Wisdom 1.11 The mouth that lieth slayeth the soule Sic. Thom. in opuscul 2. Observ. Not to conceale the truth whether publikely or privately AGaine it is a kinde of false witnesse as is shewed before when the truth is concealed either publikely or privately as when one suffereth his neighbour to be overcome in judgement when hee by his testimony might deliver him As to this purpose may be applied that saying of the Wise-man Prov. 24.11 Deliver those that are drawne to death and wilt thou not preserve them that are led to be slaine And of this kinde is that usuall negligence and oversight of men that privately doe not one tell another of their sinnes which duty is reproved by the law Levit. 19. Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart but thou shalt plainly rebuke thy neighbour and suffer him not to sinne He then which seeth his brother sinne in drunkennesse prophanenesse swearing or howsoever else and holdeth his peace therein offendeth against the rule of charity and is found before God to be an hater of his brother Augustine useth this fit similitude Si hominem videres ambulare incautum in tenebris ubi tu put cum esse scires taceres qualis esses c. If thou shouldest see a man walking in the darke without taking heed where thou knowest there is a pit and holdest thy peace what manner of one wouldest thou shew thy selfe Pracipitat se quis in vitia sua c. One casteth himselfe headlong into vice and vaunteth himselfe in thy hearing of his evill doing and yet thou doest praise him and smilest to thy selfe c. August in Psal. 49. Upon the tenth and last Commandement 1. The questions discussed QUEST I. The last precept Thou shalt not covet whether two or 〈◊〉 THou shalt not covet c. 1. Some thinke that this Commandement is to be divided into two and the first to restraine the concupiscence and desire of anothers wife the other the coveting of such things which doe belong unto him which are either moveable or immoveable things the moveable are of two sorts either the things with life and them either reasonable as his man servant his maid servant or unreasonable as his oxe or asse or without life as his goods his immoveable are his house lands possessions Of this opinion is August lib. de 10. chord cap. 9. to whom consenteth Thomas Aquinas and Tostatus and it is the received opinion among the Romanists and some other as Pelargus Osiander Pellican Their reasons shall first be examined 1. Thomas useth this reason Because there are but three Commandements in the first table there must be seven in the second to make up the number of ten And that there are but three in the first table he would prove by the subject or matter of the Commandements which concerne our duty to God which is three-fold Diligenti Deum tria necesse est facere He that loveth God must performe three things 1. Quòd non habeat alium Deum He must have no other God 2. He must honour him therefore it is said Thou shalt not take in vaine c. 3. Libenter quiescat 〈…〉 He must rest and settle himselfe in God therefore it is said Remember thou keepe holy c. Answ. 1. Thomas here omitteth one principall duty which is the internall 〈◊〉 of God for it is not enough to know who is to be worshipped which is prescribed in the first precept Thou shalt have no other Gods but after what manner he will be worshipped that is by a spirituall and internall worship as our blessed Saviour saith Ioh. 4.21 God is a spirit and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and truth This manner of Gods worship is prescribed in the second Commandement Thou shalt make to thy selfe no graven image c. 2. Wherefore thus rather may the 〈◊〉 toward God be distinguished his worship is either internall or externall the internall sheweth who is to be worshipped in the first precept and how that is spiritually in the second precept The externall is either private in the confession of Gods name in the third precept or publike in keeping of his Sabbaths Vrsin 2. Lyranus thus reasoneth Those things which are so divers that one may be covered and not the other belong not to one precept Aliquis habens pronitatem ad 〈◊〉 non habeâ—â— ad alterum One may have a pronenesse and aptnesse to one and not to another as he may covet his neighbours wife and not covet any of his beside therefore these two kindes of covetings belong not to one precept Answ. 1. This reason may be retorted for so one may be guilty of idolatry and false worship who yet holdeth but one Cod and therefore by this reason the two first precepts which they confound and make but one which divide the last must be distinguished 2. Though in particular he that coveteth a mans wife doth not alwayes covet his oxe or asse yet in generall he coveteth that which is another mans for his wife is properly his as any thing that belongeth unto him therefore the proposition will be denied that the coveting of that which is not joyned with the coveting of another thing belongeth not to the same precept for one may covet a mans house and ground that coveteth not his oxe or asse as Ahab did that desired Naboths vineyard and so by this rule as many particular things there are which may be severally coveted so many particular precepts there should be of coveting 3. Tostatus thus argueth Sicut se habet actus ad actum c. As one act is to another the like respect hath one concupiscence to another but the act of adultery and theft are divers and belong to two divers precepts therefore so should the divers concupiscence tending to those divers acts be divided into two precepts Answ. The argument followeth not because the acts of adultery and theft are forbidden in two divers precepts therefore the concupiscences tending thereunto should for there is difference betweene the conception of sinne and the birth and perfection thereof when sinne is brought forth and perfited then it appeareth of what kinde it is but being yet in the body or in the seed it cannot be so distinguished as darnell and corne being but yet in the grasse cannot bee so well discerned Beside another difference is because the externall acts of theft and adultery differ in the quality of the sinne and oâ—e is more hainous than another and deserveth a greater punishment and therefore the precepts are fitly distinguished but the like difference of quality and punishment cannot be made in the originall and first concupiscence where the will hath not yet assented 4. Pelargus addeth this reason Duo sunt principia concupiscentiae c. There are two beginnings or occasions of concupiscence one internall the other externall the Apostle calleth them the concupiscence of the flesh and the concupiscence of the eye 1. Ioh. 2.16 therefore
partly figurative of things to come and significative of some spirituall thing partly they had some other politick end and use which not in respect of the figure and type but in some other regard may upon a new institution be observed under the Gospell as the shew-bread or face-bread as it was a figure of Christ is now no more used but yet bread by Christs institution is still retained in the Eucharist as representative of the body of Christ. So they under the Law used washing with water to signifie the inward cleansing and now also in the new Testament upon a new ordinance it is used as the outward element in Baptisme So the observation of the Sabbath the paying of tithes Churches garments Church-musicke and the like were partly ceremoniall partly morall belonging to the service of God to the maintenance of Ministers to externall decencie and comelinesse in which respect though the ceremoniall use be ceased they may be retained still all things being done without offence and to edification according to the Apostles rule 4. But here I cannot let passe untouched an unsound assertion of Lyranus to whom consenteth Lippoman that thurificatio quae de ceremonialibus erat in nova lege remanet that censing and offering of incense being one of the ceremonials of the old Law yet remaineth in the new because it signified nothing to come but only shewed the devotion of the people in the worship of God which is greater in the new Testament than in the old Contra. 1. The offering of incense was a necessarie appertinance to the externall sacrifices of the Law it did continually wait and attend upon them and as the sacrifices did prefigure the holy sacrifice of attonement and passion of our blessed Saviour upon the crosse so the incense did betoken the sweet savour of that sacrifice and the acceptance thereof with Gold as Saint Paul sheweth that Christ hath given himselfe for us an offering and a sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God Ephes. 5.2 Beside the oblation of incense did shadow forth the mediation of Christ in offering up the prayers of the Saints as Revel 8.3 Much odors were given to the Angel that had the golden censer to offer with the prayers of the Saints and hereunto alludeth the Prophet David when he saith Let my prayer be directed in thy sight as incense Psal. 141.2 It is evident then that the incense of the old Law was figurative and significative of things to come 2. And true it is that the inward and spirituall devotion is more and greater in the new Testament than it was in the old but not the externall for they had more outward ceremonies and rites prescribed as signes of their devotion than are now required under the Gospell for now they that worship God must worship him in spirit and truth Ioh. 4.24 QUEST IV. How farre the Iudicials are now to be retained FUrther concerning the Judicials of Moses 1. They doe much differ in respect of their observation from the Ceremonials for these are so abrogated as that now to observe the figures and types of the old Testament were great impiety for all such things were observed then vel expresè vel tacitè sub protestatione Messiae futuri c. either expresly or closely under protestation of the Messiah to come now therefore to observe them were to protest Christum nondum venisse that Christ were not yet come But it is not so with the Judicials for they being conclusions and rules of justice grounded upon the Law of nature and first given for the conservation of the peace and politike state of that Common-wealth and not prescribed for any signification or prefiguring of things to come they may now be so farre forth observed as they are found fitting and agreeable unto the state and condition of the people Sic fere Tostat. Lippom. 2. Two wayes is a precept said to be figurale figurative◠one way when it is principally instituted to figure somewhat such were the ceremoniall precepts another ex consequenti by a certaine consequent and so are the Judicials after a sort figurative because they belonged unto that people cujus status erat figuralis whose state was figurative Sic Thom. Lippom. To bee figurative in this sense letteth not but that the Judicials may be retained now seeing they were not appointed or ordained to prefigure any thing as the Ceremonials were 3. But here two strange positions come to be examined the one is of Lippoman That to observe the Judicials tanquam ex lege veteri obligatoria esset mortiferum as binding by force of the old Law were a deadly sinne Tostatus also saith We receive the judiciall precepts given of God tanquam dicta sapientis viri c. as the sayings of some wise man not as of a lawgiver binding us to the observation thereof like as the Romans borrowed their Lawes of the wise Grecians Tostat. qu. 1. Contra. 1. The old Law in the constituting of the Judicials was grounded upon the Law of equity which rule of equity it is no sinne to follow now therefore it is no sinne to follow the rules of the old law as they are grounded upon equity and justice nay therein to depart from them were rather transgression 2. S. Iames saith chap. 4.12 There is one Lawgiver which is able to save and destroy therefore to whom doth it rather belong to give direction for what offences mans life is to be saved and other punishment to be afflicted and for what his life is to bee taken away than unto that perfit and soveraigne Lawgiver who is the author and giver of life and at whose will and pleasure only mans life is taken away To say therefore that the Judicials appointed by God are to be observed now only as the sayings of a wise man not as of a Lawgiver is both to derogate from Gods authority who is the only sufficient Lawgiver and from the sufficiencie of his law which is more perfect than any humane constitutions whatsoever in making these Judicials but equall unto the sayings of other wise men But this question hath beene already handled at large before in the generall questions in chap. 1. Exod. QUEST V. Why these Lawes are called judgements THese are the judgements 1. He saith not Dei judicia sed absolut◠judicia the judgements of God but absolutely judgements for he which observed these was not yet just before God though hee were before men Lippoman 2. This word judgement in the singular signifieth not as judgements in the plurall for judgement in the singular for the most part signifieth condemnation but in the plurall it signifieth tam re◠vindictam quà m innocentis defensionem as well the revenge and punishment of the guilty as the defence of the innocent Rupertus 3. This word judgement is taken three wayes first it signifieth the act of the judgement and understanding which determineth what is meet and convenient to be done and
it as the water in the red sea did or that though it were covered with water it might be preserved as the Olive tree whereof the Dove tooke a branch or that God might restore Paradise againe after the floud the first is presumptuous to imagine a miracle without warrant of Scripture and if it had beene so Noah needed not to have made an arke he and his sonnes and the cattell might have beene preserved there the second is not sufficient for though Paradise which is not like had beene so preserved yet Henoch must have beene drowned The third is frivolous for if the terrene Paradise had beene planted againe seeing it was situated in a knowne place in Mesopotamia it could not have beene hid In this question Pererius is an adversary to Bellarmine Senens and the rest that yet dreame of a terrene Paradise 5. Confut. Henoch shall returne into the world to die IT is also the constant opinion of the popish writers that Henoch shall come againe toward the end of the world and then shall die being to be slaine by Antichrist Pererius cum Bellarm. Cont. But this is contrary to the Apostle That Henoch was taken away that he should not see death neither was found Heb. 11.5 Ergo Henoch shall not see death nor bee found in a mortall state in earth whereas they object that place Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men that they shall once die The answer is ready like as they which are alive at Christs comming shall not die but be changed 1 Cor. 15. which notwithstanding shall bee in stead of death so Henoch was changed in his taking up though he died not a common death 6. Confut. Henoch shall not returne to preach repentance to the world COncerning the end and causes wherefore Henoch was translated 1. Wee admit that God hereby would put the righteous in comfort that notwithstanding the sentence pronounced against Adam there was a way of righteousnesse whereby to recover Adams lost state 2. To minister comfort to the afflicted members of Christ that they should not doubt but that their reward is with God as Habel though he had an untimely end yet lived with God as Henoch did thus Theodoret. 3. Wee refuse not the collection here of Thomas Aquinas that God both by Henochs translation before the law and Elias under the law would nourish the hope of life in his Church as by types representing the ascension of Christ in whom the promise of salvation should be accomplished These causes of Henochs translation may safely be received 4. But we neither thinke as it is in the booke of Wisdome which is no Canonicall Scripture and therefore we may safely dissent from it That hee was taken away lest wickednesse should alter his understanding for as he walked with God before God kept him in his feare and preserved him from evill so he could have guided him still as the Apostle saith He shall be established God is able to make him stand Rom. 14.4 speaking of the faithfull servants of God as Mathuselah the sonne of Henoch being the longest lived of all the Patriarkes continued righteous to the end 5. Neither is that surmise fit to be received that Henoch is kept alive to preach repentance in the end of the world and to maintaine the Gospell against Antichrist which is the common opinion of the papall professors For of Henochs preaching in the end of the world there is no mention in Scripture but only of the sending of Elias which is not understood of Elias person but of his spirit and zeale And this Elias the Angell expoundeth to be Iohn Baptist who should goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias And there is no such necessity that Henoch should be preserved so many yeares by miracle to that end seeing the Lord is able to raise up Prophets and Ministers as he did Iohn Baptist in the spirit of Elias and Henoch to maintaine the truth against the Pope and Antichrist which we see plentifully performed in these dayes 7. Confut. Of the Prophesie and booke of Henoch WHereas S. Inde in his Epistle vers 14. maketh mention of the Prophesie of Henoch the seventh from Adam which is not found in any other part of the Canonicall Scripture lest the adversaries might hereupon build their traditions and unwritten verities I will briefly declare what is to be thought of this Prophesie of Henoch 1. I neither thinke with Tertullian that there was any such propheticall booke of Henoch then extant who conjectureth that though it perished in the floud yet it might be restored againe by Noah thereunto inspired 2. Neither yet with Hierome that this booke of Henoch was an Apocriphall booke yet some part of it might be true which the Apostle might alleage For it is not like that the Apostle would derive a testimony from an hidden and obscure booke of no authority in the Church 3. Neither yet is it like as Michael Medina thinketh that there was no such booke at all under Henochs name for the fathers Origen Hierome Augustine doe in many places make evident mention that such a booke there was but thought it to be forged 4. And it is as unlike that the true book of Henoch was extant in the Apostles time which was afterward corrupted with fables and so rejected of the Church for then the Church would rather have purged the true booke from such errours and preserved the rest pure as they did discerne the true Gospels from the forged and adulterate Our opinion then is 1. With Augustine that the booke of Henoch which in his time was produced by Heretikes was altogether forged and no part of it of Henochs writing Non quod eorum hominum qui Deo placuorunt reprobetur authoritas sed quod ista non creduntur ipsorum not that saith he we refuse the authoritie of such men as pleased God but for that they were thought not to be theirs 2. We judge it not unlike with Origen that there might be such an authenticall booke of Henochs prophesie out of the which Iude did take his testimony which is now lost as some other parts of the Canonicall Scripture are as the books of God Nathan Iddâ— and other Prophets mentioned in the Chronicles 3. Or this prophesie of Henoch might be preserved by faithfull tradition in the Church of the Iewes which is approved by the Apostle But this is no warrant for other unwritten traditions unlesse some had the like Apostlike spirit to judge of them as Iudas had and further this prophesie of Henoch is a greeable to the Scriptures so are not many unwritten traditions urged by the Church of Rome 6. Places of exhortation 1. IN that the line only of the race of the faithfull is rehearsed in this chapter it both sheweth that God will alwaies have his church in the world and that in the most corrupt times God will have a remnant that shall
Calvin Mercer Wherefore in this manner to aske a signe not of distrust in Gods power or doubtfulnesse of his promises but with confidence in God nor prescribing unto him but onely desiring to be assured what is his good pleasure and this to doe not with any superstitious minde but with devout prayer and by the secret motion of Gods spirit it is no tempting of God at all But as Augustinus saith of Gedeon asking a signe Consultatio illa magis quà m tentatio fuit It was a consultation rather than a tentation Now seeing an entrance is made into this question concerning the lawfulnesse of such ghesses and conjectures as are made by mens speeches or behaviour of things to come as Abrahams servant desireth here to be informed by the answer and behaviour of the maid whether she were appointed to be Isaacks wife it shall not bee amisse some what more fully to discusse this matter QUEST XV. Of the divers kindes of conjecturall and ominous predictions THere are then foure sorts of such conjectures and ominous predictions of things to come The first are naturall which doe for the most part certainly foreshew that which followeth as the cause producing the effect as a cloud rising in the west causeth and foresheweth raine the Southwind heat Luke 14.55 or the effect doth sometime premonstrate the cause following as the lightning the thunder which though it be first seene and perceived by reason of the quicknesse of sight yet is it last done These signes and conjectures it is not superstitious or vaine to observe Secondly there are some humane conjectures which are taken by the words behaviour and actions of men as when the king of Israel had let fall a word calling Benhadad brother the messengers tooke it for a good signe the Latine translation saith acceperunt pro omine they tooke it for good lucke 1 King 20.22 they thereby gave conjecture of the kings favour So when the king Ahashuerosh had said of Haman will he force the queene also before me c. they tooke this as a signe of the kings displeasure and covered Hamans face Esther 6.8 The like in forraine stories is recorded of Tarquinius Superbus king of Rome who being sent unto by his sonne Sextus Tarquinius how hee should use the Gabii that had received him into their citie he gave no other answer to the messenger but topped the heads of the poppies in his garden with his staffe whereby his sonne perceived his meaning that he should make the chiefe of the citie lower by their heads By these humane conjectures we may ghesse of such things which are in mens owne power and purpose to doe but otherwise to catch at words and syllables and to make them as divine oracles it is a superstitious and ridiculous use as Cicero giveth an instance how when M. Crassus did ship his Armie at Brundusium one in the haven that brought figs from Cannus a citie in Caria chanced to crie out caricas canneas Cannean figges if Crassâ—s had taken this hint as a signe of evill lucke and gone no further he had not perished Tullie himselfe condemneth such observations as ridiculous for then saith he by the same reason pedis offensio abruptio corrigiae sternut amenta sunt observanda the stumbling of the foot breaking of the shooe point sneesing and other such things must be observed as ominous Perer. The third sort of predictions is divine which are either uttered by men inspired of God being well advised and knowing what they say as Ionathan encourageth himselfe with this signe thereunto directed by the spirit of God that if the Philistims should say come up unto us he would take it as a signe that God had delivered them into his hand and so it came to passe 1 Sam. 14.10 Sometime God directeth mens tongues to speake the truth unawares as Caiphas prophesied that it was better for one man to die for the people than the whole nation to perish Iohn 11.50 yet Caiphas understood not what he said of this kinde was that direction given unto Augustine much perplexed within himselfe what profession of life he should betake himselfe unto by a voice saying unto him Tolle lege Take up thy booke and read and then opening the booke hee light upon that place Rom 13.13 See that wee walke honestly c. not in gluttonie and drunkennesse chambering and wantonnesse c. by reading which sentence hee was resolved to reforme his life and to leave his youthfull pleasures The fourth kind of ominous predictions is superstitious and diabolicall whereof Augustine giveth his judgement thus Cum ad decipiendos homines fit spirituum seductorum operatio est VVhen it is done to deceive men it is the working of seducing spirits such was that conjecture of the priests and soothsayers among the Philistims that if the arke which they had put into a new cart went up the way by Bethshemesh then it is he that is the God of Israel that hath done this great evill 1 Sam. 6.9 This indeed came so to passe and the event answered the prediction whereby the devill cunningly wrought that those idolatrous priests and soothsayers should still retaine their credit and estimation Pausanias maketh mention of the like superstitious observation in the towne of Phare in Achaia where after the people had consulted with the oracle their manner was going away to stop their eares and the first voyce which they heard afterward they tooke as a divine oracle Pausan. in Achaic Cicero reporteth of Paulus Aemilius that preparing to goe against Perses king of Macedonia and seeing his daughter sad and she answering being asked the reason because her little dogge called Persa was dead saith he Accipio omen I take this as a signe of good lucke my daughter Such superstitious curious and vaine observations are not beseeming a Christian profession which Sathan useth as meanes to keepe men in a superstitious awe and feare and to seduce them from trusting in the providence of God QUEST XIV Why it is said that Rebecca was a virgin with this addition and unknown of man Vers. 16. A Virgin and unknowne of man c. Lest this might be thought a superfluous speech because she could not have bene a virgin unlesse she were unknowne of man divers interpretations are given 1. Some thinke that she is called a virgin in respect of her outward habit and unknowne of man for her chastitie Cajetan 2. Others that because there was a lewd use among the Gentiles to abuse other parts of the body to their filthy lust beside the place of virginitie they thinke shee is called not onely a virgin but altogether untouched or unknowne in any part of her body Rasi Rabbi Salomon 3. Some that she was not a virgin onely in body but unknowne of man that is not tempted in her minde of the devill Origen hom 10. in Genes 4. Some thinke this clause is added to shew a
together or write all after one manner of purpose but in some variety of order and words were directed by the Spirit to write one truth Other rules also may be propounded for the reconciling of places of Scripture which seeme at the first sight to be repugnant in respect of the divers computation of time 1. When as one writer doth inclusively account the time which another doth exclusively as Luke c. 9.29 saying that Christ about an 8. dayes after was transfigured includeth in this number both primum ultimum the first and last day Matthew saying after 6. dayes doth exclude these two dayes making mention of those six that came betweene sic Augustin lib. de consens Evang. c. 56. 2. Sometime the principall part of the time is rehearsed and the small or odde numbers omitted as 1 King 2.11 David is said to have reigned 40. yeares over Israel 7. yeares in Hebron and 33. yeares in Jerusalem whereas the precise account of his reigne in Hebron was 7. yeares 6. moneths and in Jerusalem 33. yeares which make in all 40. yeares 6. moneths 2 Sam. 5.5 3. Sometime the yeares of a Kings reigne are reckoned which he reigned alone sometime those wherein he reigned with another so Iotham reigned 16. yeares alone but twenty yeares counting those wherein he governed under his Father 2 Kings 15.5.30.33 Perer. QUEST XX. Why Abrahams servant refused to eat or drinke Vers. 33. THey set before him to eat but he said I will not eat 1. Hee neither refused to eat because unusuall meat was set before him such as hee was not accustomed unto in Abrahams house as some Hebrewes thinke 2. Neither doth he deferre till he had spoken his words that is said grace as some interpret for though it is not to bee doubted but that they used in Abrahams house to receive their meat with thanksgiving yet hee meaneth the delivering of his message 3. But that is a meere fable that hee would not eat because they set poyson before him to have his goods which poyson was returned upon Bethuel who thereupon died and this fable the Hebrewes would build upon the word sam poyson answerable to the word sume here used which signifieth to place or set for neither were they so poore that they needed Abrahams goods nor so unhonest so to deale with their nearest kinsmans servant nor yet is there any affinity betweene those two words the one beginning with samech the other with shin Mercer 4. Neither doth he refraine from eating and drinking fearing lest afterward hee should not tell a sober tale 5. But his diligence is commended who preferreth his masters businesse before his meat and drinke QUEST XXI Perswasions used by Abrahams servant to further the mariage Ver. 35. THe Lord hath blessed my master c. 1. The servant beginneth to use perswasions to make a way for the mariage intended 1. That hee was rich and not by evill meanes but by Gods blessing Muscul. 2. That Isaack was borne of Sarai in her old age and so not without a miracle as a man ordained of God for some great matter Calvin 3. And lest they might object why being so rich he tooke not a wife neare hand he addeth that his master gave him speciall charge not to take a wife of the daughters of Canaan Mercer QUEST XXII Certaine fabulous conceits of the Hebrewes refused IT shall not bee amisse to note certaine fabulous collections of the Hebrewes 1. Vers. 39. They thinke that Eliezar secretly insinuated that if hee could not otherwise provide a wife for Isaack hee would offer his owne daughter but that Abraham absolutely refused because he was of the Canaanites But yet they say that this Eliezar for his faithfull service was taken alive into Paradise as Isaack came alive from thence 2. Vers. 42. Where he saith I came this day to the well the Hebrewes thinke that he came from Hebron to Charras in a day which is noted to be seventeene dayes journey and this day noteth the time not of his departure from home but of his comming thither Mercer 3. V. 47. They note that he put the jewels so upon her face that he touched not her flesh whereas the meaning is that hee gave her them rather to put them on her selfe QUEST XXIII Whether Abrahams servant gave the gifts before he knew who she was Vers. 47. WHereas before v. 22. he first brought forth the jewels before hee asked her whose daughter she was whereas here he first is said to aske her 1. Neither is it like that he asked her before he brought them forth as Iun. Perer. 2. Neither doth he here report it otherwise than it was done lest they might have accused him of levity to give jewels to one whom he knew not as Rasi 3. But first he brought them forth and then asked her the question and after gave them Mercer QUEST XXIV Why Laban is set before Bethuel Vers. 50. THen answered Laban and Bethuel 1. Neither was this Bethuel the brother of Laban as Lyran 2. Neither was Bethuel Rebeccahs father dead as Iosephus 3. Neither is Labans impiety noted who taketh upon him to speake before his father as Rasi 4. Nor yet is Laban first named as more excellent in wisdome than his father as Aben Ezra 5. But for that his father being old or sickly had committed his houshold government to Laban Iun. Mercer QUEST XXV The space of ten dayes for Rebeccahs abode how to be understood Vers. 55. LEt the maid abide with us at the least ten dayes 1. She meaneth not that is Rebeccahs mother to have her stay a yeare or at the least ten moneths as the Hebrewes and Onkelâ—s for this had bin an unreasonable request seeing the man made such haste 2. Neither the words standing thus let her abide dayes at the least ten by dayes are understood seven dayes of mourning for Bethuel whom they supposed to have beene dead for then they would not have requested for seven dayes first and then for ten but have begun with the greater request first 3. Neither is the vulgar reading the best to joyne the words together at the least ten dayes for in the originall dayes goe before 4. The best reading then is let her abide dayes that is certaine or at the least ten Iun. QUEST XXVI Of the willingnesse of Rebecca Vers. 58. I Will goe c. 1. Not that she said in effect I will goe though you will not as Rasi for this thought or speech had noâ— become the modesty of the maid 2. but rather her obedience to her parents appeareth to whom she consenteth Calvin 3. and her will was no doubt directed by the Spirit of God Muscul. QUEST XXVII How Isaack dwelled in Beersheba Abraham remaining in Hebron Vers 6â— ISaack came from the way of Beer-lahai-roi c. 1. Not that Isaack went thither to fetch Hagar to be Abrahams wife after Sarahs death as some Hebrewes for she was not Keturah as shall appeare
are not to be stood upon 2. Some think that these children began to be borne in the beginning of the first seven yeares as R. Levi but the text overthroweth that conceit for Iacob went not into Lea till he had ended his terme of seven yeares vers 21. Some thinke that these and the rest of the children were borne to Iacob in the last seven yeares and the six yeares beside of Iacobs service but the story is otherwise that all Iacobs children were borne before he entred into a new covenant to stay still with Laban his two seven yeares being expired Genes â—0 25 But it is more probable that all Iacobs children only Benjamin excepted that was borne in the land of Canaan that is eleven sonnes and one daughter were brought forth in the compasse of the last seven yeares for it is not necessary to assigne their birth successively one to be borne after another but that their mothers might be with childe at once and so it is not improbable that foure women in seven yeares might bring forth 11. or 12. children Mercer 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God directeth even the least actions of his servants Vers. 1. IAcob lift up his feet that is he went cheerefully and willingly and in that mention is made of so small an action as the lifting up of his feet we learne that even the least and ordinary actions of the faithfull are directed by the spirit of God and guided by his providence Mercer as our Saviour taketh knowledge of Nathaniels sitting under the figge tree Ioh. 1.48 so the Apostle saith that all things worke together for the best to them that love God Rom. 8.28 2. Doct. Men may hold the truth in generall and yet faile in particular Vers. 15. SHouldest thou serve me for nought Laban here speaketh reason and seemeth to know what is just and right but afterward he failed and recompenced Iacob but meanely for his faithfull service as Iacob complaineth Thou hast changed my wages ten times Gen. 31.41 Thus we see that carnal men may hold generall principles a right but when it commeth to their owne particular then they are blinded with selfe-love Calvin So dealt Herod with Iohn Baptist he did acknowledge him to be a just and holy man yet to please his wives daughter commanded him to be beheaded 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Custome not to be pretended where greater enormities are admitted Vers. 26. IT is not the manner of this place to give the younger before the elder He pretendeth a custome in the lesse matter in the meane time he transgresseth the custome and all good order in a thing of greater importance in thrusting upon a man in the night one sister for another thus after the like manner the Romanists object the custome of the Church against the marriage of Ministers whom they call Priests and in the meane time they breake all good order while for want of the due remedie fornication and uncleane lust is suffered to be practised amongst them Muscul. 2. Confut. Iacobs polygamie and marriage of two sisters not justifiable Vers. 30. SO entred he into Rachel also This multiplicity of wives which is called polygamie is diversly excused 1. Augustine saith Nulla lege prohibebatur it was forbidden by no law quandâ—mos erat crimen non erat It was no fault when the custome was so as in times past it was a shame for the Romans to have talares tunicas side garments but now every one of honest sort doth weare them Aug. lib. 22. cont Faust c. 47. Contra. 1. Though there were no written law in those times yet their owne conscience grounded upon the light of nature and the faithfull tradition of the fathers might have discerned it to be a fault seeing that God in the beginning for one Adam made but one Eve and Lamech of the wicked race is the first found in Scripture to have had two wives 2. And though custome may be pretended for many wives yet to marry two sisters there was no such custome Mercer 3. The example of long garments is nothing like for it is a thing indifferent which may be thought comely or uncomely as time and place doth vary but that which is simply unlawfull and against the first institution as polygamie is cannot be borne out by any custome 2. Some say that polygamie is after a sort against nature yet so as it may be dispensed with as it is like after the flood to Noah this indulgence was given Perer. in 29. Gen. numer 31. Contra. 1. If Noah had beene dispensed with for many wives then had there beene greatest cause to have used that liberty and if polygamie for propagation were tolerable God might have preserved in the arke more than for every man one woman 2. Against a written law and institution as this is of having one wife Gen. 2.24 A man shall leave father and mother and cleave to his wife not wives a dispensation unwritten cannot be admitted 3. Divers allegories are made of Iacobs two wives Augustine by Leah figureth the people of the Iewes by Rachel the Gentiles Rupertus saith contrary that Rachel was a type of the Iewes Leah of the Gentiles August ser. 80. de tempor Rup in Gen. 29. Gregorie by Leah interpreteth the active life by Rachel the contemplative Homil. 14. in Ezech. ex Perer. Contra. 1. By the diversitie of these allegories it appeareth they are mens collections and humane devices and therefore cannot excuse the transgression of a divine ordinance 2. And though these allegories might be warranted by the Scripture yet thereby is not the fact justified Christs comming for the suddennesse thereof in Scripture is compared to the comming of a theefe yet I trust thereby is not a theeves sudden approching approved 3. This then is the resolution of this question 1. that Iacob shewed his infirmity in this not double but quadriple marriage yea and the same incestuous in the marriage of two sisters 2. yet Labans fault was greater than Iacobs who by his craft induced him unto it 3. God in his deepe providence used this oversight of Iacob as a meanes greatly to increase and multiply his seed 4. Iacob and the rest of the Patriarkes in their manners and generall example of life but not in some particular acts such as this is are to be imitated Mercer 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Education of children in labour Vers. 9. RAchel came with her fathers sheepe for she kept them Thus in that simple age did they bring up their children not idly and wantonly but in labour and houshold workes Laban had many servants beside in his house yet he setteth this faire damzell to keepe his sheepe though this be not an example now to men of good sort and place thus to imploy their daughters for the particular yet they should follow it so far to provide that their children bee industriously brought up and not to give them the reines of licentious
that God had shewed before by the mouth of the Prophets that Christ should suffer he hath thus fulfilled Act. 3.15 18. 4. Mor. To seeke to maintaine peace Vers. 24. FAll not out by the way Ioseph as he was ready to make peace with his brethren and to be at one with them so he laboureth to maintaine peace among themselves thus teaching us by his example not only to be lovers of peace our selves but to procure it in others according to the doctrine of Christ Blessed are the peace-makers for they shall be called the children of God Matth. 5.9 5. Mor. Lyers shall not be beleeved when they speake the truth Vers. 26. FOr he beleeved them not This is a just reward of lyers that when they speake the truth they shall not be beleeved Iacobs sonnes had told him a tale before when they shewed him Iosephs coat as though some wilde beast had devoured him Genes 37. and now when they tell the truth that Ioseph was alive no credit is given unto them Muscul. Thus S. Paul would not endure that the maid which had the spirit of divination and deceived the people with lies should testifie the truth of the Apostles that they were the servants of God and taught the way to salvation Act. 16.18 CHAP. XLVI 1. The Method and Argument of the Chapter FIrst we have here set downe Iacobs preparation to his journey 1. He offereth sacrifice to God 2. The Lord answereth him by vision appearing unto him and encouraging him to goe downe to Egypt promising him both a prosperous journey a peaceable end and the returne of his posterity vers 2. to 5. Secondly the journey itselfe is described vers 5. to vers 8. with an enumeration of the persons that went downe with Iacob 1. In particular the of-spring of Leah and her maid Zilpah the of-spring likewise of Rachel and her maid Bilhah of every one by themselves from v. 8. to 26. they are all summed in grosse v. 26.27 Thirdly Iacobs arrivall in Egypt is declared 1. How he sent for Ioseph and of their meeting greeting and salutation in Goshen vers 27. to 31. 2. The counsell and advice given by Ioseph to his brethren how they should answer Pharaoh that they might obtaine the land of Goshen vers 31. to the end 2. The divers readings where the translations differ v. 1. he came to the well of the oath H. S. to Bersheba caeter v. 2. he heard God calling him by a vision of the night H. God said to Israel in a vision of the night cat v. 3. I am the God of thy fathers S. I am God the God of thy father B. G. I am the mighty God of thy father caet he haâ—el celohe the strong God v. 4. I wil bring thee up againe in thy returne H. I will bring that back againe in the end S. I will surely make thee come up againe C. B. I will bring thee up againe G. I will cause thee to come up by comming up with thee T.P. he v. 5. they tooke their substance S. their father children and wives caeter v. 6. they tooke all that they possessed in Canaan H. S. they tooke their cattell and goods which they had gotten in the land of Canaan caeter he racash to get goods v. 7. their daughters and daughters daughters S. their daughters H. their daughters and sons daughters caet v. 10. Iachin Saher H. B. Achin Saar Iachin Sacher C. Iachin Zohar G. Iachin Tzochar T. he Sochar P. v. 12. Ezron Amul H. C. Esron Iemuel S. Hezron Hamul B. G. chezron chamul T. P. heb v. 13. Thola Phua Semron H. Thola Phua Asum Sambram S. Thola Phuah Iob Simron caet v. 16. Arâ—lis S. Haeri caet v. 17. Ieul S. Iesui caet v. 20. priest of On. T.P.C.G. cohen signifieth both a prince and priest v. 21. the sonnes of Manasses which Syra his concubine bare unto him were Machir Machir begat Galaad the sonnes of Ephraim Manasses brother Sutalaam and Taam the sonnes of Sutalaam Edem S. the rest have none of these words v. 21. Mophim Ophim and Ared H. Mamphim Ophim and Gerah begat Arad S. Muppim Huppim and Arde. caet v. 22. eighteene soules in all S. fourteene soules all caet v. 27. all the soules are seventy five S. seventy caeter the sonnes of Ioseph nine soules S. two soules cater v. 28. he sent Iudah c. that he should meet him at the citie of the nobles in the land of Ramesse S. that he should tell him that he might meet hm in Goshen H. to prepare before him C. to direct his face to Goshen B. to direct his way to Goshen H. to premonish him to meet him in Goshen T. to appeare before his face in Goshen P. he iarah to appeare to signifie v. 37. said to his brethren S. said to his brethren and all his fathers house caet v. 34. in Gâ—sem of Arabia S. in the land of Goshen caet 3. The theologicall explication QUEST I. Why Iacob offered sacrifice in Bersheba Vers. 1. ISrael came to Bersheba c. 1. This place is interpreted the well of the oath or of seven for shabang signifieth both so called first by Abraham where he made a covenant with Abimelech and gave him seven lambs Gen. 21. and afterward the name was revived by Isaack Gen. 26. 2. To this place came Iacob being both in his way as he went to Egypt for it is in the utmost bounds of Canaan toward the South as also because there Abraham and Isaack had long dwelled built altars there and consecrated it as a peculiar place for Gods worship 3. He offereth sacrifice both to give thanks to God for the life of Ioseph and to desire the Lord to make his journey prosperous Iun. QUEST II. Of the Lords calling of Iacob Vers. 2. IAcob Iacob who answered I am here c. 1. He is called Iacob not Israel not because as the Hebrewes imagine he should not prevaile against men in Egypt for he is also called Israel in Egypt Gen. 48.29 but when as the Lord vouchsafeth to speake familiarly unto him he calleth him by his name Iacob Mercer 2. The name is doubled to stirre him up to greater attention Calvin and to shew the certainty of that which God spake Perer. â— Iacob answereth readily here am I and therefore Iosephus misreporteth this story that Iacob should say quisnam esset who it was that spake unto him as though he had not beene acquainted with Gods voice lib. 1. antiquit QUEST III. Who it was that spake to Iacob Vers. 3. I Am God the God of thy father 1. This then was not an Angel that spake in the person of God but it was the Lord himselfe to whom Iacob offered sacrifice vers 1. 2. who is called the God of his father rather than of Abraham because Iacob so used to call the Lord the feare of his father Isaack Genes â—1 53 and for that he had
of cattell Calvin 2. That they might dwell apart from the Egyptians and so not be corrupted with their idolatry and supestition Mercer Muscul. 3. Lest that being dispersed among the Egyptians they might have beene distracted and so one divided from another Iosephus 4. Because the Egyptians abhorred keepers of sheep it would have beene an occasion of envy and hatred if they had lived among the Egyptians 5. lastly the land of Goshen stood more commodious for the Israelites returne and passage out of Egypt being situate in the utmost bounds toward Canaan whereas if the Israelites had beene seated in the inward or remote parts of the Countrey they could not afterward so conveniently have escaped Pererius QUEST XVII Why keepers of sheepe were an abomination to the Egyptians Vers. 34. FOr every sheepe-keeper is an abomination to the Egyptians c. These are the words of Moses rather than of Ioseph as the like reason is inserted by Moses Gen. 43.34 why the Hebrewes and Egyptians might not eat together the Egyptians then abhorred shepherds and keepers of sheepe 1. Not onely because they were a proud people and despised shepherds as base and servile men as Rupertus for they were an abomination unto them which is more than to contemne and despise them 2. Neither did they abhorre shepherds as though there were none of that condition among the Egyptians for they had their flocks of sheepe Genes 47.17 3. Neither yet is it like that the Egyptians did altogether abstaine from all eating of flesh Aben Ezra reporteth of the Indians that they kill no flesh neither doe so much as eat of the milke that commeth of cattell and that for this cause the Egyptians abhorred the Hebrewes 4. Therefore I thinke rather that the Egyptians especially detested keepers of sheepe rather than of other cattell because they superstitiously adored that kinde and so abstained altogether from slaying of sheepe and eating the flesh thereof keeping them for their milke and wooll whereas the Hebrew shepherds did without any scruple eat of their flocks other kinds of cattell it is like they did eat of as Mercerus reporteth the opinion of some writers that it was lawfull for the Egyptians to kill and eat foure kinds of creatures Oxen Calves Swine and Geese 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Not to depend upon meanes or put any confidence in Princes Vers. 4. I Will goe downe with thee into Egypt Although Ioseph were Lord of Egypt and a man of great power able to provide for Iacob and protect him from danger yet the Lord would not have Iacob to depend upon the meanes but to trust to his providence Muscul. Whereby also wee are taught not to put our confidence in men but to wait upon God as it is in the Psalme It is better to trust in the Lord than to put any confidence in man it is betteâ— to trust in the Lord than to put any confidence in Princes Psal. 118.9 2. Doct. The Lord will never forsake his elect Vers. 4. I Will also bring thee up againe c. The Lord promiseth his presence and gracious assistance to Iacob both going downe into Egypt and returning the Lord then will never forsake his elect Whom he once loveth he loveth to the end Ioh. 13.1 and as he said to Iosua I will not leave thee nor forsake thee Iosu. 15. so the same promise belongeth unto all the faithfull servants of God as the Apostle â—pplieth it Heb. 13.5 3. Doct. A man is not bound to reveale all his counsell so he speake the truth and lie not Vers. 34. THen ye shall say thy servants are men occupied about cattell This also was true which Ioseph taught his brethren to answer that they might dwell in the land of Goshen but there was another reason which Ioseph would have them to conceale because it was the most fruitfull and fertile soyle of all Egypt We see then that a man is not bound to utter all his minde but speaking the truth in the rest he may conceale that which he thinketh will bee prejudiciall to his suit and businesse Calvin and in such affaires that precept of our Saviour taketh place To be wise as serpents but innocent as doves Matth. 10.16 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. No Sacraments without the spirit and life of the word Vers. 2. GOd spake unto Iacob in a vision The Lord doth not onely appeare and shew a vision to Iacob but hee also speaketh unto him to the vision he adjoyneth a voyce of this nature and kinde are all Gods signes and ceremonies they are not dead or dumbe but the word of God putteth life unto them Wherefore it is presumption in the Church of Rome to impose signes and Sacraments upon the Church which receive not their life from the Word Calvin as our Saviour saith It is the spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing Ioh. 6.63 so the fleshie and terrene part in signes and sacraments profiteth not without the spirit and life which they receive from the Word 2. Confut. Antiquity no good argument of the truth Vers. 3. I Am the God of thy father He saith not of thy fathers as of thy great Grandfather for Terah was an idolater Iosu. 24.4 Iacob could not goe beyond Abraham for divers hundred yeares to fetch his faith though the most ancient Patriarks Noe Seâ— Heber were of the same faith and religion Wee see then that antiquity is no good argument to prove true religion by unlesse wee run unto the first beginning for so truth is more ancient than errour In like manner wee deny not but that of late yeares wee cannot derive the profession of the Gospell from our fathers and ancestors past the third degree because all the world was blinded with superstition and ignorance for divers hundred yeares but leaving the meane generations which were corrupted we are able to fetch and derive our faith from the Apostles of Christ this the Romanists doe call in derision a probation of our faith persalium by leaping But Iacob could prove his faith no otherwise he must leape from Abraham to Heber and Sem So Steven would not prove his faith from the immediate descent of his father for of them he saith ye have alwayes resisted the holy Ghost as your fathers did so doe you Act. 7. he ascendeth up to Abraham and Moses and the prophets times and in such manner doe we prove and justifie our faith and profession 3. Confut. Against Perer that holdeth the Septuagint in their number of 75. not to 〈◊〉 error Vers. 27. ALL the soules of the house of Iacob c. are 70. yet the Septuagint reade 75. notwithstanding Pererius justifieth the Septuagint and freeth them from errour although they set downe five more of Iosephs race than Moses hath which were born in Egypt afterward If this saith he be an error in them then was it in Moses for he also numbreth among the rest the sonnes of Phares and Benjamin which were borne afterward in Egypt
may be warned that they offend not in the like as this correction imposed upon Simeon and Levi was for the admonition of their brethren and posterity 3. That men feeling the justice of God in their due corrections may flee unto Gods mercy and the promises of God in Christ as Adam when he received the sentence of death for his transgression had also the promise of the Messiah given him Mercer 2. Confut. Against popish 〈…〉 SEeing then that corrections remaining after the forgivenesse of sin are to make ourselves and others more cautelous this is no ground for the Popish purgatory paines which are not visible and so serve not for the example of others neither are they availeable unto godly repentance for the which there is no place after this life Mercer 3. Confut. Peter not the chiefest of the Apostles because first 〈◊〉 Vers. 3. RVben mine eldest sonne This is to be observed that the twelve Patriarks are not rehearsed in the same order here as before Gen. 30. and Genes 27. and afterward Numb 1. 〈◊〉 33. yet 〈◊〉 these places Ruben is named first but not alwayes sometime Iudah is named before him as Numb â— 2 As then this were but a simple argument for the preheminence of Ruben before his brethren because he is in most places named first being the eldest so as simply doe the Papists conclude for Peters supremacie before the other Apostles because he is commonly named firsts which was rather because of his Eldership than any priority before the rest neither is he alwayes named in the first place for Galat. â—9 〈◊〉 is named before him 4. Confut. The bookes of Iudith and Tobie not canonicall Vers. 5. SImeon and Levi brethren in evill Hence it may appeare that the booke of Iudith is not Canonicall because there this fact of Simeon is commended cap. 9.2 which here Iacob condemneth and accurseth It satisfieth not to say with Dyonis Carthusian that the fact of Simeon and Levi in respect of the Sichemites was just but unjust in respect of them who brake their faith and covenant for Iudith commendeth their zeale which were moved with thy zeale v. 4. Neither is Lyranus and Pererius answer sufficient 1. For Iudith in that place commendeth also the manner of the fact and saith that God did put the sword of vengeance into their hand vers 2. and Iacob here curseth their very affection and zeale wherewith they were first moved Cursed be their wrath for it was cruell and further whereas Iudith doth set it downe as a reward of their zeale Thou gavest their Princes to the slaughter Iacob even therein doth accurse For in their wrath they slew a man It is evident then that the booke of Iudith was not written by the spirit of God because it commendeth that which is here condemned Seeing also Iacob remembreth Sampson in Dan Mordecai and Esther in Benjamin Barak in Nepthali it is like that Tobie also under Nepthali and Iudith in Simeon should not have beene forgotten if their stories were of like truth 5. Confut. The Pope succeedeth not Christ in this Kingdome Vers. 10. THe scepter shall not depart from Iudah Pererius applieth this to the kingdome of Christ that is his Church which shall endure for ever and so shall the Pope Christs vicar saith he who succeedeth Christ as the sonne doth the father in his authority and dignity in Gen. 49. numer 58. Conâ—â—a True it is that of Christs dominion there shall be none end and that he will alwayes have a Church upon the earth But the Pope which is the Antichrist is no successor to Christ but an usurper of his kingdome he is Christs son as the Jewes boasted they were Abrahams sonnes but Christ telleth them plainly They were of their father the Devill if ye were Abrahams children saith our Saviour ye would doâ— the workes of Abraham Iohn 8.39.44 So the Pope is his sonne whose doctrine he followeth but to forbid to marry and to teach to abstaine from meats as the Pope doth are the doctrines of Devils 1 Tim. 4.1 2. 6. Confut. Antichrist shall not come of Dan. Vers. 17. DAn shall be a serpent by the way c Divers of the ancient Writers upon this place did ground their opinion that Antichrist should come of Dan and therefore they say that tribe is omitted Apocal. 7. and this Pererius holdeth a probable opinion and worthy of credit Conâ—r 1. By this meanes that which Iacob pronounceth as a blessing upon Dan they turne to a curse and whereas Iacob speaketh of one that should be a deliverer of his people which some doe fitly apply to Sampson they would have him point out an enemy and adversary to the Church of God 2. The tribe of Dan was dispersed a thousand yeeres before Antichrist appeared in the world 3. Dan is omitted in the Apocalypse because of the idolatry which began in that tribe wherein Antichrist doth imitate him though hee come not of his stocke so likewise is Simeon omitted in Moses benediction Deuter. 33. yet they will not â—nferre that Antichrist should come of that tribe as Simeon is omitted by Moses for his evill example so Dan is by Iohn for his idolatry 7. Confut. Against Limbus 〈◊〉 Vers. 25. WHo shall blesse thee with the blessings of the deepâ—◠〈◊〉 lieth beneath Pererius maketh Ioseph here a type of Christ whom the Patriarks blessed and praised in the lake or Limbus in the deepe beneath whom he delivered from thence numer 1â—5 Contra. 1. These are but weake arguments of such weighty matters that are taken from types and figures â— Iacob speaketh here of temporall blessings of the wholesome aire pleasant dewes fruitfull ground and nourishing springs in the deepe below they are therefore unproperly applied to spirituall 3. Neither shall he ever be able to prove that the Patriarkes were shut up in the deepe below seeing that the rich man in hell looked up and lift up his eyes to Lazarus being in Abrahams bosome Luk. 16. it was then a place above not in the deepe beneath 8. Confut. What it is to be gathered to his people Vers. 33. WAs gathered to his people 1. Burgensis will have this people to be the fathers in Limbus to whom Iacob went so also Lyranus Contra. 1. Henoch was of this people to whom the Patriarks went after death but hee was not in Limbus hee was taken up to heaven and walked with God 2. Abraham went to his fathers in peace Gen. 15.15 that is with joy and comfort but what comfort is there in Limbus a lake and dungeon of darkenesse 3. Wherefore to be gathered to his people is not to be joyned to the Angels as gloss interlinear for Abraham is said to goe also to his fathers but the Angels were not his fathers neither is this phrase all one as to say he slept with his fathers or went the way of all flesh or changed his life as Perer. Mercer for Ismael is said also to goe to his people
nature as the naturall burning of certaine mountaines as of Aetna in Cicilia Vesuvius in Campania It is found by experience that certaine things putrifie not as the flesh of a Peacoke as Augustine saith and coales upon the which for the same cause Chersiphron founded the temple of Diana lime boyleth with water and is quenched with oile the adamant is so hard that it cannot bee broken upon a smithes anvill the Agrigentine salt melteth in the fire and sparkleth in the water there is said to bee a fountaine among the Garamants that boileth in the night and freezeth in the day the stone Asbestus burneth continually being once set on fire and is never extinct the wood of a certaine figge tree in Egypt sinketh in the water in the Isle Tilo the trees cast no leaves in the Temple of Venus there was a lampe that no tempest could put out and Lodovicus Vives there reporteth that a certaine lampe was found in a grave that had burned above 1050. yeeres At Alexandria in the Temple of Serapis a certaine image of iron did hang in the top by reason of a certaine loadstone which was inclosed in the roofe These and other such like strange things in nature Augustine remembreth Some wee have knowledge of but many secrets of nature are hid from us but knowne unto the spirits who by this meanes doe worke wonders only producing extraordinarie effects of nature 4. Augustine further in another place sheweth the reason thereof in this manner Sunt occulta quaedam semina arborum plantarum c. in elementis c. There are certaine hid seeds of trees plants in the elements for as there are visible seeds so there are hid seeds which give unto the other their vertue like as then the husbandman doth not create corne but bringeth it out by his labour so the evill Angels doe not create things but only doe draw forth those seeds which are unknowne to us but well knowne to them As Iacob did not create that variety of colour in the sheep but by applying of particoloured rods brought it forth sicut ergo matres gravidae sunt foetibus itâ— mundus gravidus est causis seminibus nascentium Then as mothers that are great with child so the world is full of such seeds and causes of the beginning of things which causes they better knowing then we doe worke wonders yea wee see that men by the pounding of certaine herbes and by such like meanes can cause wormes and other like small creatures to come forth To this purpose Augustine QUEST XVI What workes in naturall things are forbidden unto spirits to doe IT followeth now to shew as wee have seene what things are possible to bee done by spirits so what things are out of their reach and beyond their power 1. Touching the immediate action of spirits which is by locall motion the Devill cannot destroy the world or any principall part thereof nor subvert the order and course of nature he cannot change the course of the heavens or put the starres out of their place neither although he may work some alteration in some part of the earth the whole he cannot remove these and such great workes he cannot doe Perer. ex Aquinat the reason is this because this were to crosse the Creator who by his providence as by his power hee created the world and all that is therein so he preserveth the same in that order which he hath appointed as the Psalmist saith The earth is the Lords and all that therein is hee hath founded it upon the sea and established it upon the flouds Psalm 24.1 2. Secondly concerning the other mediate action of spirits by the instrument and mediation of the creatures these things are denied unto spirits 1. They cannot create any thing of nothing for that argueth an infinite power and is peculiar unto God 2. The Devill being himselfe spirituall and without a bodily substance cannot immediatly change or transforme any materiall or corporall substance without some other naturall cause comming betweene 3. Neither can these spirits change any naturall thing into an other naturall thing immediatly without that subordination of nature and preparation and disposition of the matter which is observed in the generation of things therefore hee cannot bring forth a beast without seed nor a perfect beast all at once because naturally both the generation of such things is by seed and they receive their increase and growth not all at once but by degrees and in time therefore when by the operation of Satan lions and beares and such like creatures have beene made to appeare either they were but phantasies and no such things indeed or were transported from some other place and by this reason he cannot restore dead bodies to life because the body being void of naturall heat and spirits is not fit to entertaine the soule 4. Neither can Satan hinder the operation of naturall things if nothing be wanting which is necessâ—ry for their working And generally whatsoever alteration may be made by naturall causes as wormes and frogs and such like may come of pâ—â—refaction these things may be atchieved and compassed by spirits but such changes and transmutations as cannot be done by naturall meanes as to turne a man into a beast are not within the limits of Devils power But when such things seeme to be done they are in shew rather than truth which may be done two wayes either by so binding and blinding the inward phantasie and sense as that may seeme to be which is not or by fashioning some such shape and forme outwardly and objecting it to the sense Perer. Ex Aquinat QUEST XVII Whether Satan can raise the spirits and soules of the dead AMong other things which exceed the power of spirits it is affirmed before that they cannot raise the soules of men departed as Necromancers doe take upon them to talke with the dead 1. Let us see the vaine opinion of the heathen of this devilish Necromancy Porphyrius writeth that the soules of wicked men are turned into Devils and doe appeare in divers shapes and the soules of them that want buriall doe wander about their bodies and sometimes are compelled to resume their bodies Likewise Hosthanes did professe and promise to raise what dead soever and to bring them to talke with the living as Plinie writeth lib. 30. cap. 2. who in the same place reporteth a farre more strange or rather fabulous thing that Appion the Grammarian should tell of a certaine herb called Cynocephalia and of the Egyptians Osirites which hath power to raise the dead and that thereby he called Homers ghost to inquire of him touching his countrie and parents There were among the Gentiles certaine places famous for Necromancie where they received oracles from the dead as they were made to beleeve such was the Cymmerian oracle at the lake Avernam in Campania such was Ericthone the Thessalian that raised up the dead to declare to Sextus
this plague 1. Augustine would hereby understand the Poets of the Gentiles which as by the crooking of frogs so by their vaine babling have brought in many impious and deceitful fables 2. Grâ—gorie Nyssenus maketh these frogs a type and figure of the Epicures and licentious life which entereth into Pharaohs house that is most aboundeth in the houses of Princes and great men 3. Ferus doth take it in the better part that hereby the conversion of a sinner is set forth God sendeth frogs upon the land when he sheweth a man his owne filthinesse 4. But that other application of Ferus is more apt who by the crooking of frogs understandeth Hereticks that doe open their mouth against the truth as Revel 16.13 the uncleane spirits that came out of the mouth of the Dragon and false Prophet are resembled unto frogs such crauling frogs are the popish Monkes and Friers that are sent forth from the mouth and spirit of Antichrist to crooke against the truth Borrh. 5. Beside the historicall application of this plague is this that these frogs are spued out of Nilus the glorie of Egypt where their greatest delight was from thence commeth their confusion Simler And as in Nilus they drowned the children so from thence their punishment taketh beginning and as they abhorred the sight of the infants so they are constrained to indure the ugly sight of deformed frogs and vermin QUEST IX Why Pharaoh appointeth Moses to morrow Verse 10. THen hee said to morrow 1. Some understand it of the time when Pharaoh would let the people go but it appeareth by Moses offer in the former verse leaving to Pharaoh the time when he should pray for him that Pharaoh accordingly named the next day to that end 2. Which time he setteth not Moses as giving him some space for his prayer Simler For Pharaoh had no such devotion to consider what time was meetest for his prayer 3. But the very cause was this hee might thinke that Moses offered himselfe at this time which he saw by some constellation or aspect of the starres to bee fit for his working and therefore putteth him to another day or Pharaoh might thinke this to be some naturall worke and not sent of God and therefore would stay a while and see whether the frogs might goe away of themselves without Moses prayer Pellican Perer. QUEST X. Why the Lord did not remove the frogs quite Vers. 14. ANd they gathered them together by heapes 1. The Egyptians had beene able of themselves to have destroyed these frogs but that God armed them against them and their number was so infinite that they could not resist them like as the history of the Bishop of Ments is famous that was destroyed of rats and mice following him into the midst of the river of Rhene where yet the Rats tower so called is to bee seene Simler And our English Chronicles also doe make mention of a young man pursued by â—oades who could by no meanes bee defended from them but being hanged in the top of a tree in a trunke they crauled up thither and devoured him 2. God could either have cast these frogges into the river againe or caused them to vanish but it pleased him they should remaine in heapes as a spectacle to the Egyptians both to shew that it was a true miracle and that the stinke thereof in 〈◊〉 noses might put them in mind of their sinne that made them stink before God Ferus QUEST XI The difference of the third plague of lice from the former Vers. 17. ALl the dust of the earth was lice 1. In this plague there goeth no commination or denouncing before for because Pharaoh had mocked with God and his Ministers and had hardned his heart he was worthy of no admonition Simler 2. This plague is brought out of the earth as the two first out of the water for the Egyptians were worthy to be punished in both because they had shewed their cruelty in both in destroying the infants in the water and in oppressing the Israelites by working in clay and therefore out of the clay and dust are they punished Simler 3. In the other plagues in the first the Lord sheweth his power in changing the nature of the creatures in the second in commanding them in the third in using them as instruments of his revenge the first plague was horrible to the sight in seeing the bloudy waters the second was both horrible to the sight and troublesome the third was both these and brought griefe and vexation beside Ferus QUEST XII Whether the third plague was of lice NOw what manner of plague this was whether of lice or some other shall briefely bee examined 1. The Hebrew word is cinnim which the Latine translateth sciniphes and the Septuag 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 derived with some small change from the Hebrew Origen whom Augustine followeth taketh them for certaine small flies with wings that can scarse bee seene as they flie yet with their stings doe pricke very sharpely 2. Alberâ—us Magnus saith that they have the taile of wormes the head and wings of flies and are ingendred in fenny places and doe specially follow and light upon men Lib. 26. de animalib this description agreeth to those flies which we call gnats 3. Suidas taketh it to be a worme that eateth wood 4. Pererius thinketh it was a new kinde of vermine not knowne before 5. But I thinke rather with Iosephus that they were lice so also Iun. Vatab. Pagnin Montan. translate so R. Salomon understandeth the word cinnim and they were such lice as did cleave and swarme upon the body that would not be killed with any oyntment or other medicine as Iosephus but they did gnaw upon their flesh much like to the lowsie disease that Sylla and the two Herods died of Simler And Philo saith they did not only sting the flesh but entred in at the eares and nostrils and pained the eyes and though most of them were of this kinde of vermine of lice which came of the slime and dust resembling the same in colour also Oleaster yet it is like that other vermine as gnats and other biting flies and vermine were mingled among them Borrh. QUEST XIII Why the Lord plagued the Egyptians with lice ANd whereas God might have turned by his great power the dust of the earth into Lions and Beares which should have destroyed the people yet it pleased him for these causes to punish them with this contemptible vermine 1. Because the Lord would not consume them all at once but give them space to come to repentance Philo. 2. And that by this meanes the haughty pride of the Egyptians might bee abated seeing that God was able to punish them by such contemptible and base creatures as proud Tyrants are most daunted when they are quailed by weake and impotent meanes as Abimelech thought it a dishonour unto him to be killed by a woman Ferus 3. This plague also served to keepe them in awe
workes sayings or doings so Iehâ—nadab that gave that lewd counsell to Ammâ—n is noted for a crafty and subtile man 2. Sam. 13.3 4. Constancie here required is a vertue which persevereth in the truth being once knowne and apprehended and not changing without necessary or probable cause as Psalm 15.4 That sweereth to his owne hindrance and changeth not Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect levity and inconstancy without any just occasion to 〈◊〉 and change the opinion as Saul in his phranticke fits hated David and sought his life having confessed his foolishnesse and error before 1 Sam. 26.21 2. In the excesse is pertinacie and obstinacie by no reason or perswasion to change an opinion or purpose once conceived such was Herods perversenesse in keeping his rash oath in beheading of Iohn Baptist. 5. Docilitie or willingnesse or aptnesse to heare and conceive the truth is joyned with constancie hereof the Wise-man saith Prov. 21.28 A false witnesse shall perish but he that heareth speaketh continually He may soone be seduced to testifie falsly that will receive no other information but he that is willing to heare and to be further instructed in the truth cannot lightly erre or be deceived Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect easinesse to be lead and carried away with every tale to bee light of beleefe as Patiphâ—r was against Ioseph without any further examination 2. In the excesse not to heare at all what others informe such an one was Nabal who was so wicked that a man might not speake to him 1 Sam. 25.17 6. Taciturnitie or discreet silence is here requisite also which is to conceale things secret and not fit to be revealed in time and place Herein Rachel and Loah contrary to the weaknesse of that sex shewed a good example in keeping secret Iacobs purpose of departing from Laban and consenting thereunto Gen. 31.14 Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect first garrulitie pratling and talking to be full of words without reason and out of season Such light women the Apostle noteth 1 Tim. 5.13 They are pratlers and busie bodies Secondly futilitie in keeping nothing secret but telling whatsoever they know as the young man that discovered Ionathan and Ahimaaz and told Absolom 2 Sam. 17.18 Thirdly treaâ—herie as the Ziphius betrayed David unto Saul 1 Sam. 23.19 2. In the excesse are contrary morosity stubborne and wilfull silence not to speake at all or confesse any thing Such was Cain that being asked where his brother Habel was stubbornly made answer Am I my brothers keeper Genes 4.9 And concealing of the truth when it ought to bee revealed against such unwise uncharitable silence the Wise-man giveth this rule Answer a foole according to his foolishnesse lest hee be wise in his owne 〈◊〉 Proverb 26.5 3. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against the Origenists that in some cases made it lawfull to lye FIrst here that erroneous assertion which Hierome imputeth to Origen commeth to be examined which is this Homo cui incumbit necessitas mentiondi c. sic matur inter dum mendario quomodo condimento atque medicamento ut servet mensuram ejus c. He upon whom there lieth a necessity to lye let him sometime so use a lye as a sauce or medicine that he keepe a measure and exceed not the bounds c. Hierome reproveth this opinion and counteth it as one of Origens errours though Ruffinus therein finde fault with Hierome See Hierom. apolog cont Ruffin Contra. 1. But there is no necessity of lying at all Moriendum est potius quà m peccandum We ought to dye rather than finne and so consequently to tell a lye S. Pauls rule must stand We must not doe evill that good may come of it Rom. 3.8 2. If a lye were tolerable in any case then chiefly when by telling a lye one may save his life but even in such necessity a lye is not justifiable Augustine saith well Meâ—tiri vis ne moriaris meutiris mâ—râ—ris c. Thou wilt make a lye lest thou shouldest dye thou both liest and diest too for while thou wouldest shun one kinde of death which thou mayest deferre but canst not take away thou fallest into two first dying in thy soule and then afterward in thy body August in Psal. 30. Hierome to this purpose writeth to Innocentius of a woman suspected of adultery that was tormented and racked to confesse the fault whereof she was not guilty who in the middest of her torments uttered these words Tu testis es Domine Iesu non ideo me negare velle ne peream sed ideo memâ—â—â— nalle ne peccem Thou art my witnesse Lord Jesus that I doe not deny it lest I should perish but that therefore I will not lye lest I should sinne Sic Hierom. 3. Whereas Origen urgeth the example of Iudith that deceived Holoserâ—â—â— and of Iacob Qui patris benedictionem artifici impetravit mendacie who obtained his fathers blessing by an artificiall lye it may be answered that Iudahs example is one of an Apocryphall booke and therefore is of no force and Iacobs example is either extraordinary and so not to be imitated or that therein he sheweth some humane infirmity which is not to be commended though it pleased God to use it and dispose of it for the effecting of his purpose 2. Confut. Against the Priscilliâ—nists SEcondly the Heretickes called Priscillianists held that it was lawfull for their Mâ—â—dacio occuliare haeresius se Catholices singere To hide their heresie by telling a lye and to faine themselves Catholikes such a trick also that unreasonable sect of the Family of Love have taken up who use so to wind away with obscure and intricate termes when they are examined that their heresie by their confession can hardly be found out The Priscillianists reasons were these 1. That it was enough to have truth in the heart though not in the mouth 2. And a Christian is bound only to speake the truth to his neighbour but they which are of another religion are not our neighbours 3 Iohn fained himselfe a worshipper of Baal Answ. 1. But S. Paul requireth both to beleeve with the heart and to confesse with the mouth Rom. 10.10 Peter denied Christ only with his mouth not in his heart Et tamen laerymis hoc poccatum aâ—â—uit yet he was faine to wash away this sinne with teares 2. Licet aliqua 〈…〉 sint â—era c. although some truths may be hid from him that is not yet initiate in the mysteries of religion Non tamen dicâ—nda falsa sunt yet false things are not to be uttered 3. Augustine answereth that Iehu had not a right heare before God and therefore his example in every respect is not to be justified So August lib. commendatium But to this last answer thus much may be added that Iehu his example here is much unlike for he did not seeke his owne gaine or propounded his owne safety but did this in a zeale to the