Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	church_n	know_v	scripture_n	6,716	5	6.3200	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A25853	The nevv heresie of the Jesuits publickly maintain'd at Paris in the Colledge of Clermont, by conclusions, printed 12 Decemb., 1661, denounced to all the bishops of France / translated out of the French original.; Nouvelle hérésie des Jésuites. English	Arnauld, Antoine, 1612-1694.	1662 (1662)	Wing A3730; ESTC R15927	16,007	24

THE NEVV HERESIE OF THE JESUITS Publickly maintain'd at PARIS in the Colledge of CLERMONT by Conclusions Printed 12. Decemb. 1661. Denounced to all the BISHOPS OF FRANCE Translated out of the French Original Lucae 5. 39. Nemo bibens vetus statim vult novum dicit enim vetus melius est LONDON Printed in the Year of our Lord 1662. THE NEW HERESIE OF THE JESUITS Publikely maintained at Paris in the Colledge of Clermont by Conclusions Printed the 12 of December 1661. Denounced to all the Bishops of France AS it is the duty of Bishops to cut off whilst they are yet in the bud the Errors that tend to the ruine of Faith so is it no less the part of Divines to make Discovery of them and stir up their pastoral vigilance by giving them a timely advice thereof For which Reason My Lords you will not I am confident disapprove the Information given you of a New Heresie publikely maintained by the Jesuites in their Colledge of Paris by Conclusions printed and defended the 12 of December past which bear in Front this Title Assertiones Catholicae de Incarnatione contra saeculorum omnium ab Incarnato verbo praecipuas haereses Catholike Assertions of the Incarnation against the principal Heresies of all Ages since Christ Whereby they sufficiently intimate that excepting some subtleties of the Schools they would have us take for Catholike truths whatever else they advance in opposition to these Heresies They propose then for the Heresie of the 10 th Age the Schism of the Grecians and pretend by the following words to prescribe us what we ought to beleeve that we fall not into this Heresie X. SAECULUM Romanae Ecclesiae Caput contra Graecos Schismaticos HOc tandem saeculo Schisma Phocii invalcscens Graecos ab Ecclesiae capite dis-junxit Christum nes ita caput agnoscimus ut illius regimen dum in caelos abiit primum Petro tum d●inde successoribus commiserit eandem quam habebat ipse infallibilitatem concesserit quoties ex Cathedrâ loquerentur Datur ergo in Ecclesia Romana Controversiarum Fidei Judex infallibilis etiam extra Concilium generale tam in questionibus Juris quam Facti Vnde post Innocentii X. Alexandri VII Constitutiones fide divinâ credi potest librum cui titulus est Augustinus Jansenii esse haereticum quinque Propositiones exeo decerptas esse Jansenii in sensu Jansenii damnatas Propugnabuntur Deo duce auspice Virgine in Aula Collegii Claromontani Societatis Jesu die 12 Decembris Anno 1661. X. AGE The Head of the Roman Church against the Schismatick Grecians IT was in this Age that the Schism of Photius growing strong cut off the Grecians from the Head of the Church for our parts we acknowledge Jesus Christ to be in such sort the Head that he hath left the government first to S. Peter and afterwards to his Successors and that he hath bequeathed unto them as often as they shall speak out of their Chair the same infallibility which he himself had Wherefore there is in the Church of Rome an infallible judge of Controversies of Faith even out of a General Council as well in Questions of right as matters of Fact for which reason now after the Constitutions of Innocent X and Allexander VII one may believe with Divine Faith that the Book of Jansenius intituled Augustinus is Heretical and that the five Propositions extracted out of it are of Jansenius and condemned in his sense This Conclusion contains two parts One the Primacy of the Pope in which all Catholicks agree The other the Infallibility which the Jesuits attribute to him Nor is the question concerning that Infallibility which some Divines maintain and which regards only the judgements of Popes touching the truths revealed by God in the Holy Scripture and Tradition It is well known what the opinions of the Gallican Church and School of Paris are upon this Subject and what is to be understood by their words Sententia Parisiensium when one meets with them in the Books even of Jesuits upon this matter It is also known that those among some modern Doctors who would be most favourable to Popes as Dr. Du Val were nevertheless of Opinion that it is not a point of Faith that the Pope is Infallible Non est de Fide summum Pontificem esse infallibilem and that the contrary opinion is neither erroneous nor rash Non est erroneum neque temerarium temeritate opinionis dicere summum pontificem in decernendo errare posse But these same Divines how passionate soever they were to exalt the authority of the Sovereign Bishops do acknowledge as a thing certain unquestionable and agreed on by all Catholicks that in matters of fact they are not infallible but may be deceived and so really have been in sundry occasions All Catholicks are of Agreement sayes Cardinal Bellarmin that the Pope acting as Pope with advice of his Council nay even of a general Council may be deceived in particular affairs depending on the information and attestation of Men. And applying this general Maxime to a particular fact altogether conformable to that of Jansenius to wit whether the Heresie of the Monothelites were contain'd in the Letters of Honorius as the VI general Council confirmed by so many Popes had determined A General Council sayes he that is a lawful one cannot erre in the definition of dogmatical points of Faith wherein the VI Council likewise was free from error but it may erre in questions of Fact Generale Concilium legitimum non potest errare ut neque erravit hoc sextum in dogmatibus Fidei definiendis tamen errare potest in questionibus de Facto And Cardinal Baronius sayes the same upon the same subject of the sixth Oecumenical Council The Condemnation even of General Councils is not received with so much rigour in what concerns mens persons and their writings For no man doubts but that whoever he be he may be deceived in matters of Fact in which occasion the saying of St. Paul is appliable we can do nothing against truth but for truth In his enim quae facti sunt unumquemque contingere posse falli nemini dubium est All other Divines even the more wedded to the interest of the Court of Rome have hitherto contain'd themselves within these bounds But the Jesuits will neither admit Bounds nor Examples in their excesses and extravagancie● It is not enough for them to make the Pope infallible in the manner as some other Divines have done they must needs have it that Jesuus Christ hath given him the same infallibility which Himself enjoyed here on earth and as this infallibility of Jesus Christ reached to all things and not only to matters revealed but also to such as till then had not been reveal'd and which he revealed by uttering them so they will have the Pope to become infallible not only in proposing to the Church the truths comprised in Divine Revelation but also

Honorius are Heretical and he that denies it especially after having asserted this General Maxime bears in his forehead the most notorious mark of an Heretick according to S. Paul which is to be condemned by his own proper judgement Nor will it serve to have recourse to the pretended falsifying of the Acts of the sixth Council and of the letters of Leo the second For as this pretension is both unsustainable ridiculous and extravagant as in the last Assembly of the Clergy the Bishops even most addicted to the Jesuites did acknowledge if there were no other then this poor evasion to excuse men from beleeving with Divine Faith that Honorius was justly anathematiz'd and his Letters legally condemned as full of Heresies one must needs have renounced all common sense to make any other judgement of this Pope or not to hold his Letters for heretical But as it is the property of Error to destroy it self the same person that by this new Opinion of the Jesuites should be ingaged of necessitie to maintain these Letters of Honorius to be Heretical by the same principle would be obliged to acknowledge the falsity of his own opinion For how could he beleeve that all the Popes wer indued with this infallibility of Jesus Christ speaking out of their chair seeing Honorius fell into an error in a conjecture where it is hard to conceive how he should not speak out of his chair since he spoke as Judge of controversies of Faith for the adjusting the greatest variance that then raigned in the Church and which had divided all the Patriarks of the East And nevertheless without insisting on the judgement of the Sixth Council and supposing which yet is most absurd that the Acts of it were corrupted how can any one pretend that Honorius in this occasion was assisted with the Infallibility of Jesus Christ since having by his Letters approved the letter of Sergius Patriarch of Constantinople either he understood it rightly and then he fell into an Error of right by approving an heretical Opinion of one only Will in Jesus Christ which he must have acknowledged to have been contained in the letter of Sergius Or else he mis-understood the said letter taking in a Catholike sence that which Sergius writ in an heretical one in which case he must needs have erred at least in a matter of Fact So that the Jesuites can in no sort avoid being Heretikes for if it be an heresie as questionless it is to ascribe to the Popes speaking out of their chair the same infallibility which Jesus Christ hath as well in matters of right as of fact in such sort that their decision even in matters of Fact may be believed by divine Faith then they must needs be Hereticks because they are engaged to maintain not an heresie only but a blasphemy And if they pretend this opinion is true they are likewise Heretikes because they impugn faith by impugning the decision of so many Popes and General Councels touching the condemnation of Honorius whom according to their erroneous Opinion one is bound to beleeve by divine Faith to have been most justly condemned since it was by the sentence of Judges as infallible both in matters of right and of fact as Jesus Christ himself My Lords I dwell too long upon the refutation of so visible a folly but permit me to lay before you one other pernicious consequence thereof Your Lordships have seen the design of their Conclusions and how glorious a Title they prefix before them Assertiones Catholicae contra saeculorum omnium praecipuas Haereses What can a man rationally conceive when he sees what Doctrines in pursuance of that Title they oppose to these heresies but that their meaning is to obtrude them upon us for Catholick truths maintained by the Church against Hereticks and which we are bound to embrace under pain of Heresie and of falling off from the Communion of the Church Wherefore according to the Jesuites the Catholike Church can never receive the Grecians back into Communion nor reunite its members cut off by so deplorable a Schism otherwise then by obliging them to confess that Jesus Christ hath given to the Popes the same infallibility which he himself had in all they propose to the whole Church even particular Facts And as all Heretikes of these latter Ages have embraced the Error of the Grecians touching the Primacy of the Holy Seat so likewise neither can we open the Church doors to any of them upon other terms then by extorting from them a profession of this new Article of Faith But admitting the Church should not tye them to such hard measure yet what a World of Obstacles are by this opinion cast in the way of their conversion What scandall doth it not give them What a fair pretext doth it afford their Ministers to decry the Catholick Church in their Sermons to their abused flock and render it odious and contemptible and confirm them in their ancient reproach and calumny so often cast upon Catholicks of equalling the Pope with God almighty It is well known that this was the principal Engine to work so many people to a revolt from the Church Is it possible that even Religious persons should concur with them in so pernitious a design and furnish them with armes to fight against us giving them a just occasion to look upon the submission which all faithful Christians yield to the Pope as an insupportable yoak imposed on their consciences even in matters that no ways concern the Catholick Faith nor whereof the knowledg doth in any sort contribute to Salvation This is it My Lords that hath chiefly forced us to speak in this ranconter It was absolutely necessary that Catholick Divines should make all hast to cry out against this impiety lest these uncircumcised should take occasion to insult over the Hosts of the living God We were obliged to prevent them that it might appear to all the World that these excesses were no lesse detested in the Catholick Church out of the love of truth then they seemed to detest them upon the accompt of justifying their guilty separation But if to have exposed their complaints to the publick be enough to acquit Divines of the duty incumbent on them it will not suffice for the honour of the Church and an entire reparation of this scandal that they alone should speak in this occasion 'T is your part My Lords who ought to be inflamed with a pious zeal for the purity of Christian Doctrine whereof you are the Depositaries for the safety of Souls whereof you are the Spiritual Fathers for the Sanctity of the Church whereof you are the Bridegrooms for the honour of Jesus Christ whose chief Ministers you are to consider before Almighty God what service you owe him in an occasion of this importance where the Faith of the Church is violated by a capital error that strikes at the very roots thereof where the Faithful are in danger to be poysoned by an

opinion that tends to change into Idolatry the veneration which they owe to their Soveraign Pastor where the Church is profaned by an impiety that dishonours and exposes it to the outrages of its enemies and finally where Jesus Christ is horribly blasphemed by a Sacrilegious parity which they endeavour to establish betwixt his sacred words and those of his Minister by making the one as well as the other the object of Divine Faith Some one 〈…〉 say it is an extravagance which deserves not to have such notice taken of it and this without question will be the pretext to move you to connive at such an excesse But you ought to consider My Lords that how extravagant soever the opinion may be It is advanc'd by persons who may give a just occasion to apprehend strange consequences of it For clearly it is not by chance or the blind passion of some one private person that it now comes to light but of old there have been dispositions laid for the introducing it nor was it ushered in with such pompe and ceremony but just at that nick of time which they conceived most favourable to procure it a successeful acceptance and in which they thought not any one would have the boldnesse to hold up his hand in opposition to it Their pretensions perchance are not yet ripe enough to draw a formal approbation of it from the Bishops but their hopes are since we must speak the plain truth that their credit and the power which of late they have got of doing both good and bad Offices will at least be able to keep them in silence so that not one shall dare attempt the condemnation of it for fear of drawing on his head the vengeance of so potent a Society and that the Sorbone which now they think they have brought to their beck will never have the confidence to censure it what aversion soever it may have inwardly for it They hope then under the favour of this silence and whilst the whole world shall seem buried in sleep dum dormirent homines this cockle which they have sowed in the fields of the Church will take root and grow up by the advantage of the season In the mean time they will leave it to grow to maturity according to their manner of expression relinquent tempori maturandum and when it shall be fully ripe they will extract the natural consequences that necessarily must spring from it For the present they tell us modestly one may believe with Divine Faith such like particular Facts but we shall shortly hear that we are bound to believ them which grad●tion will be easie for them to establish because it follows by a necessary consequence out of their principle it being certain that no man can believe with Divine Faith but what is a matter of Faith and what is such ought of necessity to be believed in that nature when it shall be sufficiently proposed It i● enough for their turns at present that the Bishops do not condemn this opinion but we shall see them ere long inveagle them in to be the approvers of it according to an other of their Maximes which is That the Church doth approve all such Doctrines as ●t suffers without making opposition It highly concerns you My Lords to reflect on the danger whereunto not only the Church but you your selves are also exposed lest one day the Jesuits bring you in for abettors of their Heresie and God himself lay it to your charge For though it be a most false error that the Church approvs all opinions which it doth not suppresse it is notwithstanding a constant truth confirmed by Popes and Councils that God imputeth to Pastors the approval of errors which they did not in due time oppose Error cui non resistitur approbatur Qui non corrigit resecanda committit Which made the second Council of Tours declare that the Shepheard seem'd to side with the Woolf as often as he did not hinder the slaughter of his flock having the power to do it And St. Leo speaking of those that were negligent in applying remedies to the grievances of the Church lays them all at their doors Qui multam saepe nutriunt pestilentiam dum necessariam dissimulant adhibere medicinam But these are reflexions altogether needlesse to be suggested to you My Lords whose zeal and Pastoral vigilance is of greater force to represent you what is expedient for the good of the Church in these occasions then all the discourses that can be made you It is enough for private Divines to lay before your eyes the emergent evils and deep wounds inflicted on its Doctrine and only to say to each of you in particular the same which a Prophet said to God Vide Domine considera See and consider what Doctrine is taught in the Church whereof you are the Masters Their duty extends no further and this done they may take up their rest and lament before Almighty God in Silence and Humility Paris the 1st of January 1662. FINIS