the next place to be considered and they are opposite to the things wee pray for and they may be referred to fiue heads also which are these following First ignorance and errors Secondly vanitie of minde Thirdly a prophane heart Fourthly prophane speeches Lastly prophane actions all which are so many meanes to obscure or deface or abolish the glorious name of God out of the world Of these in order Ignorance dishonoreth God First ignorance either of Gods workes or word is the cause of prophaning Gods name for as pearles cast before swine or dogs so are the works and word of God amoÌ„g ignorant persons swine or dogs will trample pearles vnder their feete in the durt but skilfull Lapidaries will vse them carefully and set them in gold and costly garments so the ignorant people that know not the works or word of God wil contemne reiect or at least neglect the excellent instructions and documents of Gods glorie therein exhibited and so prophane the name of God but they that know them may vse them aright and glorifie God in them The dunghill Cocke as the fable moralizeth regardeth a barly corne more than a pretious pearle knowing the profit of the one but not the price of the other so the blind dunghill people of the world Atheistlike through light estimation because of their ignorance preferre the dirtie commodities of this life before the glorious footsteps of Gods Maiestie imprinted in his workes and word thereby marueilously disparaging the Lord himselfe and dishonouring his name Againe Error dishonoreth God Matth. 22. Ioh. 4. ignorance being the cause of superstition and errors as Christ teacheth saying Ye erre not knowing the Scriptures and ye worship ye know not what therefore it must needes bee a maine cause of blemishing Gods glorious names and memorials for errors and heresies are so many lies against the truth of God charging false and slanderous imputations vpon God making him the author of that which he abhorreth and condemneth and as it is blasphemous to make God the cause of sinne so is it of error for it is to call God by a false name and to belie God which is a great dishonour to God For as it is a disgrace to a Prince to bee belied or blasphemed or backbited so is it much more inglorious and dishonourable to God to make him the master and teacher of lies for it is customable with false teachers and their followers to father their doctrines vpon Gods word which God himselfe inspired to his Church and so by necessarie consequent in that they are found liers against the truth of God they shamefully dishonour God In the second place also we are to marke how vanitie of minde prophaneth the name of God Vanitie of minde prophaneth Gods name Rom. 1. The Apostle defineth this sinne to be the withholding of the truth of God in a lie that is to make a false consequent or vse from a true doctrine to know God and not to glorifie him as God for example to know God to bee inuisible and yet to make an image of him to know God to bee incorruptible and yet to resemble him to corruptible creatures as beasts birds creeping things c. and thus the Gentiles thinking themselues to bee wise hauing some truths of God became starke fooles in deducing foolish consequents from that truth so through their vanity of mind defaced that truth with a lie and this is a great indignitie offered to Gods truth For as a subiect knowing his Prince yet making as though he knew him not and so vsing himselfe vnreuerently before him doth disgrace the prince so they that know God and his workes and word yet notwithstanding doe not glorifie God but become vaine in their imaginations and discourses and conclusions from Gods word and workes thereby occasioning and encouraging themselues in licentious liuing and by their liues denying the power of their knowledge which otherwise might haue been auailable to their saluation do shamefully abuse their knowledge iniuriously dishonor the truth reuealed vnto them which they should haue glorified A prophane heart d shonoreth God As blindnes and vanitie of minde so prophanenes of heart also which in the third place commeth to be considered doth greatly dishonor God which is when mens affections are not stirred according to the qualitie of Gods workes or word his titles or attributes and that is especially of three sorts Atheisme dishonoreth God The first is an Atheists heart which is the extinguishing of al affections in respect of God for as an Atheist laboreth for a perswasion that there is no God so also he desireth that the feare of God may be cleane taken away also that the loue of God the hatred of sinne the loue of vertue and of the word of God may be put out and that he may liue as he list without any conscience or difference of good and euill which is to bury the memorie of God and to banish his name out of the world which is the greatest indignitie that may be VVorldlines dishonoreth God The second is a worldly heart when a man is so estranged from heauenly matters and so wholy possessed with the loue and liking of worldly things as that he careth not for God nor any goodnes further than he may gaine thereby which men doe greatly dishonor God and his truth making it a meanes of compassing the world whereas indeede we should make the world a meanes of religion for to this purpose hath God created and bestowed the world vpon man that thereby they might be the better prouoked and furthered to the worship and glory of God hither are to be referred all couetous persons that minde nothing but their goods all proud persons that minde nothing but the trimming of themselues gay apparrell and the credit of the world all wanton persons that minde nothing but the pleasures of the flesh generally all such as dishonor God by presuming any thing in their estimation and affection before God for seeing God is the chiefest good and the most high he therefore ought to bee the chiefest and mosâ— highly esteemed of vs otherwise we honor the creature more than the Creator Rom. 1.25 and dishonor God by communicating his glory to another The third is a secure heart Securitie dishonoreth God when men that haue the grace of God in them notwithstanding doe not so carefully and diligently â—â—irre vp the grace of God in the meditation and application of Go is workes and word as the condition thereof doth require for sometime it falleth out that euen Gods children slumber and sleepe Cant. 5.23 2. Sam. 12. so we reade that the Church in the Canticles complaineth or excuseth her sluggish disposition so we reade that Dauid slept in securitie almost a whole yeere in which time no doubt hee vsed the word of God and the rest of Gods worship though with dulnes and great flatnes of spirit whereby it came to
passe that much of Gods honor and glory fell to the ground vnrespected of the Prophet but then God is dishonored when he is not honored in that measure as the meanes affoord and our grace may permit Hauing hitherto intreated how Gods name is inwardly profaned in our mindes and hearts Prophane speeches dishonor God it followeth now in the next place to speake how by our words and actions we dishonor God and for our speeches which is the fourth generall head we must remember that they are especially of sâ—xe kindes Frst to speake of Gods workes or word without reuerence and feare and attentiue respect to the matter 1 Vnreuerent â—peeâ—â— of Gods vvord or vvorkes dishonor God 1. Cor. 24.13 whether it be in prayer or preaching or conference or howsoeuer else for Gods word being so reuerend and honorable a name of God must with proportionable reuerence and honor be handled and therefore the Apostle would haue Preachers so deliuer the word as that the matter and words be of the same nature for sanctified matter must haue sanctified words and spirituall matter spirituall speeches otherwise the matter is dishonored by the words therefore the Scriptures phrase and rhetoricke is to be obserued of Preachers that their sermons may sauor of them as much as is possible Here also they are to be reprooued that make prayer a lip-labor onely for they speake to God of his word and adde no attention and reuerence which is to dishonor that graue and solemne exercise of inuocation Hither also appertaine those curious schoole-disputes interlaced with philosophicall quiddities whereby Gods word is miserably stretcht and rackt and rent in peeces and disfigured as Christ was vpon the crosse by the souldiers in summe whatsoeuer vndecent homely and vnmannerly metaphors or comparisons whatsoeuer false glozes and expositions whatsoeuer railings and reuilings shall be vsed in disputations sermons or tractats vpon the word fall within the compasse of abusing the holy word of God and the Apostles counsell is reiected who willeth 1. Pet 4.10 that if any man speake he should speake as the words of God 2 Approbation o◠〈…〉 writing dishonoreth God Next to vnreuerent speech are such as giue approbation to error or false worship whether by word or writing as subscription to poperie Mahometisme or any other false doctrine or superstition For if it be alleadged that though they by word or writing may seeme to approoue that profession whereto they subscribe yet they keepe a pure heart free from any assent or allowance thereto The answere is 1. Cor. 6.20 Ioh. 4.24 1. Cor. 8.10.11 that God will be glorified with the whole man and not with the spirit onely though that be chiefely regarded of him himselfe being a spirit as Christ teacheth the Samaritane The reason which the Apostle vseth to disswade the Christian Corinthians from presenting their bodies at idolatrous feasts least thereby the weake be enboldned to doe so likewise is sufficient to enforce this conclusion that no outward approbation must be giuen to superstition least others be deceiued thereby and so Christ be dishonored For that which may be alleadged of Elishâ—es approbation to Naaman the Syrian 2. King 5.18 is altogether impertinent if the place be truely translated for Naaman doth not desire indulgence from God for idolatrie which he purposeth to commit as though hee spake in the future tense but for that idolatrie which he had formerly committed for indeede the words may aswell be translated in the time past and so they are directly in the originall So then whatsoeuer may be alledged to the contrarie it is manifest that all outward approbation of false doctrine or worship by word or deede is dishonorable and scandalous to our weake brethren Let vs take heede therefore how wee receiue the marke of the beast in our foreheads Apoc. 13.16 or our right hands that is that we by our gestures or subscription doe not approue the doctrine and superstition of the Pope or the Turke Vers 3. least by this meanes we worshipping the beasts and dishonoring God our names be not found in the booke of life After superstitious subscription or approbation of false worship 3 Scoffing speecâ—â—s about Gods wo d or wâ—rkes d shonor God follow mocking and iesting at or with Gods workes or word a thing very common now adayes for euery wittie or rather indeede witles braine wil be deuising and belching out the scum of their wit in iesting and scoffing at Gods workes or with Gods word or other holy writings agreeable to the word and consecrated to the worship of God These men in truth mocke God himselfe in that they mocke Gods workemanship for the disgrace of the worke tendeth to the dishonor of the workeman for the world hath Nick-names for euey one that hath either a great head or wry necke or long nose or crooked backe or lame legge or that wanteth a hand or an eye or so forth these deformities should stirre vp in vs humiliation as being so many prints of Gods wrath in man and if we be free from them to acknowledge with thankfull memorie the mercie of God to vs that haue desâ—â—ued as much that so wee might glorifie God in his iustice and mercie also the world and especially the stage which is a little world of wickednes is full of Scripture iests it would cause a mans hayre to stand vpright to heare how some please themselues in this kinde of Rhetoricke which the diuel deuised and suggested into the mindes and mouthes of mocke-gods 2. King 1.24 We reade how seuerely God punished young children that mockt the Prophet for his infirmitie of baldnes and his ministerie of prophecie and the Apostles condemneth iesting which notwithstanding the heathen man counted a morall vertue Now if it be a fault for one man to mocke another it is likewise a fault and much more for a man to mocke with the word of God it is a great sinne also for vs to make our selues merâ—y with the simplicitie of a naturall borne fooles in all which Gods workes and word and so God himselfe is dishonored 4 Vaine swearing dishonoreth God Furthermore vaine oathes diminish Gods glory when men vpon no necessitie hauing no calling in vaine toyes vsurpe the name of God or the name of Gods workes as by this light fire salt bread or the name of false gods or worship as the Masse our Lady Saint Anne c. In al which God is dishonored either directly or immediatly Matth. 5.34 as in vsing Gods titles or attributes or the parts of Christs body or soule Matth. 23.16.17.18.19 20.21.22 Psal 16.4 Exod. 23.13 idlely and fruitlesly or indirectly and by consequence in calling to witnes the workes of God which are so many memorials and testimonies of God as faith troth c. Or lastly in calling to witnes false gods or false worship which is to rob God of his honor and giue it to another which
A PATERNE OF TRVE PRAYER A LEARNED AND COMFORtable Exposition or Commentarie vpon the Lords Prayer wherein the Doctrine of the substance and circumstances of true inuocation is euidently and fully declared out of the holie Scriptures By IOHN SMITH Minister and Preacher of the Word of God AT LONDON Imprinted by Felix Kyngston for Thomas Man and are to be sold at his shop in Pater-noster row at the signe of the Talbot 1605. TO THE RIGHT HONOVRABLE EDMVND LORD SHEFFIELD LORD LIEVTENANT AND President of his Maiesties Councell established in the North Knight of the most noble Order of the Garter c. IT is neither ambition nor couetousnes Right Honourable that moueth me to publish this Treatise to the view of all which not long since I deliuered to the eares of a few being then Lecturer in the Citie of Lincolne but partly the motion of some friends partly and chiefly the satisfying of some sinister spirits haue in a manner wrested from me that whereto otherwise I had little affection Credit through writing bookes is a thing of such dangerous hazard by reason of the varietie of censurers that it is doubtfull whether a man shall winne or lose thereby Gaine also is so slender as that for a booke of a yeeres paines and studie it will be a verie hard matter to attaine if it were set to sale in Pauls Church-yard so much money as inck paper and light cost him that penned it so as except a man should doate hee must haue better grounds of publishing his writings than either credit or gaine especiallie considering the plentifull haruest of bookes of all sorts amongst which there appeareth variable contention In some it is questionable whether wit or learning getteth the victorie in others the strife is betwixt wit and the truth some bewray dissentions betwixt conscience and policie others contend after other fashions All declare thus much that except a man can adde something new of his owne it is vanitie to write bookes for otherwise a man shal sooner get mocks than thanks for his paines Wherefore I doe professedlie renounce all ambitious affection of credit and couetous desire of gaine and betake my self to a better refuge which is the cleering of my selfe from vniust imputations and accusations I haue beene strangely traduced for the doctrine I taught out of the Lords Prayer I haue been vrged to answere in defence of the doctrine I deliuered touching that subiect before the Magistrate ecclesiastical as if so be I called in question the truth thereof For the cleering of the truth I am bold to publish this present Treatise wherein I protest before the God of heauen and before your Lordship I haue truly set downe the substance of all that which I deliuered in handling the Lords Prayer I must needes confesse that it is not word for word the same for that were impossible to me yet to my knowledge it differeth not in any materiall circumstance nay I doe verily thinke that if I misse the truth it is rather in the writing than in the preaching Howsoeuer it be I most humbly beseech your Honour to vouchsafe the patronage of this traduced Pamphlet I must acknowledge it is presumption in me to impose vpon your Honour the scandall of countenancing so suspitious a writing for who knoweth whether it shal gaine the approbation of the godly learned when it commeth to their censure but for that your Lordship had the managing of the cause of difference betwixt my accusers and me concerning this occasion and for that your Honour so wisely and charitably compounded the controuersie on both parts to the contentment of either of vs your Lordship might iustly challenge a greater title herein than any other whatsoeuer wherefore although it proue a troublesome burthen I beseech your Honour not to refuse it the rather for that the honourable interest which your Lordship hath in the affections and iudgements of men honestly disposed will so farre preuaile as to cleere your Honour from the least spot of dishonour which perhaps might accrew through the patronage of so dangerous a tractate yet thus much I may be bold to assure your Lordship that this Treatise passeth with approbation to the presse and doth not shroud it selfe in tenebris as if it either shamed or feared the light which may be some reason to induce your Honour the rather to receiue it into your Honourable protection for my selfe I freelie confesse there is in me no abilitie to declare my thankfulnes to your Lordship otherwise than by betaking my selfe by some such pamphlet to your Honours safe conduct which if it shall please your Honour to affoord I shall at all times acknowledge my thankfulnes and instantly pray for your Lordships continuance and increase in al true honor and happinesse Your Honours humblie at commandement IOHN SMITH TO THE CHRISTIAN READER BEloued marueile not that after so many expositions vpon the Lords Prayer this Pamphlet steppeth vp as if so be it had some thing to say besides that which hath been alreadie spoken to confesse the truth I gesse it may occasion the iudicious reader to enter into a more inward view of Christs purpose in propounding that prayer perhaps also the manner of handling the seuerall petitions may giue some light but my intent was none of these when I intended to publish the treatise onely the cleering of my selfe from vniust accusations and the satisfying of a few friends moued me therto but whatsoeuer it be and howsoeuer vttered I pray thee of charitie to construe a thing indifferently done to the better part especially those few questions resolued in the latter end of the treatise I doe here ingenuously confesse that I am far from the opinion of them which separate from our Church concerning the set forme of prayer although from some of them I receiued part of my education in Cambridge for I doe verily assure my selfe vpon such grounds as I haue deliuered in the treatise that a set forme of prayer is not vnlawfull yet as Moses wished that all the people of God could prophecie so doe I wish that all the people of God could conceiue prayer the rather for that personall wants blessings and iudgements are not comprised particularly according to their seuerall circumstances in any forme of prayer possibly to be deuised wherefore I desire that no man mistake me in this treatise I doe iudge that there is no one doctrine or opinion contrarie to the doctrine of this Church in all this tractate in respect whereof I hope it shall finde more indifferent censure at thy hands And for that misconceit which some perhaps haue intertained at the hearing of the doctrine when I taught in Lincolne I doe also as freely and truly protest that I neuer durst admit I blesse God for his mercie so blasphemous a thought into my minde as to surmise whether the prayer commonly called the Lords prayer be the prayer which Christ taught his Disciples or no for I doe with
Paul on the sea shore Ionas in the Whales belly in the bottom of the sea but the superstitious papists will haue some place more holy than others hence come there pilgrimages to such a holy place hoping thereby sooner to obtaine their petitions therefore also they thinke the church-yard holy ground the Church holyer than the Church-yard the Chancell then the Church and the high altar more holy than the rest of the chancell True it is indeed that when the Church of God is assembled in the Church the place is more holy but not for any inherent holines in the ground but because of Gods presence among his people and because of holy actions there performed in regard whereof it is sacriledge to offer violence to such places or any way to prophane them yet God will assoone heare thy prayer at home in thy closet as in the Church though the publike prayers are more effectuall than priuate Finally to shut vp this point in regard of place prayers are publike or priuate The place of publike prayer is the assembly of the Saints wheresoeuer it be which sometime in persecution was in priuate houses or in caues of the earth or the wildernes or mountaines Act 1.13 Heb. 11 38. The place of priuate prayer is the house or the closet or some such fit place in secret not the market place nor the corners of the streete though I doubt not but a man may sigh and groane to the Lord walking in the streete and making his markets Mat. 6.5.6 but the outward signes of prayer priuate must then be concealed from the sight of men least wee appeare to men as hypocrits Hitherto of the necessitie of prayer with the time and place of performing that dutie The second generall thing to be considered in the dutie which Christ enioyneth his disciples is the manner how we must pray How we must pray which is expressed in these words After this manner pray ye The meaning of which words must needes be one of these things following that is to say Pray either 1. These words onely or 2. This matter onely or 3. In this method onely or 4. These words and matter or 5. These words and method or 6. This matter in this method or 7. These words and this matter in this method Now which of these things our Sauiour Christ doth enioyne shall appeare by the seuerall consideration of euery one of these seauen things First Christ doth not commaund vs to pray these words onely for then we should offend if we vsed any other words and words without matter is babling and Christ spake in the Hebrew tongue the Euangelists wrote in the Greeke tongue but Christ will not haue vs speake Greeke and Hebrew only when we pray therfore it is euident that Christ commaundeth not to say and so tyeth vs not precisely to these words onely Secondly he doth not enioyne vs to pray onely in this order or method for then whosoeuer vseth any other order should sinne and Christ commaundeth vs Matth. 6. First to seeke the kingdome of God and his righteousnesse Matth. 6. â—3 before our daily bread but in this prayer Christ doth set the prayer for daily bread before remission of sinnes and imputation of Gods righteousnes wherefore aâ—so this is plaine that Christ doth not commaund vs to vse onely this method Thirdly he doth not commaund vs to pray this matter in these words onely for then Paul and Daniel and Dauid should sinne that pray this matter in other wordâ— â— Cor. â—â— 1â— Dâ—n 9. Psal 119. and all the Churches that euer haue bin which haue vsed other words in prayer though they haue alwaies kept themselues to this matter but it were impietie and blasphemie to say so therefore Christ here doth not binde vs to this matter in these words onely Fourthly he doth not commaund these words and method as hath been prooued in the second and third parts Fiftly he commaundeth not this matter in this method as is proued in the second and third parts Sixtly he commandeth not these words matter and method as may appeare by all the former parts wherefore in the last place it followeth necessarily this being a sufficient enumeration of parts that he commandeth vs to pray only this matter as if when Christ said thus After this manner pray hee should haue said pray 1. the matter herein contained and 2. with the affections here expressed This then is the meaning of these words and here Christ tieth vs to the matter and affections of this prayer To proceed Although Christ commandeth not these words and matter and method yet he doth not forbid them for in the whole Scripture there is no such prohibition wherefore Christ leaueth it arbitrarie vnto vs as a thing indifferent when we pray to say this prayer or not to say it so be that we say it in faith and feeling or if wee say it not VVhether a sâ—t forme of prayer be lawfull yet to pray according vnto it and this I suppose no indifferent man will denie yet there are some whom we wil account brethren though they doe not so reckon of vs seeing they haue separated from vs which thinke it vnlawful to vse the Lords Prayer as a set prayer or any other prescribed forme of prayer but that they are in a manifest error it may appeare by these considerations ensuing For if it bee lawfull to vse the salutation of Paul the Psalmes of Dauid and the blessing of Moses then wee may lawfully vse the Lords Prayer or any other prayer in holie Scripture agreeable thereto for a prayer For Paul himselfe vsed alwaies one manner of salutation our Sauiour Christ as is very probable vsed one of Dauids Psalmes with his Disciples after the first institution and celebration of his Supper Psal 92. and the 92 Psalme was vsually in the church of the Iewes sung vpon the Sabbath day and Moses alwaies vsed one manner of prayer at the remouing of the Tabernacle Numb 6.24.25.26 and 10.35.36 and another at the pitching thereof which euidently serueth for the ouerthrow of that opinion which they of late haue deuised contrarie to the practise of the ancient Church and all the reformed Churches in Christendome who haue an vniforme order of publike prayer one and the same almost in the very forme of words and plainly confirmeth vs in the present truth wee hold that it is lawfull to vse the prayers in Scriptures or any other prayers made by the Saints of God to our hands consonant to the Scriptures and yet notwithstanding here are some cautions to be remembred 1. That wee labour to insinuate our selues as much as may be into the grace and affections expressed in the prayers by the makers thereof that so wee may pray with the same spirit they did indite and vse them hauing by diligent consideration and vnderstanding of them as it were made them our owne 2. This vsing of other mens prayers is
of men As for example they will write it vpon a peece of paper or hauing written it cause the partie diseased to weare it about his necke and so they shall be cured they will write it in cheese or vpon bread and giue it to mad dogges to eate and their madnes shall depart from them and other practises of like folly and impietie all which plainely argue societie and fellowship with the diuell and the helpe of the diuell for others cannot doe it but themselues and why I pray you cannot others doe it forsooth say they you doe not beleeue as we doe no not though you say or write the same prayers that they doe Surely wee beleeue that to be true which they say for they haue either openly or at the least secretly contracted with the diuell whose they are whom they serue and honor and in whom they beleeue No maruaile then though others which worship the true God cannot doe such charming trickes as they can for indeede good Christians beleeue not in the diuell as they doe Wherefore seeing they direct their prayers to the diuell which should be directed to God alone they doe greatly abuse their prayers Obiection If any obiect that these wise women vse medicines as well as prayers and so their prayers doe only sanctifie their medicines which they vse to cure their diseases the answere is their medicines are not such as the art of physicke alloweth but some foolish trumperie which hath no qualitie or vertue sutable to the disease as fit to draw the moone out of heauen as to cure a disease and both their medicines and prayers are nothing else but a colour of their charming that so vnder such a shew of art and holines they may the easier deceiue the simple people who for the most part thinke that all is gold that glistereth and who knoweth not that euen Sathan can transforme himselfe into an Angell of light Also if it be obserued these women and charmers are either ignorant or profane persons wanting the true knowledge of God or leading lewd and vngodly liues yet outwardly at performing of their cures they will make such a holy show of deuotion as may bleare the eyes of vnexperienced people In regarde whereof greater care and diligence ought to be vsed in examining and trying their actions for the white diuell will sooner deceiue than the blacke diuell It appeareth then plainely by this which hath been said that the Lords prayer is diuersly abused by diuers sorts of persons as namely the ignorant the impenitent the papist the charmer The holy vse of the Lords prayer The second point to be handled in the generall consideration of the Lords prayer is the true lawfull and holy vse thereof and so of prayer generally which may partly be perceiued by that which hath alreadie been deliuered concerning the abuse for the knowledge of one contrarie ariseth but of the knowledge of another and he that knoweth wherein the abuse of the Lords prayer consisteth knoweth also wherein the true and holy vse doth consist Yet notwithstanding it shall not bee amisse to intreate briefely of this point referring the further vnderstanding thereof partly to that which hath been alreadie spoken of the abuse and partly to that which shall be spoken afterward in the preface and in the conclusion of the Lords prayer of the affections and dispositions in the time of prayer and of the manner of prayer To handle this point then of the true and holy vse of prayer it consisteth especially in foure particulars 1. Knowledge for a man must vnderstand what he prayeth 2. Faith which is an assurance of obtaining that we aske 3. Repentance which is bewailing our sins and wants and a practizing of our prayers 4. Deuotion which is a due disposition in time of prayer For if vnderstanding the matter of our prayers Knowledge necessarie for the vse of prayer feeling our sinnes and wants bewailing them purposing to amend them earnestly asking pardon and reliefe reuerently carying our hearts in Gods presence faithfully perswading our selues God will heare vs if I say we thus aske we doe truely and aright vse prayer First for knowledge that it is necessarie shall appeare by consideration of the seuerall parts thereof for there is a threefold knowledge required 1. Knowledge of the words vttered 2. Knowledge of the matter contained in the words 3. Knowledge of the doctrine comprehended in the matter The knowledge of the words is opposed against prayer in an vnknowne tongue which edifieth not and therefore must be remooued out of the congregation and in the congregation the words of the prayer must be vnderstoode 1. Cor. 14. else the speaker shall be a barbarian to the hearer and otherwise the hearer cannot say Amen Strange languages is a iudgement of God vpon the world as may be seene by the history of the tower of Babell Gen. 11. the euidence whereof appeareth vnto this day in that the paines we bestow about the learning of the tongues is so hard and tedious and is a gâ—eat impediment to the true knowledge of the Scriptures If it be a iudgement of God why shall we not seeke to pray in a knowne tongue and so to vnderstand whâ—t we pray that we may be freed from that iudgement The knowledge of strange tongues indeede is a blessing but the strange tongue is vndoubtedly a iudgement The knoâ—ledge of the matter is a thing absolutely necessarie also for shall we vtter we know not what to God or shall we giue consent in publike prayer to that we are ignorant of the prayer perhaps may containe Arrianisme or Pelagianisme it may be hereticall or schismaticall or sâ—uor of some foule errors which cannot please God seeing they are not agreeable to holsome doctrine of the word 1. Ioh. 5.14 all our prayers must be according to his will but false doctrine heresies or errors are contrary to his will Wherefore we must carefully know and search whether the matter of our prayers containe in them truth or falsehood and so the knowledge of the matter is also absolutely necessary if wee will haue our prayers accepted and graunted The knowledge of the doctrine comprehended in the matter also is needefull that a man in some measure know the fundamentall points of religion Ioh. 4.22 which our Sauiour Christ requireth in the Samaritanes for they worshipped they could not tell what but the Iewes knew what they worshipped Ioh. 17.3 2. Cor 13.5 1. Cor. 11.28 a man therefore must know God and himselfe the law and the Gospell in some tolerable measu e before hee can make acceptable prayers to God through Christ Iesus The second thing necessarie for the true and holy vse of prayer Faith neceâ—sariâ— o the â—olie vsâ— of pâ—â—â—er 〈…〉 5 14. is faith or an assurance of obtaining that wee aske according to his will this faith or assurance is a fruite of iustifying faith which laieth hold vpon Christ for
concluded A king that is of abilitie will aduance his kingdome cause himselfe to be honoured cause his subiects to obey his will and prouide for the outward prosperitie and inward felicitie of his subiects God he is of abilitie being a powerfull king Therefore he will prouide for his honour c. The third argument is taken from the glory of Gods kingdome Glory of Gods kingdome Where first consider the meaning of the words Thine is glorie that is 1. Thou hast made al things for thy glory 2. The things we aske are meanes of thy glory 3. The things we aske shall by vs be referred to thy glory and so the conclusion followeth Ergo graunt vs these things which we aske in these petitions Secondly let vs also consider the argument framed thus directly confirming our faith for the first petition That which is most deere to thy selfe thou wilt procure But thy glory is most deere to thy selfe Therefore glorifie thy selfe by vs or in vs or giue vs grace to glorifie thy name Indirectly it confirmeth our faith in all the other petitions after this manner Thou Lord wilt further all the meanes of thy glorie But the enlarging of thy kingdome the obedience of thy will our daily bread remission of sinne and perseuerance in grace are meanes of thy glory Therefore Lord we are perswaded thou wilt cause c. The eternitie of Gods kingdome The fourth argument wherby our faith is strengthened is taken from the eternitie or euerlasting continuance of this kingdome and of the two other properties thereof mentioned in the second and third arguments for the kingdome power and glory of God is euerlasting or Gods powerfull and glorious kingdome is eternall and that in a double respect 1 In themselues for that they neuer haue end 2 In the faithfull who doe and will euerlastingly remember and magnifie the Lord the most mighty and glorious king This fourth argument is framed after this manner If thy kingdome power and glory shall euerlastingly be remembred and magnified by vs as it is euerlasting in it selfe then grant these our praiers which are means thereof But by granting these our petitions we shall be prouoked to procure the euerlasting remembrance of thy kingdome power and glory by our selues as long as we liue by our holy seede after vs and for euermore in thy heauenly kingdome Therefore we are perswaded thou wilt graunt vs these our petitions Faith is supported God is not perswaded by arguments Thus our faith is supported and strengthened by arguments which are vsed not to perswade God who is vnchangeable and immoueable in his purposes but to perswade vs who are of little faith and scarse beleeue God himselfe and therefore haue need to find out in our selues strong arguments as it were maine pillars to support our faith as it were a crasie house ready to fall to decay continuallie Desire a part of feruency The second part of feruencie is desire which is expressed in the word Amen As faith is the principall worke of the vnderstanding so desire is the principall worke of the will in regard of that which we want and as faith may well be compared to the hand or arme laying hold vpon blessings so desire may be compared to the brawne or sinewes of the arme or hand the instruments of strength whereby wee holde fast that which we apprehend Mat. 7.7 This is expressed by Matthew in very significant and forcible metaphors Aske as a begger doth to get an almes Seeke as one with a candle looketh for a iewell lost vpon the ground Knocke with strength and force to get open the gate of Mercie The word whereby desire is expressed is an Hebrue word and it signifieth VVhat Amen doth signifie verely truely certainely so be it let it bee so O Lord I desire it might be so as I aske And this may afford an argument for the confirmation of our faith to obtaine taken from the trueth of God framed in this forme Thou Lord art a God of trueth Amen containeth an argument to support our faith thou art true in all thy promises thy promises are yea and Amen thou art Amen the faithfull and true witnesse thou keepest fidelitie for euer But thou hast promised to grant the petitions of thy seruants made in feruencie of desire and faith Therefore grant these our petitions so qualified Thus the manner of making our prayers is taught vs in the conclusion of this prayer which is feruencie in the two parts thereof faith and desire Now contrary to feruencie is coldnes in prayer Coldnes in prayer whereof something briefely must be spoken that contraries may be more perspicuous by their opposition A cold prayer is either when a man vnderstandeth not that which he bableth with his lips or hath no assurance to obtaine that hee asketh or regardeth it not in comparison or prayeth liuing in sinne vnrepented of for all these conditions are as it were colde water cast into a boyling caldron which boyling before through heate now ceaseth Iam. 1.6 The Apostle Iames compareth such prayers to waues of the sea tost to and fro with the wind and at length are consumed into froth or beaten in peeces vpon the rocke A cold prayer obtaineth nothing for although perhaps a cold prayer may swell in great and eloquent words and roare with pitifull complaints and outcries and be tumbled vp and downe in the mouth by repetitions or in the mind by imagination yet at the length the winds of wandring thoughts faint affections or grosse ignorance driueth them vpon the rockes of presumption doubting despaire and impenitencie and so suddainely they are dissolued into froth and consumed into nothing In briefe therefore to conclude this conclusion wee must striue and wrastle with the Lord in time of prayer as Iacob did with the Angell Genes 32.24 Hosea 12.4 holding him fast not letting him goe till he blesse vs till he change our names and call vs Israel men preuailing with God that so after our prayers we may find spirituall ioy and comfort and incouragement in all our waies which is the fruite of feruent prayer Here should bee the end of this treatise but that there are certaine extrauagant questions to bee discussed which could not be referred to any one proper place of the former method and yet containe matter very profitable though onely probable and consisting of vncertainties and coniectures for the most part The questions with their answeres are briefely these following VVhether Christ prayed the Lords prayer 1 Whether Christ euer prayed the Lords prayer The answere It is probable that Christ did pray the Lords prayer himselfe for himselfe and for vs for although the expositors say that the word Father is Naturae nomen non personae that is to say common to all the three persons not proper to the first person and therefore it would follow that if Christ prayed this prayer he should pray to himselfe
yet if it be said that the word Father may be either proper to the father or common to all the three persons or both there will no absurditie follow and the obiection is answered Againe if it be obiected further that Christ should pray for the pardon of sinnes he hauing committed no sinne thereby giuing occasion to thinke that he had sinne the answere will be very indifferent that Christ might vse that petition as an instrument of intercession for vs and not as a petition for pardon of his sinne prescribing it neuerthelesse vnto vs for a prayer of remission who had sinned or else it might be answered that Christ being the suretie might intreate God to pardon his sinnes not the sinnes which he had committed but the sinnes which were to him imputed or the petition being deliuered plurally forgiue vs it may bee Christ prayed for both and there was no doubt of misconceit in his Disciples to whom hee priuately expounded doubtfull matters and if the matter bred any misconceit in the other auditors it was through their own corruption and ignorance and therein the Lords iustice might appeare in blinding their mindes and hardening their hearts as himself teacheth who oft times spake obscurely and ambiguously 2 How oft Christ vsed the Lords prayer and how How oft Christ vsed the Lords prayer and how The answere of this question is partly certaine partly probable It is certaine that Christ vsed the Lords prayer twice first he vsed it when he taught the doctrine of prayer and so Matthew hath propounded it as a part of the sermon in the mount Secondly he vsed it when he taught his Disciples a forme of prayer according to the example of Iohn who taught his Disciples a paterne of prayer and this was presently after Christ had ended his prayers in a certaine place as Luke reporteth whence in all probabilitie it may be collected that Matthew prescribeth this prayer one way and Luke another for in Matthew Christ taught the doctrine of prayer and so it is dogmaticall in Matthew Luke saith Christ taught a prayer for his words are When ye pray say and so it is practical so that Christ taught it both for a prayer which his Disciples might vse and for the doctrine of prayer which his Disciples might teach Againe it is probable that Christ neuer vsed this prayer but twice although it cannot be demonstratiuely proued onely this coniecture we haue that whereas Christ maketh diuers prayers to his Father in the Euangelists this is not mentioned nor any petition of it in so many words and the Euangelists neuer name it elsewhere by any speciall name and the Apostles in their writings neuer make mention of it but when they pray in their writings vse other formes though still they keep themselues within the compasse of the matter and affections of this prayer which we call the Lords prayer both for that it was composed by Christ and vsed by him hence therefore it followeth probablie that the Apostles neuer tied themselues to the words of this prayer but varied vpon occasion Briefly then Christ vsed this prayer twice but it cannot certainly be determined whether he vsed it oftner neither can it be proued that the Apostles vsed it often VVhether Christ spake all and onely the words of the Lords prayer 3 Whether Christ spake all and onely the words of the Lords prayer The answere is onely coniecturall for it cannot be proued that he vsed the very words set downe by the Euangelists the reason is for that the Euangelists vse to set down not all and onely the words which Christ spake but the summe and substance of them and if it be graunted that the Euangelists haue done it in other places why may they not doe it in this place especially seeing the Euangelists doe differ in words in reciting many of Christs speeches as namely of the Beatitudes Mat. 5.3 Luk. 6.20 Matthew maketh eight Luke reciteth but foure and Luke expresseth the contrary woes and Matthew doth omit them whence this may in al likelihood be collected that Christ vsed diuers other words by way of exposition to the Beatitudes and so by consequent to the petitions of the Lords prayer and wee see directly that Christ expoundeth one petition viz. the fifth and why might he not also expound others seeing that other petitions are as hard to bee vnderstood as that and this doth not any whit call into question the truth of Canonicall Scripture but doth rather commend vnto vs the spirit of wisedome and truth wherewith they spake in that diuers writers differing in words still agree in matter and substance of doctrine Vpon this question and answere dependeth another like vnto it viz. 4 How the Euangelists Matthew and Luke differ in rehearsing the Lords prayer Matth. 6. Luk. 11. 〈◊〉 â—nce beâ— Matthew â—nd Luke 〈◊〉 â—atâ—ng the Lords prayer For answere whereof wee are to consider what the Papists say They make a very great difference for in the vulgar Latin translation there are these three clauses in Matthew which are wanting in Luke First in the preface which art in heauen is wanting Secondly the third petition is wholie wanting Thirdly the last petition wanteth one halfe Deliuer vs from euill Yet they say all these things are included in the other petitions or else may necessarily bee deduced from them but let the Popish dreames goe and let vs see the true differences which are three in words but the substance is all one The first difference in words is of the fourth petition for Matthew saith sémeron Luke cath ' eméran The second difference in words is in the fifth petition for all the words in the originall differ except two or three The third difference is in the conclusion which Matthew hath and Luke wanteth Now by this difference betwixt Matthew and Luke which is verbal not material this coÌ„sequence ariseth either that the Euangelists did not precisely bind themselues to the words that Christ vttered or else that Christ vttered the Lords prayer in diuers words at the two seuerall times when he vttered it 5 Who prayeth best he that saieth the Lords prayer VVho maketh the best prayer or he that saieth not the Lords prayer For answere of this question thus much The Lords prayer is the best forme of prayer that euer was deuised The Lords prayer is the best prayer that euer was deuised He that prayeth the Lords prayer in words and matter prayeth well Hee that prayeth the Lords prayer in matter onely prayeth well though he vse other words as Christ vsed other words Iohn 17. It is one thing to say the Lords prayer another thing to pray it It is one thing to vse the Lords prayer aright another thing to abuse it for a good thing may be absurdly abused He that vseth a deuised forme of prayer aright prayeth more acceptably to God than he that abuseth the Lords prayer It is likely that he which can say nothing but the Lords prayer when he prayeth cannot pray but abuseth the Lords prayer It seemeth that that man doth not sinne which neuer vseth the words of the Lords prayer for a prayer for that Christ did neuer intend to bind vs to the forme of words but of matter He that in particular hath conceiued his wants and accordingly made his petitions to the Lord in a conceiued prayer may neuer the lesse end and conclude his prayer with the Lords prayer Diuers other doubtes concerning the vse of the Lords prayer may bee propounded but it is not profitable to make doubts except that they could well be dissolued only thus much for a conclusion of this treatise of prayer I had rather speake fiue words to God in prayer from vnderstanding faith and feeling than say the Lords prayer ouer a thousand times ignorantly negligently or superstitiously FINIS