11 18 c. V. And Christ the Lord layeth divers vvorks and administrations upon these offices and ministers themselues besides the duties that are coÌ„mon to them both viz. Vpon the Pastors that they should in their ministerie more particularly use the speach of vvisedome together vvith doctrine exhort rebuke comfort and vvisely apply the vvord of God as there is occasion to the divers uses necessities and conditions of the church and people that they should also administer the Sacraments and seales of Gods grace annexed to his word and promise execute the censures and sanctions of his vvord and judgments and alvvaies stirre up al of all sorts to godlines righteousnes and sobrietie and defend the truth of God against all adversaries and finally to governe the Church in all things according to the duetie of their calling carefully vvisely and faithfully under Iesus Christ the Lord and Archpastor of his church and people 1 Cor. 12 5 8. with Rom. 12 8. Ephes 4 11 12. with Esa 66 21. 2 Chro. 13.10 11. and 15 3. 1 Cor. 10 16 21. and 11 23 26. with Mat. 26 26 27 28. Eze. 44 15 16 23 24. Lev. 10 9 10. Num. 6 23 27. Joh. 20 19 23. with Mat. 16 19. and 23 34. and 24 45. and 28 18 19 20. Epist to Timoth. and Titus Heb 13 7 17. â— Pet. 5 1 4. Rev. 1 12 13 16 20. and 2 1. c. All vvhich things may well be included and comprised in the verie name of a Pastor Which is the more to be observed both for the similitude of the Shepheards whence it is taken and because the names of Offices used in the Scripture doe fitly note out the nature dueties of the Offices themselues sometimes in one respect sometimes in another Vpon the Teachers also the Lord hath laid that they should in their ministerie specially use the speach of knovvledge and instruct the Church out of the vvord of God interpreting the Scriptures teaching the knowledge of the truth vvhich is according to godlines catechizing the people elder and younger as there is occasion confuting errours convincing adversaries performing all those things that more specially perteyne to the delivering and defending of the doctrine of God faithfully and syncerely under Christ the great Prophet and Teacher of his church and people 1 Cor. 12 5 8 28 29. with Rom. 12 7. Eph. 4 11 12. with Esa 66 21. and 30 20. Neh. 8 8 9. Deut. 33 8 10. vvith Num. 16 8 9 10. Gal. 6 6. Prov. 22 6 20 21. Esa 28 9 12. Heb. 5 12. and 6 1 2. Matth. 13 52. and 23 34. Luke 2 46. and 4 16 24. and 5 17. and 13 33. vvith Deut. 18 15 22. Act. 5 34. and 8 30.31 35. and 13.1 and 15 35. 1 Tim. 1 3 4 7. and 2 7. and 3 2. and 5 17. 2 Tim. 1 11 13. and 4 1 2 3. Tit. 1 5 9. c. And these things may vvel be implied in the name of a Teacher But whether more is to be required of them as they are Teachers may further be considered As also that of old in the Church of Israell they might haue Teachers vvho vvere not Sacrificers and vvhether likewise they might not haue Teachers that were not Rulers or governours among they unles they vvere also chosen to government besides Deut 33.8 10. Neh 8 8 9. vvith Numb 16 8 9 10. and 18 1 7. 1 Chron. 6 48 49. Amoâ— â—â— 12 15. Mat. 13 52. and 23 34. Luke 2 46. and 5 17. compared with 2 Chron. 17 7 8 9. Iohn 3 1 10. and Act. 5 34. Finally for the distinction betvveen the Pastors Teachers office obserue hovv Ambrose repeating the place of Ephes 4 11. saith thereon I doe neither challenge the glorie of the Apostles for who will doe that but those whom the â—â—me of God himself chose nor the grace of the Prophets nor the vertue of the Euangelists nor the circumspection of the Pastors but I desire onely to obteyne intension and diligence about the divine Scriptures which the Apostles placed last among the offices of the Saints and â—â—â—n this that studying to teach I may learne Ambros off l. 1. c. 1. For which also see Gregorâ—e Nazianzen de mod And Ierome who likewise distinguish the Pastor Doctor Eph. 4 11. And among the later Writers Calvin in his Institutions treating of the ministers of the church and on Ephes 4.11 after he hath spoken of the Apostles Prophets Euangelists comming to speak of the Pastors Teachers saith thus There followe the Pastors and Teachers whom the church can never want among whom there is this difference that the Teachers are not set over the discipline nor the administration of the Sacraments nor admonitions or exhortations but over the interpretation of the Scripture that the doctrine may be kept syncere and sound among the faithfull But the Pastors office conteyneth all these things in it Calvin Institut lib. 4. cap. 3.
sect 4. And a litle after comparing together those functions that are spoken off Eph. 4 11. he saith As the Teachers are ansvverable to the auncient Prophets there spoâ—en off so are the Pastors to the Apostles except that these haue their certain peculiar churches assigned unto them Ibid. sect 5. Piscator also hath the like vvho first noteth this that the Lord at the beginning of his kingdome raised up Apostles Prophets and Euangelists by whom when the Churches were founded and planted he appointed in their place Teachers and Pastors perpetually to endure And then putteth the same difference between these Offices and in the same words as Calvin doth here before Piscat Aphorism cap. 20. sect 8. and 12. Beza like wise in his Annotations on Rom. 12 7. making this difference betvveen them noteth it thus The Apostle calleth him a Teacher who in the church attendeth onely to the simple interpretation of the Scripture that the doctrine may be kept pure and syncere And the Exhorter who otherwhere is termed a Pastor he calleth him â—â—at â—â—yneth doctrine together with admonitions and exhortations also with the administration of the Sacraments Beza in Rom. 12 7. Vrsinus noteth the same difference betvveene these Offices Vrsin Catec part 3. writing on the fourth Commandement 〈◊〉 the Ministerie quest 2. So doth M. Fenner also in his Theologie vvhere he vvriteth thus The Teachers are they which are imployed privately and publikely in delivering of doctrine faithâ—â—â—â— touching all dueties both common and proper Nehem. 8.9 Luke 5 17. Rom. 12 â— 1 Câ—â— 12 8. The Pastors are they which are imployed in applying the word with wisedome to al duties 〈◊〉 proper and common Rom. 12 7 8. 1 Cor. 12 8. Wherefore besides exhortations there is required of him that in his publike office he apply the truth to the hearts of men by the administration of the seales Lev. 10.9.10 2 Chron. 13 10. Rom 12 5 8. Ephes 4 11. Fenneâ— Theâ—â— lib. 7. cap. 7. Divers others haue written in like sort hereabout which I leaue to the observation of the Reader CHAPTER VI. Of the having of one or moe Pastours in particular Churches Also of Diocesan and Provinciall Bishops c. VVHether it be not most according to the ordinance of God that in everie particular church there be * Rev. 2 1 8 12 18. and 3 1 7 14. and 22 16-19 vvith Phil. 4 3. Col. 4 16 17. Act. 21 18. Luc. 12 42. 1 Tim. 1 3. and 3 15. 5 19 22. and 6 13 14. one Pastor or Angel of the church so properly and specially called and †divers teachers and ruling Elders according to the condition of the church joyned to the Pastor in the ministerie and government of the same church who may all of them also generally be called Pastors yet so as one be specially distinguished from the rest in respect of his place function to be the Pastor 〈◊〉 more particularly called under Iesus Christ the Archpastor Or whether there being many Elders appointed to feed instruct governe the Church they should be all alike or of one sort vvithout any distinction of Office or function among them Where touching the first point these things and the like may be considered I. The constitution of the Primitiue churches as they were established by the Apostles As namely the churches of Ephesus Smyrna Colosse Laodicea c. Rev. 2 1 8 12 18. and 3 1 7 14. and 22 16-19 vvith Phil. 4 3. Col. 4 16 17. Act. 21 18. Luc. 12 42. 1 Tim. 1 3. and 3 15. 5 19 22. and 6 13 14. †Act. 20 17 28. compared vvith Rev. 2 1. and Ephes 4 11 12. 1 Tim. 1 3. and 3 1 15. and 5 17 19 21. Act. 11.30 and 13.1 and 14.23 and 15.2.6.22.23.35 and 16.4 and 21.18 Rom. 12.7.8 1 Cor. 12.5.8.28 Phil. 1. 1. Col. 1.7 and 4.12.17 1 Thes 5.12.13.14.27 Tit. 1.5 9. Heb. 13.7.17.24 Iam. 5.14 1 Pet. 5.1 4. And divers things also hereabout may be noted in the auncient vvriters who lived a while after the Apostles dayes This being stil carefully observed vvithall because the mysterie of iniquitie began to vvork euen in the Apostles time and the apostasie of Antichrist spread abroad aftervvard more and more that we insist no further nor otherwise upon those Writers in any points of religion but as they agree with the Scriptures and in such things as are grounded thereupon Now therefore concerning the point in hand Ignatius hath often in his Epistles to the Churches to which he wrote these the like sayings Let all things be done of you according to good order in Christ Let the laymen or people be subject to the Deacons the Deacons to the Elders the Elders to the Bishop the Bishop to Christ as he to his Father And again What is the Eldership but an â—â—ly Senate the Counsellors and assistants of the Bishops Ignat. epist ad Smyrn ad Tâ—â—lenses ad Antiochenos 3. ad Magnesios c. And Iustine Martyr calleth him TON PROESTOTA the president or chief governour whom Ignatius Irenaeus Eusebius and others call EPISCOPON the Bishop or Overseer so applying generall termes to this office more particularly Iustin Martyr Apolog. 2. Irenaeus writeth of Polycarpus by name that he was made Bishop by the Apostles in Asia in the church of Smyrna And that himself had seen him vvhen he was young Irenaeus libr. 3. cap. 3. He also nameth sundry of the Bishops of the Church of Rome who succeeded one after another in that church from the Apostles times to his ovvne dayes Ibid. Eusebius writeth likevvise of Polycarpus made Bishop of the church of Smyrna by the Apostles Euseb l. 3. c. 32. and l. 4. c. 14. and of many Bishops by name who follovved one another in the church of Rome and in sundry other churches after the Apostles Euangelists vvhich were long here to recite in particular Euseb lib. 3. c. 2.13.14.19.31.32 and lib 4. c. 1.4 5.10.19.22.23 c. Onely note these for some special instances hereabout In the church of Alexandria Anianus and after him Abilius c. Euseb l. 2â— 24. 3.13 In the church of Ierusalem Simeon after Iames the Apostle after him Iustus c. Ibid. l. 3. c. 11. 32. In the church of Antioch 〈◊〉 and after him Ignatius c. Ibid. l. 3. c. 19. In the church of Corinth 〈◊〉 and after him Dionysius c Ibid. l. 4. c. 21. 22. In the church of Athens Dionysius Areopagites after him Quadratus Publius c. Ibid. Where also obserue hovv Eusebius sometimes calleth the churches parishes As the parish of Alexandria the parish of Ephesus the parish of Ierusalem the parish of Hierapolis the parish of Athens Of other interpretation or application of the word parish I will not now insist nor of the 〈…〉 c. vvhereof such such there named were Bishops or Overseers one after another Euseb l. 2. c. 24. â— 3. c.
put for the Congregation of governours meeting at a knovvne time and place c. Psal 82 1. Num. 25 12. and 27 2. with 36 1. Iosh 20 4 5 6. Exod. 12 3 21. Lev. 8 3 5. with 9 1 3. See also M. Ainsvv Counterpoyson pag. 113. And note hovv R. Salomon understandeth those words in Lev. 4 13. If the whole †Ghnedah Congregation of Israell sinne through ignorance c. of the Iudges of the Sanhedrin vvhich represented the whole Congregation As * Drusij Com. in locu difficil Pentatâ—ch p. 244. Drusius noteth upon that place Besides that if the vvord vvere Kahal yet ‡ As M. Ains himself also acknovvledgeth Count. p. 113. that word also sometimes is used for the assemblie of Elders and Governours the Synedrion c. 1 Chron. 13 1 2. and 29 1 6. compared vvith 28 1 2. and 2 Chron. 1 2 3. Deu. 23 1 2. and 31 28 30. and so is translated by the word Synedrion in the Septuagint Pro. 26 26. For which moreover see Psal 26 4 5. where for those vvords I haue not sit vvith vaine persons I haue hated the congregation of evill doers c. the Septuagint hath I haue not sit vvith the Synedrion or councill of vanity I haue hated the Congregation of the malignant c. or the church of evill doers as M. Ains translateth it how ever he passe over that point touching the Synedrion in his notes upon that place Which may the more be observed because the Psalme there useth the termes of sitting and of taking bribes and the like which the Scripture also otherwhere often ascribeth to Rulers and Governours And now that I am speaking of this matter it is also worth the noting how M. Ains himself a notable adversarie of this exposition cannot deny but that †M. Ain Animadv pag. 13. in the old Testament he hath observed the word Church to meane the congregation of Elders Yet to obscure the trueth and blynd his follovvers vvith vanity and errour vvhat he can herein he addeth this glose vvithall concerning it that now the old Testament is chaunged And vvhat if another now should arise and say in like sort that in the old Testament he hath observed the vvord Church to meane the Congregation of the people but that novv the old Testament is chaunged vvould not himself readily discerne and condemne the vanity and errour of such ansvvers and assertions Wherabout note that the speach is not of the legal covenant of works or the Curse thereof neyther of the ceremonies or any changeable ordinances of the Law as sometimes by the old Testament is understood but of the Scriptures and books of the old Testament and of the vvords and phrases used therein Touching vvhich he saith the old Testament novv is chaunged Which if it were true as he saith then should we be freed from the use of those vvords and Scriptures and whosoever obserue them should make Christ unprofitable unto them For so are we freed and set at libertie from the yoke of the Law old Testament that novv is changed Gal. 5 1 2. Col. 2 8 16 17 20. Heb. 8 7 13. Thus also he is fallen into the same errour vvhich heretofore †M. Ains Defence of Script pag. 28 32. c he convinced as detestable and blasphemous in M. Smith vvho likevvise perverting some words and phrases of Scripture as namely that of blotting out and taking avvay the hand writing that was against us c. gathered thereupon that the written Lavv of Moses the Prophets was novv blotted out and taken away from the church And thus moreover he maketh his own Annotations vvhich he publisheth on Genesis Exodus the Psalmes c. yea all the arguments and proofs that in his doctrine or other vvritings he bringeth out of the books of the old Testament to be vayn and unsound So as any that read or heare them might turne them away with his owne glose and tell him that the old Testament novv is chaunged Yea thus he annihilateth the proofs and testimonies that in the Nevv Testament are alledged by the Apostles out of the old And taketh avvay the meanes of persvvading the Iewes to the Christian faith with vvhom we must eyther reason from the Scriptures of the old Testament as being †Psal 19 7 8 9. Prov. 22 21. Mat. 5 18. the Word of God that endureth for ever and that hath the certaintie of the vvords of truths or els vvhat hope can we haue ever to perswade them to the faith of Christ But the Apostles teach us farre otherwise then this Opposite that * 2 Pet. 1 19. the Propheticall vvord is a most sure vvord to which vve shall doe vvel to take heed And that †2 Tim. 3 16 17. all the Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to improue to correct to instruct in righteousnes that the man of God may be absolute and made perfect to all good works To let this Opposite therefore alone with his shifts and errors I vvill proceed vvith the matter in hand 3. Where obserue next the agreement of Christs speach in Mat. 18 17. with that other speach of Christ in Mat. 5 22. Where Christ in the one place teacheth the offending party how to carry himself Mat. 5.22.23 c. and in the other the party offended Mat. 18 15. c. and in both places shevveth to whom the brother offending may be brought saying in the one place Tell it to the church or Congregation Mat. 18.17 in the other he is in daunger of the councill or Synedrion Mat. 5 22. Besides the agreement that these Scriptures also haue with those other in 1 Sam. 2 25. Deu. 1 16. and 19. 16.17 and 21 19. 2 Chron. 19.6 10. 1 Thes 5 12 13. 1 Tim. 5 17. Hebr. 13 17. and the like And note here how M. Brightman treating of this matter in his exposition of Salomons Song and applying it to the time of the Gospell saith expressely that he thinketh there is one and the same intendement of Christs speach in Mat. 5 22. as is of that in Mat. 18 15. c. Of which judgment are others also vvhom I need not mention in particular 4. Moreover the Syriack translation in Mat. 5 22. hath Kenushta which signifieth a congregation assemblie or synagogue where the Greeke Originall hath Synedrion the Councill or Congregation of the Elders And the like againe in Mat. 26 59. Which plainly sheweth hovv they sometimes use the vvord congregation or assemblie where the Greek hath Synedrion the sitting or assemblie of the Elders And is the more to be marked because the same translation othervvhere useth the same word KENUSHTA so generally as it putteth it for the Greek vvord SYNAGOGE the Synagogue Mat. 4 23. 9 35. 10 17. where also it hath BETH DINE the house of judgment for the Greek SYNEDRION the councill or sitting of the Elders so both using