Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n jew_n spirit_n worship_v 2,654 5 9.6923 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A43114 The Quaker converted to Christianity re-established, upon the same, sure, safe, and only foundation, Jesus Christ crucified, and his righteousness imputed for justification : having yet no mind to change the sweet and easie Yoke of Christ's Gospel, for the Old Covenant-Yoke of Quakerism, which he found so burdensome and intolerable, or, A full reply to a book entituled, Rebellion rebuked written by John Crook and William Baily, both in the ministry among the Quakers / written by William Haworth ... ; with an account from William Dimsdale ... Haworth, William.; Dimsdale, William. 1674 (1674) Wing H1196; ESTC R513 168,839 185

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

other Men. Reply That Scripture John 1.9 which thou bringest will not prove this viz. That every one that cometh into the World is lighted i. e. savingly by the Light of Christ for that Phrase cometh into the World hath reference to that Word Christ not the Word Man as appears by another Scripture John 12.46 I am come a Light into the World so that it 's said this Was the true Light having Respect to the person of Christ taking Flesh thus coming into the World he was the greatest Light and brought the greatest Light that ever was by his Preaching working Miracles giving the Spirit but saith not here that he is the Light in every one Now the other viz. that Lighteth every Man this cannot be meant universally of every individual Man or Woman in the World because many at that day were in darkness v. 5. The Light shined in darkness but the darkness comprehended it not Christ was among them yet they were darkness and they cannot be said to have a saving Light in them and yet be called darkness for then their state would be changed from darkness to Light Again the Apostles are the Light of the World will it therefore follow that all the Heathens and every one was Lighted within by them that they were that Light within that every Man hath It s said of Paul warning e●every Man and teaching every Man Col. 1.28 did Paul warn every individual Man and Woman in the World That Christ as a Creator doth give some kind of Light to every one may be granted to thee but not as a saving Light that must be as a Mediator thou must seek another Scripture It 's at hand Baily Titus 2. If the Grace of God which brings Salvation hath appeared to all Men then it appeared to the Heathens for they were Men. Reply It should have been said in the last Proposition viz. to all the Heathens to the Heathens it did for many of them were converted by the Preaching of the Gospel but what is this to thy purpose the Light in every Man cannot be called the Grace of God in that I proved it to be a Natural Light before But withal how camest thou to be so mistaken if thou hadst minded the Margin it would have corrected the reading but thou wast not willing it is not so in the Greek as thou reads it viz. hath appeared to all Men neither ought it to be rendred in the translation but thus the Greek hath it The Grace of God that bringeth Salvation to all Men hath appeared this then will not effect thy business yet unless thou wilt say that this bringing Salvation to all Men will do it but if Salvation be brought to every individual then every one is saved surely then it was only to every one that was saved by it The Third Argument of Bayly is W. H. calls it the Deity Ergo. This is a notorious falshood it 's well if not maliciously perverting my plain words I have given a fair account of it in my Answer to Crook Pag. here thou acts not according to the Light to do as thou wouldst be dealt withal The Fourth Argument is drawn from the Fruits of this Tree which thou Blasphemously calls the Tree of Life which should be spoke of the Person of Christ He and He only is the Tree of Life The young Man saith the Light that every Man hath is not the Light of the Spirit of Christ i. e. Of Regeneration and Faith because of it's Fruits which were these three 1. It taught that the first motions to evil arising in the heart if not consented to were not sin 2. That the Doctrine of Justification was a Doctrine of Libertinism 3. That Salvation was by our own Righteousness Now thou speakest not a word here to this corrupt Fruit that sprang from that which thou callest the Tree of Life but let us hear what the Fruits are as thou sayest Baily 1. Thou sayest It assented to the word of Christ and his Apostles therefore it must be the Spirit of Christ Reply The Devil did assent to the words of the Scripture it will follow then according to thy Arguing which I may not write 2. It doth not assent to all the Scripture which the Spirit of Christ doth for it taught him contrary as you may see in these three things 3. It assented only to the Abstaining from outward Evils which foolish talking and jesting were which it may do and yet not be the Spirit of the Son as I will make appear plainly in the Answer to thy next proof 2. Fruit. It convinced him of Evil and let us joyn the four following to this for they are all of the same nature 3. Kept him from stealing 4. From Lying that of few words was spoke to before 5. From doing any wrong outwardly sinning outwardly 6. It gave him strength and power to do that which was good in the sight of God and Men. Reply In this last passage thou greatly wrongs the young Man and in that other likewise viz. and delivered him from it his words are that he had power over Evil and was delivered but not that this Light within gave him the Power but let it go as thou wouldest have it what from all these therefore is thy conclusion It is the Spirit of Truth the Comforter that leads into all Truth pag. 30. Reply Then had Judas the Spirit of Truth that leadeth into all Truth the Comforter for the was convinced of sin and so the most wicked Man under Heaven hath sometimes convictions for sin 2. Then the young Rich Man had the Spirit of Truth the Comforter for he could say touching the commands of the Law All these have I done So had Paul before his Conversion while a Persecutor and Blasphemer for at that time he could say of himself touching the Law blameless Phil. 3. likewise by this Reasoning of thine the Pharisee had the Spirit the Comforter that thanked God he was not as others nor as the Publican Luke 18. it 's said Matth. 12.44 of the Jews that they were swept and garnished yet Satan entred outward Reformation of Life doth not evince the Spirit 's indwellings 7. Fruit. He had Joy Peace and Comfort in obeying the Light Therefore it is the Comforter the Spirit of Truth Reply Then had Paul the Comforter the Spirit of Truth before his Conversion Rom. 7.9 I was alive without the Law once What is that But that he had Peace before he came to have the Spiritual Knowledg of the Law convincing him that desires after evil though not consented to were sin 2. If all Peace was true then this Fruit would argue it to be the Spirit of Christ but all Peace is not right good true else why doth Christ say my Peace I leave with you John 14. and the Apostle speaks of the Peace of God that passeth all understanding c. 3. There can be no Good Conscience nor true Peace without Faith in the
follows to give the Light of the Knowledg See still they had it not in them before Again of the Glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ Now look into those that are well acquainted with the Greek Language they will tell thee this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth properly a Person Answering to that Hebrew word used in Levi● 19.15 Thou shalt not respect the Person of the Poor And it is used in 〈◊〉 1.11 by the means of many Persons Now was no the Per●o● Christ without them That which in 1 John 1. they had seen 〈◊〉 their eyes it was external to them And most of the Glory of 〈◊〉 did shine forth in Christ's personal coming Therefore when he 〈◊〉 which is the next Scripture thou bringest We have this Trea●●e in Earthen Vessels It was the Knowledg the Apostles had in their 〈◊〉 of the Person without Pag. 42. Parag. 2. Thou ownest the Work of God without If thou wast plain-hearted and honest we would thank thee And we do say with thee there are none knoweth the things of God aright but by the Spirit And it 's the same Spirit that raised Christ from the dead that dwels in his people and will at last quicken their Mortal Bodies But thou hast a reservation in all this Is it any less than Blasphemy to say that the Light within raised Christ from the dead and shall raise the Saints Mortal Bodies in the day of the Resurrection As that Scripture Rom. 8.11 i● to be understood All discerning ones by this time see that the Quakers deny the Resurrection of the Body and so consequently Christ's Resurrection Then this quickning of the Mortal Bodies mentioned by Baily is no more than what as the Quakers apprehend is attained by attendance to the Light within Are the Quakers Christians Baily Next quoteth Rom. 8.9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16. to prove the Apostle preached Christ within Reply Not for Justification those Scriptures speak of Sanctification He had spoke of Justification before which is the Cause of this and this an evidence of the other Baily And Christ Preached the Kingdom of Heaven within people Luke 17.21 Reply This place is much made use of by the Quakers Now it 's plain he speaks to the Pharisees whom he calls there Vipers Hypocrites said Satan was their Father Is it likely that Christ would give a Specimen of what his Kingdom was by it's being in the Pharisees What Children of the Devil and Unbelievers and yet the Kingdom of Heaven within them What the Holy Ghost's Sanctification Faith Love Holiness Peace and Joy For the Kingdom of God consists in these things what all these in the Pharisees The Quakers Light I grant was in them but is this any where called the Kingdom of Heaven What is Nature the Kingdom of Heaven Then this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is but intra vos or apud vos i. e. with you or among you used by the Greeks in their Translation of the Old Testament 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 among you there is no more in it than 〈◊〉 1 John 26. There standeth one among you These Pharisees dreamed 〈◊〉 an Earthly Kingdom in Earthly Glory Therefore he saith 〈◊〉 Kingdom cometh not with Observation Their Eyes were blinded 〈◊〉 this Conception of theirs and they stumbled at the lowness and 〈◊〉 verty of Christ and would not believe that he was the Messiah 〈◊〉 were inquiring for the Kingdom Now he tells them It cometh 〈◊〉 with Observation but it was come he being come and it was among them he in Person being among them working Miracles in the midst of them They sought for the Messiah as absent when he was present and very near them We still grant Sanctification within but here the Kingdom of Heaven is taken for the personal coming of Christ that is without Baily And the True Worship of the Father is in Spirit and in Truth Reply But had not the Father an existence of himself without 〈◊〉 before any had their beings Do ye Worship the Father within by the Light or Spirit as ye call it within And was not the Fathers powerful work in sending his Son And the Righteousness of Christ without notwithstanding this Worshipping of the Father in Spirit and Truth Baily And said what and if ye shall see the Son of Man ascend 〈◊〉 where he was before John 6. It is the Spirit that quickneth the Flesh profits nothing When they cryed How can this Man give us his Flesh ●● eat Whose Minds were wholly without like many of yours Reply These Jews did not believe that Christ was God but did despise his low estate He is convincing them here that he was God as well as Man though he did vail his Glory thus in the Flesh for the present Therefore he asserts his Original that it was from Heaven and his Eternal existence before he took Flesh and saith here the Son of Man was in Heaven before he took Flesh He useth a Phrase that is common in Scripture Attributing that to his humane Nature which was proper to the Divine Otherwise as the Son of Man he was not in Heaven before his Ascension from the Earth It 's well if thou and thy Brethren did Believe that he is now Ascended into Glory as he is the Son of Man But is evident ye do not That of his Flesh profiting nothing must be understood thus viz. That his Manhood is nothing for Salvation taken alone and apart from his Deity called the Spirit there And they believed him not as we said to be God The reason why they stumbled at that saying viz. That he would give them 〈◊〉 to eat was because they were ignorant of the way of Faith 〈◊〉 gross Conceptions of eating his Material Flesh with their Ma●●● Teeth We Glory in the Flesh of Christ and know that it pro●●● i. e. the Son of God taking Mans Nature into Union with him●● and therein fulfilling the Law and bearing the Curse of it Of●●ng that Body on the Cross Thus he is the Bread of Life and by 〈◊〉 in this as done for us we have Life and entrance into Glory 〈◊〉 New and Living way which he consecrated for us through the Veil 〈◊〉 to say his Flesh Heb. 10.20 Baily And said 2 Pet. 1.19 We have also a more sure Word of Pro●●ty to which ye do well to take heed as unto a Light that shines in a 〈◊〉 place until the day dawn and the day-Star arise in your hearts 〈◊〉 Jesus is the Bright and the Morning-Star Reply Remember Reader that these Scriptures are brought to prove 〈◊〉 the Apostles did Preach Christ only within Now let us see whether in this Scripture Peter doth not point them to the Person of Jesus Christ and this day dawning and day-Star arising in their hearts was but a more clear knowledg of Jesus Christ Certainly he is pressing them to get into their hearts a more distinct knowledg of Jesus Christ's Person and of the
things put together here with which thou art angry 1. That there is a Light that e●ry Man hath not 2. That there is a Righteousness imputed 3. That Salvation is from a Person wholly without which are all Truths and I am ready to defend them The First thou begins with and asks Whether the Apostles of Christ did Preach a Light or of a Light that every Man hath not 1. Now I assert and will make it good that the Scriptures do frequently speak of a Light that every man hath not Jude 19. Natural or Souly not having the Spirit Now the Spirit is Light and he that is but a Natural Man hath it not Then this Scripture speak● of a Light that every Man hath not John 14.17 The Spirit of Truth whom the World cannot receive If the World i. e. Worldly Carnal Men cannot receive it be sure they have it not Luk. 8.10 To you it is given to know the Mysteries of the Kingdom of God but to others in Parables that seeing they might not see c. Now here is a Light that the Disciples had which the others had not Matth. 11. Thou hast hid those things from the Wise and the Prudent and hast revealed them to Babes Then the Wise and Prudent to whom the Father reveals not Heavenly things want this Light that other Babes have Isa 60.21 Darkness shall cover the Earth and gross Darkness the people but the Lord shall arise upon thee and his Glory shall be seen upon thee A Prophecy of the Church that should be in Gospel-times All excepting these he saith will be in Darkness as Goshen had Light when all the rest of Egypt were in Darkness Here is a Light that the Church hath that none other hath This Light that they were to have in a distinguishing way was the Spirit in their Hearts and Gods word in their Mouths According to God's New Covenant Isa 59. and the last verse As for me this is my Covanant with them saith the Lord My Spirit that is upon thee and my words which I have put in thy Mouth c. When thou writest be sure thou omit not answering these Scriptures plainly or else Recant for saying that it is a strange erroneous Doctrine quite contrary to the General Testimony of all the Holy Men of God in all ages B. saith What is that other Light beside the true Light That it may be known distinctly according to plain Scripture And in the next Parag● If you are not able to give us an account of this Light which every Man hath not a measure of we shall justly Judg it to be a meer dark and vain Imagination of your own Brains and asks in p. 41. Whether every one hath two Lights in him And whether they differ in degree only or in kind nature Reply This is something worth while to Answer to I am glad following thee step by step in every line that I have brought thee hither It had been fair if thou hadst promised that if in any plainness I lay down this thing thou desirest and Answer thy Objections that thou wouldest have left the dark vain Imagination of thy Brain and own this to be a Truth and ceased thy Quakerism 1. I Grant that there is a Light in every Man a spark remaining in ●llen Man of that Light that Adam had in a full Flame before his Transgression in his time of Innocency If ye ask me what it is I Answer some Principles of Common Truth fixed in the Mind of Man 2. What can it effect How far can it go 1. By this Man may know some Divine things viz. That there is a God and that he is to be Worshipped Therefore every Nation have had some kind of Worship 2. Hereby Man may discern betwixt some Moral Good and Evil. As the Heathens saw hereby Murther and Adultery to be Evils and therefore made Laws to punish those that were guilty of them 3. Man may hereby and by the help of Conscience and the Common Restraining Power of God be kept from many Evils and do many Duties that lie before him for the profit of his Neighbour for the good of the Society or Common-Wealth wherein he dwells for this one thing he seeth by it viz. the Judgment of God i. e. Justice to punish sin and this makes him fear 4. From this Light is that power in Man which he feels of condemning and excusing He may know many things to be good and his duty to do them now when he doth according to this knowledg of his reflecting upon it he hath Peace his Conscience will be quiet if not there will be trouble through the many reasonings that will be in Man and fear of Judgment 5. This Light is greatly helped and increased by the consideration of the Works of Creation Rom. 2.19 20. 6. More by the reading of the Scriptures hearing the Word preached converse with Christians And let it be noted that the Quakers had the Improvement of the Light this way though they will not acknowledg it In India we hear but of little Improvement of it 7. Many that live not up to this Light will be very inexcusably Condemned 8. And those that walk according to it doing some things contained in the Law do shame Judg and Condemn those that pretend to Christianity and yet live not in Righteousness and Sobriety And shall not Vncircumcision which is by Nature if it fulfil the Law Judg thee who by the Letter and Circumcision dost transgress the Law Rom. 2. 27. Quest 3. What can it not shew to Man 1. It cannot shew to Man how sin came into the world None of the Heathens ever spoke of this it is known only by the Revelation of the History of it in the Scriptures 2. It doth not shew to Man neither can it that the first motions to evil in the heart though not consented to are sin None of the Philosophers saw this Paul saith Rom. 7.7 I had not known Lust i. e. Concupiscence Desire to be sin he means except the Law That is Moses Moral Law had said thou shalt not Covet or desire He knew it not by all the Light of Nature within 3. It doth not shew Unbelief to be a sin a slighting and contemning and rejecting Jesus of Nazareth as the sealed Mediator John 14.8 He i. e. the Comforter shall convince the World of sin because they believe not Now this is plain in the Quakers who following the Light do so much contemn the Person of Jesus and his Righteousness 4. It shews not to Man some Moral Evils The Heathens saw not Fornication to be a Sin by all the Light they had Poligamy was not accounted a sin by them Nor Revenge a Sin Nor Vain Glory c. 5. It doth not shew the right way of Worship that is by Scripture-Revelation only Therefore the Heathens always ran into Idolatries and false Worships 6. It will not shew to Man the necessity of the New-Birth Every Man