himselfe but that other person of the humanity by whose death our reconcilation was wrought and so not by his owne bloud but by the bloud of another person should hee have entred into the holy place So God should not have sent his owne Sonne into the world that the world by him might be saved contrary to that which is Heb. 9.12 Ioh. 3.16.17 But he that is mighty to save even Iehovah our king hath saved us Esay 33.22 and that not with forraine bloud but by his owne offering of himselfe hath he purchased for us eternall redemption This then being the great mystery of our salvation that God was manifest in the flesh 1 Tim. 3.16 That God is one with us Matth. 1.23 That that holy thing which was borne of the virgin is the Sonne of God Luk. 1.35 it may appeare how detestable that heresie of Photinus and his predecessours was who made our Mediator the Sonne of man by nature and the Sonne of God by adoption only and how dangerous this consequence of Nestorius is who of that one Mediator betweene God and man 1 Tim. 2.5 would make two persons If you desire to know the growth of this heresie and the other positions of the Nestorians you may reade M. Breerewoods enquiries chap. 19. § 9. Arius and his followers held that Christ was truly man so that be might truly be called the Sonne of the virgin Mary borne in time as concerning his manly body and the Sonne of God as being the first begotten of every creature and so the most excellent creature created by the will of God the Father before all times and ages but not coeternall with him because there was a continuance when he was not and therefore was hee not say they 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or coessentiall with the Father because hee was created of that which was not from which Errour these Arians were also called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This poysonous fountaine overflowed afterward into divers streames For the halfe Arians of whom Acatius was chiefe held that Christ was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or of the like being withthe Father by nature but others said that this likenesse was not in nature but only in will and powerfull working Whereupon Asterius is by some affirmed to have said that Christ was the vertue only or a creature indued with the power of God other heretickes againe as Aetius and his scholler Eunomius said that Christ was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or of another manner of being unlike to the Father both in nature and will and hence arose the errour of the Dultians who thought him onely the servant of God in the worke of the creature and so of the Bonosians who held him to bee the Sonne of God onely by adoption And although this Hydra might seeme to have beene nipt in the head by the writings of Athanasius and other learned men of former times and especially by the first Councell of Nice Anno 327. and other that followed afterward yet never was there any heresie in the primitive Church that went on with that violence and strength or that caused more trouble and persecution as being confirmed by divers Councels and set forward by the authority of sundry Emperours And for the continuance thereof it hath been such as that unto this day not onely among the Turkes but ever in the Church of Christ if at least they may bee said to bee of his Church who falsly denie unto him the truth and excellencie of his being some have beene found from time to time even since the clearer light of the truth hath shined that have maintained this heresie of Arius in whole or in part as Socinus Gittichius David the Hollander Servetus Neuserus and with us Legat Mannering and others In Polonia also and Transylvania they swarme as you may reade in Wents à Bud. pag. 229 c. But say you is it possible that an heresie so foule as this is taken to bee should continue so long and be upheld by Councels and maintained by Emperours and justified by learned men except there were both reason and authority of Scripture for it For as no man is wilfully ill but by the errour of his judgement betweene good and bad so no man doth erre wilfully but onely by mistaking of falshood for the truth Answer Saint Paul saith that there must be heresies and this I suppose should come to passe because men would not be content to learne the doctrine of Christ and his truth according to the simplicity of the truth as he had taught it in the holy Scriptures whereunto if men would take heed and trie the truth as they ought the things of God by the word of God matiers of Religion by the rule of Religion that is the holy Scripture alone so many heresies had not sprung up For mans understanding so long as it doth follow the true guide thereof the revealed truth of God it cannot deceive nor be deceived But if it will presume to be guide and make the truth of the Scriptures to follow it it is impossible not to stray and so by the just judgement of God men also grow hard and obstinate in their owne errours not onely to resist the truth but also to persecute it as these Arians did very grievously at severall times But see their reasons and their authorities 1. The Godhead is in the Father wholly or else hee cannot bee perfect God and if the Deitie be wholly in the Father then can it not be in the Sonne nor in the holy Ghost Answer The word wholly is equivocall or of doubtfull meaning for wholly may signifie as much as with all the parts but this cannot belong to that which is infinite or wholly may signifie onely and so the proposition is false or it may meane asmuch as perfectly and so the proposition is true but the consequence is false for the Deitie is wholly and perfectly in all the persons alike 2. He onely is the true God that is prayed unto by the Mediator But God the Father onely is so prayed unto therefore God the Father onely is the true God I answer If we worship the Godhead in the nature or being of God we worship one onely being in the three Persons But if we worship the persons we worship them in the vnitie of the Godhead that is acknowledging every person to be God And this is that Father that one God whom we pray unto by that one Mediator of God and man the man Iesus Christ 1 Tim. 2.5 who having himselfe in his owne body borne our sinnes upon the tree 1 Pet. 2.24 is set at the right hand of God and makes intercession for us Rom. 8.34 and hath commanded all them to come unto him that travaile and are heavie laden that hee may refresh them Mat. 11.28 3. When the Sonne was begotten and the holy Ghost proceeded either hee was or he was not If he were before he was begotten then was he not
manner of being is when any thing is changed from any estate either proper thereto or else appropriate to an estate or condition that is or seemes to be lower or worse Thus our Lord was said to descend or come downe from heaven when He clouded His Deitie in our humanitie as I have shewed heretofore Thus also He and all man-kind may be said to descend to be abased or brought low when the soule is parted from the body For seeing both the parts are for the perfection of the whole the whole must needs be more excellent than either of the parts so that the whole being dissolved both the parts doe suffer hurt or losse thereby especially the soule which sees the losse and findes it selfe in a state of being beside the end of the creation of it selfe which was to give life unto the body and this is the cause why the soule would not bee unclothed but rather that this mortalitie might bee swallowed up of life And this is the lowest state of humiliation whereto the soule of our Lord could come naturally and by this state some will interpret the descent into hell as I shewed in the beginning Nu. 2. But if this humiliation must meane also the separation of the soule from the body while the body was laid in the dust it reaches no further than to his death For a man is not said to bee dead till his soule be departed from his body But if this state of humiliation be taken in that sence as some doe very fitly interpret it by that phrase used often in the Scripture of a mans being gathered unto his people or cōming unto that congregation of the saints which had died in the faith of Him that was to come then taking also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or hell according to the interpretation of the word Vnseen it will easily be admitted of all that when our Saviour was dead His body was buryed and his soule went unto the assembly of them that were unseene And because this is true safe and unquestionable it may on all parts be agreed unto as I said before and yet the word of descending or going downe reserved to the right meaning by the abatement or losse of that estate which the soule had with the body in the being of the whole and perfect man So also the question about the place of hell and Paradise which hath moved most doubt herein by this interpretation is avoyded But because all this will reach no further than to be perfectly dead and because the Latine interpretation Descendit ad inferos rendered by our Church Hee went downe into hell suffers us not to stay here and because the most voices amongst the Fathers have swayed the meaning to a locall descent and that as it seemes in the third sence spoken of before and most of all because the holy Scripture binds us thereto let us follow our best and surest guides and confesse with the Prophets and Apostles that the soule of our Lord after His death on the Crosse went downe into hell or the place of the dead and there continued three dayes and three nights in the heart of the earth as it was prophesied in the signe of Ionas the Prophet Matth. 12.40 And let us beleeve that the flesh of Christ did therefore rest in hope because His soule was not left in hell nor His body was suffered to see corruption Psal 16.9 10. Actes 2.31 Objection 1. Obiect 1 They object that the soule may signifie the whole man as in Gen. 46.27 All the soules of the house of Iacob were 70. But how doth that helpe to prove that this Article must bee interpreted onely of the torments of Christs soule while Hee was yet alive For it is manifest that Saint Peter bringing that text to prove His resurrection speakes not of Christs soule while it was yet in his body when He was not subject to a state of resurrection but of His soule after His death But if they will hope by that text of Gen. or the like to interpret it as Al. Hume loc cit Thou shalt not leave mee in the grave let them answere mee what they meane by this word Mee whether the body or the soule or both together If they say the soule it was not in the graue they will bee ashamed to say both together for so they should make Him not yet to be dead as the word Mee doth truely signifie the whole Person yet alive jf they say the body let them see what an unfit tautologie it will make with that which followeth Nor suffer thy Holy one that is the body of Thy Holy one to see corruption But in this place the soule and the body are made direct disparates so hell and the place of corruption so that we may argue the body was in the place of corruption Ergo not in hell the soule was in hell Ergo not in the grave or place of corruption Object 2. Obiect 2 The purpose of Saint Peter was to prove the resurrection of Christ and that belonged to the body which had died not to the soule which died not Answere If this be given what will you conclude thereon But I say the resurrection is of the whole man returned againe to life after the parting of the soule and the body So it is neither of the body onely nor of the soule onely but of the whole man which Saint Peter prooves heere to have beene done in Christ because His soule was not left in hell where it was but was againe joyned to the body to cause it to live that it might not see corruption And because all the glorious doings and sufferings of our Saviour were for our uttermost benefit and comfort therefore is this going downe of His into hell also to give us assurance of our full and perfect deliverance from all the powers of death and hell and restoring of all His beleevers unto an immortall life and glory And because the doctrine of our Church into which I was baptized bindes me to beleeve that our Lord Iesus after His death went downe into hell-locally and that by the authorities of the Scripture and because I have before shewed that the soule of Christ did not ascend to heaven before His resurrection and have denied also that I thinke with them that say that He went downe to suffer for our sinne And having as I thinke said enough to all contrary opinions the trueth by the Holy Scripture and the reasons grounded thereon must be made to appeare But first of all it is plaine that the meaning of our Church is such for in the 8. Article it is said that the Creed of Athanasius ought thorowly to bee received and beleeved and that because it may be prooved by most certaine warrants of Holy Scripture And in the 7. Article the Church of Ireland agreeth hereto in these words All and every the Articles conteined in the Nicene Creed the Creed of Athanasius and that which
1. Sect. 1 Concerning the first it is an irrefragable argument that the Scriptures were given of God because the Prophecies in them which were before-hand concerning things to come were such perfect declarations of them as that they may rather seeme to be Histories then Prophecies Take for instance that promise to Abraham that his seed should possesse Canaan after 430. yeeres and accordingly in the selfe same day Exod. 12.40 41. were they brought out of Egypt Or the promise of Iudahs Kingdome foretold by Iacob Gen. 49.8 9 10. Of Iosia and Cyrus prophecied by name the one above 300. yeeres the other above 100. yeeres before he was borne Of the captivity of that nation and destruction of Ierusalem foretold by Daniel For seeing God alone is infinite in His wisedome and that all His workes are foreknowne to Him alone therefore can He alone declare from the beginning what shall come to passe at the last as He saith of Himselfe Isa 42.9 whereas the Angels being finite both in their wisedome and knowledge know nothing of things to come but either by speciall revelation as Gabriel foretold the birth of Iohn Baptist or by the Prophecies of the Scripture or by observation of naturall causes in their long and subtile experiences And therefore it came to passe that all the devils that mocked the heathen by their Oracles were so uncertaine in their answeres except they were informed by some of the meanes spoken of As the devil gave a certaine answere to Alexander concerning his expedition against Darius because he knew what the Decree of God was by the Prophecie of Daniel Chap. 8. 2. Another Argument that the Scriptures were given by the Holy-Ghost is that admirable consent of all the Doctrines contained therein which are delivered with that certaintie of Truth and Knowledge with that authority and power over the soule of the faithfull Reader and that in so simple and plaine a manner of writing as no other whereas in mens writings the unsetlednesse of their judgement their ignorance and doubtfull suppositions especially when they speake of their owne as seldome they doe justifies the holy Text Rome 1.22 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 professing to teach they shew their folly 3. Moreover the Argument or things contained in the holy Scriptures doth manifest the Author thereof the Writers for the most part shewing their Commission Thus saith the Lord and Paul an Apostle not by man but by Iesus Christ and God the Father Then the purport or intent of the Commission We are Ambassadors for Christ as though God did beseech you by us we pray you in Christs stead to be reconciled unto God And this under such conditions as none but God alone is able to performe of acceptance eternall life or refusall eternall fire 4. The glorious and mighty workes which Almighty God gave especially to the first Writers of the Law and of the Gospel to doe and those miracles whereby He continually justified the trueth thereof the wonderous preservation and deliverances of the professors as of Daniel c. And the balefull confusion of the adversaries of the Trueth contained in the Scriptures in all ages approve that God alone is the Author thereof 5. The hatred of the devil and his continuall endeavours either utterly to deface the Bookes of the holy Scripture or upon pretext of obscurity and danger of Heresie not to reade them And againe the providence of God in preserving those Bookes and the love and delight which He hath begotten in the hearts of His Saints to reade and understand them are no lesse proofe that these holy Scriptures are the Word of God and the Testimony of His eternall Truth 6. The extraordinary calling of many of the Pen-men of the holy Bookes and the enabling of them being simple and unlettered men to write and to preach those high Mysteries which none of the Princes of this world did understand as of Amos among the Herdmen of Peter Iames and Iohn and the other of the twelve Apostles shew that the Author of that Truth and their Bookes was God alone 7. The great 1. Antiquity of the Bookes of the Law preserved so long uncorrupted for in comparison of Moses almost all the writings of the heathen all their religions and many of their Gods are but upstarts and things of yesterday 2. The great simplieity and sincerity of the Writers who sought not their own praise nor concealed their owne faults and imperfections 3. The consent of the Church which receiued the Scriptures as the word of God 4. The consent of forraine Histories writing of the same things with such uncertaintie and untruth as time and heare-say use to bring into History as of Berosus Herodotus Strabo Trogus and others are a manifest proofe that the true records of the same things are the writings which God Himselfe did dictate to Moses and the Prophets which followed after him For none but God did truely know the creation of the world and none among men did certainely record the universall flood the Tower of Babel the actes of Abraham Iacob Ioseph Moses Ioshua and others So that if the devill might vaunt as he did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I did indite and Homer did write In the perfection of truth might the Holy Spirit of God say as it is recorded 2. Tim. 3.16 All Scripture is given by the inspiration of God And 1. Pet. 1.21 Prophecie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy-Ghost 6. And if wee beleeve that the writings of Historians and Poets and other profane Authors are indeed theirs under whose names they goe shall wee not much rather beleeve that they are the writings of God Himselfe that goe under His Name especially seeing wee know that Hee is a jealous God and neither would suffer His authority to bee abused to falshood neither would Hee give His Church to bee ever seduced by lyars and false prophets § 2. Sect. 2 And these holy Oracles God of His Goodnesse and Mercy would have to bee written from whence by their excellencie above all other they are called Scriptures or Writings 1. First that wee through patience and comfort of these Scriptures might have firme and sure hope in God and His promises Rom. 15.4 2. Secondly that nothing through mans infirmity might be forgotten of all that which ought to be in continuall remembrance 3. Lest by the wickednesse of men and the subtilty of the devil inciting them thereto the holy Doctrine of God might be corrupted from the native and true meaning and so new Doctrines and new Religions brought in in stead of that Service which we owe onely to God and that according to His owne revealed Will and Word 4. No man knoweth the thoughts of a man but onely that spirit of a man which is within him much lesse can any know the things of God but onely the holy Spirit of God The things of God of which I
worke See 2. Tim. 3.16 17. 2. And if it might with due reverence unto God be supposed that the holy Scriptures have not sufficiently instructed us in every thing Yet who is he or what is that Church that may presume to adde to His word Proverb 30.6 Lest if they teach things that are not to be beleeved or command that which is not to be done our faith be found to be foolishnesse and our obedience become if not sinne yet without reward as the Prophet saith Esay 1.12 Who hath required this at your hand 3. As the man is so is his strength Iud 8.21 as his wisedome is such are his words And seeing it is evident by the Scripture which is given that it was the good will and pleasure of Almighty God to give instructions unto His Church and that it hath already been prooved that the Wisedome Chapter 5. and the Trueth of God as all His others dignities are infinite Chapter 7. if the instructions and directions of the Scriptures were not in every respect perfect and sufficient for the Church to that end for which they were written then the Wisedome of Goodnes of God should be defective in that which was necessary for His Church to know But that is impossible Therefore the Holy Scripture is sufficient 4. If God have not sufficiently and perfectly instructed us by His word what we ought to doe and to beleeve then can He not in Iustice punish those defects which shall be found in our Faith or obedience especially seeing we are not bound by any precept in His revealed will to hearken to any traditions with that reverence as to His word but rather are every where commanded to hearken to His word and that without any adding thereto or taking away therefrom Deut. 4.1 2. and 5.32 Esay 8.20 sends us to the Law and to the Testimony and if any one shall speake not according to this Word it is because there is no light in them So our Lord sends us to the Scriptures Iohn 5.39 Therefore the holy Scriptures are perfect and sufficient to teach all things that belong by way of divine revelation to faith and godlinesse All the Fathers runne this way and the most learned among the Schoolemen and later Papists as you may see them cited by Master G. Langford Enquiry after verity § 2. Of Traditions Object 1 Against this doctrine of the sufficiency and perfection of the Scriptures Obiect 1 doubts are raised two wayes First from the necessity of Traditions Secondly for that it is supposed that some bookes of the holy Writ are lost For the first it is manifest even by the reasons that are brought for the sufficiency of the Scripture For if it were alwayes necessary that the service of God in His Church should be according to His owne commandement and direction it must follow necessarily either that the Scriptures should have beene given even from the beginning of the world for the Church of the redeemed began in Adam or else that the seruice of the Church was onely according to tradition The first is apparently false For Moses was the first inditer of any Scripture and that after the deliverance out of Egypt which was after the Creation of the world 2513 yeeres Therefore the second followes of necessity that Traditions were necessary Answer This is a wilfull mistaking of the question which being about the sufficiency of the Scriptures must needs be limited to the times since the Scripture was given But Moses was not the first inditer of the holy Scripture but God Himselfe who had first written His Law in mans heart did secondly write it in two Tables of stone with His owne hand in mount Sinai And thirdly againe when the Tables of the Covenant were broken this was the first of all that which we call holy Scripture After which time God taught Moses the Originall of the world the sinne and redemption of mankind the order of times and whatsoever was necessary for that people to know and to doe And although it bee most true that the faith and seruices of the Church before the law was onely according to tradition yet because those traditions were not kept as God had taught them God brought upon the world of the ungodly the Flood Yet even within foure hundred yeeres after the Flood by the craft of the devill and his new revelations the best among men became Idolaters as it is manifest in Iosh 24.2 And therefore God gave Ordinances and Lawes by Moses in writing to the obseruation of which the whole Church of Israel was bound without any addition thereto or taking away therefrom Deut. 12.32 Object 2. But traditions may be necessary for the Church Object 2 as well since the Scriptures were written as before as Saint Paul 2. Thess 2.15 exhorts them to hold the Traditions which they had been taught whether by word or by Epistle So the Councill at Trent Sess 4. Can. 1. commands them to be received as the holy Canonicall Scripture Answer The word Tradition there is doubtfull For either it may signifie at large any thing that is delivered either by word or by writing and that may be any fundamentall trueth according to the holy Scripture as Saint Paul meanes in that place as Saint Athanasius Epist ad Adelphium de Incarn Contr. Samos calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an Apostolicall Tradition and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the faith delivered by tradition that God was manifest in the flesh or else it may signifie any canon or rule for the ordering of things indifferent in Ecclesiasticall policy wherein all things ought to be done in order And in these two sences traditions are to be held the first in obedience to God and His trueth as we receive the Apostles Creed and as you read in the Note on Chap. 33. § 2. N. 4. how Hosius speakes of the coessentiall Persons of the Trinity as a tradition from Christ to His Apostles and from them to us the second for peace and avoiding of divisions in the Church as to kneele at the holy Communion rather then to fit or to stand though none of all these gestures be essentiall to the Sacrament In the third place Traditions may signifie any rule thrust upon the Church as necessary to be beleeved or obserued quite besides or contrary to the word of God for conscience sake toward God that Priests and Nunnes may not marry which things though they be brought in as Apostolicall or Ecclesiasticall Traditions yet by the rule of Saint Paul 1. Tim. 4.1 2 3. they seeme rather to leane to the doctrines of devills beleeved by such as speake lyes in hypocrifie and have their consciences seared No part of Holy Scripture lost Object 3. ANd if Traditions might therefore seeme to be necessary Object 3 because it is yeelded by some of the Fathers that some of the Canonicall Scriptures are lost by whose reasons or authority some of the later writers have strayed after them yet
will follow easily enough if it be made manifest that the will and decree of God upon all man-kind is that there shall be a resurrection both of the just and unjust Act. 24.17 I will first bring the holy Oracles thereto then the reasons that accord with them and lastly answere such objections as Atheists are wont to bring to the contrary That which is in Gen. 3.15 The seed of the woman shall breake the head of the serpent in Iohn 3.8 is interpreted shall destroy the workes of the devill that is sinne and the punishment thereof death which cannot be except the dead be raised againe Iob 19.25 I know that my Redeemer liveth and that Hee shall stand at the later day upon the earth and though after my skinne wormes destroy this body yet in my flesh shall I see God whom I shall see for my selfe and mine eyes shall behold and not another though my reines be consumed within me Which text though it be as plaine and direct for the resurrection as any other in the Scripture yet Iohn Mercerus rejects that sence because the Hebrew Commentators doe not so expound it Esay 26.19 21. Thy dead men shall live together with My dead body shall they rise awake and sing ye that dwell in the dust for the earth shall cast out her dead For behold the Lord commeth out of His place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity the earth also shall disclose her blood and shall no more hide her slaine Reade to this purpose Ezech. 37. all And if you say that the calling of the Israelites is there prophesied in that Metaphor yet remember that no Metaphor is taken from things that are not Dan. 12.2 Of them that sleepe in the dust many shall awake to everlasting life some to shame and everlasting contempt Hosea 13.14 I will ransome them from the power of the grave I will redeeme them from death ô death I will bee thy plagues ô grave I will be thy destruction repentance is hid from mine eyes Iohn 5.28 29. The houre is comming in which all that are in the graves shall heare His voyce and shall come forth they that have done good to the resurrection of life and they that have done ill to the resurrection of damnation 2 Cor. 5.10 Wee must all appeare before the judgement seat of Christ that every one may receive the things done in his body according to that which He hath done whether it be good or ill So by these texts among many other it being manifest that God hath decreed a resurrection for the bodies of men both good and bad it being also manifest that nothing is impossible unto Him but that He doth whatsoever it pleaseth Him in the heaven and earth in the seas and all deepe places Psal 135.6 it must follow of necessity that there shall be a resurrection which that ye may the better apprehend we will adde some reasons that accord hereto 1. And first of all that argument which our Lord Iesus brings to this purpose Matth. 22.32 I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Iacob but God is not the God of the dead but of the living Therefore Abraham Isaac and Iacob though they be now dead yet must they rise againe for all men live to Him that is are in His power to be brought againe unto life when Hee will To know the strength of this argument you must looke to that which is Gen. 17. I will establish My Covenant with thee and with thy seed for an everlasting Covenant But no covenant can bee everlasting if either of the parties die Therefore Abraham and his seed that is the faithfull cannot perish but evermore live unto God as it is said in Luk. 20.38 For to this end Christ both died and revived and rose againe that Hee might bee Lord both of the dead and living the dead He saith that they may live againe For if our Lord Iesus died to purchase eternall life for us it is impossible that we should not live eternally 2. The arguments of Saint Paul in 1. Cor. 15. fall as thicke as haile and that first argument in the first place stands thus 1. It is a Gospel which he received and preached unto them according to the Scriptures And seeing the doctrine of God for His owne authoritie being the God of Trueth is to be received for our reverence only which we owe to him we ought to beleeve it Hitherunto tend those words v. 3. and 4. For I delivered unto you that which I received that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures and that He was buryed and that He rose againe the third day according to the Scriptures 2. And from this ground of faith he doth conclude vers 12. that there is a resurrection to wit for them that die in the faith of Christ For Christ died not for Himselfe but for our sinnes and rose againe for our justification Rom. 4.25 3. Since by man came death by man also came the resurrection of the dead vers 21 22. For the well-being of the body cannot bee but by the head 4. vers 25. Hee must reigne untill He have put all His enemies under His feete Psal 110.1 Therefore death also shall be subdued Ergo. The bodies of men kept under His power shall rise againe 5. If the bodies of men rise not againe these absurdities and inconueniences must follow That they that are dead in Christ are perished and while they lived here were of all men most miserable Our preaching and your faith is vaine We are false witnesses of God ye are yet in your sin They that are baptized over the dead are baptized in vaine we are needlesly in danger every houre for the preaching and beleefe of this doctrine My contention at Ephesus hereabout was to no purpose The Epicure that lives to eate and drinke is the only happy man But these things are impossible and amongst Christians accounted incredible Therefore there is a resurrection His doctrine in other Epistles is to the same purpose as Rom. 8.11 6. If the Spirit of Him that raised up Iesus from the dead dwell in you He that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies by His spirit that dwelleth in you This argument from the communitie of the Spirit you may understand by Chap. 17. § 4. n. 2. Phil. 3.21 7. Hee shall change our vile bodie that it may be fashioned like to His glorious body according to the working whereby Hee is able even to subdue all things to Himselfe 8. The hope of the resurrection as it is a comfort against all the trouble and afflictions of this life so especially against sorrow for them that depart from hence as you read 1. Thes Chap. 4. vers 13 14. c. 9. 2. Cor. 5.10 All must appeare before the judgement seat of Christ therefore the dead shall rise againe 10. For none of us liveth
poysonous herbs that they may be avoyded so are these heresies here set out Moreover in this triumph of the truth of Christ a great part of the captive traine should have beene wanting if they had not been driven before the triumphant Coach Whereas now the Christian may have comfort to see how the truth hath been fought against but yet hath overcome hath beene besieged not taken battered not shaken so that hereafter he may contemne the force of any adversarie And for feare of danger I thinke there is none when both by Scripture and reason these heresies mentioned are so utterly overthrowne But if any contrary to both these will yet bee licking of that foule vomit Let him that is filthie bee filthie still and let him that is holy be holy still The heresies I mention under the most usuall and knowne name not reckoning up for ostentation all those that were followers of that opinion The word Heresie I use at large for any opinion which a man doth chuse to maintaine against the truth knowne or unknowne And herein I put not onely the perverse opinions of them that have beene called Christians but also those false positions of the Heathens who profest Philosophie of whose traditions and false principles we are admonished to beware Col. 2.8 And these things being thus remembred let us now with due reverence and regard first be assured That God is that we may know what that glorious truth is which is the ground and rule of all truth and the foundation of our most holy and Christian religion because that this foundation being once laid the spirituall building of our most glorious faith may on that firme Rocke be raised up in all the parts thereof perfect and entyre And as we know that the author of all truth hath no need of our Lye whereby to be justified so where the truth is manifest let us not shut our eyes against it because we know that it is the shine of his being upon our understanding and that for this end that our understanding and will being enlightned thereby we may find the way to everlasting happinesse ARTICLE I. J beleeve in God That GOD is CHAP. I. IN the Grammaticall interpretation of the words I follow onely that sence which the Church of England holds my purpose is not to dwell therein but onely to ascertaine these doubts whereabout question may arise Therefore let the Atheist heare and the foole that saith in his heart There is no God for certainely There is a God And although no word or speech can bee uttered of which it is confessed that it is true or false but that it doth from thence follow necessarily That God is yet I will take onely those neerest attributes which we know to belong essentially unto him and so affirme that by this name God is meant a being eternall and infinite in all perfection of goodnes wisdome power will truth virtue glory and all those excellencies which may be in so glorious and infinite a being And againe convertibly that this being most perfect in infinitie eternitie goodnesse wisdome glorie c. is God The first reason is from the eternity If there bee not a being which had no beginning then that which was first existent or begun must bee a beginning unto it selfe by causing it selfe to be when it was not But it is impossible that any thing should be a cause and not be for so should it both be and not bee Therefore there is an eternall being the beginning of all things himselfe without beginning And that eternall being is God 2. Seing there is being which could not possiblie raise it selfe out of not being it followes that being was before not being and therfore of necessitie must be eternall for otherwise there was a a time wherein it might be said that being is not being and so not being should have been eternall and b contradictories might have stood together that is not being in eternitie and yet eternitie is most of all being But these things are impossible therefore there is an eternall being and this eternall being we call God 3. Eternitie is For neither can Nature which in continuance tooke her beginning together with time nor yet can mans understanding put any point of beginning in continuance before which some other continuance may not be understood to be Therefore all Nature and Reason must needs yeeld that there is Eternitie Therefore there is an eternall being for if in eternitie you put privation or not being it would be impossible that any thing should be brought out thereby Therefore God is 4. Whatsoever enforces the privation or taking away of a being infinitely and eternally good brings in an infinite and eternall ill But to deny that God is enforces the privation or taking away of a being infinitely and eternally good Therefore to denie that God is brings in an infinite and eternall ill Heare Atheist and consider how thou doest put ill to have the prioritie before good both in being and in action For that which is first must needs be a cause to all things that follow so that the cause of all things being ill every effect necessarily answering the cause every thing should in the very being have beene ill whereas ill is onely morall in the wickednesse of the qualities or action not of the being Gen. 1.31 The greatest excellencie or perfection of every thing is in the likenesse thereof unto the first cause but every thing is more excellent in the being thereof than in the not being therefore in the being it is most like the first cause whereupon it followes that the first cause of all is most of all being therefore before not being and so eternall And that is God All truths inferior and created depend necessarily upon a superior and increated truth for nothing can be in the effect which is not first in the power of the cause Wherefore seeing no space can bee given so great but that it is possible for the understanding a created being truly to conceive a space yet more large nor any number so multiplied but that still a greater number than it may be given the understanding must needs yeeld that there is a being infinite in extension that fils all space and yet is infinitely greater than it and a wisdome or mind numbring which is also infinite which no number can-either exceed or equall but only that most simple unity of his owne most pure and absolute perfection c Therefore there is a God Notes IF any man desire to see other reasons to this purpose let him reade those arguments that are brought by Tho. Aquinas lib. 1. cap. 13. contra Gentiles Sum. Theol. part 1. cap. 2. out of Aristotle and out of Thom. in Savanarola in his booke called Triumphus Crucis cap. 6. The arguments also that are here brought in the chapters following to prove the Eternity Infinity Omnipotency c. of God doe prove that there is a God
this reason and the like which wee make from our owne understanding hath a most sure foundation and ground in the truth of God for therefore is the light of reason and understanding in man as a glasse or image of the divine wisdome created by him in us Iohn 1.4 Ephes 4.24 that we thereby might be led unto the knowledge of Him and so unto that happinesse for which wee are created therefore the understanding doth evermore apply it selfe unto the truth and makes the will to joy therein and to hate that which is false and impossible For reason in man being the image of Christ the second Adam is set in the Paradise of God freelie to eate of every tree therein that is to consider the whole creature which yeelds unto reason infinite truths as fruit whereon to feed to the praise of him that hath created it but if shee that is given to him for his help that is the imagination his Hevah the mother of all living for by the imagination alone the formes of all things live and are lively presented to reason if shee I say deale treacherously with him and without him entertaine speech with the craftie Serpent then is he by her easily perswaded to taste of the forbidden fruit to follow her foolish and wicked suggestions and to let into his understanding falshood and errours which cannot stand with the light of the truth but are onely according to the traditions of Arts falslie so called and the authorities of men misled by opinions Concerning authorities See Postell de Nat. Med. pag. 16.17 and log Cap. 23. n. 8. and note a c The first Mover ceasing to move R. 14. Though this reason shew the truth of the conclusion a posteriori yet is not this argument proper to this place because the question here is onely about the inward actions of God in himselfe not that which is outward upon the creature of which you shall hereafter understand more at large in the 13. Chapter d So is his working infinitely ib. Seeing it is firmely agreed unto both by Divines and Philosophers that God is altogether unmoveable not onely by those kindes of motion properly so called See Log. introduct sect 4. Append. n. 1. but also improper and metaphoricall as change of the will anger desire or other passions it may seeme that this conclusion of Gods infinite action or working is enforced utterly against the truth because it seemes that no working can be without motion I answer that motion and operation or working are very different these are like to motions but neither are motions nor yet with motions for to feele to see to understand to will or any other action immanent or dwelling in the worker are actions operations or workings of the sences the understanding and will but yet no motions but most improperly and onely in likenesse for all working action or operation is of a thing that is in perfection but motion properly so called is alwayes with imperfection and leaves the thing wherein the motion is in possibilitie onely to a further perfection And yet the very moving from place to place may be an example of this working which I have proved in God to be infinite For if you set a ruler upon a pin and turne it with violence upon that centre you shall perceive no part of the surface ouer which it is turned which you shall not see covered every where with the ruler and the swifter it is carried about the better and more closely doth it cover it so that if you suppose that motion to be infinite in swiftnesse with continuance for a certaine time then every part of the ruler in the continuall succession of that time must of necessity be every where upon the under surface according to the length of that time which the ruler doth make from the navell point to the hemme or circumference So that you cannot more rightly call it motion than rest when every part of the ruler is continually upon every part of the surface under it And even so this working which I have proved to be in the Godhead because it is infinite may most truly according to this example be called rest because his owne action in himselfe is that wherein above all other he can take most glorie and delight as being in the perfection of goodnesse power wisdome truth and glorie c. And thus according to the measure of our weake understanding having considered what God is in his being it followes that we enquire also what Hee is according to the manner of his being The Father Almightie CHAP. XI That there is a Trinitie of Persons in the Vnitie of the Deitie Section 1. THat the wisdome of God manifested in this lower creature and all the possibilities that are therein shall at last bee made knowne to man for whose sake and use they were created I have elsewhere sufficiently proved But as yet how farre wee are from thence every man doth sufficiently know For is there any Dyer so overweening in his craft of dying as that he dare take upon him to know all the possibilities that are in the mixing and setting of colours nay in the service of that great god of our pampered gurmandizers I meane the belly is there any Cooke that will take upon him to bee able to make all those very things which are day lie sought out to please the taste if then in those things wherein our sences are most delighted wherein we studie with greedines how to please our selves we must confesse our dulnesse how much more heavie must we needs be in that whereof neither our sences nor our reason nor the highest and best part of our understanding all Nature helping us herein can give us any knowledge Who knowes the thoughts of a man but the spirit of a man that is within him how much more then is it impossible to know the mysteries of God but by that relation which hee hath made unto us of himselfe Therefore the knowledge of that mysterie of the holy Trinitie in the Unitie of the Godhead is that superexcellencie of knowledge which we have by the holy Scripture onely which truth we are so much the more carefull to know and constantlie to uphold first because it concernes that most excellent and high being even of God himselfe secondly because the revelation thereof is from God alone manifested by his word thirdly because it is the foundation of our faith and hope for if Christ our Saviour be not very God and very man the being of our Mediatour and the alsufficiencie of his merit is utterly vanished fourthlie it is one of the maine and principall differences between our most high Religion taught us by God himselfe and the false worship of Idolaters of the Iewes Turkes Arians and other hereticks which from time to time have turned the truth of God into a lye Fifthlie we follow herein the holy Martyrs and the Fathers in the primitive Church and those Councells
than ill seeing ill neither is but in that which is good nor workes but in the power thereof Therfore if man by one ill deed were able to destroy himselfe much more by many good deeds shall he be able to make satisfaction Answer Ill is in every want or failing of that which is good but Good holds all perfections whether in being or in working Therefore man might easily corrupt himselfe but being corrupted hee cannot possibly repaire himselfe nor yet doe any thing that is good or acceptable Math. 7.18 12.33 3. But the satisfaction being now made are wee not restored unto as good an estate by the suffering of Christ as that which Adam lost so that if Adam for his obedience sake might have lived a naturall life eternally wee also for our workes sake may bee accounted worthy of everlasting blisse For if wee be restored by Christ and for his sake accepted our workes likewise are for his sake both accepted and rewarded according to their merit Answer I say that our estate is farre better than Adams in this that his hope of everlasting life being set in his owne obedience did instantly faile but ours standing in the obedience of Christ who is made to us righteousnesse sanctification redemption and life can never faile For therefore because that pretious treasure of eternall life was so carelesly kept by Adam God who loved the salvation of mankinde better then man himselfe would in no wise commit the keeping of that jewell to man any more Therefore though sinne have no power to condemne them that are in Christ yet is it still suffered to dwell in us that wee should not trust in our selves but in the living God For as the Father saith Multum nobis in hac carne tribueremus nisi usque ad ejus depositionem sub veniâ viveremus Aug. de Civ lib. 10. cap. 22. And although Adam by the grace and favour of his Creator might have continued in the estate in which hee was created if hee had stood in his innocency yet could hee not even then have beene said to merit everlasting life For merit or hire comes ever for that which is above duty which cannot bee in the creature towards the Creator As to a hired servant the wages merit or hire comes for his worke because it was in his power whether hee would labour for that master or no being not bound unto him but for his hire but in a bondman the possession of his Lord all his service and labour is his Lords to require and imploy it as it pleaseth him Luke 17.8.9 and this is the condition of the whole creature to the Lord and Creator of all And if Adam in his innocency could not merit much lesse can sinnefull man merit any thing but affliction and death by his sinne and service to the devill to whom hee is no way bound but by his sinne And this difference the Apostle maketh Rom. 6.23 the wages of sinne is death but the free gift of God is eternall life 4. But are wee not commanded to worke out our saluation with feare and trembling Phil. 2.12 and is not the sentence of everlasting life pronounced for the workes of charity which were foreseene in us and for which the kingdome of heaven was prepared for us from the beginning of the world Math. 25. vers 34.35.36 Answer What merit can any man claime for that which another hath principally wrought in him And if God worketh in us to will and to doe Phil. 2.13 what is our worke but that wee should with joy runne after Him that drawes vs Cant. 1.4 Therefore although good workes are ordained of God that wee should walke in them and that wee are created thereunto Eph. 2.10 and that God who chose us in Christ to bee heires of glory ordained all the meanes thereto and workes in us to bee ready to every good worke and thereby makes our calling and election sure unto us yet is not that worke solely and intirely ours but chiefely of the grace and spirit of Christ that dwels in us and crownes His owne good workes in us with everlasting life 1 Cor. 15.10 So then our workes must vanish that every mouth may bee stopped and the whole world may bee guilty before God Rom. 3.19 So that every man notwithstanding his owne workes even the chiefest among the Saints may with Iob abhorre himselfe and repent in sackcloth and and ashes Iob. 42.6 5. The naturall desires common to all men cannot bee in vaine because they come not unto them out of any particular choyse or present necessity but by influence or direction of that common nature which is in all men which though it cannot effect it yet hath it shewed what is to bee wrought for the uttermost good of every particular by the Lord of Nature But every man by the inclination of his owne will doth desire the uttermost perfection and happpinesse of his owne being which hee acknowledges to bee in being united to that which is the greatest good and the enjoying thereof in eternall life Therefore every man by the guidance of nature it selfe doth returne unto God as the Author and Finisher of his happinesse Answer No agent can worke of it selfe above the proper strength and power of it selfe And eternall life is a thing beyond the limits of naturall knowledge and desire which mindes onely the well-being and continuance of the whole man according to the present estate of this naturall life alone But because Hee that wils not the death of a sinner Ezech. 33.11 would have all men to come to the knowledge of the truth 1 Tim. 2.4 therefore are all men so farre instructed or at least if they doe not willfully winke may bee so farre instructed either by the voyce of the creature or by certaine inbred notions or by tradition or by an influence of grace denyed to none that they may know the eternall power and Godhead Rom. 1.20 and the immortality of the soule in a better estate then this life can afford as hath beene said before in Pref. And this is that universall grace which wee may yeeld to bee vouchsafed to all not onely without the visible Church but much more within the Church where by the cleare light of the Holy Scripture all may and ought to know particularly whatsoever is meet for their soules health And this universall grace I say further wee ought to yeeld unto because without it neither the pagans and infidels nor yet the false Christians can bee without excuse But that every one that knowes doth of himselfe according to this knowledge frame his will constantly and effectually to desire whatsoever belongs to eternall life Pelagius will never bee able to demonstrate For he that wils any thing constantly and effectually wils also those meanes constantly and effectually without which that thing cannot bee come unto And because without holinesse no man can see the Lord Heb. 12.14 in whose presence onely is the fullnesse
By which texts it is plaine that the Saviour of mankind must bee both man and God dwelling in man and the second person of the holy Trinitie which we call the Sonne Notes a THe subject no other than the termes For the understanding of this see my second part of Logonomia Introduct Sect. 4. numb 11. b Hee tooke on him the humanitie If it bee most true which is said Col. 1.19 that all fulnesse should dwell in him yea all the fulnesse of the Godhead bodilie how can it bee but that if Christ dwell in our flesh all the persons likewise must bee incarnate For all the Persons together make but one infinite fulnesse of the Deitie And therefore 1. Tim. 3.16 it is spoken without any distinction of Persons that God was manifest in the flesh Answer To become man was a personall proprietie of the Sonne of God for the incarnation was not of the Godhead wherein the Persons are one but of that subsistence according to which the three Persons are distinguished So that as in the Trinitie there be three persons in one nature so in the mysterie of the incarnation there is one person in two natures Now why the person of the Sonne and none other could become man the reasons before doe make it plaine And although it bee most true that all the Persons together are but one God in the infinitie or fulnesse of the Deitie yet is it as true that the infinite fulnesse of the Deitie is in all and every person alike as the fulnesse or perfection of mankinde is in every man equally Neither is that in Tim. spoken without distinction of the persons for it followes immediately He was justified in the Spirit What is that but that the Spirit of God the holy Ghost did justifie his doctrine and Gospell as most true in causing the hearts of all the faithfull to beleeve it But it is most manifest that the witnesse is neither the thing witnessed nor the person in whose behalfe the witnesse is given Neither was this witnesse of the Holy Ghost onely but also of the Father from heaven 2. Peter 4.17 1. Iohn 5.9 10 11. Compare herewith if you please the note g on Chap. 24. § 9. Object 1. In the end of which Chapter you may see other objections fully answered Our Lord. CHAP. XXIIII That this Jesus the Sonne of the Virgin Mary whom the Christian faith confesseth is the Saviour of the world THat reverend and fearfull name of God is a name of glory but the word Lord importeth the title of that right which he hath in his creature And how justly this belongs to our Lord Christ may appeare by that interest which he hath in us both by the right of our creation and of our redemption and of all the benefits which we hope thereby What right he hath in us for our creation it hath appeared in that wee are his workemanship Chap. 13. § 9. Now it remaineth that we make it manifest that he alone is our Mediatour and that besides him there is no other for if the Saviour of the world must of necessitie be man that hee might satisfie the justice of God for the sinne of man as we have proved Chap. 20. and likewise that he must be God that hee may be able to heare and to save all them that come unto him as was manifest Chap. 21. and that the Sonne of God tooke on him our flesh that by him the love of God might be manifest to the creature as it was proved Chap. 23. If there can be but one Sonne of God as it was shewed Chap. 12. and the note thereto it must follow of necessity that there can be but one onely Saviour of mankinde which Saviour is our Lord Iesus the Sonne of the blessed Virgin Mary as it is further manifest by these reasons following 1. It is necessary that all the dignities of God bee magnified in the creature according to the uttermost greatnesse which they can have therein But if this Iesus whom we confesse be the Saviour of the world then all the dignities of God are magnified according to the uttermost extent of greatnesse which it is possible they should have in the creature and that without any abatement or lesning in any one of them for his mercy is magnified to the uttermost in pardoning the sins of many for the merit of one his justice and love in this that he spared not his only Son but gave him to death for a satisfaction for the sin of mankinde his glory in that the creature once sinfull and mortall is made partaker of glorie and immortality his wisdome that out of the greatest ill the destruction of the creature by the malice of the devill he hath brought the greatest good that is the exaltation of the creature beyond that state of happinesse wherein it was created Chap. 18. § 2. and so in the rest But if this Iesus bee not the Saviour of the world as the Iewes affirme if when that other Bar-Coziba of theirs shall come he preach the same doctrine and doe the same glorious miracles which our Lord hath done though it be impossible that God should suffer the world to be so mocked then the same most high and glorious truth should bee both preached and confirmed by a most false and lying Prophet who should professe himselfe the Saviour of the world and was not yet neverthelesse seeing our Lord was the authour and manifester of that truth he shall have the honour to be beleeved and the falshood shall dwell with that other to come But if he shall preach any other doctrine than this which wee have received then neither can the dignities of God bee magnified in his greatest and most excellent worke in the creature that is in the salvation of mankinde as was shewed before neither can his Scriptures bee of absolute authority when another manner of Saviour shall come than they have described unto us but both these things are utterly impossible and therefore this Iesus whom the Christian faith confesseth to be our Lord is the Saviour of the world and beside him there is no other 2. If this Iesus whom wee acknowledge bee the Saviour of the world then the expectation of the most excellent and virtuous men is quieted and at rest in the assurance of his heavenly promise But if this bee not hee but that the Saviour is yet to come for wee have already proved that man having sinned should be restored by a Saviour that should bee both God and man then since that time that Christ the Sonne of God and the virgin Mary came wee that have beleeved in him are in the greatest errour that may bee and all our hope in God through the satisfaction of Christ must bee ashamed all our beleefe in his word is vaine and all the virtues the constancie love and patience of the Martyrs is perished so that when that pretended Messiah shall come he shall not be beleeved or if
1602. by the name of Hebraeomastix The authorities of the Talmud and other Rabins cited by them I have of purpose omitted and with many additions and proofes of the holy Scripture onely have contented my selfe with this plainnesse and brevity which you see But if any man desire to see those Iewish authorities hemay finde them there in Ficinus also de Christ Rel. cap. 27. c. in Postel de orbis concord lib. 1. cap. 3. and in many others Yet those testimonies fitted Lactautius well against the Gentiles which you may read if you will Instit lib. 4. ca. 6. The authorities of the * Sibyls also and such pompous learning I have neglected of purpose because the simplicity of the doctrine of Christ and the certaine truth of this article can no where bee had so plainely truely and powerfully as in the holy Scripture it selfe And therefore having furnisht you with reason against the Atheist and Infidel I leave it to your owne diligence to compare these Scriptures together as they are cited they in the old testament shewing what was to befulfilled in Christ the other shewing the accomplishment of the same * The Iewes acknowledge the authoritie of the old testament See the difference of their sects in the 13 chapter of M. Breerwoods Enquiries and although they doe not beleeve the new yet none of their most shamelesse Rabbies durst ever goe about to refute it or shew the least untruth to bee therein And although it were written in those times and amongst those people which did most violently fight against the truth thereof yet was it so strongly confirmed by miracles by the innocency of the witnesses by the power of the holy Ghost by the constant sufferings of the professors thereof and by the selfe conscience of the persecutors that all the power of the adversary could not discredit it And although the Atheists ever have questioned the authority and certainty of the holy Scriptures as you may reade in the great controversies thereabouts on both sides yet the word of the Lord and the truth thereof indures for ever 1 Pet. 1.25 The answers to their chiefe objections against the old Testament you shall finde most briefe and plaine in Hen. Ainsw additions to the annotations on the law and the defence of the new in Mars Fic de Christ Rel. cap. penult And for your ease you shall finde the most necessary questions hereabout handled in chap. 34. following b Gen. 49.10 The Scepter shall not depart from Iuda nor a Lawgiver from betweene his feet untill Shiloh come and unto Him shall the gathering of the people bee It is strange to see what wretched shifts the wicked Iewes have to wrest the true meaning of this place rather than they will acknowledge the truth that they might be saved Some will have this Shiloh to be Saul others Ieroboam some Nebnchadnezer as you may reade in Pet. Galat. lib. 3 cap. 4. But being convinced by other prophecies and the authoritie of their owne doctors they confesse that this Shiloh must be the Christ and that hee is already come but that hee shall not bee manifested till the time come that they shall be restored to their owne land againe which though it bee true in a sort as I shewed Reason 5. yet to us it is sufficient to marke the circumstances of the text and thereby to remove all scruple and doubt First the word Shiloh is interpreted Her Sonne because hee was to be the Sonne of a virgin without the company of any man Then the other circumstance to whom the gathering or obedience of the people both Iewes and Gentiles should be cannot agree to any of the aforesaid persons For before the daies of Saul Iudah had no governement more than any other tribe and having never had any preeminence it could not be said to Ioose it by Sauls being preferred to the kingdome And although Ieroboam tooke tenne tribes from the house of David yet the kingdome of Iuda did still continue a Kingdome And although Nebuchadnezer ruled over many people yet he subdued them by force they gathered not unto him as the word here signifieth a willing obedience and is therefore by Ierom translated expectation or waiting for So that none of these could bee that Shiloh Therefore their wisest doctors and both their paraphrasts translate it untill Messiah or Christ come the text is so plaine But yet it may bee here questioned how this Scepter or dominion continued in Iuda in the time of the captivity in Babylon and likewise in the time of the Machabees who were Priests of Levi and yet ruled as Kings somewhat more than 160. yeares before Christ came For certaine it is that after Ianna Hircanus the grandfather of Levi who was the great grandfather of the blessed Virgin Luk. 3.24 none of the Stocke of David bare any rule as Prince but the tribe of Levi swayed all untill the time of Herod the great To this it is answered that by the marriages of the Priests with the tribe of Iuda and the family of David as it is manifest in Iehoiada 2 King 11. and others the rule might be said to remaine in Iuda But descents in Israel were accounted by the male-side onely who is therefore called Zacar of a word that signifies to record And therefore in our Lords descent though Tamar Rahab and Ruth are remembred for our comfort of the Gentiles and to shew the constancy of Gods promise His whole genealogie by his mother is reckoned up by S Luke in the seventy seventh generation yet is the account by Ioseph his supposed Father called the Sonne of Heli though hee were onely his Sonne in Law And therefore the Rabbins affirme that in the time of the captivity the great councell of the seventy elders instituted by God numb 11.25 did ever continue And certaine it is that the prince of the house of Iuda Zorobabel of the line of David was he under whom they did returne from captivity But yet that either the one or the other had any authority or rule over their fellow captives in a forraine countrie stauds not with any practice or policie now in use no nor after their returne from thence as it appeares Neh. 9.37 And although Daniel were a chiefe Prince in the Court yet he procured the businesse of the king onely as Lord Treasurer Dan. cap. 6.2 or Chancellour Dan. cap. 2.48.49 as Nehemiah and Mordecai by extraordinary fauour only procured the wealth of their people without any authority over them but by speciall commission But you will say that the right of government remained still to the tribe yea but Iacob speakes of an actuall Shebet that should still remaine Therefore others answer that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Shebeer signifies either a staffe a truncheon or Scepter the ensigne of authority as used by leaders and commanders in warre who are therefore called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so by a metonymia it may signifie
may seem to stand well with the fourth reason for the worlds eternity brought in Chap. 13. if by the world you understand the created wisdome spoken of by these Authours The Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ben a sonne of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 banah to build according to the Idea or representation which is in the minde may bring some proofe hereto but especially the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bar of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bara to create wherefore the Chaldean Paraphrast in Psal 2. vers 7. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yelidticha I have begotten thee hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 berichach I have created thee And Prov. 8.22 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Kanani he possessed me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 barani He created me VVhere the Greeks translated some according to the paraphrase some according to the Text. Among the Fathers also some consented to this opinion as Theophilus Bishop of Antioch about the yeare 180. ad Antolicum lib. 2. God saith he having eternally the Word in himselfe as it is said Iohn 1.1 The Word was with God did then at last bring him forth the first begotten of every creature when he determined to make the world as it is written Psal 2.7 This day have I begotten thee But Origen is slandered to have spoken more meanely of Christ as of a small thing in comparison of the Father as that hee was indeed of the essence of the Father but created see Suidas and Epip haeres 64. But can these things stand together that Hee should be of one being with the Father and yet created Or can it sticke to Origen who writ according to the right faith as you may read In Exod. Hom. 8. But Lactantius without wavering consented to Theophilus Inst lib. 2. cap. 8. lib. 4. cap. 6. The Nativitarii also though Augustine lib. 15. de Trin. cap. 20. make Enomius a follower of Arius their Authour held this same opinion with Theophilus and Lactantius Aug. de haeres cap. 80. But that place of Ps 2. doth not prove that Christ was not brought forth till then that the world should be created For the word this day hath not any respect to time but to the perennity or continuance of the action For Christ is no otherwise brought out this day than he was eternally as it is said Iohn 17.5 and Hebr. 13.8 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same for ever Some of the latter Presbyters of learning also consent to this conclusion See Leo Hebr. Dial. 3. pag. 510. So Raimund Lully Artis Magnae parte 9. cap. 8. hath this By this meanes mans understanding knowes that there is one great created being which is greater than all the creature beside which I dare neither name nor declare in this place because this Art is generall Also Iohn Picus makes it the first of his conclusions according to the Chaldees That the first order of separate or created beings is that of the fountaine which by the meanes of vision is superexalted above all the rest as I even now explaned the superiour Shekinah or habitation of the Cabalists But this conclusion of Picus is after the later interpreters of the Chaldaean Theology For if you looke unto the oracle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. You shall see that both Plethon and Psellus interpret it thus That the being of the Father is utterly imcomprehensible and beyond the understanding not only of men and Angels but also of the Sonne himselfe and this not out of any envie but onely by the impossibility of the thing that that which is infinite should be apprehended by a finite and created being The Arians follow this but Psellus rejects it as contrary toour Christian doctrine Also * See Aug. de Civ lib. 10. cap. 2 Plotinus Iamblicus Porphyrie Proclus and their schollers though they no Christian yet hold that for truth which Picus from the Caldeans hath delivered And although Steuchus De perenni philosophia lib. 1. 2. hath cited many authorities from them as meeting with that truth which wee defend concerning the Trinity yet if you examine them well you shall finde that most of them agree with this conclusion of Postellus For if they allow all the conclusions of the Chaldeans intire as Psellus in summa affirmes they must of necessitie hold the created being of this second wisdome with Postellus And although Plato holds but what hee likes of these conclusions yet in this point as his commentator Ficinus gathers out of his Timaeus and Epinomis he is directly for this created divinity See the argument on the sixt Epistle But to all these authorities first and last I answere thus much that although it be plaine that these authors were of this minde yet that binds not that the truth doth stand with them Onely it seemes that seeing a famous Christian Church and so many great Doctors and expositors beside though the Chaldaean and Platonicks be set at naught were of this Iudgement seeing no Synod either oecumenicall or nationall forought that I know did ever condemne it it may be held as an opinion not utterly hereticall especially seeing the booke of Ecclesiasticus both by the warrant of some fathers and other Churches and especially of our owne hath been commended as profitable to the advancement of Christian vertue though not for the establishment of doctrine Art 6. And many choice Chapters from thence appointed to bee read in our publique Liturgie even that twentie fourth where this point both of the eternall v. 18. and succeeding generation v. 8.9 is plainly taught See November 7. Morning prayer 1. But Postellus to ascertaine this matier to the understanding brings these reasons following First God is altogether unmoveable as in place because he fills all so likewise in wisedome and in will because hee is every way infinite And therefore it was necessary in the creation which was not but with a most particular dispensation or providence by which all causes and effects are ordered that there should be an agent which gave to every thing a being and that a severall and distinct individuall being which cannot bee but by those specificall formes or proprieties by which every thing doth worke according to kinde which could not bee but by such an agent as hath both an infinite activity of being by which he is one with God and likewise an infinite possibility of working or not working according to the particular possibilities in nature by which hee must of necessitie communicate with the Creature And this is that Wisedome created and increate without which nothing was made This both the Creator and the Creature that forme of formes in whom by whom and for whom are all things pag. 21. 103 c. I answer That if it must of necessitie be put that God cannot worke without Himselfe because He is infinite and therefore immoveable then for the same reason it must follow that no such great created being can at all
this will nothing at all support those unwritten verities For it is utterly denyed and that according to reason and the word of God that any part of the holy Scripture is perished 1. For can we thinke that it stood with the goodnesse of God to give His Word to His Church for comfort and instruction and stood it not with His providence to preserue that Word that it should not perish but accomplish that thing for which it was sent Esay 55.11 But divers objections are brought hereto as you may see in the author G. Langf forenamed in the 4. § 1. The booke of the warres of IEHOVAH is mentioned Numb 21.14 but not extant Therefore some part of the holy Scripture is perished Answer It ought first to be manifest what this booke was but in briefe the bookes of the Chronicles of the Kings of Iudah and of the Kings of Israel are often mentioned in the bookes of Kings and Chronicles yet were not those bookes therefore holy Scripture written by the Prophets but rather by the Recorders or Secretaries of state appointed for that purpose as the histories of other kingdomes are or ought to be written and of this ranke may that booke mentioned by Moses seeme to be For it is not necessary that all writings mentioned in the holy Scripture should be holy Scripture For the Poets whose writings Saint Paul mentions were but Heathens and Iannes and Iambres as profane writers call him Mambres are no where mentioned in holy Scripture but onely 2 Tim. 3.8 2. A second doubt is from that which is in Ioshua 10.13 and 2 Sam. 1.18 where mention is made of the booke of Iasher whereto though some according to the interpretation of the word just or upright will have the sence of that text of Ioshua Is it not recorded by him whose writings are upright and true as it is said Iohn 21.24 This is the Disciple that testifieth these things and we know that his testimony is true yet because the booke is mentioned in times above 390. yeeres distant it seemes to me rather to be some Liger or booke of record wherein such memorable things were written by the appointment of their Synedrion as might serue for remembrance to future ages for that Synedrion or great Councill of 70. Elders instituted by God under Moses Numb 11. never failed so long as their state lasted 3. The writings of the Prophets themselues as of Nathan and Gad mentioned in 1 Chron. 29.29 of Ahia and Iddo 2 Chron. 9.29 of Iehu 2 Chron. 20.34 are utterly lost Answer Not so For as it is manifest that all the things written in the 2 of Sam. were done after his death so likewise may we very well thinke that both the bookes of Iudges and Ruth 2 of Samuel and the two bookes of Kings for some give the Chronicles wholly to Ezra were written by divers Prophets whom God raised up in all the ages of that Church to bee inditers of His Word and were as Saint Luke saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 eye-witnesses of the things which they recorded and these Prophets here mentioned with others were the Authors of those bookes 4. But some texts are cited in the new Testament which are 1. not found in the old as that in Matth. 2.23 Hee shall be a Nazarite or else are 2. not found in the Author cited by which we may thinke that some booke of his is lost as that which S. Matthew cites out of Ieremy Chap. 2.17 is not found in all that booke 3. Moreover S. Paul remembers the word of our Lord Actes 20.35 which is no where extant beside 5. And the Epistle to the Laodiceans mentioned Coloss 4.16 is utterly lost For that schedule which is found here and there is rejected by every one as unworthily to be remembred by the Apostle 5. Iude likewise cites the prophecie of Henoch which is not found except in the Talmud Answere 1. Some referre that of Matth. 2.23 to Esay 11.1 The Branch that should grow out of the roote of Iesse But it is more fully verefyed in that which is written Iud. 13.5 Where Sampson the Figure that should begin to save Israel is a Nazarite unto God and Hee much more which is separate from sinners and should perfect the deliverance of all the Israel of God and the text cited by the Evangelist may not onely intend both these but whatsoever else either the Law or the Prophets understand by the figurative snow-white puritie of the Nazarites Lam. 4.7 and is therefore cited in the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of all the Prophets 2. The other citation in Saint Matthew where one Prophet is named by another doth not prove that any booke of Ieremiah is lost neither was it of any ignorance or forgetfulnesse in the Evangelist or yet mistaking of them that have copied out that booke but because that the seed of the Woman so long expected was now to come into the world it may be that Zachariah by interpretation Remember the Lord is now Ieremiah exalt the Lord who never ought to hee remembred without his praise especially in the performance of that inestimable benefit for man-kind 3. Concerning that which is cited by Saint Paul Actes 2.25 If he had that which he cites by the suggestion of the Holy-Ghost as wee may well thinke or that the saying of Christ was in fresh remembrance with them that heard it it is not therefore to bee concluded that S. Paul cites it out of any booke now lost seeing he might receive it from those Disciples which had heard it 4. And as to that Epistle to the Laodiceans it is but a common errour that S. Paul makes mention of any such but hee perswades the Colossians for the better understanding of some passages in the Epistle written to them to read the Epistle sent from Laodicea to him and that they of Laodicea should read that which he sent to the Colossians as containing doctrine and instruction fit for both the Churches to know and doe 5. And if Saint Iude were taught of God that Henoch had so prophecied though the prophecie were never written or if he cited it from any booke which went under the name of Henoch if nothing in the booke were Henoch's beside this prophecie Saint Iudes citing doth not make the booke Canonicall Scripture no more than S. Pauls citing the heathen Poets or if S. Iude had it onely by tradition that Henoch had so prophecied how doth it make for the question For it is not said that all things are false which are delivered by tradition but that in the matiers of the faith and doctrine of the Church those traditions have no force or credit which are contrary to the truth of God revealed in His Word 5. But it is yeelded that though some part of Scripture be lost yet that which remains is sufficient and containes all things necessary Answere Our Lord saith Luk. 10.42 That one thing is necessary which in Iohn 17.3 he
of Arius should not provide for your safety as he did He denied the authority of S. Iohns writings to be authenticall And why because this earth-bred Giant which would pull Christ out of the throne of His Deitie should with his lightning be suddenly burnt Beleeve you the Scripture Is Iohns authority sufficient then the case is plaine We are in Him that is true in His Son Iesus Christ who is very God and eternall life 1. Ioh. 5.20 Can you now confer this Scripture with that place I have said yee are Gods and not be ashamed I and the Father are one The Iewes understood that He herein professed Himselfe to be very God and are you His enemy more then they Reade Ioh. 10. ver 30. 33. 34. and you may understand the meaning of both places The devills acknowledged Him to be God of Infinite power I know Thee who Thou art even that Holy One of God And will not you confesse as much as the devills But this is more then I thought to say onely you may see hereby that we speake no other thing then Christ Himselfe even in His enemies understanding said Now if you could see a little the folly of your own opinion that were inough to cause you to put on a better mind I will touch it as lightening doth touch the ground for if you be willing to be reformed there is no doubt but you may propound it to the learned Divines and be fully satisfied You say Christ is onely man but yet indued with the infinite Power of God Here first you doe injurie to the Highest to make the Power of God to be accidentall unto Him whereas hee is purus actus absolute perfection and without shadow of change His Being is most simple and pure not capeable of accidents Then His Being is such as no addition can be made thereto to make it more then it is therefore it is necessary that He be ever actually whatsoever he may be Besides His Being is Infinitely distant from Not-Being therefore His Power is inseparable Againe if there come any thing to God as an accident it must come unto Him from Himselfe or else from another not from another for He is impassible or such as cānot suffer violence not from Himselfe for all such accidents doe proceed à potentiâ that is from the imbecillity or imperfection of the subject but His Being is most simple and infinitely perfect Againe all accidents do rise from the matier forme or composition of the subject In Him is neither matier forme nor cōposition Now al things we see in this world do consist ex actu potentiâ of perfection from God imperfection from thēselues for of themselues they are non entia absolutely nothing Yea even the very Angels and the soule it selfe are partakers of this composition for nothing is purus actus but God alone therefore are they subject to accidents yet they which come neerest to perfection are most free from accidents as that which is meere perfection hath no accidents at all Know then that all the dignities of God are in him essentially one God For the Goodnesse of God His Power His Wisedome His Glory c. Being all infinite do of necessitie concurre in the nature of Infinitie Whence it followeth that whatsoever is in Him is essentially Himselfe therefore the power of God is not accidental or such as may be imparted to a man The learned Hebrues according to this doe hold that Ensoph or Infinitie is not to be numbred among the other attributes of God because it is that abstract Vnity whereinto they all essentially concurre and from which they all essentially proceed and hence by the way take another strong argument to the former question for if God bee essentially a Father then the terme correlative a Sonne must be in the Godhead also and that essentially But now againe see another folly in your supposition The work of our Redemption is a work of infinite goodnesse mercie power wisedome and glory therefore it followeth that Christ the worker had infinite mercie power wisedome c. Now I demand had Christ this infinite goodnesse and power so given to Him of God that the Father Himselfe had in the meane time none This you dare not say for that were to say that God did cease to be God which cannot stand with His Eternity Now if God the Father had notwithstanding this absolute infinite power of Christ of which he spake All power is given unto Me both in heaven and in earth then it followeth that either there were two infinities of power or else that these two which had this infinite Power were all one Infinite The first is against the nature of Infinitie for that is absolutely infinite which so comprehendeth all things as that it leaveth nothing without it selfe and yet is not comprehended to any other Besides if you would say that the Father and the Sonne had each of them severall indiuisible infinite Powers it must follow that neither of their Powers were absolutely infinite because each of them had not the infinite Power of the other And besides that both these infinite Powers must be conjoyned with infinite weakenes because they must be mutually subjected to the infinite Power one of the other But both these things are impossible So you see that two Infinities can by no meanes stand together therefore it followeth that these two to wit the Father and the Son are in Being one and that of infinite Power and this is that which I strive for which as you see I have concluded by your own assertion The time would faile me to lay before your eyes the manifold untruths which would ensue of your position which savoureth neither of wit judgement nor learning And therefore I see how they which have once departed from the truth must of necessrity run into infinite absurdities Therefore looke back and be ashamed of such new-fangled toys as you do daily imagine which in truth do argue the great inconstancy and vanity of your mind withall such palpable blindnes of understanding as the darknes of Egypt For tel me without selfe-liking what sound judgement doth this argue to be driven about with every wind of doctrine a Protestant a Brownist an Anabaptist an Antichrist What bringing up what gift of learning and knowledge have you that you should presume to oppose your sentence against the faith doctrine of all the Christian Churches in the world Blush and learne with meeknes the truth of that Word which is able to save your soule You may see by your owne miserable experience what it is to forsake the Vnitie of Faith and the Communion of the Saints who imbrace the truth of Gods word and have manifest tokens that they are the true Church to wit The word of God truely taught and the Sacraments duely administred What if there want perfection The Church militant must ever confesse I am lovely yet black For it is impossible that any church should be without imperfection so long as the world standeth but at the end it shall be presented without spot or wrinkle Therefore remember from whence you are fallen and repent and doe the works of righteousnesse lest Christ whom you so despite come against you shortly The worke of Christianity is not in foolish questions and disputing about needles subtilties but in doing the works of truth and righteousnesse Pray and endeavour your selfe thereto And till such time as God for His Christs sake vouchsafe to have mercy on you the enemy of His Son and give you grace to repent of this great wickednes I am neither your friend nor yet your foe ALEX. GIL FINIS