Churches that wee keep and preserve our own people safe and sound from their Errours and not that wee may render the others odious branding them for obstinate Heretiques Seeing it is easie to call any man an Heretique but not so easie to comprise in a certaine regular Definition what makes an Heretique Yea if we beleeve Augustine it is a matter of very great difficulty CHAP. VI. Chap. 6 Of the notes and markes whereby we may know that any Point is not Fundamentall WEE have showne already that Fundamentall points have this character plainly printed upon them that without the knowledge of them neither Salvation of Christians nor the Worship of God can consist Now let us adde some other signes and tokens out of which we may safely set down that any point is not Fundamentall although some urge and enforce it for Fundamentall and they especially who have long laboured and sweat soundly in the maintaining of it First therefore that is not Fundamentall which was never clearely revealed from the beginning by the Prophets and Apostles inspired from Heaven to Christian people and to Christian Churches founded by them through the whole World For they had not been pure from the bloud of them all if they had shunned to declare all the Counsell of God to all so far forth as it was necessary to the procuring the Salvation of all by Faith in Christ Jesus And the saving Truth in such necessary and fundamentall things was so revealed by the Apostles that all might behold it Mark 16.15 Go ye into all the world and preach the Gospell to every creature Rom. 1.16 For it is the power of God unto Salvation to every one that beleeveth We preach Christ Col. 1.28 warning every man and teaching every man in all wisdome that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus What therefore in the time of the Apostles was not declared to all that cannot in our Age begin to bee Fundamentall Yea neither the Papists themselves dare deny this although they arrogate to the Pope of Rome and Romish Church more power than is meet over the Articles of the Christian Faith For Canus set all those things apart from the Doctrines of the Catholique Faith Lib. 4. cap. ult pag. 145.146 which were not univorsally preached by the Apostles How much more then ought they to be severed from the Fundamentals Lib. 12.6.10 p. 391. The same Author alloweth that some propositions may bee called Truths of the Christian Doctrine which he thinks not worthy to be called Truths of the Catholique Faith For this name he counts peculiarly to belong to those Doctrines which so nearly concerne the Faith that by removing them Faith it selfe is taken away Lib. i. quest 17. p. 148. And Corduba to the same purpose saith It is no Catholique Truth nor is the contrary opinion Heresie unlesse such a Truth be revealed and generally propounded to all to be necessarily beleeved Last of all Bellarmine himselfe grants us Lib 4. de Verbo Dei cap. 11. That those things which are absolutely necessary for all to Salvation were preached unto all by the Apostles themselves Let this therefore bee the first signe of a Doctrine not Fundamentall that it hath not beene delivered by the Apostles to all publiquely generally and plainely Secondly that is no Fundamentall Point which was never admitted and held for such in the Primitive Church succeeding the Apostles and never recommended to all by generall consent of the Catholique Church For if any will maintaine that the Catholique Church did ever refuse or was ignorant of any Fundamentall Doctrine he must by the same reason maintaine that the whole Church was severed from her Foundation which no man well in his wits will ever suffer to enter into his Thoughts It was well observed by the right Reverend Arch-bishop of Armach a man of singular Piety and stored with the commendation for Learning in all kinds That if at this day wee should put by the points wherein Christians differ one from another and gather into one body the rest of the Articles wherein they generally agree Vsher Sermon before the King pag. 43. which worship Christ God and Man and acknowledge him for their Saviour We should find that in those propositions which without all Controversie are Vniversally received in the Christian World so much truth is contained as being joyned with holy Obedience may be sufficient to bring a man unto everlasting Salvation Which plainely evinceth that these things alone of the common Faith are those which rightly are called Fundamentall but as for those points which we so dearely prise and for love of them clash the Protestant Churches together because of the right of neare alliance which they have with the Fundamentals they may sometimes be ranked amongst true and profitable Doctrines but may not be accounted absolutely necessary or Fundamentall Thirdly it is not a Fundamentall maxime of the Christian Religion which is so handled or propounded that to conceive the truth thereof and to apprehend it with Faith we stand in need of the Wit and cunning of Logicians and of the abstracted and abstruse speculation of Metaphysitians Nazian Orat. 21. For nothing were more unjust than the Christian Faith if it should only sit and belong to those who are Learned and Skilfull in these Arts. Nothing is more usuall amongst Learned Men than in their minds and conceits to abstract the manner of things from the things themselves nothing more common than to propound the same single numericall thing to be considered under severall formall differences and to reare and raise these touring speculations on the plaine Doctrines of the Christian Faith If any such matter were Fundamentall or necessary to be knowne to Salvation there were no hope of the Salvation of all unlearned People But we defend with Augustine Epist 3.22 that the Faith of the holy Church is apprehended not by the Reason of Disputation but the Piety of beleeving otherwise none but the Philosophers should obtaine blessed happinesse Yea we say with the Apostle 1 Cor. 1.20 27. Where is the Wise where is the Scribe where is the Disputer of this World c. But God hath chosen the foolish things of the World to confound the Wise As if he had said Where art thou O Learned man and skilfull in lofty speculations Art thou alone meet to receive the Doctrine of Life Yea every one of the plaine countrey People is more fit than thy selfe and thou altogether unfit if thou thinkest that in these things thou mayst rely on thy own Art and witty apprehension for the way of Salvation is not only a holy way but also so plaine and direct that the foolish cannot wander in it Isa 35.8 So be it they stick to the Word in the simplicity of their hearts On the place As Luther well affirmeth Therefore saving and Fundamentall Doctrines are not to be sought for in the dark
Church conceive the Roman may be hindered and broken off and yet by no default of ours as often as it shall demand and require that we should approve or exercise any Idolatrous Acts in the publike service of God or should command or compell us to acknowledge or receive any doctrines repugnant to Scriptures or Godly mens consciences Yet in the meane time that Church which is counted no whit sound or Orthodox is to be esteemed a visible Church of Christ and to be ranked amongst the particular Christian Churches Yea as much as lies in us wee are to afford to the same all offices of brotherly Charity although our Actuall and outward Communion with the same be neither suffered of them nor may be retained of us because of the false doctrine and superstitious worships prevailing in the same Now out of those things which we before have disputed concerning the difference of Fundamentall points from those which are not Fundamentall we will endeavour to shew that those things are not Fundamentall about which hitherto there hath been such strife with so great heate of mens minds betwixt Protestants Those points onely are to be owned for Fundamentall Reas 1 which being overthrown or not at all beleeved no congregation of men can worship God so as to obtaine from him Pardon Grace and Glory But no point controverted is of this nature Therefore not Fundamentall None will call our Major Proposition into question because it is cleere that those who start asunder from the very foundations of saving Faith are not capable of those benefits which are promised to the Faithfull alone As touching the Minor If any dare affirme that no hope of pardon Grace or Glory doth shine to them who are otherwise minded than the rest in these controverted Doctrines him I conceive to sin more against charity than any of the Protestant Churches sin against verity Yea I dare adde this if any converse or persisteth in this errour alone he more shakes the foundation of the Protestant Truth than those whom he rashly chargeth to have violated the foundation for other errours whatsoever in controversall Divinity Those Points Reas 2 whereabout Protestants contend were neither Preached to the whole world by the Apostles as all those things were which were absolutely necessary to be known and believed to the salvation of Christians neither were they for such recommended by the succeeding Churches universally to Christian People whatsoever therefore divers Churches diversly determined concerning the Truth of these opinion yet ought they all to agree in this That they ought not to be reckoned with the fundamental articles of the Christian Faith If any man can cast and contrive any head of controverted divinity betwixt Protestant Churches into a short and no whit doubted of Proposition and truly affirme thereof This Proposition was maintained by the Apostles was received of the Vniversall Church amongst the Articles of Catholike and saving Faith I yeeld up the bucklers and grant the cause I will call it a Fundamentall Doctrine and I will pronounce those Churches which reject it to have fallen off from the Foundation and I will adjudge them unworthy of Brotherly communion with other Churches But if no Protestant can doe this none ought to call that a fundamentall Doctrine which himselfe defends or to challenge the Divines of other Churches being of another opinion of overthrowing the Foundation much lesse for this cause to deny the Rites of brotherly communion to whole Churches The affirming of Fundamentall Doctrines is so cleerly set down in the holy Scriptures Reas 3 that none of the unlearned much lesse of the learned can fall into the contrary damned opinions except they bee very negligent in learning the Catholike Faith or such as will not learne the Faith it selfe which is manifest in the Scriptures which is truly observed of Augustine De Agone Christi 6.28 But it is plaine to all that in these Doctrines whereabout Protestant Churches dissent that at the least on the one side numberlesse Christians are deceived and they men godly pious and most desirous of the Truth yea many Divines of the first ranke being versed and exercised in reading and meditating of the Scriptures through the whole course of their life Neither let any here object against me that the modern Anti-Trinitarians daily doe search the Scriptures and yet neverthelesse persist in the obstinate deniall of a Fundamentall Article for they are not only negligent in learning the Catholike Faith and drawing it out of holy Scriptures but also they are wilfully contemptuous in opposing the Catholike Faith and furiously bold in recalling the manifest Doctrine of the Scripture to the account of their doating and giddy Reasons subject to an erroneous Vertigo therefore to them agrees that of the Apostle 2 Thes 2.11 For this cause God shall send them strong delusion c. But none can passe the same sentence upon those Christians which adhere either to the Saxon or Helvetian Churches None therefore ought to set downe that those Doctrines are Fundamentall or necessato be known to Salvation in which it is probable that now this side now that side is deceived but impossible that both should be in the right as often as they contradict one another It is no Fundamentall point which Reas 4 cannot otherwise bee extracted or deduced out of the Scriptures than by the hard and long pathes of controversies alwayes untraceable to simple Christians sometimes scarce sometimes not at all evident even to the learned themselves Such are all those things which are in controversie betwixt Protestant Churches whose connexion with the Foundations of the Catholike Faith the Disputants on both sides say they see plainly necessary but the Adversaries on both sides cry it down that they see no connexion at all but plaine people ignorant of the art of Logick oftentimes give a blinde assent to their Doctors being themselves in the meane time altogether uncertaine of the strength of such consequences Things that in this manner are by their Doctors extracted and propounded to Christians may sometimes be true but can never be fundamētall that is absolutely necessary for every Christian to be known and beleeved for the obtaining of eternall life For even as they may enjoy the light and benefit of the Sun who cannot perceive the Mathematicall demonstrations of the bignesse and motions thereof so those may enjoy the light and benefit of fundamentall Doctrines to Salvation who cannot behold the Theologicall inferences and deductions drawn out of them Therefore they are not Fundamentalls but things rightly deduced in some mens Judgements from the Fundamentalls which are so much urged to be beleeved from the Divines which strive amongst themselves It is not the part of wise Divines Reas 5 so to swell and increase the number of Fundamentall points that all Christians as well learned as unlearned should be wholly uncertaine and ignorant what and of what kinde those be which are adjudged properly to belong to the
Foundation of Religion Catholike Faith But if we should let the matter run on so long till all the controverted Problemes betwixt Protestants bee counted Fundamentall long since they have grown to too numerous hereafter they may grow to an almost numberlesse multitude For this solemne course and practice is observed of many that what they themselves have added to any Fundamentall Axiom as over weight and what they beleeve to be a consequence of the same this they presently require of all to be counted in the number of Fundamentalls If we grant to any particular Churches or to their Doctors this power of creating and multiplying Fundamentalls all hope is past of the certainty of the Catholike Faith all hope is gone of the Brotherly communion of the Catholike Church The mad error of the Church of Rome may confirme the Truth of our opinion who by stuffing a medley of uncertain opinions into the Creed of Trent by the same deed did both shake the immoveable certainty of the Catholike Faith and the Union of the Catholike Chuch so much desired of all we ought not therefore to mingle controversies lately born betwixt us with the foundations of Catholike Faith which are few and published by the preaching of the Apostles through the Christian world and received by the joynt consent of Christians In the last place that these things whereabout we contend Reas 6 were never counted in the number of Fundamentalls plainly appeares out of the very Augustane confession penned by Ph. Melancthon and approved and commended by Luther It is not likely that the Authors of so solemne a confession would have omitted any Fundamentall Doctrine of the Christian Faith without the knowledge and beleife whereof Salvation could not be attained by Christ Jesus But in this confession none of those points doe appeare about which so fierce a strife hath been been maintained betwixt the Helvetian and Saxon Churches In the third Articles of the Union of the two Natures in Christ in the tenth Article of the presence of the Body and Bloud of Christ in the Lords Supper they have established nothing which is not approved by the consent of all the Protestants And if we should run over the rest of the Articles we shall finde very few things after the last correction of which there is any dissenting betwixt the Protestant Churches nothing of so great moment that it should bring in a Schisme into the Church But grant some things to be in this confession to which other Churches cannot afford their consent it sufficeth to the retaining of Peace that they consent in all things necessary to be known for the Salvation of Christians For the confessions of particular Churches are not streitned to fundamentals alone but sometimes are extended to the declaring of their judgement of all heads of Divinity as they conceive it expedient for the Aedification of their people in Truth and Piety Therefore their errour is not to be born with who what ever they finde in their confessions will have it counted so fundamentall that they feare not to ranke those forreign Churches which in all and every thing will not admit the same to be the Rule of saving Faith among damned Hereticks overthrowers of the Foundation in a word amongst wicked men estranged from the holy brotherhood of good Christians Nothing could be done or thought of more injurious For if we weigh the confessions or disputes of all Reformed Churches and place on one side those things wherein they exactly agree and set on the other side those things which are in controversie wee shall perceive that the former out of the very Nature and Quality of the points themselves belong to the foundations of Faith and Piety the later either to the no wise necessary speculations of subtile braines or if they have any soliditie in them to the true inferences of the more skilfull Divines out of well grounded Propositions But those things which in this manner are built upon the foundation are not to be made equall with the fundamentalls themselves nor are they to bee accounted to erre in fundamentalls which swarve somewhat herein from the right line of Truth CHAP. XI Chap. 11 That there is no Controversie betwixt Protestants about Fundamentalls is shewn by instancing in three particular questions which are conceived before all other of greatest moment to the disjoynting of Churches BEFORE wee enter into this dispute wee must premise this firme and unmoveable rule That Christian Churches are not to be disjoynted which agree in all things necessary to be known or done to the Salvation of Christian men For no Authority lyes in one particular Church to make enquiry into others or office to compell other particular Churches to the rule of their owne confessions or power to dissolve the bands of brotherly Unity betwixt their owne and other Churches whatsoever which consent in the same common Faith that is in fundamentalls and the saving Articles of the Christian Religion Let us see therefore whether the Protestants agree so farre forth and let us take example only from those three controversies Of the Presence of the Body and bloud of Christ in the Eucharist Of the Communication of Properties in the person of Christ God and man Of Divine election and preterition according to the good pleasure of the Divine will For if in these questions by occasion whereof mighty surges and billows of contention have been blown up betwixt the Saxon and Helvetian Churches so much bee confessed on both sides as is necessary to know to Salvation All the rest may be left indifferent in the middle or to be disputed of betwixt learned men with peaceable mindes the brotherly Communion betweene Churches being no whit broken or torne a pieces Wee will begin from that which gave beginning to all the rest namely from the Presence of the Body of Christ in the Lords Supper and the eating of the same First of all nothing can be conceived fundamentall which is not by joint consent admitted by or received on both sides This is Fundamentall That the Body and Bloud of Christ are so truly present in the Administration of the Sacrament that Communicants may partake of them so as to draw life from thence and they may justly be condemned who so receive Bread and Wine as that withall they receive not the Flesh and Bloud of Christ to the Salvation of their Soules Hospin ad annum 1544. p. 191 Of this there is no dissention For Bucer grants That the Body of the Lord in the Eucharist is truly present and partaken off An annum 1540. p. 178 Calvin saith Wee all confesse with one mouth that we when we receive the Sacrament by Faith according to the Lords institution In Cons Mompelg p. 66. are made truly partakers of the Substance of the Body of Christ Beza saith we deny not the Body of Christ to be truly present to bee truly given and received I passe by the rest because no
and not to please our selves saith the same Apostle That Church pleaseth it selfe too much which scorns and disdaines other Churches as unworthy of her Communion for some weaknesse in their understanding which are found guilty neither of Tyranny Idolatry nor any deadly Heresie Not so the Fathers of the ancient Church whose desire and care in making agreement betwixt particular Churches scattered over the whole world may be observed in the Centurists through every hundred of yeares But that very fitly serveth our purpose which Optatus Milevitanus hath written Lib. 2. c. 7. That the Churches through the whole world by the intercourse of Formall letters might agree in the fellowship of one Communion Now in those formall peaceable or Synodall letters nothing else was contained besides the confession of the Catholike Faith established in the Creeds and briefly explained against Heritiques by the generall consent of the universall Church in the Nicene Calcedonian and other Councels Of infinite other questions which may arise and be canvassed betwixt the private Doctors of dispersed Churches no Church either required or expected a forme of absolute consent from other Churches For if without this the brotherly Communion betwixt particular Churches were adjudged impossible to the cementing and sodering thereof we should not stand in need of Synodall Epistles or briefe formes of confessions but of huge volumes of controversies But if we refuse to learn of the ancient Fathers yet now at last let us learn of our Enemies that the brotherly communion of Mindes Duties of Courtesie and Sacraments is not impossible betwixt those Churches which defend contrary opinions about controversies never to be decided I will say nothing of the wranglings of Thomists and Scotists nothing of the Dominicans and Jesuites There is at this day a controversie beaten and bandied betwixt the Churches of the Romish Religion of more moment than all those things whereabout Protestants doe strive if they were rouled up in one bundle I mean that of the infallible Judge in all questions of the Christian Faith The Spanish and Italian Churches defend the Pope to be this Supreame Judge warranted with the irresistable authority of Christ himselfe and so inspired and inlightned with the spirit of truth that in all his decrees and determinations wherewith he intendeth to bind the whole Church he can in no wise erre and be deceived But on the other side the French Churches cry him downe justle him out of his infallible chaire and conclude him to be so subject to error that if in matters of faith or manners he refuseth to obey and to be ordered by the judgement and Authority of a generall Councell they voice him to be counted for a Schismatique and a Heretick and one to be deposed See agreat difference about the very Pillar of the Catholike faith Yet in this brawling about opinions there is no breaking off of brotherly communion betwixt the Churches themselves Tell it not in Gath nor publish it in the streets of Ascalon that the Philistines were more forward than the Israelites to preserve Peace and unity betwixt them Lastly if such controversies should make an union betwixt particular Churches impossible I faine would have one shew to me even but two Churches whereof one is not subject to the other which must not of necessity be alienated pluckt asunder and as it were with a partition wall divided each from other For except we return to this point that we only admit and allow of this Separation from other Churches for dissenting in Fundamentals the communion of the Catholike Church anciently so highly extold August de unit Feles cap. 12. will be but a bare name fained title to which the heart of the thing it selfe will never answer The Donatists of old were wont to say that the Church had perished out of the whole world besides and onely remained in the party of Donatus The Romanists in this point are pure down-right Donatists who shout it out that the Catholikc Church is found only in the part of the Pope of Rome It is our duty to detest such Schismaticall wickednesse and to keep and professe brotherly Communion with all Christian Churches which we adjudge not as yet to be disjoyned from Christ the Head by Heresie or Idolatry or not at all to be shunned by other Churches for usurpation of Tyranny What hitherto hath been disputed about those Obstacles which make the communion of divers Churches betwixt themselves impossible and also of those different opinions which no wayes cause the same all aime at this end That if it could be agreed betwixt Divines that those controversies which so long have troubled and tyred the Protestant Churches are not of such importance that whether one come off to this or that side in their opinions he is not to be judged to depart from Christ and the Fundamentall Faith and to fall into a Heresie contrary to the foundation we would confesse that brotherly union may be made up and kept betwixt all Protestant Churches even whilest these dissentions rather of the Schooles than the Churches doe still remaine It is not my purpose to engage my selfe in the controversies themselves only I would desire that the most learned and famous Divines of the Dutch Churches would be entreated with peaceable mindes and calme affections to runne over all those controversies which are in agitation betwixt them seeing the Judgement perisheth when the matter is passed into the affections The chief and almost the mother of all the rest is that controversie which as yet remains undetermined of the manner of the presence of the body and blood of Christ in the Lords Supper And as touching this point the every way most learned Bucer after serious weighing and considering of the matter expressed himselfe thus that In the thing it selfe and meaning there was an agreement only some variety in the words In Epist ad Lutherum Contra. Robert Atringen alibi Hosp Hist Sacrpa 144. and manner of speaking Luther said formerly If you beleeveâ— and teach that the true body and true blood of our Lord is exhibited given and taken in the Lords Supper and not the bread and wine only and that this receiving and exhibiting is done truly and not imaginarily we are agreed At the same time Bucer with his associates did grant That the true body and true blood of the Lord were exhibited given and taken with the visible signes Bread Wine James Andrews wrote formerly Wee neither are of opinion of the Capernaites nor doe we receive the Transubstantiation of the Papists nor doe we establish a Physicall or Locall presence or inclusion of the body and blood of Christ in the holy Supper Neither doe those words Substantially Corporally Orally signifie to us any thing else besides the true presence and eating of the Body and blood in the holy Supper Now let us heare what was the Judgement of the Helvetian Churches Hosp Anno 1536. â—ag 145. Although they deny
the bitter and hostile ones pacified and laid a sleep But what is to be bemoand those Divines which are too much drawn away with Selfe-love are by the breath of popular applause and desire of vaine-glory driven farther than they themselves at first intended or thought it ever possible For men troubled with this evill will trouble all things humane and Divine rather than they will confesse themselves deceived or weary of the fight or overcome by their Adversaries Yea except they may conquer and carry the adverse party captive before their Triumphant Chariot they are determined continually to clash the Protestant Churches together with deadly discords I am not ignorant that all pretend the desire of truth and Gods Glory but that too many continue these contentions for the love of vaine-glory would I might deny it and at the same time speak truth Surely 't is scarce to be beleeved that those who must needs know what dammage States Churches and Mens soules bought with Christs pretious bloud receive from these dissentions betwixt Protestants can in the midst of these contentions have their eyes only fastned on the glory of God Wherefore let the hot disputants on either side examine their owne Consciences whether they perpetuate these Controversies and Discords of the Churches that God may lose no honour or rather that there be not wanting an apt and lasting matter to their own vaine-glory Other occasions and causes of these dissentions we have no leasure to recite but of one wee must more largely dilate which hath made these Controversies as it were hereditary and will make them everlasting except God pitying the Protestant Churches put new minds into the Pastors thereof For this opinion hath possessed the minds of many pious and learned Divines that the matters controverted betwixt Protestants are of such moment that such as are found erroneous therein are thereby convicted to shake yea to overturne the very Foundations of the Catholique Faith and mans Salvation Hence whilst both partyes are fully perswaded that the truth stands on their side they must also perswade themselves that their Adversaries lay at and loosen the Foundations of the Christian Faith Ionah 4.9 What therefore Jonah once said unto God that he did well to be angry even unto death for his Gourd which was cut down these men use to say that they do well to contend to death with their Protestant enemies for overthrowing as they conceive the foundations of mans Salvation No wonder then if pious men seasoned with this Opinion detest such men so farre as to entertaine no peace or brotherly Communion with them Seeing therefore this is justly counted the principall cause of this long dissention let us a while withdraw the eyes of our mind from received opinions and with peaceable affections enquire concerning the Foundation and what is Fundamentall CHAP. II. Of the signification of these words Foundation and Fundamentall which often offer themselves in this discourse HE that will not erre in the knowledge of things themselves must begin from the expounding of words In Cratylo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For rightly Plato Whosoever knowes the Names will also know the Things Foundation therefore is a metaphoricall terme borowed from builders and signifies the whole ground-work of the building placed in the bottom which upholds the structure and which being taken away the edifice tumbles downe and is shattered into pieces Forasmuch therefore as the Church is called the City of God Psal 122. 47. the House of the Lord it must have some Foundation on which whilst it leanes and relyes it remaineth safe and sound from which if it giveth off and starteth aside it presently perisheth and is brought to nothing It is plaine therefore that whilst we speake of the Church founded by God that hath the name and nature of a Foundation by which all the parts therof are supported and from which they borrow both their strength and safety And as in some great Aedifice the severall parts have not all the same strength beauty yea some somtimes may seem somewhat more inclined to fall which as yet stand and stick to the foundation So in this far stretched building which we call the House and Church of God there is great difference of particular Churches For some are fairer and firmer than the rest because better and neerer joyned to the Foundation others somewhat ruinous and shaken because not so well fastened to the foundation yet all which are not as yet plucked off from the foundation are sustained by the strength and benefit thereof and are continued to the firmer and fairer parts of the building Hence it is plaine when we speak of the Churches what a kind of thing that is which challengeth to it self the name of a Foundation Let us see now retaining still the former Metaphor what manner of things they be which we use to call Fundamentall for this is the word that hath made so much work for our Divines and hindered them in the advancing of the whole businesse of the pacification But first of all here we must observe that a materiall Edifice built of Wood and Stone is founded nothing like unto a Spirituall Building whose structure consists of Living Trees and Stones that is of Men enjoying the use of their Reason and Will For in this Quick and Lively Building nothing either hath due conjoyning with or receiveth any strength from the Foundation except it be coupled thereunto by the Act of the Reason and Knowledge and by the Act of the wil cleave fast to it obey it Those things therfore are truly counted and called Fundamentall which being known Christians may have a saving conjunction with their Foundation which they cannot have if the same things be not known or not beleeved In like manner if we consider the Will those ought to be called practicall Fundamentals by the observation and doing whereof we may remaine joyned to our Foundation but may not if we dispise or neglect them And let the Knowledge of Christians be never so imperfect yet if they know and beleeve these Fundamentals they shall not be parted from the Foundation for the defects of their Understanding Let the righteousnes of Christians be never so imperfect yet if they do these practicall Fundamentals they shall not be separated from the Foundation for the defects of their good will It being therefore a matter of such moment with God himself to be joynted and joyned to our Foundation that to all such life and eternal Salvation is promised let us be very wary how rashly we cut off either particular Churches or private Men from this Conjunction and by the same verdict cast them from all hope of life and happinesse But because besides these Metaphoricall words of Foundation and Fundamentall sometimes other termes are used having the same force and intimating also the same dependancy of the Church on another of them also briefly What therefore is called the Foundation of the
Churches concerning Fundamentalls and that the whole Bickering is either about certaine manners of speech which are not founded in the Scriptures themselves or about consequences which some affirme others denie that they can be rightly inferred out of the Scriptures meane time the Fundamentalls being safe on both sides although all errour be not excluded about things not Fundamentall The truth of this Assertion will appeare First if with a sincere and prudent Judgement we ponder all those things in which those who wrangle about other matters yet acknowledge there is one Consent and Harmony of all Protestant Churches Pag. 18. James Andrews reckons up seven Propositions of all which he confesseth there is no Controversie betwixt the Churches Pag. 20. Also Beza recites certaine heads of doctrine of the Person of Christ and Communication of his Properties in all which it is evident That all Protestant Divines doe Consent Not many yeeres since the Conference at Lipsigh Pag. 5.6 certaine famous Divines summ'd all these Points up to twelve Articles in which there is unanimous consent of the Communication of the Person of Christ and his Properties In these things wherein we have the opinions of all Protestant Churches so well agreeing I dare not say that nothing is wanting which belongs to knowledge in divinity yet I confidently affirme That there is nothing deficient which pertaines to the Catholike Faith nothing which is necessary to be knowne and beleeved to the Salvation of a Christian man Lastly nothing which argues either these or those to have started asunder from the Foundation or that they ought to start from mutuall Communion If therefore in this Controversie of the Person of Christ and Properties of his Natures there remaine some knotty things which are more smoothly to be explained Let Divines afford their helping hand to this matter and not for this thing rend their Churches in pieces Let them kindly bring back their wandring Brethren into the way let them not furiously break asunder the bands of Brotherly Unity Let them build upon the fundamentall Doctrines their owne Gold Silver or Pretious stones and let them throw downe the hay and stubble built up by others Let them not thrust downe others from the Foundation nor disjoynt themselves from those whom they themselves see stick fast to the Foundation and Fundamentall Articles Secondly what hath been said of the joynt Consent in Fundamentalls may be plainly seene if we weigh all those Heresies that ever opposed the Fundamentall Articles of the Person of Christ and overturned the Foundation of mans salvation For they who damne and curse all these cannot be accused of violating the Foundation except by Slander cannot be condemned but by high injustice But now it is well knowne that no Heresie can be reckoned up whether ancient or moderne against which all the Protestant Churches are not most ready to bring their voice to condemne them In the Conference at Lipsigh whereof we have often made mention for the hope it gave to us of renewing of unity all the speakers with joynt consent Pag. 10. and from their whole heart did damne and reject all errours of ancient and later Arians Nestorians Eutichians Monothelites Marcionites Photinians and by what other names soever they be called On the other side with mouth and heart they gave their consent to the Apostolicall Nicene and Athanasian Creed He that in this manner approves all Points received and allowed of the Ancient Church concerning the Person of Christ and properties of both his Natures rejects all things condemned of the same may perchance in manner of speech retaine a forme of words not very sound or in some consequences may make a small swerving from the Truth but cannot make a departure from the foundation or fundamental Doctrine of the Catholike Church seeing Melanct. said rightly Apud Lutherum Tom. 1o. in disp p. 441. B. That opinions unknown to the ancient church although at this time they be generaly received yet are no Doctrines of the Catholik Church much lesse such Fundamentall doctrines as are of force before God to break the Peace Unity of Churches Thirdly in this matter of the Person of Christ and communication of his Properties that those things are not fundamentall which as yet hang undecided may appear from the very terms and words which Divines are constrained to use to expresse their opinion For in fundamentalls we heare Plaine cleer propositions such as these are In Christ God and Man the humane and divine nature are most neerly coupled together each nature in Christ hath and retaines its owne proprieties The proprieties of one nature can never be made the proprieties of another nature In the person of Christ there is a Communication of Properties by which that is attributed and ascribed to the whole Person which is proper to one of his natures As when we say God was crucified for us or the Man Christ is Omnipotent In this Communication the divine nature neither powreth forth the properties of its Divinity nor infuseth them into the humane nature These and all other things which are cleerly spoken of the Person of Christ and Communication of his Properties are contradicted by none But those things which are conceived and infolded in strange forreign and doubtfull termes beget strifes upon strifes and questions upon questions Such are those Problems Whether the proprieties of the Natures in the Person of Christ be communicated only verbally or really Whether they bee communicated in the abstract or the concrete and others of the same stampe which by the very sound of the words doe appeare to have sprung out of the Schoole of Grammarians and Logicians not of the Apostles and ancient Fathers and therefore not to bee recounted in the number of fundamentalls But let us adde some few things of the questions themselves That some affirme that this question is propounded Whethere there be such an Union of natures in the person of Christ in which neither nature communicates any thing to the other besides the bare name they seem to me to feigne a question which never was betwixt the protestant Churches For with one voice they confesse That such is the Union of the natures in the Person of Christ in which many things are communicated to the humane Nature yea all things although excellent gifts whereof a created nature can be a subject capable to receive them And even as no Protestant corrupteth this Proposition The Man Christ is God with this wicked Interpretation The Man Christ hath the bare and empty title of God So neither doe any deprave this proposition The Man Christ is omnipotent with this perverse exposition The Man Christ is in word only or title Omnipotent but acknowledgeth the matter it selfe which is signified in this Praedicate truly and really to agree to the Man Christ because it truly agrees to his person which the terme Man doth designe and denote They which on the other side defend that it is
AN EXHORTATION TO BROTHERLY COMMUNION betwixt the PROTESTANT CHURCHES Written by the Right Reverend Father in God JOHN DAVENANT Bishop of Sarum IN DOMINO CONFIDO LONDON Printed by R. B. for Richard Badger and John Williams and are to be sold at the shop neare S. Dunstane's Church-yard and in S. Paul's Church-yard TO THE COURTEous Reader and desirous of Peace Grace and Peace in CHRIST JESUS SOme yeares since wee privatly imparted to JOHN DURAEUS a man learned godly and most desirous of the Churches Peace our advice of procuring Peace betwixt the Protestants He thought fit to print our Opinion delivered in a Letter and to present it to the view of the World After the publishing whereof the same DURAEUS and also other most worthy men were instant and did presse me with much earnestnesse that I would somewhat more largely make an inquiry concerning the Fundamentals of the Catholique Faith that it might the better appeare whether or no the Protestants in all these agree amongst themselves For truly and wisely they did conceive that Peace and Vnion could not be made up betwixt them who indite each other as guilty of violating and overturning the Foundation But this they did not so advisedly that they accounted me a man almost spent with old age able to undergo the weight of so hard and heavy an imploiment Therefore I long and often gave the Deniall to some of my friends who desired it and were importunate with me to enter into consideration of this matter and conceived this imployment was to bee committed to none but some Divine flourishing in his health and strength Yet I know not how not long since of its own accord it came into my mind that it would not be amisse if to give my selfe some satisfaction I should a little meditate with my selfe of the question propounded Hence came forth this our Discourse however it be done Which after that out of our Study it had come into the hands of some friends whilst they requested it and I was not unwilling it came abroad into the World But we will not have this Tractate appeare in publike unlesse also accompanied with that other which we formerly sent to DuRAEUS Which we do both for the asfinity of the subject matter which is well nigh the same in both as also because the one reflects mutuall clearnesse on the other Meane time I am not ignorant on how dangerous a rock he toucheth who offereth to define Fundamentall Doctrines or to bound them within certaine limits But it was enough for my purpose with this our sleighter worke to have whetted the industry of others to a more full and acurate explaining of this Matter In the meane time if those our paines may be any ways usefull to Peaceable Divines towards the establishing of Peace betwixt Protestant Churches for my part let them enjoy them who the whilst shall enjoy this comfort that my weake helpe herein hath not been wanting to the Church in distresse Farewell Brethren in Christ and Prince of Peace diligently endeavour to procure the Peace of your own Churches AN EXHORTATION To Brotherly Communion betwixt the Protestant Churches MOST worthy indeed of the consideration of all godly Divines is that Speech of God himselfe in the Prophet Zachary Love the Truth and Peace Zach. 8.19 To which also agreeth that of the Apostle Speake ye the Truth in Love Ephe. 4.15 Wee ought not therefore so farre to tender the Truth that the care of Peace should be wholly neglected nor to be ambitious of such an Unity wherewith the true Faith is forsaken Let the Divines therefore which encounter each other pretend what they please of Religion and Faith they heartily love neither which love not both They desire neither with a godly mind which desire not both For if every Naturall body as Philosophers maintaine no lesse desireth its own Unity than its Being I see no reason why that Spirituall and Mysticall body which we call the Catholique Church should not with equall affection desire its own Unity as being that which if it bee dissolved it cannot really subsist nor so much as in the mind bee conceived Therefore let us burne with a longing desire after Truth as great as possibly may be in godly Catholiques So be it in the meane time we forget not that of Paul Rom. 12.18 If it be possible as much as in you lieth live peaceably with all men I say with all men embrace an outward and civill Peace with all Christians an Inward Ecclesiasticall and Spirituall This is the Will of Christ himselfe This the generall desire of the Christian Church that all that beleeve in Christ may meet and be joyned together in one Body yea in one Heart and Minde These things therefore being thus deservedly are those Peace-making Divines to be praysed of all who lately employed their paines in making a brotherly fellowship betwixt the Protestant Churches For my part would to God for the Common good I might give some advice which may serve to advance so holy a work What I can I will do at your request beloved DURAEUS and I will publiquely produce those things which very lately came into my mind whilst I thought on this matter Therefore in the first place I conceive it must bee considered whether such an Union of the Reformed Churches betwixt themselves be possible by vertue wherof each should count other not only in the place of Friends but Brethren and because of such an Union should mutually receive and returne betwixt themselves all signes effects and offices not only of outward Friendship but of Brotherly and Spirituall Communion For if this most neere Union which we so much desire be impossible Impossibilium nulla est obligatio There is no tye which obligeth men to endeavour after Impossibilities but if it be possible no excuse can be made why so holy a thing so acceptable to God should either bee opposed or delayed any longer Now what I have said that it must bee enquired of in the first place whether such a Communion be possible That ought so to be understood although the beaten Controversies still remaine betwixt the private Doctors of particular Churches which all see and the godly sigh for have so long disquieted the German Churches Although a full and perfect agreement betwixt Divines is to be wished for in all these Controversies yet truly it can scarce be hoped for much lesse effected in one age That so many heads should agree in one opinion But that the Churches may in the meane time notwithstanding these Controversies depend undecided make up betwixt themselves a brotherly and holy Communion may appeare from thence that as oft as the Divines of both sides have begun from their soules to desire and seriously to attempt it so oft and so much have they effected herein as themselves were desirous to effect and without doubt had brought more to passe if their owne want of will had not beene their
Protestant Churches desire all to meet in one brotherly Communion not so much as the least spot or staine of Idolatry were to be feared on either side Away therefore with all pretence of Impossibility drawn from this Reason neither let it make mens mindes or endeavours step aside from this so holy a purpose and designe The third and last obstacle whence the Communion of divers Churches betwixt themselves is held impossible is the asserting and defending of some Fundamentall Article necessary to be known and beleeved to the salvation of Christians on the one side which is sound and Catholique and the denying and opposing the same on the other side which is Hereticall For to grow together into one with Hereticks subverting the foundations of the Christian Faith is to start off from Christ the Foundation of the Christian Church Concerning this hinderance because it is a matter of greatest moment we must dispute somewhat more largely Therefore in the first place I conceive that is to be counted a Fundamentall Article which through the will of God revealing it to the attaining of Salvation and eternall happinesse is so necessary to be known and beleeved that from the Ignorance and much more from the opposing thereof men runne the manifest hazard of losing eternall Life This care and charge lyes not upon the Divines of our age that they should forge new and fundamentall Articles of the Catholique Faith for Christian people That which was not Fundamentall in the times of the Apostles and Primitive Church cannot with all our Affirmings wranglings and Cursings become Fundamentall These first Beleevables which we have gathered and brought together out of the whole body of the Scriptures into the Apostles Creed Epist 57. ad Dardan makes up that Rule of Fundamentall Faith which Auâ—ustine cals common to small and great and determines that it must be maintained of all with Perseverance whereof Hilary almost to the same purpose It is most safe for us to retaine that first and sole Evangelicall Faith confessed and understood in Baptisme Ad Constan August And I think the Apostle had an eye to these Fundamentall Articles when he calls Titus Titus 14. mine owne son after the common Faith This common faith comprised in the Apostles Creed proposeth to all Christians to beleeve the admirable workmanship of all Creatures made of nothing the unsearchable Mystery of the Trinity which is to be adored the benefit of Christ Incarnated Suffering Rising againe Glorified bestowed on miserable sinners and those things which flow from thence the Redemption of mankinde the Sanctification of Gods peculiar people the Communion of the Saints betwixt themselves the forgivenes of sinnes the Resurrection of the bodyes and the Glorification of the faithfull Who so believeth all things which we have contained in this short Creed and endeavours to lead his life conformable to the precepts of Christ is not to be dashed out of the lift of Christans nor to be driven from the Communion of other Christians members of what Church soever On the other side He that filcheth away or carpeth at any of these Articles though he challengeth to himself the name of Christian is to be driven and kept off from the Communion of those which rightly beleeve yet I acknowledge that besides these Articles many Doctrines are contained in the holy Scriptures out of the holy Scriptures may be deduced by firme consequence which are very profitable to be known and conduce much to proficiency in Divine knowledg but then at last are to be â—eld under the perill of losing Salvation or Communion when they are manifestly declared and understood to be contained in the Scriptures or necessarily to follow out of them In these things if any Church cannot so cleere the truth of her opinion to other Churches as to draw them to the same opinion shee ought to cast off their errors but ought not to cast off brotherly Communion with them because of these errours To these I adde that although some place of Scripture may seem to these Churches to establish a Fundamentall Article seems not unto others yet in this diversity of opinions there is not cause just enough to break off the Communion so be it both sides piously beleeve the same Article and acknowledge it to be cleerly and solidly sounded on other places of holy Scripture Lastly and this also must be added It is neither impossible nor swarving from the duty of good Christians to retain communion with those Churches who seem to us to follow some opinion which truly cannot hold together with a fundamentall Article so be it as in the meane time they professe the same Article and with both armes as we say embrace it For it abhors from the rule of Charity yea from sound reason that any for those Consequences by himselfe neither understood nor granted should be conceived to have denied or rejected a fundamentall Article which he firmly beleeves explicitly affirmes and if need were would Seale and Signe the truth thereof with his own blood More true and favourable is the judgement of a great and peaceable Divine Bucere It is not our part to have respect to that which of it selfe followeth of any opinion but to that which followeth in their consciences who hold that Point which we conceive opposite to a fundamentall Article For even as he that believeth any true Principle doth not presently believe and understand all those things which learned Men by consequences may deduce from the same so he that holds any false opinion doth not instantly hold all those things which those of better sight do perceive to be conjoyned with or â—oâ—lowing after that false opinion It is lawfull therefore to urge such consequences to snatch our brethren from their Errors but odiously to charge them therewith as if they were their own proper Doctrines it is unlawfull How farr this spreads it selfe and how forcible it is to establish brotherly union betwixt Reformed Churches Wise men and lovers of the Peace of the Church may easily observe For if it be granted that Communion onely is impossible that is unlawfull with those Congregations which explicity reject any fundamentall Article or defend an Heresie which stabs the Heart and cuts asunder Communion with Christ himselfe that also will follow that this brotherly Communion which we so much desire betwixt the German Churches may be establishes between Churches which are found and those which are not so well in health between Churches of a more and of a lesse refined Standard Therefore lâ—t those Churches which stick to the foundation depart from those which by Apostacy slide back from it but in the meane time from those which erre in matters of lighter moment neither disjoyn from Christ the fountain of life let them not depart Rom. 14.1 Rom. 15.1 The Apostle commands us to receive the weake in faith not to cast them off Wee that are stronger ought to beare the infirmities of the weake
things they professe the same Communion who are admitted to the same holy Supper But in very deed as by this mutuall Communion we doe not professe that we all have attained a perfect or the same degree of knowledge in Diviniry so neither doe we by this deed protest that we have a perfect consent amongst our selves in all heads of Doctrine in Divinity or altogether the same opinion of every question If the Communion of Christians amongst themselves should stand on these hard termes scarce could Peter and Paul have held Communion amongst themselves Sure the Church of the Corinthians had been broken into shivers but in these our times it had not been easie to finde many divines of great credit who could with a safe conscience be partakers together of the Lords Supper All Rulers therefore of Churches ought being guilty of their own and the common infirmity to beware least whilst they exact require from their own people a too harsh and not at all necessary confession they seem to shake and weaken the most sweet and most necessary Communion of Christians amongst themselves So much concerning the Governors of the Churches Wee come now to the Ministers or any other Christians which desire Communion with the Chruches wherein they live and yet cannot worke upon their consciences with any entreaties to approve and professe all the received opinions of the same Church It shall be their duty to afford and expresse themselves teachable and humble not obstinate and proud in the maintaining of those opinion wherein they step aside from the common opinion of the Church but he is to be counted teachable and humble who willingly and submissively lendeth his cares and heart to the Church teaching him who rejects not the doctrine propounded unto him out of a vitious disposition of his Rebellious will but is hindred by the weaknesse of his understanding that he sees not the Truth in these hard controversies which those who are more learned and accurate perchance with no difficulty can discern Now because 't is the priviledge of God alone to search hearts it is our part ever to encline to the most favorable side and to presume of every one where the contrary appeares not by manifest evidence that rather out of conscience than stubbornnesse he is detained and hindred from affording his consent They who shall behave themselves in this manner are not for every stubble of erroneous opinion to be parted and kept off from the Churches Communion wherein they live Yet on those terms and conditions they are not to be driven off if they presume not at all to oppose the common Judgment of the Church or to extoll and spread their private opinions amongst the people Nor ought they to take this in ill part who are desirous to entertaine Peace and Ecclesiasticall Communion for suppose the opinion of any private Doctor or Christian to be true and that to be erroneous which useth to bee defended by the Church yet if the error be in a matter or opinion which hinders not the Salvation of Christians farre better is it that the true opinion of any private Doctor whatsoever lye hid in the dark than that the publike authority of the Church bee in the broad light openly trampled upon or the Peace of the Church be shaken by this altogether unnecessary bickering of contrary opinions as with the struggling of windes crossing each other But if any one perswadeth himselfe that that opinion which he defends against the judgement of the Church be of so great moment that the Salvation of men doth depend from the knowledge thereof if he cannot perswade the same to the Rulers of his own Church he must either depart unto another Church or else for the good of the Soules in that Church to which he is subject patiently to undergoe the censure imposed upon him These are the things most learned Duraeus which I though fit at your request to write and send unto you If they may be usefull to you or any other towards the furthering of the Union of the Churches I have abundantly satisfied mine own desire and purpose They without doubt may suggest more and better things to whom the present estate of the German Churches is better known and looked into This thing alone remaines for me to doe humbly to pray to the God of Heaven that he would bow the hearts of Princes from their Soules to desire this Union of the Churches that he would enlighten the mindes of Divines to finde out and apply those meanes whereby it may foonest be established that he would kindle the hearts of all Christians to embrace and propagate this Peace to all Posterity The God of peace grant this for his Sounes sake our only Mediatour and Procurer of Peace with the Father to whom with the Holy Spirit be all Honour Glory and Thankesgiving for ever and ever Amen FINIS AN EXHORTATION to the restoring of Brotherly COMMUNION betwixt the PROTESTANT CHURCHES FOUNDED IN THIS That they do not differ in any Fundamentall Article of the Catholique Faith IN DOMINO CONFIDO LONDON Printed by R. B. for Richard Badger and John Williams 1641. An Exhortation to the restoring of Brotherly Communion Chap. 1 betwixt the Protestant CHURCHES CHAP. I. Of the discommodities and occasions of these Discords together with the Remedies briefly declared WHAT Cicero the Oratour said once of the Discords betwixt famous men Orat. de harusp respons that may we now truely say of the Dissentions betwixt severall Churches that they usually end either in the destruction of them all or in the injurious domineering of the Conquerours over the party subdued Now though it is to be hoped that there is none amongst the Reformed Churches which affecteth a sole and absolute Command over the rest Yet is it much to be feared least all by these dayly and deadly contentions which God forbid hasten their own overthrow Whose present condition the godly bemoane and by the miseries fallen on some guesse the dangers hanging over all unlesse they schooled with their calamities at last begin to be wise and heartily study the advancing of Peace For whilst this strife groweth hot amongst Brethren they afford their enemies constant matter of rejoycing and insulting over all Churches and not only of rejoycing and insulting but also arme them with infinite opportunities to hurt and oppresse them Nor do they order the matter well for their own people which will have even the unlearned to be distracted about such endlesse Controversies which perchance the Learned are never able to determine If Schollers only were to enter the Lists and to combat with Schollers the danger were lesse but it is too plaine that Christians of all sorts and sides are summoned to the fight whose minds are no sooner entangled in these needlesse controversies but they are cal'd away from the most necessary duties of charity and fruits of new obedience Moreover these dissentions betwixt the Reformed Churches hinder the more
Church when it is compared to a Building when it is likened to a Man is termed the Head when resembled to a Tree stiled the Root It is called an Head because it maintaineth the members united unto it ceasing not to convey spirituall strength and life into them In the same sense it is named a Root because it spouteth a vitall Sap into all the Boughs and Sprigs ingrafted in it As therefore those are counted Fundamental Doctrines which are sufficiently effectuall and absolutely necessary to joyne Christians to their Foundation so may they also be called Capitâ—â—â— or Radicall Articles which being known and beleeved by any Members of the Mysticall Body they may be united to their Quickning Head and any of the Branches may rely upon that Roote of theirs which conveyeth Life unto them and stick fast to the same Moreover as every thing is not sitly called the Foundation which is usefully imployed about the building but only that which is so underlaid beneath the building that without it it cannot be supported but may stand strongly if coupled and conjoyned with it So all Doctrines profitable for the furthering of edification are not properly termed Fundamentall but only those which are so necessary to be known that without them there is no coupling of the building to the Foundation with them a saving conjunction may be had though somethings be wanting which are requisite to the perfecting of the Knowledge of a Christian Lastly 2 Tim. 3.16 let us acknowledge with the Apostle all Scripture to be profitable for Doctrine for Reproofe for Correction for Instruction of all Christians in Righteousnesse Godlinesse and Truth but we do not call all propositions founded in Scripture Fundamentall Doctrins because the nature of the thing and the propriety of the Metaphor doth forbid it The folly of Tanner in a like case was laughed at by all when in Conference at Ratisbone he feircely maintainedt hat whatsoever is affirmed in the Scripture is an Article of the Christian Faith as for example that Tobiah had a Dog But least we should stay longer than it is meet in handling the bare signification of words be this setled and resolved on that the names of Foundation and Fundamentall agree only to those things which in reference to what is founded on them are of absolute necessity and power to bring unto Salvation I find amongst Divines in this Sense a threefold acception of Foundation 1. Personall Foundation of the Church and this only one properly so called 2. Ministeriall Foundations of Churches so termed but not in the same Propriety of Language 3. Doctrinall Foundations justly so called as deserving that honorable stile not by the Opinion of a few Divines but the constant Judgment of the Catholique Church All the difference betwixt the Reformed Churches is about the two later yet can it not easily be composed Chap. 3 except we discourse of all three So much of thenotion and use of the words we come now to handle them severally in order CHAP. III. Of the only Personall Foundation of the Church Christ Jesus God and Man Mediator betwixt God and Men and of the true conjunction with him THE most wise God and most loving towards mankind was pleased to found a Church which should endure for ever and prevaile against the Gates of Hell Now such a Church could not be except it stood on a solid and eternall Foundation which might not be forced by any strength or foundred by Engines God therefore thought fit to lay no other Foundation than Jesus Christ the eternall Son of an eternal Father whom he sent into the World that every one which beleeveth on him might not dye but have everlasting life The prophets and Apostles witnesse with a joynt consent Him alone to be the Personall Foundation of the Church Psal 118.22 Esay 28.16 Act. 4.11 12. 1 Cor. 3.11 Hence David calleth Him the corner Stone Esaiah termeth Him a tryed Stone Precious and placed in the foundation of Zion This is the Stone set at nought by the Builders which is become the Head of the Corner neither is there Salvation in any other Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid which is Jesus Christ. Now what hath been said of this one only Foundation ought also to be understood of the one only Head Husband Root of the Church and also of all other Metaphorical Titles which import the same dignity of Christ the Churches same dependancy on him For Christ God and man is the only quickning and saving Head of the Church from whom the whole Body is fitly joyned together and compacted Eph. 4.15 16. Ioh. 3.29 Hos 2.20 Fph. 5.26 He is the only Bridegrom of the Church who hath the Bride and hath espoused her to himself that he might Eternally preserve that is that he may sanctifie her in this World and present her glorious in that which is to come Lastly he is the heavenly root of the Church Col. 2.7 in whom whosoever are rooted spring up towards Heaven and shall continually flourish in Heaven This Personall prerogative is so properly invested in Christ God and man that it can agree to no other Heb. 2.11 Not to Angels because they want that conformity of Nature which ought to be betwixt the Foundation and things founded in it the Head and the Members joyned unto it the Husband and Wife coupled to him in lawfull marriage Not to a bare man because no mortall by reason of the corruption and weaknesse of humane Nature can possibly performe the office of a Foundation Head Spouse in upholding quickening and preserving of the Church Not to God himselfe considered alone in the dreadfull nature of his Divine Majestie For though we acknowledge God the founder of the Church we still want a Foundation to which we need not feare to approach draw neare to come and as it were to glue our selves But the Majesty of God considered in it selfe is not only a light not to be approached unto but also is a consuming fire and what mortall man can dwell with a devouring fire Heb. 12.29 Isa 33.14 We cannot therefore have in or under Heaven any other personall Foundation by the Mediation whereof we may be reconciled and united to God save only the Word Ioh. 1.14 Made Man full of Grace and Truth But to what purpose is this dispute about a matter so plaine and granted of all Protestants Namely that it may hence appeare that other Churches neither may nor ought to renounce brotherly Communion with those particular Churches which retaine a saving conjunction with this Foundation We wonder not that the Papists who besides Christ himself make another personall Foundation another Head another Husband of the Church cut and cast off all Churches though firmely and fastly sticking to Christ which cleave not to the Pope of Rome as to their Foundation Head Husband Nor care we for their false clamours whereby they think to affright the
Churches of Christ If ye be founded upon the Rock of Rome ye be living and pretious stones if not only spongy and hollow ones If ye acknowledge the Pope of Rome Head of the Churches ye are the true and living members of the holy Catholique Church if otherwise ye are dead and rotten carkasses of Churches Lastly if ye imbrace the Pope for your Husband ye are chast and true-borne Churches if otherwise ye are adulterous and to be accursed to the pit of Hell So the Romanists We can patiently take these taunts and wrongs from their hands who dreame that our Churches are rent from the true Foundation because they refuse to joyne with a false But verily if any Protestant Church which dares not deny but that another is built on Christ should dare notwithstanding to cut the same off as a rotten member and cast it off from all brotherly Communion this were to offer an affront to Christ himselfe and to do an injury to the Brethren both of us and Christ That therefore we may know with what Churches it is meet for us to retaine Brotherly Communion we ought to know what Churches are to be accounted to have and to hold true and saving Union with this their Foundation We deny not but that amongst the Churches which cleave to this only Foundation some may be fastened firmer and nearer than others amongst the Churches quickened by this Head and Root some may draw more plentifull sense and sap than others but we ought not because of the severall degrees of Knowledge and Grace to separate our selves from Brotherly Communion with those whom we may and ought to hope as yet to remaine conjoyned with their saving Foundation As touching single Persons God alone who searcheth the Heart can know who have an inward spirituall and lively conjunction with this saving Foundation But concerning whole Churches so far as it is lawfull for men to know and judge whether or no they be savingly coupled to the Foundation it may be judged and determined by the works which can and use dayly to be exercised by them For those Churches wherin those Acts are performed whereby men may be united to Christ remaine in him and by him be brought to eternall life none can affirme or will imagine that such are estranged or pluckt asunder from this the only Foundation of mans Salvation That we may now begin from Infants In all Reformed Churches Baptisme is administred in the Name of the most holy Trinity by benefit wherof such are grafted into Christ and rightly coupled to this their Foundation For as for these Infants who cannot by any Act of their own apply themselves to the Foundation the holy Spirit vouchsafeth by the Laver of Regeneration to frame apply the Foundation to them But of those who are capable of Reason and can use the Freedome of their own will 't is expected and required from them that they bring divers Acts both of their Understanding and Will to the making and keeping of their due Union with Christ Amongst which these foure are accounted the Principall to which all others may easily bee reduced First on the part of the Understanding there is required an Act of knowing all those things concerning God and Christ without which no saving Union can be established betwixt us and Christ nor free Reconciliation betwixt us and God the Father To which purpose those words of our Saviour seem to tend This is eternall Life that they might know thee the only true God Ioh. 17.3 and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent If there be any Congregations of men which as yet have not attained to this measure of saving Knowledge we confesse such to be alienated from the life of God Ephe. 4.18 2.12 13. through the Ignorance that is in them and that because of the blindnesse of their hearts as we are taught by the Apostle But there is none of the Protestant Churches blinded with such dark Ignorance but that the Christians therein may know God and Christ so far as is sufficient to Salvation if they assent to the Truth Preached amongst them Secondly besides this speculative Knowledge of God and Christ there is also required an Act of beleeving that is Practically with Assurance to rely on Christ being knowne We grant therefore that those Churches or Companies of men met in one body of a Congregation however they may put on and pretend the Name of Christian yet to have no entercourse nor society with Christ the Foundation amongst whom Christ is not so preached nor acknowledged that men may rely on him with a lively and justifying Faith Such are those which dissolve the Hypostaticall Union of two Natures in Christ the Mediatour without which we can neither have nor hope for a saving conjunction with Christ and God the Father But in all the Reformed Churches Christ God and Man is so Preached that there is no doubt to be made but numberlesse soules embrace him with a true lively and justifying Faith They are therfore and do remaine conjoyned to this Foundation under that very formall conception wherein Christ the Foundation of mans Salvation may bee conjoyned to men to conferre Grace and Life upon them Thirdly on the part of the Will it is required of all that would not be parted from this their Foundation that they practise a dayly exercise of Repentance without which it must needes come to passe that our dayly sins must divide and separate us from God and Christ to our eternall destruction On the other side where this constant practice of Repentance comes betwixt we remaine founded in Christ reconciled to God and ordained to happinesse Wherefore in what Church soever the Gospell is so preached and the Foundation of mans Salvation is so setled and established that it is to be hoped that Christians taught by it and living in it by beleeving and repenting may obtaine forgivenesse of their sins and everlasting life we ought to pronounce and conceive of that Church that it is truly conjoyned and remaines firmly coupled to Christ the Author Fountaine and Foundation of Grace and Salvation Fourthly besides this Practice of Repentance that this our conjunction with the foundation may be the more sure and evident the unfeigned desire and endeavour of Obedience and a new Life flowing from Faith and Love of Christ is required If the Act of Obeying be wanting there wants the Act of Beleeving and Loving there wants all hope of conjoyning such with Christ For what Christ said Ioh. 14.15 If you love mee keep my Commandements was all one as if he had said If you be conjoyned to me keep my Commandements Gal. 6.15 and 5.6 Because In Christ neither Circumcision availeth any thing nor Vncircumcision but Faith which worketh by Love What Churches then soever of the Protestants stand in this condition that men in them are enlightned to know God and Christ are furthered to beleeve in him are turned away from their sins
by the Act of Repentance are made subject to God and his Commandements by the act of Loving and Obeying him No doubt is to be made but that these Churches remaine firmely fastned to their saving Foundation Therefore this saving and undoubted Union of them with Christ ought to bring a Tye and a Band of no meane Consequence to the binding of the Affections of all Reformed Churches together CHAP. IV. Chap. 4 Of certaine Foundations which use to be called Ministeriall and of their Office and Power ALTHOUGH We acknowledge our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ the only personall Foundation of his Church yet do we not deny but that the name Foundation is in a different sense ascribed to others To whom in what respect this high Title is given and what Power and Command they have who are thus intitled it must be afterwards enquired into The name therefore of Foundation is sometimes lent to others but then always in a lessened and restrained acception For they are called Foundations in no other right than because the personall Foundation is layd by their Ministery through the preaching of the Gospell and by the continuation of that preaching always kept in the Church Amongst these Ministeriall Foundations the Prophets and Apostles possesse the prime place Hence the wall of the Heavenly Jerusalem is said to have twelve Foundations Rev. 21.14 and in them the names of the twelve Apostles of the Lambe Also Christians are said to be built upon the Foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Eph. 2.20 In this sense Peter and Paul and all the Apostles were Ministeriall Foundations because all they as wise Master-builders bestowed their excellent paines in laying that only Foundation of which we spake before Wherefore when the Prophets and Apostles are adorned with this honorable Title it is rather to be referred to their saving Doctrin concerning Christ than to their own particular Persons The power of these was far greater than that of their succeeding Ministers because they were so enlightned and governed by the holy Spirit that they could not at all erre either in Preaching or Writing Therefore we acknowledge their Doctrine as the Doctrine of God and Christ certaine infallible and wholly Divine with Tertullian that saith There is no Divine Word but of God alone In that his booke of the Soule Which Word was thundred both by the Prophets by the Apostles by Christ himselfe But the Papists to these Ministeriall Foundations endeavour to joyne another in words calling it a Second and subservient but in very deed making it a Principall and plainly Divine one This honour the Jesuites thinke fit to be conferred on the Pope alone whom they so appoint to be the Second Foundation of the Catholike Church that in the meane time they maintaine him to be the only Foundation of the Church next unto Christ But there is no need to speake much of this fading foundation and palsy-shaking head the Scriptures being silent of any such sole Ministeriall foundation as the Papists do faine Besides all Protestant Churches long since have cast this filthy Idoll of a secondary head and foundation with others of the like nature to the Moles and Bats as fit for so blind companions We owne no power placed in this secondary foundation of the Papists to subject the Faith of Christians unto it counting those little better than mad when they write and maintaine Bellâ—â— praefâ—t in lib. dâ— Rom. Poâ—â— That the power and infallibility of the Pope of Rome is the summe of Christian Religion and his judgment is to bee accounted the square and Rule of Faith But leaving the Pope of Rome le ts come to the Catholique Church which on a farre better title might challenge to her selfe the name of Ministeriall Foundation because the Faith of every one may seeme in some sort to rely upon her For in this even to the end of the World that Doctrine shall bee kept and preached to which those Christians which afford beliefe and obedience are rightly joyned to their foundation and in it shall obtaine eternall Life To this purpose that of Paul to Timothy is often alleadged where he calleth the Church the Pillar and Ground of Truth 1 Tim. 3 15. Neither may we doubt but that in this Holy Catholique Church which wee beleeve in the Creed the truth of the Gospell ever hath and ever will be preserved so farre forth as it shall suffice for the Salvation of those that beleeve it Therefore to know what hath been beleeved received and published of all Christian Churches always and every where is to know all those things which are sufficient for the obtaining of Salvation in Christ the Foundation thereof But this Catholique Church scattered over all the world is presented rather to our mind than outward senses Wherefore when we desire to heare the voyce of the Catholique Church wee are forced to fly to the Church which they call Representative that is to say to a Generall Councell Of which Representative Image of the Catholique Church and of the Ministeriall power therof we will briefly discourse That this Representative Church did excellently discharge the Office of a Ministeriall Foundation in Oecumenicall Synods is witnessed by those foure Councils of Nice Constantinople Ephesus and Chalcedon In which the Divinity of Christ against Arius of the holy Ghost against Macedonius the Union of two Natures in Christ against Nestorius the distinction of two Natures against Eutyches were declared defended and established In these and the like Councils those Doctrines of the Christian Faith which were there in common handled and discussed because therein all that professed Christianity were represented are therefore with great reverence to bee received For it ever belongeth to the Office and lawfull power of this Representative Church to divide and distinguish Fundamentall Doctrines of the Christian Faith from those which were not fundamentall provided alwayes that they passed not the bounds set by the Apostles and Primitive Church to multiply or diminish the Number of these Fundamentals 2a 2ae Qu. 1. Art 7. Resp ad 4. For it is credible what Aquinas observed that the Apostles and others which were nearer to Christ had a fuller Knowledge of the mysteries of the Faith than we that are further off which Cajetan in the same place confesseth to be most true For however that the Apostles and the Fathers of the Primitive Church were not much given to controversall Divinity and disputing about Questions yet were they of all most skilfull in saving necessary and Fundamentall Divinity Moreover after this Representative Church had once published her resolution founded in Gods Word of Fundamentall Articles which were simply necessary to the Salvation of Christians the care and charge also lay upon her to defend fence and fortifie those Articles against all fraud and force of Heretiques For it is the wont of Heretiques to undermine the very Foundation of Christian Religion whilst they retaine the words
but deny the matter of the Articles Thus the Arians in words confessed Christ to be the Son of God but they hatcht a Monster in their hearts when they would not acknowledge him to be coessentiall to the Father Hee is but mocked with a Title to whom the thing signified by that Title is denyed It was lawfull therefore for the Representative Church that is for the generall Councell for the better declaring of the true meaning of an Article to frame and fit a new but apt terme and to compell Christians to confesse Christs Divinity under this forme of words Christ is Coessentiall with God the Father For to be God and to be the Son of God though not in sound in sense are the same as to be coessentiall with God Lastly we do not straiten and confine the power of an Oecumenicall Synod or representative Church only to the declaring and defending of Fundamentall Articles such whereof an explicite and cleare unfolded Faith must be had to Salvation but wee confesse the same also doth extend to any true doctrines and profitable for the edification of mens Soules Yea we conceive this definitive sentence of the Church to bee so armed with the sharp edged sword of Excommunication that they may be separated from the outward Communion of the Catholique Church which dare stubbornly oppose their private opinions against her determinations Notwithstanding if that wherein they do erre be not of the Fundamentall and absolutely necessary Doctrins we ought not to despaire but that some who justly are cut off from the outward CommunioÌ„ of the Church God in his mercy pardoning their errors arising from the weaknesse of their Understanding may still retain an Inward and saving Communion with Jesus Christ their Foundation For the outward Excommunication is not a certaine or infallible signe of the inward Excommunication Tom. 1 an disp pag. 374. as rightly Luther What we have said of the Power of a Generall Councill we desire should also be understood of any lawfull and free Councill rightly representing the Catholique Church not of those Councils which are meere Vassals to the Pope of Rome and represent the Catholique Church in the same manner as an Ape doth a Man But because it is altogether impossible to call the Catholique Church into a Councill representing the whole body by reason of the Popes Tyranny and other hinderances let us come to explaine what power particular Churches have in this matter If therefore the name of Ministeriall Foundation doth agree to the Representative Church or Generall Councill for the Ministeriall power it hath in publishing explaining and defending that Doctrine which joyneth Christians to their saving foundation it agreeth also in its kind and degree to every particular Church suppose the English French Dutch and others which take their denomination from divers Countries For what the Catholike Church assembled in a Council may and ought to do towards the founding of all Christians in the saving Truth of the Gospell that every Particular and Provinciall Church may and ought to do to those that are under it From this Office the Church of Ephesus wherof Timothy was President is called the pillar and ground of Truth because it is the duty of every Church to defend and maintaine the Truth preached by the Apostles to the World commending and explaining the same to the people and to unsheath and draw the Sword of Ecclesiasticall censures against forgers and Heretiques But least every particular Church should advance her power and authority even to match and equall it with the Catholike Church in a Generall Council we must marke and observe first that the particular Doctours of particular Churches met in a Synod only represent their own and nâ—t forraigne Churches and therefore to have no power of prescribing to others what they must beleeve or refuse much lesse to cut them off from the Brotherly Communion which they hold with the Catholique Church who either out of conscience or ignorance cannot assent to their Decrees and Determinations For an Equall hath no power over him which is his Equall Herein the moderation of Cyprian is commended who held communion with those Churches whom he conceived to live in a grievous errour The African Churches are commended Apud August de Bapt. cont Donat. lib. 2. cap. ult Idem super gestis cum Emerit Serm. for their not condemning of any nor removing them from the right of communion but continuing in fellowship with those Churches which were of a different opinion and would not rest and rely on their judgement For no particular Church ought so far to tender her own honor as thereby to envy prejudice or dammage the unity of other Churches Secondly we must observe that particular Churches for instance those of Saxony and Switzerland may and ought to commend the Summe of the Doctrin of the Gospell which they professe to such as are subject to their Ministery which abridgement of Doctrine compiled and digested into Articles we use to call the Confession of the Churches or Articles of Religion But a speciall care must be had that in the framing of these Articles we insert not into them any thing that is subtile superfluous and litigious For it is not the part of wise Doctors to stuffe those things which should further Peace and the Edification of Soules with that which may trouble the Learned help the Unlearned little or nothing to Salvation For what is this else than to minister to the Learned matter of striffe and to thrust on the unlearned Wind for Milk and Stones for Bread We ought also to have some respect of neighbouring Churches in these our Confessions which wee set forth and nor to affect in our Articles to expose to the view of all that whence occasion of wrangling may bee given to our neighbour Protestant Churches and matter of rejoycing afforded to the Papists These inconveniencies might easily bee avoyded if it would once enter into the hearts of Divines to sever hard and obscure Controversies from the publike Confessions of the Church and confine them to private exercises in the Schooles For whilst we place and proclaime our Controversies in the light Mat. 10.27 and as it were on the house top of our publique Confessions wee shew abroad the nakednesse of the Reformed Churches which it was farre better going backward with our faces wee should desire to cover Lastly when these Confessions are ordered in this manner it is lawfull and usefull for every particular Church to exercise that Jurisdiction over their owne people which in no case they ought or can usurpe over the subjects of another Church For if their own oppose the received Doctrine of their Church established by publique consent they may both for the errors they scatter and for the disturbance they cause in the Church put them aside from the Communion of their Church so long till they leave off to infect others and trouble the Church with their errours But as soon
as they repent of their errors they are to be received againe into the Bosome of their Mother Thus may they deale with their own But when they are to meddle with Churches not at all subordinate unto them they may hold Divine concord and keepe Gods Peace with those which think and teach otherwise than themselves as we may see it in Cyprian Epist. 72. ad Stephanum 73 ad Julianum It will not be from the matter after this our discourse of Particular Churches to adde something concerning some famous and eminent Doctors in the same For private Doctors are also in their distance to be accounted Ministeriall foundations who in the maintaining expounding defending preaching or writing the Truth of the Gospell have imployed their commendable paines And here amongst the principall Doctours of the Reformed Churches wee reckon those Worthyes Luther and Philip Melancthon not fearing to joyne unto them Bucer Calvine Martyr and others whom we need not to name But of all these though exellent Divines of our Age we ought so to esteeme as accounting them Stars but not Deities in our Churches nor do we reverence them as the Prophets and Apostles inspired by God but value them as godly Men worthily learned and raised up by God for the generall good of the Church withall confessing them to bee but ordinary Ministers and subject to their mistakes Besides we must beware that we do not suffer the Churches themselves to be sirnamed by Epithets from these famous Men. Lactan. Instit lib. 4. cap. 30. For to put off the Name of Christ and to put on and weare humane and outward names is far from Christians and most times is the fuell of endlesse dissention That therefore of Nazianzens ought wonderfully to please all prudent and pious Christians Orat. 30. I reverence Peter yet will I not be called a Petrian I honour Paul yet will I not be called a Paulian If private Christians can not take this in good part how much lesse is it fitting to nick-name a whole Church from a single man Last of all I may adde this concerning private Doctors It is a most in jurious thing that a whole Church should be indited guilty of the errors of that Doctor whatsoever hee bee which hath or doth use his Ministery therein unlesse it doth appeare that that Church by their publique assent doth approve and maintain his errors But where is there one of an hundred amongst common Christians who so searches the books of their Doctors that he giveth his consent to all their Opinions Yea where is there one amongst those Doctours themselves which doth not from his whole heart abhorre such errors when his adversaries charge him with them Lastly where is there one to be found amongst the Learned in any Church who hath so sworne to defend the words of Luther or Calvin or any other writer but that he thinks it lawfull to depart from them where they depart from the Truth Now seeing it is manifest these things are so if these which wee call Ministeriall Fundamentals sometime in some things do shake or stagger we must not pin their Personall errors upon the whole Church Apud Luth. Tom. 1. disp de Author Eccles pag. 439. B. For the Church properly so called doth not allow whatsoever ill Doctours mingled in the Church do allow as rightly Melancthon to which we adde neither every thing which good Doctors have taught ill CHAP. CHAP. 5. V. Of the Doctrinall Foundations of the Christian Faith in Generall and how farre they are to bee beleeved under the necessity of Salvation THE Doctrine of the Holy Scripture contained in the Books of the Prophets Evangelists and Apostles is that Foundation on which alone the Faith of Christians may safely rely because of the most certaine authority of God revealing it Nor must we give eare to the Papists when they object Augustin Confes lib. 6. cap. 5. Irenaeus li. 3 cap. 1. Whence know you those Books to have been given to mankind by the Spirit of the most true God If God as yet hath not perswaded me in this point he hath not as yet perswaded me that I am a Christian For the will of God hath commended the Scriptures unto us to be the Foundation and Pillar of our Faith If the Romanists will give no credence neither to Augustine nor Irenaeus they ought notwithstanding undoubtedly to beleeve Peter 2 Pet. 1.19 20 21. who calleth the voyce of the Scriptures a voyee more sure than that which came down from Heaven and not brought by the will of man but holy men of God spake it as they were moved by the holy Ghost Therefore the holy Scripture so propoundeth the foundations of our Faith and fastens the Rule of our Doctrine that the Faith of Christians only trusteth and reposeth it selfe on those Revelations which are contained in the canonicall Books I will say nothing against that fantastick imaginary Doctrinall foundation which the Papists trislingly defēd to be in a word not written and couched in the privy cabinet of the Popes breast because I conceive so profane and grosse an error in a matter of so great moment amongst wel instructed Christians is not worthy of a confutation He that seeks for the Doctrine of Salvation and Eternall Life out of the Scriptures shall find it no sooner than if hee looked for the Tree of Knowledge and Life out of Paradise But although wee straitly maintain that no fundamentall Doctrine of Faith is to bee sought for out of the Bookes of the Old and New Testament yet wee do not defend that all things contained in these books are fundamentall points so necessary to be known and beleeved that if any of these be unknown or denyed of any we should presently adjudge them to have falne off from the foundation of Salvation Many things in the Books of both Testaments are Historicall some things are dogmaticall which are truly affirmed and profitably placed there and yet are accounted not to come into the Number of Fundamentall points Numberlesse things there are which by true firme consequence may be deduced out of the Scriptures and yet mount not up to this high pitch of honour Therefore those things only are to be set apart and owned for Fundamentals without the plaine and explicite Knowledge whereof none can be saved in which as well Negative infidelity not at all to know them as positive infidelity to refuse to beleeve them doth condemn Now such are all those things without which we can neither savingly beleeve in Christ nor rightly call upon God in Christ and worship him to the obtaining of eternall Life In a word without which Christians can neither have pious affections towards God nor exercise the Religious Acts of Faith Hope and Charity being absolutly necessary to Salvation These two things beene yeelded and granted that our Faith is to trust on the Scriptures alone and that all every one of those things
which may be seen in the large prospect of the Scriptures are not to bee ranked with Fundamentals this is to be added in the third place that our Faith is so subject and tyed to the whole word of God that every one is bound to embrace every Truth which hee sees revealed in the holy Scriptures or duly derived from them For although out of the nature or matter of a Proposition we are not bound and obliged to beleeve and know it under the perill of losse of Eternall Life Yet notwithstanding because of the authority of the revealer so oft as it shall appeare unto us that such a proposition is revealed in Scripture we are bound not to refuse it For whatsoever he should pretend on the contrary who at his pleasure shall trample on a proposition which he understands to bee founded on the Scripture he is to be accounted one that gives not that beleefe which he ought to any proposition For Instance sake That Christ is God and Man is a plaine Fundamentall Article which if not at all beleeved we can neither beleeve in Christ himselfe nor so worship God as to be restored into his favour and admitted into his Kingdom But many things are expresly mentioned in Scripture of this Christ himselfe Incarnated which are not Fundamentall also many things may bee deduced from this Fundamentall Article Christ is God and Man which are not to be reckoned as Fundamentals If notwithstanding they be perceived and understood to bee placed in or duly deduced from the Scriptures hee contemnes God speaking in the Scriptures who beleeves not such Propositions But as often as it shall happen not out of the perversnesse of the Will but weaknesse of the Judgement that he being deceived with an Imagination Aug lib 4. ad Vinc. Vict. cap. ult that Truth and Piety are on his side shall affirme or deny any thing repugnant to the Scriptures even in those his Tenets which thorough his Ignorance are not Catholique his heart and mind notwithstanding is Catholique because it is prepared for amendment on better information Of such therefore we may rightly say Heb. 5.14 Rom. 14.1 that they have their Senses not so well exercised in heavenly matters that they are weak and children in Faith that they are not to be taken along with us to doubtfull Disputes but we cannot truly call them forraigners estranged from Christ Apostates from the Faith such as are to be separated from Brotherly Communion with the Godly However therefore let it be taken for granted that the Romish Prelats do not deny any Fundamentall point truly and properly so called hence notwithstanding it appeares that they both hurt the Unity of the Catholique Faith and hinder the Union of the Catholike Church For what Church soever shall patch their own uncertain opinions to the fundamentall Articles of the Christian Faith must needs mishape and deforme the body of the Catholique Faith by joyning to it so many members both useles and monstruous But as for those which use the same and inforce them on other Churches to be beleeved under the necessity of Salvation it manifestly appeares that they alone are guilty of the rents in the Catholique Church Herein the pride of the Romish Church swels so big that it leaves no room to receive the Truth but I hope that all Protestant Churches will at length consent in this to renew the Brotherly Communion betwixt them and not to thrust their private opinions on others That attempt of the Papists to shut out all from the Catholique Church and eternall Salvation which in all things give not their assent to the Creed of Trent ever seemed to me so desperate and foule that all the water of the Ocean powred upon Rome can not wash away the staintherof Wee desire that all which wee have spoken be understood of casting them off from Brotherly Communion who either out of obstinacy or ignorance contradict the Scriptures in any Principle of Catholique Faith which not at all being known we can neither have Union with Christ nor Adoption by him into the Son of God which not at all being beleeved we can neither rightly perform Gods worship nor from him obtaine Eternall Salvation Such things are neither denied nor unknown of any which challenge to themselves the name of Christians save only those 2 Cor. 4.3 4. in whom the God of this world hath blinded their mind lest the light of the glorious Gospel of Christ should shine unto them Moreover neither are the things which we have said so to be taken as if thereby leave and liberty were given to Christian people to set up their rest in fundamentals and to go no further in searching the Scriptures as if it were lawfull to sleight any Doctrine which we confesse not to be fundamentall 2 Tim. 3.16 Yea all Scripture given by Inspiration of God is prositable for Doctrine for reproofe for correction for instruction in righteousnes We must therefore endeavour Col. 3.16 that the Word of God may dwell in us plentifully in all wisdome that we go on to perfection and not always make our abode only in Fundamentals In the words of Saint Augustine wee thus call upon all Christians Epist. 222. Let every one of you gaine to himselfe as much Knowledge of Faith as he can greater if he desires more lesse if lesse yet so that he gives not off from his journey till he attaine unto perfection Last of all I would not have these things which are spoken in generall of the doctrinall foundations of the Christian Faith to be so understood as if this care and duty did not lye upon Doctors and Pastors to instruct their people in every Doctrine of the Scripture wherby they may bee furthered and edifyed in Faith and Piety but that principally they urge and inculcate these Fundamentals as of principall moment to Salvation This was the judgement of Luther in his Preface to the greater Catechisme where he willingly confesseth himselfe to be a Scholar of the Catechisme Tom. 5. p. 645. Surely great is the unhappinesse of Christian people where by reason of the noyse and over much heat of controversies they have scarce leave or leasure to heare or thinke of the Fundamentall and saving Doctrin of the Scriptures and not at all to doe those deeds most necessarily required by Gods Commandements Now as concerning forreigne Churches I deny not but that other Churches may and ought to confute their errors although they contradict not the Foundations of the Christian Faith Nazian orat in S. Epiph. But let their Errours be confuted and not the Parties erring be traduced let the matter be handled by Arguments not by Outcries by Reasons not by Railing nor let them contend about Words when the divers sound of Syllables may be brought to Spell and make up the same Sense To shut up all in a word we must so dispute of all Points not Fundamentall with the Doctours of other
clouds of speculation but in the plaine propositions of the holy Scriptures to the conceiving whereof there is more need and use of Faith than Art of an obedient Heart than of a subtile and piercing Wit Fourthly as all points justly challenging to themselves the Title of Fundamentall are plaine and naked for the manner of their Expression so ought they to be few and so framed that they do not swell to an infinite number yea that they grow not into so great a bulk burthensome to bee portable in the memory of Gods little ones Hence Aquinas cals them the First things to be beleeved 2a 2ae Qu. 2. de Fide cap. 2. and speciall Articles of the Faith William Paris termes them the Fundatories of Religion Others stile them Radicall Truths But although these first Fundatory and Radicall Doctrines of the Christian Religion may beget and bring forth a great uncertaine and numerous of-spring of Consequenceâ— arising from and following after â—â—â—m yet it beares no proportion with reason that they in themselves should 〈◊〉 many or uncertaine When therefore wee behold that to these First credibles of the Divine Essence and Attributes of the Incomprehensible Trinity of the Hypostatical Union of two Natures in Christ of the Cómunication of his Properties and almost of every Object of Knowledge in Divinity there is annexed so great a traine of severall points as thick Volumes are not able to containe them it is most certainely sure that the greatest part of them is not Fundamentall All Christians ought to heare the Counsell of Learned Nazianzen Orat. de Modest observ in D sp Contemplate saith he on Divine things but stay stil in the Termes Speake the Phrases and Language of the Spirit and if it be possible nothing else Do not thou curiously pry thorow those narrow rifts into the Nature of the Father the Essence of the only begotten Sonne the Glory of the Holy Ghost and one God in three Persons Vse the words accustomed the reason of them belongs to those that are Wiser to inquire Let it satisfie thee that thou hast the Foundation and let alone to Artificers to build thereupon Would to God only Artificers would build upon them would to God they would not mingle their many and almost infinite superstructures with the few and plaine Fundamentals to bee embraced with equall affections and to bee received with honour alike If they endeavour thus to do yet it becomes all pious and prudent Christians to discerne and make a difference betwixt those first and few things to bee beleeved immediately revealed by Christ and his Apostles and those numberlesse deductions of Divines which they according to their severall minds and opinions seeke to thrust and crowd into the same roome with Fundamentals Fiftly it is no Fundamentall point which though furbished and attired in new termes is not the same in effect with the Doctrine expressed in the words of the Holy Scripture For if the addition of our new coyned words importeth any thing more than what is in the Scripture this new accession may bee allowed for a consequent of the Fundamentall Doctrine but it cannot with this new peece bee urged for a direct downeright Fundamentall Doctrine But if the new word or the addition therein for matter of the Sense of the Proposition brings no new thing at all but so that understanding the Termes the effect of both appeares to be the same then wee acknowledge both to bee Fundamentall For the disserence of the expression alters not the nature of a Fundamentall Doctrine where the essence and meaning of the Proposition remaines the same What wee have said somewhat obscurely we will make plaine by an example Christ is God and the Sonne of God This is a Fundamentall Point and so also is this Christ is coessentiall with God his eternall Father For although in the latter there is a new Terme yet it addes no new thing nor affirmes any thing which will cause the cumberance of a toilesome deduction to extract it out of the former but whosoever understandeth the termes of both presently understands that they agree so well as in sense they are the same For no man of sound sense can have a conceit of diverse Gods in the same Essence or substance But if the Doctrine or Proposition deck't in forraign Termes and new language cannot bee annexed to a plaine and cleare Fundamentall Article without a busie and artificiall deducing of it it ought not to bee inserted into the Catalogue of Fundamentals Indeed those which perceive the force of the Consequence or Deduction are bound to afford beliefe to such Consectaries But they to whom it doth not sufficiently appeare that such a Proposition followeth from any Fundamentall point they are not bound to embrace it for a tried Truth much lesse for such a Doctrine without which no hope is left to obtaine Salvation To conclude in a word As often as it is inquired whether any Doctrine bee Fundamentall or no let us not give heed to the clamours of Disputants But have recourse to those Notes which now wee have reckoned up If the Doctrines they presse on us bee not clearely recommended by the Apostles themselves to the Catholique Church in the first preaching of the Gospell if in succeeding Ages they were not Universally received if they bee not suited to the capacity of simple Christians but only fitted to the braines of Philosophers and Logicians if they bee too many and not comprised within certaine bounds Lastly if expressed in such formes of Speech that they cannot bee reduced to an equivalent sense with a cleare and of all confessed Fundamentall Article sometimes they may bee Truthes but they can never beâ— counted Fundamentals CHAP. Chap. 7 VII Of the Summe of Fundamentall points contained in the Creed and Commandements so farre as wee ought to Beleeve or Practise MANY of the Papists and somme of ours when we maintaine that the difference betwixt the Reformed Churches is not about Fundamentals presently require of us to bring in a Bill and set forth an acurate Catalogue of Fundamentals so that we may say so many Fundamentals there be of the Christian Faith neither more nor lesse We easily answer the Papists that it were presumption in Protestants who confesse themselves subject to errour to undertake so hard a Taske let Papists rather addresse themselves to the Pope of Rome who alone can speake Oracles and is said to have all Laws Humane and Divine lockt up in the Closet of his Brest But if any of our men shall earnestly maintaine that unlesse this first be done no Brotherly love can be renewed betwixt the Protestant Churches let him try which is somewhat more easie if he can but only reduce the Propositions in Controversie which he desires should be Fundamentall to a certain and stinted number If he shrinkes to do this let him not blame the backwardnesse of others in the same matter Although it be not hard to show the reasons why
the Fundamentall Points can scarce or not at all to be brought to a set number First of al that which hinders is this that according to the diverse conceits of diverse men the formes of Propositions are altered and one Divine breaks that into two which another makes up into one Proposition Hence of necessity must arise an uncertainty of their number Which wee see to have happened in the very Articles of the Creed Aquâ—n 2. 2. quaest 1. aâ—an coâ—p which Divines commonly count to be twelve and yet some reckon them up fourteen What shall I say that as yet Divines are not well agreed amongst themselves of the very distinction of a Fundamentall point Some restraine this name to those Doctrines alone which with an expresse Faith are to be beleeved of all Christians to the obtaining of Salvation and eternal life by Christ and this I professe to bee mine opinion Yet are there some most learned and famous Divines which terme all Propositions Fundamental Doctrines which they themselves by good and strong Consequence inferre out of the former Fundamentals although few or none bee found in their neighbouring Churches who plainely perceive the Truth of these Consequences Many things deterre me from being of this opinion but this most especially that this would bee a necessary and everlasting cause of an unnecessary and everlasting Rent betwixt the Churches of Christ Lastly there never were nor will bee wanting some who will require that it may bee reckoned amongst the Fundamentals whatsoever themselves unlearnedly and erroneously dreame that they have digged and drawn out of the Word of God And these for the most part are those hatefull and troublesome Brawlers who presently give out the Alarum that the Foundations of Religion are pluckt up from the very roots if any dare shake their imaginary Fundamentals Whilst the very nature and definition of a Fundamentall Doctrine flotes in this manner it is no more impossible to count the waves of the Sea than it is percisely to define the set and certaine number of Fundamentall Doctrines ebbing and flowing according to mens severall opinions But least I might seeme wholly to wave and decline the marking out of Fundamentall Doctrines I will shew plainely what was the opinion both of Ancient and Moderne Divines in this matter by publique producing of their testimonies As touching things to be beleeved all Foundations of the Christian Faith are comprised in the Apostles Creed neither shall he who from his heart professeth that he affordeth beliefe to all and every thing therein contained be deficient in any thing so farre as concernes things to be beleeved to the partaking of Salvation in Christ and retaining of Communion with the brethren of Christ Now let us see how honourably the ancient Fathers did both thinke and speake of this Creed Irenaeus saith That the Church dispersed thorow the whole World received this Faith from the Apostles Lib. 1. cap. 2 3. and carefully kept it so that by consent in this Faith they as it were dwell all in one house and have one heart And hee sheweth that this Faith doth suffice for the Vnity of all Churches together amongst themselves as the Dutch Spanish French Easterne Egyptian Lybian in a word all Christian Churches Irreformabâ—â—em lib. de Virgin velan Tertullian calleth this Creed the one Rule of Faith sole immoveable and which need not or may not be altered or reformed Hilary tyred with the contentions of the Arians takes breath with this speech Ad Conslat August It is most safe for us to retaine the first and sole Evangelicall Faith Confessed and Vnderstood in our Baptism Augustine cals this Creed the comprehension and Perfection of our Faith Tom. 10. de temp Serm. 2. Domâ— in Ramis palmar pag. 849. Serm. 131. adding with all that it is plaine short and full so that the plainenesse doth provide and take order to helpe the homelinesse of simple Auditours The shortnesse easeth the memory and the fulnesse compriseth all Doctrine In another place he cals it the certain rule of Faith by which Beleevers may hold the Catholique Truth and by which they may convince all hereticall wickednesse Russinus saith Exposit in the Creed that this Creed may also be called the Triall or Touchstone if we meet a man we doubt of do but examine him by this Creed and he will presently discover himselfe whether he be a foe or a Friend Lastly Serm of the Creed Maximus Taurinensis writes that the Apostles did deliver the mystery of Faith to the Church of God that because there was to be diversity of Beleevers under the one name of Christ the privy signet of the Creed should distinguish the Faithfull from the Vnbeleevers Come we now to see what was the Schoolmens Judgement of this Creed Alexander of Hales brings this reason why the Creed was composed Parte 3. quaeâ— 69. mâ—mb 2. That it might be the Instruction of the Faithfull in one Vnderstanding and Confession of the Truth and Devotion of Religion in which the nature of Man is to obtaine blessednes Somewhat after To instruct in the Faith was the cause of making the Apostles Creed for to this purpose was it composed that the Faithfull might be taught in one Faith to beleeve all things necessary to Salvation Aquinas determines that as touching these first believables 2.2 quaest 2. art 5. in corp whith are the Articles of the Faith every one is bound explicitely to beleeve them but as concerning other believables he is bound only implicitely to beleeve them and in the Preparation of his mind that is having his Heart in readinesse to imbrace them when it shall appeare to him that they are contained in the Doctrin of the Faith Bonaventure saith Sent. l. 3. dist 25 qu. 1. in conclu respâ—ad 2. When it is demanded whether the Doctrin of the Faith be sufficiently contained in the Apostles Creed we may answer that if we speak of the Doctrin of Faith in respect to those things which therein are most principall and proper they are sufficiently contained in the Creed Neither is there any thing to be beleeved which may not be reduced to the Articles contained in the Creed as the principles and stable foundations I passe other Schoolemen because it is their generall judgement that the plaine and unfolded beliefe of the Apostles Creed is enough for Common Christians for the attaining of Salvation though a greater measure of Knowledge bee required from men of greater Learning Whence the Master of the Sentences after hee had concluded Sent. lib 3. dist 25. That in the time of Grace all things ought to be beleeved which are contained in the Creeds afterwards hee addeth that it is one thing to know only what a Man ought to beleeve to obtaine eternall lift and another to know how the same may be maintained and defended against wicked men opposing it which Knowledge many Faithfull men cannot skill of and yet they
many are one body with Christ and every one one anothers members From the connexion with this foundation depends and followes of necessity the connection and communion betwixt severall Churches and private single persons 1 Cor. 12.12 Eph. 4.16 except were account no credit to be given to the Apostle Of every single man Reason 3 and much more of every single Church we must presume well till the contrary doth apeare Therfore the Churches of Saxony are bound to presume that those of Swizerland do adhere to Christ their foundation till they can prove it to bee otherwise by some evident or at least wiseprobable reason Now they are so far from being able to prove their Separation from Christ that most evident Reasons and of Proofe against any doubt present themselves to the eyes and hearts of all that they are savingly united with Christ Eph. 4.5 6. who hold this One Lord one Faith one Baptisme Who duely worship one God and Father of all who is above all Either these things ought to suffice that Churches bee carefull to keepe betwixt them the unity of the Spirit in the bond of Peace Eph. 4.3 or Paul the Apostle knew not what might availe to the soddering of this unity together If any object that the Churches of Switzerland are not sound in the point of the presence of Christs body in the Eucharist in the manner of the eating of it in the Communication of Christs properties and in many other heads of Knowledge in Divinity I would aske of him but this one thing for here is no place to dispute of these matters whether hee conceives these errours to be of such moment that they pluck up the erring Church from its foundation so that they suffer it not to have the same Lord the same Faith the same Baptisme the same God and Father of whom the Apostle speaketh If hee dare not affirme this the Churches may object to those who deny to entertaine Brotherly Communion with them De Schismat Donat lib. 4. in initio that of Optatus Milevitanus You will not keep and hold peace with us that is with your Brethren whom one Mother Church bred in the same bowels of the Sacraments whom God the Father in the same manner received to be his adopted sons But if any shall stil proceed to distract and rend asunder those Churches which are conjoyned in this personall foundation we conceive those words of Isayah fit to be objected against him Destroy them not for a blessing is in them Esay 65.8 We may draw a strong argument from the practice of the Apostles Reason 4 to be used against those who think the Brotherly Communion betwixt Churches may be dissolved for the errours of particular persons For the Apostles did never so much as offer this they never divided asunder or clasht together whole Churches which did stick to Christ the foundation of mans salvation taking advantage of the occasion or pretence of their errors whatsoever It is well known that there were divers errours brought into the Churches of Corinth and Galatia it is well knowne that they were maintained of great men and of great account and yet Paul never went about to perswade the purer and sounder Churches of the Ephesians Philippians and Collossians not to retaine Brotherly Communion with those Churches more impure 1 Cor. 1.2 Gal. 1.3 5 11. 6 18. Yea morover he acknowledgeth those Churches which are full of errors and troubles for the Sanctified Churches of Christ nor disdaineth he to grace and honour those that erred and were deceived with the name of Brethren Indeed it is never lawfull for us to approve and allow those errours which are scattered in other Churches but it is ever lawfull for us to professe Brotherly communion with the Congregations of particular Churches whilst they professe and retaine saving union with Christ the Foundation of the Catholique Church Even as the good ought not otherwise to be separated from the evill in the Catolique Church Aug. de Fide ad Pet. Diaco cap. 43. than by the difference of their works So Churches which are sound in any point ought not to be separated from those which are erroneous save only by their dis-agreeing from their errors Tom. 4. de fide ope To desire by the gulfe of wicked Schismes to part the good from the bad is rather the rashnesse of men which be mad than the strictnesse of those which are diligent saith Augustin Now we say It savours more of rashnesse than care of the truth by wicked Schismes to desire to part the not erring Churches from those which be erronious Piety commands us to depart from those heretiques who overturne the very Foundation because this is necessary But Charity forbids us by unjust dissentions to start asunder from those erring Churches who stick to the foundation because this is Schismaticall Betwixt particular Churches all those offices should be performed Reason 5 which tend to the mutuall edification and nothing to the destruction of the body of Christ I confesse it partaines to edification for us to shew wandring Churches their errors but I maintaine it tends to their destruction that those Churches which we confesse remaine conjoyned to the very foundation wee should disjoyne them for any errors they defend For it was never heard spoken that one Church brought backe another into the way of truth or joyned it closer to Christ by raylings revilings cursings and renouncing of Brotherly Communion The counsels must be more mild and plaisters more lenitive which must be applied to the healing of an erroneous and setling of a shaken Church As for these intentions and decrees of separation and breaking off Communion they have not only hither to been vaine and uselesse but also mischievous and much more forcible to the disturbing than building up of the Churches If therefore any Church be not as yet pluckt asunder from its Foundation it belongs to the neighbouring Churches to restore such a one in the Spirit of meeknesse Gal. 6.1 and not with hostile cruclty to cut them off and cast them away They who are founded in the same Christ Reas 6 and rooted to the partaking of Eternall life ought to be founded and rooted in mutuall Charity but no Protestant will deny but that the Protestant Churches are founded in the same Christ our Lord and Saviour It ought therefore to be well weighed and considered whether the office and nature of Charity it selfe doth not wholy detest this to make an endlesse Schisme and rent betwixt Churches for some diversity of opinions It was Augustine's judgement that Christian Charity could not be kept Contr. lit Petiliani li. 2. c. 77. contra Donat 1.15 c. ibid. cap. 12. except in the unity of the Church and that those who persist in discord belong to the lot and portion of Ismael For who will say that there is not brotherly hatred in a Schisme when there is
no other Originall and obstinate persisting in a Schisme but brotherly hatred Most sure it is that the proper duties of Charity cannot appeare and shew themselves in these differences of the Protestant Churches I appeale to the Apostle himselfe for my witnesse Rom. 12.9 10 11 Ioh. 13.35 1 Ioh. 3.14 1 Cor. 13.1 2. c. 1 Cor. 13.5 6 7 c. If we grant those Churches which wee conceive somewhat to erre in the Faith yet to be sanctified and preserved in Christ the foundation of the Church our Faith though something the sounder Chap. 9 will little availe us August de Bapt. contr Denat lib. 1 cap. 8. if our Charity be wanting towards all the Saints For saving Faith cannot bee unlesse conjoyned with Charity or Brotherly love as the Scriptures every where doe witnesse For what shall a mans sound Faith profit him where the soundnesse of his Charity is baned with the deadly wound of Schisme CHAP. IX That Brotherly Communion betwixt the Protestant Churches is not to be broken off for their divers opinions about questions in Controversy is proved by Arguments drawn from the want of lawfull power in Ministers to cause such a breach or dissolution NONE can be ignorant but that at the first the very Doctors and Ministers of the Churches were the chiefe yea the sole Authours of this Separation which we so desire may be taken away For it is not to be doubted but they alone are the hinderance why the Reformed Churches though by wofull experience they have found the numberlesse discommodities of this long lasting dissention yet they will not amongst themselves renew the Charter of their Brotherly Communion For if it seemed good to their Doctors to give each to other the right hands of brotherly fellowship in this selfe same houre we should see the Churches mutually embracing one another Therefore let us see whether they have done or now doe rightly who either have perswaded that the bands of Brotherly Communion betwixt the Protestant Churches should be broken or earnestly maintaine that for the present they ought not to be renewed againe We are of the contrary opinion being induced thereunto by these Arguments It is not in the power of the Ministers of any particular Church Reas 1 to separate or cut off another particular Church from the brotherly Communion which it hath with the Catholique therefore neither from that which it hath with any part of the Catholique Church and by the same reason not from the brotherly Communion which it ought to have with it selfe unlesse she will confesse her selfe to be no part of the Catholique Church The truth of the Antecedent seems therefore plaine to me because all just and lawfull seperation of every member from its body Catholique ought to leane and rely on the authority of the Catholique Church for one member hath not this judiciary power over another It is a known Rule of Lawyers A sentence given by him that is not his Judge is voyd in Law But particular Churches are not the Judges of private persons living in forreign churches how much lesse then over the Churches themselves If therefore any Church should pronounce another to be disjoynted from the Communion with the Catholique Her sentence were to be sleighted and contemned as of a Judge that presumed to make laws out of the bounds of his owne Jurisdiction But perchance they who easily grant the Antecedent of our Argument will yet doubt of the Consequent and set downe that one part of the Catholique Church may cast off another part thereof that is one particular Church may separate another particular Church from Brotherly Communion with her selfe by the power of her own private sentence and authority I deny that any particular Church hath any lawfull power to dissolve Christian Brotherhood with any other except so farre forth as the separation rely on the Authority of the Catholique Church which one claspes and containes within her embraces the Churches of all Nations Now this separation relyes on this authority so often as it is made for those points which are so established by the judgement of the Catholique Church that they are to bee counted shut out from the cōmunion of faithfull Christians who are known to oppose or deny them Trusting on this authority we justly deny brotherly Communion to those Churches which falsely and equivocally are entitled with the name of Christ who with joy and jeering hisse out the Divinity of Christ Who carpe at the mystery of the Trinity which is to be adored or with sacrilegious boldnesse overthrow any foundation of the Christian Faith For all these things have been passed for things judged on and that by the well known and famous authority of the Apostolike and Catholike Church But this separation is not made rightly nor according to the custome of the Catholike Church as often as one particular Church shall deny Brotherly Communion to another for dissenting from them in questions newly risen and never determined on one side or other by the authority of the Catholike Church as points of the Catholike Faith For no Church can at its own pleasure breake off the Band of Brotherly Communion by which all the members of the Catholike Church are coupled together with any particular Church but that with the selfe same Deed shee divides her selfe from the body of the Catholike Church in which those members can have no being which have lost their due joynting and Union with their fellow members We will conclude this argument with the Testimony of Augustine who every where teacheth Tom. 3. de side ad Petr. Diac. cap. 43. that this Separation of the good from the evill being within the Catholike Church is unlawfull and they which endeavour to pluck other members from the joynting of the body doe rather separate themselves from the Vnity of Christ Tom. 4. de side oper cap. 4 5. Lastly it nothing hurteth or hindereth those that are good that they abide still in Vnity and participation of the Sacraments with those whose Deeds they disallow Neither with those whose opinions they cannot approve For if we will beleeve the same Augustine they cannot be excused of unlawfull presumption who too much loving their own judgement arrive at such an height of boldnesse as to cut off Communion with others Tom. 7. de Bant. contra Don. For they neither ought nor can be cut off from communion with particular Churches which remaine conjoyned with the Catholike Church Particular Churches ought not in our age Reas 2 to challenge that to themselves which none ever durst to do in the time of the Apostles The Ministers of the Churches ought not to urge that which the Apostles themselves durst never perswade to be done But that one particular Church should renounce all Brotherly communion with another is a thing altogether unheard off wholy swerving from the prudence and practice of the Apostles Amongst the seven Churches to which S. John wrote
not only truly said of the Man Christ that he is Omnipotent Omniscient c. but also that of the humane nature of Christ that the same is Omnipotent Omniscient c. yet doe so temper and explaine this their opinion that they deny these divine properties to bee powered into the humane nature or ever become properties fixed and setled in the humane nature and determine them only by the personall Union and exaltation that followed upon it to be attributed to him in his Person and not severally If there be any difference betwixt these Opinion it is so subtle so farre removed from the capacity and cōmon understanding of Christian people that it cannot be in the number of fundamentall Doctrines except we will faine a new kinde of fundamentalls hitherto unknown and unheard of to the Catholike Church and people of God As concerning other questions which those foure words have bred unto us Verbally Really in the Concrete in the Abstract we may freely say such termes of Art ought not to enter into the articles of the Christian Faith from the knowledge wherof depends the life and Salvation not only of learned men and Logicians but of the unlearned and of all common Christians Moreover it is little suteable that we should seek fundamentall Doctrines in Propositions as long as it is not agreed on of the sense and signification of the termes which are used in the framing of them But what comes to be understood Colloq Mompel pag. 222. c. 22◠under the name of Concrete what under the name of Abstract could not be consented on betwixt James Andrewes and Theodore Beza neither as yet doe the Divines of both sides well agree in the signification of these words when they are referred to Christ Therefore it is enough for the retaining of Unity betwixt Churches that all acknowledge the Communication of Properties not to be verball but reall so farre forth as that the same and one only Person to whom it is attributed is truly and really God is also truly and really man and therefore things may really be predicated of God which belong to Man and of the Man Christ which belong to God But if we should change the name of God into Godhead or Man into Manhood all also will acknowledge that the Propositions are not to be received with the same certainty None will doubt of this Proposition God was Crucified for our sins But if it be thus altered The Godhead or Divine Nature was Crucified for our sins It will afford occasion not only of doubting but of being deceived So this Proposition is placed without the reach of all question The Man Christ is omnipotent omnipresent c. But if the word Man be changed into the word Manhood as to say The Manhood or humane nature of Christ is omnipotent omnipresent c. it will not appeare so plainly to the Orthodox in their Judgement Tom. 2. vide Epist 102. Tom. 6. contra Ser. Arian tom 7. De Pecc mer. lib. 1. c. 31 tom 10. S.N. 14. de verbis Dom. Hist Sacra vart 2. pag. 15 16 17. 18. Augustine sheweth us the light to frame and understand such Propositions made of Christ God and Man almost in every book Let the places noted on the margin be consulted with Also Luther himselfe in Hospinian hath many things most worthy to bee considered of the Person of Christ and communication of his Attributes and most to the purpose for the true understanding of this question I will adde this one thing that those two Propositions The Man Christ is God The God Christ is Man Which are the foundation of all the rest in which this communication of Attributes whereof the strife is is made are above and against all rules of Logicians and Philosophers In vaine therefore doe we leane to the consequencies of Logick when we endeavor to annex other new fundamentalls unto them we doe it in tearing and rending the unity of the Churches when they cannot see alike the force of such consequencies For those which acknowledge and embrace the truth of all fundamentals in this question about the Person of Christ are not to be cast off from other Churches for every error in the manner of speech or ignorance in the manner of inferring or deducing of consequencies Now in the last place let us briefely see what is to be determined in that controversie which is about divine Predestination Of Divine Predestination AS concerning this controversie many things in the very heat of disputation have fallen from some private Doctors of great account which seem not to agree square to the exact rule of Truth But these things ought not to be urged to the breaking asunder of the Unity and Communion of the Churches if once it appeare to all Protestant Churches that that is confessed whatsoever in this matter is necessary to be believed unto Salvation and that all errors are rejected of all which crosse and oppose Mans Salvation to be obtained by Christ Look into all the Confessions of the Reformed Churches you shall finde nothing left out of them which may be called fundamentall nothing put into them which overthroweth any fundamentall Article All doe consent that none is elected or Predestinated from Eternity to Salvation except out of the meer and most free mercy and grace of God that none in time is brought to Salvation or Eternall Life except by the way of Faith Repentance and new Obedience Also all grant that God from Eternity did as well decree to give to the Elect as he did foresee all those saving goods should bee given them by helpe whereof they are brought to Eternall Life That he did also decree so to give to them and did foresee that this saving grace should so bee given that they cannot boast of any cause or occasion found or foreseen in themselves of this Gods bounty unto them Lastly they grant that all the certainty which single persons have or ought to have to eternall Life ought not to be sought a Priori beginning at the Top in the Decree or Prescience of God but a posteriori beginning at the bottome in the fruits of Faith and Holinesse And moreover they conclude this That the Elect themselves cannot be sustained or refreshed with the comfort of their electiō or salvation when and as long as they wander out of the way of Salvation because the holy Spirit will not beare witnesse to their hearts Rom. 8.14 15 16. that they are the sonnes and heires of God but when they are led by the Spirit of God But men cannot have a sure and firme comfort of their Election and Adoption except the Spirit witnesse this unto their spirits Now as touching that Passing men by or not Electing them which is commonly called Reprobation I see nothing Fundamentall whereof there is any dissention betwixt the Reformed Churches If as yet all things be not well agreed on betwixt particular Doctors Let them so
employ their Armes and use their strength that they pluck not asunder the Churches themselves with a dangerous Schisme The Authors of our English Confession in the XVII Article where Predestination is handled would not so much as in a word touch upon the other Question of Reprobation both because of the uselesse speculations which mens curiositie would extract thence as also because out of the Doctrine of Predestination well grounded so much may easily be gathered as is necessary or profitable to know or hold of Reprobation But neither for this thing is there cause to dissolve the Brotherly Union betwixt Protestants All grant and agree that these Propositions are most true That the Act of Reprobation in God as that of Election is from Eternity That none is Reprobated from Eternity which might not be Reprobated without all Cruelty or Injustice That no one was fore-damned of God from Eternitie whom he from Eternitie did not foresee wrapt up in the guilt of damnation That no one shall in time be damned but through the most just merit of his owne corruption and impiety That the Originall and cause of all Evills which drownes Reprobates in perdition is not found in God Reprobating but in the Reprobates themselves That this Eternall Reprobation cannot appeare to any particular Person unlesse out of the fruits most worthy of damnation which he brings forth and loves to bring forth to the end of his life That there is no single Person which may not attaine Eternall Life by Repenting Beleeving and Persevering according to the Tenor of the Covenant of the Gospell That there is no such Decree of God by which Reprobates should be forced and necessitated to sinne and perish But alwayes they perish by their own voluntary unbeliefe and impiety free and not constrained It appeared lately in the Conference of Lipsigh that there is an agreement in all these Points If there be any other things remaining they are rather Controversies about words than about matter rather discords about subtile Speculations than fundamentall Articles Such are those which are disputed betwixt Schoolmen of the Signification of the very words namely Predestination and Reprobation of the Imaginary order of Priority and Posteriority betwixt the Eternall Acts of Predestinating and Fore-knowing of the unsearchable manner of Divine working about all humane Actions whether good or bad of the necessitie or Contingency of all things which from Eternity were predestinated or fore-knowne of God In such perplexed Controversies it cannot bee but contradictions must arise oftentimes betwixt Disputants Yet brotherly Concord may be made up and maintained betwixt the Churches themselves as anciently it was preserved betwixt the African and Latine Churches Their Doctors in the mean time being of different opinions in the weighty Question of Baptizing of Hereticks Vid. Cypr. Epist ad Jubaiannum Et in sent Episc de de Heret Bapt. To close up all in a word Those Churches falsly so called may be forsaken which possesse not the Foundation of the Apostles preaching But true Churches ought not to be deserted and pluckt asunder from others for the Errors of particular Doctors because the Faith of Churches leanes not upon the names or writings of single Persons CHAP. XII Some Objections wherewith some Learned Divines have been moved to breake off the Communion betwixt Protestant Churches are answered TRuly it is to be bemoaned That some so far abhorre from the Brotherly Communion of Protestants betwixt themselves that they charge this very thing as a fault upon peaceable Divines that they will not suffer that these Controversies which are handled betwixt Learned men ought to break off the Bands of holy Brotherhood betwixt the Churches themselves But let us weigh what Reasons they chiefly rely on who contend that this disjoynting of Churches is absolutely necessary No Communion is to be retained with those Churches which embrace Arg. 1 and with obstinacy defend corruptions of Doctrine intrenching on the Glory and repugnant to the Word of God but the Lutherans thinke that this is done in many points by the Calvinists and on the other side the Calvinists complaine that the same is done by the Lutherans Therefore it is not lawfull for these Churches which are ill distinguished by the names of Luther and Calvin to retaine Brotherly Communion amongst themselves The major Proposition they conceive well founded in that most true Maxime That all things which we doe are to be referred to the Glory of God 1 Cor. 10.31 The minor they account themselves to have proved by running over all these heads of Doctrine whereabout they contend for the Divines on both sides doe presume that their Opinions doe ever make to the illustration of Gods Glory and that the contrary alwayes obscures it None denie Answ but that in all our actions we must level at the Glory of GOd and it must also be confessed that this is the nature of sin and false Doctrine that alwaies of it selfe it is of force to impaire the Glory of God in some part But that to me seems weak and unfound which both sides presume upon as on a thing to be granted and not at all to be denyed Namely that it tendeth to the Glory of God for us to renounce Brotherly cōmunion with those Churches wherein Doctrines are defended in some manner and degree crossing the glory of God Those things which so shake the Glory of God that they suffer not at all those which are erroneous in them to have saving Communion with God and Christ neither doe they suffer Orthodox Christians to retaine Brotherly Communion with them But those things which in some measure are repugnant to the truth of the Scriptures and glory of God but yet doe not destroy the said Communion can in no wise afford to any particular Church just cause of departing and dividing it selfe from another for this is the very selfe same fault which the Ancients endeavored to render odious to all under the infamous name of Schisme But that also may be added that the Churches which are in the right doe well enough discharge their dutyes when they provide and take care that their owne People be not intangled in the errors of others when they endeavor with all gentlenesse to reduce the wandring Churches into the way of Truth But when they depart from the Communion and Brotherly Unity of the Church from which Christ hitherto hath not departed they defend not but grievously wound the glory of God and Christ by this their separation Lastly when the far greater part of particular Churches consists not of learned Doctors but of simple people it cannot truly be affirmed that they understand the Errours propagated by the learned much lesse that they stick to them least of all that they stick to them with obstinacy and wilfulnesse Therefore under pretence of these the bands of Christian Brotherhood are not to be broken betwixt whole Churches For Jerusalem is built as a city which is at unity in