Selected quad for the lemma: truth_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
truth_n	body_n	bread_n	wine_n	4,141	5	8.0622	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A43220	The speech of Nicholas Heath Lord Chancellor of England, Lord President of Wales, Bishop of Worcester, and afterward Archbishop of York and ambassadour into Germany / delivered in the Upper House of Parliament in the year 1555 ; proofs from Scripture that Christ left a true church and that there is no salvation but in the Catholick and Apostolick Church ; proofs from the Fathers that there is no salvation to be expected out of the true Catholick and Apostolick Church ; certain principles of the first authors of the Reformation not so well known to many of their followers ; the principle of the Catholick Apostolick Church ; testimony of the Fathers concerning the real presence.	Heath, Nicholas, 1501?-1578.	1688 (1688)	Wing H1337; ESTC R35988	79,776	181

a Decree rather be assented to than the contrary Decree of the forementioned Synod called at London Now for a further Confirmation of This Doctrine I will here deliver Evident Testimonies of most Eminent Fathers and Doctors of the Church concerning it The Truth of the Eucharist and Real Presence of the Body and Blood of Christ in the Eucharist Confirmed by the Testimonies of the Fathers MAny of the Holy Fathers have taught That the Faithful partake of the Body and Blood of Christ in the Eucharist not with a mental mouth by Faith only as Calvin would have it but even with a Bodily Mouth in the way of a true and proper Eating So St. Augustin l. 2. contra Adversarium legis Prophetarum c. 9. We receive with a faithful heart and mouth Christ Jesus giving us his Flesh to eat and his Blood to drink and St. Leo Serm. 6. de jejunio mensis septimi where he Writes thus We ought so to communicate at the holy Table as that there be no doubt of the truth of Christ's Body for the same is taken with the Mouth which is believed with the Heart In like manner Calvin's Errour is Excluded by St. John Damascen for he tells us De Orthodoxa Fide l. c. 14. The Bread and Wine are no figures of the Body and Blood of Christ far be this from us to imagine but the very Body of Christ our blessed Lord himself testifying this is not a sign of my Body but my Body nor a sign of my Blood but my Blood The like hath Theophylact in S. Matth. 26. and St. Mark 14. where explaining the self-same Words of Christ he adds He shews that the Host which is offered upon the Altar is the very Body of our Lord and no Figure for he said not this is a Figure of my Body but my Body hence is it that the Holy Fathers Teach that by receiving the Eucharist Christ is truly incorporated with us and not by Faith only or Figuratively but united to us indeed so speak the Holy Fathers For thus says St. John Chrysostom Homil. 3. on St. Matth. He incorporates himself says he with us and not by Faith only but he makes us his Body verily and indeed So St. Cyril of Alexandria in St. John l. 10. c. 13. tells us We are not only united to Christ spiritually by a true Faith and sincere Charity but Christ also dwells in us Corporally by Communication of the Flesh of Christ and that Corporal Union of Christ with the Faithful therein by participation of the Eucharist he Illustrates by this Instance Like as says he if one blends one piece of melted Wax with another so as one lump seems to be made up of both the pieces even so by Communication of the Body and Blood of Christ he is in us and we in him for the corruptable Nature of a Body cannot otherwise pass over to Life and Incorruption unless a body of Natural Life be joyned with it St. Gregory Nyssen uses another instance in Orat. Catech. cap. 37. where he speaks thus In like manner as a little Leaven as the Apostle Testifies 2 Cor. 11. Leavens the whole Lump even so that Life giving Body passing into our Bodies Translates it self wholly into us and changes us as it renders ours like it and immortal in due time for it is necessary that our Nature so far as may be should admit so Efficatious a power into our Bodies where he also teaches us that it behoves us to believe that like as the forbidden Fruit was corporally eaten by Adam even so that the Body of Christ is taken of us corporally and received in the Belly so that it is not only mentally by Faith or Figuratively as Calvin would have it so as the wholsom Medicine be in us be no otherwise in us than the Destructive poyson which was bodily received to Repeal the same by a contray Action Read that whole Chapter then which nothing can be more clearly against the Errours of the Calvinists maintaining the Body and Blood of Christ to be taken by us Spiritually and not Corporally Last of all the Holy Fathers Teach that the Sacrament of the Eucharist for the sake of Christ's being there is to be Adored but Adored it ought not to be nay such Adoration would be Idolatry if Christ be not truly and really there contained for that Worship or Adoration that is called Latria is to be given to God alone whence it is plain that in the opinion of the Holy Fathers Christ is truly and really contained in the Sacrament of the Eucharist now that the Holy Fathers every where teach that the Sacraments of the Eucharist is to be Adored because of Christs being there appears plainly from St. Austin Epist 120. cap. 27. Where he tells us That the Faithful came to the Table they eat and Adored the same he maintains in his Comment 82. that place Psalm xcviii upon Worship his Foot-stool where the Foot-stool he explains by the Earth and the Earth by the Flesh of Christ Because says he he walked here in our Flesh and gave his very Flesh to be eaten by us for our Salvation and no man eats that Flesh unless he hath first Adored it It is discovered how such a Foot-stool of our Lord may be Adored and we shall not only not Sin in Adoring but we Sin in not Adoring and St. Ambrge de Spiritu Sancto l. 13. c. 11. upon the same words says thus By the Foot-stool is meant the Earth and by the Earth the Flesh of Christ which we daily Adore in the Mysteries Thus St. Ambrose The like hath St. Chrysostom in Epist ad Eph. homil 3. where he hath it thus Adore this and Eat And St. Cyril of Hierusalem Catech. 3. Mystagog hath these words Make thy approach to the Chalice of his Blood in the manner of Adoration This the Church has constanty held from the beginning and hold even to this day as appears from the General Council of Trent Sess 13. Cap. 5. where it requires the Worship of Latria to be given to the Sacrament according to the custom ever received in the Church Many more Testimonies of the Holy Fathers are yet behind which to produce were easy if there were no pains in Transcribing them and those already produced are sufficient for the truth of the Eucharist and for the Real Presence of the Body of Christ there Jo. 6. v. 54. Who Eates my Flesh and Drinks my Blood hath Eternal Life and I will raise him up at the last day And the Council of Nice calls the Eucharist Symbolum Resurrectionis a token of the Resurrection and St. Ignatius M. Epist 14. ad Epes termes it Pharmacum Immortalitatis A Medicine of Immortality Now if you ask the manner how it serves as an incorruptible food for a Glorious Resurrection I Answer The Species being altered by the heat of the Stomach the Body of Christ ceases to be here but his Deity remains after a special

as each one judg'd by Scripture to be convenient they Covenanted against Bishops Lastly look upon our Realm as it is at present the symptoms of dissatisfactions which you may read and hear in Coffee-Houses in publick and private Conversations the sparkles of Jealousies which appear in the Kingdom the Cabals against our Government the animosity of divided Parties the murmur and complaints of all what 's all this but the smoke of that hidden fire of Zeal wherewith Protestants would force Presbyterians by Penal Laws to profess their Tenets which each Opinion endeavour to oppress the other do but duly consider each Sect and they will all appear Tyrants over our Conscience For no one Sect among us but would root out all the rest none fearing that danger whereof St. Paul Gal. 5.15 warns us If we bite and devour one another let 's take heed we be not consumed one of another Giving us likewise a wholsom advice in the same place how to prevent this Evil c. When this Kingdom profess'd the Popish Religion to prevent this Evil of variety of Opinions their Rule of Faith was Interpreted by the Church and was kept from the hands of the flock No man permitted to give any other Interpretation or Sense of it but what the Church did approve Then the Reformers Luther Calvin Zuinghus Beza and others who freed from this slavery laid it down for their Rule of Faith That any man of sound Judgement may believe whatever he takes to be the sense of Scripture these are the Principles from which the Reformation proceeded No man is to be constrain'd to believe any Doctrine against his Judgement and Conscience and therefore it is quite contrary to the Spirit of the Reformation to force us by Acts of Parliament Decrees of Synods Invectives and Persecutions of Indiscreet Brethren to drive us to this or that Religion No every one ought to be Permitted to believe what he pleases as for instance If he thinks Bigamy or Self-Murder to be the Doctrine of Scripture to have freely liberty to profess and practice the same In the first place let my Reader consider that the Pure and Orthodox Dostrine of the Reformation I purpose in this Treatise to describe in its native Colours It 's the Doctrine of the Reformation that we may with a safe Conscience be to day Protestants to morrow Lutherans in France Hugonots in Hungary Trinitarians in Poland Socinarians and in London of any Religion but Popery they allow to be Lawful to change Religion as Time and Occasion require this is the practice of the first Reformers This Truth requires not much to justify it be pleas'd only to consider how you came to Change the Antient Religion profess'd in the Kingdom for 1500 years together It 's uncontestedly true that the Rule of Faith in common to the whole Reformation is Scripture as the humble of Heart assisted with the Spirit of the Lord understand it for Lutherans will never admit their Rule of Faith to be Scripture as Interpreted by the Church of England but as Interpreted by themselves nor will England admit Scripture to be the Rule of Faith as it is Interpreted by the Presbyterians but as Interpreted by the Church of England So that the Doctrine of each Congregation is but Scripture as interpreted by them and whereas all these Congregation joyntly compose the whole Body of the Reformation and each Congregation is truly a Member of the Reformation the Doctrine of the Reformation comes to be Scripture as each Congregation and Person of sound Judgement among them Interprets it This being an uncontrouled truth what Man of ever so sound Judgement but may read to day Scripture as Interpreted by the Lutheran Church and judging in his Conscience that Interpretation and Doctrine to be true consequently he may with a safe Conscience profess that Religion Soon after he may meet Calvin's Books and charm'd with the admirable strength of his reasons and glosses upon Scripture he may judge in his Conscience he is to be preferr'd before Luther and so may lawfully forsake Lutheranism for Calvinism then again he hits upon Scripture as Interpreted by the Church of England whose Doctrine ravishes him with that decency of Ceremonies that Majesty of her Liturgy that Harmony of her Hierarchy he is convinc'd it's better than Calvinism and embraces it Then again he reads the Works of Arrius and convinc'd by the energy of his Arguments and Texts of Scripture may alter his judgement and become an Arian Wherein can you say does this Man transgress the Doctrine or Principles of the Reformation Does he forsake the Reformation because he forsakes Lutheranism for Calvinism No sure for Calvinism is as much the Reformation as the other Is not Protestancy as much the Doctrine of the Reformation as Presbytery though he changes therefore one for the other he still holds the Doctrine of the Reformation Is not the Doctrine of the Reformation Scripture and that not as Protestants only or Presbyterians interpret it but as any Congregation or Man of sound judgement holds it It is therefore evident that according to the Doctrine and Principles of the Reformation he may with a safe Conscience change Religions and be to day of one to morrow of another until he run over All. Point me out any Congregation the obstinate Papists excepted that will dare say I cannot live with a safe Conscience in any other Congregation but in it self all other Congregations will laugh at it Why then may not I lawfully forsake any Congregation and pass to another and be in England a Protestant in Germany a Lutheran in Hungary a Trinitarian or Socinian It is against the grain of Mans reason that we can with a safe Conscience change Religion If you be a Protestant and you judge it to be the true Religion you are bound to stick to it and never to change it If I discourse with a Papist I would not wonder he should say it 's against the grain of Mans reason to believe it lawful but I admire that a Child of the Reformation be he of what Congregation he will should be so ignorant of his principles as to say a Man cannot change Religions when he pleases Nor do I undertake to prove against the Papist that this is lawful but I undertake to prove it lawful against any Reformed Child or force him to deny the Principles of the Reformation Is it against reason that a Man may read to day Scripture and the Lutherans Interpretation upon it and like it very well and that he should in this case embrace that Religion Is it against the grain of Mans reason that this same Man should next Year afterwards hit upon Calvin's works upon Scripture and after better consideration think his Doctrine to surpass that of Luther and could not he then being obliged to chuse the best forsake Lutheranism and stick to Calvinism And is it against Mans reason that he after this may meet other Books of Arians