Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n church_n profess_v visible_a 1,998 5 9.1242 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A02584 The reconciler: or An epistle pacificatorie of the seeming differences of opinion concerning the true being and visibilitie of the Roman Church Enlarged with the addition of letters of resolution, for that purpose, from some famous divines of our Church. By Ios: Exon. Hall, Joseph, 1574-1656. 1629 (1629) STC 12709A; ESTC S103708 25,794 138

There are 6 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

were such as serued fitly to leade the Reader into that Sense which vnder the word True comprehendeth only Truth of Beeing or Existencie and not the Due Qualities of the thing or subiect you haue beene causelesly traduced But on the other side if that Proposition comes in ex abrupto or stands solitarie in your discourse you cannot maruell though by taking the word True according to the more ordinarie acception your true meaning was mistaken In briefe your Proposition admits a True sense in that sense is by the best learned in our Reformed Church not disallowed For The Beeing of a Church does principally stand vpon the Gratious Action of God calling men out of Darknesse and Death vnto the Participation of sight and life in Christ Iesus So long as God continues this Calling vnto any people though they as much as in them lies Darken this light and corrupt the meanes which should bring them to life and saluation in Christ yet where God Calls men vnto the Participation of life in Christ by the word by the Sacraments there is the true Being of a Christian Church let men bee neuer so false in their Expositions of GODS Word or neuer so vntrustie in mingling their owne Traditions with Gods Ordinances Thus the Church of the Iewes lost not her Being of a Church when shee became an Idolatrous Church And thus vnder the gouernment of the Scribes and Pharisees who voided the Commandements of God by their owne Traditions there was yet standing a true Church in which Zacharias Elizabeth the Virgin Mary and our Sauiour himselfe was borne who were mēbers of that Church and yet participated not in the corruptions thereof Thus to grant that the Roman was and is a True Visible Christian Church though in doctrine a false and in practice an Idolatrous Church is a true assertion and of greater vse and necessitie in our Controuersie with Papists about the Perpetuitie of the Christian Church then is vnderstood by those who gainsay it This in your Reconciler is so wel explicated as if any shall continue in traducing you in regard of that Proposition so explained I thinke it wil be only those who are better acquainted with wrangling then reasoning and deeper in loue with strife then truth As for the aspersion of Arminianisme I can testifie that in our Ioint imployment at the Synod of Dort you were as farre from it as my selfe And I know that no man can imbrace it in the Doctrine of Predestination and Grace but he must first desert the Articles agreed vpon by the Church of England nor in the point of perseuerance but he must vary from the common Tenet and receiued opinion of our best approued Doctors in the English Church I am assured that you neither haue deserted the one nor will vary from the other And therefore be no more troubled with other mens groundlesse suspitions then you would be in like case with their idle Dreames Thus I haue inlarged my selfe beyond my first intent But my loue to your selfe and the assurance of your constant loue vnto the Truth inforced me thereunto I rest alwayes Ian 30. 1628. Your louing Brother IO. SARVM ¶ To the Reuerend and learned Master Doctor PREDEAVX professor of Diuinitie in Oxford and Rector of EXCETER Colledge WOrthy Master Doctor Predeaux All our litle world here takes notice of your worth and eminencie who haue long furnished the Diuinitie Chaire in that famous Vniuersitie with mutuall grace and honour Let me intreate you vpon the perusall of this sorie sheete of Paper to impart your selfe freely to me in your censure and to expresse to mee your cleare iudgement concerning the true being and visibilitie of the Romane Church you see in what sence I professe to hold it neither was any other euer in my thoughts Say I beseech you whether you thinke any learned Orthodoxe Diuine can with any colour of reason maintaine a contradiction herevnto And if you find as I doubt not much necessitie and vse of this true and safe Tenet helpe me to adde if you please a further supplie of Antidotes to those Popish spiders that would faine sucke poyson out of this herbe It was my earnest desire that this satisfactorie reconcilement might haue stilled all tongues and pens concerning this ill-raysed brabble but I see to my griefe how much men care for themselues more then peace I suffer and the Church is disquieted your learning and grauitie will be ready to contribute to a seasonable pacification In desire and exspectation of your speedie answere I take my leaue and am Your very louing friend and fellow-labourer IOS EXON Right Reuerend Father in GOD VPon the receite of your Reconciler which it pleased you to send me I tooke occasion as my manifolde distractions would permit to peruse what had beene said on both sides concerning the now-being of the Romane Church VVherin I must professe that I could not but wonder at the needlesse exceptions against your Tenet you affirming no new thing in that passage misliked in your Old Religion And this your Aduertisement afterward so fully and punctually cleareth and your Reconciler so acquitteth with such satisfying ingenuitie that I cannot imagin they haue considered it well or meane wel that shal persist to oppose it For who perceiues not that your Lordship leaues no more to Rome then our best Diuines euer since the Reformation haue granted If their speeches haue beene sometimes seemingly different their meaning hath beene alwayes the same that in respect of the common Truths yet professed among the Papists they may and ought to bee tearmed a True visible Church in opposition to Iewes Turkes and Pagans who directly denie the Foundation howsoeuer their Antichristian aditions make them no better then the Synagogue of Sathan This being agreed vpon by those whose Iudgement wee haue good reason to follow cited in your Aduertisement and by others they doe an ill office to our Church in my opinion who set them at ods in this point that are so excellently reconciled and giue more aduantage to the Aduersarie by quarrelling with our worthies then the Aduersarie is like to get by our acknowledgment that they are such a miserable Church as we discouer them to be VVhat I haue thought long since in this behalfe it appeareth in my Lecture De Visibilitate Ecclesiae and as often as this hath come in question in our publicke Disputes we determine here no otherwise then your Lordship hath stated it And yet wee trust to giue as little vantage to Poperie as those that doe detest it and are as circumspect to maintaine our receiued Doctrine and Discipline without the least scandall to the weakest as those that would seeme most forward That distinction of Romes case before and since the Councell of Trent holds not to dis-Church it but shewes it rather to be more incureable now then heretofore Neither find I any particulars obiected which those worthy men haue not sufficiently cleared that haue iustifyed
Men but cannot utterly dischurch it whiles those main principles maintaine a weake life in that crazie and corrupted bodie But is not this language different from that whereto our eares and eies have beene inured from the mouthes and pens of some reverend Divines and professors of our Church Know Reader that the streame of the famous Doctors both at home and abroad hath runne strongly my way I should have feared and hated to goe alone what reason is there then to single out one man in a throng Some few worthie Authors have spoken otherwise in the warmth of their zealous contention yet so as that even to them durst I appeale for my Iudges for if their sound differ from me their sense agrees with me that which as I touched in my Advertisement so I am now readie to make cleare by the instance of learned Zanchius whose pregnant testimonies compared together shall plainly teach us how easie a reconcilement may bee made betwixt these two seemingly-contrarie opinions That worthie Author in his profession of Christian Religion which hee wrote and published in the 70. yeare of his age having defined the Church of Christ in generall and passed thorow the properties of it at last descending to the subdivision of the Church militant comes to inquire how particular Churches may be knowne to be the true churches of Christ wherof he determines thus Illas igitur c. Those Churches therefore doe wee acknowledge for the true Churches of Christ in which first of all the pure doctrine of the Gospell is preached heard admitted and so onely admitted that there is neither place nor eare given to the contrarie For both these are the just propertie of the flocke or sheepe of Christ namely both to heare the voice of their owne Pastor and to reject the voice of strangers Iohn 10. 4. In which secondly the Sacraments instituted by Christ are lawfully and as much as may bee according to Christs institution administred and received and therefore in which the Sacraments devised by men are not admitted and allowed In which lastly the discipline of Christ hath the due place that is where both publiquely and privately charitable care is had both by admonitions corrections and at last if need be by excommunications that the Commandements of God be duly kept and that all persons live soberly iustly and piously to the glory of God and edification of their neighbour Thus hee wherein who sees not how directly he aymes both at the justifying of our Churches and the casheering of the Roman which is palpably guiltie of the violation of these wholsome rules And indeed it must needes be said if we bring the Roman Church to this touch she is cast for a meer counterfeit shee is as farre from truth as truth is from falshood Now by this time you goe away with an opinion that learned Zanchie is my professed adversarie and hath directly condemned my position of the truenesse and visibilitie of the Roman Church Have but patience I beseech you to read what the same excellent Author writes in his golden Preface to that noble worke De natura Dei where this question is clearly punctuall decided There you shall finde that having passed through the wofull and gloomie offuscations of the Church of God in all former ages he descending to the darknesse of the present Babylon concludes thus Deinde non potuit Satan c. Moreover Satan could not in the verie Roman Church doe what he listed as hee had done in the Easterne to bring all things to such passe as that it should no more have the forme of a Christian Church For in spight of Satan that Church retained still the chief foundations of the faith although weakned with the doctrines of men it retained the publique preaching of the word of God thogh in many places mis-understood and mis-construed the invocation of the name of Christ though joyned also with the invocation of dead men the administration of Baptisme instituted by Christ himselfe howsoever defiled with the addition of many superstitions So as together with the symbole of the covenant the Covenant it selfe remained still in her I meane in all the Churches of the West no otherwise than it did in the Church of Israel even after that all things were in part profaned by Ieroboam and other impious and Idolatrous Kings upon the defection made by them from the Church and Tribe of Iuda For neither doe I assent to them which would have the Church of Rome to have no lesse ceased to be the Church of Christ than those Easterne Churches which afterwards turned Mahumetan what Church was ever more corrupt than the Church of the ten Tribes yet we learne from the Scriptures that it was still the Church of God And how doth S. Paul call that Church wherein Antichrist hee saith shall sit the Temple of God neither is it any Baptisme at all that is administred out of the Church of Christ The wife that is an Adulteresse doth not cease to be a wife unlesse being despoiled of her mariage-ring she be manifestly divorced The Church of Rome therefore is yet the Church of Christ but what manner of Church Surely so corrupted and depraved and with so great tyrannie oppressed that you can neither with a good conscience partake with them in their holy things nor safely dwell amongst them Thus he againe Wherein you see hee speakes as home for me as I could devise to speake for my selfe and as appositely professeth to oppose the contrarie Looke now how this learned Author may be reconciled to his owne pen and by the very same way shall my pen bee reconciled with others Either he agrees not with himselfe or else in his sense I agree with my gainsayers Nothing is more plaine then that hee in that former speech and all other classicke Authors that speake in that Key meane by a True Church a sound pure right beleeving Church so as their vera is rather verax Zanchie explicates the terme whiles he joines veram puram together so as in this construction it is no true Church that is an unsound one as if truth of existence were all one with truth of doctrine In this sense whosoever shall say the Church of Rome is a true Church I say he calls evill good and is no better than a teacher of lyes But if we measure the true being of a visible Church by the direct maintenance of fundamentall principles though by consequences indirectly overturned and by the possession of the word of God and his Sacraments though not without soule adulteration what judicious Christian can but with mee subscribe to learned Zanchius that the Church of Rome hath yet the true visibilitie of a Church of Christ what should I need to press the latitude and multiplicity of sense of the word Church there is no one term that I know in all use of speech so various If in a large sense it be taken to comprehend the
THE RECONCILER OR An Epistle Pacificatorie of the seeming differences of opinion concerning the true being and visibilitie of the Roman Church ENLARGED With the addition of Letters of Resolution for that purpose from some famous Divines of our CHVRCH By Ios Exon. LONDON Printed for NATH BVTTER 1629. TO THE RIGHT HONOVRABLE AND truly religious my singular good Lord Edward Earle of Norwich My ever honoured Lord I Confesse my charity led me into an error Your Lordshippe well knowes how apt I am to be overtaken with these better deceits of an over kinde credulitie I had thought that any dash of my pen in a sudden and easie advertisement might have served to have quitted that ignorant scandall which was cast upon my mis-taken assertion of the true visibility of the Romane Church The issue proves all otherwise I finde to my griefe that the misunderstanding tenacitie of some zealous spirits hath made it a quarrell It cannot but trouble me to see that the position which is so familiarly current with the best reformed Divines which hath beene so oft and long since published by mee without contradiction yea not without the approbation and applause of the whole representative body of the Clergie of this kingdome should now be quarrelled and drawne into the detestation of those that know it not As one therefore that should thinke it corosive enough that any occasion should be taken by ought of mine to ravell but one thred of that seamless coat I doe earnestly desire by a more full explication to give cleare satisfaction to all Readers and by this seasonable reconcilement to stop the flood-gates of contention I know it will not be unpleasing to your Lordship that through your honourable and pious hands these welcome papers should be transmitted to many Wherein I shall first beseech yea adjure al Christians under whose eies they shall fall by the dreadfull name of that GOD who shall judge both the quicke and the dead to lay aside all unjust prejudices and to allow the words of Truth and Peace I dare confidently say Let us be understood and we are agreed The searcher of all harts knows how far it was from my thoughts to speak ought in favour of the Roman Synagogue If I have not sufficiently branded that Strūpet I justly suffer Luthers broad word is by me already both safely cōstrued sufficiently vindicated But doe you not say It is a true visible Church Doe you not yeeld some kinde of communion with these clients of Antichrist What is if this be not favour Marke well Christian Reader and the Lord give thee understanding in all things To beginne with the latter No man can say but the Church of Rome holds some Truths those truths are Gods and in his right ours why should not wee challenge our owne wheresoever we finde it If a verie Devill shall say of Christ Thou art the Sonne of the living God wee will snatch this truth out of his mouth as usurped and in spight of him proclaime it for our own Indeed there is no communion betwixt light and darknesse but there is communion betwixt light and light Now all truth is light and therefore symbolizeth with it selfe With that light therefore whose glimmering yet remaines in their darknesse our clearer light will and must hold communion If they professe three Persons in one Godhead two natures in one person of Christ shall we detrect to joine with them in this Christian veritie We abhorre to have any communion with them in their errors in their idolatrous or superstitious practices these are their owne not ours If we durst have taken their part in these this breach had not beene Now who can but say that wee must hate their evill and allow their good It is no countenance to their errors that we imbrace our owne truths It is no disparagement to our truths that they have blended them with their errors Here can be no difference then if this communion bee not mis-taken no man will say that we may sever from their common truths No man will say that we may joyne with them in their hatefull errours For the former Hee that saith a theefe is truly a man doth hee therein fauour that theefe He that saith a diseased dropsied dying bodie is a true though corrupt body doth he favour that disease or that living carcasse It is no other no more that I say of the Church of Rome Truenesse of being and outward visibility are no praise to her Yea these are aggravations to her falshood The advantage that is both sought and found in this assertion is onely ours as we shall see in the sequell without any danger of their gain I say then that she is a true church but I say withall shee is a false Church True in existence but false in beleefe Let not the homonymie of a word breed jarres where the sense is accorded If we doe not yeeld her the true being of a Church why do we call her the Church of Rome What speake we of or where is the subject of our question who sees not that there is a morall trueness and a naturall He that is morally the falsest man is in nature as truly a man as the honestest and therefore in this regard as true a man In the same sense therefore that wee say the Devill is a true though false spirit that a cheater it a true though false man wee may must say that the Church of Rome is a true though false Church Certainely there hath beene a true errour and mis-taking of the sense that is guiltie of this quarrell As for the visibility there can be no question Would God that Church did not too much fill our eie yea the world There is nothing wherein it doth more pride it selfe than in a glorious conspicuitie scorning in this regard the obscure paucitie of their opposers But you say What is this but to play with ambiguities That the Church of Rome is it selfe that is a Church that it is visible that it is truly existent there can be no doubt but is it still a part of the truly existent visible church of Christ Surely no otherwise than an hereticall and Apostaticall Church is and may be Reader whosoever thou art for Gods sake for thy soules sake marke where thou treadest Else thou shalt bee sure to fall either into an open gulfe of uncharitablenesse or into a dangerous precipice of errour There is no feare nor favour to say that the Church of Rome under a Christian face hath an Antichristian heart overturning that foundation by necessarie inferences which by open profession in avoweth That face that profession those avowed principles are enough to give it claime to a true outward visibilitie of a Christian Church whiles those damnable inferences are enough to feoffe it in the true style of heresie and Antichristianisme Now this heresie this Antichristianisme makes Rome justly odious and execrable to God to Angels and
here meete with no other then the words of a commonly professed truth acquit me so farre as to say there is no reason I should suffer alone And let the wilfull or ignorant mis-takers know that they wound innocencie and through my sids strike their best friends I should not herein desire you to tender my fame if the iniurie done to my name did not reflect vpon my holy station vpon my wel-meant labours vpon almost all the famous and wel-deseruing Authors that haue stood for the truth of God and lastly if I did not see this mis-taken quarrell to threaten much preiudice to the Church of God whose Peace is no lesse deare to vs both then our liues In earnest desire and hope of some few satisfactorie lines from your Reuerend hand in answere to this my bold yet iust suit I take leaue and am Your much deuoted and louing Brother IOS EXON To the Right Reuerend Father in God my verie good Lord and Brother IOSEPH Lord Bishop of Exon these RIght Reuerend and as dearely beloued Brother I haue I confesse beene too long in your Lordships debt for these Letters which are now to Apologize for me that although I had my payment ready and in numeratis at the first reading of your Reconciler yet I reserued my Answere vntill I had perused the two other Bookes and seconds that so I might returne my payment cum faenore In that your Lordships Tractate I could not but obserue the liuely Image of your selfe that ●s according to the generall interpretation of all sound professors of the Gospell of Christ of a most Orthodoxe Diuine And now remembring the Accordance your Lordship hath with others touching the Argument of your Booke I must needes reflect vpon my selfe who haue long since defended the same point in the defence of many others I do therefore much blame the Petulcitie of whatsoeuer author that should dare to impute a Popish affection to him whome besides his excellent writings and Sermons Gods visible eminent and resplendent Graces of Illumination zeale pietie eloquence haue made truely Honourable and glorious in the Church of Christ Let me say no more I suffer in your suffering not more in consonancie of iudgement then in the sympathie of my affection Goe on deare Brother with your deserued Honor in Gods Church with holy courage knowing that the dirtie feete of an Aduersarie the more they tread and rubbe the more lustre they giue the figure grauen in Gold Our Lord Iesus preserue vs to the glorie of his sauing grace Your Lordships vnanimous friend and Brother THO. Couent and Lichfield To the Right Reuerend Father in God IOHN Lord Bishop of Salisburie MY Lord I send you this little Pamphlet for your censure It is not credible how strangely I haue beene traduced euerie where for that which I conceiue to be the common opinion of reformed Diuines yea of reasonable men that is for affirming the true being and visibilitie of the Romane Church You see how clearely I haue endeauored to explicate this harmelesse position yet I perceiue some tough mis-vnderstandings will not bee satisfied Your Lordship hath with great reputation spent manie yeares in the Diuinitie-Chaire of the famous Vniuersitie of Cambridge Let me therefore beseech you whose Learning and sinceritie is so throughly approued in Gods Church that you would freely how shortly so euer expresse your selfe in this point and if you find that I haue deuiated but one hayre-breadth from the Truth correct me If not free me by your iust sentence What need I intreat you to pittie those whose desires of faithfull offices to the Church of God are vnthankefully repayed with suspicion and sclaunder whose may not this case be I had thought I had sufficiently in all my writings and in this verie last Booke of mine whence this quarrell is picked showed my feruent zeale for Gods truth against that Antichrian faction of Rome and yet I doubt not but your owne eares can witnesse what I haue suffered Yea as if this calumnie were not enough there want not those whose secret whisperings cast vpon mee the foule aspersions of another Sect whose name is as much hated as little vnderstood My Lord you know I had a place with you though vnworthy in that famous Sinod of DROT where howsoeuer sicknesse bereaued me of the houres of a conclusiue subscription yet your Lordship heard me with equall vehemencie to to the rest swaying downe the vnreasonablenesse of that way I am still the same man and shall liue and die in the suffrage of that Reuerend Synod and doe confidently auow that those other opposed opinions cannot stand with the Doctrine of the Church of England But if for the composing of the differences at home which your Lordship knowes to be farre different from Netherlandish there could haue beene tendred any such faire propositions of accordance as might bee no preiudice to Gods truth I should haue thought it an holy and happie proiect wherein if it be not a fault to haue wished a safe peace I am innocent God so loue me as I doe the tranquilitie and happinesse of his Church yet can I not so ouer-affect it that I would sacrifice one dram of Truth to it To that good God doe I appeale as the witnesse of my sincere he art to his whole Truth and no lesse then euer zealous detestation of al Poperie Pelagianisme Your Lordship will be pleased to pardon this importunitie and to vouchsaue your speedy answere to Your much deuoted and faithfull Brother IOS EXON MY Lord you desire my opinion concerning an assertion of yours wherat some haue taken offence The proposition was this That the Romane Church remaynes yet a True Visible Church The occasion which makes this an ill sounding proposition in the eares of Protestants especially such as are not throughly acquainted with Schoole Distinctions is the vsuall acception of the Word True in our English tongue For though men skilled in Metaphysickes hold it for a maxime Ens Verum Bonum conuertuntur yet with vs he which shall affirme Such an one is a True Christian a True Gentleman a True Scholler a True Souldier or the like hee is conceiued not only to adscribe Truenesse of Beeing vnto all these but those Due Qualities or Requisite Actions wherby they are made commendable or Praise-worthy in their seuerall kinds In this sense the Roman Church is no more a True Church in respect of Christ or those due Qualities and proper Actions which Christ requires then an arrant whore is a True and loyall Wife vnto her Husband I durst vpon mine oath be one of your Compurgators that you neuer intended to adorne that Strumpet with the Title of a True Church in this meaning But your owne Writings haue so fully cleered you herein that Suspition it selfe cannot reaosnably suspect you in this point I therefore can say no more concerning your mistaken proposition then this If in that treatise wherein it was deliuered the Antecedents or Consequents
your Assertion Not to trouble therefore your weightier affairs with my needlesse interposition As that controuersie about the Altar Iosuah 22. had presently a faire end vpon the ful vnderstanding of the good meaning on both sides so I trust in God this shall haue In which I am so perswaded that if it were to bee discussed there after our Scholasticall manner it might well bee defended either pro or con with out preiudice to the Truth according to the full stating which your Aduertisement and Reconciler haue afforded And thus with tender of my due obseruance and Prayers for your happinesse I rest Your Lordships in Christ to be commanded IO. PRIDEAVX From Exon Coll. Marij 9. No. ¶ To my Reuerend and learned friend M. Doctor PRIMEROSE Preacher to the French Church in LONDON WOrthy Master Doctor Primerose you haue beene long acknowledged a great light in the Reformed Churches of France hauing for many yeeres shined in your orbe the famous Church of Burdeaux with notable effects and singular approbation both for iudgment and sinceritie both which also your learned writings haue well approued So as your sentence cannot be liable to the danger of any suspition Let me intreate you to declare freely what you hold concerning the truenesse and visibilitie of the Romane Church as it is by me explicated And with all to impart your knowledg of the common Tenet of those foraine Diuines with whom you haue so long conuersed concerning this point which if I mistake not onely a stubburne ignorance will needs make litigious It grieues my Soule to see the peace of the Church troubled with so absurd a mes prison In exspectation of your answer I take leaue and commend you and your holy labours to the blessing of our God Farewell from Your louing Brother and fellow-labourer IOS EXON To the Right Reuerend Father in God and my very good Lord IOSEPH Bishop of Exceter Right Reuerend Father in God I Haue beene so busied about my necessarie studies for preaching on Sunday Tuesday and this Thursday that I could not giue sooner a full answer to your Lordships Letter which I receiued on Friday last at night whereby I am desired to declare freely what I think concerning the truenesse and visibilitie of the present Roman Church as it is by your Lordship explicated and what is the common tenet of the forraine Diuines with whom I haue so long conuersed beyond the Seas concerning that point I might answere in two lines that I haue read your Reconciler and iudge your opinion concerning that point to be learned sound and true Though that if I durst fauour an officious lie I would willingly giue my Suffrage to those Diuines which out of a most feruent zeale to God and perfect hatred to Idolatry hold that the Roman Church is in all things BABEL in nothing BETHEL And as they which seek to set right a crooked tree bow it the cleane contrary way to make it straight so to recouer and pull out of the fire of eternall damnation the Roman Christians I would gladly pourtray them with sable colours and make their religion more black in their owne eyes then they are in ours the hellish coloured faces of the flat-nosed Ethiopians or to the Spaniard the monstrous Sambenit of the Inquisition But fearing the true reproch cast by Iob in his friends teeth Will you speake wickedly for God and talke deceitfully for him and knowing that we must not speake a lie no not against the Deuill which is the Father of lies I say that the Roman Church is both BABEL and BETHEL and as Gods Temple was in Christs daies at once the house of Prayer and a den of theeues so shee is in our dayes Gods Temple and the habitation of Deuils the hold of euery foule spirit and a cage of euery vncleane and hatefull bird which I proue thus The Church is to be considered three manner of wayes First according to Gods right which he keepeth ouer her and maintaineth in her by the common and externall calling of his Word and Sacraments Secondly according to the pure preaching of the Word and externall obedience in hearing receiuing and keeping the Word syncerely preached Thirdly according to the election of grace and the personall calling which hath perpetually the inward working of the Holy Ghost ioyned with the outward preaching of the Word as in Lydia Thence commeth the answere of a good conscience toward God by the resurrection of Iesus Christ To begin with the last consideration these only are Gods Church which are Iewes inwardly in the spirit aswell as outwardly in the letter whose prayse is not of men but of God who are Nathaniels and true Israelites in whom there is no guile Inuisible to all men Visible to God alone who knoweth them that are his and each of them to themselues because they haue receiued the Spirit which is of God that they might know the things which are freely giuen to them of God and the white stone which no man knoweth sauing he that receiueth it Of this Church called by the Apostle the people which God foreknew Rom. 11. there is no controuersie amongst our Diuines In the second consideration these onely are the true visible Church of God amongst whom the Word of God is truly preached without the mixture of humane traditions the holy Sacraments are celebrated according to their first institution and the people consenteth to bee led and ruled by the Word of God As when Moses laid before the faces of the people all the words which the Lord commanded him and all the people answered together All that the Lord hath spoken we will doe the Lord said vnto Moses Write thou these words For after the tenor of these words I haue made a couenant with thee and with Israel And Moses said to the people Thou hast auouched this day the Lord to bee thy thy God to walke in his wayes and to keepe his Statutes and his Commandements and his Iudgements to harken vnto his voice And the Lord hath auouched thee this day to be his peculiar people as he hath promised thee that thou shouldest keepe all his Commandements This condition of the Commandement GOD did often inclucate into their eares by his Prophets As when hee said to them by Ieremiah This thing commanded I them saying Obey my voice and I will be your God and yee shall bee my people and walke yee in all the wayes in that I haue commanded you that it may bee well vnto you So in the Gospell Christ saith My sheepe heare my voice and I know them and they follow me But a stranger will they not follow but will flie from him For they know not the voice of strangers where he giueth the first marke of the visibly true and pure Church to wit the pure preaching and hearing of Christs voice As likewise Saint Iohn saith He
that knoweth God heareth vs hereby know wee the Spirit of truth and the spirit of errour Againe the Lord saith By this shall all men know that ye are my Disciples if ye haue loue one to another pointing out the concord and holy agreement which is among the brethren as another marke of the orthodoxe Church As likewise when hee saith Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good workes and glorifie your Father which is in Heauen hee sheweth that good workes are the visible mark of the true orthodoxe Church The true preaching reuerent hearing of the Gospel is a visible mark of our faith and hope Our concord in the Lord is a marke of our Charitie Our good workes are reall and sensible testimonies of our inward Faith Hope and Charitie Where wee finde these three signes we know certainly that there is Christs true Church and iudge charitably that is probably that euery one in whom wee see these outward tokens of Christs true and orthodoxe Church is a true member of the mysticall body of the Lord Iesus I say charitably because outward markes may be outwardly counterfeited by Hypocrites as it is said of Israel They did flatter with their mouth and they lyed vnto him with their tongues for their heart was not right with him neither were they stedfast in his Couenant And of many of these that followed our Sauiour Many beleeued in his Name when they saw the miracles which he did But Iesus did not commit himselfe vnto them because he knew all men Therefore when the people of Israel departed from the Couenant and by their Idolatrie brake as much as in them lay the contract of marriage betweene them and God they ceased in that behalfe to bee Gods true Spouse and people though still they called him their Husband and their God When they made a molten Calfe in the Wildernesse and worshipped the works of their owne fingers God said to Moses Thy people which thou broughtest out of the land of Egypt haue corrupted themselues and not my people And Moses to shew that on their part they had broken the Couenant broken the Tables of the Couenant when vnder Achaz they did worse Isaiah called them children that are corrupted their Prince and Gouernours Rulers of Sodome themselues people of Gomorrah their holy Citie an Harlot And God about the same time cried vnto them by Micah Thou that art named the house of Iacob Thou that was ●●late my people And to the teh Tribes by Hosea Yee are not my people and I will not bee your God After the same manner Christ said to the Iewes which gloried and made their boast that God was their Father If God were your Father yee would loue me Yee are of your father the Deuill And the lusts of your Father yee will doe If we speake of the Romish Church according to this distinction defining the Church by the keeping of the Couenant in purenesse of doctrine and holinesse of life God himselfe hath stript her of that glorious Name calling her spiritually Sodome Egypt and Babylon Sodome in the pollution of her most filthy life Egypt in the abominable multitude of her filthy Idols Babylon in the cruell and bloudie oppression and persecution of the Saints And because she was to cal her selfe as falsly as arrogantly the mother Church the Angell calleth her THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH Because also shee was to bring and magnifie her selfe in the multitude of her Saints hee saith that shee is drunke with the bloud of the Saints and with the bloud of the Martyrs of Iesus And taking from her the name of the Church which she challengeth priuatiuely to all other Christian congregations hee nameth her as I haue already said the habitation of Deuils the hold of euerie foule spirit and a Cage of euerie vncleane and hatefull bird In the first sence Moses said to God why doth thy wrath wax hote against THY people because although they had broken the Couenant on their part by the workes of their hands God had not as yet broken it on his part Ieremiah in the greatest heate of their monstruous I dolatries prayed after the same maner Doe not abhorre vs for thy Names sake doe not disgrace the Throne of thy glorie Remember breake not thy Couenant with vs. And Esaiah Thou art our Father we are ALL thy people For so long as God cals a people to him by his word and Sacraments and honoureth them with his name So long also as they consent to be called by his name professing it outwardly they remaine his people although they answere not his calling neither in soundnesse of faith nor in holinesse of life Euen as rebellious Subiects are still true Subiects on the Kings behalfe who looseth not his right by their Rebellion Nay on their owne also in some maner because they still keepe and professe his Name and giue not themselues to any forraine Prince Did Dauid loose his right by the Rebellion of the people vnder his sonne Absalom And therefore when the King subdueth these traitours hee carrieth himselfe towards them both in forgiuing and in punishing as their lawfull and naturall Prince and not as a Conquerour of new Subiects So as a strumpet is a true wife so long as her husband consents to dwell with her and shee is named by his name And as Agar when shee fled from her mistresse Sarai was still Sarais maide as shee confessed saying I flee from the face of my mistresse Sarai In like manner a rebellious fugitiue and whooring Church is still a true Church so long as God keeping the right of a King of a Master of a Husband ouer her giueth her not the bill of Diuorcement but consents that her Name bee called vpon her and shee still calleth her selfe his kingdome his maide his wife Thus God calleth the Iewes His people euen then when he said they were not his people because hee had not broken the band of marriage with them and put them away by diuorcement Therefore he said vnto them Where are the Letters of your mothers diuorcement whom I haue put away Meaning he had not giuen vnto them a writing of diuorcement but did still acknowledge them to bee his spouse notwithstanding their manifold and most filthy Whoredomes with false Gods which he charged them with saying vnto them by Ieremiah Thou hast polluted the land with thy whooredomes and with thy wickednesse Thou hast a whoores forehead and refusest to bee ashamed wilt thou not for this time cry vnto me my father thou art the guide of my youth Turne O backsliding children saith the Lord for I am married vnto you Or according to the French translation I haue the right of an Husband ouer you So after hee had called the ten Tribes Lo-ruhama and Lo-hammi saying hee would no more haue mercie vpon them