Some perhaps will here say it would easily be granted that the words were binding if it could bee proved that Adam knew of this institution The works of God are wrought for man to know and in knowing them to acknowledge God in them and to observe them and to make that use of them which he intendeth by them This is an universall truth Againe his works wrought are to bee taken notice of of the first to whom they may become observeable and to whom they doe belong This is undeniable All Gods works are documentary and lead men to some use of them as the Scriptures doe teach Adam created in the excellency of perfection according to the image of God saw Gods workmanship of the world and knew God in them and well understood how to make use of them But now that in six dayes God was creating all things Adam could not know but by information from God nor could he know the seventh day to be the seventh day on which God rested but by his knowledge of the six dayes before it Yet after God made him he knowing that God wrought six dayes and hee beholding Gods rest on the seventh day by his excellent understanding he could conceive that God in both to wit in his six dayes working and in his seventh dayes resting made himselfe a patterne for his imitation for else what needed God to take so many dayes for working or the seventh day for resting But concerning the seventh day Gods exemplary rest is not only mentioned by Moses but Gods blessing and sanctifying of the day not for himselfe for so to think were absurd saith learned B. Lakes but for man Mark 2. 27. In his Thes If so then Adam must needs know thus much else Gods blessing and sanctifying of the day for Adam and his posterity had beene of none effect Although there bee a dispute about the time yet on all hands the words are acknowledged to be words of an institution Now every institution of God is made manifest without delay to them whom it concerneth no instance can be given to the contrary but I have proved the institution to have beene upon Gods rest after the six dayes work and therefore was it forthwith knowne unto Adam to bee an institution of the Sabbath for which cause he knew himselfe bound to observe it as no doubt but hee and the Patriarchs did as followeth to bee proved in the next Section 2. The holy men of God before the Law knew the space of times they knew the space of yeares and reckoned by yeares Gen. 5. and 7. 11. and 14. 4. They knew the space of a moneth Gen. 29. 24. and 38. 20. Exod. 2. 2. and could reckon the moneths knowing which was first which the second the third and fourth c. Gen. 8. 13 14. Exod. 12. 2. and 19. 1. They moreover observed weeks Gen. 29. 2â— 28. and knew how many dayes made a week else how could Laban say fulfill her week or Jacob understand what he meant by it But it is said he fulfilled her week which was seven dayes which made the week as they had learned from God in working six dayes and resting the seventh day and as the Hebrew name sheweth it for a week was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Shabuah comming of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Septem seven which language the Church of God then spake and the Septuagint translates the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latines call Septimana and Hebdomada which doth constare septem diebus as a man learned in the Hebrew tongue delivers it All doe reckon seven dayes for a week and so is it taken in the Scriptures where a week or weeks be mentioned Dan. 9. 27. and 10. 3. Levit. 12. 15. Luk. 18. 12. Now they knowing a week and taking to themselves six dayes of the week for work from Gods example and as God allowed them as we see by his words in giving the Law Exod. 20. 9. 11. may it bee in reason thought otherwise but that they gave God the seventh day according to his owne institution 3 The much observing of the number of seven and seventh may somewhat move us hereto else why did God himselfe so observe it First in his resting upon the seventh day at the beginning Gen. 2. 2. 3. Secondly in his distinction of beasts and foules commanding Noah to observe the number of seven in taking in to him the cleane Gen. 7. 2. 3. Thirdly in ordering so the Arke by the hand of his providence that it as the Type of the Church should rest in the seventh Month on the Mountaines of Ararat Gen. 8. 4. and that the earth should be dryed on the seventh day of the second Month falling out upon no other number but upon the number of seven I say by the guidance of Gods providence to teach the godly that as hee rested the seventh day Sabbath so the Arke the Typicall Church should rest on the seventh day and as he ending his work of Creation and blessed the seventh day so hâ—e ending his work of his judgement upon the sinfull word upon the seventh day on which the earth was dryed which seventh day might very likely be the seventh day Sabbath what may bee said to the contrary I know not For the Sabbath day as now sometimes it doth might fall upon the seventeenth day of one Month and on the twenty seventh day of another Month. Fourthly in ordayning the Passeover to bee kept upon a seventh day Exod. 12. 3 6. for the fourteenth day was the seventh day for if wee reckon from the first day of the Moneth to the tenth and the keeping up of the Lamb till the fourteenth day it must be the second seventh day of the Month which the Jewes began at the evening and continued to the evening Fiftly in the Lords appointing the feast of unleavened bread to consist of the number of seven dayes and the seventh day to be an holy Convocation Exod. 12. 15 16. and a feast unto the Lord Exod. 13. 6. Sixthly in his not rayning of Mannah on the seventh day because he would have no gathering on that day All these put together doe shew that God did much extoll the seventh day before his people and those holy Patriarches to stirre them up to observe the seventh day Sabbath Seventhly to adde to all these the Lords speaking to Noah of the number of seven dayes to bring in the Floud and opening the windowes of Heaven and breaking up the fountaines of the great deep on the seventeenth day of the second Month Gen. 7. 11. and in bringing the Floud upon the old world upon the seventh day Gen. 7. 10. as the learned Translatours have it in the Margin So Tremelius and Innius give us it from the Hebrew Text Fuit ipsorum dierum septimo Vatablus hath it Cum illuxisset dies septimus that hereby among other the wickednesses of the times God might shew his wrath against those evill
learnedst Jewish Rabbies very many judicious Divines among us Protestants and divers learned Papists do hold the affirmative Some few in comparison of the other do hold the negative upon the former suppositions suppositions I call them for that they have no ground of Reason from either the Letter or Circumstance of the Text. SECTION II. Of the conceit of an Anticipation or Prolepsis and what it is TOstatus his conceit of an Anticipation in the words was saith Catherinus ineptum commentum and is indeed contrary to the plaine meaning of Moses his whole narration and the letter of text Here its fit in the first place to shew what is an Anticipation It 's the setting down of a thing in order of story before which cometh to be so in order of time afterwards The Reason of every such Anticipation is from the Penman of the Historie who writeth down things not as they were of old at the first but as they then were when he wrote the story Such an Anticipation here some of them only so say or do rest on others who affirme it without allegation of reasons for this their conception and brain birth But there is one of late who hath produced his grounds for it 1. Because saith he the words may be thus translated And God hath blessed the seventh day and hath sanctified it Ans 1 None so translate the words otherwise than the former in verse 2. Perfecit requievit no advantage to be taken more in the word hath blessed and hath sanctified than in saying He blessed and sanctified Hath is but an English particle and not of force in the Hebrew in the Greek or Latine which yet if we adde to the other verbs as He hath ended and hath rested speaking of that same time would be absurd Ans 2 Thus to devise a Translation from all that have Englished the words as a reason to build thereon a new conceit is no sound dealing but a perverting of the true sense 2. For that diverse places are named elsewhere by an Anticipation saith he Ans This will not conclude therefore here is an Anticipation because there For in those other places there evidently appeareth the grant of the Prolepsis why of necessitie it should be so taken there would else manifestly be an untruth uttered which cannot be here understood when the words are taken as they be in the text as then and at that time so Yet these two reasons for no more I finde are onely the weak under propers of their fancie SECTION III. Arguments against this Anticipation or Prolepsis Argument 1. WHere the words may be taken literally without danger of any untruth contradiction or absurditie there is no figure and anticipation For in a plain narration to take the words figuratively is to abuse the Scripture and to make it as a nose of wax But these words He blessed and sanctified applied to that self-same singular day in which he rested have in them no falshood no contradiction no absurdity Therefore here is no Anticipation Let any shew wherein the falshood the contradiction or obsurditie in so applying and understanding of the words is if they cannot they must give over Abulensis commentum figmentum Argument 2. EVery Prolepsis is onely in places or in the description of things and actions done by men but not of Gods divine institution no instance can be given hereof But these words are not spoken of any place nor act nor thing of men but an act of Gods institution who is said to blesse and sanctifie the day and are words of his divine institution And therefore here is no Anticipation till it can be proved that one may so differ from all other in holy Story Argument 3. In every Anticipation the name act or thing forespoken of in order of Storie hath its dependance and rise from some thing following yet before in order of time For this is an Anticipation as is before shewed and it is most true in every such figure See it in instances In Bethel is a prolepsis Gen. 12. 8. from Gen. 28. 19. In Gilead is a prolepsis Gen. 31. 31. from Gen. 31. 47. In Gilgal is a prolepsis Iosh 4. 19. from Iosh 5. 9. In Bochim is a prolepsis Iudg. 2. 1. from Iudg. 2. 5. In Exo 16. 33 34. which act was when the Tabernacle was built and the Testimony made afterwards Exo. 25. and 26. and 27. on which the truth of this act of Aaron dependeth In 1. Sam. 17. 54. is a prolepsis for the act of David here mentioned could not be true till afterward he won the strong hold of Zion and got Ierusalem 2. Sam. 5. 7. In all these and in every other prolepsis there is such a dependance so clear and evident as none can doubt of the truth of the figure except we would faultie the narration with an untruth But now these words in Gen. 2. 3. have not their truth dependant upon any thing after recorded in Scripture which was before this act of God in time For who can say truely and sollidly prove it that the words in Exo. 20. 11. were the institution of the Sabbath in time before this in Genesis For t is manifest that the Sabbath was kept before the promulgation of the Law Exo. 16. 30. And again the words in Exo. 20. 11. shew us not what new thing God did then but what he had done when he rested the seventh day from his six dayes works in the Creation For as God telleth them what he had done in the very first six dayes in the beginning so he told them what he did that very seventh on which he rested from his work he blessed and hallowed it and made it the Sabbath Therefore it s to be concluded from the nature of a true Prolepsis and the dependance of that which is first spoken upon that which maketh it so in time that here is no Anticipation Argument 4. IN every Anticipation the thing so spoken of is generally known to be come to passe before the Penman wrote it as those former instances do shew If here then were a Prolepsis Gods blessing and sanctifying the seventh day should have been known generally and the institution before Moses tyme who wrote this history of Genesis If they will not acknowledge it was so known before Moses wrote Genesis then is there no Anticipation If they grant it to be generally known then must they yeeld that the Sabbath day was before the giving of the Law and generally so known If they say it was known unto all Israel onely after the giving of the Law then I ask them 1. What Sabbath that was which was knowne to Israel at the raining of Manna 2. How they know that Moses wrote Genesis after the time of the giving of the Law If only it was generally knowne from that time and not before from whence hee must take occasion as they say to insert the words into the second of Genesis and third verse by
way of a Parenthesis Argument 5. THey have no ground whereupon to settle their Prolepsis no Scripture have ever any of them alleadged but either the sixteenth of Exod. or the twentieth and eleventh verse But in neither of these can they fetch their rise for it Not out of Exod. the sixteenth for there are no words of Gods blessing and sanctifying the day mentioned in all that chapter Not out of Exod. the twentieth for the reasons forenamed in the third argument Therefore in the words Gen. 2. 3. is no Prolepsis Argument 6. EVery Anticipation in holy Story hath its ground for it within some convenient space of time Usually and commonly the thing anticipated is recorded within the same book where the Prolepsis is Sometime in the same chapter Jud. 15. 14. 17. and 2. 1. 5. Gen. 31. 21. 47. Sometime in the same verse of the chapter as in Gen. 33. 17. Sometime in the next chapter as in Josh 4. 19. and 5. 9. Most usually in the same book though somewhat farther off in chapters as in Gen. 12. 8. and 28. 19. yet the space then within a mans age Seldome in any other book though sometime as that in the first of Samuel 17. 54. and in the second of Sam. 5. 7. when there is a continuation of the story of the same person whose act is the ground of the Anticipation as is cleare in this instance of David where the Anticipation and the act of David are within the terme of his life But here is a supposed Anticipation not of a few yeares or the age of a man but the space of one world for 1657 yeares and then into another for the space of 450 and odde yeares in the whole 2450 and more yeares A monstrous birth of a leaping Prolepsis for so many generations not to be assented unto Argument 7. IN every true Prolepsis the very selfe same singular thing is to be understood in the Anticipation and that whereon it dependeth As Bethel in Gen. 12. 8. is the selfe same in Gen. 28. 19. not another Bethel But the seventh day in Gen. 2. 3. is not the very selfe same singular and individuall seventh day in Exod. 20. 11. as it was confessed but the same in likenesse saith one and in successive revolution but the nature of an Anticipation doth not admit of such a distinction And here note further that the words of Exod. 20. 11. whence they doe ground their Prolepsis have not the word seventh day in them for in Exod. 20. 11. it is said Wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it But in Gen. 2. 3. it is said He blessed the seventh day so as Moses kept not to the word precisely as he ought if in Gen. 2. 3. there were a true Prolepsis Therefore there is none Argument 8 and last EVery true Prolepsis is raised upon a sure ground and not upon a meere and uncertaine supposition as is manifest in all the former instances and in any other that may be produced But this Prolepsis is grounded upon a meere and uncertaine supposition which is this that Moses wrote his story of Genesis after he heard the Law promulgated upon Mount Sinai where he heard God to blesse and sanctifie the seventh day to Israel and therefore in writing of Genesis he occasionally Pererius is of opinion that Moses wrote Genesis in Midian Euseb Casariensis holds it written before the Israelites comming out of Aegypt lib. 7. cap. 2. de Praepa Evang. inserted the words in Gen. 2. 3. by way of a Parenthesis But till they can prove this every one may see their sandy building and withall admire that any learned men dare thus to wrastle with their wits to overthrow a divine institution Thus much for this Anticipation SECTION IV. Of another conceit concerning Destination and what it is also confuted IT is cleare that there is no Anticipation in the words which some perhaps well weighing have devised another shift to darken the plaine narration that here should not be conceived a present institution of the first Sabbath and this is by interpreting the words by way of Destination which stiffely some maintaine contrary to the opinion and judgement of many learned men aswell Papist as Protestant Divines as afterwards shall be shewed For better proceeding herein to shew the error and to cleare the truth let us see first what they meane by Destination to wit Gods purpose and intention to have the seventh 1 What is meant by Destination day mentioned in Gen. 2. 3. to be the Sabbath day in actuall use after the giving of the Law upon Mount Sinai 2450 yeares after Gods creation of the world and his resting on the first seventh day this is their conceited Destination of the day Next before I come to their Reasons let us see what they yeeld us First that God bestowed a speciall prerogative and preferment 2 Our agreement upon the seventh day setting it apart from the rest of the week That this was done saith a learned Opposite we all agree but when it was done is the question Secondly it is said further that when God had ended his workes he ordained and appointed that the seventh day the day of his owne rest should bee that on which his Church should rest and follow his example and this was that great blessing and prerogative bestowed on that day Thirdly it is moreover granted that the seventh day was from the beginning the day of Gods rest and might have been imployed as the Lords Sabbath and some dayes doubtlesse were thus bestowed and perhaps this Fourthly and lastly that the cause and reason of the Sabbaths sanctification to wit Gods rest was from the beginning though the sanctification it selfe was a long time after From all this note First that the seventh day was the day of Gods own rest Secondly that this his rest was the cause or reason of the Sabbaths sanctification Thirdly that as God actually rested so he then actually sanctified the day deputed and consecrated it unto rest Fourthly that this his rest was exemplarie he ordayning and appointing that the Church should follow his example Fiftly that he set it apart from the rest of the weeke Sixthly and so bestowed upon it a speciall prerogative and perferment and a great blessing which was his appointing it the day of the Churches resting and following his example Seventhly that that day might have beene imployed as the Lords Sabbath that some dayes doubtlesse were thus imployed and perhaps the seventh day it selfe Thus farre wee accord and if well weighed it might easily overthrow their discord from us and bring them home to us for our disagreement is only in this Wee say that all this which they yeeld was for the time present by way of actuall use and employment 3. Our discord They say it was only by Destination and Gods purpose to have it so after he should give his Law on Mount-Sinai after the destruction of the
Adam of his work of creation and of the space he did take to create all things in to wit in six dayes for Adam could not know that God had made the world in six dayes except God had so informed him and not acquaint him with the use of the seventh day also 2 Can we imagine that God distinguishing the seventh from the other six yet would leave it for use in common with the six for so long a time Can wee think that Gods work in six dayes put men into the present possession and use of the six dayes and his rest on the seventh day not afforded unto them the present use thereof 4 Can we suppose in any reason that the Sabbath day was only needfull to the Israelits in the Wildernesse and of no use to Gods people and Church before the Floud nor after till those dayes There are other reasons which are brought out by some for this Destination but they are without any waight of reason Reason 1. THere is no Historicall narration of the observation of the day Answ Yes the observation of the Sabbath is mentioned and plainly witnessed Exod. 16. 30. Reason 2. THere was no Commandement given to Adam concerning his resting upon the day 1 Answ There was no Commandement for whole six dayes working but only Gods example propounded for imitation 2 This reason concludeth not a Destination of the day till Moses his dayes nor any Destination at all for 3 It was needlesse to give to Adam any Commandement affirmative in his state of innocency because he was filled with great wisdome with holinesse righteousnesse and uprightnesse and it was enough for him to see Gods example of rest as a pattern before him to make him to follow him for he could not but know by his excellent wisdome and knowledge that God was to be imitated and hee bound to take his example for imitation Hee also knew that God blessed and sanctifled the day not for himselfe to keep it holy but for man Reason 3. IT is repugnant to the opinion of the Doctors of the Church that God imposed upon Adam in his innocency any more positive precepts but one which was that of the forbidden fruit 1 Answ This reason concludeth not the Destination It followeth not that in Gen. 2. 3. there is a Destination because Doctors hold only one positive precept given to Adam for the plaine narration hath not its dependance upon either one or more precepts given of God to Adam 2 This argument imployeth that the words in Gen. 2. 3. should be a Commandment or else needs must they afford a Destination but though it should be granted that there is no Commandment yet the simple narration of the truth of Gods resting then and his blessing and sanctifying the seventh day preventeth the Conceit of any future Destination Reason 4. THat the Law of the fourth Commandment was not agreeable to the state of innocency Answ The Circumstances of the fourth Commandment to men as they stood under the fall and as the Law was given to the people to rest their men and maid-servants sons and daughters with cattell and stangers after toylesome labour could not agree with Adams state of innocency but the fourth Commandment to keep holy the Sabbath day might be agreeable to Adam in innocency 1. It would and did well agree with Adam to be an Imitator of God but God rested on that day and was refreshed Exo. 31. 17. Therefore it was no whit disagreable to Adams innocency to rest after the example of the Lord his God and to keep a Sabbath 2. Adam was to work six dayes though his labour was delightsome and not toylesome in imitation of God and therefore to rest the seventh day because God did so This is reason enough if no more can be said for it For albeit Adam toyled not his bodie with payn and sweat yet his mind was attent to his weekly bussinesse while he laboured and six dayes were destinated to his labour but now on the seventh day his bodie was altogether freed from all labour and his minde also from attending to it and the whole man set apart for an holy rest unto the Lord which befitted him well 3. Though on the other dayes he served God yet neither the dayes nor he on those dayes were immediatly consecrated to God as this day was and held also for holy duties and to attend upon God immediatly who in that happy estate did in a visible apparition manifest himself to him And what know we what Adam did and should have heard learned and seen from God on that day I may think it should have been such matter as might be agreeable enough to that his estate of innocency 4. Adams perfection of knowledge in holynesse and righteousnesse with uprightnesse and innocency of life did furnish him with matter of heavenly Contemplation and made him bold to present himself before God in a speciall manner that day and was fitted to spend the rest of that day in heavenly meditations who prepared himself and strengthened his faith in the assurance of eternall life in heaven whither he should have been translated in Gods appointed time for eternall life was promised from the worlds beginning Titus 1. 2. whereof the Tree of life was a Sacrament as the Fathers and other learned men do hold So that in this regard the seventh day a Sabbath to the Lord agreed right well to his estate in innocency 5. If the day was blessed and sanctified of God which must needs be granted if the Anticipation and Destinations bee removed then a blessed and sanctified day agreed well to his holy and blessed state of innocencie not any jarre or unfittingnesse comming betweene 6 The day of Gods resting was not only exemplary to Adam but to all Adams seed had he and they abode in innocencie Now then all men labouring the six dayes had it beene unagreeable to their holinesse and innocencie to have bestowed the seventh day in meditations heavenly contemplations praysing God in the beautie of his creatures and the like This surely would have stood with the very highest degree of their excellencies in their state of perfection 7 And lastly Adam had on him as all men should have a double calling one for his body his particular calling in the duties of righteousnesse for which he was allowed six dayes and another for his soule his generall calling to be performed in duties of holinesse for which the seventh day was ordained So that in this respect a seventh day Sabbath was not disagreeable to the state of innocency Reason 5. THe most ancient primitive Fathers as Iustine Martyr Tertullian Irenaeus affirm that none of the Patriarches living before Moses observed a Sabbath Therefore in Gen. 2. 3. is a Destination for future time 1. Answ There be as many Fathers who affirm the contrary and also Jewish Rabbies 2. Affirmations are not to be rested on but the proofes produced 3. Those Fathers are to be