by the deeds of the Law shall no flesh be justified in his sight Rom. 3.20 However any may be justified in the sight of Men or Angels by their own Obedience or Deeds of the Law yet in His Sight none can be so Necessary it is unto any man who is to come unto a Trial in the sentence whereof he is greatly concern'd duely to consider the Judge before whom he is to appear and by whom his cause is finally to be determined And if we manage our Disputes about Justification without a continual regard unto Him by whom we must be cast or acquitted we shall not rightly apprehend what our Plea ought to be Wherefore the Greatness the Majesty the Holiness and Soveraign Authority of God are always to be present with us in a due sense of them when we enquire how we may be justified before him Yet is it hard to discern how the minds of some men are influenced by the consideration of these things in their fierce contests for the Interest of their own works in their Justification precibus aut precio ut in aliqua parte haereant But the Scripture doth represent unto us what thoughts of him and of themselves not only Sinners but Saints also have had and cannot but have upon near Discoveries and effectual Conceptions of God and his Greatness Thoughts hereof ensuing on a sense of the guilt of sin filled our first Parents with fear and shame and put them on that foolish attempt of hiding themselves from him Nor is the wisdom of their posterity one jot better under their Convictions without a discovery of the Promise That alone makes sinners wise which tenders them relief At present the Generality of men are secure and do not much question but that they shall come off well enough one way or other in the Trial they are to undergo And as such persons are altogether indifferent what Doctrine concerning Justification is taught and received so for the most part for themselves they encline unto that Declaration of it which best suits their own Reason as influenced with self-conceit and corrupt Affections The sum hereof is that what they cannot do themselves what is wanting that they may be saved be it more or less shall one way or other be made up by Christ either the use or the abuse of which perswasion is the greatest fountain of sin in the world next unto the Depravation of our nature And whatever be or may be pretended unto the contrary Persons not convinced of sin not humbled for it are in all their Ratiocinations about spiritual things under the conduct of Principles so vitiated and corrupted See Mat. 18.3 4. But when God is pleased by any means to manifest his Glory unto sinners all their presidences and contrivances do issue in dreadful horrour and distress An account of their Temper is given us Isa. 33.14 The sinners in Sion are afraid fearfulness hath surprized the Hypocrites who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire who among us shall dwell with Everlasting burnings Nor is it thus only with some peculiar sort of sinners The same will be the Thoughts of all guilty persons at some time or another For those who through sensuality security or superstition do hide themselves from the vexation of them in this world will not fail to meet with them when their Terrour shall be encreased and become remediless Our God is a consuming fire and men will one day find how vain it is to set their Briars and Thorns against him in battle array And we may see what extravagant contrivances convinced sinners will put themselves upon under any real view of the Majesty and Holiness of God Micah 6.6 7. Wherewith saith one of them shall I come before the Lord and bow my self before the high God shall I come before him with Burnt-offerings with Calves of a year old will the Lord be pleased with thousands of Rams or with ten thousands of Rivers of Oyl shall I give my first born for my transgression the fruit of my body for the sin of my Soul Neither shall I ever think them meet to be contended withall about the Doctrine of Justification who take no notice of these things but rather despise them This is the proper effect of the Conviction of sin strengthened and sharpened with the consideration of the Terrour of the Lord who is to judge concerning it And this is that which in the Papacy meeting with an Ignorance of the Righteousness of God hath produced innumerable superstitious Inventions for the appeasing of the Consciences of men who by any means fall under the Disquietments of such Convictions For they quickly see that none of the Obedience which God requireth of them as it is performed by them will justifie them before this high and holy God Wherefore they seek for shelter in contrivances about things that he hath not commanded to try if they can put a cheat upon their Consciences and find relief in Diversions Nor is it thus only with profligate sinners upon their Convictions but the best of men when they have had near and efficacious Representations of the Greatness Holiness and Glory of God have been cast into the deepest self-abasement and most serious Renunciations of all trust or confidence in themselves So the Prophet Isaiah upon his vision of the Glory of the Holy One cried out Woe is me I am undone because I am a man of unclean lips chap. 6.5 nor was he relieved but by an Evidence of the free pardon of sin ver 7. So Holy Job in all his contests with his Friends who charged him with Hypocrisie and his being a sinner guilty in a peculiar manner above other men with assured confidence and perseverance therein justified his sincerity his Faith and Trust in God against their whole charge and every parcel of it And this he doth with such a full satisfaction of his own Integrity as that not only he insists at large on his vindication but frequently appeals unto God himself as unto the Truth of his Plea For he directly pursues that counsel with great Assurance which the Apostle James so long after gives unto all Believers nor is the Doctrine of that Apostle more eminently exemplified in any one instance throughout the whole Scripture then in him For he sheweth his Faith by his works and pleads his Justification thereby As Job Justified himself and was Justified by his works so we allow it the Duty of every Believer to be His plea for Justification by works in the sense wherein it is so was the most noble that ever was in the world nor was ever any controversie managed upon a greater occasion At length this Job is called into the immediate presence of God to plead his own cause not now as stated between him and his Friends whether he were an Hypocrite or no or whether his Faith or Trust in God was sincere but as it was stated between God and him wherein he seemed to
words are not so but his own ubi pudor ubi sides That which I affirmed to be a part of an evil End when and as it makes up one entire End by being mixed with sundry other things expresly mentioned is singled out as if I had denied that in any sense it might be a part of a good End in our Obedience which I never thought I never said I have spoken and written much to the contrary And yet to countenance himself in this disingenuous procedure besides many other untrue Reflections he adds that I insinuate that those whom I describe are Christians that seek Righteousness by Faith in Christ pag. 167. I must needs tell my Author that my Faith in this matter is That such works as these will have no influence in his Justification And that the principal Reason why I suppose I shall not in my progress in this Discourse take any particular notice of his exceptions either against the Truth or me next unto this consideration that they are all trite and obsolete and as to what seemeth to be of any force in them will occur unto me in other Authors from whom they are derived is that I may not have a continual occasion to declare how forgetful he hath been of all the Rules of ingenuity yea and of common honesty in his dealing with me For that which gave the occasion unto this present unpleasing digression it being no more as to the substance of it but that our sins were imputed unto Christ and that his Righteousness is imputed unto us it is that in the Faith whereof I am assured I shall live and dye though he should write twenty as learned Books against it as those which he hath already published and in what sense I do believe these things shall be afterwards declared And although I judge no man upon the Expressions that fall from him in Polemical Writings wherein on many occasions they do affront their own experience and contradict their own prayers yet as to those who understand not that blessed Commutation of Sins and Righteousness as to the substance of it which I have pleaded for and the actings of our Faith with respect thereunto I shall be bold to say That if the Gospel be hid it is hid to them that perish Sixthly We can never state our Thoughts aright in this matter unless we have a clear Apprehension of and satisfaction in the Introduction of Grace by Jesus Christ into the whole of our Relation unto God with its respect unto all parts of our Obedience There was no such thing nothing of that nature or kind in the first constitution of that Relation and Obedience by the Law of our Creation We were made in a state of immediate Relation unto God in our own persons as our Creator Preserver and Rewarder There was no mystery of Grace in the Covenant of Works No more was required unto the consummation of that state but what was given us in our Creation enabling us unto rewardable Obedience Do this and live was sole Rule of our Relation unto God There was nothing in Religion originally of that which the Gospel celebrates under the name of the Grace Kindness and Love of God whence all our favourable Relation unto God doth now proceed and whereinto it is resolved nothing of the Interposition of a Mediator with respect unto our Righteousness before God and Acceptance with him which is at present the Life and Soul of Religion the Substance of the Gospel and the Centre of all the Truths revealed in it The Introduction of these things is that which makes our Religion a mystery yea a great mystery if the Apostle may be believed 1 Tim. 3.16 All Religion at first was suited and commensurable unto Reason but being now become a mystery men for the most part are very unwilling to receive it But so it must be and unless we are restored unto our primitive Rectitude a Religion suited unto the principles of our Reason which it hath none but what answer that first state will not serve our Turns Wherefore of this Introduction of Christ and Grace in him into our Relation unto God there are no notions in the natural conceptions of our minds nor are they discoverable by Reason in the best and utmost of its exercise 1. Cor. 2.14 For before our understandings were darkened and our Reason debased by the Fall there were no such things revealed or proposed unto us yea the supposition of them is inconsistent with and contradictory unto that whole state and condition wherein we were to live to God seeing they all suppose the Entrance of sin And it is not likely that our Reason as now corrupted should be willing to embrace that which it knew nothing of in its best condition and which was inconsistent with that way of attaining happiness which was absolutely suited unto it For it hath no Faculty or Power but what it hath derived from that state And to suppose it is now of it self suited and ready to embrace such heavenly mysteries of Truth and Grace as it had no notions of nor could have in the state of Innocency is to suppose that by the Fall our Eyes were opened to know Good and Evil in the sense that the Serpent deceived our first Parents with an Expectation of Whereas therefore our Reason was given us for our only Guide in the first constitution of our Natures it is naturally unready to receive what is above it and as corrupted hath an Enmity thereunto Hence in the first open proposal of this mystery namely of the Love and Grace of God in Christ of the Introduction of a Mediator and his Righteousness into our Relation unto God in that way which God in infinite Wisdom had designed the whole of it was looked on as meer folly by the Generality of the wise and rational men of the World as the Apostle declares at large 1 Cor. ch 1. Neither was the Faith of them ever really received in the World without an Act of the Holy Ghost upon the mind in its Renovation And those who judge that there is nothing more needful to enable the mind of man to receive the mysteries of the Gospel in a due manner but the outward proposal of the Doctrine thereof do not only deny the Depravation of our Nature by the Fall but by just consequence wholly renounce that Grace whereby we are to be recovered Wherefore Reason as hath been elsewhere proved acting on and by its own innate Principles and Abilities conveyed unto it from its original state and as now corrupted is repugnant unto the whole Intoduction of Grace by Christ into our Relation unto God Rom. 8.7 An Endeavour therefore to reduce the Doctrine of the Gospel or what is declared therein concerning the hidden mystery of the Grace of God in Christ unto the principles and inclinations of the minds of men or Reason as it remains in us after the Entrance of sin under the power at least
necessary Condition of Justification for it is that which they call the first Justification alone which we treat about And that the Continuation of our Justification depends solely on the same causes with our Justification it self shall be afterwards declared But it is not yet proved nor ever will be that whatever is required in them that are to be justified is a Condition whereon their Justification is immediately suspended We allow that alone to be a Condition of Justification which hath an influence of causality thereunto though it be but the causality of an Instrument This we ascribe unto Faith alone And because we do so it is pleaded that we ascribe more in our Justification unto our selves than they do by whom we are opposed For we ascribe the efficiency of an Instrument herein unto our own Faith when they say only that it is a Condition or Causa sine qua non of our Justification But I judge that grave and wise men ought not to give so much to the defence of the Cause they have undertaken seeing they cannot but know indeed the contrary For after they have given the specious name of a Condition and a Causa sine qua non unto Faith they immediately take all other Graces and Works of Obedience into the same state with it and the same use in Justification and after this seeming Gold hath been cast for a while into the fire of Disputation there comes out the Calf of a personal inherent Righteousness whereby Men are justified before God virtute foederis Evangelici for as for the Righteousness of Christ to be imputed unto us it is gone into Heaven and they know not what is become of it Having given this brief Declaration of the Nature of Justifying Faith and the Acts of it as I suppose sufficient unto my present Design I shall not trouble my self to give an accurate Definition of it What are my Thoughts concerning it will be better understood by what hath been spoken than by any precise definition I can give And the Truth is definitions of Justifying Faith have been so multiplied by Learned Men and in so great variety and such a manifest inconsistency among some of them that they have been of no advantage unto the Truth but occasions of new Controversies and Divisions whilst every one hath laboured to defend the Accuracy of his own Definition when yet it may be difficult for a true Believer to find any thing compliant with his own Experience in them which kind of Definitions in these things I have no esteem for I know no man that hath laboured in this Argument about the Nature of Faith more than Doctor Jackson yet when he hath done all he gives us a definition of Justifying Faith which I know few that will subscribe unto yet is it in the main scope of it both pious and sound For he tells us Here at length we may define the Faith by which the just do live to be a firm and constant Adherence unto the mercies and loving kindness of the Lord or generally unto the spiritual food exhibited in his Sacred Word as much better than this Life it self and all the Contentments it is capable of grounded on a taste or relish of their sweetness wrought in the Soul or Heart of a Man by the spirit of Christ. Whereunto he adds The terms for the most part are the Prophet Davids not metaphorical as some may fancy much less equivocal but proper and homogeneal to the subject defined Tom. 1. Book 4. chap. 9. For the lively Scriptural Expressions of Faith by receiving of Christ leaning on him rolling our selves or our burden on him tasting how gracious the Lord is and the like which of late have been reproached yea blasphemed by many I may have occasion to speak of them afterwards as also to manifest that they convey a better understanding of the Nature Work and Object of Justifying Faith unto the minds of men spiritually enlightened than the most accurate Definitions that many pretend unto some whereof are destructive and exclusive of them all CHAP. III. The Vse of Faith in Justification It s especial Object farther cleared THe Description before given of Justifying Faith doth sufficiently manifest of what Vse it is in Justification Nor shall I in general add much unto what may be thence observed unto that purpose But whereas this Vse of it hath been expressed with some variety and several ways of it asserted inconsistent with one another they must be considered in our passage And I shall do it with all brevity possible for these things lead not in any part of the Controversie about the Nature of Justification but are meerly subservient unto other Conceptions concerning it When Men have fixed their Apprehensions about the principal matters in Controversie they express what concerneth the Vse of Faith in an Accommodation thereunto Supposing such to be the Nature of Justification as they assert it must be granted that the Vse of Faith therein must be what they plead for And if what is peculiar unto any in the substance of the Doctrine be disproved they cannot deny but that their Notions about the Vse of Faith do fall unto the Ground Thus is it with all who affirm Faith to be either the Instrument or the Condition or the Causa sine qua non or the preparation and disposition of the Subject or a meritorious cause by way of condecency or congruity in and of our Justification For all these notions of the Vse of Faith are suited and accommodated unto the Opinions of Men concerning the nature and principal causes of Justification Neither can any Trial or Determination be made as unto their Truth and Propriety but upon a previous Judgment concerning those causes and the whole Nature of Justification it self Whereas therefore it were vain and endless to plead the principal matter in Controversie upon every thing that occasionally belongs unto it and so by the Title unto the whole Inheritance on every Cottage that is built on the premises I shall briefly speak unto these various Conceptions about the Vse of Faith in our Justification rather to find out and give an understanding of what is intended by them than to argue about their Truth and Propriety which depends on that wherein the substance of the Controversie doth consist Protestant Divines until of late have unanimously affirmed Faith to be the instrumental cause of our Justification So it is expressed to be in many of the publick Confessions of their Churches This Notion of theirs concerning the Nature and Vse of Faith was from the first opposed by those of the Roman Church Afterwards it was denied also by the Socinians as either false or improper Socin Miscellnn Smalcius adv Frantz disput 4 Schlicting adver Meisner de Justificat And of late this expression is disliked by some among our selves wherein they follow Episcopius Curcellius and others of that way Those who are sober and moderate do rather decline
forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood As he is a Propitiation as he shed his Blood for us as we have Redemption thereby he is the peculiar Object of our Faith with respect unto our Justification See to the same purpose Rom. 5.9 10. Ephes. 1.7 Col. 1.14 Ephes. 2.13 14 15 16. Rom. 8.3 4. He was made sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the Righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 That which we seek after in Justification is a Participation of the Righteousness of God to be made the Righteousness of God and that not in our selves but in another that is in Christ Jesus And that alone which is proposed unto our Faith as the means and cause of it is his being made sin for us or a Sacrifice for sin wherein all the Guilt of our sins was laid on him and he bare all our Iniquities This therefore is its peculiar Object herein And wherever in the Scripture we are directed to seek for the forgiveness of sins by the Blood of Christ receive the Atonement to be justified through the Faith of him as crucified the Object of Faith in Justification is limited and determined But it may be pleaded in Exception unto the Testimonies that no one of them doth affirm that we are justified by Faith in the Blood of Christ alone so as to exclude the consideration of the other Offices of Christ and their actings from being the Object of Faith in the same manner and unto the same ends with his Sacerdotal Office and what belongs thereunto or is derived from it Answ. This exception derives from that common Objection against the Doctrine of Justification by Faith alone namely that That exclusive term alone is not found in the Scripture or in any of the Testimonies that are produced for Justification by Faith But it is replyed with sufficient evidence of Truth that although the word be not found Syllabically used unto this purpose yet there are exceptive Expressions equivalent unto it as we shall see afterwards It is so in this particular instance also For 1 whereas our Justification is expresly ascribed unto our Faith in the Blood of Christ as the Propitiation for our Sins unto our believing in him as Crucified for us and it is no where ascribed unto our receiving of him as King Lord or Prophet it is plain that the former Expressions are virtually exclusive of the later consideration 2 I do not say That the consideration of the Kingly and Prophetical Offices of Christ is excluded from our Justification as works are excluded in Opposition unto Faith and Grace For they are so excluded as that we are to exercise an act of our minds in their positive Rejection as saying Get you hence you have no Lot nor Portion in this matter But as to these Offices of Christ as to the Object of Faith as Justifying we say only that they are not included therein For so to believe to be justified by his Blood as to exercise a positive act of the mind excluding a compliance with his other Offices is an impious Imagination 3. Neither the Consideration of these Offices themselves nor of any of the peculiar Acts of them are suited to give the Souls and Consciences of convinced Sinners that Relief which they seek after in Justification We are not in this whole cause to lose out of our Eye the state of the Person who is to be justified and what it is he doth seek after and ought to seek after therein Now this is Pardon of Sin and Righteousness before God alone That therefore which is no way suited to give or tender this Relief unto him is not nor can be the Object of his Faith whereby he is justified in that exercise of it whereon his justification doth depend This Relief it will be said is to be had in Christ alone it is true but under what Consideration For the sole design of the Sinner is how he may be accepted with God be at peace with him have all his wrath turned away by a Propitiation or Attonement Now this can no otherwise be done but by the acting of some one towards God and with God on his behalf for it is about the turning away of Gods Anger and Acceptance with him that the enquiry is made It is by the Blood of Christ that we are made nigh who were far off Eph. 2.13 By the Blood of Christ are we Reconciled who were Enemies v. 16. By the Blood of Christ we have Redemption Rom. 3.24 25. Eph. 1.7 c. This therefore is the Object of Faith All the actings of the Kingly and Prophetical Offices of Christ are all of them from God that is in the Name and Authority of God towards us Not any one of them is towards God on our behalf so as that by vertue of them we should expect Acceptance with God They are all Good Blessed Holy in themselves and of an eminent tendency unto the Glory of God in our Salvation Yea they are no less necessary unto our Salvation to the praise of Gods Grace then are the Attonement for Sin and Satisfaction which he made for from them is the way of life Revealed unto us Grace communicated our Persons sanctified and the Reward bestowed Yea in the exercise of his Kingly power doth the Lord Christ doth pardon and justifie Sinners Not that he did as a King constitute the Law of Justification for it was given and established in the first Promise and he came to put it in Execution Joh. 3.16 But in the vertue of his Attonement and Righteousness imputed unto them he doth both pardon and justifie Sinners But they are the acts of his Sacerdotal Office alone that respect God on our behalf Whatever he did on Earth with God for the Church in Obedience Suffering and Offering up of himself whatever he doth in Heaven in Intercession and Appearance in the presence of God for us it all entirely belongs unto his Priestly Office And in these things alone doth the Soul of a convinced Sinner find Relief when he seeks after Deliverance from the state of Sin and Acceptance with God In these therefore alone the peculiar Object of his Faith that which will give him Rest and Peace must be comprized And this last consideration is of it self sufficient to determine this difference Sundry things are Objected against this Assertion which I shall not here at large discuss because what is material in any of them will occur on other occasions where its consideration will be more proper In general it may be pleaded that Justifying Faith is the same with saving Faith nor is it said that we are justified by this or that part of Faith but by Faith in General that is as taken essentially for the entire Grace of Faith And as unto Faith in this sense not only a respect unto Christ in all his Offices but Obedience it self also is included in it as is evident in many
Righteous and the Sons of God then may Christ by the imputation of our unrighteousness be said to be a sinner and a child of the Devil Ans. 1 That which the Scripture affirms concerning the imputation of our sins unto Christ is that he was made sin for us This the Greek Expositors Chrysostome Theophylact and Oecumenius with many others take for a sinner But all affirm that denomination to be taken from imputation only he had sin imputed unto him and underwent the punishment due unto it as we have Righteousness imputed unto us and enjoy the benefit of it 2 The imputation of sin unto Christ did not carry along with it any thing of the pollution or filth of sin to be communicated unto him by transfusion a thing impossible so that no denomination can thence arise which should include in it any respect unto them A thought hereof is impious and dishonourable unto the Son of God But his being made sin through the imputation of the guilt of sin is his honour and glory 3 The imputation of the sin of Fornicators Idolaters Adulterers c. such as the Corinthians were before their Conversion unto Christ doth not on any ground bring him under a denomination from those sins For they were so in themselves actively inherently subjectively and thence were so called But that he who knew no sin voluntarily taking on him to answer for the guilt of those sins which in him was an act of Righteousness and the highest Obedience unto God should be said to be an Idolater c. is a fond imagination The denomination of a sinner from sin inherent actually committed defiling the Soul is a reproach and significative of the utmost unworthiness But even the denomination of a sinner by the imputation of sin without the least personal guilt or defilement being undergone by him unto whom it is imputed in an act of the highest Obedience and tending unto the greatest glory of God is highly honourable and glorious But 4 The imputation of sin unto Christ was antecedent unto any real union between him and sinners whereon he took their sin on him as he would and for what ends he would But the imputation of his Righteousness unto Believers is consequential in order of nature unto their union with him whereby it becomes theirs in a peculiar manner so as that there is not a parity of reason that he should be esteemed a sinner as that they should be accounted Righteous And 5 we acquiesce in this that on the imputation of sin unto Christ it is said that God made him to be sin for us which he could not be but thereby and he was so by an act transient in its effects for a time only that time wherein he underwent the punishment due unto it But on the imputation of his Righteousness unto us we are made the Righteousness of God with an everlasting Righteousness that abides ours always 6 To be a child of the Devil by sin is to do the works of the Devil Joh. 8.44 But the Lord Christ in taking our sins upon him when imputed unto him did the work of God in the highest act of holy Obedience evidencing himself to be the Son of God thereby and destroying the work of the Devil So foolish and impious is it to conceive that any absolute change of state or relation in him did ensue thereon That by the Righteousness of God in this place our own Faith and Obedience according to the Gospel as some would have it are intended is so alien from the scope of the place and sense of the words as that I shall not particularly examine it The Righteousness of God is revealed to Faith and received by Faith and is not therefore Faith it self And the force of the Antithesis is quite perverted by this conceit For where is it in this that he was made sin by the imputation of our sin unto him and we are made Righteousness by the imputation of our own Faith and Obedience unto our selves But as Christ had no concern in sin but as God made him sin it was never in him inherently so have we no interest in this Righteousness it is not in us inherently but only is imputed unto us Besides the act of God in making us righteous is his justifying of us But this is not by the infusion of the habit of Faith and Obedience as we have proved And what act of God is intended by them who affirm That the Righteousness of God which we are made is our own Righteousness I know not The constitution of the Gospel Law it cannot be for that makes no Man righteous And the Persons of Believers are the object of this act of God and that as they are considered in Christ. Gal. 2.16 The Epistle of the same Apostle unto the Galatians is wholly designed unto the vindication of the Doctrine of Justification by Christ without the Works of the Law with the use and means of its improvement The sum of his whole design is laid down in the repetition of his words unto the Apostle Peter on the occasion of his failure there related Chap. 2.86 Knowing that a Man is not justified by the Works of the Law but by the Faith of Jesus Christ even we have believed on Jesus Christ that we might be justified by the Faith of Christ and not by the Works of the Law for by the Works of the Law shall no flesh be justified That which he doth here assert was such a known such a fundamental principle of Truth among all Believers that their conviction and knowledge of it was the ground and occasion of their transition and passing over from Judaism unto the Gospel and Faith in Jesus Christ thereby And in the words the Apostle determines that great inquiry how or by what means a Man is or may be justified before God The subject spoken of is expressed indefinitely A Man that is any Man a Jew or a Gentile a Believer or an Vnbeliever The Apostle that spake and they to whom he spake the Galatians to whom he wrote who also for some time had believed and made Profession of the Gospel The answer given unto the question is both Negative and Positive both asserted with the highest assurance and as the common faith of all Christians but only those who had been carried aside from it by Seducers He asserts that this is not this cannot be by the Works of the Law What is intended by the Law in these disputations of the Apostle hath been before declared and evinced The Law of Moses is sometimes signally intended not absolutely but as it was the present instance of Mens cleaving unto the Law of Righteousness and not submitting themselves thereon unto the Righteousness of God But that the consideration of the Moral Law and the duties of it is in this Argument any where excepted by him is a weak imagination yea it would except the Ceremonial Law it self for the observation of it whilest
acknowledged that the objective Grace of the Gospel in the Doctrine of it is liable to abuse where there is nothing of the subjective Grace of it in the Hearts of men and the ways of its influence into the Life of God are uncouth unto the Reasonings of carnal minds So was it charged by the Papists at the first Reformation and continueth yet so to be Yet as it gave the first occasion unto the Reformation it self so was it that whereby the Souls of men being set at liberty from their bondage unto innumerable superstitious fears and observances utterly inconsistent with true Gospel Obedience and directed into the ways of Peace with God through Jesus Christ were made fruitful in real Holiness and to abound in all those blessed effects of the Life of God which were never found among their Adversaries The same charge was afterwards renewed by the Socinians and continueth still to be managed by them But I suppose wise and impartial men will not lay much weight on their Accusations until they have manifested the efficacy of their contrary perswasion by better effects and fruits than yet they have done What sort of men they were who first coined that systeme of Religion which they adhere unto one who knew them well enough and sufficiently enclined unto their Antitrinitarian Opinions declares in one of the Queries that he proposed unto Socinus himself and his followers If this saith he be the truth which you contend for whence comes it to pass that it is declared only by persons nulla pietatis commendatione nullo laudato prioris vitae exemplo commendatos imo ut plerumque videmus per vagabundos contentionum zeli carnalis plenos homines alios ex castris aulis ganeis prolatam esse Scrupuli ab excellenti viro propositi inter oper Socin The fiercest charge of such men against any Doctrines they oppose as inconsistent with the necessary motives unto Godliness are a Recommendation of it unto the minds of considerative men And there cannot be a more effectual Engine plied for the ruine of Religion then for men to declame against the Doctrine of Justification by Faith alone and other Truths concerning the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ as those which overthrow the necessity of moral Duties Good Works and Gospel Obedience whilst under the conduct of the Opinions which they embrace in opposition unto them they give not the least evidence of the power of the Truth or Grace of the Gospel upon their own hearts or in their lives Whereas therefore the whole Gospel is the Truth which is after Godliness declaring and exhibiting that Grace of God which teacheth us to deny all ungodliness and worldly lusts and that we should live soberly and righteously and godly in this world we being fallen into those times wherein under great and fierce contests about notions opinions and practices in Religion there is an horrible decay in true Gospel Purity and Holiness of life amongst the generality of men I shall readily grant that keeping a due regard unto the only standard of Truth a secondary Trial of Doctrines proposed and contended for may and ought to be made by the ways lives walkings and conversations of them by whom they are received and professed And although it is acknowledged that the Doctrine pleaded in the ensuing discourse be liable to be abused yea turned into licentiousness by men of corrupt minds through the prevalency of vitious Habits in them as is the whole Doctrine of the Grace of God by Jesus Christ and although the way and means of its efficacy and influence into universal Obedience unto God in Righteousness and true Holiness be not discernable without some beam of spiritual Light nor will give an experience of their power unto the minds of men utterly destitute of a principle of spiritual Life yet if it cannot preserve its station in the Church by this Rule of its useful tendency unto the promotion of Godliness and its necessity thereunto in all them by whom it is really believed and received in its proper light and power and that in the experience of former and present times I shall be content that it be exploded 4. Finding that not a few have esteemed it compliant with their Interest to publish exceptions against some few leaves which in the handling of a subject of another nature I occasionally wrote many years ago on this Subject I am not without Apprehensions that either the same persons or others of alike temper and principles may attempt an opposition unto what is here expresly tendered thereon On supposition of such an Attempt I shall in one word let the Authors of it know wherein alone I shall be concerned For if they shall make it their business to cavil at Expressions to wrest my words wiredraw inferences and conclusions from them not expresly owned by me to revile my person to catch at advantages in any occasional passages or other unessential parts of the Discourse labouring for an Appearance of success and reputation to themselves thereby without a due attendance unto Christian moderation candor and ingenuity I shall take no more notice of what they say or write then I would do of the greatest impertinencies that can be reported in this world The same I say concerning oppositions of the like nature unto any other writings of mine a work which as I hear some are at present engaged in I have somewhat else to do than to cast away any part of the small remainder of my Life in that kind of controversial Writings which good men bewail and wise men deride Whereas therefore the principal design of this Discourse is to state the Doctrine of Justification from the Scripture and to confirm it by the Testimonies thereof I shall not esteem it spoken against unless our Exposition of Scripture Testimonies and the Application of them unto the present Argument be disproved by just Rules of Interpretation and another sense of them be evinced All other things which I conceive necessary to be spoken unto in order unto the right understanding and due improvement of the Truth pleaded for are comprised and declared in the ensuing general Discourses to that purpose These few things I thought meet to mind the Reader of From my Study May the 30th 1677. J. O. Considerations previous unto the Explanation of the Doctrine of Justification § 1. THe General Nature of Justification State of the Person to be justified antecedently thereunto Rom. 4.5 Chap. 3.19 Chap. 1.32 Gal. 3.10 Joh. 3.18 36. Gal. 3.22 The sole Inquiry on that state Whether it be any thing that is our own inherently or what is only imputed unto us that we are to trust unto for our Acceptance with God The sum of this Inquiry The proper ends of Teaching and Learning the Doctrine of Justification Things to be avoided therein Pag. 1. § 2. A due consideration of God the Judge of all necessary unto the right stating and apprehension of the Doctrine of
there is no Relief or Deliverance to be expected from any of those ways of sorrow or duty that he hath put himself upon 3 In this condition it is a meer Act of Soveraign Grace without any respect unto these things foregoing to call the sinner unto Believing or Faith in the Promise unto the Justification of Life This is Gods order yet so as that what precedeth his call unto Faith hath no causality thereof 3. The next thing to be enquired into is the proper Object of Justifying Faith or of true Faith in its office work and duty with respect unto our Justification And herein we must first consider what we cannot so well close withall For besides other Differences that seem to be about it which indeed are but different Explanations of the same thing for the substance there are two Opinions which are looked on as Extreams the one in an Excess and the other in Defect The first is that of the Roman Church and those who comply with them therein And this is That the Object of Justifying Faith as such is all Divine Verity all Divine Revelation whether written in the Scripture or delivered by Tradition represented unto us by the Authority of the Church In the latter part of this Description we are not at present concerned That the whole Scripture and all the parts of it and all the Truths of what sort soever they be that are contained in it are equally the Object of Faith in the discharge of its Office in our Justification is that which they maintain Hence as to the nature of it they cannot allow it to consist in any thing but an Assent of the mind For supposing the whole Scripture and all contained in it Laws Precepts Promises Threatnings Stories Prophesies and the like to be the Object of it and these not as containing in them things Good or Evil unto us but under this formal consideration as divinely revealed they cannot assign or allow any other Act of the mind to be required hereunto but Assent only And so confident are they herein namely That Faith is no more then an Assent unto divine Revelation as that Bellarmin in opposition unto Calvin who placed knowledge in the description of Justifying Faith affirms that it is better defined by Ignorance than by Knowledge This Description of Justifying Faith and its Object hath been so discussed and on such evident Grounds of Scripture and Reason rejected by Protestant Writers of all sorts as that it is needless to insist much upon it again Some things I shall observe in relation unto it whereby we may discover what is of Truth in what they assert and wherein it falls short thereof Neither shall I respect only them of the Roman Church who require no more to Faith or Believing but only a bare Assent of the mind unto divine Revelations but them also who place it wholly in such a firm Assent as produceth Obedience unto all divine Commands For as it doth both these as both these are included in it so unto the especial nature of it more is required It is as justifying neither a meer Assent nor any such firm degree of it as should produce such effects 1. All Faith whatever is an Act of that power of our Souls in general whereby we are able firmly to assent unto the Truth upon Testimony in things not evident unto us by Sense or Reason It is the Evidence of things not seen And all divine Faith is in general an Assent unto the Truth that is proposed unto us upon divine Testimony And hereby as it is commonly agreed it is distinguished from Opinion and moral certainty on the one hand and Science or Demonstration on the other 2. Wherefore in Justifying Faith there is an Assent unto all divine Revelation upon the Testimony of God the Revealer By no other Act of our mind wherein this is not included or supposed can we be justified not because it is not justifying but because it is not Faith This Assent I say is included in Justifying Faith And therefore we find it often spoken of in the Scripture the Instances whereof are gathered up by Bellarmin and others with respect unto other things and not restrained unto the especial promise of Grace in Christ which is that which they oppose But besides that in most places of that kind the proper Object of Faith as Justifying is included and referred ultimately unto though diversly expressed by some of its Causes or concomitant Adjuncts it is granted that we believe all divine Truth with that very Faith whereby we are justified so as that other things may well be ascribed unto it 3. On these Concessions we yet say two things 1 That the whole nature of Justifying Faith doth not consist meerly in an Assent of the mind be it never so firm and stedfast nor whatever Effects of Obedience it may produce 2 That in its Duty and Office in Justification whence it hath that especial denomination which alone we are in the Explanation of it doth not equally respect all divine Revelation as such but hath a peculiar Object proposed unto it in the Scripture And whereas both these will be immediately evinced in our description of the proper Object and Nature of Faith I shall at present oppose some few things unto this Description of them sufficient to manifest how aliene it is from the Truth 1. This Assent is an Act of the understanding only An Act of the mind with respect unto Truth evidenced unto it be it of what nature it will So we believe the worst of things and the most grievous unto us as well as the best and the most useful But Believing is an Act of the Heart which in the Scripture comprizeth all the Faculties of the Soul as one entire principle of moral and spiritual Duties With the Heart Man believeth unto Righteousness Rom. 10.10 And it is frequently described by an Act of the Will though it be not so alone But without an Act of the Will no man can believe as he ought See Joh. 5.40 Joh. 1.12 chap. 6.35 We come to Christ in an Act of the Will and let whosoever will come And to be willing is taken for to believe Psal. 110.3 and Unbelief is Disobedience Heb. 3.18 19. 2. All Divine Truth is equally the Object of this Assent It respects not the especial nature or use of any one Truth be it of what kind it will more than another nor can it do so since it regards only Divine Revelation Hence that Judas was the Traytor must have as great an influence into our Justification as that Christ died for our sins But how contrary this is unto the Scripture the Analogy of Faith and the Experience of all that believe needs neither Declaration nor Confirmation 3. This Assent unto all Divine Revelation may be true and sincere where there hath been no previous work of the Law nor any Conviction of sin No such thing is required thereunto nor are
And for which the Father loved him Joh. 10.17 18. There was therefore no reason why God should hate Christ for his taking on him our Debt and the payment of it in an Act of the highest Obedience unto his will 2 God in this matter is considered as a Rector Ruler and Judge Now it is not required of the severest Judge that as a Judge he should hate the guilty person no although he be guilty Originally by Inhaesion and not by Imputation As such he hath no more to do but consider the guilt and pronounce the sentence of punishment But 3 suppose a person out of an Heroick generosity of mind should become an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for another for his friend for a good man so as to answer for him with his life as Judah undertook to be for Benjamin as to his liberty which when a man hath lost he is civilly dead and capite diminutus would the most cruel Tyrant under Heaven that should take away his life in that case hate him would he not rather admire his worth and vertue As such an one it was that Christ suffered and no otherwise 4 All the force of this exception depends on the ambiguity of the word hate For it may signifie either an aversation or detestation of mind or only a will of punishing as in God mostly it doth In the first sense there was no ground why God should hate Christ on this Imputation of guilt unto him whereby he became non propriae sed alienae culpae Reus Sin inherent renders the Soul polluted abominable and the only Object of Divine Aversation But for him who was perfectly Innocent Holy Harmless undefiled in himself who did no sin neither was there guile found in his mouth to take upon him the guilt of other sins thereby to comply with and accomplish the design of God for the manifestation of his Glory and infinite Wisdom Grace Goodness Mercy and Righteousness unto the certain expiation and destruction of sin nothing could render him more glorious and lovely in the sight of God or man But for a will of punishing in God where sin is imputed none can deny it but they must therewithal openly disavow the satisfaction of Christ. The heads of some few of those Arguments wherewith the Truth we have asserted is confirmed shall close this Discourse 1. Unless the guilt of sin was imputed unto Christ sin was not imputed unto him in any sense For the punishment of sin is not sin nor can those who are otherwise minded declare what it is of sin that is imputed But the Scripture is plain that God laid on him the Iniquity of us all and made him to be sin for us which could not otherwise be but by Imputation 2. There can be no punishment but with respect unto the guilt of sin personally contracted or imputed It is guilt alone that gives what is materially evil and afflictive the formal nature of punishment and nothing else And therefore those who understand full well the Harmony of things and Opinions and are free to express their minds do constantly declare that if one of these be denied the other must be so also and if one be admitted they must both be so If guilt was not imputed unto Christ he could not as they plead well enough undergo the punishment of sin much he might do and suffer on the occasion of sin but undergo the punishment due unto sin he could not And if it should be granted that the guilt of sin was imputed unto him they will not deny but that he underwent the punishment of it and if he underwent the punishment of it they will not deny but that the guilt of it was imputed unto him For these things are inseparably related 3. Christ was made a Curse for us the Curse of the Law as is expresly declared Gal. 3.13 14. But the Curse of the Law respects the guilt of sin only So as that where that is not it cannot take place in any sense and where that is it doth inseparably attend it Deut. 27.26 4. The express Testimonies of the Scripture unto this purpose cannot be evaded without an open wresting of their words and sense So God is said to make all our Iniquities to meet with upon him and he bare them on him as his burden for so the word signifies Isa. 53.6 God hath laid on him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Iniquity that is the guilt of us all ver 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and their sin or guilt shall he bear For that is the intendment of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where joyned with any other word that denotes sin as it is in those places Psal. 32.5 thou forgavest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Iniquity of my sin that is the guilt of it which is that alone that is taken away by pardon That his Soul was made an Offering for the guilt of sin that he was made sin that sin was condemned in his flesh c. 5. This was represented in all the Sacrifices of old especially the great Anniversary on the day of expiation with the Ordinance of the Scape Goat as hath been before declared 6. Without a supposition hereof it cannot be understood how the Lord Christ should be our 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or suffer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in our stead unless we will admit the exposition of Mr. Ho. a late Writer who reckoning up how many things the Lord Christ did in our stead adds as the sense thereof that is to bestead us then which if he can invent any thing more fond and senseless he hath a singular faculty in such an Employment CHAP. IX The formal cause of Justification or The Righteousness on the Account whereof Believers are justified before God Objection answered THe principal differences about the Doctrine of Justification are reducible unto three Heads 1 The nature of it namely whether it consist in an internal change of the Person justified by the infusion of an Habit of inherent Grace or Righteousness or whether it be a Forensick Act in the judging esteeming declaring and pronouncing such a person to be Righteous thereon absolving him from all his sins giving unto him Right and Title unto life Herein we have to do only with those of the Church of Rome all others both Protestants and Socinians being agreed on the Forensick sense of the word and the nature of the thing signified thereby And this I have already spoken unto so far as our present design doth require and that I hope with such evidence of Truth as cannot well be gainsayed Nor may it be supposed that we have too long insisted thereon as an opinion which is obsolete and long since sufficiently confuted I think much otherwise and that those who avoid the Romanists in these Controversies will give a greater appearance of fear than of contempt For when all is done if free Justification through the Blood of Christ and the Imputation of his Righteousness be
also necessary unto the same End and Purpose For why was it necessary or why would God have it so that the Lord Christ as the Surety of the Covenant should undergo the curse and penalty of the Law which we had incurred the guilt of by sin that we may be justified in his sight Was it not that the Glory and Honor of his Righteousness as the Author of the Law and the Supream Governor of all Mankind thereby might not be violated in the absolute impunity of the infringers of it And if it were requisite unto the glory of God that the penalty of the Law should be undergone for us or suffered by our Surety in our stead because we had sinned Wherefore is it not as requisite unto the glory of God that the preceptive part of the Law be complied withal for us in as much as obedience thereunto is required of us And as we are no more able of our selves to fulfil the Law in a way of obedience then to undergo the penalty of it so as that we may be justified thereby So no Reason can be given why God is not as much concerned in Honor and Glory that the preceptive power and part of the Law be complied withal by perfect Obedience as that the Sanction of it be established by undergoing the penalty of it Upon the same Grounds therefore that the Lord Christs suffering the penalty of the Law for us was necessary that we might be justified in the sight of God and that the satisfaction he made thereby be imputed unto us as we our selves had made satisfaction unto God as Bellarmine speaks and grants On the same it was equally necessary that is as unto the glory and honor of the Legislator and Supream Governor of all by the Law that he should fulfil the Preceptive part of it in his perfect obedience thereunto which also is to be imputed unto us for our Justification Concerning the first of these namely the satisfaction of Christ and the Imputation of it unto us our principal Difference is with the Socinians And I have elswhere written so much in the vindication of the Truth therein that I shall not here again reassume the same Argument It is here therefore taken for granted although I know that there are some different Apprehensions about the notion of Christs suffering in our stead and of the Imputation of those sufferings unto us But I shall here take no notice of them seeing I press this Argument no farther but only so far forth that the obedience of Christ unto the Law and the Imputation thereof unto us is no less necessary unto our Justification before God then his suffering of the penalty of the Law and the Imputation thereof unto us unto the same end The nature of this Imputation and what it is formally that is imputed we have considered elswhere That the Obedience of Christ the Mediator is thus imputed unto us shall be afterwards proved in particular by Testimonies of the Scripture Here I intend only the vindication of the Argument as before laid down which will take us up a little more time then ordinary For there is nothing in the whole Doctrine of Justification which meets with a more fierce and various opposition But the Truth is great and will prevail The things that are usually objected and vehemently urged against the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto our Justification may be reduced unto three heads 1. That it is impossible 2. That it is useless 3. That it is pernitious to believe it And if the Arguments used for the inforcement of those Objections be as cogent as the charge it self is fierce and severe they will unavoidably overthrow the perswasions of it in the minds of all sober persons But there is oft-times a wide difference between what is said and what is proved as will appear in the present case 1. It is pleaded impossible on this single ground namely That the Obedience of Christ unto the Law was due from him on his own account and performed by him for himself as a man made under the Law Now what was necessary unto himself and done for himself cannot be said to be done for us so as to be imputed unto us 2. It is pretended to be useless from hence because all our sins of omission and commission being pardoned in our Justification on the account of the Death and satisfaction of Christ we are thereby made compleatly righteous so as that there is not the least necessity for or use of the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto us 3. Pernitious also they say it is as that which takes away the necessity of our own personal Obedience introducing Antinomianism Libertinism and all manner of evils For this last part of the charge I refer it unto its proper place For although it be urged by some against this part of the Doctrine of Justification in a peculiar manner yet is it managed by others against the whole of it And although we should grant that the Obedience of Christ unto the Law is not imputed unto us unto our Justification yet shall we not be freed from disturbance by this false accusation unless we will renounce the whole of the satisfaction and merit of Christ also And we intend not to purchase our Peace with the whole World at so dear a rate Wherefore I shall in its proper place give this part of the charge its due consideration as it reflects on the whole Doctrine of Justification and all the causes thereof which we believe and profess The first part of this charge concerning the Impossibility of the Imputation of the obedience of Christ unto us is insisted on by Socinus de Servat part 3. cap. 5. And there hath been nothing since pleaded unto the same purpose but what hath been derived from him or wherein at least he hath not prevented the Inventions of other Men and gone before them And he makes this consideration the principal engine wherewith he indeavors the overthrow of the whole Doctrine of the merit of Christ. For he supposeth that if all he did in a way of Obedience was due from himself on his own Account and was only the duty which he owed unto God for himself in his station and circumstances as a Man in this World it cannot be meritorious for us nor any way imputed unto us And in like manner to weaken the Doctrine of his Satisfaction and the Imputation thereof unto us he contends that Christ offered as a Priest for himself in that kind of offering which he made on the Cross. Part. 2. cap. 22. And his real opinion was that whatever was of offering or sacrifice in the Death of Christ it was for himself that is it was an Act of Obedience unto God which pleased him as the savor of a sweet smelling Sacrifice His offering for us is only the presentation of himself in the presence of God in Heaven now he hath no more to do
when he denies that by the Works of the Law any can be justified is the entire Rule and Guide of our Obedience unto God even as unto the whole frame and spiritual Constitution of our Souls with all the Acts of Obedience or Duties that he requireth of us And 2. That the Works of this Law which he so frequently and plainly excludeth from our Justification and therein opposeth to the Grace of God and the Blood of Christ are all the Duties of Obedience Internal Supernatural External Ritual however we are or may be enabled to perform them that God requireth of us And these things excluded it is the Righteousness of Christ alone imputed unto us on the account whereof we are justified before God The Truth is so far as I can discern the real Difference that is at this Day amongst us about the Doctrine of our Justification before God is the same that was between the Apostle and the Jews and no other But Controversies in Religion make a great Appearance of being new when they are only varied and made different by the new Terms and Expressions that are introduced into the handling of them So hath it fallen out in the Controversie about Nature and Grace For as unto the true nature of it it is the same in these days as it was between the Apostle Paul and the Pharisees between Austin and Pelagius afterwards But it hath now passed through so many forms and dresses of Words as that it can scarce be known to be what it was Many at this day will condemn both Pelagius and the Doctrine that he taught in the Words wherein he taught it and yet embrace and approve of the things themselves which he intended The Introduction of every Change in Philosophical Learning gives an Appearance of a Change in the Controversies which are managed thereby But take off the covering of Philosophical Expressions Distinctions Metaphysical Notions and futilous Terms of Art which some of the Ancient Schoolmen and later Disputants have cast upon it and the Difference about Grace and Nature is amongst us all the same that it was of old and as it is allowed by the Socinians Thus the Apostle treating of our Justification before God doth it in these Terms which are both expressive of the thing it self and were well understood by them with whom he had to do such as the Holy Spirit in their Revelation had consecrated unto their proper use Thus on the one hand he expresly excludes the Law our own Works our own Righteousness from any interest therein and in opposition unto and as inconsistent with them in the matter of Justification he ascribes it wholly unto the Righteousness of God Righteousness imputed unto us the Obedience of Christ Christ made Righteousness unto us the blood of Christ as a Propitiation Faith receiving Christ and the Atonement There is no avvakened Conscience guided by the least beam of spiritual Illumination but in it self plainly understands these things and what is intended in them But through the Admission of Exotick Learning with Philosophical Terms and notions into the way of teaching Spiritual things in Religion a new face and Appearance is put on the whole matter and a Composition made between those things which the Apostle directly opposeth as contrary and inconsistent Hence are all our Discourses about Preparations Dispositions Conditions Merits de congruo condigno with such a train of Distinctions as that if some bounds be not fixed unto the inventing and coyning of them which being a facile Work grows on us every day we shall not e're long be able to look through them so as to discover the things intended or rightly to understand one another For as one said of lies so it may be said of arbitrary distinctions they must be continually new thatched over or it will rain through But the best way is to cast of all these coverings and we shall then quickly see that the real difference about the Justification of a Sinner before God is the same and no other as it was in the days of the Apostle Paul between him and the Jews And all those things which men are pleased now to plead for with respect unto a Causality in our Justification before God under the Names of Preparations Conditions Dispositions Merit with respect unto a first or second Justification are as effectually excluded by the Apostle as if he had expresly named them every one For in them all there is a management according unto our Conceptions and the Terms of the Learning passant in the present Age of the Plea for our own personal Righteousness which the Jews maintained against the Apostle And the true Understanding of what he intends by the Law the Works and Righteousness thereof would be sufficient to determine this Controversie but that men are grown very Skilful in the Art of endless Wrangling CHAP. XV. Faith alone THe Truth which we plead hath two Parts 1. That the Righteousness of God imputed to us unto the Justification of Life is the Righteousness of Christ by whose Obedience we are made Righteous 2. That it is Faith alone which on our Part is required to interest us in that Righteousness or whereby we comply with Gods Grant and Communication of it or receive it unto our Use and Benefit For although this Faith is in it self the radical Principle of all Obedience and whatever is not so which cannot which doth not on all occasions evidence prove shew or manifest it self by Works is not of the same kind with it yet as we are justified by it its act and Duty is such or of that nature as that no other Grace Duty or Work can be associated with it or be of any Consideration And both these are evidently confirmed in that Description which is given us in the Scripture of the Nature of Faith and believing unto the Justification of life I know that many Expressions used in the Declaration of the Nature and Work of Faith herein are Metaphorical at least are generally esteemed so to be But they are such as the Holy Ghost in his Infinite Wisdom thought meet to make use of for the Instruction and Edification of the Church And I cannot but say that those who understand not how effectually the light of knowledg is communicated unto the minds of them that believe by them and a sense of the things intended unto their Spiritual Experience seem not to have taken a due consideration of them Neither whatever Skill we pretend unto do we know always what expressions of Spiritual things are Metaphorical Those oftentimes may seem so to be which are most proper However it is most safe for us to adhere unto the Expressions of the Holy Spirit and not to embrace such senses of things as are inconsistent with them and opposite unto them Wherefore 1. That Faith whereby we are justified is most frequently in the New Testament expressed by receiving This notion of Faith hath been before spoken unto
for Christ he says may be called the Lord our Righteousness because he is the efficient cause of our righteousness As God is said to be our Strength and Salvation Again Christ is said to be our righteousness as he is our Wisdom our Redemption and our Peace because he hath redeemed us and makes us wise and righteous and reconcileth us unto God And other reasons of the same nature are added by others But not trusting to these Expositions of the words he adds Deinde dicitur Christus justitia nostra quoniam satisfecit patri pro nobis eam satisfactionem ita nobis donat communicat cum nos justificat ut nostra satisfactio justitia dici possit And afterwards Hoc modo non esset absurdum si quis diceret nobis imputari Christi justitiam merita cum nobis donantur applicantur ac si nos ipsi Deo satisfecissemus De justificat lib. 2. cap. 10. Christ is said to be our Righteousness because he hath made Satisfaction for us to the Father and doth so give and communicate that Satisfaction unto us when he justifieth us that it may be said to be our Satisfaction and Righteousness And in this sense it would not be absurd if any one should say that the righteousness of Christ and his merits are imputed unto us as if we our selves had satisfied God In this sense we say that Christ is the Lord our Righteousness nor is there any thing of importance in the whole Doctrine of Justification that we own which is not here granted by the Cardinal and that in terms which some among our selves scruple and oppose I shall therefore look a little further into this Testimony which hath wrested so eminent a confession of the Truth from so great an Adversary Behold the dayes come saith the Lord that I will raise up unto David a righteous branch and this is his name whereby he shall be called the Lord our Righteousness ver 5 6. It is confessed among Christians that this is an illustrious Renovation of the first promise concerning the Incarnation of the Son of God and our Salvation by him This promise was first given when we had lost our Original Righteousness and were considered only as those who had sinned and come short of the Glory of God In this estate a Righteousness was absolutely necessary that we might be again accepted with God for without a Righteousness yea that which is perfect and compleat we never were so nor ever can be so In this estate it is promised that he shall be our Righteousness or as the Apostle expresseth it the end of the Law for righteousness to them that do believe That he is so there can be no question the whole enquiry is how he is so This say the most Sober and Modest of our Adversaries because he is the efficient cause of our Righteousness that is of our personal inherent Righteousness But this Righteousness may be considered either in it self as it is an effect of Gods Grace and so it is good and holy although it be not perfect and compleat or it may be considered as it is ours inherent in us accompanied with the remaining defilements of our Nature In that respect as this Righteousness is ours the Prophet affirms that in the sight of God we are all as an unclean thing and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags Isa. 64.6 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comprizeth our whole personal inherent righteousness And the Lord Christ cannot from hence be denominated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Lord our righteousness seeing it is all as filthy rags It must therefore be a Righteousness of another sort whence this denomination is taken and on the account whereof this name is given him Wherefore he is our Righteousness as all our righteousnesses are in him So the Church which confesseth all her own Righteousnesses to be filthy rags says in the Lord have I righteousness Isa. 45.24 which is expounded of Christ by the Apostle Rom. 14.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 only in the Lord are my righteousnesses which two places the Apostle expresseth Phil. 3.9 That I may win Christ and be found in him not having mine own righteousness which is of the Law in this case as filthy rags but that which is through the Faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by Faith Hence it is added in the Lord shall the seed of Israel be justified ver 25. namely because he is in what he is in what he was and did as given unto and for us our righteousness and our Righteousness is all in him which totally excludes our own personal inherent righteousness from any interest in our justification and ascribes it wholly unto the Righteousness of Christ. And thus is that Emphatical Expression of the Psalmist I will go in the strength of the Lord God for as unto holiness and obedience all our spiritual strength is from him alone and I will make mention 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Psal. 71.16 Of thy righteousness of thine only The redoubling of the affix excludes all confidence and trusting in any thing but the righteousness of God alone For this the Apostle affirms to be the design of God in making Christ to be righteousness unto us namely that no flesh should glory in his presence but that he that glorieth should glory in the Lord 1 Cor. 1.29 30 31. For it is by Faith alone making mention as unto our Justification of the Righteousness of God of his righteousness only that excludes all boasting Rom. 3.27 And besides what shall be further pleaded from particular Testimonies the Scripture doth eminently declare how he is the Lord our righteousness namely in that he makes an end of sin and reconciliation for iniquity and brings in everlasting righteousness Dan. 9.24 For by these things is our Justification compleated namely in Satisfaction made for Sin the Pardon of it in our Reconciliation unto God and the providing for us an everlasting righteousness Therefore is he the Lord our Righteousness and so rightly called Wherefore seeing we had lost Original righteousness and had none of our own remaining and stood in need of a perfect compleat righteousness to procure our acceptance with God and such a one as might exclude all occasion of boasting of any thing in our selves the Lord Christ being given and made unto us the Lord our righteousness in whom we have all our righteousness our own as it is ours being as filthy rags in the sight of God and this by making an end of sin and reconciliation for iniquity and bringing in everlasting righteousness It is by his Righteousness by his only that we are justified in the sight of God and do glory This is the substance of what in this case we plead for and thus it is delivered in the Scripture in a way bringing more Light and Spiritual Sense into the Minds of Believers than those Philosophical expressions and distinctions which vaunt themselves
application of them unto all that do believe which may be justly pleaded unto the same purpose with those passages of the Context which we have insisted on But if every Testimony should be pleaded which the Holy Ghost hath given unto this Truth there would be no end of writing One thing more I shall observe and put an end unto our discourse on this Chapter Vers. 6 7 8. The Apostle pursues his Argument to prove the freedom of our Justification by Faith without respect unto Works through the Imputation of Righteousness in the instance of pardon of Sin which essentially belongeth thereunto And this he doth by the Testimony of the Psalmist who placeth the blessedness of a man in the Remission of Sins His design is not thereby to declare the full nature of Justification which he had done before but only to prove the freedom of it from any respect unto Works in the instance of that essential part of it Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth Righteousness without Works which was the only thing he designed to prove by this Testimony saying Blessed are they whose Iniquities are forgiven He describes their blessedness by it not that their whole blessedness doth consist therein but this concurs unto it wherein no respect can possibly be had unto any Works whatever And he may justly from hence describe the blessedness of a man in that the Imputation of Righteousness and the Non-Tmputation of Sin both which the Apostle mentioneth distinctly wherein his whole blessedness as unto justification doth consist are inseparable And because Remission of Sin is the first part of Justification and the principal part of it and hath the Imputation of Righteousness always accompanying it the blessedness of a man may be well described thereby Yea whereas all Spiritual Blessings go together in Christ Eph. 1.3 A mans blessedness may be described by any of them But yet the Imputation of Righteousness and the Remission of Sin are not the same no more than Righteousness imputed and Sin remitted are the same Nor doth the Apostle propose them as the same but mentioneth them distinctly both being equally necessary unto our compleat Justification as hath been proved Chap. 5. Vers. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21. Wherefore as by one man Sin entred into the world and death by Sin and so death passed upon all men for that all have sinned For until the Law Sin was in the world But Sin is not imputed when there is no Law Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adams transgression who is the figure of him that was to come But not as the offence so also is the free gift For if through the offence of one many be dead much more the grace of God and the gift by Grace which is by one man Jesus Christ hath abounded unto many And not as it was by one that sinned so is the gift For the Judgment was by one to condemnation but the free gift is of many offences unto Justification For if by one mans offence death reigned by one much more they which receive abundance of Grace and of the gift of Righteousness shall reign in life by one Jesus Christ. Therefore as by the offence of one Judgment came upon all men to condemnation Even so by the Righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto Justification of life For as by one mans disobedience many were made Sinners So by the obedience of one shall many be made Righteous Moreover the Law entred that the offence might abound But where Sin abounded Grace did much more abound That as Sin hath reigned unto death even so might Grace reign through Righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord. The Apostle Chap. 3.27 affirms That in this matter of Justification all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or boasting is excluded But here in the Verse foregoing he grants a boasting or a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And not only so but we also glory in God he excludes boasting in our selves because there is nothing in us to procure or promote our own Justification He allows it us in God because of the eminency and excellency of the way and means of our Justification which in his Grace he hath provided And the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or boasting in God here allowed us hath a peculiar respect unto what the Apostle had in prospect further to discourse of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not only so includes what he had principally treated of before concerning our Justification so far as it consists in the pardon of sin For although he doth suppose yea and mention the imputation of Righteousness also unto us yet principally he declares our Justification by the pardon of sin and our freedom from condemnation whereby all boasting in our selves is excluded But here he designs a further progress as unto that whereon our glorying in God on a right and title freely given us unto eternal life doth depend And this is the Imputation of the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ unto the Justification of life or the reign of Grace through Righteousness unto eternal Life Great complaints have been made by some concerning the obscurity of the discourse of the Apostle in this place by reason of sundry Ellipses Antapodota Hyperbata and other Figures of Speech which either are or are feigned to be therein Howbeit I cannot but think that if Men acquainted with the common principles of Christian Religion and sensible in themselves of the nature and guilt of our original apostasie from God would without prejudice read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this place of the Scripture they will grant that the design of the Apostle is to prove that as the sin of Adam was imputed unto all Men unto condemnation so the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ is imputed unto all that believe unto the Justification of life The sum of it is given by Theodoret Dial. 3. Vide quomodo quae Christi sunt cum iis quae sunt Adami conferantur cum morbo medicina cum vulnere emplastrum cum Peccato justitia cum execratione benedictio cum condemnatione remissio cum transgressione obedientia cum morte vita cum inferis regnum Christus cum Adam homo cum homine The differences that are among Interpreters about the Exposition of these words relate unto the use of some Particles Prepositions and the dependance of one passage upon another on none of which the confirmation of the truth pleaded for doth depend But the plain design of the Apostle and his express Propositions are such as if Men could but acquiesce in them might put an end unto this controversie Socinus acknowledgeth that this place of Scripture doth give as he speaks the greatest occasion unto our opinion in this matter For he cannot deny but at least a great appearance of what we
Doctrine and that which would so easily solve this difficulty and answer this objection as both of them are by some pretended certainly neither his wisdom nor his care of the Church under the conduct of the infallible Spirit would have suffered him to omit this reply were it consistent with the truth which he had delivered But he is so far from any such Plea that when the most unavoidable occasion was administred unto it he not only waves any mention of it but in its stead affirms that which plainly evidenceth that he allowed not of it See Eph. 2.9 10. Having positively excluded Works from our Justification not of Works least any man should boast it being natural thereon to enquire to what end do Works serve or is there any necessity of them instead of a distinction of Works legal and Evangelical in order unto our Justification he asserts the necessity of the later on other Grounds Reasons and Motives manifesting that they were those in particular which he excluded as we have seen in the consideration of the place Wherefore that we may not forsake his pattern and example in the same cause seeing he was Wiser and Holier knew more of the mind of God and had more zeal for personal Righteousness and Holiness in the Church than we all if we are pressed a Thousand times with this objection we shall never seek to deliver our selves from it by answering that we allow these things to be the condition or causes of our Justification or the matter of our Righteousness before God seeing he would not so do Secondly we may observe that in his answer unto this objection whether expresly mentioned or tacitly obviated he insisteth not any where upon the common principle of moral Duties but on those motives and reasons of Holiness Obedience good works alone which are peculiar unto Believers For the question was not whether all mankind were obliged unto Obedience unto God and the Duties thereof of by the moral Law But whether there were an Obligation from the Gospel upon Believers unto Righteousness Holiness and good Works such as was suited to affect and constrain their minds unto them Nor will we admit of any other state of the question but this only whether upon the supposition of our gratuitous justification through the imputation of the Righteousness of Christ there are in the Gospel grounds reasons and motives making necessary and efficaciously influencing the minds of Believers unto Obedience and good Works for those who are not Believers we have nothing to do with them in this matter nor do plead that Evangelical grounds and motives are suited or effectual to work them unto Obedience yea we know the contrary and that they are apt both to despise them and abuse them See I Cor. 1.23 24. 2 Cor. 4.4 such persons are under the Law and there we leave them unto the Authority of God in the moral Law But that the Apostle doth confine his enquiry unto Believers is evident in every place wherein he maketh mention of it Rom. 6.2 3. How shall we that are dead unto sin live any longer therein Know ye not that so many of us as were Baptized into Jesus Christ c. Eph. 2.10 For we are the workmanship of God created in Christ Jesus unto good Works Wherefore we shall not at all contend what cogency unto duties of Holiness there is in Gospel motives and reasons unto the minds of Vnbelievers whatever may be the truth in that case But what is their power force and efficacy towards them that truly believe Thirdly The answers which the Apostle returns positively unto this objection wherein he declares the necessity nature ends and use of Evangelical Righteousness and good Works are large and many comprehensive of a great part of the Doctrine of the Gospel I shall only mention the heads of some of them which are the same that we plead in the vindication of the same truth 1. He pleads the Ordination of God God hath before ordained that we should walk in them Eph. 2.10 God hath designed in the disposal of the order of the causes of Salvation that those who believe in Christ should live in walk in abound in good Works and all Duties of Obedience unto God To this end are Precepts Directions Motives and Encouragements every where multiplied in the Scripture Wherefore we say that good Works and that as they include the gradual progressive Renovation of our natures our growth and increase in grace with fruitfulness in our lives are necessary from the Ordination of God from his will and command And what need there any further dispute about the necessity of good Works among them that know what it is to believe or what respect there is in the Souls and Consciences of Believers unto the commands of God But what force say some is in this Command or Ordination of God when notwithstanding it and if we do not apply our selves unto Obedience we shall be justified by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ and so may be saved without them I say 1 As was before observed that it is Believers alone concerning whom this enquiry is made and there is none of them but will judge this a most unreasonable and senseless objection as that which ariseth from an utter ignorance of their state and relation unto God To suppose that the minds of Believers are not as much and as effectually influenced with the Authority and Commands of God unto Duty and Obedience as if they were all given in order unto their Justification is to consider neither what Faith is nor what it is to be a Believer nor what is the Relation that we stand in unto God by Faith in Christ Jesus nor what are the Arguments or motives wherewith the minds of such persons are principally affected and constrained This is the Answer which the Apostle gives at large unto this Exception Rom. 6.2 3. 2 The whole fallacy of this Exception is 1 In separating the things that God hath made inseparable These are our Justification and our Sanctification To suppose that the one of these may be without the other is to overthrow the whole Gospel 2 In compounding those things that are distinct namely Justification and eternal actual Salvation the respect of Works and Obedience being not the same unto them both as hath been declared Wherefore this Imagination that the commands of God unto Duty However given and unto what ends soever are not equally obligatory unto the Consciences of Believers as if they were all given in order unto their Justification before God is an absurd figment and which all of them who are truly so defie Yea they have a greater power upon them than they could have if the Duties required in them were in order unto their Justification and so were antecedent thereunto For thereby they must be supposed to have their efficacy upon them before they truly believe For to say that a man may be a true Believer or truly