Rahabs made for the spies received into her house Augustines answer is this 1. Aut siguratè prolata sunt atque ita non mendacia c. Either they are figuratively spoken and so no lies for we must consider Non quid in facto dicitur sed quid in sensu significatur Not what is expressed in fact but what is signified in sense for as it is no lye in speech when one word is put for another as in metaphors and other tropes so neither is it in matter when one thing is signified by another 2. Another answer is they are not lies which are mentioned in Scripture Si figurate sunt dicta If they be spoken figuratively Si mendacia non sunt imitanda Or if they were lies they are not to be imitated August lib. de mendac cap. 21. 3. Commendantur comparatione c. They are commended by way of comparison not absolutely 4. Concerning the excuse of the Midwives and of Rahab he saith Non est remunerata fallacia sed benevolentis beniguitas mentis non iniquitas mentientis Their fallacie was not rewarded in them but their mercy the benignity of their mind not the iniquity of their lying Thus August lib. cont mendac cap. 17. 4. Confut. Against the Iesuits new trick of equivocating FOurthly that late taken up trick of the Judasites in equivocating with their mentall reservations is evidently contrary to this Commandement they thinke it lawfull to dissemble with the Magistrate and to delude him with their ambiguous and equivocating answers As if they be asked whether they were in such a place as beyond the seas in France or Spaine at such a time when and where it is certaine they were they will answer they were not understanding to themselves secretly to such an end or purpose The folly and falshood of which their deceitfull equivocations doth diversly appeare 1. This was the very evasion of the old Priscillianists before confuted that if they held the truth inwardly in their heart it was no matter if the truth were not alway in their mouth but a right Christian is knowne by this He speaketh the truth in his heart Psal. 15.3 he hath the truth both in his heart and mouth 2. By this device of theirs they invert the order and nature of things they make falshood truth and truth falshood they turne affirmatives into negatives and contrariwise as it is all one to say I was not in such a place with a mentall reservation as to say I was and so as Augustine saith Veritatem faciunt patronam mendacu They make the truth the patron of a lye 3. If every one should take this licentious liberty there should be no truth among men no certainty of any thing all testimonies given in evidence all promises and contracts might justly be suspected lest some secret condition or reservation might be understood for who can trust him at any time that thinketh it is lawfull to lye and dissemble sometime for as Augustine saith Volens cum mentitur esse aptior fit cum verum dicit intertus For while he applieth himselfe when he lieth aptly to the time he is held uncertaine when he speaketh the truth 4. And whereof commeth this doubling and dissembling but of feare and a bad conscience what needed the Martyrs by their plaine confession of the truth to have adventured and lost their lives if they had held such dissimulation and equivocating lawfull So Augustine saith Si simulare liceret quare id non faciunt Martyres If it were lawfull to dissemble why did not the Martyrs so lib. cont mendac cap. 5. 5. But if they shall reply againe that they doe thus equivocate for the maintenance of their Pope Catholike faith and for the discovering of heresie as they call the profession of the Gospell wee say againe with Augustine in a case not much unlike Melius occultaretur haeresis quà m praetipitaretur veritas It were better that heresie lay hid still than that the verity should be endangered de mendac cap. 7. 6. But the example of our blessed Saviour is pretended who used such kinde of dissimulation and equivocation as Mark. 5.30 Christ made himselfe as ignorant who had touched his cloathes whereas he knew it well enough as well who touched them as that they were touched So Luk. 24.28 Christ made as though he would have gone further and yet did not Likewise Ioh. 7.8 he saith to his brethren Goe ye up unto this 〈◊〉 I will not yet goe up c. but immediatly after he went up vers 10. Here Christ did equivocate with his brethren he said he would not goe up whereas he did indeed goe up meaning not with them Answ. 1. To the two first instances Augustine answereth that they are figures of other things â—as in that Christ maketh himselfe ignorant who touched him therein the Gentiles were prefigured who were a people whom the Lord saith he knew not In the next he saith Christus non menteâ—us est c. 〈◊〉 in câ—â—los profectus est Christ said no untruth for indeed he went further namely to heaven August ibid. c. 19. But wee are not driven here to such a strait with Augustine to finde out a mystery Our Saviour in neither of these places dissembleth for dissimulation is an hiding and cloaking oâ— the truth but in both these places Christ 〈◊〉 by this meanes to bring the truth to light in the first to trie onâ— the faith of the woman that touched him in the other to make 〈◊〉 of the humanity and charity of his Disciples as he did the like to Philip. Ioh. 6.6 to prove him 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Against the evill custome of lying THou shalt not beare false witnesse By this strait charge and commandement of God all men are warned to take heed of lying and speaking untruth under what pretence soever and that for these foure causes 1. Propter diaboli assimilationem Because lying maketh men like unto the Devill For as God is truth and all that love the truth are the children of God so they that use lying are the children of the Devill for he is a lyer and the father thereof Ioh. 8.44 He told the first lye that was ever made in the world when he said to Eve Yee shall not dye Gen. 3. 2. Propter societatis dissolutionem Humane society and entercourse is by this meanes dissolved for how can one man trust another if lying and dissembling should be used This reason the Apostle urgeth Ephes. 4.25 Cast off lying and speake every one truth unto his neighbour for we are members one of another 3. Propter fama amissionem The lier loseth his credit that he cannot be beleeved no not when he telleth the truth as Ecclesiastic 34.4 Who can be cleansed by the uncleane or what truth can bee spoken of a lier 4. Propter anima perditionem Wee must take heed of lying for it destroyeth the soule Wisdom 1.11 The mouth that lieth slayeth the soule Sic.
v. 17. of this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 only shalt thou not eat S. only is here added 17. Cursed is the ground for thy sake B.G.T.P. in opere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in thy workes S.H. heb bagnabar for or because of the Ch. 20. called her Hevah B.G.C.T.P.H. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 life S. heb Chavah 21. garments of honour vpon their skin C. coats of skinne caeter 24. a fiery sword 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 T.B.S.H. the point or blade of a sword shaken P.G. lahat signifieth a blade and a flame a sharpe sword shaken C. 21. Adam is the only man on earth of himselfe knowing good and evill C. is as one of us knowing c. caeter The Exegesis or theologicall explication QVEST. 1. Whether it were a true serpent that talked with Eva. vers 1. NOw the serpent was mâ—re subtill c. 1. we neither thinke with Iosephus that it was in the beginning naturall to the serpents as to other beasts to have the use of speech and understanding which was the conceit also of Plato that under Saturne men used to speake conferre by language with beasts Euseb. lib. 12. de prepar Evang. c. 9. for if it had beene naturall to beasts to speake they should no more after the fall have beene deprived of their naturall faculties than the Angels or 〈◊〉 that fell and beside this opinion is contrarie to the Scripture which saith that man onely was created according to Gods image that is with reason and understanding which guideth the speech 2. We refuse also the opinion which Barcephas ascribeth to Ephrem lib. de paradis c. 27. that the use of speech was given unto the serpent onely for this time as it was to Balaams asse that the Devill spake in the serpent as the Angell did in the Asse we grant but the serpent could not speake of himselfe wanting the instruments and organs of the voice which man hath 3. Neither is Cyrillus opinion to be received that it was not a true serpent but a shew onely and apparition For then it should not have beene said that the serpent was wiser than all the beasts of the field and afterward God layeth a curse upon the serpent that he should goe upon his bellie and eate the dust of the earth it was a true serpent then not a shadow onely 4 Cajetanus conceit also is to be rejected who by a continued allegorie by the serpent would have the Devill understood that there was neither serpent in truth nor in shew that appeared to Eva but this tentation was altogether internall and spirituall for by this meanes the whole storie of the creation may as well be allegorized and so the truth of the narration called in question and beside whereas the Devill internally tempteth onely two wayes either by alluring the sense by some object or else by moving and working the phantasie our parents before their fall could not be so tempted having no inordinate motion 5 Some thinke that the woman did understand the speech of the serpent such as beasts use to expresse their minde and not otherwise but it is evident that the serpent did verily speake 6 Aben Ezra is of opinion that it was the serpent and nothing else but the curse afterward pronounced upon the serpent and that prophesie that the seed of the woman should breake the serpents head sheweth that the Devill spake in the serpent who is principally accursed 7 Our opinion then is that it was a true serpent which talked with Eva as may appeare by the punishment inflicted upon this kind and that the Devill used the serpent a subtill beast as his instrument and spake out of him This our Saviour confirmeth in the Gospell that it was Satan which was a murtherer from the beginning and caused the death and fall of our parents Iohn 18.44 And Saint Paul affirmeth that the serpent beguiled Eva through his subtiltie but the woman was not deceived by the serpent but by the craft of the Devill speaking and working by the serpent Of this judgement are most of the auncient fathers Basil Chrysostome Augustine Damascene c. QVEST. II. How the serpent is said to have beene more subtile c. THe serpent was more subtile than any beast of the field 1. These words cannot be understood of the Devil as Cajetane thinketh who here by a metaphore is called a serpent for betweene the Devil and the beasts of the field there is no comparison who in subtiltie farre exceedeth man who is wiser than any brutish nature 2. Neither was the serpent more subtill onely for this time as Augustine seemeth to thinke lib. 11. Genes ad lit c. 29 for Satan could not infuse more subtilty into the serpent than by nature it had and the text it selfe seemeth to insinuate that the serpent by nature was more subtill than other beasts 3. wherefore the truth is that whereas the serpent is a most subtill beast it was not by chance that Satan used him as his instrument beeing by his naturall subtiltie apt thereunto and the serpents subtill nature appeareth both by the sleights he useth in helping himselfe as to let passe what Plinie reporteth that by the juice of fennel he strippeth himselfe of a certaine skinne wherewith he is overgrowne in winter and with the same hearb cleareth his dimmed sight the Scripture sheweth that the serpent stoppeth his eare against the voice of the charmer Psal. 58. As also his craft appeareth in his enmitie against man whom he assaileth secretly and in silence as biting the horse by the heele to cause the rider to fall Gen. 49.17 And further concerning the naturall wisdome of the serpent our Saviour witnesseth saying to his disciples bee yee wise as serpents innocent as doves Mat. 10.16 4. Some thinke that this is set forth as a praise and commendation in the serpent that he had such a gift of wisdome subtilty given him in the creation but the contrarie appeareth that although this naturall gift in the serpent was good yet here relation is made to Satans craft whereby he seduced Eve Adam and Eve are said before to be gnarumim naked simple and here the serpent is said to be gnarum in the contrarie sense craftie covert not smple for the Hebrew word admitteth a contrarie sense Mercer QVEST. III. Why Satan in the serpent beginneth with an interrogation vers 1. YEa hath God indeed said c. 1. Some doe take this to bee an ironicall speech as though Satan in the serpent should scoffingly say it is a like matter that God careth what you eat 2. Some make it an interrogation as though Satan should aske the reason why God had so said c. as the Latine and Septuagint 3. Some make it a naked question Is it true that God hath said Chald. 4. R. Sel. expoundeth it for san perhaps and would have it doubtfully spoken 5. Some make the emphasis or force of the seÌ„tence in this
become as one of us 1. Not as one of the Angels as Oleaster interpreteth or that the Lord speaketh in the plurall number as is the manner of great persons for this phrase of speech was not used in those dayes neither are the Angels and God alike 2. But by us the Trinity is vnderstood and the rest is uttered ironice by way of derision Adam is rebuked that he came farre short to be as God as Sathan promised him either as God the Father in power or as the sonne in wisedome or as the holy ghost in goodnesse holinesse Verba sunt insultantis as Augustine saith quod non solum factus fuerit qualis esse voluit sed nec illud quod factus fuerat conservavit they are as the words of one that insulteth because he was so farre from being made that which he desired that hee could not keepe that which he was made And as Rupertus non solum nequaquam sicut Deus sed penefactus erat sicut diabolus He was so farre from being as God that he was almost become as the Devill if Gods mercie had not prevented him 3. I rather preferre this sense with Mercerus and Calvin that God speaketh ironically even in Adams hearing then either with Iunius and Paguine to referre these words to the time past when man was in the state of innocencie or to make it an affirmative speech of the time present with Onkelos that Adam now of himselfe knew good and evill as God for then he had gained and not lost by his transgression he knew evill by experience as he did not before but he had no such perfect knowledge as in the Angels therefore the Lord here derideth mans folly and alludeth to the vaine words of Satan who promised they should be as God 4. And where he saith lest he put forth his hands c. by living forever 1. Neither long life is meant 2. Nor that God herein had compassion of man that being brought to so miserable an estate he should not alwayes live in it 3. Neither that if he did eat of the tree of life he should have lived for ever as Calvin thinketh that God vitam conjungit cum externa tessera did joyne life with the outward signe for the tree of it selfe gave not life but was a symbole only of immortality which man should have received of God if he had persevered in his obedience Muscul. 5. But seeing the Lord had deprived man of life he taketh away also the symbole of it and speaketh according to the judgement of man who foolishly might thinke to recover his estate by eating of the tree of life and therefore by putting forth his hand is expressed that voluntary action whereby man of purpose would have eaten of the tree of life to releeve himselfe Mercer 6. Now although it had not beene materiall though Adam before his fall had eaten of the tree of life for it could not have helped him now yet I rather thinke with Ramban that he did not eat of it at all QVEST. XXXII At what time Adam fell Vers. 23. THerefore the Lord sent him forth from the garden of Eden Here a great question is moved how long Adam continued in Paradise and when he was cast out of Paradise Some would have Adam to continue so long in Paradise as Christ lived yeares on earth others the space of forty dayes and that Christ fasted so many dayes for a remedy against Adams intemperancie in Paradise so long others thinke that Adam fell the next day after his creation upon the day of rest as Tostatus but it is not like that God upon that day which was a time of rejoycing would execute judgement nor curse in that day which he blessed some thinke that Adam fell upon the eighth day of his creation that day seven night wherein he was made as Pererius but the most approved opinion is that Adam fell the same day of his creation which seemeth to be most probable for these reasons 1. The Angels that fell presently after their creation sinned as our Saviour saith that the Devill non steâ—it in veritate did not stand or continue in the truth Ioh. 8.44 Hereunto Augustine consenteth Factus coâ—tinuo se à luce veritatis avertit as soone as he was made he presently turned aside from the light of truth unde angelicae vitae dulcedinem non gustavit quam non acceptam fast idivit sed nolendo accipere de seruit amifit so he tasted not the sweetnesse of the angelicall life which he loathed not being received but by disdaining to receive it lost it So it is like that man also eftsoone lost the benefit of the creation 2. Our Saviour saith that the deuill was a murtherer from the beginning Ioh. 8.44 not of the world but of mans creation therefore at the very first he set upon them 3. The subtilty of the Devill doth insinuate as much who would then assault them when they were least able to resist before they by experience were confirmed in their obedience 4. And it was fit that man sinning should be cast out of Paradise before he had fully tasted of the pleasure thereof lest he afterward might have beene tormented with the losse and attempted to returne 5. And it is cleare by the serpents first onset Hath God said ye shall not eat of every tree c. that they had not yet tasted of any fruit but at the very first the forbidden fruit was offered before their appetite had beene served with any other 6. Adam had not yet eaten of the tree of life as is evident vers 21. lest he put forth his hand and take also of the tree of life and therefore Augustine is in an errour that he did eat of other trees and specially of the tree of life but if they had stayed any time in Paradise it is not unlike but they should have tasted of the tree of life it being in the heart of Paradise where Adams chiefe aboad was 7. Likewise seeing presently after the creation they were bidden increase and multiply it is not other like but the man should have knowne his wife in Paradise if they had stayed there so long and so they should have gotten children without sinne To this purpose Augustine saith Quasi in ea â—tate facti credendi sunt ut expectanda esset maturitas pubertatis aut non illud tunc legitimum esset eâ—m primum fieri potuit as though they were created of such an age which was not fit for procreation or that it had not beene lawfull for them to come together as soone as might be 8. What became of Lions and Beares that lived of flesh all this while of Adams being in Paradise they could not fast so long and flesh they did not eat because there was no death before mans fall and they did not feed on grasse for then their nature should not so soone have beene changed to devoure flesh 9.
handle them roughly to bring them to knowledge and confession of their treachery against him so Christian governors should not put the Iewes to death but use them hardly by laying taxes and impositions upon them that at the length they may be brought to repentance for their blasphemies against Christ as it is in the Psalme Slay them not lest my people forget it but scatter them abroad by thy power Psal. 59.12 Rupert lib. 9. comment in Gen. cap. 4. 2. Doct. Where the feare of God is not there can be no true vertue Vers. 18. THis doe and live for I feare God c. Ioseph biddeth them bee secure of his sincere and true dealing with him because he feared God so that true religion is the fountaine of vertue and honest dealing they therefore that feare not God may for a while make a semblance and shew of honestie but it cannot be in truth where the ground of true religion is wanting where therfore the feare of God is not we cannot expect any vertuous action as Abraham reasoned with himselfe when he sojourned in Gerar The feare of God is not in this place and they will slay me for my wives sake Gen. 20.12 3. Doct. The guilt of sinne remaineth when the act is past Vers. 21. THey said one to another we have verily sinned against our brother By this wee learne that although the act of sinne be done and past yet the guilt and conscience of sinne may continue as here the sinne which they had committed against Ioseph 23. yeares before is revived Muscul. As the Lord said to Cain If thou doest not well sinne lieth at the doore Gen. 4.7 It lieth lurking in the doore of the conscience ready upon every occasion to assault us 4. Doct. The author of affliction it commeth not by chance Vers. 28. WHat is this that God hath done unto us These men having a guilty conscience thinke that God meeteth with them in every corner yet this good perswasion they have that nothing hapned to them by chance as this the finding of their mony in their sacks mouth but they ascribe all to Gods providence they make him the authour of their crosses and affliction Calvin As David in like manner saith that the Lord bid Shemei curse him 2 Sam. 16.11 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Saint Pauls prophecie of some that should give eare to the doctrine of devils fulfilled in the Synagogue of Rome Vers. 6. THey bowed their face to the ground before him Here Iosephs brethren unwittingly doe fulfill Iosephs prophecie that they should fall downe unto him and doe him reverence like as the Jewes did ignorantly accomplish many things in the passion of Christ which were foretold by the Prophets So also they which in these dayes give eare to the doctrines of devils in the Romish and Antichristian Synagogue doe fulfill the prophecie of the Apostle 1 Tim. 4.1 some of them of ignorance and simplicity but their blinde guides of malice and obstinacie against the truth Muscul. 2. Confut. Against Purgatory Vers. 8. IOseph knew his brethren but they knew not him Augustine propounding this question how it came to passe that all this time of Iosephs prosperity he sent no word to Iacob but he continued still mourning for his sonne giveth this reason Quoniam sine istis minutis peccatis Iacob esse non potuit volens Deus illa parva peccata in hoc seculo igne tribulationis consumere c. Because Iacob could not be without some small sinnes God would by this meanes purge them with the fire of tribulation in this world serm 82. de tempor If small sinnes then which they call veniall bee purged in this world then there is nothing remaining to be cleansed in purgatory fire afterward which they say serveth to the purging not of mortall but veniall sinnes and indeed Iob well sheweth that our purgatory fire is in the affliction and sorrow of this life where he saith Exibo ut aurum I shall come forth like gold Iob 23.10 And the Prophet saith That the Lords fire is in Sion and his furnace at Ierusalem Isa. 31.9 it is not then in hell or Purgatory I much muse that Pererius alleaging this sentence of Augustine could not perceive how strongly it maketh against Purgatory 3. Confut. Against the swearing by Saints Vers. 15. BY the life of Pharaoh ye shall not goe hence c. Thomas Aquinas justifieth this fact of Ioseph in swearing by the life of Pharaoh and would warrant thereby the swearing by creatures as namely by Saints for an oath saith he is made two wayes by execration when some creature is produced that God should shew his judgement upon if one sweare falsly as when one sweareth by his head or such like the other way is by contestation either directly when the name of God is mentioned or indirectly when some creature is named in whom the truth should be manifested so we sweare by the Gospell wherein Gods truth is expressed by Saints that beleeved in the truth so Ioseph sware by Pharaoh a minister of Gods truth and justice Thom. 2.2 qu. 89. ar 6. Conâ—ra 1. This subtill disputer doth justifie that kinde of oath which is directly forbidden by our Saviour himselfe as to sweare by the head Matth. 5.36 Neither shalt thou sweare by thine head wee may justly suspect him in the rest when at the first he dare controll the holy doctrine of the Gospell 2. Men use not to sweare by the Gospell but upon it when they lay their hands upon the book for so we reade that the Saints have used some visible ceremonie and rite in taking an oath as Abrahams servant layed his hand upon his masters thigh Gen. 24.3 Iacob did sweare unto Laban upon an heape of stones but neither did the one sweare by his masters thigh nor the other by the stones but by the name of God Gen. 24.3 Gen. 31.53 Iacob sware by the feare of his father Isaack after the same manner is a booke used as a visible object for further evidence in the ministring of an oath but Saints are neither visible nor present and therefore the case is not alike 3. It is also directly forbidden to sweare by any but by the Lord Deut. 6.13 Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God and serve him and sweare by his name and though onely be not here found yet our Saviour so interpreteth Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serve Matth. 4.10 and so consequently by him onely shalt thou sweare 4. Concerning Iosephs act I have shewed before quest 9. that although it may be somewhat qualified and extenuated yet it cannot be justified but it savoureth somewhat of the Egyptian manners and seemeth to be against that place Zephan 1.5 where the Prophet reproveth those that sweare by the Lord and sweare by Malcham that is their King whether they made the idoll or a mortall man their King both abuses are here reproved 6. Places of
had shewed before by the mouth of the Prophets that Christ should suffer he hath thus fulfilled Act. 3.15 18. 4. Mor. To seeke to maintaine peace Vers. 24. FAll not out by the way Ioseph as he was ready to make peace with his brethren and to be at one with them so he laboureth to maintaine peace among themselves thus teaching us by his example not only to be lovers of peace our selves but to procure it in others according to the doctrine of Christ Blessed are the peace-makers for they shall be called the children of God Matth. 5.9 5. Mor. Lyers shall not be beleeved when they speake the truth Vers. 26. FOr he beleeved them not This is a just reward of lyers that when they speake the truth they shall not be beleeved Iacobs sonnes had told him a tale before when they shewed him Iosephs coat as though some wilde beast had devoured him Genes 37. and now when they tell the truth that Ioseph was alive no credit is given unto them Muscul. Thus S. Paul would not endure that the maid which had the spirit of divination and deceived the people with lies should testifie the truth of the Apostles that they were the servants of God and taught the way to salvation Act. 16.18 CHAP. XLVI 1. The Method and Argument of the Chapter FIrst we have here set downe Iacobs preparation to his journey 1. He offereth sacrifice to God 2. The Lord answereth him by vision appearing unto him and encouraging him to goe downe to Egypt promising him both a prosperous journey a peaceable end and the returne of his posterity vers 2. to 5. Secondly the journey itselfe is described vers 5. to vers 8. with an enumeration of the persons that went downe with Iacob 1. In particular the of-spring of Leah and her maid Zilpah the of-spring likewise of Rachel and her maid Bilhah of every one by themselves from v. 8. to 26. they are all summed in grosse v. 26.27 Thirdly Iacobs arrivall in Egypt is declared 1. How he sent for Ioseph and of their meeting greeting and salutation in Goshen vers 27. to 31. 2. The counsell and advice given by Ioseph to his brethren how they should answer Pharaoh that they might obtaine the land of Goshen vers 31. to the end 2. The divers readings where the translations differ v. 1. he came to the well of the oath H. S. to Bersheba caeter v. 2. he heard God calling him by a vision of the night H. God said to Israel in a vision of the night cat v. 3. I am the God of thy fathers S. I am God the God of thy father B. G. I am the mighty God of thy father caet he haâ—el celohe the strong God v. 4. I wil bring thee up againe in thy returne H. I will bring that back againe in the end S. I will surely make thee come up againe C. B. I will bring thee up againe G. I will cause thee to come up by comming up with thee T.P. he v. 5. they tooke their substance S. their father children and wives caeter v. 6. they tooke all that they possessed in Canaan H. S. they tooke their cattell and goods which they had gotten in the land of Canaan caeter he racash to get goods v. 7. their daughters and daughters daughters S. their daughters H. their daughters and sons daughters caet v. 10. Iachin Saher H. B. Achin Saar Iachin Sacher C. Iachin Zohar G. Iachin Tzochar T. he Sochar P. v. 12. Ezron Amul H. C. Esron Iemuel S. Hezron Hamul B. G. chezron chamul T. P. heb v. 13. Thola Phua Semron H. Thola Phua Asum Sambram S. Thola Phuah Iob Simron caet v. 16. Arâ—lis S. Haeri caet v. 17. Ieul S. Iesui caet v. 20. priest of On. T.P.C.G. cohen signifieth both a prince and priest v. 21. the sonnes of Manasses which Syra his concubine bare unto him were Machir Machir begat Galaad the sonnes of Ephraim Manasses brother Sutalaam and Taam the sonnes of Sutalaam Edem S. the rest have none of these words v. 21. Mophim Ophim and Ared H. Mamphim Ophim and Gerah begat Arad S. Muppim Huppim and Arde. caet v. 22. eighteene soules in all S. fourteene soules all caet v. 27. all the soules are seventy five S. seventy caeter the sonnes of Ioseph nine soules S. two soules cater v. 28. he sent Iudah c. that he should meet him at the citie of the nobles in the land of Ramesse S. that he should tell him that he might meet hm in Goshen H. to prepare before him C. to direct his face to Goshen B. to direct his way to Goshen H. to premonish him to meet him in Goshen T. to appeare before his face in Goshen P. he iarah to appeare to signifie v. 37. said to his brethren S. said to his brethren and all his fathers house caet v. 34. in Gâ—sem of Arabia S. in the land of Goshen caet 3. The theologicall explication QUEST I. Why Iacob offered sacrifice in Bersheba Vers. 1. ISrael came to Bersheba c. 1. This place is interpreted the well of the oath or of seven for shabang signifieth both so called first by Abraham where he made a covenant with Abimelech and gave him seven lambs Gen. 21. and afterward the name was revived by Isaack Gen. 26. 2. To this place came Iacob being both in his way as he went to Egypt for it is in the utmost bounds of Canaan toward the South as also because there Abraham and Isaack had long dwelled built altars there and consecrated it as a peculiar place for Gods worship 3. He offereth sacrifice both to give thanks to God for the life of Ioseph and to desire the Lord to make his journey prosperous Iun. QUEST II. Of the Lords calling of Iacob Vers. 2. IAcob Iacob who answered I am here c. 1. He is called Iacob not Israel not because as the Hebrewes imagine he should not prevaile against men in Egypt for he is also called Israel in Egypt Gen. 48.29 but when as the Lord vouchsafeth to speake familiarly unto him he calleth him by his name Iacob Mercer 2. The name is doubled to stirre him up to greater attention Calvin and to shew the certainty of that which God spake Perer. â— Iacob answereth readily here am I and therefore Iosephus misreporteth this story that Iacob should say quisnam esset who it was that spake unto him as though he had not beene acquainted with Gods voice lib. 1. antiquit QUEST III. Who it was that spake to Iacob Vers. 3. I Am God the God of thy father 1. This then was not an Angel that spake in the person of God but it was the Lord himselfe to whom Iacob offered sacrifice vers 1. 2. who is called the God of his father rather than of Abraham because Iacob so used to call the Lord the feare of his father Isaack Genes â—1 53 and for that he had better
them In the Apostles times Iarchas among the Indian Drachmanes Tespesion among the Gymnosophists of Aethiopia excelled in this kinde and Simon Magus was in that time But Apollonius Tyaneus in Domitians time went beyond them all 5. And what might be the cause that these Diabolicall studies received such liking in the world Plinie declareth because this Magicall profession borroweth of three notable Arts Physicke or Medicine the Mathematikes and a colour or shew of Religion is the third and thus mens mindes were bewitched therewith But whosoever was the minister and instrument to set abroach these impious Arts Satan was the author and inspirer of them for he was a lier from the beginning and when hee telleth a lye hee speaketh of his owne as our Saviour saith Ioh. 8.44 Porphyriâ— also confesseth as much that the mysticall knowledge of these things came first from the spirits themselves Quibus rebus gaudâ—ant quibus alligantur dâ—i hominibus significarunt ad haec quibus rebâ—s ipsi cogantur qua illi offerenda sint c. The Gods hee meaneth such Gods as Magicians worship themselves signified unto men what things they were pleased with and with what they are bound and further wherewith they are forced and what is to bee offered unto them Ex Perer. Which testimonie of Porphyrie by the way sheweth what we are to thinke of those usuall receits against witchcraft as in scratching the Witch burning of some part or seething of the urine and such like that these were Satans owne revelations at the first in making carnall men beleeve that he is bound with such things QUEST X. Who were the ringleaders and chiefe of the Egyptian Magitians BUt if further it be inquired who these Magicians were 1. Saint Paul sheweth that the principall of them were Iannes and Iambres 2. Tim. 3. which Paul had either by some certaine tradition or by inspiration for in Scripture their names are not found so thinketh Chrysostome Theodoret and Theophylact upon that place It seemeth that some Heretikes afterward by occasion of these names framed a booke of Iannes and Iambres which Origen and Ambrose count among the Apocryphall bookes and of hid authority 2. Other forren Writers also have made mention of these two Iannes and Iambres as Nuâ—enius Pythagoricus as Eusebius reporteth writeth that these two resisted Moses whom he calleth Musius the Captaine of the Jewes Plinie also calleth them Iamne and Iotape whom hee saith were many thousand yeeres after Zoroastres wherein he is deceived for from Abrahams birth which was in the time of Ninus when Zoroastres flourished were not above 500. yeeres 3. But that seemeth to bee very strange which Palladius reporteth in the life of Macarius if it be true that whereas Iannes and Iambres in their life had made them a sepulchre in a pleasant place set with all manner of fruitfull trees and therein made a fountaine of water which place was kept by evill spirits Macarius having a desire to see this place and approaching thither was met with 70. Devils in divers shapes gnashing their teeth and running upon him but he not affraid passed along and came to the sepulchre where the great Devill appeared unto him with a naked sword shaking it at him and there he saw a brasen bucket with an iron chaine wasted and consumed and pomegranates dried having nothing in them Wee may worthily suspect that some Friers finger hath beene tempering with this fable as in other reports of the Saints lives to get credit unto them with fained miracles QUEST XI Whether things done by magicall enchantment are in shew or in truth NOw it followeth to shew by occasion of this conversion of rods into serpents wrought by these Egyptian Magitians whether such things done by magicall inchantment are verily so effected or but in shew and appearance only 1. It cannot bee denied but that many apparitions brought forth by sorcery are meere illusions as the transforming of Vlysses companions into divers shapes of beasts so the Arcadians are said by swimming over a certaine river to bee turned into wolves Augustine writeth of certaine women in Italy that by giving certaine inchanted cheese unto passengers changed them into beasts and used them to carry their burdens for a time The like Philostratus reporteth of Apollonius that as he sat at the table brasen men served them with drinke and filled the cups like butlers and how the image of Memnon in Egypt as soone as the Sunne rising shined upon the mouth began to speake and how Vespesion the chiefe of the Gymnosophists in Aethiopia caused an elme with a low and soft voice to salute Apollonius So to this purpose in the Cannons mention is made of certaine women that were so deluded of Satan that they thought they did ride in the aire in the night and were brought unto a pleasant place where they did feast with Diana and Herodias 2. These and such like were but done in conceit and imagination for the Devill cannot in truth bring forth the substance of Lions and such other beasts which cannot come without generation and not at once but in continuance of time they come to their growth and seeing to speake and worke are actions incident to man they cannot bee performed in truth by images and dead things And whereas they have seemed by Magike to raise up the dead as is also written of Apollonius that is beyond the Devils power for the soule being immortall the Devill hath no command over it it is in Gods hand and though he had yet can he not prepare the body being without naturall heate and life to bee a fit and apt instrument againe for the soule 3. Yet notwithstanding that some workes of Magicians are counterfeit it followeth not that all should bee so the Scripture sheweth that a false Prophet may shew a signe or wonder that may come to passe Deut. 13.1 Apollonius principles and receipts were currant through the world whereby they used to stay the inundation of waters and incursion of wild beasts which Iustinus Martyr thinketh might bee done by the great skill which hee had in naturall things The Roman histories remember how Claudia Vestalis to prove her chastity did move a ship her selfe alone tying her girdle to it that many men and oxen could not stirre So Tucia another vestall Virgin for the triall of her chastity carried water in a fieve from the River Tibris unto the Capitoll Plin. lib. 28. cap. 2. These things seeme verily to have beene so done but by the operation rather of Satan to keepe the prophane Gentiles still in blindnesse and unbeleefe than by the ministry of the good Angels as thinketh Thomas Aquinas ex Perer. 4. Now that many such things may be truly effected by Sorcerers through the power of Satan it is evident by these two reasons first because Satan by the subtility of his nature and long experience hath great knowledge of naturall things he knoweth their sympathies
the naturall burning of certaine mountaines as of Aetna in Cicilia Vesuvius in Campania It is found by experience that certaine things putrifie not as the flesh of a Peacoke as Augustine saith and coales upon the which for the same cause Chersiphron founded the temple of Diana lime boyleth with water and is quenched with oile the adamant is so hard that it cannot bee broken upon a smithes anvill the Agrigentine salt melteth in the fire and sparkleth in the water there is said to bee a fountaine among the Garamants that boileth in the night and freezeth in the day the stone Asbestus burneth continually being once set on fire and is never extinct the wood of a certaine figge tree in Egypt sinketh in the water in the Isle Tilo the trees cast no leaves in the Temple of Venus there was a lampe that no tempest could put out and Lodovicus Vives there reporteth that a certaine lampe was found in a grave that had burned above 1050. yeeres At Alexandria in the Temple of Serapis a certaine image of iron did hang in the top by reason of a certaine loadstone which was inclosed in the roofe These and other such like strange things in nature Augustine remembreth Some wee have knowledge of but many secrets of nature are hid from us but knowne unto the spirits who by this meanes doe worke wonders only producing extraordinarie effects of nature 4. Augustine further in another place sheweth the reason thereof in this manner Sunt occulta quaedam semina arborum plantarum c. in elementis c. There are certaine hid seeds of trees plants in the elements for as there are visible seeds so there are hid seeds which give unto the other their vertue like as then the husbandman doth not create corne but bringeth it out by his labour so the evill Angels doe not create things but only doe draw forth those seeds which are unknowne to us but well knowne to them As Iacob did not create that variety of colour in the sheep but by applying of particoloured rods brought it forth sicut ergo matres gravidae sunt foetibus itâ— mundus gravidus est causis seminibus nascentium Then as mothers that are great with child so the world is full of such seeds and causes of the beginning of things which causes they better knowing then we doe worke wonders yea wee see that men by the pounding of certaine herbes and by such like meanes can cause wormes and other like small creatures to come forth To this purpose Augustine QUEST XVI What workes in naturall things are forbidden unto spirits to doe IT followeth now to shew as wee have seene what things are possible to bee done by spirits so what things are out of their reach and beyond their power 1. Touching the immediate action of spirits which is by locall motion the Devill cannot destroy the world or any principall part thereof nor subvert the order and course of nature he cannot change the course of the heavens or put the starres out of their place neither although he may work some alteration in some part of the earth the whole he cannot remove these and such great workes he cannot doe Perer. ex Aquinat the reason is this because this were to crosse the Creator who by his providence as by his power hee created the world and all that is therein so he preserveth the same in that order which he hath appointed as the Psalmist saith The earth is the Lords and all that therein is hee hath founded it upon the sea and established it upon the flouds Psalm 24.1 2. Secondly concerning the other mediate action of spirits by the instrument and mediation of the creatures these things are denied unto spirits 1. They cannot create any thing of nothing for that argueth an infinite power and is peculiar unto God 2. The Devill being himselfe spirituall and without a bodily substance cannot immediatly change or transforme any materiall or corporall substance without some other naturall cause comming betweene 3. Neither can these spirits change any naturall thing into an other naturall thing immediatly without that subordination of nature and preparation and disposition of the matter which is observed in the generation of things therefore hee cannot bring forth a beast without seed nor a perfect beast all at once because naturally both the generation of such things is by seed and they receive their increase and growth not all at once but by degrees and in time therefore when by the operation of Satan lions and beares and such like creatures have beene made to appeare either they were but phantasies and no such things indeed or were transported from some other place and by this reason he cannot restore dead bodies to life because the body being void of naturall heat and spirits is not fit to entertaine the soule 4. Neither can Satan hinder the operation of naturall things if nothing be wanting which is necessâ—ry for their working And generally whatsoever alteration may be made by naturall causes as wormes and frogs and such like may come of pâ—â—refaction these things may be atchieved and compassed by spirits but such changes and transmutations as cannot be done by naturall meanes as to turne a man into a beast are not within the limits of Devils power But when such things seeme to be done they are in shew rather than truth which may be done two wayes either by so binding and blinding the inward phantasie and sense as that may seeme to be which is not or by fashioning some such shape and forme outwardly and objecting it to the sense Perer. Ex Aquinat QUEST XVII Whether Satan can raise the spirits and soules of the dead AMong other things which exceed the power of spirits it is affirmed before that they cannot raise the soules of men departed as Necromancers doe take upon them to talke with the dead 1. Let us see the vaine opinion of the heathen of this devilish Necromancy Porphyrius writeth that the soules of wicked men are turned into Devils and doe appeare in divers shapes and the soules of them that want buriall doe wander about their bodies and sometimes are compelled to resume their bodies Likewise Hosthanes did professe and promise to raise what dead soever and to bring them to talke with the living as Plinie writeth lib. 30. cap. 2. who in the same place reporteth a farre more strange or rather fabulous thing that Appion the Grammarian should tell of a certaine herb called Cynocephalia and of the Egyptians Osirites which hath power to raise the dead and that thereby he called Homers ghost to inquire of him touching his countrie and parents There were among the Gentiles certaine places famous for Necromancie where they received oracles from the dead as they were made to beleeve such was the Cymmerian oracle at the lake Avernam in Campania such was Ericthone the Thessalian that raised up the dead to declare to Sextus Pompeius the successe
forth serpents of a sudden Contra. The excellency of the agent doth adde to the manner of the worke as to doe it sooner or better it addeth noâ— to the matter Angels working by naturall meanes doe it more admirably than nature can worke it of it selfe but beyond the strength of nature or against the course of nature they can doe nothing 3. Pererius misliking both these answers of Cajetane yet consenting to his opinion for the truth of this miracle addeth a third that Satan fetched those serpents and suddenly transported them into this place and suborned them in stead of the rods Cont. But the text saith the rods were turned into serpents the serpents then were not brought from any other place but there changed or seemed so to be Againe as here they turne their rods into serpents so afterward did they change water into bloud but that was not by transportation for from whence could Satan convey such abundance of true lively bloud which is not ingendred but in the body neither have they power to alter substances it was therefore done by collusion and so was this 3. Wherefore the founder opinion is that those serpents which the Egyptian Sorcerers brought forth were only such in shew not indeed or in truth so Iosephus writeth that the Magicians serpents In speciem ac similitudinem verorum serpentium reptasse did creepe in shew and likenesse of true serpents lib. 2. antiquit cap. 15. And Iustinus Martyr Those things which the Magicians did by the helpe of the Devill spectantium oculis praestigias offundebant did dazle and deceive and as it were cast â— mist before the eyes of the beholders quaest Orthodox 16. Tertullian Mosis veritas mendacium Magorum devoravit Moses trueth devoured their lie lib. de anima Gregor Nyssenus saith they were visus deceptione serpentes serpentes onely in the mistaking of the fight Ambrose calleth it commentitiam emulationem a fained emulation in cap. 3.2 Epist. ad Timoth. Hierome saith imitabantur signa quae faciebat Moses sed non erant in veritate They did imitate the signes which Moses did but they were not in truth lib. 2. advers Iovin The reasons of this opinion before alleaged are these 1. because solius divinae potestatis est It belongeth onely to the power of God to convert a dead substance into a living creature Rupert 2. Moses true serpents devoureth the other which Iosephus and Ferus urge as an argument that they were imaginary 3. Other signes which they did were only imaginary as the turning of water into bloud as is before shewed and so this also QUEST XXII By what meanes Satan deluded Pharaoh with a shew of serpents THis being then thus resolved upon that those were but serpents in shew and to the outward sense this counterfeit signe might be wrought two wayes by the operation of Satan 1. Either by the confounding the inward sense and phantasie of the beholders that they imagined to see that which was not as sicke men of phrensie doe conceive they see strange sights and there is no question but that the Devill can effect whatsoever by diseases or other naturall meanes may be wrought 2. Or else which is more like Satan did forme such a shape and shew of spirits as before is shewed that the Devill hath such power by illusions apparations and phantasies to deceive as the Apostles seeing Christ walking upon the seas supposed it had beene a spirit Phantasma that is a phantasticall apparition Mark 6.49 Ex Perer which sheweth that such illusions were usuall QUEST XXIII Why the Lord suffered the Sorcerers of Egypt to shew such contrary signes NOw the Lord suffered the Magitians thus by their lying signes to contend with Moses for divers weighty causes 1. That by this meanes Moses the faithfull servant of God and true Prophet might be the better knowne as darkenesse maketh the light more glorious and sicknesse health Chrysostome So Saint Paul saith There must bee Heresies that they which are approved among you might bee knowne 1. Cor. 11.29 2. That Moses might be freed from the imputation of being a Sorcerer which thing some have not beene affraid to object and a difference might appeare betweene his working by the power and in the name of God and of the Sorcerers working by the power of Satan Rupert 3. That thereby it might be made manifest how the truth hath alwayes gainesayers and is never without contradictions and oppositions as Lucifer opposed himselfe to God in heaven Cain to Abel in earth Ismael was against Isaack the true Prophets were molested by the false Thus Saint Paul collecteth that as Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses so these also resist the truth 2. Tim. 3.8 Perer. 4. Hereby also it is manifest how according to the common saying the Devill is Gods ape that he taketh upon him to imitate and counterfeit Gods workes that therefore wee should examine such workes and signes whether they be of God that wee be not deceived and as the Apostle saith cry every spirit 1. Ioh. 4.1 5. Another reason is that seeing the Devill by his ministers can doe such strange things that the servants of God bee not offended when thy see wonders and signes to be done in the false Church by Heretikes or Idolaters the instruments of Satan 6. This was permitted for the triall of the faith and constancie of Moses and Aaron and the rest of the Hebrewes whether because of the contrary signes they would doubt of the truth of Gods promises Perer. 7. And for the further hardning of Pharaohs heart as hee had deserved by his former sinnes that God might take occasion thereby to worke all his wonders in Egypt Simler Ferus Borrh. QUEST XXIV Whether Pharaoh being deceived by the Magicians false signes be thereby excusable BUt seeing these Magicians by their Satanicall craft doe so strongly deceive whether is Pharaoh to be excused that he doth not acknowledge Moses to be the Minister and Prophet of God To this the answer is that this notwithstanding Pharaoh is not to be held excusable because there are evident signes to have discerned betweene the working of the one and of the other so that Pharaoh could not plead ignorance To omit the differences before noted Quest. 20. how that true miracles differ from false in the power of working in the quality of persons that worke the worke it selfe the manner and the end which differences are not so easie to be discerned of all there were besides most notorious workes that discovered the hypocrisie and weaknesse of those Sorcerers 1. Moses serpent devoured theirs which required a greater power 2. They could counterfeit the like plagues but they could not remove the true plagues as Moses did 3. They faile in their working they could not bring forth lice nor counterfeit any of the plagues following 4. The plagues doe fall upon the Sorcerers themselves chap. 9.11 5. Lastly they themselves doe give way and confesse it was the finger of God By all these
insinuateth Deut. 11.11 where Moses sheweth a difference betweene the land of Canaan and Egypt where they watered their fields with their feet as a garden that is they conveyed the waters of Nilus by trenches and furrowes to their fields which overflowing their grounds serveth in steed of raine and therefore the Egyptians did more honour Nilus than heaven Perer. QUEST XLIII Whether the Sorcerers did turne the waters into true bloud NOw whether the Sorcerers brought forth true bloud as Moses did though it need bee no question as is before shewed Quest. 21. yet there are divers opinions about it 1. Augustine thinketh that the Sorcerers by the Devils helpe did change the water into very naturall bloud lib. 83. quâ—st 79. But that cannot be for the Devils have no power to change or transforme one substance into another immediatly without naturall meanes and seeing true bloud is not ingendred but in the body and that not immediatly but by certaine degrees and preparations Satan could not in truth doe any such thing 2. Pererius thinketh that this bloud was cunninly conveyed by the Devils helpe from some other place and not made out of the water But this is not likely for it was no small quantity of bloud which seemed to be changed by the Sorcerers out of how many bodies could the Devill draw and sucke so much bloud and if the bloud were brought what came of the water that must bee conveyed away also Beside the text saith that the enchanters did likewise then as Moses turned water into bloud they must to make their worke like turne water also into bloud or seeme to doe it 3. Wherefore I subscribe rather to Iustinus Sanguinem à Magis exhibitum non fuisse verum sed fallacem praestigiosum That the bloud brought forth by the Magicians was not true bloud but deceitfull and counterfeit quaest Orthod 26. Ferus reason is because naturas mutare solius Dei est it only belongeth unto God to change natures Osiander saith Videntur ad breve tempuâ— conversae The waters seemed to be changed by the Sorcerers but for a short time but Moses miracle continued seven dayes which sheweth that it was a true miracle So Ambrose concludeth Si arte sua quis sublimitate astutiae aliam creaturam fingat ad horam sicut finxerunt Iannes Iambres If any by his cunning and deepe deceit can faine another creature for a time as Iannes and Iambres did c. QUEST XLIV How this first plague was stayed HOw this plague ceased is not expressed 1. Philo thinketh that at the supplication of the Egyptians made to Moses and his prayer unto God the waters returned to their first nature But if it had beene so it is not unlike but that Moses could have expressed so much as hee doth in the other plagues that were stayed by that meanes 2. Iosephus writeth that Pharaoh seeing the miserable state of the Egyptians did give leave to the Israelites to depart and so the plague ceased but presently after hee repented him but the Scripture seemeth to be contrary for Pharaohs heart was hardened at the first and not mollified at all neither did this plague enter into his heart vers 23. 3. Therefore it is most like that this plague contined untill the beginning of the second which is the end of the first and so it ceased neither at the entreatie of Pharaoh or the Egyptians or by the prayer of Moses but by the will of God Thostat Perer. QUEST XLV Of the application and use of this first plague FOr the mysticall application of this plague 1. Augustine comparing the ten plagues of Egypt and the ten Commandements together doth referre the first plague to the first Commandement applying it thus The water out of the which commeth the generation of many things signifieth God the beginning of all the turning of this water into bloud is the corrupting of the divine worship by humane and carnall inventions of flesh and bloud 2. But I preferre rather Ferus applications the one propheticall that this plague did portend the bloudy end and destruction of Pharaoh and the Egyptians the other morall that wherein a man sinneth thereby in the justice of God is he punished as Adonibezek by the cutting off his fingers and toes as he had served others Absalon by his haire which hee was proud of so the Egyptians are punished in the water wherein they had destroyed so many innocent babes Pererius 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Of the institution of the princely and priestly calling Vers. 1. I Have made thee Pharaohs God and Aaron thy brother shall be thy Prophet Here we have the institution of two most necessarie callings among the people of God the princely power in Moses whose commission was to give edicts and lawes and the Ecclesiasticall in Aaron to whom it appertained to interprete and expound the Law as the Prophet saith Aske the Priest concerning the law Borrh. 2. Doct. Of the hardning of the heart how it is said to proceed from God Vers. 3. I Will harden Pharaohs heart Mans heart is hardened two wayes either by it selfe internally or by some externall accident that moveth the inward cause or the instruments thereof the externall agents are either efficients and so the Devill as an efficient and working cause moveth the heart of man unto evill being corrupt of it selfe or they are only disposing and ordering so the Lord is said to harden the heart which he doth three wayes 1. By leaving the will of man being destitute of good to it evill nature and disposition 2. By some occasion given by the Lord which in it selfe is good the heart of the wicked becommeth more obstinate as by the Lords commandement by Moses Pharaoh was more hardened so the Apostle sheweth that some take occasion by the law which is good to bee more evill Rom. 7. like as tender and weake eyes by the brightnesse of the Sunne doe dazle the more and become blinder 3. The Lord seeing the will of obstinate men to be thus hardened and bent upon evill he in his justice also driveth them to that end whither of themselves they runne headlong Iun. Like as the primum mobile in the heavens the utmost sphere carrieth all the other inferiour orbes of the planets about yet every one of them doe keepe their contrary course by the which the eclipses of the Sunne and Moone fall out yet so as by the first overruling motion they are whirled about and brought to their Eclipse which is properly caused notwithstanding by their owne particular motion so there is an overruling power of God that bringeth every thing to the end appointed yet the defects and eclipses of our will doe proceede of our owne corrupt nature See more of this point how the Lord is said to harden the heart chap. 4. quest 19. 3. Doct. That no man sinneth of absolute necessitie Vers. 22. HE did not hearken unto them as the Lord had said It was
necessary that Pharaoh should not hearken unto Moses because the Lord had foretold so much who cannot be deceived But Pharaoh was not forced or compelled thereunto there is then an absolute or violent necessity which forceth and compelleth there is a conditionall and hypotheticall necessity when a thing is said to be necessary another thing presupposed so Pharaohs disobedience and obstinacy was the second way necessary upon the presupposall of Gods prescience but the first way it was not necessary the first necessity is coactive but the second is voluntary the other neither justifieth a man if he doe well being forced noâ— condemneth him if hee doe evill but the second hath place in both both the righteous have praise whose obedience in respect of Gods ordinance is necessary and infallible and the wicked are justly condemned who sinne willingly though Gods prescience considered in some sort also necessarily Borrh. 5. Places of controversie and confutation 1. Confut. Against those that impugne the deity of Christ. Vers. 1. I Have made thee Pharaohs God Hence certaine Heretikes as Nestorius that did separate the humanity of Christ from his divine nature would confirme their heresie that the man Christ was God no otherwise than Moses is called God as Eliphandus a Bishop of Spaine who held that the man Christ was onely the Sonne of God by adoption Contra. 1. The name of God in Scripture is given unto men as Psal. 80. I said ye are Gods but that title is given them in respect of their office but it agreeth unto Christ by nature for here the Lord is said to have appointed Moses God not to have begotten him as Hilarie well noteth neither is he simply called God as Christ is but with an addition Pharaohs God 2. Not onely the name of Elohim God is given unto Christ but Iehovah which is a name not communicable unto any creature but peculiar unto God and if Christ were no otherwise God than Moses was it were Idolatry to worship him Simler 3. Hilarie also sheweth that Christ is said to be five wayes very God which agree unto none but him 1. in name he is simply called God as Iohn 1. The word was God and 1. Epist. Ioh. 5.20 speaking of Jesus Christ he saith the same is very God 2. By his nativity and generation and so he is called the Sonne of God 3. By nature hee is one with God I and the father are one 4. In power all power is given me in heaven and in earth Matth. 20. 5. By his owne profession he professed himselfe to be the Sonne of God and therefore the Jewes went about to kill him because he said that God was his Father Iohn 5.18 Hilar. lib. 7. de trinitat 2. Confut. Against transubstantiation Vers. 13. AArons rod devoured their rods The Papists would establish their transubstantiation by this place for as Aarons rod being turned into a serpent is still called a rod not because it was so now but for that it had beene so so the bread in the Eucharist after it is converted into the body of Christ is called bread still because it was so before Contra. 1. If they could shew Scripture to warrant the conversion of the bread into Christs body as here is an evident text for the turning of the rod into a serpent they should say somewhat but untill they can doe that their error can have no colour from hence 2. Beside Aarons rod is so called not only because it had beene a rod before but it was to returne to be a rod againe but they will not have the body of Christ returne againe to be bread Simler In the questions before handled the 27. and 28. concerning the power of Satan in counterfeiting the spirits of the dead one question of purpose there handled by Pererius touching the apparition of Samuel raised by the Pythonisse 1. Sam. 28. I of purpose there omitted reserving it for this place of confutation 3. Confut. That Samuel himselfe appeared not to Saul but the Devill in his likenesse 1. THe most of that side are of opinion that it was the very soule of Samuel not raised up by the witches enchantments but God interposing himselfe did prevent her superstitious invocations and sent Samuel to declare his judgements to Saul sic Thostatus Cajetanus Pererius and their reasons are these First because the Scripture saith it was Samuel 2. Hee saith as the Lord spake by my hand vers 17. which was true of Samuel not of the Devill in the likenesse of Samuel 3. Hee foretelleth what should happen unto Saul the next day which the Devill could not doe 4. In Ecclesiasticus it is written that Samuel after his sleepe told of the Kings death chap 46.20 Ferer Contr. 1. The Scripture speaketh according as the thing appeared not as it was as Pharaoh in his dreame is said to have seene kine come out of the river Gen. 4.1 2. which were but representations of kine 2. As the Devill tooke upon him Samuels person so he also counterfeiteth his speech it was not true out of the Devils mouth no more was it true Samuel such counterfeit speech became a counterfeit Samuel 3. The Devill might either by certaine conjectures perceiving in what distresse Saul was and that God had forsaken him gesse what the successe of the battell should be or rather God herein might force him to speake the truth as did the false Prophet Balaam Borrh. 4. The authority of the booke of Ecclesiasticus doth not presse us and Augustine doubteth also thereof affirming that it was not in Canone Hebraeorum The Hebrewes received it not into the Canon of Scripture lib. de cura pro mortuis chap. 18. 5. Neither is there the like reason of Gods preventing the witches enchantments and Balaams divinations for that God did to his further glorie to shew his power in making the false Prophet to be an instrument of the trueth but this had beene contrary to Gods owne law who forbiddeth that any should aske counsell of the dead Deut. 18. Borrh. 2. Some doe goe further and thinke that the Devill might have power also to bring up Samuels body as Satan transported Christs body to the top of the pinacle Contra. 1. There is not the like reason betweene the transporting of the bodies of the living and of the dead which are asleepe and at rest 2. Satan had no power over Christs body but hee yeelded himselfe to Satans temptation that hee might overcome him in his owne weapon and this was permitted unto Satan to doe for the glorie of God the comfort of his members the confusion and victory over Satan but if Satan should be suffered to take up the bodies of the Saints neither God should receive honour by it nor the Church profit and beside Satan thereby would strengthen his Kingdome of darkenesse Borrh. 3. Wherefore the sounder judgement is that it was not the spirit of Samuel but of Satan that appeared to Saul who can transforme himselfe into an Angel
of light much more take upon him the shape of a Prophet Out reasons are these 1. Tertullian saith Absit ut animam cujusquam sancti à daemone extractam credamus Far be it from us to thinke that the soule of any holy man can bee brought out by witchery lib. de anima Pererius answereth that the Witch called not up Samuel but it was Gods worke to send him preventing the Witches enchantments Contra. But this is not to bee admitted because the Scripture calleth it an abomination to the Lord to aske of the dead Deut. 18.12 the Lord would not be accessary to any thing which is an abomination before him 2. The true Samuel would not have suffered Saul to have worshipped him with a religious worship as the counterfeit Samuel doth so reasoneth Augustine Pererius answereth that this was not such adoration as is due unto God but that reverence which may be yeelded to Angels and Saints Contra. There are but two kindes of adoration a civill and religious the religious veneration is onely due unto God and therefore refused by the Angel Revel 22. the civill this was not as appeareth by Sauls submisse behaviour and superstitious devotion 3. This Samuel saith Why hast thou disquieted me But Samuels soule being at rest in Abrahams bosome was out of the Devils reach he could not disquiet it Pererius answereth that Saul did disquiet it occasionaliter by giving the occasion not efficaciter as being the efficient cause thereof Contra. But if Samuel spake these words then hee was in truth disquieted the question is by whom if not by the Devils meanes occasioned by Saul than by God but I thinke it will not bee confessed that God disquieteth the soules of his Saints being at rest 4. If the Lord vouchsafed not to answer Saul when hee lawfully sought unto him neither by his Priests nor his Prophets how is it like that the Lord should answer by his Prophet and when he useth unlawfull meanes Pererius answereth that God did not vouchsafe to answer him by any such meanes that hee might know that God had forsaken him but now not seeking unto God but unto a Witch God doth send him a sorrowfull message by that Prophet whom hee would not harken unto while hee lived Contra. Yet is not the objection removed that God should rather answer Saul using unlawfull meanes than when hee used lawfull first if the not answering before shewed that God had left him then the answering now by a Prophet of Gods sending argueth that hee was not altogether forgotten If it bee said that Saul knew him not to bee sent of God but raised by a Witch then it will follow that this Samuel kept him in that error without reproofe which the good Prophet would not have omitted Againe if the heavy answer and message of evill tidings was a signe that God neglected him why then did not the Lord vouchsafe to answer him before at all God would answer him neither good nor evill Thirdly this Prophet being dead could bring him no worse tidings now then he did when he lived that his Kingdome was rent from him and given to another 5. Some adde this as a fifth argument that Samuel would not have said To morrow thou shalt be with mee that is in the state of happinesse seeing hee knew that the Lord had cast him off Pererius thinketh that hee did meane he should descend in generall to hell as all before Christs comming did though not to that region and place of hell Limbus Patrum where the Fathers were Contra. But first Pererius must shew us out of Scripture that there be divers hels In the parable of the rich glutton there are but two places mentioned after this life Abrahams bosome a place of rest whither the Angels carried the soule of Lazarus and a place of torment where the rich man was That Abrahams bosome was no part of hell beside Augustines opinion who cannot thinke taâ—tae felicitatis sâ—â—um membrum inferorum c. that a place of sâ—ch great happinesse was a member or part of hell the text it selfe evidently sheweth as much because it was a place of comfort and joy and of great distance from hell and the Angels of light did minister there who remaine not in the kingdome of darknesse And againe that the Patriarkes and Prophets before Christ were in heaven our Saviour testifieth Many shall come from the East and West and sit downe with Abraham Isaack and Iacob in the Kingdome of heaven Matth. 8.11 Abraham Isaack and Iacob then were now in the Kingdome of heaven and yet Christ in their opinion had not then harrowed hell nor yet emptied Limbus Patrum Some doe expound these words thou shalt be with mee generally of the state of the dead Iun. But beside the opinion of some Hebrewes that doe take these words to bee spoken of Sâ—uls particular state that he should be in some place of rest where Samuel was and hereupon they inferre that Saul died penitently where we receive their interpretation but refuse their collection as being builded upon a false ground the testimony of a lying spirit this place is like to that where David saith of his infant departed I shall goe to him 2. Sam. 12.23 which words doe not onely signifie a generall kinde of departure but a resolution in David that it was well with his child Like also unto this is that phrase Gen. 25. that Abraham was gathered to his people and in the same chapter that Ismael was gathered to his people which seemeth to insinuate that each went unto his people and that Abraham was associate unto the just and righteous departed See more hereof Quest. 15. upon Genes 25. And hereunto the Apostle seemeth to allude when he saith Hebr. 12.23 Yee are come c. to the congregation of the first borne c. to the spirits of just and perfect men shewing the society and communion which we have with the people of God gone out of the world 6. Places of Morall use 1. Mor. They that humble themselves shall be exalted I Have made thee Pharaohs God Moses who before so abased himselfe that hee by all meanes would have declined his calling excusing him by his insufficiencie now the Lord doth exalt him making him superior to Kings he should be as a God to Pharaoh not whom Pharaoh should worship but whom he should feare and stand in awe of he should be as a God to bring plagues and judgements upon him and his land and to remove the same againe Thus is that saying of our Saviour fulfilled He that humbleth himselfe shall be exalted 2. Mor. Gods commandements are simply without any exception to be obeyed Vers. 6. SO Moses and Aaron did as the Lord commanded so did they This repitition is not needlesse but sheweth that they most exactly performed all given them in charge the commandements of God must be obeyed without all exception or limitation An Emperour of Rome commanded a workman from the
darkenes should be divided which argument our Saviour useth in the Gospell to shew that he did not cast out devils by the power of Satan 6. Wherefore the best interpretation is that by the finger of God they understood the power of God as the heavens in the Psalme are said to be the worke of his fingers sic Thostatus Lippoman So also is the hand of God taken 1 Sam. 6.9 And hereby is insinuated the great power of God if these horrible plagues were but the worke of his fingers that is an effect of his smallest power what are the workes of his arme and handes when hee sheweth his mightie power for so that which one doth easily or with small labour he is said to doe with his finger as the phrase is used of the Pharises in the Gospell that they laid heavy burdens upon others and would not themselves stirre them with their finger And indeede these plagues of Egypt if they be compared with Gods great workes as the universall floud brought upon all the world the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrha they will appeare to be but workes of Gods fingers in comparison of his whole hand Simler Perer. QUEST XVII Whether the sorcerers had any feeling of Gods power BUt now it will further be inquired whether these sorcerers thus spake as having any knowledge of God or feeling of his power 1. Some thinke that they used this pretence of words to satisfie Pharaoh that was angrie with them because they could not doe now as before and to excuse their want of power Cajetane But it seemeth rather seeing the Sorcerers were indeede hindred and controlled that they spake as they thought 2. Lyranus thinketh that they had no thought at all of God but that they understood the power of some superiour devill And his reason is that if they had in truth confessed and acknowledged the power of God they would not afterward have resisted Moses as it appeareth they did for they were smitten with botches and biles in the sixt plague cap. 9. Contra. But this is a weake argument for though they had at this present some sense of Gods power yet they might afterward returne to their former obstinacie as Pharaoh himselfe would one while seeme to relent and eftsoone be hardned againe and Nebuchadnezzar who upon the interpretation of his dreame by Daniel acknowledged the true God Dan. 2. yet presently after setteth up Idolatrie Perer. 3. Some as is shewed in the former question did thinke that the Magicians had some knowledge and speciall revelation not only of the power of God but of his spirit and so consequently of the Trinitie but such a particular knowledge cannot be ascribed unto them 4. Therefore I thinke rather that for a time they seeing their power hindred did indeede and as they thought acknowledge Gods power that Pharaoh might thereby be left inexcusable Iun. but this knowledge was soone againe obscured by the malice and obstinacie of their heart QUEST XVIII By what power Sorcerers do worke NOw whereas they confesse that Moses wrought by the finger of God they therein evidently bewray that they themselves did not worke by God This therefore shall briefly be made plaine and maniâ—est that Magicians and Sorcerers doe not worke wonders by any divine humane or naturall or Angelicall power I meane the good Angels but Satanicall and Diabolicall 1. These spirits whom they confederate with do require of them divine worship and that affectation of divine honour which they began in heaven and obtained it not being cast downe from thence they seeke to compasse in earth but good Angels refuse to be adored and worshipped as the Angell that appeared to Iohn Revel 22. 2. Sorcerers are men of an impure and wicked life and they use their enchantments to wicked purposes as to theft adulterie murther but good Angels do neither favour wicked men neither will bee assistant in any wicked worke 3. Magicians use to threaten the spirits to enjoyne them certaine impossible things if they come not when they are called but men can exercise no power neither can have any command over the good Angels 4. if it bee objected that Magicians doe often cast out devils but Satan doth not cast out Satan as our Saviour saith for then his kingdome should be divided and could not long stand To this it is answered that our Saviour speaketh of such casting out of devils as is done with power when Satan is violently dispossessed not of such when hee giveth way of himselfe by some compact and contract with the Conjurer And as Augustine saith our Saviour meaneth the perfect ejection of Satan when hee is cast both out of the bodie ad soule But when any seemeth to be cast out by a Satanicall power he goeth out of the bodie that he may more strongly possesse the soule which is indeede no casting out 5. That Sorcerers doe worke by the power of Satan themselves are the best witnesses for Porphyrius who was a great Magician as Eusebius noteth him doth confesse that the devils themselves whom he calleth gods doe signifie unto men quibus rebus dij cogantur qua illis offerendâ— sunt c. with what things the devils are forced and what is to be offered unto them what daies they should chuse what signes and images thâ—y should make and such like And Eusebius further setteth downe to the same purpose an epistle written by Porphyrius to Aâ—ebonus the Egyptian wherein he propoundeth nine inexplicable doubts as he calleth them about Magicall practices 1. How Magicians doe invocate the spirits as their superiours when they command them as their inferiours 2. Why the spirits of Magicians bid men to be just when as they being called upon and sent doe many wicked things 3. They will not heare the Conjâ—rer unlesse hee abstaine from venerie and yet they being sent doe inflame to venerie and unlawfull lust 4. They prescribe their disciples when they are about invocation to abstaine from eating of flesh and yet themselves delight in the smell and bloud of sacrifices 5. They will not have him that hath touched any dead thing to use any Magicall practice and yet many magicall enchantments are practised with dead things both beasts and men 6. They doe terrifie the spirits in their invocations with threats as if they answere not they will reveale the mysteries of Isis and deliver Osiris members to Typhan but how can spirits be feared with threats 7. They use ridiculous invocations as thus they call upon their spirits Thou which camest forth of the slâ—â—e of the earth which hast thy seate in the lake which canst change thy shape every houre which kind of prayers spirits should seeme not to regard 8. They use barbarous and strange words as though the spirits understood only the Scythian or some other barbarous tongue 9. Seeing spirits are insensible and incorporeall how then can they be allured with sensible and corporall things These are Porphyries doubts by the
herein they were judged that is declared to bee vaine because they were not able to defend their worshippers Iun. 5. And because the Egyptians worshipped certaine beasts above the rest as Apis or Serapis which was a pide Oxe that kinde was specially punished Perer. As the last sense but one is very agreeable so I thinke that beside some notable accident befell the Egyptian gods and Idols as there did unto Dagon the Philistims Idoll in the presence of the Arke QUEST X. How the Israelites escaped this destruction of the first borne NOw the Israelites though they were intermingled with the Hebrewes were exempt and freed from this judgement after this manner 1. They were commanded to strike off the bloud of the Lambe upon the two side posts whereupon the doore hanged and upon the upper doore post because in this it was more conspicuous and in sight and in the other rather than upon the doore which was moveable and sometime open and sometime shut 2. This bloud was a signe not so much for the Angell to passe by their houses for the Angell could have told in whose houses the paschall Lambe was killed without seeing of the bloud but it was a signe to the Hebrewes both presently to confirme them in the hope of their deliverance and to be a type and figure of the bloud of the Messiah the onely unspotted Lambe by whose bloud sprinkled on the posts of our hearts by faith wee are saved from everlasting destruction 3. Now whereas some of the Israelites were so poore and few that they were not sufficient for the eating of a Lambe they joyned themselves to other families and returned not unto their owne houses that night and so their houses where no Lambe was killed were not sprinkled and marked with bloud they stood emptie that night and such Hebrewes as sojourned in the Egyptians houses left their houses and went to the houses of the Hebrewes for it is not like that the Egyptians would have suffered any Hebrew to kill a Lambe in their houses which thing they counted an abomination Perer. QUEST XI The mysticall application of this last plague upon the first borne FOr the mysticall application of this last plague 1. Origen by the first borne of the Egyptians that are slaine understandeth the devill and his angels the principalities of this world whom Christ subdued at his comming likewise Heretikes and inventers of strange doctrines which are overcome by the truth 2. Augustine maketh a resemblance betweene this tenth plague and the tenth Commandement For as they which cover their neighbours goods doe desire them to inrich their heires and posteritie so the Lord doth punish their covetousnesse and oppression in their heires and first borne 3. Rupertus by the first borne of Egypt understandeth the originall sinne of the world which is taken away by the death and passion of Christ. 4. But leaving mens uncertaine and inconstant fansies which are as divers as the heads where they are forged the Scripture thus applieth this signe of the Passeover that we are by the sprinkling of the bloud of Christ delivered from eternall death as the Israelites were by the bloud of the Lambe from a temporall and that as onely those houses were exempted that were marked with the bloud of the Lambe so onely in the Church is salvation to be found where the bloud of Christ is apprehended by faith Simler QUEST XII Of the generall application of these tenne plagues NOw for the generall application of all these tenne plagues of the Egyptians 1. We have seene before how Augustine forceth a kind of resemblance and comparison betweene the tenne plagues oâ— Egypt and the tenne transgressions of the tenne Commandements as the turning of the water into bloud he would have to signifie the corrupting of the true worship of God with the inventions of flesh and bloud by the frogges the blasphemies of the heathen against the name of God the plague of the liâ—e signifie such as have a gnawing and restlesse conscience as the Sabbath betokeneth the rest of the minde And so in the rest But by these we may judge that these allegories are but the superfluitie of mens wits and as every mans conceit is so he findeth an allegorie 2. Yet Ferus application is more apt who by these ten plagues setteth forth the ten torments and paines of hell 1. There water shall bee turned into bloud all things shall bee turned to the destruction of the ungodly 2. Their frogges are horror of conscience 3. Their lice a restlesse and unquiet minde 4. By the flies is signified that they shall be destitute of all helpe 5. By the murrane of beasts the perpetuall punishment of their bodies 6. By the boiles the anguish of minde 7. By the haile continuall terror 8. By the Locusts the want of every good thing 9. By the darknesse their depriving of the favour of God 10. And everlasting death by the death of the first borne But neither is this allegoricall application simply to be approved for how can any man number the plagues of hell which are endlesse infinit and without number and to make the comparison hold hee is constrained to inculcate the same thing twice or thrice 3. Wherefore somewhat to content them which delight in such curious applications these ten plagues which the Egyptians indured may seeme to decipher those ten mercies principall benefits which God vouchsafed unto the Israelites being delivered out of Egypt 1. As one had water turned into bloud so the other was blessed in their water they received it out of the rock and whereas it was bitter it became sweet Exod. 17. 2. As they had their rivers and fields crawling full of frogges so the other saw the red Sea full of the Egyptians bodies floting in the water and rose up upon the land 3. Their dust was turned into lice and the Israelites had Manna that â—ay in stead of dust upon the ground 4. They had swarmes of noysome flies and serpents the other were healed from the biting of serpents 5. And as the Egyptians lost their cattell by the murrane so the other were increased and inriched with the cattell of their enemies as from the Midianites onely they â—ooke 675000. sheepe 72000 beeves 61000. asses Numb 31 32 33 34. 6. In stead of the Egyptians soreâ— and botches their feet swelled not in all their journey 7. They were terrified with lightning and thunder the other received the law in thunder and lightning in mount Sinai 8. For the Egyptians Locusts the Israelites had quailes 9. In stead of darknesse they had a piller of fire to guide them in the night and Gods glorious presence in the Tabernacle 10. And as they were punished with the death of their first borne so the first borne of Israel are made holy and consecrate unto God Exod. 13. Vers. 10. The Lord hardned Pharaohs heart For the evident and full discussing of this question how the Lord is said to harden mans
pillowes under all arme-holes There are other flatterers in civill affaires such was Iehonadaâ— that applied himselfe to 〈◊〉 filthy humour 2. Sam. 13. thinking thereby to insinuate himselfe unto him being the Kings eldest sonne Pelarg. 3. A double mischiefe commeth by these flatterers for they both corrupt them whom they flatter and nourish them in their evill and feed their humorous disposition as the people puffed up Herod in pride by their flattering acclamations that it was the voice of God not of man Act. 12. So Alexander and Nero were corrupted by flattery and of good Princes became most cruell Tyrants Simler Therefore Diâ—gâ—â—s said well that it was better to fall upon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Crowes than 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 flatterers for they did but devoure the body these did devoure the soule And beside this mischiefe flatterers procure great hurt unto those whom in their flattery they accuse and traduce as Doâ—g was the cause that 85. Priests were put to the sword Simler 5. Another kinde of false testimony is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all kinde of lying and false speaking for lying lips are an abomination to the Lord Prov. 12.22 The beginning of lying was from the Devill Ioh. 8.44 When he speaketh a lye thâ—n speaketh he of his owne he is a lyer and the father thereof and the end of liers is to be cast into the lake that burneth with fire and brimstone Basting Pelarg. Of the divers kindes of lies see before quest 6. QUEST XVIII Of a false testimony which a man giveth of himselfe NOw remaineth the last kinde of false testimonies when one is a false witnesse of himselfe and hereof there are two sorts 1. Arrogancy and vaine ostentation when any maketh his boast of vertue and piety which is not at all in him such the Prophet Esay meaneth chap. 65.5 which say Stand apart came not neare me I am holier than thou Such was the Pharisie that vaunted himselfe before the Lord of his fasting and almes 2. The other is coloured and cloaked hypocrisie such was that of the Pharisies that under pretence of long prayer devoured widowes houses Matth. 23.14 these 〈◊〉 gaine and profit the end of their religion Another sort of hypocrites make the praise of men the scope of their dissimulation such were also the Pharisies that caused a trumpet to be blowne before them when they gave their almes and used to pray in the corners of the streets that they might be seene of men Matth. 6. Like unto these Pharisaicall hypocrites were the Monkes in Popery that through a pretence of religion gathered infinite wealth and riches possessions and lands unto their Monasteries and Cels. All these are enemies to the truth and maintainers of falshood making a lye of themselves Simler 3. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The particular vertues commanded with their contrary vices forbidden IN this Commandement generally is commanded the love confession and defence of the truth and contrariwise is forbidden all lying falshood dissimulation 1. The first vertue then here required is the love of the truth and the franke confession thereof with the mouth and practice in the life therefore the Devill though he sometime speake the truth yet because he loveth it not hee is not of the truth neither can be said to be true The confession of the truth as it concerneth the glory of God belongeth to the third Commandement but as it respecteth the good of our neighbour it is referred to the ninth Concerning this inward love and outward profession of the truth the Prophet David saith describing a righteous man Psal. 15.2 And speaketh the truth in his heart Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect all kinde of lying whatsoever dissimulation fraud circumventing flattering such the Prophet noteth Psal. 12.2 They speake deceitfully every one with his neighbour flattering with their lips and speake with a double heart the Lord cut off all flattering lips 2. In the excesse there is 1. an intempestive and unseasonable confession of the truth concerning the which our blessed Saviour giveth this caveat Not to give holy things unto dogs nor to cast pearles before swine Matth. 7.6 not in all places and before every one to utter every truth 2. Curiosity which is to enquire things unnecessary or unsearchable as the Apostles were inquisitive after the time of restoring the Kingdome to Israel to whom our Saviour maketh this answer That it was not for them to know the times and seasons which the father hath put in his owne power Act. 1.7 2. Here is required that vertue called Candor which is a favourable interpreting of mens doings and sayings taking all things in the better part and hoping the best where there is no evident cause to the contrary which is an especiall fruit of charity as the Apostle sheweth 1 Cor. 13.7 It beleeveth all things it hopeth all things Contrary hereunto are 1. In the defect first perversenesse taking all things in the worst part and wresting mens sayings and doings to another sense than they meant as the false witnesses did those words of our blessed Saviour Of the destroying the temple and raising it in three dayes which he meant of the temple of his body they turned it to the materiall temple Secondly suspition when men are ready to take every occasion to suspect their neighbour of evill which is contrary to charity which thinketh not evill 1 Cor. 13.5 it is not suspitious Yet all suspition is not condemned in Scripture for our blessed Saviour saith Matth. 10.16 17. Beware of men c. And Bee wise as Serpents c. There is then a good suspition and an evill suspition which are thus distinguished 1. The evill suspition is raised without any cause at all or the same not sufficient the good ariseth of a probable and sufficient cause 2. The evill when upon a bare suspition any thing is certainly concluded the good leaveth the thing suspected in suspense and doubt 3. The evill is when upon suspition followeth hatred and an intention to worke mischiefe the good when one useth his suspition to charitable and friendly admonition 2. In the excesse here offendeth the credulous person that is without all suspition where there is just cause such an one was Godaliah that would suspect nothing of bloudy Ismael that was sent to kill him Ier. 40.16 Secondly the flatterer erreth here who upholdeth men in their sinnes and will not tell them their 〈◊〉 therefore Moses saith Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart but thou shalt plainly rebuke thy neighbour and not suffer him to sinne 3. Simplicity and plainenesse is commanded which is a vertue whereby one plainly and sincerely professeth that which is right and agreeable to the truth without any colouring or cloaking so in Nathanieâ—â— commended for an Israelite indeed in whom there was no guile Ioh. 1.47 Contrary hereunto is doubling and dissembling either in words or workes sayings or doings so Iehâ—nadab that gave that lewd