externall and visible which are bread and wine and besides the heauenly internal and inuisible the true body and blood of Iesus Christ together with al his gifts benefits and treasures according to the doctrine of Ireneus Thirdly we agree that in the supper of the lord we are made partakers not onely of the vertue and operation of christ but of the very essence and substance of his true body and blood which was giuen for vs to death vpon the crosse and was shed for vs so that we are most cōfortably nourished with the same vnto eternal life Fourthly we beleeue that the bread wine are not changed or transubstantiated into the flesh and blood of christ but remaine true and natural bread and wine in substance as before so that the bread is called his body and the wine his blood not only because his body and blood are signified by these and set before vs but because so often as we eate and drinke them worthily christ himselfe giueth vs his body blood truely to euerlasting life Lastly we al hold the vse of the supper in both kinds and that without the right vse of the outward signes it is no sacrament vnlesse the bread be eaten and 〈◊〉 wine drunk and therefore we condemne al 〈◊〉 and adoration of the bread al carying it about and lifting it vp by the priest to the people vsed in the Church of Rome The disagreements and diuersities in opinion among vs are in certaine adioynts and in the manner of receiuing for seeing we all reach and confesse the true communication of the true body and the true blood of our Lord Iesus christ the controuersie must needes stand in the manner of communicating and therefore the vnity of the churches is not therby plucked 〈◊〉 The difference standeth in these particulars First one part contendeth that these wordes of christ this is my body must be vnderstood literally and as the words found which yet that side doth not so vnderstand the other part holdeth that they are to be vnderstood sacramentally and figuratiuely according to the declaration of christ the interpretation of Paule and the infallible rules of our christian faith Secondly one part wil haue the body blood of christ essentially and bodily in with and vnder the bread and wine and so to be eaten as that together with the bread and wine they enter into the mouth and body of the receiuers but the other part holdeth that the body of christ which at the first supper sat at table with his disciples doth not now continue with vs vpon the earth but abideth in the heauens and shal remaine there vntil he break the heauens and discend thence to iudgement Lastly one part will haue al communicants that come to the lords table and partake the outward signs whether they come worthily or vnworthily whether they be beleeuers or insidels whether godly or vngodly tó eat the body and drinke the blood of christ corporally and with the mouth of the body so as the beleeuers doe eate him to life and saluation the vnbeleeuers to death and damnation the other side holdeth that the vnbe leeuers abuse the outward signs of bread and wine to their destruction and that only the faithful can eat the body and drinke the blood of christ by a true faith by the working of the holy ghost wherby they are made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone being more neerely and firmely knit vnto him then the members of our body are vnited to our head and thereby drawing from him life euerlasting These are briefely the pointes of difference faithfuly not partially particularly not confusedly set downe in discussing the truth wherof howsoeuer great bitternes hath 〈◊〉 broken out betweene bretheren as likewise did betweene Paule and Barnabas yet setting the 〈◊〉 of disputation aside they were worthy members of the church zealous defenders of the faith learned teachers of the truth earnest destroiers of heresie and rare examples of golines notwithstanding the infirmities imperfections and intemperate stile of th one part And howsoere this odious mak-bate N. D. boldly auoucheth pag. 46. that these men neuer met 〈◊〉 to compound their controuersies but they haue alwaies departed more disagreeing more enimies theu euer they were before their meeting yet al men know he doth either ignorantly or maliciously conceale the seueral points of their vnion and agreement concluded and subscribed at Marpurge anno 1529. cha 15. which was in this sort credimns 〈◊〉 omnes c. we all beleeue and professe concerning the supper of the Lord Iesus Christ that the vse there of in both kinds according to the inctitution of christ is to be obserued And that the masse is not any such worke wherby one man may obtaine grace for another whether he be dead or aliue Also that the sacrament of the altar is the sacrament of the true body and blood of Iesus Christ. And that the spirituall eating of the same his body and blood is very necessary for euerie christian man Moreouer that the vse of this sacrament euen as the word it selfe is instituted of almighty God to stir vp vnto faith the weake consciences of men by his holy spirit And although it could not hither to be altogether agreed amòg vs whether the true body blood of ch be in the bread and wine corporallie yet neuertheles both parties ought to declare christian charity one toward the other so far as conscience can beare And both parts shal diligently pray vnto god that he by his spirit may vouchsafe to establish vnto vs the true vnderstà ding of that matter A men In this act which was subscribed with the hands of Luther Melanthou Brentius 〈◊〉 Oecolampadius Bucer and others we see they professe christian charity and promise earnestly to pray vnto God to reueile his truth vnto them bring them to be of one hart in the truth and confirme them to discerne of things that differ so 〈◊〉 the enimies of our church haue cause rather to enuy our agreement then to in ueigh against our disagreement It is not the custome of the true church tò delight in contention it is the fashion of the church of Rome to command to compel to enforce to presse to oppresse to ban to throw out cursings and to thunder out excommunations against those that dissent frō thē but our churches not withstanding this variance haue not so proceeded one against another as enemies we curse not but blesse we hate not but loue we parsecure not but pray one for another keeping the groūdwork of faith 〈◊〉 ioyning harts and hands we seeke to repaire the ruine of Syon and pull down the fortresses of the enemies therof Moreouer albeit it were to be presumed in men of iudgment and discretion that such as haue leysure with delight and pleasure to paint out the iars and quarels abroad either are or doubtlesse shoulde be in league and loue at home yet
sunder the corrupt heresie of the Anabaptistes then the wooden dagger of humaine tradition which the church of Rome draweth out against them The Scripture is all sufficient to proue all truth and to beate downe all false doctrin that lifteth vp it selfe against God Wherefore we hold their traditions to be superstitions their vnwritten 〈◊〉 are written lies As we retaine the baptisme of children so wee haue alwaies beene ready to maintaine it by the old and new testament as by the sword of the spirit against all the aduersaries thereof Secondly let vs learne from hence 〈◊〉 acknowledge a difference betweene 〈◊〉 and the Lords supper For in baptizing of children 〈◊〉 faith not 〈◊〉 not regeneration is required but onely to bee borne in the couenant but the supper of the Lord requireth knowledge discerning trying and examining of our selues which are not required neither can be performed of young children who know not light from darkenesse nor good from euill Thirdly if infants haue interest in baptisme then hence it floweth that all are conceiued and borne in originall sin and whatsoeuer is of the flesh is flesh So the apostle saith As in Adam all dy euen so in Christ shall all be made aliue There is no difference all haue sinned and are depriued of the glorious kingdome of God we must be iustified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in christ Iesus by nature all are the children of wrath and borne dead in sins and trespasses infants not excepted We learne therfore that whatsoeuer is begotten of man is sinfull and corrupt it must be cut and pared away we must be renewed and borne again by the spirit of God clensing vs from our sins yea the children of the faithfull parents whose corruptions are mortified whose lustes are subdued whose flesh is tamed and brought vnder the obedience of the will of God are notwithstanding brought forth in sin because they are born by carnall generation and not by spirituall regeneration as corne winnowed from the chaffe yet groweth vp againe with it and as the foreskin cut off from the parents recurneth in the child Again haue infants of the faithful right to be baptized Then acknowledge heereby the difference betweene them and the children of infidels Iewes Pagans and Turkes As the children of the Iewes being heires of the couenant were separated distinguished from other children of the wicked Idolatrous nations and were therefore accounted the holy seed so for the same cause and reason the children of christians are called holy borne of either party and parent being faithful and a beleeuer and do differ from the prophane seede of idolatrous people Indeede whosoeuer maketh a true profession of the faith which he holdeth and is ready to lead his life according to that confession though he be not the seede 〈◊〉 child of the faithful yet is to bee baptized though hee came of the race of Turks or paganâ—s as appeareth by the speach of Phillip to the Eunuch If thou beleeuest thou maiest Thus we see that the childreÌ„ of those that professe the faith belong to the church of God the children of Pagans belong not to the church of God loe how great a difference there is betweene them Heerby then the children of the faithfull are discerned and distinguished from the prophane multitude of Atheists Epicures Libertines Arrians Anabaptistes Turkes Sarazens Persians and other barbarous nations which are without christ without hope without God in the world wheras the holy seede of all the faithfull belong to the church of God and are reckoned in the company of the church For this cause the Apostle calleth the whole posterity of Abraham holy that is consecrated and halowed to God If the roote be holy the branches are also holy Not that the children of the faithfull do want originall sinne or that they gather any actuall holinesse or inherent righteousnesse by carnall generation and propagation from their parents but because by benefit of the couenant of God and by force of his gratious promise they are separated from prophane infidels and brought into the bosome of the church as Noah was into the Arke Fiftly this doctrine setteth forth the honor and glory of God For is not God greatly glorified when he sheweth himselfe true in his promises and hath mercy vpon the faithfull for a thousand generations And is not occasion offered to vs continually to glorifie him Can we deserue that God should be our God Nay do we not deserue that hee should not be our god And yet behold he will be the God of our children also Let vs therfore neuer forget his mercies let vs fil our mouthes or rather our heartes with his praises let vs confesse before the Lorde his louing kindnesse and his wonderfull workes before the sonnes of men Sixtly all parents are heereby wonderfully comforted they haue their faith strengthened and are confirmed in the loue of GOD when they see themselues so beloued of GOD that it descendeth and floweth euen to their Children as they are assured by this visible signe This is that worthye and wonderfull promise which wee must receiue by faith I will be thy God and the God of thy seed after thee I will establish my couenant betweene me and thee and thy seed after thee A sentence to be written not onely in Golde but in the tables of our hearts to dwell with vs for euer When we must leaue the worlde and our families in poore estate behind vs and go vnto the father let vs not be dismayed discoraged or discomfited this is the stay of our hope this is the staffe of our cófort this is our Anker-hold that he wil not shut vp his mercy towarde our children but be a gracious God to them as he hath bene to ourselues so that wee may assuredly say vnto them with faithfull Abraham My sonne God will prouide Let vs be content with those things that we haue for he hath saide I will not 〈◊〉 thee neither for sake thee so that we may boldly say The Lord is my helper neither will I feare what man can do vnto me Godlines is great gaine and he that is truely godly is truely rich He that hath Christ hath all things he that wanteth him wanteth all things Heauen and earth are the Lords all the gold and siluer are his who hath promised to be an husbande to the Widdow eyes to the blind a couering to the naked a father to the fatherlesse and he will not forget his kindenesse towards vs for euer Wherefore let vs lift vp our hands and our harts which hang downe let vs strengthen our weake knees and make straight steps vnto our feet God is able to worke contentednes in all his seruants whose power is best seene in our weakenes 〈◊〉 whose glorie shineth brightest in our greatest wants Remember what the prophet saith Psal 37 25 I am young and now am olde
So the Prophet Ieremy saith Breake vppe your fallowe grounde and sowe not among thornes be circumcised to the Lorde and take away the fore-skinnes of yonr heartes ye men of Iudah and inhabitantes of Hierusalem least my wrath come foorthe like fire and burne but none can quench it because of the wickednes of your inuentions Circumcision was the thing wherin they bosted aboue althings it was their glory wheros they bragged to be a cirpeople peculiar to God Now the Prophets recall and reclaime them from trusting in outwarde signes and lying words that shall not profit and stirre them vp to confider the power and effect therof not to rest in cutting off a thin peece of skinne but to cut off quite and cleane their lusts and corruptions which rebell against the spirit This the Apostle teacheth euidently He is not a Iew which is one outward neither is that circumcision vvhich is outvvard in the flesh but he is a Ievv vvhich is one vvithin and the circumciston is of the hart in the spirit not in the Letter vvhose praise is not of men but of God The outward Letter is of no moment with God it must be the circumcision of the heart otherwise the circumcising of the flesh is nothing So if we woulde haue God to take vs for his people and heritage we must be all baptized in our hearts and our soules What will some say baptized in soule and in heart What is that Or how can this be Can the water wash the soule Surely the Water cast vppon our bodies is nothing if we haue not the truth of it As then the apostle Paule maketh a difference between inward circumcision of the spirit and outward circumcision of the letter insomuch that if they would haue the true circumcision indeed they must haue that which is within so is there a great difference between the baptism of the spirit and of the letter between that of the soul and the other of the body betweene that which is outwarde and that which is inward Whosoeuer would haue the true baptism indeed he must be clensed within repent of his Wickednesse mortifie his imaginations deny himselfe renounce his affections and offer vp his soule and body in sacrifice to God that he may renew and regenerate vs otherwise it is a certaine thinge we were neuer indeede and in truth baptized For as the Iewes were charged to be vncircumcised though the fore-skin of the flesh were cut off and so they were circumcised in body so we may in like maner be charged to be vnbaptized albeit we haue bin outwardly washed with water The Iewes chosen aboue all Nations to be the people of God were oftentimes condemned of forgery and fasehood for breaking the couenant of God and not answering to the truth thereof and were 〈◊〉 with the vncircumcisednesse of their heartes that they were worse then the heathen themselues a bastard broode witches children and vnworthy to be accounted Abrahams seede to the end they should bragge no more of their circumcision as Act. 7. Stephen a faithfull witnesse of God obiecteth against them Ye stiffe-necked and of vncircumcised heartes and eares ye haue alwaies resisted the Holy ghost as your fathers did so do you they shew the prophets which shewed before of the comming of that iust of whom ye are now the betrayers and murtherers where we see he discouereth their hypocrysie and setteth their sinnes before their faces telling them that as their fathers rebelled against god so the children followed their fathers footesteppes Do not these things concerne vs Though we haue not circumcision in action and practise belong they not to vs now a daies Yes euen to vs For we shall bee condemned for our vnclensed and vnsanctified heartes not answering to the truth of our baptisme For so much we profit by baptisme as we profit in mortification If then we be once baptized and washed with water we shall pay dearely for our desiling that sacred water which God hath appointed to so holy an vse True it is the water of it selfe is as nothing no other in substance and nature then that wherewith wee washe our hands but when once it is ioyned to the word and applyed to an holy end it is as it were an authenticall seale which God hath engrauen in it Now he that counterfaiteth the seale of a Prince shall hee not bee punished Behold baptisme is the seale of GOD which serueth not to seale conueyances of earthly possessions as house and landes but to assure vs that wee are called to the heauenly life and bringeth good assurance and warrant with it that we be washed from our sinnes by the blood of our Lorde I esus christ and borne again by his holy spirit Shall we break al and escape punished Let vs not then boast of our baptisme and Christianity to say oh we are baptized wee are christened we weare the badge of God these things these things I say will cost vs deere if we make not our baptisme auaileable to our selues and our owne soules by killing our corruptions for thereby we shew our selues like vnto the foole that maketh a vow and immediately after breaketh it Now although we professe the Gospell yet you shall finde a great number that knowe not this vse of baptisme neither wherto it auaileth nor to what endes it was ordained They cal it indeed their christend ome but are altogether ignorant of the nature therof are vnacquainted with the effect of it This will cost them decrely for abusing such a pledge-token at Gods hands seeing it is a meanes whereby we are vnited to our Lord Iesus christ and ingrafted into his death and resurrection Wherefore whereas many haue receiued baptisme in their infancy and haue liued 40. or 50. yeares in the world without knowing to what end they were baptized it had been better for them that they had beene borne dead or perished in their mothers wombe as as vntimely fruite then to haue vnhalowed so holy and precious a thing Thus of the third and last vse of baptisme as also of the parts thereof and generally touching this whole Sacrament The end of the second Booke THE THIRDE BOOKE of the lords Supper being Christs farwel-token to his church and a sweet pledge of his woonderfull kindnesse toward mankinde where in the truth of this Sacrament is manifested the parts are deliuered the vses are shewed the doctrine of the reformed Churches is cleered the errors of the church of Rome are euidently conuinced and the meanes set downe how euery one is to be prepared to the worthy receiuing thereof with fruite and comfort CHAP. 1. of the names and titles of this Sacrament together with the reasons and vses thereof IN the former Booke we haue spoken of baptisme the first sacrament of the church together with the partes and vses thereof Now we are to set downe the doctrine of the Lordes supper which is the second sacrament For after that God
are oftentims in gendred Eucharist and so consume it whether the shewes of bread be the body without the blood and the shews of wine the blood without the body It were infinite to note out all their contentions and contradictions these may suffice to shew how the enimies of God fight one against another and all of them with their own shadwoes And thus much of the late doting deuise of transubstantiation which is the soule and life of their popish religion the deniers or doubters wherof they pursue with fire and sword more eagerly then such as are enemies to the blessed trinity The last generall vse is this if christ deliuered both these signes not onely the bread but the wine also to his disciples then both kinds by the minister are to be deliuered and both kinds by the people are to be receiued not bread alone nor wine alone but bread and wine the bread in token of his body giuen for vs and the wine in token of his blood shed for vs. This is the ordinance of Christ this is a greeable to the scripture Notwithstanding the Church of Rome hath decreed that it is not necessary for the people to cómunicate in both kinds and holdeth them accursed that hold it necessary for the people to receiue the cup cósecraced by the priest Thus it appeareth they labor nothing more then to take from the faithful the sweete comfort of the Lords supper This is a sacrilegious corruption of christs institution deuised by sathan broached by Antichrist published by his adherentes in the corrupt times of most palpable darknesse as may appeare by these reasons Frist if none may drinke of the consecrate wine but the priest then none should eat of the bread but priests so that they must either exclude the people from both which I trust they dare not or admit them to both which as yet they do not For to whom Christ said Take and eate to those gaue he the cup and said Drinke ye Wherefore the signes being both equal all communicants must drinke of the one as wel as eate of the other there being the same warrant for the one that there is for the other and the let that would barre the one will hinder the other so as the thinges which God in his goodnesse hath ioyned together man without sinne cannot separate Secondly when Christ instituted this sacrament he said Drinke ye all of this and by all he vnderstood of the Communicants And the Euangelist Marke addeth They al drank of it to wit all that were present at his last supper who had before eaten of the bread of the Lord. This also appeareth by the Apostle 1 Cor. 12. They haue beene all made to drinke into one spirit This commaundement of Christ being generall imposeth a necessity vpon the people when he saith Take ye eate ye drinke ye do ye this These commaundements are perpetuall vnchangable and alwaies in force not arbitrary not temporall not repealed but bind the conscience to the end of the world against which no limitation or dispensation can be alowed being the commaundementes of God not of man Thirdly the cup is a part of Christes will and testament Now touching the nature of a testament or will the saying of the Apostle is knowne If it be but a mans testament when it is confirmed no man doth abrogate it or addeth any thing therto where he sheweth that the dead mans wil may not be changed nothing can be put to nothing taken out without forgery and salsehood This is the law of nature and Nations But the Lordes Supper is a sacrament proper to the new testament as Christ saith this cup is the new testament in my blood which is shed for you This testament the Lord Iesus made the night before he was betrayed he sealed it by shedding his most precious blood he hath giuen Legacies not of earthly and temporall but of heauenly and eternall goods And seeing he hath appointed the cup of this his testament to be deliuered and drunke of all those for whom his blood was shed it is intollerable boldnes and presumption to take away the vse thereof from the greater part of the Church and an infallible token of an vnshamefast and shamelesse harlot to alter her husbands will to defraud and defeat his children of that worthy portion which their father alotted 〈◊〉 and so to keepe backe part of their inhetitance and 〈◊〉 Fourthly the blood of Christ shed vpon the Crosse belongeth not onely to the pastors and teachers but to all the faithfull that come to the table of the Lord as appeareth by the wordes of Christ This is my blood which is shed for you and for many why then should the blood of Christ be denyed or the cup of the Lord be barred from them If then the blood of Christ were shed for the people as well as for the ministers surely the cup belongeth to one as wel as to the other If the people haue the greater who shall keepe them from the lesse If they haue their part in the thing signified who shall deny them of the outward signe For as the fruite and effect of the blood of Christ is common to the people with the pastor so should the cup also which is the communion of his blood shed for the redemptionof the peoples sinnes be diuided indifferently betweene the pastor and the people Fiftly the Apostle deliuered that to the Church which he had receiued from the Lord Iesus Now the Church ought diligently to obserue the written traditions and verities of the Apostles which are committed to posterity to be kept inuiolably But he hath deliuered how the Lord after taking blessing breaking and distributing of the bread likewise tooke the cuppe blessed and distributed it among them so saith the Apostle must the Churches do If then he receiued this from the Lorde to deliuer both kinds to the people let the Church of Rome consider with her selfe from whence she hath receiued the contrarye to withhold one of the kinds from the people for both cannot proceed from one and the same spirit of truth which is neuer contrary to it selfe Sixtly if all the faithfull that come to the Lordes Table must shew forth the Lords death vntill he come and this be done by them as wel by drinking of the cup as by eating of the bread then all the communicants must receiue the sacrament vnder both kinds vntill the second comming of christ But the faithfull must shew forth the lordes death by eating of that bread and drinking of that cup as the Apostle teacheth As often as ye shall eate this bread and drinke of this cup ye shew the Lordes death vntill he come Therefore all communicants must partake the sacrament vnder both kinds Seuenthly the Apostle giueth an expresse commaundemēt to 〈◊〉 whole church which al must obey that come worthily to this holy table Let a man examine himselfe
strong hot fiery and fuming was wont to allay it with water that it might be mild and temporate least that which was taken 〈◊〉 helpe and further the soule should 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 the body This began for conueniency not for 〈◊〉 for fitnesse not for signification for sobriety not for any mistery But the water is no part of Christs institution neither can it be proued that Christ or his Apostles vsed water with their wine or commaunded others to mingle wine and water in this mistery or that Christs apostles euer receiued it as a matter of faith or taught it to be a necessary parte of this sacrament For Alexander the 5. Byshop of Rome was the first that mingled water 〈◊〉 wine at consecration and ordained that the oblation should be of vnleauened bread and not of leauened as till that time had beene vsed Wherefore let vs retaine and maintaine the plaine and simple institution of Christ who in his last Supper gaue wine not water to be drunk for he calleth it the fruit of the vine which is wine and not water Againe they may be pressed and hampered with their own dreames and deuises For whereas they hold that the wine must be mingled with water and that the elementes after the words of consecration are transubstantiated and remaine in their owne nature no more I would aske this question of these Watermen rowing in the troubled Sea of their owne decrees who are neere of kinne to the old hereticks called Aquarij whether the water mixed with the wine be turned into blood If they say it is not then they deny transubstantiation of all that is within the cup and so shake the vertue of their consecration in pieces if they say it is then will they make Christ a watery body and elementall besides it cannot be by vertue os Christes institution where water is neither expresled nor included So then their best defence is to answer with the Pharisies We cannot tell To conclude let vs not seeke to be wiser then Christ nor to mingle together more mysteries then we haue learned of him as Paule saith of his own practise That which I receiued of the Lord I haue deliuered vnto you Neither prophet nor Apostle nor Angell from heauen is to teach otherwise then Christ himselfe hath taught as he charged his disiples Teach them to obserue all things whatsoeuer I haue commaunded you He hath supreme authority in the Church his doctrine alone should be heard as the father himselfe witnesseth from heauen This is my beloued sonne in whom I haue delight heare him We are not to regard what other before vs haue thought meete to doe but what Christ did who is before all other and called himselfe the truth and not custome Thus much of the third outward part of the Lordes Supper to wit the two signes of bread and wine Chap. 6. Of the fourth outward part of the Lords Supper THe last outward part remaineth which are the communicantes whose actions are outward to take the bread and wine into their hands then to eate the bread and drinke the wine to the nourishment of their bodies as is directly proued by the institution of this sacrament where christ gaue the bread and cup into their hands the Disciples receiued the one and the other they did eate the bread and all dranke of the cup. These being the necessary actions of euery receiuer to take to eate to drinke it beateth down many falfe doctrines of the Church of Rome as their reseruation ostentation eleuation adoration circumgestation procession and pryuate communion it teacheth also many necessary truths to direct our knowledge and increase our obedience which we will consider in order First of all did Christ commaund his Disciples to eat and. drinke that he deliuered and posted them not ouer to eate thereof when they were departed neither willed them to defer their eating vntill afterward then all keeping and reseruing of bread in boxes pixes and other vessels of the church for daies weekes and months all shewing it to the people lifting it ouer the priests head and going with it in procession is vtterly vnlawfull For it is no sacrament vnlesse it be vsed according to Christs institution and cómandement but to the institution it belongeth as one the behalfe of the minister to take to blesse to poure out and to distribute so on the behalfe of the communicants to take to eate and to drink in them al to shew thereby the Lords death and to do it in remembrance of him which cannot be performed but by obseruing the whole action For how can they shew the Lords death or do it in remembrance of christ vnlesse they take and eate And as the paschallambe was not that passeouer vnlesse it were killed and eaten no more is the bread and wine a sacrament except they be receiued and digested The passeouer was the same in effect with the Lords supper who was the lambe slaine from the beginning of the world Now god commaunded that none of it should remaine vnto the morning but the remnant should be consumed with fire The like may be said of Manne the same in substance with this sacrament it was not to be kept caried about Let no man reserue thereof til morning Besids there is the same reason of the cup and of the bread but they reserue not the wine they carry it not about to shew the people why then should they keepe the other part Likewise when christ said to his Apostles Go baptize the nations it was no baptisme by the confession of the aduersaries themselues vnlesse there were some person baptized so when christ said Take and eat there is no sacrament vnlesse there be a receiuing and eating For as the one standeth in washing so doth the other in eating and drinking not in keeping and reseruing not in carying in procession on a white horse not in hanging it vp vnder a Canopy nor in bearing it to the sicke with bell and candle Christ tooke bread and gaue it to his Disciples saying Eate ye he tooke the cup and when he had giuen thanks he said drinke ye all of this do this in remembrance of me as often as ye shall eate this bread and drinke of this cup ye shew the Lordes death till hee come But they hang in it the pixe beare it in boxes and carry it about in publike tryumphes and in common calamities when any iudgement and war plague pestilence and famine and like visitation is among them then Iack in the boxe goeth abroad in solemne processions to be seene which is the way to increase not to slack to kindle not to quench to prouoke not to reuoke the iudgementes of God gone out against them Besides they shew this sacrament to the simple people to fall downe to it as to a God they put it vpon the breastes of the dead and sometimes lay it in
christ our sauiour they neither eate his flesh nor drinke his blood Wee must open the eyes of our faith to beholde him and the mouth of our soule to receiue him for by faith onely we are made partakers of him which the vngodly want he that drinketh of the blood of christ shal neuer be more a thirst Thirdly we know that satan the prince of darknes ruleth in all the harts of the children of disobedience sitteth in their consciences as the God of this worlde and filleth them full of iniquity as wee see in the example of Iudas Now if these receive the body of Christ then christ and the deuill shoulde dwell in one subiect togither and bee ioynt-possessors of one and the same house but this cannot be these cannot be at one these can neuer be friends reconciled there is no fellowship between righteousnes and vnrighteousnes ther is no communion between light and darkenesse there is no concord betweene Christ and Beliall Fourthly the Apostle teacheth that where christ is he worketh mortification and dying to sinne Rom. 8 If any haue not the spirit of Christ the same is not his and if Christ be in you the body is dead because of sin but the spirit is life for righteousnes sake But the wicked are not dead to sin they are dead in their sinnes and trespasses and they haue sinne not onelie remaining but raigning in them therfore christ cannot be in them Fiftly where christ is there are all things necessary to saluation and to whom God giueth his sonne to him he giueth iustification sanctification redemption repentance remission of sinnes and eternall life as Rom. 8. If God be on our side who shall be against vs Who spared not his owne sonne but gaue him for vs all to death how should he not with him giue vs all things also But the wicked haue not these gifts accompaning saluation they are not iustified they are not sanctified they are not regenerated therefore they cannot haue christ from whom these flow Sixtly we are charged to try and proue our owne hartes whether Christ be in vs or not that thereby we may discerne of our estate and standing in the faith 2 Cor. 〈◊〉 Proue your selues whether ye are in faith examine your selues know ye not your owne selues how that Iesus Christ is in you except ye be reprobates To what purpose serueth this tryall and examination if christ may bee in vs and yet remaine reiected Wherefore Christ cannot be in vs if we bee not approued but refused of God Lastly the Apostle chargeth the Church of the Corinthians not to eate things sacrificed to idols in the idols temple because they cannot be partakers of christ and the Dinels nor drinke of the cvp of Christ and of the cup of Dyuels 1 Cor. 10. 20. 21. These thinges which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice them to Diuels and not vnto god and I would not that ye should haue fellowship with the Diuels ye cannot be partakers of the Lords Table and of the table of Diuels Where hee sheweth that a man may come polluted with idoll sacrifices to the Lords Supper but then he cannot be partaker of Christ indeede and in truth Thus we see the doctrine of the church of Rome striken to the ground which hold it as a principle of their faith and teach it to others that wicked men do receiue and eate christ himselfe in the supper making christ indeede to be no Christ. For whereas wee haue shewed that this sacrament consisteth of the outward signs which are bread and wine and the inward truth represented by them which is Christes body and blood according to the doctrine of the holy scripture and the common consent of all antiquity the Romanists haue turned this trueth topsie turuie and haue laid a new plat-forme of the 〈◊〉 of the Supper Hence it is that they haue abolished the signes of bread and wine and make Christ Iesus an outward parte as it were thrusting him out of the dores to be receiued of all both good and bad and the grace of Christ to be the inward part taken only of the faithfull Thus they make a deuorcement and a separation between Christ and his sauing graces which can neuer be parted and deuided For whosoeuer receiueth Christ pertaketh the merits and graces of christe and whosoeuer enioyeth the graces of christ imbraceth withall christ himselfe Besides if christ be the signe and the sanctifying graces of Christ the thing fignified according to the rule of the church of Rome what shall we say of the accidents and shewes of bread and wine whereunto shall they be reduced what parte shall they act and play in this comedy wherefore we hold it as a strong trueth which we haue euinced by sundrie reasons that wicked men are not made partakers of christ Chap. 12. Of the first vse of the Lords supper HItherto we haue spoken of all the partes of this sacrament as well outwatde as inwarde which is the first 〈◊〉 to be considered in the doctrine of them as we shewed before now we are to handle the vses or endes of the Lordes Supper which are principally these three first to shew forth with thanksgiuing the death crosse and sufferings of christ Secondly to teach vs our communion and growth with and in christ thirdly to declare our communion and growth in and with our brethren In these three standeth the knowledge of those rich and greate benifites which are bestowed vponall worthy communicants which haue sactified and prepared their heartes for this holy action These thinges being duely considered doe directly condemne the church of Rome who burying these true ends of the Lords Supper the commemoration of his passion the merit of his crosse our communion with Christ and our fellowship one with another haue altered it like the ship-mans hose into all forms and fashions and make it profitable for all purposes for peace and war for tempestes and calme weather for the fruites of the earth and distemperature of the ayre for the whole and sick for men and beasts for the liuing and for the dead And to begin with the last as none of the least corruptions of this Sacrament it was concluded in a Counsel that as a prayer therin is made for the liuing so the remembrance of the dead is to be made in all Masses It is adiudged an excellent remedy against storms and tempests of the sea and therefore al sea-men are warned in times of danger to call to their mindes and remember to sing the Masses d which are accustomed to be sung for tēpests And as they make it good in storms so they make it serue turn in the day of battell to saue them from the sword of the enemy for the Priests are charged to say the Masses vsed for them that go to wars Besides these abuses they make it auaileable to purge and cleer offendors suspected of any crime
testament and the new they had sundry significant signes and Ceremonies whose interpretation was not easily knowne vnto them Thirdly seeing God hath giuen vnto vs two signes and added two seals to his word and writings we ought to haue the stronger faith in his mircyfull promises For wherefore hath he doubled the signes but that wee should encrease in faith and as it were double our assurance of his graces Lastly this number of two ouerthroweth the number of seauen sacramentes maintained in the church of Rome which iust number was first broched by Peter Lumbard afterwarde ratysied in the Counsell of Florence and lastlye established in the Counsell of Trent and is now become the common doctrine of that counterfect church For besides baptisme and the Lords supper which wee receiue they haue instaled into the number of sacraments Confirmation Penance Matrimony Orders and extreame Vnction contrary to the doctrine of the scriptures contrary to the nature of Sacramentes and contrary to the euidence of sundry reasons And firist of all confirmation cannot bee lifted vppe into the seate of the Sacramentes or sit downe in this Chaire of honour because it wanteth the institution of Christ it wanteth an outward signe it hath no word to warrant it or promise of blessing for howsoeuer the Apostles by imposition of hands gaue the holy ghost those miraculous gifts are now withdrawne from the church of God Lastly they haue aduanced it aboue baptisme they administer it in a strange tongue and halow the greazy oyle to purifie soule and body Secondly their popish penance instituted by bodily chastisements to make satisfaction for sinne to God is no sacrament of the new testament nor any sacred thing being thus vnderstood For we acknowledge no other satifaction for sinne wherein God delighteth and the conscience of man 〈◊〉 but only the death and obedience of christ Besides true repentance hath beene preached and practised from the beginning of the world after that sinne entred into the world Furthermore their penance hath no visible signe as baptisme and the supper of the Lord haue Thirdly matrimony albeit it be a diuine ordinance honourable among all estates yet can be no Sacrament of the church of christ because it was instituted before the law it is ratified among the infidels which are no members of the church it hath no promise of grace and saluation ioyned to it and albeit it be honorable in all yet it is not necessary in all Lastly the Roman church esteemeth it as an vnclean thing a prophanation of holy orders a liuing in the flesh so that as with one hand they aduance it to a great dignity with the other hand they cast it downe with great disgrace and contempt as vnworthy of the high and holy priesthood Fourthly orders come in the next place which are the offices and ministry of the church but no sacrament or sacraments of the church For then according to the number of orders we should multiply the number of sacraments Neither haue they any outward element and visible signe Lastly we are come to extream vnction which we suffer not to maske vnder the name of sacraments but pul off the vizard thereof because the church had the vse of anoynting so long as it retained the miraculous gift of healing Besides it hath no word ofinstitution to warrant the continual practise of it vntill the second comming of christ Wherefore seeing the word of God teacheth the number of two sacraments onely and the church of Rome instructeth her children in the number of 7. sacraments neither moe nor lesse they must pardon vs if we harken rather to the scriptures then to their traditions rather to God then to man rather to the truth then to the spirit of error Hitherto we haue spoken of the Sacramentes in generall of their parts their vses their number now we come to speake of them in particular first of baptisme then of the Lords supper And howsoeuer baptisme hath sundry significations yet as it signifieth that washing with water which serueth to seale the couenant of the new testament it is the first sacrament wherein by the outward washing of the body with water once in the name of the father of the son and of the holy ghost the inward clensing of the soule by the blood of christ is represented This descrption teacheth that such as are not yet baptized are not to be admitted to the lords table that albeit dipping be not necessary to the being of baptisme yet washing with water is of the essence of this sacrament that such as are once baptized are not to be rebaptized albeit they haue beene baptized by heretickes and that whosoeuer is baptized hath made a solemne couenant to professe the Christian religion Now q wee are to consider in Baptisme as wee did before generally in a Sacrament these two thinges his partes and his vses The partes of baptisme are outward and inward The outward partes are these foure The first outward part is the Minister as the Messenger of God For baptisme is a part of the Minystry and God hath ioyned the ministry of the word sacraments togither Wherfore the minister must be carefull and not carelesse in the execution of his osfice who is to sanctifie the Water and to wash the party Moreouer the people are directed to whom to resort when they haue children to be baptized Lastly the Church of Rome prophane baptisme when they appoint mid-wiues and priuate persons to baptize children The second outward part is the word of institution which is as the forme of this sacrament The third part is the element of water which is the matter whereof baptisme consisteth Whosoeuer therefore baptiseth with any other liquorthen with water as with blood with sand with snow with milk or such like matter doth frustrate Baptisme and maketh it an idell ceremony Againe all Popish corruptions added and annexed to this sacrament contrary to the simplicity of the gospel as creame crosses censors tapers spettle salt and such like vnsauory trumpery are 〈◊〉 hauing also a superstitious opinion of holinesse and worship ioyned with them Also if water be an outward part the want of washing with water cannot hinder the saluation of such as dye without baptisme All perished not vnder the law that died without circumcision God is not more rigorous vnder the Gospell This therefore is a bloody and discomfortable doctrine to be abandoned and abiured of all parents of all childeren of all Christians The fourth outward parte of baptisme is the body that is washed Novv such as are to be baptized must be within the Couenant these are eyther men and Women of riper yeares or else the infantes of such vvho haue interest in Baptisme as vvell as their parentes This condemneth the Romyshe practise of baptizing bels and serueth to set forth the great loue of God to all
beleeuers who vouchsafeth to be their God the god of their seed Hence likewise it appeareth that infants are to be baptized For baptisme succeedeth in place of circumcision the Apostles baptized whole houses Christ calleth infants and sucklings vnto himselfe and 〈◊〉 that to such belongeth the kingdome of Heauen they are Christ sheepe and members of his body Hence we learne that the baptisme of infantes is no vnwritten tradition but a written and diuine institution taught in the Scriptures Consider also heereby the difference betweene baptisme and the Lords Supper and that all are conceiued in originall sinne Acknowledge also a difference between them and the children os Infidels and let parents be incoraged to bring vp their children in the instruction and reformation of the Lord. Hitherto of the outward parts now follow the inward parts which also are four in number First god the father represented by the Mi. wherby our faith is gretly strengthned For whensoeuer the eie seeth the minister 〈◊〉 water on the body faith beholdeth god the father clensing the soule with the precious blood of his sonne Christ. The seconde part is the spirit of God hauing relation to the word and promise of God and therefore whensoeuer wee come to heare the word or to receiue the sacramentes we must craue the assistance of the spirit to open our harts as he opened the hart of Lydia If this in ward teacher be wanting the eare heareth and the hand handleth but the hart is hardned The third in ward part of baptism is Christrepresented by the water This serueth greatly to confirme our faith to consider with our selues when we behold with our bodily eies the water poured vpon the bodie baptizd the blotting out of all our sinnes by the blood of Christ Iesus The 4. inward part is the soul clensed P most liuely and effectualy represented by the body washed For the washing of the body representeth the clensing of the soul. This teacheth that by nature we are corrupt and abhominable so that God must worke in vs both the will and the deede These are the foure in ward parts of baptisme The agreement betweene these outward and inward parts is very euident For as the Minister by the word of institution applyeth Water to the washing of the body so the father through the working of the spirit applyeth the bloode of Christ to the clensing of the soule Thus farre of the parts of Baptisme both the outward and the inward parts now we come to the vses thereof which are principally three First to shew our placing and planting into the blood of Christ to remaine in him for euer This coniunction with Christ is not bodily or naturall but misticall and marueilous in our eyes for we are made one with Christ by the same spirit dwelling in Christ and in all the members of Christ. So then the saints triumphing in heauen and al the beleeuers fighting vpon earth as souldiers in warfar haue one and the same spirit of christ dwelling in them and therfore are one with him Secondly to assure vs of the remission of our fins that we may bee able to stand in the presence of God hauing put on the garments of Christ as Iacob receiued the blessing clad in the garments of his elder brother This ouerthroweth the doctrin or rather doting of the church of Rome which teacheth that baptism abolisheth al sins going before it and leaueth nothing that hath the name or nature of sinne If this were a truth of god not a dreame of men it is not only decent but greatly to be desired to haue baptisme deferred vntil old age nay vnto the hower of death that so we may depart hence in peace with greater assurance of Gods fauor in the pardon of our sins Thirdly to slay the old man and to kil our natural corruption by the power of the death and burial of christ besides to raise vs vp againeto holines and newnes of life by his resurection Hence it is that the Euangelists call it the Sacrament of Repentance admonishing euery one of vs to expresse the strength and power of baptisme as the Prophets of tentimes exhort the lews to circumcise the forskin of their harts and to harden their necks no more So we ought not to content our selus to be baptized in body but must labour to be baptized in soul by a daily proceeding in regeneration by bringing foorth the fruites of sanctification and applying Christ Iesus to our full iustification Thus much of baptisme the honourable badge of our profession and dedication to Christ that dyed vppon the Crosse what it is what are the 〈◊〉 and vses thereof Now wee come to the Sacrament of the body and bloode of CHRIST e which is called by sundrye names in the new testament Sometimes it is called the Communion teaching that we are one body coupled togither in Christ shewing that it is to bee receiued of many togither and admonishing vs of vnity and concorde among our selues Sometimes it is called the Lords Supper hence we see who is the author of it no man no Angell but the Lord Iesus leauing it for a fare-well token of his loue toward vs. We must also come with an earnest desire hungring after Christ that we may be satisfied with his righteousnesse Sometimes it is called the breaking of breade this sheweth that the substance of breaderemayneth after the wordes of consecration that figuratiue speeches are vsed in the Sacrament and that this externall rite of breaking the bread vsed by Christ practised by the Apostles obserued by the pastors of the church ought not to be omitted and ouerpassed Sometimes it is called the table of the Lord this teacheth that christ and his Apostles at the celebration of it vsed a table not an altar that it is a Sacrament not a sacrifice and that we ought to draw neere vnto it with all regard aud reuerence Lastly it is called the new testament or Will of Christ. This title teacheth that there is a double couenant betweene God and man the one old the other new the one of the law the other of the Gospell the firste of Workes the seconde of grace Againe it serueth to condemne the cursed sacriledge of the church of Rome which addeth and detracteth altereth and mangleth this sacrament at her own pleasure and mingleth it with the leauen of her owne inuentions This is a great comfort to all Gods children to consider that all faithfull christians are the heires of Christ to whom he hath promised saluation of their soules and forgiuenesse of their sinnes As we haue seene the seueral names of this sacrament which shew the nature there of vnto vs so now we will set downe what the lords supper is The supper of the lord is the second sacrament wherein by visible receiuing of bread and wine is represented our spirituall
vp the very body and blood of Christ to god the father for the sinnes of the liuing of the dead we receiue it not but condemne it to the pit of hell from whence it came For Christ offered vp himself but once And if they be priests properly to offer him they must likewise be the murtherers of him forasmuch as when he was offered he was killed Moreouer they make his al-susficient sacrifice to bee vnperfect which notwithstanding maketh vs perfect and themselues to be after a sort mediators betweene god and man and so depriue themselus of the sweet mediation of Christ. Thus much of the gainefull Marchandize of Masses vsed in the church of Rome and of the oblation or rather abhomination thereof These and many other errors are discouered and opened in this Treatise which I commend vnto thee good christian reader desiring thy farther instruction in the truth I know it cannot but grieue thee to hear of contentions and dissentions especially in the matters of God wherein wee should al think and speak one thing Wherefore thou must remember that it cannot be auoided but offences wil com but wo be to him by whom they come The apostle saith There must be euen haeresies among you that they which are among you may be knowne For my part I haue labored to doe no more then to quench the fire which other haue kindled and to plucke vp the weeds which other haue planted The successe of this worke I commit to the Lord the examination and fruit thereof to thee Read it with iudgement Try al things and hold fast that which is good Lay al partialy aside and weigh the doctrine set before thee with the ballance of the Sanctuary The Lord of heauen and earth bring vs all to be of one mind and of one hart in the truth and giue vs the spirit of vnderstanding that we may be able to discerne light from darkenes and truth from errour and that we may not be caried away with euery 〈◊〉 of false doctrine but that we may knowe what is the good and acceptable wil of God and may grow vnto a perfect man in Christ Iesus to whose mercifull direction and protection I commend thee Amen FINIS The Principles of Christian religion set downe in Questions and answers shortly for the remembrance and plainely for the vnderstanding of all persons requisite to be learned and knowne before they be admitted to the Lords Supper Q. What is true religion A. It is the knowledge of gods wil to the end we may serue him in holinesse and righteousnesse Ioh 17 3 Eph 4 23 24. Q. How many parts are there of religion A. Two repentance and faith Mar 1 15 Act. 20 20 21 Q. What is repentance A Repentance is a turning from al sin vnto righteousnes act 3 19 Ezek. 18 21 Q How many things haue we to consider in repentance A Two thinges the parts of it and the meanes whereby to attaine it Esa 1 16 xvii xx Q What are the parts of repentance A Two partes first a for faking of sin with an hatred and sorrow for it Secondly a betaking of ourselues vnto righteousnes with a loue and liking of it 2 Cor. 7 x xi Q What are the meanes to come to repentance A Two meanes first the knowledge of our sins by the law Secondly the consideration of the punishments due to sin Reuel 2 5 Q How many commaundements are there in the law A Ten Exod. 34 28 Deut. 4. xiii x 4 Q 〈◊〉 how many tables are the 〈◊〉 deuided A Into two tables Mar xii 30 xxxi Exod xxxi xviii 34 1 Q What 〈◊〉 the first table concerne A Our duties toward God contained in the 4 first commaundements Math xxii 36 37. 38 Q what is the 〈◊〉 commaundemant A Thou shalt have none other Gods but me Deut 5 7 Exod 20 3 Q what is the summe of this law A We must not account that as God which by nature is no God but haue and chuse the true God onely for our god Mar. 12 29 Q What is the second commaundement A Thou shalt not make to thy selfe any grauen image Exod 20 4 Q What is forbidden and commaunded in this law A We must not worship the true god falsely but worship god as he hath appointed in his word Ioh. 4 24 Iosh 24 15 Esa. 29 13 Q What is the third commaundement A Thou shalt not take the name of the lord thy God in vaine Exod. xx 7 Q What is forbidden and commaunded in this law A We must not bereaue god of the honor due to him but vse his titles word and works with al reuerence Math. 5 33 34 35 36 37 Q What is the fourth commaundement A Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it holy Exod xx 8 Q What is commaunded and forbidden in this law A We must 〈◊〉 the sabbath with the works of the sabbath and not 〈◊〉 it with our owne works Esa. 58 13 Neh 13 xv xvi c. Q What are the workes of the 〈◊〉 A 〈◊〉 as are holy and of present necessity Luk 14 3 4 5 Act. xx 7 Q 〈◊〉 must keepe the Sabbath A 〈◊〉 thy son thy daughter thy man thy maid and thy stranger Exod xx x Q 〈◊〉 of the first table what doth the second table concerne A 〈◊〉 duties toward our neighbors in the sixe last commaundementes Rom. 13 8 9 Q Who is our neighbour A Our neighbor is euery one of our owne flesh yea our enemies Esa 58 7 Luk. x 35 36 37 Math 5 44 Q What is the first commaundement A Honor thy father and thy mother Exod xx 12 Q who is our father and mother A Al superiors set ouer vs of god for our good Rom 13 1 2 Eph. 6 1 2. 3 Q what doth the word honor 〈◊〉 A It 〈◊〉 reuerence obedience and maintenance whether they be worthy or vnworthy that are our superiors Math xxii xxi Q what is the first commaundement A Thou shalt not kil Exod. xx 13 Q what is forbidden and commaunded in this law A We are charged not to hurt our owne life or our neighbors but to preserue and tender it as our owne 1 Ioh. 3 15 Math 5 xxii xxiii 24 Q what is the seuenth commaundement A Thou shalt not commit a dultery Exod 20 14 Q what is required in this law A we must kepe our bodies and soules chast from consenting to vnclean lustes Math 5 8 29 〈◊〉 Col. 3 5 Q what is the eight commaundement A Thou shalt not steale Exod 20 15 Q what is forbidden and commaunded in this law A we must not 〈◊〉 or hurt our neighbors goods but maintaine and preserue them Eph 4 28 1 Thess. 4. 6 Q what is the ninth commaundement A Thou shalt not beare false witnesse against thy neighbor Exod 20. 16 Q what is forbidden and commaunded in this law A we must not diminish or hurt the good name of our neighbor but 〈◊〉 his credit and estimation Exod
10 hee sealeth vp the promise maketh it eff 〈◊〉 Christ Iesus chap. 1 who is the truth and 〈◊〉 of all sacraments the faithful receiuer c. xii 〈◊〉 christ apylieth him to himselfe the Vses see this letterb. the vses of a sacrament are three to strengthen and confirme faith chap. 13 〈◊〉 God is true in his promises Many of the faithfull first beleeued before they didde partake the sacraments to be a seale of the 〈◊〉 chap. 14 these are the articles of agreement between God who promiseth Forgiuenesse of sinnes Adoption of son nes Possession of Heauen Man 〈◊〉 hoe promiseth to beleeue the promises to loue his Brethren Enimies to performe Obedsence to be badges of our christian profession chap. 15 the number of them See the letter a that Baptisme and the Lords supper are the two onely sacramentes of the New testament chap. 16 that 〈◊〉 is no sacrament chap 17 that popish pennance is no sacrament chap. 18 that Matrimony is no sacrament chap 19 that Orders are no sacrament chap 20 that extreame unction is no sacrament chap 21 A Table of the contents of the Second Booke Baptism is the first sacramēt wherin by outward washing of the bodie once in the name of the father the son and of the holy ghost the inward cleansing of the soule is represented chap. 1 In Baptisme consider the partes are twofold chap. 3 Outwarde partes Minister chap. 3 whose dutie it is to Sanctifie the water Wash the party Word of institution Baptise in the name of the father of the sonne and of the holy ghost chapt 4 Element of water chap 5 Receiuers are all such as are in the couenant chap. 6. Men and women in yeares that are in the faith Infantes of them chap 7 Inward partes God the father chap 8. who Offereth the bloud of his sonne Giueth Christ to the beleeuers Holy spirit chap 9 who perfourmeth that which is promised in the word Christ Iesus chap 10 ratifieng our Regeneration Remission of sinnes Soule clensed represented by the body washed cha 11 The vses of baptisme are these 3 To shew our planting and ingrafting into the body of christ cha 12 to assure vs of the remission of sinnes cha 13 Original Actual to teach to die to sinne and liue to righteousnesse cha 14. A Table of the principall points contained in the last Booke The Lordes supper called by 〈◊〉 names ch 1 is the second sacrament wherein by visible receiuing of bread and wine is represented 〈◊〉 spiritual communion 〈◊〉 the 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 ch 2 In this sacra obserue the work it selfe where in obserue the parts Outward Minist chap. 3 whose duty is To take the bread and mine into his hands to blesse and 〈◊〉 the words of institution to breake the bread and poure out then ine to distribute the bread and Wine The word of institution and promise contained therein chap. 4 The outward signes chap. 5 which are Bread Wine The cōmunicāts chap 6. whose actions are to take the bread and cupinto their handes to eate the bread drink the wine Inwarde God the father ch 8 who offereth christ to al commers Giueth christ for the redemtion of the fat Spirit who assureth vs of the truth of Gods promises ch 9 the body and bloud of christ prepared to be the liuely food of our soules ch x the faithfull receiuer chap. 1 〈◊〉 hose duties are to apprehend receiue christ his benefits to appropriate and apply him to the soule the Vses see this letter c to shew forth with thankesgiuing the sufferings of christ chap 12 to teach our communion and growth in christ chap. 13 to declare our communion and growth with our brethren chap. 14 Preparation to the worke See the letter d The necessitie in respect of Gods presence with whom we haue to do and to deale Our owne profit being rightlie prepared Our owne practise in preparing and taking our ordinarie meates The sacrament it selfe defiled by vnreuerent receiuing the punishment procured by want of this care the partes the knowledg of God and our selues especially of the whole doctrine of the sacraments chap 16 Faith in Christ seeing euerie one receiueth so mnch as he beleeueth he receiueth chap. 17 Repentance from dead workes daily renewed for daily sinnes Reconciliation to our brethren chap 19. THE FIRST BOOKE of the Sacraments in generall containing the true Doctrine therof ouerthrowing the errors of the Church of Rome and deliuering the comfortable vse ofthem to all the people of GOD. CHAP. I. Of the agreement and difference betweene the word and Sacraments GOD euen from the beginning added vnto the preaching of the word his Sacramentes in the Church as the Scripture teacheth outwardly representing vifiblie offering to our sight those things that inwardly hee performeth to vs as the tree oflife and the tree of the knowledge of good and euill in the Garden After mans fall when a new necessity was added in regard of mans want and weaknesse he testified his loue and ratified his Couenant by sacrifices and Ceremonies to our first Parents He gaue the Arke to Noah and his sonnes to confirm them in the promise which he made to them that they should not be drowned with the rest of the world He added to Abraham the signe of Circumcision as a seale of the 〈◊〉 of faith and to the Israelites he gaue the Passeouer Manna oblations purifications the brazen Serpent the Rock and such like spirituall tipes whereby he assured them of the promise that God for the onely sacrifice of Christ vvrought vpon the Crosse would giue to all that beleeue forgiuenesse of sinnes and euerlasting life Now the world of God may fitly be resembled to writtings and euidences and the Sacraments to seales which the Lord alone setteth to his owne letters They are as a visible Sermon preaching vnto vs most liuely the promises of God that as the vvord we hear doth edifie and instruct the minde by the outward eares so doth the Sacraments by the eyes other senses First then that we may vnderstand the doctrine and nature os the Sacraments we are to consider what the word Sacraments haue in common and how they agree one with another then what they haue peculiar and proper each to other and how they differ one from an other The agreement betweene them standeth in these points First both are ofGod and instruments which the holy ghost vseth to this end to make vs more and more one with Christ and partakers of saluation 〈◊〉 that God needeth them or that he is tyed vnto them for as he can nourish without meate and drinke so he can saue without word or Sacraments but because we neede them he vseth them when he will and as often as it pleaseth him The same which is published and promised by the word of God is signified and sealed by the Sacraments For they are not a deliuering of new promises and
a Sacrament THe outward parts of a Sacrament are such things as vnder a certain similitude likenes do represent and signifie heauenly things to assure vs they are as truely present and offred vs as we beholde with our cies and receiue with our hands the earthly things giuen vnto vs. The outward parts of a Sacrament are in number foure First the Minister Secondly the word of institution Thirdly the element Fourthly the receiuer All these and euery one of them are needfull to the being and nature of a Sacrament take them away or any of them and you take away the substance and bring in a nullity of the Sacrament If ther be no minister no word no element no receiuer there is no Sacrament If there be wanting either minister to deliuer it or word to 〈◊〉 it or element to represent it or receiuer to take it we cannot assure our selues to haue any sacrament of God but rather a tradition and inuention of our owne First then there is required a Minister lawfully called chosen and ordained hauing at the least the approbation and alowance of the church to pronounce the words of institution and to deliuer the outward signs to the receiuers They are not makers of the Sacrament but ministers not autors but administators not deuisors but deliuerers Earthly princes haue their letters patents their great seals keepers of the same if another shal set to the seal that is not appointed the keeper thereof is it not made an heinons crime worthy of heauy punishment So the Lord is a mightye Prince king of kings and Lord of Lords he hath appointed his seales to seale vp his promises of forgiuenes of sinnes and eternal life and he hath ordained his Officers as it were keepers of his great seals God publisheth saluation and pardon to all beleeuers by his word as by his letters pattents and he addeth baptisme and the Lords Supper as two broad seales for greater assurance and confirmation and appointeth the Ministers to be keepers thereof Whosoeuer therfore shall presume to 〈◊〉 to any of these seals without warrant without a caling without a function and direction from God himselfe being no officer no Minister no keeper of them prophaneth these seales and setteth to a counterfet stampe For as no man may preach except he be sent so no man may administer the Sacrament except he be called This is it the Apostle teacheth No man taketh this honor vnto himself but he that is called of God as was Aron and Christ tooke not to himselfe this honor to be made the high Priest but he that 〈◊〉 vnto him thou art my sonne this day begat I thee gaue it to him Now to minister the sacraments is an honour in the Church which none can take to himselfe at his owne pleasure but God must giue it They should haue in their owne consciences a witnesse of Gods calling them to this office and honour Wherefore the sacred functions ordained of God must not be prophaned by voluntary officers and vsurped offices no man must take vpon him without a lawful calling to teach hese holy misteries Of these the Lord complaineh I haue not sent these prophets yet they ranne I haue not spoken to them and yet they prophesied Thus these intruders did thrust their sickle into other mens corne The reasons why the ministers and no others are to intermedle with the Sacraments are very apparant First because euery part and member of the church hath his especiall office and his proper guifts to execute his 〈◊〉 we see in a campe the Souldiers in Warre haue their standing-place in sight of their captaine who hath chosen them to be Warriors so in the Church 〈◊〉 euery one keepe his seuerall calling in the presence of God who hath in wisdome and mercy called him thereunto We see in the natural dispositiō of the body euery member hath his speciall vse the eye to see the hand to handle the foote to walke the eare to heare and if one member should incroch vpon the office of another it must needes tend to the destruction of the body We see in the gouernment of an house and famely the husband and wife the father and sonne the master and seruant know and acknowledge their places to rule to obey to commaund to be commaunded without intruding themselues and incroching vpon the function as it were vpon the free-hold of an other If we would ascend a step higher we obserue in the affaires of state and matters of the cōmon-wealth euery man doth keepe within his owne listes and limits and no man dare presume to charge any man or enterprise any thing in the princes name and authority without a sufficient warrant from the prince himselfe so may no man take vpon him any functions in the church vnlesse hee haue a commission and commaundement from the Lord. For as the prince appointeth by what officers he will be serued so is it in the offices and officers of the Church God hath placed and ordained the Apostle to plant the Euangelist to second and assist the prophet to prophesie the pastor to feede and hath set euery one in his proper place and standing as i were in his watch-tower out of which he must not wander and depart Let euery man abide in the same vocation wherein he was called and afterward Let euery man wherein he was called therein abide with God Whosoeuer therefore medleth without a lawfull vocation as it were violently inuadeth another mans possession and cannot do it without the check and controlment of Christ Iesu who is the captaine of his own host the head of his own body the Lord of his own house and the great king of his owne church Againe Christ the prophet and teacher of his church and the prince of pastors hath committed the office of administration of the Sacraments to those alone to whom he hath committed the dispensation of his word and preaching of the Gospell therefore if any other 〈◊〉 set to the seale it is no true seale but a counterfait stamp The truth of this appeareth Indeede I haptize with water that is I that am apointed a techer in the church to make ready a people prepard for the Lord. And Paule being conuerted and called to preach to beare the name of God to the gentiles did without further word warrant or commaundement minister the Sacraments Now then as we haue seene the truth of the doctrine let vs consider the vses thereof First is the minister of the substance of the Sacrament and a principall part of Christs institution Then he must consider it is his duty being authorised from God and by his church to sanctifie the outward elementes and administer the same to deliuer the outward signes and offer them to the receiuers His workes therefore are to put a part and consecrate the signes to an holy vse to open and
and first finder and founder of this number ofseuen Augustine when he speaketh of Sacraments in the strict and proper signification taketh them for holy signes and seales not only signifieng but representing and exhibiting spiritual graces commaunded by christ succeeding in the roome of the Iewish two ordinary Sacraments and offering Christ to all faithful receiuers reckneth them as we do Haec sunt Ecclesiae gemina sacramenta 1. These be two sacraments of the church And in one other place Christ and his Apostles haue deleuered vnto vs a few sacraments in stead of many as Baptisme and the Lords supper So S. Ambrose intreating purposely of the Sacraments speaketh but of two as the reformed churches hold at this day Innocentius the third speaking also of them onely maketh mention of those two which we receiue not of the rest which we refuse Yea Thomas of Aquine the chiefe doctour of the papistes holdeth heerein the truth teaching that the forme of Bapt. and of the Lords supper is found in the Scripture but not of the other pretended sacraments and namely of extreame vnction To conclude cardinall Bessarion confesseth this Haec duo sola sacramenta in Euangelijs manifestè tradita legimus that is we read that these two onely sacraments were deliuered vs manifestly and plainly in the Gospell Now let vs come to the vses of this diuision In that Christ hath appointed so few sacraments in number hereby appeareth the great loue of God toward vs he hath not laid a burden vpon vs which neither we nor our fathers were able to beare but charged vs with two sacramentes onely whereas he might haue deliuered other moe vnto vs. The Ceremoniall law was a very heauy burden pressing downe the fathers of the olde Testament and keeping them in great bondage now the yoke is broken and we are deliuered As we see the like mercy of God in teaching a short for me of prayer as a perpetuall direction to the church and in deliuering the ten commaundements diuided into two tables so he hath not troubled vs with many sacraments whereby also our nature prone to Idolatry is respected and the grace of the new testament is wonderfully amplyfied We see how superstition grosse Idolatry haue preuailed in the church of Rome and infected with deadly poison one of the Sacramentes how much greater danger were it if moe sacraments had beene commaunded and commended vnto vs. Againe heereby we may perceiue and conceiue the difference betweene the old and new testament between the Sacramentes vnder the law and these vnder the Gospell betweene those giuen to the Iewes and these retained among Christians For ours are few in number theirs were many in number the Arke circumcision the Passeouer Manna the cloud the sea the rock many purifications oblations which are not easie to be numbred But the Gospell acknowledgeth onely two as two twins of the same father Hee reunto wee may adde not vnprofitably other material differences to be acknowledged They 〈◊〉 in time ours shew forth our communion with Christ already come and so are more firme and durable as those which are not to be chāged to the end of the world Ye shew the Lords death til he come Their Sacraments were ordained onely vntill the comming of Christ because they shewed and pointed out Christ to come so that the worke of grace was more obscure to them Again they differ in variety of Sacramentall signes and rites as the cutting of the foreskin the lambe of the Passeouer iournying through the sea sauing by the Arke drinking of the rock lifting vp the brasent Serpent raining downe of Manna washing of their body they had calues sheep Gotes doues bread wine Oyle and such like we haue onely water in Baptisme and bread and wine in the Lords Supper Thus the signes do greatly vary Fourthly they differ in easinesse For the Ceremonies committed to the people of the Iewes were hard combersome painefull to the slesh and some of them were administred with effusion sheding of blood partly of man and partly of beastes Of man as in circumcision of beasts as in the paschall lam be and in the sacrifices But our Sacramentes though Sacramentes of Christs blood shed for vs yet of themselues be voide of blood Fiftly they differ in measure of signification For our Sacramentes haue a more plentifull and full representation of grace offered and stir vp a greater measure of saith then the Sacramentes of the old Testament which were more darke and obscure the Lord reseruing a fuller measure of knowledge vnto the blessed times of the Gospe'l For as the exhibiting of Christ Iesus in the flesh and fulnesse of time and as it were in the old age of the world is of more efficacy to moue vs then the expectation of him to come so we haue better helpes and an holy aduantage to raise and rouse vp our faith to a greater assurance of grace and mercy by how much the accomplishment is more then the promise and the fulfilling greater then the foretelling Lastly they differ in respect of the people to whom they were giuen and for whom they were ordained ours belong to all people dispersed ouer the face of the whole earth that are ingrafted into the church wheras theirs wer tied to one Nation to one people to one place to the posterity of Abraham Notwithstanding these differences which are in signes and circumstances touching the chiefe thing euen the matter and substance of the Sacramentes they are equall hauing the same end and the same signification and being of one esficacy as also the word of the prophets and Apostles is One and the same God is author of them One and the same mediator betweene God and man euen the man Iesus Christ is represented in both being the lambe slaine from the foundation of the worlde They signifie and shew forth the same communion of Christ by which all the clect are saued and seale vp saluation and remission of sinnes to all that do receiue them by faith For they were giuen to bee signes and seales of grace and of the promises of God to distinguish the faithfull from all other sectes and religions in the world and that they should be receiued with profit onely of the faithfull In these and such like things the Sacramentes of the Iewish and Christian church are not vnequall although in the outward signes and circumstances they be diuers yet in the substance and in the thing signified there is no difference Thirdly we are bound to beleeue his promises and to haue strong consolation seeing he hath giuen vs 2. signes If we had onely had one signe as a seale of the mercies of God in Christ it had beene a great sinne not to haue beleeued the promise and not to haue rested therein as in a thing vnchangable For he is not as man that he should ly or deceiue his onely promise is
and receiued circumcision as the Apostles said to the Iailer humb'ed vnder the mighty hand of GOD and desiring to be instructed in the way of saluation Beleeue in the Lord IESVS CHRIST and thou shalt bee saued and thy whole houshold So the 〈◊〉 testifieth the like of Zacheus when hee had once receiued CHRIST into his house nay which is more into his heart then Iesus said vnto him This day is saluation come vnto this bouse for-asmuch as he is also become the sonne of Abraham Thus when the Sunne of rightcousnesse shineth vpon the head and maister of the family the beames thereof by a gratious influence beginne to comforr and concerue all the rest in the house like the precious oyntment vpon the head of Aaron that ranne downe vpon the beard and descended vpon the borders of his garmentes or like the dew that falleth from heauen vpon Hermon and the Mountaines of Sion which goeth downe into the vallies and maketh all the plaine countrey fertill The knowledge of this point offereth diuerse profitable vses to our consideration and consolation First it is the duty of all those that are within the couenant to giue their bodies to be washed and to receiue that washing in the face and presence of the Congregation Let such as are of yeares desire and craue this Sacrament let them claime this priuiledge let them demaund to be baptized according to the example of the Eunuch Act. 8 so soone as he was instructed in the faith of Christ by the preaching of Phillip as he came to a certaine water he saide of his owne accord See heere is water what doth let me to be baptized And to the same purpose Act. 22 Ananias stirreth vp Paule to this duty saying Why 〈◊〉 thou Arise and be baptised and wash away thy sinnes Secondly this condemneth the blinde ignorant and superstitious practise of baptizing belles practised in the church of Rome whereof now they begin to be ashamed and seeking fig-leaues to couer their shame they say they were not baptized but onely hallowed and consecrated to holy vses as Bellarmine betaketh himselfe to this shift as to a place of refuge Lib. 4 de pon Rom. cap. 12. Where the Cardinall confesseth that the people call their solemne blessing and sprinkling with holy-water the baptisme of belles And indeede what can it else be called and accounted They giue names vnto them as to their children they haue God-fathers appointed vnto them as children haue when they are baptized and confirmed they haue new garments put vpon them as the persons baptized among them like wise haue it is also permitted onely to the By shops suffragan who exacteth great summes of money for the baptizing of belles they ascribe to them a spiritual power against stormes and tempests against thunder and lightning against windes and euill spirits Lastly they sprinkle them with holy-water blesse them crosse them and so horribly corrupt this Sacrament of baptisme Yea Durand a principall schooleman not in the schooles of the prophets but of the papists a fit teacher of such schollers setteth out solemnly the praises of belles making them publike preachers and driuers away of deuils But the deuils are not feared and fraied away by fight of crosses by sprinkling of water by sound of belles and babies This kinde goeth not out but by fasting and prayer as our sauiour teacheth And the Apostle willeth euery Christian to take vnto him the whole armour of God that he may be able to resist in the euill day Stand therefore hauing your loynes grided about with verity and hauing on the brest plate of righteousnesse the shield of faith the sword of the spirit the preparation of the Gospell of peace and the grace of prayer in the spirit Heere is the vniuersall armour of God heere is the compleat furnishing of a Christian Souldier heer is perfect direction giuen to vnderstand and to withstand the assaultes of the deuill but among these wee haue neither the signe of the crosse nor the hallowing of belles nor the sound of such preachers and therefore they are no part nor parcel of spitituall armour to surnish vs to goe into the fielde against the enemies of our saluation For euill spirits which fightagainst the soule are not driuen away by hallowing of belles If then there were euer prophanation of Baptisme this may iustly bee iudged to bee one of the most vile and miserable corruptions thereof to bee detested of all true hearted Christians that grone vnder the burden of them Thirdly we may see the great loue of God to all beleeuers seeing he vouchsafeth not onely to bee their God but the God of their seede after them as God himselfe promiseth to Abraham Gen. 17. I will make my couenant betweene me and thee and thy seede after thee in their generations I will be their God walke before mee and be thou vpright And ought we not to walke in the vprightnesse of our heart before this mercifull and all sufficient God Who thus aboundesh in kindenesse toward vs and the fruite of our body Let vs returne vnto him loue for his loue who loued vs first Lastly this teacheth that infants are to be baptized and haue as great right and interest in this Sacrament as they which be in yeares able to make confession of their faith Of which we will intreate in the chapter following where we will proue this truth by testimonies of the scriptures and maintaine it against the Anabaptistes and other heretiks that condemne the same Chap. 7. That Infants are to be baptized ALthough it cannot appeare vnto vs that infantes and new borne babes brought to be baptized haue actuall faith but rather is like they want the habit of faith which haue not the vse of vnderstanding vnlesse God extraordinarily work it which lieth not in vs to iudge of yet wee baptize them and admit them to this sacrament which we doe vpon very good grounds and susficient reasons First therefore we wil proue by euident demonstration out of the scriptures the doctrin of childrēs baptisme to be conformable to the Iewes circumcisiō agreeable to the practise the Apostles allowable by the wordes of Christ answerable to the custome of the primitiue church reasonable in it selfe profitable to the infants auaileable by the ordinance of God and very comfortable to all christian parents Secondly we will maintaine this assertion against the obiections and arguments of the Anabaptists and other aduersaries that haue crossed and contradicted this truth Lastly we will shew what euident and necessary vses may be gathred from hence for the strength of faith and the increase of our obedience Touching the first that the baptising of infants is waranted by the word of God I will make it appeare by sundry reasons We see in the old testament that all males by expresse commaundement were willed to be circumcised the eight day If God made infants partakers of
heer baptized in these pIaces But do we read that any wer excluded And seeing the scripture expresseth al the houshold who shal dare to debar infants Are not they a principall part of the house Besides if the baptisme of children bee not to bee beleeued because it is not named and expressed wee might with as good reason shut out women from the Lords Supper if any were as great an enimie to the communicating of Women as to the baptisinge of Children seeinge wee do not expressely read that they were not admitted to the Lords table in the apostles times Wherfore childrens baptisme is no humaine tradition no apishimitation no ancient corruption of this Sacrament but is grounded on the vnblamable practise of the Apostles which hath the force and strength of a commaundement Thirdly Christ by his owne example aloweth and approueth their baptisme as we see Mar. 10 when the Disciples rebuked those that brought little chilren to Christ that he might touch them he said Suffer little children to come vnto me forbid them not for of such is the kingdome of God verily I say vnto you who soeuer shal not receiue the kingdome of God as a little child he shal not enter therein Wher we are to obserue that he saith not of these onely is the kingdome of heauen but of such like infants which shall be in all ages and times of the church In this act of Christ embracing the infants brought vnto him and sharply rebuking his Disciples thatforbad them we are to consider that he commaundeth children to be brought vnto him and addeth a reason To such belongeth the kingdome of heauen If any obiect It is said he embraced them it is not said he baptized them or if any reply and say that there is no agreement and resemblance betweene baptizing and embracing I answer he layeth his hands vpon them he prayeth for them he commendeth them to his father and saith The kingdome of heauen is theirs All this is a great deale more then to giue them the outward signe For if reason require they should be brought to Christ why should they not bee receiued to baptisme which is a signe of our vnion with Christ If the kingdome of heauen belong to them why should the signe be denied vnto them wherby the doore of entrance into the church is opened Why should we driue them away from Christ whom christ calleth vnto himselfe Neither let any say these children were of yeares and growne vp in age able of themselues to come and repaire to christ For the Euangeliste vseth such words as signifie such young infants as are babes and hang vpon their mothers brestes therefore by comming in this place he meaneth to draw neere or to haue excesse Againe they were such as were brought to Christ by others Luk. 18 15 they were caried in their Armes they walked not on their feet and Christ also tooke them in his owne armes Besides heerto agreeth the practise and custome of the primitiue church for no teacher so profound no docter so learned no writer so ancient which doth not refer the beginning heereof to the precise times of the Apostles Let the Anabaptists and aduersaries of this truth tell vs who was the first author and inuenter of childrens baptisme if they refer it not to Christ who first administred it What was his name if they cancel let them not hide it Let them declare the time when it began Let them shew the place where it was deuised Let them name the child first baptised and in what assembly or church it was If they cannot doe these or any of them let them acknowledge the baptisme of children to bee the ordinaunce of God and not of man warranted both by doctrine of the scripture and practise of the church Moreouer if there were no writer to auouch this ancient truth yet is it in it selfe very right and reasonable For doe we not see and behold daily verie babes and 〈◊〉 oftentimes among men admitted to their inheritance haue they not liuery and season of lande and haue they not the wand or turfe taken in their hands according to the vse of the 〈◊〉 or custome of the Manour of which they holde They knowe not what is done they perceiue nothing what the Lord of the Manour or stewarde speaketh vnto them yet we see among the wisest men in this world this is not thought foolish neither is such an admission called into question but they are afterwarde instructed what they haue done what they haue vndertak n and taken vpon them what seruices and duties they owe what their Lord requireth of them Thus they are admitted in their infancy to a temporal inheritance and possession this they holde to the end of their life and of the validity of such entrance no tenant maketh doubt Why then shoulde it seeme vnreasonable to giue them baptisme the signe of the couenant being born heirs of the promise that after they come to discretion they may make vse of it as the rest of the members of the church They shall understand afterward that which they vnderstand not for the present and yet if it please GOD to take them in mercy to himselfe from the miseries of the worlde before they know the mistery of their baptisme he worketh extraordinatily by wayes best knowne to himselfe the force of their baptisme in their harts and sealeth vp their engrafting into Christ I esus If then children haue the white wande deliuered vnto them to assure them of the inheritance which they holde let none deny vnto them the partakinge of this sacrament wherby they are assured of an eternal inheritance howsoeuer for the present time they are not capable of the knowledge thereof Lastly the priuiledges and prerogatiues of children are no lesse then those of elder yeares For infantes are a parte of the Church of GOD they are the sheep of CHRIST they are the children of the heauenly father they are inheritors of the kingdome of heauen they are redeemed with the blood of CHRIST and engrafted into his body why then should they not beare the marke of CHRIST seeing they are a principall part of his possession If they be a part of the houshold they ought to haue entrance into the house if they belong to the Citty of GOD who shall dare to shut the gates against them Or if they be in the number of the sheepe of Christ who shall presume to keepe them from the sheepe-folde Or if they be sound members of the bodie of christ who shall cut them off as rotten members Wherefore then should they not receiue the seale whereby the promise is confirmed vnto them seeing they haue the promise it selfe of saluation Why shoulde they not be pattakers of the outward signe seeing they are partakers of the thinge signified Why should they be put back from the figure seeing they haue the truth itselfe Why shoulde they not be
yet I saw neuer the righteous for saken nor his feed begging bread And againe Tast ye and see how 〈◊〉 the Lord is blessed is the 〈◊〉 that trusteth in him Feare the Lord ye his saints for nothing wanteth to them that feare him The Lyons do lacke and suffer hunger but they which seeke the Lorde shall want nothing that is good Loe how the man shal be blessed that feareth God not onely in his owne person but in his children inasmuch as our seed is no lesse dear to him then we are as Psal 115. He will blesse them that feare the lord both small and great the Lord will encrease his graces towarde you and toward your children And to the same purpose the prophet 〈◊〉 Chap 32. saith They shal be my people and I will be their God and I will giue them one heart and one way that they may feare me for euer for the wealth of them and of their children after them Let vs all rest in his words and rely vppon his mercifull promises He is not as man that he should lie nor as the sonne of man that he should deceiue He hath said he will be our God and the God of our seed that we leaue behind vs. Behold O Lord the words of thine own lips consider the promises that are gone out of thine owne mouth We know thou art true and faithfull in all thy sayings thou wilt not alter the things which thou hast written with thine owne finger on thee we wait and in thee we put our trust let it be vnto thy seruantes according to thy free promise and according to thy gratious couenant that we may feele the accomplishment thereof in our soules Seuenthly all parents are heereby to be warned and admonished that seeing the promise of forgiuenes of sinnes and the kingdome of heauen belongeth to their seede and consequently the signe and seale therof they must be carefull to bring them vp in the true knowledge and feare of God as Eph 6. Fathers prouoke not your chrildren to wrath but bring them vp in instruction and information of the Lord So Moses teacheth Exod 12 26 27. When their children should aske them touching the paschall lambe that then it is their duty to declare and deliuer to them the true cause and occasion thereof Likewise so often as we consider how our children are by grace accepted by baptisme consecrated vnto God and 〈◊〉 made heires of life and saluation it standeth vs vppon to plant and water the sauing knowledge of Christ Iesus in them For what should it profit vs to leaue them great riches and large possessions and make them for want of instruction and information in the waies of God the children of hel If we do no more but feed them and giue them meat and drinke what do we for them which we do not 〈◊〉 the Oxe and Asse Or if our chiefest care be to cloth them wel and to apparrell them warme what doe we which the Turkes and infidels do not as wel as we Haue not they as great a portion in this as we but our obedience to the wil of God and duty to our children must exceede theirs if we will enter into the kingdome of heauen Whereby we see that they are greatly deceiued who when they haue made honest prouision for the sustenance and sustentation of their children in this world wil say they haue done their part although they haue not taught them to know God these haue the greatest and chiefest account to make for their soules Now if this be a greeuous sinne to neglect the teaching of our children the feare of God then they increase and double their iniquity who by their corrupt example do lead them into euil and so murther their soules For children in steade of godly and religious instruction do oftentimes heare their fathers sweare swagger lie raile and slaunder see them deale deceitfully and vniustly and marke their walking in euery euill way making their houses as it were any mage and representation of Hell it selfe by practise of all manner of abhominations leading therevnto Lastly this doctrine is very comfortable to children themselus For howsoeuer they cannot know or remember their owne baptisme yet they are to consider that they liue in a church and among a people where infants are ordinarily baptized and sealed with the signe of the couenant of God Besides it is and euer hath bin of auncient time a laudable custome in the church to haue speciall witnesses men of credit and estimation of euery childes and infants baptisme whome commonly wee call God-fathers and God-mothers The steps of this truth may be traced out if we consider what the Pprophet Esay saith Chap 8 where he declareth that so soone as his wife had borne him a son he gaue him his name which was done at circumcision and tooke two faithfull witnesses Uriah and Zechariah to testifie the circumcision of his sonne and the solemne giuing to him of that name in the presence of the congregation And howsoeuer Uriah walked not with a right foot but turned aside from the pure worshippe of God to set vp the idolatrous Alter after the fashion of Damascus to seede the fancy of Ahaz yet he was a man of reputation whose testimony was sufficient to assure the naming of the prophets sonne because the times to come woulde be troublesome and full of many calamities For their children were named when they were circumcised as now our children are named when they are baptized So likewise the Church oftentimes lyeth vnder the crosse and is subiect to persecution as the Woman driuen into the Wildernesse Reuelations 12 6 and so the baptisme of many members might many times be doubted of and called into question forasmuch as no impressionabideth in the flesh as there did in circumcision the Churches haue thought it conuenient to require certaine men to bee as speciall witnesses of infantes their bringing to Christ and to the church by baptisme and of their names giuen them in their baptisme Seeing therefore children are baptized and haue by this meanes no assurance giuen them of their baptisme they haue a marueilous benefit bestowed vpon them that they so soone obtaine the partaking of CHRIST and all his benefits God worketh in the children of the faithfull belonging to his couenant by waies vnknowne to vs as Iohn Baptist is saide to be filled with the Holy-ghost from his Mothers 〈◊〉 and they are called holy by the Apostle insomuch that they cannot perish whom God calleth some sooner and some later all in his owne appointed time as seemeth good to his heauenly pleasure The remembrance whereof when children come to age greatly comforteth them in the loue and feare of God when they call to mind that they are so greatly esteemed and highly regarded of GOD from the first comming into the worlde before they had the vse of speech of reason and of vnderstanding
couenant it self but a sign and token of the couenant as also it is afterward expounded It shall be a signe of the couenant betweene me and you The aduersaries cannot denie a figure in this speech Now what difference is there betweene these two speeches This is my couenant and this is my body are they not alike and in like manner to be vnderstood So Exodus 12. 11 It is the Lordes passeouer properly the lambe was not the passeouer but serued to put them in remembrance of that benefit and it is expounded aster the blood shall be a token for you vpon the houses where ye are this day shall be vnto vou a remembrance Likewise the Apostle sayeth 1 Cor. 10. That rocke was Christ whereas properly the rocke was not Christ but the water flowing from it did represent him Thus then we must vnderstand the words plainely truely and briefely as if Christ had saide in this manner This bread which ye haue seene me take breake deliuer and distribute and which I bid you take and cate is a signe or sacrament of my true body signifying and sealing vp vnto you that my body shal be broken crushed and crucified for you to purchase to you eternal life let these sacramental rites and actions now performed by me and you be heerafter put in practise by you and all faithfull ministers and professors for the strengthning of your faith by the remembrance of my death and by the applying of the benefit thereof euery one to your owne selues Likewise hauing finished his supper when he did eate the passeouer with his Disciples hauing taken the cup and giuen thanks he gaue it being filied with wine to his Disciples and saide drinke ye al of this for this wine in this cup is a signe and sacrament of my blood by the shedding whereof togither with my death following the full forgiuenes of sins and perfect saluation which I by my vnchangable wil decree do giue vnto you and al that beleeue in me are assured to you and all beleeuers Thus hauing opened and cleared the interpretation of the words we shal heerafter need to spend the lesse time in confuting the contrary doctrin darkenes shal flie before the light error before truth cloudy mists before the sun-shine of the day Again seeing the words of institution are variably and diuersly set down by the Euangelists and the Apostle Paul we learne that euery change of the words where the sence is nothing altered or diminished is not to be condemned as 〈◊〉 or vnlawfull so that the alteration being in the forme and frame of words not in the substance and sence of the matter the sacrament is not destroyed For if it had bene an heinous sinne to haue made any change or alteration or to haue missed of the tearmes or sillables of the institution no doubt the Euangelists would haue consented in the words and not haue swarued one from another as we see they haue done We see how the Apostles in the allegation of sundry places of Scripture borrowed out of the olde Testament do not euermore strictly binde themselues to the very wordes as Mathew 26. Hebrewes 10. 5. and in sundry other but onely to the sence and therefore sometimes they adde as Mathew 4 10. sometimes they leaue out as occasion serueth True it is to alter any substantiall part or to wrest the wordes to a wrong and contrary meaning or not at all to expresse the sence of the wordes maketh the Sacrament voide but an alteration onely of certaine circumstaunces as of number or person of Letters or sillables cannot make frustrate the whole sacrament albeit we allow not any priuate and particular man to make any chaunge of his owne heade in such circumstaunces or to bring in a new frame of wordes So in baptisme the Greeke church saith Let the seruant of CHRIST be baptized in this Water c. and heereby nothing is detracted from the truth of the sacrament because Christ Iesus hath not precisely appointed how many wordes the Apostles and pastours of the Church shoulde vse in the execution of their Ministry Not withstanding the obseruation of the words I baptize thee obserued in our churches seemeth to drawe neerer to the commaundement of Christ and to confirme more fitly and fully the faith of the baptized and to answere vnto the words of Iohn the baptist I baptize with Water Likewise in the Lordes supper whereas Christ saide Take ye eate ye doe ye this as speaking to many the sacrament is not destroyed when the words are particularly rehearsed and specially applyed in our churches saying take thou eat thou drinke thou Lastly seeing the wordes of institution are an outwarde part of the Sacrament necessary to be knowne read marked and vnderstood wherein the substance and comfortatable vse of the Lordes Supper consisteth it followeth that they are to be published and pronounced openly distinctly plainely not in a strange language but in a knowne tongue that the church of 〈◊〉 and people of God may be edified For wherefore serueth the commaundement and promise set foorth in the supper if they be not vnderstood Whether we doe read the Scriptures sing Psalmes poure out supplications receiue the sacraments or whatsoeuer 〈◊〉 we performe to God that he may be 〈◊〉 and the congregation instructed we must doe all in a knowne tongue to be vnderstood This God commandeth this the Apostle prescribeth this the true church of God practiseth this reason teacheth this the Heathen acknowledgeth 〈◊〉 the sinagogue of Rome that it might take away all fruit and comfort from the faithfull and that it might broch horrible errors 〈◊〉 and securely and not be 〈◊〉 hath not onely commanded to pronounce the words of consecration closely and 〈◊〉 but forbidden to vse the common mother tongue of all the people The people of God must not be like Parrots or 〈◊〉 or Rauens or such birds that chatter with voice record mens words and sounde a sentence but vnderstande not the meaning thereof As Plmy maketh mention of a certaine 〈◊〉 that had learnd to say Aue Caesar imperator All haile or good morrow Emperor Caesar saluting 〈◊〉 and the two young princes 〈◊〉 and Drusus And Celius Rhodiginus writeth that Cardinall Ascanius had a Popiniay that coulde pronounce distinctly and 〈◊〉 all the Articles of the Creede Such birds or rather beasts woulde they haue Christian men to be that would haue them 〈◊〉 and not vnderstand what they pray 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the reading of the scriptures but not know what is reade 〈◊〉 the sacraments but not know the meaning of the institution Things without life which giue a sounde whether pipe or 〈◊〉 except they make a distinction in the soundes howe shall it bee knowne what is piped or harped Or if the 〈◊〉 pet giue an 〈◊〉 sound who shall prepare himselfe to battell All things in the church must tend to the instruct on 〈◊〉 edification
and so let him eate of this bread and drinke of this cup. Where he giueth a double commaundement first to appeare reuerently then to receiue worthily Now al that must proue and try themselues are commaunded not only to eate bread but to drink of the cup but al must try and examine themselues therfore al are commanded both to eat and drink at the lords table If this be a commaundement to examine then the wordes following of eating and drinking are likewise commandements There is no halting in these let them admit both or let them deny both Eightly if the faithfull take not the cup in the supper of the lord the condicion of Christians vnder the Gospel shal be worse then of the Isralites vnder the law For the people of Israell in the wildernesse hauing the same sacrament in effect with vs Did all drinke of the spiritual rock that followed them and that rock was Christ as the Apostle affirmeth But out condicion is not worser and weaker then theirs therefore all the faithful are to drink of the cup of the lord Bellarmine the Souldan of the Romish Synagogue answereth thus They drunke not water out of the rock when they did eate of the spirituall meate but in another place and at an other time But this is an answearlesse answer which cannot satisfie For albeit the sacraments of the Isralites as figures and types did represent the same graces that our Sacraments do yet it is not necessary they should in all pointes answer each other and in all respectes agree together Besides the Church of Rome at no time aloweth the people to drinke of the Wine a seale of the blood of Christ they keepe them from the cup of the Lord both when they giue them the bread and at all other times and thereby make their estate worse then the estate of the Iewes Indeed if they did at any time permit al the people to drink of the cup they might pretend this example of the Israelites but inasmuch as they vtterly deny them this part of the cup they ouerthrow themselues in their malice and yet in their blindnes they do not see it Lastly many of the fathers did both eate Manna and 〈◊〉 water out of the rock if not in the same place yet at one the same time inasmuch as they gathered thereof euery morning and it ceased not vntill they entred the frontiers and confines of the land of promise But they neuer alow without a toleration and dispensation the people in any place at any time vpon any occasion and in any respect to tast of the cup in the Lords supper Ninthly if the cup of the new testament may be taken from the Lordes people in like manner the water in baptisme may be taken away froÌ„ them For the blood of christ whereby remission of sins is purchased and procured is represented by the wine of the Lordes Supper as well as by the water in baptisme But the water in baptisme without great sacriledge cannot be omitted or neglected wherefore then should the cup be taken away Lastly if any part of the supper might be taken away from the people then like wise the word of God may be taken from them for in this point there is the same reason and respect of them both A Sacrament is nothing else but a visible word and a sealing vp of the word and the offence semeth to be the same whether a man break the seale or rent the writing But the word cannot be withdrawen froÌ„ Christian people it being the instrument of faith and the life of the Church Wherefore it is the greatest wrong and iniury done to the people of God to take from them the cup of saluation The answer to this reason must be to confesse the parts and yeeld the conclusion forasmuch as by forbidding the people the reading of the Scriptures they haue robbed them of the word of God and taken from them the key of knowledge neither entring themselues into the kingdom of heauen nor suffering those that would enter No marueile then if they take the cup of blessing from the people who haue taken from them the free vse of the word of God To conclude these reasons it is Antichrist who contrary to the doctrine of christ contrary to the institution of the supper contrary to the practise of the Apostles and contrary to the vse of the former churches hath excluded the people languishing and thâ—â—sting after the blood of christ as the dry earth for the sweete shewers of raine from taking the cup of the lord and left them a dry coÌ„munion to eat the bread of the sacrament alone Hauing considered the truth of God by sundry reasons grounded in the scripture that the people haue good interest and title in the cup denied vnto them let vs answer the obiections of the aduersaries made against the former doctrine First they pretend that christ administred it to the apostles only and not to any of the people consequently the institution for taking the cup can be no general coÌ„maundement for al men thus the Rhemistes reason I answer first it may be doubted and disputed whether onely the Apostles were present at his last Supper For seeing diuerse were added vnto the church and professed the faith of christ seeing he had other disciples beside the twelue seeing many Godly men and women followed him to see his miracles and to hear the gracious words that proceeded out of his mouth why should we think that none of them were admiâ—ted to his table who had often heard his preaching and depended vpon him in their liuing Again the passeouer was celebrated in that house of a faithful man as may be collected by sundry circumstances now theÌ„ either the lord Iesus annexed that famely vnto his as the law in one case appointed or else we shall haue two passe-ouers at one time in one house which hath no warrant of scripture no colour of truth no probability of reason We read in the institution celebration of the passe-ouer of ioyning house to house and taking his neighbor next vnto him in case of the insufficiency of one houshold to eate the lambe but we neuer read of killing two lambes and keeping two passeouers vnder one roofe Besides the smal remnant of the faithful among the Iewes would no-doubt rightly and religiously obserue the passe-ouer after the example of their lord and maister rather according to the precept of Moses ' then aceording to the practise of the Iewes in imitation of christ rather then according to the tradition of the elders Furthermore we are to consider that in eating the passeouer they sorted theÌ„selues together according to the number of the persons able to eate vp the lambe for they commanded to take A lambe without blemish a male of a yeare old if the houshold be to little for the lambe he shal take his neighbour which is next vnto
the Apostle 1 cor 11. reproouing the abuses crept into this Sacrament and labouring to reduce it to the first institution exhorteth the Corinthians to tarry one for another and if any be hungry that he cannot tarrie he must before hand 〈◊〉 at home that so he may better wait for the rest of the congregation Now he would neuer haue giuen counsell and commandement if it had bin vnlawfull or vngodly to take some little repast and short refreshing before in regarde of the present infirmity and weakenes of the body Lastly he teacheth in another place That the kingdome of heauen is not meat nor drinke but righteousnes and peace and ioy in the holy-ghost To conclude as hee willeth that he which eateth despise not him that eateth not and he which eateth not condemne not him that eateth so must it be in this indifferent practise he that can take it let him take it but let not him that receiueth fasting iudge him that fasteth not and let not him which fasteth not condemne him that receiueth fasting he standeth or falleth to his owne maister Who art thou then that iudgest an other mans seruant Let euery one be perswaded in his owne mind and looke to the warrant of his own worke Let vs follow those things which concerne peace and where with one may edisie another If any list to bee contentious we haue no such custome neither the 〈◊〉 of God And thus much of the communicants of this sacrament and likewise of the rest of the outward parts of the Lords supper Chap. 7 Of the words of 〈◊〉 in the sacrament of the Lords supper ALthough we haue spoken before sufficiently of consecration what it is and how it is wrought to satisfie all such as are sober minded and simple Louers of the truth yet be cause special points are heere to be obserued and that the aduersaries turn the true consecration into a taine magicall incantation to worke a miraculous or rather a monstrous transubstantiation it shall not be amisse to assure and handle this point againe that therby the truth of God may be cleered the ignorant instructed the aduersaties satisfied and consequently their mouthes stopped Consecration is a change or conuerting of the outward elementes into another vse by obseruing the whole institution of Christ which giueth it his effect We confesse a turning and changing not of one substance into another not by abolishing of natures not by close pronouncing of certaine wordes but in the vse and in respect of vs and in regard of the promise of God 〈◊〉 he water which floweth out of the rock in the wildernesse signified the same to the fathers which the Wine 〈◊〉 to vs in the supper Notwithstanding it was a common watering to the beasts of the fielde and to the people of God the cattell dranke thereof as well as the people and therefore there could be made no change there in but in respect of men to whom God gaue his gratious promise which teacheth vs to account of the outward signes otherwise then of common meats and common drinks The stones hammered in the quarrey the timber hewed in the forrest the gold tryed in the furnace were common stuff before they were layd in the building of the Temple and so made holy and sanctified to God and man The sayings and sentences of the heathenish poets were prophane before they had passed through the pen of God and were taken vp by the holy ghost So wee teach of the bread and wine before the institution of christ is vsed and obserued they are common but afterward they are holy We confesse and 〈◊〉 not but say plainely there is a change in the sacramentes the elements which before were ordinary meates now become spiritual in respect of the vse before they serued only to feede the belly now they serue to seale vp the nourishment of our soules The discussing of this question together with the foundation of this consecration and sanctification of the creatures is taken out of 1 Tim. 4. 4. Euery creature of God is good and nothing ought to be refused if it be receiued with thanks giuing for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer These are the two meanes the word and prayer whereby the elementes are changed though not transubstantiated yet they haue a dignity and preheminence which they had not before they are no more common bread common Wine common meate but a Sacrament of Christes body a warrant of Gods promises an holy Mystery and seale of the couenant between God and vs. The first meanes of this consecration and setting a part of the creatures to our vse is by the word of God If we haue the euident and expresse word to warrant our vse of the creatures of God we may vse them for our necessity and comfort if we haue no word to beare out the practise they are not sanctified vnto vs. The tree of knowledge of good and euil was not sanctified vnto Adam though it were good in it selfe as all creatures are because he had a word of commaundement not to eate of it Of the tree of the knowledge of good and euill thou shalt not eate of it for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death After the fall and after the flood all creatures were not sanctified some were accounted vncleane all might not be eaten all might not be offered as vnder the law among the beastes onely they were cleane that did chew the cud and diuide the hoofe and among the fishes of the Sea onely such as had skales and finnes were called cleane the rest were vncleane vnto them because the word did not allow but restraine the vse of them So likewise for this Sacrament of the Lords Supper not euery creature is sanctified not a 〈◊〉 not any flesh not any fish not oyle but onely bread and Wine These two are consecrated all the rest are cancelled by the word The second meanes whereby the creatures are sanctified is by prayer For albeit that God by the comming of his sonne into the world hath sanctified all meates and drinkes that nothing of it selfe is vncleane but to him that counteth it vncleane yet something must necessarily be done on our partes otherwise that which is holy we may prophane and that which is good we may turne into euill and therefore the apostle addeth praier which is both a thanksgiuing to the Lord that he hath sanctified and prepared them for vs and likewise a petition that they may bee healthfull for vs and we thankefull for them whereby our foode our apparell and all the succours of this life are sanctified to his glory and our comfort These be the two meanes of consecration if these or any of them be wanting there can be no true consecration If then in the time of the law they should haue eaten swines flesh which indeed part the 〈◊〉 but
subiect to the pleasure of euery priest to come at his call to stay till he commandeth nay to suffer himselfe to be torne with the teeth of euery receiuer Wherefore the presence of his glorified body cannot be grounded vpon these words of Christ touching the Sacrament This is my body Neither let them say as Campion that boasting champion like an other Goliah challenging the hoaste of God sometimes said in the Tower-conference that this is a fallation inasmuch as his glorification 〈◊〉 it not a diuerse bodye and that a man whole and a man sicke at sundry times make not a seuerall man This lesuitical denise hath no colour of reason but a tricke of euasion For we speak not of the difference betweene Christs glorified and mortall body but of the meaning of the wordes this is my body whether Christ vnderstand his naturall and mortall bodie wherein shortly he was to be glorified or whether he vnderstand it of his body glorified Either it must bee vnderstood of the one or of the other or of both or rather indeed of neither except they wil haue the words taken and spoken one way to the Disciples and another way to vs. Thus the meaning of them when they were first vttered shoulde be This is my mortall body but nowe spoken to vs taken in another sence of vs to the end of the worlde This is my glorified body So then the same words spoken to the Disciples should be false as we are to vnderstand them and the disciples shoulde be deceiued vnderstanding them as we do take them What is this but to bring vs back againe to the reproachfull comparisons and blasphemous assertions of sundry Popish writers to compare the scripturs to a nose of wax and a rule of lead that they may be expounded diuersely and framed to times so as at one time they may be vnderstood one way at another time they may be interpreted another way These things before being duly considred we may safely conclude that christ is not present in his naturall body Lastly the presence of christ in his naturall body abolisheth the light of reason and confoundeth the nature of thinges For what is more repugnant to reason then for a man to bear himselfe in his own hands that a man should 〈◊〉 vp himselfe that another shoulde eate him yet he remaine vntouched vntasted and vncorrupted that one and the same man should be visible and inuisible present absent in the teeth of the disciples and at the table with the Disciples bee a man of stature and yet bee contained and comprehended in a little Cake and Cantle of bread Now as by these reasons and sundry other that might be alledged the reall presence is sufficiently convinced so the arguments brought to maintaine and vphold it are easily answeared For as the doctrine is false so the reasons are weake and foolish First they obiect the wordes of institution for the defence of this cause For as in the questions of the supremacy of Peters pretended of the Popes vsurped which are many they alwaies alledge the wordes of Christs to Peter Pasce oues meas feede by sheepe so doe they deale in controuersies of the Supper where we misse not long Hoc est 〈◊〉 meum This is my body His wordes say they are true therefore we must beleeue them hee is a man of his worde therefore wee must credit him if then we be deceiued holding his body to be present hee hath deceiued vs. I answere the question is not of the truth of the wordes whether they be true or false but of the interpretation and meaning thereof which we say is figuratiue and yet no other then is vsuall when the Scripture speaketh of other Sacraments to the church as circumcision is the couenant the lambe is the passeouer the cup is the new testament the breaking of the bread is the communion of the body of Christ the rocke is Christ baptisme is the washing of our new-birth Are not all these places like to the words of Christs institution or can they deny them to be vnderstood 〈◊〉 and not properly so the meaning of those words is that the bread which he had taken broken and giuen is a sign and figure of his body it is now no longer common bread but are presentation of his body truely offered to all and truely giuen to all the faithfull Our Sauiour Christ spake many thinges to his disciples figuraâ—ively not litterally to be taken he said they were the salt of the earth the light of the world a Citty set on a hill he speaketh of cutting off the hand and pulling out the eye he calleth himselfe a door a vine a way are not these figuratiue and metaphorical speeches Againe the circumstaunces of the text the nature of a Sacrament and the Articles of our faith will not suffer vs to take them properly besides this that they shoulde commaund vs an horrible and Wicked thing to eat mans flesh and drinke his blood Moreouer the Euangelists neuer say the bread is transubstantiated into his body or the wine into his blood or that the body and blood of Christ are in the bread or vnder the bread or with the bread all the circumstances teach that the breade is a Sacrament of his body the Wine is a Sacrament of his blood as circumcision was a signe of the Couenaunt the Lambe a signe of the Passeouer the rocke a figure of Christ. Lastly as Christ speaketh to the euill seruant Out of thine own mouth will I iudge thee so the aduersaries themselus giue sentence on our side and one arch-papist condemneth another Bishop Fisher writing against Luther affirmeth that no man can proue by the wordes of the Gospell that any priest in these daies doth consecrate the verie bodie and blood of Christ and therefore Lindanus among the rablement of Traditions which he reckoneth rehearseth the real presence Likewise Tonstall another Byshop of the same birth holdeth that it wer better to leaue euery man to his owne coniecture as they were before the counsell of Lateran then to bring in such questions And Biel a man of the same stampe not inferiour to the rest confesseth that it is not found in the canonical scripturs that christs body is in the Sacrament And let them tell vs their opinion whether that hildebrand helde this bodily presence when hee cast the Sacrament into the fire contrary to the liking of certaine cardinals present with him Thus we see counsels sathers reasons doctors schoolemen Byshops cardinals Popes and others of the aduersaries themselus fight against the 〈◊〉 prefence of Christ and the Scriptures themselue ouerthrow it Secondly they obiect the words of Christ Except ye eat the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his blood ye haue no life in you I answere these words are not vnderstood of the Sacrament they were vttered long before the
institution of the Supper and therefore coulde not be referred vnto that which as yet was not so that Christ speaketh of spirituall eating not of carnall by faith not by the mouth whereby wee abide in him and he in vs but many eate the Sacrament of his bodie that haue not him abiding in them not themselues in him Againe without this eating of his 〈◊〉 heere spoken of no man can attain eternal life but manie haue eternall life that neuer are partakers of the Lords Supper Besides how absurd is it for those to imagine that Christ naming bread speaketh of the Sacrament of the altar for they would haue no 〈◊〉 of bread to remain but one lie the figure shew and likenesse of bread so that according to the deuise of their new-found doctrine hee might more 〈◊〉 say I am no breude or I am the sher es of bread then as he doth I am the true bread Moreouer it christ promising to giue bread for the redemption of the world had pointed out the Sacrament of his Supper then he shuld haue giuen his flesh for the saluation of mankind not vpon the crosse but in his last Supper Wherefore then serued his death What neede was there to shed his blood on the crosse Furthermore if these words be referd to his Supper then the svpper maie bee celebrated without materiall breade and Wine without giuing of thankes without blessinge without consecration without breaking and distributing of the bread without pouring our and deliuering of the wine and without remembrance of the death of christ For in this place we haue no mention of these things And shal we imagine that the sacrament is spoken off where neither the matter nor forme nor word of institution nor minister nor externall rite is once remembred Lastly to eate the flesh of Christ and to drinke his bloode is nothing else but to come to Christ and to beleeue in Christ as appeareth in the text I am that bread of life he that commeth to me shall not hunger and he that beleeueth in me shall neuer thirst And speaking of faith hee faith No man can come to me except the father which hath sent me draw him This his truth is so cleere and euident that manye of the aduersaries are driuen to confesse it howsoeuer som of thē seeke to cast mistes before the eies of men that they may not espy it among the which are Sanders and Bellarmine And as we haue shewed before how the Schoolemen and Doctors of the church of Rome are together by the eares in sundry controuersies about the supper so are they about the true interpretation of Ioh. 6. some vnderstanding it of the sacramentall eating some of the spirituall eating and some of both Thirdly they obiect the omnipotency of God that he is able to turne the bread into the body and the Wine into his blood he is able to make it really present in heauen and earth and wheresoeuer Masse is said he is able to make a body to be in many places at once and yet not occupy a place I answer when all other reasons faile they flye to gods omnipotency as vnto a sanctuary and place of refuge But this will not proue a reall presence For albeit God be omnipotent and almighty must he therefore do al things yea offer violence to his owne body to maintaine their absurd and hereticall opinions of the reall presence and of transubstantiation Must his power attend vpon their fansies and dreames Cannot he be omnipotent except their positions and assertions be graunted There is no feare of Gods power albeit we withstand their carnall presence For touching the omnipotency of god we must obserue these two rules and conclusions First gods power is neuer to be opposed and set against his expresse wil plainly and certainly known for God is not contrary to himselfe Now then it is not enough to proue that God can turne bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ vnlesse they proue he will turne them into his flesh and blood We our selues can do many things which we do not and which we will not do so we must know it is with God he could haue added winges to man he might haue made many worlds if it had pleased him Christ of the stones could haue raysed vp children vnto Abraham Christ covld haue praied to his father in his afliction to send him more then 12. legions of angels but how then should the scriptures be fulfilled Wherefore we are not to reason of his power vnlesse wee bee assured of his wil reueiled in his word as we see Christ 〈◊〉 against the Saduces saith Ye are deceiued not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God Where we see he ioyneth the scriptures and the power of God together so 〈◊〉 he is truely said to be omnipotent because he can bring to passe whatsoeuer he will neither can the effect of his will be hindered or resisted Now it is the knowne will of God that christ should haue a true body that he might be a true man with his quantity and dimensions The second rule to be remembred is that in God there is no contradiction that whatsoere necessarily implieth a contradiction is an argument not of power but of weakenesse This the scripture decree this the fathers deliuer this their own schoolmen determine For in God is not yea and nay he abideth faithful he cannot deny himselfe he cannot dye hee cannot lie he cannot deny his word he cannot sin he cannot deceiue he cannot be deceiued These and such like 〈◊〉 cannot do which if he should doe he were not omnipotent For this were a token of impotency not of omnipotency of debility not of ability of want and weakenesse not of strength and power For in euery contradiction there is falsehood and a lie which cannot agree to God who is truth it selfe and therfore hee cannot make affirmation and negation truth and falsehood yea and nay to be true together which things are imposible Yea the popish schoolmen confute this popish fansie of the real presence when they teach that God cannot doe any thing wherein a contradiction is implyed and that all other things he can do and therefore is omnipotent Now who seeth not that herein is a manifest and notable contradiction that christs body is made visible and inuisible together finite and infinite circumscribed and vncircumscribed to haue dimension and to want dimension to be compassed in one certaine place and to be in a great number of Sacramentes in many places to be included in a little bread on earth which is contrary to that nature of a mans true body not to be contained therin as 〈◊〉 in heauen and there hauing the naturall properties of a true body which cannot 〈◊〉 brought within so narrow a compasse as the wafer cake Wherfore the absurd conceit of the reall presence cannot be maintained
renewing of the minde a change of the heart a turning of the soule and a reformation of our life and affections As knowledge is the beginning and as it were the forerunner of faith like a messenger going before his maister to prepare for his comming so repentance is an especiall fruit of faith without which whosoeuer draweth neere to the Lordes Table prophaneth the Sacrament and departeth without comfort For it is an altering of our liues and conuersations to God ioyned with a Godly sorrow and detestation of all sinne together with an vnfained loue and desire of righteousnesse This appeareth in the change of the whole man of our thoughtes affections meditations and delightes in al these the old man with his deceitful lusts must be put off and the new man must be put on which after God is created vnto righteousnesse and true holinesse This duty is taught in diuers places of the scripture Herunto come the wordes of the Prophet Esaiah When ye come to appeare before me who required this at your hands to tread in my courtes Bring no mo oblations in vaine 〈◊〉 is an abhomination vnto me I cannot suffer your new Moones nor Sabbaths nor solemne 〈◊〉 it is iniquity nor assemblies And when ye shall stretch out your handes I will hide mine eies from you and though ye make manie praiers I will not heare for your handes are ful of blood Wash you make you cleane take awaie the euil of your workes from before mine 〈◊〉 to do euel learne to do wel c. And Ch. 66. He that killeth a bullock is as if he 〈◊〉 a man he that sacrificeth a sheep is as if he cut off a Dogges necke he that offereth an oblation as if he fered swines fleshe he that burneth incense as if he blessed an idoll yea they haue chosen their owne waies and their soule delighteth 〈◊〉 their abhominations Whereby the prophet meaneth that god accepteth no sacrifices without faith and repentance This also was figured and shaddowed out by washing the garments and changing the attire of such as came with their oblations vnto God and prepared themselues to his seruice This Iacob commaunded when he reformed his houshold and went vp with them to Bethell the house of God Thus Moses prepared the people before the law was deliuered in Mount Sinas And heereunto the prophet Dauid alludeth Psal. 26. I will wash mine handes in innocency O Lord and compasse thine alter as if he should say I will indeauour to liue most vprightly toward thee and toward men and so come and offer sacrifices at thine alter Wherefore such as feele not themselues to haue penytent heartes to be humbled and grieued for their sinnes to sigh and grone vnder the burden of them to tremble at Gods iudgementes cannot come aright to this holy Supper but eate and drinke certaine iudgement to themselues The broken and contrite heart is the path way to heauen and an vnspeakeable companion of repentance This the Apostle teacheth 2 Cor. 7. Godly sorrow causeth repentance vnto saluation not to be repented off but worldly sorrowe causeth death but behold this thing that ye haue beene Godly sory what great care it hath wrought in you yea what cleering of your selues yea what indignation yea what feare yea what desire yea what zeale yea what punishment Heere be the notes and tokens whereby we may try our repentance whether it be sincere or not It hath these signes to discerne it a care to leaue that sinne into which wee are fallen otherwise we haue not repented as Act. 2. they which had crucified the Lord of life and deliuered him into the handes of sinners were pricked in their heartes and sayed to Peter and to the other Apostles Men and bretheren what shall wee doe And Peter sayde vnto them Amend your liues and saue your selues from this froward generation The other signes of repentance are a confession of our sins to God and a condemning our selues for them an holy and inward anger against our selues for our carelesnesse in looking to our owne waies a feare not so much of Gods iudgements as least we fall into the same sins againe and so offend our mercifull father a desire euer after to please God with all our hearts and last of all a renewing and punishing of our owne soules for our offences cōmitted against him Now to the end we may repent aright and sit in iudgement of our selues according to the forme of gods iustice it shal be needful for vs to examine our selues by the ten words of the law and out of the same to frame ten seueral enditements against our selues whereby we shal find a great defect of righteousnes a great spoile of obedience a great accesse of disobedience and a great heape of all kind of corruptions This then may serue and suffice for the true examination of our selus We must consider and confesse that we haue not loued and feared God we haue not beleeued and depended vpon him in al estates as we ought but haue oftentimes feared and loued the creature aboue him we haue preferred a filthy pleasure before him we haue doubted of his promises through vnbeleefe and relyed vpon an arme of flesh and blood Wee haue beene carelesse in the worship of God we haue not prayed to him with stedfast assurance to be heard we haue not serued him in spirit and in truth as he requireth of vs but hypocrisie hath crept into our best actions and meditations we haue more laboured after the outward shewes and appearances of religion then to expresse the power of Godlinesse and haue more esteemed to seeme to others to bee true Christians then to bee such indeede Wee haue not reuerenced the eternall Maiesty of God as is meete to doe who is infinite inuisible vnchangeable we haue not blessed and praysed his name with thankes-giuing for all thinges and at all times as well for aduersity as prosperity Wee haue not heard reade and meditated in his word with such affection reuerence and zeale as is requisite when occasion hath beene offered to speake of the workes of gods prouidence we haue not acknowledged in them the greatnes of his wisedome power and goodnesse as we ought nay rather the glorious and dredful name of god which ought to be more deare vnto vs then our own liues hath beene blasphemed dishonored and abused by vs. Touching the sabboth wee must consider and confesse how we haue prophaned it we haue bene more careful to follow our worldly workes and affaires then to seeke the kingdome of God and his righteousnes hauing had more care of the body then of the soule we haue sent out our seruants to dispatch our busines on that day and haue not suffered them to attend on the 〈◊〉 of the Lord for the saluation of their soules and our soules haue neglected the ministery of the word of god haue defiled his sanctuary and haue polluted that holy
communion with the body and blood of christ Heere God is present and sitteth as president at this table he offereth vnto vs his owne sonne for our iustification and therefore this supper must be reuerently regarded and diligently frequented of vs. In this sacrament we are in like manner to consider the partes and the vses thereof The parts are partly outwarde and partly inwarde The outwarde partes are foure First the Minister who is to take the breade and Wine into his hands after the example of christ to seperate the breade and Wine so taken from their common vse to an holy to breake the breade to poure out the Wine and deliuer them both into the hands of all the people present So then they are not consecrated to be priestes of the new testament but preachers of the gospel and ministers of the sacraments and therefore priuate persons may not take this supper to themselues or deliuer it to others The second part is the word of institution this is my body that is this bread is a signe of my body which shortly shall be crucified for you this cuppe is the new testament in my blood that is this wine in the cup is a true sign of my blood presently to be shed to confirme the new couenant of God touching forgiuenes of sinnes and eternal life These words are not properly but figuratiuely to be vnderstood being sacramentall speeches Thus the Scripture speaketh of Circumcision and of the paschall Lambe The third outward part are bread and wine fit signes to signifie our spirituall nourishment by eating the body and drinking the blod of Christ In Baptisme we haue one onely signe but in this supper we haue two to note out our ful and perfect nourishment by Christ. Nether did christ deliuer the deceiueable shewes of bread and wine or cast a mist before the eyes of his desciples to make them thinke it breade which was no bread or wine which was no wine but he gaue them true breade and the true fruit of the vine as the apostle calleth them after the blessing breaking consecration Hereby falleth to the ground the mystery of transubstantiation the most misshapen monster that euer liued or was deuised It bringeth in a false Christ and turneth him into an idoll it maketh Sacraments without signes it maketh Christ to haue an infinite body who is like to vs in all things sinne onely excepted lastly it confoundeth heauen and earth together Neither let any obiect that Christ hath now a glorified body sitting at the right hand of his father and therefore his body hath a great priuiledge aboue ours to be in diuers places at the same time For first when the holy supper was instituted the body of Christ was not glorified Againe glorification doth not take away the nature of a true body but taketh away the infirmity and weaknes thereof Take away space of place from a body and it remaineth no longer a true body but the essence of it is abolished as Austine hath well determined Againe if Christ deliuered both signes the people ought to receiue vnder both kindes so that they may be iustly called church-robbers who haue taken from the people the vse of the cup and wretched depriuers of christes testament depriuing the right heires of their inheritance and ingrossing into their hands the goods of others They make it of the essence of the Sacrament to vse 〈◊〉 bread and to mingle water with wine which christe neuer ordained or commanded but that which is necessary they esteeme as needlesse and superfluous b thus transgressing the commaundement of God by their owne traditions The fourth outward part are the communicantes whose duty it is to take the breade and wine into their hands to eate the bread and to drinke the wine to the norishment of their bodies He did not bid them to reserue the outward signes to holde them and adore them or call the sacrament their Lord and their God he did not command them to offer thē vp to God the father as a propitiatory sacrifice for the quicke and dead as is vsed in their vnbloody or rather most bloody Masse which hath caused so much innocent blood of the blessed martyrs to be shed who being kild for theword of god and the testimony which they maintaind their souls vnder the altar cry day night with a loud voice vnto the L. holy and true to iudg and auenge their blood on them that dwell on the earth Lastly hereby are ouerthrown the priuat Masses of the church of Rome which now grow to be too common canot stand with the communion of Christe who deliuered the signes of bread and wine to all the disciples that were present they did not stand by and gaze one vpon another but receiued the supper of the Lord 〈◊〉 The outward parts haue bin hitherto handled which being rightly perfourmed there followeth consecration which is a seperation of the outward signes from their ordinarie vse to an holy and spirituall vse that whereas before they serued for the body now they are made instrumentes of grace and seales of the righteousnes by faith The inward parts follow which are foure First god the father who appointed his sonne to performe the gratious work of our redemption and in the fulnes of time sent him into the world who died for our sins and rose againe for our iustification Secondly the Holyghost who assureth vs of the truth of gods promises This sheweth that he is true god equall with the father and the son proceeding from the father and the son This 〈◊〉 such as suppose no partaking of the body and blood of christ except he be giuen vs in a carnall and fleshy manner whereas the spirite worketh faith in our hearts which is the ground of thinges which are hoped for and the euidence of thinges which are not seene The thirde inwarde part of the Lordes Supper is the body and blood of Christ deliuered for vs vnto death This conuinceth such of a spirit of errour who make vnbeleeuers and reprob partakers of Chr. body and blood thus his body should be prophaned and his sauing graces seperated from his person But euen as where Satan dwelleth and possesseth the heart there alwaies raigne the workes of darkenes and damnation so the gifts of Christ accompanying saluation are inseperably ioyned with the person of Christ. This also condemneth the reall presence and carnall eating of Christ which forgeth many Christs and reuiueth the Haeresie of Eutiches it crosseth sundry Articles of the christian faith and maketh faithfull men like the vnfaithfull Barbarians that deuoured mans flesh and drunke his blood True it is christ is truely present in the Sacrament howbeit not carnally and corporally but spiritually and mistically He hath giuen himselfe to be the foode of our soules let vs hunger and thirst after him and lay hold on him to
our saluation for he that hath the sonne hath life he that hath not the sonne of God hath not life The last inward part is the faith full receiuer who stretcheth forth the hand of faith and so layeth hold on Christ and all his sauing graces For no man can communicat with his body but the same is made partaker of his benefits Let vs all prepare the true and liuely faith of Gods elect and assure our selues that Hypocrites and vnbeleeuers cannot possibly be partakers of the bodye and blood of Christ. These are the foure inward partes also of the Lord supper The similitude and relation of the outward and inward parts one to another standeth in this manner euen as the Minister by the words of institution offereth and giueth bread and wine to the communicants to feede the reupon bodily so the father by the spirit offereth and exhibiteth the body and blood of christ Iesus to the souls of the faithful to feed vppon them spiritually Thus much of al the parts of the Lords supper now folow the vses to be vnfolded The vses profit which we reap by the Lords sup are special three First to shew forth with praise and thanks giuing the death and the suffrings of chri who his own selfe bare our sins in his body on the tree by whose stripes we are healed so that we haue the chiefe cause in our selus which did crucifie christ Secōdly to teach our comunion wich christ being made flesh of his flesh bone of his bones Hence we learn that al the godly and be leeuers are made partakers of christ and his graces This is matter of great comfort in our manifold trials and tentations that we are ioynd to Ch. as members to the head and therfore neither life nor deth nor angels nor principalities nor powers nor things presēt nor things to com nor hight nor depth nor any other creatur shal be able to seperate vs from the loue of God which is in christ Iesus our L. But on the other side the vngodly and vnbeleeuers haue no part or Portion in chri and his graces they are as branches cut off which wither and men gather them to cast them into the fire and to burn them 3 to declare and testifie our communion fellowship and agreement with our brethren meeting together at the same table and partaking togither of the same supper Wherfore seeing we haue not onely an vnion with christ but a comunion among our selus we are the seruants of the church to serue one another in al duties of loue to instruct them that are ignorāt to raise them that are fallen and to bind vp the broken hearted to reconcile our selues one to warde another and to keepe the vnity of the spirit in the bond of peace Hitherto we haue handled the doctrin of the Lords supper declaring what it is what are the parts and vses thereof the preparation to this work followeth consisting in the Examination of our selues and trying our owne harts by the touchstone of the lawe of god This duty is very necessary to be performd of vs for the hart of man is deceitful aboue all things and the secret corners of it past finding out We haue to deal with god in this busines Great is the profit which we reap receiue if we come rightly and 〈◊〉 prepared Great is the punishment procured by want of this try all and examination And the Sacrament it self is defiled by vnworthy receiuing This preparation principally standeth in these 4. points in the knowledge of god and of ourselues especially of the whole doctrine of the sacraments in a liuely faith in Christ seeing euery one receiueth so much as he beleeueth he receiueth in repentance from dead works and lastly in reconciliation towarde our brethren hauing peace with all men and loue towarde our enemies Thus I haue opened plainly yet truely the doctrine of the Sacramentes deliuered in the Scriptures and taught in the reformed churches I haue disclosed some part of the mistery of iniquity and discouered and laid open the skirts of that great Idoll of the Masse the reproach of christians the scorne of the gentiles the offence of the weak and the occasion of ruine to many that stumble therat to their own confusion The Lord god high possessor of heauen earth and preseruer of his people that call vpon him put it into the heart of all christian princes and rulers of the earth to pull downe this abhominable Idoll that hath aduanced itselfe against the kingdome of christ and to deface this filthy monster that hath deceiued many who trusted in it The same Lord vouchsafe to reueale his truth to the ignorant to establish them that are weake and to confound all obstinate enemies to his truth to their prince and to their country for Iesus Christs sake Amen Amen FINIS A Corollary THe Apostle Paule Christian Reader prophesieng of these last times in which Antichrist should be reueiled declareth that his comming shal be by the effectual working of Satan withall power signes lying wonders in al deceiuablenes of vnrighteousnes that so they might be damned which beleeue not the truth but haue pleasure in vnrighteousnesse In this discription the effectual working of this 〈◊〉 is set down but it is in those which 〈◊〉 For as God imparteth his power to his ministers and indueth them with his spirit to saue such as beleeue so doth Satan after an apish imitation giue power to his instruments and breath his spirit vpon them to condemne such 〈◊〉 receiue not the truth The manner and meanes of Antichrists preuailing in the children of disobedience is double to wit by worke and by worde His working is with great power which is seene by signes and lying wonders Now who it is in our daies that boasteth of wonders and I wot not what miracles Who maketh the power of working signes and miracles a note of the Church Who glory that they can euery day nay euery houre of the day miraculously transubstantiate the bread wine into the blood of christ who pretendeth that their real presence their images their priuate Masses other like superstitions haue been confirmed by miracles frō heauen Is not this the church of Rome which hath the Pope for her head her spouse and her foundation And is he not discerned by this note among other to be that very Antichrist described in scripture prophesied to com in the world 〈◊〉 now to the church and felt of euery christian Wherfore let vs carefully beware 〈◊〉 such signes and wonders carry away our eies and steale away our harts from the simplicity and sincerity of the Gospell The second meanes of his proceeding and preuailing is by word to wit by deceiuablenes of vnrighteousnes He is indeede an enemy to Christ and to his church how beit not open but secret not shewing
himselfe as he is but disguised not oppugning the truth with manifest violence as an open enemy but masked vnder the cloke of godlines pretending the fairest frendship but intending the greatest deepest mischiefe against God and his truth Who is it therfore that propoundeth false doctrine to the people coloured with the name of Christ and shew of Christian 〈◊〉 Who condemneth marriage vnder the cloke of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vse of the creatures vnder the vizard of fasting Lawfull possessions vnder the pretence of voluntary pouerty Who vnder a false shew of counterfeit deuotion zeale and 〈◊〉 to bleare the eies of the simple and to carry away the hearts of the vnstable hath nourished 〈◊〉 rebellions and Machiauillian practises against lawful princes but he I hese are the marks of Antichrist and these haue been his cunning baits to allure men to his superstition and their owne confusion Moreouer marke the order of their proceeding First they haue gon about to erect the kingdom of Babilon and as it wer to put life into the beast by handling the questions of religion betweene them and vs and to this purpose haue published controuersies dictates Narrations Lectures disputations Demands Motiues Principles Apologies Chalenges Demonstrations and 〈◊〉 of Popish doctrine But being beaten from his bulwark and out of all their sophistry by the sword of Gods spirit which is the word of god they haue sought to gaine get ground of vs another way For wheras they saw 〈◊〉 ouermatched in matters of doctrin they indeuored to excel or at least to equall vs in life and conuersation and 〈◊〉 partly at home and partly abroad they haue penned sundry treatises of Directions Deuotions Reuclations Imitations Memorials Meditations and christian exercises tending to reformation of manners thereby thinking through hipocrisie to win estimation among the simple and to incite men to alow their religion it selfe But finding themselues in processe of time far inferior vnto vs both in purity of doctrine and sincerity of life they haue last of al inuented another shift wherin is lesse honor and more dishonesty to wit by setting downe the debates and disagreements that haue been among our churches and gathering an heape of testimonies out of our own wtiters bitterly inueighing one against another thereby to raise vp 〈◊〉 to 〈◊〉 the minds of many from vs and to work a deepe dislike of our religion Among other ther is a notable example of a crafty enimy both nameles and shameles who writing against a worthy knight in the common-wealth and a learned docter in the church entituleth himselfe first the Warder and now lately the warner though he shew neither skill in the one nor wisedome in the other and through their sides seeketh to giue a wound to the 〈◊〉 This man pretending nothing against vs but braulings and 〈◊〉 inuectiues ione against another as wel at home as abroad not being able to handle the controuerfies of religiō hath filled his Warn-word with continual allegations of authorities and speaches out of our owne writers as Luther zwinglius Oecolampadius Caluin Beza and diuerse others together with most bitter raylings and calumniations of his own inuention against vs al which if they were taken out of his booke as euil humors out of a body it could not be esteemed worth so many counters as now it is k diuided into encounters There is nothing so hard as to do wel there is nothing so easy as to speak euil Let it therfore of al persons be called for euer not the Warn-word but the Scorn-word being a confuted masse of slanders euil practises to be scorned rather then confuted And albeit it be the deepe subtility and wretched pollicy of our aduersaries to aledge Luther against Zuingilus and one of our writers against another to the end that while they striue about mens words and writings maters of greatest substance may lye buried in silence yet they shall neuer bring vs from the holy defence of gods eternall truth to skirmish with them about mens sayings We wil not leaue the great keies and questions of religion and fall to dispute of matters of inferior nature condicion this wer to wrāgle about nothing and to fill the world with friuolous fruitles writings Let them know we are no more bound to defend and iustyfie Luther and his followers in all their sayings then they will be bound to defend Bellarmine Hofius Harding and other harsh maintainers both of popish opinions and their owne priuate assertions If they will take vpon them to allow whatsoeuer positions and propositions Caietan Durand Canisius Gregorius de Valentia or any of their side hath published let them professe it and giue out so much otherwise they take paines in vaine and offer vs great iniury obiecting against vs words neither vtterd by vs nor aproued of vs. And howsoeuer we agree together better then the aduersaries wish or desire as appeareth By the Harmony of the Churches set forth to be read and vnderstood of all declaring to the world how falsly we are charged with disunion and diuision and shewing the peace and concord betweene the churches of Britaine France Germany Swizerland Denmarke and other places in matters of faith yet I will not deny the gifts of God being diuerse some difference and dissention betweene vs about the sacrament of the Lordes sup which notwithstanding is not so great as hath beene in former times nor so bloody as the aduersaries surmise neither so dangerous and grosse as hath been and is at this day in the church of Rome No age and generation hath seene all Churches following all together one another in all points but some difference hath appeared in doctrine or in discipline or ceremonies or manners or in all yea Byshops haue beene against Byshops Doctors against Doctors fathers against fathers Saints against Saints churches against churches yet were they not heerby rent one from another but ioyned together with hand and hart in the common faith Cyprian dissented from Cornelius and Augustine from Ierome as Lot did from Abraham Was there not a violent and troublesome contention betweene Theophilus of Alexandria and Chrysostome of Constantinople between Cyrill and Theodoritus as great as euer was between Luther and Zuinglius Yet were they Godly learned zelous and excellent pillars of the Church of God in their times Neither is the contention so great or Warre so hote and bloody betweene the reformed churches about the sacrament as is imagined For touching the matter it selfe there is no strife the difference is onely in certaine circumstances First we all acknowledge that the holy signes haue not a bare signification but assure our consciences through the ordinance of God that the things themselues are as truely and certainely giuen of God to all the faithful that come to his supper as the outward signes are deliuered by the minister of God Againe we professe that the supper consisteth of two parts the earthly