Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	word_n	write_a	zeal_n	14	3	7.7431	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93958	Ad clerum. A sermon preached at a visitation holden at Grantham in the county and diocess of Lincolne, 8. Octob. 1641. By a late learned prelate. Now published by his own copy.	Sanderson, Robert, 1587-1663.	1670 (1670)	Wing S580; ESTC R228093	21,750	45

Negatives Touch not Tast not Handle not are called the Commandements of men Col. 2. 22. Which place I note the rather because the appellation here used and cited out of Esai 29. according to the Septuagint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are not found any where else in the whole Testament besides in the relation of this storie save in that one place onely By the analogy of which places in as much as there is mention made in them all as well of Doctrines as of Commandements and that in some of them with the Conjunction Copulative between them we are warranted to bring within the extent of this word according to the general intention and scope of our Saviour in this place Doctrinals as well as Morals that is to say as well those that prescribe unto our Judgments what we are bound to believe or not to believe in matter of Opinion as those that prescribe unto our Consciences what we are bound to do or not to do in matter of Practice Although the special occasion whereupon our Saviour fell into this discourse against the Pharisees and the special instance whereby he convinceth them do withall shew that the Morals do more principally properly and directly fall under his particular intention and scope therein In the full extent of the word then all those prescriptions are to be taken for the Commandements of men wherein any thing is by humane Authority either injoyned or forbidden to be believed or done especially to be done which God in his Holy Word hath not so enjoyned or forbidden Jonadab's command to the Rechabites that they should not drink Wine they nor their sons for ever and the Pharisees tradition here that none should eat with unwashen hands were both the commandements of men This is clear enough yea and good enough hitherto if there were no more in it but so For you must observe or else you quite mistake the Text and the whole drift of it that it is no part of our Saviours meaning absolutely and wholly to condemne all the Commandements of men For that were to cut the sinews of all Government and Order and to overturn Churches Kingdoms Corporations Families and all other both greater and lesser Societies of men none of all which can be upheld without some posttive Laws and Sanctions of mans devising We do not therefore find that either Jonadab was blamed for commanding the Rechabites not to drink wine or that they were blamed for observing his commandement therein But rather on the contrary that God well approved both of him and them yea and rewarded them for their obedience unto that command though it were a command but of mans devising and had no more than a bare humane Authority to warrant it And therefore those men are very wide that vouch this Text against the Ecclesiastical Constitutions or Ceremonies with such confidence as if they were able with this one Engine to take them all off at a blow not considering that it is not barely the Commandments of men either materially or formally taken that is to say neither the things commanded by men nor yet mens commanding of them but it is the teaching of such Commandments for Doctoines that our Saviour here condemneth the Pharisees for What that is therefore we are next to enquire 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 teaching for doctrines the commandments of men In the 29. of Esaie the substantives have a Conjunction copulative between them in the Septuagint and they are read in the very same manner and order 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by St. Paul alluding thereunto in Col. 2. But in the Greek Text in all Copies extant both here and in Mark 7. where the same Historie is related they are put without the Conjunction by Apposition as the Grammarians call it The meaning is the same in both readings onely this latter way it appeareth better and it is in effect this Whosoever shall endeavour to impose upon the judgments of men in credendis or in point of faith any thing to be believed as a part of Gods holy truth or shall endeavour to impose upon the Consciences of men in agendis or in point of manners any thing to be observed as a part of Gods holy will which cannot be sufficiently evidenced so or so to be either by express testimonie of the written Word of God rightly understood and applied or by clear natural and necessary deduction therefrom according to the Laws of true Logical discourse is guilty more or lesse of that Superstition our Saviour here condemneth in the Pharisees of teaching for Doctrines the commandments of men And a fault it is of a large comprehension It taketh in all additions whatsoever that are made to that absolute and all sufficient Rule of Faith and Manners which God hath left unto his Church in his written Word In what kind soever they are whether in Opinion Worship Ordinance Injunction Prohibition Promise or otherwise From what cause soever they proceed whether from credulity ignorance education partiality hypocrisie misgoverned zeal time-serving or any other For what end soever they may be done whether those ends be in truth intended or but in shew pretended say it be the glory of God the reformation of abuses the preventing of mischiefs or inconveniences the avoiding of scandals the maintenance of Christian liberty the furtherance of piety or whatever else can be imagined If they have not a sufficient foundation in the sacred Text and yet shall be offered to be pressed upon our judgments or consciences in the name of God and as his Word they are to be held as chaffe fitter to be scattered before the wind or cast out to the dunghil than to be hoarded up in the Garners among the wheat alas what is the chaff to the wheat or as wood hay or stubble meeter to become fewel for the Oven or Hearth than to be coffered up in the treasurie among gold and silver and precious stones And he that bringeth any such doctrine with him let his piety or parts be otherwise what they can be should he in either of both or even in both match not onely the holy Apostles of Christ but the very blessed Angels in heaven yet should we rather defie him as a Traitor for setting Gods stamp upon his own Bullion than receive him as his faithful Embassadour and salute him with an Anathema sooner than bid him God speed Especially if the doctrine be apparently either false or ungrounded and yet positively and peremptorily delivered as if it were the undoubted word and will of God I may not now descend to particulars But thus much it will concern us all to know in the general That whosoever teacheth any thing either to be absolutely unlawful which God hath not forbidden in his word or to be absolutely necessary which God hath not required in his word he teacheth for doctrines the commandments of men and so far forth plaieth the

Imprimatur IO. FELL Vicecan Univ. OXON Aug. 9. An. 1669. AD CLERUM A SERMON Preached at a VISITATION holden at GRANTHAM In the COUNTY and DIOCESS of Lincolne 8. Octob. 1641. By a late Learned PRELATE Now Published by his own Copy Sirac 3. 24. For many are deceived by their own vaine opinion and an evil suspicion hath overthrown their Judgment OXFORD Printed by H. Hall Printer to the UNIVERSITY for Ric. Davis 1670. MATTH 15. 9. But in vain they do worship me teaching for doctrines the commandments of men 1. OUr Saviour sometimes forewarneth his Disciples to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees Which leaven as he expoundeth himself and he best knew his own meaning was of two sorts the leaven of hypocrisie Luk. 12. and the leaven of corrupt and superstitious doctrine Matth. 16 Wee read 1 Cor. 5. of a third sort and that is the leaven of maliciousness which also usually accompanieth the other two Where any of the three are in abundance but especially where they all meet and abound as in these Pharisees it is impossible by any care or cunning so to keep them hidden as not to bewray themselves upon occasion to an observing eye As you know it is the nature of leaven though it be hidden never so deep in a heap of meale to work up to the top so that a man may certeinly know by the effects and be able to say that there it is In the storie of this present Chapter the Pharisees discover all the three Malice Hypocrisie and Superstition Their Malice against Christ although it appeared sufficiently in this that their quarrelling his Disciples for eating with unwashen hands was with the intent to bring an odium upon him for not instructing them better yet he passeth it by without taking any special notice thereof It may be for that his own person was chiefly concerned in it But then the other two their Hypocrisie and Superstition in rejecting the Commandments of God for the setting up of their own Traditions because they trencht so neer and deep upon the honour of God his heavenly Father he neither would nor could dissemble But themselves having given him the occasion by asking him the first question Why doe thy Disciples transgress the tradition of the Elders he turneth the point of their own weapon full upon them again as it were by way of recrimination not without some sharpness do you blame them for that But why then do you your selves also transgress the Commandment of God by your Tradition which is a farre greater matter That is their Charge vers 3. Which having made good by one instance taken from the fift Commandment more he might have brought but it needed not this one being so notorious and so convincing he thenceforth doubteth not to call them Hypocrites to their faces and to apply to them a passage out of the Prophet Esaias very pat to his purpose Wherein the Prophet charged the people of those times with the very same crimes both of them whereof these Pharisees are presently appealed to wit Hypocrisie and Superstition Hypocrisie in their Worship and superstition in the Doctrine The Leaven whereof by how much more it swelled them in their own and the common opinion making them to be highly esteemed among men for their outward preciseness and semblances of holyness by so much the more it sowred them towards Almighty God rendring the whole lump of their so strict Religion abominable in his sight So true is that of our Saviour Luk. 16. That which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God Their Hypocrisie he putteth home to them in the Verses before the Text Ye Hypocrites well did Esatas prophesie of you saying This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth and honoureth me with their lips but their heart is farre from me That done he forgetteth not to remember them of their Superstition too continuing his allegation out of the Prophet still in the words of my Text But in vaine do they wohship me teaching for doctrines the commandments of men This later verse I have chosen to entreat of alone at this time For although Hypocrisie and corrupt teaching do often go together as in those Jewes whom the Prophet long before reproved and in these Pharisees whom our Saviour here reproveth yet have I purposely severed this verse from the former in the handling moved thereunto out of a double consideration First because Hypocrisie lurking more within we are not able to pronounce of it with such certainty neither if we were have we indeed any good warrant so to doe as we may of unsound Doctrines which lye more open to the view and are allowed to our examination Secondly and especially because hundreds of those my brethren whom I cannot in reason excuse from symbolizing with the Pharisees in teaching for doctrines the commandments of men which is the fault reproved in this verse I cannot yet in charitie and in my own thoughts but acquit from partaking with them in the measure at least of that their foul hypocrisie wherewith they stand charged in the former Verses The Words themselves being one entire proposition to stand upon the curious dividing of them would be a matter of more ostentation than use And the truth thereof also when the meaning is once layd open will be so evident that I shall presume of your assent without spending much time in the proof The main of our business then upon the Text at this time must be Explication Application and Use First the Explication of the Words then the Application of the Matter and lastly some Corollaries inferred there from for our Use Which for your better understanding and remembrance I shall endeavour to do as plainly and orderly as I can As for the Words first There are three things in them that desire Explication First what is meant by the commandements of men secondly what it is to teach such Commandements for doctrines thirdly how and in what respect they that teach such doctrines may be said to worship God in vain For the first 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Commandment properly and strictly taken is an affirmative precept requiring something to be done the contrary whereof is a Prohibition or negative precept forbidding the doing of something But in the Holy Scriptures as in our common speech also the word is usually so extended as to comprehend both Prohibitions also as well as Commandements properly so called The reason whereof is because Affirmatives and Negatives do for the most part mutually include and infer the one the other As in the present case it is all one whether the Pharisees should command men to wash before meat or forbid them to eat before they had washed We call the whole Decalogue the ten Commandements though there be Negative Precepts there as well as Affirmative yea more Negative than Affirmative And those