Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
truth_n church_n ground_n live_a 1,680 5 9.4884 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A43640 The third part of Naked truth, or, Some serious considerations, that are of high concern to the ruling clergy of England, Scotland, or any other Protestant nation and also a discovery of the excellency of the Protestant religion as it stands in opposition to papistical delusions, being a representation of what is the true glory of Protestants, and what are the base, contemptible and ridiculous principles, on which those that are called Roman Catholicks do build, as upon the sand being very necessary for all Protestant families in this present juncture of time.; Naked truth. Part 3 Hickeringill, Edmund, 1631-1708. 1681 (1681) Wing H1830; ESTC R2673 42,995 50

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Nature of her Policy For the Acquiring of that Arbitrary Absolute and unlimited Power which she exerciseth And first we find that she doth upon her own Authority affirm That it is neither the Letter of the Scripture nor the Grammar of it how Plain Clear or Express soever it be that doth or ought to bind the Consciences of men but the sence of the said Scripture only And Secondly she doth affirm That it is not the sence of the Scripture also which doth or can any way directly bind the Consciences of men if this sence be considered nakedly in it self either as literal or mystical but that the said sence is capable of binding only considered as it is Catholick And Thirdly That it is not either in the Letter or in the Grammar of the said Scripture how clear or plain soever it be that the Divine Authority of it is placed but simply and only in the sence of it as this sence is the sence of the Universal Church and therefore that sence which is properly called Catholick Which Propositions she having in her Prudence thus peculiarly laid down as the Grounds or Foundations not only of all Christian Faith but of all Christian Verity and Truth it self In the next place she builds upon these unsound Grounds an Assumption that is parallel to them and that is every way as entirely her own as the former viz. That she alone hath not only the Right as exclusive to all others of Dispencing this Catholick Sence to all the Members of the Christian Church but of dispencing it in order to their Salvation and hath inherent in her the full and absolute Power finally and Inappealeably to determine at all times and upon all Occasions what the said Catholick Sence is concerning all Points whatever that may be controverted and concerning all places of Scripture whatever that may be doubted of or disputed And that as this Power is absolutely necessary for the Preservation of the Unity so for the Preservation of the Purity of the said Christian Faith in regard it is impossible that such a Sence of the Scripture as is wholly Universal and Catholick should at any time Err. The Conclusion then if all these Premises be true is That the Church of Rome is to be believed and that all her Determinations whatever they be are for Conscience sake to be Obeyed and Submitted unto even by the whole Christian Church without any Dispute or without so much as any scruple of Mind This Conclusion being that which all the Partizans and Champions of the Church of Rome do labour with Might and Main to bring every man to and therefore it is the same with that Security and Rest which they pretend all men may have not only with absolute Safety but with absolute satisfaction in the Bosom of their Church But indeed this Conclusion hath not any tendency to Salvation at all but is quite contrary to all that is alledged and leads expresly to nothing else but to the utter Overthrow and Subversion of the whole Scripture it self with the Mind Law Will and Counsel of God so far at least as depends upon Revelation in regard it puts the Scripture together with the whole Authority of it though Divine in it self absolutely perfectly and entirely into the Arbitrary Will and Power of the said Church And therefore the Protestants upon Consideration of the extreme Mischiefs that must of necessity follow from such a Conclusion as this they do with Indignation reject it And First The Protestants do wholly deny that the said Church of Rome hath any rightful Authority to make null the Grammar of the Scripture Secondly The Protestants do much more deny that she hath any Right to institute or set up such a Sence of the Scripture under any name or pretence whatever that is either opposite to the Grammar of the Scripture or that at least pretends that there is not a necessity to follow and observe the Rules of it Thirdly Consequently they utterly deny that she hath any Right to transfer the Authority of the Scripture from the Sence proper to the Letter of it self to such a Sence as is only and properly hers And Fourthly They deny that she hath any Right or any Power to set up any Sence of her own at all which is not absolutely subjected to the Rule and Authority that is inherent to the Scriptures Letter and Word with the proper Sence of it as this is and ought to be Supreme to all others Fifthly And they do much less acknowledge that she hath any such Right in her or derived to her therefore as to make her Sence of the Scripture or what she declares to be so the Sence of the Universal Church Sixthly Or that she hath any Right to make her sence of the Scripture to be the Absolute or Supreme Rule of all Infallible and Christian Truth or to disallow any Appeal from her proper Determinations to the living Rule of the Scriptures Grammar and to the Letter or Word of it Seventhly And the Protestants denying all these things they do deny therefore that she hath any Authority Power or Right to dispence with That Duty and Obligation which is divinely and absolutely laid upon the Consciences of men which is To obey the Word of God in the litteral plain and express Sence of it Eighthly And the Protestants do deny consequently that the Consciences of men are or can any way possibly be obliged to her bare Determination of the Sence of the Scripture Especially so far as this is set up absolutely by her and is not dependant upon any Sence proper to the Words and Grammar of the Scripture it self All and every of which Powers as the Protestant Church doth wholly deny to the Church of Rome So for as much as the Church of Rome can pretend to no one of the said Rights or Authorities now mentioned otherwise than as it must by some means or other be lawfully conveyed or derived to her The Protestant Church therefore challengeth her and provoketh her to shew that special and peculiar Commission by which SHE and SHE alone is impowered to do all or any of those things before named Because without this Commission can be produced and produced upon some Clear Evident and Sufficient Warrant or Ground for it All Her pretences to the said Authority seeing it is so manifestly destructive to the Scripture it self must needs appear to be not only Precarious but very frivolous and very absurd The Church of Rome being thus challenged and provoked in the point of her Commission and yet well knowing that there is nothing which she can possibly appeal unto for the proof of her Authority beside the Scripture it self She becomes hereupon to be several ways distressed and perplexed First because she finds that she cannot allow of the Grammatical Sence of the Scripture in any one Case whatever But she must necessarily and unavoidably allow it in all other Cases also where it may
he presumeth the Church also to be a thing altogether Holy and such as neither hath Erred nor can Err for should he question this he must question the whole of his Religion it self opposite to which Character we shall now consider The Character of a Protestant But the Protestant Church on the other hand having separated from the Church of Rome not only upon the Supposition that she hath actually Erred but that she hath been grosly corrupted as well in Manners as in Faith And the Protestant Church having for the better Justification of her own Practice both in the matter of Worship and in all things relating to Doctrine and Faith SET UP The Scriptures as the Sole and Soveraign Rule of Gods Mind and Will to his Church As she cannot challenge the Exercise of any Authority therefore that is beyond that of the Scripture or any that is not subordinate to the said Scripture it self So it is expected that all the Duties which she requires and all those Articles or Points of Faith which she at any time recommends to such as are the Members of her should always be enforced from those Arguments properly and only which are drawn from the Scripture Because it is this which she her self hath appealed unto and this only which she challengeth to justifie her A Protestant then that understands the Grounds of his Religion or that hath been at all instructed in the Rise or Principles of the Reformation taking this for the very first Article of his Faith That a Church may Err and may have Corruption in it and may in its Worship possibly swerve and depart from the pure Mind Word and Wisdom of God And laying that no less firmly as the Foundation of his Belief on the other hand viz. That the Scripture cannot Err nor can be other than the unalterable and incorruptible Rule of Gods Law and of his Will and Mind to his People he cannot possibly hold the Authority of the Church to be Divine any further or otherwise than as it appears to be clearly grounded upon the Scriptures as the Word of God And therefore the Tye or Obligation which he hath to obey the Church so far as it relates to the Conscience and binds the Conscience ariseth out of no other Ground than from the Conformity which he seeth or is perswaded that the said Church hath in her Laws Orders and Doctrines to the said Word and if this Conformity doth or shall once cease in the said Church a Protestant as a Protestant cannot but judge his Tye or Obligation to her as a Church ought to cease also with it And this being the true State of that Radical or Essential Difference that is between the Principles of a Protestant and the Principles of a Papist as a Papist It will hence follow That if a Church that professeth her self to be Protestant or the Ruling Clergy of a Protestant Church shall not much consider or regard the justifying of what Laws and Orders she makes by the Consonancy they expresly have to the Law or Mind of God in his Word which is his Rule to the Church nor shall much concern it self to clear and inforce the Faith and Doctrine which she holds by the Evidence of its Truth or by the Authority of it as sufficiently grounded upon that Word that is absolutely Divine But shall on the contrary in whatever she Commands or in the things she Teacheth constrain or exact an Obedience from her Members to her self and to her own Authority as absolute and as unsubordinate to the Word of God and therefore to her Authority as it is a distinct thing from the said Word That Church or the Clergy rather that are the Rulers of it so far as she doth this in any Doctrine or in any Law that she makes indispensable doth so far cease in her Principles and Practice to be Protestant and doth so far disclaim not only a main and chief Ground of her Separation from the Church of Rome but the very Principle it self upon which she pretends to guide her self in her Reformation For it cannot be denyed that these were the great and the main Causes of our Separation from the Church of Rome viz. First Because she had made her self Absolute and had set up an Authority in the matters of Worship and Faith above that of the Scriptures as the only Word of God And Secondly Because she did not barely excommunicate men but did also persecute them and did deprive them both of their Estates Liberties and Lives upon a Principle as contrary to humane Reason as it was contrary to humane Society and Quiet viz. not for any evil in their Conversations in their Morals or in their Lives But meerly for obeying what they sincerely judged to be the Law Mind and Will of God And meerly for believing that his whole Law Will and Mind to his Church as a Church especially relating to the Worship of himself was contained in his Word Thirdly Because by this persecution as it was extended to the extreme Punishment of Persons both in their Liberties and Goods and sometimes in their Lives by stinking Prisons and want of Necessaries she did unavoidably draw upon her self the Guilt of mens Apostacy Hypocrsie and Dissimulation who durst not but obey and comply with her Commands meerly out of fear And did as unavoidably draw upon her the Guilt of all that Suffering Cruelty and Blood whatever it were she spilt and did inflict upon those persons who withstood her Commands and who were otherwise in all things blameless both as to their Morals Lives and Conversations I say if it be matter of Fact and that which cannot be denyed that these three things were some of the Main and Principal Causes for which we separated from the Church of Rome and for which our first Reformers themselves called her Antichristian and sometimes Bloody and sometimes the Scarlet Whore And if these three things when at any time mentioned with reference to the Church of Rome are still acknowledged to be evil and so stiled to this day so far as it concerns her Yea if these three things are at this very present in our Controversies with that Church not only charged upon her but cast in her teeth among many other things by way of reproach and to set forth the just ground that we even as the Church of England as well as other Churches have both of exception against and hatred of her MUST NOT these three things be MUCH MORE EVIL in a Protestant Church who after she hath condemned all these things not only as evil but as Antichristian in the Church of Rome and after she hath pretended to separate from the said Church for them doth nevertheless give her self leave to practise them without condemning her self at all in them And MUST NOT This Practice cast a manifest Blemish and Reproach upon on her own Reformation and evidence to the world that she doth not either believe the Principles
Popish Clergy do punish men viz. for their worshipping God and for their worshipping of him not contrary to the Scripture or contrary to any thing that seems clearly and plainly their Duty in the Word of God but contrary only to some Order or other in the Church And if the quality of the Persons that do suffer and that are punished by the Protestant Clergy are the same also with those that are punished by the Popish Clergy that is such men as are neither blameable in Nor so much as accused or charged by them with or for any Crime Or any Immorality in their Lives and Conversations But such as otherwise demean themselves in all Duty and with all Subjection to their Superiors I say if both these are the very SAME one with another wherein doth the Essential Difference lye between the Persecution of the Popish Clergy and the Persecution of the Protestant Clergy unless it be strictly in this That the Protestant Clergy do pretend to believe the Scriptures to be the Supreme Rule and mind of God to his Church and if asked do freely grant That men are NOT bound in Conscience to any Rule Superior to this Nor can be bound in the things of Faith or in things relating to the Worship of God to any Rule above this And yet at the same time that they own this they persecute their Brethren not only in their Liberties but in their Goods Fortunes and Estates and sometimes in their Lives also through nasty Prisons and want of Conveniences for acknowledging the said Scriptures to be such as they themselves do own them to be and for that they accordingly conform to their own Principles Whereas The Popish Clergy though they persecute men for the same Crimes yet they do not give so much Honour to the Scriptures nor do so much as pretend to it But which of these two Are for this very Cause the greater Crimes before God may be left to all rational men to consider In the mean time I am most sure of this That whereas our first Reformers did call the Church of Rome Antichristian and did charge her with Innocent Blood and did put the name of Scarlet-Whore for this Reason upon her Yet now it is most certain the Stain and Discredit of it is in her eyes manifestly lessened if it be not wholly bletted out For it is impossible that the Church of Rome should ever hereafter grant these things to be Stains or Crimes proper only to her which she doth not only see but can daily observe some Protestant Church or other to follow her in upon such Grounds as are far less justifiable in the said Protestant Church according to the Principles they profess than they are in her self And that this is not a thing ever to be hoped or expected from her hereafter is the more clear in regard the said Church of Rome hath already in so many words sharply and closely Retorted it upon the Protestant Church So that the VERY things which we blame the said Church of Rome for and for which we accuse her Criminally And which we pretend to be the main Grounds why we could no longer have any Communion with her which was her laying aside the sole Authority of the Scriptures And her persecuting such as desired to walk according to the Rule of it some Protestant Churches have not only imitated her in but have outgone her and have done so much worse than she ever did by how much we have contradicted the Principles we profess which she hath not And that she hath cast this as a Reproach upon us in words and hath alledged several Arguments to confirm it and such as have not to this very day been answered by us is matter of Fact And if in all Courts of Judicature matter of Fact be good Evidence and if the highest Evidence that can be given in matter of Fact is when the Fact is able to speak and attest it self or when it is capable to be attested to by thousands then is the Evidence which I here bring every way as good and every way as vallid to prove what I affirm Which is That the Church of Rome hath endeavoured to justifie and acquit her self from the Crime of unjust Persecution and Blood by instancing the same thing in the Practice of Protestants one toward another and therein hath exonerated her self from the sole Guilt of this evil and from the sole Guilt of her being alone that Babylon mentioned Rev. 17. which hath been frequently fixed singly upon her and attributed to none besides her And she hath produced several Arguments also and those of Weight to make it appear That Protestants In their Persecution one of another are far more unjust upon the Principles we profess as Protestants than she is upon her own Principles how much so ever we have pleased to inveigh against her and revile her And these Arguments she hath no way scrupled publickly and openly to divulge in English to the end that every man that is rational may the better examine them and judge of them And that we have not as yet pleaded to the said Arguments Or to the Retortion she hath made upon us either by denying the Fact it self absolutely or by distinguishing the respective differing Circumstances and Grounds of it is also well known Whereby she hath the more just occasion to think that those Protestants that have thus persecuted others are conscious to themselves of their own Guilt And seeing all this is pure matter of Fact one of these two Conclusions therefore do seem to be impossible to be avoided viz. That either we have done very evil in charging the Church of Rome as Antichristian and in charging her as guilty of the Blood of the Saints which is mentioned Rev. 17.6 which must nevertheless be inevitably charged some where and very evil to impose the name of Scarlet-Whore and of Babylon upon her Or If the Protestant Churches have said all this really in Judgment and really in Truth against her Then have some Protestant Churches done much worse themselves in being actually guilty of the same things which have been so criminally charged upon her And if the Church of Rome be guilty of Innocent Blood then none that is sober can doubt but she must at length be lyable to the extreme Judgments of God for it And therefore if any Protestant Churches have followed her in that very Guilt the same judgments must as unquestionably come upon them and perhaps more severe And to the end that all Protestant Churches may be awakened to consider their great Danger in this Case if they have been Persecutors of their Brethren I need do no more than to lay before them the express Prophesie of our Lord Jesus Christ in this Case viz. That there should be some who delaying in their hearts the Consideration of his coming should instead of giving a portion of Meat to their fellow-Servants be found smiting of them The
Heart smote him And some things he was about to do for the prevention of which he gave solemn thanks to God For we find that Davids Heart smote him after he had numbered the people and after he had but cut off the Skirt of Sauls Garment 2 Sam. 24.10 and 1 Sam. 24.5 And he gives solemn Thanks for Abigails being an Instrument to prevent him from shedding Blood 1 Sam. 25.32 For if the Church of Rome do punish others really and indeed upon the Principle of Disobeying her Authority though she dare not pretend this openly lest her Cruelty and Blood-Guiltiness being for no other Cause should be so manifest that it would never be able to admit of a competent Apology Colour or Excuse And therefore leaving this she insists upon the Ground of Her Persecution as it is for Herefie only But if we on the other hand punish others not only with loss of Goods but with loss of Liberty Banishment and perpetual Imprisonment which is far more Cruelty than Immediate Death it self and would be more willingly chosen by most men and do all this for a Non-conformity and Disobedience to the Orders and Rites of the Church without so much as a pretence to any Guilt of Heresie Then Where is the difference between these two sorts of Persecutors unless the Ruling Clergy of our Church have done it more daringly and more Broad-facedly than the Church of Rome doth But which is more to be considered and laid to heart If the Church of Rome do not punish those that acknowledge her to be a True Church but those only that condemn her as a false Church and who do under this Notion professedly separate from her as from that Babylon mentioned in the Revelations And if we on the other hand punish those that own not only the same Faith and Doctrine But the very same Principles of Reformation with our selves and who therefore give no just Provocation nor use any such reproachful Language to our Church as the Protestant Churches generally do to the Church of Rome Where then is the difference unless it be that she renders evil to her professed Enemies who cannot but openly own a Hatred and Contempt for her We inflict all manner of Evil upon our Brethren that supplicate for Peace with us and would be glad not to separate from us and which of these two then is the more ingenious But which is yet more If we as we are Protestants cannot but grant that there is to be a Subordination of the Church not only immediately to the Lord Jesus Christ himself but to HIS Word and that we utterly deny that he hath any such One as a Vicar upon the Earth and utterly deny that any man whatever hath any power to dispence with the Commands of our Lord Jesus Christ so far as they appear to be clear to us from his Word wherefore if we notwithstanding we make these things to be the very Profession of our Faith yet shall never punish any But such as keep exactly to all and every of these Principles and shall observe them conscientiously and strictly Whereas the Popish Clergy on the contrary punish none but such only who deny or oppose wholly the things which their Church affirms Where then is the Reasonableness of our Punishment and the Unreasonableness of theirs and which of these two hath the greater Resemblance of Hypocrisie even in our own Judgment whether our Punishment or theirs seeing we punish men for following the Principles we allow They never punish any but for following those Principles that they totally disallow But the evil of this Persecution further appears thus for if we as Protestants say we have separated from the Church of Rome out of Conscience First because she imposed those things that were Inscriptural upon us And secondly because she was guilty of Blood and that the Characters of a false Church did for both these Reasons lye upon her and therefore that we cannot but give thanks solemnly unto God for our Deliverance out of her power And if the Ruling Clergy of a Protestant Church have nevertheless not spared to persecute unto Blood even those that have not only out of the same two Motives separated with us But by persisting constantly in the said Motives do daily justifie us How comes our Blood and Persecution to be less sinful than hers and why should it be less crying unto God for had we never so intently studied how we might have put the greatest stumbling-Block we could before our Adversaries or how we might have brought the greatest Blemish Scandal and Reproach that was possible upon our Reformation or how we might have opened the Complaints and Exclamations of men most against us What Course could possibly have been taken to all these ends that could have been more effectual than this For how can he that is thus persecuted by the Ruling Clergy of a Protestant Church give Thanks unto God solemnly for his Deliverance out of the Church of Rome's Thraldom when the very same Persons that pretend to be delivered with him Imposeth nevertheless the like Thraldom upon him Or how shall he that is thus persecuted be any way able to imagine and much less to believe that the Church which persecutes him is serious in her Profession of Thanks unto God for her own freedom when she is no sooner freed her self but she brings others into the same Hardship and Servitude that she her self did but a little while since greatly complain of and groan under But leaving these things to be most seriously considered by all Protestant Churches in these three Kingdoms and elsewhere even by all whomsoever they Concern I shall now proceed to give in this place A Description of the Absurd Ridiculous and Contemptible Grounds and Foundations on which the Papists Build Though nothing is more Evident than this that the Thraldom or Bondage of the Church of Rome doth principally consist in the disagreeableness of her Doctrines to the Rule of the Scripture yet nevertheless it is Matter of Fact That the Church of Rome doth not in plain and express Terms deny the Truth or deny the Authority of the Scripture or deny the end of them as they are appointed for the Church And if we cannot for this Cause justly charge her with any of these things Then we must necessarily grant that the said Doctrines so far as they are corrupt and have a real Inconsistency with the Scripture it self could have their Rise at first no otherwise Than by vertue of her Authority as a Church And consequently that as they had thus their Rise at first so they have had their whole Maintenance and Support ever since no otherwise than as this Authority being Absolute and Arbitrary hath defended them against whatever might be said from the Authority of the Scripture in opposition to them And therefore here we shall lay open her Shame and Nakedness and her great Absurdity that lyeth in the Manner and Method and
prove her proper Authority by the Catholick Sence of the Scripture And To prove the Catholick Sence of the Scripture by vertue of her proper Authority And at length not only without all ground but without all shame or sence of Justice to beg the whole Argument it self in Controversie between us Than which we say there can be nothing whatever that is either more unreasonable or more impudent and base And having gotten her Authority therefore in this manner not only or not so much by shuffling as by plain snatching it and being conscious to her self that it would be a very vain thing for her to suppose she should be able to defend the said Authority by any better Argument than that very Stratagem she made use of it to prove it she concludes it to be most safe to maintain it therefore in the same manner as she got it which is by force and therefore resolves to punish all men with Death that will be so hardy as to deny it so far at least as her Power or Mediation can any way extend to do it And yet lest the Quarrel should by this means look as if it were too personal and too private and that such Princes as were less concerned at it should not be much disposed to ingage with her in it She as if she were Pious in the very Execution of her Malice pretends this shedding the Blood of men though it may seem indeed to be very severe yet is absolutely necessary not so much because they disobey her as because they disobey and oppose the Catholick Sence of the Holy Scripture In which Catholick Sence all the Authority and Divinity of it if you will believe her is properly placed and that by opposing of this they oppose by Consequence not only the Catholick Faith of the Church but the consent of all Christianity it self In the unquestionableness of which the Security and Salvation of men can only and alone rest which pretext is another part as well of her Absurdity as of her Violence and Fraud That notwithstanding she neither hath nor can prove any Obligation that men in Conscience can have to her Authority or to rely upon the Determination of it And though she cannot otherwise require the belief of it from any but as it is a thing meerly precarious yet she puts all to death that yield not to this absolute Usurpation of her Power The Use of this last preceding Discourse From this brief Scheme or summary Prospect of the Nature of this new and peculiar Policy of the Church of Rome We may easily make a measure of her Wisdom as well as of her Truth for by this short State or Account that we now have of these Motives which did mainly induce the said Church intirely to lay aside the express Letter and Grammar of the Scriptures at least as to the Certainty Truth or Infallibility of it we may easily have a view of several horrible Absurdities Contradictions and indeed Impieties that she is by this means forced and necessitated to fall into of which we shall now mention a few Particulars For first as it is Matter of Fact which is the most infallible Evidence in the World that all the Doctrines of the Church of Rome do depend solely upon The Authority of the said Church So it is Matter of Fact equally That both the said Doctrines and the said Authority it self which upholds the said Doctrines do depend upon the Catholick Sence of the Scripture For the same Reason therefore it is even from the strictness of the Connexion and mutual Dependance of these three one upon another That as the Doctrines of the Church of Rome must necessarily be all of them True and all of them Divine If the Authority of the said Church is altogether True and altogether Divine So also the Authority of the Church of Rome must be unquestionably Divine If the Catholick Sence of the Scripture upon which it is alone built be absolutely Divine and free from all possibility of Error And consequently then as the surest proof that we can possibly have of the Divinity of all the Doctrines of the said Church doth lye in the proof the divine Authority of the said Church and in the sureness of it So the surest proof of this doth lye in the proof of the Catholick Sence of the Scripture viz. in the Proof that this Catholick Sence is both divine and infallible and free from all manner of Error imaginable For it is this Sence alone that gives being to the said Authority In as much then as it is strongly alledged that the Catholick Sence cannot possibly but be Divine Infallible and free from all manner of Error The Authority of the said Church therefore must necessarily be Divine Infallible and free from all manner of Error and therefore it is impossible but the Doctrines which are taught by the said Church must be such also that is They must be Divine Infallible and free from all Error So then these three are and must be all of them Divine alike viz The Doctrines of the Church of Rome and the Authority of the said Church and The Catholick Sence of the Scripture And consequently the Sence of the Universal Church must be as Divine as any of these three Because the Catholick Sence of the Scripture and the Sence of the Universal Church is but one and the same Et quae in eodem Tertio conveniunt inter se conveniunt wherefore seeing of all these The Catholick Sence of the Scripture is The main and sure Basis of all the rest and that upon the Divinity certainty and infallibility of This ALL the Divinity Authority and Infallibility of the Church of Rome with its whole Doctrine doth and must wholly and intirely depend The absolute and unquestionable Certainty or Divinity of this therefore is first to be cleared seeing this as we said is of all others the most strongly alledged To one that is an apt Schollar to understand and receive whatsoever the Church of Rome teacheth we shall here shew how this is by her cleared To evidence then the truth of the Catholick Sence of the Scripture how Infallible and Unquestionable it is and to manifest not only the necessity but the absoluteness of its Divinity We need not much more than one Reason because this doth of it self upon the matter amount to a Demonstration which is That there is nothing more clear or more certain than that the said Catholick Sence neither really is the Sence of the Scripture nor really is not nor any thing more certain than that the said Catholick Sence is Both That is to say both it is and it is not the Sence of the Scripture And that we may be yet the more fully and distinctly instructed in the nature of this Mistery and of the strangeness of it we are to know That the extraordinary wonderful and peculiar Power of this Catholick Sence lyeth in the singular Relation which it hath
to the Universal Church and to the Scripture as it is the Sence of neither of them properly and entirely and yet is the Sence of both of them at one and the same time For though this Catholick Sence cannot be had without the Scripture and though it is and must necessarily be given therefore to the said Church by the Scripture Because it is the Scripture only that the said Church doth always refer to when it doth at any time cite or alledge the said Sence as it is Divine And consequently though without the said Scripture it had been wholly impossible that the said Church should either have Challenged or laid Claim to any Truth that had been Authoritative or Divine Notwithstanding this The said Catholick Sence both is given and must necessarily be given to the Scripture by the said Church because without the said Church it would be impossible that this Sence should ever be found out in the Scripture it self in regard nothing is more certain than that the Scripture hath of it self properly no Sence at all at least none that is True Certain and Infallible but as this is by the Universal Church and by the Prudent Care and Foresight of it bestowed upon it And so we must unavoidably grant that though the Catholick Sence be but One yet this One Sence is both created by the Church for the Scripture and created by the Scripture for the Church Which is a very rare and unusual sort of Production And therefore it will follow also that if we regard the Truth Certainty and Infallibility of this Catholick Sence it is wholly and entirely from the Church because neither the Authority properly of it nor its Divinity doth consist in its Truth or in its Certainty If we regard the Divinity and Authority of this Catholick Sence it is not only originally but entirely from the Scripture because it may be Divine though it have neither Certainty nor Infallibility in it at least as the Church of Rome tells us And consequently the said Catholick Sence considered as it is strictly in the Scriptures hath indeed both Authority absolutely in it and Divinity but it neither hath Truth Certainty nor Infallibility But considered as it is strictly in the Church it hath both Truth Certainty and Infallibility absolutely in it But it hath not for all this any thing of Divinity or Authority for this it must borrow from the name of the Scripture So that it is plain That the said Catholick Sence is neither the Sence of the Church properly and entirely nor the Sence of the Scripture properly and entirely and yet that it is the Sence of both of them entirely And the Reason for this is also plain viz. Because according to the Doctrine of the Church of Rome the Divinity of the Catholick Sence is one thing its Truth and Infallibility is quite another for though the Church can give to the Catholick Sence its Truth and Infallibility entirely yet she cannot give any part of its Divinity And though the Scripture can give to the Catholick Sence its whole Divinity and consequently its Authority entirely yet it cannot of it self give it any thing of truth or any thing of Infallibility but this it must have from the Church So mystically is this Catholick Sence parted and divided between both By which partition of the Catholick Sence which is strange we come to know another thing also which is as strange and which otherwise we should never have been able to have found out viz. That though the end of giving the Scripture was unquestionably for the enlightening Ruling and Governing the Church yet the end of setting up the Church was equally also for the enlightening Ruling and Governing of the Scriptures Which as it is a Consequence that can no way be avoided by the Rules of the Church of Rome so it is as manifestly absurd as all the rest Secondly The Divinity of the Catholick sence with the necessity absolutely of it will appear also yet the more clearly if we shall consider that unless we do admit the Church in the first place to be holy infallible and free from all manner of Error imaginable it will and must be impossible that the Catholick sence of the Scripture should be absolutely True Holy Infallible and free from all Error Because the sence of the Scripture becomes thus Catholick Holy Infallible and True only as it is the sence of the Catholick Church first and as it is by this means derived to the Scripture it self And for any to seek a sence in the Scripture therefore that is Holy True Infallible and free from all Error alone by the Scripture it self without the Direction and Assistance of the said Catholick or Universal Church is manifestly absurd Both because the Scripture hath properly of it self no sence at all that is certain and because it is the immediate Authority of the Church only upon which the sence of the Scripture so far as it is properly Catholick Infallible and absolutely True is wholly and entirely built And yet on the contrary in regard it must be confessed that the Church could not possibly have so much as either Name or Being were it not for the Scripture it self and much less that it could have those Privileges or that Authority placed in it which it challengeth above all others for being Holy True Infallible and free from all manner of Error Unless we admit therefore the Scripture in the first place to be originally True Holy and Divine and therefore to contain all Authority and Truth prmitively in it self that is Holy Absolute and Divine and that by reason of this its primitive Sanctity Divinity and Truth it hath a power simply and properly of its self to confer a Divine Right Authority and Infallibility to the Church it will and must be impossible that the said Church should be any way impowered or enabled either to teach such Doctrines as are Certain True Holy and Divine and without any fallibility whatever or that it should be able to declare what that sence of the Scripture is which is absolutely Holy True Infallible and free from all manner of Error Because if the whole being of the Church is entirely from the Scripture then not only all the Holiness Truth and Infallibility of the said Church with the truth of whatever it teacheth but all the Authority also which it hath or challengeth by reason of any of these extraordinary Properties is and must unavoidably be built upon the Scripture also and upon the primitive Truth Authority and Sanctity of it Both which things now being admitted it must necessarily follow that if we will fully comprehend the Divinity of the Catholick sence and come to be convinced of the necessity and absoluteness of its Infallibility Authority and Truth we must grant that the Truth Holiness Infallibleness and Authority of the Church was and could not but be before the Truth Holiness and Infallibility of the Scripture sence And
must also grant that the Truth Sanctity and Authority of the holy Scripture was and could not but necessarily be before any Truth Holiness Infallibility and Authority was or could possibly be in the Church and consequently we must grant that these were both first and so both of them were one before another respectively In like manner we must grant that as there is an absolute necessity that the Church and its Authority as infallible should be built upon the Scripture entirely and upon the Original Authority of it so there is as great a necessity that the Sence of the Scripture with the truth of it wherein its Authority doth properly and principally consist should be built upon the Church and upon the Authority of it and therefore a necessity that both these should be built each upon the other mutually and respectively and therefore a necessity that the Church should be the Foundation of all the Scriptures truth and that the Scripture should be the Foundation of all the Church its Truth and therefore that each of these should be the respective Basis or Ground of the other of these mutually The Clearness Consonancy Coherence and manifest Consistency of all which things whoever doth not understand and doth not also fully and unquestionably believe is neither a Schollar that is quick enough nor a schollar that is qualified enough for the sufficient and substantial comprehending of the Divinity of the Catholick sence And therefore upon the consideration of the whole we may conclude that if all these things now mentioned are substantially true and capable to be clearly understood by rational Persons and that they are consistent really one with another Then it must be certain that the Church of Rome is both a true Church and its Doctrines are all certainly and unquestionably true and all its followers must be true Christians also and free from all Error for these things must be all of them true and certain alike But if these several things above mentioned are manifestly contradictory and absurd and such therefore as are no way possible to be rationally understood or capable to be consistent any way one with another then these things can never be true viz. Either that the Church of Rome should be a true Church or that its Doctrines should be all of them true or that its followers should be such true Christians as to be free from all Error Seeing none of these three things can be otherwise true or certain than as the several things above mentioned are true or certain which are manifestly absurd and utterly false The horrible Wickedness of the Church of Rome further manifested The Impiety and Wickedness as well as Absurdity of the Church of Rome in this invention of the Catholick Sence and in her setting up of it will be evident also to any that will consider that even while she goeth about not only to corrupt but to defeat the Scripture of its proper Authority as a Divine Writing by her denying that any Sence is capable to be had from it but what the Church only doth give it and by denying therefore that the Litteral or Grammatical Sence or Construction of the Scripture is in any place certain or at least not so certain as it may be said of its self to be simply absolutely or infallibly true or so certain that it is in any place sufficient to give an infallibility of truth to us she doth no other than discover by all this what her drift is throughout all this Device For she would never run her self upon so many Rocks to maintain things so manifestly gross and absurd as this Invention puts her upon were it not that her aim by all this is To spoyl and deprive the Scripture utterly not only of all power and Authority but of all Right immediately and absolutely of its self to bind and oblige the Consciences of men to it even though the sence of it should from the plain and genuine Construction of its words appear never so strong clear or coherent to them which Scope or Design of the Church of Rome for withdrawing our Obedience and Subjection wholly from the Scripture it self even in things that are plain and can be no way doubted by us as we are rational Persons and understand well enough what the Nature and Import of Sence is I say this scope or design of withdrawing our Obedience from the Scripture it self and from the plain and genuine fence of it is no other than openly to withdraw us from the plain and express Mind of God the Scripture being his Word which is not only to offer an Injury to the Authority and Councel of God but to his very Grace also in giving his Word to us And yet that this is the Chief and Principal Aim of the Church of Rome in her contending for the Catholick Sence and in her disallowing all other Sence whatever to the Scripture is the more clear because it is matter of Fact that wheresoever she can or doth exercise any Dominion either by her self or by her delegates there she will suffer none even not of her own Clergy to depend upon the Scripture strictly But will have all men at all times to submit all their Judgments and all their Consciences absolutely to her particular Determinations in all things relating to Faith whether the things she doth determine be agreeable or not agreeable to the Word or Rule of Faith it self And if all her own Natives are treated with this Severity and Arbitrariness by her is is easie then to imagine what Strangers may expect from her especially if we consider that for the more effectual preventing the Laity also to shew any manner of Duty immediately to the Scripture and lest they should be convinced even by the very sight of it or should hold themselves obliged to the things plainly and expresly commanded by it she doth throughout all places where she hath any Power utterly forbid all use of the Scripture to them and will not suffer the Scripture so much as to be read or heard by them in a Vulgar or known Tongue By which Instances it may sufficiently appear seeing these things are matters of Fact that the Indeavour used by the Church of Rome to lessen the Credit of the Scriptures Letter Grammar or Word as if there were no certainty of sence in it is not really grounded upon any thing which may justly be attributed to the Scripture it self * But is a thing absolutely plotted Contrived formed or purposely Designed by the said Church for no other end but that men might not rely upon the Scripture or trust to the truth of those things that may be plainly and expresly founded in the very Letter of it and so might be moved to give Obedience to the Authority of it and to be led by it NOR for any other end but that Men might not be able to plead the said Word with the expressness of it against her or have a
just ground to examine her Doctrines or Authority by it and to withdraw from her or to assert there is a necessity that divers things should be reformed in her And for this Reason it is therefore that she neither hath any Subjects nor can or will admit of any to be her Subjects whether of the Laity or Clergy who will not withdraw their Obedience immediately from the Letter of the said word and from the Authority of it and give it to her as a Church Which injury against the Authority of the Scripture or written Letter of the word of it as it is therefore knowingly wittingly and willingly committed by the Church of Rome must for this cause be much the greater But the greatness and heinousness of it is made most manifest by that Argument which the Apostle useth Heb. 2.2 3. Heb. 10.28 29. Heb. 12.25 For if the Law or Covenant of Moses how divine soever was given to the Church nevertheless by one that was no more than a Servant only in Gods house And if that the Grace and Truth which came by Jesus Christ was given us by the only Son of God who was properly the Lord himself of the House Then a Sin or Crime done purposely against the Gospel of Christ and out of a real intent or design to turn men from the express Word or Letter of that Law or Covenant which was set up by Christ must be a far greater Evil or Impiety against God than the like sin attempted against the Law of Moses with a purpose or intent to turn men from the Letter and express Word of it There is such Force and Strength in this Argument added to what hath been already said as there needs no more to be said to manifest the abominableness of this Evil and therefore we shall herewith conclude this Discourse as with that great word of Truth which ought in this case to be most of all pondered and considered by them whom it most concerns For if it were evil in any even in him that had the name of a Prophet to turn men from the Law or from the Word of Moses who was but the Servant of God with an intent that they should rely upon another word different from it even upon his Word or upon such a Sign or Wonder as was wrought by him who did desire so to turn them from Moses and if this was such an Evil as was by Gods own Command to be punished absolutely with Death Then how much greater evil must it be in the sight of God to go about to turn men from the express Word and Law of the Lord Christ who was the only begotten Son of God with an intent that they should rely upon another Word different from it and to do this not only wilfully but avowedly and professedly by preaching to men openly that it is not their duty to rely upon the Word of Christ as it is immediately and expresly set down by the Holy Spirit but upon the Church only and what the Church shall declare to them concerning the said Word and when to effect this also the better men shall throw so great Contempt and Scandal upon the said Word as to affirm it to be so dark and confused that no certain or infallible Sence either is in it or can possibly be had from it And if this sin were the greater under the Law because of those Miracles which God had wrought by Moses to testifie him to be the Servant of himself Then it must be an aggravation of the said sin under the Gospel Because God hath not only by Miracles but even by Moses himself and by many other means and ways in his Providence born a far greater Testimony to the Lord Jesus Christ than ever he did bear unto Moses and hath abundantly manifested That he was the Only begotten Son of himself And if any man under the Law that did attempt to turn men from the word of the said Law was to be accounted as a false Prophet much more then ought he to be so accounted that doth both with all Industry and set Design indeavour to do this under the Gospel FINIS