Florentine councell and that of Trent doe approve the said Bookes to be Canonicall as also Augustine and Innocentius To which it may be answered 1. That the Councell of Carthage was but a Provinciall Councell and therefore it cannot binde the whole world Moreover in that Councell there are divers things which the Papists will not endure as in the 26 Canon there is a decree that no Bishop shall be called chiefe or universall Bishop no not the Bishop of Rome how should the Papists binde us with the authority of that Councell with which they will not binde themselves 2. The Latine Fathers judged these bookes fit to be read for example of life and instruction of manners but not for confirmation of faith or establishing any doctrine 3. These Bookes are not Proto Canonicall truely and properly Canonicall inspired by God containing the immediate and unchangeable truth of God sanctified by him and given to the Church to be a perfect rule of sound doctrine and good life but Deutero-canonicall or rather Ecclesiasticall as they are stiled In this sence Augustine and Innocentius are to be taken when they reckon these Bookes among the Canonicall 4. No Councell hath authority to define what Bookes are Canonicall what not seeing Bookes truely Divine receive authority from God himselfe and are to be esteemed of undoubted truth although all the world should barke against them These two Councels are of too late standing to oppose against the other ancient Councels which reject these Bookes The coâ—ncell of Trent was gathered and kept against all Civill and Ecclesiasticall right neither was there any forme of justice observed in it 1. It was not kept in a lawfull place for whereas it was intended against the Protestants and the Germans were the parties accused it ought to have been kept in Germany according to the request exhibited by the body of the States of Germany assembled at Noremberg this equity was not observed the parties accused being called into Italy 2. In that Councell matters were concluded and the sentence passed the adversary not being heard speake nor so much as present for the Protestants might not be admitted to hearing neither could they obtaine to propound their opinion in the Councell muchlesse to avouch it by lawfull reasoning Sleidan fol. 29. and yet were condemned against divine and humane law for they both forbid the condemning of any before he have lawfull liberty granted him to plead for himselfe 3. In that Councell the accuser and Judge were the same for the Pope did accuse the Protestants of heresie he did convocate the Coucell he by his Delegates was President and Moderator in it and so together was Accuser Judge and Witnesse whereas the reformation of the Pope was the thing in question Lastly all Councels ought to be free but in this Protestants might not propound their cause nor defend it neither might any thing be proposed but according to the mind of the Legates or otherwise then they approved no man had any voyce in the Councell but such as were sworne to the Pope nothing was there determined which was not first concluded of at Rome by the Pope in the Colledge of Cardinals and sent from Rome to Trent whereupon this Proverbe arose Spiritum Sanctum Roma pâ—r peram mitti Tridentum The Holy Ghost came to Trent packt up in a Cloke-bag We hope therefore since the Apocrypha are justly rejected out of the Canon that hereafter they will neither have the honour to be bound with our Bibles nor read in our Churches The Apocrypha was never received by the Church of the Israelites before Christ his comming nor of the Apostolicke and Primitive Church for more then 300 yeeres after as both Eusebius out of Origen and the Councell of Laodicea Can. 59. confirmed afterward by the sixth generall councell of Constantinople sheweth for the Greeke Church and St Jerome for the Latine CHAP. VI. Of the Authenticall edition of the Scripture NOw we must enquire which is the Authenticall edition of holy Scriptures it being necessary that this heavenly truth committed to writing should be delivered in some forme of words and in some language which may be understood Lawyers from whom the use of the word Authentique seemeth borrowed doe call those instruments and writings authentique which have a certaine and just authority in themselves A booke or writing is authentique either by divine or humane institution those are by Divine appointment and institution authenticall which have from God sufficient and absolute authority to command and approve themselves worthy credit and faith in as much as God himselfe doth approve thtm by humane institution such writings are held authenticall which by the opinion and sentence of learned men in their severall professions may be esteemed worthy credit and beliefe for themselves and for the truth in them There is a great diversity of editions of holy Scripture all cannot be simply and perpetually authenticall in of and for themselves without reference unto another no more then many draughts of the same Lease or Deed or copy of one pardon can be Some amongst many are authentique whence the others are transcribed yea it cannot be that there should be many but although there may be many counterpanes of the deed yet there is but one or two principall Deeds so amongst this great variety of editions one or more ought to be as principall and authenticall Thrre is a question betwixt the Church of Rome and the reformed Churches about the authentique edition of Scripture they say that the edition of the Bible in Hebrew and Greeke iâ— not authenticall but rather the vulgar Latine We hold that the vulgar Latine is very corrupt and false that the Hebrew for the old Testament and the Greeke for the new is the sincere and authenticall writing of God therefore that all things are to be determined by them and that the other versions are so far to be approved of as they agree with these fountaines The Tridentine Councell thus decreeth that in all sermons readings disputations controversies the vulgar Latine Translation should be taken for authentique before the Hebrew or Greeke and that no man should presume upon any occasion to reject it or to appeale from it When the Councell of Trent saith the vulgar Latine is authenticall it compares it with other Latine Translations not with the Hebrew Muis. Andradius the chiefest of the Divines at the Councell of Trent thinketh that the Councell of Trent did not meane either to condemne the Hebrew truth as he calleth it or to acquit the Latine Translation from all errour when they called it Authenticall but onely that the Latine hath no such errour by which any pestilent opinion in faith and manners may be gathered This saith Rainolds against Hart. ch 6. p. 202. Chamier tomo 1. l. 12. c. 2. The Rhemists in their preface to the new Testament translated by them prolixly
descent into Hell totidem verbis is not in the Scripture yet it may be deduced thence Acts 2. Wee shall now lay downe some propositions or Theoremes about the sufficiency of Scripture 1. In every Age of the Church the Lord hath revealed so much supernaturall truth as was for that age necessary unto salvation his wayes he made knowne to Moses Psal. 103. 7. and his statutes to Israel Deut. 4. 6. Psal. 147. 20. Heb. 1. 1. Therefore that is an erroneous opinion that before the Law written men were saved by the Law of nature and in the time of the Law by the Law of Moses and since in the time of the Gospel by the Word of grace 2. The substance of all things necessary to salvation ever since the fall of Adam hath beene and is one and the same as the true Religion hath beene one and unchangeable 1. The knowledge of God and Christ is the summe of all things necâ—ssary to salvation John 17. 3. Col. 2. 2. but this knowledge was ever necessary Jer 9. 23. Acts 4. 12. the Fathers indeed saw Christ more obscurely and aenigmatically we more clearely distinctly and perspicuously but yet they knew him and believed in him unto salvation as well as wee John 8. 56. 2. The Covenant of grace which God made with man is an everlasting Covenant therein the Lord hath revealed himselfe to be one and unchangeable as in nature so in will Heb. 13. 8. Rom 3. 29. shewing that as God is one in nature truth and constancy and that as well toward the Gentiles as toward the Jewes so hee would justifie both the circumcision and uncircumcision the Jew and the Gentile by one way of Religion that is to say through faith and belief in his Son Jesus Christ. 3. Christ and his Apostles professed and taught no new Religion but the same which the Scriptures of the old Testament did before instruct Matâ—hew 5. 17 John 5. 39. Acts 10 43 Luke 24. 25 26 27 44. 45. Acts 18 28. 17. 7. 26. 22. 28. 23. Rom. 6. 26. Therefore the beleeving Jewes and the converted Gentiles are sâ—iled the children of faithfull Abraham being justified by Faith as Abraham was Whence wee may conclude that before under and after the Law since the fall of Adam there was never but one true Catholick Religion or way to Heaven and happinesse The Word of God being uttered in old time sundry ways was at length made knowne by writing the Lord stirring up and by his holy Spirit inspiring his servants to write his Will and Pleasure So long as there was any truth in any Age necessary to bee more fully and clearly knowne then was already revealed in the Bookes of Moses it pleased God to stir up holy men whom he Divinely inspired and sufficiently furnished to make the Truth knowne unto the Church thus after Moses during the time of the Law the Lord raised up Prophets who opened the perfect way of life unto the Church of the old Testament more clearely then it was before manifested in the Bookes of Moses the time and Age of the Church requiring the same The Church of the Jewes in the severall Ages thereof was sufficiently taught and instructed in all things necessary to salvation by the writings of Mâ—ses and the Prophets which appeares 1. In that our Saviour being asked of one what hee should doe that hee might inherite eternall life answered what is written in the Law and Prophets how Readest thou Luke 10. 25 26. and out of the Scripture hee declared himselfe to be the Saviour of the World foretold and promised Matthew 21. 44. 26. 31. Luke 4 21. 24 25 26 27 44 John 3. 14. 2. The answer of Abraham to the Rich man sending his friends to Moses and the Prophets sheweth that they sufficed to instruct the faithfull Jewes in all things necessary to salvation Luke 16. 29 30. by them they might learne how to obtaine Life and escape Death when hee saith Let them heare them he meaneth them onely as that place is meant Mat. 17. 5. 3. The Jewes themselves acknowledged the sufficiency of those writings to leade them unto life and happinesse John 5. 39. 5. The Prophets did expound the Law of God and speake more plainely precisely and distinctly touching the comming of the Messias then Moses did but the last full and cleare Will of God touching the salvation of man was not manifested by them that was together and at once to be published and taught by the Messias who also at his comming did establish that order in the Church of God which was to continue therein for ever For 1. Christ was ordained of the Father to bee the great Doctor of his Church a Prophet more excellent then the rest that were before him both in respect of his Person Office Manner of receiving his Doctrine and the excellency of the Doctrin which he delivered 2. This was well knowne not onely among the Jewes but also among the Samaritanes in so much that the woman of Samaria could say I know when the Messias is come he will tell us all things John 4. 25. 3. The time wherein God spake unto us by his Sonne is called the last dayes or the last time Heb. 1. 2. 1 Pet. 1. 20. to note that we are not hereafter to expect or looke for any fuller or more cleare Revelation of Divine mysteries then that which was then delivered 4. Christ is called a mediator of the New Testament or the new Covenant Heb. 9. 15. because all things are established by him as they ought to continue for ever for that which is old decayeth and is ready to vanish but that which is new abideth Heb. 8. 13. 5. It pleased the Lord in great wisdome to reveale the Covenant of grace to the Church that she might not despaire but obscurely at the first that she might earnestly long for the coming of that Messiah who was to make known what he had heard and seene of the Father which dispensation was needfull that the grace of God might not be contemned as haply it would have been if God had fully revealed and made knowne his bounty unto man before he had seen his misery and the necessity thereof Our Saviour Christ for substance of doctriâ—e necessary to salvation taught nothing which was not before in some sort contained in the writings of Moses and the Prophets out of whom he confirmed his doctrine but that which was in them more obscurely Enigmatically and briefely he explained more excellently fully and cleerely the Apostles proved their doctrine out of the Books of Moses and the Prophets Act. 17. 11. and 26. 22. Luke 24. 27. Rom. 1. 2. Act. 28. 23. 6. All things necessary in that manner as we have spoken were taught and inspired to the Apostles by our Saviour Christ and there were no new inspirations after their times nor are we to expect further hereafter which we prove 1. By places
gladi puniendi Beza hath written a peculiar Tract de Haereticis a maâ—istratu puniendis Calvin also hath written aureum librum as Beza cals it of this very argument We doe deservedly condemne the cruelty of Turkes and Papists which goe about by force alone to establish their superstitions The Church of Rome and the Pope will judge what Heresie is and who is an Hereticke and they appropriate to themselves the name of Catholiques and all such as dissent from them must presently be pronounced heretickes Because Heresie is not easily defined as Austin saith and because faith should be perswaded not compelled We conceive that all faire means should be firâ—t used to convince men of their errours and discover the danger of them and that be termed Heresie which indeed is so Therefore we will premise some things concerning the nature and danger of Heresie before we speake partcularly of the punishment of heretickes Chillingworth thus defines Heresie It is saith he an obstinate defence of any errour against any necessary Article of the Christian faith Two things must concurre say some to constitute an Hereticke 1. Error in fide 1 Tim. 1. 19. 2 Pertinacia Titus 3. 10. Errare possum Haereticus esse nolo Dr Field thus describes the nature of Heresie Heresie is not every errour but errour in matter of Faith nor every errour in matter of Faith for neither Jewes nor Pagans are said to be Hereticks though they erre most damnably in those things which every one that will be saved must believe and with all the malice fury and rage that can be imagined impugne the Christian faith and verity but it is the errour of such as by some kind of profession have been Christians so that onely such as by profession being Christians depart from the truth of Christian Religion are named Heretickes Secondly for the danger of Heresie Heresie is a fruit of the flesh Gal. 5. 20 An Hereticke after the first and second admonition reject Titus 3. 10. Heresie or false doctrine is in Scripture compared to Leaven and to a Gangrene for the speading and infectious nature of it The Heresie of Arrius was more dangerous to the Church then the Sword of all the persecuting Emperours We need not to aske whether he joyne obstinacy to his errour saith Dr Field which erreth in those things which every one is bound particularly to believe because such things doe essentially and directly concerne the matter of of our salvation and he is without any further enquiry to be pronounced an Hereticke and the very errour it selfe is damnable as if a man saith he shall deny Christ to be the Sonne of God coessentiall coequall and coeternall with his Father or that we have remission of sinnes by the effusion of his blood They therefore who first hold pestilent Heresies and secondly who when before they professed the Christian Religion and held the truth have yet made a defection from the same to such Heresies and thirdly who labour to infect others and fourthly being convicted doe yet obstinately persevere in them and in the manner before mentioned such are and ought say some worthy Protestants to be punished by the Christian Magistrate with death They reason thus from the Office of the Magistrate Every Magistrate may and ought to punish offenders and the more pernicious the offenders are the more hainous ought the punishment to be That the Magistrate is both custos ac vindex utriusque tabulae these two Scriptures doe plainly evince For he is the Minister of God to thee for good but if thou doe what is evill be afraid for he beareth not the sword in vain for he is the Minister of God a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil Rom. 13. 4. and 1 Tim. 2. 2. For Kings and all that are in Authority that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godlinesse and honesty and are urged by Calvin Beza and divers others to this very purpose For if saith Beza the Magistrate have not power over Heretickes one of these two things must necessarily follow either that Heretickes doe not doe ill or that what Paul speakes in generall must be restrained to a certaine kind of evill deeds viz. to corporall sinnes From the 1 Tim. 2. 2. both Melancthon and Beza collect that the Magistrate is constituted by God not onely a preserver of the second Table but also and especially of pure Religion and the externall Discipline of it and so a punisher also of the offences against it For the inforceing of this Argument from these two Scriptures these reasons may be added 1 The sinnes against the first Table Caeter is paribus are greater then those against the second Table and the Magistrate is more to respect the glory of God then the peace of the Common-wealth Heresies and corruptions in judgement are held by a Reverend Divine to be worse then corruptions in manners his reason is taken out of Levit. 13. 44. one that was leprous in his head was utterly uncleane 2. Errours and Heresies are called in Scripture Evill deeds 2. Epist John 10 11. and Heretickes Evill dâ—ers Phil. 3. 2. Divines generally hold that such who erre blasphemously are to be put to death such as Arrius and Servetus in France One saith the Divell will thinke he hath made a good bargaine if he can get an universall liberty for removall of the Prelacy That which Jerome wrote to Augustine Quod signum majoris gloriae est omnes Haeretici te detestantur may be applyed to those of our times who have been Champions for the truth such evill doers will maligne them but if they mannage well so good a cause it will beare them out THE ERRATA REader as men have their errors so books have their errata Though my publick occasions might be an apologie for me yet I never bestowed more paines in correcting any booke then this and after my correcting of the severall sheets many faults have still passed especially in the third Booke The litterall faults where a letter is mistaken the false interpunctions nor the joyning together in the margent things of a different nature nor the mistaking of the figures in the first and third Booke nor the misplacing of Scriptures I shall not mention Others that doe wrong the sence are chiefly these In the Text Lib. 1. pag. 33. line 25. after 17. leave out Acts p. 59. l. 30. vixit p. 63. l. 21. Glasseus p. 70. l. 6. never doubted of their being p. 115. l. 2. sanctissimam p. 117. l. 30. Gretzerus 182 183. wants the figure 4 5. Lib. 2. p. 21. l. ult doth know live and will p. 30. l. 10. conceiving p. 59. l. 20. 1 Themselves 2 Stockes and stones p. 96. l. 5. suis should be quis p. 129. l. 5. same should be sonne Lib. 3. p. 10. l. 25 26. not pro singulis generum but
soule and body shall be perfectly united with God 3. How Divinity is to be taught In the generall it is to be handled methodically There is a great necessity of methode in Divinity that being usefull both to enlighten the understanding with the clearnesse of truth and to confirme the memory that it may more faithfully retaine things therefore in Divinity there will be a speciall need of art and orderly disposall of precepts because the mind is nowhere more obâ—use in conceiving nor the memory more weake in retaining There is a different way of handling Divinity according to the severall kinds of it Divinity is threefold 1. Succinct and briefe when Divine truth is summarily explained and confirmed by reasons and this Divinity is called Catecheticall Systematicall 2. Prolix and large when Theologicall matters are handled particularly and fully by definitions divisions arguments and answers this is called handling of Common places Scholasticall and controversall Divinity 3. Textuall which consists in a diligent meditation of the holy Scriptures the right understanding of which is the end of other instructions This againe is twofold either more Succinct and applied to the understanding of the learned as commentaries of Divinity or more diffuse and popular applied to the capacity and affections of the vulgar as Preaching which is called Patheticall Divinity and is especially usefull to correct the manners of men and stir up their affections 4. How Divinity is to be learned There is neede of a fowrefold minde to the study of it 1. Of a godly and heavenly minde most ardent Prayers in our learning being frequently powred out to God the fountaine of light and wisdome that dispelling the darknesse of ignorance and error he would deigne to illuminate our minds with the cleare knowledge of himselfe we can not acquire Divine wisdome as we doe the knowledge of other arts by our owne labour and industry it is a praise to learne humane arts of our selves here we must be taught of God 2. Of a sober minde that we may not be too curious in searching out the profound mysâ—eries of Religion as about the Trinity predestination we must be wise to sobriety and not busie our selves about perplexed and unprofitable questions being content to know such things which are revealed to us for our salvation 3. Of a sâ—udious and diligent minde other arts are not wont to be gotten without labour this being the Queene of arts requires therefore much paines both for its difficulty and excellency 4 Of an honest and good minde Luke 8 40. We must learne 1. with a deniall of our wit and carnall reason not measuring the unsearchable wisdome of God by our shallow capacities 2 with deniall of our wicked affections 1 Pet. 1. 2 3. 3 with a firme purpose of obedience Joh. 7. 17. Psal. 50. 23. Prov. 28. 28. 5. The things contrary to Diviniy are 1. Heathenisme being altogether ignorant of and refusing the true and saving knowledge of God 2. Epicurâ—isme scoffing at Divinity 3. Heresie depraving and corrupting Divinity 6. The excellency of Divine knowledge or the study of Divinity appeareth in these particulars 1. In the subject matter of it which is Divine either in its own nature as God and Christ Ps. 70 7. 1 Joh. 5. 46. or in relation to him as the Scripture Sacraments It is called the wisdome of God Prov. 2. 10. 3. 13. 1 Cor. 2. 6 7. and that wisdome which is from above Jam. 3. 17. If to know the nature of an Herbe or the Sun and Stars be excellent how much more to know the nature of God Aristotle held it a great matter to know but a little concerning the first mover and Intelligences Paul desired to know nothing but Christ and him crucified 1 Cor. 2. 2. That is he professed no other knowledge Si Christum discis satis est si caetera nescis Si Christum nescis nihil est si caetera discis The Metaphysicks handle not things properly divinely revealed but that which the Philosophers by the light of nature judged to be Divine 2. In the end the principall and maine end of Divinity is the glory of God that is the celebration or setting forth of Gods infinite excellency the secondary end is mans blessednesse John 17. 3. 3. In the certainty of it Gods Word is said to be sure and like Gold seven times refined there is no drosse of falsehood in it The Academicks thought every thing so uncertaine that they doubted of all things 4. In the cause of it these truths are such as cannot be known but by Gods revealing them to us all Scripture was given by Divine inspiration flesh and blood hath not revealed this to thee a humane light is enough to know other things 5. In the holines of it Psal. 19. 5. by them thy servant is forewarned 1 Tim. 3. 15. the Word of God is able to make us wise to salvation and to furnish to every good worke Christ makes this a cause of the errour and wickednesse in mans life that they doe not reade and understand the Scriptures 6. In the delight and sweetnesse of it Job 23. chap. 12 verse preferred the Word of God before his foode David before thousands of Gold and Silver before the honey and the honey combe Psal. 19. 10. 119. 103. and when he ceaseth to compare he beginneth to admire wonderfull are thy Testimonies Archimedes tooke great delight in the Mathematicks Austin refused to take delight in Tullies Hortensius because the name of Jesus Christ was not there Nomen Jesu non erat ibi 7. In that the Devill and Hereticks oppose it the Papists would not have the Bible translated nor Divine service performed in the vulgar Tongue TWo things are to be considered in Divinity 1. The rule of it the Scripture or word of God 2. The matter or parts of it concerning God and man Principium essendi in Divinity is God the first essence principium cognoscendi the Scripture by which we know God and all things concerning him I shall handle both these principles but begin with the Scripture as many Systematicall Writers do Of the Scripture It is necessary that the true Religion have a rule whereby it may be squared else there could be no certainty in it but there would be as many Religions as men It appeares by the light of nature the Heathen had known rules for their Rites Ceremonies and services the Turkes have their Alcoran the Jewes their Talmud the Papists their Decrees neither can any thing be a duty which hath not a rule God revealed himselfe divers wayes to the Fathers Heb. 1. The manner of revealing Gods will is threefold according to our three instruments of conceiving viz. Understanding Phantasie and senses to the understanding God revealed his will by ingraving it in the heart with his owne finger Jer. 31. 33. by Divine inspiration 2 Pet. 1. 21. 2 Chron.
that no man can see just cause to call them into question as the doctrine of creation of all things in six daies the doctrin of the fall of our first parents the story of the delivering Israel out of Egypt of the delivering of the Law and ten Commandements the doctrine of the incarnation of Christ Jesus of the resurrection of the dead of the last judgement of the life to come and of the immortality of the soule for though this last was taught also by Philosophers yet it is so doubtfully and unperfectly handled by them in comparison of the delivering thereof in Scripture that it is apparent it was another Spirit which guided the teachers of it here then they were guided withall What Angell could ever have found out such an admirable temper and mixture of mercy and justice together as the Gospel revealeth in the reconciliation of God with man God in giving and establishing his law useth no other preface but I am the Lord Exod. 20. nor conclusion but I the Lord have spoken it upon his absolute authority without other reasons to perswade commanding what is to be done though it be contrary to our natures forbidding what is to be left undone though pleasing to us he promiseth things incomprehensible requiring faith he relateth and teacheth things strange above likelihood above mans capacity and yet will have them to be believed to be understood There is nothing in the Law against reason or common equity A Jesuit reports in his History that when his fellows came first to preach in the East-Indies the Gentiles and Indies there hearing the ten Commandements did much commend the equity of them See Sir Walter Raleighs History 2. It teacheth the nature and excellency of God and the works of God more clearly and distinctly than any other writings nay then any without God could have contrived viz. That there are three persons and one God that God is infinite omniscient omnipotent most holy that he created all things that he doth by a particular providence rule all things that he observes all mens actions and will call them to account and give every man according to his works that he alone is to be worshipped and that he must be obeyed in his word above all creatures 3. It requireth the most exact and perfect goodnesse that can be such as no man could ever have conceited in his braine and yet such as being taught and revealed the conformity of it to right reason will enforce any well considering man to acknowledge it to be most true and needfull for example that a man must love God above all and his neighbour as himselfe that he must keepe his thoughts and cogitations free from all the least taint of sinne that he must lay up his treasures in Heaven not care for this life and the things thereof but all his study and labour must be to provide well for himselfe against the future life that he must not at all trust in himselfe nor in any man but onely in God and that he must doe all he doth in Gods strength that he can deserve nothing at Gods hand but must looke for all of free favour through the merits and intercession of another 4. The end of the Scripture is Divine viz the glory of God shining in every syllable thereof and the salvation of man not temporall but eternall These writings lead a man wholy out of himselfe and out of the whole world from and above all the creatures to the Creator alone to give him the glory of all victories therefore they are from him and not from any creature for he that is the Authour of any writing will surely have most respect of himselfe in that writing The Scriptures manifest Gods glory alone Jerem. 9. 23 24. 1 Cor. 1. 31. ascribe infinitenesse of being and all perfections to him Nehem. 9. 6. The doctrines precepts prohibitions and narrations tend to the setting forth of his glory and bring solid and eternall comfort and salvation to their soules which follow their direction They make us wise unto salvation 2 Tim. 3. 15 23. shew the path of life Psal 16. 11. Guide our feet into the way of peace Luke 1. 79. Christ John 7. 18. proves that he came from God because he sought not his own glory but the glory of him that sent him 5. Another reason is from the difference of these writings from all other whatsoever in regard of their phrase and manner of writing All other writings use perswasive and flourishing speeches these command and condemne all other Gods all other religions all other writings and command these onely to be had in request and esteem and acknowledged as the will of God without adding or diminishing requiring every conscience to be subject to them and to prepare himself to obedience without any further objecting or gainsaying and to seeke no further then to them for direction Both the simplicity and Majesty of stile shew it to be from God the wonderfull plainnesse and yet glorious Majesty the simplicity because it is plaine in no wise deceitfull and because it describes great matters in words familiar and obvious to the capacity of the Reader the Majesty since it teacheth so perspicuously the chiefest mysteries of faith and divine revelation which are above humane capacity Whether we read David Esay or others whose stile is more sweet pleasant and rhetoricall or Amos Zachary and Jeremy whose stile is more rude everywhereâ— the Majesty of the Spirit is apparent There is an authority and Majesty in them above all other writings of other authors the Scriptures command all both King and people Jerem. 13. 18. 1 Sam. 12. ult and bind the heart to its good abearing Jerome could say as oft as I read Paul it seâ—mes to me that they are not words but thunders which I heare Junius reading the first Chapter of John was stricken with amazement by a kind of Divine and stupendious authority and so he was converted from Atheisme as himselfe saith in his life Johannes Isaac a Jew was converted by reading the 53. of Esay Our Saviour spake as one having authority not as the Scribes So this booke speaks not as men it simply affirmes all things without proofe other authors use many arguments to confirme the truth of what they say Therefore Raimundus de Sabunda hence proves that he who speaketh in the Bible is of that authority that his bare word ought to be believed without any proofe whereas Galene Atheistically urged it the other way The Socinians reject all things in Religion which they cannot comprehend by reason The Philosophers called the Christians by way of scorn credentes Julian derided the Christian beliefe because it had no other proofe then thus saith the Lord. 6. Another argument is taken from the experience of the truth of the predictions and prophesies thereof For seeing it is generally confessed that onely the Divine essence can certainly foresee
that time of the writing of the new Testament did speake Syriacke and not Hebrew which language is mixt consisting of Hebrew and Chaldee therefore saith Whitaker it is more probable that Matthew and he which wrote the Epistle to the Hebrewes wrote in Greek because the Greeke tongue was not unknowne to the Jewes which were Hellenists Act. 6. 1. and other Apostles wrote in Greeke which wrote peculiarly to the Jewes as JAmes and Peter Matthaeum Hebraicè scripsisse convenit inter antiquos Citat Irenaeum Origenem Athanasium Epiphanium Chrysostomum Hieronymum Vossius de genere Christi dissertat Scripsit Haebraea lingua quiae praecipuè Judoeorum quos viva voce hactenus docuisset haberet rationem Id. ibid. vide Grotium in libros Evangel It was needfull that the Gospell should be written by many First for the certainty Secondly for the perfection of it Amongst all the Evangelists there is a Generall agreement and a speciall difference they all agree in the maine scope and Subject Christ they differ in the speciall argument and order All describe the life of Christ some more largely some more briefely some more loftily some more plainely yet because all were inspired by the same Spirit they all have equall authority The difference of Evangelists in some smaller matters proveth their consent in the greater to be the voyce of truth for had they conspired all together to have deceived the world they would in all things have more fully agreed The doctrine of the Covenant of grace is more plainly expounded the will of God and way to salvation more plentifully set down in the new Testament then ever it was in the daies of Moses or the Prophets and in these bookes of the new Testament all things are so established as to continue to the end so that we must not looke for any new revelation All these Bookes we receive as Canonicall because they are divine for matter and forme divinely inspired by God sanctified and given to the Church for their direction written by the Apostles or Apostolicall men sweetly consenting with other parts of holy Scripture and with themselves received alwaies by the greatest part of the Church of God They were written after the death of Christ by the direction of the holy Ghost the Apostles by lively voyce first preached because it was needfull that the doctrine of the Gospell should by their preaching as also by signes and wonders be confirmed against the contradictions and cavils of the Jewes and Gentiles and allowed by the assent of believers generally before it was committed to writing that we might be assured of the certainty of those things which were written These bookes are acknowledged Canonicall both by us and the Papists so that touching this matter there is no controversie between us and them The Epistles doubted of by some for a while were first the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of JAmes the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epistles of John the Epistle of Jude and the Revelation of which I shall treate more when I come to handle the bookes of the new Testament particularly The story of the woman taken in adultery hath met with very much opposition See Gregories preface to his notes upon some passages of Scripture Crojus defends the truth of it Observat. in nov Testam c. 17. Vide Seldeni uxorem Ebraicam c. 11. The inscriptions and titles prefixed before the Epistles are no part of holy Scripture written by the Apostles but added to the Epistles by some others The Subscriptions and Postscrips also of divers bookes are false counterfeit and erroneous not written by the Apostles but added afterward by the Scribes which copied out the Epistles The subscriptions of the latter Epistle to Timothy and also to Titus are supposititious they are neither found in the Syriacke nor in all Greeke copies nor yet in the vulgar Latin translation these additions were made some 100 yeeres after the Apostles The Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament are either Historicall Doctrinall or Propheticall 1. Historicall containing matters of fact the history of 1. Christ exhibited in the foure Evangelists or Gospels as they are stiled by God himselfe Marke 1. 1. Matthew Marke Luke and John so called because they containe a message of joy and gladnesse They all treate of one subject Christ Jesus incarnate most true Historians Luke 1. 2. John 21. 24. 2. His Apostles in the Acts written by Luke thirty yeeres after Christs ascention so termed of the principall subject of the History though the acts of others not Apostles are there recorded Dogmaticall or Doctrinall such as were written by the Apostles for the instruction of the Church of God in faith and manners commonly called Epistles and that by warrant of the Scriptures 1 Thess. 5. 27. 2 Pet. 3. 1. 16. because they were sent to them who had already received and professed the Gospell of God These are 21. written 1. By Paul 1. To whole Churches To the Romans Corinthians Galathians Ephesians Philippians Colossians Thessalonians 1. Gentiles 2. Jewes To the Hebrews 2. To particular persons 1. Timothy 2. Titus 3. Philemon 2. JAmes one 3. Peter two 4. John three 5. Jude one 3. Propheticall wherein under certaine resemblances the state of the Church of Christ till the end of the wolrd from the time of John the Evangelist is most truely and wonderfully described and receiveth its name Apoealyps of the Argument Beza Piscator Calvin Erasmus have doâ—e well on all the new Testament Of the Papists Jansenius hath done well on the harmony of the Lutherans Chemnitus and Gerhard of the Protestants Calvin Maldonate de Dieu Cameron Scultetus and Grotius have done well likewise on the Evangelists Matthew and John were Apostle of the twelve Marke and Luke Evangelists Apostles is a name of office or dignity It notes one sent from another with command in speciall certain famous Ambassadours of Christ. The Evangelists accompanied the Apostles in preaching the Gospell Matthew There was never any in the Church which doubted of its authority Some say he wrote in Hebrew but that is uncertaine as hath been already declared He interprets the Hebrew name Emanuel Chap. 1. 23. and those words Chap. 27. v. 46. therefore it is likely he wrote not in Hebrew for why should one that writeth in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to such as understand Hebrew and how came this authenticall Copy and Prototype to be lost for it is not now extant How ever the Greeke edition is Authenticall because it came forth when the Apostles were living and was approved by them which the Ancients confirme Of the time when Matthew wrote Authours agree not Eusebius saith that he wrote in the third yeere of Cajus Caesar others say he wrote after Claudius He wrote his Gospell in the fifteenth yeere after Christs ascention saith Nicephorus the 21 saith Irenaeus in the eighth yeere saith Theophylact.
name at least thrice saying I John Chap. 1. 9. 21. 1 2. 22. 8. whereas in the Gospell he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the history of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly in the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together v. 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himselfe the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ behold I come shortly 4. Of John I John heard and saw all these things 5. The protestation of Jesus Christ vers 18. Fourthly the matter of the Booke doth convince the authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Propheticall spirit doth appeare the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set downe part of the Prophesies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greeke and Latine ascribe this Booke to John the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chysâ—stome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenaeus To deny then the truth of this booke is contra solem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sunne it selfe The Chyliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Booke but those places have been cleared long agoe by the learned as bearing another sence See Dr Raynolds conf with Hart Chap. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingenuously he knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetan at the end of his Exposition of Jude confesseth that he understands not the literall sence of the Revelation and therefore exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of 22 Chapters the best Expositors on it are Ribera Brightman Pareus Cartwright Dent Forbes Mode Simonds 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Propheâ—s sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come the old Testament may convince the Jewes which deny the new Testament of this truth John 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 Chapter of Esay is a large history of his sufferings We have also another Booke or Testament more clearely witnessing of Christ the Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiasticall and false Canon follow CHAP. V. SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Bookes of the old Testament as the Jewes doe those of the new as if they had proceeded from the Divell Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Bookes called by us Aprcrypha i. hidden doe belong to the old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue whatsoever Scripture 1. is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeale and confirme their doctrine by it that is Canonicall and of equall authority with the new Testament But the holy Scripture of the old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speakes even of the Bookes of the old Testament as is gathered both from the universall all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the new Testament was published 2. Christ speakes not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall to search it John 5. 39. this famous elogium being added that it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternall life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeale to it and confirme their doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. 17. 11. 20 43 26. 20. the new Testament gives testimony of the old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiasticall Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Bookes belong Tobit Judith first and second of the Machabees Wisdome Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Hester for these neither containe truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custome they were called Canonicall yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonicall by the name of Apocryphall The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphall the third and fourth Booke of Esdras the prayer of Manasses the third and fourth of Machabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senensis Bellarmine and so the Councell of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is whether those seven whole bookes with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonicall We doe not deny but many of these especially Wisdome and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonicall and of infallible truth out of which firme arguments may be drawne that we deny Those Bookes which the Jewes of old and the reformed Churches now reckon for truely Canonicall in the old Testament are received all even by our adversaries for Canonicall without any exception 2. for the Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the old Testament whole Bookes are reckoned by them for Canonicall which we hold Apocryphall The reason why these Bookes at first were added to holy writ was this the Jewes in their later times before and at the comming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Jerusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jewes of the dispersion mingled with the Graecians These had written sundry bookes in Greeke which they made use of together with other parts of the old Testament which they had in Greeke of the translation of the 70 when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrewes received onely the 22 Bookes before mentioned Hence it came that the Jewes delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greeke
all happinesse promised nay we may invert the words with Hugo de sancto victore and say Quicquid ibi docetur esâ— veritas quicquid praecipitur bonitas quicquid promittitur felicitas All that is there taught is truth all that is there commanded is goodnesse all that is there promised is happinesse It is a wonderfull thing that all the particulars which the Canticles containe being taken from marriage are handled so sincerely that no blemish or spot can be found therein Therefore the Scriptures should be preacht read and heard with holy affections and should be reverently mentioned The â—ewes in their Synagogues will not touch the Bible with unwashed hands they kisse it as often as they open and shut it they sit not on that seat where it is laid and iâ— it fall on the ground they fast for a whole day The Turke writâ—s upon the outside of his Alcoran Let no man touch this Book but he that is pure I would none might meddle with ours Alcorâ—â— signifieth but the Scripture you need not be afraid of the word but such as indeed are what other men doe but think themselvâ—s 6. The Scripture is Perfect The perfection of the Scripture is considered 2 wayes 1. In respect of the matter or the Bookes in which the holy doctrine was written all which as many as were usefull to our salvation have been kept inviolable in the Church so that out of them one most perfect and absolute Canon of faith and life was made and this may be called the Integrity of the Scripture 2. In respect of the forme viz. of the sence or meaning of these Canonicall Books or of Divine truth comprehended in them which Books containe most fully and perfectly the whole truth necessary and sufficient for the salvation of the elect and therefore the Scriptures are to be esteemed a sole adequate totall and perfect measure and rule both of faith and manners and this is the sufficiency of the Scriptures which is attributed to it in a twofold respect 1. Absolutely in it selfe and that in a threefold consideration 1. Of the Principle for every principle whether of a thing or of knowledge ought to be the perfect since demonstration and true conclusions are not deduced from that which it imperfect therefore it is necessary that the holy Scripture being the first only immediate principle of all true doctrine should be most perfect 2. Of the Subject for it hath all Essentiall parts matter and forme and integrall Law and Gospell and is wholy perfect both 1. Absolutely because for the substance it eitheir expressely or Analogically containes the doctrine concerning Faith and Manners which is communicable and profitable for us to know which may be proved also by induction that all necessary opinions of Faith or precepts of life are to be found in the holy Scripture 2. Relatively because as it hath a perfection of the whole so of the parts in the whole that perfection is called essentiall this quantitative For all the Books are Sufficient with an essentiall perfection although integrally they have not a sufficiency of the whole but only their own yet so that at distinct times every part sufficed for their times but all the parts in the whole are but sufficient for us 3. In its effect and operation it makes men perfect 2 Tim 3. 16. 17. Rom. 15. 4. John 2. ult 5. 39. 2. As opposed to unwritten Traditions all which it excludes by its sufficiency but we doe not understand by Traditions generally a Doctrine delivered in Word and Writing but specially a Doctrine not written by Prophets or Apostles whether Dogmaticall Historicall or Ceremoniall for a perfect reason of the primary opinions belonging to Faith and Manners is delivered in Scripture and those things which are out of beside or against the Scripture doe not binde the Conscience 2. Historicall the Sayings and Deedes of Christ and the Apostles are perfectly contained in the Scriptures as many as suâ—fice us for our salvation John 20. 30 31. Those things which are delivered out of Scripture are to be esteemed mans writings 3. Ceremoniall or secondary opinions concerning Ecclesiasticall Rites and Customes are for Essentialls Substantials and Fundamâ—ntals generally contained in the Word of God The accidentals accessaries and circumstantials are free and mutable If Traditions agree with the Scripture they are confirmed by it if they oppose it they are disproved by it The perfection of the Scriptures is not First Infinite and unlimited that is an incommunicable property of God every thing which is from another as the efficiente ause is thereby limited both for the nature and qualities thereof Secondly we doe not understand such a perfection as containeth all and singular such things as at any time have beene by Divine inspiration revealed to holy men and by them delivered to the Church of what sort soever they were for all the Sermons of the Prophets of Christ and his Apostles are not set downe in so many words as they used in the speaking of them for of twelve Apostles seven wrote nothing which yet preached and did many things neither are all the deeds of Christ and his Apostles written for that is contradicted John 20. 30. 31 21. 25. but we meane onely a Relative perfection which for some certaine ends sake agreeth to the Scripture as to an instrument according to which it perfectly comprehendeth all things which have beene are or shall be necessary for the salvation of the Church Thirdly the severall Bookes of Scripture are indeed perfect for their own particular ends purposes uses for which they were intended of the Lord but yet not any one Booke is sufficient to the common end the whole Scripture is compleate in all the parts thereof one speaking of that which another doth wholy passe over in silence one clearely delivering what was intricate in another Paul speakes much of Justification and Predestination in the Epistle to the Romans nothing of the Eucharist or Resurrection Fourthly since God did reveale his will in writing those writings which by Divine hand and providence were extant in the Church were so sufficient for the Church in that Age that it needed not Tradition neither was it lawfull for any humane wight to adde thereto or take therefrom but when God did reveale more unto it the former onely was not then sufficient without the latter Fifthly the holy Scripture doth sufficiently containe and deliver all Doctrines which are necessary for us to eternall salvation both in respect of Faith and good works and most of these it delivereth to us expressely and in so many words and the rest by good and necessary consequence The Baptisme of Infants and the consubstantiality of the Father and of the Sonne are not in those words expressed in Scripture yet is the truth of both cleerely taught in Scripture and by evident proofe may thence be deduced that Article of Christs
of Scripture John 14. 26. he that teacheth all things omitteth nothing Christ said all things to his Apostles as appeares John 15. 15. and 17. 8. John 16. 13. 2. By reasons drawne from thence 1. The plentifull pouring forth of the spirit was deferred till the glorifying of Christ he being glorified it was no longer to be delayed Christ being exalted on the right hand of God obtained the Spirit promised and that was not according to measure and poured the same in such abundance as it could be poured forth and received by men so that was fulfilled which was foretold by Joel 2. 28. Act. 2. 33. John 3. 34. 35. Act. 2. 16 17. 2. The Scripture and the prophesies of the old Testament doe teach and declare that all Divine truth should fully and at once be manifested by the Messias who is the onely Prophet High-Priest and King of his Church there is no other Revelation promised none other needfull besides that which was made by him Esay 11. 9. Act 3. 23. 24. Joel 2. 23. Vide Mercerum in loc therefore the last inspiration was made to the Apostles and none other to be expected The doctrine of the Law and the Prophets did suffice to salvation yet it did send the Fathers to expect somewhat more perfect 1 Pet. 1. 10 but to the preaching of the Gospell nothing is to be added we are not sent to waite for any clearer vision 3. So long as any truth needfull to be known was unrevealed or not plainly taught the Lord did stirre up some Prophet or other to teach the same unto the Church therefore the Lord surceaâ—ng to speake since the publishing of the Gospell of Jesus Christ and the delivery of the same in writing is unto us a manifest token that the whole will of God is now brought to light and that no new Revelation is to be expected Our 7th Proposition is Christ and his Apostles were able to propound and teach by lively voyce that doctrine which pertaines to perfection John 1. 18. and 11. 11. 32. John 8. 26. and the Apostles perfectly taught all things which are or shall be necessary for the Church Act. 20. 27. Gal. 1. 7. 8. 9. The doctrine of repentance and remission of sinnes in the name of Christ doth summarily containe all things necessarily to salvation Act. 5. 31. and 11. 11. but this doctrine the Apostles preached Act. 13. 38. 39. Luke 24. 47. The word of God is not onely Milke for Babes but strong Meat for men of ripe yeares 1 Cor. 3. 1. 2. Heb. 5. 14. and 6. 1. 2. therefore it containeth not onely matter of preparation but of perfection Or 8th Proposition is The sum and substance of that heavenly doctrine which was taught by the Prophets and Apostles was by them committed to writing the Holy Ghost giving them a commandement and guiding their hands therein that they could not erre so that the word preached and written by them is one in substance both in respect of matter which is the will and word of God and inward forme viz. the divine truth immediately inspired though different in the externall forme and manner of delivery Our 9th Proposition is that nothing is necessary to be known of Christians over and above that which is found in the old Testament which is not clearly and evidently contained in the Bookes of the Apostles and Evangelists Our last Proposition is that all things which have beene are or shall be necessary to the salvation of the Church to the end of the world are perfectly contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles long since divinely inspired written and published and now received by the Church of God so that now no new Revelation or Tradition beside those inspired published and comprehended in the Scripture are necessary for the salvation of the Church There are 3 opinions 1. Of the Papists who altogether deny it 2. Of the Socinians which would have all things expressely contained in Scripture and if it be not totidem verbis they reject it 3. Of the Orthodoxe who say it containes all things expressely or by consequence The expresse testimonies of Scripture forbidding even Angels to adde any thing to those things which are commanded by the Lord doe prove the perfection of the Scripture Deut. 4. 5. 12. and 12. 32. and 30. 10. and 5. 12 13 14. and 28. 58. Josh. 1. 7 8. Prov. 30. 5. wherefore the Apostle commands that no man presume above that which is written 1. Cor. 4. 6. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. Divers reasons may be drawn from this famous place to prove the perfection of the Scripture 1. The Apostle teacheth that the Scriptures are able to make a man wise to salvation therefore there needeth no further counsell nor direction thereunto but out of the Scriptures 2 The Scriptures are able to make the man of God that is the Minister of the word perfect and compleat unto every worke of his Ministery whether it be by teaching true doctrine or confuting false by exhorting and setting forward to that which is good or dehorting from that which is evill Paul would not have us thinke that all and every writing viz. of Plato Aristotle is divinely inspired for in the 15. v. he not onely useth the plurall number calling them the holy * writings thereby to note the word of God and not one sentence or Booke but all the sentences and Bookes of the Scripture and also useth the Article which hath force of an universall note therefore the Greeke word the whole Scripture signifieth the whole altogether and not every part severally in this place 2. No one part of holy Scripture is able to make the Minister perfect therefore it must needs be understood of the whole body of holy Scripture wherein this sufficiency is to be found The Ancient Fathers and other Divines have from this place proved the perfection and sufficiency of the Scripture in all things necessary to salvation We doe not reason thus as the Papists charge us it is profitable therefore it is sufficient but because 1. The Scripture is profitable for all these ends viz. to teach sound doctrine to refute false opinions to instruct in holy life and correct ill manners therefore it is sufficient or it is profitable to all those functions of the Ministery that a Minister of the Church may be perfect therefore muchâ—more for the people Argumentum non nititur unica illa voce utilis sed toto sententiae camplexu Chamierus Hitherto of the perfection of the Scripture absolutely considered now followes the sufficiency thereof in opposition to unwritten traditions or verities as the Papists speake Doctor Davenant premiseth these things for the better understanding of the sufficiency of the Scripture 1. We speake of the State of the Church saith he in which God hath ceased to speake to men by the Prophets or Apostles divinely inspired and to lay open new Revelations to his
1. 9. 2. 29. Justice in man is a setled will to doe right in every thing to every person so God hath a setled will to doe right Shall not the Judge of all the world doe right and are not my waies equall God stiles himselfe by this title and gives himselfe this Attribute Zepâ— 3. 5. Gods justice is twofold 1. Disposing by which as a most free Lord and supream Monarch of all he disposeth all things in his actions according to the rule of equity and imposeth most just Lawes upon his creatures commanding and forbidding onely that which is fit for them in right reason to doe and forbear 2. Distributive which renders to every one according to his worke without respect of persons Psal. 62. 12. Iâ—b 34. 11 19. Prov. 24. 12. Jerem. 32. 19. Ezek. 7. 27. Matth. 16. 27. Deut. 16. 17. 2 Chron. 19. 7. Acts 10. 34. Ephes. 6. 9. Gal. 2. 6. and this distributive justice is also twofold praemii paenae of reward and punishment 1. Of reward when God bountifully rewards the obedience of the creature with a free reward 2 Thess. 1. 5 7. Matth. 10. 41 42. Marke 9. 41. God bestowes this reward not onely on the godly both by heaping divers mercies on them in this life and by the fulnesse of glory and felicity in the life to come but also on the wicked whose morall actions he rewards with tâ—mporary rewards in this world as the obedience of Jehu the repentance of Ahab 2. Of punishment by which he appointeth to the delinquent creature the equall punishment of eternall death for the least sinne Gen. 2. 17. Rom. 6. 23 which death is begun in this life in divers kindes of miseriâ—s and punishments which for the most part are proportionable to their sinnes Genes 3. 17. 20. 18. but is perfected in the life to come when the full wrath of God is powred upon it John 3. 36. 2 Thess. 1. 6. This justice is so essentiall to God immutable and as I may so speake inexorable that he cannot remit the creatures sinne nor free them from punishment unlesse his justice be satisfied God can not dispence against himselfe because sinnes doe hurt the inward vertue of God and the rule of righteousnes the integrity therefore and perfection of God can not stand if he satisfie not that yet through his bounty and goodnesse he hath found out a way by which due satisfaction may be given thereunto viz. by Christ who hath borne a punishment equivalent to our sinnes for us The Scripture proves the justice of God 1. Affirmatively when it cals him just a revenger holy right and extols his justice Exod. 9. 27. Psal. 11. 7. Jerem. 12. 1. 2. Negatively when it removes from him injustice and iniquity respect of persons and receiving of gifts and also all the causes and effects of injustice Deut. 32. 4. 10. 17. Dan. 9. 14. Job 8. 3. 3 Affectively when it Attributes to him zeale anger fury Exod. 20. 5. 32. 10. Num. 11. 10. which are not in God such passions as they be in us but an act of the immutable justice 4 Symbolically when it cals him a consuming fire Deut. 4 24. compares him to an angry Lyon an armed Souldier Esay 38. 13. 5 Effectively when it affirmes that he renders to every one according to his workes 1 Sam. 26. 23. Gods justice comprehends his righteousnesse and truth he is just in words and deeds Gods justice is considered foure waies 1 As he is free Lord of all and so his decrees are just Rom. 9. 13 14. 2 As he is God of all and so the common workes of preserving both the good and bad are just 1 Tim. 4. 14. Matth. 5. 45. 3 As a Father in Christ and so he is just in performing his promises and infuâ—ing his grace and in bestowing the justice of his Sonne 1 John 1. 5. 4 As Judge of all the world and so his justice is not onely distributive but corrective His justice is 1 Impartiall he will not spare 1 Multitudes all Sodome and Gomorrha and the old world perished 2 Great ones the excellency or greatnesse of any creature will not exempt it from punishment the Angels and Adam fell he spared not the Angels but threw them into hell Adam was cast out of Paradise for one sinne 3 Neernesse the Jewes Gods people formerly are now cast off Moses and David were punished 2 Generall it extends to a mans posterity God will visit the iniquity of fathers upon their children 3 Inexorable no sinners can escape unpunished the sinnes of the godly are punished in their surety Christ and they are afflicted in this life God is justice it selfe justice is essentiall to him his will is the rule of justice a thing is just because he willeth it and not he willeth it because its just He will right the wrongs of his children 2 Thess. 1. 6 7 8. He can not be corrupted nor bribed Gods justice comprehendeth two things under it 1 Equity in that he directs men equally and requites them equally commanding all and onely good things such as they in reason ought to doe promising and threatning fit and due recompences of their obedience and disobedince 2 Truth whereby he declareth nothing to them but as the thing is and fidelity whereby he fulfilleth all that he hath spoken The Arminians urge how can God in justice command a man by his word the performance of that which cannot be done by him without the inward helpe of the Spirit and yet in the meane time God denies this inward grace unto him God may without blemish to his justice command man to performe his duty although he have now no strength to doe it because once he had strength and he hath now lost it It reproves such as live in sinne Exod. 34. 17. Psalm 5. 5. Gal. 6. 6. if God be mercifull that he may be feared much more is he just that he may be feared 2. We must take heed of justifying the wicked we should be just in our actions to man in buying and selling in rewarding and punishing Magistrates Ministers Masters Parents should be just We should not murmur at Gods disposing justice in making us poore and should yeeld to his directing justice obeying his Commandements seem they never so unreasonable We should get Christs righteousnesse to satisfie Gods justice for us and to justifie us The consideration of Gods justice should affright us from hypocrisie sinning in secret keeping bosome sinnes It ministers comfort to the godly who are wronged by the wicked they shall have an upright and just Judge who will uphold them in a good cause Psalm 33. 24. It may serve to exhort us to glorifie Gods justice both in fulfilling of his promises and punishing wicked men Psal. 7. 18. 51. 15. 4 God is True Truth or veracity is by which God is true as in himselfe so in his sayings and deeds
He revealeth himselfe to his creature such a one as indeed he is Reall truth or the truth of things is a property of them by which they are the same indeed which they seem It is an agreement betwixt the being and appearance of things It is double 1. Essentiall or of the very substance of things 2. Accidentall of the qualities and actions of things and this as it is referred to the reasonable creature for such truth can be no where but in it is inward and outward according as the actions are Inward truth of understanding is an agreement betwixt its conceite of things and the things themselves contrary whereto is errour or misjudging and of the will contrary to hypocrisie and dissimulation Outward 1. of word which is Logicall when I speake as the thing is morall when I speake as I conceive the thing to be and also in the matter of promises when I mean as I say and hold still that meaning till I have actually made good my words 2 Of deeds when they are such in the intention and meaning of my mind as in the outward pretence and are agreeable to the promises I have made God is true in all these respects 1. His essence is reall and true he is a God indeed not in imagination alone the Scripture calls God the true God to know thee saith our Saviour Christ the onely true God and whom thou hast sent Jesus Christ. He is the true God not a bare conceit of our own head or fiction He hath not an imaginary and counterfeit but a very reall being he is indeed such he saith he is for that which gives being to other things must needs it selfe be in very deed The other supposed Gods alone in name and in fancy of the worshippers â—ut he is 2 He hath a true not an erroneous conceite of things lie knows all things most exactly he is indeed a willer of true goodnesse 3 He speaks nothing but as the thing is and as he doth conceive it He meanes what he promiseth and doth what he meanes the Lord dissembleth not with men He is true in his Word and his whole Word whether narrations promises threats visions or predictions what he telleth it is as he telleth it what he promiseth or threatneth to doe he intendeth and will performe Psalm 89. 33 34. Deut. 7. 9. 2. Cor. 1. 20. Promissa tua sunt suis falli timeat cum promittit veritas Aug. Confesâ— l. 12. c. 1. 4 God is true in his workes they are not done counterfeitly as those of the Devill but truely Psalm 145. 17. Revel 15. 3. The Scripture proves the truth of God 1. essentially when it affirmes God to be true in his workes Deut. 32. 4. Psalm 25. 10. Revel 15. 3. 16. 7. 2 In his words which is proved both affirmatively John 17. 17. 2 Sam. 7. 28. and negatively Num. 23. 19. 1 Sam. 15. 29. Heb. 6. 18. Reas. 1. All lying and fashood ariseth from weaknesse and imperfection or wickednesse neither of which is in God seeing to be God is to be perfect and absolute He is the Lord God of truth Psalm 34. 5. his sonne is truth John 14. 6. his holy Spirit the Spirit of truth John 17. 6. the Gospell is the word of truth Col. 1. 5. God is the chiefe and first truth the Authour of truth truth is in him essentially and immutably Psalm 100. 5. onely true Rom. 3. 4. This distinguisheth him from false Gods 2 Chron. 15. 3. John 17. 3. God is worthy to be trusted honoured and esteemed ergo most true Where it is said God seduced the Prophets it is not so understood as if God inspired a false prophesie and an errour but that he delivered them to the divell to be seduced 1. It serves to reprove the wicked who believe not threats and the weake Christians who in temptations and desertions doubt of promises 2 It exhorts us to desire the manifesting of this truth Psalm 43. 3. we should be true like God Zach 8. 16. in our words and deeds keepe our vowes with God and promises with men God loves truth as in himselfe so in his creatures but abhors dissimulation and hypocrisie Prov. 12. 22. The true Church is the pillar of truth Gods Word the word of truth Psalm 19. 9. We should therefore believe Gods Word and depend upon his promise seem it never so unlikely or impossible give him the glory of his truth he that believeth setteth to his Seale that God is true he that believeth not maketh God a lyar Will you receive the testimony of men and will you not much more receive the testimony of God He that believeth Gods promises will surely doe the things to which the Lord by promises encourageth him He that believes the threats will forbeare the thing which God by his threats seekes to deter him from This is matter of solid comfort for all the true children of God if he be faithfull they must be happy Truth is that vertue of the wil by which it is moved to goodnesse for Gods sake when the thing moving us to be good is Gods Commandement and the end whereat we aime is the glorifying and pleasing of God then we serve God in truth 5. God is Faithfull 1 Cor. 19. 18. Rev. 19. 11. First in himselfe by an uncreated faithfulnesse Secondly in his decrees Esay 14. 24 27. Thirdly in all his waies and workes Psal. 145. 17. 1 Of creation 1 Pet. 4. ult 2 Of Redemption Heb. 2. 17. 3 Of Justification John 1. 19. 4 Of protection and preservation of his Church Rev. 19. 11. Fourthly in all his words and speeches 1 His Commandements are the rule of truth and faithfulnesse to us Psal. 19. 9. 2 His predictions are all faithfully accomplished many thousand yeeres after as Christs incarnation in the fulnesse of time so Gen. 49. 10. 3 His menaces are most faithfull 4 His promises Exod. 12. 41. Heb. 10. 23. There is a difference between faithfulnesse in the Creator and in the creature 1 This is the ocean and full fountaine from whence all faithfulnesse and truth in men and Angels issue 2 This is the rule and measure of that and the neerer it comes to this the more compleat it is 3 It is unchangeable in him the Angels that fell were faithfull but soon changed so Adam 4 It is in God in most high perfection Reasons 1 Because of his most just and righteous nature whose most righteous will is the rule of all his waies Psal. 145. 17. 2 He is most perfect and unchangeable in perfection 3 Because of his most pure and holy affection 4 There is no imperfection in him to hinder his faithfulnesse Gods faithfulnesse is the ground of all true Religion 1 We must ground all the doctrine of faith all the Articles of faith all our judgement and opinion in matters of faith upon this faithfulnesse of God and this by holding
mystery of the Trinity is necessary to be known and believed of all that shal be saved it was not so plainly revealed to the Jewes of old as it is to us in the new Testament a perfect and full knowledge of this mystery is not attainable in this life Although Trinity in its native signification signifie the number of any three things yet by Ecclesiasticall custome it is limited to signifie the three Persons in the Trinity This is not meant as if the Essence did consist of three Persons as so many parts and therefore there is a great difference between Trinity and Triplicity Trinity is when the same Essence hath divers waies of subsisting and Triplicity is when one thing is compounded of three as parts they are three not in respect of Essence or Divine attributes three Eternals but three in respect of personall properties as the Father is of none the Sonne of the Father and the holy Ghost of both three Persons but one God as to be to be true to be good are all one because Transcendents Opera Trinitatis ad extra sunt indivisa the outward workes which concerne the creature belong to one person as wel as the other as to create govern but opera ad intra sunt divisa the personall properties or internall workes are distinguished as the Father begets the Sonne is begotten of the Father and the holy Ghost proceeds from the Father and the Sonne There is in the Trinity alius alius another and another but not aliud aliud another thing and another thing as there is in Christ the Father is another person from the Sonne but yet there is the same nature and Essence of them all They differ not in their natures as three men or three Angels differ for they differ so as one may be without the other but now the Father is not without the Sonne nor the Sonne without the Father so that there is the same numericall Essence The Father in some sence is said to be the onely God John 17. 3. that is besides the Divine nature which is common to the three persons there is not another God to be found the word alone is opposed to all faigned Gods to every thing which is not of this Divine nature so when it is said None knoweth the Father but the Sonne and the Sonne but the Father that excludes not the Holy Ghost which searcheth the hidden things of God but all which are not of that Essence Though there be no inequality in the persons yet there is an order not of dignity but of beginning The Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost made the world not as if there were so many partiall causes much lesse as if God the Father were the Principall and these Instrumentall but onely meere order Persona divina est essentiae divinae subsistentia incommunicablis Wendelinus The Essence considered with the manner of subsisting is called a Person A Person is such a subsistence in the Divine nature as is distinguished from every other thing by some speciall or personall property or else it is the God-head restrained with his personall property Or it is a different manner of subsisting in the Godhead as the nature of man doth diversly subsist in Peter JAmes John but these are not all one It differs from the essence as the manner of the thing from the thing it selfe and not as one thing from another one person is distinguisht from another by its personall property and by its manner of working The personall property of the Father is to beget that is not to multiply his substance by production but to communicate his substance to the same The Sonne is said to be begotten that is to have the whole substance from the Father by communication The Holy ghost is said to proceed or to be breathed forth to receive his substance by proceeding from the Father and the Sonne joyntly in regard of which he is called the Spirit of the Father and the Spirit of the Sonne both Gal. 4. 6. The Father onely begetteth the Sonne onely is begotten and the holy Ghost onely proceedeth both procession and generation are ineffable In the manner of working they differ for the Father worketh of himselfe by the Sonne and through the holy Ghost the Sonne worketh from the Father by the Holy Ghost the holy Ghost worketh from the Father and the Sonne by himselfe There is so one God as that there are three persons or divers manners of being in that one Godhead the Father Sonne and the holy Ghost 1 Whatsoever absolutely agrees to the Divine nature that doth agree likewise to every person of the Trinity 2 Every person hath not a part but the whole Deity in it selfe A person is one entire distinct subsistence having life understanding will and power by which he is in continuall operation These things are required to a person 1 That it be a substance for accidents are not persons they inhere in another thing a person must subsist 2 A lively and intelligent substance endued with reason and will an house is not a person nor a stone or beast 3 Determinate and singular for mankind is not a person but John and Peter 4 Incommunicable it can not be given to another hence the nature of man is not a person because it is communicable to every particular man but every particular man is a person because that nature which he hath in particular can not be communirated to another 5 Not sustained by another therefore the humane nature of Christ is not a person because it is sustained by his Deity 6 It must not be the part of another therefore the reasonable soule which is a part of man is not a person That there are three persons in the Deity viz. Father Sonne and holy Ghost is manifest by expresse testimonies of Scripture Genes 1. 1. Gods created and v. 26. Psalm 33. 6. there three are named the Word the Lord and the Spirit Esay 6.3 Holy Holy Holy But this truth is most clearly taught in the new Testament Matth. 3. 16. Luke 3. 22. The first person in the Trinity utters his voice from Heaven This is my beloved Sonne the Sonne is baptized in Jordan the holy Ghost descends in the shape of a Dove upon Christ. Pater auditur in voce Filius manifestatur in homine Spiritus Sanctus dignoscitur in columba Aug. tract 6. in Joh. Adde to this the History of Christs transfiguration described Matth. 17. 5. Marke 9. 7. Luke 9. 35. In which likewise the voice of the Father was heard from Heaven This is my beloved Sonne the Sonne is transfigured the Holy Ghost manifests himselfe in a bright cloud Matth. 28. 19. The Apostles are commanded to baptize in the Name of Father Sonne and holy Ghost Cameron thinks that is the most evident place to prove the Trinity But that is as â—pposite a place as any for this purpose 1 John 5.
7. For there are â—hree that beare record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost The Arrians wiped this place out of many bookes 2 Cor. 13. 14. The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the communion of the holy Ghost be with you all The Arrians Samosatenians Sabellians Photinians and others deny the Trinity of persons in one essence of God Servetus a Spaniard was burnt at Geneva in Calvins time he denied that Christ was Gods Sonne till Mary bore him Servetus Trinitatem idolum item Cerberum Tricipitem vocabat See Mr Cbeynels rise of Socinianisme ch 1. p. 6. Socinus cals him Deum tripersonatum ridiculum humanae curiositatis inventum Infaustus Socinus omnium haereticorum audacissimus saith Rivet See Cheynels rise of Socinianisme Chap. 3. That the Father is God is confessed by all and it is manifest from Scripture we are directed to pray to him The Apostle saith Grace to you and peace from God our Father Philem. v. 3. That Christ is God is proved 1 By cleare Texts of Scripture affirming this truth in so many words The Prophet foretelling of him saith this in his name by which you shall call him Jehovah or the Lord our righteousnesse Jerem. 23. 6. and the mighty God Esay 9. 6. Paul saith Rom 9. 5. who is God over all blessed for ever and St John saith 1 John 5. 20. This is very God and St Paul saith 1 Tim. 3. 16. Great is the mystery of Godlinesse God manifested in the flesh and accordingly Thomas made his confession John 20. 28. My Lord and my God which title he accepteth and praiseth Thomas for believing and that he could not have done without extreame impiety had he not been God 2 By evident reasons drawn from the Scripture He hath the Name Titles Workes essentiall Attributes and worship of God ascribed unto him in Scripture 1 Divine Names and Titles are given to Christ He is the onely blessed Potentate 1 Tim. 6. 15. The King of Kings Revel 1. 5. and Lord of Lords Apoc. 17. 14. 19. 16. He is called the Image of the invisible God Col. 1. 25. the brightnesse of his glory Heb. 1. 3. the word and wisdome of the Father Prov. 8. 12. 9. 1. He is called the Word because he is so often spoken of and promised in the Scripture and is in a manner the whole subject of the Scripture he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cum articulo John 1. 1. Acts 20. 28. 1 Tim. 3. 16. the great God Titus 2. 13. the true God 1 John 5. 20. God over all or blessed above all Rom. 9. 5. the most high Luke 1. 76. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by which name the Septuagint have expressed Jehovah the proper name of God alone John 20. 28. My Lord Jude 4. the onely Lord Acts 10. 36. the Lord of all 1 Cor. 15. 48. the Lord from Heaven 1 Cor. 2. 8. the Lord of glory 1 Cor. 2. 8. the Lord of Heaven and Earth Matth. 28. 18. These Titles are too high and excellent to be given unto any meere man whatsoever God therefore who wil not have his glory given to another would never have given these Titles to another if he were not God 2 The workes of God even the principall and most eminent of all which are proper to the Lord onely are ascribed to Christ. 1. The worke of Creation even of creating all things John 1. 3. and Col 1. 16. He for whom and by whom all things were created is very God for Christ and by him all things were created therefore he is very God 2 The worke of preservation and government is attributed to him also he is before all things and by him all things consist Heb. 1. 2. He who upholds all things by his powerfull word is God so doth Christ therefore he is God 3 The working of Divine miracles raising up the dead by his own power is given to him John 6. 54. and John 5. 21. He that can quicken and raise the dead is God so doth Christ therefore he is God 4 Redeeming of mankind Luke 1. 68. Matth. 20 28. Eph. 1. 7. Rev. 1. 5. 5 Sending of the Holy Ghost John 21. 22. 14. 16. and of Angels is ascribed to him Matth. 13. 41. Revel 1. 1. He forgives sinnes Marke 9. 2 5. He gives eternall life 3 The principall and incommunicable attributes of God are given to him 1 Omniscience John 2. 24 25. He knew all men and he knew what was in them John 21. 17. Lord thou knowest all things 2 Omnipotency Rev. 1. 8. Phil. 3. 21. 3 Eternity John 17. 5. Revel 1. 18. John 1. 1. Esay 9. 6. He is called the everlasting Father 4 Omnipresence Matth. 18. 20. 5 Unchangeablenesse Heb. 1. 11 13. 13. 8. He that is Omniscient Omnipotent Eternall Omnipresent Unchangeable equall to the Father in Majesty and glory Phil. 2. 16. is God so is Christ therefore he is God Laâ—â—ly worship due to God is ascribed to him Heb. 1. 6. Let all the Angels of God worship him Revel 5. 13. the Lambe that is Christ hath the same worship tendred to him that the Father hath We are commanded to call upon his name to believe and trust in him John 14. 1. 3. 16. 6. 39. to hope in him Esay 11. 10. we are baptized in his name Matth. 28. 19. Acts 8. 16. and sweare by him Rom. 9. 1. Ob. Christ is called God of God and light of light Sol. Christ as God is from himself but if the Deity of Christ be considered as in the person of the Sonne so it is from the Father The Sonne in respect of his essence is from none in respect of the manner of subsistence he is from the Father Ob. Matth. 19. 17. Christ denieth that he was good because he was not God Sol. Christ applieth himselfe to him to whom he spake now he called Christ good in no other sence then he would have done any other Prophet and in this sense Christ rebuked him for calling him good Ob. John 17. 3. God the Father is called the onely true God Sol. Some referre both these to God himselfe and Christ but others give a generall rule that the word alone is not opposed to the other persons but to the creatures and feigned Gods and so John 8. 9 the woman is not excluded but her accusers the added expressions shew him to be God because it is life eternall to know him as well as the Father Ob. Ephes. 4. 6. Sol. The word Father is not there used relatively or personally for the first person in the Trinity but essentially as Mal. 2. is there not one Father of us all and so he is God called Father in regard of his workes ad extrâ—i Ob. John 14. 28. My Father is greater then I. Sol. As he was man onely or mediator the Father was greater then
constitution of the creature by the Creator soe Angels are immortall 3. Not by any singular condition of nature but by Grace so the bodies of the Saints glorified 4. When it is mortall inwardly but yet conditionally it is immortall that is if he doe his dutie and soe Adam was immortall For the second Question The properties of it are these 1. It is originall righteousnesse because it is the naturall perfection of the whole man and all his faculties for distinction sake we call it originall righteousnesse It is soe both in regard of it selfe for it was the first in the first man 2. in regard of man because he had it from his very begining 3. In regard of his posterity because it was to be propagated to others 2. It is universall it was the rectitude of all parts it could not else be an image of God unlesse it did universally resemble him in all holinesse His understanding had all things for truth his will for good his affections for obedience 3. Harmonious every facultie stood in a right order the will subject to the understanding and the affections to both 4. It was due to him not by way of desert as if God did owe Adam any thing but conditionally supposing God made Adam to injoye himselfe and by way of meanes 5. Naturall 1. Subjectiuè that which inwardly adheres to the nature of a thing from its begining 2. perfectivè that which perfects nature for its end and actions 3. propagativè when it would have beene propagated in a naturall way if man had continued in innocencie but constitutivè and consecutivè supernaturall The Papists denie that that was naturall to man in innocencie and therefore they say mans nature is not corrupted by the fall because a supernaturall gift onely is taken from him all his naturals being left which is the opinion of the Pelagians who affirme that the nature of man fallen is perfect before the committing of actuall sinnes Paradise is spoken of in the 2. of Genesis Some of the Ancients as Origen Philo yea and of latter Authors have turned all this into an allegorie but now that it was a reall corporal place we may prove 1. because God planted a garden and put Adam into it and there went a river out of it which was divided into foure streames but these were visible and corporeall as Euphrates and Tigris in the third Chapter it is said that Adam hid himselfe with the leaves of the tree therefore the trees in paradise were reall and not allegoricall and lastly Adam was cast out of it The ground of allegorizing all these things ariseth from the vanitie of mans minde which thinketh these things too low for the Spirit of God to relate and therefore indeavours to find out many mysteries 2. In what part of the earth it was Some have thought it to be the whole world but that cannot bee for it is said God tooke Adam and put him into it and likewise that he was cast out of it others thought Paradise to be a very high place reaching to the very globe of the Moone but that cannot be habitable for the subtiltie of the aire others as Oleaster and Vatablus thinke it was in Mesopotamia onely and that it hath lost his beautie by the floud But the safest way is not to trouble our selves any further then Moses text which saith it was in the region of the East in respect of Judaea Aegypt or Arabia and as for the limits and bounds of it they cannot now be knowne However had his invention of Alcinous Gardens as Justin Mayrter noteth out of Moses his discription of paradise Gen. 2. those praises of the Elisian sieldes were taken out of this storie ver erat aeternum c. Ovid Metam Homer lib. 2. and from the talke betweene Eve and the Serpent Aesops fables were derived Thirdly Whether the waters of the floud did destroy it Bellarmine and generally the Papists will not admit that it was destroyed by Noahs floud and it is to maintaine a false opinion for they say that Enoch and Elias who are yet in their bodies are the two witnesses spoken of and that they shall come when Antichrist shall be revealed and then he shall put them to death and therefore they hold that Enoch and Elias are kept alive in this paradise which they say still remaineth but that this is a meere fable appeareth because John Baptist is expresly said by Christ to be the Elias that was to come because he came in the Spirit of Elias Therefore we hold that wheresoever Paradise was yet in the great floud it was destroyed not but that the ground remaineth still onely the forme beautie and fruitfullnesse is spoiled Gen. 7. 19. Paradise signifieth a garden the word being translated out of Greeke into Latine and soe into french and English In Hebrew it is called Heden which signifieth delights a Garden of all manner of delights a place beset with all kinde of fruitefull and beautifull trees There were two speciall trees in it one called the tree of life the other of the knowledge of good and evill Some say it was called the tree of life from the effect because of the hidden power and force it had of sustaining and prolonging mans life Although it be a dispute whether it had this force as meat to prolong life or as medicine to prevent death old age and diseases as likewise whether this power in the tree were naturall or supernaturall Therefore others say it was called soe not from the effect but signification because it was an outward signe that God would give them immortalitie if they did continue It is questioned whether the tree of lif was a Sacrament Pareus answers that it was a Sacrament three wayes 1. As an admonishion to them that the life which they had they had it from God for as often as they tasted of it they were to remember that God was the author of life 2. As it was a symboll of a better life in heaven if he did continue in obedience 3. Sacramentally of Christ as in whom Adam and Angels did obtaine life Rev. 2. 7. He is called the tree of life in the midst of Paradise but that is onely allegoricall and allusive soe that what the tree of life was to Adam in innocencie the same is Christ to us in our corrupt estate 2. The tree of Good and Evill It was not so called from any internall forme as if it selfe were knowing good and evill nor from the effect as if by eating thereof it would have procured wisedome in man and made him wiser nor yet was it called so from the lying promise of the Devill concerning omniscience for God called it so before they met together therefore it was named so from the Event for God by this name foretold what would follow if man did not abstaine from it that he should experimentally know what was good and what was
the smallest things is so wise and excellent as it serveth sufficiently to free him from all imputation of basenesse in regarding them No Philosopher would count it a base thing to be able to dispute accurately of the nature of a flea and to give a reason of its making and working why therefore shall it be an impeachment to Gods glory in a more perfect manner then we can conceive of both to know and guide them Ob. 1. Cor. 9. 9. Doth God take care for Oxen Sol. He doth not take care for Oxen cheifely and principally but subordinately as his care is toward the other bruit creatures Psal. 36. 7. and 147. 9. Paul doth not simply exempt the Oxen from Gods care but denieth that the law thou shalt not muzzell the mouth of the Oxe that treadeth out the corne was especially written for oxen but rather for men that they may understand what their duty is to the Ministers of the Gospell whose labours they make use of 2. The kinds of Gods providence 1. The providence of God is either 1. Generall and common to all Creatures that whereby God taketh care of the world and all things therein according to their nature Act. 17. 25. Heb. 1. 3. Gen. 9. 1 2 3. Psal. 36. 6. 2. Speciall that which doth peculiarly appertaine to Creatures endued with reason and understanding viz. Men and Angels and among them he lookes chiefly to this Elect with a fatherly care 1 Tim. 4. 10. and of this Providence is that place before noted 1 Cor. 9. 9. to be understood 2. Gods Providence is either 1. Mediate when God governeth creatures by creatures as by meanes and instruments But God useth them 1. Not necessarily for want of power in himselfe but of his owne Free-will in the abundance of his goodnesse 2. Providence includes meanes * which if we neglect we tempt God 3. God well useth evill instruments besides and beyond their own intention as the Jewes Acts 2. 23. and Josephs brethren Gen. 45. 5. 2. Immediate when God by himselfe without the Ministry of the creatures doth preserve and govern things Thus the Apostles were called thus God made the world immediately without any instruments 3. Gods Providence is 1. Ordinary and usuall when God governeth the world and things of the world according to the order and lawes which himselfe set in the Creation 2. Extraordinary and unusuall when hee worketh either against or beside that order so appointed as in working miracles 3. The degrees and parts of Gods providence 1. Conservation Job 12. 14 15. Psal. 44. 2. It is that whereby God doth uphold the order nature quantity and quality of all and every Creature both in their kinde and in particular untill their appointed end Psalm 19. 1 2. 36. 6. 65. 2. Psal. 135. 6. 7. 136. 25. He conserves those things quoad species which are subject to death in their individua as trees herbs bruite beasts men Hee preserves things quoad individua which are incorruptible as Angels Stars 2. Government it is that whereby God doth dispose and order all things according to his owne will and pleasure so that nothing can come to passe otherwise then he hath determined Psal 33. 13 14 15. Eccles. 8. 6. Psal. 75. 6 7. It is a great work of God to continue a succession of living creatures in the world Psal. 104. 30. This is that for which God tooke order in the beginning when having made the severall things he bade them encrease and multiply and fill the face of the earth Gen. 1. 22. God challengeth this worke to himselfe in his speech to Job 39. 1. One generation comes and another goes It is noted as an act of Divine blessing to encrease the fruits of the Cattle and the flockes of sheepe and kine Deut. 28. 4. Psal. 107. 38. Reasons 1. If this worke were not wrought the world would bee empty of living creatures within one age beasts birds and fishes and all would faile within a few yeares and so should men be deprived of that help and benefit which they enjoy by them 2. The powers of propagating kinds is a wonderfull work no lesse then that of Creation done by a wisdome and power infinitely surpassing all the wisedome and power of all men Let us sanctifie God in our hearts by contemplating this great worke We see the truth of one part of the narration of Scripture in the increasing and multiplying of creatures and we see it done by a secret and hidden way let us therefore beleeve his promises Can God promise any thing to us more exceeding our reason to conceive how it should be effected then it exceeds our reason to think how the kindes of things are increased and continâ—ed in the world for so many hundreds of yeares We can see no reason how an egge by the hens sitting upon it for a few dayes should be made a sparrow starling hen or other bird God prepareth fit nourishment for all the creatures to eat and conveyeth it to each of them in that quantity and season which is fittest for them Psal. 104. 27 28. 145. 15. 147. 9. Psal. 136. 25. Reasons He that provideth foode for all must know their number their nature and places of abode and their severall needs and he that knowes these particulars must be none other but God he must know the quantity of the thing provided for foode and the quality of it and the season of it and none can doe these things but an infinite Essence that is to say a God 2. God in providing for the Creatures provideth for man who feedeth on them and he declareth his own wisedome and goodnesse in continuing the kindes of things and continuing them in welfare This should teach us faith in Gods promises by which he hath undertaken to feed and to provide for us soe our Saviour argues Matth. 6. 26. Object The adversity of the good and prosperity of the wicked seeme to oppose Gods providence If there were any providence God would see that it should be bonis benè malis malè Sol. There is no man absolutely good or absolutely evill but as the best have some evill so the worst have some good and therefore God will punish that evil which is in the good with temporall punishments and give temporall blessings to the evill for the good that is in them that seeing all good must be rewarded with good and all evill with evill the good of the good might have an everlasting reward of good and on the contrary the evill of the evill might have an everlasting reward of evill 1. It refutes the fancie of Atheists and Epicures which pretend that the observation of such slender matters holds noe correspondence with Gods greatnesse Aristotle said it was as vnfit for Gods knowledge to descend into these inferiour things as for a Prince to know what is done in the kitchin Wheras it is Gods greatest