Soul out of Hell So you see the difference that still we have it and yet we have it not But why is our own Righteousness that is inherent in us to be disclaimed 1. Because it is a way impossible for a Sinner to go to Heaven by or to be Righteous by that Ladder is too short tho' it seem long enough to you that have some Fragments of the Law 2. Not having it why Because there is another Righteousness and not this which is called the Righteousness of God There is another Adam and that Adam hath another Righteousness for all to believe in a Gospel Righteousness which is not of the Law There is another Covenant God hath appointed whereby a Sinner must be just now because there is another not this 3. Because one of these voids the other if I have the Righteousness of God then mine own is void if mine own then the Righteousness of God is void As the Apostle saith of Grace if Works not Grace and if Grace not Works p. 192 193 194 195. Calvin Reverend Sir we must from the bottom of Hearts most sincerely acknowledge That it is a great piece of Service that you have done to Christ his Gospel Church and poor lost Sinners in this ample and distinct Testimony which you have born to the Truth not only in plainly discovering Mr. Neonomian's corrupt and illiterate Interpretation of this great Portion of Scripture and vindicating of it but also in that you have subverted his whole Scheme laid open the rottenness of the Principles he hath so boldly asserted in his Book and shew'd the dangerous tendency of them Neonom This Gentleman is much mistaken and I could shew where his Mistakes lies Antinom You shew his Mistakes Quid Rectum dignoscere curbo Neonom I believe him an able Man and that sometimes he was of my Judgment because Mr. B. dedicated his Aphorisms to him and acknowledged that he was a fit Censor of his Doctrin Antinom It 's true one would think that piece of Flattery and many others had been enough to engage Mr. R. Vines to subscribe to Mr. B.'s Opinion but it was sufficiently known that instead of so doing Mr. Vines seldom preached a Sermon wherein he did not make a strict Inquisition after the Neonomianism that lay in his way and crackt it as a Man will crack a Louse DEBATE XX. Of Gospel and Legal Preaching Neonom I Have this Error further to charge upon Mr. Antinom viz. Gospel Preaching he saith Is to teach Men that they were as much pardoned and as acceptable to God always as when they were Regenerate and while they are Vngodly they had the same Interest in God and Christ as when they believe neither can Sin any way hinder their Salvation or their Peacc nor have they any thing to do further either of them Christ having done all for them before any holy qualification or endeavour D. W. p. 208. Antinom Here is a long Charge whether it be true or no in part or whole it will appear by the Proof Neonom Page 159. he saith The more Light and Glory of the Gospel shineth in the true Intention of God to his People the more should they have Joy and Gladness why may not then a Believer say The Lord hath been bountiful to me God hath done every thing in Christ and taken away all things that can disturb my Peace and Comfort Antinom What is this to prove your Charge What is this to prove that I say a Man is as much pardoned and as acceptable to God always as when Regenerate while he is Ungodly c There 's not any part of your Charge here proved for I speak of a Believer and that God hath done all for him in Christ and dare you say otherwise But hear what I said which you hide lest your Charge should appear false at the first sight you take only the concluding Words of my Sermon on Rom. x. 2 3 4. just before that p. 158. Object You will say you know many of the People of the Lord Jesus that walk sadly and disconsolately not having this joy and gladness I answer There is nothing hinders the Joy of God's People but their Sins those as they conceive stand as a separation betwixt God and them Oh they stand as a cooling Card in all their Joys and Mirth But when they return to Zion they shall rejoice in that they see that the Blood of Jesus Christ the Son of God hath taken away all their Sins the Scape-goat having carried them away into the Land of Forgetfulness in that they see that all their Transgressions are blotted out as a Cloud c. When they shall come by the sight of the Glory of the Gospel and the Light thereof to behold this state that Christ hath brought them into then all matter of Sorrow and Sighing shall fly away and the bitterness of it shall be taken away and then that which was the occasion of that bitterness shall vanish too I do not say that he is no Believer that hath not this perfectly far be it from me so to say there are that are Believers that are weak in Faith and there are Believers strong in Faith the more the Light of the glorious Gospel shines c. Calvin Mr. Neonomian I wonder what a Gospel you Preach or would have others Preach Is not Sin the Hindering-Cause of Spiritual Joy Is it not God that blots out our Sins and remembers them no more Is not the Faith of this the Ground-work of all true Joy Have not some Believers less and some more according as their Faith is and the Light of the Gospel shines into their Hearts And do they not by virtue of this Joy and Peace in believing return to their rest And may they not say The Lord hath dealt bountifully with me as David did May they not return to their rest and sit down in the Comforts of the Holy Ghost The Lord hath done all for me in Christ who hath made him Wisdom Righteousness Sanctification and Redemption Is there any thing you can rejoice in but what is done for us or wrought in us by Christ That Sin is taken away in the attonement and satisfaction of Christ the great cause of my disturbance Neonom He saith p. 186. Here is first Deliverance and then Service is the Fruit of this Deliverance not Deliverance the Fruit of Service The Tenor of the Law runs thus First do and then live The Gospel saith First live and then do do not think God gives Christ upon condition Antinom What 's all this to the proving of your Charge of Error 1. It reacheth not the Terms of your Charge if it were Error But 2dly Where is the Error Doth he not clear it from plain Scripture which you take no notice of viz. Zacharias's Song Luke 1.74 75 Do we serve God acceptably before we are delivered from Sin and Satan through Redemption and Application Can we serve God in Holiness and
Neonomianism Unmask'd OR THE Ancient Gospel PLEADED Against the OTHER CALLED A New LAW OR GOSPEL IN A Theological Debate occasioned by a Book lately Wrote by Mr. Dan. Williams Entituled Gospel-Truth Stated and Vindicated Unwarily Commended and Subscribed by some Divines Applauded and Defended by the late Athenian Clubb As many as are of the Works of the Law are under a Curse Gal. 3.10 And the Law is not of Faith Ver. 12. Christ is the End of the Law for Righteousness to every one that believeth Rom. 10.4 By ISAAC CHAVNCY M. A. LONDON Printed for J. Harris at the Harrow in the Poultry 1692. TO ALL True Lovers OF THE LORD JESUS BOTH Ministers Christians Of any Perswasions whatever THE Apostle Paul doth declaim against nothing more than Another Gospel which is not another Gospel as he saith because no Gospel Quod nusquam est cum unum fit Evangelium non plura saith Beza on the Gal. 1. It is no where seeing there is but one Gospel and not more This pretended other Gospel was a Doctrine that taught the Conjunction of the Works of a Law with the Grace of God and the Righteousness of Christ in the Juctification of a Sinner before God which some False Teachers did zealously press upon the Galatians in opposition to the Apostles Doctrine These he calls Troublers of the Churches and Perverters or Subverters of the Gospel of Christ viz. The Doctrine of Justification by Free Grace Such as teach Justification by a Law of Merits not of Christ but our own See Beza on the pl. Altho' we say they were wrought in us by Christ as if Christ could be said to Justifie by giving us a way or means to justifie our selves you may as well reconcile Light and Darkness as these two As to the Introducers and Teachers of such Doctrine the Apostle denounceth a bitter Curse against them whatever they were pretending to never so much Holiness Apostles or Angels Yea he puts himself under this Anathema if at any time he should be guilty in this kind And to shew that he speaks not rashly or passionately but by the Spirit of God and to awe Men's Minds the more and deterr them from such Attempts he redoubles the Imprecation But you 'll say May we not a little make bold with the Gospel of Christ How far may we venture to go and not fall under this Anathema The Apostle answers v. 9. If any Man preach any other Gospel unto you than that you have received let him be accursed And the Doctrines which they had received was Justification by Faith without the Works of a Law And that a Law is not of Faith in the Point of Justification ch 3.12 Mr. Beza justifies our Translation in rendring 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 besides rather than against For saith he the Apostle said not If they preach contrary things and subvert the whole Gospel as Chrysostom hath it But If they pervert it a little if they preach any thing besides that Gospel which they had received c. If they as the Apostle saith many did 2 Cor. 2.17 * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Caupanariam Exercentes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Caupones Infames semper sordidi sunt babiti quod merces corrumpunt adulterant Jun. Beza Corrupt the Word of God as fraudulent Vintners who dash their Wines with Water or any base Liquors But saith the Apostle We are of those who Preach the Word of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Sincerity in the Truth of our Hearts as we will answer unto God without any thing of Craft or Double Dealing or mixing our omn Schemes or Phantasies therewith that speak the very Truth as we have dealt plainly and truly not shunning to declare unto you all the Counsel of God Acts 20.27 not shuffling and hiding some great Truths that we think are not fit for the People to know and therefore saith he we have abdicated * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Abrenunciavimus pudendis latebris non calliditaté ambutantes neque falsantes sermonem Dei 2 Cor. 4.2 this shameful hiding the Word of God not demeaning our selves craftily nor handling it deceitfully And to such as receive this other Gospel who have professed to the receiving the True Gospel he saith I marvel you should be so soon removed from him that called you into the Grace of Christ unto another Gospel Calls them Fools Gal. 3.1 saith they were fascinated bewitched the Devil had got a great hand over them tells them they were Apostates had began in a Spiritual Gospel but ended in a Carnal Nay he testifies that whoever is Justified by a Law it's 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are fallen from Grace and that all their former Sufferings how great soever they have been would prove in vain Oh! that Professors of our Days would seriously consider these things who are so ready to run after this other Gospel Lastly It is also needful to observe how the Apostle Paul complements Peter that Great Apostle and one of the Pillars in the Churches for his double dealing in these matters in so much as countenancing this False Gospel or the Imposing Teachers of it He withstood him to the Face and publickly he rebuked him sharply because he was exceedingly culpable and in that he not only committed a great Sin himself but carry'd away Barnabas and many professing Jews with his Dissimulation insomuch that they all plaid the Hypocrites * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with him to please the Neonomians He aggravates their Fault in telling them they countenanced a Doctrine which they were convinced was false ch 2.16 That they made Christ a Minister of Sin that they condemned themselves in their Practice by building the things which they had destroyed He takes off also all Apologies that they might make from the seeming Smallness of the Fault as to refuse to eat with the Gentiles Come come saith he the mischief lies in it's Tendency viz. To encourage the Preachers and Receivers of the Doctrine of Justification by the Works of the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For saith he we have believed on Christ that we might be justified by the Faith of Christ and not by the Works of a Law for by the Works of a Law no Flesh living shall be justified I hope they whom these things do nearly concern at this time will duly weigh and consider them Tho' I doubt not but they know them yet it may not be amiss to stir up knowing Men by putting them in remembrance 2 Pet. 1.12 13. Verbum sat sapientibus As to the present Grand Assertor of a New Law and of the Doctrine of Justification by the Works of the said Law I thought it due to the Grandeur of his Appearance in the Head of a New Sect to treat him by the Name thereof viz. A Neonomian * One that Asserts the Old Law is abolished and therein is a superlative Antinomian but pleads for a New Law and Justification by
what I propose in this very Endeavour Antinom It 's well if it be so but as they say the Proof of the Pudding is in the Eating It 's no new thing for Men to pretend well let their Undertaking be what it will But Non videtur id manticae quod in tergo est Apollinarius the Heretick had a School cum Titulo Orthodoxi And Nestorius the Heretick shrouded himself under 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Error sibi ex principiis fidem perstruit ut cum magna mercede fallet It 's observed that Error will always shelter it self under a plausible Pretext of Truth that it may do it with the greatest Advantage Neonom I am convinced after many Prayers and serious Thoughts that the Revival of those Errors must not only exclude that Ministry as Legal which is most apt in its Nature and by Christ's Ordination to convert Souls and secure the Practical Power of Religion but also renders Vnity among Christians a thing impossible Antinom You know also another old Proverb In Nomine Domini c. Livy reports of Scipio Africanus before he set upon any Business he entred the Capitol alone pretending thereby a Consultation with the Gods whereupon apud multitudinem plerumque velut mente divinitus monitâ agebat thereby he had a great Vogue among the People of the Justness of his Cause I can't perswade my self that the Composure of that piece of Work that hath so much Moral Evil in it and bitter Opposition to Gospel-Truth is an Answer of Prayers neither can I pray as those Gentlemen whose Names stand over your Porch but think it my Duty to pray quite contrary and as for what you speak of Revival of Errors I judge that your Dictates are no Rule to judge of Faith and Error by how magisterially soever you impose them And I think we are come to a sad pass if a Man of your declared Principles must be set up as a Reformer of Error and Former of Articles of Faith and such as are in Fundamental Points directly contrary to the Doctrinal Part of the 39 Articles yea such as our first Protestant Reformers decryed by Scripture and the best Arguments as highly Antichristian and destructive to the Souls of Men which Witness of theirs many of them sealed with their Blood You say the Danger of such things as you call Error will be in excluding the Teaching of your Doctrine and Ministry as Legal Would to God such Ministry as the Spirit of God call's Legal Preaching were excluded by the brighter Shining of the Grace of God into the Hearts both of Ministers and People from which Light some and too many this Day have swerved having turned aside unto vain Jangling desiring to be Teachers of the Law understanding neither what they say nor whereof they affivm 1 Tim. 1.6 But you call that Evangelical which we call Legal We can't help your calling Light Darkness and Darkness Light Law Gospel and Gospel Law and you say it 's most apt in its own Nature to secure the Power of Religion Whereas Experience hath shewed to the contrary how well the Doctrine of Justification by Works hath secured it among the Romanists And the Apostle Paul testifies by the Spirit That whosoever is justified by a Law it's not the Law is fallen from Grace Gal. 5.4 And therefore its false that such Doctrine is Christ's Ordination It hath not Fitness in it to convert Souls for the Law brings none to God No Man is justifyed in or by a Law in the Sight of God Gal. 3.11 Those Places and divers others should be read a Law and not the Law because the Spirit by them excludes all Laws even your Law Its 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the emphatical Particle is not put in and therefore there 's no ground to say this or that Law only is excluded from Justification but every Law and where there 's no true Justification taught there can be no true Practical Obedience But the last Prejudice is That such Doctrines as are opposite to yours renders Vnity among Christians a thing impossible Good Reason there is for it because they can't unite in their Head Christ Jesus and therefore can't unite as Members There lies the Impossible For what Communion between Christ and Belial By this it appears you strike at the Union Neonom Every Sermon will be matter of Debate and mutual Censures of the severest kind will be unavodable while one side justly press the Terms of the Gospel under its Promises and Threats for which they are accused as Enemies to Christ and his Grace c. Antinom Reason Good that every Sermon that makes the Gospel a Law i. e. That press Duty under a Law-Sanction should not only be matter of Debate but earnestly contended against for the Performance of Duty as Terms enforced by a Law-Sanction is a Covenant of Works So that such Men are Preachers of a Law it s no matter what Law Works performed under a Law-Sanction are Legal Works and do make the Covenant enjoyning them a Covenant of Works Censures are here justly made of such a Ministry and they that preach such Doctrine are certainly Enemies to the Grace of God under whatsoever Vizards of pretended Holiness they vail themselves Neonom And the other side ignorantly set up the Name of Christ and Free Grace against the Government of Christ and the Rule of Judgement Antinom I think the Stomach of every Good Man may justly rise not only against your Insolent but prophane Expression All Men besides Neonomians are Ignorant Men. What saith the Poet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 O miserimos mortalium Qui spiritus tumidos gerunt Arrogancy is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a tough Itch not easily cured How far doth this Spirit come short of the Imitation of Christ in Meekness and Lowliness Yea how far from his Rule which you would seem to be so zealous for To do nothing out of Strife and Vain-Glory 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but in lowliness of Mind let each esteem other better than themselves Phil. 2.3 But with you all that adore Free Grace and set up Justification by Faith without the Works of a Law do ignorantly set up the Name of Christ Is this a piece of Ignorance to set up the Name of Christ as a Saviour of Sinners and as that Name whereby we are Justifyed from all things from which we could not be justifyed by the Law of Moses or any other Law Beware lest that come upon you which is spoken of in the Prophets Behold ye Despisers c. Acts 13.39 40. And what do these Men so ignorantly do They set Christ against himself Set up his Name and Free Grace against his Government And why Because they say we are saved not by our Works of Righteousness which we have done but according to his Mercy and that it was the meer Kindness and Love of God our Saviour that appeared to us in the Gospel-Salvation Tit. 3.4
for I have subscribed the Doctrinal Articles as very tolerable Divinity for those former well-meaning times but you know the Opinion of our modern Divines about Subscriptions how far a man may go in those cases with a safe Conscience But to proceed to what I was saying That by the pretence to the Honour of Free Grace Antinomianism so corrupted Germany and in N. E. c. Antinom It was the Pretence of those that abused Free Grace to Licentiousness in St. Paul's time Therefore you might have gone further back than the Antinomians in Germany or New England And do we not know that a Pretence to Holiness and the Exaltation of that in Opposition to the Doctrine of Free Grace is that which hath brooded all the Doctrine of Popery Arminianism Quakerism c. And is it not this that you shelter all your Errours and false Accusations under whereby you endeavour to murther the Name of one who was an holy Man and a Gospel Divine and hereby would deceive the Reader into the Belief of a gross and notorious Falsehood in the Entrance into your Book which is this You say I have in nothing misrepresented Dr. Crisp 's Opinion nor mistaken his Sence This Assertion I shall prove to be as I said Neonom It bid fair to Overthrow Church and State in New England and by its Stroke at the Vitals of Religion it alarum'd most Pulpits in England Pr. p. 1. Antinom It was by reason of some such as you are that beat the Cushion and Kettle-Drums as they do sometimes against the Truth it may be oftner than for it The Pulpit and Press are like the rest of London Roads you 'll meet both Truth and Error upon the Tantivy there and the fewest in number must break the way So he that can make the greatest Cry of Error and Magisterially cry down Truth for Error he is the Man Neonom Many of our ablest Pens were engaged against those Errors as Mr. Gataker Rutherford Burgess Provincial Synod c. Antinom Sir These Persons were worthy Divines but dead and gone I will not rake in their Ashes as you have done in this good Man's and whatever Errors you pretend they were against it may be we shall find their Opinions were no more as you represent them in your Book than Dr. Crisp's was as you represent him Neonom To the Grief of such as perceive the Tendency of those Principles we are engaged in a new Opposition Antinom After a certain zealous Neonomian had taken his leave of us there was a great deal of Probability this Controversie would have fell to the ground But since that you have been the only Bellweather that hath set it on foot thinking to make your self the Head of a Party but do not believe that so many do admire you as you think nor perswade your self you can wind all the Divines in London about your Finger as you think you have done some here and all at Dublin Neonom I believe many Abettors of those Notions have Grace to preserve their Minds and Practices from their Influence But they ought to consider the Generality of Mankind have no such Antidote and themselves need not to fortifie their own Temptations nor lose the Defence which the Wisdom of God hath provided against Remisness in Duty and sinful Back sliding Antinom The great Advantage the World is easily perswaded of that the Opposers of the Doctrine of Free Grace in the Salvation of Sinners â—â—ve had against the Assertors thereof in all Ages is a Suggestion that the said Doctrine tends to the Countenance and Encouragement of Sin And this Accusation the Apostle Paul doth industriously set himself to the wiping off Tit. 1.10 11 12. and divers other places And to affirm that the Grace of God is the oâ—â— Root and Foundation of true Holiness in the freest and fullest Despensation the Truth of which doth not only abundantly appear in the Word but by manifest Experience that your Self-Justiciaries Free-willers Neonomians that seek Justification by a Law they are least observant oâ— any Rules of strict Obedience or conscientious Regards to the Commands of God I will go no further now for an Instance than your self who now come forth into the World in a Vizard of Holiness to the deluding of such as can discern but Skin-deep when your Treatise it self is sufficient Evidence to contradict what you pretend to being stuffed with so many Immoralities Immoralities I say for such are false Accusations Malice Envy Evil Speaking and all shot from the Quiver as it were of a Persecutor at the good Name of one that was upright in heart Psal 11.1 2 3 4. if not at the Name of Christ and other his Faithful Servants And as for the Danger of those Truths to the generality of Mankind which you call Error it is an high Impeachment of the Grace and Wisdom of God because a wicked carnal corrupt World for such is the generality of Mankind do abuse the Grace of God as well as refuse count it Folly yea and stumble at it therefore it is to be blamed and shunned as an Error and such a Doctrine of Life and Salvation is to be set up as may be of better Influence upon the generality of Mankind and more suitable to their Nature i. e. Their Carnal Reason and Corrupt Affections And therefore you would have Antidotes to take off the Poyson that Mankind is apt to suck in from the Doctrine of Free Pardoning Grace and this must be the Doctrine of Neonomianism and likewise a Cure of that which Believers have suck'd in already and are apt to perish under by reason of Temptation Therefore as it may be supposed you have given it the Name of a Remedial Law to cure the Distempers that arise from the Doctrine of Free-Grace Neonom Who can wonder at the Security of Sinners the mistaking the Motions of sensible Passion for Conversion and the general Abatement of exact and humble walking when so many affirm Sins are not to be feared as doing any hurt even when the most flagirious are committed Graces and Holiness can't do us the least Good God hath no more to lay to the Charge of the wickedest Man if he be elected than he hath to lay to the Charge of a Saint in Glory The Elect are not governed by Hope or Fear for the Laws of Christ have no Promises nor Threats to rule them by nor are they under the Impressions of Rewards or Punishments as Motives to Duty or Preservatives against Sin Antinom As for this great Flourish it 's but like Don Quixot 's brandishing his Sword against a Windmill It 's not only a Rule that Calumniators go by and known to be their Practice Fortiter calumniari aliquid adhaerebit But Calumnies go no further than the Ears with wise Men according to a Proverbial Saying apud Aeschium 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 At the first light of a black Tongue it 's easie to judge of the Foulness of
persolveré suppliciis maleficiis metuere Cicero Castigare pro commerita noxia Plaut Pro dictis factis ulscisci Terrent Pro peccatis Passus aut Mortuus Grot. de sat that he thinks Christ became the very Idolater and Blasphemer you heard him again and again deny that he thought so but he said that Christ was charged with and bore the Sins of the Idolater and Blasphemer and I stand to it and I must tell you if a Man bound for Money becomes a Debtor it 's for that Debt which is owing And if Idolatry be a Sin whereby a Sinner is a Debtor to the Law Christ becomes a Debtor in the same sence for Idolatry And I told you a Debtor is a Moral Transgressor if he make not due payment as well as a Thief both Sinners against one Command Neonom Christ paying our Debts was a satisfaction for Criminals not a payment of Money Antinom Not Silver and Gold but a better sort of Money 1 Pet. 1.18 19. You know the Spirit of God alludes to that Metaphor he calls our Redemption Our being bought with a Price or a Ransom c. 1 Cor. 6.20 therefore I think you should not pretend to be wiser than the Spirit of God and Christs paying our Debts was making satisfaction for Criminals and he was a reputed Criminal he was numbred among Transgressors not only by Man as you say but by God Neonom And yet it is plain that if I were bound for Money for one that by Drunkenness wastes his Estate my being bound to pay the Money doth not argue that I was or must by the Creditors be so accounted when I make payment Antinom It is very true Mr. Moderator I think it's time for us to break up our Club at this time for if the Constable should happen to look in and hear such high-flown Reasoning as this is I do not know but we may be in danger of being laid by the Heels the best of it is that we shall not be reckoned Constables for being laid by the Heels Neonom Once more to clinch the last Conviction a little closer because Christ was made Sin i. e. an Offering or Sacrifice for Sin therefore he thinks our very Sins was laid upon him and he made filthy Antinom Because he was made a Sacrifice for Sin therefore I say he was made Sin the Sacrifices were made Sin and bore the Sins of the People Typically as Shadows Christ really and as the Substance and as the Sacrifices became Levitically Unclean by the bearing of Sin so Christ the true Sacrifice was Judicially Unclean when he bore our Sins in his Body on the Tree Neonom To add no more because men wickedly arraigned him as a Blasphemer therefore â—he Doctor thinks he was so indeed and in God's account Calvin What blundering Doctor is this to have so many gross Mistakes in such a plain point of Divinity and of so great concern that ever any Man's Skull should be so thick as to think that Christ Actually Blasphemed God because he bore the Sins upon the Cross of those that reproached him for a Blasphemer and Arraigned him as such Antinom I pray Sir let me ask him one Question for Information now he talks of Blasphemers and he is so good at rectifying Mistakes Tell me the meaning of that place Psal 69.3 applyed to Christ Rom. 15.3 Some take it to mean that the Blasphemies of Blasphemers were charged upon and imputed to Christ and I think the Apostle Paul quotes the place in that sence but it may be the Apostle Paul and I may be both mistaken I pray Sir make it so and add it to the other mistakes Calvin You have been a great while shewing what laying of Sin upon Christ is not and convincing this Dr. of Antinomianism and want of Brains I pray Sir now let us be the better for yours and let us know the Truth in this great matter and that we may not be liable to be led aside by such dark Larthorn Doctors as you make this to be Neonom I came on purpose to be a Guide to you I know you are all at a loss in these Points Truth Though our Sins were Imputed to Christ with respect to the Guilt thereof so that he by the Fathers appointment and his own consent became obliged as a Mediator to bear the Punishment of our Iniquities and he did bear those Punishments to the full satisfaction of Justice and to our Actual Remission when we believe nevertheless the filth of our Sins was not laid on Christ nor can he be called the Transgressor or was he in God's account the Blasphemer Murderer c. D. W. p. 7. That you may not be mistaken I will tell you in several particulars what I hold 1. Christ bare the Punishment of our Sins D. W. p. 9. Antinom Sir I desire to remark upon your Concessions as you Name them Neonom I pray take your liberty as to that Antinom Punishment is such no otherwise than as the Wages of Sin and where Sin is not charged there 's no Wages due and therefore if Punishment be taken only as Suffering for Sin it 's no Punishment but bare Sufferings An Innocent Person may suffer but none can be punished by justice but a nocent Person that is so in the Eye of the Law that inflicts the Suffering Neonom 2. Christ bare the Guilt of our Sins which is that respect of Sin to the threatning of the Law whereby there is an Obligation to bear the Punishment Antinom We have told you the Scripture every where says Christ bore our Sin You say before that our Sins were Imputed to Christ with respect to Guilt as if they were not layed on the guilty 2. We find God's People for whom Christ bore Sin do often labour under Guilt of Sin 3. Guilt of Sin is a result of Sin belongs to the Committer and all the World is found Guilty before God or else it is the Judicial Charge or Accusation by the Law whereby the Sinner is made to deserve Punishment thus it is with Thousands that have no sense of Guilt in Conscience 4. Guilt in Conscience is taken off at the application of the satisfaction of Christ to the Soul by the sence of his bearing Sin 5. Guilt in Judgment is upon proof of the Charge or Confession of it either from Conscience of the Fact in the Person that committed it or from a submitting to the Charge in the place and stead of another whereupon the Person becomes Guilty i. e. blame-worthy and faulty in the Eye of the Law 6. You mistake in saying Guilt is that respect of Sin to the Threatnings of the Law whereby there is an obligation to bear Punishment Guilt is the just Charge of Sin which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Transgression of the Preceptive part it 's Extrinsick to Sin to suffer Punishment for Sin and though they are relata by God's Constitution that where-ever there is Sin there must
it the Money is his own the Debt is the Principal 's transferred to him but the Payment is the Surety's subjectively and properly Therefore to say the Payment is imputed to the Surety is Nonsence The Spirit of God speaks expresly that our Sins were laid on Christ no less than Three times in Isa 53. and expressed by three different Words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 12. It 's express 1 Pet. 2.24 the Apostle plainly there speaking after the Prophet says He bore it as a Sin-offering Heb. 9.28 Was made Sin 1 Cor. 5.21 Therefore we neeed not fear to say Christ bore our Sins let the Sence be what it will which the Spirit means it was certainly so as to take away the Charge of Sin which is Fault and Blame from before God 1 John 3.3 4. To take it away as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is so to take it away as to set a Man right in the Eye of Justice Your next Branch of Proof to the Minor is That to impute Sin to Christ would argue him a Propagator of Corrupt Qualities What could be done or said more by a Socinian to load the great Truths of the Gospel with reproachful Consequences 1. Sin is no positive Quality as such but only privative 2. All Qualities of a pernicious Nature to the Sinner consisting of Natural Causes are Subjecta peccati not Peccatum it self and they are separable from Sin in it's Moral Consideration There were in Christ himself Effects of our Sins in Infirmity Sorrow Reproach c. They were very uneasie Qualities though not corrupt 3. God himself tells us He laid Iniquity upon him and made him Sin and yet saith Positively He was no Committer of Sin And you charge the Spirit of God with Nonsence and Contradiction For you say it 's impossible to impute Sin to Christ any other way than punishing of him it 's to mistake and make Christ the Committer which Punishment is not sin therefore what the Spirit saith is false Sin was not laid on Christ at all and yet the Spirit speaks it expresly 4. You will inferr these Absurdities 1. That Sin cannot be laid on Christ but by Transfusion wherein you deny Imputation 2. That Christ must be corrupted thereby Whereas the Spirit of God tells us he bears Sin as a Lamb without Spot You will have it that he had the Macula fixed on him by bearing it 3. You will have God by laying Sin on Christ to become a Propagator of Sin The Spirit of God says he appeared to take away our Sins and in him is no Sin 1 John 3.5 How audacious is our Carnal Reason to set upon Divine Mysteries Neonom It was needless to the Ends for which our Sins were laid on Christ Antinom You should have said what 's needless Your Argument should have run thus Laying Sins on Christ is needless to the ends for which they were laid on Christ and therefore those Scriptures that say so are needless Neonom Sins were laid on Christ that he might make Atonement by suffering for them and so release us who had transgressed Antinom Now Sir you say something you speak like a Divine if you can hold there Now you own something laid on Christ besides Punishment for the Atonement was made by being punished and say well now that Sin was laid on him that he might make Atonement for them viz. by being punished For bearing Sin is one thing and making Atonement is another but are inseparable relata and therein contraria affirmantiae Neonom Now Christ by submitting to the Guilt as an Obligation to Punishment according to the Terms of the Covenant of Redemption was sufficient to this End and all that was needful Antinom That Christ bore the Desert or Demerit of our Sin which is done only by a Judicial Charge and Accusation in our stead is sufficient What is Sin after the Fact is committed but reatus culpae Guilt is the Fault declared and applyed somewhere in a way of Judicial Proceeding And this is often the Conscience of Sin and is not removed but by Faith on Christ crucify'd who bore our Sins before God Neonom All that endangered us was the Threatning of the Law and the Punishment included in the Threat Antinom Where there is true Godly Sorrow it 's more upon this Account that he hath sinned against a Holy God and broke his holy just and good Law than for fear of the Threats of Wrath. I thought I had better understood the Nature of Sorrow for Sin that it had been the nature of Sin in Contrariety to God had more grieved than the Fear of Punishment Neonom The Obliquity of the Fact as against the Precept shall not hurt where the Sanction of the Law is answer'd Antinom I think this is that you call Antinomianism with a Witness you shall hear of it again e're long only observe That this is as much a Doctrine of Licentiousness as any you charge on me Secure but your self from Hell and you need not regard the preceptive part of the Law you may live as you list See how you 'l clear your self when you charge it for a great Crime upon me in saying Sin will do no hurt in some Sence c. Neonom And he that suffers as Sponsor for another need not sustain in himself the filthiness of the Crime to make him capable of giving Satisfaction Gen. 44.13 Phil. 18. Antinom No that 's true upon your Hypothesis there 's no need of a Sponsor for the Filthiness of Sin is too foul for Christ to bear the Sinner must be his own Expiator and carry away his Filth himself or if he keep it it will not hurt See 1 John 7.9 Neonom This transacting of the Filthiness of our Sins on Christ is blasphemous Antinom Friend that 's a cruel Bomb to shoot at a good Man to charge him with Blasphemy But where 's the Blasphemy to say Christ bore the Filth of Sin in a Sence Is not Sin filthy under all Considerations Doth not the Spirit of God call it filthy and abominable in all respects 1. Is not the Guilt of Sin Filth and abominable in God's Sight And is it not so when it lies upon the Conscience I think the Spirit of God represents it always as the greatest Foulness and Uncleanness I say a Conscience polluted with Sin to those that are defiled and unbelieving and can't by Faith fetch and derive cleansing Vertue from the Blood of Christ into their Consciences to such nothing is clean 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tit. 1.15 Now this is the very Rooot and Foundation of a Defilement And what is it that takes it off but Faith in the Sin-cleansing Vertue of Jesus Christ The great Contrariety of Sin to the Holy Law is the Filthiness of Sin And the Apostle tells Heb. 9.14 How our Consciences come to be purged from dead Works it 's no other way than
Sin You say the guilty Person is no Sinner formally What then a punishable Creature Do you mean a Creature capable of Suffering so is a Dog or a Cat or a Horse Or do you mean a Man under a Law If under a Law he is not punishable but as a Sinner Sin is Subjectivè formalis ratio poenae Sin is subjectively the formal Reason of Punishment So that a Man must be denominated a Sinner formally or else he is not punishable in any way of Justice Neonom In the whole Scheme of your Principles it 's Elect as Elect who cease to be Sinners When you speak of Believers you do not mean that he was a Sinner before he believed for you state the time when Christ had his Sins laid upon him D. W. p. 23. Antinom Believers of great Antiquity older than Methuselah But methinks a Man that would be taken for a great Divine and one that in tenderâ—ess to Holiness will rather with-hold the Truths of the Gospel and abscond them lest Men should take too much liberty thereby to sin I say one would think such a Man should for his Reputation sâ—ke make Conscience of speaking Truth and much more tremble at the Temptation to Bantering and exposing the great Truths of the Gospel to Scorn and Reproach How can you dare to toss tumble reproach and load this great Truth of the Gospel in the very Words of the Holy Ghost with all the odious Consequences imaginable You may value your self as you please or other Men may judge of you and your Words as they please I shall only desire you to read Job 19.27 28 29. Neonom Now I will tell you what is the Truth Antinom No no I hope we know the Truth Tell us the Eror you charge me with and if there be time we will hear the Truth afterward Neonom If you are in such haste for it you shall have it then Errour The Elect upon the Death of Christ ceased to be Sinners and ever since their Sins are none of their Sins but are the Sins of Christ and this I prove to be your Error from your own Words You put this Objection Must he not be reckoned a Sinner while he doth sin A. I answer No Tho he doth Sin yet he is not to be reckoned a Sinner but his Sins are reckoned to be taken away from him c. A Man doth sin against God God reckons not his Sin to be his he reckons it Christ's therefore he cannot reckon it his Dr. Cr. p. 8. Antinom Gentlemen I would have you observe the things that are Asserted by Mr. Neonom for I beseech you do me Justice that it appears that I speak always of the Elect as Elect and not Believers and when I mention Believers that I do not mean he was a Sinner before he believed I will read my Discourse to you taken from me as I delivered it Preaching from John 14.6 I was shewing Christ was the Way from a State of Sinfulness There is a two-fold consideration of Sinfulness from which Christ is our Way in a special manner 1. That which is called the Guilt of Sin which is indeed the Fault or a Persons being Faulty as he is a Transgressor Is 2ly The Power and over-masterfulness of Sin in Persons Christ is the way from both these 1. From the Guilt of Sin Christ is the way from the Guilt of Sin It is briefly no more but this to be â—â—d of the Guilt of Sin viz. Upon Tryal to be quitted and discharged from the Charge of Sin that is laid or may be laid to him and to be freed from it This is for a Person in Judgement to be pronounced actually innocent and a just Person as having no Sin to be charged on him This is to be free from the Guilt of Sin A Man is not free from a Fault as long as the Fault is laid to his Charge and he is then free when he is not charged with it He is only the way by which a poor Sinner may be pronounced innocent and having proved that Christ is the way to take away the Guilt of Sin which I say is the Charge of Fault by many plain places of Scripture and by the Type of the Scape Goat I came to answer this Objection But do not those that receive Christ actually commit Sin I answer Yea they do commit Sin and the Truth is themselves can do nothing but commit Sin If a Person that is a Believer hath any thing in the World he hath received that if he doth any thing that is good it is the Spirit of God that doth it not he Therefore he himself doth nothing but Sin his Soul is a Mint of Sin Dr. Cr. p. 3. 8. Now therefore judge Gentlemen whether here I say the Elect ceased to be Sinners ever since the Death of Christ If Sinners after believing much more before in respect of the Indwelling of Sin and Corruption and do not in this Sence cease to be Sinners after believing I went on Then you will say If he doth sin must not God charge it where it is all this while speaking of a Believer Must he not be reckoned to be a Sinner while he doth sin A. I answer No though he doth sin yet he is not to be reckoned a Sinner i. e. Being a pardoned Believer God doth not reckon him so and he ought by Faith to behold all his Sins taken away in Christ but his Sins are to be reckoned to be taken away from him A Man borrows 100 l. some Man will pay it for him Doth he not owe this 100 l. seeing he borrowed it I say no in case another hath paid it for him A Man doth sin against God God reckons not his Sin to be his he reckons it Christ's therefore he cannot reckon it his God hath laid it upon Christ ' Thou hast sinned Christ takes it off supposing I say thou hast received Christ Is this any other Doctrine than what John teaches 1 John 1.7 8. Chap. 2.1 2. I say in one respect they are not Sinners in another they are Sinners And is this any other Doctrine than what the Scripture and all our best Divines teach Therefore judge ye how justly now I am charged with this Error Neonom But you said If thou hast part in the Lord Christ which he thinks all unbelieving Elect have All those Transgressions of thine become actually the Transgressions of Christ and so cease to be thine Dr. C. p. 270. Antinom Is it not very unfair dealing for you to impose a wrong meaning upon my Words when I express my self so plainly If thou hast received Christ if thou hast a part in the Lord Christ who will understand these Expressions but of our active receiving and partaking of Christ though I do speak elsewhere of our having Benefit by Christ and a hidden Right in him and it hath an Influence on us and we are passive therein before we believe yet it 's not
great Confidence take up the sense and words of these Men. Neonom But Dr. Owen saith That Imputation is not the Transmission or Transfusion of the Righteousness of another into them that are justified that they should become perfectly and inherently righteous thereby c. p. 242. D. W. p. 51. Antinom We say so too but Dr. Owen doth not say We are justify'd by the Imputation of the Effects of Christ's Righteousness he opposeth that Imputation as a Socinian Notion Neonom He doth not For he saith That the Righteousness of Christ is imputed to us as to it's Effects hath this sound Sence namely The Effects of it are made ours by reason of that Imputation It is imputed so reckoned unto us of God as that he really communicates all the Effects of it unto us Antinom But what immediately follows in the next Sentence Dr. O. p. 243. Why did you not quote all the Dr. said Is not this base false dealing You would only quote as much as should serve your turn But to say the Righteousness of Christ is not imputed unto us only its Effects are so is really to overthrow all Imputation For as we shall see the effects of the Righteousness of Christ can't be said properly to be imputed to us and if his Righteousness it self be not so Imputation hath no place herein nor can it be understood why the Apostle should so frequently assert it as he doth Rom. 4. Therefore the Socinians who do expresly oppose the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ and plead for a Participation of it's Effects and Benefits only do wisely deny any such kind of Righteousness of Christ i. e. of Satisfaction and Merit as alone may be imputed to us Here 's matter of Fact to shew your double-dealing Neonom But the Assembly is of my mind Q. 69. What is the Communion in Grace which the Members of the Invisible Church have with Christ A. In their partaking of the Vertue of his Mediation in their Justification Adoption Sanctification and whatever in this Life manifests their Vnion with him so that in their Judgment it 's the vertue of Christ's Mediation operates on us and not the Mediatorial Righteousness in us Antinom This is strange Language to talk of Imputing the Mediation of Christ to us and this is that you now plainly tell us is the Mediatorial Righteousness that you mean all along or that partaking of the Vertues of Mediation and Imputation are convertible Terms Those Reverend Divines do not say the Mediation of Christ was imputed to us no more than his Kingship Priestship Prophetical Office yet we are in a Sence made Kings Priests and Prophets but not by Imputation They tell you only of the Effects of his Mediation of which Justification is one If you would have told us what they say of Imputed Righteousness you should have rehearst the next Q. 70. What is Justification A. Justification is an Act of God's Free Grace unto Sinners in which he pardoneth all their Sins accepteth and accounteth their Persons righteous in his sight not for any thing wrought in them or done by them but only for the perfect Obedience and full Satisfaction of Christ by God imputed to them and received by Faith alone See the Shorter Catechism Q. 33. See also the Confession directly condemning all your Scheme of Divinity at once C. 9. Of Justification Those whom God effectually calleth he also freely justifyeth not by infusing Righteousness into them but by pardoning their Sins and by accounting and accepting their Persons as righteous not for any thing wrought in them or done by them but for Christ's sake alone not by imputing Faith it self the Act of believing nor any other Evangelical Obedience to them as their Rigteousness but by imputing the Obedience and Satisfaction of Christ unto them they receiving and resting on him and his Righteousness by Faith The Savoy Conf. ch 11. is the same verbatim Now Gentlemen I appeal to all Men of Sence and Honesty whether Mr. Neonomian hath dealt fairly thus to represent the Judgment of Dr. Owen and the Reverend Divines of the Assembly or thus to impose upon the weak and such as have not Will or Leisure to search into the Truth of what he saith Neonom I tell you what the Savoy says which is the same Articles with the Assemblies Antinom But you tell us or would have us to understand that the meaning of the Assembly about Imputation is that the Vertue of Christ's Mediation i. e. in your declared Sence the Effects only operates upon us and then after rehearsal of the Words of the Savoy you add Thou seest it 's Christ's Righteousness is imputed for Pardon and not infused You 'll oppose imputation to Infusion which none of us plead for But this Imputation is in your Sence only as to the Effect which you would have us to believe is the Judgment of Dr. Owen and the two Assemblies And I find you lamely rehearse the Article of your Confession as being ashamed to behold your Erroneous Doctrine so fully condemned by them Do not think such pitiful little Sophisms as these are such as do become a professed Minister of the Gospel or that your Reverend Vouchers have not prejudiced their Honour by asserting so publickly to the World That in all material things you have fully and rightly stated the Truths and Errors in this Treatise and look upon this as a Work of considerable Service to the Church of Christ c. when your manifest Design is to hide Truth by Equivocations false Representations and odious forced Consequences and to impose old palpable decried Errours Veritas non querit angulos Now Sir that you may see we have more than Authority for this great Doctrine of Imputation of Christ's very Righteousness 1. I prove that to say Christ's Righteousness is imputed only as to Effects is to deny the Doctrine of Imputation Consider from the Nature of Imputation it self Imputation is the reckoning and esteeming that unto one man which is done by another As in case of Debt or Wrong done by one Man to another a third comes and does or promiseth that thing whereby the Offended Person becomes satisfied with the Offender previous to which Satisfaction in Nature is his reckoning the Payment made or to be made unto the Offender it 's not the taking of this or that Payment in any kind that is Satisfactory for the Offender unless it be by the offended Person reckoned to him Paul to Philemon v. 18. gives the clear Notion of Imputation both as to Wrong and Righteousness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If he hath criminally or unrighteously done thee wrong in filching or stealing impute this to me or put it upon my Account Take me as Paymaster and put my Payment on his Account i. e. In respect of any wrong that he hath done thee or Debt that he owes thee Here 's my hand for it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will repay it to thee Now Paul
insisted so much upon the Conditionality of Works and wherein it 's said they continued not viz. In the Mount Sinai Covenant which God gave them when he brought them out of Egypt Heb. 8.9 4. In regard of that sort of Promises which they stood encouraged by to the performance of this External Obedience they were usually Temporal Blessings only and the Threats and Curses denounced against Disobedience was usually in rsepect of outward things though under all this Cloudiness and Conditionality the Covenant of Promise was applied in its Absolute Nature as at first revealed to Adam and Abraham which was to all the Elect living before Christ the Ministry of the quickning Spirit and a Savour of Life 15. The Original Contract of this Covenant before the World was is by some called the Covenant of Redemption and distinguisht from the Covenant of Grace but such do greatly mistake for both the Original Contract and the Manifestation thereof are one and the same Covenant there 's no Specifick Difference that which is is but secundum adjuncta Ordinis Manifestationis Neonom Next to the Doctrine of Imputation which I think I have sufficiently cleared up according to my Scheme and fully and rightly stated Truths and Errours in those Points Let us now Debate the Conditionality of the Covenant of Grace This being a Point of Great Concern I shall premise an Enquiry nto some particulars for the explaining this Subject Q. 1. What is the Covenant of Grace D. W. C. 8. p. 53. A. 1. It is not the Covenant of Redemption between the Father and Spirit as one Party and the Eternal Word the Lord Jesus as the other Party Antinom Who ever put the Father and Spirit on one Party in the Covenant of Grace it's New Divinity and secondly you are very Magisterial in this Negative Position Quadam confidentia non est Virtus ut audacia Methinks the Judgment of the Reverend Divines should have weighed so much with you as not to have blowed it off at one Puff In the Larger Catechism Q. 30. Doth God leave Mankind to perish in a state of Sin and Misery A. God doth not leave all Mankind to perish in the Estate of Sin and Misery into which they fell by the Breach of the first Covenant commonly called the Covenant of Works but of his meer Love and Mercy delivereth his Elect out of it and bringeth them into a state of Salvation by the second Covenant commonly called a Covenant of Grace Q. 31. VVith whom was the Covenant of Grace made A. The Covenant of Grace was made with Christ as the second Adam and in him with all the Elect as his Seed You say That the Covenant Agreement made with Christ was not the Covenant of Grace You call it a Covenant of Redemption as another thing from the Covenant of Grace I acknowledge the Covenant of Grace is a Covenant of Redemption and the Covenant you call the Covenant of Redemption is the Covenant of Grace and therefore shall not incumber our Discourse with a Debate about Names but shall affirm that there is no such thing as an Essential Difference between the Covenant of Grace and Redemption the distinction made between them is but Novel at least that it was but lately so generally received for it appears by what is here spoken in this Answer of the Assembly so plainly and positively that they owned but two Covenants that of Works and that of Grace They are only distinguished between the making and manifesting this Covenant of Grace A Covenant hidden or secret and manifest is but distributio ex adjunctis therefore after they had told us that this Covenant of Grace was made with Christ the second Adam and with all the Elect as his Seed They enquire next Q. 32. How is the Grace of God manifest in the second Covenant A. The Grace of God is manifested in the second Covenant in that he freely provideth and offereth to Sinners a Mediator and Life and Salvation by him c. So that the Covenant of Grace contains all Grace and Mercy Redemption and the offer and application thereof Neonom Were this Covenant understood I think many well meaning People would be undeceived In that Covenant i. e. of Redemption all the Causes of Man's Salvation are adjusted and secured all Satisfaction and Merit are on Christ as his undertaking c. Antinom It seems then this well-meaning Assembly was deceived and many Able Divines besides who have not admitted of this Novel Distinction between the Covenant of Redemption and that of Grace 2. You talk at least very improperly that the causes of Man's Salvation are adjusted and secured in the Covenant of Redemption which placeth it before Election for I take the Grace of Election to be the first adjusting and securing cause of Mens Salvation and not so only but of the Covenant it self made with Christ I thought all the causes were sufficiently adjusted in the Councel of God's Will and that by the purpose of Grace they were secured to us and Redemption too Christ's Undertaking the charge of Satisfaction and Merit is a cause of our Salvation not adjusting and securing it they were adjusted and secured before Neonom Yea it 's provided there that the Elect shall obey the terms of Life and certainly possess Salvation Antinom 1. It 's manifest that you esteem not Redemption one of the Terms of Life but some other Terms distinct from it I had thought that Christ's Righteousness had been the great condition of our Life and Salvation but it seems it 's but provision for the performing the Terms of Life 2. I thought it had been provided in Election that all the Elect should certainly believe and obey the Gospel but it seems by what you say here they were only conditionally Elected and provision made in the Covenant of Redemption that they should perform the Condition and obey the Term very improper it's to perform the Terms Now what is in such a Covenant of Grace more than Adam's would have had if he had stood for God must have provided that he should obey or perform the Terms of Life which were to him very small and easie no more than giving a Pepper-corn or not so much only to forbear plucking and eating an Apple when he had enough besides There 's no Essential Difference in your Opinion for where-ever the Creature performs a Condition of a Covenant of God's making God must provide for that performance by Grace given and confirmed Neonom Yea as that Covenant was not made with the Elect though for the Elect so they have nothing to do as a Condition of this Covenant Antinom Rare Divinity Mens tua sublimis supra genus eminet ipsum 1. You say that Covenant was not made with the Elect. The Assembly say it was made with the second Adam and his Seed but you I suppose deny Christ to be a second Adam a publick Person and a Spiritual or Mystical Root 2. I would fain
Iniquity the Lord hath laid on Christ God himself cannot charge one Sin on that Man and he makes a difference between a strong Believer and a weak to consist in the degree of his Perswasion Dr. C. p. 158. Antinom This was a Use that I made upon that Point of laying Sin on Christ If God have laid our Iniquity upon Christ then whosoever thou art to whom the Lord will be pleased to give the believing of this Truth that the Lord hath laid thine Iniquity on Christ that laying thine Iniquity upon him is an absolute and full Discharge to thee that there neither is nor can be any Iniquity for the present nor for hereafter that can be laid to thy Charge and then follows what he hath rehearsed And if this be not true Doctrine that every Believer that by the Grace of God sees his Sins laid on Christ hath a full pardon of all Sins past present and to come so that Sin shall never be charged on him for Condemnation before God I am to seek for the Doctrine of the Gospel I quote that place Rom. 8.33 to me a very full Proof And I do affirm that the Degrees of our Faith doth stand in the Degrees of the sight of Christ's Glory and the Perswasion we have in our Hearts of our part in him And I do not say That he is no Believer that hath not this perfectly far be it from me to say so there are that are Believers that are weak in the Faith and there are Believers that are strong in the Faith the more the Light and Glory of the Gospel shines in the true Intention of God to his People the more shall they return to their rest the more shall they have Joy and Gladness Why may not a Believer then say as David did The Lord hath been very bountiful to me that I may return to my rest God hath done every thing in Christ and taken away all things that can disturb my Peace and Comfort Dr. C. p. 158. Calvin I pray Mr. Neonom let us have your Description of Saving Faith Neonom I shall express it in the Assemblies Words ch 14. A. 2. D. W. p. 72 73. By this Grace a Christian believeth to be true whatsoever is revealed in the Word from the Authority of God himself speaking therein and acteth differently upon that which each particular Passage thereof containeth yielding Obedience to the Commands trembling at the Threatnings and embracing the Promises of God for this Life and that which is to come But the principal Acts of Saving Faith are Accepting Receiving and resting upon Christ alone for Justification Sanctification and Eternal Life by vertue of the Covenant of Grace Gentlemen weigh this Account of Faith well which if it were regarded and no essential part excluded when Faith is considered as a Condition of any Gospel-benefit One would think no man need prove that it is not saving Faith when any Essential part of it is wanting and that it must be saving Faith when we mention Faith as a Condition Antinom That Reverend Assembly do here express the Essential Parts of Faith and something more as the Effects of it I take it not to be intended for a Definition wherein only Essentials are put but a Description that takes in Subjects Adjuncts Effects c. The Definition is first given A. 1. That the Grace of Faith is whereby the Elect are enabled to believe to the Saving of their Souls After they proceed to shew the Causes of it the Word and Spirit and after that its several ways of Acting and it's Effects They do in the shorter Catechism give a briefer Account of it which may be more properly called a Definition Quest 86. What is Faith in Jesus Christ Answ Faith in Jesus Christ is a Saving Grace whereby we receive and rest upon him alone for Salvation as he is offered to us in the Gospel And if you please to turn to Quest 31. you shall see what they mean by receiving and resting There they say Effectual Calling is the work of God's Spirit whereby convincing us of our Sin and Misery enlightning our Minds in the knowledge of Christ and renewing our Wills he doth perswade and enable us to embrace Jesus Christ freely offered to us in the Gospel And in the Larger Catechism you have a full Description of Faith as Justifying Quest 72. wherein there is the Genus of it a saving Grace the principal efficient Cause the Spirit the Causa ministrant the subservient efficient Cause the Word Both Causae procreantes The Subject in whom it is wrought a sinful miserable and lost Creature really so and in his own Eyes And then you have the Material Cause the truth of the Promise of the Gospel In the Confession wherein it's more largely express'd it's whatever is revealed in the Word this is the Objective part of it and Material The Form of Saving Faith is an Impression wrought upon the Soul from the proper Efficacy of the Spirit by the Word according to the acceptable Nature and Evidence thereof The Truth must have Goodness in it because we believe many things that we fear and are averse to The Word works objectively upon the Understanding perswading it to assent and set to it's Seal that the Word is Truth and from the Goodness in that Truth it perswades the Will to embrace because Voluntas sequitur ultimum dictamen intellectus and the consenting of the Will is an Effect of the assenting of the Understanding Hence then it 's not barely believing without Ground but upon some Authority In the Confession 't is said For the Authority of God himself speaking in the Word which is believing on Christ believing in God from whence follows an awful Reverence and Regard to his Word as also the resting and depending of the Soul thereon And when it 's determined to the Grace of Justification it 's as in the Larger and Shorter Catechism it receiveth Christ and his Righteousness in the Promise and resteth thereon for Pardon of Sin Justifying Grace through the Righteousness of Christ is the Object and that which it aims at is the accepting and accounting of a Mans Person Righteous in the sight of God for Salvation which is fuller express'd in the Confession shewing what saving Faith in the largest Sence designs viz. accepting receiving and resting upon Christ alone excluding all other Foederal Conditions for Justification Sanctification and Eternal Life by vertue of the Covenant of Grace Now you see how clearly they make Faith a Perswasion and that it doth all objectively by taking in the Truth and receiving it for the Understanding receiveth and embraceth by being perswaded it takes in the Light of Truth and the Will embraceth by being perswaded and the great procatarctick Cause is the Covenant of Grace Now I see you have a clean contrary Notion of making it a Condition and moral Instrument i. e. A moral Condition of the Covenant and so a Work and as such
in our Bodies being delivered out of the hands of your Enemies our State is secured our Safety past we serve in Holiness and Righteousness c. do we serve toward Deliverance then it 's not past 1. We are delivered from VVrath before we step a step in Duties we do not the Duty to be delivered but we do Duty because we are delivered And now follows what he chargeth for such a fault and take notice that I speak all along of the change of our state in Justification by Faith and that works have nothing to do in neither are we to look upon them as such All things are setled by Christ for us of free Gift all we do is for Christ himself not for our selves i. e. to put our selves in Christ's Room thereby to Rob him of his Glory if we do it for our selves we do but labour in vain suppose we compass never so much good by doing thinking thereby to put our selves into a justified Estate it is but labour in vain it was compassed before-hand for us in the justifying Righteousness of Christ Christ brings Salvation enters into Covenant what needs all that Travel for Life and Salvation i. e. with a design of purchasing it thereby for all that is said is spoken to the Price that Christ bought us with and I instance in running for Money that a Man need not run for a price that he hath freely without so that he that works for Justification works in vain for saith the Apostle The Jews that followed after the Law of Righteousness obtained it not but ran in vain and this the Apostle means in that place Have ye indeed suffered so much in vain why because you obtained not your end thereby not likely so to do Neonom But it 's not your Intention that nothing we do can Merit but not that they are required as the requisite means and way to obtain these Blessings D. W. p. 122. You intend this p. 45 46. you say I will note one thing before I go on to make clear this thing c. Antinom I will give you my own words and sence The words he referrs to are part of an Answer to an Objection D. Cr. p. 45. Obj. Will but this is a way to lead to a Licentious Life Answ I say the contrary it is the only way to lead Men into a more enlarged way of Holiness than any way in the VVorld which I will declare to you by and by VVe have shewed that Christ is a safe way a lightsome way a near way we will make good now that the consideration that Christ is a free way to all Comers is the only way to Build up Men to an enlarged course of Holiness more than the greatest Self-denial frequentest Prayer greatest Study bearing down of the Body c. And this will further appear if we enquire how Christ is such a way as there is no way wherein there is a quicker wherein there is a better riddance of Businesses and Employments Believers have than in Christ now comes in what he quotes I will note one thing by the way to make clear this thing viz. It is a received Conceit of many that Obedience is the way to Heaven and though it be not Causa Regnandi yet it is Via ad Regnum Let me give you a hint or two of another thing D. Cr. p. 45. or two and lay down this Position There is no Believer under Heaven that doth come to Heaven before he hath served his Generation there is no Person that is a Believer and hath received Christ but that after he hath received Christ he is Created in Christ Jesus unto good Works that he should walk in them Here you may see I am for good Works in a Gospel Way and Sence I say he that sprinkleth 〈◊〉 with clean Water that they may become clean from all their filthiness writes his Law in their inward parts c. so that I say mark well my words that Sanctification of Life is an inseparable Companion with the Justification of a Person by the Grace of Christ but withall I must tell that all this Sanctification is not the way of that Justified Person to Heaven It is the Business of a Person that he hath to do in his way to Christ Dr. Cr. p. 46. Now I shew that Christ is the way and nothing else Sanctification is part of the Salvation wrought in Christ and the Apostle Heb. 6. calls the works of Sanctification things that accompany Salvation therefore I say this is no derogation from works to say they are not the way to Heaven but that they are Concomitant to Heaven unto Persons that shall come thither and now comes in what he rehearseth The Truth is since Redemption is managed by Christ the Lord hath pointed out other Ends and Purposes for our Obedience than our Salvation i. e. than purchasing or procuring or qualifying conditionally in your sence for Savation in this sence is not the end of any good work we do in plain truth good works are a great part of the Salvation it self that Christ is the way to The Ends of our good works are Manifestation of our Obedience and Subjection the setting forth of the praise of the Glory of the Grace of God and as such so actually glorifying him in the World the doing good to others to be profitable to Men the meeting of the Lord Jesus Christ in them where he will be found according to the Promise These are the special Ends that Obedience is ordained for Salvation being setled firm before to keep the true Prerogative of Christ alone that no Righteousness of Man entrench upon his Priviledges Now judge you whether I detract from works of Sanctification as Mr. Neonomian would make me to do because I allow them not that place in Justification and Salvation which he would have them have and that belongs to Christ alone Neonom He puts this Objection We had as good sit still He that works all day and gets no more than he had in the Morning c. Answ Let me tell you the prevention of evil if there be reality of evil in it obtaining of good if there be reality of Good Peace of Conscience Joy in the Holy Ghost Pardon of Sin the Infallibility of Non-miscarriage the Light of God's Countenance all these you aim at are abundantly provided for you and established firmly on you by the meer Grace of God in you before you perform any thing whatsoever D. Cr. p. 151. Antinom I intend no more than that we are Blessed with all Spiritual Blessings in Christ and we can have no greater Security of all these Benefits than in Christ Jesus and that all performances upon account of our Security is nothing to Faith in Christ who is the Yea and Amen of the Promises and therefore I shew the Vanity of proposing that to our selves by our Works which is done in Christ for us and can be done by none else
still the consideration of these Sins thus upon them must needs draw them out on these Services till some way be sought out to clear themselves of them Where is now that sincerity and singleness of Heart that Men ought to have in the Service of the Lord If he could be but once resolved of this thing that ail this Business of his is already dispatched to his Hands viz. Sin pardoned and Wrath removed then all this Selfishness would quickly die then you would serve God sincerely the End of your Duties would be the glorifying of God then you would see that your Prayers Tears Fastings and Performances were not appointed to Rob God of his Service by serving your selves and Christ of his Glory by putting your Services in the place of his Blood which only taketh away Sin Calvin You have now given very good satisfaction of your Intention and Meaning in those Expressions Mr. Neonomian chargeth upon you as unsound tho some of your Expressions barely taken may give some offence which I think might have been spared and the truth you intend cloathed with more unexceptionable words and on the other side Mr. Neonomian I think you may expose and banter most Sermons of Orthodox Divines if you will pick out here and there a Sentence and not give an account of the Connexion upon what account such were spoken But I pray Mr. Neonomian let us have the positive Truth from you in this matter and the state of the Question Neonom You shall Sir Truth Though we ought to intend God's Glory as our Supream End in all our Duties and Design therein expressing our Love and Gratitude to God for his Benefits with a great regard to publick Good Yet we also lawfully may and ought to strive after Grace grow in it and perform Holy Duties and Services with an Eve to and concern for our own Spiritual and Eternal Advantage D. W. p. 152. Antinom You have delivered your Opinion in a discreet Proposition wherein you say the same thing as I do in the first part but yet the second part doth not run full enough it should run thus From this Motive of the Love of God the Promise of Grace and the procurement made by Jesus Christ entitling us to all the Blessings of the Gospel we ought to perform Holy Duties and Services growing in all Grace with an Eye to the Enjoyment of that full Inheritance provided for us in Grace and Glory ascribing all to the Glory of Free Grace and nothing to the procurements of our own Works And therefore I say none ought to propose advantage to himself in respect of Title to the Blessings of the Covenant by any Duty he performs being Heir of the Promise by Faith in Jesus Christ all the Promises being in him Yea and Amen neither ought he to propound profit from any Duty as such only but in and thorough Christ and in whom every Duty is accepted and from whom we receive the Benefit for whatever we ask it 's in his Name and for his sake alone not for our Duties sake we receive it And that it is vain and unlawful to do any thing with an Eye to our Spiritual or Eternal good as a proper Effect by way of Remuneration of our Duty performed for that cannot be in Subordination to God's Glory in Christ but a Robbing of him Neonom I will tell you then wherein we differ not 1. It 's not whether we should principally aim at God's Glory in what we do Antinom Is it not But I will tell you more we should not only principally but altogether aim at God's Glory in all we do 1 Cor. 10.31 According to your Position many Sins will be Justified as he that doth evil that good may come of it And Paul's Persecution in his Unregeneracy wherein he principally aimed at the Glory of God thinking that thereby he did God good Service Neonom Nor whether we should aim at Publick Good with great concern nor whether Gratitude to God deserves our utmost Service and Love to him should Influence our Aims and Labours Antinom Gratitude to God should not only Influence but be the very procatarctick Moving Cause to us in all Neonom Nor whether we ought to renounce every Thought of purchasing from God any Benefit for what we do Antinom Therefore not to think to have the Benefit for the Work sake at all for if so it 's purchasing in a Law Sence to have it upon Federal Conditionâ—lity of the Work done is to have upon Bargain and Purchasing Terms either in respect of the first right or as to continuation of right therefore we ought not to tertain but renounce the least thought of this Neonom Nor whether Carnal Selfishness or seeking of Pleasures Riches Honour c. above Spiritual and Eternal good be the undoing Sin of the World Antinom Nor whether it be not the undoing Sin of Professors there 's no other to be expected from the World and there 's multitudes of Sins more of a grosser Nature undoing to the World Neonom The real difference is 1. Whether the Spiritual Improving and Saving our Souls may be a Motive with us to our Religious Endeavours This you deny and I affirm Antinom Not upon the grounds afore-mentioned Neonom Whether our Souls advantage be not so joined with God's Glory that we ought to intend both as the Scope of our Life and Labours Antinom Our Souls advantage is so provided for in the Promise of Grace that we intend it as the great thing bestowed on us for the Glory of God and not to be obtained by us or gained by Works and Services The true Question betwixt us is Whether we should do Works as entitling us to and gaining of life and Salvation in Subordination to the Glory of God this you and the Papists affirm but I deny because they are inconsistent and can never be truely so according to the Gospel whatever is pretended or Men may think of themselves as Paul did in his Vnregenerate State Neonom To confirm the Truth 1. I have proved before that God hath appointed Graces and Duties for that end that we obtain those Benefits and if so we then despise God's Ordination in not intending our obtaining the Benefits when we Act those Graces and Duties and we obey his Will in doing them for that end D. W. p. 155. Antinom We have shewed that you have not proved it yet in your sence by way of entitling us to and continuing us in a Covenant state or standing 2. We have shewed that you make Graces and Duties nothing but a piece of Drudgery and Slavery for a Man to work as for his Wages and to be paid as he doth his Work but make them none of the Benefits of the Covenant of Promise which they are in an Eminent manner And therefore 3. You despise the Ordination of God and his Constitution of the Covenant of Grace who never gave them such a place in the Covenant nor ordained
say he means not this Hurt in respect of the Nature of Sin and if so it must be in respect of the real pernicious Effects of Sin for a Believer sees Hurt in Sin and complains of it but as to its Nature which is odious in itself or to its Effects 2. It appears that you judge his meaning is such because you say that by his Doctrin of Christ beaâ—ing Sin he makes Sin innocent to the Elect Whereby 1. You make the nocency of Sin to lye in the punishment of it and thereby justifie Dr. Crisp's Expression how unproper soever it be or erroneous 2. You say totidem verbis that Penal Effects of Sin are most of the hurt that comes by it according to what Doctrin we have already charged you with supra The great sign of the truth of Grace that is usually given is the fear and hatred of Sin from the very nature of it its contrariety to God and his Law and that its the greatest sign of an Hypocrite to abstain from it only for fear of Wrath and Hell And 3. You tell us upon what Principles he goes 1. That God hath no Sin to charge upon an Elect Person tho' a Man sins God reckons not his Sin to him c. Whereby you shew where your grudge is it 's against the Doctrin of Imputation more than against the Doctor for any thing he hath said As for your Instance about poisoned Wine you say yourself he speaks not by way of Exhortation but Doctrinally therefore exhorts none to take poisoned Wine but cautions them against it again and again and as for any that have through weakness and inadvertency he tells them their Antidote as the Apostle John 1st Epist c. 2. 1. My little children these things I write unto you that you sin not and if any man sin we have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the righteous and he is a propitiation for our sins DEBATE XVIII Of God's Displeasure for Sin in the Afflictions of his People Neonom THE next great Antinomian Errour is That none of the Afflictions of Believers have in them the least of God's displeasure against their Persons for their Sins D. W. p. 190 191. Antinom We must proceed in our ordinary Method let us know what you ground your Charge upon Neonom He affirmeth p. 15. Except God will be offended when there is no cause to be offended he will not be offended with Believers because he doth not find the Sin of a Believer to be his own Sin but the Sin of Christ Antinom But he in the next words quotes places of Scripture to prove what he saith He hath made him Sin for us he hath laid upon him the Iniquities of us all the Blood of Jâ—sus Christ cleanseth us from all Sin he bare our Sins in his Body c. and from these he Argues thus If he bear our Sins he must bear the displeasure for them and he did bear the Indignation of the Lord and if so he did bear it all or but part If he did not bear all the Indignation of the Lord then he doth not save to the uttermost all that come unto God by him as Heb. 4. I say not to the uttermost because here is some Indignation and Displeasure left behind and for lack of taking this Indignation upon himself it lights and falls upon Believers So that either you must say Christ is an imperfect Saviour having left some scattering of Wrath behind that will fall on the head of a Believer Or else you will say he is a perfect Saviour and takes away all God's displeasure then there remains none of it upon the person of a Believer Now why had you not Answered his Argument for what he said yea why had you not brought in the next Objection made to clear up his meaning but quote only so much as may leave your Reader under Prejudice Object Yet you will say Is not God displeased and offended at the Sins of Believers when they do commit them Hath Christ taken away the offence of Sin by his Death Answ No therefore do not mistake your self there may be easily a mistake for lack of serious pondering the words I speak I have not said God is not offended with the Sins a Believer doth commit but that God stands not offended with the Persons of Believers for the Sins committed by them he hath that everlasting Indignation against Sin as ever And as there is the same contrariety in Sin against his nature so there is the same contrariety in God's nature unto Sin All contrarieties have a mutual contrariety against each other as Water and Fire c. As Sin is contrary to the nature of God so there is an Abhorrency of God to that Sinfulness here see with what ground you could say that Dr. C. makes Sin Innocent but there is no Offence of God to the Person that commits that Sin because the Offence of God for that Sin hath spent it self upon the Person of Christ there remains none of it to light upon the person of a Believer Christ having born all this Offence for Sin Tho' in our Natures and in the Sinfulness of them there is matter of displeasure yet in Christ for all this God is well pleased with us And yet there is none of God's Indignation against Sin lost in all this for he is satisfied for this his Offence in his Son more than in our own Persons Neonom And he saith p. 18. But are not the Afflictions for their Sins Antinom Come I will tell you he Answers that Objection He saith I Answer No Afflictions are unto Believers fâ—om Sin but not for Sin What is the meaning of that will you say This God in Afflicting Believers doth not intend to punish them as now laying on them the desert of their Sin for that is laid upon Christ but he doth Afflict them in part to be a help to preserve them from Sin I say all Afflictions to Believers are to keep them from Sin rather than Punishment unto them for Sin Neonom P. 170. He saith That at that Instant when God brings Afflictions upon them he doth not remember any Sins of theirs they are not in his Thoughts Antinom That which he Asserts is from plain Texts of Scripture how dare you Banter and Expose so great a Truth as this it is in that great place Jer. 31.33 declared to be the great promise of the Gospel by the Spirit of God Heb. 10.16 17. God saith He remembers our Sins no more you say he doth who are we to believe God or you Neonom He saith Christ being Chastened for our our Sins there 's nothing but Peace belongs to us P. 170. Antinom The Words were thus I see the Scripture runs wholy in this strain and is so full in nothing as in this that he hath generally discharged the Sins of Believers Oh then take heed of falling into the Errour of the Papists that say that God hath taken
in charging him for saying That singleness of Heart may be in the Enemies of Christ for he acquaints us what it is from Eph. 5 6. Singleness of Heart is a doing what he doth as unto Christ and for the Lord's sake And he saith The best shall find it difficult to find it in all they do Neonom I will shew you the grounds of the mistake because our Goodness extends not to God for his profit therefore he regards it not no more than Dung and Filthiness Antinom Notably hit you should have said because he chargeeth his Angels with Folly therefore he will admire the Righteousness of them that dwell in Houses of Clay Job 4.18 19. An Holier Man than you could say If I Justifie my self mine own Mouth shall Condemn me Vers 21. If I were perfect yet would I not know my Soul I would despise my Life Job 9.21 Prov. 20.9 Who can say I have made my Heart clean I am pure from my Sin And who can say this or that Duty is or will commend him to God Neonom Object Doth not Israel say Isa 64.6 All our Righteousness is as Filthy Rags Answ But that is spoken of Persons and not of real Holiness it 's the same as Micah 7.4 and Isa 1.6 Corruption had invaded the very Priests and the generality of the best Professors c. Antinom But where have you this Notion upon the place I 'le tell you where you had it viz. in the Assembly's Annotations on the place The Annotator takes notice of variety of Opinions about the meaning of this place and to encrease the number he brings in his singular Opinion that hath less ground than all the rest He tells us By Righteousness some understand Legal Rites and Sacrifices but so performed by them that they found no Grace or Acceptance but were abominable in God's sight and the Jews extend it further to their Good Works which were so ill done out of Vain-glory or by Corrupt Grounds and Ends that they were as Filthy Rags in God's sight such were the Pharisees c. Lastly Many of ours draw it in further and take in all the best Works and Actions even of the best performed in the best manner as not free from some default or defilement And thus both divers of the Ancients and very many not Protestants only but Popish Writers also and not a few do both expound and apply the place and these latter viz. the Popish Writers with those Ancients giving Testimony thereby unto the Truth herein maintained by us against those of their side that do herein Controul and Oppose us Is this Interpretation so generally received by Learned Interpreters Ancient and Latter both Papists and Protestants by the Annotator's own Confession and so Eminent a Truth which the Papists oppose maintained against them by it And shall we desert so plain natural and useful an Interpretation and one so generally agreed on by Learned Protestant Interpreters to embrace one single Man's Opinion that sets by the Text as altogether useless to those great purposes for which the Protestants have used and refuted the Papists by their own Authorities as the Annotator himself acknowledgeth And for what Sense and Interpretation must we part with it the received Sense Our Annotator's design is to wave that received Sense upon any terms tho' he will not flatly deny it but tells us of a more Genuine Sense and what 's that 1. It 's that which is not commonly received and therefore he is single in it 2. It 's a Tropical Sense he makes the Abstract put for the Concrete and what need of such a Sense when there 's no reason to suppose such a Trope in the Words And that 's against the general Rules of Interpretation He saith That which induced those both Ancienter and later Writers to bring within compass of this Doom in this place those defects and defaults adhering to and alloying the purest Practices of the most Sincere seems to have been because the Prophet saith Our Righteousnesses as speaking in his own Person c. He saith The Words may well be understood with those Jewish Doctors for those Semblances of Holiness and Righteousness that was among them so that by our Righteousness may well be understood our Hypocrisies but he rather recommends his Genuine Sense and what 's that The Prophet hath a very remote meaning viz. He speaks of our Righteousnesses and he means Righteous Men and not Righteous Men neither but Wicked and Corrupt Men Bryars and Thorns such as the Prophet Micah speaks of Mic. 7.4 plain Bryars and Thorns and now here 's a plain Text of Scripture merely sham'd off and delivered up into the hands of the Papists and so we shall trick off one Text after another till they have got them all I acknowledg that which the Jewish Interpreters say the Prophet Personates the Church in this Prayer but then he Personates the very best of them as well as the very corrupt and degenerate part for after the Churches desire that God would wonderfully appear for her Deliverance and Reformation as formerly he had done Ch. 64.1 2 3. she lays the Case of Two sorts that were among them before the Lord the Holy and Sincere and the Corrupt and Apostate part the Basket of Good Figs and of Rotten Figs for the best part they were not Prophane nor Hypocrites but are Characterized as waiters upon God partakers of special Grace as appears by the Application the Apostle makes of Vers 4. 1 Cor. 2.9 The Prophet insists upon the description of them that we might not be mistaken and suppose that he meant the Prophane or Hypocritical part they are such as work Righteousness and God meets that Rejoice in God's ways and tho' they are under the National Wrathful Calamities yet such as should be saved which must be understood of Spiritual Salvation for they were to take their share with others in the Captivity and External Calamities in them were continuance hence the Holiest and Best prostrate themselves and acknowledg their Faith of Salvation was not built upon any Righteousness or Worthiness of their own For the Nation had not only sinned but they had sinned and fallen short of their Duty in their best performances and we are so far from pleading or rejoicing in our own Righteousness or Holiness for in the Old Testament Dialect Personal Holiness is often called Righteousness that we are all as an Unclean Thing we are Polluted with so much Sin and Corruption and our very Righteousness and Holiness are as Filthy Rags our Goodness is as the Morning-Dew we fade as a Leaf towards Autumn and our Iniquities have withered us We see the whole Nation under the Bliting Winds of thy Displeasure for its Iniquities And then he proceeds to shew how great a scarcity there was of those that were Sincere for there 's few that call upon God there 's none i. e. but a very few comparatively there was never so an Apostate time
Righteousness before we be delivered from our Enemies Will you run at all Scripture and Experience Is it not true that the Law said to Man that had Life and Power concreated with him Do and thou shalt live And can this be the Tenor of the Gospel to say to a dead Sinner Do and thou shalt live Can a Man dead in Trespasses do any thing Were it not madness to say to a dead Corpse Walk and thou shalt live Doth not Christ first come as the Resurrection and Life to a Sinner before he can do any thing Do you think that Christ comes to a Sinner upon condition of any thing he can do in his natural Estate What is more plain than that Life is the Principle and Cause of Action and not Action of Life Christ himself saith a Man must have Life before he can Believe it 's first in Nature Joh. 11.26 Whoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die Now is the giving of Christ for Life the condition of our having Life Or our doing before we have Christ or Life the condition on which we have Christ and Life Calvin I think you have gained nothing nor yet made any proof of your Charge unless you think it be in this that the Doctor saith we must live before we can do If you take that for an Error I pray do you try your Skill the other way to make Men do before they live and if you can attain to that Art either in Naturals or Spirituals you will be the Wonder of the World Neonom He saith p. 124. The Freeman of Christ hath this freedom Christ doth all his Work for him as well as in him c. Christ doth all for them that God requires to be done Antinom You must know it is this I said A Freeman of Christ hath this freedom Christ doth all his Work for him as well as in him He that is in bondage under the Law must do every thing himself and that he doth he must do perfectly that is an unsupportable thing and heavy bondage for a Man to have more laid upon him than he can bear The Freeman of Christ considering that he is weak poor and unable to work Christ doth all his Work for him Isa 26.12 The Holy Ghost tells us he hath done all our Works in us and in the Margin it is render'd for us See Rom. 5.19 Their freedom is that they stand righteous in the sight of God by that which Christ hath done for us that they are as righteous as if they had done it in their own persons c. Thus I treat concerning the Obedience of Christ unto a Satisfactory Righteousness on our behalf But Obj. Doth not this take off Men from all manner of Obedience and all manner of Holiness A. It takes them off from those ends that they aim at in their Obedience viz. the end for which Christ's Obedience served viz. our standing Righteousness as it concerns us in point of Justification Consolation and Salvation We have our Peace we have our Salvation only by the Righteousness Christ hath done for us but this doth hot take away our Obedience nor Services in respect of those ends for which such Services are required of Believers to glorifie God to evidence our thankfulness to profit Men as Ordinances to meet God in to make good what he hath promised so far we are called out to Services and walking uprightly exactly strictly according to the good pleasure of God and in regard of such ends of Services there is a gracious Freedom that the Freemen of Christ have by Christ i. e. so far forth as Services and Obedience are expected at a Freeman's hands there is Christ by his Spirit present with such persons to help them in all such kind of Services so that they become strong in the Lord and the Power of his Might to do the Will of God Mark what the Apostle speaks I am able to do all things through Christ strengthening me of my self I am able to do nothing but in Christ and through Christ that strengtheneth me I am able to do all things c. There 's much more to this purpose Now judge whether here 's any ground for his Accusation Dr. C. p. 126. He slanders me to the World as if I taught a Doctrin of Licentiousness and were against all Duty but it will appear otherwise plainly enough if an impartial Man reads my Sermons especially that Sermon on 1 Joh. 2.1 2. Sermon III. p. 548. Neonom He saith p. 554. Man will be mincing of this Truth and tell you if you walk close to God and if you refrain from sin especially from gross sins God will love you and then you may apply these and these Promises unto your self but God speaks plainly before they had done good or evil Jacob have I loved the Grace of God is passed over to Men as they are ungodly c. This is the Grace of God revealed he hath exhibited it freely to Men Hath the Lord given us Commission to Preach this Gospâ—l Antinom In my Discourse from 1 John 2.1 2. this Objection is answered p. 557. viz. There are many admire and adore the Doctrin of the Free-Grace of God and yet are notoriously known to live in all manner of Lewdness and Licentiousness and upon this ground Because their Sins are laid on Christ The Sum of the answer is I confess I never knew any such Monsters c. There are many taxed for such but I cannot say any thing to the truth of this Charge by mine own experience c. But it may be there are such and Paul speaks of such in his time c. But if there be such I must tell you they are the greatest Monsters upon the face of the Earth c. And I dare boldly say they are the greatest enemies to Free-Grace and that open Drunkards Harlots and Murderers come infinitely short of them in Abominations c. But admit this that the Grace of God hath been abused hath not the whole Scripture been abused Law and Gospel Is not Christ set for the fall and rising of many in Israel Is he not a Rock of Offence But in the mean time shall the Children want their Bread because the Dogs catch at it c Shall not the Gospel be preached because some abuse it Obj. But you will say it may be done with caution and limitation A. But let us not be more wary and cautions than God would have us to be to put mixtures of Mens doings to the obtaining the Grace of God while the Lord himself doth pour out his Grace to Men simply for his own sake without consideration of any thing in them Men will be mincing this Truth c. Then follows what you rehearse And what doth all this amount to but what the Apostle John expresly speaketh 1 John 4.10 and the Apostle Paul Phil. 2.13 Eph. 2.23 That God's Love and Grace is the cause of all that which we do
this Society the Overseers of my Will with this Proviso That if Mr. Neonomian do refuse or do not well and truly execute this my last Will and Testament in the agreed Judgment of this Society that then the whole Trust shall devolve upon the said Society which I doubt not but they will endeavour faithfully to perform Calv. Mr. Neonom Will you accept of this Executorship Neonom I do not know what Power he hath to dispose of the Goods of other Men I take it to be great presumption in him if not dishonesty to dispose of other Mens Proprieties seeing he renounceth them all Antinom Sir I crave your Pardon I must confess Mr. Calvin he hath given me a just Rebuke for when we met in the Eutopian Fields finding me Anonymus he was so courteous as to lend me or rather impose upon me the Name of Mr. Antinomian during my short Converse here he having two Names himself he could lend me one for a little while which as you see for Conversation sake I have made use of with an Intention to return it yea in the mean time did declare and did plead it against all Men that it was Mr. Neonomian's Propriety and therefore I now return it to him accordingly Neonom No no Sir I gave you that Name as your Propriety it best expressing your Opinions Antinom Then Sir you 'l grant I have Power to bequeath it in my last Will and I bequeath it to you Calv. But by your favour Sir it 's a judged Case and therefore you have not Power to bequeath it if you borrowed it it 's Honesty to return it before you depart Neonom What do you mean by a judged Case Calv. I mean that Mr. Neonomian hath before this Society sufficiently given us to understand that his Opinion is that the moral Law is vacated and a new Law brought into the room of it Antinom And more than that there are certain Divines in this City great Friends to this Society that have excepted against his Principles as highly Antinomian Therefore take it as your own by Law Vale. Antinomus Exit Anonymus Calv. Now Sir your great Antagonist is withdrawn I shall deal plainly with you and briefly sum up the Heads of these things wherein it hath manifestly appeared by the foregoing Debates that you have given abundant cause of just offence by your late Writings 1. That you have unjustly charged and misrepresented Dr. Crisp by your self owned to have been a holy Man 2. That you have falsly stated those things which you call Truths and Errors 3. That you have vented your own erroneous Tenents and endeavoured to prove them agreeable to the Articles Confessions and our Orthodox Protestant Writers by perverting their Sense or misapplying what they say when as they are most repugnant to you 1. As to the said Doctor you charge him unjustly with those things which are directly false I shall give an Instance or two of it You say this is one of his Errors chap. 1. that he saith That if the Elect should die before they believe yea when they are under the Dominion of Sin and in the Practice of the grossest Villanies they are as much the Sons of God and justified as the Saints in Glory Whereas he expresly denies the truth of this Charge in his Vindication he makes of himself against some who in his Life-time had reproached his Doctrin and Ministry as you do now p. 637. They say that I should affirm that if an elect Person should die a Whoremonger and Adulterer c. in all kind of Prophaneness he shall be saved He appeals to his Hearers whether ever they heard him Preach any such Doctrin and declares it a gross notorious and groundless Slander And his following words are I said before and say again That there is no elect Person suppose him to be capable and come to years shall die before he is called i. e. before the Lord give Faith to this Person to believe and in some measure frame him to walk by the Spirit according to the Rule of the Gospel The second false Charge is Chap. 2. Err. 2. That he should make Christ the real Blasphemer Murderer c. and that he was so accounted of the Father Whereas he asserts and vindicates the Innocency of Christ's Person he saith only that Christ was accounted a Transgressor from a real Transaction or Imputation of our Sins to him in which Doctrin the Scriptures are most full and express 3. You charge this Error upon him Chap. 10. That Christ is offered to Blasphemers Murderers and the worst of Sinners that they remaining ignorant unconvinced and resolved in their purpose to continue such they may be assured they have a full Interest in Christ and this only by concluding in their own minds upon this offer that Christ is theirs That Christ ought to be offered to the vilest of Sinners and they invited to come unto him is sound Gospel-truth tho' you condemn it for an Error And is it possible a Man of Conscience can slander a Man whom he owneth to be holy with such a notorious Falshood That he should assert that Christ is offered to Men that they remaining ignorant unconvinced and resolved in their purpose to continue such might be assured of their Interest in Christ concluding only in their minds that Christ is theirs this we have proved to be a notorious Slander Many other Falshoods have been proved 2. As for Misrepresentations they run thorow the whole Book 1. Of Dr. C. that you may abuse and expose him 2. Of other noted Writers and Confessions you have horridly misrepresented them to serve your turn in asserting Error and condemning of Truth In misrepresenting Dr. Crisp you have either perverted his meaning and partially rehearsed his Expressions or else condemned what Truth he asserts and defends as great Errors As to the first we have sufficiently made it manifest in some Instances in the first part and it hath abundantly been proved in the whole progress of our Debates And here it is not amiss to add a word or two to what is said to your Error in the sixth Debate that you make a great Cry and Noise about viz. That Dr. C. should say That Christ while he bore Sin and was under the Punishment thereof was the Object of God's abhorrence The Doctor 's words are p. 180. All that hatefulness and loathsomness of Sin is put upon Christ that he stands as it were the abhorred of the Father for a time 1. You leave out as it were 2. You improve this to a hatred of the Person of Christ and a separation of his Natures upon his using the word Separation as Exegetick of forsaking both Scripture Expressions concerning Sin and Christ 3. You hereby manage your design of beating down the Doctrin of Christ's bearing God's Wrath and Curse for us as you do the Doctrin of his bearing Sin 4. As to the word abhorred upon a diligent Enquiry we find it to
be a Scripture Expression concerning Christ yea and of Christ under his Sufferings of Wrath and Curse for Sin for tho' God never hated his Person in the highest of his Suffering neither is it necessary any Judge passing Sentence on the worst Criminal should hate his Person yet his Father dealing with him in a judicial way by the eye and hand of Justice in this present state and standing under the Charge of Sin and thereby cloathed as it were with filthy Garments is said to be as it were abhorred of God and it s not only included in the word forsaken the Syriack word Sabactani and taken from Psal 22. where the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used signifying dereliquit deseruit and so rendred by the LXXII and the Evangelist Abhorrere being used by Classick Authors in the sense of being averse to a state or condition Cic. Abborret ab auribus vulgi it s not agreeable to the Peoples Ear abhorrere a nuptiis to be averse to Marriage and from that aversion to turn away from it or a Person in it so God having purer Eyes than in his Justice to behold or endure Iniquity forsook and turned away as it were abhorring his Son standing under the charge of Sin in that state and condition And accordingly as Christ considered in this respect and state of Guilt and Condemnation is brought in prophetically by the Prophet speaking those words Psal 22. and are actually applied to himself by himself on the Cross Mat. 27.46 So we see in another famous Prophecy of this same state of his Suffering this word Abhor is used by our Interpreters most properly Psal 89.38 Thou hast cast off thou hast abhorred thou hast been wrath with thine Anointed The Hebrew hath it with thy Messias and the 72. hath it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rendred abhorred Sign sprevit reprobavit aspernatus est and by the 72. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast contemned or despised 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dereliquit absecit deseruit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sprevit Resâ—â—nt reprobavit aspernatus aversatus est abhoruit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exconduit Furere percitus And it 's observable that three such highly significant words should he here used in one Verse as expressive of the unspeakable weight of God's Wrath and Curse that lay upon him Thou hast deserted thou hast abhorred thou hast dealt in fury of wrath with thy Messiah In Dr. Abbot's Defence of the Reformed Catholick p. 428. we have the following Passages The Prophet saith The Lord did lay upon him our Iniquities the Lord would break him and make him Subject to Infirmities that we may understand that God did not only leave him to the hands of Men but himself counted him with sinners by the bearing of our sins and therefore dealt with him himself accordingly So that he had cause to cry out Thine Indignation lieth borâ— upon me and thou hast vexed me with all thy storms Lord why abhorrest thou my Soul and hidest thy Face from me thy wrathful Displeasure goeth over me and the Fear of thee hath undone me Yet as touching the Person of Christ we acknowledge that he was excepted from Sin In the Margin he qoutes Psal 89.38 applied to Christ by Athenas Interp. Psal by Arnob and Hierom. on Psal 87. As to the rest of the Mis-representations of the said Doctor which wâ—â—â— take up too much Time and Paper to rehearse I refer you to the particular Debates And as to your charging the Truths that he affirms and insists on for Error I shall mention briefly some principal ones under the next Head As to the second thing in which just Exceptions lie against your Book we have this to charge That you have not in all that is material fully and rightly stated Truths and Errors For 1. You have not rightly divided Truth from Error but confounded them one with another 2. You have condemned Truth for Error and asserted Error to be Truth 3. You have stuffed your Positions with ambiguous Words and Terms that instead of stating you have perplexed them and so that when you seem to speak one thing it 's most apparent you mean another Let me but give a few Instances of many that are more largely and particularly demonstrated in the Debates 1. According to this threefold falseness you state Truth and Error in your 1 2 3 4 5 6 Chapters in the Doctrins of Christ's bearing our Sins and Punishment for them 2. In the Doctrin of Imputation of Christ's Righteousness you plainly deny it to be any other than as to Effects which is no Imputation at all That there was no change of Person betwixt Christ and us That he suffered not in our stead That Spots remain in justified ones as they stand justified before God and therefore not perfectly justified and then imputed Righteousness must be imperfect C. 7. 3. You condemn it for an Error to say The Covenant of Grace as to us is not conditional and that Faith is not a Federal Condition of it And to say The Covenant of Grace was made between the Father and Son as the second Adam and with the Elect in him Or that this Covenant-Transaction is pleadable by us If all this be Error what Truth is there in the Scripture and the Assembly C. 8. p. 53 58. 4. You condemn this for an Error to say Christ is to be offered to the worst of sinners before they are willing to deny themselves and renounce all their Sins and Idols C. 10. p. 81. 5. You insinuate a Condemnation of all Union to Christ before an Act of Faith C. 11. p. 91. 6. You insinuate Perswasion not to belong to the Nature of Faith C. 9. p. 73. and make Faith and Repentance to justifie as qualifying Conditions C. 12. p. 102 114. 7. You insinuate a Condemnation of this great Truth asserted by our Lord Jesus Christ himself That he is the Way Truth and Life in Justification Sanctification and Glory Joh. 14.6 C. 13. p. 121. 8. The Sum of what you design in C. 14. is to condemn this great gospel-Gospel-Truth for Error that a Believer is not to work from Life but for Life p. 153. 9. You condemn all Ways of Assurance besides By-Signs and Marks found in us among which Perseverance is the greatest Here you condemn Assurance arising from the direct Act of Faith and immediate Witness of the Spirit by it self or in and by the Word C. 15 160 161. 10. You charge that great Truth to be an Error That God sees no Sin in justified ones C. 16. p. 170. And to say that Sin cannot hurt them in a way of condemnation C. 17. p. 181. And that the Afflictions of God's People are Effects of God's Vindicative-Justice and his Displeasure against their Persons C. 18. p. 150. 11. You condemn the Protestant true Acceptation and Interpretation of Phil. 3.8 9. C. 19. p. 196. 3. To these I shall name