Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	lie_v	speak_v	yield_a	20	3	16.1318	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A09383	A commentarie or exposition, vpon the fiue first chapters of the Epistle to the Galatians: penned by the godly, learned, and iudiciall diuine, Mr. W. Perkins. Now published for the benefit of the Church, and continued with a supplement vpon the sixt chapter, by Rafe Cudworth Bachelour of Diuinitie	Perkins, William, 1558-1602.; Cudworth, Ralph, 1617-1688.	1604 (1604)	STC 19680; ESTC S114465	595,047	756

the better man Outward things doe not commende vs to god And it is the spirituall kindred by meanes of faith and our new birth that bringes vs into fauour with God Mathew 12. 49. 20 Nowe the things which I write I speake before God I lie not Before Paul hath auouched sundrie thinges of himselfe that he preached in Arabia Damascus that he went thence to Ierusalem that he did not learne the Gospell there of Peter Iames or any other Apostle Now some men might happily say that these sayings of his are but false and fabulous auochments therefore in this verse Paul defends himselfe and iustifies his owne sayings by a diuine testimony The wordes containe 2. partes An answer to an obiection concealed on this manner I may be thought to lie but indeede I lie not The second is a confirmation by oath Before God I speake it Touching the first parte there be two pointes to be handled what is a lie And whether it be a sinne or no A lie is when we speake the contrarie to that we thinke with an intention to deceiue More plainly in a lie there be 4. thinges the first is to auouch and affirme that which is false The second is to speake with a double harte Psal. 12. 2. That is to speake against knowledge and conscience as when a man saith that is true which he knowes to be false or that is false which he knowes to be true This makes a lie to be a lie and this distinguisheth an vntruth from a lie For here it must be obserued that a man may speake that which is false and not lie namely if he speake that which is false thinking it to be true For then though he erre and is deceiued yet he speakes not against conscience and consequently he speakes no lie Againe a man may speake that which is true and yet lie for if he speake that which is true indeede and speake it as a trueth and yet thinke it to be false he lies indeed because he speakes the truth against his conscience The third thing in a lie is a minde or intention to deceiue or hurte For in the ninth commandement that is a false testimonie that is against our neighbour The 4. pointe is that he which speakes that which is false vpon a vanitie of minde without reasonable cause is a lier Thus bosters flatterers are liers And these are the things which concurre in the making of a lie For the better conceiuing of the nature of a lie we must put difference between it and sundrie other things incident to speach First we must put difference betwene a lie and a Parable or figure In a parable indeed there is something supposed or fained as for example when the trees are brought in conferring and consulting aboute their king Iud. 9. 8. neuerthelesse a parable is farre from falsehoode or lying for by things fained it signifies and declares an vnfained truth Againe difference must be put betwene a lie and the concealement of a thing for it is one thing to speake against our knowledge and another to speake that which we knowe And concealements if there be a reasonable cause and if it be not necessary for vs to reueale the thing concealed are not vnlawfull Thus Abram speakes the truth in parte calling Sara his sister and conceales it in part not confessing her to be his wife Gen. 12. 10. Thus Samuel by Gods appointment reueales that he came to Gilgall to offer sacrifice and conceales the annointment of Dauid that he might saue his life 1. Sam. 16. 5. Ionas preaches that Niniue shall be destroyed within 40. daies and he conceales the condition of repentance The like did Isaie to Ezechias Isa. 38. 1. Thirdly a difference must be made between lying and fayning which some call simulation not dissembling but rather sembling if I may so terme it And that is when something is spoken not contrary but beside or diuers to that which we thinke And this kind of fayning if it be not to the preiudice of truth against the glory of God and the good of our neighbour haue some conuenient and reasonable cause is not vnlawfull It was not the will and counsell of God to destroy the Israelites for their idolatrie And he doth not speake vnto Moses any thing contrary to his will but something that is beside or diuers vnto it when he saith let me alone that my wrath may waxe ho●● and I may destroy them Exod. 32. 10. And this he spake that he might stirre vp Moses to feruencie in praier for the Israelites and the Israelites to vnfained repentance Iosua hauing besiged Ai meant not to flie yet doth lie faine a flight that he might draw his enemies out of the citie destroy thē Ios. 8. 5. There is a kind of deceit called dolus bonus that is a good deceit and of this kind was the act of Iosua Thus Physitians for their good vse to deceiue the senses of their impotent patients Thus parēts insinuate vnto their childrē terrible things of the beare and bull-begger that they may keepe them from places of hurt and danger And this may be done without fault for it is one thing to contrary the truth and an other to speake or doe something diuerse vnto it without contrariety The second point is whether to lie be a sinne or no the answer is yea For euen in this place Paul puts lying from himselfe and that with an oath The deuill is said to be the author of all lies Ioh. 8. And it is Gods commandement that we should put away lying Eph. 4. 25. It is obiected that the sporting and officious lie is not against charitie to the hurt of any but for the good of men I answer first though it be not to the hurt of our neighbour yet is it to the hurt and preiudice of trueth Secondly they are deceiued to whom these lies are told Thirdly he hurts himselfe that tels a lie though it be for the good of men for when he speakes the truth indeede he is lesse beleeued Lastly though these kind of lies seeme to be good in respect of their ende yet are they not good in respect of their nature and constitution For in speaking there should be a conformitie and consent betweene the tongue and the minde which is not when any lie is vttered Secondly it is obiected that the Egyptian Midwiues saued the male children of the Israelites and Rahab the spies by lying Exod. 1. 19. Ios. 2. 5. and that they are commended for this I answer we must distinguish the worke done from the ex equution of the worke The worke in sauing the children and the spies was a fruite of faith and the feare of God and it is cōmended but the manner of putting these workes in exequution by lying is not approoued If it be said that faith and the feare of God cannot stand with a manifest sinne I say againe that faith and the feare of

God are imperfect in this life and therefore they are ioyned with many frailties and actions of faith are mixed with sundrie defects and sinnes Now then we are to be exhorted to make a conscience of lying and to speake the trueth from our hearts And there be many reasons to induce vs to the practise of this dutie First it is Gods commandement Iam. 3. 14. Secondly lying is a conformitie to the deuill and by truth we are made conformable to God who is truth it selfe Thirdly we are sanctified by the word of truth Ioh. 17. 17. and guided by the spirit of truth and therefore we are to detest lying and deceit Fourthly truth is a fruit of Gods spirit Gal. 5. and a marke of Gods child Psal. 32. v. 2. he hath the pardon of his sinnes in whose spirit there is no guile and Psal. 15. 2. he shall rest in the mountaine of God who speakes the truth from his heart Lastly destruction is the lyers reward Psal. 5. 6. God will destroy them that speake lies and they must haue their portion in the lake that burnes with fire and brimstone Reuel 22. 15 Thus much of the answer to the obiection now followes the confirmation by oath before God Here it may be demanded how these words can be a forme of swearing Ans. In an oath there be foure things The first is an Asseveration of the truth The second is Cenfession whereby the partie that is to sweare acknowledgeth the power presence and wisdome of God in searching the heart and that he is both witnes iudge of all our doings The third is Invocation of God that he would be a witnesse with vs and to vs that we speake the truth The last is Imprecation that God would be a iudge to take reuenge vpon vs if we lie Now then the forme of an oath is a certen forme of wordes in which not all but some of the principall parts of an oath are expressed and the rest concealed and yet to be vnderstood Ierem. 4. 2. there is the forme of an oath The Lord liueth and here onely confession is expressed The forme of swearing I call God to witnesse to my soule 2. Cor. 1. 23. expresseth the third part namely inuocation The words Ruth 2. 17. The Lord doe thus and thus vnto me is an Imprecation The common forme The Lord thee helpe through Iesus Christ is partly praier and partly imprecation And the forme in this place is directly a confession that God is present to witnes and iudge the truth Thus commonly in all formes of oaths one part is expressed and the rest are infolded Here first we learne that the forme of an oath is to be plaine and direct in the name of God and not indirect or oblique in the name of the creatures Gods name concealed And it is the flat commandement of God Math. 5. 34. It is alleadged that Paul 1. Cor. 15. 31. sweares by his reioycing in Christ. I answer the words of Paul by my reioycing are not an oath but an obtestation for the meaning of his wordes is this that his sorrowes and afflictions which he indured for Christ would testifie if they could speake that he died daily Thus Moses called heauen and earth to witnes without swearing for in an oath the thing by which he sweares is made not onely witnes but also iudge Neuerthelesse it is not vnlawfull to name the creatures in the forme of an oath if they be considered as pledges presented vnto God that he should punish vs in them if we lie Thus Paul sweareth I call God to witnes to or vpon my soule Here they are to be blamed whose common fwearing is by the creatures as by their faith by their troth by the Masse Marie by this bread by this drinke c. Secondly here we learne to vse an oath onely in the case of extremitie namely when a necessarie truth is to be confirmed whē this cannot be don by any reason or proofe to be foūd among men vpon earth then may we flie vnto heauen for proofe and make God our witnes Thus Paul confirmes his owne calling when all other proofes failed And it must further be obserued that in extremities he vseth an oath but seldome This seemes to condemne their wickednes that crie at euery word in their common talke before God before God Thirdly before we sweare we are to vse great meditation consideration and preparation and therefore Paul in swearing vseth a word of attention and saith Behold I speake it before God This condemnes the rash and customable swearing of men in their common talke who also in that they commonly and rashly sweare commonly forsweare themselues In that Paul confirmes his writings by oath it appeares that they are of God For if he had sworne falsly God would haue taken reuenge vpon him and his writings before this which he hath not done Whereas Paul saith Before God I speake it he teacheth vs after his owne example to bring our selues into the presence of God to walke before him as Enoch did Gen. 5. 22. and as Abraham was commanded Gen. 17. 1. and to doe whatsoeuer we doe as in the sight and presence of God and to be afraid to sinne because of his presence This is the true feare of God and this is the right practise of religion 21 After that I went into the coasts of Syria and Cilicia and I was vnknowne by face to the Churches of Iudea which were in Christ. 22. But they had heard onely some say He which persequuted vs in times past now preacheth the faith which before he destroied 23 And they glorified God in me Here Paul answers an other obiection which may be framed thus Though Paul learned not the Gospel of the Apostles at Ierusalem yet might he happily learne it of them in other Churches of Iudea To this Paul answers three things The first is that he went from Ierusalem into Syria and Cilicia The second that he was not knowne in person to the Churches of Iudea but onely by hearsay and he sets downe the report that went of him The third is that the Churches of Iudea did not disgrace and slander him but they glorified God for him Of these in order For the first that Paul went from Ierusalem straight into Syria and Cilicia the regions of the Gentiles there be two causes One because Paul was ordained specially to be the Apostle of the Gentiles Act. 9. 15. Rom. 15. 16. The second because Cilicia was his owne countrey for he was borne in Tarsus a towne in Cilicia and his loue to his countrey no doubt was great For in the like case he could haue wished himselfe to be accursed for his countrimen the Iewes From this first answer I gather two things First if any Apostle aboue the rest be the Pastour and vniuersall Bishop of the Church ouer the whole world it is Paul and not Peter because he specially was ordained to teach and conuert the nations The second is

are we so to doe Answ. We are members all of one bodie and we are members one of another Eph. 4. 25. And it is Gods pleasure that men shall be instruments of good mutually one to another Goodnesse respects either the bodie or the minde Goodnesse concerning the bodie hath many actions as to feed the hungrie to giue drinke to the thirstie to harbour the harbourlesse to cloath the naked to visit the sicke and them that are in prison Math. 25. 35 36. to burie the dead 2. Sam. 2. 5. Lastly to lend freely and liberally to such as be decaied and impouerished Deut. 15. 7. Goodnesse concerning the soule is to indeauour partly by counsell partly by example to gaine the soule of our neighbour to God and it stands in foure actions to admonish the vn●uly to comfort the distressed to beare with them that are weake and to be patient towards all 1. Thess. 5. 14. Goodnes is hard to be found in these daies among men The common practise is according to the common prouerb Euery man for himselfe and God for vs all The studie of men is howe to gather goods honours riches for themselues and for their children and the common good is not aimed at Good orders hardly take place as namely the order for the poore and the reason is the want of goodnesse in vs. If any professe any shew of goodnesse more then the rest they are sure to be despised and reproched at euery hand and this shews that there is little goodnesse among men Faith First we are here to vnderstand faith towards God which is to beleeue the remission of our sinnes and our reconciliation with God in Christ. This faith is common to all among vs yet is it but a false dead ceremoniall faith in many men Reason I Faith comes by the hearing of the word of God preached Rom. 10. 14. but this faith in many is conceiued without preaching for they say they beleeue their saluation by Christ and withall they liue in the perpetuall neglect or contempt of the publike Ministerie II. True faith is ioyned alwaies with the exercises of invocation and repentance yet in many among vs this faith is without any conuersion or change of heart and life and therefore it is but a dead faith III. True faith is mixed with contrarie vnbeleefe so as they that beleeue feele in themselues a want of faith and much vnbeleefe But there are many among vs that say they perfectly beleeue and that they neuer so much as doubted in all their liues Now such a faith is a vaine perswasion IV. Many that boast of their faith in Christ want faith in the prouidence of God touching food and raiment And that is manifest because they vse any vnlawfull meanes to helpe themselues now if their faith faile them in a smaller point it cannot be sound in the greatest of all Secondly by faith is meant faith towards men that stands in two things One is to speake the trueth from the heart the other is to be faithfull and iust in the keeping of our honest promise and word This faith is a rare vertue in these daies For the common fashion of them that liue by bargaining is to vse glosing facing soothing lying dissembling and all manner of shifts And with many it is a confessed principle that there is no liuing in the world vnlesse we lie and dissemble They that deale with chapmen shall heardly know what is trueth they haue so many wordes and so many shifts In this respect Christians come short of the Turkes who are said to be equall open and plaine dealing mē without fraud or deceipt Our care therfore must be to cherrish maintain amōg vs the vertue of faith and truth Reasons I. Gods commandement Put away lying and let euery man speake the truth to his neighbour Eph. 4 15. II. By truth we are like to God whose waies are all truth who hates a lying tongue Prou. 6. 17. whose spirit is the spirit of trueth III. Lyars beare the image of the deuill He is the father of lies Ioh. 8. 44. so oft then as thou liest thou makest thy tongue the instrument of the deuill IV. Eternall punishment in the lake that burnes with fire and brimstone Reu. 22. 15. Here marke that liars are entertained at the same table with murderers and theeues and the liar neuer goes vnpunished Prou. 19. 5. V. To speake the trueth from the heart is a marke of Gods child Psal. 15. 2. And he whose faith failes towards men shall much more faile towards God Meekenes The same in effect with long suffering The difference is that meekenes is more generall and long-suffering is the highest degree of meekenesse Temperance It is the moderation of lust and appetite in the vse of the gifts and creatures of God For the better practising of this vertue remember these foure rules I. We must vse moderation in meats drinks This moderatiō is to eat and drinke with perpetuall abstinence And abstinence is to take lesse then that which nature desires and not more And that measure of meate and drinke which serues to refresh nature and to make vs fitte for the seruice of God and man is allowed vs of God and no more II. We must vse moderation in our apparell And that is to apparell ourselues according to our sexe according to the receiued fashion of our countrie according to our place and degree and according to our abilitie Here the common fault in to be out of all order for none almost know any measure Euery meane person now adaies will be a gentleman or gentlewoman III. We must vse moderation in getting of goods and that is to rest content if we haue food and raiment for our selues them that belong vnto vs. 1. Tim. 6 8. Here is our stint we may not desire to be rich v. 9. The king himselfe must not multiply his gold and siluer Deut. 17. 17. and yet hath he more neede of gold and siluer then any priuate man IV. There must be a moderation in the spending of our goods contrarie to the fashion of many that spend their substance in ●●●sting and company and keepe their wiues and children bare at home Against such there is no law Here Paul sets downe the benefit that comes by the former vertues The words carrie this sense Against such vertues and against persons indued with such vertues there is no law And that for two causes One there is no law to condemne such Secondly there is no lawe to compell them to obey because they freely obey God as if there were no law Marke then the condition of spirituall men They are a voluntarie free people seruing God freely without constraint So as if Christ would not giue vnto them life euerlasting yet would they loue him and desire the aduancement of his kingdome On the contrarie if there were no hell and God would not punish adulterie drunkennes blasphemie c. with eternall

that is to binde them to a necessarie obseruation of the ceremoniall lawe Here let vs marke the practise and pollicie of the deuill Libertie from sinne death and the ceremoniall lawe is the treasure of the Church and therefore the deuill seekes to ouerthrow it by holding men in bondage vnder abolished ceremonies Thus at this day they of the popish Church are in bondage vnder an heape of humane traditions beeing indeede a yoake farre heauier then that of the ceremoniall-lawe Againe when men professe the name of Christ the deuill is content with it and he indeauours with all his might euery where to hold them vnder the bondage of sinne and to hold them in his snare at his will Thus vnder the name of Christianitie there be swarmes of Atheists Epicures Libertines worldlings and prophane persons At this time according to auncient custome we celebrate the memoriall of the birth of Christ and yet no time so full of disorder as this For the most that professe Christ take and challenge to themselues a licentious libertie to liue and doe as they list and this kind of libertie is flat bondage But they that are seruants of Christ indeed should take heede of this bondag● For beeing free from sinne they should be seruants of nothing but righteousnesse Rom. 6. 18. They that be of a corporation stand for their liberties what a shame then is it that men should loue bondage and neglect the spirituall libertie which they haue by Christ. Thus we see howe the false brethren vrged circumcision now let vs come to Pauls refusall The first point is that they would not giue place for an houre It seemes they were requested to vse circumcision but once but they would not yeeld so much as once because their acte would haue tended to the preiudice of Christian liberty in all places Here we learne that we may not vse the least ceremonie that is in the case of confession before our aduersaries that is when they seeke to oppresse the trueth by face or by fraud and make ceremonies signes and tokens of the confession of any vntrueth Iulian the Emperour sitting in a chaire of estate gaue gold to his souldiers one by one withal cōmāding to cast of frākincense so much as a graine into the fire that lay vpon an heathenish altar before him Nowe Christ in souldiers refuse to do it and they which had not refused afterward recalled their acte and willingly suffered death Againe here we learne that we are not to yeeld from the least part of the trueth of the Gospel that God hath reuealed to vs. This truth is more pretious then the whole world beside and heauen and earth shall rather passe then the least tittle of it shall not be accomplished The commission of the Apostles was to teach them to doe all things which God had commanded Therefore the vnion or mixture of our religion with the popish religion is but a dreame of vnwise Politickes for in this mixture we must yeeld and they must yeeld something but we may not yeeld a iot of the truth reuealed to vs. There is no fellowship of light with darkenesse 1. Cor. 6. Colacinthus a naughtie pot hearbe marred a whole pot of pottage 2. King 4. 40. Christ saith in the like case of the Pharisies Let them alone they are the blinde leaders of the blind Math. 15. 14. We may yeeld in things indifferent but not in points of religion In matters of this world we may be indifferent and of neither side but in matters of God we may not There is no halting betweene two religions The second point is they gaue not place by way of subiection The reason is the Apostles were of highest authoritie simply to be beleeued in their doctrine And they had extraordinarie authoritie to punish them that rebelliously withstood them Act. 5. 5. 10. Act. 13. 20. 2. Cor. 10. 6. For this cause they were not to stand subiect to the iudgement and censure of any man They willingly suffered their doctrine to be tried yet were they not bound to subiection as other ministers of the new testament are 1. Cor. 14. 32. 1. Ioh. 4. 1. It may be said if they would not giue place by subiection howe then gaue they place Answer There is two kinds of yeelding one by tolleration without approbation the other by subiection which is the greatest approbation that can be By the first it may be Paul was content to giue place but not by the second Here we see howe we are to yeeld to the corruptions of the times in which we liue whether they be in manners or in doctrine We are to giue place by meeke and patient bearing of that which we cannot mende but we are not to giue place by subiection The third point is the ende of Pauls refusall That the truth of the Gospell might continue that is that the Gospel might be preserued in puritie and integritie in all things And by this Paul giues vs to vnderstand that if circumcision be made a necessarie cause of iustification and saluation the truth of the Gospel doeth not continue Here let vs obserue that when iustification or saluation is ascribed to workes or Sacraments the truth of the Gospell giues place and falshood comes in the roome Wherefore the religion of the Church of Rome is a meere deprauation of the Gospel for it makes workes to be the meritorious causes of iustification saluation Nay which is more it teacheth men to worship a peece of bread and to invocate dead men and to kneele downe to stockes and stones 6 And of them that seemed to be great what they were in times past it makes no matter to me God accepteth no mans person for they that are the cheife did not communicate any thing to me Here Paul laies downe the second signe of his approbation namely that in conference he learned nothing of the cheife Apostles And this he expresseth in the first words in which the concealement which he vseth is to be obserued For hauing begun a sentence he breakes it off in the middle and conceales the latter part and leaues it to be supplied by the reader thus Of them that seemed to be great I was not taught or I learned nothing The like forme of speaking is vsed 1. Chron. 4. 10. Where Iabez saith If the Lord blesse me and be with me concealing the end of his sentence I will be thankefull thus and thus In the roome of this concealement Paul puts an answer to an obiection For some man might take exception against his former speech thus Thou callest the Apostles Great but thou speakest fainedly for thou knowest they were but poore fishermen To this he makes answer thus What they were once it makes no matter to me Then he renders a reason of his answer God accepts no mans person This done he proceeds and renders a reason of his first speech he learned nothing of the cheefe Apostles because they did

by name Exod. 33. 17. Againe it is a perpetuall and vnchangeable knowledge For whome God once knowes he neuer forgets Isai 49. 15. The third estate of the Galatians is their estate in their reuolt or Apostasie in these words How turne ye again to impotent and beggarly rudiments whereunto as from the beginning ye will be in bondage againe or thus to which ye will doe seruice againe as from the beginning The words carrie this sense How turne ye againe that is it is an intollerable offence in you hauing knowne God to returne againe to the rudiments of the law By rudiments we are to vnderstand Circumcision the Iewish sacrifices and all the ceremonies of the law of Moses And it may not seeme strange that they are called impotent and beggarly rudiments For they must be considered three waies with Christ without Christ and against Christ. With Christ when they are considered as types and figures of Christ to come and as signes of grace by diuine institution for the time of the old Testament Without Christ when they are vsed onely for custome whether before or after the death of Christ. Against Christ when they are esteemed as meritorious causes of saluation and the iustification of a sinner is placed in them either in whole or in part as though Christ alone were not sufficient In this respect Paul calls them impotent and beggarly rudiments And Paul hauing said that the Galatians returned againe to the rudiments of the lawe in the next words he shewes howe they doe it namely by seruing them againe They serued or yeilded seruice to them three waies In opinion because they iudged them to be necessarie parts of Gods worshippe and means of their saluation In Conscience because they subiected their consciences to them In affection because they placed part of their affiance in them for their iustification and saluation It may be demanded howe the Galatians can be said to returne againe to the rudiments of the law serue them againe that were neuer vsed to them before Answ. In the speach of Paul there is that which is called Catachresis that is a kind of speaking somewhat improper in respect of finenesse and Elegancie The like we haue Ruth 1. 22. when Ruth is said to returne to Iuda with Naomi yet shee was neuer there before Neuerthelesse the speach in sense is most significant and proper For Paul no doubt signifies hereby that when the Galatians subiected themselues to the rudiments of the law and placed their saluation in part euen in them they did in effect and in trueth as much as returne againe to their old superstitions serue againe their false gods Here then we haue a description of the Apostasie of the Galatians It is a voluntarie sinne for Paul saith ye will serue after the knowledge of the truth in which they returne againe to the rudiments of the law by yeelding subiection and seruice to them which act of theirs is indeede as much as if they had serued againe their false gods Here some may say if this be so then they sinned against the holy Ghost Ans. The sinne against the holy Ghost is indeede a voluntarie sinne but that is by reason of the obstinacie and malice of the will and this offence in the Galatians was voluntate onely by infirmitie Againe the sinne against the holy Ghost is an vniuersall Apostasie in respect of all the Articles of religion for that sinne makes men crucifie Christ crucified Heb. 6. 5. and to tread vnder foote the sonne of God the Apostasie of the Galatians was particular onely in the article of iustification The vse In that the Ceremonies of the law set vp against Christ in the cause of our iustification and saluation are called impotent and beggarly rudiments Paul teacheth a waightie conclusion That Christ stands alone in the worke of redemption without collegue or partner without deputie or substitute whether we respect the whole worke of redemption or the least part of it Againe that all the workes of mediation stand alone by themselues and admit nothing to be added and adioyned to them There is no other name whereby we can be saued beside the name of Christ. Act. 4. 12. Christ saues them perfectly that come vnto him Heb. 7. 25. In him we are complete Col. 2. 10. He alone treads the winepresse of Gods wrath and none with him Isai 63. 3. If Christ be a Sauiour he must be a perfect Sauiour considering he is God and man and beeing a perfect Sauiour in himselfe he needs no partner and because he is euery where 〈◊〉 all times therefore he needs no deputie in his stead Again euery worke of redemption is acted by whole Christ according to both his natures and as there are in him two natures so are there two operations of the said natures and as both natures concurre to make one person so the operatiōs of both natures concurre to make the compound worke of a mediatour which is an admirable worke not meerely humane but theandricke that is humane-diuine For this cause no action pertaining to redemptiō can be performed by a mere creature whether man or angel Obiection I. Ioh. 20. 23. The Apostles haue the power to remit and retaine sinnes therefore it is not proper to Christ. Answ. To remit by meriting and by efficacie in the conferring of pardon is proper to the mediatour The Apostles and other Ministers remit by preaching and by declaring remision The ministers of the word doe not procure our reconciliation with God as Christ doth but they exhort men to be reconciled to God 2. Cor. 5. 20. Obiect II. 1. Pet. 3. 18. Baptisme saueth therefore not Christ alone Ans. Baptisme saueth by signifying and by sealing vnto vs the grace and mercie of God and the effecting of our saluation is in the same place ascribed to Christ and his resurrection The conclusion then of Paul is to be remēbred for it serues as in engyne to ouerturne the maine grounds of poperie The primacie of the Pope is a certen estate in which he is substituted into the place and roome of Christ for he takes vpon him to make lawes that properly and truely binde conscience euen as the lawes of God Againe he takes vnto him a proper and iudiciall power to remit or retaine the sinnes of men Nowe these actions indeed are the proper actions of God Christ no meere creature is capable of them In this respect the primacie of the Pope is an impotent and beggarly inuention Again the Romish relligion beside the al sufficient oblation of Christ vpon the crosse lets vp the sacrifice of the masse for the sinnes of the quicke and the dead besides the Intercession of Christ it sets vp the Intercession of Saints and Angels beside the perfect satisfaction of Christ it sets vp humane satisfactions beside the infinite merit of Christ it maintaines and magnifies the merit of humane workes But all these are but impotent and beggarly deuises of men