shew in those wordes I answere it is to be said that one thing may be said to be before another two waies Tho. Aq. 22. q. 4. ar 7. one way of it selfe another way by accident and of it selfe faith is the first of all other vertues for as in things agible and to be done the end is the beginning as is abouesaid it is behoofefull that the Theologicall vertues which haue the last end for their obiect be the first and take place of other vertues and for the last end it selfe it is behoofefull that first it be in the vnderstanding then in the will because the will is not carried vpon any thing but as it is apprehended in the vnderstanding therefore for that the last end is in the will by hope and charitie and in the vnderstanding by faith Tho. Aqu. 12. q. 34. art 4. ad princip art q. 13. art 3. it is behoofefull that faith be the first of all vertues because naturall vnderstanding cannot reach vnto God as he is the obiect of blisse in which sort hope and charitie aymeth vnto him yet accidentally another vertue may be before faith for the cause which is accidentally is accidentally the first Now to remoue the impediment appertaineth to that cause which is accidentally as it is manifest by the Philosopher accordingly Aristoteles in 8. Phisuli 8. text 32. to 2. whereunto some vertues may bee said accidentally to be before faith in how much they remoue the impediments of beleeuing as fortitude remoueth inordinate feare hindering faith humilitie pride by which the vnderstanding refuseth to submit it selfe to the truth of faith and the same may be said of some other vertues although they be not truly vertues vnlesse faith be presupposed Augustin contra Iouinianum l. 4. cap. 3 tom 7. as it appeareth by Saint Augustine in his booke against Iouinian Hence it appeareth by this Doctor that if faith be wanting no Christian can haue that reuealed knowledge which necessarily for his saluation hee is bound to haue and therefore I incessantly laboured to finde out the assurednesse of this faith and the more that I thought how I might finde out this faith so necessarie to saluation it pleased God to suffer me to proceede in my search for some infallible rule by which I might measure without danger of mistaking the true faith of Christ and thereby be most comfortably led as with the fierie pillar like the Israelites by night through the wildernesse of this world Exo. 13. vers 22. vnto the most desired land of euerlasting happinesse and securitie where that promise of God made by the mouth of his Prophet may be verified of vs Esay 32. vers 18 My people shall dwell in a peaceable habitation and in sure dwellings and in quiet resting places CHAP. VI. Containing the fourth fundamentall obseruation about the rule and straight mete-wand of the true Christian faith BEing thus arriued by Gods grace to discouer and rightly to obserue how important a thing it is to build vpon this foundation of true faith The true Canonicall Scriptures the chief rule of faith without which all the building of our soules would be but weake and soone fall to ruine I felt my selfe most forcibly moued by Gods Spirit with all humilitie and diligence to search out the most straight rule where no crookednesse should appeare with the which I might so truly measure out the right faith and true Church of God which Saint Paul calleth the Piller and firmament of truth In the desire whereof occurred vnto my memorie the Angell that talked with Saint Iohn Apocal. 21. vers 15. hauing a golden reed in his hand to measure the spirituall Hierusalem with all the gates the walles the foundations and all the parts of that great citie wishing that it would please God to bestow vpon me such a golden reed wherewith I might measure out the true faith and Church of God that all that are crooked in faith and misproportioned in their liues might find out the truth and be in the number of those of whom the Psalmist saith Psalme 32.11 Laetamini in domino exultate insti gloriamini omnes recti corde Be glad ye righteous and reioyce in the Lord and bee ioyfull all yee that are vpright in heart Whereupon I began to reflect vpon the chiefest rules spoken of either by the Church of Rome or other Churches pretending reformation and examining with a great desire of truth whether visibilitie and continuance of personall succession of Bishops in any Church or whether the Popes sole iudgement and definitiue sentence either with a Councell or tanquam ex Cathedra without a Councell or whether vnwritten traditions or whether the written word and facred Scriptures could be vnto me a straight rule of true faith and of the true Church of Christ me thought I found by all probable euidences and allowed testimonies that only and principally the written word of God I meane the true canonicall Scriptures could be the golden rod and straight mete-wand wherewith the true proportion and frame of Christian faith could bee measured in so much that me thought I might well say to my inexplicable comfort and to the honor of God as that high soaring Eagle Saint Iohn said Apoc. 11. vers 1. There was giuen me a reed like vnto a rod and it was said vnto mee rise and mete the Temple of God and the Altar and them that worship therein 2 But heere thou wilt say gentle Reader that this is but an imagined golden reed Obiections against Scripture as the chiefe or certaine rule and that this is but as crooked a measure as any other in respect of the many difficult places of Scripture which tire out the braines of the most learned as also in regard of the diuersitie of iudgements that is found about the sence of Scriptures for that the translations hauing been diuers it is hard for any man to iudge which is the truest but all these mists of but apparent reasons will easily be disperst if thou wilt please but heedily to peruse the proofes and authorities I bring for this my sure and strongest fundamentall obseruation I know onely but three kinds of strong arguments that may be produced for any veritie as namely the sacred Scriptures the authoritie of the learned and the force of natural reasons all which three do proclaime with a loud voice vnto vs that the written word is the most certain sufficient and infallible rule of faith that we can haue in this world and consequently the true golden mete-wand of Gods eternall truth and all Christian reuealed verities 3 This haue I gathered first out of the Scriptures By proofe of Scripture Esay 8.20 for I find in Esay the Prophet that we must repaire to the Law and to the testimonie if any speake not according to that word Prou. 2. vers 1. Prou. 2. vers 9. there is no light in them I
haue most plaine Scriptures in all points for the Catholike faith he meaneth the faith of the present Church of Rome Doctor Hill in his quart of reasons the eight reason And Doctor Hill seemes willing to haue it thought that they build vpon the Scriptures in all points of doctrine when he sayth Neither may here the Protestants reply and say that the Papists build vpon miracles visions prophecies and vpon such like but not vpon the Word for all that they alledge are most agreeable to the word of God neither doe they teach any doctrine but such as is deriued out of the holy Bible This affertion sheweth much weaknesse of iudgement and little skill euen in the grounds of Diuinitie for who is so ignorant that knoweth not the Papists doe build vpon miracles visions prophecies And who so simple amongst them that know not that they build least vpon the word when they generaly teach that the written word is not sufficient for faith without traditions And what a foule misbeseeming vntruth is it for a Doctor to say That all that they alleadge are most agreeable to the word of God when they ordinarily obiect that the perpetuall virginitie of the virgine Marie the assumption of her bodie into heauen the baptizing of reasonlesse children the keeping of the Sunday and others the like are not to be proued by the word of God but are built onely vpon traditions Is not this then a very grosse forgetfulnesse to affirme That they teach not any Doctrine but such as is deriued out of the holie Bible And yet he forgetteth himselfe so much that againe in the same reasons hee saith euen for the time past That the Catholikes meaning Papists euer squared their Doctrine by the Line and the Leuell of the word of hir Spouse and therfore neuer had cause to reiect the least iote of the holie Bible and at one word the Catholikes follow the Bible By all which it seemeth most apparent that the learned doe approue the word of God that is the Canonicall Scriptures to be the most certain sufficient and most infallible rule that can be assigned What reason then haue I to forsake the iugement of so many learned men both ancient and moderne Writers who heerein are most conformable to Scripture it selfe 9 For if we consider rightly of the nature of faith Natural reason sheweth this rule obseruing that the knowledge whereto it consenteth and the end to which it leadeth are supernaturall nothing can seeme more agreeable to naturall discourse than to gather also that only that book which containes Gods reuealed verities can be the sufficientesi means to know them which is the holy writings of the old and new Testament If a man should aske me why I beleeue the creation of the world all the miracles wrought by Moses Elias and Elisaeus that there is a God that Christ is is the sonne of God that he was borne of a virgine I cannot answere with assurednesse because this Priest or that Priest teacheth me so for reason will obiect that hee may erre or that all Priests agree not therein or that first I must be assured he teacheth me doctrine of such a Church as cannot misinstruct me which I must know by some other meanes Therefore my only answere must be that I beleeue because those Scriptures reuealed from God doe teach me which are the most sufficient rule whereby I can haue assured knowledge of truth reuealed from God by all which it seemed most cleare vnto m that onely the Scriptures can be the most assured sufficient and infallible rule by which I am to measure my faith and all vertues belonging thereunto and therefore all other rules are verie subiect to the crookednesse of many errors Siluest vers 60. fides Nu. 2. Hence I began to see my former error in holding with Siluester that the Pope as the vice gerent of Christ vpon earth was to be my rule according to his assertion taken out of Saint Thomas The Pope hath the primacie of the vniuersall Church to whom it appertaineth to determine those things which belong to faith 22. 1. 11. ar 3. that they may bee held of all with a constant faith and in him resideth the authority of the vniuersall Church Therefore it belongeth to faith to adhere vnto the sentence of the chiefe Bishop in those things which belong to faith yea also in those things which belong vnto good manners because in such the Church cannot erre nor consequently her head as head or as Bishop which I vnderstand alwaies to be true when in doubts he is required not as a learned man or such a person but as the head of Christianity or according to Archidiaconus Note this when he determineth with the Councell of Cardinals but the first is better because the Pope may be without Cardinals But when I remembred that two Popes namely Sixtus and Clemens set out two Bibles within two yeares space for Sixtus Bible came forth in the yeare 1590. and Clements in the yeare 1592. with commaundement to be read and followed vpon penalties mentioned in their seuerall breues wherein many disagreements contradictions and contrarieties appeared in so important a matter of faith as the appointment of what is Scripture and what is not that herein Pope Sixtus grieuously erred I concluded that the Popes sentence definitiue could not bee a sufficient rule for me to measure my faith by vnlesse I would be like vnto a principall Romane Clarke of this land affirming that heere in England he thought the opinion of Cardinall Bellarmine the best to be held concerning deposition of kings namely that the Pope hath his dominion in temporalties onely indirectly yet if he were in Rome he would follow the opinion of Bosius that he hath it directly as the most plausible there And much wondering that such an assertion should passe from the mouth of so graue a man I began to inferre that if but place or persons were the rule of such mens faith in matters of such waight it was time for me who regarded but the saluation of my soule to seeke after some better rule more sure and infallible 10 Now then courteous Reader hauing found out this most sufficient rule of faith namely the holy Scriptures I referre my selfe vnto your impartiall censure to iudge whether I could doe lesse then to measure all the doctrinall points of my faith by this golden meet-wand and therewith measure out the spirituall and true Church of Christ which if thou shalt iudge fit for me I hope such shall be the care of thine owne saluation as to vse it alwaies in like manner for thy selfe that thy faith may be free from all crookednesse of heresies and thereby be made partakers of Gods promises for the manifold diuisions about the Church the diuers errours taught by those that pretend to bee other mens Teachers and euen the loue of thy selfe may well make thee say with holy Dauid following the
as the Church of Rome teacheth who being deuoted much to the virgine Marie prayed often vnto her to bee deliuered from this doubt Who being one day at Masse the Hoast before the saying of the Pater noster was gone out of his sight whereof as hee was in a great amazement the virgine Marie appeared vnto him holding her sonne Iesus betwixt her armes and said vnto him This is he whom I brought into this world this is he whom you haue consecrated this is he whom you haue held and touched with your hands and shewed to the people to be adored which you eate and drinke in the Sacrament behold here I giue you my Sonne with reuerence and deuotion to be receiued of you and so as shee presented him vnto him he changed at that instant againe into the forme of bread whom he receiued and so his doubt ceased Here you see courteous Reader strange miracles alledged by the Papists in confirmation of their doctrine one while the bread is vnseene then Christ and our Ladie and then againe the forme of bread another while a Mule forsaking his prouender to adore God in the Sacrament whether these be not such signes wonders and great prodigies as may seduce the elect if it were possible I leaue to the holy Ghost to informe you the truth saying Nolite eis credere beleeue them not And one more yet I will relate vnto your memorie which hath beene wrought of late yeares and may be esteemed for a notable lie Till Bred. 7. Col. sac c. 7. There was a certaine Caluinist that married a Catholike woman that is Papist that long endeuoured to induce her to heare a Caluinist Minister preach The wife after she had a long time contradicted him was at last constrained to goe by the rigorous speeches and threatnings of her husband yet did she first acquaint her ghostly father there with who aduised her to obey the commaundement of her husband and to goe onely once to the said Sermon yet with condition to goe first to Confession and to the Communion The woman hauing performed the aduise of her ghostly father strengthned with the Sacraments went to the Sermon and she was no sooner entred but the Preacher became as silent and mute as a fish yet said at last after a little pause Here is some bodie present that hath eaten of the bread of Papists which is the cause that I will now giue ouer preaching hoping to make recompence another time The husband who was present seeing the Preacher A pretie fiction to disgrace Caluinists by Gods permission to become silent and disabled to prosecute his matter for the presence of one that had receiued the holy Communion who being returned home enquired of his wife whether shee had not receiued the Communion that morning or not she without dissimulation answering yes her husband suddainly knew that this doctrine of the Caluinists was false and accursed in that being placed with the light of the Sacraments of the Catholike Church it withered so and came to nought whereupon presently he made a good fire burned all his bookes to pouder and ashes and became himselfe a child of the Catholike Church In which miracle first I obserue that the ghostly father of this woman gaue her leaue for obedience to her husband to go to the Church of Caluinists which how it can hang with the doctrine of Paule the fifths Breue who sheweth it vnlawfull for English Catholikes to goe to the Churches of Heretikes viz. of all Caluinists and Protestants that are so in his iudgement vnlesse it be said that the Church of Rome holds one doctrine of faith lawfull at one time that is not lawfull at another time I should be glad to be resolued But this I obserue to proceede from Gods prouidence that the inuentors of these and the like miracles for the confirmation of their doctrine in one point doth often in some circumstance or other shew such ignorance or falsehood that discouereth them either not to approue the matter they intend or else runneth into some other error lesse tolerable shewing them most plainely to be such signes and wonders as Christ giueth a Caueat of them Not to be beleeued Many other miracles I might here insert but that I will not be too tedious in such idle tales fitter to be told amongst children as fables than to any men of more ripe iudgement yet are they amongst the Clergie of Rome of such account that their Sermonists are stuffed with them as may be obserued in Iacobus de Voragine Iohannes Meff Bernard de Bust Philippus Dies and many the like and are held more profitable for the people than any other manner of doctrine Yet I obserue one thing by reading of their liues of Saints that many miracles which were authenticall for many hundred yeares past are now growne to be Apocryphall as may be seene by comparing the auncient liues of S. George S. Katherine the Queene and others with them as they are of late yeares corrected and written by Lipeloo following Baronius and other writers of the same kind 12 Now therefore to draw neere my conclusion My conclusion about miracles what fruit could I better gather vpon the due obseruation of Christs warning vnto the world Not to beleeue such miracles than that the Church of Rome cannot bee the true Church of God that either winketh or authoriseth infinite numbers in the same nature as these are of which I haue alreadie recorded out of her owne Writers for which cause I could not but abandon her Communion and flye to that Church which like a faithfull Spouse resteth contented with the former miracles where with Christs Church was begun and chiefely relying vpon the holy Scriptures and the auncient doctrine of the Primitiue Church Yet is not my opinion in this point of miracles so to bee vnderstood as that I doe thinke no true miracles at all shall euer be done in the declining age of Gods Church but I would haue it knowne that my iudgement is that none are to be beleeued which are pretended to be done in confirmation of new doctrines not taught in the Scriptures not knowne to the auncient Church because it is most euident that Christ hath forbidden all beleefe of them and therefore not to be esteemed of otherwise than as of illusions of Sathan wherewith to enchant soules and to make them beleeue lyes in stead of truth and verities Oh what a miserie is it to see how many simple sincere and ouer-credulous Christians are cousened with these deceits and illusions of the Diuell and the true markes of Antichrist Let me therfore entreat thee courteous reader to remember the predictions of these signes and wonders aboue mentioned forespoken of by Christ S. Paule and S. Iohn and not so fondly to be lead blind-folded to the eternall destruction of thy soule by too much credulitie Be not like the Scribes and Pharisies seeking after signes from heauen for the faith least you
be another not this Damasus In Appar pag. 378. Tom. 1. pag. 573. Bar to 4. pag. 428. which Baronius saith containeth many things repugnant vnto themselues almost in euery Pope and therefore he thinketh it to be collected out of diuers authors Master Doctor Heskins in his Parliament of Christ to proue the sacrifice of the Masse alleageth Amphilochius who liued in the yeare 390. as the author of the life of Saint Basil Pag. 157. Bar Mart. Ian. 1. pag. 6. Spurius Posseuin in Appar pag. 77. yet Baronius saith That in the iudgement of all the wiser sort it is thought to be some bodies else And Posseuine saith The bastard Amphilochius cannot be his vnder whose name it is carried about Glicas in the fourth part of his Annals hath taught vs. By all which examples of the Papists alle aging such counterseit Fathers for the confirmation of this doctrine of the Masse as also many other points I can by no meanes thinke but that many of them do teach this doctrine most wittingly and maliciously against their owne conscience and therefore sinne deadly against the holy Ghost heaping Gods iudgements vpon them against the day of his wrath and also I assure my selfe that their doctrine cannot be good which is vpheld by such counterfeit and weake props as are the writings of bastard teachers and counterfeit bookes But besides the former obseruations The pretended priuiledges of the Masse most fond Ioannes de Comb. compend Theol. verit li. 6. cap. 18. which doe sufficiently discouer the erroneous doctrine taught by the Church of Rome concerning the Masse the great and maine excellent priuiledges which she pretendeth to waite vpon this sacrifice is not to be omitted whereof Ioannes de Combis alleageth diuers saying The Masse hath many prerogatiues First because it is celebrated by one that is fasting Secondly because only in a Church and vpon an altar vnlesse sometimes of necessitie vnder a Tent or in some other honest place Thirdly because it is behouefull that he that celebrateth bee a Priest Fourthly because it is behouefull that hee be clad in sacred vestments Fifthly because only it is done in the day and not in the night vnlesse in the Natiuity of the Lord. Sixtly because it is celebrated with a lighted candle yea though a thousand Sunnes should shine vpon the earth Seuenthly because there words doe sound which are Diuine Angelicall and humane Diuine words when the Pater noster is said or sung and when the words of the Lord are read in the Gospell Angelicall words when Glorie be to God in the highest but humane words in the Collects and the like Eighthly because there are heard three of the noblest tongues viz. Hebrew as Saboath and Osanna Greeke as Kyrie eleison Latine as in others which are there Ninthly because the Masse in his kind is as full of mysteries as the sea of drops as the Sunne of beames as the firmament of Starres as the imperiall heauen of Angels Tenthly because Priests in solemne Churches haue in their Masse many Ministers the Deacon Subdeacon and Acolytes Eleuenthly because the Angels being there in the presence of such maiestie it sufficeth vs to be schollers Twelfthly because there is the Lord of heauen and earth I might vnto these twelue adde the effects of the sacrifice of the Masse also taught by Bernardinus de Busto who amongst many others very ridiculous putteth for one this prerogatiue Bern. de Bust. in ser de Sacrif Mis viz. quamdin quis audit sacrum not senescit man waxeth not old so long as hee heares Masse When I read these priuiledges after it had pleased God to giue me a true vnderstanding of the Masses idolatries I could not but grieue that men should be thus deceiued by the diuels suggestions as to giue credit vnto such idle deuises for the maintenance of Gods dishonor and the diuels seruice Is it not a great prerogatiue thinke you of the Masse that the Priest must be fasting before he go to take a peece of wafer and a prertie quantitie of good Maligo rich Canarie or other strange wine I trow it is a prettie breakfast to take three draughts of such wine although there be a few drops of water in the last This priuiledge I haue obserued pleaseth the Iesuites best of all who scorne to haue weake wine as Clarret but commonly make prouision of the best comfortable Sackes for that purpose and will lightly take more into the Challice then any other Priests out of a greater care they haue that no particles of Christs sacred flesh should stay about the sides of the Chalice which religious care is a good faire cloake for them to warme their fasting stomackes with the more beartie and full draught so that in truth this fasting priuiledge of the Masse serues but for a colour to haue a good breakfast and so to comfort the Priests stomacke that many a Lay man would be full glad of the like The other prerogatiues as weakly grounded vpon mans inuentions not on Scriptures or Apostolicall traditions in truth are as meane but especially that great prerogatiue of the Masse viz. that a man groweth not old so long as he heareth Masse is one of the foolishest conceits of a Franciscan Frier that euer I heard or read For if it were true there is no Doctor Steuens water could so preserue a mans life or prolong it as the hearing of a Masse and I thinke many would heare more Masses then they doe if this were sound Diuinitie but by this it is easie to discouer the Masse not to be as the Church of Rome teacheth a principall act of religion and a worke that surpasseth all the workes that euer God wrought as the worke of creation and redemption more miracles appearing in the Sacrament then in either of them as may be obserued in Ioannes de Combis Lib 6. de cap. 14. and noted by Master Perkins in his Reformed Catholike and not any whit touched as farre as I could perceiue in master Doctor Bishop against him but rather a most diabolicall illusion of the world drawing men to serue the creature in stead of the Creator and the diuell in stead of God And this in very truth appeareth most plainely The Masse confirmed by false miracles a palpable marke of false doctrine if wee consider diligently how the Pseudochrists and false prophets of the Church of Rome endeuor as it were seeing the weaknes of their cause to establish and make good their doctrine of the Masse with the signes wonders and prodigies which Christ himselfe the Sauiour of our soules willeth vs not to beleeue which are so ridiculous that no man of sound iudgement reading them can chuse but laugh and smile at them howsoeuer out of true charitie and a right religious zeale he haue greater cause to commiserate the poore blinded soules that are most miserably seduced by them I will therefore for the fuller manifestation hereof set downe some few
and to attribute more vnto her then will stand with the nature of a pure Creature and derogate from her that most blessed benefit of her Redemption by Christ And further consider that if the approbation but of one heresie argueth infidelitie and sheweth no true faith in other points as the Church of Rome teacheth then are they who are led with this errour no true beleeuers at all CHAP. XVIII Containing an obseruation of the honourable state of Marriage prehibited by the Church of Rome to Priests who by Gods Law may lawfully liue in it and allowed to those who by Gods Law can not liue together without Incest AMongst all the fearefull dangers where-with the life of man is enuironed How miserably the Church of Rome is illuded by Satans wily suggestions by reason of the continuall outward assaults and hidden ambushes of our three Enemies the World the Flesh and the Deuill It is certaine that none of them can be more difficultly auoided or hardly resisted than those of the Deuill who being least apparent with greater subtletie can deuise his plots and slily conuay them with faire outward pretences vnto their designed ends than the other two can who by their outward appearances and shewes either of Beautie Riches Pompe or sensuall Preasures may bee discouered and with the more facilitie preuented or foiled The reason hereof is because the Deuill hath a knowledge surpassing mans knowledge and hath power so great that there is none vpon earth may bee compared vnto it by the first be knoweth how to deceiue man by the second hee is most able to performe the intentions of his deceiptfull nature Hence hee appeared to Eue in Pa adise in the disguised shape of a serpent by GODS permission that thereby were may learne how much his craft is to bee feared The Seraphicall Doctor of the Church of Rome noting as much Bonauen in breuiloquio part 3. cap. 3. when hee said It was the prouidence of God that the Deuill in tempting should assume the forme of a Serpent that his craft might not only bee discouâ—red but also that by that likenesse the wilinesse of the Deuill 〈◊〉 tempting might bee knowne to all the children of Adam Hence also bee appeared to our mercifull Redeemer in the Wildernesse as Saint Augustine and others thinke vnder the shape of a Râ—igious man that hee might the more craftily tempt him saying Si filius Deies die vt la pides isti panes fiant If thou art the Sonne of God say that those stones bee made bread Where saith Vega Didacus de la Vega tom 1. Dom. in Quadrag Iob 41. You may see how the Deuill vnder the shew of pietie hideth his malice Therefore well said Iob of the Deuill Quis reuelabit faciem indumenti eius Who shall reueale the face of his garment as if hee should say it is a difficult thing to reueale the Deuills countenance for hee often changeth his countenance to deceiue men and being full of fraude and malice hee vseth often to change his countenance and vnder the colour of some pietie and vertue to hide himselfe Which craftie imposture of the Deuill is not more liuely in any one thing to bee discouered than by his suggestions to the Church of Rome which vnder the colour of chastitie and for greater perfection hee hath guilefully induced to make a prohibition of Priests marriages which the law of GOD doth not forbidde thereby giuing occasion of farre greater abuses against chastitie than otherwise could haue happened to the dishonour of God to the scandall of the Church and to the ruine of infinite soules who being debarred of the lawfull and honourable remedie of marriage appointed and approued by God himselfe through the weakenesse of humane nature fall into such abhominable impurities as are not to be named Neither only hath the Deuill cunningly vnder this pretence deceiued the Church of Rome like a slie Serpent but also by too high a conceipt and estimation of her selfe an other way euer praising her authoritie and preheminence of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction by a sinister interpretation whereof shee soareth so high aboue her selfe in equalitie with God that hee hath enduced her out of her pretended fullnesse of authoritie and power to dispence with Marriage in those degrees of affinitie as GOD himselfe hath prohibited The doctrine of both which points are so repugnant to the holy Scriptures and so crossing thâ— practise of the first ages of the Church as nothing can be more 2. The prohibition of Priests marriages is not agreeable to the holy Scriptures Genes 2. vers 18. For first the prohibition of Priests marriage can no way stand with Gods truth reuealed in the holy Scriptures For first it is apparent that marriage is an institution and ordination of God himselfe instituted before the fall of man as appeareth in Genesis where it is written It is not good for man to be alone let vs make a helpe like vnto himselfe Which place of Scripture Cardinall Bellarmine most impetitinently wresteth in citing it De Matri Sacram lib. 3. c. 2. to proue marriage to bee a Sacrament of the new Law instituted by God for that purpose If this place proue it to bee a sacrament it will follow that it was also a Sacrament in the old Law which were inconuenient and against the whole current of Romish Doctors Thomas Aquinas teaching out of Saint Augustine That the Sacraments of the old Law are taken away S. Thom. 3. part q. 61. art 4. sed contra August contra Faustum lib. 19. cap. 13. tom 6. Thom. in corp vbi supra because they are fulfilled and others are instituted in power greater better for profit more easie to performe fewer in number And further Aquinas himselfe teacheth It is behouefull there should bee other Sacraments in the new Law wherewith the thinges should bee signified that went before of Christ besides the Sacraments of the old Law by where future thinges were foretold Bellarmine to proue his purpose should shew where in the new Law it is instituted as a Sacrament for as Thomas Aquinas saith marriage as it is ordained for the procreation of children 3. p. q. 42. art 2. in corp which was necessarie before sinne was instituted before sinne but as it affordeth a remedie against the wound of sinne it was instituted after sinne in the time of the Law of nature but as it representeth a mysterie of the coniunction of Christ and the Church it hath had an institution in the new Law and according to that institution it is a Sacrament of the new Lawe By which Doctrine of Thomas Aquinas first saying that it hath had an institution in the newe Lawe it is cleare to be very absurdly cited by Bellarmine for the institution of marriage before to prooue it to be a Sacrament and secondly that this Doctor himselfe committeth a great ouetsight in affirming it to haue had an institutioÌ„ in the new Law whereby it
DOCTRINALL AND MORALL OBSERVATIONS CONCERNING RELIGION WHEREIN THE AVTHOR DECLARETH THE Reasons of his late vn-enforced departure from the Church of ROME and of his incorporation to the present Church of ENGLAND teaching maintaining and defending the true Christian Catholike and Apostolike Faith professed by the ancient Primitiue Church most conspicuous in the outward vertues and constant sufferings of many holy Bishops and other good Christians glorious in the crowne of Martyrdome By IOHN COPLEY Seminarie Priest LVKE 22.23 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy brethren IAMES 5.20 He which maketh a sinner to be conuerted from the error of his way shall saue his soule from death and couereth a multitude of sinnes LONDON Imprinted by W. S. for Richard Moore and are to be sold at his Shop in Fleet-street in Saint Dunstans Church-yard 1612. TO ALL SEMINARIE PRIESTS MONKES FRIERS IESVITES AND ALL LAY-PROFESSORS of the present Romane falsely pretended Catholike faith grace and true conuersion in Christ IESVS VVHereas now some monthes are ouer-passed since my conformitie to the Church of England wherof I haue hitherto beene silent withdrawing myselfe to further the contemplation of those inducements which lead mee hereunto my zeale of truth and knowledge of your great spiritual miseries who liue wrapped in a cloud of ignorance depriued of the most comfortable beames of true Christian faith working by the heate of charitie in mens soules enforceth me to dedicate these my doctrinall and morall obseruations vnto your selues as standing in most need of them My intention in dedicating them to you is no other then true compassion of your soules dangerous estate not seeing nor knowing your owne erroneous doctrines taught in the present Romane Church of which I dare say many of you are sincere zealous professors with onely regard to your soules health and the kingdome of heauen esteeming that aboue all things to bee the cheifest to bee sought for in this world is in truth it is and therefore your case the more worthie of Christian commiseration and true Apostolicall endeauours for your deliuerie out of your so perillous and lamentable a condition which according to the small portion of that talent that Almightie God hath vouchsafed to bestow vpon mee I haue endeuoured to shew vnto you by this Treatise desiring you curteously and charitably to accept in good part with no lesse humility and care of your owne soules good then I do present it vnto you with a sincere desire thereof in the most tender bowels of Christ Iesus Vouchsafe to reade it with deliberate iudgement examine well the spirit wherewith it is written weigh the substance and contents rather then the manner or circumstances of my writing the stile is but plaine and familiar you shall find no affectation of eloquence in it because my labours and paines taken herein haue been rather for the profit of your soules then for the recreation of your wits I know well that neither the planting of Saint Paul nor the watring of Apollo can redound to your profit vnlesse God giue encrease and prosper the successe and therefore leauing the encrease to God and desiring you most attentiuely to reade these my obseruations deliberately to ponder them and effectually to follow them I most kindly take my leaue of you with Saint Pauls charitable words Pax Dei quae exuperat omnem sensum custodiat corda vestra intelligentias vestras in Christo Iesu Philip. 4.7 The peace of God which passeth all vnderstanding keepe your hearts and intelligences in Christ Iesus Resting this 13. day of Iune Anno Domini 1612. A most zealous friend and louer of your soules IOHN COPLEY ¶ Aduertisements to the Reader ALbeit to my singular comfort Christian Reader I might in the Sunne-shine of mine owne happinesse haue enioyed to my selfe the great benefite of Gods fauour shewed mee in my conuersion from Romish nouelties to the ancient Catholike Faith taught in this Kingdome yet for that I had diuers reasons inuiting mee to the participation thereof vnto other mens knowledge that what was priuate to my selfe might be also a publique good vnto others I haue thought it expedient with the promulgation of it for thy better information concerning my selfe to propound vnto thee some particular Aduertisements whereby thou mayest the better know mee and my meaning who am otherwise perhappes vnknowne vnto thee and accordingly with moderation of iudgement void of impatient humour or partialitie censure my proceedings in the matters handled in this Treatise 2 First therefore I would haue thee take notice that some few more zealous and earnest than charitable or wise followers of the Church of Rome sticke not to obiect vnto mee That they cannot be perswaded that I am truly in iudgement vnderstanding a sincere Professor of the faith of England otherwise than for some priuate respect eyther of liberty or other contentment or preferment whereby you may well inferre that they haue no great opinion of any ignorance in me of their Doctrine nor of actual miscarriage in maners that should make me forsake their communion since they thinke I haue too much knowledge to be in heart of any other and yet can charge mee of no misdemeanour for mine owne part I must needes tell you that herein they are either very ignorant in their vnderstandings or malitiously affected in their willes ignorant of the true knowledge of Gods fauour in conuerting sinners and malitious to the Church of England whereunto I haue incorporated my selfe and therefore to disgrace it they are willing without either true vnderstanding or vertue to cast any sinister imputation they can vpon my person which I doubt not but by Gods assistance and the endeuors of patience and diligence I shall turne to their owne shame and to the further manifestation of the wicked doctrines and impieties of their Romish Church without any indignitie or disgrace to the Church to which I am now incorporated 3 Secondly I would further haue thee know that some few Priests of their Church hauing growne debauched in their liues and conuersations and after their forsaking communion with the Church of Rome for a cloake of liberty to their lewd inclinations haue proued most treacherous to those vnto whom before they professed friendship remaining in their owne consciences perswaded they did not well in discouering Priests and causing them to be apprehended and ransacking the houses of Recusants more for their own profits than for any desire of seruice to the state or zeale to the Church of England giuing ouer all exercise both of vertue or learning fit for Cleargy men Hereupon diuers of the Romaine Church haue made their aduantage for the iustification of their owne Religion and reproofe of theyr aduersaries faith insomuch that I heard a Iesuit of good reputation say that a great noble man of this realme being in conference with others of his rancke should say that he much wondred why such men as were vertuous in their cariages so long as they were
light to deceiue my soule withall and so I confessed them as ordinarie temptations against faith till at length with a more powerfull light it pleased the true Sonne of iustice and God of glorie to enlighten my vnderstanding in such sort that all the clouds of error and endarkened affections were dispersed like mist before the Sunne what before I held to be hereticall I approued to be most Catholike what before was falsehood was now truth what before was darknesse was now light I found my selfe suddainely in my meditations vpon the grounds of true faith and beleefe like S. Paul enuironed not with a corporall but with a spirituall and most comfortable light from heauen placing my vnderstanding in the paradise of truth and all her delights struck downe to the ground in the humble acknowledgement of mine vnworthinesse and terrified with a voice from heauen not sounding in the eares of my bodie by their corporall Organs but sweetly making a most delightfull harmonie in my soule mollifying the obdurate crust of my heart and forcing me to say Act. 9. vers 6. Domine quid me vis facere O Lord what wilt thou haue me to doe with perfect true conformitie of all my thoughts actions and endeauors answerable to his will Hence was I moued with great power working euen with comfort to my soule to call to mind innumerable passages of Scriptures and auncient Fathers in former times obserued and other reasonable congruencies moouing me most effectually to conuert my selfe to the onely Apostolike Primitiue and Catholike faith truly professed in the Church of England as it were destined hereunto by a presage in my youth when being borne beyond the seas I was by Gods directing prouidence inspiring my parents mindes by my nurse and her husband who were purposely sent for out of England sent into this Realme when I was but few daies old to be nursed here which was a great furtherance and meanes that now in the ninth yeare of my Priesthood I am in this Realme nursed and growne to such a spirituall strength as to embrace the right faith of a true Christian which heretofore I wanted And although lately since my conuersion one said vnto me that it had been better if I had been drowned at sea in the great storme which happened in my passage into this Realme so young which I escaped with exceeding great danger being forthwith entertained into the Castle by the Captaine thereof for my fathers sake than at riper yeares thus to liue an Apostata and to be a scandale vnto the Church of God Yet I trust that I shall make it apparant that it was much better I escaped Gods prouidence in the first escape of my bodie foreshewing a more dangerous second escape from the shipwracke of my soule whereby his glorie in my happinesse may be manifested to the good of many that they may truly say Exod. 1. vers 19. Digitus Dei est hic the finger of God is here 7. The working of the Trinitie in my conuersion the first cause of this treatise Hereby you may see courteous Reader whether I haue not iust cause to make knowne to the world this my conuersion and the true occasions and motiues thereof that all that beare of it may say as I haue cause to say in mine owne soule The finger of God is here For first you may obserue that whilest I wandered out of the right way of true Catholike doctrine Gods goodnesse following the Church of Rome the finger of Gods mercie and goodnesse directed and pointed me which way to take into the right path of heauen most fauorably bestowing vpon me beartie contrition for my former errors both in faith and manners more than euer before Secondly the finger of his wisdome Gods wisdome euen when I was most addicted to the studies of the Roman doctrine occasion being giuen me of conference with some Protestants requiring satisfaction of me in some capitall points of controuersie which I promised either to proue by the Scriptures ancient Fathers and naturall reason or else to embrace the Protestants faith as Catholike therewithall intending to impugne the doctrine of the Religion here professed in England directed my vnderstanding so to examine the controuersies weighing all Cardinall Bellarmines reasons for both sides that doing it with sinceritie I fell into such doctrinall and morall obseruations vpon the grounds of the Romane faith that I most cleerely discouered the darke clouds of error and ignorance wherewith my iudgement and reason were ouercast I found the weakenesse of their grounds the fallacies of their reasons and the insufficiencie of iudgement shewed in most of their controuersies I found many places of Scripture impertinently alledged diuers citations of auncient Fathers fondly wrested against their true vnderstanding many naturall reasons alledged most repugnant to reason Lastly the finger of his Almightie power Gods power as efficaciously as the Load stone draweth yron vnto it drew all the affections of my heart to a firme resolution no longer to sleepe or slumber in my errors but to breake off all the bands of erronious and superstitious doctrine and nouelties wherewith the present Church of Rome holdeth soules in slauerie to Sathan and to embrace the truth of the Ancient Catholike and Apostolike doctrine which I found to bee most purely taught in the Church of England according to the primitiue sinceritie Hence it is most cleerely apparant how much the glorie of God appeareth in my conuersion and the three diuine attributes of goodnesse wisedome and power of the blessed Trinitie Qui tribus digitis appendit molem terrae Esay 40. vers 12 who weighteth the earth with three fingers in the contemplation of which great benefit I may well crie out with holy Saint Paul Rom. 12. vers 33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdome and knowledge of God how vnsearchable are his iudgements and his waies past finding out for who hath knowne the mind of the Lord or who hath bin his counsellor Or who hath first giuen to him and it shall be recompenced vnto him againe for of him and through him and to him are all things to whom be glorie for euer For to God himselfe must I needes attribute this fauour hauing iust cause for the same with the kingly Prophet to say Psal 34. vers 2. I will alwaies praise the Lord his praise shall be alwaies in my mouth who chiefly hath wrought in my soule the vnderstanding the will and the accomplishment hereof which I can doe no lesse in gratitude than make knowne that his name may be glorified therein Satisfaction the second cause Secondly if my blinded zeale of your soules good did so much transport me in my ignorance and errors as to imploy my best endeuours yea and to venter my life for your good and for the reducing of any in this Realme to the pretended Catholike faith which then I professed without feare of incurring
Whereat all the assistants admiring determined to deferre his buriall till the next day when thinking to performe the exequies they came againe to that passage afotesaid of the office of the dead he suddainely rose vp againe and cryed out with a loud voice saying Iusto Dei iudicio iudicaetus sum that is to say I am iudged by the iust iudgement of God Whereat the assistance were strucken againe into a great admiration and much more astonished than before to beholde so dismall and hideous a spectacle And although he had then declared himselfe to be accused and iudged by the iust iudgement of God yet it was not manifest by these wordes that he had yet receiued sentence of damnation insomuch that yet it ressed for them to interprete and hope the best and therefore they thought it good to deferre his buriall till the third day Whereto verie early the next morning all the towne flocked together being desirous to know the euent of so strange rare and fearefull a iudgement of God when hauing begun againe the office of the dead and comming to the same passage aboue specified he raysed himselfe vp the third time and to the great horror of all the standers by he said Iusto Dei iudicio condemnatus sum that is I am condemned by the iust iudgement of God Therefore Parcite funeribus mihi nil prodesse potestis Heu infoelicem cur me genuere parentes Ah miser aeternos vade damnatus ad ignes Which verses may well be Englished in this sense O spare vaine prayers with outward shewes of peace Your Dirges yeelds no comfort to my soule Aye me accurst from hope of ioyes I cease Gods iudgements iust doe all your prayers controule Why did my parents euer foster me A damned wretch and hell-hound for to be Ah cursed me thus to prouoke Gods are And to be doom'de to euer lasting fire Who is there that cannot be astonished to heare that a personage who liuing amongst men was esteemed for a holy and perfect man should be condemned by the iust iudgement of God This Doctor by the common suffrage of the Church being found vnworthie of Christian buriall was interred in a prophane place But this rare miracle occasioned manie to correct amend their liues Whereat Bruno with others were so much terrified that they framed a more strict order than euer was before tearmed Carthusians that by the strictnesse of that life they might be the better prepared for the strict iudgements of God In the consideration of his miracle if it were true and no hypocriticall cunning vsed therein I cannot conceiue but that it makes more against the faith of Rome than for it of which profession this Doctor whilest he liued was reputed both to be a learned and holy Saint For first if he were so holy and learned no doubt he knew what belonged to preparation for his death and therefore howsoeuer hee might bee depriued of outward meanes or helpe of the Sacraments yet it is to be presumed that at least in voto Sacramenti he would excite himselfe as much as lay in him to be penitent for his sinnes And it is to be thought his Holinesse would not permit him to be negligent of that which lay in his power to performe And lastly since there is no cause registred of his damnation but knowne onely to God he being both a professor and teacher of the Romane faith it may as well be presumed so farre as man for his soules benefit may enter into Gods secrets that God shewed this extraordinarie iudgement to manifest to the world that though his life was neuer so good in the sight of the world or his learning so great yet where true faith is wanting no saluation can be attained and that therefore the Romane faith cannot be the true faith This is the fittest collection I can make of this miracle because he was a Doctor professing that faith of Rome and liued and died therein 11 But now I will relate another miracle which much astonished me making me stagger The strange deliuerie of Traianes soule out of hell fabulous and most vncertaine and was neuer able to finde a good answere for it which was the strange deliuerie of Traianes soule out of hell by Saint Gregories prayers for him which how repugnant it is to the verie true doctrine of the Romane Church it selfe is cleare by that which is read in the Office of the dead viz. Ex inferno nulla est redemptio Now it is to be noted Lipeloo in vita Gregor magn that Lipeloo recordeth it for a truth and so it hath beene recorded alwayes by the Church of Rome and yet of late by Baronius and Bellarmine it is reputed a fabulous narration Whereupon I inferre that if after so many ages recording and beleefe it proue but a fabulous thing a man may as well suspect all the rest that seeme of the like nature notwithstanding hee bee learned that recordeth them What erronious doctrine is to be found almost in the Church of Rome that hath not many miracles for the confirmation of it mongst them so pleasant to reade that they will sooner make a man laugh in reading them than giue any credit at all to them So in confirmation of the reall and substantiall presence of Christs bodie in the Sacrament there is a pretie tale recorded in the life of Saint Anthonie of Padua of whom it is recorded S. Anton. in sum hist 3. p tit 24. c. 5. ff 2. That a certaine heretike promising to be of his religion if his Mule after three dayes restraint would goe and worship his God in the Eucharist Tho. Boz li. 14. de sig eccles dei cap. 3. Laurent Sur. to 3. The tale of a Mule and refuse his prouender which he would prouide for him When the day was come the Mule being brought forth by his Master and the Eucharist by Saint Anthonie hee staying himselfe a little said O thou brute beast in the name and power of thy Creator whom I vnworthie wretch doe hold truly in my hands I charge and commaund thee that forthwith thou come humbled before him and doe him honour and reuerence as thou canst to the end that the peruerse obstinacie of heretikes may know hereby that euerie creature is subiect vnto him whom the Priestly dignitie dayly handleth vpon the Altar Which speech being ended the hungrie beast forsooke the prouender prouided which the heretike had set before his eyes and went forthwith vnto the Sacrament kneeled downe before it and humbled downe his head which the people admiring praysed God saying We haue seene this day maruellous things which the heretike seeing repenting him of his fault abiured his heresie and embraced the true Catholike saith No lesse remarkable is that which is reported of a certaine Priest that doubted of the presence of Christ in the Sacrament Ant. d'Ance Cat. Hist l. 1. c. 5. tit 8. loan Meff in hor. Reg. ser de coen Domini
proue one of those that are tearmed by Christ a wicked and adulterous generation CHAP. X. Containeth an obseruation of the great hipocrisie of false Teachers fore-spoken of in the holie Scriptures AMongst the many testimonies recorded in holy Scriptures concerning false Teachers The hypocrisie of false teachers shewed in the Scripture by which I might further discouer the erroneous doctrin of the Church of Rome and make comparison of her doctrine with other reformed Churches the next which represented themselues were such places as describe the dissimulation and hipocrisie of false Teachers and inuite men to take heede of them to preuent all their dissimulations and impostures by which they seduce simple soules from the knowledge of truth lead them by cunning art of wordes to follow leasings and false Gods This I noted first out of Christs wordes describing the manner of Heretikes comming and giuing a preuenting Caueat to take heede of them Math. 7. vers 15 where he said Attendite à falsis Prophet is qui veniunt ad vos in vestimentis ouium intrinsecus autem sunt lupi rapaces Beware of false Prophets which come to you in sheepes clothing but inwardly they are rauening wolues as if he should say take heede of the hipocrisie of those Prophets who seeme to be one thing and are an other of whom S. Paul saith Rom. 16. vers 18. Per dulces sermones benedictiones seducunt corda innocentium With faire speech and flattering they deceiue the hearts of the simple who in another place speaking of the heretikes of latter times saith In hipo crisi loquuntur mendacium 1. Tim. 4. vers 2. cauteriatam habent cōscientiam Who speake-lies through hipocrisie hauing their consciences burned with a hot yron Further Christ dehorreth all from hipocrisie when he said Math. 5. vers 20 Nisi abundauerit institia vestra plus quam Scribarum aut Pharisaeorum non intrabitis in regnum coelorum Except your righteousnesse exceede the righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisees yee shall not enter into the Kingdome of heauen Now how the iniustice of the Pharisees was a foure-fold Hipocrisie is also plaine by the Scriptures The Pharisees four-fold Hipocrisie The first consisted in externall righteousnesse without internall whereof Christ speaketh saying Vos Pharisei quod deforis est calicis catini mundatis quod autem intus est vestrum plenum est rapina iniquitate Stulti nonne qui fecit quod deforis est Luc. 11. v. 36. etiam quod deintus est fecit Yee Pharisees make cleane the outside of the cup and of the platter but the inward part is full of rauening and wickednesse Yee Fooles did not hee that made that which is without make that which is within also And againe Vae vobis Scribae Pharisaei Hipocritae similes estis sepulchris dealbatis quae a foris apparent hominibus speciosa intus vero plena sunt ossibus mortuorum omni spurcitia Math. 23. v. 27. Sic vos aforis apparet is hominibus iusti intus autem pleni estis hipocrisi omni iniquitate Woe be vnto you Scribes Pharisees Hipocrites for yee are like vnto whited tombs which appeare beautifull outward but are within full of dead mens bones and of all filthinesse For so are yee also for outward yee appeare righteous vnto men but within yee are full of Hipocrisie and iniquitie The second consisted in an externall holinesse also but preposterous and defectiue because they were scrupulous in trifles large or of no conscience therefore Christ said vnto them Vae vobis Pharisaeis Luc. 11. v. 42. qui decimatis metham rutam omne olus preteritis iudicium charitatem Dei Woe be vnto you Pharisees for yee tithe the mint and rue and all manner herbs and passe ouer iudgment and the loue of God or as S. Matt. saith Math. 23. v. 23. Et reliquistis quae grauiora sunt legis iudicium misericordiam fidem And leaue the waightier matters of the law as iudgement and mercie fidelitie The third hipocrisie of the Pharisees was verbal not real a fained not a true obseruation of Gods commandements which Christ taxed in them saying Math. 23. v. 3. Quaecunque dixerint vobis c. Whatsoeuer they bid you obserue that obserue and doe but doe not according to their workes for they say and doe not And againe If you be the children of Abraham doe the workes of Abraham The fourth hipocrisie of the Pharisees was vaine glorious who in all their actions of religion sought the glorie and praise of men Christ saying Math. 6. v. 5. They fast and pray Vt videantur ab hominibus That they may be seene of men from all which foure-fold hipocrisie wherein consisted the vnrighteousnesse of the Pharisees Christ dehorteth all Christians by a motiue of heauenly blisse saying as before Vnlesse your iustice abound more then the Scribes and Pharisees you shall not enter into the Kingdome of heauen Hence it followeth that in what Church soeuer a proper resemblance of this Hipocrisie is found The hipocrisie of the Church of Rome there may wee well presume the false Prophets to be which Christ biddeth vs beware of and therefore since I obserue it abundantly to appeare in the present Church of Rome the Teachers of that Church as false Prophets comming vnto vs are the reuenous wolues in sheepe-skinnes whose iustice doth no lesse abound then that of the Scribes and Pharisees which will keepe them from entring into the Kingdome of heauen For so long as I haue beene in that Church I haue seene much externall righteousnesse as long praiers much whipping with disciplines much fasting many miraculous cemonies of religion strange mortifications and all this without the true faith by reason of the many nouelties crept into that Church and without charitie the inward life of the soule whence it proceedeth that there is much dissension amongst all sorts many diuisions amongst the learned many back-bitings amongst religious persons many wrongs and iniuries offered without conscience much violation of morall honestie and ciuilitie enuie amongst most detraction amongst all wicked life without measure rash iudgements without any consideration lying reports against one an other traducing of one the others reputation by writings by wordes by secret complotments and macheuillian deuises without all feare of God or loue of honestie Religious men are poore in the outward shew of their profession Once acertain Capuchine said as a Iesuit hath related when one said that the Iesuites and his Order proceed well together that the cause was because the Iesuites desired to haue al and they desired to haue nothing but who abound more in common than the landed Monkes and well monied Iesuites They are chast in the outward vowes but many of them most lasciuious in heart as by the one Author of the Pruritanus may bee iudged of many besides Who more blindly
amongst many which I haue read and noted out of diuers authors of good credit and well approued in the Church of Rome The first is taken out of Pope Gregorie the Great S. Greg. Mag. hom 37. in Euang lib. 4. dialog cap. 57. who writeth That a certaine man being taken prisoner by his enemies was carried into a farre Countrey where hee was kept prisoner a long time whose wife not hearing any thing of him thought him to bee dead and therefore caused a Masse to be said for him euery weeke Whereupon it happened that so often as the Masse was offered for the deliuerance of his soule so often were his irons and shackles loosened in the prison where he was which afterward when being released he returned againe to his wife he told her as much with great admiration whereupon the wife enquiring the time and the houre when hee found him so freed from his fetters she found it happened at he same houre that Masse was said for him Whereupon Pope Gregorie saith Hence my best beloued brethren and good friends learne ye how much the sacred hoast being offred by our selues is of force to vntie the bands of our hearts since being offered by one it had such power as to breake the bands of anothers bodie Certainly if this sacrifice be of such force I maruaile why the Priests in prison offering it with the deuotion of worthie Confessors heere in England should not be able often to loosen their chaines yea and to open the verie prison gates for their deliuerance but this cannot be because such fictions neuer prooue true and these are but fables inuented to delude poore simple soules that Priests by saying of Masses for them may emptie their purses and bee partakers of their coine Againe as it is written that heere in England A certaine Prince which had beene sicke of the Palsie a long time and carried into Saint Stephens Church Edinerus Angelus in vit S. Anselm to heare Masse sung by Anselme Bishop of Canterburie and to receiue his blessing whereupon he recouered present health Either this storie is inuented to honour Anselme with or else to approue the Masse by it or if the Masse be of such power how hapneth it in all this time of persecution as the Papists terme their small suffrings here in England that they haue no sicke persons cured by so many Masses as are offered by Priests and Iesuites But all is but mans inuention and as babes are deceiued with shewes so are simple Papists with false lies and such like fabulous wonders inuented either by ambitious and foolish Priests or hypocriticall and pharisaicall Monkes and Friers It is an vsuall thing in the Church of Rome by such inuentions to confirme one false doctrine by another so confirmed so I haue noted the doctrine of Purgatorie by the doctrine of the Masse for diuers Romish Authours haue left it recorded that Benedictus Octauus Pope was deliuered out of Purgatorie by the sacrifice of the Masse Petr. Dam. Card. Al. lâ—y in fest S. Odâ—li 〈◊〉 Ian. Laur. Sur. to 1. lib. 2. cap. 2. An. Ebor. cap. de orat Cath hist cap 5. tit 19. part 2. Tho. Cant. lib. 2. Aâ—un cap. 53. part 14. Cath. hist cap. 5. tit 19. part 5. and the prayers of Saint Odilus Abbot and his Monkes Heere is a miracle framed not onely for the Masse but also for Purgatorie and praying for the dead So likewise I haue read of a Priest in France who being verie poore yet verie deuoutly affected to the soules in Purgatorie in so much that euerie day without failing he â—ffered the sacrifice of the Masse for them for the which he was cited and accused before his Prelate and being brought before his Bishoppe hee simplie confessed the truth wherefore hee was taxed to payment of a certaine summe and forced to giue suretie for the same which hauing sworne to performe the poore man was in great trouble finding out none to answer for him but instantly the eyes of the Bishoppe were opened and hee beheld more than a thousand hands stretched foorth readie to giue suretie for the Priest Whereupon the Bishopped said vnto the Priest thou hast sureties enough goe and according to thine owne pleasure and mine say Masse as thou hast done heretofore Many other straunge wonders could I alleage in this kind not to bee beleeued but rather to bee wondered at that any man dares haue so much presumption as by such wicked deuises to wrong Gods truth and to maintaine false-hood for if it bee a true marke of false teachers which Christ prescribed when he spake of those that should do such wonders that the elect might be seduced by them then it followeth that the Romish teachers are those euen in this verie doctrine of the Masse who onely pretend to haue miracles and wonders to approue it 10 For in truth they haue no one place of Scripture for this sacrifice which they so highly esteeme of The storie of Mâ—lchâ—sedech wrested to prooue the Masse they pretend many figures and types of the old Law many predictions out of the Prophets and also other testimonies out of the Gospell but they are all insufficient weake and impertinent nothing seruing their purpose So most impertinently doth Cardinall Bellarmine alleage the example of Melchisedech Desacrif mis lib 5. cap. 5. 6. Genes 14. Psal 109. vers 5. who brought foorth bread and wine for hee was the Priest of the Highest but Christ is a Priest after the order of Melchisedech and not according to Aaron as Paul teacheth Hebrewes the seuenth therefore hee was to institute an vnbloodie sacrifice vnder the forme of bread and wine This reason of Bellarmines is of no force for were it true that Melchisedech offered bread and wine which is not yet nothing else would follow but that Christ offered bread and wine which our Aduersaries will neuer graunt for they teach that bread and wine doth not continue after consecration but that they are annihilated and so transubstantiated that nothing remaineth of the substance besides the bodie and blood of Christ Besides Melchisedech did not offer but onely brought foorth as the Hebrew word signifieth bread and wine for the refreshing of Abrahams souldiers as the Text it selfe clearely teacheth Neither is Melchisedâ—ch a Type of Christ either in offering or bringing foorth bread and wine but first in respect of the name Melchisedech the King of righteousnesse secondly because hee was King of Salem Jsai 9.6 and Christ is King or Prince of peace Thirdly because Melchisedech was together both a King and a Priest and so is Châ—â—st Fourthly because the Progenie of Melchisedech is not related so is Christ a Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedech Psal 110.4 Therefore this figure of Melchisedech hath no refâ—reâ—â—ce to the saâ—rifice of the Mâ—sse at all Controuers 5. Confess Petricomensi cap. 41. And howsoeuer Pighius and Hosius say that this is the
I might well thinke my selfe bereâ—uâ—d of my right wittes if I should any longer offend GOD by the still offering of it as I haue done too often and by continuing the practize thereof to the eternall damnation of other mens soules Therefore curteous Reader if thou art a child of the Church of Rome follow no longer such a stepmother leading thee by publique appearances to thine owne ruine and to the dayly prouocation of Gods wrath against thee hate her fooleries detest her idolatries and abandon her communion if thou wilt not eternally perish albeit thou hâ—st long laine asleepe in the deadly lethargie of Romish superstitions awaken at last and breake off all the bands of thy sinfully-habituated affections to that Antichristian monarchie esteeme no longer that to be white which is blacke that to bee holie which is most vngodlie feare not the curses of the Pope in denying the Sacrifice of the masse to be propitiatorie for sinnes his excommunication will haue no such force as Antoninus the Archbishop of Florence had Lipelo in vita Ant. 2. Maij. who denouncing the sentence of excommunication vpon a white loafe of bread made it as blacke as a coale and freeing it afterward from the same curse it returned to be as faire as it was before All the Popes Anathemaes can not make the bread of the masse otherwise than it is idolatrous all the white flower in it cannot make it pleasing vnto GOD or a Sacrifice allowable for Christians Therefore say thou with mee from thy heart with mee in true detestation of all the abhominations committed by such Idolatrie Deus propitius esto mihi peccatori Lord bee thou mercifull vnto me a sinner CHAP. XIII Containing an obseruation about the doctrine of transubstantiation which is a principall noueltie taught in the Church of Rome AFter the former obseruations had sufficiently alienated by iudgement and affections from further approbation of the faith of Rome My proceeding about the doctrine of transubstantiation yet because I thought that I could not bee sufficiently enough armed against those errours and falshoods wherein from my youth both my vnderstanding and affections had beene habituated which would be powerfull still to incline and leade my soule againe vnto those Romish abhominations which long custome had made familiar and in conceit religious I still proceeded further to the discussion and discouerie of other errors false doctrines secceeding nouelties taught in that Church that more and more beholding her spirituall fornications and disloyalties I might in my soule bee the stronger to oppse against them and the better able to relinquish and abandon with assurance of truth of my side and securitie to mine owne conscience all communion and participation with her sinfull heresies and nouelties and happily auoyde Gods iust punishments which are threatned by the holy Scripture against her disloyalties to the faith of Christ her heauenly Spouse 2 Amongest all which there was scarce any one thing that wrought more powerfully and fearefully in mine vnderstanding It ought to be a great terror to adore the creature for the Creator euen to the terrour of mine owne soule for my erroneous doctrine deliuered to others than the discouery of this late new-sprung-vp doctrine of transubstantiation which sets vp such an Idoll of bread in the Church of Rome to be adored as God that that seemeth to be truly verified of her which was vttered long before Colet Deum quem ignorauerunt patres eius auro Argento lapide pretioso rebusque pretiosis Dan. 11.38 He shall honour the God whome his fathers knew not with gold and siluer with precious stones and with pleasant things The gainsaying of which doctrine vnto the Church of Rome seemeth so vnlawfull that shee pronounceth most bitter execrations against those that shall so doe Sess 13. an 2. If any shall say sayth the Councell of Trent that in the holy Sacrament of the Eucharist there remaineth the substance of bread and wine together with the bodie and bloud of our Lord Iesus Christ and shall denie that admirable and singular conuersion of the whole substance of bread into the bodie and of the whole substance of wine into the bloud the formes of bread and wine still remaining which conuersion the Catholike Church most fitly calleth Transubstantiation be he accursed 3. Yea The Church of Rome hateth the reformed Churches for nothing more than for impugning the doctrine of Transubstantiation Pet. Besseus concept Theolog. Quadraeg dom 3. Dan. 13. the Teachers and Preachers of that Church doe not hate the worthie Professors and Arch-Doctors of the Gospell for any point of doctrine more than for impugning this of Transubstantiation Peter Besse the great and famous French Preacher against Master Caluin and Luther speaketh thus Two wicked old men of vnbridled lust did wickedly accuse the most chaste Susanna of Adulterie notwithstanding that shee was the most chast and honestest that was to be found in the whole Kingdome of Babylon here againe wee see two craftie knaues marching out vpon the Stage Luther and Caluin that accuse the chaste Susanna viz. the holy sacred Sacrament of the Eucharist and Transubstantiation the chiefe member thereof of Idolatrie then the which notwithstanding there is nothing to be found in the world more holy or diuine And the samd Author soone after for the same point compares them to the two witnesses of most deperate audacitie that gaue false witnesse against Christ adding further That as Christ was crucified in the middle betweene two theenes Ibid. so likewise wee see it fareth with the Sacrament of the Altar where being placed betweene two theeues two most desperate Heretikes it is assaulted with diuers blasphemies who a little after speaketh vnto the Idoll in this manner and also to God saying Worthily therefore O sacred Eucharist thou mayest crie out Dirupisti vincula mea Psal 115. tibi sanctificabo hostiam laudis And thou O Lord Saepe expugnauerunt me a iuuentate mea For often O Lord haue they persecuted thee often haue they blasphemed against thee shot their arrowes at thee and chiefely at Transubstantiation This Preacher it should seeme hath forgot that the doctrine of Transubstantiation is a noueltie of no greater antiquitie than the fourth Councell of Laterance Iacques Gualter Chron. de Pestat du Christianis tries siecle Can. 1. which was held but in the yere 1215 vnder Innocent the third which is not yet 400 yeres since where that doctrine was deliuered in these wordes But the bodie of Christ and the bloud in the Sacrament of the Altar is contained vnder the formes of bread and wine the bread being transubstantiated into the bodie and the wine into the bloud by Gods power This it seemeth his Maiestie very iudiciously obserued when after he had said If the Romish Church hath coyned new articles of Faith neuer heard of in the first fiue hundred yeares after Christ I hope I shall neuer be
condemned for an Heretike for not being a Nouelist where numbring vp many nouelties which are vsed in the Romish Church hee reckoneth this Transubstantiation for one 4. Arguments against Transubstantiation Comp. Theol. verit l. 5. c. 58. Which doctrine of Transubstantiation I discouered to containe a notable Heresie by the proofes following First sayth Ioannes de Combis Latria is a seruice and reuerence exhibited to God therefore if the honour due to God be exhibited vnto the creature it is Idolatrie Latria comprehendeth fiue thinges viz. Faith Knowledge Reuerence Sacrifice and Prayer Whereupon I framed this Argument The doctrine of Transubstantiation admitteth this worship in the Church of Rome to a Creature viz. to Bread and Wine which notwithstanding the words of Transubstantiation remaineth still a creature otherwise how is Bread and Wine the externall signes of inusible grace as euerie true Sacrament is or how is the essentiall part appointed by CHRIST in the Sacrament remaining when it ceaseth to be there as Transubstantiation teacheth the Bread and Wine doth Nay the very Scriptures say so much shewing the Bread still to remaine Bread and the Wine still to remaine Wine Saint Paule the heauenly interpreter of CHRISTS wordes doth not admit Transubstantiation but doth so interpret the Sacramentall vnion that still the visible elements remaine for the Bread of the Sacrament hee calleth Bread still euen after the consecration to teach that the substance of the Bread remaineth still and so he calleth the Wne still Wine as appeareth plainely by his wordes The Cup of Blessing which wee blesse 1. Cor. 10.16 is it not the communication of the bloud of CHRIST and the Bread which wee breake is it not the participation of the bodie of the Lord Now then if the Chalice be but a communication of his bloud and the Bread but a participation of his bodie still remaining Bread and Wine for the thing participating is not the thing participated where then is their doctrine of Transubstantiation or how can it stand sound with the truth of the Scriptures He sayth plainely further 1. Cor. 10.16 1. Cor. 11.26 Vers 27. Vers 28. All wee are partakers of one Bread And againe As often as yee shall eate this bread And againe Whosoeuer shall eate this Bread besides Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this Bread Now therefore the Scripture teaching vs so plainely Bread and Wine to remaine in the Sacrament it followeth that there is no Transubstantiation in the Sacrament and so consequently it is apparant that all those commit grosse Idolatrie that worship it with Latria because they giue that worship which is due to God to the creature which they beleeue to be God teach to be God and pray to as vnto God 5. Fathers against Transubstantiation Secondly I summoned diuers auncient Writers to see whether they would afford me any warrant for Transubstantiation and I finde them against it and none for it I finde Tertullian in expresse wordes to say Iesus Christ hauing taken bread Tertul. l. 4. adu Marc. cap. 40. distributed it to his Disciples he made it to be his bodie saying This is my bodie that is the figure of my bodie I finde him likewise to shew as much in expresse wordes in another place Tertul. l. 3. adu Mars cap. 19. saying God hath so reuealed it in the Gospell calling the bread his bodie to the end that thou mayest thereby vnderstand that he hath giuen to the bread the figure of his bodie Now then if the bread be a figure of CHRISTS bodie according to Tertullian then it is not transubstantiated Saint Cyprian sayth Epist 3. l. 2. Wee finde that the Cuppe which the Lord offered was mingled and that which he called his bloud was wine See here Saint Cyprian giueth but a denomination to the bloud attributing substantiall being to the wine by the Verbe Substantiue Lib. 8. demonstr Euang. cap. 1. Eusebius is also cleare agianst Transubstantiation in these wordes IESVS CHRIST gaue vnto his Disciples the signes of the diuine dispensation commaunding them to celebrate the figure of his owne bodie For seeing that he did now no longer receiue the sacrifices of bloud nor the slaughter of diuers beastes ordained by Moses hee hath taught vs to vse the bread for a signe of his bodie See here it is still called bread and a signe of the bodie how then is it transubstantiated Saint Augustine also standes against Transubstantiation De doctrine Christian l. 3. c. 16. saying These wordes Vnlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud are a figure commaunding vs to partake the Passion of CHRIST and profitably to remember that his flesh was crucified for vs. Nowe therefore if the eating the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinking his bloud is but to partake of the Passion of CHRIST and a profitable remembrance that his flesh was crucified for vs how did Saint Augustine teach the doctrine of Transubstantiation Nay rather doth he not most plainly insinuate the contrarie I finde also the same Doctor to say against Adamantus Chap. 12. The Lord made no difficultie to say this is my body when he gaue the signe of his body Here I obserue the word Bodie to bee expounded by the signe of his body Who saith in an other place Epist 23. ad Bonifac. The holy signe of Christs body is after a sort the body of Christ and the holy signe of the bloud of Christ and so the holy signe of faith to wit Baptisme is faith Surely Baptisme can not bee said to be Transubstantiated into faith how then can the Sacrament of the body and bloud of Christ bee substantially transubstantiated into the body and bloud of Christ Saint Augustine in an other place is yet plainer against Transubstantiation saying Vnderstand that which I say spiritually Super Psal 98. you shall not eate my body which you see neither shall you drinke the bloud which my Tormentors shall shed I haue recommended vnto you an holy signe which being spiritually vnderstood shall make you liue Behold how cleare S. Augustine is against Transubstantiation So also is S. Chrysostome that golden mouthed Doctor of Greece most clearely gainesaying the doctrine of Transubstantiation in the Sacrament saying The bread before it be sanctified we call bread Ad Caesar Monachum but when the diuine grace sanctifies it it is deliuered from the name of bread and is thought worthy the name of the Lords body though the nature of bread remaine still Now curteous Reader if I should not iudge vnpartially I can not but here conclude that if the nature of bread remaine the substance of bread can not be changed into the body of Christ substantially and therefore no transubstantiation can follow 6. I can not omit here to record Gelasius who saith Other strong places of ancient Fathers agianst Transubstantiation De duabus naturis Christi The bread
hold of the Popes Indulgences grounded vppon the couetousnesse of Popes and drew them to employ their studies more in gathering together temporall wealth than the riches of Gods graces and true knowledge of the Scriptures For hence and from this source only hath flowed diuers points of doctrine now currant in Rome more tending to the amplification and enlarging of his temporall Kingdome than the Kingdome of Christs Church amongst which the doctrine of Pardons and Indulgences is not the least profitable for the filling vp of the Popes cofers and giuing contentment to his auaricious desires arguing the great spirituall blindnesse God hath permitted him to fall into in punishment of the detestable sinne 2. Indulgences disproued by their definitions Now this obseruation hauing auerted my minde from the Church of Rome with diuers others and laied open vnto my soule the most foule abhominations of that Church for the better explication of her erroneous doctrine concerning Indulgences and Pardons I must shew thee curteous Reader how this auersion grew in mee by the examination and studie of truth First I beganne to examine the true nature of these Romish Indulgences and Pardons by the definition of them which I found in Cardinall Bellarmine to be thus expressed Lib. 5. de poenit cap. 2. Indulgences saith he are the remissions of paines which are to be endured after the remission of faults granted vnto the faithfull for a reasonable cause by the high Bishops out of a Fatherly lenitie and condescention Ioannes Viguerius the great Scholler of Spaine calleth Indulgence Ioan. Viguer Instit Christi cap. 16. vers 29. A distribution of the treasure or an application of the penalties of the supererogation of Christ or of his Saints for the remission of paines due for passed sinnes made by him that ruleth the Vniuersall Church with iudgement of discretion Siluester their best Summist for cases of conscience defineth it thus The Ecclesiasticall Indulgence Siluest verb. Jndulgentia num 3. is a donation of some thing taken out of the spirituall treasure of the Church made vnto a sinner that hee may satisfie God the creditour of his paines Thus these learned men of Rome write of the nature of Indulgences Whereupon first I note out of Bellarmine that these pardons are not to bee granted without a reasonable cause and according to Viguerius with iudgement of discretion yet notwithstanding this is contradicted by Emanuel Sa the Iesuite who saith That some say an Indulgence giuen without cause is of value Verbo Indulgen num 1. Bonauent 4. d. 20.2 part q. vlt. Solu 4. d. 21. q. 2. art 2. others doe not onely require a iust cause but such a cause as is proportionable to the Indulgence I but Sa himselfe peremptorily affirmeth I thinke no doubt to be made of an Indulgence giuen from the Pope Where I note this man to be more the Popes Friend than the rest who whether the Pope with iust cause or without iust cause graunt an Indulgence hee approues it and further I obserue a great difference amongst the Romish Writers in this point and therefore no credit to bee giuen to those that so much disagree in the cause why Indulgences should bee graunted Secondly I note out of Siluester that the subiect of Indulgences is a sinner I meane as hee saith it is graunted to a sinner and yet this seemeth to bee contradicted by him and others who saith Hee that is not in Gods grace obtaineth not Indulgence Sil. Lerb Indulg 5. Tho. 3. p. q. 27. art 1. Solu 4. d. 21. q. 2. a. 3. Adrian 4. de Indulgent col 13. Concl. 3. Thirdly I obserue moreouer that whereas the Pope graunteth Indulgences oftentimes both from sinne and paine which now is growne ordinarie hee crosseth the Doctrine of these Authours who in the definition of an Indulgence make mention onely of remission of paine and not of the sinne for according to their owne Doctrine else where both mortall and veniall sinnes are taken away by the Sacrament of Penance as the proper subiect and matter of their Sacramentall absolution 3. Now for the establishment of this doctrine of Indulgences The Scripture abused about Indulgences they haue no Scripture as farre as I can perceiue of any force which hath made the Reformed Churches to tearme these Papall Indulgences pious frauds of the faithfull inuentions and impostures and his Maiestie discouering as much iustly to reckon them amongst the trash depending vpon Purgatorie To Christ. Mon. f. 43. not worth the talking of yet doe they not sticke to bee so presumptuous as to alleage Scriptures most indiscreetly for their doctrine as namely Ioannes Viguerius doeth as if hee had got a great victorie against the Reformed Churches in this point prouing the name of Indulgence to bee found in the Prophet Esay his wordes which he citeth are these Notwithstanding to conuince their ignorance Instit Christ c 6. § 6. vers 19. and vnbridled boldnesse wee must shewe the name Indulgence expresly to bee found in the sacred Letters in the same sense the Church vseth And this chiefly in Esay the Prophet where in the Person of Christ hee saith The Spirit of the Lord vpon mee in that hee hath annointed mee Hee sent mee to announce vnto the meeke to heale the contrite of heart to Preach Indulgence vnto Captiues releasement to those that are shut vp and so it can not bee denyed that the name of Indulgence in the sacred Letters is not to bee found And that Esay wrote according to the intention which the Church vseth Christ the Lord hath declared in S. Luke where it is said Luc. 4. that when vpon the Sabaoth hee entred the Synagogue of Nazareth hee rose vp to reade and the Booke of the Prophet Esay was deliucred vnto him and turning the Booke he found the place where it was written the Spirit of the Lord vpon me for that he hath annointed me hee hath sent mee to Euangelize to the poore to heale the contrite of heart to Preach remission to Captiues behold how the name Indulgence Christ interpreteth remission But of what Indulgence spake Esay truly of sinnes for the pardoning and remitting of which Christ was sent by God the Father and because in sinne there are two thinges to wit the fault and the paine the remission of the fault and also the remission of the paine is rightly called Indulgence But the Church as is said taketh Indulgence for the application of penalties of supererogations of Christ and his Saints by which paines are remitted therefore nothing is more manifest than that the name of Indulgence is found in the sacred Letters according to the intention which the Church vseth Here I see a braue proofe of a vaunting Spaniard who with his Spanish Brauadoes thinks to haue conquered but I beleeue when hee shall haue found the strength and truth of his encounterers whom hee termeth Heretiques if he were now aliue he would say as I
ground of them in all rpobabilitie than that the Popes being desirous to enrich themselues with money haue deuised them for the emptying of mens purses throughout all Kingdomes subiected to his vsurping authority like Boniface the ninth of whom it is written That he sent into diuers Kingdomes his Treasurors with Pardons Theod. a mem de scismat lib. 1. ca. 68. pag. 20. who extoried thereby very great summes of money from the simple people that in some one Pronince they would get together aboue an hundred thousand florens and released all sinnes to them that confessed vnto them without anie penaunce Therefore as I said in the beginning anarice caused spirituall blindenesse in Popes and blindenesse as a punishment confirmeth them more and more in their errors 6 Is it not strange considering all reason to bee against this doctrine of Indulgences that the Church of Rome will by her comminations still curse those that embrace it not as the Councell or Trent doth all those That affirme them to bee vnprofitable Ses 25. decret de Indulgentijs or denie anie power to be in the Church to graunt them What shall not as I said before the bloud of Christ as well take away the temporall paine due vnto sinne as the eternall or is not his satisfaction infinite what neede then the superfluous satisfaction of Saints 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Did the auncient Church euer speake of other Pardons than of the Pardons of outward penances which ere enioyned for publique satisfaction of the Church Hath not Christ fatisfied for the whole world what neede then of the satisfactions of Saints what more than Indulgences instilleth a vaine securitie into the soules of men and ouerthroweth the foundations of all true contrition is not Gods forgiuesse and remission expressed with an Omne debitum dimisi tibi Matth. 18.32 I haue forgiuen thee all thy debt if euerie debt why not aso the debt of temporall paine if an exception can be shewed why is it not made manifest Now iudge beloued Reader whether heere bee not sufficient reason to make mee or anie other say farewell vnto the Romish Church that thus enthralleth soules prophaneth the bloud of Christ disableth the Sacraments and picketh mens purses by the deuised doctrine of her Ecclesiasticall Indulgences Deere Iesu pardon my former fault make mee see better heereafter let mee with true compunction for this errour say with the holy Prophet Dauid Erraui sicut ouis quae perijt quaere seruum tuum I haue gone astray like a lost sheepe seeke thy seruant O Lord Psalme 119. verse 176. CHAP. XVI Containing an obseruation about the number of seuen Sacraments admitted by the Church of Rome IN my trauels in the Low-countries I haue often smiled to see how the people in those parts Vaine is the terrors of Romish curses against the truth in a faire corne-field to driue away crowes and other birds from the corne will most artificially frame the reprefentation of a terribleman standing ouer the corne with a grimme countenance and with bow and arrowes drawne vp to the head to the great terror of all birds that none may approach as if forthwith he would hit all that came neare So likewise when I confider how the Church of Rome vseth the shew of terrors and comminations to keepe Christians from feeding vpon the wholesome truthes and verities growing in the spacious fields of Gods word I find much cause of laughter to see shee should thinke men endued with reasonable soules should haue so little sense as not to discouer her vaine scare-crowes of curses and excommunications which are only terrible in words and iust nothing in effect but counterfeit terrors without hurt or harme as for example she makes a great shew in words concerning the number of seuen Sacraments as if she would shoot euery one to the quicke that will be so venterous as to approach vnto the field of Scriptures to know the truth thereof her threatning shew is this Concil trid sess 7. desacra in genere Can. 1. If any shall say that all the sacraments of the new Law were not instituted by Iesus Christ our Lord or that there are more or fewer then seuen viz. Baptisme Confirmation Eucharist Penance Extreame-unction Order and Matrimonie or also any one of these seuen not to be truly and properly a Sacrament be hee accursed Heere is the definitiue sentence of the Church of Rome casting you out of her Synagogue if you gainesay her decree it is curiositie with her and great presumption to examine her doctrine you must not be so hold as to taste of the sweet and most pleasant fruits of Gods word the arrow is drawne vp to the head against you the terror of Anathema must put you to flight Christs doctrine must be no longer the little graine of mustard-seed growne vp aboue all hearbs for his faithfull birds to sit vpon the boughs therof this scar-crow Anathema must put all to flight 2 But those that are wise and iu siciall doe discouer the vanity of this frightful spectacle Those that are wise discouer the vanitie of them with the Berraeans they will examine the Popes doctrine by the Scriptures as they did Saint Pauls they will follow the directions of Doctor Stapleton who appointeth also a meane to trie the doctrine of false teachers by antiquitie euen for all the common sort of people They will as a great Doctor and Champion of the Popes said to me once find that it had been better that the Pope had left many of the doctrines of the Councell of Trent vndefined because so many new Anathemaes makes the world begin to suspect that the Popes labour more to subiect people vnto them by terrors then by truth as men doe children who to keepe them in awe will tell them of Hobgoblins and Robin-good-fellowes such like that wil fetch them away if they bee vnruly and leaue not their crying Which policie my selfe partly obseruing to be vsed by the Church of Rome euen in a moderne example of Paul the fifth his Breue against the oath of alleageance thinking only by the bare words declaratiue without any one reason alleaged for the vnlawfulnes in taking it other then his owne plaine assertion to strike such a terror both into his owne children and into the King and State as if none would dare to gain-say it but blessed be almightie God who hath so communicated the beames of his vnspeakable wisdome vnto him and his loyall subiects yea and vnto many of the Popes owne children who were long seduced by his pretended inerrable power that they dare not onely beleeue the contrarie but also openly auouch it to the world and ioyne foot to foot in defence thereof both with pen and sword if need be howsoeuer the Iesuites would thinke themselues aduantaged if both sides should come to this latter encounter but I trust God out of his mercie will dispose of milder courses more manife sting therein his
And diuers other writers affirme Scot. 3. d. 37. Cost Enchir. pag. 51. that in the most ancient times of the Church and after the Apostles death they had their wiues And I obserue that hee was the first that forbad Priests to marrie Greg. à Valent. tom 4. d sp 9. q. 5. punct 5. §. 1. Dist 82. plurim Inuent lib. 5. cap. 4. Dist 84. cum in preterito gloss §. qui Sacrament Index expurg 381. uum 261. Naucler tom 2. generat 137. Jnuent lib. 5. cap. 4. Sigebert an 1074. Lambert pag. 201. 207. Auentine in Annal. lib. 5. Nauclâ—r vol. 2. ge 36. Baron an 174. Sigon reg Jtal. lib. 9. an 174. pag. 448. pag. 460. by the decree thereof extant in the Canon law as also by the confession of Polydor Virgil and the Glosse vpon the Canon law saith Syricius brought in the continencie of Priests and Deacons yea some affirme that of old before the time of Siricius Priests might contract marriage This Glosse Pius Quintus the late Pope hath commanded to be wiped out because it makes against the present doctrine of the Church of Rome but Nauclerus saith in effect as much that SyriÌ„cius commanded Deacons to be continent But although Pope Syricius began this matter yet as Polydor Virgil saith It could neuer be effected that their marriage should be taken away til Gregory the seuenth came to be Pope in the yeare 1074. Which thing when he attempted in Germany he was opposed against as one that brought in a new eustome neuer receiued before Auentine writeth that in those daies Priests had wiues openly as other men bad and begate children their wiues being called by aseemely name Presbyteresses And when the Pope forbad them marriage this to many Bishops and other learned and good men seemed a new doctrine and a pestilent heresie as euer troubled any Christian kingdom And he saith the Bishops of Italy Germanie and France met together and for this cause decreed that he had done against Christian pietie and deposed him for that among diuers other things he diuorced men and their wiues denying such as bad their lawful wiues to be Priests wheÌ„ yet in the meane time he admitted to the altars whore-mongers adulterers and incestuous persons Fast lib. 1. Mantuan saith that Hilarie a Fench Bishop was married and that in his time it was lawfull Sinesius the Bishop of Ptolomais writeth thus of himselfe Epist ad Enopt Niceph. lib. 14. cap. 55. The sacred hand of Theophilus hath giuen me a wife and hereupon I testifie vnto all men that I will neither forsake her nor yet as an adulterer keepe her company but I will pray God to send mee by her many and good children Athanasius reports that Bishops and Monkes liued married Epist ade Dracont Epist 321. Pius 2. apud Plaitn in vita and had children And Pius Secundus saith It is better for a Priest to marrie then to burne though hee haue vowed not to marrie And moreouer that there bee many reasons to forbid Priests marriage but more to allow it But no maruaile that this restraint was made by the Pope since the prohibition of marriages is a plaine marke of Antichrist who should bring in the contempt of women for after that the Prophet Daniel had said that Antichrist should persecute the holy teachers and the pious beleeuing people Daniel 11. and should exalt himselfe aboue all God hee addeth Hee shall know nothing of the God of his Fathers and hee shall know nothing of the loue of women and of euery God and that hee shall magnifie himselfe aboue all things Which version agreeth with the Hebrew truth and with the seuentie Interpretors and Aquila Therefore let not any man oppose that which is carried about and in which it is read Hee shall bee in the concupiscences of women Where Saint Hierome himselfe in his Comentaries vpon Daniel interpreteth this sentence thus That Antichrist shall counterfeit chastitie to deceiue many By all which it is manifest that this law restraining Priests from marrying is a noueltie brought into the Church by Popes by degrees and a great wrong vnto the state of marriage which I haue shewed to be honorable in all This I could exemplifie by the abuses come into the Church by this restraint both in former ages and in this present age wherein wee liue If this law had not been it is likely that Matthaeus Parisiensis would haue had no cause to leaue recorded vnto posteritie that a Cardinall did all the day in a Synode heere in England inueigh against the marriages of Priests Matth. Parisan Henric. primum who at night was taken in bed with a strumpet there are too many to bee found as carnall as this Cardinall If this law of the Pope had not restrained Priests from marrying occasion would neuer haue been giuen for a Gentleman in Wales this last yeare to haue written vnto Master Birkhead the Arch-priest complaining of a Iesuite who by the heate of the powder-treason was thought to be driuen into Ireland where he got his owne kinswoman with child neither would many the like abuses bee complained of in diuers if the wicked restraint of marriages which is in truth the very doctrine of Diuels had neuer been made and inuented Gentle Reader pardon mee if these obscaenities offend your eares I may as well relate truthes in iustification of true doctrine against the Church of Rome as that Church both by reports and printed bookes may disgorge multitudes of lies against the reformed Church of England your deare countrey I do not this of any delight I take to walke in the wayes of sinners bt onely to discouer the wickednesse of their doctrine by such their wicked fruits as iust punishments inflicted by Gods permission that they may see their errors and forsake their wicked wayes Now therefore since it appeared vnto me by these premises how the Church of Rome against the law of God against the practise of the purest ages to the scandall of the Christian world through Satans craft vnder pretence of chastitie restrained Priests from lawfull marriages I could not remaine in the communion of that Church lest by Gods permission in time I might also be partaker of her iust punishments 8 And as I was moued to abaÌ„don her by reason of this illusioÌ„ whereby the diuel maketh her his The Church of Rome alloweth of incestuous marriages so was I no lesse moued by the coÌ„sideration of her doctrine permitting such mariages to be lawful in such degrees as som of their own teach to be prohibited by the law of God nature as namely by suffering one brother to marrie his brothers wife when the other is deceased For so doth the Pope by dispencing in this case which notwithstanding is iustly to be reprooued as I proue out of Ioannes Viguerius the learned Bishop of Spaine who deliuereth his Doctrine thus It is a doubt Io. Viguer
by the secret vertue of the Stone after an inuisible manner adioyning the Rings together a goodlie entire Chaine was made of them Euen so dearely beloued Christian Reader I finde Christ Iesus to haue beene such a powerfull and attractiue Loadstone vnto my Soule by the precedent obseruations lincking the one vnto the other with such infallible truth that therewith euen as with a most strong chaine of his excessiue loue and charitie hee hath now at the length drawne mee to the knowledge of his true Faith rightly taught and professed in the Church of England 2 It is no other than a chaine of Charitie A briefe recapitulation of the premised obseruations by which hee hath drawne mee to write this Treatise for the manifestation of his truth to those that are ignorant thereof It was a chaine of his prouidence by ministring occasions of times persons and places concurring to my conuersion It is a chaine of truth that euery mans chiefe businesse in this life must bee to attaine vnto the end he is created vnto by God or else hee receiueth his soule in vaine It is a chaine reaching from heauen that a supernaturall and reuealed knowledge from God is necessarie to saluation The obseruation also of an absolute necessitie of a supernaturall Faith is a strong chaine to draw any man to search diligently after it The knowledge likewise of the right rule and golden mete-wand of true Faith consisting of GODS sacred Word is a most forcible chaine to drawe Christians vnto the right knowledge of GODS truth The true knowne visible Church of Christ teaching the true sense of Scriptures is a powerfull chaine to draw men vnto the right faith of CHRIST IESVS Conformitie of Doctrine with the ancient doctrine of the Primitiue Church being a proper marke of the true Church of God is likewise a most attractiue chaine drawing to the true knowledge of right Christianitie The wonders and supposed miracles which Christ fore-told the Pseudo-Christs and false Prophets should doe for the seducing of Gods Elect if it were possible are also a strong chaine to draw any man from the Church of Rome The great hypocrisie of false Teachers fore-spoken of in the holy Scriptures agreeing chiefly with the Church of Rome are a chaine of great strength and power to draw any man from that Church The fruits by which false Prophets are to bee knowne and discerned abounding in the Church of Rome are also a powerfull chaine to draw any man of true iudgement from the abhominiations of that Church The discouerie of the Sacrifice of the Masse to bee Idolatrous which is accompted by the Church of Rome the chiefest act of religion that can bee done to God is a most forcible chaine to draw any man to the knowledge of CHRIST IESVS once offered for vs procuring our Sanctification Is not the proofe of Transubstantiation also to bee a noueltie a potent chaine to draw any man from Rome to the Church of England where the Sacrament is freed from such disgrace Is not the Amputation also of the holy Eucharist a powerfull chaine to draw men from the Church of Rome that they may rightly according to Christs institution bee partakers of the Lords Supper else where Is not also the noueltie of the Popes Pardons and Indulgences which is annexed to Crosses Graines and Meddals a powerfull chaine to draw any man that is not ridiculously childish a stronge chaine to draw him from the Church of Rome If the false doctrine of seuen Sacraments be well discouered by any man bee can not want a strong chaine to draw him to acknowledgement of two true Sacraments instituted by Christ if the doctrine of the Virgin Maries conception in originall sinne bee doubtfull in the Church of Rome the truth of Scriptures shewing it certaine may serue for a strong chaine to draw any man from that doubtfulnesse If the pretended chastitie of the Romish Clergie doe make the Church of Rome seeme more pure and holy than any other the prohibition of lawfull marriage to Priests and the dispensation and permission of vnlawfull marriage to kindred may bee as a strong chaine to draw deceiued soules from the filth and impurities of her hypocriticall holinesse By these the mightie strength power of all those chaines hath the goodnesse of almightie God deliuered my long estraied soule out of her dangerous waies setled me in the happie societie of his true faithfull beleeuers teaching the true ancient Catholike and Apostolike faith Oh how truly may I now say with holy Dauid in humble acknowledgement of Gods singular mercies vnto my soule Maruailous are thy workes Psal 139.14 O Lord and that my soule knoweth right well 3. Now it is time To all Seminarie Priests O all yee Seminarie Priests in this Land or else where who labour still in the same blindnesse and errours wherein hitherto I haue beene my selfe inwrapped as in a darke cloude that out of that true charitie and zeale of your soules good and happinesse wherewith I haue cause to be affected towardes you I direct my speech a while vnto you and manifest the sincere candor of my heart and affections to pittie your case as I haue had cause to bee sorrie for it heretofore in my selfe and therefore I can not but admonish you of the perill you liue in both of body and soule for looking no better into the doctrines which you teach You pretend to bee the salt of the earth Math. 5. vers 13. and the light of the world therefore you haue cause to see well that your doctrine bee sound wherewith you season mens soules and that the example of your vertues and life bee not hypocriticall and superstitious if your salt bee infatuated with nouelties and corrupt doctrines all the world will trample vpon you and you are only fit to bee cast out vnto the dunghills if your liues giue no true light but bee a couered vnder the appearance only of vertues as vnder a bushell where there is no corne your poore followers will bee hunger starued and runne into darkenesse and neuer finde the true light of the world CHRIST IESVS Who illuminateth as Saint Iohn saith Ioh. 1. vers 9. euery man comming into this world If it bee true that CHRIST saith Hee that doeth and teacheth Math. 5.19 shall bee called great in the Kingdome of hâ—auen Vnlesse both these duties goe together without mixture of falshood and finne you can neither bee great in Heauen nor in Earth but certaine I am your paines will bee great in the deepedungeon of hell Examine well your owne consciences both for doctrine and conuersation build not vpon other mens bookes only but examine their doctrines by the infallible rule of Scriptures send your Disciples vnto Christ as Saint Iohn Baptist did not to the Popes who can and haue erred both in doctrine and manners say vnto your Children as Christ our Lord and Master said Search the Scriptures c. because
for proofe of the Romish auricular confession out of S. Paul to the Corinthians he hath giuen vnto vs the ministerie of reconciliation and he hath put in vs the word of reconciliation for Christ therefore we are Legates O God O heauen Verse 19 O Angells O all yee men liuing vpon the earth come and iudge whether the learned Cardinall doe rightly applie this place of Saint Paul or not I will not iudge my selfe I will only oppose what lieth in Saint Paul going before and following these passages cited by him Can this place bee meant of absolution after a particular enumeration of sins to man if you consider what Saint Paul saieth before Beholde Vers 17. 18 all things are made new but all of God who hath reconciled vs vnto himselfe by Christ where it appeareth the chiefe meanes of reconciliation is by Christ as it is said in the nineteenth verse Verse 19 Not imputing vnto them theyr sinnes and the ministeriall meanes of reconciliation by the Cleargie doth it not appeare to bee by preaching the word and exhortation and not by any power to absolue after auricular confession for the Apostle after he had said Hee hath giuen vs the ministery of reconciliation and hath put in vs the word of reconciliation Doth hee not shew the meanes of this ministeriall reconciliation to bee by preaching and exhorting God working it so and no otherwise by them when hee saieth For Christ therefore wee are Legates God as it were exhorting by vs. Who foorthwith performeth this ministeriall office and duetie of reconciliation saying For Christ wee beseech you bee reconciled to God Verse 20 Now heere if wee may beleeue the Apustle Saint Paul iudge whether Christ be not the chiefe cause by not imputing to sinners their sinnes and surther whether the Priest be heere expressed to be the ministeriall cause otherwise than by way of exhortation concluding Him that knew no sinne for vs hee made sinne that is Verse 21 as the Rhemists note Vpon this place a Sacrifice for sinne That wee might bee made the iustice of GOD in him Iudge yee now therefore out of all these places whether the Cardinalles allegation of Saint Paul make anie thing for auricular confession or not as it is a part of the Romish Sacrament of Penance 8 A third place of Scripture alleadged for auricular confession by Cardinall Bellarmine is taken out of Saint Iames chap. 5. where it is said Confesse therefore your sinnes one to another and pray one to an other that yee may bee saued Which place doth neither make for Auricular Confession nor for absolution by the Priest for immediately before Saint Iames imputes the remission of sinnes to prayer in Faith saying The prayer of Faith shall saue the sicke and our Lord shall lift him vp and if he bee in sinnes they shall bee remitted him Againe the wordes seeme not to import that Auricular Confession the Church of Rome vseth for they are spoken as well of the Priest who is to praie as of the sicke for a mutuall and reciprocall prayer each one for the other now the Priest is not by Auricular Confessio to confesse to Lay people that hee may bee prayed for for according to the Papists that Confession is for absolution onely but this Confession Saint Iames speaketh of is meant of such a Confession as ioyned with prayer a man may bee saued by it and that which in the Romish sacramentall Confession saueth a man is the absolution of the Priest who as a Iudge giueth a iudiciall sentence of pardon which is the forme of the Sacrament of Penance and not as a suppliant prayeth for his neighbour which is onely intimated by Saint Iames neither is it apparent that Saint Iames meaneth more by this text than mutuall Confession of them who haue trespassed one the other and therefore may bee thought right well that he meaneth in these words no more than Christ did concerning reconciling our selues with our brother offended that so the offerings of our prayers to God may bee acceptable one for an other when hee said Matth. 4.25 Goe first to bee reconciled to thy brother and then comming thou shalt offer thy gift 9 A fourth place which I discouer most miserably and fondly wrested by Cardinall Bellarmine A text mise rably wrested 1. Iohn 1. verse 9 is out of the first Epistle of Saint Iohn where hee saieth If wee confesse our sinnes hee is faith full and iust for to forgiue vs our sinnes and to cleanse vs from all iniquitie whereupon he saith Vbi supra Hence is Sacrament all Confession probably gathered but it may more truly be said Hence is Confession of our sinnes to God most clearely to be gath ered and the other most probably confuted For first the wordes Hee is faythfull to forgiue our sinnes is spoken of GOD and not of anie Priest as may appeere by the wordes following if wee coâ—nfesse not to GOD If wee shall say that wee haue not sinned Verse 10 wee make him a lyar and his word is not in vs By which it is cleare that Saint Iohn also speaketh heere onely of Confession in generall to GOD as also may appeere by the wordes before If wee shall say that wee haue no sinne wee seduce our selues and the truth is not in vs. Secondly that by this confession is meant that which wee ought to make to GOD is euident by the Rhemists who for the better vnderstanding of this place doe referre vs in the inner margent to the third booke of Kings chap. 8. verse 47. and to the second of Paralipomenon chap. 6. verse 36. both which places make against Auricular Confession the first mentioning prayer to God and acknowledgement of sinnes onely in generall Peccauimus iniquè egimus ininstè gessimus Wee haue sinned wee haue done naughtily we haue behaued our selues wickedly The second place also expressing as much almost in the very same wordes Whereby it appeareth how much the Cardinall abuseth this Scripture and wresteth this Text against all right sense and meaning which cannot possibly be applied for the iustifying of his Auricular Confession Now therefore finding by due search and examination that none of the places of Scripture cited by Cardinall Bellarmine the chiefe Pillar in this our age of the Romaine faith doe prooue eyther Auricular Confession to bee necessarie to saluation or to be truely anie materiall part of Penaunce as a Sacrament instituted by Christ Iesus it followeth as a most certayne truth that the Church of Rome hath most grossely erred in defining the number of Sacraments to bee seauen cursing all those which shall holde and maintaine the contrarie Which curse and threatning of the Church of Rome no man hath cause to scare that esteemes of S. Pauls curse vpon those that shal teach other doctrine than wha the taught or that findteh himselfe lesse surprized with the feare of mens threatnings than with the feare of God who can cast our
soules into hell fire 10 And in very truth Diuers Authors shew auricular confession not to be ancient Socr. li. 5. ca 19. Tripartit hist lib 9. 35. Sozom. li. 7. c. 16 Niceph. libr. 12. cap 28. Wald. tom 2 de saora ca 141. Dom à Sot 4. dest 8 q 1. Henriq sum pag 325. Andâ— Orthodox expl c. pag. 663. Bâ—ron tom 1. ann 56. nu 28. Homil 22. ad pop Antioch when I looke backeward vppon the beginning of Christianitie as by the Scriptures I finde no such doctrine of auricular Confession to Priests as a thing necessary to saluation so doe I finde it a nouell doctrine not agreeable to Antiquitie but to haue had beginning after the planting of Christianitie For Nectarius the Bishop of Constantinople Put it downe in his Church and all the Bishoppes of the East did the like in theirs This the learned est Writers of the Romaine Church know well enough and acknowledge rayling vpon Nectarius for so doing as Andradius and Baronius doe which is a signe that the refourmed Churches reiecting confession breake no commandement of God but follow the example of the primitiue church that refused it This seems to be most cleare by S. Chrysostome saying This is wonderfull in God that he not onely forgiueth vs our sinnes but neythâ—r doth he disclose them or make them knowne neyther enjorceth he vs to come foorth and teil them he requireth no more but that we speake to him alone and to him alone confesse our faults It is not likelie that these learned and holie Bishoppes would thus haue done and also taught if Auricular Confession with a numerall accompt of euerie particular sinne to a Priest had beene generally receyued as an essentiall part of pennance necessarie to saluation in theyr times I doe finde by diuerse that there is scarce anie kinde of thing which causeth more scandall vnto the Cleargie it selfe than this Doctrine of particular enumeration of sinnes For a certaine Writer saith Religious men themselues in no thing sinne so much as in dissembling confessions Alua. Pelag. de planot Eccles lib 2. art 28. p. 255. For scarce or seldome at all doe they confesse otherwise then in generall termes naming no great sinne What they say one day that they say the next as if euery day they sinned alike Yet this abuse is nothing to that the same Author addeth saying That it was an ordinarie practise for the Priests to commit execrable villanie with the Women at confession as if they were the Sonnes of Eli Art 127. pa. 111 rauishing wiues and deflouring maides in the Church Art 2. pag. 83. and committing Sodomie with yong men with other stuffe then this affirming That the Church was made a stewes I finde further that an other Romish Writer saith Art 2. 73. 83. Cornel. Agrippa de vanit c. 64. I could by many examples fresh in memorie shew how fit this confession is for bawderie for Priests Monkes and Nunnes haue this speciall prerogatiue that vnder pretence of religion they may goe vp and downe when and whither they will and vnder colour of confession talke with anie woman whom they oftentimes entertayne but homely closely they goe to the stewes rauish virgins and widdowes yea manie times which my selfe haue seene and knowne runne awaie with mens wiues and carrie them to their fellows and hereby whose soules they should gaine to God their bodies they sanctifie to the Diuell II. â—isconueniences ouerthrowing auricular confession Many other proofes might be alleaged of the inconueniences of auricular Confession as by opening such sinnes by women or yong men as the very hearing of them striketh impression in the Priests and many times engendreth such occasions of temptations to them as they haue no power to resist them besides euen to the penitents also some sinnes into which they may fall by humane infirmitie may bee of that nature that they can neuer haue the heart through bashfulnesse to confesse them and then follow vnperfect confessions and after continuall remorse and perplexities of minde which make their whole liues irkesome vnto them drawing them into the remedilesse gulfe of desperation especially when the sinnes are such in weake natures as the Apostle Saint Paul himselfe thought vnfit to bee named which are fitter to bee opened to GOD than to Men. Therefore no man can well thinke that auricular confession is a soueraigne medicine for sinne which often is an occasion of much sinne No doubt IESVS CHRIST and the Apostles were as carefull to preserue men from sinne as the Pope can be and yet they neuer prescribed this medicine For certes whosoeuer feareth not to commit sin in the presence of God that seeth all men will as little blush to confesse it after their manner to a Priest whom they may deceiue and hee that regardeth not the law of God will care as little for the Priests absolution the feare of God and awe of his truth being of more force to bridle our sinnefull nature than the pollicie of man so that to conclude obseruing this auricular confession not to be an essentiall part of Penance nor to haue any warrant in the word of God nor to bee ancient doctrine without beginning since Christ and his Aposses nor to bee agreeable to reason in respect of many inconueniences that ensue of it it followeth that Penance is not a Sacrament instituted by Christ and consequently that there are not seuen Sacraments instituted by him as the Church of Rome teacheth and therefore I could no longer bee frighted with the Excommunication of the Councell of Trent against those that should denie this doctrine like those qui trepidant timore vbi non est timor Who tremble for seare where there is no cause of feare 12. Strange sables deuised for the prâ—ose of auricular coniession I remember a notable fable worth the relating deuised to breede feare and terrour for want of totall confession into the eares of a Priest which is recorded in diuers Writers of the Church of Rome of which two one of them was Penitentiarius to the Pope a man of great learning and good life and the other to wit the yongest was a simple vnlearned man In mag Spec. exemplor dist 9. p. 531. Guil. Pip. tr 1. super Conc. c. 13. ex lib. qui dicitur Scala coeli It happened that these two trauailing abroade together were lodged at a certaine Castle where a great Ladie dwelt that had committed Adulterie nay Incest with one of her owne Kinne Who out of the shame shee had conceiued for hauing committed so enormous an offence remained for the space of eleuen yeares without going to confession to her Curate who entertaining this religious couple and obseruing them in their carriages to bee vertuous and grane and not to haue any acquaintance with her and considering that perhaps they might neuer come againe to her house shee thought shee might doe well to make her
held that all men besides Christ alone deriued from Adam doe contract originall sinne from Adam Now if this be a matter of faith that all haue contracted sinne from Adam shall it not be against faith to hold that the virgine Marie did not contract sinne from Adam What did she not deseend from Adam by the line of corporall generation Or is there any Scripture or reuciation to the contrarie Is there any exemption of this Virgine No curtainely Nay I dare confidently affirme that it would haue been a great discomfort to this holy Virgine not to haue been partaker of that seet redemption by Christ which others were partakers of If shee were not partaker of the benefit of redemption why did shee say 1. Luc. 47. Magnificat anima mea Dom et exultauit spiritus mâ—us in Deo salutarimeo My soule doth magnisie the Lord and my spirit doth reioyce in God my Sanior How could it be true that God was her Sauior vnlesse it were by Christ of whom wee read in S. Mathew Ipse saiuuÌ„ faciet populuÌ„ suuÌ„ à peccatis eoruÌ„ 1. Matth. 21. He shall sane his people from their sinnes If she had onely been preserued from originall sinne by extraordinarie priuiledge she would haue said that she did reioyce in God her preseruer therefore in that she said she reioiced in God her Sauior according to the phrase of Scripture it is right well inferred that shee acknowledged her selfe saued from originall sinne by Christ whom shee had thus conceiued by the helpe of the holy Ghost without the seede of man to saue people from their sinnes so consequently her selfe calling â—im her Sauior If it be true that S. Paul sayth Ephes 2. Eramus omnes silij irae we were all the children of wrath and sivnus pro omnibus mortuus est if one died for all ergo omnes mortui sunt 1. Cor. 2. v. 14. 15. therefore all died Et pro omnibus mortuus est Christus and Christ died for all it necessarily followeth that the virgine Marie was also a child of wrath by originall sinne through Adam and that Christ who did for all died also for her or else how can it be verified that he died for all If my illation is not to be credited herein Thomas of Aquin may be demaunded his opinion and he will be found to agree with me herein Tho. 3. p.q. 27. art 2. in corp his wordes are these The sanctification of the virgine Marie cannot be vnderstood before giuing of soule or life for a two-fold respect First because sanctification of which we speake is no other than a cleansing from originall sinne Cap. 12. de diui Nomi parum à principio for holinesse is perfect cleanenesse as Dionysius sayty but sinne cannot be clensed but by grace whereunto the reasonable creature is onely subiect Therefore before the infusion of the reasonable soule the blessed Virgine was not sanctified Secondly for that since onely the reasonable creature can haue sinne before the infusion of the reasonable soule the fruit conceiued is not obnoxious to sinne And therefore by what meanes soeuer the blessed Virgine was sanctified before giuing soule or life shee should neuer haue incurred the blot of originall sinne and so shee should not haue stood in neede of redemption or saluation which is by Chris of whom it is said Matth. 1. He shall saue the people from their sinnes But this is inconuenient that Christ should not be the Sauior of all men as wee reale in the first to Timothie the fourth Therefore it resteth that the sanctification of the blessed virgine was after shee receiued soule or life Here then it is apparant that this their Angelicall Doctor held the virgine Marie to be obnoxious to originall sinne because the sanctification he speakes of as himselfe sayth is a cleansing from originall sinne as also for that he sheweth that it would haue beene inconuenient for her not to haue incurred the blot of originall sinne because then shee should not haue stood in neede of redemption So that I thinke it is hereby plaine by the Scriptures according to Thomas Aquinas vnderstanding that the virgine Marie was conceiued in originall sinne and therefore this doctrine is a point of faith 3. Hence I obserue farther The disagreement in the Church of Rome about the virgine Maries conception Ban. part 1. pag. 75. De consecratione d. 4. firmissime nu 12. pag. 101. vpon more serious consideration of the doctrine holding the contrarie how much the late Diuines of the Romish Church especially the Iesuites doe swarue from former Diuines who taught the virgine Marie to be conceiued in originall sinne Bannes acknowledgeth that all the Fathers with one consent held the virgine Marie to be conceiued in originall sinne And Turrecremata sayes That almost all the Schoolemen held the virgine Marie had originall sinne yea that is the common opinion among the famousest of them and he hath colleced an hundred of that minde I obserue a notable contradiction amongst some Romane Writers in this point Cardinal Bellarmine indeede commeth neere the truth when he sayth To affirme that the blessed virgine was conceiued in originall sinne Bellar. de stat peccat l. 4. c. 15. is not against faith He had said well if he had said it is de side it is a matter of faith for is not that a matter of faith which is plaine by the expresse word of God as I haue shewed Yet others say shee had no originall sinne Almain potest eccles c. 16. Clicto super Damas l. 3. c. 2. Frac. Titl Io. 2. and that it is a point of our faith so to beleeue and that it is impietie to thinke otherwise Now if they say true then doe they make the Cardinall an Heretike when in the second conclusion hee affirmeth That the blessed Virgine is piously thought to haue beene conceiued without originall sinne by the singular priuiledge of God Is that thing to be but piously beleeued which is a point of our faith as the former said Or is not that thing against faith which is contrarie to that proposition which they say is a point of faith and that it is impietie to thinke otherwise But in verie truth omitting the contradictions of their writings about this doctrine if we looke but into the institution of the Feast of the Virines conception which they keepe euerie yeare we shall finde it verie nouell in respect of antiquitie and such occasions thereof as are vnfit to ground their doctrine vpon contrarie to all antiquitie 4. To. 1. c. 4. tit 1. p. 6. Anthonie d'Aneroult in his Historicall Catechisme sheweth how the Feast of the Conception of the Virgine Marie was instituted which he recounteth in this manner William the Duke of Normandie An apparition whereupon this doctrine was grounded and the Feast of her Conception first instituted a man fearing God after he had conquered England and reformed the
Church in the same Kingdome was aduertised that the Dacians made preparations for the warres against him Whereupon he sent the Abbot Hersinus vnto them to know the truth of their designements The Abbot then being vpon his returne at sea was surprised with such a tempestuous storme that he and all his people were in danger of their liues if they had not sought for succour of the virgine Marie for as they inuoked her with all the deuotion they could behold there came from Heauen a venerable Personage apparrelled like a Bishop who after he had saluted the Abbot said vnto him Will you be deliuered from this danger he answered that he desired nothing more Know you then said the Personage that I am sent from the virgine Marie to aduertise you that you shall be deliuered from all danger if you will obey me Commaund said the Abbot all that you please and you shall be willingly obeyed Hereafter then said he you shall keepe a solemne Feast of the Conception of the virgine Marie and in preaching you shall declare that it is to be kept The abbot asking vpon what day it should bee kept and what Seruice the Church should say thereon he answered it should be kept the eight of December and for the Seruice they should take that of the Natiuitie putting the word Conception in lieu of Natiuitie Anno 1060. Then the Personage vanished away the storme ceased and the Abbot escaped with all his companie and afterward performed his promise Is not this a strong foundation to build an article of Faith vpon Let the circumstances be considered as that the Bishop that appeared comming from the virgine Marie vsed such great familiaritie with the Abbot as to salute him that he appeared in a storme when wicked spirits are busiest that he willed him to keepe a Feast of that act concerning the blessed Virgine which cannot be freed from sinne and iudge whether it be not time to flye to the Scriptures reuealed from God when such visions must serue as it is probably deuised by the diuell to delude men withall for the establishment of a new article of faith as diuers of the Romane Church hold this to be It may be this vision might be such a one as I haue sometimes heard of the like nature by a certaine Gentleman as acquaintance of mine who told mee that one appeared vnto him in the forme of a Bishop telling him he must be a Romane Catholike if he would be saued and that he should trauell ouer the seas escape many dangers acquainting him with future euents concerning the Earle of Essex and himselfe which he would not speake of Which vision some of his kindred gaue credit vnto and furthered him in his iourney And I haue heard since when his money was spent beyond the seas he returned home againe and finding himselfe deluded by his vision embraced againe his former religion and continueth in it to this day Some Romanists haue thought that this vision was but an inuention that thereby hee might finde a few golden peeces out of his friends the better to maintaine his trauailes The truth of his vision I leaue to his owne conscience but this I may truely say there is a great resemblance betwixt his and the Abbots and therefore in my iudgement if the Diuell played the Bishop in the one he might as well doe it in the other 5. Another apparition to the same effect Ibidem part 7. Dionys Cor. ser 2. Conc. Be. Mariae Polbert ibid. I haue noted another apparition recorded by diuers Writers of the Church of Rome tending to the same purpose viz to make good the doctrine of the Virgine Maries conception without originall sinne In the time of Charles King of Fraunce a certaine young man nephew to the King of Hungarie loued so much the Virgine Marie and was so addicted to her seruice that daily before he eate any thing he sayed her Houres who falling vpon a time into a great infirmitie and sicknesse vowed his chastitie vnto her if she would helpe to saue his life Forthwith the chamber was replenished with a great light and he was restored to his health Soone after his vncle died without issue which made the Lords of the Countrey to persuade him to enter into the estate of Marriage to the end the Kingdome may not be without heires offering him a faire Ladie which he married But after he had receiued the blessing he remembred that he had not yet that day read our Ladies office he retyred himselfe to say them the more deuoutly sending the Ladie Bride with the rest of the companie home to his house and when he said that Anthieme Pulchra es decora filia Hierusalem that is to say Thou art faire and gracious O daughter of Ierusalem suddainely the virgine Marie appeared vnto him with two Angels attending her and said vnto him If I am faire honest and gracious as thou sayest wherefore doest thou forsake mee for another am not I more beautifull than she O Ladie said he your beautie surpasseth all the beautie of the world thou art exalted aboue the Angels what is your pleasure that I should doe If you leaue said she your carnall espouse for the loue of me you shall haue me for wife in Heauen and if you will keepe a yearely solemne Feast euerie yeare vpon the eight day of December of my conception teaching others to keepe it you shall be crowned with me in the Kingdome of my Sonne When she had spoken these wordes shee vanished out of sight and the young man transpoeted himselfe out of the Citie and Kingdome into a Wildernesse where his comportement was so holy that since he was made Patriarch of Aquilâ—ia where hee preached and instituted the said Feast Collections vpon this storie Iudge now gentle Reader whether this be an apparition likely to come from Heauen when that which is commaunded here is so expressely against the word of God inuiting from that state of marriage which the Apostle calleth honourable vnto the seruice of that fained and deuised priuiledge of the Virgin Maries Conception without originall sinne which I haue already shewed to be expresly repugnant to the word of God and therefore diametrally against faith Besides the institution it selfe is so late that it appeareth to bee cockle sowed by the enuious man the Deuill not by Christ or his Apostles and therefore not to be receiued by those who know Antiquitie to bee the infallible marke of truth The due obseruation of all which premises considered in this Chapter was as forcible an inducement to leade my feete out of the dangerous waies of Romish nouelties as any other therefore curteous Reader let me intreate thee with me to call the Virgin Marie most blessed amongst women as truly shee was vpon earth and is so also in heauen in the glorie of her soule but thinke her not yet so blessed as in this point of her Conception to paralell her with Christ