the inward Essence and the other according to the outward manner of Existence Yet this must be taken further into Consideration seeing from this distribution of the Church Mr. Baxter hath got up an Argument to prove visible Churches to be no Churches which is his nineteenth Argument of his 26. and is thus framed If the distribution of the Church into visible and invisible be but of the subject into divers adjuncts and not of a Genus into its Species then that part or those Members which are meerly visible are indeed no part of the Members of the Church so distributed but are onely Equivocally called a Church Church-Members c. The Antecedent must be yielded him the Consequence he saith is undeniable in that adjuncts are no part of the Essence much lesse the form or the whole Essence and therefore cannot denominate but aequivocally instead of the essence To this I answer the consequence might as fairly have been that these members which are invisible are no parts or members of the Church so distributed seeing invisibility or invisible as is confest is an adjunct as well as visibility or visible There may be a distribution of man by hundreds of adjuncts either corpulent or leane high or low black or fair old or young rich or poor learned or unlearned c. If one of these so denominated be a true man shall the other then be onely aequivocally a man If a corpulent man be a true man is a leane man no man If a tall black or old man be a true man shall then a low fair or young man be no man This must needs follow as well as the other The reason given that adjuncts are no part of the Essence is not at all to the purpose seeing the subject that is denominated by such adjuncts hath its Essence though blacknesse be not of the essence of a man yet the man that is black hath his essence and though visibility be not of the essence of the Church yet the Church which is denominated visible hath its essence And whereas we are warned to note that visibile is not the same with visum so I can give warning that invisibile is not the same with non visum though I know not to what purpose Secondly I answer the Church being an integrum and that per aggregationem and onely one in exact propriety of speech it cannot be capable of any such distribution so there must be one Church of one denomination and another of another but it is a distribution of Church-members which serve as parts to make up the whole some of which are onely visible that is all their honour to make a visible profession and to enjoy the glory of Ordinances and the Divine protection of God over his vineyard upon which account they are nigh when others are a far off The other are invisible members As they have all the visible honour before mentioned so they have an addition of a far greater glory of invisible graces The former I take to be the Church most properly though I know others are of another opinion for two reasons 1. When the Church is an integrum as Mr. Hudson hath largely proved it the visible Church containes the whole for the invisible part is also visible invisible respective to graces but visible respective to profession and outward priviledges The invisible is onely one part and so not the Church in its most proper signification 2. The Scripture almost wheresoever it speakes of a Church takes it in this acception and that which is the ordinary and common language of the holy Ghost which he uses most often almost alwayes is that which is most proper Some have said that the word Church is not more then once taken for the Church invisible which is Heb. 12.23 The Church of the first born If it should be granted that there is two or three places more which will bear that acceptation of it which is as much as can be pretended yet I dare say there is not one for twenty where the Church is taken for the Church visible And is the language of Scripture still all over aequivocal When Christ sayes The Kingdome of heaven is like to a man that sowed good seed in his field is like to a draw-net shall we say the Kingdome of heaven aequivocally taken Stephen sayes This was he that was in the Church in the wildernesse must we understand it of the Church aequivocal And when Paul gave Timothy a directory how to behave himself in the house of God which he sayes is the Church of the living God must we understand it of a Church aequivocal Such a one would be but a weak ground or pillar of the truth we may say the same of abundant other places If all these aequivocals be granted it will shortly be questioned whether there be any reality in Scripture language The Author vindicated from Arminianisme As the authority of our Divines is produced against the Papists so also their authority against the Arminians is brought forth Our Divines against the Arminians saith he do suppose the first act of believing to be the first time that God is as it were engaged to man in the Covenant of grace and that it is dangerous to make God to be in actual Covenant with men in the state of nature though the conditional Covenant may be made to them and though he hath revealed his decree for the sanctifying his elect That God is then first engaged for the graces of the Covenant I easily yeeld for then the grand condition by the help of grace is put in by the soul But let us here take up that which he is pleased to yield and compare it with that which he hath put into the Index of his Treatise of Infant-Baptisme where he notes this as Mr. T. his Error That the Covenant whereof Baptisme is the seal is onely the absolute Covenant made onely to the Elect which pag. 223. he confutes And if men in the state of nature be in that Covenant that Baptisme seales viz the conditional Covenant then men in the state of nature and short of justifying faith have right to Baptisme It follows In my opinion the transition is very easie from Mr. Blakes opinion to Arminianisme if not unavoidable save by retreat or by not seeing the connexion of the consequence to the antecedent When this was charged upon me by another hand I was acquitted by Mr. Br. and he testified for me that I had acquitted Mr. M. from any such charge I marvel therefore that now it should be fastened upon me But let us hear his reason For grant once that common faith doth coram Deo give right to Baptisme and it is very easie to prove that it gives right to the end of Baptisme God having not instituted it to be an empty sign to those that have true right to it What is it that we hear will it give immediate right to the end of Baptisme
a may to life as though we must get Salvation by our fulfilling of its conditions nor must we look upon its curse as lying upon as remedilessely This is as much as I assert or rather imply in that which I say that the Covenant of works is of no use to the attainment of Salvation upon which the Sacraments of that Covenant the see are laid aside with it we hear no more of a tree of life or the tree of the knowledge of good and evil Rivet Exer. 40. on those words Lest he put forth his hand and take of the tree of life and live for ever Observes a resemblance between that proceeding of God and the Churches proceeding in keeping unworthy men from the Sacrament The l Quemadmodum nunc ex Dei instituto à Sacramentis arcentur indigni ne sibi Symbola sumant ad judicium condemnationem ita hac prohibitione usus est Deus tanquam ex communicatione minori quam abstensionem vocant ad hominem magis magis humiliandum ut se indignum agnosceret vita qui à vitae Symbolo arcebatur unworthy saith he are kept from the Sacrament lest they should eat of those signes to their judgement And so God made use of this prohibition as a lesser excommunication called suspension for the further humiliation of man that he might see himself to be unworthy of life being kept from the outward symbole or Sacrament of it But me thinks this is so far from resemblance of that kind of Excommunication which is called the lesser that it is a sentence in terrour farre above that which is highest and greatest And this it seemes my Author saw and therefore addes m Praeterea tale Sacramentum homini lapso non erat amplius aptum quia arbor vitae non data erat ut vitam restitueret mortuo sed ut viventem in statu vitae commodo conservaret Ergo Adamo per peccatum mortuo mutanda fuerunt Sacramenta Furthermore such a Sacrament was unmeet or unsuitable to fallen man because the tree of life was not given to restore a man dead to life but to preserve life in a living man therefore Adam being dead by sin and his condition changed the Sacraments were to be changed likewise Two sorts of men then are here fitly to be parallelled with Adam in this proceeding of God against him 1. Those that God casts out of Covenant taking away their Candlestick and his Kingdom refusing to be their God or to own them as his people God denying them his Covenant all must deny them the sign and seal of it 2. Those that cast themselves out of Covenant and apostatize from the faith of Christ Jesus Where there is no Covenant in which men may expect happiness where there is no profession of such expectation there is to be no Sacrament there the seal is put to a blank and these Sacred Mysteries are prophaned Therefore I cannot but marvel at those that deny the Church of Rome all being of a Church and affirm that they are in no Covenant-relation to God yet yeeld that they have Baptisme in truth among them explaining themselves that it is as a true mans purse in the hand of a theefe But the purse and the man stand not in that relation as Covenant and Sacrament the Covenant being gone the Sacrament hath no truth of being remaining Satans imitation of God in his precepts of worship to his followers Fourthly Let us yet see how forward Satan is to imitate God in prescribing a way of worship to his servants and how ready the world is to follow Satan in these things by him prescribed God appointed a tree of life as a sign and pledge of immortality in the due use of which man might have lived for ever and been preserved from the evils and infirmities of age and Satan among those in the world that are his for worship hath of old found out a fiction of certain meats called by them Ambrosia and certain drinks named Nectar and Nepenthe which the gods using to take were preserved from age and death It cannot be imagined how they should reach such a fancy but that the posterity of Noah had scattered some Divine light of this tradition among them Their gods who were but men and some of them the worst of men bringing all wickedness to renown by their example being supposed to have an immortal being must have some way or means to come up to immortality As they had their meats and drinks that made immortal so also their fountains found out by Cadmus to whom they ascribe the first invention of letters Aganippe Hippocrene Castalius near to Parnassus at which their Muses drunk which raised them in eloquence These they have borrowed from these symboles of the tree of life and the tree of knowledge of good and evil dreaming of a Physical operation and not understanding any Sacramental efficacy God also instructed his people in the use of sacrifices which we know was with his people from the beginning and I cannot believe with some Jesuits that this was of the dictates of nature which as they say led them without any revelation to the use of sacrifices For in what sense soever we take sacrifices Nature could never teach man to give it unto God If we take it more largely for a gift tendred reason would tell that the Divine Majestie stands in no need of it And in case we understand it more strictly and make the destruction of that which is offered essentiall to a sacrifice how could this in reason enter into any mans thoughts that when a man had sinned a beast must dye And that of the Apostle Heb. 11. doth fully contradict it Abell offered by faith and faith is not of nature but above it This then was a worship of God by institution not commanded in the first but second Commandment and this Satan is ready to follow As there was scarce a Nation as the Orator observed but worshipped a god so there is scarce a Nation that did not sacrifice to those gods and the Apostle gives us to understand what those gods were The things that the Gentiles offer in sacrifice they offer to Devils and not to God 1 Cor. 10. It is his worship and he teacheth his the way of it As in duties of worship there is this imitation seen so in wonders and prodigies in like manner there is an emulation God had his miracles in Egypt and Satan his We know the general Deluge in the sacred Histories in which none were preserved from death but Noah and his family by an Arke prescribed of God Heathens must have a fable in imitation and tell us of drowning of the World onely Deucalion and his wife Pyrrha in an Arke preserved likewise And as Noahs Arke rested on the Moutains of Ararat upon the asswaging of the waters so theirs rested on the Mountain of Parnassus We have a narrative of Jonah cast into the Sea
the syllables themselves uttered with all the consecrating intention that the Priest can imagine to create a new Sacrament Bellarmine lib. 1. de Sacram. in genere cap. 21. hath a proposition to the contrary k Non solum ses sed etiam verba in Sacramentis novae legis is à Deo determinata sunt ut non liceat quickquam immutate Not only the things themselves saith he in the Sacraments under the New Covenant of which he saith there is little difference between them and us but the words are so determinate that they may not anything be changed yet when he hath done he is put to it to limit his own proposition and shewes there may be a variation six wayes in some of which the essence of a Sacrament is lost the substantiall forme being taken away in others the accidental forme onely so that the essence continues notwithstanding such variation so that he doth not onely approve of the determination of Pope Zachary who in an Epistle to Bonifacius resolves that when some out of ignorance of the Latine tongue did baptize in nomine Patria filia speritua sancta that the substantial forme was not altered But also acknowledges that the Baptisme of the Greeks was valid and the substance not changed when they baptized in this way Let the servant of Christ be baptized in the Name c. yet allowing of it onely upon that account because the Church of Rome did tolerate it so that their toleration or prohibition can give or take away the very substantial forme of Sacraments Arguments evincing the truth of the proposition the essence of them is at their courtesie The truth of this proposition is clear 1. No prescribed forme of words is laid down in the Old Testament as is confest and therefore Bellarmine puts it into his proposition That in the Sacraments of the New Law the words are so determinate that nothing is to be changed And that the Apostles did use any such prescript forme in so precise a way cannot be proved yea the contrary is more then probable considering the multitudes in so short a space baptized Act. 2. Act. 8. Peter exhorts his converts to be baptized in the Name of Jesus Christ Act. 2.38 And those mentioned Act. 19.5 were baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus And Bonaventure as he is quoted by Whitaker sayes that the Apostles baptized in the name of Christ And Scotus as the same Author affirms sayes that if any should baptize in that manner he durst not say it were no Baptisme and this with good reason seeing Baptisme in the Name of Christ virtually comprizes the whole Trinity Father Son and holy Ghost His work being to reconcile man unto God essentially and not personally considered 2. Either the very syllables themselves in which the institution is set down is the forme and contains the essence of Baptisme or else the sense and meaning But it is not the very words and syllables themselves This is clear in reason and confest by the adversary First it is clear in reason then the same words and syllables must be used in which they were pronounced when they were first instituted That was the Syriack Tongue as is believed being the language in Judea at that time or at least the Greek in which Tongue the words of the institution were committed to writing But the forme of the Sacraments is never tyed to those Tongues to neither of them Papists officiate in Latine Orthodox Churches in their own language in which the same thing in other syllables is held forth This is confest by the adversary Bellarmine approves as we have heard the ratification of that Baptisme where scarce ever a word was aright uttered and that upon this account that it might be easily understood what he would have said as well by the act of baptizing as by the word In nomine In the name for that was aright pronounced It is not then the words but that which ought to be intended in the words that holds forth the institution which may be further from the Jesuite cleared in that he confesses Scripture to be too short to hold out the forme of Baptisme-institution which l Nos respondemus illud hoc facite referre ad totam actionem Christi ita ut comprehendat etiam verba Id quod ut omittam nunc alia argumenta discimus ex traditione usu Catholicae Ecclesiae quae traditio si non recipiatur in dubium revocabitur etià m forma baptismi nam unde quaeso colligitur dum aqua aspergitur dicenda esse illa verba Baptizo te in nomine Patris filii Spiritus sancti Certe non aliunde quam ex illis verbis Matth. ult Docete omnes gentes baptizantes eos in nomine Patris Filii Spiritus sancti At ex hoc loco id non potest certe colligi nisi recipiatur Ecclesiae traditio Non enim Dominus ait dicite Baptizo te in nomine Patris c. Satis igitur erit si aspergentes aquam dicanus innomine Patris Filii c. can be gathered from no place he saith but that of Matth. 28.19 Go teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy Ghost But there it is not said I baptize as he observes nor doth Christ command to say in the Name of the Father of the Son and holy Ghost but to baptize in the Name of the Father c. If it be done in that Name by that authority it were saith he sufficient had we not tradition to the contrary De Sacramentis in Genere cap. 19. All which makes it appear that an institution is necessary and not a certain number of words of absolute necessity Fifthly A Sermon formally so called A Sermon formally so called is not essential to a Sacâ—ament to be preacht at the same time as the Sacrament is administred is no way of the essence of Sacraments This Chamier worthily rejects as a calumny put upon protestant Writers No protestant Writer ever did affirm it Bellarmine would fain fasten it upon Calvin and Beza but confesses that Calvin speaks doubtfully in it And sometimes seemes to speak of a Sermon as distinct from the Sacrament They that hold this opinion must not onely conclude it to be the greatest of prophanations to administer the elements when no Sermon is preached But whensoever they administer any Sacrament their Sermon must ever be of that subject for to make a Sermon essential to Sacraments which treats nothing about Sacraments is to make the body of a bird essential to a beast That which we say is that every word in the institutions of Sacraments is for instruction of communicants and without such instruction they can make no actuall improvement of them to any spiritual benefit either of justification or sanctification which yet is not of absolute necessity to be prest as oft as ever
his reason seeing by baptisme grace is given If any one be rightly disposed to receive the effect of baptisme in the instant that he receives perfect Baptisme he shall receive grace therefore he receives the Sacrament with sufficient dignity and sanctity further adding Seeing this is a Sacrament of the dead grace is not praerequired for the receiving of it being ordained to confer grace that disposition is sufficient upon which the Sacrament confers such an effect Suarez in tertiam partem Thom. Tom. 3. Q. 68. Dis 24. art 4. Sec. 2. p. 250. Our opinion being otherwise of the work of baptisme it is otherwise concerning admission to baptisme when men are willing to be received into the number of Christians and will engage for Christian wayes which necessarily implies a profession of repentance of all unchristian practices we judge them to have right of admission Thirdly How far rules laid down by some Fathers and Councils for the way of discipline did exceed in rigour hath been the complaint of many not admitting those that had been overtaken by temptation to Church-fellowship notwithstanding any evidence of repentance till after many years space of humiliation In which time how much advantage might be given to Satan let men of experience judge Mr. F. himself dislikes their long deferring of their Catechumeni from baptisme and may not others have liberty to manifest their dislike as well as he Fourthly Let it be taken into due consideration whether such rigour in holding converts off so long a space and requiring such an height in preparatory graces were not a great remora to the progresse of the Gospel and gaining in men to Christian profession How speedy a progresse the Gospel made in the Apostles times we may see in the Acts of the Apostles and Ecclesiastical Story Dr. Andrewes in his Preface to his Work on the Commandements quotes a testimony of Egesippus That by the diligent instructing of the Church there was no known Common-Wealth of any part of the world inhabited but within 40 years after Christs Passion received a great shaking off of heathenish Religion But how slowly it proceeded after some time is over-plain May not the difference of their way that thus swerved from the Apostles and men in Apostolique times be assigned as a great reason We find them facile in admission but in the mean time exceeding plain in making known what was required of them in order to the end of their professed faith their everlasting salvation that were admitted Fifthly If it may be granted which according to Scripture rules can never be denied that men wrought off from Turcisme Paganisme Judaisme and brought to a profession of Christianity and a professed engagement to Christian wayes have their right and stand in title to baptisme If then upon observation of inconveniences arising as jealousies conceived that they may offer themselves out of design to work themselves into a fairer opportunity of persecution as was suspected in Paul the Church in Prudence for some space shall delay their admission I shall not contend Onely I assert their right and justifie their practice that proceed accordingly and unlesse some great cause appear to the Churches prejudice tendring themselves they are actually to be received A Digression for Vindication of Chap. 32. of the Treatise of the Covenant from Mr. Baxters Exceptions touching the Faith that entitles to Baptisme HEre I am put upon it to take into consideration The occasion of this Digression that which Learned Mr. Baxter in his Apology hath been pleased to oppose against me Though he be large I shall make it my businesse if it may be to be more brief I entitled the two and thirtieth Chapter of my Treatise of the Covenant in this manner A dogmatical Faith entitles to Baptisme being a Corollary naturally as I yet think inferred from the Doctrine that I had before delivered of the latitude of the Covenant explaining my self that I meant such a faith that assents to Gospel-truths though not affecting the heart to a full choyce of Christ and therefore short of that Faith which is justifying and saving ratifying it with several arguments In which I might well have thought that I should have found my ancient friend my Second rather then an Adversary considering what he had delivered pag. 224. of his Treatise of Infants Church-Membership This opinion Mr. Baxters concession that the Covenant of grace which Baptisme sealeth is onely to the Elect and is not conditional is one of the two master pillars in the Antinomian fabrick and afterwards If any shall think that this affirming that Christ hath brought the reprobate also into a Covenant of grace conditional be any part of the Arminian errors as the whole scope of Scriptures is against them so Mr. Blake hath said enough to satisfy He that will deny reprobates to be so farre within the Covenant of grace must not onely denye infant Baptisme but all Sacraments till he be able infallibly to discern a man to be Elect. I did never rise so high in words for my opinion as the Reader may here see my adversary hath done for me and I shall have more occasion to observe his concessions in this thing But how to reconcile all with that which pag 327. of the same Treatise he delivers I know not If men be taught once that it is a Faith short of justifying and saving faith which admitteth men to Baptisme as having true right in foro Dei it will make foul work in the Church This he asserts with five several arguments to which in the Chapter quoted I gave a brief answer not once naming the Author that if it might be such contests with a man that I so much honour might not have been observed and yet the truth not deserted Before he enters upon any refutation of my arguments or vindication of his own he is pleased to spend nine full pages to shew how farre he takes unregenerate men to be in Covenant and to discover as he saies my mind in this point Neere to the close of that discourse he saies that what I mean by Covenanting he despairs to know which surely will be the Readers wonder that knowes what he hath said pag. 224. before mentioned I speak impartially according to my judgement I think there is more true worth in those two or three leaves of Mr. Blakes book in opening of the Covenant then in all c. And as he despaires to know my meaning so I as much despair ever to make it known to him He quotes very many expressions of mine and knowes my meaning in none of them and some that I borrow from others as Dr. Preston and Pareus and he knowes neither my meaning nor theirs in them And in case I should make attempt if it might be to make it further clear he hath still an art to render it obscure He observes that I say that which I think all say that the accepting of the word preacht
promise of Church-priviledges and I now tell him that these stand actually possest of these priviledges and have all the Promises together with these priviledges that the Gospel contains And that these priviledges are appointed of God to bring them in Gods way to the possession of them 2. Saith he That he would have it proved out of Scripture that God hath such a Covenant distinct from the Covenant of grace which promiseth Justification and Salvation and having other conditions on our part To this I know not what to say but that when Mr. Baxter hath proved that there are not onely mountains of earth in his West side of England viz. Wreakin Mawbourn Clee but also mountnins of Gold I will endeavour the proof of this if I can tell how for he hath had as many thoughts of such golden Chimaera's as I have had of any such Covenant distinct from the Covenant of Grace which in my name he here imagineth Having vindicated my self from these imposed fancies that never entred into my thoughts I shall now endeavour if it may be further to clear my own meaning in these following Propositions Propositions tending to cleer the Authors meaning 1. Those that take upon themselves a Christian profession being separate for God calling him by the name of Lord that have Ordinances of God as their inheritance that acknowledge a Deity and no other but the true Deity a necessity of worship and none but the Christian worship these with me are in Covenant with God as was Propos 1 the whole state of the Church of the Jewes and the whole face of the visible Church of the Gentiles that were engraffed in their stead This to me is plain in that they are the Church or Churches of God Acts 7.8 Gal. 1.2 The called of God Mat. 22.14 The people of God Isa 1.2 Psal 90.7 They that sacrific'd to the true God Psal 50.7 Are the sons of God Gen. 6.1 Deut. 14.1 Rom. 9.4 Are a people nigh unto the Lord Deut. 4.7 Psal 148. ult God professing himself to be their God Psal 90.7 Are Children of the Covenant Acts 3.35 Saints Psal 90.5 Act. 26.10 1 Cor. 14.33 Believers Act. 8.12 13. Act. 21.20 Luke 8.13 Disciples Matth. 10.1 4. Acts 9.1 15.10 Christians Act. 11.26 That all of these imply a Covenant-state and that unregenerate men have in Scripture all this honour is clear These therefore with me are in Covenant I know that as to all of these elogies it is answered in a word that they are equivocal An answer that I can scarce take into my thoughts without horrour As though Gods oracles were all over from one end of the Bible to the other like those of Apollo and there were no reality either in their separation for God or gifts that they receive from God which as to illumination conviction faith as well ordinary as extraordinary oftentimes are many or priviledges that they enjoy But this we shall have further occasion to consider and when there can be no plain denial that all of this here mentioned argues Covenant-state a quarrel seems to be pickt rather then any direct answer given For as I say pag. 189 of my Treatise That in Old-Testament-times the Covenant was made with Israel in the uttermost latitude of it with all those that bore the name of Israel making proof at large from Deut. 29. as the Reader may see Mr. Baxter quoting the place takes notice of no more then that it was made with all Israel and infers pag. 65. So that it seems he takes all to be in Covenant that bear the name Christian And then questions What Though they know not what Christ or Christianity is Is taking a name entring into Covenant The poor Indians that by thousands are forced by the Spaniard to be baptized are said to know so little what they do that some of them forget the name of a Christian which they assumed And do's not he think that a man may take as plausible exceptions against his word where he saith The rule is That a serious professour of the faith is to be taken for a true Believer If he would travel as far as India for it as he doth here against Gods Word Do not we know that force may make these poor Indians to appear serious in their profession And it is wonder that it should be so strange with him that taking a name should be entring Covenant or at least that it should imply a Covenant-state Let him consult Isa 4.1 and those manifold Scripture-Texts which expresse the relation of Gods Covenant-people to him in these words A people called by his Name or on whom the Name of God is called And distinction should be put between children of the Covenant by descent from parents in Covenant whether Jewes or Christians who continue their Covenant relation till they professedly cast it off notwithstanding their ignorance and such that of meer aliens are to be received having no other title then their own present qualification This ought to be voluntary as well in renouncing their old false way as embracing the present as we see it was in those converts through the Acts of the Apostles And it is not to be without some competency of knowledge discerning the evill of their former course and the happinesse attainable in the present And I am easily induced to believe that more knowledg by the industry of teachers is now required then was in the primitive times seeing there is not so much of God by miracle to perswade and as it were to overrule So that it is not a naked taking of a name that is intended but that which still attends upon it As a wife is called by her husbands name and withall makes her abode in his house so it is with a Covenant-people and was with Israel They bore the name of God and they made abode in the Church of God enjoying his Ordinannances as their inheritance Mr. Baxter saies For the Word of God God oft bestowes it on infidels and in England there aremen that deride the truth of Scripture and esteem it afliction and yet for credit of men come ordinarily to the Congregation These have the Word given and so have other unregenerate men but not by Covenant that I know of That God doth bestow his Word on infidells to me is strange it is true that he often tenders it to them but in case they remain infidells they put it away from them and bestowing implies not onely a tender but an acceptance It is the great advantage of Israel above other Nations that to them was committed the oracles of God when others had not that honour And to speak of Gods giving his Word by Covenant is a most improper speech seeing it is the very Covenant droughts as though we should say he gives his Word by his Word And these sure are no open deriders that for the credit of men make such a publique profession this would work restraint on
Christ and several others If I will acknowledge this I shall be soon brought to yield up all Is all Adoption proper to the regenerate what shall we say then to that of the Apostle Rom. 9.4 To them pertained the Adoption Had the Apostle that heavinesse and continual sorrow of heart for Israel after the flesh and doth he yet give them that testimony that they are regenerate Gomarus on the place hath these words Lest any in this place should mistake Adoption and acceptation for sons in Scripture is twofold general and special General adoption is an outward destination or call into the visible Church and Company of the Sons of God upon which account many are said to be the Sonnes of God as opposite to the Sonnes of men that is aliens from the Church Gen. 6.2 And Israel this general way are called the sons of God not onely those that were elect to life eternall and regenerate but also those that were reprobate and meerly carnal and therefore the Jewes Sons of the kingdome or the Church of God are said to be cast into utter darknesse Matth. 8.12 And whether all union with Christ imply regeneration let John 15.2 be consulted where an union with Christ is cleerly held out yet Mr. Baxter brings that text among others to prove that there are some Saints that shall never be saved Mr. Hudson and Mr. Cobbet tell us at large that Christ is the head of the Church visible and hath many unfruitful members Other phrases are there brought or titles as proper to the regenerate which are well known in Scripture to be applyed to such as have Apostatized and are brought by Arminians to prove falling away and are answered by their adversaries Mr. Hudsons words are here worthy of consideration Onely the invisible company have internal spiritual communion and are elect many of those that have external communion and are visible members shall perish and yet by reason of their profession are said 2. Thes 1. 1. to be in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ as Ames also confesseth Med. lib. 1. Cap. 32. art 9. Such was the Church off Corinth and Ephesus c. wherein all were not in Communion for life and of such Christ speaketh John 15.2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he takes away and verse 6. If a man abides not in me he is cast forth as a branch and is withered and men gather them and cast them into the fire and they are burned These are said to be redeemed 2 Pet. 2.1 denying the Lord that bought them and sanctified Heb. 10.29 yet hath accounted the blood of the Covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing and much more to this purpose Vindi. pag. 5. And if the Apostle give Testimonies to whole Churches holding out what they ingage to be ought to be and professedly were this comes short of his purpose I find little or nothing in all the other Arguments but that which either looks not at all towards any thing that I hold Humane authorities vouched or else is already spoken to His last onely from humane authority is observable Our Divines against the Papists saith he do generally plead that Hypocrites are not true members of the universal Church but as a wooden leg is to the body I must tell him that if they be Members of a particular Church then they are true members of the Church universal Taking universal and particular in a Similar homogeneal way for the visible Church state as we must take them if we speak any thing to purpose That which is pars partis is pars totius if my finger be a part of my hand it is a part of my body and if Mr. Baxter be an Inhabitant of Kederminster then he is an Inhabitant of Worcestershire and if of Worcestershire then an Inhabitant of England and let us see what they say of the Church visible indefinitely Lord Duplesse in his Treatise of the Church pag. 3. saith The invisible Church conteineth none but the good the visible containeth both the good and the bad that onely the Elect this all those indifferently that are brought into her by the preaching of the truth e Visibilis Ecclesia est coetus communiter vocatotum tum electorum tum reproborum Wollebius saith pag. 194. the visible Church is a company joyntly called as well of Elect as Reprobate f Ecclesia visibilis constat non solum ex electis vere piis sed etiam ex reprobis Hypocritis Ravanellus in verb. Eccles The visible Church consists not onely of the Elect and truely Godly but also of reprobates and Hypocrites g Nostri Ecclesiam universalem non invisibilem quae solos electos vere fideles complectâ—tur de quae Christus loquitur Matth. 16. sed visibilem quae electis hypocritis constant intelligunt Gomarus Analysis in 2 Thes 2. Our Divines understand the Church universal not invisible which onely contains the elect and truely faithful of which Christ speaks Matth. 16. but the visible which consists of Elect and Reprobate Mr. Hudson Vindication pag. 7. In the same sense that a visible Church may be called a Mystical body of Christ Christ may be also called a Mysticall head thereof as Christ terms himself a Master so he hath evil slothfull servants and stewards as a King he hath rebells that will not have him to rule over them even in his Church Matth. 25.6 giving like instance as a shepherd as an householder as a bridegroom a husbandman a fisherman a vine adding Christ saith My people are foolish they have not known me sottish children c. h Alia est Ecclesia vocatorum promiscue bonis malis fidelibus hypocritis constans Alia est Ecclesia electorum vere fid lilium qui quidem in coetu vocatorum sunt Pareus Revelation 3.1 The Church of the called is one consisting promiscuously of good and bad faithful and hypocrites the Church of the elect is another consisting of Elect and truely faithful which indeed are of the same company of those that are called Ames Anti Bel. T. 2. lib. 2. Cap. 1. not 5. when Bellarmine had stated the controversy between his party and his adversaries Others he saies require inward virtues to make any a Church member i Nosautem ut aliquis aliquo modo dici possit pars verae Ecclesiae de qua Scripturae loquuntur non putamus requiri ullam inteman virtutem But we faith he do not think that any inward virtue is required to make a man in some sort a part of that true Church of which the Scripture speaks After discovery of his sophistry in the word after a sort positively answers k Falsum est internas virtutes requirui à nobis ut aliquis sit in Ecclesia quod visibilem ejus statum It is false that inward vertues are required of us to put a man into the Church according to
and takes to other objects that is to me sufficient Or will it follow that either the Eunuch did or must necessarily be presumed to understand upon that little acquaintance that it seems he yet had in the Gospel the whole of those choyce observations or can it be any way certainly collected that such a Confession that he made was accompanied with a present saving work But Mr. Baxter hath singularly engaged me to him quoting those Texts John 11.25 26 27. John 1.49 50. 1 Joh. 4.15 he addes Here is more then right to Baptisme Then a man may have right to Baptisme that is short of those great priviledges of dwelling in God and being born of God and I scarce know what to say more for my own opinion It further followes If you think as you seem by your answer to do that a man may assent to the truth of the Gospel with all his heart and yet be void of justifying faith you do not lightly erre It followes not I think from any thing that I have said that I am in any such opinion That Expression is in Philips words and I have told you he might require de bene esse that which is not necessary to the esse of Baptisme But in case I be in any so heavy an Error I am thus holpen out of it Though an unregenerate man may believe as many truths as the regenerate yet not with all his heart Christ saith Matth. 13. The Word hath not rooting in him It is then granted that he may believe all truths and that which is added to prove that he cannot believe them with his whole heart is not with me convincing The Word had not root not because they did not intirely from the heart assent to it But because they received it not in the love of it They received the light to inform their judgments not any thorow heat for the warmth of their affections There followes Doubtlesse whether or no the practical understanding do unavoidably determine the will yet God doth not sanctifie the understanding truly and leave the will unsanctified which must be said if the dogmatical faith that is the Intellectual assent of a wicked man be as strong as that of a true believer Here is suggested that I say that the Intellectual assent of a wicked man is as strong as that of a true believer I know not where I have said it or any thing that implies it It may be a true assent though not of that strength But if I had said it will it thence follow that God doth sanctifie the understanding truly and leave the will unsanctified I trow not Is every strong Intellectual assent sanctified is every Intellectual assent which is of equal strength with that in the regenerate truly sanctified Clearnesse of light commands assent to truths when corruption of affections will not suffer that at least pro hic nunc that the goodnesse or bestnesse if I may so say should be believed I believe it is as strong in the Devils as in any Regenerate man in the world I know not how it fares with some whom God may exercise more gently respective to temptations and Satans Buffettings I am sure that there are those that would sometimes freely give up all that is dear to them in the world to be as clear in some fundamental truths as Satan himself he doubtlesse injects Scruples where himself is without scruple I know some question whether there be any such thing as faith in divels notwithstanding James saith The Devils believe and tremble But certain it is there is an Intellectual assent to Divine truth in the Devils as we may see Matth. 8.29 Mark 3.11 Luk. 4.41 Acts 19.15 and yet there is no sanctification wrought And therefore though the wicked match the regenerate in assent in their understanding it will not follow that their understandings therefore are truly sanctified I am further referr'd to Dr. Downam against Mr. Pemble which is not in my hands and whether my answer be equal to silence as is in the close affirmed I must leave to the Reader to determine Advertisements given to Mr. Baxter touching his undertaking for Mr. Firmin IN a distinct Section Mr. Baxter lets us know how good a mind he had to have appeared in this cause for Mr. Firmin which wonderful change in him may well be my admiration All know that have looked into my Birth-priviledge that I delivered the same things there as in my Treatise of the Covenant I have asserted against Mr. Firmin and that past with Mr. Baxter if reports have not deceived me with good approbation I communicated to him a considerable part of my defence of it against Mr. T. his letter in Manuscripts and I blush not to tell the Reader that he applauded it And besides what I have produced already out of him I have a witnesse of reverend esteem that he hath said that I had given him in discourse full satisfaction of the title of unregenerate men or some phrase parâ—llell to Sacraments But in case upon change of judgment he will appear for Mr. Firmin in this particular and that meerly as he sayes in love of the truth least the reputation of man should cloud it and in love to the Church and the lustre of the Christian name lest this fearful gap should let in that pollution that may make Christianity seem no better then the other Religions of the world Further explaining himself For I fear this loose doctrine so he is pleased to call it of Baptisme will do more to the pollution of the Church then others loose doctrine of the Lords Supper or as much If upon these specious pretences he hath still a mind to it I shall crave leave to offer some words by way of advice to him First To reconcile himself to Mr. F. they being as yet so far from agreement either in judgment or in practice both of them are gone out of the road of the Reformed Churches but Mr. Baxters friend for whom he is about to undertake as to his judgment is yet in the lower form when he is in the upper Mr. F. requires not truth of grace to make a visible Church-member but declares himself very largely against it he requires not truth of grace in a parent to entitle his child in the right of Baptisme It is enough with him that he be a man of knowledge and free from scandal which he well knowes to be the case of many in unregeneration And though Mr. Baxter is thus gone beyond him in judgment yet he sits down far short of him in practice and sayes that we are bound to baptize all those that make an outward profession and consequently their children when Mr. F. upon tender conscienciously refuses many of them Mr. F. and I are as I suppose upon neerer terms of accord then Mr. F. and Mr. Baxter both of us agreeing that unregenerate men have their title and a faith that is short of justifying may
d Utrum Sacerdos debeat denegare corpus Christi peccatori petenti whether a Priest ought to give the body of Christ to a sinner seeking it part tertia quaest 80. Art 6 without mention of any other in power for it The Fathers were also of the same judgement we need not quote testimonies from them of exclusion of men from the Sacraments he that will be furnished let him read Mr. Gillespy Aarons rod lib. 3. cap. 17. And we read of no other joyned with the Minister for that work Dionysius Areo pagita who is reckoned amongst ancient Writers though not of that standing to be Pauls Scholar Hierarch Eccles cap. 3. pag. 3 having spoken of those that were possest with Devills and tormented called Energumeni and of flagitious persons saith e Primi igitur isti quidem rectius quam illi Ministri officio voce separentur Let these therefore first and much rather then the other be separated by the voice and office of the Minister It was then accounted to be his office to see to that work That of Chrysostome frequently quoted for exclusion of scandalous persons from this Supper speaks fully to the power of dispensers for it Homil. 83. in Matth. Let no cruel one no unmerciful one none any way impure come unto it I speak these things to you that do receive and also to you that do administer even to you this is necessary to be told that with great care and heedfulnesse you distribute these gifts there doth no small punishment abide you if you permit any to partake of this Table whose wickednesse you know for his blood shall be required at your hands Other reformed Churches place for the greater part this power in the Eldership preaching and ruling Elders joyned together in Consistory Those of the independant Congregational way judge it meet that the whole Church even all the body of the faithful should have their vote in it The best way for the discovery of truth is to hear what each part have to say for themselves and then to examine proofs brought together with inconveniencies that may be objected and are like to follow from any one of these by whom power is claimed and lastly to pitch upon that which we judge to be most suitable to Scripture and to answer the inconveniences charged upon it For that party that can speak most of reason according to Scripture-rule and whose way is followed with fewest inconveniences may in all reason lay the fairest claim to it But to do this throughly were an endlesse labour in which we might take in the whole dispute about Church Government which would be an outlet farre bigger then this whole work Those that vest the Pastor in this power say 1. He is the steward of the Mysteries of God 2 Cor. 4.1 Allegations for a Ministers sole power And as stewards in great families have the care of ordering the food of the whole household so they being called to this honour are to have the like power in the Church of God 2. They alone are to dispense this ordinance as upon a manifold account may be made good and in due place God willing shall be spoken to 3. The administration of Sacraments belongs to the power of order wherewith Ministers are solely vested and not to jurisdiction as is granted and therefore his prudence must guide him in discerning the parties that are to partake of it A faithful and wise steward discerns the season when to give portions of meat to the household Luk. 12.42 as also the persons to whom he is to impart it This learned Mr. Jeans saith is the opinion of the Schoolmen though he is pleased to say They are extreamly out in it in denying the debarring from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper to notorious offenders to be an act of jurisdiction and and so they saith he put it into the hands and power of a Minister to deny it those that he judgeth to be gosse and scandalous sinners pag. 46. quoting a full and pertinent passage out of Suarez in tertiam partem Thomae tom 3. disput 67. Sect. 3. Haec dispensatio vel denegatio Sacramenti non est consideranda ut actio jucialis vel inflictiva poenae sed solum ut prudens ac fidelis administratio Sacramenti ideo non pendet ex testibus aut probantionibus sed solum ex ea Scientia cognitio ne quae prudenti existimatione secundum occuâ—entes circumstantias judicatur sufficiens ut sine incâ—mmodo possit debeat negari Sacramentum This dispensation or denyal of the Sacrament is no judicial act or imposition of a penalty but onely a prudent and faithful administration of it and therefore doth not depend on witnesses or proofs but onely on such a knowledg and understanding of the thing which by a prudential estimate according to emergent circumstances may be judged sufficient that without any inconvenience the Sacrament may be denied 4. If this power be denyed to aM inister many times it so falls out that of necessity either the administration of the Sacrament must be wholly suspended which some of reverend worth have largely shewed to be of dangerous consequence or else the Minister must be necessitated to dispense it to those that are most unfit to partake of it In abundance of places no such power of jurisdiction is set up nor can be expected and food is necessary when we want a rod. Allegations for the power of an Eldership Those that contend for the Elderships power in it affirming that it belong to them and no other First distinguish of the administration of the Sacrament and admission to it confessing that administration belongs to the power of order but admission as they say belongs to jurisdiction Now jurisdiction is in Elders together with the Pastor not so narrow as to be seated solely in the Pastor nor so large as to take in all the people Secondly They dispute largely from the inconveniences that will follow in case it be left solely in the hands of the Minister or put promiscuously into the hands of the people and therefore to avoid both of these extreams they vest the whole Eldership and onely the Eldership in power with it Allegations for the power of the people Those that plead for the power of the people say First that they must in duty avoid such in their converse that are thus under censure and therefore are to have a hand in and to be called to counsel about it Secondly That in excommunication the people are to have a hand we find the Apostles direction for it 1 Cor. 5.4 and consequently insuspension and so they conclude that the power is in all the faithful I must freely professe that the first of these which hath been longest in use takes most with my judgement as that which hath most strength of reason for it and attended for ought I can yet see with least
are likewise seals where there are like Sacramental expressions notwithstanding they have no such name in Scripture And as the Apostle infers from the institution of Circumcision and Abrahams acceptation of it that Circumcision was a seal so may we infer in like manner that other Sacraments are signs and seals Compare that which the Apostle here deduceth from Gen. 17. concerning Abrahams Circumcision with that which may be deduced from Acts 8.34 35. concerning the Eunuchs Baptisme Abraham believed and was justified upon believing and then received the sign of Circumcision a seal of the righteousnesse of faith which he had being uncircumcised And the Eunuch did believe on Philips preaching and afterwards received Baptisme May we not well then say He received the sign of Baptisme a seal of the righteousnesse that he had being yet unbaptized so we may say of Pauls Baptisme and the Jaylours upon their miraculous conversion to the faith they received the sign of Baptisme for the same reason Secondly It is demanded whether the Covenant of grace and promises of salvation be compleat valid and firm in themselves Object without these things annexed to them or whether they be meerly void and null in Law as Kings and mens Deeds and Charters without a seal to confirm them If incompleat infirm and invalid this is extreamly derogatory to the Covenant and therefore they are not properly seals Answ 1. Sol. If there be some dissimilitude between civill seals used by men in Charters and conveyances and seals of God put to his Covenant will it then follow that upon that account they are no seals There are dissimilitudes between the Ambassadors of Princes and the Ministers of Christ respective to their functions are Ministers then no Ambassadors There is difference between servants of men and servants of God are Christians then no servants Sacraments are seals by way of metaphor because they do the office that seals do among men and if they do not per omnia quadrare as no metaphors do yet in case they agree in the main for which that serves from whence the metaphor is borrowed it is sufficient Ministers are fitly called Ambassadors being sent of God to treat from him with a people as Ambassadors are sent of Princes notwithstanding that those to whom Ambassadours come may treat or not treat at pleasure may give in Propositions as well as receive them when they to whom Gods Ministers are sent must give audience must take the Propositions delivered and not stand to Capitulate If Sacraments ratifie to us the promises of the Covenant That is enough to denominate them seales though wit could devise twenty differences And yet I read some differences assigned which I confesse I do not understand to be any differences at all 2. I know not that it is absolutely true in Law that mens grants are void altogether without a seal I have heard of Leases parol and Wills nuncupative which I am sure have no seal And seales sometimes by the injury of time are utterly broke and lost and in this case I suppose the Covenant may yet stand 3. What is objected against this office of Sacraments as seales may also be objected against the oath of God made to Abraham for confirmation of his Word That will admit the dilemma Either his Word of Promise was true and firm without it or else which I am loath to speak subject to change The application is easie The same thing was revealed to Pharaoh in a dream for seven years plenty and seven years famine by a double sign If there was truth in one we may argue the second needs not if untrue neither have cause to be heeded or regarded If we will undertake such kind of reasonings we should make no end 4. The Covenant is compleat full firm and valid in case we should never more then once hear it or never have any seal put to it nor any oath for confirmation yet our unbelief and distrust is such that we need ingeminations inculcations oaths seals and all from God to uphold us Object Thirdly It is yet demanded whether these seales are inseparably annexed to the Covenant and promises of grace in the Old or New Testament as parts or parcels of them as seales are annexed To the Charter If yea then shew us to what Covenants and Promises and in and by what Texts they are thus inseparably annexed and how any can be saved or made partakers of the benefit of the Covenant and promises of grace who do not actually receive these seales of grace when as your selves with all Orthodox Divines must grant that many who were never baptized and infinite who never received the Lords Supper are and may be saved and are made partakers of the Covenant and promises of grace without receiving or enjoying these seales of grace If no then how can these be termed seales of the Covenant and promises of grace which are not inseparably affixed to them as seales are to Charters since many receive the Covenant and promises of grace without these seales and other receive these seales without the Covenant or promises the benefit whereof they never enjoy Answ They are inseparably joyned respectu praecepti Sol. as being enjoyned of God and here all the Texts brought to prove the Sacraments not arbitrary but necessary may be brought in to witnesse though not so respectu medii The Covenant may have its effect without them The Covenant is intire in it self without them They are not inseparable quoad esse yet they have their necessity though not simple and absolute quoad operari for the Covenant to have its due work on our hearts God saw them necessary helpful and useful and therefore gave them in charge as many Scriptures witnesse and we of necessity must submit to them in order to obtain the end to which they serve and for which they are designed and appointed SECT II. Rules for a right understanding of Sacramental Seales FIrst These are outward visible seales Explicatory Propositions touching the sealing of Sacraments and priviledges of visible Churches and Church-membership committed to the Stewards of God in his house to dispense and apply to their people And so different from that other seal of God frequently mentioned the seal of the Spirit which is internal invisible proper onely to the elect regenerate reserved in the hand of God according to prerogative to give That these are external and visible needs no more then our eyes and that they are the priviledg of visible Churches and Church-members sufficient hath been spoken And therefore they both agree in the general nature of a seal both are for ratification and confirmation of the truth of Gods promises yet in a different way and different latitude They have the former that never reacht the latter and the former is serviceable to attain to the latter Secondly They are seales not to confirm any truth of God in it self or to work in us any assent to general Scripture-Propositions But
how great things they ascribe to the body of Christ received if no barre be put which they understand of the Sacramental bread is very well known But as some have observed where poyson growes providence takes care that there be antidotes found so none of these ever appeared in the Church but some by the good hand of God have stood up in opposition How mightily did the Prophet Jeremy oppose himself against that over-high opinion that the Jewes in his time had of Circumcision Jer. 9.25 26. As also Paul making use of his authority against the Jewes in his time and disputing at large against it Rom. 2. And the Apostle Peter foreseeing it seems that Baptisme would be set up as high among Christians as ever Circumcision was among the Jewes makes it his businesse to prevent it Having affirmed that Baptisme saves he is careful to let us know that it is not by its own power but by the resurrection of Christ that is Faith in the Resurrection and further explains himself that it is not the outward act alone but as answered with an inward work that hath that power as you have heard And Popish Schoolmen making it their work as we have heard to advance Sacraments to that height Protestant Writers in a sull stream have appeared to set them on their right bottome and to make it appear what it is that Scripture attributes to them and what in their right use may be expected from them Calvin's words lib. 4. instit cap. 14. Sect. 14. are high and notable having opposed the doctrine of nuda signa which makes Sacraments to be bare and naked signs On the other hand saith he b Rursum admonendi sumus ut isti vim Sacramentorum enervant usumq prorsus evertunt ita ab adversâ parte stare alios qui arcanas nescio quas virtures Sacramentis affingunt quae nusquam illis à Deo insitae leguntur Quo errore periculosè falluntur simpliciores et imperiti dum et Dei dona quaerere docentur ubi reperiri minime possunt et à Deo sensim abstrahuntur ut pro ejus veritate meram amplexentur vanitatem Magno enim consensu Sophisticae Scholae tradiderunt Sacramenta novae legis hoc est quae in usu nunc sunt Ecclesiae justificare et conferre gratiam modo non ponamus obicem peccati mortalâ—s Quae sententia dici non potest quà m sit exitialis et pestilens eoque magis quod multis ante saeculis magna Ecclesiae jactura in bonâ orbis parte obtinuit Planè certe diabolica est nam dum justitiam cirra fidem pollicetur animas in exitium praecipites agit deinde quia justitiae causam à Sacramentis ducit miseras hominum mentés in terram sâ— apte sponte plus satis inclinatas hâc superstitione illigat ut in spectaculo rei corpore ae potius quam in Deo ipso acquiescant we are to be advertis'd that as those weaken the efficacy of Sacraments and utterly overthrow their use so there are others on the other hand that assign I know not what vertue to them such that we never read that God ever put into them which errour saith he dangerously deceives the simple and unlearned Whilest they are taught to seek the gifts of God where they cannot be found they are by degrees drawn from God to imbrace meer vanity instead of truth For the Schooles of Sophisters with great consent have taught that the Sacraments of the new law that is those that are now in use among Christians do Justifie and confer grace provided that we put no barre of mortal sin Which opinion saith he hath been of more deadly danger than can be spoken and so much the more because for many Ages to the great losse of the Church it hath prevailed It is certainly saith he devillish for whilest it promiseth Justification without Faith it casts soules headlong to destruction And upon that account because they derive the cause of righteousnesse or Justification from the Sacraments by this superstition they so ensnare the poor soules of men over-much of their own accord inclined to earth that they had rather rest in a corporeall element than in God himself This is his entrance upon the dispute That which he hath further upon it in four whole Sections is very well worth the reading The consent of other Writers of his time and that have followed after him as a cloud of witnesses might be produced but this as the Reader hath heard is already done to my hand And when some of reverend esteem and singularly deserving in the Church of God have gone overmuch on this hand as soon as it was carried abroad in Manuscripts a learned Manuscript of Mr. Gatakers met with it and afterwards appearing in print as a Posthumous work this as soon as it came to the Authors cognizance by his zeal to the truth followed it And let me here adde to that which hath been said that if nothing else yet experience might correct this over-high conceit of the work of Sacraments That which we evidently see is not wrought by Sacraments we cannot believe they are assign'd of God to work This Proposition hath certainly reason in it They certainly do that office which God hath assign'd and appointed them But we evidently see that they do not actually work all that they figure out even where according to these there is no bar put therefore there is no cause to believe that they are design'd of God for it Here I might instance in their failing in the work of remission of sin in Infants seeing when they come to growth we oft see them in that way of sin that stands not with actual forgivenesse But I know that many that here are adversaries confesse an intercision of Justification and therefore this is not against them and others that admit not that doctrine speak of a double Justification one for the state of Infancy another of those that are of growth upon their acceptation of Christ by faith and therefore though sins be remitted in Infancy and afterward upon their acting of sin charged here is no such intercision of justification which Arminians hold and their adversaries oppose I shall therefore wave this and instance in the failing of Baptisme in the work of regeneration which is as well figured out in Baptisme as that other of remission of sin Baptisme comes not alone to remove the guilt but also to correct the power of original corruption and so to work in us a freedome from the power of sin as well as the pardon of it And in case Baptisme effects this work how is it that sin in Infants is so apt to shew it self that as soon as they act they are so readily prone to act that which is evill When Saul said he had done the Commandment of the Lord Samuel had a confutation ready What means then sayes he this bleating of sheep and lowing of oxen in mine ears that
with you are God for you tell us presently that he was justified by them The Apostle indeed addes in the following words He that judgeth me is the Lord But those words have not reference to these now in hand as is plain in the context but to that which he had spoken to vers 3. With me it is a very small thing that I should be judged of you or of mans Judgment yea I judge not mine own self to which these words come in direct opposition But he that judgeth me is the Lord. And thus then the Apostle here argues He that must stand to the Judgment of the Lord may account it a very small thing to be judged of men But I must stand to the Judgment of the Lord Ergo. I think the Reader may find a better interpretation of this text from Mr. Ball quoted by me in this treatise which might be seconded by the authority of severall others and such as he sayth renders the text strong against Justification by works When you have expounded the words as you have done they serve to shut out all works in which Paul ever appear'd from Justification There followes such an inference that you would hardly bear with from another Can you hence prove say you that accepting Christ as a Lord is not the condition of Justification then you may prove the same of the accepting of him as a Saviour It seemes every word in a whole treatise must immediatly of it self formally prove the main thing that is in question It proves that works parallel to Abrahams offering Isaack or leaving of his Country are none such whereby men are justified It fully proves that which the next words seems to disprove I brought in by way of objection that text of James and endeavoured to give some answer to it James 2 24. vindicated James indeed saith that Abraham was Justified by works when he had offered Isaack his Son on the Altar Jam. 2.21 But either there we must understand a working faith with Pisator Paraeus and Penible and confess that Paul and James handle two distinct questions The one whether faith alone Justifies without works which he concludes in the affirmative The other what faith Justifies Whether a working faith only and not a faith that is dead and idle Or else I know not how to make sense of the Apostle who streight infers from Abrahams Justification by the offer of his Son And the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse How otherwise do these aceord He was Justified by works and the Scripture was fulfilled which saith he was Justified by faith Here are many exceptions taken If James must use the term works twelve times in thirteen verses a thing not usuall as if he had fore-seen how men would question his meaning and yet for all that we must believe that by works James doth not mean works it would prove as hard a thing to understand the Scripture as the Papists would perswade us that it is Answ First it seemes the difficulty of interpretation is supposed when the word is used 12 times so near together otherwise I doubt not but your self wil confesse a necessity of interpretation of this kind which yet you would be loath to have branded with such absurdity Secondly If I durst take the liberty that others assume the doubt were easily solved and say that Paul speakes of a reall Justification James of an equivocall which interpretation would far better suit here then else where A dead faith is fit to work a dead Justification and such as carries as full resemblance to Justification in truth as a dead corps doth of a living man Thirdly were you to interpret that of David Psal 22.6 I am a worm and no man I think you would so interpret it as to make him a man and no worm But to leave Metaphors Metonymies frequent in Scripture and come to the Metonymies of this kind How frequently are such found in Scripture which inforce us to say that not to be in strict Propriety of speech what Scrippture saies is He hath made him to be sin for us 2 Cor. 5.21 When yet we must say he was not made sin an entity cannot be made a non ens or meer privation He was made then an atonement for sin a sin-offering as we say a Metonymy of the Adjunct These died in faith having not received the promises Heb. 11.13 They had received the promises Rom. 9.4 It is a contradiction to say They died in the faith and had not received the promise It is taken there for the land promised a Metonymy of the Object When Herod the King heard these things he was troubled and all Jerusalem with him Matth. 2.3 Jerusalem was not troubled It was alone the Inhabitants that were troubled by a Metonymy of the Subjâ—ct This is the Will of God even your Sanctification 1 Thes 4.4 and this was not voluntas Dei but res volita not the Will of God but the thing willed by a Metonymy of the Cause A Thousand more of these might be named which yet are as well understood as we understand each others common Language 2. Do but read say you over all the severses put working faith instead of works trie what sense you will make Answ Here is implyed that As works are taken in some of these verses So they must be taken in all If there be no Metonymy in all then there is no Metonymy in any As one so all are to be understood But if you please to consult Gomarus in his vindication of those words of Christ Matth. 23.27 Com. 1. Pag. 110.111 One and the same word is often repeated in the same verse or neer to it in a different sense Infirma est haec consequentia nititur enim falsa hypothesi quasi ejusdem verbi repetitio semper eundem sensum postularet cum contra pro circumstantiarum ratione saepe diverso sensu accipiatur quem admodum illustria ex empla demonstrant You will find frequent instances where the same word in the self same place or verse must be taken in a different sense in one properly and in the other figuratively Interpreting those words O Jerusalem Jerusalem of the heads and leaders of the people of Jerusalem there lies an objection against him that in Luk. 13.33 the words immediatly before are It cannot be that a Prophet should perish out of Jerusalem where the word Jerusalem is taken for the City it self and not for the heads and leaders of the people He answers This consequence is weak For it is built upon a false ground as though the repetition of the same word should also enforce the same sense when contrawise according to the circumstance of the place it may be taken in a different sence as many illustr ous examples make manifest Instancing in Joh. 3.17 God sent not his Son into the world to condemne the world
an enemy of the Churches peace that dissents in judgement from the Church in some particulars as in ages past it was or he that confessedly dissents from the Church whereof he is and where he lives and as that present it stands I think here the determination is easie Let us enquire whether of these dissents will work more heart-broyles quarrels contentions envyings mutuall oppositions and needless disputes and let that be agreed upon as well it may to bear the blame If all must be tyed up to keep peace and be at one with the Church as to all particular tenents in the revolution of all these ages they are then tyed to know and their Pastors are bound to teach what in all successive ages hath been the Churches opinion But this were a great burden for Pastors and far more intolerable to be put upon the people If a man may be secure in this that he goeth not against truth I think he need not trouble himself as to ages past in the matter of peace Had you produced the vote of Antiquity as a probable inducement to perswade that you had truth according to Scripture and reason on your part it had been somewhat such appeals to humane Authority after Divine Testimony produced is ordinary but to dissent from the Church in which a man lives and of which he is to avoid the danger of a breach of peace with the Church that sometimes was is such a way of peace that I never yet knew troden or taken 2. Whether Antiquity be as cleer for you as the Church in present is for me The latter you freely grant but the former will I think hardly be yeelded notwithstanding what you say Because a word or an opinion that is unsound hath got possession of a little corner of the world for about 150 yeers therefore I am suspected as a novelist for forsaking it Whereas it is to avoid singularity and notorious novelty that I assent not to your way The same I say about the interest of mans obedience in his justification as continued and consummate in judgement If either Clemens Roman Polycarp Ignatius Justin Martyr Irenaeus Tertullian Origen Athenagoras Tatianus Clem. Alexand Minutius Faelix Arnobius Lactantius Cyprian Athanasius Eusebius Greg. Nazianzen Epiphanius Cyrill Hierosol Synesius Cyrill Alaxandr Macarius Hierome Salvian Vincentius Lirin Vigilius or any councill were of your mind in any one of these points and against mine then I will confess at least my supine negligence in Reading and my very faulty Memory in retaining their words How fully you have proved the unfoundness either of the word or opinion in question others must judge But whether the novelty be so notorious as you speak is to be enquired into and in order to that I shall request you Some things propounded to the Readers consideration To take into consideration who they be that make the loudest noyse and send out the greatest Cracks about the Fathers If the Church of Rome may be believed all Antiquity is theirs Hoping to put that cheat upon us as the Gibeonites sometimes did upon Israel Ad patres si quando licebit accedere confectum est praelium Tam sunt omnes nostri quam Gregorius 13. Papa filiorum ecclesiae amantissimus Pater Testes fenestrae omnes res reculae It is still their pretence that all former ages were on their side If we might but appeale to the Fathers saith Campian the controversie were ended They are all as fully ours saith he as Pope Gregory the 13. that most Loving father of the Sons of the Church As the windowes in the Church all other things and thinglings to take the liberty to coyne English as he doth Latine are their witnesses So all the Fathers also that the truth is with them I will say no more but that these naked names will appear to Judicious Readers but as an empty sound a voice and nothing more 2. That some of untainted integrity and of no lesse ability to give account of the Judgement of Antiquity in these controversies have asserted the full contrary to that which you here with so much confidence deliver Chemnitius was a man differing from you in every piece of this doctrine in which you dissent from me and particularly your adversary in all these three poynts in which you make this appeal to former ages He is a man zealous for the instrumentality of Faith in Justification he is large in asserting the promise of mercy in Christ to be the speciall object of Justifying Faith and against your distinction of Justification begun by Faith alone and consummate by works yea there is not a man that ever wrote that appears more your adversary in this poynt then he being judged the most learned grave and moderate of that party in the Reformed Churches wherewith you are most displeased in this Controversie yet he is full in quotation of Antiquity as of his side both in his Common places and in his Examination of the Council of Trent 144. After a List of authorities brought by him his close is worth observation (a) Haec pauca ideo annotavi ut ostenderem doctrinam nostram de Justificatione habere testimonia omnium piorum qui omnibus temporibus fuerunt idque non in declamatoriis rhetoricationibus nec in otiosis disputationibus sed in seriis exercitiis poenitentiae fidei quando conscientia in tentationibus cum suâ indignitate vel coram ipso judicio Dei vel in agone mortis luctatur Hoc enim solo modo rectissimè intelligi potest doctrina de justificatione sicut in Scripturâ traditur Quaeres put concerning this Appeale These few saith he I have noted that it may appear that our doctrine of Justification is attested by all the Godly of all ages that have lived in all times and that not in their Rhetoricall declamations or vaine disputes but in their serious exercises of Repentance and Faith in their Conflicts of conscience in temptation or with their own unworthinesse or before the Tribunal of God or in the Agony of death For this way saith he the doctrine of Justification as it is delivered in Scripture can alone rightly be understood What can be now more contrary then his Testimony and yours how high are both your confidences in full contradiction one against another That which you say is a notorious novelty he saith hath the attestation of all antiquity who shall he now believe that hath not nor cannot search the Authors themselves that have lived in your 1300. or 1400. years 3. I would have you to take into serious consideration these following Quaeres 1. Whether the doctrine of those that bore the name and outward face of the Church was uniforme through out that whole series of time that you take in in you◠challenge Whether in the time of Thomas Aquinas and the following ages the doctrine concerning Justification in the Latine Church was the same as in the daies