Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n church_n true_a visible_a 8,046 5 9.4741 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A55308 Speculum theologiæ in Christo, or, A view of some divine truths which are either practically exemplified in Jesus Christ, set forth in the Gospel, or may be reasonably deduced from thence / by Edward Polhill ..., Esq. Polhill, Edward, 1622-1694? 1678 (1678) Wing P2757; ESTC R4756 269,279 440

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

is it imputed to us it is derived down upon us as Members of him else the want of Righteousness in us is not a privative want of what we once had in Adam and afterwards lost in him but a meer negative want as being only of that we never had or forfeited Adam's Righteousness being not imputed to us we never had it Adam's sin being not imputed to us we never forfeited it such a meer negative want is no sin Nay if Adam's sin be not imputed to us our inherent pravity is no sin it cannot be sin in unfallen Creatures it is no sin to be born into the World there is no foundation in us to make it sin and the consequence of this is that there is no such thing as original sin at all in us which to say is to oppose the Doctrine of the Church in all Ages We see here that such an imputation to those in conjunction is possible because it is actually done and it must needs be true because it is done by God who is Truth it self and cannot err You will say It cannot be true primitive Righteousness was never in us we never committed Adam's sin I answer This is one thing which over-turns Religion we are apt to reject that as false which our weak Reason cannot comprehend Is not an internal sin in the Will imputed to the Members of the Body if not why must the Body rise and suffer for it if so sin may be imputed to that which it never resided in in this case the conjunction salves the matter and by a parity of Reason Adam's Righteousness and Sin may be imputed to us as being parts and Members of him and the Imputation is true because it is to those in conjunction and according to a just constitution God set Adam to be a Head of Mankind we are propagated from him as Branches from the Root his fin therefore may be justly imputed to us the Imputation of it is according to the Divine Constitution But the reason of that Imputation is because Adam the Head of Mankind sinned and all in him It is a pretty question which is started in Anselm De Concept Virg. cap. 4. how the Senses and Members in Man should be guilty of sin when God himself subjected them to Man's Will I answer God's order was meet and congruous in so subjecting them yet the act of the Will renders them guilty as being in conjunction with it in like manner God's Constitution that Adam should be the Head of Mankind was just and equitable but this transgression of Adam derives a guilt upon us as being parts and Members of him 2ly The Conjunction between Christ and us must be considered and that is double The one is that Conjunction which is between Christ and Mankind in common the Titles given to Christ will manifest it he is a Mediator not only an internuntial one but a satisfying and atoning one a Mediator above all Peer or Parallel and that in all his Offices in which he acted not as a private Person or in his own name only But as the Office was in Gods or ours in his Prophetical and Kingly Offices he acted in God's Name towards us in his Priestly Office he acted in our Name towards God hence the Apostle saith that every Priest is ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for Men Heb. 5.1 to act in their behalf towards God he was our Sponsor or Surety he undertook to satisfie Justice for us Loe I come to do thy will O God saith he Heb. 10.7 Burnt-offerings and Sacrifices could not pay our Debts but he would do it and for that purpose he took an Humane Nature to do it in never was there such a Surety as he he undertook to satisfie for us not as common Sureties do upon a meer contingency but upon a certain determinate Counsel not when we were solvents or able to reimburse him again but when we were known utter bankrupts under a perfect impossibility to expiate the least sin So plenary was that satisfaction that if we receive him by Faith we are Debtors no longer all our debts are blotted out of God's Book no more to be charged upon us a second payment cannot be demanded of us he was the representative of Mankind He did sustinere nostram personam he stood in our room he suffered in our stead not only nostro bono but nostro loco it may be thought perhaps that Christ was not a proper substitute but it was well said by the Learned Rivet in another case Regulis Legibus humanis Deum alligare vult pulvis cinis We are apt to limit the Holy one to our Rules and measures But if the Mysteries of Christ may be put into the straights of humane Laws and Reason he can scarce be properly any thing of that which the Scripture ascribes to him he cannot properly be a Surety and a Mediator too much less a Priest and a Sacrifice too least of all these and a Redeemer too in the same sufferings A Mediator doth not pay as a Surety doth nor a Surety offer as a Priest doth nor a Priest die as a Sacrifice doth neither is a Redeemer the very same with these but distinct from them all may there be a proper Priest and Redeemer a proper Offering and Paying a proper Sacrifice and Price in the same sufferings these conjunctions seem to carry difficulty in them Nevertheless I verily believe that he was properly all these yet in a way of transcendency above humane Law and Reason it is observable in Scripture that one notion of Christ runs into another the notion of a Mediator into that of a Redeemer he is a Mediator who gave himself a ransom 1 Tim. 2.5 6. the notion of a Mediator into that of a Priest he is a Mediator for the Redemption of Transgressions Heb. 9.15 that is for the expiation of them by offering up himself to God as it is in the precedent verse the notion of a Priest into that of a Surety hence in the midst of a Divine Discourse touching his Priesthood comes in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the surety of the Covenant Heb. 7.22 nay it is observable that these notions of Christ are interwoven with that of a Substitute as the mode of performing them Thus as a Priest he gave himself an Offering and a Sacrifice for us Ephes 5.2 as a Redeemer he was made a Curse for us Gal. 3.13 as a Mediator and Redeemer he gave himself a ransom for all 1 Tim. 2.5 6. in each of which the substitution comes in hence it appears that Christ is properly all these or else as Socinus would have it all seems to be but a Metaphor To add no more these Conjunctions tell us that Christ was so far one with us that those things fell upon him which otherwise he was utterly incapable of The Holy One was made sin the Blessed One a curse his sufferings were properly penal such as were not
established by Grace Again The Power of God being revealed in a way of Grace How should we look up to him by Faith that he may do great things for us He who gave his own Son to come in the flesh can do every thing for us He can raise up Children to Abraham out of the very stones He can melt the Rocky heart into Repentance He can write his Law in the inward parts He can make us willing in the day of his Power He can subdue the most strong and inveterate lusts He can new-frame the heart and draw his own Image upon it He can make all Grace abound towards us and supply all our need according to his Riches in Glory by Christ Jesus Let us look unto him and be saved Let our Souls ever be in a posture of waiting and dependance upon him that the Divine Power which was so eminently manifested in Christ may in a measure be felt and experimented in us that we who are poor impotent Creatures in our selves may be able to do all things through Christ strengthning us CHAP. VII Chap. 7 The Truth of God manifested in Christ The Promise of the Messiah The Messiah is already come Jesus is the true Messiah All the other Promises are built upon him The truth of the Moral Law evidenced in him The Mandatory part proved by his active Obedience The Minatory by his Sufferings He is the substance of the Types and Sacrifices Somewhat in him answers to them and somewhat in him infinitely transcends them The truth of Worship set forth in him He unclogged it from Rituals opened the spiritual mode of it communicates Grace for it reveals the great Reward of Eternal Life HAving spoken of other Attributes I proceed in the last place to consider the TRUTH of God It was a notable speech of a Philosopher That Truth is so great a Perfection that if God would render himself visible unto men he would chuse Light for his Body and Truth for his Soul Indeed God is Ipsissima Veritas very Truth it self and can no more cease to be such than he can cease to be Himself He is true in his Essence Others are only gods by fancy or fiction but he is God by nature and essence He is true in his Promises he means what he promises and he doth what he means Promissa tua sunt Confes l. 12. c. 1● quis falli timeat cum promittit veritas saith St. Austin He is true in his Commands these are the counterpanes of his Will he approves what he commands and rewards what he approves He is true in all his Works the Creatures have first an Ideal being in him before they have a real one in themselves they are therefore true because congruous to the first Truth He is so true that it is impossible that he should lye A lye which arises from weakness or wickedness can no more be found in him than Weakness can be found in Power or Wickedness in Sanctity it self The Truth of God doth in an excellent manner appear in Jesus Christ He is the Complement of the Law the Pearl of the Gospel The Truths of the Old Testament run unto him as to an Ocean to be swallowed up in his Perfection The Truths of the New meet in him as in the Center to receive all their strength and stability from him The Divine Truth is manifested in Jesus Christ several ways First It is manifested in him in that all the Promises and Predictions of a Messiah to come are accomplished and compleated in him Two things will clearly evidence this The one is this It is plain that the promised-Messiah is already come The Scepter shall not depart from Judah nor a Law-giver from between his feet until Shiloh come and unto him shall the gathering of the people be saith Jacob Gen. 49.10 Shiloh is the Name of the Messiah the ancient Rabbins confess it Messiah saith one of them shall not come till there be a clean riddance of Judges and Magistrates in Israel The Jews had Kings in their own Land Heads or Princes of the Captivity in Babylon and after their return from thence they had Governours and Judges but now Government and Judiciary Power hath been for 1600 years departed from them The Messiah therefore is already come Again within the compass of the Seventy weeks mentioned in Dan. 9 many things were to come to pass The re-edifying the City and Temple of Jerusalem the coming and cutting off the Messiah the confirmation of the Covenant the cessation of the Sacrifices and after all these the universal destruction was to ensue However these weeks be computed yet it evidently appears that first the Messiah was to come and be cut off ver 26 and afterwards the Oblation and Sacrifice was to cease v. 27 this being the true order of things in the Text the Messiah must needs come whilst the Sacrifices were standing If the Sacrifices under this second Temple have for these 1600 years ceased as they have then the Messiah must needs be come many Centuries since Scho. Sacr. disput 10.72 73 74. Franzius used this argument to a learned Jew who only returned this answer Perhaps one week in Daniel might be one thousand years Franzius replied If that were admitted Yet if he thought that Daniel's weeks were not expired he would entreat him to shew where the Jews do now sacrifice seeing according to Daniel the Messiah was to come before the abrogation of the Sacrifices it must needs be that the Sacrifices must still stand in being if the Messiah were not yet come To this no answer at all was made the knot being indeed too hard to be untied Further the Messiah was to come while the second Temple was standing hence that of the Prophet The glory of this latter House shall be greater than of the former Hag. 2.9 The first Temple had more of outward glory and magnificence than the second Under the first there were as the Rabbins observe five things the Ark the Fire from Heaven the Majesty or Shecinah the Spirit of Prophecy the Vrim and the Thummim which were wanting under the second From whence then came that greater glory in the second The Prophet tells us God would shake the heavens and the earth that is do a very great work the Messiah the Desire of all Nations should come v. 6 7 His presence should put a greater glory upon the second Temple than was upon the first In the first there was the types and symbols of Gods presence but into the second the Lord himself came in our assumed nature Mal. 3.1 and so filled it with glory This is the only tolerable account can be given of that greater glory This second Temple being long since destroyed it must needs be that the Messiah did come before the fall of it The other is this Our Jesus the Son of Mary is the true Messiah he is that seed of the woman who broke the Serpents head Gen. 3.15
judicia tua The other is Maximilian who in the time of Pope Julius the second expressed his thoughts touching Providence thus Deus aeterne nisi vigilares quàm malè esset mundo quom regimus nos ego miser venator ebriosus ille ac sceleratus Julius There being a Divine Providence such as spreads it self over all things what acknowledgments and adorations should be paid to it it upholds and directs all things it stoops down to worms and hairs it governs the great things of the Church and the World it ascertains the most casual events it rules over the freest agents nay it reduces sin it self the most horrible of ataxies into order it brings light out of darkness order out of confusion good out of evil it leaves nihil inordinatum in universo nothing simply totally inordinate in all the World O how should we hang and depend upon it our purposes should all have that pious condition If the Lord will we will do this or that Jam. 4.15 Our motto should be nihil sine Deo nothing without Providence In all our ways we should look up and wait for the good hand of God to direct and prosper us without which vanity takes us and all comes to nothing In our converses with men we should look above them to him who sits at the stern and rules Do they do us good let us remember the fountain is above man is but the channel not the least good drops from them but what was distilled out of them by Providence Jacob saith That he saw Esaus face as the face of God Gen 33.10 Little of God was to be found in Esau yet in his kindness Jacob spied out a beam of the Divine Goodness and favour Do they deal ill with us let us consider no more of their malice or wrath can issue forth upon us than Providence will suffer the remainder shall be restrained and kept back in their verbal reproaches and obloquies let us say with David the Lord hath bid him curse In their real injuries and oppressions let us say with Job the Lord hath taken away still our eyes should be lifted up above instruments to that wise Providence which orders all In all the great affairs of the Church and the World let us still hold to this the Lord reigneth Psal 93.1 Providence governs the World and all in it heresies and bloody persecutions may break out as a flood yet Truth shall stand and the Church built upon it In a word seeing God is universal Governour we should fear him in every place eye him in every work submit to him in every event depend upon him in every estate and glorifie him in all his administrations This is indeed to confess his Kingdom which ruleth over all and practically to own his Providence which sweetly and strongly disposes all things to his own Praise and Glory CHAP. IX Chap. 9 The Doctrine of Original sin the great moment of it Adam's sin imputed to us The proof of it from Scripture Adam's capacity Adam's righteousness Objections answered Our inherent pravity The proof of it from Scripture The experience of our hearts The actual sins in the world The doctrine of Original sin manifested from Christs extraordinary Conception His Headship opposed to Adam's from the institution of Baptism The wickedness of the Jews in crucifying of Christ The purchase of Regeneration and Salvation made by Christ A short improvement of this Doctrine IN the next place I shall proceed to consider Original sin the Doctrine of which is very momentous The Psalmist in the fourteenth Psalm notably sets forth the corrupt estate of man by nature and again he sets it forth in the 53. Psal almost in the same words pointing out to us the great necessity and utility of this Doctrine Moll Com. in Psal 53. which admirably tends to undeceive and deliver us from that fascinating opinion of our own righteousness and worthiness which too much charms the hearts of all men and withal to prepare and make us ready to accept a cure from Christ and his regenerating Grace This is a most necessary fundamental Doctrine De peccat Or. lib. 2. cap. 24. St. Austin speaking of Adam and Christ saith In horum duorum hominum causa proprie fides Christiana consistit the Christian faith stands in the knowledg of those two men the one the spring of sin and death the other the spring of grace and life And speaking of the Pelagians as denying Original sin he charges them Epist 90 94. fundamenta Christianae fidei evertere to overturn the foundations of the Christian faith Without the knowledg of this sin that excellent rule 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 know thy self becomes altogether unpracticable a man though near to his own soul is a stranger to it though he hath a reflecting faculty yet he cannot make a true inspection into his heart he sees only his outside within there is a deadly wound yet he feels it not a sink a chaos of corruptions yet he perceives it not that holy image which was the beauty and pure rectitude of his nature is departed and gone yet he is not concerned at it He is as Nazianzen speaks totus lapsus all fallen all out of order yet it seems to him as if all were well and in a due posture he is miserable and poor and blind and naked and yet insensible in all these according to that false or rather no-judgment that he hath of himself he is happy in his misery rich in his poverty seeing in his blindness beautiful in his shame and spiritual nakedness in the midst of straits and necessities he finds no need of Christ or regenerating grace the necessity and excellency of these appears in such proportion as the depth and breadth of that sin is apprehended to be Hence it is observable on the one hand Those who own Adam to be a fountain of sin and death do withal own Christ to be a fountain of righteousness and life Those who see the horrible ataxy and pravity in our nature see also the necessity and excellency of Grace in the repairing of it On the other hand the Pelagians and Socinians who deny Original sin are enemies to Grace it is in the power and will of man vel nitere flore virtutum vel sentibus horrere vitiorum Aust de Grat. Christ c. 18. to make himself beautiful with the flowers of virtue or horrid with the brambles of vice So Pelagius In nostra potestate situm est ut Deo obtemperemus Cap. 10. it is in our power to obey God So the Racovian Catechist And what room is there for Grace Aust ad Bonis lib. 1. cap. 21. when the power and free-will of man may do the work The Pelagians affirmed that before the Law men were saved by Nature afterwards by the Law Socin de Serv. pars 3. cap. 2. afterwards by Christ The Socinians say that under the Old Testament good men were
not such I answer The foundation of this Objection That all proper sin is voluntary or an act of our will is not universally true Vain thoughts are sin and such as are the objects of a good mans hatred much more of the hatred of the Holy One yet they are no acts of our will The first risings and stirrings of lust which antecede consent are sins and yet no acts of our will The mutinies and rebellions of the lower faculties against Reason are sins and yet no acts of our will But might this rule hold in actual sin yet surely it cannot in original for then there should be no such thing as original sin though Scriptures Fathers Councils assert it though the Church have been possessed of this truth in all ages yet it is an error there is really no such thing For neither was Adams transgression the act of our will neither is the inherent pravity in us such If then we confess original sin we must acknowledg that the rule extends not to it Thus when Julian objects That there is no sin in Infants because they have not the exercise of free-will St. Austin distinguishes thus Hoc recte dicitur propter proprium cujusque Contr. Jul. lib. 3. cap. 5. peccatum non propter primi peccati originale contagium Whatever may be said in actual sin it is not so in original Further Adams sin as to us may be said to be voluntary in two respects the one is this It was voluntary voluntate primi parentis in the will of Adam the Head of Mankind while he stood in his integrity He was the moral Head of Mankind and as Bellarmine speaks Totius humani generis gessit personam he sustained the person of all mankind his will therefore was interpretatively ours our will was virtually in his Murder is imputed to the hand because the will though it be not there is yet in that person of whom the hand is a part In like manner Adams sin is imputed to us because the will though it was not personally in us was yet in him of whom we are parts and members Thus that learned Professor Dr. De Peccat Or. 107. Ward Ex voluntate primi parentis ex quo tota posteritas derivatur peccatum illud in posteris velut in membris Adae voluntarium esse censetur The will of the first Parent from whom all the posterity is derived renders his sin voluntary in all men as being members of him The other respect is this it is voluntary in us in our own persons habitually there is in us an evil frame and disposition to sin and transgress as Adam did the act was his yet a seed of it is found in us Further they say It is against justice and equity that Adams sin should be imputed to us that we innocent in our selves should be guilty by a sin not our own I answer Adams capacity considered there is no injustice in it he was the head and root of mankind he was the common Trustee of righteousness and immortality for all the Covenant was made with him for himslf and for his posterity his sin therefore was not meerly his but ours neither are we born innocent but guilty If it were against justice and equity to impute his sin to us then it was against justice and equity to punish us for it with death temporal spiritual eternal But the latter is false so therefore is the former Death falls as a punishment upon Infants void of actual sin of their own Thus the Apostle lays it down clearly Sin entered into the world and death by sin and so death passed upon all men Rom. 5.12 Death was not a meer misery or infelicity but a just punishment Surely it consists not with justice and equity that proper punishment should fall on persons altogether void of guilt or that the threatning of death should seize upon those who no way transgressed that command to which it was annexed therefore the imputation of Adams sin to us is so far from being against justice and equity that without it the equity and justice of God in inflicting death as a punishment upon all men cannot be reasonably cleared I need add but one thing more God dealt with Adam the head of mankind upon terms of abundant equity for as Adam sinning was to transfer sin and death to us so Adam obeying was to transfer righteousness and immortality to us The terms were equal on both hands we were in him as our head as well for the obtaining of blessedness upon his obedience as for the incurring punishment upon his disobedience These objections being removed out of the way I conclude That the capacity which Adam stood in at first is a clear evidence that his sin is imputed to us 3. If Adams sin be not imputed to us then neither was his righteousness so then we never were righteous we never were esteemed such in Gods account then we are not fallen creatures we are meerly simply as God made us Then what need of renovation or regeneration An unfallen creature is uncapable of reparation Whence then or by what way could it possibly come to pass that there should be an innate inordination or proneness to evil in us Such things cannot be found in an unfallen rational creature yet doubtless they are found in us The Scripture tells us that we are naturally dark nay darkness it self That the heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked Nay the very Philosophers spied out this Hence Tully saith That man was brought forth into life not by nature as a Mother but as a Step-mother with a body naked frail infirm with a mind anxious in troubles low in fears soft in labours prone to lusts Upon which St. Austin glosses thus Contr. Jul. l. 4. cap. 12. Naturam accusavit rem vidit causam nescivit latebat eum cur esset grave jugum super filios Adam He accused nature the thing he saw the cause he knew not the grievous yoke on the sons of Adam was hid from him Nay the very Socinians though in the point of Original sin they are more blind and void of sense than Pagans confess thus much Homines ad peccandum sunt naturâ proni Volk de Rel. l. 1. c. 6. Men are by nature prone to sin Nay it is added sense and appetite draw them as it were with chains to vice Thus saith one of them Whence then is this natural inordination and pravity Is it from the fall We are not fallen creatures Is it from the Creator It is impossible Darkness cannot be from the Father of lights nor pravity from the fountain of infinite goodness Adams sin not being imputed to us no tolerable account can be given how it should ever come to exist among men But supposing what is most true That it is naturally in us yet unless Adams sin be imputatively ours it is not sin in us What though we want knowledg and righteousness It is