endeavour is That Controversies be clearly stated And with great perspicuity and solidity doth he confirm the Truth by Scripture and Reason and confute the contrary Error and all this without bitterness or wrath but with such calmness and moderation of Spirit wherein he did excell So that as I am informed divers of the English Army though of a contrary Judgement did resort to hear him I know not what effects his Teaching of these Truths had on Them but by the Blessing of God these of his own Flock were so established in the Truth that not one of them was seduced from it And I cannot but record it to the praise of God and commendation of that Congregation and for the encouragement of any who may be invited to be their Pastor when I to their and my grief am to be separated from them to a more difficult Post I say I cannot but record it that as that Congregation of Kilwinning hath since the Reformation been blest with eminent learned and pious Men Mr Glasford Mr Bailie Mr Fergusson and Mr Rogirs So they have by the Blessing of God on their labours been kept not only Sound in the Faith but United among themselves when others have been wofully Divided And they have alwayes shewed a great love to the Gospel and all the Ordinances of the Lord Jesus and the Ministers thereof And I pray That their fruit may abound more and more If some Expressions Concerning the Opinion of Independents or Congregational Men seem severe It would be remembred that the Author doth not speak against Persons but against Things And in a time when many Errors followed that Division about Church Government and the Debate was hot about it and fear that it should have taken place in Scotland But considering the Zeal these of New-England have discovered against Error and their United way of acting in Association and Synods when they think there is need and the love that hath been in time of Common Tryal and the Late Essay which hath been made for an Accomodation betwixt Presbyterians and Them in England I suppose if our Reverend Author had lived until this time he would have concluded the Difference may be so lessened that it need not hinder their walking together in that wherein they are agreed nor their Endeavours to keep the Vnity of the Spirit in the bond of Peace I do not know of any particular design of publishing these Discourses now when they have been kept hid for fourty years but that the Author's Son having long delay'd and declin'd to Publish them though frequently and seriously advis'd to do it by many he was advertised that some would publish the Imperfect Notes received from His mouth in the time of Hearing which being incorrect might not only prejudge the Authors name but the Truth and others Edification If these as is hoped they will be acceptable and useful what yet remains unprinted of these Discourses may see the Light in due time There are here subjoyned Four Sermons of the Reverend Author which the Publisher and others hope may be found of good use and may make way for the communicating more of his Pious and Judicious Sermons which are longed for by them who knew Him or his other Works It had surely been of great advantage to the Church had it pleased God to have spared this judicious and pious Author till now and that he had published more of his Works in his own time But seing our infinitely wise and good God hath disposed otherwise it becometh us to submit But if by this or any other of his Works God get Glory and the Church be edified The Publisher will rejoice and bless God as having attained his end And if the Reader peruse his Works with the same Spirit wherewith they seem to be spoken and written I am confident he will not fail of profit Now that the Spirit of Truth and Holiness would lead Thee and all His people into all Truth and help them to edify one another in love and that He would bless His Churches with Truth and Peace and send out many Faithful Labourers into His Harvest with a double measure of the Spirit that was in Mr. Fergusson and other eminently holy Men who then lived shall be the Prayer of Christian Reader Thy Souls cordial Well-wisher George Meldrum Edinburgh June 1692. The Contents SECT I. OF Doctrine in general and the Tryal thereof Being some Doctrines raised from the Text Introductorie to the main purpose Pag. 1 ad 26. Doctr. I. Error is to be Eschewed pag. 3. Doctr. II. Orthodoxy or a Right opinion in the matters of Truth is as much to be stuâ—â—ed as Holiness of Life pag. 5. Doctr. III. As at all times so chiefly when there is danger of spreading of Error there is most need that Love should be intertain'd betwixt Pastor and People Where are some directions for a Ministers carriage in order to the keeping of the affections of his People while he is Refuting their Errors pag. 12. Doctr. IV. The Spirit of Error began very early to trouble the Church Where are some Reasons for which the Lord suffers Errors to spread pag. 16. Doctr. V. The foulest Errors go out oftentimes under fairest Names and are backed with most specious Pretences pag. 19. Doctr. VI. When foul Error is holden out under fair names and backed with fair pretences there is a danger lest People drink them in and believe them Where are 5 things that speak this hazard pag. 23. Doctr. VII Ministers the Servants of God are not to clap Peoples heads or to indulge them in this inclination of Theirs to Error but on all hazards they are to testify against it Where are 3 Reasons for which People ought to reverence much what warnings of this kind are given by Ministers pag. 28. Doct. VIII It is not Gods Way That People because there are differences about Religion should therefore believe no Religion Where are 5 Directions for the unlearned to walk by in order to difference of opinions among the Learned pag. 31. Doctr. IX How fair soever the pretence is that a Doctrine is colloured with It should not be taken upon Trust but must be brought to a Tryal Where are some Directions how to walk betwixt Popish Tyranny and Sectarian Confusion pag. 34. Doctr. X. The right Tryal to be taken of Doctrines preached or any otherwise vented is To try whether they be of God or not Where is shown what is requisite to a Doctrines that it may be said to be Of God pag. 38. Doct. XI There are many Doctrines pretending to the Spirit which yet being brought to the Touchstone will be found Not to be of God p. 44 SECT II. The Doctrine of Toleration Try'd and foundnot to be Of God Wherein as in all the Errors following First The Question is stated 2. Arguments are brought for Confirming the Truth and vindicated from the Opposites Exceptions 3. The Opposites Objections are Answered and Refuted from Scripture
of God to commit the great affairs of his House to those whom he hath not qualified to that purpose Besides no instance can be given that ever he trusted any with those things but he promised them furniture and in some measure enabled them accordingly So when he sendeth forth Moses Jeremiah Isay c. he giveth them furniture and when he sendeth out the Apostles he furnishes them for that End So John 20. 21 Then said Jesus to them again peace be unto you as my Father sent me even so send I you There is the commission given them and upon the back of this in v. 22. And when he had said this he breathed on them c. There is the Furniture And so does he to Ministers whom he entrusts with this power He promises them Furniture Matth 28 20 and lo I am with you alway even unto the end of the World There a promise made to the Apostles and in them to the Ministers as appears from these following words even unto the end of the World And so these promises could not be fully verified in the Apostles who were to die within a little but in Ministers their successors to the Worlds end Now it is very evident he hath neither made such promises to every particular believer for Governing the Church neither doth he perform them unto them What Is every believer furnished with that measure of knowledge prudence and wisdom that is required for the right managing of the affaires of Church Government Yea God doth not require it of them And so certainly it stands not with his wisdom to have committed the power of Church Government to all and every one of believers This for ouâ— third Argument Our Fourth Argument for the Truth is If so be that the power of Governing the Church belongeth to Church Members Then it belongeth to them either as they are gifted for it and chosen out for that purpose And if so then we have our intent For then all are not Church Governours but only those who are gifted and chosen And so Church Officers Or it belongs to them as believers or Church Members and if so then it Belongs to all for every one is a Church Member as well as another and every one that hath Faith is a believer as well as another and whatever priviledge floweth from Faith belongs to every believer the meanest as well as the greatest So if the right of Church Government be grounded on Faith and Grace then every believer and none but believers should have the right of it from whence shall follow many absurdities as that Children as well as Parents the simple as well as the wise Women as well as Men may Preach Administrate the Sacraments lay on hands in Ordaining the Ministers sit in Sessions inflict Censures Excommunicate and what not Secondly Then none but believers should have right to Church Government So none hath power to Baptise Censure c. But they that have Grace And upon this People should have Reason to doubt whether they be rightly Baptised or not because they know not if the Minister who Baptised them had Grace or not and if he wanted Grace he had no power of Church Government by this Doctrine And so no power to Baptise We bring a Fifth Argument for the Truth and it is this private Christians are in no place of Scripture acknowledged to be Church Governours There are no names nor titles given to them importing this power to be in them as is given to Church Officers 1 Tim 5. 17. Let the Elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour And 1 Corinth 12. 28. And God hath set some in the Church first Apostles secondly Prophets thirdly Teachers c. But no title of that kind is given to private Christians Yea they are set down plainly under names in opposition to Governours As the flock to Overseers Acts 20. 28. Take heed tberefore unto your selves and to all the flock over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers c. Yea and are commanded to honour obey submit to their Governours set over them and distinct from them Hebr 13. 17. Obey them that have the rule over you and submit your selves c. Now it is strange to imagine That Christ should have intrusted them with highest power of Government And yet in all the stiles he gives them there is nothing imported of that power but much of their Subjection Surely he hath not done so with Officers as we have shown And let any discover the Reason of the difference A Sixth Argument for the Truth is this If so be that the power of Governing the Church be given but only to some then it does not belong to all but so it is that the power of Governing the Church is only given to some therefore not to all Church Members The first part of the Argument cannot be denyed For the second That it is only given to some see those proofs that limit this power only to some as Ephes 4. 11. And he gave some Apostles and some Prophets c. Some and therefore not all 1 Cor 12. 28. which we cited before and God hath set some in the Church first Apostles secondly Prophets thirdly teachers There are but some that he hath set for Governing his house and therefore not all and Heb 13 17. Obey them that have the rule over you and submit your selves c. Tim 5. 17. as is likewise before cited There are some then that rule to whom the rest ought to submit And so all are not Rulers There is a Seventh Argument for clearing the Truth And it is this That power which Jesus Christ hath not set down rules and limits to order it by in his word is not of God but he hath set down no Rules how to direct the managing of Church Power in the hand of Church-Members therefore it is not of God The first part of our Argument That whatever Power is appointed of God he hath set down Rules how to order it is very clear As we may prove by the Enumeration of lawful Powers He hath set down Rules how to Regulate the Power of a King that he play not the Tyrant He hath set down Rules to Regulate the Power of Masters Parents by So the Power in the Hand of the Church Officers is regulated that they Rule with Diligence Rom. 12. 8. And so through the Epistles to Timothy and Titus But so it is that he hath set down no Rules to order Church Government by in the Hands particular Believers For in no place of the word will such Rules be found Ye that are the flock govern the Pastors and feed them watch over the People of God lay hands suddenly on no man I say there are no such directions given to private Christians and therefore this pretended Power is not of God Our last Argument for the Truth is If so be the Power of governing the Church doth belong to every
Church but if he neglect to hear the Church let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a Pubican That is Excommunicate him Now for what faults he is to be Excommunicate they are set down v. 15. Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee c. So it is a scandalous Trespass wherein the offender does persist and remain obstinate on which according to Christ's Rule Excommunication should strick Now sure it is there are many Errors not contrary to fundamental Truths such as many points of Arminianism Antinomianism c. which yet persisted in are Scandalous both to particular Christians and the Church and therefore according to Christs Rule Excommunication should strick upon other Errors than those contrary to the fundamental Points of Religion which is contrary to their assertion Thirdly Neither can we assent that Excommunication should strick on no other Errors but those contrary to the light of Nature and that not only because of what is presently said that Excommunication should strick against every scandalous Sin done against a Brother or the Church wherein the offender does persist and remain obstinate but also according to that Rule whereby they maintain that Excommunication should strick on no other Error but these that are contrary to the very Light of Nature it would follow that the publisher of these Errors following or the like against fundamental Truths should not be censured to wit That the Scriptures are not the word of God That Jesus Christ was an Impostor a Deceiver That we are not justified by free Grace say according to that rule such Hereticks should not be censured no not Ecclesiastically because these Errors are not against Natures Light but Scripture Light only for Natures Light teacheth not the Truths which are contrary to these Errors This much for Church Tolleration but as said is concerning this is not the present Contraversy The main question then is concerning State Tolleration Concerning which some do affirm That whatever the Church may do in Inflicting Church Censures on Hereticks Maintainers of Heterodox Opinions Yet say they no civil Punishment such as Death Imprisonment Mulcts or Fines should be inflicted on any Error or Blasphem whatsoever providing the Maintainers of them carry themselves peaceably do not trouble the State or do evil against the Commonwealth in civil Things We again on the contrary do hold That it is the Duty of the Civil Magistrate to suppress Error Heresie and every sin against the First Table as well as it is his Duty to suppress Adultery Fornication Sedition and other sins against the second Table And that he is not only bound to suppress Errors and Blasphemies that are contrary to fundamental Truths or the Light of Nature but all Error contrary to other points of Truth Now for clearing the State of this Question and freeing it from some odious Imputations that may be cast upon it Before we come to Arguments we shall lay down these Assertions First We do not say that the Magistrate is bound to punish Hereticks at the first step Pains should first be taken to inform them the Judgement of the Church is Antecedent and their Labour is to convince Gainsayers So this must go before the Magistrates Duty they must be found Obstinate before the Magistrate medle with them or punish them Civilly Especially if their Errors be not horrid Blasphemies against God and Natures Light in such the Magistrate is not bound to give so much Forbearance Secondly We do not say that all Errors and Heresies are to get alike punishment but according to the degrees of the guilt that is in them even as it is in sins committed against the Second Table Murder is a more hainous Fault than Fornication and therefore the Magistrate is bound to punish it more highly Even so is it in Sins done against the First Table Blasphemies done against God or a denying of the true God is a higher Sin than Worshiping of the true God after a false manner and therefore the Magistrate is bound to punish it more severely Thirdly As we do not say that every Error and Heresie is to receive the like punishment so neither do we say that every one that maintains the same Error is to be alike punished for there are some that are Seducers or Drawers on of others to Error Disturbers of the Peace of the Church Ring-leaders there are others again that are only seduced and drawn away to Error and these last although they should not be Tollerate yet the power of the Magistrate is to be exercised more sparingly towards them So Secondly There are some rooted in Error confirmed in it who will not hear Instruction There are others that are but weak and are seeking Light whose way evidenceth them to be Conscientious only for the time they are Ignorant and in Humility seeking after Light and these last the Magistrate as all other Christians is to bear much with according to Rom. 15. 1. We then that are strong ought to bear the Infirmities of the weak c. Now this being said to clear the question we come to Arguments to make out this Truth to wit That the Magistrate is bound to suppress and punish Error Heresie and other sins against the First Table as well as he is bound to punish Adultery Theft and other sins against the Second Table The First Argument we bring is from the approven practice of Kings and Magistrates under the Old Testament from which we form an Argument thus If it was the approven practice of Kings and and Magistrates under the Old Testament to suppress Error Heresie and Blasphemy then Magistrates under the New Testament are bound to do the like But so it is that it was the approven practice of Kings and Magistrates under the Old Testament to suppress Error Heresie and Blasphemy and other sins against the first Table Therefore Magistrates under the New Testament are bound to do the like For confirming of this Argument there are two things to be made out First That it was the practice of the Magistrate under the Old Testament to suppress Error and Heresie Secondly As it was their practice so their practice herein is approven of God otherwise it were not binding unto others for Kings and Magistrates did several things wherein they were not approven and so not binding unto us now The first thing then we are to clear is that this was the practice of Magistrates under the Old Testament And we shall begin First with Abraham's practice Genes 18. 19. For I know him that he will command his Children and his Houshold after him and they shall keep the way of the Lord to do Iustice and Iudgement c. Secondly with Jacob who was a Magistrate in his own Family And we shall see him employing his Power to suppress false Religion In the 35 of Gen. vers 2. Then Jacob said unto his Houshold and to all that were with him put away the strange Gods that are among you
There is an Union in Judgement when there is no considerable Difference among the Members of the Church in the matter of Opinion When all Think the same thing And this is here pressed Be prefectly joined in one Judgement 2. There is an Union in Heart and Affections spoken of Act. 4. 32. The multitude of them that believed were of one Heart and of one Soul And this Union is also here pressed Be perfectly join'd together in the same Mind or in Love and Affection as we shew'd in the opening up of the Words 3. There is an Union in Practice and that is when whatever Difference there is in Judgement yet it 's not openly proclaim'd Publick Contradictions and Eristick Debates are eschewed and an unanimous joint practice in these things wherein there is Agreement is followed And this Union is also pressed in the Text I beseech you that ye all speak the same thing So it 's clear the Text means all these three sorts of Union the Doctrine intends them All and as might be made evident other Scriptures press them All. Only this we would know the Order wherein they are pressed to wit So as every Breach in the Former is not to make a Breach in the Latter Every Difference in Judgement is not to make a Rent in Heart or Affection Nor tho a Rent be in both doth it infer necessarly a Divided Practice at least in these things wherein there is Agreement And for that the Scripture is clear especially Philipp 3. 15 16 where v. 15 the Apostle supposeth difference of Judgement among the Philippians as to the point he is there speaking of and subjoineth for matter of Practice v. 16. Nevertheless whereunto we have already attained let us walk by the same Rule That is to say Tho we cannot agree in all things yet let us eschew the prolaiming of Our Differences by Our contrary Practices This much for the first thing to wit What Union the Doctrine presseth It is an Union necessary to the Well-being of the Visible Church particularly an Union in Judgement an Union in Affection an Union in Practice An Union all these wayes is to be sought for and laboured after yet so as if we cannot attain to Union in the Former we are yet still to endeavour it in the Latter For Confirmation of this Truth we might cite several Scriptures 1. These wherein this Union is promised to the Church and that as a rich Covenant Blessing such as Jer. 32. 39. I will give them one Heart and one way that they may fear Me for ever The like is in Ezek. 37. 22. 2. These Scriptures wherein this Vnion is highly commended Especially Ps. 133. 1. Behold how good and how pleasant it is for Brethren to dwell together in Vnity and so through the whole 3. These Scriptures which hold out the Mediator's Prayer to the Father for this Union Joh. 17. 21. That they all may be one as Thou Father art in Me and I in Thee that they also may be one in Vs and so v. 23. 4. Those Scriptures where this Union is expresly enjoyned and pressed whereof there are many Such as Philipp 2. 1 2 3. If there be any consolation in Christ if any comfort of Love if any fellowship of the Spirit if any Bowels and Mercies Fulfil ye My Joy that ye be like minded having the same Love being of one accord of one mind And 2 Cor. 13. 11. Finally Brethren farewel be of one mind live in peace And lastly these Scriptures where Division contrary to Unity is condemned as Rom. 16. 17. I beseech you Brethren mark them which cause Divisions and Offences and avoid them But for further Confirmation of this Truth we shall in the next place bring foreward some Reasons concluding the equity and necessity of seeking after and entertaining of Unity in the Church which shall also serve as motives to the Duty Reason 1. Union furthers Edification So Eph. 4. 3. Union is pressed And One Fruit among many to be reaped hereby is v. 12. the edifying of the Body of Christ. And as Unity furthers Edification so Division marreth it Divisions in a Church tho about small things yet if stiffly mantain'd prove a great stumbling Block to the Weak they are put to doubt all Truths because Men gracious and learned doubt of some So Division not only marreth progress in the building but striketh at the very foundation of what is already built Reas. 2. Divisions in a Church make the Ministers contemptible Of all Men Ministers suffer most this way because usually they are most active in beginning and upholding the Division and usually even these who have Truth for them suffer much if not most this way Paul tho an Apostle and a Man for Truth yet he lost much of the former esteem he had amongst the Corinthians though once they would have pluck'd out their Eyes for him yet through the Division their Distemper grew to such an hight that he was look'd on as Contemptible rude in speech yea A Fool and what not as appears from 2 Cor 10. 10. Ch. 11. 6 16. Reas. 3. The Essential Unity of the Church and the many things wherein a Church agreeth that way should enforce this Union The Apostle Paul Eph. 4. draweth a strong Argument for Unity and Peace in the Church from this Ground The Duty is propounded v. 3. Endeavouring to keep the Vnity of the Spirit in the Bond of Peace And v. 4 5 6. it is pressed by this Argument There is on Body and one Spirit One Lord one Faith one Baptism One God and Father of all Here are many Ones together in two or three lines as if he had said What a shame is it for you who are so many wayes One to rent in pieces for a thing of so small moment Reas. 4. Divisions in a Church turn away every Man's Eye from his main Task I mean from the joint opposing of Satan's main Design to be wrangling one with another It 's Satans Policy when he intends to bear down Truth in a Church to set those who should oppose him most by the Ears about smaller things that so he may carry his point with less difficulty herein making use of Matchiavils or rather his own Principle divide impera Divide and Carry It 's often seen that the nearer those who differ come to one another they drive on their point against others with the greater Animosity and Eagerness the Jews and Samaritans were at greater variance than Jews and Heathens And the Reason is this The less the Difference is they have the more hopes to bring others to their mind hence their mutual On-setts are more furious and their Disappointments the more bitter the higher they were in their hopes and in the mean time while they mind nothing so much as to bear down one another Satan cometh good speed in bearing down of Truth and Them and All. Reas. 5. Union when once lost in a Church is hardly ever
and Reason 4. The Truth being vindicated is applyed to a Practical Vse pag. 47. SECT III. The Doctrine of Errastianism Try'd and found not to be Of God pag. 86. Head l. There is a Church Government 〈◊〉 forth in Scripture ibid. Head II. The power of Church Government belongeth not to the Civil Magistrate pag. 103 SECT IV. The Doctrine of Independency Try'd and found not to be Of God pag. 123. Head I. The power of Church Government is in the Church Officers and not in the Body of Church Members ibid. Head II. The highest power of Church Government is not in Church Sessions or Congregational Elderships pag. 150. Paragr I. There is a Plate-form of the Government of many Congregations by One Common Presbytry holden out in Scripture pag. 152. Paragr II. There is a Plate-form of Government by Synods over many particular Presbytries held forth in Scripture pag. 167. Paragr III. Infertor Church Judicatories are subject Superior pag. 173 SECT V. The Doctrine of Separation Try'd and sound Not to be of God pag. 191 Head I. Shewing what is required for making one a Member of the Visible Church ibid Head II. No Separation from a true Church or Gods Worship in the Church because of the Sins of Fellow-worshipers pag. 214 A Sermon Preach'd before the Synod at Glasgow April 5. 1653. From 1 Cor 1. 10. pag. 235. Sermon Second Preach'd at Irving foom Psalm 51 6. Immediatly before the Giving of the Communion Being a Preparation Sermon in order thereto pag. 287 Sermon Third Preach'd at Kilwinning 11 May 1663 From Luke 7. 23. Vpon the Munday Immediatly after the Giving of the Communion pag. 313. Sermon Fourth Preach'd at Kilwinning From Acts 11 23. Vpon the Munday Immediatly after the Giving of the Communion pag. 340. A BRIEF REFUTATION OF THE ERRORS OF Tolleration c. SECT I. Of Doctrine in General and the Tryal thereof 1 John ch 4. ver 1. Beloved believe not every Spirit but try the Spirits whether they are of God THE Body of this Epistle as we shew'd when first we entred upon the handling of it runs upon three Heads The first is upon Marks whereby to discern real Grace to wit who had it and who not The second runs upon Exhortations to several Duties of Sanctification chiefly Love to the Brethren that Christians would Love them that Love God Love Grace wherever they saw it The third Head whereon it runs is Exhortations to Constancy in avowing Truth against Error In this fourth Chapter there are two of these Heads according to which we may take up the Chapter in two parts In the First There is an Exhortation to stand by Truth and to beware of those who would seduce People from it And that to ver 7. In the second part There is a renewing of the former Exhortations To Love the Brethren And a Confirmation of it by a number of new Arguments to the end Both which have been handled already and yet the Apostle returns again to them because Exhortations against Error cannot be enough inculcate and therefore he reiterats them again and again In the first part of this Chapter There is 1. An Exhortation 2. There are Arguments to enforce the Exhortation The Exhortation is set down in the former part of the first verse Believe not every Spirit that is lend not an Ear to every point of Doctrine covered over with a fair Name but bring every Doctrine to the Touch-stone There are two Things considerable in this Exhortation First There is the compellation he gives them a warm and kindly Stile Beloved And then Secondly There is the Exhortation it self And in it there are two Things 1. What they should not do And 2. What they should do For the First What they should not do Believe not every Spirit Some take the Spirit here for Preacher Believe not every Preacher And some for Doctrine Believe not every Doctrine But both may well be joyned together thus Believe not every Preacher who pretends the Spirit for his Doctrine For the second What they should do It is to Try the Spirits whether they are of God He bids them not cast at all Doctrines because there are some Errors vented for Truths as the natural Heart is ready to do But he Exhorts that they would bring every Spirit to the right Touch stone Thus much for opening up the words We intend if the Lord give us liberty to speak somewhat largely on this Verse of those Doctrines or Errors which are most like to trouble our Church therefore we shall raise some Doctrines before hand which may make way for what we intend Doct. I. The First is from the Apostles dehorting Believers from false Doctrine by many Arguments Hence observe That Christians would by all means eschew any thing that may tend to seduce them from the pure Truths of Jesus Christ Particularly that they would beware of Error Heresy and any thing of that sort Hence there are so many Exhortations in Scripture to stand by the Truth to be rooted in the Faith and to eschew contrary Error So it is a Duty lying on Christians to be guarding and watching against Error or what is contrary to Truth Reas The Reason is because Errour is a Sin and a very dangerous one We shall shew the danger of it in three Things I. It is dangerous because of the desert of it It is Damnable 2 Peter 2. 1. False Prophets are spoken of there as those who bring in damnable Heresies that is highly condemnable We shall afterwads show in what respect Heresies are Damnable 2. Errours are dangerous Sins because they steal subtily in upon People and people do too readily relish them So there are many whose nature abhorres gross Sins against the second Table as Fornication and such like and yet the Devil gets them hooked by this sin of Error Nature is born with a cry against gross Sins committed against the second Table and so naturally there is some kind of loathing in People at them but it is not so in the sins of Error Sathan can transform himself into an Angel of Light and plead Conscience whereas he intends to bear down Truth So the sins of Error are dangerous because subtile 3. They are dangerous in this respect that as they creep easily in So when once they are in it 's hard to get them shut to the door again And that because deluded Conscience pleads for them People tainted with Error think themselves right and therefore whatever is brought against them Conscience casts at all as wrong Now in other Sins to wit such as are against the Second Table altho Affection plead for them yet usually Peoples Light does witness against them And so in this respect it is more hard to get a sin of Error thrust out where it is once rooted than the sin of Prophanity it self Vse This Doctrine may serve to fit you for receiving the following Doctrines which if the Lord will we are to speak of
tending to the Refutation of divers Errors Error in Doctrine is a subtile temtation the temtation of the time a dangerous temptation because it hath now many advantages to plead for it Now if the Lord shall bless the following Discourses they may prove an Antidote against it And what we have now said shew's how great need ye have to guard against it It is a dangerous Sin and so ye had need to be armed against it Doct. II. Again a general Doctrine arriseth from the connexion of this Chapter with the preceeding In the preceeding the Apostle hath been all alongs stirring up Christians to Sanctification of Life to eschew Prophanity here he subjoyns an Exhortation to cleave to the Truth Which gives us this Obeservation That an Orthodox Judgement or a right Opinion in the matters of Truth is as much to be studied as Sanctification of Life and the contrary of them both is equally to be eschewed That is to say a Child of God is bound to guard himself and to watch as much against Heresy and Error in the matter of Opinion as against Prophanity and gross Sins in the matter of Practise We had need to clear this because there is a conceit in People whereby they are ready to think that for the matter of Opinion it makes not much what men be many that have Error may have Grace Grace and Error say they are consistent And so if men live well it matters not much what be their Opinion We grant indeed every Error does not destroy Grace and Grace is consistent with some Errors yet every Error does in so much weaken the work of Grace within a man And secondly Error is consistent with Grace as other dam-Sins are as David's Adultery was consistent with Grace And that is the point to be proven That Error in the matter of Doctrine is as much to be abhorred by the Child of God as gross Sins in the matter of their Practice Reas. We shall bring several things to clear this Truth to you and the first is this Scripture doth equally discharge both It is as much in guarding against Error as Prophanity So in Hebr. 13 9. Be not carried about with divers and strange Doctrines For it is a good thing that the Heart be established with Grace and in Coloss. 2. 8. Bewar lest any man spoil you through Philosophy We need not insist to multiply Scriptures to this purpose any that are acquaint with Scripture especially the Epistles of the new Testament will find Exhortations against Error to be as pressing as against any sin else Secondly as Scripture discharges both alike so it aggravates the sin of Error as much as the sin of Prophanity There is nothing almost that Scripture brings to aggravate gross sins against the second Table but it uses the same to aggravate Error In the Epistle to the Gallat 5. 19. Adultery Fornication Lasciviousness c are called the works of the Flesh An odious name But in ver 20. Heresy gets the same name also and is rekoned up amongst the works of the Flesh. So in the Epistle to the Coloss. 2 18. a superstitious mind is called a fleshly mind Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility And worshiping of Angels intruding into those things which he hath not seen vainly puft up by his fleshly mind And both get one name Thus in 1 Peter 2 11. If fleshly lusts be aggravated from this that they fight against the Soul they are soul destroying sins So Heresy and Error are branded with a worse name in the 2 Peter 2. 1 who privily bring in damnable Heresies Heresy is damnable a soul destroying sin not for this respect only that they deserve Damnation For the meanest sin of Infirmity is damnable that way in it self it merits damnation therefore this Scripture must mean somewhat more when it calls Heresy damnable than to rank it amongst our ordinary infirmities Neither are they called damnable in that sense as if the Soul guilty of Heresy could not be saved For many Hereticks have repented unto Salvation But they are called damnable sins as other gross sins are called damnable that is to say justly and highly Condemnable They are damnable because they marr the work of Grace they marr the thriving of Grace the lively acts of Grace even as Davids Adultery so long as he lay under it did Reas 3 There is a third Reason to prove this point and it is this Stability of the heart in Grace and stability of the mind in Truth stand and fall together So that upon the mind 's wavering in the matters of Truth the heart will begin to waver in the matter of Grace also Prophanity followeth upon Error Error received and imbraced oftentimes endeth in Prophanity at the last And therefore it should equally be watched against with Prophanity it self Now to make what we have said appear viz. That Error in the matter of Truth and Prophanity against Holiness of Life usually go along together Ye would first look to Experience Experience makes this good that Error for the most part ends in a prophane Godless Life Scripture experience clears it So the Apostle Jude descrives these Hereticks he speaks of to be vile Livers And later than Scripture Experience makes this good also That Error and Prophanity for the most part follow hard upon the heels one of another It 's true Sathan ensnares People at the first to Error by a pretence of leading them to a more strick way than others But the thing he is aiming at is still more loosness Ye need not seek a more clear proof than what ye see before your Eyes Did ever ye see a more Godless company of men than divers of those Hereticks amongst us who were first drawn on to Error by a pretence of walking after a more strict way of Holiness than others They could not joyn in worship with the Presbyterians many in their Churches were so prophane as they pretended but would gather Churches of their own and would Joyn with none but those that had evident signs of Grace and so came of it They would be stricter than God would have them and therefore many of them have turn'd so abominably loose And so Experience aboundantly clears that Error and Prophanity do follow hard one upon another But we shall clear it also from Scripture And our first proof is from those Scriptures holding forth That Error in the matter of Doctrine hath usually its rise from some unmortifyed Lust within which makes way for such an Error So Rom 16 17. 18. I beseech yoâ— Brethren mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the Doctrine which ye have learned and avoid them Now from whence come these divisions contrary to the right Doctrine v. 18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ but their own Belly and by good words and fair Speaches deceive the hearts of the simple Unmortified corruptions within bloweth wind in their
light breaks out to the clearing of the Truth These are Reasons why Hereticks must be Vse The use is seeing the Spirit of Error began so early to trouble the Church in the Apostles time that were guided with an infallible Spirit then ye are not to wonder that Error should trouble the Church now when there are not such infallible lights as these The Spirit of Error is a bold darring Spirit it will dare to contradict God Himself and find out some shift to cast at that which God Himself sayeth As may be seen Gen 3. The Lord said The day thou eatest thereof thou shalt die And Sathan contradicts it thou shalt not surely die And so no wonder there be such impudence seen in the Spirit of Error now as to cast at any thing which Gods Servants say seeing Satan still Acts the Instruments of Error Vse 2 But secondly from this Doctrine learn not to quarrell with Gods most Holy and wise Providence in that he suffers so many Errors to be We are ready to think that if God had that care of his Church Covenant and Cause as men would think he had he would not suffer such Effronted Spirits and such Blasphemous Hereticks to prevail and to outdare his Truth But that is to quarrel the Lords providence and without a ground He whose furnace is in Zion can make all the tryals of the time that arise from Error to contribute much for the clearing of Truth by this means he will rouse up his People to study Truth to understand it better to search out grounds for it and that is one advantage only ye would know also that these times will be discovering times they will discover many a corrupt heart many unstable hearts and light heads many proud Spirits and many that have Lusts lurking within them So that many will choose that Religion that will gratify their Lusts most For there is not an Error that Sathan hatches but there is one Lust or other within People that speaks for it and there is nothing more ready to make People take in Error than their harbouring of unmortified Lusts. So in 2 Timoth Cap 3. The Apostle speaking of those who should be caried away with false Teachers says in the 6. v. For of this sort are they which creep into houses and lead captive silly women laden with sins led away with diverse Lusts Unmortified Lusts are as fuel to make the fire of Zeal for Error to burn very hot in Peoples bosom and so Error will try People this way Doct V. Next observe he sayes Believe not every Spirit that is believe not every Doctrine that hath the name of the Spirit and fair pretences put upon it as if they were the Doctrines of the Spirit of God believe them not From this we learn That the foulest Errors go out oftentimes under fairest names and are backed with most specious pretences what Fouler Errors than these spoken of here The denying of the Son of God And yet what fairer Names than the Spirit What fairer pretences than that they are Doctrines taught by the Spirit of God We will find this of all Errors spoken of in Scripture for the most part Coraâ— Dathan and Abiram's Error whereby they rose up against the Magistracy of Moses and Preist-hood of Aaron hath a fair pretence for it Ye take too much upon you Moses and Aaron are not all the Lords People Holy And Jeroboams Error his Idolatry in setting up the Calf at Dan and Bethel hath a fair pretence 1 Kings 12. It is too fair for you c. The Peoples ease and the publick good is the thing he pretends though his design was far otherwise And so these that urged Justification by works and opposed the way of free Grace and being justified by Faith they had their fair pretences O! say they to cast off Workes from Justification will make People secure wee may sin that Grace may abound very taking pretences all of them and as taking as any that Error is now covered over with The Reason of the Doctrine is from the cause for which the Tempter presents Error under fair colours and specious pretences which is this That he may make the Error the more taking For these are the baits he puts on the hook that he may deceive and catch the simple Therefore for use of this Doctrine ye would not be deceived with fair pretences or ravishinglike expressions that Error may be fairded over with See what the Apostle Paul sayes to this purpose 2 Thess cap. 2 v. 2. Where speaking against an Error he beseeches them by the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ That they be not soon shaken in mind or troubled neither by Spirit nor by word nor by letter as from us as that the day of Christ is at hand It supposes that the spreaders of that Error had all these three pretences Firstâ— they pretended the Spirit that it was a Doctrine taught them by the Spirit of God accompanied by his presence in their Spirits with more than ordinary flashes and raptures and In-bearings of the Spirit of Light And Secondly that they had the word or Scripture to alledge for it And Thirdly they picked somewhat out of Pauls Letters for them so would they say In speaking against us he contradicts himself These are fair pretences and yet sayes Paul be not shaken in mind with them So say I ye would guard your self against the fair pretences which Error may have and look not only to the out side but to the inside of them and then ye will find most bitter Serpents Lurking under fairest flowers As for example The Mother of all Error Tolleration hath a fair pretence for it viz. that good men may Err and so in suppressing Error ye may suppress Piety A fair pretence but it hath afoul end For by this meanes Blasphemers Denyers of God and Jesus Christ must have Liberty to vent their damnable Errors if so be that they can but pretend Conscience and so stable roome must be given in Christs Church to every unclean beast that ever was hatched in Hell The Antinomian Errors again have a fair pretence O say they Christ hath become sin for us and therefore it is taken off from us so we are not bound to repent for it for to say that we are to repent were to take the burthen off from Christs Back and to put it on our own These are specious words without solidity but they contradict Scripture Truths where they are narrowly looked to Peter was a justified Person and yet when Christ looked on him He weeped bitterly Davids sin was pardoned and Christ had taken the burthen of it and yet David was to Repent of it and to be corrected for it and so the Lord tells him that the sword should not depart from his house because he had made the Enemies of the Lord to Blasphem and yet sin was not laid upon David to satisfy divine Justice for it Only he must get
least not such an ample grant as it is Matth 28. 19. Goe ye therefore and teach all nations c and lo I am with you alway even unto the end of the World It doth not exeem them indeed from Erring themselves but the promise is there more largly given to them than to others And Secondly Ministers as called watch men have the charge of Peoples Souls God hath charged them with them which he hath not charged others with there is not a charge of Peoples Souls laid on private men by way of office every one is bound indeed by way of Charity to take a care of the Souls of others contrair to that of Cain am I my brothers keeper But beside this tye of Charity lying on sent Ministers there is a tye by vertue of a particular charge So that place Act 20. Take heed to the flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers He hath given them a special Charge and so they are charged in a special way with Peoples Souls Then there is a Third Reason it is Sathan's Method to bring in Error on People by casting in prejudices betwixt them and sent Ministers which we have cleared sometimes from Scripture and so it should be watched against lest Sathans subtility prevail so far as to bring People to dis-respect their Ministers for if that be once gained he hath prevailed very much Doct VIII Now further he sayes Believe noâ— every Spirit But bring them to the tryal Doe not cast at all but try the Spirits Hence take this Doctrine It is not Gods way that People because there are differences about Religion should therefore believe no Religion that is not Gods way So Matth 16. we see the Apostles practise Christ sayes unto them whom say they that I am Say they some say thaâ— thou art John the Baptist some Elias others Jeremiah or one of the Prophets But whom say ye that I am They do not Answer we know not what to say there are so many different sayings about thee but say they Thou art Christ the son of the living God Reas So People are not to cast at all Religion because there are differences about it and that because First that were to give way to the Devils plot His design in raising up Error about Religion is to make People Atheists so as not to care for any Religion and so when the use which thou makest of different Opinions is that thou wilt believe none Thou fulfillest the Devils design Secondly thou makes use of Gods Providence to thy destruction The Lords Providence in raising up Error is to make men seek more after the knowledge of the Truth And when thou makest that use of it to cast at all Religion thou mockest the Holy Counsel of God to thy own ruin The Use then of the Doctrine is to reprove those of this stamp to wit Prophane Atheistical men that make no differences about Religion but this Let Church-men once agree among themselves what 's right and what 's wrong untill then the back of our hand to altogether that is a wofull way Indeed there may be a doubt proposed here viz. What else shall poor ignorant People do about differences in Religion but to lay aside the care of all when they see every party have their own Reasons stronger than these poor People can Answer I Answer there are some directions grounded on Scripture which if we walk by may bring us to a safe shore amidst these rocks of contrary Opinions And the first is this that for Differences that concern not Peoples practice I would not have People trouble themselves much with them as for example Our late unhappy Differences about the publick Resolutions the Lord hath taken the occasion of them away so I would not have any troubling themselves much about them Whatever Differences in matters of practice fall in it seems to be a safe rule that when the occasion of such Practices are removed all Contention about them should be laid aside Secondly As to the Differences wherein Peoples practice is concerned take these Rules First For these that are uncontraverted Truths make Conscience of the practice of them which will help to the knowledge of other things this rule Christ prescrives John 7. 17. sayes he If any man do his will he shall know of the Doctrine whether it be of God c. There is something that thy Conscience is clear of to be Duty and although the Differences of Opinion might be some excuse to make thee keep off from these things about which there is difference yet how art thou excused for neglect of these things which thou art convinced to be Duty as Prayer Reading the Word c. Secondly We would know whatever be the contrary Opinions about matters of Religion yet there is but one true way and the knowledge of this one way may be attained to by those who seek humbly after it At least if thou be judging thy self and as a damned Bankrupt or Dâ—vour by Nature be closing with Christ and drawing Grace from him to make thee Holy Thou wilt attain to the knowledge of as much of these things debated as will take thee home to Heaven A Third Direction is That ye should beware of calling in question any of these Truths that once have been Sealed into your Spirits by the Spirit from the Word of God 2 John ver 8. Look to your selves that we lose not those things which we have wrought The point of Truth that People have got thus Sealed to their Conscience should not readily be called in question A Fourth Direction is this That in seeking out Truth under Differences we should beware of Loftyness of Spirit 1 Cor. 14. 32 it is said The Spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets How much more ought the Spirits of private persons to be subject to the voice of Christs Ambassadors speaking in his Courts This is not as if we would make Ministers Sayings the Peoples Rule to walk by But this much will follow that in a constitute Church where Discipline is Exercised there should be that Humility in People that whâ—n doubts arise concerning any point of received Truth within the Church they should offer their Judgement and the Reason of it to the Prophets and Christs Courts to be tryed before they lay down any new Opinion as a solid Truth That much is contained under this The Spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets if it mean any thing at all Doct IX Now we proceed The next thing that we come to is what People should do Try the Spirits and the Rule of Tryal is whether they are of God The first point we learn is that how fair soever the pretence be that our Doctrine is colloured with it should not be taken upon Trust but the Spirits must be Tryed Such we see was the practice of the Bâ—reans and they are commended for it they would not take the Apostles Doctrine on
trust Act 17. 11. These were more noble than those in Thessalonica in that they received the word with all readiness of mind and searched the Scriptures dayly whither those things were so They would not take the Apostles Doctrine on trust and this is a command given by Paul writing to the Thess 1 Epistle ch 5. v. 21. Prove all things after he had said despise not Prophecyings So that Doctrines should be brought to a Tryal whatever be their fair pretences Reas The Reasons are first because foulest Errors may be coloured over with fairest pretences And Secondly the Scripture sayes all men are Lyars that is to say all men may Err and therefore words cannot be the Ground of Divine Faith for Faith must have an infallible ground as Ephes 2. 20. And are built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets c. i. e. the word Preached by them and dictated by the Spirit of God Vse This Doctrine reproves first the Papists that will have nothing Tryed that comes from the Church but all taken upon trust hence is it that many swallow such Monsters of Absurdities as the Errors of Transubstantiation Purgatory Merite Mals and such like for which they have no other ground but because their Church sayes so But this Doctrine holdeth out another duty that who ever heareth any Doctrine proponed by one or other they are bound to pass their Judgment on it Try the Spirits Now that we may walk betwixt extreams the Papists on the one hand who set up Tyranny and these Sectaries on the other hand who set up Confusion we would know there is a twofold Judgement to be passed on Doctrine Publick Judgement and Private Judgement Publick Judgement again is either peremptorily absolute or limited A publick peremptory Judgement is That which binds the Conscience to obey simply that which is spoken and none have this Judgement but God himself Secondly There is a publick Judgement which is limited and this is a publick declaring and holding out that which is found to be God's mind in his word which does not bind absolutely but in so far as it agrees with the Word and this Judgement belongs to publick Church Judicatories met together in Christs Name They are like the Lyon-Herauld set forth to proclaim the Royal Acts if he proclaim that which is contained in the principal Acts it binds but if he add any thing of his own it binds not Next there is a private Judgement of Discretion and this belongs to every Christian every man in relation to his own practice is bound to pass Sentence on what is held out to him by others that if it be right he may embrace it but if wrong he may reject it but his private Judgement is not binding to others Now this private Judgement or this Judgement of Discretion is necessary because all men may Err Councils may Err Synods c. And Secondly Their Error will not excuse private Christians to follow them in their Error sayes Christ When the Blind leads the Blind both falls into the Ditch And therefore there must be a Judgement of Discretion in private persons to try what they hear And this much for guarding against the Popish Tyranny but least this Doctrine be abused to cast at all publick Church Judicatories we shall next speak somewhat to guard against Sectarian Confusion First Although publick Church Judicatories have not Power to bind Consciences yet when men are in a doubt concerning a point of Truth their Judgement ought to have more weight than the Judgement of private Men And that not only because there are more Gifts exercised together but mainly because there is a promise annexed to the Commission given by Christ to publick Church Judicatories Matth. 18. 20. Where two or three are gathered together in my Name there am I in the midst of them And Secondly From this it followes that there would be a kind of loathness to differ from publick Church Judicatories a man's grounds would be well examined lâ—st if differing from these Judicatories they also differ from Truth And Thirdly when they differ they are to bear them at Reverence although in such a point they should Err yet for their Authority they are to be Reverenced This much is granted by us to Church Judicatories but no further They are not to be made the Rule of our Faith Vse 2. It reproves those who are Lazie and cannot endure the trouble of trying what they hear but take things on trust and have no more but such a mans Authority he is of that Way and Opinion and therefore they are Fire and Flint Tooth and Nail for it as much as if they had the Word of God for it We have seen much of this in the unhappy Differences that have fallen out in our time which I have no pleasure to speak much of and therefore we proceed to another Doctrine Doct. X. The next thing then that we observe is from what he sayes Try c. whether they be of God that is the Tryal The Doctrine is this That the right tryal of Doctrine is To try whether they be of God or not and this point puts us to give Marks whereby it shall be known what Doctrine is of God and what Doctrine is not of God and here we shall speak to two things First We shall show what are the marks that necessarly infer a Doctrine to be of God And secondly we shall speak of other things that do not infer necessarly a Doctrine to be of God but for the most part follow upon such a Doctrine For the First That which makes Doctrine necessarily to be of God is if it be according to the rule of the Word So when the Bereans are commended Acts 17. The rule they went by in the tryal of Paul's Doctrine is the Scripture And this is Isaâ—a's rule chap. 8. ver 20. To the Law and to the Testimony c. He would have all Doctrines tryed by the Word of God So the Word is the rule and that Doctrine which has the Word for it is of God and whatever Doctrine has not the Word for it is not of God All Spirits even the Spirit of God himself must be tryed that way And that because the Word is a perfect rule I give only two places of Scripture to clear the perfection of this rule First The heavy Plagues pronounced against those who add to this rule The Word is so perfect that if an Angel should come and pretend a purer Rule Let him be sayes Paul Anathema Gal. 1. 8. There is another place which proves the perfection of this rule according to this point in hand 2 Timoth. 3. 16 17. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for Doctrine for reproof for correction for Instruction in righteousness That the Man of God may be perfect c. So there is as much in the word of God as may make the man of God perfect And this in relation
to Doctrine and Instruction It is profitable for Doctrine and Instruction It will make a man perfect in that as well as in reproof Vse This reproves First the Papists they cast by the rule of the Word and will have their Traditions and their Poâ—es Decrees to be the rule But of this enough already in the preceeding Doctrine In the second place it reproves the Sectaries some whereof reprove the Word they will have a higher tryal and rule to examine by and it is the inbearing of Gods Spirit say they He is the Spirit of Truth and can he bear in a Lye But say we how know they the Spirit of the Devil by the Spirit of God except they bring it to the Word So the Word is the Rule yea and the last Rule But here is a doubt which we shall speak to This is a very hard task may some say for poor ignorant People to try Doctrines by the Word the Word it self is obscure and every one pretends the Word all Parties will say that they have the Word and so it is hard for us to know what is of God and what not if we have no other rule but the Word I answer it is very true there are very few Sectaries who will not pretend the Word And yet it does not follow that ye may cast by the Word But Secondly we say although the Word be in some places obscure and although Men of Opinions as contrary to the Word as Light is to Darkness may every one of them wrest the Word yet there is as much of the Word clear if it be rightly studied as will make a man know what is right and what is wrong Hence that Epithet given to the Word The word of the Lora is a Lamp to direct thy Paths The Word of the Lord is not unfitly compared to a Sea wherein Elephants i. e. men of greatest parts and Learning may swime and readily lose their fect how great soever their parts be if they rely upon them And yet it may be compared to a shallow calm running Stream wherein Lambs that is men of mean Gifts may wade and find out Gods mind in it if they be humble and take Gods way for searching of it But say ye what is that way of God wherein people may hope so as not to miscarry in the searching out of Gods mind in his Word In answer to this we shall give several Directions First A man that would not mistake Gods mind in his Word should be a diligent Reader of it Acts 17. 11. and searched the Scriptures daily c. it was their daily task And Secondly Reading of the Word should have Prayer going alongs with it Prov 2. 3. Yea if thou cryest after knowledge and liftest up thy voice for understanding ver 4. If thou seekest her as silver and searchest for her as for hid treasures Then c. this crying and seeking is certainly in Prayer as well as in other means When people joyn Prayer with the Reading of the Word they will more readily attain to the knowledge of Gods mind Than a man that takes no more with him but his own natural parts Thirdly The word should be read with Meditation Psal 1. 2. in his Law doth he meditate day and night And Fourthly with Self-denial Prov. 3. 5. Trust in the Lord with all thine heart and lean not to thine own understanding We should go to the Word with a deep sense on us of our own Ignorance to seek Light from it There are several other directions how People may be led to get the meaning of the word we shall speak of some First Obscure places being compared with these that are more clear will be clear also There are some places obscure but the Lord hath been so Graciously condescending in contriving the Scriptures that there are other places to make them clear So there is an obscure place we are not under the Law but under Grace which at first seems to sound as if People needed not to take heed to the Law But there is another place that clearly shows how we are not under the Law There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ. They are freed from the condemning power of the Law but not from the directions of it Secondly in obscure and dark places of Scripture on which men according to their several Conceptions would Father several senses the meaning that agrees most with the â—nalogy of Faith should be taken this is that which Paul calls the forme of wholsom words So there is a place controverted he laid on him the iniquitâ— of us all Says the Antinomians all our sins were laid on Christ and so do what we will we are not bound to seek pardon or mourn for tâ—em for our sins are laid on him and so we have none Now this gloss is contrary to the whole current of Scripture which holds out that believers have sin in them a body of Death 1 John 1 8. If we say we have no sin we deceive our selves and the Truth is not in us It holdeth out believers at their best condition as Mourning for sin and praying for the pardon of sin Rom. 7. Psalm 25. 11. So that this Antinomian sense cannot be right because it is contrar to the whole current of Scripture and therefore the laying of our iniquities on him must be the guilt and punishment of our iniquity and not the being of sin it self which was bound upon Christ So another place the promoters of Tolleration pleads from is that in Phil. 3 15. that Counsel that Paul gives Let us therefore as many as be perfect be thus minded And if in any thing ye be otherwise minded God shall reveal even this unto you say they there is Tolleration whatever be Peoples differences let them walk according to their Light we say again that what Paul sayes of mutual forbearance must not be extended to all Errors but it must only be applyed to these that were Errors of infirmitie As Rom 15. 1. we then that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak and not to please our selves And that the opposite meaning cannot be right because it is contrair to the current of many other Scriptures which command Hereticks to be Excommunicat An Heretick after the first and second admonition reject and not so much as bid them God speed So this is another way to know the meaning of the Scripture And this much now for directions to help you in the study of Gods word that you may attain to know Gods mind in it and so to know whether a Doctrine be of God or not We thought to have spoken of these other marks which do not infer necessarly a Doctrine to be of God but for the most part do follow on such a Doctrine but the time being now ended I shall only name them First That Doctrine which is of God will have Holiness following upon it And so that Doctrine of the
Antinomians that tends to prophanity of life cannot be of God Secondly that Doctrine that is of God tends to exalt Christ. John 16. 15. Speaking of the Spirit of Truth he sayeth he shall take of mine and shall shew it unto you And so that Doctrine of the Papists I mean their Doctrine of Merit is not of God Thirdly That Doctrine which is of God humbles men as Error doth fill men with pride Thus those Sectaries that are spoken of in Jude are called Lofty and so the Doctrine of Separation is not of God because whatever be the pretence of strickness that it caries along with it there is an over-weaning conceit of the Man's self and undervaluing of others that cleaves to this Error And Secondly it maketh People orderly in standing for it So is it said of Christ His voice is not heard in the streets Now these marks as we have said do but usually follow for because of the corruptions of men even the Doctrines that are of God may want these properties and the Doctrines that are not of God may have a shew of them and therefore the first mark to wit the word is the adequate Rule So that all Doctrines ought to be brought to it Whatever be the shew any Doctrine hath whether of Holiness exalting Christ and free Grace whatever shew it have of Humility and orderly carriage in those who profess it in their avowing of it Yet if it be not according to this Rule viz. the word of God it is not of God Doct XI We come now to our main design to wit the Refutation of some of the most dangerous Errors of the Times The ground of what we are to speak to this purpose is taken from the following Doctrine which is evidently imported in the words to wit That there are many Doctrines pretending to the Spirit which yet being brought to the Touchstone will be found not to be of God For while he bids us try the Spirits whither they be of God He evidently insinuates that there are some Spirits which being brought to the tryal will be sound faulty and not to be of God I shall God willing give instances of this and accordingly make it out upon the most taking dangerous and most Erronious Doctrines of the Times particularly upon those following First the Doctrine of Tolleration Secondly the Doctrine of Erastianism Thirdly the Doctrine of Independency Fourthly the Doctrine of Separation Fifthly the Doctrine of the ordinary Preaching by unsent men Sixthly the Doctrine of Antinomianism And Lastly the Doctrine of Anabaptism In all which we shall with the Lords assistance make it appear here that however they pretend to be Doctrines warranted by the Spirit of God in his word yet they are not so warranted in a word we shall show they are not of God SECT II. A BRIEF REFUTATION OF THE ERROR OF Tolleration WE shall begin with the Error of Tolleration of all Opinions in the matter of Religion a Doctrine that is much cryed up among Sectaries and a Doctrine that is very taking what thinks People if they get leave to serve God according to their own Conscience they need not trouble themselves what others do Our purpose is to show that this Doctrine though it pretend to the Spirit is not of God and for this end we have read these places of Scripture whereupon we are to ground the most of what is to be said against this Error I begin to refute this Error of Tolleration First because it is the Sectaries main refuge it is their Holy of Holys wherein they shelter themselves in their grossest Errors what say they it is our Conscience and who dare meddle with Conscience but the God of Conscience Secondly we think it needfull to begin with it First because of all other Errors it is the most dangerous and damnable in so far as other Errors do only evert these particular Truths of Scripture to which they are contrary but by this one Error this Monster of Tolleration way is made to evert all the Truths contained in Scripture and to the setting up all Errors contrary to every Jote of Truth and in the mean time there shall be no power on earth to hinder it or take order with it In prosecuting of this we shall follow this Method First we shall clear the state of the question Secondly we shall bring our Arguments for confirming the Truth and vindicate them from the Adversaries exceptions Thirdly We shall bring forth their Arguments and shall refute them from Scripture and Reason And Fourthly We shall apply the whole to some practical use First For the state of the question what a thing this Tolleration is that we Labour to refute There is a two-fold Tolleration of Error There is a Church Tolleration and a State Tolleration A Church Tolleration is That whereby it is pleaded that Error and Heresy should have liberty to be vented and go free even from Church Censure such as suspension from the Sacraments or Excommunication There are but few Sectaries of any note that plead for Tolleration in this Latitude and that because the Scripture is so plain against it Paul sayes An Heretick after the first and second Admonition reject Therefore they are content that Church-censures such as Excommunication be inflicted on Hereticks providing First that they be free from Civil censure Secondly That Excommunication be inflicted for no Error but for these that are contrary to fundamental points of Truth or as some say contrary to the very light of Nature Upon these and no other will they have Excommunication to strike Though this be not the main question which we are to insist upon Yet we shall lay down some assertions contrary to their Doctrine even in this point And First we do not see what reason can be brought to exeem Hereticks from civil Censure but the same may be brought to exeem them from Church Censures also If Conscience as they say be free from the one what reason but it should be free from the other also And if fear of civil Censure against those who Err do as they say enforce the Conscience and make People Hypocrites we see not but the fear of Church Censures may do the same Or if notwithstanding of Church Censures the Conscience is not forced the Service not constrained which they grant then notwithstanding of Civil Censure it is not forced or the Service constrained either And so from their own grounds this vast Tolleration of Error falls to the ground Secondly We cannot assent to that which they affirm that Excommunication is not to be inflicted for any Error but these which are contrary to fundamental points of Religion and that because Christ gives us a rule upon what faults Excommunication should strick to wit on every scandalous Fault done against a Brother or the Church wherein the Offender persists obstinate and will not be reclaimed So Matth. 18. 17. And if he shall neglect to hear them tell it unto the
Heaven to consume the Samaritans and from this they argue That when People refuse Christ in his Person much less when they oppose him in his Doctrine it is not his mind that they should be punished but admonished and waited on But before we Answer they must prove the Quarrel was for Religion Now this cannot be made out for the Reason why James would have â—ire coming down from Heaven was because of an Act of Inhumanity in denying lodging to Christ and that because of the great envy and hatred betwixt these two people the Jews and Samaritans The Second Answer we give is although the Quarrel had been for Religion yet it makes not against this Doctrine because they were wholly Idolaters utterly ignorant of the Gospel and our Doctrine is not that when a Nation is lying in Idolatry that the first thing that should be done is the Magistrates sword to slay them or to seek fire from Heaven to consume them We say it is utterly unlawful to goe with fire and sword to force the Indians to embrace the Christian Faith only they should be taught instructed and restrained from spreading Blasphemies reproaching the Son of God c. Our Question is whether or not a People that are Members of the visible Church that have bound themselves by Covenant to adhere to the Christian Truths whether or not when they fall away from Truth to damnable Error the Magistrate may make them stand to their Covenant as Josiah did 2 Chron 34. 31. And he caused all that were present to stand to it Object 6. The Sixth Objection is this say they If Magistrates may punish Error and Heresy then he may force the Conscience for what they hold is as they profess according to the light of their Conscience Now to force the Conscience is a fearful sin who dare meddle with Conscience but the God of Conscience Answer This Argument seems plausible but for Answer to it we say Conscience cannot be forced properly Only we say that the Magistrate may punish for or restrain sin in such outward motions as come from an evil informed Conscience and if this be a sinful forcing of the Conscience then it were a sin to punish those who from Conscience killed the Apostles John 16 2. the time cometh that whosoever Killeth you will think that he doeth God Service Yet we hope none will say the punishment of such would be a sinful forcing of the Conscience so it were a sinful thing to punish those who made their Children to pass through the fire unto Molech under the name of Conscienceâ— These and many other absurdities would follow on this Tenet of theirs that none ought to be punished for any thing they do following the indytments of a deluded Conscience What have there not been and yet are Hereticks who pretend Conscience for the vilest villanies of the World The Jesuits pretend Conscience for stobbing Kings and Magistrates The Gâ—ostâ—cks to have Wives common And ancient Hereticks hath made it a point of Conscience to practice Adultery and some present Hereticks to Marry their Sisters so that the â—igher in Blood the Persons Married are the Marriage is to them the more spiritual and a number of such like villanies Now will any think it a sinful forcing of Conscience to punish such whatever they tatle of Conscience But Secondly To what they say for the Magistrate to punish men for Error is a persecuting of men for Conscience To this we Answer Then it should follow that God commanded sin to the Godly Magistrates under the Old Testament for it is clear they had a command to punish men for Idolatry Thirdly if this be a persecuting of Conscience then it is a persecuting of Conscience to Preach against Error to refute it by good Reason To make this Consequence clear know as there is a Persecution with the hand so with the Tongue and it is the bitterest Persecution that is called job 5. 21 The scourge of the Tongue And the mocking of Christ was one of the fearfullest Persecutions he met with he trusted in God c. And so according to this Doctrine it were unlawful to Preach against them c. Why For it is a sin to persecute them for Concience But Fourthly our Answer is It is not the hurt inferred that makes sinful Persecution but it is the cause for which the punishment is inflicted There is a Seventh Objection they bring against this Truth and it is this say they If Magistrates were bound to punish Error and Heresy it would lay a tye on Magistrate to know what is Truth and what is Error Now say they there are many intricate Questions about the nature of Error and Truth which the Generality of Magistrates are ignorant of and therefore say they according to this Doctrine we put power in the hand of the Magistrate whereby he may punish those that profess the Truth if the Magistrate mistake and take Truth for Error A dangerous Doctrine If Magistrates turn ignorant or corrupt This seemeth plausible But we shall Answer to it If this Argument hold strong then it would follow that the Civil Magistrate hath no power to punish sins against the second Table for there are a number of difficult Questions even about these as in some cases of Murther Incest matters of false Witness And the Lord sayeth Deut. 17. 8. If there arise a matter too hard for thee in Judgement between blood and blood between plea and plea and between stroke and stroke c. Which suppones there are many doubtful questions even about things Civil which the generality are ignorant of and so it may fall out they may punish the honest man for the knave and yet this doth not evert the ordinance of Magistracy neither doth it follow that he hath no power to punish for Civil crimes Secondly they may argue as well against what is commanded to Masters of Families That he receive not an Heretick within his house 2 John v. 10. and 2 Timoth 3 6. For of this sort are they which creep into houses c. Rom 16. 17 18. Now I beseech you Brethren mark them which cause divisions and avoid them c. By all which he supposeth certainly they have some knowledge to judge who are Hereticks and who not else how could they elchew them and so they may argue as well against these commands as against this Doctrine For may they say this is to put it on Masters of Families to know who are Hereticks who not to know what is Truth and what not and this the generality of Masters of Families are ignorant of and so a power put on them to barr the door on honest men in stead of an Heretick Now when they free these Commands from these consequences we shall free this Doctrine from them also Thirdly Neither the word nor this Doctrine putteth a power on Magistrates to punish Truth their power is only to punish Error They may indeed so abuse their power but
it followeth not that therefore they have no power to punish Error no more than because that a Godless Magistrate as Nero was may abuse his power to oppress Murther honest Citizens and do other Acts of Injustice against the second Table that therefore the Magistrate hath no power to punish Theeves Robbers Murderers because either through mistake or wickedness he may abuse it to punish innocent Men whatever remedy is left for the Magistrates abusing of his power under the one the same is left under the other as insome cases suffering in others resisting There is an Eighth Objection they have against this Truth say they we make the mean unproportionate to the end no outward force can convert a man and brâ—ng him to Christ it makes men but Hypocrites the blast of the Kings horn or outlawry can make no man a member of Christs body that must be done willingly not by compulsion and this were to cudgell People out of their opinions To this we Answer That our Doctrine doth not hold forth that the power of the Magistrate is any mean to convert Souls Only this it doth hold forth that the power of the Magistrate is a mean to restrain men from doing sinful Acts against Christ as Asa made use of his Civil Power to keep down Idolatry it puts People indeed on the profession of outward Obedience and to this it is very proportioned And therefore Secondly Though the blast of the Kings horn cannot make a Member of Christs invisible Body by working Grace Yet it may be a mean in its own kind for making a Member of the Church visible by with-holding from sinful Acts and putting them on Acts of outward Obedience A Third Answer we give That the power of the Magistrate doth not make men Hypocrites of it self but through the corruption of Man's heart who makes himself an Hypocrite The end of this ordinance what it is in it self is set down in Deut 13. 11. And all Israel shall hear and fear and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is among you That is the end that they being moved by their Example should abstain from such like worke but that they do this Hypocritically is from their corrupt nature who fears him more who can kill the Body than him who after he hath killed the Body can cast both Soul and Body into Hell We Answer lastly if this were a good Argument why a Magistrate should not make use of his power to punish for false Doctrine because throw occasion thereof many turn Hypocrites then say we It should follow that the Magistrate should not make use of his power to punish Incests Adulteries Murders Thefts c. because it is the occasion of many Hypocrites who abstain more from such for the fear of punishment than for the fear of God yea according to this Doctrine it should follow That the Preaching of the word should be unlawful because through the occasion of it many turn Hypocrites under it There is a Ninth Objection they have against this Truth and it is this say they By this power we give to the Magistrate to punish Error and Heresy we give him the Power of Church Judicatories to judge of Doctrines Error and Heresy In Answer to this we shall speak more fully in the 〈◊〉 Doctrine only for the present this giving Power to the Magistrate to punish Error and Heresy gives him not a publick Judgement to discern what is Error and what not as a Judge in Church matters but only a Judgement of Discretion in relation to his own Act As for Example when the Lord gives Power to Masters of Families not to let Hereticks come into their House it is not a putting the Power of Church Judicatories in their Hands IV. The last thing we promised to speak to you of was to give you some use of this And the First is to reprove those who think Opinions are free and that none ought to be punished for such We grant as we said that there would be a difference amongst Errors some more damnable some less and so to be less punished and there is a difference to be put amongst persons some are seduced some whose Conscience is Seared some venting their Darkness some seeking Light In such there should be a difference observed Again the Magistrate is to deal one way with a Community another way with some persons before it come to such an hight And Lastly He is to deal otherwise with Errors that cannot be mantained without troubling the Peace of the Church and State and those that break not Love nor strike not at any material point of Truth the last happily may be Tollerate if the Maintaineâ—s of them do not evidence contempt But not so the first These and such like Distinctions may be to qualify this Power but to deny it altogether is the most damnable Doctrine that ever was vented the Devil cannot take a shorter course to undoe Religion and there can be no heart zealous for God but he must loath it and therefore look so on it Think not what is that to you what others do if ye get leave to serve God your self Is that all your zeal for God that if ye get leave to serve him ye care not that all beside you Spit on his Face and serve the Devil Vse 2. Hence see what an Account those Magistrates have to make who make no use of their Power this way for God if they get their own Houses built cares not for his if Rebellion against themselves be curbed cares not for the curbing of Rebellion against God This was the Sin of the Parliament of England though they entred into a Covenant with the most high God That they would suppress Error and Heresy they never employed their Power that way and that because they durst not for angring of their Army and therefore God hath suffered their Army to overturn them and set themselves and whom they please in their place And now they by their practice give Tolleratâ—on to all and this is the way to strengthen them I say in the Name of the Lord if they repent not it shall be the way to ruine them A people Swearing in their low condition to root out Heresy c. And God blessing them from that day and within a few years carrying themselves as if they had Sworn to do the contrary to suffer all encourage all invite all the Devils in Hell to vent what Blasphemies they please and for their encouragement to give them Surety that no Power in Brittain shall hinder them Was there ever such an affront done to God Think ye that he will sit with it No if he should make the one half avengers of a broken Covenant against the other He will not It is noted of Asa 2 Chron. 14. 5. Gods way to keep Magistrates sure and their Kingdoms quiet is to be zealous against false Worship No but say they the way is not to anger Hereticks they
substantial parts of Church Government have a warrand in the word and are therein so fixed and established as they are unalterable by any State whatsoever And Secondly As to the Circumstantials that relate to this Government we say they are set down under general Rules sufficient for the ordering of them such as let all things be done in order and to edification Our Second Assertion is we are not to enter here to show what is the particular kind of Government that is appointed in the word and what things falls under the power of Church Governours and in what relation they are to handle them what are the nature of these Censures and how in all these things they differ from the Civil power It would take long time to clear these The thing we aim at is only this general That Jesus Christ the King of his Church and Lord of his House hath set down in his word a particular way for Governing of his house distinct from the Civil which is not in the power of any State to alter We proceed now to Arguments for comfirming this Truth II. The first Argument is this If so be that under the Old Testament there was a particular form of Church Government different from the Civil set down in the word then there must be also the like set down under the New but so it is that there was a particular way set down under the Old Testament for Governing the Church Therefore there must be the like set down under the new For making out this Argument there are two things we have to clear The First is That there was such a Government as this under the Old Testament warranted by the word The Second thing to be cleared is that therefore and upon the same Reason there must be also the like under the New For proving of the First that there was a particular Government of the Church different from the Gvernment of the state under the Old Testament We shall clear two things First That they had Church Judicatories different from the Civil Judicatories And to prove this we shall cite two places of Scripture The First is in 2 Chron 19. 8 9 10. Ye may read the place at leasure but there are these things in it proving that there was a Church Judicatory distinct from the Civil First We see that there is a Judicatory made up of the Church-men of the Levits and Priests in verse 8. Secondly We see that the things they judged of were spiritual matters distinguished from Civil things by calling the the first sort The matters of the Lord And the Second Matters of the King v. 11. Thirdly We see that in this Judicatory a Church-man was Moderator in the 11 verse And behold Amariah the chief Priest is over you And Fourthly We see that the sentence of the Court was Execute by Church-men in the end of the 11 vers Also the Levits shall be officers before you All which being laid together makes out clearly that under the Old Testament â—â—â—re was a Church Judicatory different from the Civil The Second place is in Jeremiah 26. 8. 9. 10 Where we have these things to make out the present point First We see that there were two Judicatories in the 8 v. There is a Judicatory of the Priests and Prophets condemning Jeremiah as a false Prophet again in the 10. and 1â— v. We see there is a Civil Judicatory made up of States-men When the Princes of Judah hard these things then they came up from the Kings house c. So it is plain they had a Church Judicatory for Church matters as well as a Civil Judicatory for Civil matters The Second thing that we are to speak to in order to the proving of the first point to wit That there was a Government of the Church different from that of the State among the Jews is this that as they had Church Judicatories different from the Civil so they had also Church Censures different from Civil punishments as we have amongst us And First publick confession of Scandalous sins was in use among them we shall clear it from one place of Scripture Ezra 10. 10. 11. And Ezra the Priest stood up and said unto them Ye have transgressed Now therefore make confession unto the Lord God of your Fathers c. There is confession of sin appointed for a fault that was Scandalous to wit their Marrying with strange Wives Now this confession was not only private to God nor on a Fast day but a personal publick acknowledgment after particular Examination of all one by one And we gather this from the 13. v. where it is said Neither is this a work of one day or two c. And in the 16. v. Three moneths was spent on the business so that this was a personal acknowledgment given by every one of them after the Examination of their guilt as we do in our Church Judicatories Secondly Besides this publick Confession they had the Censure of suspending Scandalous men from the Ordinances as we do suspend from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper we will find this in David his appointing of the offices of the Priests Among the rest it is recorded of Jehoiadah 2 Chron. 23. v 19. And he set the porters at the gates of the house of the Lord that none which was unclean in any thing should enter in They were suspended from the Ordinances because of their uncleaness And for the neglect of this the Priest's are reproved in Ezek. 22 v 26. Her Priests have violated my Law and have prophaned my Holy things they have put no difference between the unclean and clean neither between the Holy and prophane They let all come rushing together to the Ordinances And for this they are reproved Thirdly They had among them the sentence of Excommunication which is set down under the name of Cutting off from among the People And in the new Testament it is expressed by the name of casting out of the Synagogue which certainly was Excommunication It is a Ridiculous alledgence that they say by cutting off was meaned the inflicting of Temporal death by the sword of the Magistrate for the uncircumcised Man-child he that had touched a dead Body and did not wash after it were to be cut off now who would think that such were to be put to death The Second thing to be made out is That therefore there must be a Church Government under the New Testament seing it was so under the Old and the Reason is because no necessity can be alleadged for a â—hurch Government then but the same necessity is now Is not the Church a mixed multitude now as well as then is there not as great need to separate betwixt the precious and the vile now as then Is not the Church now a feild of Wheat and Tares as well as then Is there not need to keep the Ordinances pure now as then by the fence of Government Is there not need now to
The Magistrate hath much power about Church matters but he hath no Church-power properly so called that belongeth only to Christs own officers Secondly For clearing of the question take this Assertion what we deny to the Christian Magistrate in the power of Governing the Church we deny it to him only as a Magistrate for so we laid it down in the conclusion to be proved A Magistrate as a Magistrate hath no power in Governing the Church otherwise if a Christian Magistrate be chosen an Elder he hath power of Church Government being joyned with the rest Only we say as a Magistrate he hath no power to Govern the Church II. We come to the Second thing which is our Arguments to confirm the Truth And the first Argument is this That Jesus Christ hath given no warrand to the Civil Magistrate for the Government of his Church and therefore he hath no right to it 1 We say that Christ in his word hath given no warrand to the Magistrate for Governing his Church And this will appear from all these places where mention is made of any warrand given to any of Church Government There is no word of the Christian Magistrate in any of them only mention is made of Apostles Ministers and Elders so in Matth 16. 19. The power of Governing the Church to bind and loose is given to Peter in the name of the rest of the Apostles but no word of the Civil Magistrate And Matth 18. 17. the power of Excommunication is given to the Church and if he shall neglect to hear them 〈…〉 be c. The Church of Ministers and Elders hath the power but no word of the Civil Magistrate And so in Timoth and Titus the scope of which Epistles is to instruct Ministers concerning the right way of Governing the Church what is spoken there is spoken to them and to Ministers succeeding to them but there is no mention of the Civil Magistrate And therefore we may conclude he hath no right from Jesus Christ for Governing the Church And what he would challenge of that kind is but an usurpation and intruding unto that to which he hath no right Our second Argument is If the power of the Church Government belong to a Magistrate as a Magistrate then it belongeth to every Magistrate but this were absurd We say if the power of Governing the Church did belong to a Magistrate as a Magistrate then it should belong to every Magistrate for whatever belongs to one as such belongs to all such Now this hath many absurdities following on it For by this Rule Heathen Magistrates might have power of Church Government and be Church Governours which were absurd For they are not Church Members Then Secondly Women might be Church Governours for they may be Magistrates in some cases and yet they may not speak in the Church Yea Thirdly By this it should follow that Children not come to age might have the power of Church Government for they may be Magistrates when Magistracy goeth by succession Now Children cannot have the power of Church Government for that power is not to be Exercised by deputies but by the persons themselves who are intrusted with it A Third Argument to confirm the Truth is this That Magistrates as Magistrates are not Church Officers And therefore they have no power to Govern the Church The consequence is clear for if Magistrates have power to Govern the Church then they must be Church Officers if any thing make a man a Church Officer then power to Govern the Church will do it for State Government and State Officers are Relata and have a mutual Relation one to another and so must Church Government and Church Officers have a mutual Relation one to another But in the next place it is evident That a Magistrate as a Magistrate is no Church Officer and that because among all that roll set down in the word of God wherein Christ reckons up his Officers there is no mention made of the Civil Magistrate Ephes 4. There is a roll verse 11. And he gave some Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and teachers But no word of the Civil Magistrate and in Rom 12 6 7. There is an other roll of Church officers but no word of of the Civil Magistrate whether prophecy let us prophecy according to the proportion of Faith Or Ministery let us wait on our Ministering or he that teacheth on teaching c. But neither in this place or any other is there any mention of the Civil Magistrate Only some of our Adversaries mutter somewhat of 1 Cor 12. 28. That by Governments there mentioned is meaned the Christian Magistrate but it is easily refuted for the text speaketh evidently of such Governours as the Church had at that time And God hath set some in the Church c. Now the Church at that time had no Christian Magistrate nor for above 200 years after So by Governments cannot be meaned the Christian Magistrate but the Ruling Elder who is often spoken of in other places Our Fourth Argument to prove this point is That the Church did enjoy full power of Government within her self and accordingly did exercise it near 300 years before any Magistrate was a Christian and so the Church hath this power within her self yet For the first part of the Argument it is evident if we consider First That which is not controverted to wit that in the space of 300 years after Christ there was not a Magistrate a Christian If we consider Secondly That all this time the Church had full power of Church Government within her self and therefore Paul sayes to Timothy 1 Tim 4. 14. Neglect not the gift that is in thee which was given thee by prophecy with the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery So they had power of Ordination Power also to dispence Censures as Excommunication 1 Cor 5. 4 5 When ye are gathered together To deliver such a one unto Satan for the destruction of the Flesh c. And they had power to relax from Excommunication So 2 Cor 2 6. Where Paul commands to relax the Excommunicate man from that Sentence Sufficient to such a man is this punishment which was inflicted of many v. 7. So that contrariwise ye ought rather to forgive him c. Fourthly They had Synods meeting together making binding Canons to guide the Church Act 15. The Synod of Apostles Elders and Brethren meet together determine a controversie and Censure those who had troubled the Church Thus the first part of the Argument is made out to wit That the Church did enjoy full power of Discipline within her self long before any Magistrate became Christian And therefore it followes that this power is yet in the Churches hand and not in the Magistrates And that because if the Church at that time had right to dispence this power as undoubtedly she had then they must make it appear how Christ took this right from her and
transferred it to the Civil Magistrate which they cannot do Our fifth Argument is to obviate that which they say That Ministers are but the Magistrates deputes From which we argue thus If Church Officers in inflicting Censures be the Magistrates deputs then whatever the Church Judicatory does the Magistrate may do it also for none can delegate more right to ther than what he hath himself And so by this it should follow that the Magistrate might ordain Misters himself by imposition of hands he might Excommunicate And if he may do this by consequence he might also Preach Administrate the Sacraments c. For what right can be pretended to the one which may not be extended to the other and so there should be no need of Pastors and Teachers but the Magistrate might do all Our last Argument is taken from the distinction which the Scripture holdeth out betwixt Ecclesiastick and Civil power Scripture condemneth Church-mens usurping the Civil power and States-mens usurping the Church power Church men are forbidden to judge or meddle with Civil things by Christ himself Luk 12. 13 14. 22 25. And so the Civil Magistrate may not meddle with Church power either There are two Kings we read of to be heavily punished for their Transgression in this kind Saul for offering a Burnt-offering 1 Sam 13. 13. And Vzziah for burning Incense 2 Chorn. 26. 19. He would go in and burn Incense And therefore the Lord smites him with leprosie And surely Reason would say if it be a sin for Church Officers to Exercise the Civil Government then it is a sin for the Civil Magistrate to take to himself the only supream power of Church Government and ingross it wholy to himself III. We come to the Third thing we promised to speak to And that was the answering of the Opposites Arguments The first Argument they bring against this Truth is That Godly Magistrates under the Old Testament had the power of Church Government And therefore so should Christian Magistrates have it under the New Wee Answer That their Argument proves nothing except they also prove that what power of Church Government Magistrates had then they had it as Magistrates For we grant indeed what did belong to Magistrates as Magistrates under the Old Testament does belong to Magistrates under the New But it may not be granted that that which belonged to Magistrates then under other respects doth belong to Magistrates yet For clearing of this It is to be observed that there were many Magistrates extraordinary men under the Old Testament So Moses gives out Laws and Ordinances for ordering the Church But we find in Deut 18. 15. Moses was a great Prophet and a Type of Christ. The Lord thy God will raise up unto thee a prophet from the midst of thee of thy Brethren like unto me unto him ye shall hearken So David appointed the office of the Levites that divided their courses But David was a Prophet 2. Chron 8 14. And he appointed according to the order of David his father the courses of the Priests to their service Thus in another place it is shown how David did this at the direction of other Prophets 2 Chron. 29. 25. And he set the Levites in the House of the Lord with Cymbals with Psalters and with Harps according to the Commandment of David and of Gad the Kings seer and Nathan the Prophet For so was the Commandment of the Lord by his Prophets And so from these and such like practices they can no more infer the Power of the Magistrate now in Church matters than we may infer the Power of Church-men in Civil-matters from the example of Church-men under the Old-Testament For Church-men did meddle with Civil-Matters in extraordinary Cases As Eli the Priest He governed the State And Samuel in cutting Agag in pieces Elisha in Anointing Jehu to be King And Jehoâ—ada the Priest in causing kill Attaliah the Usurper and making Joash King All which we grant were extraordinary Acts and so cannot be an ordinary rule for Church-men to have such Power in Civil things now And so must they grant concerning these extraordinary practices of Civil Judges in medling sometimes with Church matters The Second Argument they use is this If so be that Magistrates were set over Church Officers to receive Appeals from them it would make them afraid to go beyond their Duty But if they have none above them there is danger of their Ambition and abusing of Discipline To which we answer First Ministers are Men indeed and as other men are ready to abuse their Power But if the danger of abusing Power be a good Argument to take Power from them then there should be no Power in the Hands of any For what kind of Men are there to be found who are not in danger to abuse their Power and so all must be left in Confusion We give a second answer That the same Argument may be used against the abuse of Preaching the Word and administrating the Sacraments For the danger is as great and yet the Erasitans the most part of them at least will not say that the Magistrate for preventing of this abuse may step into the Pulpit himself and Preach better and Administer the Sacraments better There is another way to curb that abuse and so is it in the matter of Governing the Church there is danger indeed of abusing that Power but we say in like manner that for that the Magistrate may not sit down and take the Power of Church Government himself There are other means left to prevent this danger Which shall be our Third Answer Wherein we shall show some of these means appointed by God for preventing the abuse of Power in the hands of the Church-Officers First There are some Remedies in the Church Power it self to wit The Subordination of Judicatories So that although a Congregational Eldership should wrest Justice yet there are above them Presbyteries and above them Synods and above them General Assemblies Now it may be conceived that an Act of Injustice will hardly get through all those before it be branded with some deserved mark But Secondly Though all Church Officers should connive one at another and so the Faults of Ministers go through unpunished yet there is some remedy left even in the Civil Power For although for the reasons foresaid he may not take upon him the Power of the Church Judicatory under pretence of Righting their Abuses no more than he may take upon him to Preach for preventing their abuse of Preaching Yet he may do several things 1. If Church Officers commit a civil Crime he may curb them by his own Authority 2. If Church Judicatories meddle to judge in Civil things which concern a mans Life or Estate the Magistrate may make null what they conclude and punish them for abuse of Power for therein they medled with what belonged not unto them 3. Grant the matter be meerly Ecclesiastick wherein they abuse their Power yet the
Magistrate may do somewhat here also He may command them to resume the matter he may compear in person and reason the matter and bid them see to it in the Name of the Lord and stir them up to judge it better and he may go from one Judicatory to another till he get this done As for example If it be a censure wrongously inflicted But yet it is still the Church Judicatory that must ranverse their own Censure The Third Argument they use against this Truth is If the Power were put in the Hands of the Civil Magistrate it would be a mean to decide all the whole Controversies about Church Government which are managed with so much Animosity on all hands Prelates plead that They should have the Power of it Independents That particular Congregations Presbyterians That Sessions Presbyteries Synods General Assemblies should have the Power of it the former being Subordinate to the latter Sessions to Presbyteries c. Hence ariseth all our Debates Now were not this good to take it from all and give it to the Magistrate We answer It is a way to end the Difference such as Solomon did to the two Women striving about the living Child It shall be none of yours A way that relished not with the kindly Mother of the Child 1 Kings 3. 25. Secondly We answer This Argument may take with natural Hearts who would buy Peace at any rate but not with those who are taught of God To buy the Truth and not to sell it For it holdeth out a way to end Controversies which is not God's His way is to establish what is right and to quite what is wrong But this way tends to suppress both right and wrong such Peace-makers will not be Blessed Thirdly The Presbyterians may borrow this Argument against Prelates Independents Erastians and have better right to it and so it will run thus If Church Government were put in the hands of the Presbytery It would establish and settle all Differences in the matter of Church Government betwixt Prelates Independents and Erastians Now if this Arment be good when they use it for them it must be also good when it is used for us But I doubt if they will admit of such like reasoning and so neither can we There is a Fourth Argument they use say they Jeremiah appealed to the Civil Magistrate Jerem 26. and so Paul Act 25. He appeals to Caesar. We answer let that place of Jeremiah cap. 26. be read and nothing will be found to prove that Jeremiah makes any appeal to the Civil Judicatories But Secondly Though he had appealed yet it does not prove that it is Lawful to appeal to the Magistrate in a Church business for the Sentence which the Priests had past on Jeremiah was Civil Thou shalt surely die v. 8. Now it was the Princes Duty to see to it That Innocent Jeremiah should not be put to Death especially by those who had no Powet to inflict such a punishment As for that instance Acts 25. 10 11. about Paul's appealing to Caesar it makes nothing to these purposes He appeals only from Festus an Inferior Civil Magistrate to the Superior And this we are not against But Secondly Though Paul had appealed from a Church Judicatory yet this makes nothing to confirm their Doctrine For the cause here whereabout Paul was to be judged was a Civil cause to wit Treason against Caesar And a thing worthy of Death Now we do Teach that a Church-man may appeal to a Civil Magistrate when he is questioned about his Life and for a Civil crime But hence it followeth not That we may appeal from a Church Judicatory when the cause is Ecclesiastick and no wayes civil Their last Objection is taken from 1 King 2. 27. Whereof they make much The words are So Solomon thrust out Abiathar from being Priest unto the Lord From which they argue thus Here is a civil Magistrate inflicting a Church Censure to wit Deposition of a Church-man to wit of Abiathar the Priest Solomon thrust out Abiathar from being Priest unto the Lord Therefore Christian Magistrates have Power to Dispence Church Censures Yet we answer Solomon did nothing here but what we yeild to any Magistrate for a civil Magistrate may inflict a civil Punishment on any person whatsomever for a civil Crime and so was the present case Abiathar's Fault was Treason in assisting Adonijah to the Crown against Solomon appointed by God to it Secondly The Censure inflicted by Solomon was not a Church Censure but civil to wit Banishment to Anathoth as appears from verse 26. And therefore what is mentioned in verse 27. He thrust out Abiathar from being Priest unto the Lord Is not the Censure directly intended by Solomon but that which followed upon his Banishment from Jerusalem ipso facto because the Office of the Priests could not be exercised but at Jerusalem IV. In the last place it follows That we give a word of use from all we have said The First use If so be that Jesus Christ hath appointed a Government in his House as is proven to be exercised by his own Officers Then know that those Magistrates that would ingross this Power to themselves so as to have his Courts and Censures depending on them or rather taken away and others put in their place do highly incroach on the Regal Power of our King Jesus Christ. And this seemeth to be the great sin of the Times Atheists prophane Men plead for it as looking for more forbearance to their Lusts from civil Powers than from Christs own Courts Civil Powers plead for it They are not content that Christ let Them reign and that they let Christ reign besides them But they must have him thrust out of his Throne and made to plead at their bar And so no wonder Christ overturn Kingdoms and Governments It was the Parliament of England's fault They feared lest Christs Courts should have wronged their Priviledges Hence they would not allow him his Priviledges They set up indeed a Government in Christ's House but it was a Lame one They durst not give Christs Courts their full Power but so as to be their Deputes And therefore they have dashed themselves against that corner-stone Christ Jesus until they are struck in pieces Their Fear is come upon them What they feared from Christs Courts they have met with at the Hands of their own Servants Our Kings have still been afraid of this and Malignants also going under the Name of Royalists They thought they could not get Their Throne secure if so be Christ got leave to reign besides them And this among many others hath made their Throne shake O that Kings would be wise and kiss the Son It would be their Wisdom to be faithful in what is committed unto them But for the Government of his House it is not in their Charter and so a thing that will not thrive in their hands their prudential Laws and Rules will do no good Secondly Yee would
ground your self in this Truth It may cost you much and though it should stand you never so much it is worth the avowing Christ himself suffered on this account as we have already shown and others of his servants have thought it their Glory to be called unto suffering for it Who am I saith Master Welsh That he hath not only called me to be a Preacher of glad things but also to be a sufferer for his cause and Kingdom To wittness that good confession That Jesus Christ is the King of Saints and that his Church is a most free Kingdom Yea as free as any Kingdom under Heaven That she is free in her Government from all other Jurisdiction on Earth except only Christs We are waiting saith he with joyfulness to leave the last Testimony of our blood for the confirmation of this Truth If it would please our God to be so favourable as to honour us with that dignity Thus He. And who knowes how soon he may honour some of us with that dignity A dignity indeed to suffer for the Royal Crown and Diadem of Our Lord Jesus SECT IV. A BRIEF REFUTATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF Independency Head I. The Power of Church Government is in the Church Officers and not in the Body of Church-Members THE dayes by-past we spake against the Doctrine of Erastianism And shew you that however it had many fair pretences yet it is to be reckoned among those Doctrines which are not of God We are now with the Lords assistance to speak against the Doctrine of Independency Ye Remember when we entered on these controversies about Church Government We shew you there were Four points of Truth which we should Labour to make good The first was That Jesus Christ the head of his Church had appointed in his word a way for the Governing and Ruling of his Church and that he had not left it to the power of the Civil Magistrate King or Parliament To establish what way of Government they please The second point was That this Government of the Church which Christ established in his word was not in the hands of the Civil Magistrate to be Executed by him Thir two points we have made good in our former Disputs against Erastianism The third point of Truth is this That Jesus Christ the head of the Church hath not committed the power of Governing his Church unto the Body of Believers To the community of Church Members but hath established it in the hands of his own officers Ministers and Elders The Fourth point of Truth which we promised to prove was this That Jesus Christ the head of the Church hath not given particular Elderships and Church Sessions the Supream power of Church Government in their hands so as that there should be none above them to call them to an account But that they are subject in the Lord to Superior Church Judicatories such as Presbytries Synods and General Assemblies These two last points we are to make out in Refuting this Doctrine of Independency This Error of Independency above all other we may call a fountain Error It is the Sluce whereby an entrance is made to all other Errors of what sort soever This is the Error whereby the most part of those that hath fallen from the way of Truth these years by past have been first hooked They first turned Independents yet rested not long there but proceeded from evil to worse Our scope shall be in this as in the former points to show That however it hath many fair pretences yet when it is brought to the Tryal it will be found not to be of God There are two main heads of this Error of Independency opposit to the two last points of Truth which we promised to make out The first is That whereby they affirm That Jesus Christ has given the power of Governing the Church unto all those that are Members of the Church Although they be not Ministers or Elders To the community of believers as they call it The second Head of their Error is this They do affirm that Jesus Christ hath intrusted particular Congregations Elderships or Church Sessions with the highest power of Church Government on earth so that there is no Judicatory above them to call them to an account As for the first Head of their Error which we are to speak against at this time Therein they have different Opinions among themselves some affirming that the power of Governing the Church is given to the Body of Church Members the community of Believers without the Minister and Elders yea a power over them to ordain them Censure depose them and inflict all other Church Censures Others give them this power conjunctly with the Church Officers Ministers and Elders Secondly Some give only the power and Authority to Govern to the Church Members But for the Exercise of that power they allow it to the Elders Yet so as to the Peoples deputs to whom they must give an account Others give the People not only the power and Authority but also the Exercise of this Government So that the People may sit down in Church Judicatories themselves enact Church Canons inflict Church Censures c. Thirdly Some give them the Exercise of this power only in some things as the Excercise of the power of Jurisdiction to make Church Canons and inflict Church Censures But not to Preach Others give them a full Exercise of Authority to do all We in opposition to all these lay down this conclusion which we shall Labour to make good from the word of God and solid Reason to wit That Jesus Christ hath not given to the Body of Church Members or to private Christians either the power or Exercise of Church Government neither in whole nor in part but hath intrusted it wholly to his own Officers Ministers and Elders I prosecuting this point we shall follow forth the former Method First We shall clear the State of the Question Secondly Bring Arguments for the Truth And Thirdly We shall propone and answer their Arguments brought against the Truth And Fourthly We shall shall apply the whole to some use I. For clearing the state of the Question Thâ—a it may be known what we do grant to private Christians and what we deny several distinctions would be given First There is difference betwixt Church power or Authority and Christian priviledges We do grant several Christian priviledges to private Christians but these do not infer any Church power or Authority of Governing the Church As for Example We do grant to the People a Power of Electing their own Officers Ministers or Elders we grant to them a power to try the Spirits whether they be of God i e They are not to believe blindly what Ministers say but have a power to Try what they say in Relation to their practice To pass a Judgment of discretion upon it whether it be according to the word or not We grant these priviledges to the People but none of them doth
infer any Church power which we clear in both First The Peoples power in Electing their Minister doth not infer any power of Church Government in them and that because it is not the Peoples Election or their choise that makes the Minister to be a Minister or gives him Authority to Exercise the Ministerial calling but it is the Act of Ordination by imposition of the hands of those who are Church Officers that makes the man the Minister and gives him Authority We shall find this Acts 6 3. where the Peoples Election and Ordination by Church Officers is clearly distinguished Wherefore Brethren say the Apostles look ye out among you seven men of honest report full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom there is the Peoples Election whom we may appoint over this busines There is the Church Officers part Though the People look them out and choise them that gives them not the power of their calling untill the Church Officers appoint and ordain them Secondly The power of trying the Spirits doth not infer any such power or Authority of Government in the People otherwise it should follow that the People of Berea who did try Pauls Doctrine Act. 17. 11. And compared it with the word whetber those things were so had Authority over Paul which none will affirm A Second distinction to clear the state of the Question is this There is a great difference betwixt those to whom the Authority of Governing the Church is given and those for whom or for whose good it is given although we deny that the power of Governing the Church is given to private Believers yet we grant it is given for them So all Ordinances are given for the good of Believers As it is Ephes 4. 11. And he gave some Apostles and some Prophets aud some Evangilists and some Pastors and Teachers For the perfecting of the Saints c. and in this respect 1 Cor 3. 21 22. all is said to be theirs For all things are yours whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas or the World or Life or Death or things present or things to come all are yours i. e. given for their good But hence it will not follow that because Church Discipline is given for them that therefore they have the power of it for in this respect Paul is given to every particular believing Woman and yet it does not follow that Women have Pauls Authority And so the Body of the particular Church hath not this power in their hands although the power be given for their good A Third thing for understanding the State of the Question We do willingly grant to private Christians power to admonish exhort in the Lord out of Charity and this they may extend even to Ministers say to Archippus take heed to thy Ministry But this Liberty to admonish by way of Charity doth not import any Church power in them over those whom they rebuke no more than Pauls rebuking of Peter Gal 2. 14. doth infer a power in Paul above Peter So ye see what we do grant to private Christians and what we deny The sum whereof is this That Jesus Christ hath not given them any power of Church Government or the Exercise of it either in whole or in part but has intrusted it wholly to his own Officers Ministers and Elders This for clearing the state of the Question II. We come now to Arguments for clearing the Truth And the First is this That Jesus Christ hath given no warrand to private Christians for Governing his House or for the Exercise of this Government and therefore they have no right to it The consequence must be clear For none has right to play the part of a Governour in Christs Church except those who have a warrand in his word for it Now that private Christians have no warrand in his word for Governing the Church either expresly or by good consequence either by precept or promise or any thing else it is clear from this that in several places of the Word this power is denyed unto them So Rom 10. they must not exercise the Power of Preaching for how shall they Preach except they â—e sent v. 15. Now the whole communiâ—y of Believers cannot be sent besides they have no ability to discharge this Office there is but one of a Thousand that can convince gainsayers Is apt to teach that is able to cut and divide the word aright and so they have no power to Preach And Secondly From this it will follow that they have no power to Administrate the Sacraments for Christ Jesus hath joyned both these powers in one Commission He gives no power to any to Aministrate the Sacraments but those to whom he gives power also to Preach Matth 28 19. Go ye therefore and teach all nations Baptizing them- c Power of Preaching and Administrating the Sacraments go together And so seeing the one power is denyed to them the other must be denyed also Thirdly They have no power to ordain Ministers or to execute any other act of Church Jurisdiction for they have no ability to try Ministers gifts there is no precept commanding them to do it there is no practice in the New Testament proving that ever they did it as shall be more fully cleared in answering the Arguments they bring for it And so they have no right to Govern the Church The Second Argument for the Truth is this That this Doctrine of theirs whereby they give the power of Governing the Church to private Christians doth overturn the order established by Jesus Christ in his House And therefore they have no right to it The consequence none may doubt of For nothing appointed by God doth evert the order established by himself Now that this Doctrine of theirs whereby they put the power of Governing the Church in the hands of the People doth evert the order appointed by Christ is clear Because his order is That some be watchmen some watched over some Rulers some to submit some Governours some to be Governed some Sheepherds some the flock But if so be that all the Members of the Church had the power of Governing in their hand then all should be overseers watchmen Rulers Governours and none more than another If so be that power to Govern should flow from this That they are Church Members For all are so alike The Third Argument we bring for the Truth is this That to whomsoever Christ Jesus hath given warrand for Governing the Church to those he gives promises of sutable abilities for discharging of that great Trust But so it is that Jesus Christ hath not gifted neither promise to gift every Christian nor yet requireth He answerable gifts for Government from them And therefore he hath given them no warrand for Governing the Church For the first part of the Argument that those to whom he gives the power of Church Government he doth also promise them sufficient abilities for their Trust is clear For how could it stand with the wisdom
Church-member then every Church-member is bound in Conscience to attend all Church Judicatories to wait on the deciding of all Ecclesiastical questions But what inevitable confusion would follow on this How long time would it take to inform People about the Circumstances of things How tedious would it be to hear every mans judgment to the point And what distractions would it be to Peoples Callings This certainly would bring great confusion And so such a Power as this cannot be from God who is the God of Order These are now the Arguments for the Truth III. In the next place we shall answer their Arguments brought against the Truth The first they use is grounded on Coloss. 4. 17. A command There is given to the Body of Believers in reference to the Minister Say to Archippus Take heed to the Ministry which thou hast received in the Lord. From this they infer That People have Power to Censure their Minister And so have Church Authority We answer They make much of this Argument and yet it is little worth For they build their Power to Censure upon this that they have Power to Say A poor reason So Matth. 18. 17. Say to the Church or tell the Church It is the same word that is here used But to infer from this that one man had Authority over the Church were very ridiculous Surely if he had commanded a judicial act of Authority he would have said Command and Charge Archippus with all Authority as in the like case he speaks to Timothy But as we shew in the state of the question private Christians have Power to exhort and admonish one another yea their Pastors But this doth not import any Power of Church-Government over others else women who are not permitted to speak in the Church should have Power of Church-Government to make Church Canons Censure and Ordain their Ministers For they are bound to exhort and admonish as occasion offers Obj. 2. A second Argument they bring from Act. 11. 1. When Peter comes up to Jerusalem verse 3. the people Challenge him saying Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised and didst eat with them and verse 4 He begins to clear himself to them and rehearsed the matter from the beginning c. And from this they reason thus That the Church hath Power to call Peter to an account And therefore they have Power to Censure for Scandals It s answered first Besides the People there were Apostles and Brethren There verse 1. Secondly We answer It doth not follow because Peter purgeth himself of a Scandal unjustly laid upon him That therefore they had Power to Censure him For every Christian is bound to clear himself to another Christian of that which he is stumbled within his carriage yet one private Christian hath not Church Power over another to Censure So Peter was bound to clear himself before any one of them and if he had done wrong to take with it but that That one could not be a Church Judicatory having Power to inflict Censure on Peter our Opposits themselves will grant Obj. 3. A Third Argument they bring against the Truth is from Revel 2. 14. I have a few things against thee because thou hast there them that hold the Doctrine of Balaam The Spirit of God here is wriâ—ing to the Church of Pergamus And after he hath commended them for their Doctrine he reproves them for not exercising Discipline against these Hereticks to wit Balaam Iesabel and the Nicolattans Now from this they argue The whole Church is reproved here for not executing Discipline against these Hereticks and therefore they had power to do it Otherwise they would not have been reproved for the neglect of it But that all were reproved they prove from vers 13. and its connection with the 14. say they these who are commended in the 13. are rebuked in the 14 verse I know thy Works and where thou dwellest even where Sathan's seat is c. But so it is that not only the Ministers and Elders but all the People dwelt where Sathan's Seat was Therefore they all are reproved Answer It followeth well that they are all reproved for one fault But not that they were accessory to it after one and the same way It was the Rulers part judicially to cast out these vile Hereticks It was the Peoples part to have stirred up the Rulers to it Now because these were neglected on both hands both have their own guilt and so both reproved for their respective guilt The People are reproved for not Mourning to God for the tollerating such like abominations and their not stirring up the Rulers to take course with them But it will not follow that they were reproved for not sitting down in the Judicatory and inflicting Censures themselves That was the Rulers fault And therefore we deny that they are all rebuked for their accession to that guilt in the same way And we clear it thus Doubtless the Teachers did not teach against these vile Hereticks Now there were Women there and yet surely they are not rebuked for not Preaching against them for They ought to be silent in the Church So their fault as of all other Church Members was of another kind to wit Their not Mourning nor stirring up the Officers And so it followes that it was their Duty to Mourn stir others up to their Duty which we grant But not to exercise the Power themselves for that is not the thing they are reproved for Obj. 4. The Fourth Objection is grounded on Mat 18 17 If he shall neglect to hear them tell it unto the Church but if he neglect to hear the Church let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a Publican Whence say they the power of Church Censure is in the hand of the Church but so it is Church Officers are never called the Church Neither can they be so called without the Body of the People Therefore the power of the Church Censures is in the hand of the Body of the People Wee Answer This Argument will make more against them than us and that because they grant that neither Women nor Children have hand in Church Government but only professing Men Now they shall get no place in Scripture wherein the name of the Church is given to the Body of the Men Assembled without Women and Children Secondly We grant that the name of the Church is very sparingly given to Officers without the People Yet we say 1. 't is given them in some places As for Example Acts 18. 22. It is said of Paul When he had landed at Caesarea and gone up and saluted the Church c. Now by the Church here certainly cannot be meaned the body of professâ—rs which did amount to many thousands of People as shall appear from Acts 21. 20. In its own time So by the Church must be meaned the Chief men and Rulers of the Church For Paul having so short time to stay he seeing them but at the by could
in the minds of many if it were but for this one Reason that they who are intrusted with it do not Labour to beautify it It is looked on by many as a place of respect and not of Office If a man be Richer than his neighbour he thinks he is not respected if he be not an Elder and having goten the name he cares for no more Now is that the way either to make People respect thy Person or thy Office Let me obtest and charge all of you who have taken on this Heavenly Calling as ye will Answer on your hazard to Jesus Christ the chief sheepherd that ye would study by all means so to walk in it as to beautify it and that so much the more as the Devil is Labouring to disgrace it And this now for the First Head of Independency Head II. The highest Power of Church Government is not in Church-Sessions or Congregational Elderships WE come now to the Second Head And it is That for which mainly they are called Independents The point they affirm is this That every particular Church Session or Congregational Eldership is instructed with the highest power of Church Government on Earth so that there is no power in the Church above them to call them to an account when they go wrong to rescind any Act once concluded though it were never so unjust They grant that a Synod of Ministers and Elders may meet to consult about matters but withall affirm that they have no Ecclesiasticall power to command in the Lord any Congregation whatsoever So that if a man be wronged by a Session As for instance if he be unjustly censured as it may very readily fall out he must sit with his wrong there is no power to right it till Christ come in the Clouds Or if a particular Congregation divide turn Hereticks run wrong as many of the Independent Congregations doe there is no Church power to heal the breach unless it be by giving an advice which they may either follow or not follow as likes them best We again grant That particular Elderships have a power from Jesus Christ to Exercise Discipline in these things which concern the Congregation in particular But as for other things of more publick concernment that is to say Things that concern other Congregations as well as them these ought to be handled by a Superior Judicatory And that even in those things of particular concernment They are lyable to Appeals and the inspection of the Superior Judicatory So that wherein they shall be found wrong partial or Erronious They may be called to an account For shewing the fashood of this Error as also for the vindicating of the Government of the Church of Scotland that is now so much spoken against we shall labour to make out with the Lords assistance these Three Truths from the word of God The first it this That besides the power of Church Government that Christ hath given to particular Elderships There is also holden forth in his word A plat-form or a Copy of the Government of many Congregations by one Presbytry over them all in common The Second Truth that we shall make out is this That besides the Church Government that Christ hath established by Presbytries there is also holden out in the word greater Church Judicatories to wit Synods made up of Commissioners from several Presbytries instructed with power of Church Government from Christ also And Thirdly We shall labour to make out this Truth That the inferior Judicatories are to be Subject to the Superior as Sessions to Presbytries Presbytries to Synods Synods to General Assemblies So that the Superior judicatories have power over the Inferior in the Lord to receive Appeals from them and complaints 〈◊〉 them to Censure them for Miscarying in the matter of Discipline and to enact Church Canons or conclusions binding to them which Inferior Judicatories are bound to obey in the Lord. ¶ I. There is a Platform of the Government of many Congregations by one common Presbytery holden out in Scripture COncerning the State of this Question I only premit this That however we have the very name of this Presbytry whereabout we dispute holden out in 1 Tim 4. 14. Whereby I might easily show is meaned the Presbytry we plead for yet we shall not dispute about names Though the Name were not yet it is sufficient that the Thing be in it And this we shall make good to wit That in Scripture is holden out a pattern of the Government of many Congregations by one common Presbytry The proof of this point we might instance almost in all the Churches that were planted in the Apostles time As in the Church of Jerusalem The Church of Antioch Ephesus Thessalonica Corinth and of Rome We might easily make it appear that those Churches were not single Congregations but Presbyterial Churches under one common Government But in stead of spending of time in pointing out this in all these Churches we shall instance it only in the Church of Ierusalem That by this One ye may know what to judge of the rest And first concerning the Church of Jerusalem planted by the Apostles we shall labour to make out thir two things 1. That in that one Church there were many particular Congregations And 2. That all these particular Congregations made up but one Church and was guided by one common Presbytry and Judicatory set over them all in common Which two being made out the point we intend will appear evidently to wit That there was here a Government set over many Congregations in one common Judicatory such as our Presbytry is over all the particular Church-Sessions in the bounds The first thing we shall make out is this That there were moe Congregations in the Church of Jerusalem than one and this from four grounds First From the multitude of Church Members that were in Jerusalem Secondly From the multitude of Pastors Teachers and Elders that were there moe than could get work in one single Congregation Thirdly From the diversities of Languages that were among the People of that Church And Fourthly From the way of their meeting and the place they resorted to for Gods service And first For the multitude of Church Members that was at Jerusalem If we compare place with place we will find that they amounted to many thousands and so behooved to be moe than one single Congregation Take a view of some of these places Acts 1. 15. they are numbred to be about ane hundred and twenty And Act. 2. 41. there are added unto them about three thousand Souls and then in v. 47. There is daily Addition of moe and moe the Lord added unto the Church daily such as should be saved Act. 4. 4. We see yet a greater increase There are about five thousand and the nuâ—ber of the men was about five thousand concerning which five thousand it is necessarly to be understood that they were added presently excluding the rest of the numbers before
nothing of publick Scandals Not as if Jesus Christ did mean that publick Scandals should be passed over but that the same Rule may serve for these keeping the just proportion Even so is it here If the nature of Synods be held out in the Word that is enough though it speak nothing of the bounds to which they should extend whether of One Province or of All the Provinces of a Nation no more than it is particularly set down in Scripture what should be the number and bounds of a particular Congregation There is a Third thing for clearing of this Question The Independents and we agree in this That the word gives ground for meeting of Synods only we differ about their Power They grant that in case of Division or Scandal Synods may meet and give their Advice in Matters doubtful only they say that Synods have no Power of Jurisdiction to command others in the Lord to embrace their determinations We on the other hand maintain that they have this Power and that the Scripture holdeth out such a Power belonging to them II. We might instance this in Act 1 In the choice of Matthias which was done by no particular Church For here were the Apostles whose Paroch-Church was the whole world Here were the Brethren of Christ from Galilie v 14. Some from Jerusalem v. 15. This meeting did a Church business of common concernment to the whole Christian World and so behooved to be done by those who did represent them And therefore this behooved to be a General Council But to clear the point more fully we shall take Act 15. Where this Synod we plead for is held forth clearly The History is plain A difference ariseth in Antioch about Circumcision This cannot be composed in Antioch it self so they send up Commissioners to Jerusalem to determine this matter where there is a Synod of Apostles and Elders and they determine the Question Now that it may appear the Synod we plead for is here consider first That there was a Church meeting or Judicatory here None may doubt of this as is clear v 6. Secondly Consider That this Judicatory is made up of Commissioners from the several Presbyteries we see that Commissioners from the Presbytry of Jerusalem was there v 6. And Commissioners from the Presbytry of Antioch Act 15. 2 Paul and Barnabas and others Now that these were Commissioners and had voice appears from Act 16. 4. where the decree that was then made was ascrived to all the Elders who were present It is very likely that there were other Commissioners there also from Syria and Cilicia For they are joyned with Antioch in the Letter v. 23. For what other Reason cannot be imagined except that as they were alike troubled with the Heresy as Antioch was so they had their Commissioners there as Antioch had And therefore these Acts are binding to them in a special manner However it is clear that there were Commissioners from the Presbytry of Jerusalem and of Antioch so the meeting was made up of two Presbytries And by the same rule it may be made up of moe Thirdly We would consider that this meeting made up of Commissioners from several Presbytries makes binding Acts unto other absent Churches who were present only in their Commissioners And there are several things to clear this First They determine the Question in v 19. 20 Secondly They impose Their determination on the Churches to be keeped by them So in the Letters They wrote to the Church of Syria and Cilicia v 28. The word that is turned there a Burthen signifies a Law or a Decree and so we find it in Act 16. 4. There their Conclusions are called Decrees which were ordained of the Apostles and Elâ—ers at Jerusalem And which were to be keeped From all which it is clear They did make Acts binding other Congregations Thirdly We find they put forth an Act of Censure on the false Prophets v 24. They called them Lyars A brand of Infamy It 's true They Censured them not with Excommunication For it was time enough to doe That when they knew they were become incorrigibly obstinate according to the common Rule An Heretick after the first and second Admonition reject By this I hope ye perceive clearly a pattern for greater Synods a Judicatory made up of Commissioners from several Presbytries and these making binding Laws to other Churches who were absent in their Persons and only present in their Commissioners III. Their main Objection against this is That the Apostles were here who were guided with an infallible Spirit to determine and so this can be no Rule for our Synods made up of men wanting that assistance To this we Answer that this if it prove any thing will make against our Opposits themselves as well as against us For they hold that here is a pattern of a Synod for advice so if their Argument hold against Us in the One It must hold also against Them in the Other Secondly We shew before that the Apostles were also Elders and sometimes Acted as Elders Now if it can be proven that they Acted as Elders here it breaks the strength of their Objection But this is clear First Paul and Barnabas are sent by the Church of Antioch They willingly submit Act 15. 4 Now in their Apostolick Office they were not directed by meâ— And so surely here they acted not as Apostles Secondly The Apostles all along go not on that way as when guided by an infallible Apostolick Spirit For they state the Question and debate it in v 7. Now when they write Scripture they do not use advice nor do they debate what they shall conclude but speake all as immediatly inspired But here they debate And â—aving found Truth By force of Reason they conclude as any other Assembly upon like assurance of Scripture warrand may do It seemeth good unto Vs being Assembled with one accord c. In v 25. Thirdly When the Apostles did determine any thing as Apostles and were guided by the immediatly inspiring Spirit of God then they did determine the Question fully that nothing needed to be added But so it was not here For Peter v 6th gives his Judgment That Believers were freed from the Ceremonial Law What he saith is true indeed Yet it speaketh not fully to the point untill James addeth somewhat to wit That however the Gentils were freed from the Ceremonial Law yet to eschew the Scandal of the weak Jews They were to abstain from things strangled c v 20. And therefore They Acted not as Apostles except we would say that Peter as an Apostle intending to determine a Controversie yet did not speak fully to the point which were an injury to that immediately inspiring Spirit by which they were acted in penning Scripture Fourthly Because the decrees of the Synod are put forth in the name and by the Authority not only of the Apostles but Elders also Act 15. 22. 23. Act. 16. 4. Act. 21. 25. Now
not absurd for in our Parliament Commissioners from Shires are Judges to the whole Kingdom But how It is as they are joyned in Parliament not by themselves alone It is in matters common to the Shire not in other petty particular Affairs And so it is here They are Elders to all the Congregations indeed as they are joyned together in the Presbytery But not by themselves alone In things of common concernment to the whole particular Congregation not in these Duties belonging to every Congregation in particular Object 4. If this Subordination and Judicatory above Judicatory were of Divine Institution It s like Scripture would have spoken more plainly of it not leaving it to be drawn out by so many far fetch'd Consequences Answer We have already given sufficient Warrand for this Government by clear Consequences from Scripture And Consequences from Scripture are Scripture else we must cast at many points of Divine Truth which have no other ground but Scripture Consequence As the Trinity and Change of the Sabbath yea we see Christ himself grounding a material point to wit The Resurrection upon Scripture Consequence Mark 12. 26. 2. We must not teach God how to set down his mind in Scripture We perchance think It had been a plainer way to have cast matters of Religion to so many Heads By which means many Controversies should have been shunned But He hath thought otherwise The Lord in Wisdom hath scattered the parcels of every Truth through his Book intermixing it with other Subjects as the Gold is in the Mine and this to exercise his people in searching out his mind from Scripture IV. In the last place We come to make some Vse of what is said And the first Vse is this If it be so that this Government by Presbytery is grounded on the word of God Then ye would know it is not a thing of nought we are contesting for It 's a part of that Truth once delivered to the Saints and a Truth of no small concernment What would become think ye of Particular Congregations If they had none above them to call them to an account What Divisions Strifes Heresies Schisms would ensue if people were informed of these Contests that have fallen out among our Opposits themselves where this way of Independency was followed The one half renting from the other Excommunicating one another It might make moderate Men scar at it But we need seâ—k no other evidence of this than by looking on Scotland and England these years by past In the Church of England Presbytery could not be set up Independency was pleaded for and practised And what is become of it Sathan hath vomited out a floud of Errors that there were never more nor more gross in any time of the Christian World Yea all the rotten Graves of old Heresie are digged up and now avowed Socinianism In denying Christs Righteousness in the matter of Justification Anabaptism In denying the Baptizing of Infants Arianism In denying the Trinity And many other such like Yea there are some Errors there that were never before heard of Some affirming There is no Church they can joyn with And therefore They turn Seekers Some are above all Preaching Prayer and all Ordinances And all these are the Fruits of Independency Again look on the Fruits of the Presbyterial Government in Scotland where it hath been in Vigour God hath made it an Hammer for battering down the beginnings of Error So that these twelve years bypast not any one Error hath come to any Strength And this all under God from Presbyterial Government being His Institution Our Judicatories were indeed terrible as an Army with Banners though indeed we are now like to turn contemptible God himself heal our Breaches Secondly Guard against the Errors that would draw you from this Truth If ye cannot carry the grounds we have been speaking of with you yet ye may remember ye once heard this Truth confirmed from Scripture and Reason That so when ye meet with temptations to quite it ye may advise well before ye yeild I would press this so much the more As that this Doctrine of Presbyterial Government is the Butt of Sathan's Envy the thing he would have most gladly overthrown As that which stands most in his way For so long as it stood in its integrity We might in the Lords strength have defied the Devil to have brought Error into Scotland And indeed it is the thing he sets himself to brangle To get the hedge once plukt up that so the wild Boar of the wilderness may come in And believe me there is nothing makes me more affraid than that through Gods permission the Devil shall get a deludge of Error brought in on Scotland Because those who have been intrusted with this Government have weakned the power of it by Divisions among our selves A copy is casten How that Erronious Spirits need not stand much on the Authority of Assemblies when they would cross their Designs We are affraid yea we may be past â—ear and conclude That Presbyteries Synods c. have lost much of the weight They had lately in mens consciences Only let me intreat you in the bowels of Christ That ye would put a difference betwixt the Government it self and the Persons who are intrusted with it Doe not charge the faults of the one upon the other The best things that are may be abused And it is Peoples Tryal to put difference between the good of a thing and the Abuse of it The Government is good and of God and the abuse of it is evil and of men What is of God cleave to it and stick fast by it what is from mens corruptions mourn for it Pray themselves may get a sight of it And thus ye shall walk in an eaven way Ye had need to deal with God to ground you in the knowledge of these things For we know not how soon we may be put to it to quite them Only remember They are Truths ye have sworn to maintain with your hands lifted up on high SECT V. A SHORT REFUTATION OF THE ERROR OF Separation Head I. Shewing what is required for making one a Member of the Visible Church WE have gone through these Controversies which are about the Government of the Church We are now to refute some dangerous Errors of Doctrine And first We shall begin with the Error of Separation The Errors of Separatists are many but we shall only engage with two Heads of them which are the main The first is That which they teach concerning the Constitution of the Visible Church Or who it is that should be received Members of Christs visible Body The second is That which they hold to be the duty of every sincere Christian viz. That when they spy any corruption in a Church wherein they are Members as if Persons Scandalous be admitted to the Lords Supper seeing they ought all to be Gracious who come there Then say they It is their duty to keep back from
the Communion and not only so but to quite That Church and set up a new Church of Their own We shall begin first with that Doctrine that concerns the Constitution of Visible Churches And therein we shall follow our usual Order First Clear the Question Secondly Bring Arguments for the Truth Thirdly Answer those they bring against the Truth And Fourthly Apply the whole to some Use. I. First For clearing of the Question ye would know what Church it is concerning which the Controversy is First It is not that place where Gods people meet to go about Gods publick Worship such as this House we now are in which is called the Church by a Figure improperly But it is the People gathered together in it which People are really and properly the Church although the House be so called because it contains them by an usual Figure The Church that we are to dispute of is made up of Men and Women And not that which is built of Timber and Stone Secondly The Controversy betwixt Us and Them is not concerning the Invisible Church that is called the Church of the First-born Those who by vertue of their Effectual Calling are united to Jesus Christ the Head are living Members of His Mystical Body and draw Spiritual Influence from him Concerning the Church taken in this Sense There is no Controversy betwixt Us and the Separatists but that the Members of this Church are only made up of Believers are all gracious because this Church is Christs Mystical Body a Royal Priest-hood the Lambs Wife all fair undefiled c. Thirdly The Question Then is concerning the Church Visible which is a Company of Men and Women who have according to the Tenor of Gods Covenant with the Visible Church an Outward Ecclesiastical which is in its kind a real Right to enjoy the Outward Priviledges of the Children of God This being the Church about which the Controversy betwixt Us and the Separatists is We shall speak a litle to clear what is meaned by it And First The Church is called Visible not because the Members of it may be seen For in that respect the Church Invisible the Church of Believers may be called Visible For the Members of it being believing Men and Women may be seen also But the difference betwixt the Churches in those two Senses is taken from that which makes one to be a Member of the one Church as it differs from that which makes one a Member of the other That which makes One man a Member of the Invisible Church is True Grace sincere Faith inward Marks thereof Now Grace is a thing that cannot be seen by another certainly It s true there are outward effects of it but they are such that a Hypocrite may have the counterfeit of them so as the one cannot be discerned from the other by a Beholder The nature of Grace is only known Infallibly and certainly to God And therefore This Church is called Invisible Again that which makes a Man or Woman a Member of the Visible Church is something that may be seen something that may be judged of by those who have Power to receive Members into the Church and cast them out from it Secondly We said that this Visible Church is a Company or Society of Men and Women that have an Ecclesiastical Right to enjoy the Outward Priviledges of the Sons of God For understanding what is meaned by enjoying of Outward Priviledges we shall show you That there are Outward Priviledges and Inward Priviledges of those who are the Sons of God Inward Priviledges are Jesus Christ himself a Right to him a saving Right to the Covenant of Grace and Life Eternal These are the Inward Priviledges of the Sons of God And only Believers have right to those Painted Hypocrites have no right to them But Secondly There are Outward Priviledges of the Sons of God such as these To be ordinary Hearers of the Word Preached To be taken a care of by Jesus Christ his Servants To have liberty to come to the Sacraments These are Outward Priviledges And these are Priviledges that a Member of the Visible Church hath a right to We said they had an Ecclesiastical Right or a Church Right to them That is such a Right as gives Warrand to the Church for receiving them to enjoy these Priviledges and yet possibly they have not a Right to them before God As for Example when there is a painted Hypocrite in a Congregation who makes Conscience seemingly to use the Means That man hath an Ecclesiastical Right to come to a Communion such a Right as may Warrand the Minister for admitting of him although he have not a Right to come before God God will challenge the Hypocrite for coming and not the Minister for suffering him to come Yet we are still to consider that tho' this Ecclesiestical Right be not Saving yet it is Real in its kind being founded upon Gods Covenant with the Visible Church and his Ordinance of admitting such therein Now ye may know somewhat by this what we mean by an Ecclesiastical Right it 's That which gives warrand to Church Officers to admit a man to enjoy these Outward Priviledges And so ye may know what we mean by the Visible Church whereof we Dispute There are several differences betwixt Us and the Separatists Concerning the Visible Church First They affirm That there is no Visible Church on Earth But a single Congregation As many as may meet in one place This we refuted in the former Controversie by shewing That in the Church of Jerusalem there were far moe than could meet in one single Congregation yea many particular Congregations And yet are called but One Church Secondly They differ much from us as also from the Truth concerning the power They give to this Visible Church They give them the full power of Church Government and that Independently from any Chuch power on earth This difference also we spoke of in the preceeding Debate And so we shall stand now no longer upon it Thirdly We differ concerning That which gives a Being to the Church Visible They say To make a Society of People a Visible Church so as to have right to partake of the Priviledges there of It is requisite that all the Members of that Society Swear a Covenant one to another wherein they bind themselves to submit one to another in the Lord to walk in all the Ordinances of God and not to leave that Society till liberty be given them by the rest So that tho a man should be never so truely Godly and Gracious yet if he take not such a Covenant and if he Swear not such an Oath He is without the Visible Church He is in the state of a â—agan to live and to die without any Church Ordinance The Judgement of our Church and that of Truth herein is this That wherever a man comes out of one Particular Congregation which we call a Paroch to another By his so doing he comes
alone Because they cannot be sure enough that any others have Grace but only themselves There is a Sixth Argument taken from the similitudes and comparisons under which the Church Visible is holden forth in Scripture which similitudes do shew there is not That strictness required in admitting Members to the Visible Church as the Separatists judge It 's compared to a Draught net cast into the Sea that gathereth fishes good and bad Matth 13. Secondly To a Field wherein is Wheat and Tares ibid. Thirdly It is compared Matth 22. to a Table of Guests where there are some with and some without a Wedding Garment Fourthly It is compared to a House wherein are Vessels of Honour and Dishonour and to a Fold of Sheep and Goats And in every Church there are many Called but few Chosen Now how shall Tares chaff Goats c. give convincing signes of that which they have not Certainly these Similitudes seem to speak That there needs not so much Waling or Picking out in admitting Members to the Visible Church providing they be free of Scandals Once take them in and and then let the Word work on them This great Waleing and Separation will be when the Net comes to the shoar when the great Harvest comes when the Sheep and Goats are severed This much for Arguments for the Truth III. We shall in the next answer Their Objections whereby they labor to prove that the Church Visible should only be made up of such Church members as can give satisfactory Signs of Grace to each other Obj. 1. Their first Objection which is the most specious is taken from these Glorious sâ—â—ies given to the Church in Scripture They are called Saints a chaste â—â—rgine spoused to Christ Sons and Daughters of the Lord Almighty and Christs mystical Body whose Members are all Gracious Now say they seing the Church hath these Stiles in Scripture Should any be joyned to the Church but such who to the uttermost of our discerning have Grace For answer If this Argument conclude any thing it will conclude that none should be Members of the Visible Church but those who have Real Grace for none is a partaker of Christsâ— Mystical Body the Lambs Wife c. But such only Now this our Opposites themselves will not affirm They grant there may be painted Hypocrites in the Church and the Scripture saith the same for Ananias and Saphira Judas and Simon Magus were such and so these places of Scripture if they prove any thing will prove more than They will grant But to answer directly ye would know that in the Church Visible there is a Company of Good and Bad sincere Christians and painted Hypocrites Now the Scripture speaks of them sometimes according to the Better Part and sometimes according to the Worse Part where it speaks of them according to the Better Part it speaks so of them as if there were not One Evil Man among them all hence are these Stiles The Lambs Wise Sons and Daughters of the Almighty Called to be Saints c. They are so according to the Better Part. Again when it speaks of the Visible Church according to the Worse Part it gives such names as if there were not One Good Man among them all it calls them Stif-necked a Rebelious house Children that are Corrupters Now As it were ill Argued to conclude from these places where such stiles are given to the Church that every one within the Church were Corrupters Stif-necked c. and not one seeking God For there he gives them those Stiles from the Evil Part among them So it is also ill argued from these places where the Scripture calls them the Lambs Wife Sons and Daughters of the Almighty c. That they were All of them so And we shall clear it more fully from the Church of Corinth 2 Cor 6 18. They get many Glorious stiles They are called The Sons and Daughters of the Almighty they are called A chast Virgin c. 2 Cor 11 2. Now there were many Schismaticks among them some denying the Resurrection some Vilifying Pauls Doctrine Many who were Contentious Drunkards Fornicators so that these Stiles cannot be Verified of the Members of the whole Church but only of the Better Part that was among them even as men speaking of an Heap of Chaff and Corn will call it An Heap of Corn Not that there is nothing but Corn in it but because the Corn is the Best Part And so the Church Visible wherein is a mixed Company is denominated from the Better Part sometimes in Scripture and called Sons and Daughters of the Lord Almighty and sometimes from the Worse Part and called Stiff-necked c. Obj. II Their second Objection is taken from Act 2. 47. Where it is said And the Lord added unto the Church daily such as should be saved Say they God added no other to the Church but such as would be saved therefore we should adde no others For Answer If any thing follow from this it would follow that none should be added to the Church but these who are Believers really for no other will be saved But this is against themselves And therefore our second Answer is this That the meaning of the words must be That He had a chief care of adding those to the Church who were to be Saved But it is not said that He added no other for the same Chapter sayes He added moe v 41 whole three Thousand were added and yet all those were not to be saved For there were Ananias and Saphira and doubtless many other Hypocrites among them Obj. III. The third Objection is taken from Matth 22. 12. In the Parable concerning the Kings Banquet where he bids his Servants go and invite to the Marriage and finding One wanting the Wedding Garment says he Friend how camest thou in hither not having a Wedding Garment Now say They this is a reproof to those who admitted him to this Priviledge We Answer This is quite contrair to the scope of the Parable if we look to the command v 9 Goe ye therefore into the high-ways c. They are commanded to invite all and to hold out none for want of the Wedding-Garment For that being Inward is only discernable by God Indeed this Parable will shew this much That Ministers may admit People to Communions and yet Christ will come with an after search and find many there whom he will cast that Ministers have admitted Ye ought not to think that every man that comes through a Ministers Tryal is in a good state The place says That Christ found One wanting the Wedding Garment But it sayes not That Ministers should let none come but those that had the Wedding Garment And to shew that this is the scope of the Parable see v 14. There it is said For many are called but few are chosen Ob. IV Their fourth Objection is taken from Rev. 2. 4 5. The Lord speaking there to the Church of Ephesus sayeth Nevertheless I have
somewhat against thee because thou hast left thy first love Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen and repent and and do the first works or else I will come vnto thee quickly and will remove thy Candelstick out of his place c. From whence They argue thus None are to be admitted to the Church who will ruin the Church But all those who cannot convincingly prove their Regeneration will ruin the Church Therefore they ought not to be admitted We Answer That the last part of their Argument is false For there are many Gracious Persons keeping their first love who yet can neither satisfy themselves nor others in the Truth of their Regeneration and that will not ruin the Church Secondly We Answer To the first part of their Argument where they say that every one who hath not real Grace will ruin the Church It is not universally true for then there should be no Hypocrites in the Church at all neither known nor unknown for Hypocrites can do no other thing but that which is tending to the ruin of the Church Now themselves will not say That all Hypocrites are debarred For they admit some such and Scripture saith the contrair in the admission of Annanias and Saphira And so some must be admitted who If God look not more to his own mercy than to their meâ—â—t and more to the respect he hath to others than to them can do nothing but ruin the Church Obj. V. Their last Objection is taken from 2 Tim 3. 5. Having a forme of Goâ—liness but denying the power thereof from such turn away Therefore none are to be admitted but those who can give satisfactory signes of their Regeneration For Answer It is a gross mistake For if we look to the place Those who have only a forme of Godliness he tells what they are High-minded c. v 4. And in the 6 v Subtile Hereticks who lead away the simple Now we say none such ought to be admitted for those are Scandalous But what they say doth not follow For many cannot give satisfactory Signes of their Regeneration who yet are not Gross Livers nor Scandalous nor seduceing Hereticks And so not of the number of those from whom Paul bids Turn away And thus we have Answered the strongest of their Objections IV. Use. I. This Doctrine being thus cleared ye ought not to look on what our Opposites hold in this Point as a matter of small moment neither ought ye to suffer your selves to be deceived with the pretence of strictness with which they cover it It is a Doctrine that hath fearful Consequences For by this the third part of the best Churches that ever were shall be put in no better case than Pagans themselves to live without all ordinances their Children without Baptism And this will hold off many who have true Grace for how many are there even of those who cannot give convincing signs of Grace either to themselves or others By this Rule mens Consciences shall still be held in an Uncertainty whether they may stay members of such a Church or not because they can hardly be satisfied whether all in it have convincing signs of Grace or not Now the Judgment of our Opposits is that if the Rule be not keeped Conscientiously Christians ought to Separate By this Rule an insupportable Burthen is put on Christians not only to examine themselves but also the inward state of others By this Rule all the Churches that ever were in the dayes of the Prophets Christs Apostles or in the Primitive Times have been in the mist all living and dying without the Visible Church and so without Baptism and so as Pagans As also this shew of strictness beyond whatever God hath commanded doth ever end in looseness as appears by the Separatists present practise for what ever they speak against the looseness of other Churches that we are but a mixture of Drunkards and loose prophane Livers yet there is as great looseness in their own Churches as in any other for they make no scruple to admit Hereticks Covetous Vain Proud Boasters almost of all sorts if so be they agree with them in Principles against Presbyterians This Rule puts men in an overweening conceit of themselves others are nothing to them all are unclean or at best but civil natural moral Men but they are the Godly Saints and what not Now that Doctrine which in its natural Consequence puts People to overvalue themseves and undervalue others is certainly not of God This rule of theirs makes way for infinite Janglings and carrying on of self interests under pretence of Holiness for when the Rule is That which every particular man thinks Signs of Grace Such is the Corruption of the best that it will not be applyed to all alike To some they will be too strict to others more lax as affection caries Untill at last they think all good enough who are for Their Way And all others but Natural Worldly and Carnal who are not so I may say that this hath been one of the most unhappy Doctrines that ever the Devil hatched For it is that whereby Sathan hath carried on his design mainly these years by past Many such Deceivers crying up strictness whereby they have made themselves to be respected by some and terrible to others while under this pretence they have born down Christ Truth and Holiness I speak not this to countenance Looseness nor to give a dash to holy Strictness It is our sin and we are plagued for it that we have not walked according to our Rule Yet I love no further Strictness than what Christ Commands Let us stretch out our Arms to invite sinners to give Outward Obedience and then when they are in let us Hew them with the Word and Discipline This was Christs way And his Apostles way as we have proved So when Separatists say to you That there are such sinful mixtures in your Churches that an honest man is polluted to come among them And so it is better to stay in your Chambers with a few of a gracious temper and let the rest run to the Devil Tell them Christ and his Apostles made no such separation And ye desire to be no stricter than They were Only this is not to plead for our coming short of Christs Rule in our practise That Scandals are too easily past That so many Ignorants are admitted to the Lords Table is our sin and so not to be pleaded for This for the first Head of Separation Head II. No Separation from a True Church or Gods worship in the Church because of the sins of Fellow-worshipers WE are now to speak of the Second Head Concerning Separation from true Churches and the true worship of God in them because of the sins of Fellow-worshipers I. That which our Adversaries hold concerning this is That the presence of wicked men at Ordinances do defile the Ordinances to the Godly Therefore say they where ever there is any corruption in a Church
among them But after all the Apostle Tho he reproves them very sharply yet he no where sayes Ye that are Godly stay away from joyning in Worship because of such mens joyning But on the contrair he approves their coming together to go about the Ordinances Only reproving the wrong way they came in So Chap 11. v 18. First of all when ye come together in the Church I hear there be divisions among you And v 20. When you come together therefore unto one place c. He doth not reprove their coming together but suppones it as a thing Lawful only he reproves them for their Divisions So in the Church of Galatia There was much corruption among them they were Bewitched with Heretical Doctrine O Foolish Galatians who hath Bewitched you c. Cap 3. v 1 They had begun in the Spirit but were like to end in the Flesh v 3. In the Church of Ephesus were many who had fallen away from their first Love Revel 2 1. The Church of Sardis Revel 3 1. Did Tollerate prophane persons such as defiled their Garments And yet we never read the Spirit of God commanding to Separat from worship because of them Indeed he reproves them sharply for their Corruption For their falling away from their first love For Their Tollerating Prophane wicked men But he sayes not All ye that are Godly turn your backs upon that Church Make up a new Church of your Own But directly approves their joyning together in what was right So it is clear that Separation from the Ordinances is no more to be Tollerated under the New Testament than it was under the Old Arg IV. Our Fourth Argument to prove the point is this The Sins of wicked Men only defile the Worship to themselves Therefore not to others We shall find for this two places of Scripture Matth. 22. In the Parable of the Guests coming into the Kings Supper there is one that wants a Wedding Garmant verse 12. The Master of the Feast finds him out and sayes Friend How comest Thou hither And he was found Speechless The Master of the Feast sayes not All ye Guests are defiled because this man sits with you As should have been said If his presence had defiled the Worship to them But only he reproves the Man himself The sin is thine and thou shall bear the blame of it The Second place is 1 Cor. 11. 29. He that eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to himself He sayes not He eateth and drinketh Damnation to all but to himself It would necessarily follow according to this Doctrine that he did eat Judgment to all If so be the presence of the wicked Man did defile the Ordinance or make it sinful to the rest that Communicate with him And therefore in the preceeeding words it is said Let a man examine himself c. He sayes not when ye are coming to the Table Let everyone of you examine your Neighbour Which would necessarily follow If the presence of the Wicked Man did defile the Ordinance to the rest but all he sayes is Let every one examine himself c. It 's true the permitting of a wicked person to come to the Communion is the sin of the Church Guides but it is not the sin of Fellow Communicants seeing he is admitted to Communicate with them For He only defiles the Worship to Himself Arg. V. Our last Argument to prove this Point is That from this Doctrine of our Opposits it would follow That the Dignity and Worth of Ordinances did depend on Instruments or upon those that are partakers of the Ordinance If so be that the sins of the Instruments or of Fellow-Worshipers did defile the Worship Now this is most absurd The Dignity of Ordinances depends on him whose they are The Word of God however Preached Is His Word It s true we are ready to cast at the Word because of Instruments But whoever he be that Preaches The Word is the Word of God and worthy to be received And so the Sacraments Whoever they be that joyn with Me in them lose not their worth and efficacy to Me who am seeking Christ in them though worthless men have their hand at them And the reason is I do not Communicate with them in what they do wrong Let God and Them reckon for that The root of my Communion is Christ In so far as They lay hold on Christ I Communicate with them In so far as they do otherwise I do not The wicked man professes Communion with Christ and Seals up an Outward Fellowship with the Visible Church I Communicate with him in That But in so far as he doth this Hypocritically I do in as far separate from him And this much for the Arguments Confirming the Truth That the presence of Wicked men doth desile the Ordinances to none but to Themselves III. In the next place we come to bring to the touch-stone the Arguments they use against the Truth we shall shortly propound the most plausible of them and take them off Obj 1 The First Objection is grounded on the 2 Cor. 6 17. Wherefore come out from among them and be ye separate c. This is the stongest of their Arguments The Lord commands the Corinthians to come from among them and Separate And therefore say they when there are wicked men coming together with the Godly the Godly ought to separate from them But to shew you the vanity of the Argument we shall Answer it by reading out the rest of the verse For it is clear what the Apostle aims at Be ye separate saith the Lord and touch not the unclean thing c. He bids them only Separate from Sinful Actions and not from Lawful Duties That ye may see yet further the vanity of this Reason Know It was the custom in the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 10. When Idolaters would invite some of their Christian neighbours they would go with them and eat with them at their Idol Feasts and they thought they might lawfully do it because they knew their Idols were not true Gods and so by their eating they intended no worship to the Idol as these Idolaters did who did eat with them but did it only to satisfy their hunger and keep up common Friendship Now Paul discharges them from this kind of Communion and this is it he points at here Be separate Do not meddle with their Idol Feasts because it was indeed Communion with them in their Idolatry And so it doth not follow because Paul bids the Corinthians be separate from Heathens in doing a thing sinful That therefore he forbids Christians to joyn in a lawful Worship with the Church of Christ. Obj. II. Their Second Objection is taken from Rev 18 4. And I heard another voice from heaven saying come out of her my People that ye be not partakers of her sins and that ye receive not of her Plagues But this place is pitifully misapplyed to the purpose For its evident
that the Apostle John is there speaking of whoorish Rome and is commanding all Gods People to Separate from the Antichristian Church Now let any judge if that be not loose Reasoning We are commanded to Separate from Rome who hath overturned the foundation of Religion Worships the Creature instead of the Creator therefore we are to Separate from Christs true and Purest Churches and Gods Worship in them If so be prophane men be keeped in them It is a senseless Consequence Obj. III. Their Third Objection against the Truth is taken from 1 Cor â— 11. But now I have written unto you not to keep company c. Say they We are forbidden to eat our ordinary meat with wicked men and far more we are forbidden to eat at the Lords Table with them To this we Answer That indeed it is the shame of Christian Churches and our sin that Scandalous and Ignorant Persons are admitted to the Lords Table But when they are admitted partly through the neglect of Ministers and partly through abounding corruptions It doth not follow that every private Christian is to cast himself out of the Church because wicked men are admitted As to this place here spoken of It s true every tender Christian is forbidden to use Familiar Society with Fornicators But it is not simply forbidden as if it were unlawful at all times to eat with them For even Paul himself eats with Heathens Act 27. 35. So the thing here forbidden is That the Lords People should not use intimat Society with wicked men yet so as when they cannot get it eschewed It is lawful both to eat and drink with them As put the case we could not get it otherwise it were lawfuâ— for us to eat with them following Pauls practice And so it follows in the matter of the Lords Table If it be in Ministers power to hold them back if they do it it is well If not it doth not follow that private Christians who have no power to debarr them and so cannot get eating with them eschewed without neglecting of a duty are bound to Separate Obj. IV. Their Fourth Objection is from 1 Cor 5. 6 Know ye not that a litle leaven leaveneth the whole lump Scandalous men infect the Church And the Church being infected infects the Worship and so if I come to the Worship it is infected to me and I do sin Now this is a Consequence far from Pauls words a litle leaven sayes he leaveneth c. Therefore cast out the Incestous man But he doth not say If he be not put out cast out your selves As for that they say that prophane men infect the Worship It is without ground It s true prophane men oftimes infect these among whom they live But they do not infect the worship For the way that prophane men infect these among whom they live is not Physical As the Pest infects every thing it toucheth but they infect by their evil example And so a prophane man may infect another man but by his evil example cannot infect the Worship because the Worship is not carried away with evil example as a man is And so if I can keep my self from following their example the worship is pure and clean to me Obj. V. Their last Objection is say they My coming to the Table with them is a countenancing of them in their profanation of the holy things So I partake with them in their sins say Amen to what they do And therefore better for me to withdraw We Answer this is a plausible Argument to deter People that are tender but when tryed it will be found weak For if so be this Argument do hold for Separating from the Lords Table it will conclude also that we should not hear Preaching with them for our hearing Preaching with them is a countenancing of them as well as our coming to the Sacrament with them And the wicked man profaneth the holy things in the one as well as in the other And by this it should follow that Jesus Christ should have been polluted which were Blasphemy to speak by His Preaching to Prophane multitudes For in That He countenanced them Therefore Secondly For a more full Answer we say Worshipping with them is not a consenting to their sin except it were in our power to hold them out but not otherwise Thou doest say Amen to what they do profess that They are serving God doing the commanded Duty But not to Their Hypocritical Way in doing of It Did Christ say Amen to the Pharisees way of Hearing although He Preached to Them So neither doest thou But as is already said Thou approves of Them in so far as They do the Commanded Duty But that it is done Impenitently Thou by Thy joyning in the Worship approves it not This for their Objections IV. For Use Our first is this To regrate that there is so much occasion given to this Error in the Churches of Christ We may regrate that there are so many of the Members of the Church Prophane and Wicked And that People walk not like Their Holy Calling We may regrate that the Officers of the Church Ministers and Elders do not Purge out Scandalous Persons Do not Labour to find Them and Censure Them and debarr Them from Communions But most of all it is to be regrated That many of those who should Purge out others Their Life is such that They deserve to be Purged out as Scandalous Themselves For this cause it is that the Lord threatens to Rent the Church And if He should let men arise among our selves under pretence of Pious strictness to cast at Our Worship We behoved to say Just is the Lord Although on the other hand it is no excuse but a fearful sin to Them who by Their carriage Rent and undoe the Church because of some Corruptions that are in it Use II. The Second Use is That ye would not think all alike Guilty that may encline to this Error of Separating from Lawful Worship because of wicked Men's being admitted to it It 's true there may be some Piously strict that upon the one hand loath at that which is Good when they cannot get it but in wicked Mens company And upon the other hand because they cannot live without the Ordinances therefore They encline to make up a Litle Church of Good Men of Their Own choise By which means the Devil takes advantage of Their zeal to make them dishonour God by runing to the other extreme Now although the Humour of such should not be given way to yet those who encline this way from a desire of strictness are much to be Pitied But on the other hand we are not to think so of the Ring-leaders of this Error It hath been found by experience that such have been more carried on by a conceit of their Own Holiness than any true Love to Holiness it self It hath been usually found in Heady men who had a mind to make a Rupture in tâ—e Church that
this Breach should be under our Hand A Third Thing to make our present Division weighty is That it is the greatest Weight which Gods People up and down the Land lyeth under it 's a Weight beyond all other Weights and Sufferings And if it be their Weight it ought for many Reasons to be much more ours Fourthly Our Divisions and Courses taken for carrying them on hath given a deeper Inward Wound to the Government of Christ's House than all the Outward Power of the World could have done The leading of us by pairs to a Stake for our adhering to the Government and Constitution of our Mother Church our Imprisonment Banishment the laying of Congregations desolate for that Cause could not have shaken the minds of many in relation to these Truths so much as our own Divisions and Practices following thereupon have done An Inward Disease is more dangerous and weakeneth more than Outward Blows Fifthly Our Division may and ought to be the more weighty the more of Judgement is in it And certainly there is much of Wrath and Judgement in it It is a judicial stroak For all see it's Evil the most part are weary of it and yet cannot fall upon the right way for putting an end to it Yea no course hitherto essayed for Union but it hath proved an hightning of our Division And so it will until it come to that hight which God in His just Judgement will have it at However it 's clear that Wrath is in it much of Judgement is in it and that should make it weighty We side one against another and God is siding against us both Sixthly This should make our Division have a particular Weight with us in this Synod That we drink most of its bitter Fruits We are the Stage whereon this cruel Dividing Spirit acts its Game most None in time past so United as We but none now so Divided And even this may give Us sad thoughts of our Accession to the beginning and Fomenting of this woeful Rent Our Third Use is of Direction also following upon the former If Union be such a good if Division such an evil And if our Divisions be so much to be bewailed Then we ought to have some thoughts towards the making up of our breach there ought to be some guardings against these evils which may follow upon it until it be made up The Prosecuting of this Use as it is the most part of our Work so it is the most difficult and I fear also considering our present Distempers and deep Engagements lying on every one almost to his Own Way that for the time it shall be but Fruitless Yet being led to it by the word of Truth and not knowing when the Lord may make it have it 's own Fruits whether now or afterwards I shall with the Lords help adventure on it And therefore in pressing this Use I shall speak to three things 1. I shall show what things I conceive as necessary to be eyed by us while we aim at Union if so we would have Our aim's effectual 2. Because a Compleat Union is not soon to be expected I shall give some Directions for the Management of Our Differences so as the Church of Christ may have the less hurt by them at least Lastly I shall propound some Considerations to People for preventing of stumbling and making Shipwrack upon our Divisions As to the First I shall mention Six things we should carry alongs with us while we aim at Union Unto all which I premit One General as tending to give Life to all the rest without which all our Endeavours for Union though otherwise never so regular though guided with never so much Prudence though prosecuted with never so much zeal will prove ineffectual and it 's this That both Ministers and People should be more in seeking after God's Face So long as we remain at a distance from him no wonder we grope as Blind-men in the dark and cannot come nigh one to another It 's granted by all That Jesus Christ hath much withdrawn from the Spirits of his People There is not so much of Life conveyed by Preaching not such access granted in Prayer no such delight in Means no such joy in his presence This is granted by all and in a manner regrated by all but lamented by few And fewer yet make it their work to have the Lord returning and shewing himself as sometimes he hath done And until this be we can look for the less success of any attempts made for the removal of this our sore stroak But if God would return It were then easy work One glimpse of him filling the House with his Glory would scatter the Clouds of mutual Jealousies make us as men ashamed steal from all our Dividing Principles would put to silence all our turbulent Distempers and make us blush at our proud and selfish Animosities O! for more of God then would all be well But I come to the particulars to be eyed by us while we aim at Union First It is not to be expected that Our Union will begin at our Uniting in Judgment In that Question about which our unhappy Differences began It was the Judgment of some from the beginning that the standing at a distance in other things until we should be united in That should put Us at a further distance even in That Our Union in Practice first will be the shortest cut to bring us unto Union of Judgement about that Question if ever we shall come to it at all Hence publick Debatings before the People and such as tend to make others odious who are not of our Way is not the way for Union Such work irritateth but convinceth not It 's true no Truth may be quit for Union No not the least Quisquilâ—a veritatâ—â— praetiosissima The very refuse of Truth is most precious Yet that the positive asserting of some Truths may be forborn for Peace's sake I believe is granted by All and there is good reason for it Only there is one exception here necessary to wit when Truth is impugned then there is a necessity to speak for it at least till there be such a Testimony given to that Opposed Truth as may â—e rested upon And in this Case some may be made unwillingly to speak as the Apostle Paul was once in defence of his own Estimation 2 Cor. 12. 11. I am become a fool in glorying ye have compelled me for I ought to have been commended of you As if he should say God knows I have no more delight to speak of this subject than ye have to hear me but your Indiscretion forceth me to it A Second thing to be carried along with us while we aim at Union is no union of this kind of which the Doctrine speaks can be expected in the Church except there be an Union in one Supreme Representative land that such an one whose Authority we may stand under for the present As it is in the Civil
State so is it in the Church as to this purpose No Union can be there as of one actually incorporate Body except it be under one and the same Supreme Rulers So is it in the Church So long as there is no agreement about One and the same Supreme Representative under whose Authority we may stand for the present But one part standeth for it's Authority another is contrary unto it or setting up another against it In this case the matter is clear there is no compleat Union but a fixed Schism or at the best a strong tendency unto it A Third thing to be eyed is If so Our Union must be under one Supreme Representative then such ways of Union will do no good as carry not alongs the Body An Union if not with the Body instead of healing doth widen the Rent A resolution or desire to unite with a few not caring for the rest will not produce an union I mean of the Church altho it may be of a stronger Party in the Church These few would possibly as gladly unite as others would have them if it were not evidently a strengthening of the Breach Fourthly Yet a Part ought to labour with the Body for condescending as low as warrantably can be for Peace's sake Only a Caveat must be here They are so to deal with the Body to condescend for Vnion as to beware of making a new Rupture in the Body upon their not granting For that were in a desperate way to make a new Rent because others will not take Our way for removing of the Old Fifthly If we desire an hearty cordial Vnion it would be endeavoured without rubbing upon the Credit 1. Of Persons 2. Of Parties 3. Of Ordinances If the Credit of all can be held up it 's well He is no friend to Vnion that would endeavour the contrair But if some must suffer Love to the Publick and Zeal for God will teach That the former is to yeild to the latter viz. Persons to Parties and the Credit both of Persons and Parties yea and of both Parties themselves if need be are to stoop for upholding the Authority of Divine Ordinances A litle of this Self-denial would do much good But how litle of it is there to be found Sixthly Dividing Principles and such as tend of their own nature to obstruct Union should be abandoned There is One Principle often spoken of by some and now made more publick which if maintained in Our judgment will close the door upon Union in hast to wit That it is unlawful to sit in an Assembly with those who have enacted persecution against the Godly And this in the sence of the Propounders as it is expresly tho injuriously applyed by them is as much as to say It is unlawful to joyn in any Assembly made up for the most part of those who acted in and approved of Our late Controverted Assemblies Now if it be unlawful to joyn in an Assembly made up for the most part of such why not also unlawful to join in a Synod or in a Presbytry likewise made up of such yea and to join at a Communion Table where the most part are such And indeed some of the People chiefly draw out their Principle to this full length A Principle which to say no worse of it striketh at the very throat of Peace and if stood to makes it desperat and so I hope is and will be disowned by all who cordially pretend to Peace and Union in the Church These I conceive and many moe should be eyed by Us in Our aiming at Union if we would have Our endeavours effectual But because a Compleat Union in an ordinary way is not to be so soon expected I shall in the next place give Two Directions for managing our Differences So as the Church of Christ may have less hurt by them at least The first Direction is That we ought to guard against these Tentations which Our Standing Division may readily make way for Whereof I shall mention Three The First Tentation is this An oversight of every other fault almost whether in Ministers or Professors providing they be true to the Party A Party is a dangerous thing and in nothing more dangerous than in this That it driveth men if not all the more tender to take fidelity unto the Party to be the prime if not the only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and badge of honesty and enclines them to look on all other things whether Corrupt Principles or loose Practices as excusable Infirmities A woeful Tentation and destructive both to Truth and Piety And therefore ought so much the more to be guarded against on both hands A Second Tentation is The secret wishing after and rejoycing in the Slips one of another An Evil so woeful that David complains to God of it even in his avowed Enemies Ps. 38. 16. When my Foot slippeth they magnify themselves against me And Jeremiah complaineth of it in his false Friends Ch. 20. v. 10. They watched for my halting And yet an Evil that even Good men if once engaged in Parties will have a Battel with A Third Tentation upon Our standing Divided and which is also to be guarded against is A bending of Our selves to the outmost of Light and possibly beyond it for strengthning of our selves to the doing of these things in relation to these who now Rule which not long since we would have abhorred both in our selves and others It is very possible that as Gifts blind the Eyes of the Wise Exod. 23. So the seeming advantage unto that which we conceive Truth may draw out somewhat like an Approbation to such like Work from those of our own Judgement and if these do approve it is the less matter think we that others do disapprove But we ought to remember there are others to sift our Actions Forreign Churches abroad our own Conscience being sober and settled and above all God the Judge of All. A Second Direction for managing our Differences is That we ought not to be so taken up with others as to take our Eye off from guarding against that which is Satan's main design against the Church of Christ at this time Satan does as a subtile Warriour labour to raise a Mutiny among the Forces which should oppose him that while they are wrangling one with another he may carry his Point without stroke of Sword Being to insist a little on this Direction I shall first speak to what I conceive to be Satan's main design against the Church at this time 2 I shall give some Directions to manage our Differences So as not to further this his main design nor yet to be short-coming in our Duty against it And First For taking up what is Satan's great Design we shall in a word or two lay before you a wonderful Contexture as it were of God's Wisdom and Satan's Malice since the first beginnings of the Christian Church even untill now There is no Truth almost but Satan's
Malice hath set it self in some one Age of the Church or other to bear it down And God's Wisdom hath still overshot Satan making use of his Malice in opposing Truth for the further clearing of that Truth which he intendeth most to obscure and darken Satan's first design in the first Ages of the Christian Church was to beat down that great Fundamental Truth of Christs Divinity But after long debate this Truth was fully cleared by the means of several Worthies whose Spirits the Lord stirred up in these Ages to mantain That so much opposed Truth Satan therefore being beat off this strong Fort of Christianity retired a little and laboured next to bear down the Truth of Christs Humanity But the Truâ—h hereof the more it was opposed growing the brighter The Lord making Light break up convincingly in the midst of Hot Debates Satan retired a little further yet and bent his whole force in the following Ages against the Vnity of Christs Person And next against the Distinction of his Natures But Satan not prevailing this Way either he set himself to undermine Christ Jesus in all His Offices 1. By setting up the Infallibility of Popes and Councils against His Prophetical Office 2. The Doctrine of Merit in the matter of Justification against His Priestly Office 3. The Doctrine of Free-will and power of it in Man's Conversion to God against the Inward part of His Kingly Office And for the Outward part of it he set himself to wrest the Scepter of Christ's Government from His own Office-bearers and put it in the Hands of Popes Cardinals Arch-bishops and Bishops But after long Contest Truth is now aboundantly cleared and confirmed in all these Thus as One saith the Lord Jesus hath been content to dispute His Ground by Inches with the Devil until almost He hath beat him out of all only Satan hath no will to quit it so it seems to us he is now giving his last and sorest On-set on which in a desperate way he is to venture all wherein his design is evident to cast all in a Confusion First By trampling under foot the Outward Court of God's House I mean the Constitution of His Church Visible by the Doctrine of Renting and Separation And next to deprive the Catholick Church Visible and all Her considerable Members of all Government by the Doctrine of Independancy which confineth the whole Power of the Keys within the narrow circuit of a Particular Congregation whereby all the Particular Churches are left as so many small Boats in a storm to dash one against another having no Intrinsical authoritative Mean to make them steer an even Course without rushing one upon another Thus Satan aimeth to cast all in confusion that he may undo all What in former Ages he could not do in destroying Gospel Truths by Piece-meal and one by one he intends now to do it by whole sale and all at once For if once the bottom of the Ship be split and the Rudder broken the precious Ware contain'd in it can hardly be preserved Now that Satan's main design is to deface these Truths which are about the Constitution and Government of the Visible Church that thereby all may be covered with Confusion appeareth In that not only the method God hath hitherto keeped doth point at it There being few other Points of Truth to clear but also the thing speaketh for it self the main speat of the Errors of the time running directly contrary to these So that certainly as God intends to clear Truth in these so it 's not the least part of Satan's main design against the Church of Christ at this time to obscure Truth in these This then being Satan's design I shall in the next place give some Directions how to manage our Differences so as not to further this main design nor yet be short coming in our Duty against it Of which Directions I shall reckon Three First We ought to examine Opinions and Practices even tho by us conceived just and lawful How far they may contribute for furtherance of that Design and in that respect should be more circumspect and sparing at least in medling with them Thus the Apostle Paul Gal. 2. 3. would not Circumcise Titus tho Circumcision at that time was a thing Lawful as appears from his Circumcising of Timothy Act. 16. 3. much about the same time and yet he would not Circumcise Titus The reason is v. 4. There were False Brethren present who would have taken advantage of That his Practice to confirm themselves in their opposition to that Truth which Satan intended most to bear down at that time to wit The freedom of the Christian Church from the yoke of Mosaical Ceremonies therefore he thinks himself bound to abstain from that practice tho in it self Lawful and which in some other cases would have been necessary And that lest by That his Practice he should have been advantageous to Satan's main design against the Church of Christ at that time It 's true Truth remains still Truth however Satan abuse it yet seing all grant that the venting of some Truths at sometimes is unseasonable and so for that time may be forborn And seing it would seem that nothing makes a Truth more unseasonable than when it is known that Satan will make bad use of it for bearing down that Truth which God intends mainly to clear It will follow that the venting of such a Truth ought to be at least with great modesty and much holy Circumspection if not altogether forborn for that time For Application of this Direction I will not say much Only I shall propose it to your serious thoughts Whether or not the late Proceedings in opposition to the Supreme Judicatories of the Church together with the Tenets whereupon they are grounded which for Peace's cause and from unwillingness to give the least occasion of Irritation I forbear to name whether or not I say These even supposing the Lawfulness of the Practices and Truth of the Opinions seem not to have been unseasonable for the time as being apt to be abused for leading People upon the Errors of the time Such as the Contempt of Ecclesiastical Judicatories Quarrelling the Constitution and Separating from the Fellowship of our Church I fear much it will be hard for People not acquainted with subtile Distinctions to conceive that any Corruption amongst those with whom we converse can make Civil Fellowship with them Unlawful but it must make Church Fellowship especially Communion-table Fellowship with the same Persons to be as much if not much more Unlawful But I forbear not being without hopes but that Brethren Gracious and Wise will ponder what they hold and what they practise when they see bad use made of it beyond their own Intention and Purpose There is one thing further I shall say for application chiefly upon the other hand and it is this Such Practices ought to be eschewed as may prove unjust and unnecessary Irritations unto People to
preventing their stumbling and making Shipwrack upon the present Divisions The First Consideration is this The Church in all Ages hath been afflicted with Divisions from the Apostles time even till now yea in the very time when the Apostles were alive themselves We read Act. 15. 39. That two great Apostles Paul and Barnabas were so divided that they parted one from another The Word made use of in the Original to express their Contention signifieth The high fit of a Fever a Paroxism It is the very word The Spirit of the Lord thereby insinuating That their Contention cast them as it were in the rage of a Fever and yet the matter whereabout the contest fell out was not very great Much like That which was the Fountain of our woful Rent to wit whether Mark who had before deserted the Work should be again employed in it The one would have him the other would not hence they part Company And what Divisions fell out amongst the primitive Churches almost presently after they were planted by the Apostles The Epistles of Paul to the Romans Corinthians Galatians c. make it very clear And for the times following the History of the Church doth abundantly testify That from the Apostles Death to this very Age the Church hath still been shaken with Rents and Schisms in some one place or other and these sometimes even amongst the most Gracious Men of those times as Augustine Hierom Zuinglius Luther and Calvin Together with several others whose Names if it were pertinent I might recite So that ye are not to stumble at the present Divisions There is no new or strange thing befallen Us The Church of Christ in all Ages hath been tryed with the like A Second Consideration to prevent stumbling at our present Divisions is That God hath foretold Church Divisions should be 1 Cor. 11. 19. There must be also Heresies among you And he hath not only foretold that simply they must be but so aâ— he should have an holy hand in them Matth. 10. 35. I am come to set a man at variance against his Father and the Daughter against her Mother So that he hath an Holy hand in Church Divisions he permits them to be and for wise Reasons whereof I shall reckon Three 1. He permits Divisions to be That Men's Spirits may be thereby tryed So 1 Cor. 11. 19. There must be Heresies among you And wherefore That they which are approved may be made manifest There is a great deal of evil lurking in Peoples Spirits Unsound Principles in some Seeds of loose practices in others Pride Conceit and other unmortified Distempers in a third sort and Divisions in a Church decipher those 2. Divisions are sent for the clearing of Truths This as we shewed before has been Gods method from the beginning when he had a point of Truth to clear he hath suffered men to contradict it and the more it hath been contradicted it hath still grown the brighter 3. He permits Divisions to be that in his Holy Justice they may be a stumbling block to the wicked If thou think there are so many Opinions and so many Religions that thou 'l care for no Religion until wiser People than thou agree among themselves Then Church Divisions and difference of Opinions in Gods just judgment are thy Destruction A third Consideration to prevent stumbling at our present Divisions is That some good use may be made of them in the mean time I shall first speak to some Bad Uses of them which ye are to eschew And then to speak to some Good Uses of them which ye are to seek after 1. The First bad Use of the present Divisions is From them to take occasion of Rejoycing that Ministers are set together by the Ears A woeful Use Thou rejoycest in that which is the Gospels shame the Godly's weight and God's dishonour and God shall rejoyce in thy shame and ruin another day for it 2. Another bad Use is Because of them to wish That the work of Reformation had never been begun as having such ills following upon it An use which the carnal Israelites did often make of their present strait Would God say they we had never come out of Egypt An Use which speaks That for all thy professed adherence to the work of God and Covenant yet thou hast never thought upon it as His work else a blast of Affliction could not have put thee so soon out of love with it 3. The giving over of your selves to a Spirit of Loosness it being a lawless time Some Ministers may possibly make this Use of the present Division but it is a woeful Use and such as will deceive God may of purpose have sent such a time that thou may without fear fill up thy Cup and so be taken course with afterwards for all together 4. It is a bad Use of them to observe only which of the wayes do afford most advantage where the Sun of Prosperity is most like to shine that ye may strike in there but with a resolution if the Wind change ye will change also A bad Use and unworthy of a Man much more of a Christian Man whose Profession is to be ruled by Conscience Scripture and Reason and not by self-interest and advantage 5. The last bad Use of the present Division is To blow at the Coal making it your work what ye can search out and scrape together from the carriage of these who differ that ye may vent it and make them odious by it A base uncharitable and unchristian Use. A thing so woeful that David complains of it in his very Enemies Ps. 56. 5 6. Every day they wrest my words all their thoughts are against me for evil They gather themselves together they hide themselves they mark my steps when they wait for my Soul This is a thing I may say which hath had it's own hand in the hightning and continuance of our Differences if that which Solomon saith Prov. 26. 20. be true as it is most true Where there is no tale-bearer the strife ceaseth These now are bad Uses which ye are to eschew but out of the Eater cometh meat there is some good Use may be made of our present Divisions and that ye should seek after The first good Use is That from these separating stirs ye would labour to be convinced of abused Vnion Our Division speaketh that Union hath not been improven aright neither amongst Ministers nor Professors there hath been much of carnal Joy triffling over of time but little and too too little of God in our Fellowship And therefore in His just Judgement He hath given us some other thing to set our Teeth on edge with ye should be convinced of this and be humbled for it A Second good use of our present Division is Ye should press so much the more after Peace with God If strife with men be so wasting and wearisome what will Gods feud be If peace with men be so hard to
get seek the more of peace with God Seek the more of his smileings the more thou meets with of men's frownings seek the more warmness in him the more of Coldness thou meets with from men seek the more of Counsel and Direction from God the more Reservedness thou finds in others from whom thou was wont to get sweet Counsel This were a sweet use of our present Divisions An Exposition of Sampsons Riddle indeed For thus Out of the eater should come meat and out of the bitter should come sweet Thirdly By these Divisions ye may discover much evil in your spirit that was before undiscovered what a deal of Pride not enduring to be opposed What Carnal Emulation at the good of others What rejoying at their slips What eagerness of spirit in the pursuit of things of little worth when more excellent are neglected What violent Eruptions of unmortified nature bending after courses unwarrantable for making of our Point good except Grace did bear them down Ye find such a discovery of some things such as may make you abase your selves before God Fourthly Our present Divisions may confirm us in the Main and settle us more than ever in the belief of those so much opposed Truths concerning the Government of Christ's House and Constitution of Visible Churches and that because those who are divivided and oppose one another much yet for the most part do agree in these If a mans house stand after the shaking of many strong winds he concluds the foundation is good This is a strong Argument for Truth that our Divisions Factions and oppositions one against another do not shake our minds in relation to it Fifthly Our present Divisions may be a spur to more diligence in dealing with God for helping foreward of his so much retarded Work He is an unhappy man who when the Ship of the Church is at the point of shipwrak will not use violence against his own Laziness and improve his interest with God that he would help his tossed Church at a dead lift Oh! that there were more of this Use The Generation of those that seek God are fallen asleep many are the means that God hath used to rouze us up We have had the Calm Voice of the Word and that hath not done it We have had the Thunder-claps of Sad sufferings from without and that hath not done it And now the Earth-quakes of heart Divisions within have shaken All And if God prevent not will overturn All. And if this awake us not Oh! Lord what will thou do next I shall now shut up all with the words of my Text Now I beseech you brethren by the name of Our Lord Iesus Christ that ye all speak the same thing and that there be no divisions among you but that ye be perfectly joyned together in the same mind and in the same Iudgment I know as matters now stand This and all we have spoken from it may prove but threshing on the water as to the thing by us intended Yea and very like it may be made use of for the hightning of prejudices and further increase of Our strife and if so be I am at a point what to Answer That even this will confirm unto me the Truth of what I have said to wit That Our Divisions are an Evil much to be lamented It is a Judicial stroak in so far as nothing can be said for the removal of it but thereby one way or other it taketh strength It is a strong fire that when water is poured upon it blazeth up the higher It is a dangerous Disease in the natural body which is so prevâ—lent as to turn the very medicine applyed unto the nature of that vicious Humour whereby the disease is further fed and nourished And yet tho all this should be which God avert I have another thing to say and it is the ground of my comfort as to Our present sad stroke That Jesus Christ who hath found out the way to make God and man One when they were at variance hath ways enough to reconcile us one to another tho Our Divisions were at a greater hight than yet they 're come to And if he hath pleasure in us he will make us One tho it should be on our own Expenses He may possibly do it by sending us to one Common Goal or some such like thing For our adhering to the Cause of God Covenant and precious Liberties of the Kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ That precious Trust committed unto us by him and transmitted unto us by our Zealous and Faithful Predecessors who in the obtaining and preservation of them loved not their lives unto the death If He have pleasure in us he will make us unite and if no other thing will do it he will make such like work as this do it And it 's very like such like work may be ere long For shall we look on our mother Church oppressed and bereaved of these Priviledges which are left unto her by her Lord and husband in his Latter Will and Testament and shall we not so much as in ways competent for us upon all hazards resent it Shall stronger Powers usurp upon the Church's Right and in the mean time shall we by our mutual janglings encourage them to go on in this woful Work Or shall we resent these wrongs the less or secretly approve of them becasue possibly that which is our own design for weakning one another is thereby promoved God forbid Now the God of Peace establish our Peace with himself and give us Peace one with another in himself A SERMON PREACHED AT KILWINNING Immediatly before the giving of the COMMUNION Being a Preparation Sermon in order thereunto The second SERMON PSALM 51. 6. Behold thou desirest Truth in the inward Parts And in the hidden part thou shalt make me to know Wisdom THIS Psalm is one of Davids Penitential Psalms wherein his Conscience being first awakned and made sensible of his Sin He pleadeth hard for God's Mercy Grace and especially for the Pardon of his Sin which Petition He insists upon most and doth again and again inculcate it The Words read in the First Part of this Verse hold out somewhat which God mainly called for and David aimed at as a necessary Ingredient in his Penitential Address unto God Without which nothing he could do in any Duty of God's Service or particularly in This which He is presently about would have been acceptable to God and which being obtain'd and in exercise all He did was the more savoury and therefore He maketh mention of it in the midst of His Prayer and present Exercise that thereby He may both mind His Heart of the great necessity there was to have it and also may chear up his weighted Spirit somewhat in confidence that He would be accepted of God in His present Address seing He had something of that necessary Ingredient which God doth so much require desire and accept of The thing
it self is expressed by the Word Truth Behold thou desirest Truth in the inward parts c. Whereby is not meaned Truth in the Judgement opposed to Error nor Truth in People's Words opposed to the Sin of Lying and speaking Untruth But it is Truth in the Heart and Affections called here Truth in the inward parts In a word it is the Grace of Sincerity and Singleness of Heart For so is this Grace often expressed in Scripture Isai. 38. 3. I have walked before thee in Truth saith Hezekiah and with a perfect upright or sincere Heart And Ephes. 6. 14 Having their loins girt about with Truth c. That is with Sincerity and Single-heartedness This then is That Truth which God requires as a necessary seasoning Ingredient in all Duties and especially in all Religious Performances And which David here holds out with a Behold as the thing which above any other thing he had aimed at and yet would aim more at in his Penitential Address unto God We have then in the Words 1. A Note of Attention Behold which David prefixeth to that which he is to say I call it a Note of Attention for that is the use it serveth for in this place as I shall clear afterwards 2. There is That which he subjoineth to this Behold The Lords Complacency and Delight in the Grace of Sincerity and the Exercise of it as that without which his Present Address could not be savory or acceptable to God Thou desirest Truth in the inward parts I shall observe Two things in General before I come to the Particulars of the Text. 1. From this David holds out the Rule he had walked by and was to walk by for making his Present Address to God In confessing of Sin and pleading hard for Pardon acceptable Hence take this Doctrine That it is not enough that we do somewhat of Commanded Duties but we must labour to do what we do in some measure acceptably David not only confesseth Sin and pleads for Pardon but he aims to do it in Truth that so he may do it Acceptably For while he saith God did desire Truth in the inward parts it is evidently implyed that He aimed to have it There is reason for this Because If the thing we do be not done Acceptably and in the Right Manner though the thing done be never so good in it self the doing of it is but lost labour unto us Thus though it was a piece of Commanded Duty under the Old Testament to offer up Sacrifices to God yet when People made not Conscience to discharge this Duty in the Right Manner all they did was to as little purpose as if they had done nothing at all Hence Isai. 1. 11. To what purpose is the multitude of your Sacrifices unto me saith the Lord c. Yea the more excellent any Duty is in it self and the greater good is to be had by going about any Duty in a Right and Acceptable Manner the greater is the Hurt and Damnage which we incurr by it when we advert not how we do it And when without taking heed to our Feet we rush foreward to it and carry our selves but carelesly in the mean time that we are imployed about it What more excellent comfortable and Soul edifying Ordinance is there than this of a Communion which through God's Mercy ye have yet the liberty of approaching unto Is it not a Feast of Fat things of Wine on the Lees well refined wherein we Feast with Christ and upon Christ His broken Body is Meat indeed the most excellent that Heaven or Earth can afford And yet saith Paul If ye come not to this Ordinance in the Right Manner if ye set not your selves so to go about it as that ye may be accepted in your work if ye eat or drink unworthily without previous Examination of your selves Ye shall eat and drink Damnation and Judgement to your selves Not only shall your Table prove a snare but your meat be turned into poyson And therefore consider this in the entry and labour to have it imprinted on your Hearts That it is not enough to come rushing foreward to your Work not considering how ye come Your coming ought to be according to the Direction given Eccles. 5. 1. Keep thy foot when thou goest to the House of God c. As at all time so especially when ye approach unto such a dreadful Ordinance a this is whereof the advantage is so great if ye come Right and the hurt and hazard so unspeakably great if ye come Wrong But Secondly observe yet in General That in going about Commanded Duties in some measure Acceptably ye ought now and then to reflect upon the Manner and Way of your discharge of Duty even in the mean time when ye are about it For so doth David Here He casts an eye upon the Right Manner how He should have prayed to wit In Sincerity and Truth even in the very midst of his prayer while he saith unto God Behold thou desirest Truth in the inward parts And thus Christ in Luke 8. 18. saith unto His Disciples in the very mean time they were Hearing Take heed therefore how ye hear And surely our Hearts do oft turn formal vain wandering and lumpish or heavy in the Service of God because we do not seriously mind how sinful shameful and unseemly it is that it should be so A check of this kind in time and seasonably to a vain straying and wandering Heart would do much through God's Blessing to make it halt David doth this oft especially Psal. 43. 5. where he turns his speech from God and gives himself a rebuke and check for the present unsuitable frame of Heart wherein he then was Why art thoucast down O my Soul saith he And why art thou disquieted in me hope thou in God c. So that this reflecting upon the Manner and Way how ye discharge Duty even in the mean time when ye are about it is useful When ye find your Heart out of frame a serious timous check given unto it will prove an effectual mean to reclaim it Besides if upon your reflecting thus ye find matters tollerably Right and your Heart in such a frame for the Main as the Lord requireth it will furnish you with matter of boldness courage and confidence as here it doth David who having found somewhat of this Truth and this upright and sincere frame of Heart in his own Inward parts He takes ground of Confidence from That to expect that God who had given him This could also give him more In the hidden part saith he thou shalt make me to know Wisdom For Vse This doth shortly speak two things 1. The Service of God is a Work not of the Outward Man only but also and mainly of the Inward Man The Heart and Mind of a Man must be exercised in it if so be go rightly about it And that many wayes And this is One way The Heart must be exercised by reflecting now
immediatly after the Giving of the COMMUNION The Third SERMON LUKE 7. 23. And blessed is he whosoever shall not be offended in Me. Beloved in the Lord THAT place 1 Cor. 1. 23. We Preach Christ crucified unto the Jews a stumbling block hath had its accomplishment in all Ages and in no Age more than in this Jesus Christ and His way of working both with Churches and Particular Souls hath been a stone of stumbling and rock of offence to many yea moe and moe are stumbling still what through one occasion or other many who once did seem to run well in the way to Heaven in the way of Truth and in the way of Piety have either already taken up or are in hazard to take up such an halt as Christ may be conceived to say to those very few who seem resolv'd to follow him through Better and Worse as once he said Joh. 6. 67. Vnto the twelve when many of his Disciples went back and walked no more with him will ye also go away I have therefore chosen this Text to speak from now immediatly after having engaged your selves to walk in Christs Way that thereby ye may guard against that woeful common evil of Being offended in Christ or of stumbling and taking up an halt in his Way of Truth and Piety notwithstanding all the stumbling blocks and rocks of offence ye may meet with For Blessed is he saith Christ whosoever shall not be offended in me The Words are a Part of Christs Answer to that Question propounded to Him by Two of John's Disciples at John's desire verse 20. Art thou he that should come or look we for another Ye may wonder that John who knew Christ so well should have moved such a Question But the Answer is First Tho Souls know Christ never so well they 'l desire and have need to know him better and to get what knowledge they have of him confirmed to them especially in the day of Trial For John was now in Prison And 2dly They 'l desire that others may know him also For it appeareth from what goeth before that John propoundeth this Question for his Disciples satisfaction and to satisfy their Doubts more than his own Christ's Answer hath two Parts 1. He bids them shew John what they saw him doing Verse 22. Tell Iohn saith he what things ye have seen and heard how that the blind see the lame walk the lepers are cleansed the deaf hear the dead are raised to the poor the Gospel is preached If ye ask what makes this to the Answer of the Question I answer It maketh much for it shews he was doing that which Scripture foretold the Messias would do Isai. 35. 5 6. And therefore he behoved to be the Messias 2. In thir words he answereth a main Objection against this Truth taken from Christ's own low condition and the practice of his Followers which made many bear off him For they expected a Glorious Messias a Great earthly Monarch And because Christ was but obscure and mean therefore they stumbled and were offended in him To this Christ answereth Blessed is he whosoever shall not be offended or scandalized in me The word rendered here offended or scandaliz'd seems to be a Metaphor taken from Travellers who having dashed their Foot or Leg at some stone or block in the way do stumble or take up an halt so as they can go no further at least advance not so quickly in the way as they did And Secondly while he sayes Offended in me take this first Actively And so the meaning is They should not take occasion of stumbling from any thing in Christ or in His Way 2. It may be taken Passively so as to point out the Way that we should not stumble nor take up an halt in For there are some wayes to wit Every sinful course and way that it were good for People to stumble in and turn their backs upon But this Way wherein we should not stumble is Christ Himself and the Way of Truth and Piety prescrib'd by him Blessed is he saith Christ who shall not be offended in me As if he had said Happy is that Man who taketh not occasion from Me or any thing in My Way to stumble or turn his back upon Me and that course of Truth and Piety wherein I have commanded him to walk The Words are but One entire Proposition and Sentence I need not therefore spend time in dividing them But shall come to the Doctrines First The Lord applyeth the general Prophesies Concerning the Messias in the Old Testament to Himself in particular shewing they were verified in Him For the Words in me have in them a direct Answer to the Question propounded by John's Disciples and shews the Messias was come and that He is That Messias Whence we might mark That JESUS CHRIST the Son of Mary who was Born in Bethlehem brought up in Nazareth and Crucified in Jerusalem is that very same Messias who was to Come and promised to the Fathers We might observe 2ly That before He gave this Answer that He was the promised Messias whom they were to follow and not to stumble at He doth first prove by Scripture that it was so while he hids John's Disciples tell their Master he was doing such miraculous Works as the Scriptures did foreshew none but Christ should do Whence we might learn That all Questions and Debates about Religion should be determined from Scripture and according to the Rule set down in Scripture For here when a Question ariseth among John's Disciples If JESUS the Son of Mary was the promised Messias neither John the Baptist than whom there was not a Greater Prophet among these that are Born of Women yea nor Christ himself who was Greater than he do take it upon them to determine in it But John sends them to Christ and Christ sends them to the Scripture for a Solution Thus To the law and to the testimony saith the Lord Isai. 8. 20. if they do not speak according to this word it is because there is no light in them The neglect of this Rule hath been the In-let to Humane Traditions without and contrary to Scripture both in Worship and Government in the Antichristian Church And if this Rule once be laid aside there can be no end of Humane Ceremonies untill all that trash which is in the Roman Church be brought in upon the Church of God For if the Authority of a Man can make way for One it may also make way for all the rest But passing those The two following Doctrines are these that I intend most to insist upon And both of them are implyed 1. That there are many stumbling Blocks in Christ's way whereat People are apt to Offend take up an Halt and stumble And yet Secondly There is nothing of that kind which ought to make us stumble For if there were not some stumbling Blocks Christ needed not so much guard against them and by his guarding against them he
the courage to go on in Christs Way and set their Face against the storm of reproach and disgrace which is raised up with such like work But notwithstanding know there is no reason to stumble at Christ or his Way for any thing of that kind Because 1. He approveth no such Scandalous outbreakings His Word condemns them in all and in none more than in his Followers Because David by his fall made the Enemies of God to transgress therefore the sword never departed from his House 2. He permits such Offences to be for holy wise and just Reasons or that wicked men may thereby get occasion to vent that inward Spite they still carried against Religion and Godliness and so in Gods holy justice be permitted to break their necks upon them And 3. That all even the best may see therein their own weakness before a tentation and what unspeakable obligations they are under to God That they are not made examples of humane frailty unto others as others are to them And 4ly That all may learn not to have the Persons of men in admiration to love Truth and cleave unto it not for the Piety of men who owne it but from that worth that is in Truth it self So as that tho the very Ministers themselves who Preach it should run away from it or by their Scandalous outbreakings thro durt upon it Yet ye may still adhere to it In which case that whereon others stumble and break their neck should make you advance the faster in your way and God should bring you meat out of the eater A 6th thing that proves a stumbling block unto many is Diversity of Opinions There are so many Religions and Opinions about Religion they know not which to follow let all men once agree among themselves and then thy I 'l choose but till then they 'l forbear and so in effect do mock at all Religion But neither should this be For in the deep wisdom of God There must be Heresies that they which are approved may be made manifest 1 Cor 11. 19. Besides It lyeth not in the Devils power so to confound matters but that humble seekers of God will find out the right way He that guids the blind in a way they know not will lead such There are proud conceity People even tho otherwise good and there are also Careless profane People that is Such as look upon all Religion as Policy who are most like among such uncertainties to lose their way 7. People are ready to stumble at Christ and his way Because of the Quality of his followers It 's the Poor receive the Gospel John 7. 48. Have any of the Rulers or of the Pharisees believed on him And as Christs Followers are of the poorest sort So usually the Cross is their Livery Through many tribulations saith Paul they must enter the Kingdom of Heaven And who is Poor sickly tender despised mocked at afflicted in body and mind if Christs Followers be not But there is no Reason for stumbling at Christ and his Way for this And if thou stumble at it thou stumbles at the wisdom of God who 1 Cor 1. 27 Hath chosen the foolish things of the World to confound the wise and the weak things of the World to confound the things which are mighty And base things of the World and things which are despised hath God chosen And as to the Cross they get noe more of it than what is needful for them 1. Peter 1 6 Though for a season if need be ye are in heaveness It is needful and they find it needful so as many times they will be made to say they could not want one dram of it besides that the bitter Cross makes Christ the sweeter to them and so sweet as to furnish them with more contentment in their Crossed condition than a King hath who swayeth a scepter Psalm 4. 6. The light of Gods countenance made David Glad c. To this add Their Heaven is not here and the Lord of purpose maketh earth bitter to his followers that Heaven may be the sweeter when it cometh 8. Not only common Calamities from God but bitter persecutions from men attend the way of Godliness and these make many stumble and take up an halt Christ our Lord Matth. 13. 21. Speaks of a sort of men who when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word by and by they are offended And the experience of all times sheweth that many formerly forward do then faint Neither want they their pretended Reasons for they are made to suffer as evil doers often as disloyal or seditious persons which to some makes sufferings more terrible than any other thing Again they 'l but faint and shame the Truth when they are put to it and therefore think it better to quite it in time And how can they be answerable to God to run the hazard of losing all they have in the World and to make themselves and posterity Beggars To this add what if sufferings should run higher than goods even to their life They are not ready to dye and so they may lose their Souls besides they yeild but in a little but quit not all and therefore it is not wisdom think they to be too peremptor These and such like Reasons make many stumble at Persecution and a suffering Lot when it attends God's way and those that walk in it But there is as little cause to stumble at Christ and His Way at this as for the rest For seeing Christ our Lord and Master went to Heaven through a sea of many sad sufferings why should it be look'd upon as a matter unbeseeming or a ground of stumbling that it is with the Servants as it was with their Lord and with the Disciples as it was with their Master Christ strives to prevent his Disciples stumbling by the same Reason John 15 15. Again a Suffering Lot hath still when it followed Christ's Fellowers made Christs Way the Way of Truth and Piety a gainer It hath ever proven so as might be made appear both from Scripture and Ecclesiastick History As it was with the Apostle Paul Phiâ—p 1. 12. So hath it been and so it will be with all Christ's suffering Followers I would saith he Ye should understand that the things which happened unto me have fallen out rather to the furtherance of the Gospel This ever hath is and will be God's none-such Way wherein none can follow him to make his Truth his Work his Church his Interests thrive best when they are born down most As the Children of Israel Exod 1. 12. Who the more they were afflicted the more they multiplied and grew and therefore to stumble at Christ's way because of Persecution and a suffering Lot which usually doth attend it is nothing else but to break our neck upon the deep and infinite wisdome of God because he takes his own Way the surest and speediest way to make his Church to grow and will not take Ours
was One Athanasius And when Antichrist was to prevail it is shown Rev. 11. 3. That notwithstanding all the Tyranny of Antichrist and the torrent of Corruption in these times God should have His Two that is tho not many yet some few Witnesses 3. The Lord in His deep Wisdom doth measure out such a Dispensation for heightning His Churches Tryal And that these who keep their Garments clean may come forth as Gold It is but an inconsiderable Tryal and calls for little Resolution to stand it out When all the Lord's Ministers speak one thing lifting up their Voice as a Trumpet and denouncing the dreadful Judgements of God on all who turn their back on Truth and Piety But when the generality of Ministers at any time do blow the Trumpet of Defection from the Lord That speaks Loyalty indeed If then notwithstanding such Defection People stand to the Lords Banner and in nothing be moved from it And that because the Trumpet gives an uncertain sound speaking one thing one day and another thing the next So that to stumble at Christ's Way because of this when it falleth out is to stumble at the Wisdom of God 4. Therefore should no Man stumble at Christ nor His Way for this because the Lord in all times hath made it and no doubt will yet make it tend to the advantage of His Way in the close So as afterwards times growing more favourable the Church of God hath thereby been freed from a Fleece of Time-servers who would never otherwayes have discovered themselves Besides that others who through weakness had turned aside in some degreâ—â— with the torrent of the time somewhat against their Heart have been made to acknowledge their weakness to God's Glory And so make up by their Repentance the breach they had made on God's Way by their Fall And consequently for any to stumble at Christ's Way because of This is to break their neck on that which in God's method doth make His Way most lovely in the Close There are other Two Points yet which might be handled jointly as the former The one Expressed The other Implyed and both of them serve to confirm the last to wit That whatever we meet with in Christ's Way we should not love Christ nor His Way the less None of these things should make us take up an halt in His Way much less turn our back upon it For 1. It is an happy thing not to stumble at Christ or His Way This is expressed in the Text. 2. The Man who is offended in Christ who turneth his back upon Him because of Stumbling-blocks or Rocks of Offence in the Way That Man is an unhappy Man and cursed I might prosecute both these Points but for the time I shall forbear and only say something in Answer to a needful Question I think one may readily ask what I call Christ's Way whereat we should not stumble For there are Men and Parties of several wayes There are Papists and Protestants Sectaries Socinians Formalists Anabaptists Prelatists or Episcopâ—l-men Presbyterians Independents and Quakers every one whereof have their Own Way about Religion And no doubt all of them will call their Own Way Christ's Way And therefore it is needful to know which of these wayes are Christ's Way indeed that so we may not turn our backs upon it In Answer to which Question It cannot be expected if it were but for the time I can enter in a Debate concerning what is Right or Wrong what is Christs what is not Christs in All those Wayes I shall therefore only give you some general Directions for finding out what is Christ's Way amidst the tide and torrent of so many contrary Opinions And these such that upon the one hand I think there is no Man having his right Wits about him with the least Grain of Piety but he must give his Assent unto them And yet such as through God's Blessing being rightly improven shall not leave you without a Guide what to choose as God's Way and what not First then I doubt not it will be taken for granted by All. That the Way of Christ whereat we should not stumble are the Essentialls of Piety and Christianity I mean Faith in Jesus Christ Repentance unto Life Holiness and tenderness of Walk in eschewing all known Sin and coming up to the Practice of all known Duty This is it I intended mainly all alongs to wit That notwithstanding all the forementioned Rocks of Offence ye would not turn Profligate Profane Debauch'd and Irreligious Atheists but hold on in the Way of substantial Piety notwithstanding of all and over the belly of all 2. But this is not all It 's but a loose way of Religion and very near to no Religion at all for a Man to pretend to no more but adhere to the Practice of substantial Duties and the Faith of Fundamental Truths while in other things he sayes and unsays and rolls about with the times For hereby they may suffer the Devil to do with the most part of Scripture what he pleases For Truths absolutely necessary to Salvation are but few the Lord in Mercy having so provided that the meanest capacity may explicitly comprehend them and all of them seing they cannot be saved without them But tho there be some few Truths only of absolute necessity for Salvation yet there are others in their own kind also necessary to wit for Gods Glory and your own Comfort and the Lord will have you sticking closs by these Truths once knowing them to be Truths as well as by others and that because a great part of Christ's Way lyeth in a Mans adherence even to these Truths to wit God's Glory and the Man 's own Comfort And a Profane loose and indifferent Spirit as to these doth both in the nature of the thing and in God's just Judgement beget in progress of time Profane Indifferency and Atheism as to other more great and substantial Truths So doth the Apostle Paul inform the Galatians Ch. 5. 9. A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump Thus then the great Question is to know which is Christ's Way in Truths of that sort that so we may not stumble at it For which in the first place take Paul's Rule Philipp 3. 16. Nevertheless whereto we have already attained let us walk by the same Rule And 2 John 8. Look to your selves that we lose not these things that we have wrought In a word whatever a Man is perswaded on good ground to be Christ's Way let him stick closly by That as his way and whatever he meet with beware of doing any thing wherein his own Heart will condemn him I say this because there are some Truths of an inferiour Nature which are as clearly revealed in Scriptures as other more substantial Truths And consequently a Man may as much be perswaded of the one as the other And tho another Man may think or say he is perswaded of the contrary Error that it is Truth and be deceived
had been converted and indued with saving Grace neither doth Grace here signify Gods Grace inherent in them but Gods Grace and free Favour which he saw in the effects of it in that it wrought so Powerfully in bringing a great many to embrace the Doctrine of the Gospel among whom there doubtless were many sincere and real Converts though all of them were not so However the thing he saw was The mighty progress and success of the Gospel and this occasioned by a strong and cruel Persecution mentioned verse 19 the Ministers are forced to flee from their Flocks wherever they go they Preach Gods Grace and mighty Hand accompanies their Labour to the Conversion of many thousand Souls this is the Grace which Barnabas saw Hence take this Doctrine That sadest Persecutions for Truth do frequently prove an occasion of the Gospels spreading Thus it was Act 8. 3. Saul made havock of the Church entring into every House and haling Men and Women committed them to Prison v. 4. Therefore they that were scattered abroad went every where Preaching the Word Even as far as Phâ—nice Cyprus and Antioch as it is ver 19 of this Chapter The making havock of the Church occasioned the enlargement of the Church which hath frequently fallen out since which gave ground to that true and ancient saying The Blood of Martyrs is the seed of the Church The Reasons why the Work and Grace of God thrives best at such times may be many As 1. Peoples Ears are then bored and readiest to drink in the Word with greediness because then they have little other comfort left them Affliction and Persecution is a Tasty Sawce to make the Word Relish Psal. 141. v. 6. When their Judges are overthrown in stony places they shall hear my words for they are sweet 2. At such times the Servants of Christ are more diligent in their Work as they can have access to it and more fervent in dealing with God by Prayer for a Blessing to their Work because the thriving of their Work is all the reward which they can then expect And 3. The Lord doth then usually countenance the Labours of his Servants most because they are most despised few do then care for them or takes any notice of them And therefore the Lord takes this way both to hearten them and to put respect upon them And 4. The Couragious Constant and Cheerful enduring of Hardships and Sufferings for Truth doth commend that Truth for which they suffer unto others even to indifferent Spectators and makes them enquire after it and desirous to know what so much worth there can be in it I shall not insist for Application hasting forward to the latter part of the Text Only if it be so Then People are not to lookupon Persecution and a suffering time for Truth whenever it comes as so sad so dismal and dreadful a thing For this at least may be expected to be lovely in it The same Truth which men labour to bear down shall spread the faster and the further And that this is so the following Doctrine will shew Another Doctrine ariseth from the first effect this sight did work on Barnabas It made him Glad for so saith the Text Who when he came and had seen the Grace of God was glad The Doctrine is this That the Gospel and Truth do spread and gain ground among People is matter of Joy and gladness to a Godly heart though the times were otherwise never so sad For there were many things to make Barnabas sad at this time If we consider 1. How they had stoned the first Martyr Stephen to death a man full of the Holy Ghost and used him so as if he had been the most notorious Malefactor that ever the Earth carried And 2. The prosperous state of the Churches Enemies the Scribes Pharisees High-Priests a company of degenerate corrupt Church-men who at that time did sit at Jerusalem guiding all things at their pleasure That if any did but mutter against their State and Dignity though in the furthest part of all the Realm their hand could easily reach them They needed no more but hound out a Saul with a Commission if it were to Damascâ—s to take them and bring them bound to Jerusalem As is clear from Acts 9. 1 2. And 3. if ye consider his own poor condition and that of others the Servants of Christ at that time who were hunted from corner to corner yea from Kingdom to Kingdom These and many such things as these were at that time to make Barnabas sad and yet this makes him take all in the better part and in a manner digest all That when he came he saw the Grace of God had accompanied the Labours of his despised Servants and a rich Income of Souls to the knowledge of Christ and the Gospel And when he saw this he was glad He is in some sort so transported with it That in a manner he forgets Stephen's death he envyeth not the prosperous state of the Churches Enemies noâ— doth much resent his Own hard lot or that of others who were Christs Faithful Saints and Servants All which cleareth the Doctrine That the spreading of Truth will make a Godly Heart Glad though the times otherwise were never so sad Thus was it with the Apostle Paul Philip 1. 12. The things which happened unto me saith he meaning his Bonds Imprisonment and other harsh usage have fallen out rather unto the furtherance of the Gospel Whereupon v. 18. he breaks out What then notwithstanding every way whether in pretence or in Truth Christ is Preached and I therein do rejoyce yea and will rejoyce For Vse 1. Try your selves by this What it is that makes you Glad Is it the thriving of Gods work in Souls The down-bearing of Sin The growth of Piety If so It speaks thee to be a man of Barnabas temper and upon the other hand If things of that kind do rather make the sad and if the back-going of Gods Work The destroying what he hath built The plucking up of what he hath planted The thriving of sin and Wickedness The general Loosness of the times If I say these things make thee Glad It speaks thee to be a man of a woful temper a very Godless Heart But 2. If this be a thing that will make a Godly Heart Glaâ— in the saddest of times then Pray to God for it that it may be so That the Work of God may thrive in Hearts That those woful Spiritual Plagues of Security Deadness and Hardness of Heart may be removed and the Gospel may take many by the Heart who never hitherto knew the Power of it It 's easie for God to bless his Truth in the Mouth of his despised and persecuted Servants and to make a gracious Change tho Wickedness were at the greatest hight And if he do it whatever may be the other sadness of the Times thou who art a Godly Heart shall have reason to be Glad yea and thou shall