Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	divine_a	reason_n	revelation_n	1,875	5	9.2536	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A45738	A discourse against purgatory	Hartcliffe, John, 1651-1712.	1685 (1685)	Wing H965; ESTC R9914	22,914	41

clearly perceive this to be the word of God than it doth those things which are self-evident and the conclusions logically deduced from them there is no reason therefore that any one should fear to acknowledge that assent to be also less certain notwithstanding it follows not upon this account that Faith is uncertain for That which arises not to the certainty of Science is not therefore uncertain for although that certainty which is called Moral be of an inferiour degree to Demonstration yet it is a true certainty leaves the mind satisfied and free from doubt But how can a Man be said to have a certainty greater than that of Science when he hath not that certainty of evidence from the Arguments upon which the matter is grounded It may be answered that no Man can deny but there may be just cause why a Man may adhere to the objects of his Faith more strongly than the Arguments brought for the truth thereof do require for when a Man is sufficiently perswaded by due reasons and arguments that what is propounded to him for Divine Revelation is indeed such this Man if he duly attends and seriously considers that it is God who speaks he will be wholly bent to yield obedience thereunto he will entertain the word of God with the highest veneration he will closely adhere to it and he will be fully resolved to suffer and renounce all things rather than withdraw his assent from those matters of Faith which are contained in it and confirmed by it From thence there arises in his mind a greater or at least a more effectual adherence to the Articles of his Faith than there is in Science for the mind so affected and disposed doth more affectionately embrace and more firmly hold that word of God than any thing else by what light soever it be propounded or by whatever strength of demonstration it be confirmed neither is there any knowledge which he doth so carefully retain nor is there any assent which he will suffer so hardly or with such difficulty to be forced from him which firmness of Faith and strong adherence of mind to the objects of it is not produced by the evidence thereof but by the great weight and moment of it for the mind being enlightned by the holy Spirit understands that any other speculative scientifical Doctrine doth little or nothing conduce to a happy and blessed life but that on This our everlasting happiness doth depend and that we cannot reject This without certain Ruine Therefore we ought to take heed that cunning Men do not deceive us that we do not hearken to the Teachers of New Doctrines which have no foundation in the Scripture their pretences to infallibility and demonstration in matters of Faith are false and unreasonable for they assume these great and unwarrantabe privileges onely to deceive the Ignorant and to obtrude fictitious articles of Faith upon Mankind Wherefore all that now remains is to make some short Reflexions upon the Authours of Purgatory and other new-invented Doctrines in the Church of Rome First They may be charged for imposing upon our belief things contrary to reason self-inconsistent and incongruous of this I will give but one instance which is their asserting that the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament is changed into the real and substantial Body and Bloud of Christ For this is the hardest thing that ever was put upon Men in any Religion because they cannot admit it unless their reason be laid aside as no competent Judge in the matter unless also they give the lye to the report of their senses And if we do this how shall we think that God made our Faculties true which if he did not doe we are absolutely discharged from all duty to him because we have no faculty that can resolve us that This is of God for if our reason must not be trusted we must cease to be Men if our senses are not to be believed the chiefest proof of Christianity falls to the ground which was the sight of those who saw our Saviour after he was risen from the Dead Now if I may not believe the reason of my mind in conjunction with three or four of my senses how shall I know that any thing is this or that therefore I say that this Doctrine is a gross invention of Men contrary both to reason and sense Secondly The Truths they do acknowledge are made void subtile distinctions or equivocations as for example their Doctrine of probability and of directing the intention if a Man can find any Doctour among them that held such an opinion it makes that Doctrine probable and there is nothing so contrary to the rules of vertue and conscience but what some Romish casuistical Doctour hath resolved to be good and practicable just as Tully says there is nothing so absurd or ridiculous which some Philosopher or other hath not maintained and asserted So by directing their intention they may declare that which is false and deny that which is true because they intend the credit of their Church and Religion this mere intention shall excuse them from the guilt of downright falshood and lying They are so well practised in equivocations that you cannot confide in any words they speak they are so ambiguous and of such doubtfull meaning in their evasions their Speech shall bear a double sense whereas no Man ought to use wit and parts to impose upon another or to make a Man believe That which he doth not mean For the Christian Law is plain and obvious void of all ambiguity or ensnaring speeches free from all Sophistications and windings of Language never flies to words of a dubious or uncertain signification but plainly declares the truth to Men therefore these practices are contrary to that simplicity and plain-heartedness which ought to be in the conversation of every Christian Thirdly They super-add to Religion things altogether unlikely to be true and dishonourable to God which will appear in these following particulars I. The use of Images in the Worship of God an Idolatry they are too guilty of otherwise they would never leave out the Second Commandment and divide the Tenth into two to conceal it from the People We find better Doctrine than this among the Philosophers who say God is to be Worshipped by Purity of Mind for this is a rational service and a worship most suitable to an immaterial Being it being the use of that in us which is the highest and noblest of our Faculties II. the veneration of Reliques a very vain and foolish thing for there can be no certainty at this distance of time what they are and if they were indeed what they are taken for what veneration is or can be due to them For inanimate things are far inferiour to those that have life and for the living to worship things that are dead is unaccountable and irrational III. The Invocation or Worship of Angels and Saints our Fellow-creatures particularly of the Virgin Mary