partly figurative of things to come and significative of some spirituall thing partly they had some other politick end and use which not in respect of the figure and type but in some other regard may upon a new institution be observed under the Gospell as the shew-bread or face-bread as it was a figure of Christ is now no more used but yet bread by Christs institution is still retained in the Eucharist as representative of the body of Christ. So they under the Law used washing with water to signifie the inward cleansing and now also in the new Testament upon a new ordinance it is used as the outward element in Baptisme So the observation of the Sabbath the paying of tithes Churches garments Church-musicke and the like were partly ceremoniall partly morall belonging to the service of God to the maintenance of Ministers to externall decencie and comelinesse in which respect though the ceremoniall use be ceased they may be retained still all things being done without offence and to edification according to the Apostles rule 4. But here I cannot let passe untouched an unsound assertion of Lyranus to whom consenteth Lippoman that thurificatio quae de ceremonialibus erat in nova lege remanet that censing and offering of incense being one of the ceremonials of the old Law yet remaineth in the new because it signified nothing to come but only shewed the devotion of the people in the worship of God which is greater in the new Testament than in the old Contra. 1. The offering of incense was a necessarie appertinance to the externall sacrifices of the Law it did continually wait and attend upon them and as the sacrifices did prefigure the holy sacrifice of attonement and passion of our blessed Saviour upon the crosse so the incense did betoken the sweet savour of that sacrifice and the acceptance thereof with Gold as Saint Paul sheweth that Christ hath given himselfe for us an offering and a sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God Ephes. 5.2 Beside the oblation of incense did shadow forth the mediation of Christ in offering up the prayers of the Saints as Revel 8.3 Much odors were given to the Angel that had the golden censer to offer with the prayers of the Saints and hereunto alludeth the Prophet David when he saith Let my prayer be directed in thy sight as incense Psal. 141.2 It is evident then that the incense of the old Law was figurative and significative of things to come 2. And true it is that the inward and spirituall devotion is more and greater in the new Testament than it was in the old but not the externall for they had more outward ceremonies and rites prescribed as signes of their devotion than are now required under the Gospell for now they that worship God must worship him in spirit and truth Ioh. 4.24 QUEST IV. How farre the Iudicials are now to be retained FUrther concerning the Judicials of Moses 1. They doe much differ in respect of their observation from the Ceremonials for these are so abrogated as that now to observe the figures and types of the old Testament were great impiety for all such things were observed then vel expresè vel tacitè sub protestatione Messiae futuri c. either expresly or closely under protestation of the Messiah to come now therefore to observe them were to protest Christum nondum venisse that Christ were not yet come But it is not so with the Judicials for they being conclusions and rules of justice grounded upon the Law of nature and first given for the conservation of the peace and politike state of that Common-wealth and not prescribed for any signification or prefiguring of things to come they may now be so farre forth observed as they are found fitting and agreeable unto the state and condition of the people Sic fere Tostat. Lippom. 2. Two wayes is a precept said to be figurale figurative◠one way when it is principally instituted to figure somewhat such were the ceremoniall precepts another ex consequenti by a certaine consequent and so are the Judicials after a sort figurative because they belonged unto that people cujus status erat figuralis whose state was figurative Sic Thom. Lippom. To bee figurative in this sense letteth not but that the Judicials may be retained now seeing they were not appointed or ordained to prefigure any thing as the Ceremonials were 3. But here two strange positions come to be examined the one is of Lippoman That to observe the Judicials tanquam ex lege veteri obligatoria esset mortiferum as binding by force of the old Law were a deadly sinne Tostatus also saith We receive the judiciall precepts given of God tanquam dicta sapientis viri c. as the sayings of some wise man not as of a lawgiver binding us to the observation thereof like as the Romans borrowed their Lawes of the wise Grecians Tostat. qu. 1. Contra. 1. The old Law in the constituting of the Judicials was grounded upon the Law of equity which rule of equity it is no sinne to follow now therefore it is no sinne to follow the rules of the old law as they are grounded upon equity and justice nay therein to depart from them were rather transgression 2. S. Iames saith chap. 4.12 There is one Lawgiver which is able to save and destroy therefore to whom doth it rather belong to give direction for what offences mans life is to be saved and other punishment to be afflicted and for what his life is to bee taken away than unto that perfit and soveraigne Lawgiver who is the author and giver of life and at whose will and pleasure only mans life is taken away To say therefore that the Judicials appointed by God are to be observed now only as the sayings of a wise man not as of a Lawgiver is both to derogate from Gods authority who is the only sufficient Lawgiver and from the sufficiencie of his law which is more perfect than any humane constitutions whatsoever in making these Judicials but equall unto the sayings of other wise men But this question hath beene already handled at large before in the generall questions in chap. 1. Exod. QUEST V. Why these Lawes are called judgements THese are the judgements 1. He saith not Dei judicia sed absolut◠judicia the judgements of God but absolutely judgements for he which observed these was not yet just before God though hee were before men Lippoman 2. This word judgement in the singular signifieth not as judgements in the plurall for judgement in the singular for the most part signifieth condemnation but in the plurall it signifieth tam re◠vindictam quà m innocentis defensionem as well the revenge and punishment of the guilty as the defence of the innocent Rupertus 3. This word judgement is taken three wayes first it signifieth the act of the judgement and understanding which determineth what is meet and convenient to be done and
be proved 2. That hee was set over the whole Church of Christ is but a friers dreame all the Apostles were in equall commission and all were sent immediately of Christ to preach the Gospell a◠my father sent me so send I you Ioh. 20.21 that charge of our Saviour pasce oves feed my sheepe will not beare such universall jurisdiction for neither all Christs sheepe are committed only to Peter and feeding signifieth not ruling or commanding but teaching and instructing a duty Saint Peter himselfe being Judge common to all pastors and presbyters feed the flock c. 1 Peter 5.2 3. Neither is it true that Saint Peter first preached to the Gentles 1. for Saint Paul was converted Act. 9. before Peter saw that vision Act. 10. who immediately upon his conversion preached to the Gentiles in Arabia and Damascus Galath 1.15 16 17. 2. Saint Peter indeed was both the first and last that was resolved by vision of the calling of the Gentiles but Saint Paul was sure thereof before by revelation and communicated not with Peter about his vision before he preached to the Gentiles Galath ibid. 3. Neither is it true that Cornelius family was the first that was called among the Gentiles for Andronicus and Iunia were in Christ before Paul Rom. 16.7 who was converted before Cornelius was called 4. Though the priority of preaching to the Gentiles were yeelded to Peter yet the superiority goeth not together with it 5. Lastly all this being presupposed yet it is but a simple argument that is grounded upon types and figures as this is for Saint Peters supremacy out of this place 2. Confut. Marriage cannot be contracted by Proctors betweene the parties being absent Vers. 4. TAke a wife to my sonne Thomas Anglicus by this president would authorise the marriage of parties absent by messengers and proctors going betweene them in 24. c. Genes But no such thing can be hence gathered for Abrahams servant did not conclude the marriage betweene Rebecca and Isaack but only procured the espousals and promise of marriage which was not fully contracted and concluded till they both met and then the text saith he tooke Rebeccah and she was his wife v. 67. Perer. 3. Confut. Against the invocation of Angels Vers. 42. O Lord the God of my master Abraham though Abraham had said to his servant that the Angell of God should goe before him v. 7. yet the servant prayeth not to this Angell that was appointed to be the president of his journey but he only directeth his prayer unto God as the scripture biddeth Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serve Matth. 4.10 6. Places of Morall observation 1. Observ. Not to sweare rashly Vers. 5. ANd the servant said what if the woman will not come c. The servant is very cautelous and circumspect in taking his oath lest he should binde himselfe to any inconvenience by his oath he casteth all doubts afore and desireth to have the matter explaned to the which hee sweareth Muscul. so ought wee to bee well advised in taking of an oath which the Prophet calleth swearing in judgement Ierem. 4.2 2. Observ. Our countrey not to be hated for some abuses therein Vers. 4. THou shalt goe unto my countrey c. Abraham hateth not his countrey though hee knew the same to be addicted to Idolatry As many doe in these daies who being runnagates from their countrey for superstition rather than religion have practised the subversion of Prince and countrey by forrein invasion Muscul. 3. Observ. All our affaires must begin with prayer Vers. 12. HEe said O Lord God of my master c. This servant commending the successe of his businesse and journey by prayer unto God doth teach us to begin all our actions and enterprises with prayer as the Apostle saith I will that men pray every where lifting up pure hands c. 4. Observ. A faithfull prayer hath present effect Vers. 15. YEt he had left speaking Rebecca came Thus the Lord gave present audience to the prayer of his servant as appeareth by the immediate effect thereof According to the saying of the Prophet before they call will I answer and while they speake I will heare Isay 65.24 Mercer So the Angell said to Daniel In the beginning of thy supplication the commandement came forth Dan. 9.23 as soone as he beganne to pray the Lord heard him 5. Observ. Children must not be brought up delicately Vers. 16. SHe went downe and filled her pitcher c. Rebeccah was trained up by her mother to doe domesticall and houshold works she was not brought up delicately even shee that was appointed to be the mother of Patriarks Prophets Kings had this simple and hard education which may be a lesson to fathers and masters not to bring up their children and servants delicately or wantonly but to bring them to labour in their youth and children and servants may here learne obedience not to thinke scorne to doe such homely services which their parents and masters shall thinke good to require of them Musculus 6. Observ. It is lawfull sometime to conceale part of the truth Vers. 39. WHat if the woman will not follow me Here the servant leaveth out in his discretion Abrahams charge given him Beware that thou bring not my sonne thither againe vers 6. as also other speeches of his master As the Lord that tooke me from my fathers house c. for these speeches would have but further offended them as though Abraham had held them to be a forlorne and wicked people that he counted it a benefit that God called him out from them and would by no meanes that his sonne should returne thither Mercer Muscul. We learne then that every truth in all places and upon all occasions is not to be uttered as Ieremy thereunto moved by the King concealed the chiefe matter wherein the King communed with him and telleth the Princes what he thought good to impart unto them Ierem. 38.27 THE SECOND TOME OR PART OF GENESIS Containing THE HISTORIE OF THE THREE PATRIARKS ISAACK IACOB AND IOSEPH divided into two Bookes The first of Isaack and Jacob the second of Ioseph HEB. 11.20 21. 20. By faith Isaack blessed Iacob and Esau concerning things to come 21. By faith Iacob when he was a dying blessed both the sonnes of Ioseph c. AMBROS Officior lib. 1. Quid sapientius sancto Iacob qui Deum vidit facie ad faciem quid justius qui ea quae acquiserat cum fratre divisit quid fortius qui cum Deo luctatus est quid modestius qui filiae injuriam mallet praetexere conjugio quam vindicare What was wiser than holy Iacob who saw God face to face what more just who what he had gotten parted with his brother what stronger than him who did wrestle with God what more modest who had rather right his daughters wrong with marriage than revenge it VERITAS †FILIA †TEMPORIS LONDON ¶ Printed by
lifting up of the hand as Abraham did Genes 14 First when they use the name of God pro re futilâ— for a vaine or trifling thing Secondly in rem quam non intendis impleri upon a matter which thou doest not purpose to fulfill as they which sweare falsly Thirdly in vaine that is without cause ne jures nisi ob necessitatem thou must not sweare but upon necessity 4. Thomas more distinctly sheweth first what a vaine thing is and then how the name of God is taken in vaine First a vaine thing is taken for that which is false as he that sweareth falsly then for that which is inutile unprofitable and here they offend which doe sweare de re levi for a small and trifling matter sometime vaine or vanity is taken for sinne and iniquity and in this respect they take the name of God in vaine which take an oath to doe any wicked thing as to commit theft or any such thing of this kinde was Herods oath Secondly the name of God is assumed or taken up upon these reasons 1. Primò ad dicti confirmationem First to confirme our saying and here they offend which sweare by any other than by the name of God 2. Sumitur ad sanctificationem The name of God is used for sanctification as Baptisme is sanctified in the name of God Here they transgresse which abuse the Sacraments or holy things 3. Tertiò sumitur ad confessionem invocationem Thirdly it is taken up for confession and invocation Here they which abuse prayers and the invocation of God to superstitious ends as to enchantments or such like doe profane the name of God 4. Quarto sumitur ad operis completionem Fourthly it is taken for the perfiting and finishing of a worke as the Apostle Coloss. 3. Whatsoever you doe in word or in deed dâ—e all in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ. They therefore which have begun a good profession and afterward fall away doe take the name of God in vaine So Thomas 2.2 quaest 122. art 3. 5. The Hebrewes then doe take this Commadement too strictly that here is forbidden only prolatio nominis Dei tetragrammaton indebita the undue pronouncing of that foure lettered name of God which is Iehovah which it was lawfull they say only for the high Priest to use and that only in the Temple and only then when he blessed the people Ex Lyrano QUEST IV. What is required in taking of a right oath Seeing perjury and taking of a false oath is a breach of this Commandement as it is a dishonour unto God for as our brother is hurt thereby it belongeth unto the ninth Commandement it shall not bee amisse here to shew what conditions are required in an oath that perjury may bee the better prevented this the Prophet Ieremy declareth in these words Thou shalt sweare in truth in judgement and righteousnesse Ierem. 4.2 Which three shall now be declared in their order 1. The first thing required is truth in every oath whether it be assertorium or promissorium whether it be an affirming oath or promising oath the first must have conformity with the truth unto the thing already done in present which is affirmed to bee true otherwise it is a false oath the other respecteth the minde and intent of him that sweareth for he promiseth not certainly that it shall be done because he is uncertaine of the future events but si intendat facere ut promittit verum est if he intend to do as he promiseth it is a true oath otherwise not Tostat. qu. 8. 2. And not only falsity is contrary to truth in taking of oathes but deceit and fraud also as he sware fraudulently that having made a truce with his enemies for certaine dayes set upon them in the night and the woman that sware she was with childe by Eustochius of Antioch which was not the Bishop but another common person of the City of the same name Simler And not he only which sweareth falsum cognitum a false thing knowne but falsum dubium a false thing that is doubtfull taketh a false oath but he that having exactly sifted his memory and yet is deceived non formaliter jurat falsò formallie doth not sweare falsly Cajetan He that thus sweareth falsly injuriam facit Deo sibi omnibus hominibus doth offer wrong to God to himselfe and to men To God because an oath being nothing else but the calling of God to witnesse he that sweareth falsly beleeveth Deum aut nescire verum aut diligere mendacium that God either knoweth not the truth or that he loveth a lye To himselfe he doth wrong for he bindeth himselfe to the judgement of God wishing that the Lord may punish him if he speake not the truth To men hee offereth wrong because there can bee no society or dealing among men if one may not trust another Thomas in opusculo 2. He that sweareth must doe it in judgement that is deliberatly and advisedly not rashly and hastily The Romanes had an use that hee which would sweare by Hercules should goe forth of the doores that he might be well advised and take some pause before hee sware for they held that Hercules did sweare but once in all his life and that was to the sonne of King Augeas This deliberation in their idolatrous oathes should admonish Christians to be well advised in swearing by the name of God Simler 3. They must sweare in righteousnesse that it be a just and lawfull thing which hee sweareth Herein David offended which sware in his rage to put Nabal and his whole house to the sword Simler And he must not only sweare that which is just and lawfull but justly as he which hath seene his brother commit any offence secretly if he take a voluntary oath to discover it being not urged to depose so before a Magistrate sweareth not justly Tostat. quaest 8. QUEST V. Whether men be bound to sweare often SOme of the Jewes held that it was a part of Gods worship to sweare by his name and therefore they thought they did well in often swearing and this their custome they would warrant by that place Deut. 6.13 Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God and serve him and sweare by his name Contra. 1. The three former conditions to sweare in truth judgement and righteousnesse must be observed and kept in every oath which cannot be if men were bound or commanded often to sweare 2. An oath was brought in among men for necessity for this is laid upon man as a punishment that one is not beleeved of another upon his bare word and our Saviour saith Whatsoever is more than yea and nay commeth of evill therefore where no necessity urgeth for one to sweare it is no acceptable service unto God 3. As to sweare is not altogether unlawfull as shall be shewed afterward in the places of controversie against the Anabaptistes for then it should in no case be permitted as adultery and murder
they whom Ezechiel describeth chap. 13. that did sow pillowes under all arme-holes There are other flatterers in civill affaires such was Iehonadaâ— that applied himselfe to 〈◊〉 filthy humour 2. Sam. 13. thinking thereby to insinuate himselfe unto him being the Kings eldest sonne Pelarg. 3. A double mischiefe commeth by these flatterers for they both corrupt them whom they flatter and nourish them in their evill and feed their humorous disposition as the people puffed up Herod in pride by their flattering acclamations that it was the voice of God not of man Act. 12. So Alexander and Nero were corrupted by flattery and of good Princes became most cruell Tyrants Simler Therefore Diâ—gâ—â—s said well that it was better to fall upon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Crowes than 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 flatterers for they did but devoure the body these did devoure the soule And beside this mischiefe flatterers procure great hurt unto those whom in their flattery they accuse and traduce as Doâ—g was the cause that 85. Priests were put to the sword Simler 5. Another kinde of false testimony is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all kinde of lying and false speaking for lying lips are an abomination to the Lord Prov. 12.22 The beginning of lying was from the Devill Ioh. 8.44 When he speaketh a lye thâ—n speaketh he of his owne he is a lyer and the father thereof and the end of liers is to be cast into the lake that burneth with fire and brimstone Basting Pelarg. Of the divers kindes of lies see before quest 6. QUEST XVIII Of a false testimony which a man giveth of himselfe NOw remaineth the last kinde of false testimonies when one is a false witnesse of himselfe and hereof there are two sorts 1. Arrogancy and vaine ostentation when any maketh his boast of vertue and piety which is not at all in him such the Prophet Esay meaneth chap. 65.5 which say Stand apart came not neare me I am holier than thou Such was the Pharisie that vaunted himselfe before the Lord of his fasting and almes 2. The other is coloured and cloaked hypocrisie such was that of the Pharisies that under pretence of long prayer devoured widowes houses Matth. 23.14 these 〈◊〉 gaine and profit the end of their religion Another sort of hypocrites make the praise of men the scope of their dissimulation such were also the Pharisies that caused a trumpet to be blowne before them when they gave their almes and used to pray in the corners of the streets that they might be seene of men Matth. 6. Like unto these Pharisaicall hypocrites were the Monkes in Popery that through a pretence of religion gathered infinite wealth and riches possessions and lands unto their Monasteries and Cels. All these are enemies to the truth and maintainers of falshood making a lye of themselves Simler 3. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The particular vertues commanded with their contrary vices forbidden IN this Commandement generally is commanded the love confession and defence of the truth and contrariwise is forbidden all lying falshood dissimulation 1. The first vertue then here required is the love of the truth and the franke confession thereof with the mouth and practice in the life therefore the Devill though he sometime speake the truth yet because he loveth it not hee is not of the truth neither can be said to be true The confession of the truth as it concerneth the glory of God belongeth to the third Commandement but as it respecteth the good of our neighbour it is referred to the ninth Concerning this inward love and outward profession of the truth the Prophet David saith describing a righteous man Psal. 15.2 And speaketh the truth in his heart Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect all kinde of lying whatsoever dissimulation fraud circumventing flattering such the Prophet noteth Psal. 12.2 They speake deceitfully every one with his neighbour flattering with their lips and speake with a double heart the Lord cut off all flattering lips 2. In the excesse there is 1. an intempestive and unseasonable confession of the truth concerning the which our blessed Saviour giveth this caveat Not to give holy things unto dogs nor to cast pearles before swine Matth. 7.6 not in all places and before every one to utter every truth 2. Curiosity which is to enquire things unnecessary or unsearchable as the Apostles were inquisitive after the time of restoring the Kingdome to Israel to whom our Saviour maketh this answer That it was not for them to know the times and seasons which the father hath put in his owne power Act. 1.7 2. Here is required that vertue called Candor which is a favourable interpreting of mens doings and sayings taking all things in the better part and hoping the best where there is no evident cause to the contrary which is an especiall fruit of charity as the Apostle sheweth 1 Cor. 13.7 It beleeveth all things it hopeth all things Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect first perversenesse taking all things in the worst part and wresting mens sayings and doings to another sense than they meant as the false witnesses did those words of our blessed Saviour Of the destroying the temple and raising it in three dayes which he meant of the temple of his body they turned it to the materiall temple Secondly suspition when men are ready to take every occasion to suspect their neighbour of evill which is contrary to charity which thinketh not evill 1 Cor. 13.5 it is not suspitious Yet all suspition is not condemned in Scripture for our blessed Saviour saith Matth. 10.16 17. Beware of men c. And Bee wise as Serpents c. There is then a good suspition and an evill suspition which are thus distinguished 1. The evill suspition is raised without any cause at all or the same not sufficient the good ariseth of a probable and sufficient cause 2. The evill when upon a bare suspition any thing is certainly concluded the good leaveth the thing suspected in suspense and doubt 3. The evill is when upon suspition followeth hatred and an intention to worke mischiefe the good when one useth his suspition to charitable and friendly admonition 2. In the excesse here offendeth the credulous person that is without all suspition where there is just cause such an one was Godaliah that would suspect nothing of bloudy Ismael that was sent to kill him Ier. 40.16 Secondly the flatterer erreth here who upholdeth men in their sinnes and will not tell them their 〈◊〉 therefore Moses saith Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart but thou shalt plainly rebuke thy neighbour and not suffer him to sinne 3. Simplicity and plainenesse is commanded which is a vertue whereby one plainly and sincerely professeth that which is right and agreeable to the truth without any colouring or cloaking so in Nathanieâ—â— commended for an Israelite indeed in whom there was no guile Ioh. 1.47 Contrary hereunto is doubling and dissembling either in words or
workes sayings or doings so Iehâ—nadab that gave that lewd counsell to Ammâ—n is noted for a crafty and subtile man 2. Sam. 13.3 4. Constancie here required is a vertue which persevereth in the truth being once knowne and apprehended and not changing without necessary or probable cause as Psalm 15.4 That sweereth to his owne hindrance and changeth not Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect levity and inconstancy without any just occasion to 〈◊〉 and change the opinion as Saul in his phranticke fits hated David and sought his life having confessed his foolishnesse and error before 1 Sam. 26.21 2. In the excesse is pertinacie and obstinacie by no reason or perswasion to change an opinion or purpose once conceived such was Herods perversenesse in keeping his rash oath in beheading of Iohn Baptist. 5. Docilitie or willingnesse or aptnesse to heare and conceive the truth is joyned with constancie hereof the Wise-man saith Prov. 21.28 A false witnesse shall perish but he that heareth speaketh continually He may soone be seduced to testifie falsly that will receive no other information but he that is willing to heare and to be further instructed in the truth cannot lightly erre or be deceived Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect easinesse to be lead and carried away with every tale to bee light of beleefe as Patiphâ—r was against Ioseph without any further examination 2. In the excesse not to heare at all what others informe such an one was Nabal who was so wicked that a man might not speake to him 1 Sam. 25.17 6. Taciturnitie or discreet silence is here requisite also which is to conceale things secret and not fit to be revealed in time and place Herein Rachel and Loah contrary to the weaknesse of that sex shewed a good example in keeping secret Iacobs purpose of departing from Laban and consenting thereunto Gen. 31.14 Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect first garrulitie pratling and talking to be full of words without reason and out of season Such light women the Apostle noteth 1 Tim. 5.13 They are pratlers and busie bodies Secondly futilitie in keeping nothing secret but telling whatsoever they know as the young man that discovered Ionathan and Ahimaaz and told Absolom 2 Sam. 17.18 Thirdly treaâ—herie as the Ziphius betrayed David unto Saul 1 Sam. 23.19 2. In the excesse are contrary morosity stubborne and wilfull silence not to speake at all or confesse any thing Such was Cain that being asked where his brother Habel was stubbornly made answer Am I my brothers keeper Genes 4.9 And concealing of the truth when it ought to bee revealed against such unwise uncharitable silence the Wise-man giveth this rule Answer a foole according to his foolishnesse lest hee be wise in his owne 〈◊〉 Proverb 26.5 3. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against the Origenists that in some cases made it lawfull to lye FIrst here that erroneous assertion which Hierome imputeth to Origen commeth to be examined which is this Homo cui incumbit necessitas mentiondi c. sic matur inter dum mendario quomodo condimento atque medicamento ut servet mensuram ejus c. He upon whom there lieth a necessity to lye let him sometime so use a lye as a sauce or medicine that he keepe a measure and exceed not the bounds c. Hierome reproveth this opinion and counteth it as one of Origens errours though Ruffinus therein finde fault with Hierome See Hierom. apolog cont Ruffin Contra. 1. But there is no necessity of lying at all Moriendum est potius quà m peccandum We ought to dye rather than finne and so consequently to tell a lye S. Pauls rule must stand We must not doe evill that good may come of it Rom. 3.8 2. If a lye were tolerable in any case then chiefly when by telling a lye one may save his life but even in such necessity a lye is not justifiable Augustine saith well Meâ—tiri vis ne moriaris meutiris mâ—râ—ris c. Thou wilt make a lye lest thou shouldest dye thou both liest and diest too for while thou wouldest shun one kinde of death which thou mayest deferre but canst not take away thou fallest into two first dying in thy soule and then afterward in thy body August in Psal. 30. Hierome to this purpose writeth to Innocentius of a woman suspected of adultery that was tormented and racked to confesse the fault whereof she was not guilty who in the middest of her torments uttered these words Tu testis es Domine Iesu non ideo me negare velle ne peream sed ideo memâ—â—â— nalle ne peccem Thou art my witnesse Lord Jesus that I doe not deny it lest I should perish but that therefore I will not lye lest I should sinne Sic Hierom. 3. Whereas Origen urgeth the example of Iudith that deceived Holoserâ—â—â— and of Iacob Qui patris benedictionem artifici impetravit mendacie who obtained his fathers blessing by an artificiall lye it may be answered that Iudahs example is one of an Apocryphall booke and therefore is of no force and Iacobs example is either extraordinary and so not to be imitated or that therein he sheweth some humane infirmity which is not to be commended though it pleased God to use it and dispose of it for the effecting of his purpose 2. Confut. Against the Priscilliâ—nists SEcondly the Heretickes called Priscillianists held that it was lawfull for their Mâ—â—dacio occuliare haeresius se Catholices singere To hide their heresie by telling a lye and to faine themselves Catholikes such a trick also that unreasonable sect of the Family of Love have taken up who use so to wind away with obscure and intricate termes when they are examined that their heresie by their confession can hardly be found out The Priscillianists reasons were these 1. That it was enough to have truth in the heart though not in the mouth 2. And a Christian is bound only to speake the truth to his neighbour but they which are of another religion are not our neighbours 3 Iohn fained himselfe a worshipper of Baal Answ. 1. But S. Paul requireth both to beleeve with the heart and to confesse with the mouth Rom. 10.10 Peter denied Christ only with his mouth not in his heart Et tamen laerymis hoc poccatum aâ—â—uit yet he was faine to wash away this sinne with teares 2. Licet aliqua 〈…〉 sint â—era c. although some truths may be hid from him that is not yet initiate in the mysteries of religion Non tamen dicâ—nda falsa sunt yet false things are not to be uttered 3. Augustine answereth that Iehu had not a right heare before God and therefore his example in every respect is not to be justified So August lib. commendatium But to this last answer thus much may be added that Iehu his example here is much unlike for he did not seeke his owne gaine or propounded his owne safety but did this in a zeale to the
Wisdom 1.11 The mouth that lieth slayeth the soule Sic. Thom. in opuscul 2. Observ. Not to conceale the truth whether publikely or privately AGaine it is a kinde of false witnesse as is shewed before when the truth is concealed either publikely or privately as when one suffereth his neighbour to be overcome in judgement when hee by his testimony might deliver him As to this purpose may be applied that saying of the Wise-man Prov. 24.11 Deliver those that are drawne to death and wilt thou not preserve them that are led to be slaine And of this kinde is that usuall negligence and oversight of men that privately doe not one tell another of their sinnes which duty is reproved by the law Levit. 19. Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart but thou shalt plainly rebuke thy neighbour and suffer him not to sinne He then which seeth his brother sinne in drunkennesse prophanenesse swearing or howsoever else and holdeth his peace therein offendeth against the rule of charity and is found before God to be an hater of his brother Augustine useth this fit similitude Si hominem videres ambulare incautum in tenebris ubi tu put cum esse scires taceres qualis esses c. If thou shouldest see a man walking in the darke without taking heed where thou knowest there is a pit and holdest thy peace what manner of one wouldest thou shew thy selfe Pracipitat se quis in vitia sua c. One casteth himselfe headlong into vice and vaunteth himselfe in thy hearing of his evill doing and yet thou doest praise him and smilest to thy selfe c. August in Psal. 49. Upon the tenth and last Commandement 1. The questions discussed QUEST I. The last precept Thou shalt not covet whether two or 〈◊〉 THou shalt not covet c. 1. Some thinke that this Commandement is to be divided into two and the first to restraine the concupiscence and desire of anothers wife the other the coveting of such things which doe belong unto him which are either moveable or immoveable things the moveable are of two sorts either the things with life and them either reasonable as his man servant his maid servant or unreasonable as his oxe or asse or without life as his goods his immoveable are his house lands possessions Of this opinion is August lib. de 10. chord cap. 9. to whom consenteth Thomas Aquinas and Tostatus and it is the received opinion among the Romanists and some other as Pelargus Osiander Pellican Their reasons shall first be examined 1. Thomas useth this reason Because there are but three Commandements in the first table there must be seven in the second to make up the number of ten And that there are but three in the first table he would prove by the subject or matter of the Commandements which concerne our duty to God which is three-fold Diligenti Deum tria necesse est facere He that loveth God must performe three things 1. Quòd non habeat alium Deum He must have no other God 2. He must honour him therefore it is said Thou shalt not take in vaine c. 3. Libenter quiescat 〈…〉 He must rest and settle himselfe in God therefore it is said Remember thou keepe holy c. Answ. 1. Thomas here omitteth one principall duty which is the internall 〈◊〉 of God for it is not enough to know who is to be worshipped which is prescribed in the first precept Thou shalt have no other Gods but after what manner he will be worshipped that is by a spirituall and internall worship as our blessed Saviour saith Ioh. 4.21 God is a spirit and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and truth This manner of Gods worship is prescribed in the second Commandement Thou shalt make to thy selfe no graven image c. 2. Wherefore thus rather may the 〈◊〉 toward God be distinguished his worship is either internall or externall the internall sheweth who is to be worshipped in the first precept and how that is spiritually in the second precept The externall is either private in the confession of Gods name in the third precept or publike in keeping of his Sabbaths Vrsin 2. Lyranus thus reasoneth Those things which are so divers that one may be covered and not the other belong not to one precept Aliquis habens pronitatem ad 〈◊〉 non habeâ—â— ad alterum One may have a pronenesse and aptnesse to one and not to another as he may covet his neighbours wife and not covet any of his beside therefore these two kindes of covetings belong not to one precept Answ. 1. This reason may be retorted for so one may be guilty of idolatry and false worship who yet holdeth but one Cod and therefore by this reason the two first precepts which they confound and make but one which divide the last must be distinguished 2. Though in particular he that coveteth a mans wife doth not alwayes covet his oxe or asse yet in generall he coveteth that which is another mans for his wife is properly his as any thing that belongeth unto him therefore the proposition will be denied that the coveting of that which is not joyned with the coveting of another thing belongeth not to the same precept for one may covet a mans house and ground that coveteth not his oxe or asse as Ahab did that desired Naboths vineyard and so by this rule as many particular things there are which may be severally coveted so many particular precepts there should be of coveting 3. Tostatus thus argueth Sicut se habet actus ad actum c. As one act is to another the like respect hath one concupiscence to another but the act of adultery and theft are divers and belong to two divers precepts therefore so should the divers concupiscence tending to those divers acts be divided into two precepts Answ. The argument followeth not because the acts of adultery and theft are forbidden in two divers precepts therefore the concupiscences tending thereunto should for there is difference betweene the conception of sinne and the birth and perfection thereof when sinne is brought forth and perfited then it appeareth of what kinde it is but being yet in the body or in the seed it cannot be so distinguished as darnell and corne being but yet in the grasse cannot bee so well discerned Beside another difference is because the externall acts of theft and adultery differ in the quality of the sinne and oâ—e is more hainous than another and deserveth a greater punishment and therefore the precepts are fitly distinguished but the like difference of quality and punishment cannot be made in the originall and first concupiscence where the will hath not yet assented 4. Pelargus addeth this reason Duo sunt principia concupiscentiae c. There are two beginnings or occasions of concupiscence one internall the other externall the Apostle calleth them the concupiscence of the flesh and the concupiscence of the eye 1. Ioh. 2.16 therefore
justa ratio id postaâ—â—bit but where need it and necessary or just cause doe so require c. otherwise the Law doth forbid all unlawfull swearing as well as the Gospell 3. And the reason why they ought not to sweare by strange gods is ne frequenti juramento iâ—â—â—cantur ad cultâ—â—◠〈◊〉 c. lest that by often swearing they be induced to worship them Glos. interliâ—â—â—â— 4. And as an Hebrew then and so a Christian now was not himselfe so neither were they to compell a Gentile to sweare by them yet as Augustine determineth it is lawfull for a Christian recipere ab eo juramentum in Deo suo c. to receive an oath of a Gentile by his god to confirme some covenant or contract se Gentilis obtularis se facturum if the Gentile doe of himselfe offer it Lyran Tostat. QUEST XXV Whether a Christian may compell a Iew to sweare by his Thorah which containeth the five bookes of Moses VPon this occasion how farre a Christian may compell another of a contrary religion to sweare as a Jew or Turke Tostatus bringeth in divers questions which it shall not be amisse here briefly to touch as first whereas it is an usuall thing with the Jewes at this day to sweare upon their Thorah which is nothing else but a volume containing the five bookes of Moses yet bound up in silke and laid up very curiously in their Synagogue whereout they use to read the lectures of the Law the question is whether it be lawfull for a Christian Judge to urge a Jew to take his oath upon his Thorah for upon the Gospels he will rather dye than take an oath For the resolution of this doubt divers things are to be weighed and considered 1. That there is great difference betweene the Idols and 〈◊〉 gods of the Heathen and the Jewes Thorah for this 〈◊〉 a part of Gods word and containeth nothing but the truth and it is all one as if the Jew did lay his hand upon the Pentateuch or five bookes of Moses as any Christian may take his oath upon the Gospels or any other part of Gods word 2. And like as a Christian laying his hand upon the Gospels doth not 〈◊〉 by the bookâ— for 〈◊〉 were unlawfull in giving the honour due to the Creator unto a creature but hath relation unto God whose verity and truth is contained in that booke So a Jew swearing upon his Thorah yet sweareth by God the Author of the Law and in so doing sinneth not 3. Yet it may so fall out that a Jew may sinne in swearing upon his Thorah as having an opinion that all the contents of that booke as namely the ceremonials are yet in force which are abolished in Christ and yet the Judge may not sinne in requiring the Jew to sweare upon his Thorah for he doth not consider of those things quae sunt in voluntate agentis sed de ipso actis which are in the minde and intent of the doer but of the act it selfe therefore the act of it selfe being lawfull a Jew may be required to doe it Sic Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXVI Whether a Iew may be urged to sweare in the name of Christ. BUt as the Jew may be urged to sweare upon his Thorah which they hold to be a booke of truth as Christians doe yet the case is not alike if a Christian should compell a Jew to sweare in the name of Christ for although Christ be in deed and in truth very God yet the Jewes hold him to be worse than any Idoll and therefore the Jew in taking such an oath should doe against his conscience and consequently commit a great sinne or if a Jew should require a Christian to sweare by the name of Christ whom he holdeth to be no God nor yet a good man therein the Jew should also sinne against his conscience for it skilleth not a thing to be so or so indeed dum aliter concipiatur as long as a man otherwise conceiveth and is perswaded in his minde Tostat. qu. 15. QUEST XXVII Whether a Saracene may be urged to sweare upon the Gospels or in the name of Christ. NOw although a Jew cannot be compelled without sinne to sweare in the name of Christ whom he holdeth worse than an Idoll or upon the Gospels which they thinke containe nothing but fables yet the reason standeth otherwise for a Saracene or Turke he may be required to sweare in the name of Christ or upon the Gospels And the reason is because the Saracens have a good opinion of Christ and beleeve that he was sent of God and that he was a great Prophet and a good man and for the most part they doe assent unto the Gospels and beleeve that Christ spake the truth And therefore they in taking such an oath doe not against their conscience and therein sinne not Now if it be objected that the Saracens differ more from the Christians than the Jewes and therefore can no more lawfully take an oath in the name of Christ than the Jewes the answer is that although the Jewes consent with the Christians touching the canonicall bookes of the old Testament as the Saracens doe not yet as touching Christ they doe totally dissent from the Christians and so doe not the Saracens Tostat. qu. 17. QUEST XXVIII Whether a Christian may sweare upon the Iewes Thora BUt it hath beene before shewed that a Jew may be without sinne urged to sweare upon his Thora which is nothing but the Pentateuch containing the five bookes of Moses another question is moved whether a Christian may safely take his oath upon the Jewes Thora And that it is not lawfull so to doe it may be thus objected 1. It is a sinne Iudaizare to Iudaize to doe as the Jewes doe as to be circumcised to observe the Jewish Sabbath and such like But to sweare upon the Thora is to Iudaize that is to doe as the Jewes doe Ergo c. Answ. 1. To Iudaize is not simply to doe that which the Jewes doe but that which they alone doe and none other as to beleeve that which they only beleeve as that the ceremonies of the Law are still in force or to doe that which they only doe as to be circumcised and to abstaine from certaine kinde of meats as Saint Paul chargeth Saint Peter that he compelled the Gentiles Iudaizare to Iudaize concerning their meats for he did eat with the Gentiles before the Jewes came and afterward he withdrew himselfe from them otherwise to beleeve as the Jewes and others also beleeve and to doe likewise as to hold the world to have beene created the Israelites to have beene delivered and all other things in the Scriptures to be true as they are there set downe this is not to Iudaize 2. So because the Thora which is the Pentateuch is not only received of the Jewes but of the beleeving Gentiles and the truth of the Law we subscribe unto as well as the
cum caeter B.G.V. G.I.V. B.A.P. 2 King 3. Iudith 7.23 Ioseph lib. 3. bell Iudaic. cap. 12. Laert. lib. 1. c. 1. Ioan. Leo in descriptione Africa lib. 1. cap. 27. Plutarch in Lycurg Psal â—â— 34 Deut. â— 5 Aristot. lib. 8. cap. 14. Ierem. 26.14.15 Prâ—cop in cap. â—7 Exod. Lib. de cura mortuorum c. 5. â—â—pert lib. 3. 〈…〉 Rupert lib. 3. cap. 20. Ioseph lib. 3. antiq Iudâ—â— cap. 3. Lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 19. I.C. I. V. cum caeter I.B.G. cum caeter I. I.G.B. Lâ—ran in 2. Exod. August quast 67. in Exod. Quast 68. in Exod. Lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 22. Ecclesiastic cap. 7.6 Deut. 26.19 Other properties requisite in Magistrates Chrysost. serm de Evang. nuptia facta sunt 1. Cor. 7.5 Super Math. cap. 7. A defence of Queene Elizabeths government 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Plutarâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Matth. 6 Luke 14.14 Menideâ—uâ— Ex histor Nicolaâ— de mâ—rib Gentiaâ— A 9. â— Cor. 11. â— Ex Aâ—lii Donati praefâ—t in Terâ—ntium Oenopides so distinguisheth the bookes of the learned and unlearned Lima nunquam pulchriâ—r appareâ— quà m cum plena est Heb. 5.4 a Exod. 2.12 b Exod. 18.14 c Deut. 16.19 d Ibid. Exod. 1â— Hieron epitaph Paule 2. Cor. 12.14 Bernard de considerat lib. 3. Deut. 34.5 Ambr. de Cain Abel lib. 1. cap. 2. I. B.G.A. B. cum cat I. â— B.G. cum cater V.I.A.P. August quest 70. in Exod. 5. Sam. 8.7 Rupert lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 24. Whether our Saviour with his Disciples and the Iewes kept the Passeover together Synops. controv 13. qu. 4. Rupert lib. 3. in â—â—od cap. 28. Tostatus his reasons answered Rupert lib. 3. in Exod. cap. 28. Gregor 6. moral cap. 27. Thom. in Epist. ad Hebraeos cap. 12. lâ— 4. Lyranus deserded against Buâ—gens and Tostat. Chrysost. in Epist. ad Hebraos hom 32. Thom. in Epist. ad Hebraeos cap. 12. lâ— 4. Gregories opinion concerning the apparition and minystrie of Angels examined How Christ was the mediatour of the old Testament That place expounded Heb. 2.2 how the word and the law was spoken by Angels I.G.B. I.A.P.L. B.G.L. I.V.A. The difference of filiall and servile feare â—yrâ—l conera Iulian. l b. 8. Heresies concerning the Trinity 〈◊〉 the fiâ—st mandenâ— Of diversâ— kindes of faith James 2.19 Synops. pap pag. 879. Divers reasons shewing that justifying faith iâ— not commanded or contained in the Morall law Of the starres Of the Beasts Of Fishes Whether the waters be under or above the earth See more of this question Synops. pap pag. 400. Of oathes made to enemies Of oathes made to theeves Of unlawfull oathes Objections answered made in defences of swearing by Saints Lib. de artâ— amandi The difference betweene the Sabbath of the Jewes and Christians Chrysost. in serm ad popul Antioch pro gratiarum actione Thom. 1.2 q. 100. art 7. ad 2. distinct 37. art 2. q. 1. ad 3. Reconcil Upon what occasion some works are allowed to be done upon the Lords day Divers kinds of rests in the soule Gregor 〈◊〉 registrâ— lib. 11. Epist. â— Chrysost. concion de Lazaro Reconcil Thom. in opuscul Whether Naboth did well in not yeelding his vineyard to the Kings desire What it is to call the brother Racha It is proved lawfull by the Word of God for Christians to wage battell The conditions required in lawfull warre August in lib. de 10. chord cap. 9. Of slandering Of railing Of whispering and tale bearing Of flattery Of lying Confession of the truth To interpret things in the best part The difference of good and bad suspition A lye in the case is to be admitted Reasons shewing the last precept of coveting to be one and not two Of the degrees to be considered in sinne Difference betweene the full assent of the will and an inclination only The divers kindes of concupiscence Of the ceremoniall law Of the judiciall law How the Morall law bindeth How the law is possible to bee kept in the regenerate How it is impossible to be kept in the regenerate Difference betweene the sinnes of the regenerate and unregenerate Of the true end and use of the law a Juel defens Apolog. pag. 59. a Juel defens Apolog. pag. 59. a Juel defens Apolog. pag. 59. a Juel defens Apolog. pag. 59. How God himselfe neither can not will dispense with his owne law It is not in mans power to dispense with the Morall law though God may dispense A strange example of Gods judgement shewed upon three excessive drinkers in little Eason in Essex the 27. of December last Reconcil Of two kindes of high places Three kindes of wayes is the soule joyned to the body R. Parkes his strong positions of comprehending the Godhead Apolog. pag. 204.20 I. A. P. I.B.G. cum caeter I.V.A. I. I.A. I.A. I.B.V.G. Oblation of incense a meere ceremony of the old Law and therefore cannot be retained under the Gospell Moses Judicials rather to be imitated than any other humane constitutions What was to â—e done if a â—an should fall into the pit The oriâ—â—nall and beginning of Sanctuaries How Sanctuaries should be moderated I. I.L.C. I.C.S. I.V. A. V.I.A.P.B. Thom. 1.2 q. 105. art 2. ad Cod lib. 4. tit 34. leg 1. Cod. lib. 4. tit 34. c. 10. Diocletian Cod. lib. 4. tit 34. c. 11. Ibid. leg 7. Cod. lib. 4. tit 34 c. 3. Thom. 1.2 qu. 105. art 2. ad 3. The keeper in trust is not to answer for casualties Cod. lib. 4. tit 23. leg 1. Diocletiâ—â— Cod. lib. 4. tit 23. leg 1. 1.2 q. 105. art 2. ad 4. Cod. lib. 4. tit 23. d. 4. Institut de public judit § secundo Extra de adulter in capit perveâ—iâ—â— * qu. 8. in 7. â— p. 7â— Objections made in the excuse of witches answered Cod. lib. 9. tit 1â— leg 4. 2 King 1. Caus. 26. q. 5. c. 18. Caus. 26. q. 7. c. 15. Caus. 26. q. 2. c. 6. Ibid. c. 7. Ibid. q. 5. c. 4. Caus. 26. q. 5. c. 3. Reasons shewing the equity of this law against witches 4 D. 34. ad 3. in Ser. Cod. 〈◊〉 9. 〈◊〉 18. leg 2. Ibid. leg 3. Ibid. leg â— 2.2 q. 154. 〈◊〉 12. ad 4. Lib. 3. 〈◊〉 c. ◠〈◊〉 lib. de exhortat Martyr c. 5. cited in the Decrees Caus. 23. q. 5. c. 32. Epistol 40. ad Vincentâ—um cited C. 23. q. 4. c. 41. Plat. lib. â—5 de legib August in Psal. 36. cited C. 14. qu. 3. c. 1 sess 10. sub Leon. 10. a Cod. lib. 3. tit 32. log 12. super verb. centesimae b Lib. 7. tit 5â— leg 2. c Lib. 4. tit 32. leg 26. super verb. tertium d Ibid. e Lib. 6. tit 34. leg 1. super haeredes f Cod. lib. 3. tit 32. leg 12. in verb. centesimae g Concil Laodicen c. 5. Cod. lib. 7. tit 47. leg 1. super verb. cum prâ— eo c. Hom. 38. super Matth. Chrysost. ibid cited Decret 88. c. 11. Lib. de Tobiae C.