Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n let_v see_v word_n 4,072 5 3.9829 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A20226 A sermon of Gods prouidence Very godly and profitable: preached at South-shoobery in Essex, by Arthur Dent, Minister of Gods word.; Platforme, made for the proofe of Gods providence Dent, Arthur, d. 1607. 1609 (1609) STC 6647; ESTC S116580 16,828 48

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

regarded vs not The Periapatetickes and other sort of Philosophers broched another opinion teaching that those things which are aboue the Heauens are mooued guided and gouerned by God himself but those things that are vnder the circle of the Moone are gouerned partly by chance and fortune partly by the counsailes and deuises of men partly by a brutish or senceles force of nature There is a third opinion of the Stoicks which is that all things are ruled by fate or destiny that is by a secret order and linke of causes in which chaine all things are so surely tied that both God himselfe and man are straighted within those bounds This was a very dainty opinion in the iudgement of the Poets who to excuse the weakenes of their God Iupiter fained that he wept for that he was so hindered by the force of destiny that he could not set Sarpedo at liberty The fourth opinion is Platoes who graunteth that God by his prouidence ruleth all things in generall which afterward God cōmiteth to petty Gods halfe Gods and diuells who haue the charge and care of particular things From these foure opinions spring all other whatsoeuer touching Gods prouidence and there is no one opinion which may not easily be reduced to one of these But some of vs euen of vs Christians flying one danger run into another for that they dare not deny that God by his prouidēce ruleth al things yet will they not graunt that by it hée gouerneth euery particular thing least they should thereby be driuen as they think to some absurdities thus whilst they would auoide absurditie they commit impiety and fal away from the truth most dangerously But farre bee this frō your heart Right worshipful and that it may neuer possesse you auoid the cause that worketh it in them which is ignorance of the word of God and for that God in great mercy hath kindled in your heart a desire of knowledge quench not that godly desire in you but pursue hotly with hearty and feruent prayer after knowledge and you shall finde it and if you shall finde it you shal●certainely know that there will no absurdity be inforced vpon any doctrine grounded vpon Gods word that you néed not feare this doctrine as they do I wil first discourse breifly of the truth of it and wil proue that God gouerneth by his prouidence al things generally and euery particular thing particularly then wil I answere to al those chiefe obiections which are brought against it and by which some vaine men think to make the doctrine absurde To the first For that this argument hath béene diuersly handled and men haue béene very curious in discoursing thereof espetially since what way soeuer they winde themselues many absurdities doe séeme to follow them it wil be best I thinke for me to kéepe me in the high beaten way least séeking by-wayes I wander out of the way I meane to discourse so of this doctrine as I am taught in the word of God then diligently to remooue al those things whatsoeuer they be not beséeming the most pure nature of God which in the iudgmēt of man shal séeme hereof to follow But if my ignorance were so great that I could not remooue these inconueniences yet notwithstanding are you all Christians bound to receiue with all humilitie this true doctrine to blame me not the doctrine if I be not able to cleare it o●●●l those things which in the iudgement of man may séeme absurd And although it is not my purpose to examine all that Philosophers others say against the gouerning of euery thing by the prouidenc● of God yet in my minde all that they cā say against it may by this one argument be easily ouerthrowne If he be a God which they all confesse though they would deny it yet may it easily bée prooued against them he is a most perfect thing but y ● which is most perfect hath nothing perfecter then it selfe neither can we imagine any thing to be more perfect then that which of it selfe is truly absolutely most perfect therfore there is nothing neither can we imagine any thing to be more perfect then God herevpon I infer if God did not gouerne al things in general euerie thing in particular we might well imagine that there was some-thing more perfect then God euen such a deity which had charge and care of euery particular thing but it is shewed y ● no such deity or Godhead cā be imagined It is false therefore that they herevpon would infe 〈…〉 that God by his prouidence ruleth no● euery particuler thing the contrary is true which we teach for else surely that God which they dreame of to liue idly and at case to haue no care of any thing as they babble is not in truth a God but as Tully somtime said of their maister Epicurus so say I of them that they in words acknowledge a God but in truth deny y ● there is any But leauing Philosophers let vs sée what the Scripture teacheth vs the first place I will vse for y ● proofe of this doctrine I take out of the Epistle to the Hebrues the 1. Chapt. verse 3. where it is said of the sonne of God that Hee beareth vp that is mooueth and gouerneth all things by his mightie worde hee that graunteth that he ruleth al things excepteth no one thing from his gouernment We may then well conclude out of this place of God that God gouerneth all and euerie thing But least I should leaue any starting hole for the aduersary to winde out at let vs further sée what the Scriptur● teacheth vs of the gouerning of euery particular thing by Gods prouidence Neither will I heape vp many places but content my selfe with a fewe examples out of which the truth of this doctrine may be gathered And thus I do endeuour to prooue it briefly All the creatures of God are either indued with y ● gift of frée choise or else want this liberty of choise they that haue it are Angels both good and euill and men also both good and euill they that want this liberty of choyse are all other liuing things created by God also those his creatures which haue no life and yet of all these creatures God hath a speciall care so as he disposeth of euery one of them according to his pleasure The booke of Iob and the Psalmes do very often handle this argument so that if I should gather out of them all their proofes I should write out almost their whole bookes yet some I will bring and leaue the rest for you to gather hoping it wil be a means to bring you to the often reading of them In the 147. Psalme the Prophet saith thus of God hat he couereth the Heauen with cloudes and prepareth raine for the earth and maketh the grasse to grow vppon the Mountaines But the cloudes the raine and the grasse are things without soule