shew in those wordes I answere it is to be said that one thing may be said to be before another two waies Tho. Aq. 22. q. 4. ar 7. one way of it selfe another way by accident and of it selfe faith is the first of all other vertues for as in things agible and to be done the end is the beginning as is abouesaid it is behoofefull that the Theologicall vertues which haue the last end for their obiect be the first and take place of other vertues and for the last end it selfe it is behoofefull that first it be in the vnderstanding then in the will because the will is not carried vpon any thing but as it is apprehended in the vnderstanding therefore for that the last end is in the will by hope and charitie and in the vnderstanding by faith Tho. Aqu. 12. q. 34. art 4. ad princip art q. 13. art 3. it is behoofefull that faith be the first of all vertues because naturall vnderstanding cannot reach vnto God as he is the obiect of blisse in which sort hope and charitie aymeth vnto him yet accidentally another vertue may be before faith for the cause which is accidentally is accidentally the first Now to remoue the impediment appertaineth to that cause which is accidentally as it is manifest by the Philosopher accordingly Aristoteles in 8. Phisuli 8. text 32. to 2. whereunto some vertues may bee said accidentally to be before faith in how much they remoue the impediments of beleeuing as fortitude remoueth inordinate feare hindering faith humilitie pride by which the vnderstanding refuseth to submit it selfe to the truth of faith and the same may be said of some other vertues although they be not truly vertues vnlesse faith be presupposed Augustin contra Iouinianum l. 4. cap. 3 tom 7. as it appeareth by Saint Augustine in his booke against Iouinian Hence it appeareth by this Doctor that if faith be wanting no Christian can haue that reuealed knowledge which necessarily for his saluation hee is bound to haue and therefore I incessantly laboured to finde out the assurednesse of this faith and the more that I thought how I might finde out this faith so necessarie to saluation it pleased God to suffer me to proceede in my search for some infallible rule by which I might measure without danger of mistaking the true faith of Christ and thereby be most comfortably led as with the fierie pillar like the Israelites by night through the wildernesse of this world Exo. 13. vers 22. vnto the most desired land of euerlasting happinesse and securitie where that promise of God made by the mouth of his Prophet may be verified of vs Esay 32. vers 18 My people shall dwell in a peaceable habitation and in sure dwellings and in quiet resting places CHAP. VI. Containing the fourth fundamentall obseruation about the rule and straight mete-wand of the true Christian faith BEing thus arriued by Gods grace to discouer and rightly to obserue how important a thing it is to build vpon this foundation of true faith The true Canonicall Scriptures the chief rule of faith without which all the building of our soules would be but weake and soone fall to ruine I felt my selfe most forcibly moued by Gods Spirit with all humilitie and diligence to search out the most straight rule where no crookednesse should appeare with the which I might so truly measure out the right faith and true Church of God which Saint Paul calleth the Piller and firmament of truth In the desire whereof occurred vnto my memorie the Angell that talked with Saint Iohn Apocal. 21. vers 15. hauing a golden reed in his hand to measure the spirituall Hierusalem with all the gates the walles the foundations and all the parts of that great citie wishing that it would please God to bestow vpon me such a golden reed wherewith I might measure out the true faith and Church of God that all that are crooked in faith and misproportioned in their liues might find out the truth and be in the number of those of whom the Psalmist saith Psalme 32.11 Laetamini in domino exultate insti gloriamini omnes recti corde Be glad ye righteous and reioyce in the Lord and bee ioyfull all yee that are vpright in heart Whereupon I began to reflect vpon the chiefest rules spoken of either by the Church of Rome or other Churches pretending reformation and examining with a great desire of truth whether visibilitie and continuance of personall succession of Bishops in any Church or whether the Popes sole iudgement and definitiue sentence either with a Councell or tanquam ex Cathedra without a Councell or whether vnwritten traditions or whether the written word and facred Scriptures could be vnto me a straight rule of true faith and of the true Church of Christ me thought I found by all probable euidences and allowed testimonies that only and principally the written word of God I meane the true canonicall Scriptures could be the golden rod and straight mete-wand wherewith the true proportion and frame of Christian faith could bee measured in so much that me thought I might well say to my inexplicable comfort and to the honor of God as that high soaring Eagle Saint Iohn said Apoc. 11. vers 1. There was giuen me a reed like vnto a rod and it was said vnto mee rise and mete the Temple of God and the Altar and them that worship therein 2 But heere thou wilt say gentle Reader that this is but an imagined golden reed Obiections against Scripture as the chiefe or certaine rule and that this is but as crooked a measure as any other in respect of the many difficult places of Scripture which tire out the braines of the most learned as also in regard of the diuersitie of iudgements that is found about the sence of Scriptures for that the translations hauing been diuers it is hard for any man to iudge which is the truest but all these mists of but apparent reasons will easily be disperst if thou wilt please but heedily to peruse the proofes and authorities I bring for this my sure and strongest fundamentall obseruation I know onely but three kinds of strong arguments that may be produced for any veritie as namely the sacred Scriptures the authoritie of the learned and the force of natural reasons all which three do proclaime with a loud voice vnto vs that the written word is the most certain sufficient and infallible rule of faith that we can haue in this world and consequently the true golden mete-wand of Gods eternall truth and all Christian reuealed verities 3 This haue I gathered first out of the Scriptures By proofe of Scripture Esay 8.20 for I find in Esay the Prophet that we must repaire to the Law and to the testimonie if any speake not according to that word Prou. 2. vers 1. Prou. 2. vers 9. there is no light in them I
CHAP. IIII. Containing the second fundamentall obseruation of the supernaturall and reuealed knowledge which is necessarie to saluation AS the first worke whereby Almightie God manifested the greatnesse of his power when hee layed the foundation of the world was the light Genes 1. vers 3. which being dispersdd and confused hee afterwards placed in the globe of the Sunne by which the whole world receiueth comfort and life Euen so in the creation of man who is a liuely mirror and glasse of that greater world A supernatural knowledge necessarie he hath placed in light of vnderstanding in the firmament of his soule to direct him in the way of Gods true seruice and to bring him vnto the promised land of eternall happinesse yet not so that without dependance on him the light of our naturall vnderstanding hath sufficient knowledge thereof or can attaine thereunto of it owne naturall power without Gods especiall illumination for that as all Diuines hold to procure the saluation of our soules it is most behoofefull and necessarie that besides all naturall knowledge and Philosophicall disciplines got by the onely bare discourse of naturall reason our reasonable soules haue a supernaturall knowledge reuealed from God transcending the reach and capacitie of reason which indeed is called the Science of Saints Sap. 10. vers 10. 2 This is excellently well taught and proued by the great Schooleman of the Romane Church The proposition proued who sayth thus It is said in the second to Timothie the third chapter Euerie Scripture inspired from God Tho. Aqu. part 1. q. 1. art 1. sed contra is profitable to teach to dispute to reprehend to instruct to righteousnesse but the Scripture inspired from God belongeth not vnto Philosophicall disciplines which are inuented by the reason of man therefore it is profitable besides Philosophicall disciplines that there be another knowledge inspired from God In which wordes it is here to bee noted that this Doctor taketh the word profitable for necessarie which acception of his is repugnant to those Romanists that abuse the meaning of Saint Paule who onely will haue it serue to shew the profit of the Scriptures but not the necessitie of them and so exclude the Scriptures from being the most infallible certaine and sufficient rule of saluation therefore this Schoolemans sence and meaning here is verie remarkable by the word profitable signifying the necessitie of a reuealed knowledge 3 This he declareth much more plainely in the bodie of the same question answering the maine proposition An absolute necessitie of reuealed knowledge and saying That it was necessarie for mans saluation that there should be a certaine knowledge according to Gods reuelation besides Philosophicall disciplines which are found out by reason of man first because man is ordained by God as to a certaine end which surpasseth the comprehension of reason according to that of Esay the 64. The eye hath not seene O God Esay 64. without thee the things which thou hast prepared for those that loue thee and it is behoofefull that men haue foreknowledge of this end who must order their intentions and actions to an end Hence it was necessarie for mans saluation that certaine things which exceede humane reason should be made knowne vnto him by Gods reuelation Behold here most cleerely an absolute necessitie of a supernaturall reuealed knowledge for the vnderstanding of such things as surmount the capacitie of our naturall vnderstanding 4 His words following doe also import a conuenient necessitie also of such knowledge euen for those things belonging to saluation which wee know by naturall reason A conuenient necessitie of reuealed knowledge His words are these For those things also belonging to God which may be searched into by humane reason it was necessarie man should be instructed by Gods reuelation because the truth of God searched into by reason can be deriued vnto man but by a few and of a long time and with the admixtion of many errors vpon the knowledge notwithstanding of which truth the whole saluation of man dependeth which is in God Therefore that saluation might come vnto men the more conueniently and the more certainely it was necessarie that they should be instructed of diuine things by diuine reuelation it was necessarie therefore that besides Philosophicall disciplines which are found out by reason a sacred knowledge should be had by reuelation Whence it appeareth that a reuealed knowledge is required for a twofold necessitie the one absolute the other ad bene esse for the greater conueniencie and for the better auoidance of error and all to attaine happily the end for which we are created 5 Whereby wee may gather the great excellencie and dignitie of this knowledge aboue all others The excellencie of this knowledge the same Doctor in the next question saying That Augustine sayth in the foureteenth of the Trinitie Tho. Aqu. art 2. sed contra Li. 14. ca. 1. in med to 3. Vnto this Science is that alone attributed wherewith the most holesome faith is engendred nourished defended and strengthened But this belongeth vnto no Science but to the sacred knowlege therefore this holy doctrine is a science Ibid. in corpor And further he sheweth the author of it saying That as the Musitian beleeueth the principles deliuered him by the Arithmetician so the student of sacred doctrine beleeueth the principles delinered vnto him from God Hence the same Doctor saythi in the question following That the holy Scripture speaketh thereof as of one Science for it is said in the tenth of Wisedome he gaue him the knowledge of Saints whereby it is euidently cleere that all the sacred and reuealed doctrine and all the knowledge of faith must come from God Genes 28. vers 12. and be reuealed vnto vs mortall wights liuing in this worldly Pilgrimage for our true comforts and not to bee obtained by our selues euen as to Iacob in his fleepe the mysticall ladder reaching from heauen to earth with God leaning vpon the toppe and the Angels ascending and descending was from God reuealed vnto him when his waking eies could not behold it of whom those words of Wisedome He gaue him the wisedome of Saints Bonauent comment in Sap. cap. 10. are litterally spoken as the Franciscans seraphicall Doctor commenteth vpon that place and therefore may well be called the science and learning of Saints and not of men 6 From the due obseruation of which doctrine I considered the great vanitie and vnhappinesse of those Collections vpon the precedent doctrine that puffed vp with the pride of humane sciences neglect the studie of this principall science of God and his Saints vnto which all the rest are but as handmaids to beare vp her traine Humane sciences vaine Hence I resolued with the assistance of Gods grace to employ all the labours of my studies chiefely in attaining to the perfect knowledge of this science Secondly Knowledge necessarie in Priests I
learned Doctor whom they call the Angelicall Doctor sayth Tho. Aqu. lec in 1. Tim. 6. The doctrine of the Apostles and Prophets is called Canonicall because it is as it were the rule of our vnderstanding 1. q. 1. ar 4. And againe our faith resteth and stayeth it selfe vpon the reuelation giuen to the Apostles and Prophets which writ the Canonicall bookes 1. q. 1. ar 8. and not vpon reuelation if any such haue beene made to other Doctors And also in another place hee sheweth how all iudgement of truth is to be referred to the Scriptures saying In arguing it properly vseth viz. the said reuealed knowledge Tho. 1 q. part 1. q. 1. ar 8. ad 2. whereof he speaketh of necessitie the authorities of Canonicall Scripture but the authorities of other Doctors of the Church as it were arguing out of her owne but probably For our faith doth relie vpon the reuelation made to the Apostles and Prophets who wrote the Canonicall bookes nd not vpon any reuelation made to other Doctors Therefore Augustine sayth in his Epistle to Hierome Epi. 19. Paulo post princip to 2. I haue learned to giue this honor to the onely bookes of Scriptures which are called Canonicall as to beleeue most firmely that not one author of them hath erred in writing but others I reade so that with what soeuer holinesse and learning they are endued as not therefore to thinke any thing a truth because they haue held or written so And in another place Faith doth cleaue vnto all the articles of faith for one medium to wit for the first truth proposed vnto vs in Scriptures according to the doctrine of the Church vnderstanding rightly and therefore hee that swarueth from this meane doth totally want faith Antoninus the Archbishop of Florence writeth expressely Sum. part 3. tit 18. c. 3. ff 3. That God hath spoken but once and that in the holy Scripture and so plentifully to meete with all temptations and all cases that may fall out and all good workes that as Gregorie in the two and twentieth booke of his Morals expounds it he needes no more speake vnto vs concerning any necessarie matter seeing all things are found in the Scripture Gerson a great man in the Councell of Constance sayth De com sub vtraque specie The Scripture is the rule of our faith which being well vnderstood no authoritie of men is to be admitted against it Durandus sayth That generally in the things that touch our faith wee must speake to that which the Scripture deliuereth Praef. in sent least any man fall into that which the Apostle noteth 1. Cor. 8. If he thinke he knoweth something yet the knoweth nothing as he ought to know for the manner of our knowledge must be not to exceede the measure of faith and the holy Scripture expresseth the measure of faith Alliaco the Cardinall sayth 1. Sent. q. 1. ar 3. The verities themselues of the sacted Canon be the principles of Diuinitie because the finall resolution of Theologicall discourse is made into them and originally from them is drawne euery conclusion of Diuinitie Conradus Clingius sayth Locor l. 3. c. 29. pag. 290. The Scripture is the infallible rule of truth yea the measure and iudge of the truth Peresius the Diuinitie Reader at Barcelona in Spaine sayth The authoritie of no Saint is of infallible truth Iac. Per. de ratio con li. 2. c. 19. for Saint Augustine giues that honor onely to the sacred Scriptures Whereupon I frame this reason That onely is the infallible rule which is of infallible truth but the Scripture onely is of infallible truth therefore the Scripture onely is the infallible rule 8 Bellarmine also writeth thus Other late Writers De verbo Dei li. 1. cap. 2. The rule of faith must be certaine and knowne for if it be not certaine it is no rule at all if it be not knowne it is no rule to vs but nothing more certaine nothing better knowne than the sacred Scripture contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles wherefore the sacred Scripture is the rule of faith most certaine and most safe and God hath taught vs by corporall letters which wee might see and reade what he would haue vs beleeue concerning him Whence I gather that if the Swenckfeldians are to bee drawne to the written Text then ought those of the Church of Rome also be recalled to the same rule from their vncertaine traditions from the Popes sole definitiue sentence and from their Councels not teaching by Scriptures If nothing be more knowne nothing more certaine as the Cardinall confesseth than the Scriptures why doe they reiect them from being the rule as not sufficient to preserue from error not knowne ynough The same Cardinall sayth in another place De not eccles c. 2. ff respond Simpliciter The Scripture is better knowne than the Church in some case as namely where it is receiued and speaketh plainly and the question is of the Church Willauincentius confesseth The Scriptures and they alone are able to teach vs to saluation De ratio stud Theol. li. 1. c. 31. pag. 21. as the Apostle in the third chapter of his second Epistle to Timothie affirmeth saying All Scripture is inspired of God in which words the Apostle comprehendeth all things that are needfull to the saluation of man Comment in 2. Tim c 3 in vers 15 16. Espenceus writeth That if any thing be needfull either to be knowne or done the Scriptures teach the truth reproue the false reclaime from euill persuade to good neither yet doe they make a man good in some sort but perfect yea they can teach a man to saluation and make him learned sufficiently Panormitane writeth thus One faithfull man Part 1. de elect polest ca. significa though priuate is more to be beleeued than the Pope or a whole Councell if he haue better reason on his side and authoritie of the Old and New Testament And Gerson more sully De exemp doct part 1. considera 5. The examination and triall of doctrine concerning faith belongeth not onely to the Pope and Councell but to euery one also that is sufficiently seene in the holy Scripture because euery one is a fit iudge of that he knoweth And againe some lay-man not authorised may be so excellently learned in the Scripture that his assertion shall be more to be credited than the Popes definitiue sentence for the Gospell is more to be credited than the Pope Therefore if such a lay man though he be priuate teach a truth contained in the Gospell and the Pope either know it not or will not know it yet it is euident that his iudgement is to be preferred Costerus Cesterus sayth That such verities concerning our faith as are absolutely necessarie to be knowne and beleeued of all men are plainely taught in the Scriptures themselues Doctor Saunders sayth Rock pag. 193. Wee
I find that men of farther reach obseruing the successe of the intended powder-treason following soone after haue obserued that that letter which master Blackwell should haue spread amongst Catholikes was but a cloake of the secret designement of the powder-day to take away all apprehension of danger in the state whereof it is probably thought that both the Pope and father Aquauiua were either expressely or circumstantially made acquainted with that businesse nay moreouer my selfe strongly vrging against one the vnlawfulnes of the powder-designement he wished me to be silent for it was more then probable that the Pope knew well thereof and in speaking against it I should but cause the Iesuites to disaffect me and doe my selfe no good Hereupon I grew silent and thought the more then of such horrible hypocrisie for that some reported that both the Pope and Cardinals had spoken publikely against it which me thought could not hang well together without some intollerable hypocrisie especially considering that Greenway by the Pope was not only suffered to liue in Rome but also exalted euen before the Popes face to the dignitie of being one of his Penitentiaries appointed publikly to heare cōfessions in S. Peters Church in Rome and Gerard likewise suffered to liue quietly in Flanders without checke or controule by any man who made such deep protestations to one master Buckland Priest vpon his saluation that he had no wayes notice of the powder-designement that as I heard the said master Buckland say either he must needs beleeue him to affirme a truth or else that he was as great an hypocrite and dissembler as euer liued in the world So like are the followers of the Romane Church to the first kind of the Pharisies hypocrisie in pretending outward holinesse whilest in their hearts they harbour most detestable vnrighteousnesse Therefore well did Saint Bernard describe Hypocrites saying that they were Mordaces vt canes dolosi vt vulpes superbi vt leones they are biting like dogges they are guilefull like foxes they are proud like lions for such will suffer no mans reputation to be vntoucht but will teare it with their spitefull teeth they are craftie as foxes which teare in peeces the sheepe of the best wooll and as proud as lions for that they contemne all disgrace all without regard to any mans person or dignitie 5 Secondly The second kind of Romish hypocrisie I haue also obserued the second kind of the Pharisies hypocrisie to be very abundant in the Church of Rome which consisteth in a preposterous and defectiue outward holines breeding scrupulosity in trifles and largenes of conscience in matters of more moment As for example I find that for violating their custome obseruation vpon fasting-dayes many will bee exceedingly scandalized but giue no shew of scandale-taking at the most wicked example of the powder-treason or the traytors thereof but rather by their silence seeme willing to approue it to lament only the misfortune of their desired successe Others there are that will controule and checke any rash iudgement euen in trifles in others who themselues without scruple or knowledge or iudgment wil not stick to lay the imputation of the powder-treason vpon Protestants themselues who should by Machiuillian complotments be the first contriuers of it to draw Papists vnto it thereby to make them the more odious to the world Againe the Church of Rome forbiddeth Priests to be married which is lawfull by the law of God and whereas mariages betwixt kindred in the degrees of affinity are prohibited by the law of God they suffer and permit dispencing with mens consciences therein as for example that one brother may marry his brothers wife which was allowed in this kingdom by the Pope that the neece may marry her vncle which hath bin granted but to mean persons euen of late yeeres in Hamp-shire by authoritie granted from the Pope What cā be more preposterous thē to make a law which God neuer made in liew therof to disanull an institution which God hath made Besides the Popes thēselues suffer some of the Clergie to professe external pouertie as the poore Capuchins whilest themselues and others liue in all pompe iollity and pleasure vsing all coulors of holines to enrich thēselues and to draw treasures out of al coūtries to fill the Exchequer of S. Peter withall Who sees not most plainly that many deluded soules whilest for the grant of indulgences yearely to this Church and that Church they pay round summes of money into the Romane offices they grow negligent in seeking pardon from God and so neuer obtain truly pardon for their sins what shall I say of their preposterous zeale in keeping holidaies I often noted that the daies appointed in memory of Saints are much more solemnely kept then Sonday which is the feast of their Lord and Master in stead of one prayer to the Father or to the holy Ghost or the blessed Trinity the childrē of that Church do say many either to the virgin Mary or to S. Francis S. Benet Beatus Ignatius or some other Saint to whom they are most peculiarly addicted By all which examples I obserue the Church of Rome much also to exceed in this preposterous hypocrisie and externall holinesse without any order or rule 6 Thirdly The third kind of Romane hypocrisie I haue further entred into a deepe consideration of the third kind of Pharisaicall hypocrisie which consisteth more in words than in deedes more in shaddow than in truth Which I find without measure to abound likewise in the church of Rome For the Pope himself in words caries the stile of Seruus seruorum Dei the seruant of the seruants of God which is but meerely verball for in effect his actions are all noted with pride carrying the shew of Lord or Emperour rather than of a Seruant Auent Annal. lib. 7. who as one writeth Dominus dominantium perde ac si Deus foret esse contendit he striueth to be the lord of rulers in as if he were God and who seeth not this to be true that considereth his challenge of soueraignetie euen in temporalls ouer all Emperors and Kings of the world that beholdeth him carried vpon mens shoulpers that know how hee maketh all Princes but his vassals to be depriued of their kingdomes and all dignities whensoeuer he thinketh it expedient propter finem spiritualem for a spirituall end that is for the good of the Church that hath seene him attended vpon by the whole Colledge of Cardinalles whose intollerable prie was such that a King of Fraunce finding him inexorable in the cause of Fredericke Math. Paris in Henr. 3. His Maiesties speech in the Parliament Recessit iratus indignans quod humilitatem quam sperauerat in seruo seruorum minimè reperisset hee went away angrie and scorning not to finde the humilitie he hoped for in the seruant of seruants wel therfore may his Maiestie term him for such his pride as he doth That
of CHRIST alreadie sacrificed who once hath wrought Redemption and Propitiation for sinne vvhich is to bee applied by the Sacrament 4. The sacrifice of the Masse a nouell doctrine Praeceptor Romae desacr Mis c. 1 dict 2. In can not but meruaile that the Sacrifice of the Masse can bee esteemed so highly as it is in the Church of Rome which is as they say and teach a Sacrifice that is perfected and consisteth of Christ as the thing offered and chiefly of three actions the Consecration the Oblation and Consumption Which saith the same Authour concerning the substance was instituted by Christ Ibid. dicto 1. concerning the action as it is now done by the Church For if wee looke well into it wee shall finde it but a nouell doctrine in all the essentiall parts thereof It beganne not all at once but by degrees for the Latine language came not in where the people vnderstood it till the time of Gregorie six hundred yeares after Christ Declarat ad Censar Theol. prouis as Erasmus saith the Church in former time vsing the Seruice in the Vulgar tongue The doctrine likewise of Transubstantiation nowe beleeued by the present Church of Rome Tom. 3. dist 5. sect 1. p. 628. to be therein is acknowledged by Scotus and Biel to be no elder than the Councell of Laternae for so Suares the Iesuite writeth of them The Sacrifice or oblation thought by some to be made therein in the iudgement of other learned Papists was not done by Christ For Azorius the Iesuit writeth Jnstit Moral lib. 10. cap. 8. That some Catholikes deny that Christ offered vp himselfe vnder the forme of Bread and Wine in his last Supper which being true indeede it followeth that the opinion of such a sacrifice is not founded vpon Christs deede or instituted by him but vpon some later inuention since him Whence it followeth that Ioannes Stephanus Durantus doth teach most vnsound doctrine De ritibus Eccl. â—â—ath cap. 3. n. 1. 2. when he saith That it is perspicuous by the testimonies of Christ himselfe of Paul the Apostle and of ancient Fathers that Christ instuuted the sacrifice of the Masse and was the Authour thereof who also after hee had cited the institution of the Sacrament Luke the 21. and 1. Cor. 11. vpon those wordes Doe yee this in remembrance of mee he concludeth That by those wordes Christ gaue a commandement of sacrificing vnto Priests A notorious shift of a learned Papist to proue the Masse for to doe signifieth to sacrifice But in very truth whosoeuer is not most stupid may out of the wordes of both places euince the contrarie and discerne what a grosse absurditie it is to inforce that because to doe sometimes doth signifie to Sacrifice therefore Christ commanded the Priests to Sacrifice for if it be true that there Christs commandement to doe this imported a command to Sacrifice where then is the Sacrament instituted which is a distinct thing from a Sacrifice Many such shifts as these are the Teachers of the Romane Church enforced to vnder-take for the maintenance of their Doctrine which if men would obserue with attention and iudgement they might with very great facilitie discouer the weake grounds of all their Arguments I finde that Thomas Aquinas seemed to bee of a contrarie opinion For disputing how Christ is sacrificed in the Eucharist hee answereth that hee is said to bee in two respects First because the ministration of the Sacrament is an Image Thomas Aquinas against the Masse representing the Passion of Christ which is his true immolation and Images vse to bee called by the names of those thinges whereof they are Images Secondly in respect of the effect of his Passion because by the Sacrament wee are made partakers of the fruit of his Passion And saith hee As concerning this second manner it is proper to this Sacrament that Christ is immolated or sacrificed therein These reasons argue that hee held no such kinde of Sacrifice as the present Church of Rome defendeth because the celebration of the Eucharist in his iudgement being but an Image of the true Sacrifice of Christ hee could not thinke it to bee a true sacrifice vni-vocally so called but only by externall relation And saying againe That Christ is sacrificed therein by reason wee are made partakers of the fruit of his Paession hee sheweth clearely hee knew no reall sacrifice because wee are made partakers of that euen in Baptisme also where no man imagins Christ to bee sacrificed 5. Idolatrie is coÌ„mitted in the sacrifice of the Masse But what shall I say of that most odious and horrible Idolatrie that is committed in the sacrifice of the Masse where Bread and Wine which are the creatures of God are worshipped with Latria as is the Sonne of God the which worship is onely due to God O yee heauens come and admire at this vnspeakable folly and blindnesse of men they stick not only to doe this abhominable fact but they persist also in teaching it I my selfe being a Student in the Colledge in Rome had this deliuered me from my Master in the Pulpit a learned Iesuit in manner following as a matter of faith who vpon this question Who is to be worshipped with the adoration of Latria De adorat ff 1. q. 1. in dictat Rom. saith Thirdly with the same worship of Latria the consecrated Hoast and Chalice is to be worshipped because vnder those most sacred formes Christ the Lord is adored who is really present according to his humanitie diuinitie which is defined in the Councell of Trent Sess 13. c. 5. can 6. lib. 2. deritib Eccles cap. 40. and Stephanus Durantus sheweth it most fully this doctrine as it is most vntrue so is it here affirmed by the Italian Reader with a manifest vntruth for I can not so much as finde the word Latria in all that Chapter of Stephanus Durantus An ItaliaÌ„ trick which I haue very carefully perused herein Durant c. 40. l. 2. num 3. who only affirmeth That it is probable that the Eucharist is lifted vp and shewed to the people for adorations sake and hee may as well be vnderstood of Dulia or Hyperdulia or of a lesse reuerence which is done in the ministration of any Sacrament not in worship of the thing present but in worship of God who is in heauen Yea and to shew that this kind of Latria-worship is held to bee a doctrine of Faith in answere to his third question Ibidem which is this Since the precept of adoring the Sacrament is a matter of Faith at what time doth it oblige the faithfull to performe it Hee answereth in soure cases First when the Sacrament in the Sacrifice of the Masse is eleuated those that are present are bound to adore it Secondly when it is carried to the sick Thirdly when the Hoâ—st is ministred to the Communicants the Communicants are not only bound to
opinion of all the holy Doctors oâ— the Church that this bread and wine was offered for a sacrifice to God and not for a refection to Abraham both this exposition and assertion is false For both Tertullian contra Iudaeos and also Epiphanius expound it of his bringing foorth of bread and wine to Abraham Hebr. 55. Haeres 55. Epiphanius saith Abraham was about eightie eight or ninetie yeares old when Melchisedech met him and brought forth bread and wine vnto him Lib. 1. cap. 11. So also doth Iosephus expound it Melchisedech milites Abraham hospitaliter habuit nihil illis ad victum deesse passus simul ipsum adhibuit mensae Melchisedech vsed hospitality to Abrahams souldiers and suffered them to want no victuals and did take Abraham to his table That this is the true sense appeareth by the Hebrew word which doth not properly signifie to offer and sacrifice but to bring forth and the force of truth maketh some of the Romane Church to confesse this to be true Caietan in Gen. 1.14 Cardinall Caietan vpon this place writeth thus There is nothing heere said of sacrifice or oblation but of bringing foorth which Iosephus saith was done to the refection of them which had gotten the victory And that which in the vnlgar edition is put after as a cause for he was the Priest of the most high God in the Hebrew is not set as a cause but as a clause separated from it Andrad defens fidei â—rident lib. 4. Andradius also doth herein forsake his friends and acknowledgeth this to be the true exposition his words be these We need not Kemnitius to striue about the word offering seeing that both in the best corrected Latine copies and also in the holy Fathers which apply this place vnto the holy Eucharist it is proferens brought forth and I in iudgement agree with them which say that Melchisedech refreshed Abrahams souldiers wearied and fainted with long fight By which it appeareth how vnprofitably this place is cited for a figure prouing the sacrifice of the Masse wherein Christs true substantiall body blood is offred in sacrifice as the Church of Rome teacheth vnder the forme of bread and wine 11 Very impertinent further is that argument Bellarmine maketh for the Masse The Paschall Lambe falsely pretended to be a figure of the Masse De sacrific mis lib. 5. cap. 2. taken from the Paschall Lambe which he saith is an expresse figure of the celebration of the Eucharist saying That the celebration of the Paschall Lambe was an immolation of the victime which was offered therefore the celebration of the Eucharist must bee also an immolation of the victime offered vnto God that the figure may answere the thing figured It is a strange thing that so great a scholler will so impertinently alleage such an argument for who knoweth not that the Paschall Lambe was offered also by such as were no Priests or if they were as himselfe suggesteth concerning this sacrifice there remained an ancient priuiledge Li. 1. vitae Mosis that all housholders should exercise the priesthoode as may be seene in Philo. Besides any man may see that the figure doth not answere the thing figured because the immolation of the Lambe was bloudy which is not found in the sacrifice of the masse as the Aduersaries confesse as also for that the Lambe was sacrificed by a multitude which agreeeth not with the masse which is offered but by one Priest at a time And further in regard that the paschall Lamb was not propitiatorie for sinnes as hee holdeth the masse to be but was only done in commemoration of the Israelites freedome from Egipt There is no man lastly that is so ignorant but knoweth that the Paschall Lamb was a figure of Christs bloudy sacrifice vpon the Crosse and therefore it can onely be gathered hence that our Lamb Christ Iesus was to be sacrificed of whom Saint Iohn the Baptist said Beholde the Lambe of God that taketh away the sinnes of the world Now that we should offer Christ so as the Aduersaries teach vnder accidents without substance of bread and wine doth no where appeare And albeit some of the Church call the Eucharist by the name of a Sacrament yet doth it not follow that the masse is therefore to bee approoued as is the same for it is a fallacious argument from a thing spoken but in some respect to conclude the same thing absolutely The Fathers called the Eucharist a Sacrifice but in some respect onely as first in that all sacred rites may be called by the common word of the olde Testament Sacrifices Quasi à faciendo sacra from doing holy and sacred actions Secondly in regarde that in the Supper there is a commemoration of that onely and true sacrifice of Christ they gaue that name to the action from the chiefest and most principal respect Thirdly in regard of diuers prayers powred foorth in the celebration of the Supper Heb. 5.7 Reuel 5.8 8.4 which are called Sacrifices in the Scriptures Fourthly because the spirituall sacrifices of our soules as Faith Hope and Charitie are exercised and stirred vppe by the vse of the Supper that they euâ—r vnderstoode it to bee such a Sacrifice as our Aduersaries teach the masse where but the formes of the Creatures without substance are adored and worshipped as GOD himselfe and GOD himselfe sacrificed and offered in substance to GOD they will neuer bee able to prooue or make manifest either by Scriptures or approoued Writers of Antiquitie howsoeuer they may with Cardinall Bellarmine make shew to doe it as hee laboureth to doe by the former things so impertinently misapplied as the meanest Scholer is able to discouer their insufficiencie 12 Now therefore curteous Reader hauing thus obserued the sacrifice of the masse to bee vnwarrantable in the holy Scriptures My resolution vpon the obsâ—ruation of al the pâ—emises concerning the Masse and not approoued by the auncient Fathers as iâ— is now taught in the Church of Rome I could no longer continue in league and friendshippe with that Church which pretends so many proofes for it and hath none at all For finding as it appeareth by all my precedent obseruations in this Chapter that it was neuer instituted by Christ that the pretended propitiation thereof derogateth from the Sacrifice Christ made vpon the Crosse that it is but a nouell doctrine in many things vnknowne to the Fathers of former Ages that most hatefull Idolatrie is committed therein that it containeth ceremonies verie ridiculous and vncertaine in their meaning not knowne to the Church of Rome it selfe and such as are neyther ancient nor Apostolicall that it is maintained and defended by false deuised and baâ—â—ard writings that it hath many foolish and false prerogatiues giuen it by the Aduersaries that it is established and confirmed by many lying signes and wonders the arguments of an adulterous generation that the Types and Figures of the olde Testament make no whit for it
ground of them in all rpobabilitie than that the Popes being desirous to enrich themselues with money haue deuised them for the emptying of mens purses throughout all Kingdomes subiected to his vsurping authority like Boniface the ninth of whom it is written That he sent into diuers Kingdomes his Treasurors with Pardons Theod. a mem de scismat lib. 1. ca. 68. pag. 20. who extoried thereby very great summes of money from the simple people that in some one Pronince they would get together aboue an hundred thousand florens and released all sinnes to them that confessed vnto them without anie penaunce Therefore as I said in the beginning anarice caused spirituall blindenesse in Popes and blindenesse as a punishment confirmeth them more and more in their errors 6 Is it not strange considering all reason to bee against this doctrine of Indulgences that the Church of Rome will by her comminations still curse those that embrace it not as the Councell or Trent doth all those That affirme them to bee vnprofitable Ses 25. decret de Indulgentijs or denie anie power to be in the Church to graunt them What shall not as I said before the bloud of Christ as well take away the temporall paine due vnto sinne as the eternall or is not his satisfaction infinite what neede then the superfluous satisfaction of Saints 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Did the auncient Church euer speake of other Pardons than of the Pardons of outward penances which ere enioyned for publique satisfaction of the Church Hath not Christ fatisfied for the whole world what neede then of the satisfactions of Saints what more than Indulgences instilleth a vaine securitie into the soules of men and ouerthroweth the foundations of all true contrition is not Gods forgiuesse and remission expressed with an Omne debitum dimisi tibi Matth. 18.32 I haue forgiuen thee all thy debt if euerie debt why not aso the debt of temporall paine if an exception can be shewed why is it not made manifest Now iudge beloued Reader whether heere bee not sufficient reason to make mee or anie other say farewell vnto the Romish Church that thus enthralleth soules prophaneth the bloud of Christ disableth the Sacraments and picketh mens purses by the deuised doctrine of her Ecclesiasticall Indulgences Deere Iesu pardon my former fault make mee see better heereafter let mee with true compunction for this errour say with the holy Prophet Dauid Erraui sicut ouis quae perijt quaere seruum tuum I haue gone astray like a lost sheepe seeke thy seruant O Lord Psalme 119. verse 176. CHAP. XVI Containing an obseruation about the number of seuen Sacraments admitted by the Church of Rome IN my trauels in the Low-countries I haue often smiled to see how the people in those parts Vaine is the terrors of Romish curses against the truth in a faire corne-field to driue away crowes and other birds from the corne will most artificially frame the reprefentation of a terribleman standing ouer the corne with a grimme countenance and with bow and arrowes drawne vp to the head to the great terror of all birds that none may approach as if forthwith he would hit all that came neare So likewise when I confider how the Church of Rome vseth the shew of terrors and comminations to keepe Christians from feeding vpon the wholesome truthes and verities growing in the spacious fields of Gods word I find much cause of laughter to see shee should thinke men endued with reasonable soules should haue so little sense as not to discouer her vaine scare-crowes of curses and excommunications which are only terrible in words and iust nothing in effect but counterfeit terrors without hurt or harme as for example she makes a great shew in words concerning the number of seuen Sacraments as if she would shoot euery one to the quicke that will be so venterous as to approach vnto the field of Scriptures to know the truth thereof her threatning shew is this Concil trid sess 7. desacra in genere Can. 1. If any shall say that all the sacraments of the new Law were not instituted by Iesus Christ our Lord or that there are more or fewer then seuen viz. Baptisme Confirmation Eucharist Penance Extreame-unction Order and Matrimonie or also any one of these seuen not to be truly and properly a Sacrament be hee accursed Heere is the definitiue sentence of the Church of Rome casting you out of her Synagogue if you gainesay her decree it is curiositie with her and great presumption to examine her doctrine you must not be so hold as to taste of the sweet and most pleasant fruits of Gods word the arrow is drawne vp to the head against you the terror of Anathema must put you to flight Christs doctrine must be no longer the little graine of mustard-seed growne vp aboue all hearbs for his faithfull birds to sit vpon the boughs therof this scar-crow Anathema must put all to flight 2 But those that are wise and iu siciall doe discouer the vanity of this frightful spectacle Those that are wise discouer the vanitie of them with the Berraeans they will examine the Popes doctrine by the Scriptures as they did Saint Pauls they will follow the directions of Doctor Stapleton who appointeth also a meane to trie the doctrine of false teachers by antiquitie euen for all the common sort of people They will as a great Doctor and Champion of the Popes said to me once find that it had been better that the Pope had left many of the doctrines of the Councell of Trent vndefined because so many new Anathemaes makes the world begin to suspect that the Popes labour more to subiect people vnto them by terrors then by truth as men doe children who to keepe them in awe will tell them of Hobgoblins and Robin-good-fellowes such like that wil fetch them away if they bee vnruly and leaue not their crying Which policie my selfe partly obseruing to be vsed by the Church of Rome euen in a moderne example of Paul the fifth his Breue against the oath of alleageance thinking only by the bare words declaratiue without any one reason alleaged for the vnlawfulnes in taking it other then his owne plaine assertion to strike such a terror both into his owne children and into the King and State as if none would dare to gain-say it but blessed be almightie God who hath so communicated the beames of his vnspeakable wisdome vnto him and his loyall subiects yea and vnto many of the Popes owne children who were long seduced by his pretended inerrable power that they dare not onely beleeue the contrarie but also openly auouch it to the world and ioyne foot to foot in defence thereof both with pen and sword if need be howsoeuer the Iesuites would thinke themselues aduantaged if both sides should come to this latter encounter but I trust God out of his mercie will dispose of milder courses more manife sting therein his
they say most impudently Matth. 23.2 that for do Penance they translate Repent charging Protestants to corrupt the Greek it selfe which they pretend to transtate is not this a shamelesse impudencie considering that the foresaid Arias Montanus following the Greek translateth as Protestants do Aries Mont in Matth. 3.2 poenitemini repent yee out of the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Why is he permitted in the Church of Rome if his translation be corrupt or if his be good why should Protestants be condemned for corruption in that place and the former 5 But the Angelical Doctor proceedeth to proue penance to be a Sacrament by impertinently alleaging a place out of S. Luke Vbi supra art 7. sed contra Luc. vlt. It was behoouefull for Christ to suffer and to rise from death the third day and penance to be preached in his name and remission of sins to all people In which text if you consider the words following you shall find that he speaketh of such penance remission as began at Ierusalem according to Montanus who translateth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 incipienteÌ„ beginning at Ierusalem Now I pray what was the penance remission of sins beginning at Ierusalem it is cleere in the Acts of the Apostles what it was for after S. Peter had ended his first Sermon the hearers were compunct in heart Act. 2 37. asking S. Peter with the rest of the Apostles what they should do S. Peter answered Poenitemini repent ye as Arias translateth out of the Greek and let euery one of you be baptised in the name of Iesus Christ for the remission of sins Vers 38 therefore fondly and weakely doth Thomas apply the place of S. Luke the plaine words of the Gospel to proue a Sacrament for I trow no Popish writer will say that the repentance beginning at Ierusalem vpon S. Peters sermon before Baptisme receiued was a Sacrament for they all hold that their Sacrament of Penance taketh away onely sinnes after Baptisme And the same Angelicall Doctor himselfe saith Tho. Aquin. part 3. quaest 84. art 6. ad 2. that Penance which goeth before Baptisme is not the Sacrament of Penance Hence appeareth the first error of Thomas Aquinas and Viguerius holding penance to be a Sacrament 6 Now secondly Auricular confession not inftiâ—uted by Christ as an essentiall part of a Sacrament I find most cleerely that auricular confession by the penitent to a Priest made by a particular enumeratioÌ„ of al a mans sins according to their numerical distinct kinds is by no place of Scriptures to be proued nor was instituted by Christ as an essential part of a SacrameÌ„t howsoeuer the Councell of Florence call Penance a Sacrament and the materiall parts thereof the acts of the Penitent and Lucius the third calleth confession a Sacrament Cap. ad abolendum de Haereticis De sacra Poenit. lib. 1. cap. 15. But how shall this be true saith Bellarmine if it belong not to the essentiall part of the Sacrament As for those Scriptures which Bellarmine alleageth for confession as a part of his Sacrament of Penance they are very impertinently alleaged first I find that he affirming the three parts of Penance to be Contrition Confession Bellar. de sacra poenit lib. 1. c. 11. and Satisfaction and to prooue Confession to be a part of Penance Numb 5.6.7 citeth a place out of Numbers which is this The man or woman when they haue done all the sinnes which vse to happen vnto men they shall confesse their sinne which place according to the meaning can haue no reference to the Sacrament instituted in the law of grace for heere mention is made of acknowledgement and confession to God or of some publique act of iniustice to a mans neighbour which is to be satisfied by restitution as the words following doe expresse And therefore if the meaning of this place belong to Penance as a Sacrament it will follow that then it was a Sacrament of the old Law also Vbi supra and not a Sacrament onely of the new Law instituted by Christ Againe a second place for his Confession as a part of his Sacrament of Penance he citeth as if he cared not what he said a place of Dauid saying to God 2. King 24.10 Peccaui valde in hoc facto which is most ridiculously applied because there Dauid confesseth not to any Priest but to God Ionas 3.5 A third place hee citeth out of Ionas the Prophet to the same purpose And let them crie to God in fortitude which place is meant of importunate prayer to God for pardon for their sinnes which he wrestes to Confession so hee wresteth also the prayer of the Publican Luke 18.13 O God bee mercifull vnto mee a sinner which hee saith belongeth to confession Now the iudiciall Reader if hee marke well the force of his argument and the end shall easily see that the Cardinall doth verie impertinently alleage these places for though these places do somewhat make in generall for the acknowledgement which a man ought to make of his sinnes to God yet they nothing make for that auricular confession which the church of Rome teacheth is to be made to a Priest For he there going to proue that Contrition Confession and Satisfaction are acts of the vertue of Penance will needs infer thence by necessarie consequence that therefore they are parts of actuall penance vnder the nature of a Sacrament for the remission of sinnes which in truth is one of the most ridiculous arguments and such a prophanation of the sacred word of God as I neuer read the like and I wonder how such an illation could be inferred from such a premissie by so learned a man If it were true that a certaine Hampshire Recusant calumniously reported of me not long since to one of his Maiesties housebold viz. that I was distracted and out of my wits and therefore no maruaile if I were become a Protestant I verily thinke I could scarce make a more witlesse argument or with lesse iudgement alleage Scriptures then their learned Cardinall the chiefe pillar of their Church heere hath done But I hope that almightie GOD vnto whom I often say with the most zealous and humble affections of my heart Da mihi intellectum Domme scrutabor legem tuam Giue mee vnderstanding O Lord and I will search thy law will preserue me from such sinister vnderstanding and giue mee such iudgement as may daily discouer the like impostures against truth and GODS holy word and free the truth of Gods cause from many of their disgracefull calumniations which can issue from no other source then the Diuell the Authour of lyes whose implacable hatred and malice will neuer cease against the true Church of GOD to stirre vp such lying children as will imitate his owne wicked nature 7 As impertinently as this text Another impertinent allegation 2. Cor. 5.18 the Cardinal alleageth an other
for proofe of the Romish auricular confession out of S. Paul to the Corinthians he hath giuen vnto vs the ministerie of reconciliation and he hath put in vs the word of reconciliation for Christ therefore we are Legates O God O heauen Verse 19 O Angells O all yee men liuing vpon the earth come and iudge whether the learned Cardinall doe rightly applie this place of Saint Paul or not I will not iudge my selfe I will only oppose what lieth in Saint Paul going before and following these passages cited by him Can this place bee meant of absolution after a particular enumeration of sins to man if you consider what Saint Paul saieth before Beholde Vers 17. 18 all things are made new but all of God who hath reconciled vs vnto himselfe by Christ where it appeareth the chiefe meanes of reconciliation is by Christ as it is said in the nineteenth verse Verse 19 Not imputing vnto them theyr sinnes and the ministeriall meanes of reconciliation by the Cleargie doth it not appeare to bee by preaching the word and exhortation and not by any power to absolue after auricular confession for the Apostle after he had said Hee hath giuen vs the ministery of reconciliation and hath put in vs the word of reconciliation Doth hee not shew the meanes of this ministeriall reconciliation to bee by preaching and exhorting God working it so and no otherwise by them when hee saieth For Christ therefore wee are Legates God as it were exhorting by vs. Who foorthwith performeth this ministeriall office and duetie of reconciliation saying For Christ wee beseech you bee reconciled to God Verse 20 Now heere if wee may beleeue the Apustle Saint Paul iudge whether Christ be not the chiefe cause by not imputing to sinners their sinnes and surther whether the Priest be heere expressed to be the ministeriall cause otherwise than by way of exhortation concluding Him that knew no sinne for vs hee made sinne that is Verse 21 as the Rhemists note Vpon this place a Sacrifice for sinne That wee might bee made the iustice of GOD in him Iudge yee now therefore out of all these places whether the Cardinalles allegation of Saint Paul make anie thing for auricular confession or not as it is a part of the Romish Sacrament of Penance 8 A third place of Scripture alleadged for auricular confession by Cardinall Bellarmine is taken out of Saint Iames chap. 5. where it is said Confesse therefore your sinnes one to another and pray one to an other that yee may bee saued Which place doth neither make for Auricular Confession nor for absolution by the Priest for immediately before Saint Iames imputes the remission of sinnes to prayer in Faith saying The prayer of Faith shall saue the sicke and our Lord shall lift him vp and if he bee in sinnes they shall bee remitted him Againe the wordes seeme not to import that Auricular Confession the Church of Rome vseth for they are spoken as well of the Priest who is to praie as of the sicke for a mutuall and reciprocall prayer each one for the other now the Priest is not by Auricular Confessio to confesse to Lay people that hee may bee prayed for for according to the Papists that Confession is for absolution onely but this Confession Saint Iames speaketh of is meant of such a Confession as ioyned with prayer a man may bee saued by it and that which in the Romish sacramentall Confession saueth a man is the absolution of the Priest who as a Iudge giueth a iudiciall sentence of pardon which is the forme of the Sacrament of Penance and not as a suppliant prayeth for his neighbour which is onely intimated by Saint Iames neither is it apparent that Saint Iames meaneth more by this text than mutuall Confession of them who haue trespassed one the other and therefore may bee thought right well that he meaneth in these words no more than Christ did concerning reconciling our selues with our brother offended that so the offerings of our prayers to God may bee acceptable one for an other when hee said Matth. 4.25 Goe first to bee reconciled to thy brother and then comming thou shalt offer thy gift 9 A fourth place which I discouer most miserably and fondly wrested by Cardinall Bellarmine A text mise rably wrested 1. Iohn 1. verse 9 is out of the first Epistle of Saint Iohn where hee saieth If wee confesse our sinnes hee is faith full and iust for to forgiue vs our sinnes and to cleanse vs from all iniquitie whereupon he saith Vbi supra Hence is Sacrament all Confession probably gathered but it may more truly be said Hence is Confession of our sinnes to God most clearely to be gath ered and the other most probably confuted For first the wordes Hee is faythfull to forgiue our sinnes is spoken of GOD and not of anie Priest as may appeere by the wordes following if wee coâ—nfesse not to GOD If wee shall say that wee haue not sinned Verse 10 wee make him a lyar and his word is not in vs By which it is cleare that Saint Iohn also speaketh heere onely of Confession in generall to GOD as also may appeere by the wordes before If wee shall say that wee haue no sinne wee seduce our selues and the truth is not in vs. Secondly that by this confession is meant that which wee ought to make to GOD is euident by the Rhemists who for the better vnderstanding of this place doe referre vs in the inner margent to the third booke of Kings chap. 8. verse 47. and to the second of Paralipomenon chap. 6. verse 36. both which places make against Auricular Confession the first mentioning prayer to God and acknowledgement of sinnes onely in generall Peccauimus iniquè egimus ininstè gessimus Wee haue sinned wee haue done naughtily we haue behaued our selues wickedly The second place also expressing as much almost in the very same wordes Whereby it appeareth how much the Cardinall abuseth this Scripture and wresteth this Text against all right sense and meaning which cannot possibly be applied for the iustifying of his Auricular Confession Now therefore finding by due search and examination that none of the places of Scripture cited by Cardinall Bellarmine the chiefe Pillar in this our age of the Romaine faith doe prooue eyther Auricular Confession to bee necessarie to saluation or to be truely anie materiall part of Penaunce as a Sacrament instituted by Christ Iesus it followeth as a most certayne truth that the Church of Rome hath most grossely erred in defining the number of Sacraments to bee seauen cursing all those which shall holde and maintaine the contrarie Which curse and threatning of the Church of Rome no man hath cause to scare that esteemes of S. Pauls curse vpon those that shal teach other doctrine than wha the taught or that findteh himselfe lesse surprized with the feare of mens threatnings than with the feare of God who can cast our
Church in the same Kingdome was aduertised that the Dacians made preparations for the warres against him Whereupon he sent the Abbot Hersinus vnto them to know the truth of their designements The Abbot then being vpon his returne at sea was surprised with such a tempestuous storme that he and all his people were in danger of their liues if they had not sought for succour of the virgine Marie for as they inuoked her with all the deuotion they could behold there came from Heauen a venerable Personage apparrelled like a Bishop who after he had saluted the Abbot said vnto him Will you be deliuered from this danger he answered that he desired nothing more Know you then said the Personage that I am sent from the virgine Marie to aduertise you that you shall be deliuered from all danger if you will obey me Commaund said the Abbot all that you please and you shall be willingly obeyed Hereafter then said he you shall keepe a solemne Feast of the Conception of the virgine Marie and in preaching you shall declare that it is to be kept The abbot asking vpon what day it should bee kept and what Seruice the Church should say thereon he answered it should be kept the eight of December and for the Seruice they should take that of the Natiuitie putting the word Conception in lieu of Natiuitie Anno 1060. Then the Personage vanished away the storme ceased and the Abbot escaped with all his companie and afterward performed his promise Is not this a strong foundation to build an article of Faith vpon Let the circumstances be considered as that the Bishop that appeared comming from the virgine Marie vsed such great familiaritie with the Abbot as to salute him that he appeared in a storme when wicked spirits are busiest that he willed him to keepe a Feast of that act concerning the blessed Virgine which cannot be freed from sinne and iudge whether it be not time to flye to the Scriptures reuealed from God when such visions must serue as it is probably deuised by the diuell to delude men withall for the establishment of a new article of faith as diuers of the Romane Church hold this to be It may be this vision might be such a one as I haue sometimes heard of the like nature by a certaine Gentleman as acquaintance of mine who told mee that one appeared vnto him in the forme of a Bishop telling him he must be a Romane Catholike if he would be saued and that he should trauell ouer the seas escape many dangers acquainting him with future euents concerning the Earle of Essex and himselfe which he would not speake of Which vision some of his kindred gaue credit vnto and furthered him in his iourney And I haue heard since when his money was spent beyond the seas he returned home againe and finding himselfe deluded by his vision embraced againe his former religion and continueth in it to this day Some Romanists haue thought that this vision was but an inuention that thereby hee might finde a few golden peeces out of his friends the better to maintaine his trauailes The truth of his vision I leaue to his owne conscience but this I may truely say there is a great resemblance betwixt his and the Abbots and therefore in my iudgement if the Diuell played the Bishop in the one he might as well doe it in the other 5. Another apparition to the same effect Ibidem part 7. Dionys Cor. ser 2. Conc. Be. Mariae Polbert ibid. I haue noted another apparition recorded by diuers Writers of the Church of Rome tending to the same purpose viz to make good the doctrine of the Virgine Maries conception without originall sinne In the time of Charles King of Fraunce a certaine young man nephew to the King of Hungarie loued so much the Virgine Marie and was so addicted to her seruice that daily before he eate any thing he sayed her Houres who falling vpon a time into a great infirmitie and sicknesse vowed his chastitie vnto her if she would helpe to saue his life Forthwith the chamber was replenished with a great light and he was restored to his health Soone after his vncle died without issue which made the Lords of the Countrey to persuade him to enter into the estate of Marriage to the end the Kingdome may not be without heires offering him a faire Ladie which he married But after he had receiued the blessing he remembred that he had not yet that day read our Ladies office he retyred himselfe to say them the more deuoutly sending the Ladie Bride with the rest of the companie home to his house and when he said that Anthieme Pulchra es decora filia Hierusalem that is to say Thou art faire and gracious O daughter of Ierusalem suddainely the virgine Marie appeared vnto him with two Angels attending her and said vnto him If I am faire honest and gracious as thou sayest wherefore doest thou forsake mee for another am not I more beautifull than she O Ladie said he your beautie surpasseth all the beautie of the world thou art exalted aboue the Angels what is your pleasure that I should doe If you leaue said she your carnall espouse for the loue of me you shall haue me for wife in Heauen and if you will keepe a yearely solemne Feast euerie yeare vpon the eight day of December of my conception teaching others to keepe it you shall be crowned with me in the Kingdome of my Sonne When she had spoken these wordes shee vanished out of sight and the young man transpoeted himselfe out of the Citie and Kingdome into a Wildernesse where his comportement was so holy that since he was made Patriarch of Aquilâ—ia where hee preached and instituted the said Feast Collections vpon this storie Iudge now gentle Reader whether this be an apparition likely to come from Heauen when that which is commaunded here is so expressely against the word of God inuiting from that state of marriage which the Apostle calleth honourable vnto the seruice of that fained and deuised priuiledge of the Virgin Maries Conception without originall sinne which I haue already shewed to be expresly repugnant to the word of God and therefore diametrally against faith Besides the institution it selfe is so late that it appeareth to bee cockle sowed by the enuious man the Deuill not by Christ or his Apostles and therefore not to be receiued by those who know Antiquitie to bee the infallible marke of truth The due obseruation of all which premises considered in this Chapter was as forcible an inducement to leade my feete out of the dangerous waies of Romish nouelties as any other therefore curteous Reader let me intreate thee with me to call the Virgin Marie most blessed amongst women as truly shee was vpon earth and is so also in heauen in the glorie of her soule but thinke her not yet so blessed as in this point of her Conception to paralell her with Christ
by the secret vertue of the Stone after an inuisible manner adioyning the Rings together a goodlie entire Chaine was made of them Euen so dearely beloued Christian Reader I finde Christ Iesus to haue beene such a powerfull and attractiue Loadstone vnto my Soule by the precedent obseruations lincking the one vnto the other with such infallible truth that therewith euen as with a most strong chaine of his excessiue loue and charitie hee hath now at the length drawne mee to the knowledge of his true Faith rightly taught and professed in the Church of England 2 It is no other than a chaine of Charitie A briefe recapitulation of the premised obseruations by which hee hath drawne mee to write this Treatise for the manifestation of his truth to those that are ignorant thereof It was a chaine of his prouidence by ministring occasions of times persons and places concurring to my conuersion It is a chaine of truth that euery mans chiefe businesse in this life must bee to attaine vnto the end he is created vnto by God or else hee receiueth his soule in vaine It is a chaine reaching from heauen that a supernaturall and reuealed knowledge from God is necessarie to saluation The obseruation also of an absolute necessitie of a supernaturall Faith is a strong chaine to draw any man to search diligently after it The knowledge likewise of the right rule and golden mete-wand of true Faith consisting of GODS sacred Word is a most forcible chaine to drawe Christians vnto the right knowledge of GODS truth The true knowne visible Church of Christ teaching the true sense of Scriptures is a powerfull chaine to draw men vnto the right faith of CHRIST IESVS Conformitie of Doctrine with the ancient doctrine of the Primitiue Church being a proper marke of the true Church of God is likewise a most attractiue chaine drawing to the true knowledge of right Christianitie The wonders and supposed miracles which Christ fore-told the Pseudo-Christs and false Prophets should doe for the seducing of Gods Elect if it were possible are also a strong chaine to draw any man from the Church of Rome The great hypocrisie of false Teachers fore-spoken of in the holy Scriptures agreeing chiefly with the Church of Rome are a chaine of great strength and power to draw any man from that Church The fruits by which false Prophets are to bee knowne and discerned abounding in the Church of Rome are also a powerfull chaine to draw any man of true iudgement from the abhominiations of that Church The discouerie of the Sacrifice of the Masse to bee Idolatrous which is accompted by the Church of Rome the chiefest act of religion that can bee done to God is a most forcible chaine to draw any man to the knowledge of CHRIST IESVS once offered for vs procuring our Sanctification Is not the proofe of Transubstantiation also to bee a noueltie a potent chaine to draw any man from Rome to the Church of England where the Sacrament is freed from such disgrace Is not the Amputation also of the holy Eucharist a powerfull chaine to draw men from the Church of Rome that they may rightly according to Christs institution bee partakers of the Lords Supper else where Is not also the noueltie of the Popes Pardons and Indulgences which is annexed to Crosses Graines and Meddals a powerfull chaine to draw any man that is not ridiculously childish a stronge chaine to draw him from the Church of Rome If the false doctrine of seuen Sacraments be well discouered by any man bee can not want a strong chaine to draw him to acknowledgement of two true Sacraments instituted by Christ if the doctrine of the Virgin Maries conception in originall sinne bee doubtfull in the Church of Rome the truth of Scriptures shewing it certaine may serue for a strong chaine to draw any man from that doubtfulnesse If the pretended chastitie of the Romish Clergie doe make the Church of Rome seeme more pure and holy than any other the prohibition of lawfull marriage to Priests and the dispensation and permission of vnlawfull marriage to kindred may bee as a strong chaine to draw deceiued soules from the filth and impurities of her hypocriticall holinesse By these the mightie strength power of all those chaines hath the goodnesse of almightie God deliuered my long estraied soule out of her dangerous waies setled me in the happie societie of his true faithfull beleeuers teaching the true ancient Catholike and Apostolike faith Oh how truly may I now say with holy Dauid in humble acknowledgement of Gods singular mercies vnto my soule Maruailous are thy workes Psal 139.14 O Lord and that my soule knoweth right well 3. Now it is time To all Seminarie Priests O all yee Seminarie Priests in this Land or else where who labour still in the same blindnesse and errours wherein hitherto I haue beene my selfe inwrapped as in a darke cloude that out of that true charitie and zeale of your soules good and happinesse wherewith I haue cause to be affected towardes you I direct my speech a while vnto you and manifest the sincere candor of my heart and affections to pittie your case as I haue had cause to bee sorrie for it heretofore in my selfe and therefore I can not but admonish you of the perill you liue in both of body and soule for looking no better into the doctrines which you teach You pretend to bee the salt of the earth Math. 5. vers 13. and the light of the world therefore you haue cause to see well that your doctrine bee sound wherewith you season mens soules and that the example of your vertues and life bee not hypocriticall and superstitious if your salt bee infatuated with nouelties and corrupt doctrines all the world will trample vpon you and you are only fit to bee cast out vnto the dunghills if your liues giue no true light but bee a couered vnder the appearance only of vertues as vnder a bushell where there is no corne your poore followers will bee hunger starued and runne into darkenesse and neuer finde the true light of the world CHRIST IESVS Who illuminateth as Saint Iohn saith Ioh. 1. vers 9. euery man comming into this world If it bee true that CHRIST saith Hee that doeth and teacheth Math. 5.19 shall bee called great in the Kingdome of hâ—auen Vnlesse both these duties goe together without mixture of falshood and finne you can neither bee great in Heauen nor in Earth but certaine I am your paines will bee great in the deepedungeon of hell Examine well your owne consciences both for doctrine and conuersation build not vpon other mens bookes only but examine their doctrines by the infallible rule of Scriptures send your Disciples vnto Christ as Saint Iohn Baptist did not to the Popes who can and haue erred both in doctrine and manners say vnto your Children as Christ our Lord and Master said Search the Scriptures c. because