also conformable thereto in our lives either by our obedience or by our repentance so saith the Psalmist Psal. 119. V. 104. Through thy precepts I get understanding therefore I hate every false way as if he had said Through thy word I get the knowledge of the saving truth and that makes me avoid and abandon whatever is destructive of salvation for every way is a false way that leads from truth and from the God of truth wherefore the Greek translation thus renders the latter part of the verse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I hate every wicked way for a false way is a wicked way and a wicked way is a false way the Urim and Thummim being inseparably joyned together so that what is against the light of the truth is also against the perfection of life and indeed the way of wickedness is a false way according to Aristotle's own determination of falsity who in the fifth of his Metaph. cap. 29. saith that things are said to be false 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 either because they are not in being so a Chimaera or a castle in the air is said to be false or because they make a false appearance and beget in us false apprehensions and so a glass that represents those colours and those proportions which are not in the object is called a false glass In both these respects is the way of wickedness properly said to be a false way both because it is defective in a true being for it is a meer non entity and also because it is excessive in a false being making a false appearance and begetting in us false apprehensions as if it were pleasant and profitable when as it is the onely cause of all our wo and misery of all our punishment whether of sense or of loss And it is observable that every irreligious man hath in himself these two properties of a liar a wilfull liar which is the falsest of all false men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 first he loves and embraces that which is false and secondly he desires to propagate and derive it to others so the irreligious man whether he be irreligious out of superstition or out of faction delights in the errour of his own way and desires to bring others into the same perdition as we finde it spoken by the mouth of truth S. Matth. 23. 15. That Scribes Pharisees and Hypocrites compass sea and land to make one proselyte and when he is made they make him twofold more the childe of hell then themselves factious men and hypocrites are much more zealous for their own new and false opinions then for Gods eternal and undoubted truth so that were there nothing else in impiety and irreligion but onely its own falseness yet that alone were enough to make it eternally odious to God the God of truth and to the godly man the lover of truth for God cannot but be true even as he cannot but be God and as he is God he is truth for God is truth and for this reason some Schole Divines do answer negatively to this question Whether God can dispence with a lie as he can with the other commandments and the reason is because in his own essence he is truth so the master of Advertencies upon S. Chrys. and the four Doctours of the Church S. Hierome S. Ambrose S. Augustine and S Gregory An Deus possit in mendacio dispensari sicut in aliis praeceptis Decalogi Negatur Quia ex sua Essentia est Veritas But we may go much further because the truth will go along with us for not onely the ninth Commandment which requires us to be true men is indispensable but also all the rest of the moral Law which requires us to be good men for indeed we cannot be one without the other therefore is all the moral Law alike indispensable that is all that is intrinsecally moral by its own nature whereby we do not onely obey God but also imitate him and not extrinsecally moral being made so by Gods command or by Divine precept whereby we onely obey God but do not imitate him and the reason is because all that is contrary to what is intrinsecally moral is a lie and consequently contrary to the truth of God and God cannot will not dispence with his own truth And this is the cause that whatsoever is evil in it self is necessarily displeasing unto God and that indeed under a twofold reason for as it is evil in it self and defective in a right being so it is opposite to his goodness and as it is a lie and redundant or excessive in a false being by a counterfeit appearance and representation so it is opposite to his truth Men may and do too much out of stomack and animositie oppose one another in matters of disputation but 't is out of some spice of atheisme if they wilfully oppose Gods undoubted truth in matters of Religion either speculatively by going in a false way or practically by going in a wicked way The next communicable property in God is Goodness in his Will which appears in that he hath been so diffusive of himself in communicating his being to the creature therefore is our creation put as a ground of our thankfulness and thanksgiving Psal. 149. 2. Let Israel rejoice in him that made him which could not be if God had not created us out of his Goodness to give us a good being to make us the object of his mercy but out of his power that by his absolute dominion he might give us an everlasting ill being to make us the object of his justice Therefore 't is an excellent position of the Protestant Divines in Colloquio Mempelgertensi recited by Osiander Neque ex lege neque ex ratione humana sed ex solo Evangelio de praedestinatione electorum judicandum est That neither out of the law nor out of humane reason but onely out of the Gospel can we rightly judge of the predestination of the elect and the Gospel condemns none for reprobates but those who despising the riches of Gods goodness and forbearance by their infidelitie and impenitencie heap upon themselves damnation But let us more particularly consider this Goodness of God both in regard of it self and also in regard of us First In regard of it self and so it is an essential and universal Goodness demonstrable these three ways per viam efficientiae per viam sufficientiae per viam eminentiae as saith Bonavent by the way of efficiencie for he made all that is good by the way of sufficiencie for he satisfieth the desire of all with good by the way of eminencie for all that is good being made by him is most eminently in him that made it Secondly Consider we this Goodness of God in regard of us and so 't is the rule or exemplarie cause of all goodness in man for our good of Nature is according to the image of God the Father our good of Grace is according to
will not throw away both justice modestie can pretend it to be a work of Religion and righteousness unless there be a Religion and Righteousness without or to speak more plainly and more truly both together against the Text. And as it was before Christs time so ever since till of late years there was the same Supreme in Church and Commonwealth where the Commonwealth was Christian according to that golden rule of Theodosius in the Acts of the first Ephesine Council sacrâ ad Cyrillum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 You must know that the Church and the Commonwealth are so knit together that both do make but one body and therefore can admit but one head and when the Donatists in S. Augustines time thought much that the Civil magistrate should interpose in matters of Religion the good Father Epist. 50. alledgeth the text against them Psal. 2. 10 11. Be wise now therefore O ye Kings serve the Lord with fear and gives this gloss upon it Aliter Rex Domino servit quia homo est Aliter quia etiam Rex est Quïa homo est ei servit vivendo sideliter quia verò etiam Rex est servit leges justa praecipientes contraria prohiben'es convenienti vigore sanciendo sic servivit Hezekias lucos templa idolorum excelsa destruendo c. A King serves God otherwise as he is a man and otherwise as he is a King as a man he serves him by living faithfully but as a King he serves him by making and executing pious laws to propagate and defend his service so did Hezekias so did Josias serve him nay so did the King of Nineveh serve him in commanding a fast upon Jonahs preaching so did Darius serve him in allowing Daniel to break the image and casting his enemies into the lions den so did Nabuchodonosor serve him forbidding his subjects to blaspheme his Name In hoc ergo serviunt Reges Domino in quantum sunt Reges quum ea faciunt ad serviendum illi quae non possunt facere nisi Reges Then do Kings serve God as Kings when they do those things for his service which none can lawfully do but Kings This saith he could not be in the Apostles times when the Kings of the earth did stand up and the rulers take counsel together against the Lord and his Christ but now that text is fulfilled all the Kings of the earth shall worship him Quis mente sobrius Regibus dicit nolite curare in regno vestro c. Who but a mad man will say to Kings Do not you look after the Church what is it to you whether the people be Religious or sacrilegious and again Epist. 48. he answers the same objection concerning the Apostles times and since their times till some late centuries of years 'T is most evident that Christian Kings and Emperours did call all the general councils confirm their canons and order the chief matters of Religion Eusebius goes so far as to say that holidays were appointed by the Emperour Constantine Euseb. de vita Const. lib. 4. and that himself did once say to the Bishops when he had invited them to a feast 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 You are appointed Bishops or Overseers of Gods service within the Church but without the Church God hath appointed me to be a Bishop you must perform the Divine Service but I must see it performed The like is evident concerning all the ancient Councils The first general Council was called by Constantine and he gives this reason for it because it much concerned him to see that truth and peace 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should be preserved in the Church The second was called by Theodosius the first and the Fathers of that Council in their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the Emperour do first make this profession that they were gathered together by his writ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and then make this petition that their decrees might be confirmed by his authority 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The third by Theodosius the second and Valentinian The Monks petition them not to neglect the Church of God adulterated by Hereticks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but to call a Council to suppress them and the Council it self professeth they were gathered together by the Emperours Edict 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 calling them for their pains Most Relgious Emperours Lovers of Christ and beloved of God Democratical frensie had not yet so poisoned Religion as to teach Church-men to speak irreverently of Kings much less to act disobediently against them and Pope Celestine in his Epistle to Theodosius tells him plainly Major vobis fidei causa debet esse quà m regni ampliúsque pro pace Ecclesiarum clementia vestra debet esse sollicita quà m pro omnium securitate terrarum You ought 't is not courtesie but duty You ought saith he to set a higher estimation upon your faith then upon your Crown and to be more sollicitous for the peace of the Church then for the peace of your kingdom and he gives an irresistible reason for this undeniable truth Pro vestri enim imperii salute geritur quicquid pro quiete Ecclesiae vel sanctae Religionis reverentiâ laboratur for the same consultations which establish peace and purity in the Church do establish peace and safetie in the Commonwealth The fourth general Council was called by the Emperour Martian 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are the words of the Fathers in the second Action and in the sixth Action they call him plainly a Defender of the Faith a new Constantine a new David nay a new Paul too 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They thought a Religious King in some sort equal to an Apostle though not for preaching the Gospel yet for propagating it much like unto that gloss of Aben-Ezra upon Lam. 2. 6. The Priest is to teach the law and the King is to defend the law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the law is committed to them both The fifth general Council was called by Justinian and the Bishops with one acclamation say unto him Zizania tu ejecisti Ecclesias tu emendâsti in collat 4. ad sinem 't is you have thrown out the tares 't is you have reformed the Church and himself in his form sent to the Council to be read before they opened the Synod saith he called this Council as his Predecessours had the other before him Constantine that of Nice Theodosius the first that of Constantinople Theodosius the second that of Ephesus and Martian that of Chalcedon and saith that Constantine Theodosius and Martian did very much assist the Bishops in their several Councils for the recovering either of the veritie or unitie of the Church The sixth general Council was called by Constantinus Pogonatus his own Edict directed to Pope Domnus but by reason of his decease delivered to Agatho professeth as much wherein he requires him to send some of his Church not onely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
aliis scientiis whether the manner of knowing divine truths be more certain in Divinity then the manner of knowing natural truths is in other sciences he answers it is more certain and he gives these three admirable reasons for his answer 1. Quia certior est modus sciendi per inspirationem quà m per humanam rationem because the way of knowing by divine inspiration is much more certain then the way of humane ratiocination or collection since the one is subject to errour the other not and all divine truths are made known to us by inspiration as appears 2 Tim. 3. 16. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine for reproof for correction for instruction in righteousness I may not take any doctrine for an instruction in righteousness which I cannot prove was first taught by inspiration of God and if it be taught of God it may be found in the Scripture which is Gods word 2o. Certius est quod scitur testimonio Spiritûs quà m quod testimonio creaturarum That is more certain which is known by the testimony of Gods Spirit then of the creature But all that we know in Divinity is known by the testimony of Gods Spirit as saith S. Peter 2 Pet. 1. 21. For the prophesie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost in Divinity we appeal to the undoubted testimony of God the holy Ghost and can say Veni Creator whereas in all other sciences we can go no higher then the testimony of the creatures 3o. Quia certius est quod per modum gustûs quà m quod per modum visûs A man is more sure of that which he discerns by his taste then of that which he discerns onely by his sight for what he discerns by his sight he knows onely speculatively and perchance to his great discontent but what he discerns by his taste he knows also experimentally and if the thing be good not without great delight and from these premises he proceeds to this dogmatical conclusion or determination Est certitudo speculationis est certitudo experientiae vel est certitudo secundùm intellectum secundùm affectum vel quoad hominem spiritualem quoad hominem animalem Dico ergò quòd modus Theologicus est certior certitudine experientiae quoad affectum quia est per modum gustûs Psal. 118. Quà m dulcia faucibus meis eloquia tua quamvis non certior quoad speculationem intellectûs quae est per modum visûs item certior est homini spirituali quamvis incertior animali 1 Cor. 2. Animalis homo non percipit ea quae Spiritûs Dei sunt There is a certainty of speculation and there is a certainty of experience there is a certainty that proceeds from the understanding there is a certainty that proceeds from the will and affections Lastly there is a certainty of the spiritual man and there is a certainty of the natural man I answer then that the manner of knowing Theological or Divine truths is more certain then the manner of knowing any other truths if we look upon the certainty of experience which proceedeth from the will and affections because that certainty is by way of tasting Hence the Psalmist saith How sweet are thy words unto my taste yea sweeter then honey to my mouth although it be less certain if we look upon the certainty of evidence which proceedeth from the understanding because that certainty is onely by way of seeing And none of us all is so quick-sighted in spiritual as in natural things and hence it is that this certainty of divine truths which is very great in the spiritual man is little or none at all in the natural man Because the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God for they are foolishness unto him neither can he know them because they are spiritually discerned 1 Cor. 2. 14. The sum of all is this The certainty that is to be had of the Christian Religion is greater then the certainty that is to be had of other truths but it must be in a subject rightly qualified that is First in a man of holy affections who lives not after the flesh but after the Spirit else his profaneness will beguile him Secondly In a man of holy resolutions that desires not to satisfie his curiosity but his conscience not to provide for his temporal but for his spiritual interest else his hypocrisie will deceive him Thirdly in a man of holy intentions that steers not his course to heaven by the Cynosure of his own reason and much less of his own humours but is wholly guided by Gods authority for none but Gods authority ought to sway in Gods cause else his perversness will defraud him of his certainty for those men that are guilty of hypocrisie come short of it those that are guilty of profaneness go beside it those that are guilty of perversness go against it for as it is concerning Religion it self so is it also concerning the certainty that accompanies it the profane person goes beside it the hypocrite comes short of it the perverse person goes against it onely the sincere meek good man obtains it he that is sincere without hypocrisie meek without perversness good and honest without profaneness and debauchery The same seed is sown in several grounds but from some the sower hath not so much as his seed again from other he hath great increase The spiritual seed is the word of God the rule of Religion And as for this word some of it falls by the way-side that is among profane and vicious persons such as are in the high-way of perdition where it is troden under foot and the fowls of the air irregular and extravagant fancies and desires devour it some of it falls upon a Rock where it can have no root nor moisture for onely the mere out-side is earth the rest is all stone that is among hypocrites and dissemblers who hear the word with joy and for a time beleeve but in time of temptation fall away for temporary beleevers as they beleeve with the times so also they beleeve but for a time and soon fall away from their belief Lastly and some of it falls among thorns that is among perverse and refractory men for such are called briers and thorns Ezek. 2. 6. men of a wilfull Religion and therefore in truth men of no Religion since Religion depends not upon mans but upon Gods will and here the word must needs be choaked for a man that gives himself to be governed by his own will cannot possibly submit himself to Gods will or at least not for Gods sake but onely for his own sake and a Religion that is not for Gods sake is certainly not of Gods making and consequently though it may be of a great growth as we find by sad experience yet it cannot be of a long
was builded these many years agoe we desire not to lay one stone more nor one stone less then was anciently laid onely we are not willing to mistake a false for a true Antiquity Id verum quod primum that is the truest which was the first And it was our Blessed Saviours own way of reasoning Non sic fuit ab initio It was not so from the beginning and yet it had been so for a very long time before Secondly S. Paul had the comfort of his Religion in that he worshipped the God of his Fathers for his Religion entitled him to the same God his Fathers had before him who had shewed great mercy to them and had promised to shew mercy to their children for their sakes the Jews had comfort in their Fathers when they had not in themselves Moses useth three Arguments why God should not destroy the children of Israel for their Idolatry Exod. 32. 11 12 13. The first was his former benefits lest they should seem to be lost and thrown away The second was his own glory lest that should be obscured and his Name blasphemed and neither of these two Arguments prevailed his former goodness had been too much abused his after glory might be otherwise repaired But then follows his third Argument his Promises to the Fathers and that prevails then immediately saith the Text And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people ver 14. Gods veracity is indispensable and must be indisputable And thus Jarchi glosses upon this third Argument If they have sinned against all thy Ten Commandments yet remember Abraham was upright in his Ten Temptations let Ten go for Ten nay more If thou hast purposed to burn them or kill them or banish them yet remember Abraham and Isaac and Israel thy servants thou wilt not do it Remember that Abraham at thy command exposed himself to burning when he went to Ur that is Fire in the Chaldeaens Isaac exposed himself to killing Jacob exposed himself to a long Banishment to a wearisome Pilgrimage And thus God himself comforted Hezekiah Thus saith the Lord the God of David thy Father I have heard thy prayer I have seen thy tears Is. 38. 5. So willing so ready is God to shew mercy that he will find a cause to shew it to the Children for their Fathers sake when he cannot for their own doubtless it is to teach them not to trust in their own righteousness if they be righteous nor to distrust his mercy when they have been captivated under the dominion of sin unrighteousness And thus much concerning the worship of God the first substantial part of S. Pauls Religion The second substantial part thereof still remains undiscussed and that is his Faith Concerning which we may observe two things First That it was the Catholick Faith Secondly the Proof that it was so First That his Faith was the Catholick Faith Beleeving all things A Christians Faith may be called Catholick in a two-fold respect either essentially or accidentally essentially in the substance of it when he beleeves all those Christian Truths that God hath revealed as necessary to salvation and beleeves them because of Gods Revelation for as the second Epistle of Saint Iohn is called a Catholick Epistle though writ to a private person because it is Catholick or universal in its Instructions though it be onely particular in its occasion so is the true Faith the Catholick Faith though it may be continued onely among some few true Beleevers for what hath been already may be again and this case hath been in the days of Athanasius because it is universal in its Obligation though perchance almost singular in its Profession And in this sense the Catholick Faith and the Christian Faith are both one whence Athanasius calls that the Catholick which others have called the Christian Faith although he insist most upon the true doctrine concerning the Blessed Trinity even as the Imperial Edict cited in the Code in the Title de summâ Trinitate Fide Catholicâ gives the name of Catholicks to those Christians who had a right belief concerning the holy and undivided Trinity not onely as we may suppose because the chiefest hereticks of those daies had erred in that doctrine but also because they who erred not in it could not easily erre in denying any Fundamental of the true Christian Faith And thus Aquinas very briefly and plainly tels us what is this Christian or Catholick Faith even that Faith which brings us here to the saving knowledge and will bring us hereafter to the blessed enjoyment of our Saviour Christ. Credibilia de quibus est Fides secundum se quae directè ordinant ad Vitam Aeternam Nam Fides est principaliter de his quae videnda speramus in patriâ Heb. 11. 1. Ut Incarnatio Christi Trinitas At alia sunt de quibus non est Fides secundum se sed solum in ordine ad priora sc. ad manifestationem eorum ut quòd Abraham habuerit duos silios 22 ae qu. 1. Those truths do properly and of themselves belong to the Christian Faith which do immediately and directly order and dispose the beleever to eternal life for Faith is principally of those things which we hope to see and enjoy in heaven Heb. 11. 1. such as are the Incarnation of Christ and the Mystery of the Blessed Trinity But there are other truths which do not properly and of themselves belong to the Christian-Faith but onely in order to these to wit as far as they conduce to the manifestation of them as that Abraham had two sons As for the first of these they are to be explicitly beleeved of all Christians alike As for the second it sufficeth if they be implicitly beleeved by those who have not the means of an explicit Faith concerning them so that we may thus gloss S. Pauls words Beleeving all things that are written viz. either explicitly or implicitly all things explicitly that are revealed to me and all things implicitly that are revealed in the Text For every good Christian hath a preparation of his soul to beleeve whatsoever is contained in the whole word of God and a resolution of his soul to beleeve it as soon as it shall appear to him to be so Thus again the same Angelical Doctour Nam Fidei objectum per se est per quod homo heatus es sicitur per accidens autem secundariò omnia quae in sacrâ Scripturâ Divinitus traditâ continentur 22 ae qu. 2. art 5. The object of Faith essentially in and of it self is that which brings a man to the beatifical Vision for Faith is to end in Vision as Hope in Comprehension and Charity in Fruition But the object of Faith accidentally and secondarily is whatsoever is contained in the holy Scriptures that have been delivered to us from God As for the first every Christian is bound to beleeve them by an actual and
that is wary and timorous in the choice of his tenents though he may be thought an enemy to his own knowledge yet he cannot be thought an enemy to Gods truth for though he may stick a while at the embracing of some divine truths till they appear to him to be so yet he cannot easily obtrude any untruths for truths and God will sooner pardon the infirmity of a man in sticking at a truth then the presumption of a man in obtruding an untruth for the first shews himself as a man subject to doubtings not able to command his own faith but the other would fain be accounted little less then a God in making himself not the Interpreter but the Authour of truths and so challenging a dominion over the faith of others which however ought not to dishearten us from knowing the doctrine of any Christian Church for as of old it derogated nothing from the truth of God that some Prophets did tell lies in his Name so neither doth it now derogate from the truth of Religion that there is so much mixture of mens inventions or surmises with that truth But we must say of all these tares that an enemy hath sowed them whilest men slept and yet we may not think Gods Providence over his Church either careless in not looking after it or defective in looking after it to little purpose as if he that is the keeper of Israel did sleep when Israel most needed keeping for the Apostle hath said Oportet haereses esse inter vos 1 Cor. 11. 19. there must be sects or heresies amongst you that they which are approved may be made manifest as if he had said That must be for which there is a good reason why it should be and there is a good reason why there should be heresies amongst you nay indeed two good reasons the one on your parts that you may be tried or proved the other on Gods part that they which are approved may be made manifest to set forth the power and glory of Gods truth which like the Sun shines the more gloriously when it hath broken through some great cloud that opposed it for so much is true even of that wicked objection Rom. 3. 7. If the truth of God hath more abounded through my lye unto his glory why yet am I also judged as a sinner 't is most certain the Truth of God doth often more abound through our lies to his glory and yet the Objection is so ungodly and unreasonable why am I judged as a sinner that the Apostle doth not think it worth the answering but onely silenceth such a desperate and prophane Disputant with a damnabitur that he is like to be damned for his pains v. 8. whose damnation is just for no argument so fit to confute him as damnation who will needs plead or dispute for the devil Will ye plead for Baal will ye save him he that will plead for him let him be put to death Jud. 6. 31. what a shame is it for us Christians that Baal should have so many to plead for him and God so few that Superstition and Faction should so much outstrip true Religion the professours of the one for they both meet in the same Baal though they are so far asunder in themselves going as much beyond the professours of the other in zeal as they come short of them in truth and yet still since superstition and faction must needs be judged as sins why should they not be judged as sinners that maintain them for neither should we finde a Disputant to defend it if both be sins neither should we find an advocate to plead for it if both alike uphold the worship of Baal and yet there are and will be swarms of such Advocates multitudes of such Disputants notwithstanding Joash hath said Let them be put to death that so plead and S. Paul hath moreover said their damnation is just that so dispute for neither death nor damnation can silence the perverse disputings of men of corrupt mindes and destitute of the truth supposing that gain is godliness wherefore St. Pauls advice to Timothy is from such withdraw thy self 1 Tim. 6. 5. and we are little beholding to the Latine Translation for taking no notice of this so necessary a text yet God forbid we should therefore think it ought to be expunged out of the Greek Copies wherein both Latine and Greek Church so joyntly agree or else out of our own practise and observation S. Pauls advice in controversies or rather corruptions of this nature is From such withdraw thy self not against such oppose thy self he adviseth us rather to have no communion with them then to maintain disputations against them for as in carnal uncleanness the onely way for a man to have a clean body and a chaste soul is to flee fornication 1 Cor. 6. 18. not to resist it so is it also in this spiritual uncleanness which makes men go a whoring after their own inventions we must rather avoid the temptation then think to overcome it rather shun the Disputants then think to answer their disputations for men whose faction is above their Religion will never be silenced by arguments of Religion and men whose Interest is above their conscience will never give any ear to the plea of Conscience and this reason is in effect given by S. Paul himself why in such a case it is better to withdraw then to withstand v. 3. For saith he if any man teach otherwise and consent not to wholsome words even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ and to the doctrine which is according to godliness he is proud knowing nothing but doting about questions and strifes of words as if he had said There is little hopes of doing good upon such a man for if he would have hearkned to any wholsome words and not onely to flattering speeches he would have hearkned to the words of our Lord Jesus Christ we may say to those words which Christ spake in his person S. Matth. 22. 21. Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesars and unto God the things that are Gods for those words alone if rightly followed would suffer no man to be a Pharisee that is a Separatist either in Church or State for if men did give Caesar his due there could be no sedition in the state if they did give God his due there could be no schism nor heresie in the Church but we must say to those words which Christ spake in his doctrine whether immediately by himself or mediately by his Apostles if such a Pharisee would have hearkned to wholsome more then to pleasing words he would have hearkned to the words of Christ which he delivered both in his person and in his doctrine and if he would have received any doctrine but that which complied with his worldly interest he would have received the doctrine which is according to godliness but since he will neither hear the one nor receive the other 't is
to little purpose to labour his conversion For first he is ignorant in his understanding knowing nothing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Oecum for he who knows not that which he ought to know is as if he knew nothing nay he is much worse not onely possest with ignorance but also with a kinde of devil as saith the same authour 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he that will not know God cannot but know the devil he that will not receive Christ and his wholsome words into his understanding shall not be able to keep the devil and his poisonous dictates out of it Secondly he is pertinacious in his will which appears from his contradiction from his obstinacy from his ambition His contradiction is discovered in that he teacheth otherwise 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Oecumen he teacheth other things then those which of right are to be taught we may say he first teacheth otherwise then the Christian Church opposing his novelty against her antiquity but at last he teacheth otherwise then himself opposing his own novelty with new and worse novelties his obstinacy appears in this he will remit nothing of his humour either for truth or peace 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 others may come nearer him but he will not come nearer them he will not approach or as we render it he will not consent to wholsome words for if he draw near to the truth with his lips yet his heart is far from it Lastly His ambition and haughtiness of minde is seen in that he is proud he scorns to be a follower of any but will be a leader of all and takes more pleasure because more pride in being head of a faction then in being an inferiour member of Christ which shews his blindness that he sees not the blessing of those who are of Christs communion as well as his perversness that he will not joyn with those communicants and accordingly the Apostle here useth a word that hinteth both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is he is blinded as it were with smoke for so Ulpian upon Demosthenes descanteth that word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some derive it from darkening the sight with smoke there 's his blindness again 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the same Critick This word is derived from Typhon one of the Giants that was so mad with pride as to raise war against the gods wherefore we say of a proud man that he is as that Typhon there 's his perverseness Thus far a heathen Critick may be alledged to interpret this strange word here used by S. Paul but the Christian Divine who knew that this warring against God which was but a fable in the Giant was a truth in the devil gives us this gloss 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this kinde of pride that first swells against the true Church and at last against the God of truth is a very great friend and companion of the devils so that the proud heretick and the perverse schismatick for they cannot well be parted though they are very ill joyned under a pretence of finding a new way to heaven hath brought himself directly to hell gate and being once there the devil will not easily suffer him to go from thence but he will forthwith teach him to spend all his time and zeal upon idle questions fit for none but those that dote and upon quarrelsome disputations fit for nothing but to beget new disputes and endless contentions for if you once turn Questionist in stead of Dogmatist seeker in stead of beleever you must needs fall into logomachies strifes of words as endless as needless therefore the Apostle saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sick about questions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Oecum see here To be a seeker is indeed to be sick so to be sick in minde and that in Tullies language is to be mad Nomen insaniae significat mentis aegrotationem morbum Cic. 3. Tuscul. for madness is nothing else but a sickness of the minde and we cannot deny this if we observe the course of such a man which is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not to spend time but to mispend it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Diogenes appellat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Euclidis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Laertius Diogenes theCynick called Plato's Schooling meer fooling and said to be Euclide's Scholar was to be in choler but S. Paul hath found out an expression that in one word speaks more then both these though with less acrimony and that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a second strange word here used by the Spirit of God to shew here is set forth as strange a monster such devices and trifles as are meer new nothings whereby men do onely deceive themselves and seek to deceive others for so Oecum readeth and glosseth the word out of S. Chrysostome inverting the Prepositions and reading not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and withal enlarging the sense for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is an ill use of study and disputation not to confirm the judgement but to unsettle it not to discover the truth but to dissemble it which mischief may go no further then him alone who is guilty of the sin but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is this same mischief as it seeks to corrupt and infect others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Oecum the infecting others with this itch of vain disputing for as a scabby sheep rubbing against those that are sound of the same flock infecteth them with his touch so do these men that have itching ears rambling heads and hollow hearts infect others by their conversation saith S. Chrysost. and from him Oecumenius All this considered 't is easie to see the reason why S. Paul said to Timothy From such withdraw thy self he commands him as a Bishop to rebuke some Presbyters cap. 5. v. 19 20. which shews his jurisdiction over them but breaks not his communion with them but he must have nothing at all to do with these 't is Oecumenius his observation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he saith not converse with such a man and oppose him converse with him according to your Christian Communion and oppose him according to your Episcopal Jurisdiction but wholly depart from him after one or two admonitions which is supposed from cap. 1. v. 3. where Timothy is commanded to charge them not to preach other doctrine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word used here for you shall never make that man your convert who hath made mammon his God and this indeed is the chief reason of the great distemper and greater disturbance in Christendome that many men are mammons rather then Gods Chaplains and therefore are more ready to plead for Baal that is for their own lording it over their brethren then for God more for Belial that is for their own licentiousness then for Christ hence it is we have fiercer disputations against men then for God
nothing but what no body else can see your own holiness Come and see a Dead King ruling in his true Subjects souls whom whilest he was living you would not suffer to rule over your bodies but now he is dead you must and God grant onely you may I say you must expiate his death either with your eyes or with your hearts wash away the guilt of it either with your tears or with your bloud beleeve it all annals and among the rest some Dypticks or Church-Calenders will speak of him as a most glorious Saint but I will not tell how they will speak of you and now if you can come and call this doctrine Court-flattery which was preached not when the King was on his Throne but when he was going to the Bar and published now he is in his Grave then perchance it might have been thought Flattery when there was a Scepter to adorn it and a Sword to defend it but now that 't is so generally decried so publickly discountenanced so resolvedly detested and opposed it can be thought no other then a most divine soul-saving truth which forceth consciencious Ministers to hazard their temporal safety by proclaiming it because they see you hazard your eternal salvation by resisting it and yet to speak but the plain truth it is flattery at no time to say of Kings Ye are Gods for the Text avows it But 't is most desperate flattery at any time to say of Subjects Ye are Kings for the Text denies it and 't is not to be doubted but those men who have already flattered Subjects into Kings to make us slaves will as easily flatter those their Kings into Tyrants to perpetuate our slavery For my part this I will say boldly in regard of my calling as a Minister of the Church of England not in regard of my person who am the unworthiest of all the Ministry and I am not afraid of saying it before men because I am not afraid of saying it before God If I am deceived in this Doctrine of Allegiance and Supremacy 't is my Church hath deceived me and I humbly conceive the Church will yet further say for her self If I am deceived God hath deceived me Domine si decipimur a te decepti sumus Lord if I the now distressed Church of England or the poor Ministers who are truly of my Communion be deceived in the points of Allegiance and Supremacy 't is thou hast deceived us for we are deceived by thy holy Word and now let 's hear that Word speak for it self Eccles. 8. 2 3 4. ECCLES 8. 2 3 4. I counsel thee to keep the Kings Commandment and that in regard of the Oath of God Be not hasty to go out of his sight stand not in an evil thing for he doth what soever pleaseth him Where the word of a King is there is power and who may say unto him what doest thou ALlegiance and Supremacy do belong to Kings by the appointment and from the authority of the King of Kings 't is from him they have the right to govern 't is from him they have the inseparable Rights of Government to be above and over all which we call Supremacy to be truly and faithfully loved served honoured and obeyed of all which we call Allegiance two doctrines upon which Christians did heretofore more severely insist then other men and the Reformed Churches have hitherto more insisted then other Christians So that we cannot fall from them but we must fall both from the glory of the true Christian Religion and from the present most glorious part of that the Reformation we must turn Papists nay the worst of Papists Jesuited Papists and renounce our Reformation Doctrines both of a heavenly descent for had they risen out of the earth they would have been more agreeable with the tempers of men who had their original from thence and still have their affections there but now they are so opposite so repugnant to flesh and bloud corrupt flesh and bloud which is too proud and rebellious to endure a Supremacy over-awing it too unfaithfull and licentious to endure an Allegiance bounding and confining it that the most powerfull Doctour of the Gentiles writing of this Argument is observed to labour exceedingly for variety of expression as if his adversaries who before calumniated the weakness of his presence would now also in this calumniate the want of Power in his writings and not so much as say his Letters are weighty and powerfull though his bodily presence is weak and his speech contemptible 2 Cor. 10. 10. for though that blessed Apostle write very fully and expresly of all points of Divinity yet doth he seek out for demonstrations chiefly in these three Justification by Faith in Christ Resurrection from the dead and Obedience to the Civil Magistrate and he is particularly urgent and pressing in this latter to shew us that we ought most carefully to lay it up in our Consciences and most conscionably to practise it in our lives and conversations preparing and fore-arming the Church of Christ against those wolves in sheeps clothing those Godly seditious men which should arise after his departing and speak perverse things to draw away disciples after them Act. 20. 30. the like method did God himself observe in the Old Testament and I hope that we Protestants who take the Word of God onely for the Rule of our Faith will not at one time reject both the New and the Old Testament for least men should at any time among the Jews as stiff-necked a people as our selves either for Apostasie refuse or for hypocrisie dissemble or for timorousness conceal this heavenly doctrine which is so necessary for the salvation of souls he which before with Abraham did provide himself a sacrifice doth here with his posterity provide himself a Priest sends such a Preacher as can neither be seduced with Apostasie nor corrupted with flattery nor silenced with fear even his own holy Spirit to preach it in these words I counsel thee to keep the Kings Commandment c. Which words are not a Text but a Sermon concerning Allegiance and Supremacy due to Kings wherein you have these three parts First The Preacher 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I. Secondly The manner of his Preaching I Counsell I counsel thee Thirdly The Doctrines of his Sermon and they are two 1. That of Allegiance to keep the Kings Commandment and that in regard of the Oath of God Be not hasty to go out of his sight v 2 3. 2. That of Supremacy where the word of a King is there is power and who may say unto him what doest thou v. 4. I will handle these in their order and First of the Preacher in this particle I and who this I is we may learn from the first words of the Book The words of the Preacher the Son of David King in Jerusalem that is the words of Solomon without question for no other Son of David was King in Jerusalem but
to inspiration but rather advanceth it For God is with him and he shall prevail first over himself to settle his own conscience then over others to rectifie theirs O God endue thy Ministers with this righteonsness that so thou mayest make thy chosen people joyfull joyfull in the love and practise of their Allegiance that they may be joyfull in the testimony of a good Conscience knowing that no man who is bound to be subject for Conscience sake can at the same time be a bad subject and yet have a good Conscience Thus our Preacher of Allegiance and Supremacy here hath six names and not one of them but well befits both his office and his doctrine and yet he prefixeth not so much as one of them to the title of his Sermon chiefly sure to teach us that the doctrine was not of his own invention but of Gods Inspiration Like as the ancient Fathers in the first Nicene Council would not set any date under the confession of their faith lest it might be thought to be of their own making Haereticorum tantùm consuetudo erat edere professionem fidei Chronologiâ temporum consulum consignatam saith Binius in Concil Chalc. p. 416 417. edit colon so the Preacher here would not put too his own Name that he might not be thought to preach his own words and indeed the Hebrew Title of the Book 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 plainly shews as much which is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 either 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not a he but a she Preacher that is not a Preaching man but a Preaching soul or a Preaching wisedom and such is our Preacher here a preaching soul or Conscience to himself a preaching wisedom to others or a preaching soul in setting forth humane frailties and falsities for this Book was the publick testimonial of his repentance and a preaching wisedom in setting forth the divine power and truth And according to the Preacher is the manner of his preaching which is my second general part he preacheth by a grave judicious consciencious advice or counsell I counsel thee Indeed in the Hebrew Text there is no such word expressed but yet by the propriety of that language 't is necessarily to be understood I to keep the Kings Commandment that is I warn thee or I counsell thee or I command thee to keep the Kings Commandment So Aben-ezra fills up the Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the meaning of this particle I saith he is this I warn and counsell thee or I command thee And since King Solomon was a most notorious sinner before he was this Preacher or Preaching soul or Preaching wisedom we may thus gloss upon his words First I warn thee as my self a sinner sent to preach to my self and others there 's 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Greek Title Secondly I counsell thee as a Preaching soul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pouring out mine own conscience Thirdly I command thee as a Preaching wisedom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 setting forth Gods Truth which two last make up 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Hebrew Title of this Book and all three are admirably consonant with this doctrine of Allegiance in the best times much more in these our wicked days which are the last and the worst of this wicked world the earth growing weary of it self now it is near its dissolution First I warn thee as a Preaching sinner 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Angels happily can best teach us because they are Intelligences pure understanding spirits but surely men can best admonish us who have been and are under the same infirmities of the body under the same distresses of the soul Dives could say S. Luk. 16. 30. If one went unto them from the dead they will repent It is so here one from the dead comes to preach repentance one who had been so long dead in sin that he was certainly at hell-gate but the hand of an extraordinary mercy pulled him thence one whom others that looked more upon his sin then upon his repentance painted hanging betwixt heaven and hell as being doubtfull of his salvation such a one as this comes here to warn us to take heed of disloyalty and disobedience himself a sinner adviseth us to repent us of our sins that he may keep us from those plunges of conscience which himself hath sustained the memory of his own sins is grievous unto him and that makes him remember us of ours he accounts his own burden intolerable and therefore labours to diminish and lessen ours we were best give him audience here is an expertus loquor in the Text better see our sins in his admonition then in our own consciences better see them in our own consciences here to condemn us then hereafter to confound us better men shew them us in the time of mercy then God shew them us in the time of wrath Ego peccator I am a grievous sinner which have been guilty of much disloyalty and disobedience against the King of Kings my dread Soveraign Lord I warn thee to keep thy Kings Commandment and that in regard not onely of the Oath but also of the wrath of God Secondly I counsel thee as a Preaching soul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in its first sence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I counsel thee as a Preaching soul pouring out mine own conscience that I may have some influence upon thine that Sermon comes nearest to the soul of the hearer which comes first from the soul of the Preacher In other arts the best words but in Divinity the best thoughts are the most powerfull Oratory Conscience is the best Eloquence the most perswasive arguments are neither 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the affection of the hearer nor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the excellency of the speech but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the conscience of the speaker God having spoken to the Preachers conscience makes him speak to the consciences of those that hear him nor is there a greater curse upon earth then an hypocritical Ministery that pretend zeal of Religion and want integrity of Righteousness for if the Shepherd be smitten the sheep will be scattered S. Mat. 26. 31. if hypocrisie get into the Pulpit 't is no wonder to finde it in the pew If the Clergy once place Religion in fine words and fair pretences no wonder if the Laity forsake all Religion to seek after a Reformation Therefore our Saviour first saith ye hypocrites to the Scribes and Pharisees and after that to the common people S. Mat. 15. 7 8. Ye hypocrites well did Isaiah prophesie of you you Doctours of the Law that give false expositions upon the fifth Commandment v. 5. 6. and prefer your Corban before your Obedience Isaiah did first prophesie of you that were the seducers and after that of them who were seduced by you saying truly of both but primarily of you this people draweth nigh unto me with their