the Hebrue text and Popish translaâ—…s themselues follow it not Obiect 2. Eccles. c. 9. Man knowes not whether he be worthy of loue or hatred For al things are kept vncerâ—eâ— till the time to coâ—e Answer First I say the translation is not 〈◊〉 the words are thus in the Hebrue and in the Sevenâ—â—e No man knoweth loue or hatred all things are before them As for these words all things are 〈◊〉 vncerten till the time to come are thrust into the text by head and shoulders and Hierome hath them not Secondly I answer that the H. Ghost doth not denie sâ—mply the knowledge of Gods loue or hâ—tred as though there could be 〈◊〉 certen assurance of it in this life If we vnderstand the words thus then the argument of the holy Ghost must be framed on this manner If loue or hatred were to be knowne then it must be knowne by the outward blessings of God but it cannot be knowne by the outward blessings of God for all things come alike to all therefore loue and hatred cannot be knowne The propositioÌ„ is false For loue may be known other waies then by outward benefits and therefore the reason is not meete to be ascribed to the spirit of truth Wherefore the true and proper sense of the words is that loue or hatred cannot be iudged or discerned by outward blessings of God S. Bernard speaks of this text on this manner that no man knowes loue or hatred namely by himselfe yet that God giues most certen testimonies thereof to men vpon earth And seâ—m 5. de Dediâ— his words are these who knowes if he be worthie loue or hatred who knowes the minde of the Lord. Here both faith truth must needs helpe vs that that which is hidden in the heart of the father may be reuealed vnto vs by the spirit and his spirit giuing testimonie persvvades our spirit that we are the sonnes of God and this perswasion is caused by his calling and iustifying vs freely by faith And S. Hierome though comonly abused to the contrarie saith no more but that men cannot know loue or hatred by the present afflictions which they suffer because they know not whether they suffer them for triall or for punishment Obiect 3. 1. Cor. 4. I iudge not my selfe I know nothing by my selfe Here Paul as not being privic to his own estate refuseth to giue any iudgement of his owne righteousnes Answ. It is manifest by the words of this epistle that certaine in Corinth boldly more then wisely censured the Apostles ministerie and withall disgraced it in respect of the ministery of other teachers Therfore Paul in this chapter goes about to make an Apologie for himselfe speaking nothing of his owne person and the estate thereof before God but onely of his ministerie and the excellencie thereof And this is the iudgement of Theodoret Aquinas and Lira vpon this text And when he saith I iudge not my selfe his meaning is I take not vpon me to iudge of what value and price my ministerie is before God in respect of the ministerie of this or that man but I leaue all to God Here then Paul refuseth onely to giue iudgement of the excellencie of his owne ministerie and in other cases he refused not to iudge him selfe as when he said I haue fought a good fight I haue kept the faith henceforth is laid vp for me the crowne of righteousnes which the Lord the righteous iudge shall giue me 〈◊〉 Tim. 4. 8. And Chrysostome on this place saith that Paul refused to iudge himselfe not simply but onely for this ende that he might restraine others and teach them modestie And where Paul saith I know nothing by my selfe the speach is not generall but must be vnderstoode of negligences and offences in the compasse of his ministery For he was priuie to himselfe that in simplicitie and godly purenes he had his conuersation in the world 2. Cor. 1. 12. and he knew this by himselfe that nothing should seuer him from the loue of God in Christ. Rom. 8. 38. Obiect 4. That we may be iustified there is somewhat required of vs namely faith and repentance and where these are wanting a man cannot be iustified Now no man can be certen by the certentie of faith that he repents of his sinnes with all his heart and that he hath such a faith as God requires at our hands considering there is no testimonie in the word of our faith and repentance in particular Therefore no man can be certen by certentie of faith that his sinnes are pardoned Answer It is not necessarie that any man should be certen by faith of his faith and repentance because faith is onely of such things as are absent where faith and repentance are truly present in all that truly beleeue and repâ—… it shall be sufficient if a man may any way â—…bly certen that he hath them And though â—ome men falsly perswade themselues that they beleeue yet he that hath true faith indeede knowes that he hath true faith euen as 〈◊〉 as he that vnderstands knowes that he vnderstands Paul saith to the Corinthians 〈◊〉 your sâ—…es vvhether ye be in the faith or 〈◊〉 2. Cor. 13. 5. hereby giuing them to vnderstand that all which beleeue haue the spirit of discerning to know certenly that they doe beleeue Againe he saith of himselfe 2. Tim. 1. 12. I knowe â—home I haue beâ—eeued And Saint Iohn saith 1. â—p 3. 24. By this we know that he dwells in vs by the spirit which he hath giuen vs making no question of it but that he which hath the spirit knowes that he hath the same And testimonies of men are not wanting in this case Augustine Euery one seeth faith to be in his owne heart if he beleeue if not he seeth it to be vvanting Againe A beleeuer seeth his oâ—ne faith by which he answereth that he beleeueth without doubt And He which leueth his brother more knoweth the leue whereby he â—â—â—eth then his brother whome he loueth Againe whereas it is said that hauing faith yet we know not whether it be â—â—â—ficient or no I answear that faith beeing without hypocrifie is sufficient to saluation though it be imperfect God more respects the trueth of our faith then the perfection thereof And as the hand of the child or of the palsie man though it be feeble is able to reach out it selfe and receiue an almes of a prince so the faith that is but weake is able to apprehend and receiue Christ with all his benefits Obiect 5. Prov. 28. Blessed is the man that feareth alvvaies Pâ—â—l 2. Worke your salvation with feare and trembling Answer There is a threefold feare one of nature the secoÌ„d of grace the third of distrust Feare of nature is that whereby the nature of man is troubled with any thing that is hurtfull vnto it and therefore auoideth it Feare of grace is that excellent gift which is called the beginning of wisdome and
because conscience 〈◊〉 not say of them that they please God Esa. 29. 13. Mark 7. v. 7. Lastly wee learne here that igâ—orâ—nce of Gods will and word is a daungerous thing and makes the life of man to abound yea to flowe with a sea of offences against God Men commonly thinke that if they keepe themselues froÌ„ petiurie blasphemie murder theft whordome all is well with them but the truth is that so long as they liue in ignorance they want right and true direction of conscience out of Gods word and therfore there best actions are sinnes euen their eating and drinking their sleeping and waking their buying and selling their speach and silence yea their praying and seruing of God For they doe these actions either of custome or example or necessitie as beasts doe and not of faith because they know not Gods will touching things to be done or left vndone The consideration of this point should make euery man most carefull to seeke for knowledge of Gods word and daily to increase in it that he may in all his affaires haue Gods lawes to be the men of his counsell Psal. 119. 24. that 〈◊〉 may giue heede to them as to a light shining in a â—â—rke place 〈◊〉 Pet. 1. 19. that he may say with Pâ—â—er when Christ commanded him to lanch forth into the deepe and to cast forth his net Lord â—ve hâ—â—e ben allâ—ight ana haue catched nothing yet in thy word vvill I let dâ—vvne my â—â—t Luk 5. 5. CAP. III. Of the kindes of conscience and of conscience regenerate COnscience is either good or badde Good conscience is that which rightly according to Gods worde excuseth and comforteth For the excellence goodnes and dignitie of conscience standes not in accusing but in excusing And by doing any sinne whatsoeuer to giue an occasion to the conscience to â—…use or condemne is to wound it and to offend in Thus Paul saith that the Corinthians â—…ded the consciences of their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whâ—… they vsed their libertie as an â—ccasian of offence to them 1. Cor. 8. 9. 〈◊〉 Agaiâ—… he calleth a good conscience a conscience without offence that iâ— which hath no stoppe o◠〈◊〉 to hinder it from excusing Act. 24. 16. Good conscience is either good by 〈◊〉 or by regeneration Good by creation was the conscience of Adam which in the estate of innocencie did onely excuse could not accuâ—â— him for any thing though it may be an 〈◊〉 to accuse was not wanting 〈◊〉 afterward an occasion should be offered And hence we haue further direction to consider what a good conscience is namely such an one as by the order set downe in the creation exâ—…th onely without accuâ—… 〈◊〉 cuse is a defect in the 〈◊〉 following â—…ter the first creation Fee naâ—â—rally there is an agreement and harmony betweene the parts and the whole but if the conscience should naturally accuse there should be adâ—ssent and disagrâ—â—ment and diuision betweene the conscience and the man himselfe Regenerate conscience is that which bâ—eing corrupt by nature is renewed and purged by faith in the blood of Christ. For to the regenerating of the conscience there is required a conversion or chaunge because by 〈◊〉 all mens consciences since the fall are euill and none are good but by grace The instrument â—…ing to make this chaunge is faith Act. 15. 9. Faith purifieth the heart The mâ—…orious cause is the blood of Christ Hebr. 9. 14. How much more shal the blood of Christ c. purge your conscience froÌ„ dead works to sâ—rue the liuing God The propertie of regenerate conscience is twofold Christian 〈◊〉 Câ—ttentiâ— of saluation Because both these haue their place not in the outward man but in the 〈◊〉 and conscience Châ—istian libeâ—… 〈◊〉 spirituall and holy freedome purchased by Christ. I say it is spiâ—… first to put a difference bâ—…ne it and civill libertie which standes in outward and bodily freedomes and priuiledges secondly to confute the Iewes that looke for earthly libertie by Christ and the Anabaptists who imagine a freedome from all authoritie of magistrates in the kingdome of Christ. Againe I say it is an holy freedome to confute the 〈◊〉 who thinke that by the death of Christ they haue libertie to liue as they list Lastly I say that it is purchased by Christ to shew the author thereof Gal. 5. 1. Standfast iâ— the libertie vvhere with Christ hath made you free And to confute the Papists whose doctrine in effect is thus much that this libertie is prâ—…red indeede by Christ but is continued partly by Christ and partly by the man himselfe Christian libertie hath three parts The first is a freedome from the iustification of the morall lawe For he that is a member of Christ is not bound in conscience to bring the perfect righteousnes of the law in his owne person for his iustification before God Gal. 5. 1. with v. 3. Hence it followeth that he that is a Christian is likewise freed from the curse and condemnation of the law Rom. 8. 1. There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ. Gal. 3. 13. Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the law when he was made a curse for vs. By this first part of Christian libertie it appeares that there cannot be any iustification of a sinner by workes of grace before God For he that will be iustified but by one worke is debter to the vvhole lavv Gal. 3. 3. but no man that is a member of Christ is debter to the whole law for his libertie is to be free in that point therefore no man is iustified so much as by one worke The second part is freedome from the rigour of the law which exacteth perfect obedience and condemneth all imperfection Rom. 6. 14. Sinne hath no more dominion ouer yoâ— for ye are not vnder the law but vnder grace 1. Ioh. 5. 3. This is the loue of God that ye keepe his commandements and his commandements are not grieuous Hence it followeth that God will accept of our imperfect obedience if it be sincere yea he accepts the will desire and indeauour to obay for obedience it selfe Malach. 3. 17. And I vvill spare them as a man spareth his owne sonne that serueth him The third part is that the conscience is freed from the bond of the ceremoniall law Gal. 3. 25. But after that faith is come we are no more vnder a schoolemaster Eph. 2. 15. And hath broken the stoppe of the partition wall in abrogating through his flesh the lavv of commaundements vvhich standeth in ordinances Coloss. 2. 14. And hath put out the hand vvriting of ordinances vvhich vvas against vs. v. 16. Let no man therefore condemne you in meate and drinke or in respect of an holy day or of the new moone c. Hence it followeth that all Christians may freely without scruple of coÌ„science vse all things indifferent so be it the manner of vsing them be good And first when I say that all may
of the reward of their perseverance yet they are founde to be vncerten of the perseverance it selfe for vvhat man can knovve that hee shall persevere in the practise and increase of righteousnesse vnto the end except he be assured of it by some revelation IV. Some places must be understoode of experimentall certenty when the euent is accomplished Hieronym booke 2. against Pelagians Callâ—o man blessed before his eâ—de for as long as vvee live here vve are in the fight and as long as vvee are in the fight vve haâ—â— no 〈◊〉 victory V. Some places speakes of the uncertenty of other mens salâ—â—â—tion which we grant The authour of the booke de vâ—◠〈◊〉 Gâ—… 〈◊〉 clast saith we caâ— prâ—…ce of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before his end that hee shall be in the glory of the 〈◊〉 August lib. 〈◊〉 Per sever c. 13. Men are not vvâ—… any 〈◊〉 asseveration to 〈◊〉 that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this calling VI. Some speake of that 〈◊〉 which comes by reuelation without the worde Greg. lib. 6. 〈◊〉 2â— 10 Gregoria Whereas you adde in your epistles that you will be earnest with me till I write that it hath bene made knowen unto me that your sâ—â—nes are forgiven you haue required a hard and unprofitable thing Harde because I am unvvorthy to vvhome a revelation should be made Vnprofitable because you must not be made secure touching your sinnes vnlesse it be in the last day of your life for then you should not be able to bewaile the same sinnes VII Some places denie unto man that certentie which is proper to God which is to discerne in himselfe all things to come plainly as they shal come to passe without helpe of testimonies and outward signes Bernard serm 1. de Septuages Who can say I am of the elect I am of the predestinate to life certenly we haue none as yet but the affiance of our hope comforteth vs. Conferre these wordes with those that follow For this cause certaine signes and manifest tokens of salvation are given that it may be a thing out of doubt that he is in the number of the elect in vvhome these signes are Thus I haue in some part made manifest that an unfallible certenty of pardon of sinne and life euerlasting is the property of euery renued conscience Now therefore I will proceede further to consider how this certenty is caused and imprinted in the conscience The principall agent and beginner thereof is the Holy ghost in lightning the minde and conscience with spirituall and diuine light and the instrument in this action is the ministery of the gospell wherby the worde of life is applyed in the name of God to the person of euery hearer And this certentie is by little and little conceiued in a forme of reasoning or practicall syllogisme framed in the mind by the holy ghost on this manner Euery one that beleeues is the child of God But I â—â—e beleeve Therefore I am the child of God The proposition is made by the minister of the worde in the publike congregation and it is nothing else but the promise of eternall life applyed to the particular hearer The second part or the assumption is the voice of conscience regenerate or the voice of Gods spirite in the same Now Papistes write and auouch that the assumption is false but the reasons which they use to prooue the same are of small moment First they alledge that many are deceiued in their perswasions thinking they haue that which they haue not I answere againe that many doe falsely presume of Gods mercy and imagine they haue that faith which they haue not and in all such the assumption is false yet in all them that are chosen to saluation and truely called it is vnfallibly true For such as haue receiued the gift of true faith haue also another gift of discerning whereby they see and know their owne faith It is further obiected that Ieremy saieth 17. 9. The heart is deceitfull and vvicked above all things vvho can knovve it But the intent of this place is onely to shew that no man can search his heart to the very bottome to see all and euery want infirmitie and wicked inclination that is therein For originall sinne wherewith the heart of man is tainted is a pronenesse or disposition to all the sinnes that are or may be And though men can not discerue all their sinnes yet many of them are certenly knowen why may not then many of the graces of God be certenly known specially those which be of the principall as faith sanctification repentance Againe it is alledged that Peter beleeued that he was able to lay downe his life for Christs sake and yet indeede was not as the euent declared for when the time came he denyed Christ. Ansvv. Peter at this time was but weake in faith and hee was much carried away with a confidence of his owne strength which made him speake these wordes of presumption and though he failed in this one particular action yet failed hee not in the principall that is in the perswasion of the pardon of his owne sinnes and of life euerlasting In a word it is certen that many perswade them-selues of Gods mercy and yet are deceiued neuerthelesse all such as doe truly beleeue are not deceiued The holy ghost making them to see that in themselues which by nature they can not discerne as Paul signified when he said I speake the truth I lie not my conscience bearing me witnesse by the Holy Ghost Rom. 9. v. 1. Againe the same testimony is giuen otherwise thus Euery childe of God hath the pardon of his sinnes saith Gods word But I am Gods child and therefore have the pardon of my sinnes saith the renewed conscience by the direction of Gods spirit Rom. 8. 16. Gal. 4. 6. After that this testimony is once begun it is confirmed by the same meanes as also by prayer and the sacraments Now it may be demanded how a bodily element as bread wine water should be able to confirme a perswasion of our adoption that is in the conscience Ansvv. The element in the sacrament is an outwarde seale or instrument to confirme faith not as a medicine restores and confirmes health whether we thinke on it or not whether we sleepe or wake and that by his owne inherent vertue but by reasoning in syllogisme made by the good conscience the 〈◊〉 thereof beeing the outwarde signe in the sacrament By means of which syllogisme the Holy Ghost mooues and stirres the mind yea cherisheth and increaseth faith on this manner Hee which vseth the elements aright shall receive the promises But I do or I haue used the elements aright Therefore I shall receive the promises Whereas presumption and the illusion of Satan will as well tell a man that he is the childe of God as the true testimony of regenerate conscience the way to put difference betwene them is this I. Presumption is naturall and from the very wombe but this testimony of conscience
for the Apostolicall function Lastly Christ was sent euen as he was man to be a teacher of the Iewes therfore be is called the minister of circumcision Rom. 15. 8. so the Apostles are sent by him to teach the Gentiles Thus far is the comparison to be enlarged no further And that no man might imagine that some parte of this resemblance stands in a power of binding conscience Christ hath put a speciall exception when he saith Goe teach all nations teaching them to obserue al things that I have commanded you Arg. 6. Rom. 13. Whosoever resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God and they that resist â—â—all receive to them selues iudgement and ye must be subiect not onely for wrath but also for conscience sâ—â—e Answ. Magistracie indeed is an ordinance of God to which we owe subiectioÌ„ but how farre subiection is due there is the questioÌ„ For body goods outward coÌ„versation I grant all but a subiection of coÌ„science to mans lawes I deny And betweene these two there is a great difference to be subiect to authority in conscience to be subiect to it for conscience as wil be manifest if we do but consider the phrase of the Apostle the meaning whereof is that we must performe obedience not onely for anger that is for the auoiding of punishment but also for the auoiding of sinne so by coÌ„sequent for auoiding a breach in coÌ„scieÌ„ce Now this breach is not properly made because mans law is neglected but because Gods law is broken which ordaineth magistracie withall binds mens consciences to obey their lawfull commandements And the daÌ„nation that is due unto men for resisting the ordinance of God comes not by the single breach of magistrates commandemet but by a transgression of the law of God which appointeth magistrates their authority To this answer papists reply nothing that is of moment Therfore I proceed Arg. 7. 1. Cor. 4. What will you that I come unto you with a rod or in the spirit of meeknes Now this rod is a iudicial power of punishing sinners Answ. For the regiment protection of Gods Church There be 2. rods mâ—…oned in scripture the rod of Christ the Apostolicall rodd The rod of Christ is termed a rod of iron or the rod of his mouth it signifies that absolute soueraigne power which Christ hath ouer his creatures wherby he is able to coÌ„uert saue them or to forsake and destroy them And it is a peculiar priuiledge of this rodde to smite and wound the conscience The Apostolicall rodde was a certaine extraordinary power whereby God inabled them to plague and punish rebellious offenders with grieuous iudgements not in their soules but in their bodies alone With this rod Paul smote Elimas blind Peter smote Ananias and Saphira with bodily death And it may be that Paul by this power did giue up the incestuous man when he was excommunicate to be vexed in his body and tormented by the deuill but that by this rodde the Apostles could smite conscience it can not be prooued Arg. 8. 1. Tim. 3. Paul made a law that none hauing two wiues should be ordained a Bishop now this law is positiue and Ecclesiasticall and bindes conscience Answ. Paul is not the maker of this law but God himselfe who ordained that in mariage not three but two alone should be one flesh and that they which serue at the altar of the Lord should be holy And to graunt that this law were a new law beside the written word of God yet doeth it not follow that Paul was the maker of it because he used not to deliuer any doctrine to the Churches but that which he receiued of the Lord. Argum. 9. Luc. 10. He which heareth you heareth me Answ. These wordes properly concerne the Apostles and doe not in like maner belong to pastors teachers of the Church And the end of these wordes is not to confirme any Apostolicall authority in making lawes to the conscience but to signifie the priviledge which hee had vouchsafed them aboue all others that he would so farre forth assist them with his spirite that they should not erre or be deceiued in teaching publishing the doctrine of saluation though otherwise they were sinfull men according to Matth. 10. It is not you that speake but the spirite of my father which speaketh in you And the promise to be led into all truth was directed vnto them Arg. 10. 1. Cor. 11. I praise you that yee keepe my commandements Answ. Paul deliuered nothing of his owne concerning the substance of the doctrine of saluation the worship of God but that which he receiued from Christ the precepts here ment are nothing else but rules of decencie comely order in the congregation and though they were to be obeyed yet Pauls meaning was not to binde any mans conscience therewith For of greater matters he saith This I speake for your commoditie and not to intangle you in a snare 1. Cor. 7. 35. Arg. 11. Councels of ancient fathers when they commaÌ„d or forbid any thing do it with threatning of a curse to the offenders Ans. The church in former time used to annexe vnto hir Canons the curse anathema because things decreed by them were indeed or at the least thought to be the will and word of God and they had respect to the saying of Paul If any teach otherwise though he be an angell from heauen let him be accursed Therfore councels in this action were no more but instruments of God to accurse those whome he first of all had accursed Arg. 12. An act indifferent if it be commanded is made necessary the keeping of it is the practise of vertue therefore euery law bindes conscience to a sinne Ans. An act in it selfe indifferent being commaÌ„ded by mans law is not made simply necessary for that is as much as gods law doth or can doe but only in some part that is so far forth as the said act or action tends to maintaine and preserue the good end for which the law is made And though the action be in this regard necessary yet doth it still remaine indifferent as it is considered in it selfe out of the ende of the law so as if peace the common good comely order may be maintained all offence auoided by any other meanes the act may be done or not done without sinne before God For whereas God himselfe hath giuen liberty freedome in the use of things indifferent the law of man doeth not take away the same but onely moderate and order it for the common good Arg. 13. The fast of Lent stands by a lawe and commandement of men and this lawe bindes conscience simply for the ancient fathers haue called it a Tradition Apostolicall and make the keeping of it to be necassary and the not keeping of it a sinne and punish the offenders with excommunication Answer It is plaine to him that will not be
higher powers Rom. 13. 1. or Honour father and mother Exod. 20. which commaundements binde vs in conscience to performe obedience to the good laws of men As S. Peter saith Submit your selues to euery humane ordinance for the Lord 1. Pet. 2. 13. that is for conscience of God as he saith afterward v. 19. wherby he signifieth two thing first that God hath ordained the authority of gouernours secondly that he hath appointed in his word and thereby bound men in conscience to obay their gouernours lawfull commandements If the case fall out otherwise as commonly it doth that humane laws be not inacted of things indifferent but of things that be good in themselues that is commanded by God then are they not 〈◊〉 properly but divine lawes Mens laws intreating of things that are morally good and the parts of Gods vvorshippe are the same with Gods laws and therfore binde conscience not because they were inacted by men but because they were first made by God men beeing no more but instruments and ministers in his name to revive renew and to put in exequution such precepts and laws as prescribe the worship of God standing in the practise of true religion vertue Of this kind are all positiue lawes touching articles of faith the duties of the morall law And the man that breakes such lawes sinnes two waies first because he breaks that which is in conscience a law of God secondly because in disobaying his lawfull magistrate he disobâ—… the generall commandement of God touching magistracie But if it shall fall out that mens lawes be made of things that are cuill and forbidden by God then is there no bonde of conscience at all but contrariwise men are bound in conscience not to obay Act. 4. 19. And hereupon the three children are commended for not obaying Nabuchadnezzar when he gaue a particular commandement vnto them to fall downe and worship the golden image Dan. 3. Moreouer in that mans law binds onely by power of Gods law hence it follows that Gods law alone hath this priuiledge that the breach of it should be a sinne S. Iohn saith 1. epist. 3. Sinne it the anomie or transgressioÌ„ of the law vnderstanding Gods lawe When Dauid by adulterie and murder had offended many men that many waies he saith Psal. 51. against thee against thee haue I sinned And Augustine defined sinne to be some thing said done or desired against the law of God Some man may say if this be so belike then we may breake mens laws without sinne I answer that men in breaking humane lawes both may and doe sinne but yet not simply because they breake them but because in breaking them they doe also breake the law of God The breach of a law must be considered two waies First as it is a trespasse hinderance iniurie damage and in this respect it is committed against mens lawes secondly the breach of a law must be considered as it is sinne and so it is onely against Gods law The second point namely How farreforth mens lawes binde conscience I explane on this manner It is all that the lawes of God doe or can doe to binde conscience simply and absolutely Therefore humane laws bind not simply but so farre forth as they are agreeable to Gods word serue for the coÌ„mongood staÌ„d withgood order and hinder not the libertie of conscience The necessitie of the law ariseth of the necessitie of the good end thereof And as the end is good and profitable more or lesse so is the law it selfe necessarie more or lesse Hence it followeth that a man may doe any thing beside humane lawes and constitutions without breach of conscience For if he shall omit the doing of any law I. without hindrance of the ende and particular considerations for which the law was made II. without offence giuing as much as in him lieth III. without contempt of him that made the law he is not to be accused of sinne Example In time of warre the magistrate of a citie commands that no man shall open the gates the end is that the citie and euery member thereof may be in safetie Now it falls out that certaine citizens beeing vpon occasion without the citie are pursued by the enemie and in daunger of their lifes Herupon some man within openeth the gate to resâ—…e them The question is whether he haue sinned or no. And the truth is he hath not because he did not hinder the ende of the law but rather further it and that without scandal to men or contempt to the magistrate And this stands euen by the equitie of Gods word God made a law that the priests onely should eate of the shewbread now Dauid being no priest did vpon vrgent occasion eate of it without sinne If this be true in Gods law then it may also be true in the lawes of men that they may in some cases be omitted without sinne against God Neither must this seeme strange For as thâ—re is a keeping of a law and a breaking of the same so there is a middle or meane action betwâ—â—ne them both which is to doe thing beside the law and that without sâ—â—â—e To proceede further mens laws be either civill or ecclesiasticall Civill laws are for their substance determinations of necessarie and profitable circumstances tendâ—â—â— to â—â—hold and maintaine the commandemâ—… of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 More specially they prescribe what is to be doâ— and what is to be left vndone touching actions both civill criminal touching offices and bâ—rgines of all soâ—â—â— c. yea they conclude inioyne commaÌ„d not onely such affaires as be of smaller importaÌ„ce but also things actions of great waight tending to maintaine common peace civill societie and the very state of the common wealth Now such laws binde so farre forth that though they be omitted without any apparanâ— sâ—â—ndal or contempâ— yet the breach of them is a sinne against God Take this example A subiect in this lande vpon pouertie or vpon a couctous minde against the good law of the land coines money which after ward by a sleight of his wit is cunningly conuaied abroad into the hands of men and is not espied Here is no euident offence giuen to any man nor open contempt shewed to the lawgiuer and yet in this action he hath sinned in that closely otherwise then he ought to haue done he hath hindered the good of the common wealth and robbed the soueraigne prince of her right Ecclesâ—sticall lawes are certaine necessarie and profitable determinations of circumstances of the commaundements of the first table I say bâ—â—e 〈◊〉 because all doctrines pertaining to the foundation and good estate of the Church as also the whole worshippe of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 downe and commaâ—nded in the written word of God and cannot be prescribed and concluded otherwise by all the Churches in the world Aâ—â—or the Creedes and Confessionâ— of particular Churches they are in substance Gods word and they binde not in conscience by any power
the Church hath but because they are the word of God The lawes then which the Church in proper speach is sâ—â—de to make are decrees concerning outward order and comelines in the administration of the word and sacramâ—â—s in the meetings of the coÌ„gregation c. such laws made according to the generall rules of Gods word which requires that all things be don to edificatioÌ„ in comelines for the auoiding of offence are cessarie to be obserued and the word of God binds all men to theÌ„ so farre forth as the keeping of them maintains decent order and pâ—…s open offence Yet if a law concerning some â—…nall riâ—e of thing indifferent be at some time vpon some occasion omitted no offence giuen not contempt shewed to Ecclestasticall â—â—â—horitie there is no bâ—each made in the conscience â—â—d that appeares by the example before hanâ—â—â—â— The Apostles guided by the holy Ghost made a decree for the auoiding of offence necessarie to be obserued namely that the Gentiles should abstaine from strangled and blood and idoâ—ithyâ—â—s and yet Paul out of the case of scandall and contempt permits the Corinthians to doe otherwise 1. Cor. 8. 9. which he would not hâ—â—â— done if to doe otherwise out of the case of scandall and contempt had bin sinne Againe lawes are either mixt or meerely penall Mixâ— are such lawes as are of weightie matters and are propounded in coÌ„manding or forbidding â—eaâ—â—es and they binde men first of all to obedience for the necessary good of humane societies and secondly to a punishment if they obay not that a supplie may be made of the â—indrance of the common good In the breach of this kind of laws though a man be neuer so willing to suffer the punishment yet that will not discharge his conscience before God when he ofâ—…ds If a man coin moâ—y with this minde to be willing to die when he is conâ—icted yet that will not free him from a sinne in the action because Gods law binds vs not onely to subiection iâ—â—earing of punishments but also to obedience of his â—…e commandement it beeing lawfull though â—e should set downe no punishment A law meerely peâ—â—ll is that which beeing mâ—… of matters of lesse importance and not vtâ—…d preâ—isely in commâ—…ding tearmes doeth onely declare and shewe what is to be done or conditionally require this or that with respect to the punishment on this manner If any person doe this or that then he shall forfeit thus or thus This kind of law kinds especially to the punishment that in the very intent of the lawgiuer and he that is readie in omitting the law to pay the fine or punishmet is not to be charged with sinne before God the penaltie being answerable to the losse that comes by the neglect of the law Thus we see how farre forth mens laws bind conscience The vse of this points is this I. hence wee learne that the immunitie of the Popish cleargie whereby they take themselues exempted from civill courts and from civill authoritie in criminall causes hath no warrant because Gods commandements binds euery man whatsoeuer to be subiect to the magistrate Râ—… 〈◊〉 Let euery soule be sâ—…ct to the higher powers II Hence we see also what notorioâ—â— rebeâ—… those are that beeing borne subiâ—cts of this land yet choose rather to die then to acknowledge as they are bound in conâ—… the Qâ—… Maâ—estie to be supreame gouernour vnder God in all causes ouer all persons III. Lastly we are taught hereby to be readie and willing to giue subiection obedience reuerence and all other duties to magistrates whether they be superiou or inferiour yea with chearefulnes to pay 〈◊〉 and subsidies and all such lawfull charges 〈◊〉 appointed by them Giue to Cesâ—â— that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cesars to God that which is Goâ—â— Rom. 13. 〈◊〉 Giue to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their dutie tribute to 〈◊〉 tribute 〈◊〉 to whome custome Now follows the Oath which is either assertorie or promissorie Assertorie by which a man auoucheth that a thing was done or not done Promisserie by which a man promiseth to doe a thing or not to doe it Of both these I mean to speak but specially of the second And here two points must be coÌ„sidered the first by what means an oath bindeth the second when it bindeth An oath bindeth by vertue of such particuâ—… coÌ„mandements as require the keeping of oathâ—â— lawfully taken Num. 30. 3. Who soeuer sâ—… an â—ath to binde his soule by a bond â—e shall not 〈◊〉 his word 〈◊〉 shall doe according to all that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of his 〈◊〉 This being so â—questioÌ„ may be made whether the 〈◊〉 of insiâ—… biâ—d conscience by what vâ—… 〈◊〉 they â—â—ither know the Scriptâ—… noâ— the true God Aâ—s They doe bind in conscience For example Iacob Laban make a 〈◊〉 confirmed by oath Iacob sweares by the true God Laban by the god of Nâ—…or that i◠〈◊〉 his idols Now Iacob though he approoue not the forme of this oath yet he accepts it for a civil bond of the covenant no doubt though Laban beleeued not Gods word reuealed to the Pâ—…ks yet he was bound in coÌ„science to keep this â—th euen by the law of nature though he 〈◊〉 not the 〈◊〉 God yet he 〈◊〉 the false god of Nacâ—â—r to be the true God Gen. 31. 53. Againe if a lawfull oath by vertue of Gods coÌ„mandements bind conscience then it must needâ— be that the Romane Church hath long erred in that â—…ee â—…th and maintaineth that gouernours as namely the Pope and other inferiour Bishops haue power to giue relaxations and dispensations not onely for oathes vnlawfull from which the word of God doth sufficiently free vs though they should neuer giue absolutioÌ„ but from a true lawfull oath made wittingly willingly without errour or deceit of a thing honest and possible as when the Pope frees the subiects of this land as occasion is offered from their sworne allegiance and loyaltie to which they are bound not onely by the law of nature but also by a solemne and particular oath to the Supremacie which none euer deemed vâ—…full but such as carrie traytors hearts Now this erronious divinitie would easily be revoked if men did bâ—â— consider the nature of an oath one part whereof is Invocation in which we prâ—â— vnto God first that he would become a witnes vnto vs that we speak the truth and purpose not to deceiue secondly if we faile break our promise that he would take â—…ge vpon vs and in both these petitions we bind our selues immediatly to God himselfe and God againe who is the ordainer of the oath accepts this bond and 〈◊〉 it by his commendement till it be accomplished Hence it follows that no creature caÌ„ haue power to vâ—â—ie the bood of an â—â—th that is truly and lawfully an â—â—th vnles we wil 〈◊〉 the creatures aboue God himselfe And our Sauiour Christ gaue better â—…ell when he commanded vs to performe our 〈◊〉 to