Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	john_n	spirit_n	worshipper_n	1,614	5	12.0333	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A89619	Divinity-knots vnloosed or a cleare discovery of truth; by resolving many doubts, according to scripture, orthodox divines, and sound reason, so as weake capacities may receive satisfaction therein. To which purpose, a number of points are explained by familiar simile's. A treatise intended specially for the instruction of young Christians in Rothstorne parish in Cheshire: but published for a further extent of the benefit thereof, to the Israel of God. By Adam Martindale, one of the meanest labourers in the Lords harvest.	Martindale, Adam, 1623-1686.	1649 (1649)	Wing M856; Thomason E1352_2; ESTC R209407	38,259	96

be if one beleeving Parent should so sanctifie the other that the Seed should be internally holy Not the second Viz. Conjugall or Marriage holinesse and if the Apostle had onely meant such Children were lawfully begot in Wedlock not adulterously or in Fornication for he makes such an opposition between uncleanesse and this holinesse as will not admit this interpretation Else saith he were your Children uncleane but now they are holy Uncleannesse and holinesse are here opposed so that if by holy he meane onely lawfully begotten uncleane must needs signifie unlawfully begotten And then the Apostle saith thus much in effect that when neither party beleeveth they live and beget Children in adultery or fornication but this cannot be his meaning for it is not true Marriage being honourable and a bed undefiled not to Belevers onely but to all men a Heb. 13.4 It remaineth then that they be Covenant-wise or federally holy or set apart to God For the Lord having taken a beleever and his seed into Covenant with himselfe b Gen. 17.7 as before though his Wife be an unbeleever her infidelity cannot make Gods Covenant ineffectuall For further proofe let us view againe that Scripture in the second of Acts Vers 39. The promise is to you and TO YOVR CHILDREN This is spoken to Evangelicall repenting Parents and agrees to all such Add hereunto that many absurdities and those no small ones will follow if we deny Children because such to be uncapable of the externall Covenant as Absurdity 1 First That we have lost by the comming of Christ for before he came in the flesh if a Gentile had joyned himselfe to the Jewish Church he had taken hold of the Covenant for himselfe and his Seed but now onely for himselfe and is not a mans tenure much worsned if he formerly held to him and his heyres for ever and now onely for terme of life Surely the clearenesse of dispensation and freedome from burdensome Ceremonies appertaining to the Covenant of grace cannot make nmends for this losse A man had better undergoe many inconveniences with his owne Land then to have a morec ommodious piece for terme of life only Absurdity 2 Secondly The whole blessing of Abraham should not then come on the Gentiles according to Gal. 3.14 but onely part of it for his priviledges were not personall only but hereditary i.e. belonging to his Seed Absurdity 3 Thirdly Christ should be lesse kind to his Church now then when he was on the Earth for then he acknowledged that Infants were not debarred for their infancy from the Covenant but saith Of such is the Kingdome of Heaven c Mat. 19.13 Mark 10.14 Luk. 18.15 I know some may answer when Christ saith of such he meaneth not Children but such as they are Viz. such as are harmelesse humble and meek like them But the reply is easie that he intended to take in both for the Originall word * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is here translated such when it is referred to a patterne doth not exclude but include it I can give you many instances where the word must needs be so taken where Christ sayth Who so shall receive one SVCH Child in my Name receiveth me d Mat. 18.5 were it not ridiculous to say Christs intent was to tell them that if they received any other Child like that in his Name they received him but if they received that very Child which he shewed them they received him not It is sayd John 4.23 That the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth for the Father seeketh SVCH to worship him Here the word such cannot signifie such as are onely like to them that worship in spirit and truth for such counterfeits are hypocrites whose service God abhors but they that doe so worship Compare also the first Verse of the second Chapter to the Romans with the second Verse of the same and you shall see that such things are the same things In the same sense this word is taken in sundry other places e Mat 9.8 Act. 16.24 Gal. 5.23 Thinke withall what reason you can give why Christ should be so angry as Mark telleth us he was f Mark 10.14 The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 importeth indignation or grievous vexation of spirit and so is used Mat. 20.24 26.8 Mark 10.41 14.4 Luk. 13.14 when his Disciples rebuked them that brought Children to him that he should pray over them g Mat. 19.13 Was this the sole cause Viz. that they were like those that belong to him in conditions Then wheresoever the like vertues are found they that hold them forth must also be admitted and Christ would have been displeased had they been rebuked And upon this ground as Master Cotten rightly affirmeth Christ might as well have sayd Suffer Doves and Lambs to come to me for of such that is such meek and harmelesse ones as they are is the Kingdome of Heaven But surely that opinion would savour strongly of the idle that should set Christ in a posture of readinesse to receive Doves or Lambs to pray over them and to be displeased with his Disciples had they rebuked such as brought them which yet he must have done had he been uniforme in his working according to reason * This is cleare to him that understands the axiome A quateus ad omne valet consequentia and those imitable vertues the sole cause why he received them 65. Doubt There is a great deale of reason in that which you say and I acknowledge my selfe much engaged to you for condiscending to my capacity in avoyding tearmes of Art as much as may be But I observe you made much use of Acts 2.39 and I doubt whether it can carry all the weight you lay on it for there be no lesse then three strong exceptions against it Exception 1 First All to whom Peter spake were Jewes by Nation to whom indeed this promise belonged Keepe you to Beleevers in Abrahams line and you may say to them The promise is to you and to your Children but you cannot affirme the same of others for there is no such promise Exception 2 Secondly Others expound the place thus The promise is to you if you repent and to your Children and to those that are afarre off that is Gentiles even so many as the Lord our God shall call if they repent Or thus whosoever God calleth be it your selves your Children or any of the Gentiles to them the promise belongeth Exception 3 Thirdly Some affirme this is no the promise of Gen. 17. as you seeme to take it but of Joel 2. which the speech concerneth all along this Chapter and the sense is The promise Viz. of extraordinary gifts of the spirit to speake to people of strange languages in their Mother tongues as wee doe this day is to you and to your Children and to as many as are afar off even as many as the Lord our

Divinity-knots Vnloosed OR A CLEARE DISCOVERY of truth by resolving many doubts according to Scripture Orthodox Divines and sound Reason so as weake capacities may receive satisfaction therein TO WHICH PURPOSE A Number of Points are explained by familiar Simile's A TREATISE INTENDED specially for the instruction of young Christians in ROTHSTORNE parish in CHESHIRE But published for a further extent of the benefit thereof to the Israel of GOD. By Adam Martindale one of the meanest Labourers in the LORDS Harvest 2 Tim. 2.7 Consider what I say and the Lord give you understanding in all things 1 Pet. 5.10 The GOD of all grace make you perfect stablish strengthen settle you London Printed for John Hancock in Popes head Alley neere the Royall Exchange 1649. Divinity-knots Vnloosed OR A CLEARE DISCOVERY of truth according to Scripture Orthodox Divines and sound Reason so as weake capacities may receive much satisfaction and benefit Herein seventy five Doubts are resolved drawne from these severall heads most in Controversie Viz. Touching the Scriptures and God his Decree and Creation Of Providence Of the fall of man Of the Law of God and the two Covenants Of Christ the Mediator Of Free-will Of Calling Justification Adoption Sanctification Faith Repentance and good Workes Of Perseverance and Assurance Of Christian Liberty and Liberty of Conscience Of the Civill Magistrate and Church-Censures Of Religious Worship and of the Sabbath day Of Oathes Of the Church Of Communion of Saints Of the Sacraments By Adam Martindale one of the meanest Labourers in the LORDS Harvest London Printed for John Hancock in Popes head Alley neere the Royall Exchange 1649. To my Deare and precious Father CAPTAINE JAMES JOLLIE AND To my present and quondam Hearers at Rothstorne in Cheshire and Gorton in Lancashire Dearely Beloved THough the Title-page informs you for whose sake I was especially induced to write this small Treatise it was neuer intended by me that any party of you should wholly monopolize my thoughts of love and Christian respect but howsoever my duty presseth me more in reference to the charge I daily undergoe then to thrust my Sickle into anothers Harvest Yet since this comes on the publique Theatre you may all challenge as well a share in it as the Author whom all of you may justly claime though in different relations peradventure to be your owne Concerning the Booke it selfe it behoves me not to say much To dispraise it beyond my owne judgment were sinfull modesty to praise it above desert unsufferable arrogancy Medio tutissimus c. The best course is to leave it to your Christian perusall and charitable survay and so I doe telling you onely that nothing save the weaknesse is mine owne For the main substance though the most of it came immediately out of my memory in this forme you see it without any considerable consulting of Authors was of that store which in reading the Scripture and other Divinity Bookes and hearing Sermons conferences c. I had before treasured up Some things indeed there be which you shall hardly meet with in any VVorke yet extant but those I also disclaime as none of mine For so farre as the truth of GOD appeareth in them the spirit of God the guide to and in all saving truth in whose hand I am at the best but an Instrument may justly appropriate it to himselfe as his right and due Though sometimes I am forced to clash with unsound opinions I haue concealed the Authors Names as having a desire to vindicate the truth not to provoke any to vindicate himself for which cause I have not onely declined all bitternesse of expression which I think below a Christian at all times but also the recitall of their owne words formally contenting my selfe with the matter least it should too plainely appeare who owneth the Tenets I oppose If notwithstanding all this any be disposed to wrangle with me I shall hardly trouble the VVorld or my selfe so far as to rejoyne to such replyes But if I be reasoned with in the spirit of meeknesse whether it be in this publique way or any other I dare with a safe conscience and shall be ready as my occasions will permit to give an account in a brotherly way to any that shall desire satisfaction concerning any thing herein asserted Thus I commet both you and this small piece to the blessing of GOD remaining Yours in the affaires of the Gospell A Martindale Strethill Aprill the 9. 1649 Divinity-knots unloosed CHAP. I Of the Scriptures and by the way of the light of Nature 1. Doubt IF the Scripture be a perfect rule a 2 Tim. 3.16 17. Psa 19.7 Deu. 12.32 Pro. 30.6 Isa 8.20 Revel 22.18 19. how can the light of nature be of any use in spirituall matters Resol A rule may be sayd to be perfect in three cases 1. When there is a perfect enumeration of and provision for all particulars that possibly can fall under it 2. When it runs in generall tearmes and is comprehensive enough to include whatsoever is to be taken within it 3. When it particularizeth the principall and expresseth the rest more generally As for example * This homly Simile though it may seeme ridiculous to critick wits is of great use if well considered for the clearing of this questioned truth to the capacity of weak Christians for whose sake this worke was undertaken In a Lease we account the rules perfect which a Tenant is to walke by in occupying the ground which is letten him if 1. it give him particular leave to pasture mow and sow or secondly say in generall tearmes he is to have it to all tenantly uses or give way that the Tenant shall have it for tillage and all other tenantly uses Now the Scriptures are perfect in the last sense they deliver particular rules for all the maine poynts of Faith and practice but matters of circumstance and inferi●ur alley are comprehended perfectly though more generally And therefore as he that holdeth his Living to all Tenantly uses had need of so much judgement as to drawe this generall into particulars So when the Scripture entreth not upon the particulars but in the generall commandeth order decencie and edification b 1 Cor. 14.26.40 we had need of the light of nature assisted by the spirit of God to judge according to the generall dictates of Scripture what in such a time and such a case may make for order decencie or edifying 2. Doubt How can Ministers tell us what the Word imports in the Originall of any text they quote seeing themselves as some with probability affirme never saw the Originall Resolution By the Originall we doe not meane the first Copies that were written but faithfull transcripts of them in the same language and these none can deny us to have seene except they will deny withall that our Bibles in English which are translations thereof are the word of God which the Objecter seemeth not to doe And yet although we