doth belong to the Magistrate and Church-governour to command and appoint in matters of Religion pag. 8 CHAP. IV. The term Uniformity explained and this Proposition proved That obedience to the Act for Uniformity is the way to Unity pag. 12 CHAP. V. That indifferent things may lawfully be commanded and that to obey such commands is not onely lawfull but profitable for the Peace of the Church To refuse obedience to indifferent things as sinfull is Negative superstition with several considerations about the regulating of our zeal about things indifferent in themselves pag. 22 CHAP. VI. That to declare against the binding power of the Covenant according to the Declaration appointed by the Act for Uniformity is lawfull both by the Law of God and of the Land Wherein the judgement of reverend Mr. Perkins in six cases as to the not-binding power of on Oath is applied to the case in hand pag. 33 CHAP. VII That to declare That it is not lawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take up arms against the King and that we do abhor that trayterous Position of taking arms by his Authority against his Person c. is very warrantable by the Law of God and of the Land pag. 48 CHAP. VIII That Uniformity in publick Worship by obedience to an Imposed Form is lawful pag. 54 CHAP. IX The Vindication of the Common prayer of the Church of England be Mr John Ball from the aspersions of the Old Prownists and the Authors of the Temperate Discourse and Plus Ultra The lawfulnesse also of Conformity to it with its Rites proved by Bishop Jewell Martin Bucer and others pag. 60 CHAP. X That to subscribe to the 39. Articles of Religion and to declare an unfeigned assent and consent c. is not contrary to any command of Christ but lawful and warrantable notwithstanding all the objections made of old by Mr. Josias Nichols against subscription which are in this Chapter laid down and modestly removed Pag. 91 CHAP. XI That to subscribe to the use of those Ceremonies which have significancy in them as the Surplice and Crosse in Baptism is lawfull and warrantable proved by the judgement of Forreign and our own Modern Divines both Conformists and Non-conformists Pag. 106 CHAP. XII The general argument against Subscription to the Book of making Bishops Priests and Deacons because the Deacon we are to approve his description is not to be found in the Book of God answered The weakness of which argument is evidenced from the example of Christ and his Apostles also the great evil of urging this argument at large that nothing is warrantable but what is expresly commanded Pag. 110 CHAP. XIII The Order of Deacon excepted against by Mr. Nichols as exercised in the Church of England justified by Mr. John Balls argument for Lecturers Together with several directions from Mr. John Randal what is to be done in this present case of Conformity as to perswading of the Conscience Pag. 124 CHAP. XIV Contains the course that a Minister is to take as to Conformity Though scandal be taken by weak Brethren in which Chapter the Doctrine of scandal is considered and what is alleadged by the Author of the Temperate Discourse is answered and the Magistrate freed from what is charged upon him under this consideration Pag. 132 CHAP. XV. That to receive Ordination from the Bishop though ordained before by Presbyters is lawful Pag. 140 CHAP. XVI That for our Ministers to receive Ordination by Bishops though ordained before by Presbyters will not conclude the Reformed Churches that have no Episcopal Ordination to have no true ministers and consequently to be no true Churches Pag. 151 Bucer Scripta Anglicana pag. 455. I give thanks to God who hath given you grace to reform these Ceremonies in such a purity And of the Common Prayer thus he there writes I have found nothing in it which is not taken out of the Word of God or at least which is contrary to it being rightly interpreted Mr. John Ball 's Answer to Mr. Can part 2. pag. 9. If the Common Prayer be wholly taken out of the Mass-book how cometh it to have those things which are so directly contrary to the Mass that both cannot possibly stand together Peter Martyr's Epistle from Oxford Nov. 4. 1550. to Bishop Hooper pag. 8. How be it I will not grant that these diversities of Vestures have their beginnings of the Pope for so much as I read in the Ecclesiastical History Euseb lib. 3. cap. 31. How that John the Apostle wore at Ephesus where he dwelled a Bishops apparel terming it Petalum seu lamina pontificalis As touching S. Cyprian the holy Martyr Pontius the Deacon writeth that a little before he should be beheaded he gave unto him that was appointed to behead him his vesture called Bâ—rrus after he had put it off and to the Deacons he gave his other Vesture called Dalmatica c. Chrysostom maketh mention of the white Vesture of the Ministers of the Church in Mat. cap. 26. homil 83. ad â—oâ—ul Antioch homil 60. c. But be it so let them be the invention of the Pope as you would have it yet notwithstanding for the respect of the Papistical invention in them I cannot be perswaded so much impiety to be therein that whatsoever it toucheth it doth by and by so corrupt that it cannot be lawfull for good and godly men to use godlily pag. 7. We read how that wine was consecrated unto Bacchus bread unto Ceres water unto Neptune oyle unto Minerva song unto the Muses and unto Apollo and many other things Tertullian rehearseth in his book intituled De Corona Militis Christiani yet for all that we stick not to use all these things freely as well in holy as in prophane uses although at one time or other before they had been consecrated to Idols and to Devils Perkins on Conscience of Oaths pag. 527. If at the first it were lawful and afterward by some means become either impossible or unlawfull it binds not conscience for when it becomes impossible we may safely think that God from heaven frees a man from his oath CHAP. I. Introductory and by way of Preface pressing the necessity of searching into the nature of the things commanded before suffering for the same Section 1. INquiries after Truth in matters controverted are not more difficult in their prosecution then pleasant and delightful in the satisfaction they afford For though it be a true assertion of Democritus that Veritas in puteo latet c. and cannot be drawn out but with much labour yet no dainties are so relishing and delicious to the taste as truth obtained is to our Intellectnals Sect. 2. But more especially ought we to desire to know the truth in matters doubtful which refer to our practice and especially such as refer to the purity of Gods Worship who is a Spirit and will be worshipped in spirit and truth And though this is to be done at all times yet
schisms and divisions The Apostle John 1. 4 6 7. layeth down a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a mark or character how we may know the spirit of Truth from the spirit of Error the spirit of Truth is a Fountain of love and consequently the spirit of Error is the spring of discord as we have found by woful experience Error in doctrine is by our Saviour compared to Leaven Mat. 16.6 compared with the 12. Verse now as Leaven diffuseth a sowrenesse into the whole mass or lump whereever it cometh so also doth Error diffuse a sowreness and moroseness of spirit whereby he becomes unsociable and apt to divide and separate himself from the rest of his brethren that is leavened with it even as the Pharisees did in our Saviours time whose name with the name of Nabal are symbolical Sect. 13. Now then that obedience to the Act of Uniformity is the way to unity as it is a blessed means for the mortifying of these grand ring-leaders of division and disobedience may be thus evidenc'd as it doth remove the occasions of committing these sins For did all that professe the true Reformed Protestant Religion observe an Uniformity in their publick Worship and in the rites and ceremonies thereto belonging all distinctions of men and parties would soon vanish away there would be no occasion given for the drawing forth those woful fruits of Pride before-named neither in Ministers or People Sect. 14. As the Minister by his obedience to these indifferent things acts and exercises those graces which are diametrically opposite to pride and self conceitedness viz. humility and self-denyal and declareth that he hath got the victory over that to which the reverend Calvin saith the wit of man is nothing more adverse and contrary to viz. subjection Sect. 15. So the People are thereby delivered from the occasion of putting forth those dividing sins before named in whom there is a natural aptitude upon the forbearance of the Ministers in these modes of Worship to atgue Surely those men do see more into the iniquity of the Common prayer the Surplice c. then all the Governours that enjoyn them or the rest of their Brethren that observe them and have therefore a more pure delicate and tender conscience and consequently their Ministry is like to be most soul-saving And thereupon all other Ministers are usually censured for Time-servers and men-pleasers by which means Christian love and charity is destroyed and divisions are contracted and continued That therefore which removeth these occasions as for all to be uniform in their external modes of Worship doth as I have before shewed must needs be the way to unity Sect. 16. Secondly as Pride so Error also is a dividing sin as I have before shewed Now that which taketh away one occasion and a great one too of diffusing and spreading Error must needs be the way to unity now Uniformity in prayer doth this and was therefore by the Church in the primitive times appointed for this end and purpose Because that Hereticks did convey and spread their poysons in their Prayers In the Council of Milva which was in the year 416. it was appointed That none should use any prayers but such as were appointed by a Synod Sect. 17. There is a desultory levity in the minds even of some good men whereby they are subject to offend in their publick Devotions without a great measure of humility and spiritual prudence which all Ministers have not and therefore it was the judgement of the reverend Calvin in his Epist ad Protector in the Reign of King Edward the Sixth that there should be a set form of prayer and Ecclosiastical rites saith he Quoad formulam precum rituum Ecclesiast valde approbo à quo pastori in functione discedere non liceat c. Observe he would have a set Form of prayer and certain rites and ceremonies but were they to be left to the Ministers choice whether he would conform to them yea or no I suppose not he was not of Mr. Baxters mind in his Disputations as to this point nor yet with the Petitioners for peace but saith expresly From which form of Prayer and Ecclesiastical Rites it may not be lawful for the Pastors in their function to depart They were then to be imposed by Law upon them and for what end for these three Reasons first that thereby provision may be made for the simplicity of some secondly that the consent that all the Churches have amongst themselves may more certainly appear and lastly also that the extravagant levity of some that affect novelties may be prevented So that it is very evident that this reverend person did approve of a Uniformity in prayer and other rites as the way to unity as it did conduce to concord and agreement as it prevented dividing sins Sect. 18. I proceed now to the second Branch for the proof of the proposition and that is this That which tends to the honour of our Religion the edification and building up of the Church that must needs be the way to Unity But now if all persons both Ministers and People would be Uniform and there were an universal agreement about these modes of Worship and Discipline the Reformed Protestant Religion which for our Non conformity and divisions amongst our selves by our Adversaries the Papists is very much reviled as you find Harding in his Answer to the Apology of the Church of England flouting them even for the Non-conformists that were amongst them in Queen Elizabeths dayes Sect. 19. I say how would our Religion be honoured nay not onely so but how would it strike a terrour into the hearts of all Romish Catholicks and fill them with despair of ever seeing the Church of England reconciled to the Church of Rome for to see these woful divisions that have been amongst us removed by an universal conformity amongst Protestants in these matters which are and have been the cause of such unchristian discords Now if this would not edifie and build up the Church judge you Besides how amiable then would our assemblies be and how delightful would Gods publick Worship be to such as desire to fear his Name and to reverence his Sanctuary to behold it celebrated orderly and uniformly while all that worship do sit and stand and kneel together as if but one body while all do speak the same things required of them as if but one mouth Sect. 20. This was the practice of the primitive Church long before Popery I remember I have read that the whole Congregation were then so uniform in publick prayer lifting up their voices so all together when they said Amen which affixed to our prayers signifieth a full consent and agreement to what is prayed for I say it was uttered with such uniformity that St. Jerome as I have read compared their sounding of Amen in the Church unto a clap of Thunder and St. Basil to the roaring of the Sea You see therefore that this Uniformity
from endeavouring the introducing of such a mode of Worship and Government as is displeasing to all others in the Kingdom but our selves And they would doubtless also have seen their own mistake in charging the pressing of subscription to be the cause of separation and troubles in the Church and rather to think that the violent oposition of thesame to be also very accessary thereunto Now dear Sirs be intreated by the meeknesse and gentlenesse of Christ for the Gospel sake for the peace of the Church also which as Mr. Pool saith in his Sermon upon Gospel-Worship should be preferred above all things next to the salvation of Souls Ye who have seen what those Learned and Pious Non-Conformists saw not neither possibly could have fore-seen would have been the event of Non-Conformity and discords about the externals of Religion Be intreated be intreated not to think those holy men before spoken of to be infallible in their judgements as to what you hold from them neither do you take your selves so to be But to what you have read for your satisfaction in these doubtful and disputable matters concerning which I find the Petitioners for peace professing they do impartially study and pray for knowledge and would gladly know the will of God at the dearest rate Vouchsafe I earnestly beseech you the reading of these poor Collections of mine wherewith I now gresent you and be pleased to put on this Resolution before you begin that you will read it through and according to some of your Professions do it impartially Weigh well I intreat you the Arguments that I bring to prove the lawfulness of Obedience to what the Act for Uniformity requireth and give an Answer to them in your own Consciences as clearly and fully as I have there endeavoured to present them And let me beseech you in the Bowels of Christ Jesus that whatsoever weakness you may find in any of the Arguments I offer you will be pleased to consider from whom they come Not from a Professor of Divinity in the Schools of the Prophets but of Christianity in the School of Christ who is put upon this Work not Ex officio sed ex charitate as I have before declared And do not for the weaknesse perhaps of some one Argument despise any of the other till you have tryed their strength And above all let me remember you of what I find professed by some to be their practice that you will be pleased to read it impartially with the same candor ingenuity and freedom from prejudice that you desire any thing that you have made publick to the World should be read by others And were it not for one thing that now cometh in my mind to which I shall presently speak a word by way of Answer I should be in very great hope that the effect of your serious perusal of my poor and weak endeavours in these following sheets would be much for the publick Peace of Church and State That which I shall therefore speak to by way of Removal I ground upon a very serious passage that I find in the Epistle of Martin Bucer to Joan. Ã Lasco It is saith he a very hard thing indeed yea to most holy men to deny themselves and he is seldome found amongst men which would not be content rather to yield in his Patrimony than in the Opinion of his Wit I am apt to fear if I may speak out lest what this Wise man then observed should be some binderance at this time to that work which doth so much conduce to Unity even that which is so hard and difficult even for holy men to do To deny themselves Dear Sirs be not found now in the number of those that will rather yield in your Patrimony submit to Deprivation from the Ministry and all Ecclesiasticall Promotions which are the Scholars Patrimony rather to yield in reference to those Opinions which you have taken up for Fundamental Truths if I mistake not I beseech you consider what is said by some Ministers in the Petition for Peace except one put it out alone that they would gladly know the Truth at the dearest rate Surely though the knowing and obeying of the Truth if I mistake not may be at a dear rate considering what Bucer hath observed how hard it is even for holy men to deny themselves and retract their opinions yet it being in it self that which Christians are bound to do every day if they will exercise the grace of Repentance for their sins they must professe there is a great change in their minds and judgements Surely for those who are the Preachers and pressers of Repentance to others that they are to declare their Repentance not only by their sorrow for sin but by the change of their minds retracting those opinions they had of sin It is but reasonable that they should do themselves that which they enjoyn to others I do confesse that to stand to our Principles that is such Principles as are grounded upon the Oracles of Gods word is our duty in which we are to be stedfast and unmoveable standing like a Rock in the midst of the proud waves breaking all that beat against it but removed by none But we must take very great heed of standing to our own Principles grounded onely upon the Oracles of men and their Traditions or the Oracles of God misapplied This is not constancy but obstinacy to yield and leave these our Principles is not Apostacy but a great piece of self-denyal and true Piety This declares that we have gotten a victory over our selves which is a greater conquest than to win a City and have mortified that corruption that is in holy men as Martyn Bucer saith which inclines men more willingly to part with their Patrimony than their Opinions and declares also that they have subdued that than to the which the will of man is in nothing more naturally averse than subjection to the command of our Superiours as the Reverend Calvin long agoe observed as you shall find hereafter I beseech you Sirs consider for I doubt not but you know it well enough that it is no just cause of scandal or offence given to weak Christians nor yet of disgrace or disparagement to the wisest holyest and learnedst men that ever were to go back from their former assertions and opinions so long as they know that they goe forward towards Truth Peace and obedience What Saint Jerom writeth to Ruffinus is very well worthy of your thoughts if I may be so bold as to be your Remembrancer thereof Never blush man to change thy opinion for neither you or I or any person living are of so great Authority as to be ashamed to confess that they have erred It is farre better for those in my poor judgement to whom Christ hath committed the Care and Cure of the precious soul and so are Leaders of their flock upon a due conviction to confess that they have erred rather than by
that are members of our visible Church and I humbly conceive it to be a seasonable Truth to be treated on That obedience to this Act for Uniformity is the way to Unity Sect. 3. The reason in general why it is likely so to be is because that our chief discords dissentions and divisions which we so long have laboured under have been about our modes of Worship and Discipline That they have been so from the very first beginning of the troubles of Frankefort to this very day he is a stranger in our Israel that knoweth it not yet if you will not take it from me be pleased to take it from Mr. Baxter who in the Postcript of his Epistle to the Reader before his Treatise of the Vain Religion of the Formal Hyppocrite having cleared the Doctrine of the Church of England from being any matter of our most unchristian discord he sayes The more is the pity that the very modes of Worship and Discipline should be the matter of such sharp and uncharitable discords Now then if our sharp and uncharitable discords be and have been about the modes of Worship and Discipline then for all to observe one mode or form or rule in publick Worship and Discipline must needs be the way to unity and agreement Sect. 4. This at first view may seem to be Durus sermo a very hard saying who can bear it and I do the more incline to believe it by what I have read which discovers how contrary the apprehensions of some learned men are to this Truth Who have therefore pleaded very much for Non-conformity and a liberty for persons to chuse or refuse what form or mode of Worship they please as the way to peace Now this I say being the general argument against Vniformity with the means conducing thereunto as I find in the Petition for peace and also in Mr. Baxters sive Disputations I shall make bold with all tenderness and meekness and with much respect to those worthy persons to weigh and consider of the truth and strength thereof Sect. 6. The argument I find in the Petition for peace pag. 14. in these or the like words Nothing more affects us then to think of the lamentable divisions that have been caused and are still like to be whilest things unnecessary are imposed and on the contrary how blessed a unity and peace we might enjoy if these occasions of divisions were removed So that here in short lyeth as is said if I mistake not the ground of all these lamentable divisions about modes of Worship even since the Reformation begun in King Edwards dayes to this time That things unnecessary have been imposed And that this is the chief exception against our Superiours commands I find pag. 12 16 17. and others in the said Petition for peace that they are esteemed unnecessary but that I find them not to be charged as absolutely sinful in themselves in all that book is worthy of observation For this being acknowledged in the general by those persons of that moderation and piety which were to review the Book of Common Prayer c. That they are but unnecessary and not sinful Sect. 7. I humbly conceive that it should put a great stand to the thoughts of such who are methinks too forward to consider Whether onely for non-obedience to unnecessary things in their own judgment or in the judgment of some others that have taken up this tradition from the troubles of Frankfort it be lawful for them to lay down their Ministry or to do that which might by Law deprive them of the same Before I proceed further I shall crave leave to ask this modest question Whether or no this argument against obedience to the commands of our Superiours because we judge the things commanded to be unnecessary is not onely a principle of division but of confusion in all Government Sect. 8. I remember that I have somewhere read that Licurgus the Law-giver to the Lacedemonians being moved by one to establish a Democratical Government in the Commonwealth he bid him go home and exercise it first in his own family And surely if we do but seriously consider of it we shall find that were but this objection brought against our commands as we are Parents or Masters in the government of our Families that they are unnecessary what can be expected but disorder disobedience division and confusion Sect. 9. And had the converted Gentiles whom the Governours of the Church Acts 15. enjoyned to abstain from bloud and things strangled as necessary not to salvation but for the setling of the peace which was broken by the Jewish Teachers ver 2. and to propagate the Christian Religion which are the two professed ends of the framing this Act for Vniformity pag. 71. had they but pleaded This is an unnecessary Imposition and so have been non-conformable how had the Christian Religion been interrupted in 〈◊〉 first plantation and the dissentions and divisions occasioned by the Jewish Teachers been propagated and continued I humbly conceive therefore that this argument or objection against the commands of our Superiours That their Impositions are unnecessary is a very unnecessary objection and a principle of confusion and division in Church State or Family But now that a universal agreement in one mode and form of publick Worship and Discipline is the way to peace and unity and therefore no unnecessary Imposition I thus argue Sect. 10. First that which doth deliver us from dividing sins must needs be the way to unity Secondly that which tends to the Honour of Religion the edification and building up of the Church that must needs be the way to unity Now to have one form and to agree universally in the modes of Worship and service of God doth conduce to both these and therefore Uniformity is the way to Unity I shall begin with the first and shew what are these dividing sins naming but the principal ring-leaders amongst them and they are Pride and Error Sect. 11. First Pride that it is a dividing sin and the spring of division if not of disobedience the Wiseman tells us Prov. 13.10 onely by pride cometh contention as if this were the spring of all division and disobedience But besides from this root spring many more dividing sins as self-conceitedness and thinking of our selves more highly then we ought to think a sin forbidden with an unusual preface Rom. 12.3 a sin whereby we are apt to think our selves wiser then seven men that can render a reason Prov. 26.16 and more holy then the rest of our brethren as did the proud Pharisee From whence also floweth the judging censuring condemning and despising of each other which are all dividing sins and exceedingly tend to the tearing of that Badge by which Christ would have all his Disciples to be known even by their love to each other Sect. 12. Secondly as Pride so Error is a dividing sin for though Truth be but one yet Error is the seminary of all
and decent But the placing of holiness in them and the abusing of the people by them this was the evil in them that Bishop Jewell doth condemn but no the use of them This Reverend Prelate you may observe speaketh confidently of the Non-conformists of his time that as they did not commend Ministers garments as holy so they did not condemn them as unholy or sinful And were the Non-conformists of these times but of the same mind that they did not condemn a Cassock or a Surplice as unholy and that it were no sin to wear such vestures when commanded the case would soon be resolv'd that to wear a Cassock Surplice Gown Canonical Coat c. were lawful for distinction sake and decency in Gods Worship Sect. 23. And thus now having shewed though somewhat at large the true scope of the place brought by Plus ultra to prove his argument by in pag. 30. and that it proveth no such thing for which he doth produce it I shall onely shew how much he is mistaken in the reason that he giveth why the Church of England ought to reject conformity to the Church of Rome in matters of Worship and Discipline that have renounced communion with her in all material points of Doctrine pag. 27. Saith he the reason why we reject communion with the Church of Rome is for that the Popes Supremacy Infallibility Transubstantiation Merit of good works Invocation of Saints Purgatory Latin-Service Worshippiag of Images half communion and such like which are the Pillars of the Romiâ—h Fabrick cannot be proved and made good out of the Word of God And is not this reason of like force against the ceremonies of the Church yet in use amongst us Is there a scriptum est for one of them c. Sect. 24 To which give me leave to say the reason is not of like force for the things before named which are the Pillars of Popery Gods Word is expresly against them and the Scriptures of truth shew the Doctrine to be faelse and so ne to be the Doctrine of devils And if you could bring as clear Scriptures against using a form of prayer wearing garments for distinction and decency in Gods Worship as may be brought againâ—t Lain-Service Worshipping of Images Merit of good works c. Then there were some shew of reason in yours And as for your argument that there is not a scriptum est for one of them I shall give you a very ancient answer that was given to your very objection by the Reverend Martin Bucer to Joannes à Lasâ—o who argued against vestures and other ceremonies as holding conformity with the Charch of Rome therein and as having no scrip um est for them saith the said Bâ—â—â—er in his Epistle pag. 6. If therefore you will not admit such liberty and use of vesture to this pure and holy Church because they have no commandement of the Lord nor no example for it I do not see how you can grant to any Church that it may celebrate the Lords Supper in the morning c. for we have received for these things no commandement of the Lord nor any example yea rather the Lord gave a contrary example Sect. 25. Behold here you that have made a challenge in pag. 13. in the name of all the Non-conformists that if any learned men of our Adversaries be able to bring one sufficient sentence out of the holy Scripture or any one example of any Bishop or Minister in the time of King Edward the sixth that doe directly or ex professo plead for the wearing of Caps and Surplices c. the Zuinglian Gospellers will be then content to yeeld and subscribe Here is the authority of a great learned and pious man in the time of King Edward the sixth defending the lawfulness of these vestures you so much argue against and also condemning your very argument pag. 10. Saith he Many things which the Antichrists have made marks of their impiety may be tokens of the Kingdom of Christ as the signs of Bread and Wine the water of Baptisme the Laying on of hands Preachings Churches Holy dayes and many other things All these places of Scripture are of a great scope The earth and the fulness thereof is of the Lord not of the Devil not of Antichrist not of the wicked This colourable craft of Sathan saith he must be taken heed of by the which he bringeth to pass oftentimes that either we reckon those things which are no sins and those that be sins indeed we seem not to regard them in our selves c. Sect. 26. If the Authority of this holy man in King Edwards dayes satisfie not your conscience that these things may be continued and prevail not with you to prevail with all other Non-conformists in whose name you made the challenge and also have promised to yield and subscribe I shall in answer to your challenge produce the Authority of Bishop Jewell whom you so much quote ex professo commending the present Liturgy in the frame of it And this you will find written in pag. 162. of the Defence of the Apology occasioned by the reproachful speeches of Dr. Harding against it calling the Liturgy in Queen Elizabeth's dayes as you do now A devised Service c. but saith Bishop Jewell to him appealing to his own conscience You know that we serve God according to his holy Word and the order of his primitive Church we administer the holy Sacraments in pure and reverent sort though I suppose the signe of the Crosse was used in one and Kneeling at the other We baptise in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost we receive the Sacrament of Christs body and bloud from the holy Table we make our humble confession and prayers together we pray with one heart and one voice c. And of all these things what one is contrary to the Catholick Faith Oh Mr. Harding is it not written The man that lieth destroyeth his own soul and Christ saith the Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall never be forgiven in this life or in the life to come Sect. 27. If Bishop Jewell did not plead for the present Liturgy in the frame of it his zeal burning so hot that he accounteth Hardings calumnies of the Common prayer to be as a blasphemy against the Holy Ghost I leave to the consideration of all judicious Christians and consequently whether the Authors of the challenge are not bound to conform and subscribe especially considering what the said Bishop Jewell saith of the said Communion book or Common prayer book pag. 198. The holy Communion book and Order of the holy Administration standeth and by Gods mercy shall stand still without any change Observe I pray whatever you have said of the Liturgy of the Church that it is Tantum non the Masse-book yet if you had searched into Jewell as you ought for truth you would have found the Jesuite frequently depravi g the book of common prayer and that