Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	word_n	work_n	wrought_v	521	4	7.9652	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A08318	The nevv Gospel, not the true Gospel. Or, A discovery of the life and death, doctrin, and doings of Mr. Iohn Traske, and the effects of all, in his followers Wherein a mysterie of iniquity is briefly disclosed, a seducer unmasked, and all warned to beware of imposters. As also a confutation of the uncomfortable error, of Mr. Boye, concerning the plague, out of Psal. 91. By Edvv. Norice.	Norris, Edward, 1584-1659.	1638 (1638)	STC 18645; ESTC S113242	39,058	60

directions against it but why doth hee not name who they were that did so or why doth he not handle the point as other godly men have done but thus break out against the Law it selfe calling it a rule of the flesh to make it vile but all this is nothing else than meere deceit and collusion pretending a cause that never was in any of them at whom he aimeth no not to a thought upon which false supposition also it is that he reproacheth all other Ministers that make any use of the Law for Legalists and Iustitiaries as if they taught righteousnesse by works because they make the Law a rule of obedience which is common and I doubt wilfull calumny of all his followers who know well enough how farre they are from such doctrines and drifts whom they disclaime and decline 2. ASSERTION The Law is not to be preached to beleevers by Gospell Ministers Explication HIs meaning is that the Law is not to be preached at all in the Church of God neither to beleevers nor unbeleevers either for repentance or obedience and that his meaning is so his words declare which are these And why may it not be affirmed In his confirmation that seeing there is no Commission to preach the Law at all now under the Gospell and seeing the Gospell containes the whole mind and will of God and that the Apostles did never preach the Law at all but as subordinate to the Gospell and doth enjoyne Timothy to charge some that they teach no other Doctrine but the faith A clause added against the rest c. why may we not say that the Gospell only is to bee preached to all aswell as to beleevers except any can shew a larger Commission than Christ himselfe c. pag. 50. These words are plaine enough There is no Commission to preach the Law at all the Gospell is only to bee preached to all Generall and peremptory assertions without exception yet neverthelesse to hide his flat Antinomisme in his explanation he tells us that the Law as law is not to be preached to beleevers and afterwards demands Who ever denyed the Lawes use or excellency to discover sinne convict such as the Gospell shines not unto to be a ground for all humane Lawes the very rule of love a meanes to shew the greatnesse of sinne of very plentifull use to beleevers c. One would think that the same man could not own both these assertions at once and set them down both in the same Chapter What hath the Law so many excellentuses to beleevers and unbeleevers and yet is there no Commission at all to preach it doth it containe so many excellent truths and of that necessity in the Church and yet is it no part of the mind and will of God to bee revealed unto men Doctor Taylor his Regula vitae is very usefull for all these points how to make all this accord in any good construction I acknowledge to be past my skill or I suppose any mans else for take it according to his first words the Law as Law is not to bee preached but as subordinate to the Gospell yet then it must be preached howsoever and is within the Commission of a Gospell Minister which before he denyed either the Seducer wanted wit to see his own contradictions or else he was very wicked to speak against the truth and his own conscience together the later is most to be suspected but then they are men to be admired that will see neither of them 3. ASSERTION If repentance and faith bee wrought only by the Gospell then what doth the Law work in any mans conversion to God or conformity to Christ Explication THis demand hee acknowledgeth to be truly inferr'd by him upon the premisses of one of his then disciples according to the doctrin he had first taught him and yet lest he should lose his habit of rayling hee keeps the word * This is his Keax Slanderer on foot still although it be the truth under his own hand Concerning which point I will say no more but if the Law serve to discover sinne and to convince men as before he hath acknowledged and that this discovery and convincing bee necessary to bring men to repentance seeing they cannot repent of what they know not how then is the Law wholly excluded from having any hand in the same at all was it not that and matter of that kind which S. Peter used to convince the Iewes withall Acts 2.37 and is it not that which discovers unto all men their own unrighteousnesse and misery that they may seek unto Christ for righteousnesse and mercy Rom. 3.19 doth not that regulate our love and so our conformity to Christ and his requirings John 13.34 but these matters of repentance humiliation for sin godly sorrow sanctification of spirit feare of God care of obedience and such like are all in too low a sphere for his sublimity and not in the compasse of his mounted speculations only faith and joy are the matters he is conversant in the other serve for poore Legalists to feed upon that know no better but it followes 4. ASSERTION The law did once discover sin it doth so no more nor yet for direction love herein transcends the law as far as life doth death Explication HIs meaning is that now in time of the Gospell the Law doth neither serve to discover sin nor yet to be a rule of obedience for it was alleadged by him in way of Answer to that of the Apostle By the law is the knowledge of finne Rom. 3.20 and Chap. 7. 7. to which he replyed that though it did so heretofore yet it doth not so now those times and that use of the Law are past and gone and so out of date the Gospell now doth all without the Law which is his spirituall sense and the mystery of his way but to colour the matter being foule in appearance hee tells us in his explanation that the Sacrifice of Christ doth better set forth the odiousnesse of sinne than the terrors of the Law which is no part of the point what doth most set out the odiousnesse of sinne Ignoratio ele nchis but what doth discover the sinnes themselves in their kinds and severall branches which must needs be the Law according to the Apostles testimony the very definition of sin being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the transgression of the Law 1. John 3.4 then is it to be preached with the Gospell for repentance Concerning the other branch about the directing use of the Law to justifie his deny all he gives us to understand as if none knew it before that the inward principle from which all true obedience proceeds is love which inward grace doth farre transcend the letter without as if that were the question from what inward principle true obedience proceeded and not rather by what Rule the same is regulated and ordered which is the Law of God discovering good and

evill But his practise in this is as if a man rejecting all directions for his way in a journey should give this for his reason that the principle of motion must be in himselfe Charitas continet in sese implicite observationem impletionem omnium Dei mandatorum Ames l. 2. c. 7. medull and not in such outward directions so doth this man but therein it is marvellous what a difference he makes betweene love and the law as if they were two contraries or at least not of the same kind when the Scriptures acknowledge them to be but one and the same love being the very summe and substance of the whole Law Matth. 22.40 Gal. 5.14 But there is yet a more dangerous and suspitious passage following where he stands to maintaine that love hath no rules because God is love who being infinite is not to be limited by any law as if there were no odds betweene the Deity it selfe and a created quality in the hearts of men of which wee speak which Assertion of his therefore savours strongly of Familisme who blasphemously say H N. In his Evangelium Regni that God is manned and man is Godded with such like making no difference betweene the essentiall attributes of the Almighty and the workes and effects of his Spirit in men so this man will admit no rules for love in us because God is unlimitted but to proceed 5. ASSERTION The new covenant hath no condition at all faith is not the condition of the Gospels promises but only a qualification in us Explication TO all this he saith nothing but that the condition required is freely promised in the new Covenant it selfe to be given so leaving all the rest to stand as it did which is as much as if he had said nothing at all for the question was never whence the power came to performe the condition of the covenant but whether there be any at all required to make us partakers of the same which by his words he utterly denyeth excluding saith by name to beany condition of the Gospells promises Fide justificamur instrumentaliter Vrs pag. 343. or any instrument laying hold on Christ but only a qualification By which very ground he hath utterly ungrounded and overthrown the maine foundation of our justification by faith in Christ the condition of the covenant of grace in regard of us and of all the Gospels promises a most pernitious and pestilent opinion directly against the truth of the Gospell Novum soedus non antecedentem sed subsequentem conditionem requirit Ames and the doctrin received in the Churches of Christ and sufficient if there were none other to discover him to be a Seducer and his doctrine not to be the truth but a new Gospell of his owne devising for the promises of the Gospell of Christ pertain only to beleevers and that by reason of their faith in him as appears by Mark. 16.16 Ioh. 3.36 Rom. 10.9 Heb. 3.14 Heb. 4.23 c. else might Infidels and all sorts of wretched and ungodly persons claime right unto all the priviledges of the Gospell and benefits of the new Covenant as farre as the faithfull themselves and that so continuing it followes 6. ASSERTION The Gospel was in mans nature before the fall Explication THis assertion only he disclaimes as none of his no not in any sense throwing thereupon his wonted filth into the face of him that objects it to him and yet immediately after he confesseth some such words in a letter but in another sense which sense he doth not yet declare to cleare himselfe withall as no doubt the witty man would have done had he knowne how But it seemes hee had forgotten how he confessed the words to me himselfe at the conference to this purpose that in potentiâ it was there that is that mans nature was capable of it when it should be revealed a deep speculation and of as worthy consequence as true for if he understand it of nature corrupted the Scriptures testifie that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the naturall man comprehendeth not the things of the spirit speaking of the Gospell 1 Cor. 2.14 untill hee bee enlightned by the spirit of God But the mystery of the matter it seemes is that he would pursue the Law to the utmost even into Paradise it selfe and chase it out of the heart of Adam as that which never had any lawfull being any where so bitter was this Antinomian against the holy Law of God a fearefull mind but to proceed 7. ASSERTION Faith is not to be tryed by any fruits or effects but only by the perswasion it selfe Explication THis he confesseth to be his owne and explaineth himselfe in this manner that fruits and effects do not infallibly demonstrateth faith to any mans owne soule but faith only demonstrates them to be the fruits and effects that attend it selfe for how can any know that faith hath such fruits and effects but by the word and how can we know the word is truth but by faith only thus he wherein there is need of an other explanation to expound this such are the mazes of this mans mysteries for first the question is concerning justifying faith whether it hath any fruits or effects to be known by the answer is given out of an historicall faith in beleeving the truth of the Scriptures the former concernes particular assurance of faith and grace the later only the generall testimony of the word concerning such things wherein there is great difference for many are perswaded of the truth of the Scriptures that have no assurance at all of their own salvation yea the very Devills beleeve and tremble Jam. 2.19 the one is not by grace but by the evidence of truth which they cannot withstand the other is by a speciall work of the holy spirit but here in this reason of his is layd a false supposition for a ground viz. that as by a bare perswasion we beleeve the contents of the Scriptures to be true so by a bare perswasion we are assured of the truenesse of our faith and our owne salvation Vide Bucan de Scripturâ p. 4. Whereas there are many strong and sufficient arguments and grounds to prove the truth of the holy Scriptures besides a bare perswasion or conceit so likewise are there many evidences and signes of faith in true beleevers whereby it may bee knowne and not by a bare perswasion only For albeit we grant a certain reflect act of saving faith in the true beleever whereby he is oftentimes fully perswaded of his standing in the state of grace yet withall we affirme that this perswasion is not * See righteous mans assurance by Mr. Rogers fully of this point pag. 17.18 c. alone but hath certaine effects and concommitants proper to it selfe wherby it may be knowne and distinguished or discerned from a groundlesse presumption and bare conceit else may the most carnall persons yea the vilest men perswade themselves as