Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	father_n	mountain_n	worship_v	1,874	5	9.7184	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A58446	A Relation of the inhumane and barbarous suffering of the people called Quakers in the city of Bristoll during the mayoralty of John Knight, commonly called Sir John Knight commencing from the 29 of the 7 month 1663 to the 29 day of the same month, 1664 / impartially observed by a private hand, and now communicated for publick information by the said people.	Reinking, William, fl. 1645-1665.	1665 (1665)	Wing R838; ESTC R33989	86,091	151

people but guilty of an unlawful assembly with which thou being not satisfied they withdrew again and thus delivered themselves Not guilty according to the Inditement This gave so great a satisfaction to the Hall and the generality of the people that were therein which was very many that some manifestation thereof was given the people then present being glad in their hearts that innocent men and such as these were and those unto whom they appertained were not found guiltie and that the City thereby so far was unconcerned in a verdict against them it being to their great grief and consternation of spirit that such men for their Consciences should be thus put upon the wrack and sought to be destroyed but this their joy and gladness of spirit vexed thee to the very heart that thou wast so baffled which thou couldst not forbear to manifest and so to prove undeniably thy self what hath been here asserted viz. that thou designedly soughtst their suffering for upon the general shew that past the Hall upon the publication of the verdict as aforesaid thou as a man sensible of thy disappointment in that which thou hadst so designed and laboured to accomplish couldst not contain thy self such was the over-ruling hand of the Almighty for his truth and his people that in vehement passion as a man concerned in the contrary and so didst appear as an unjust Judge which sought the suffering of the Prisoners and was not indifferent which a righteous Judge ought to be and rather inclining which the law doth to the acquitment than to the suffering of the Prisoners saidst tthou couldst not endure to sit there and see thy Sovereigns Laws trampled under soot or words to that purpose who didst trample thy Soveraigns laws under foot in seeking to make them to suffer who by thy Sovereigns laws were acquitted and so didst demand of them whether they would take the oath of allegiance which thou before toldest them thou wouldst do if the Jury did acquit them but in this thou wast disappointed also for the rest of the Justices would not yield to it as judging it a thing unreasonable then to put the Oath to them when they vvere cleared of vvhat they stood indited by their Countrey This dissatisfied the Hall exceedingly to see thee sitting on the Bench as Judge to act so contrary to Justice for thou shouldst rather have shewn thy self as glad of their liberty the law acquitting them hadst thou been unconcerned than to have manifested thy desire to have had them to suffer and hadst thou been a wise man in thy generation thou wouldst have so done But oh the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments and his wayes past finding out he knew thy heart and therefore would not suffer thy fig-leaves to cover thee but brought thee forth stark naked to the worlds view in thy Wolfs dresse and then stop'd thee in thy course so that thou couldst not neither prevail in this of the oath yet their liberty thou didst detain who should have been acquitted and to the next day adjournedst them yet neither then nor to this day suffered he thee to have what thou wouldest upon them who bore Testimony to his name for which we glorifie his name for ever Thus passed the proceedings of the first day the next day being the 13th of the 11th month George Bishop Edward Pyot John Gibbons Nehemiah Pool George Oliver Thomas Morris James Sterridge Benjamin Cottle and John Spoor were set to the Bar and an Inditement of the same nature exhibited against them before the Jury who were Richard Codrington foreman Francis Little John Clark the elder William Loop Hump. Barecroft Walter Payne Thomas Wright Peter Rosewell John Collins Dep. Marshall John Bradford Roger Willoughby and Rich. Legg and they were demanded to answer guiltie or not guiltie to which they pleaded not guilty of the Inditement in manner and form as was therein expressed which their plea being entred the Town Clerk asked them whether they would proceed to Tryal now or traverse it they answered presently if they pleased so the witnesses were called to prove them at the meeting and thou calledst for the Depositions that were taken at their commitment as if thou wouldst have had them read the Prisoners said that there must be nothing produced in Court but viva voce by word of mouth the Town Clark said to thee it was so whereupon the reading of them was forborn the witnesses then being called upon to be sworn the prisoners desired that it might be a little laid aside because they had somewhat to say which happily might save them some labour and so they began and said and confessed that they were at the meeting in Broad mead and upon the day mentioned in the Inditement and that they were there to wait upon the Lord and in obedience to him and to testifie to his sovereignty over the Consciences of men as to worship who was Lord of all and soveraign in the conscience who was a spirit and would be worshipped in spirit and in truth not at Jerusalem nor in this mountain as Christ said to the woman of Samaria and that such the Father sought to worship him whose fear towards him is not to be taught by the precepts of men and so began to shew and would have done from the three childrens time and so throughout all Histories to this day how that there were a people that bowed not to the worships of the times but gave testimony unto and sealed with their blood the dominion that is everlasting in the Conscience and the soveraignty of him there who is Lord of all against the laws of men that sought to infringe and did usurp upon his dominion in the conscience who lives for ever and would have given reason and undeniable demonstration for this and have made it out but thou interruptedst them and wouldst not suffer them to speak but with much vehemency didst cry out that thou couldst not endure to sit there and hear a Religion instilled into the Court a Religion contrary to the laws of the Kingdome and that the laws of England were the supreme Conscience of England and suffered them not to speak further as to this ground or reason of their so being there though the attention of the Hall was very great and in deep silence though very full being willing to hear that great point opened viz. the soveraignty of God in the conscience as to worship which was so near to them all for conscience is in every man and every man would worship God according to his Conscience and would not have it dealt withall nor thou thy self to the witnesse of God in thee we speak as thou didst to them This being the matter so much in controversie onely they had so much liberty further to speak and to shew that their meeting was not in contempt of the lawes or with force and arms to

the Terrour of the people it being a thing contrary to their principle and practice So the witnesses were sworn and examined who testified that they were at the meeting at such a place and at such a time but as to force and armes c. proved nothing for though thy Sergeant Jones would needs have argued the matter being put upon it by thee in the Court and no doubt had before received from thee his instruction and thus would have brought it about viz. that it was a Terrour to him to see the Kings laws broken and he thought it being so with him that it could not but be so to every good subject or words to this purpose which signified nothing for it was pleading and so he was told that he pleaded and so his testimony in that particular signified not for thereby he shewed himself a party and not a witness who ought to be a person in his Testimony leaning to neither side but declaring the certain truth in certain words and not by argumentation and so to leave it to the Court. And though thou endeavouredst to make something of the Testimony that was against one Samuel James who coming up the stairs at the time when thy Sergeant Jones aforesaid and and the Musqueteers were at the meeting aforesaid and being presently commanded down and he not in the very minute observing it but looking about him being somewhat agast at that unusual company was endeavoured to be knocked down the stairs so musquets being about his ears and many men upon him and he not knowing what they meant to do with him it seems as the witnesse swore he laid hands on one of the souldiers sword in the scabbard and endeavoured to draw it which thou wouldst have converted as an act of theirs and so wouldst have had it to bear the interpretation of a Riot which no doubt was the reason why thou causedst them to be indicted on that dayes meeting and not on that in the street at which they were taken when last committed But this proved not to thy purpose for unawares its like in thee but otherwise in the ordering of the Lord thou droppedst this word when the matter was in Examination speaking of James and what he was a Ranter saidst thou which was observed afterwards by the Prisoners to the Jury besides it could not bear such an interpretation in Reason or Equity that a mans action and what the action was hath been said in a publick meeting where none are kept out who was none of the people which usually there met should be attributed to be the Action of that people whose principle and practice is contrary to to that action and who owned it not nor abetted it and it being transient not between those people and him or he and those people with the officers but between the officers and him and that chiefly down the stairs and in a lower room where they say the sword was endeavoured to be drawn by him not in the place where those people were met But this strained interpretation would serve for little else than to shew how eager thou wast and industrious to find something that indeed might have a reflection upon them so the matters being turned up and down and many things being spoken the Jury came at length to be addressed unto to whom the prisoners summed up the Evidence and repeated how that nothing of force and arms was proved against them for there was indeed none and how that that of James had no other reflection nor could have but as between himself and the officers the Mayor himself as was said to them telling them that he was a Ranter and so none of those people and how that their having been at the meeting they had confessed and upon what ground viz. that it was in obedience to the Lord and not in contempt to them or to the Law moreover that they had considered of the matter and if any thing on this side their peace with the Lord would have done it they had not been at that which vvas the occasion of their being thus brought thither that the son of God was the soveraign of the Conscience and the worship of the Father was in spirit and truth and his fear was not to be taught by the precepts of men but here thou interruptedst him that spake which was G. B. of that any further but he turning to the Juay said to them Neighbours and Friends we have nothing now to do with these and so turned his hand to the Court and to you I shall speak you have Consciences of your own according unto which you would worship God and you would not take it well if some such thing as hath been done and is now doing to us should be done to you for worshipping God according to your Conscience Now what saith the Judge of all whatsoever yee would that men should do unto you do even the same unto them for this is the law and the Prophets And so I shall leave you Edward Pyot also spake to the Jury and said you by the Court are made our Judges and the matter of fact for which we are called in question this day is nothing criminal nor any matter of dishonesty but onely for our meeting together in the worship and service of God and nothing more than barely meeting together is proved against us to which our selves have confessed before proof vvas made and as our meeting together in such manner and to such ends as is declared in the Inditement hath been by us denied so it is altogether without proof to you that which you are chiefly to consider of in order to your verdict is whether or not we were met together in manner and form according as is declared in the Inditement As to the manner of our meeting it was not with force and armes as you your selves in your own consciences know but we meet together in the fear of the Lord and to no other end than onely in Gods Worship and Service and therefore take heed what you do lest you be found striving against the Lord for God vvill be worshipped and served as himself pleaseth and by his own direction and prescription in spirit and in truth and not as man pleaseth nor by mens prescriptions and directions for things may be highly esteemed amongst men which are abomination in the sight of God and it is not in the power of any Creature to prescribe to his maker how his maker shall be served and worshipped It is enough for the greatest of men to prescribe their own Homage and to direct their own service and to leave that which concerns the worship and service of God unto God himself and to his own prescription and direction who alone is Law-giver to all and the Judge over all in all the matters and things which concerns his own vvorship and service and vvhom we chuse to obey rather then men Here thou rosest from thy seat