their faith to God ward was spread abroad And that this is the onlie thing which these words import their late Estiê° on Rom. 1. showeth As for testimonies of Fathers and 1. to that of Cyprian who writting to Cornelius sayeth Whilst with you there is one mind and one â—oyce the whole Church is confessed to be RomaÌ„ I answere 1. That Cyprians words are perverted which are these dum apâ—â— vos unus animus una vox est Ecclesia omnis Romana confessa est that is Whilst with you there is one minde and one voyce the whole RomaÌ„ Church hath confessed Cyprian thus commending the Church of Rome for an unanimous confession of faith before heathen persecutors as others had done which indeed proveth the soundnes of the Roman Church in Cyprians time as a meÌ„ber of the catholik church but not that shee only then was the Catholick Church 2. Giving that these were the words of Cyprian as they are alleadged they would import onlie that whil the RomaÌ„ Church keeped the unitie of the true faith that all other orthodox and sister Churches of these times would acknowledge themselves to bee of her communion and this we may see confessed by Stapleton relect con 1. q. 5. who giveth this to be the reason why by the ancients the Roman and Catholick Church wer held for one thing because her communion sayeth he with the whole Catholick Church was then most evident and certaine whence it followeth that shee her self then was not the whole Catholick Church 3. where it is said to Pope Cornelius Whilst with you there is one minde one voice that is as long as you kepe the trueth and profession thereof this speech being conditionall and limited it importeth that shee might lose the same as shee hath done Therefore not only was shee forewarned Rom. 11. 20. Not to be high minded but feare but also Cyprian ad Pompeium accuseth Pope Steven who succeeded Cornelius that he maintayned the cause of Hereticks against the Church of God the Pope then and Roman Church under him in Cyprians estimation maintayning Hereticks against the Church could not theÌ„ be accounted by him to be the Catholick Church nor yet to be infallible The second testimonie of Augustins where he sayeth That they who dissent from the bodie of Christ which is the Church they are not in the Catholick Church proveth nowise that the RomaÌ„ Church is this onlie Catholick Church But rather as the words of that testimonie beareth The whole body of Christendom And as for Jeroms words That it is all one to say the Roman faith and the Catholick faith I haue alreadie answered that this was because of her communion with the Catholick Church when Rome was orthodox and as Isai 1. 21 The faithfull City was not become an Har lot 10. THat the Churches unitie is not necessarie in al points of faith I answere that this is an impudent Calumnie as the Harmonie of Confession of reformed Churches showeth and ours in particular of 1581. art 16. For wee maintaine that a two-fold unitie is necessarie to be in Christs church to wit An unitie in Trueth and an unitie in affection both which wee should pray for and promove that as the psalmist speaketh 122. 7. peace may bee within her walls and prosperitie within her palaces And because they brag so much of unitie in doctrine and all points of faith for stopping the mouths of all Romanists ever heereafter ut ex ungue Leonem I will onelie amongst many instance but in one or two maine points of poperie that their unitie is like the division of tongues which was amongst the builders of Babell The first is papall Indulgences and Pardons which are so lucrative dependeth on their Purgatorie wherin thus they varie 1. Some of the old schoolmen as Bellar. witnesseth lib. 1. de Indulg cap. 2. they doubt of this spirituall treasure and Francis Mayro on 4. sent D. 19. maketh question in particular sayth hee of the treasure of Christs overflowing satisfactions laid up in the Church Againe Durand likewise on 4. sent D. 2. doubteth if the satisfaction of saints belong to the treasure but S. Thomas and Bonaventure sayeth hee thinketh that both belongeth thereunto Againe this is denyed by sundrie ancient Divines sayeth Bellarmin lib. 1. de Indulg cap. 7. That pardons delivereth men from punishment not onelie before the Church but also before God and verie graue Authours sayeth hee as Alfonsus Durand Paludanus Pope Adrian the 6. Petrus à Soto and Cardinall Cajetan hold That pardons were never given but for enjoyned penance but Aquinas Ioannes Major Sylvester Dominicus a Soto Michael medina Ledesinius Antonius Cordubensis Navarrus Panormitan and Ioannes Andreas sayeth hee these maintaine the contrarie 2. For the Persons that haue power to give pardons it is questioned sayeth Bellarmin lib. 1. de Indulg cap. 11. by what law Bishops may give pardons for some hold that they may do it by Gods law sayeth hee but others deny it yea Angelus in summâ— and Bartholemus Fumus do hold that all Priests who may heare confession may also grant pardons sayeth hee and they bring for their warrant Pope Innocentius and Panormitan but the coÌ„mon opinion sayth Bellarmin is contrarie to these 3. For the persons whom they availe thus they varie for amongst the Catholick Doctours sayeth Bellarmin lib. 1. de Indulg cap. 14. Ostiensis in summa and Biel on the canon of the Masse lect 57. haue taught that pardons nowise profite the dead and so this maâ—teth soule Masses but other Catholicks sayeh hee do hold the contrarie Again if they help the dead Bellarmin lib. 1. de Indulg cap. 14. showeth that it is controverted whether by way of suffrage or otherwise and that they are divyded in three opinions Last of all sayeth Bellarmin in the same place the hardest question of all is Whether pardons do help the dead upon any justice or condignitie or onely of the meer and free favour of God and congruitie some hold the first sayeth he as Dominicê° Soto on 4. sent d. 21. Navarrus others hold it to be meerlie of the mercy bounty of God And so holdeth Cajetan Petrus a Soto Cordubensis and others Now in such a division of tongues and Pen's in this point what is popish unitie let any man judge The second grand point which I will instance is TranssubstantiatioÌ„ wheron is grounded the Idoll of their Masse and that idolatrous adoration of their Hostie wherein sayth the Iesuite Aâ—lapide on Isai 7. 14. by the words of consecration as the bread is trulie and reallie transsubstantiat so Christ is brought forth and as it were begotten upon the Altar so powerfully efficaciouslie as if Christ were not yet incarnat yet by these words this is my Bodie He should be incarnat and assume an humane bodie therfore sayth he the Priest is as the Virgin that bare him the Altar is the manger the little Emmanuell which hee beareth is Christ brought
that have been borne of Adam it may be said which humbly and truly sayeth he David sayeth of himselfe I was shapen in iniquity and in sinne did my mother conceive me and therefore in the same place he calleth the feast of her conception without sin a presumptious noveltie the mother of rashnes the sister of superstition and daughter of inconstancie whosoever denyeth that all others without exception except Christ are conceived in sin he is found sayeth Augustin lib. 5. conâ— Iulian. cap. 9. to be a detestable heretick because herby as Salmeron testifies in Rom. 5. disp 49. Aquinas sayeth that this were to equal the virgin Mary with Christ himselfe And yet notwithstanding of so cleare a place of scripture so unanimously expounded by all the ancient fathers which Billarmin Salmeron calleth a sure inevitable argument of catholick verity and soundexposition of scripture Yet for al this sayeth Bellarmin coÌ„tradicting himselfe lib. 4. de amissa gratia cap. 15. § ab hac seing the Councell of Trent hath decreed the contrary as likewise Pope Sextus 4. and Pius 5. they are not to be accounted catholicks that esteemes this an errour and consequently all the ancient fathers are not to be accounted Catholicks nor Cardinal Cajetan bishop Canus nor ther master of sentences and canonized Aquinas and many more besides VVee see then howsoever they pretend traditioÌ„ or the unanimous consent of fathers to be the rule of faith or exposition of the scripture yet when they please and findeth the same displeasing to them they vilyfie and rejects the same therefore thus sayeth the Iesuit Valentia in the last chapter of the 5. booke of his analysis that any by gone tradition without the authority of the present Church is not a sufficient â—udge â—f controversies of faith So also speakes Cardinall Cajetan in the begining of his comentars on Genesis as also Baronius tom 1. annal anno 34. num 213. And if we will consider what certainty or rather what fluctuating uncertantie is in the moderne sense or exposition that the present Roman Church now puts upon scripture whereon to build their faith Let Cardinall Cusanus words testyfie epist 2. ad Bohemos pag. 833. and 838. who sayeth That one time the Church iuterprets the Scripture one way and at another tyme another way and that the understanding of the scripture must follow her practise when she changeth her judgement God also changeth his then which I know not what can be grearer blasphemy Next for answere to that testimonie which he brings out of Tertullian where he sayth we admit not our Adversaries to dispute out of scripture till thy can show who their ancessors were and from whom they received thâ— scriptures These words of Tertullian makes no wayes against us whereby he denieth not that the scripture is the rule of faith or of disputes concerning the same as he showeth against hermogenes cap. 22. saying let these of Hermogenes shop show that it is written and if it be not written let them feare that woe which is allotted to such as adde or take away but he showeth only that Apostolicall churches not Rome only which were founded by them and to that time had keeped the truth which they had delivered in the scriptures committed to them could only lay best claym to them which hereticks who dissented from these scriptures and apostolical churches of these primitive times could not do As for Ireneus whom only he citeth but not his words he hath nothing in that place that favoureth tradition as an unwritten rule of faith for so he should not agree with himselfe who sayeth lib. 3. cap. 2. that these things which are to be shown in the scriptures can not be made manifest but by the scriptures themselves and lib. 3. cap. 1. That the scriptures is that which is the foundation and pillar of our faith and not tradition or any unwritten rule Tertullian also that he is of the same mynd I have shown out of the forâ—cited testimonie concerning Hermogenes and who in that same 22. Chapter sayeth that he adoreth the fullnes of scripture Chrisostome also hom 3. in 2. cor calles it a most exact rule and ballance which it could not be if either it wer A partiall rule onely as Bellarmin calleth it or that tradition were the rule of faith Aâ—gustin also de bono viduitatis cap 1. calleth it a fixed and sure rule in opposition as it were to unsure tradition Yea Bellarmin himselfe lib. 1. de verbo cap. 2. haveing showne that the rule of our faith should have these two properties first that it should be most sure which tradition can not be luke 1. 4. 2. pet 1. 19. and 2. most known he concludeth that the scripture is the most sure and best knowne rule both of faith and manners But what shall I speake of a Cardinall when a Pope to wit Clement in his first booke of recognitions cited dist 37. cap. relatum calleth the scripture a firm and sound rule of faith Basill also hom 13. in Genesis sayeth thes things which may seem to be ambiguous and obscure in some places of the holy scripture must be explained by these which elswhere are more plaine and manifest Augustin likewise cont Crescon Lib. 2. cap. 31. speaking of an epistle of Ciprians I am not bound sayeth he to the authority of this epistle because I account not Ciprians writting as canonicall but I examine them by these that are canonicall and that which is agreable in them to the authority of divine scriptures I receive and that which is not agreeable I refuse Heer then we see that Augustin would have the scriptures only to be the rule of faith and of divine authoritie 2 THat in matters of faith we must not relye on the judge-ment of the Church or her Pastours VVHich he sayeth is contrary to Math. 23. 2. Where the jewish people are commanded by Christ To obserue all whatsoever the Scribes and Pharisees did bidd theÌ„ obserue not only sayeth hee in some principall matters but in all whatsoever without distinction or limitation For answere to whom I can not admire enough the mans impudencie or ignorance seing First our Saviour himself showeth the contrary where Math. 16. 6. 12. lie biddeth his disciples and others Beware of their leaven which be expoundeth to be their false doctrine 2. The Authour of the ordinarie gloss with whom agreeth Lyra on Deut. 17. 10 sayeth Note that the Lord requireth that whatsoever the Priest doth teach thee according to the Law do thou because otherwise thou art not to obey them Ferus also a spanish Frier and Preacher at Mentz on this place speaketh thus Christ would not that they should receive all the doctrines of the Pharisees sayeth hee but so farre only as they agreed with Gods Law else they should haue admitted all the false glosses which our Saviour refuteth Math. 5. from verse 21. to the end To this also agreeth the Iesuite Maldonat
the Church professing the Christian name in common hath ben at anytime invisible but in it wee say that the true and sincere professours may be some times brought to that estate as the 7000. were in Israell who bowed not to Baal and as the sound and persecuted Orthodox Christians were by that prevalent faction of Arrians who then usurped the title of the onely true Church altho they were onely but a prevailling faction therein But this Pamphleter contendeth for a constant and conspicuous visibilitie to all of the Church of true and â—ound professours like a Citie on a hill c. by these Texts following 1. Math. 5. 14. Where our Saviour compareth his disciples to a Citie on a hill c. To whom I answere shortly that this is meaned of the Apostles who as their own Jansenius as also Maldonat expoundeth were a light to the World by their preaching and holie life Therefore sayeth Maldonat That by these three similituds of salt a light and a citie our Saviour would declare one and the same thing to wit how farre beyond other common Christians his Apostles and their successours should eminentlie shyne in life and doctrine and so doeth Chrisostome Theophylact Lyra Ferus and Carthusian expound this Text and not of any constant conspicuous visibilitie of the Church to all The second place which he bringeth is Math. 18. 17. tell the Church to which I answere that Origen Chrisostom and Hilarie on this place showeth that a particulare Church and the Rulers therof are meaned as hath beene said which is indeed visible to it owne members speciallie in tyme of peace whereas in time of persecution the Rhemists themselves on 2. Thess 2. telleth us That this is like to be the case of the RomaÌ„ Church it self under Antichrist that the faithfull shall lurke and haue their communion amongst themselves onlie in private so to have no conspicuous visibilitie to all whence it followeth that what may bee the case of the Church at one time the same may be or hath been the case of the Church at another The third place is 2. Cor. 4. 3. which sayeth If our Gospell be hid it is to them that are lost To which I answere that there is no word heere of a Church or of persons but of the gospell it self which being preached to any if it be not believed is said to be hid from misbelievers as is said in the words following Whose minds the god of this world hath blinded that they should not belieâ—e as the Lord threatneth Isai 6. 9. which is the exposition both of Aquinas Cardinall Cajetan and their Bishope Catharinus with their late Estius The last place which he bringes is Isai 2. 2. where it is said That in the last days the mountain of the Lords house shall be established in the top of the mountains and exalted above the hills and all nations shall flow unto it To which I answere that this is a Prophecie onlie of the calling of the gentiles to the faith of the gospell by the Ministrie of the Apostles and showeth how firmlie the Christian Church should be built and bee of greater eminencie and amplitude beyond the jewish church in respect also of universalitie clearer light and dispensation of grace which is the exposition of their owne Lyra Procopius Pintus and Perusin on this place And not that they prove ther by a constant and conspicuous visibilitie of the Church to all As for the testimonies of Fathers which he adduceth they nowise prove the point the first whereof is Origens saying That the Church is full of light which showeth only that as shee is described Revel 12. 1. shee is glorious by the light of the trueth which shee holdeth forth in profession and therefore he subjoyneth this reason seing shee is the pillar and ground of truth sayeth hee 2 Hee bringeth a testimonie of Chrisostome where it is said That it is easier for the sunne to be extinguished then for the Church to be darkned which testimonie receiveth the same answer with the former For no more can the Church lose the light of the trueth than the sunne can lose his light though somtimes he may be eclipsed or by a thick mist or cloudie day he may be unseene to some 3. Hee bringeth a testimonie out of Augustin who sayeth That hee is blind that seeth not so great a mountain To which I answere that hee speaketh not there of a constant and conspicuous visibilitie of the true Church to all and at all times but onelie of the visible condition of the Church which was at that time disputing against the Donatists who affirmed that the Church was no where but amongst them in Africa whereas on the contrarie hee sayeth that in Europe and elswhere they may see famous and flowrishing Christian Churches like to a mountaine that may bee seene except they were blind and yet wee knowe that a mountaine that may be seen to all that are not blind in a cleare day may in a dark night time or darke mistie day be unseene till the sunne rise or a clearing of the mist be Therefore sayeth the same Augustin de unitate Ecclesiae cap. 20. in psal 10. and epist 80 ad Hesychium Some times the Church is not apparent when wicked persecutors rage against her againe in his sixth book of baptisme against the Donatists cap. 4. Somtimes like the Moone sayeth he shee may bee so hid and obscured that as in Elias time the members therof shall not know one of another 9 THat the Church was not ever to remaine Catholick or universall And that the Church of Rome is not such a Church THe first part of which Assertion wee disclaime as a most unjust aspersion as the harmony of confessions showeth and ours in particulare 1581. art 17. And as to the last That the Church of Rome is not universall we justlie affirme seing it is a plaine repugnancie in the adject as we say to be particulare or Roman to be Catholick or universall as their owne Cassander contradistinguisheth betweene these two in his consultation art 22. As for the places which he adduceth out of the psal 2. 8. and Colos 1. 3. 4. they no wise make for him or against us but onlie speaketh of the Churchs inlargemeÌ„t under the Gospell the first by the conversion of the Gentiles to the faith and the second of the Colossians in particular Next hee bringeth Rom. 1. 8 where the Apostle thanketh the Lord for them That their faith was spoken of through the whole World For answere whereunto 1. This no more proveth the Church of Rome to bee universall than the like words of Paull 1. Thess 1. 8 proveth the Church of Thessalonica to be the universall Church For as Rom. 1. 8. it is said That their faith was spoken of through the whol world so is it said 1. Thess 1. 8. That from them sounded out the word of the Lord as also in everie place