Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n know_v speak_v word_n 9,131 5 4.2861 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A23575 Certayne questions demaunded and asked by the noble realme of Englande, of her true naturall chyldren and subiectes of the same 1555 (1555) STC 9981; ESTC S117390 4,972 14

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

in religion folowe the commaundement of man shal be damned with the man that commaundeth yf he cōmaunde it that is contrary to the law of God ¶ Item whether children be better brought to the vnderstanding of God by learninge the x. Commaundementes and the processiō in englishe and the Catechisme or els by learninge the latyne seruyces whereof the vnlearned vnderstandeth not one worde ¶ Itē whether he speaketh doeth agaynst the holy ghost that speaketh agaynst the holye Byble and knowen trueth therein sayeth that it is the fountayne of heresies and vyly and contemptuously poulleth down the same Byble treadeth it vnder his feete ¶ Itē whether the Cytezens of Andwerpe in requyring that no spanyardes shoulde entre theyr cytie geue example to al men or not to do the lyke And whether the smart of other countreyes vnder the bondage and tyrann●e of the spanyardes where they haue bene suffered to entre dyd moue the wyse sorte of Andwerpe to forsee theyr mischief ¶ Itē whether it be lykelye that yf the spanyardes obtayne the better hād of the English nacion that the poore Englishe men shal be forced to paye such importable taxes as all countreyes cyties paye where the Prince or they haue all ready had the ouer hand ¶ Itē for asmuch as the safete of the realme toucheth the Lordes cōmons of the same and al theyr landes goodes possessions whether may a Quene marrye to such a one though she promyse neuer so fayre as may by any meanes in daunger the realme or proper possessions ¶ Itē whether the King of Spaynes subiectes beyng made free of Englād the commodities of the Realme shall come into the hādes of straungers and the Englishe men vndone thereby or not ¶ Itē whether it be a commō maxime or generall rule practysed amōgest Princes yf they maye at anye tyme breake theyr fayth and forsweare themselues for the purchasing or obtayning of a Kingdom And because Englande is one of the beste Kingdoms in al Europa whether it be lykely now at this present that England wyl prouoke a Prince rather to forsweare him selfe not withstanding any article or othe made to the contrary ¶ Itē whether the Realme of England belong to the Quene or to her subiectes ¶ Itē whether the Quene of England may sell away the realme or not to a straunger with out the consent of her commons ☞ Itē yf she cannot sell it awaye whether may she geue it away or not to a straunger and marry the same straunger without the consent of her commons or not ☞ Itē whether the cōmons may not lawefully by the lawes of God and of nature stand against such a Prince to depose her which hath and doeth seeke all meanes possyble to geue away the Realme for euer by Parliament or otherwise from her right eyres and natural subiectes to a straunger ☞ Itē whether a Quene beyng desyred by the whole lower house of Parliament to marry within the realme and to no straunger oughte to be obeyed yf she doe to the contrarye to her poore commons ☞ Itē whether William Conquerour destroyed all the nobilite of Englād for his own sauegarde by the counsell of Robart Archebishop of Canterbury whom Kyng Lerolde banished his Realme for treason And whether it be lykely that in processe of tyme the Prince of Spayne yf he be suffred wyll doe the lyke by the counsail of Steuen Gardiner now Bishop of Winchester or not ☞ Itē whether the poore commōs of England shal not be shamefully impouerished with repayinge to the Emperour .xx. C.M. franche crownes which the Prince of Spayne borowed of him before he entred the Realme that he might appeare ryche vntil he had compassed his purpose or not ☞ Itē whether the Bishop of Romes auctoritie be lawfully receyued or not agayn into England for asmuch as the laste Parliamente wherein he was restored was no Parliament because it is euydente by the olde lawes of the Realme that the Kynges of England may not kepe two Parliamentes in one yeare Wherfore the last must be vnlawfull no Parliament ☞ Itē whether such as haue any free holde coppe holdes or indenture holdes of Abby lādes shall be forced to yelde them vp agayne or not by the Bishop of Romes lawes notwithstanding any promyse made to the contrary seynge that the next Pope may vndoe al graūtes made to the contrary by his prodecessour And seynge also that there is aplayne lawe that all suche be excommunicate and excluded from the church by the Popes doctryne who kepe anye suche landes as haue bene putte at any tyme in mortmane and appoynted by the consente of Princes to fynde the Clargie ☞ Itē whether it be lykely that the Quene helpe the Pope to bring this thinge to passe by all meanes possible or not seynge she her selfe fyrst hath restored some Abbey landes to geue example ☞ Itē whether it be likely that that Prince which promysed vpō his fayth to kepe certaine articles amongest them not to demaunde the crowne and afterwardes contrary to the same fayth articles attempted to be crowned king of the realme wyll not seke all meanes possible aswel to be periured as yf nede shal requyre by open warre to obtayne his purpose ☞ Itē whether such a Prince missing of his purpose by intreaty and fayre meanes oughte not to be feared hauing forreyne power within the Realme at his commaundement which increaseth dayly and the fauoure of the Quene least he wyll attempte to obtayne that thing by conquest which otherwyse by intreatye he cannot obtayne from which miserye I beseche almightie God saue England ☞ Itē whether the Pope be God or God the Pope ¶ Itē Herry the fowrth Emperour maried with Cōstancia the eyre Quene of Napels and by her entituled Kinge of Napels yf because of her yeares beyng before a Nunne virgine dispayring of lawful issue practysed with his Phisicion hauing a wife which lately conceaued to brute according to the tyme of her cōcepcion a lyke concepcion of the Quene so in th end brought forth the Phisiciōs child as the Quenes wherby the inheritaunce of the realme was transported to a villayn whether it is impossible there might be agayne any suche lyke practyse ¶ Itē whether the testimonie of a Bishop at large out of prison enioying all his dignities openly in printe set forth to the whole worlde be stronger agaynst the Kinges chyld thē whē he beyng depriued from all and in prison vpō delyuerye and restitucion by the same chylde affyrmeth the contrary ¶ Itē yf this word noble be asmuch to saye as notable whether the notable wyse or the notable fooles of a realme are to be called nobles and whether of theyr consentes is to be taken for the consent of the nobilitie ☞ Item whether after this lyfe be ended men dye out of this lyfe there be to be loked for a resurrection and eternal lyfe or no and whether the Bishops lyues confyrme this article or dest●●ye it ☞ Item whether it be Treason to aske a question ☞ Item whether it be treason to saye God saue the noble Realme of Englande from the captiuitie bondage and conqueste of the vyle Spanyardes ☞ FINIS