that lacketh in me I supplye of thee O moost sweateste reconciliation See howe Saynte Bernarde ioyneth the offeryng of oure bodyes and of Christes bodye together that yf the oblation of our bodyes be imperfecte suffise not the oblation of christes body may fulfyll and supplye that lacketh in vs And to what ende that we might be reconciled that the body of synne myghte be destroyed that it reygne not in oure bodyes ¶ Here the Prayer was made NOw entryng to speake of y e sacrifice of the churche I pre suppose one thyng whych is the foundation of the same to be most certaynlye and constantly beloued of all vs that be here present which is that in the most blessed SacrameÌ„t of the aultare is presente the true bodye and bloude of oure Sauiour Christe the price of our redemption not in figure only but in trueth and verye dede whiche the learned men call really and essentially that is to saye that thynge that substaunce that was vpon the crosse is nowe verely presente in the blessed Sacrament before we receaue it the cause of whych real presence is the omnipotente power and wyll of God assistyng the due administration of the Priest the whiche body and bloude we christen men receaue by the seruice of our bodyes and senses though not by the iudgement of our senses but onely by the iudgement of fayth because it is gyuen not in the outwarde fourme of the selfe same bodye and bloude as it was slayne shedde vpon the crosse but in the fourmes of our dayly and speciall nutrimentes of breade and wyne and that for sondry weyghtye and necessary causes foresene by our Sauioure Christ. For â–ª seyng the substaunce of our sacrifice of the newe Testament is the verye reall and naturall bodye of Christe as may be proued by many auctorities Saynte Cypriane sayeth In sacrificio quòd Christus est non nisi Christus sequendus est In that sacrifice that is Christ no manne is to be folowed but Christe Here he sayeth that Christ is that sacrifice that we offer to almyghtye God Also Saynte Basyl wryteth in hys forme of Masse Tu es qui offers offerris qui suscipis et impartis Christe Deus noster O Christ our God thou art he that both doest offer is offered that bothe giuest the offeryng and receaueth Saynt Basyl by this meaneth that the sacrifice whyche the churche offered to GOD is Christ hym selfe who in that he is the heade of hys body the churche is one offerer with y e churche and so is bothe offerer and offered as Basyl sayeth Lykewyse Saynte Ambrose wrytynge of the inuention of the bodyes of two gloriouse martyrs Geruasius and Prothasius and of the burying of them vnder the aultare sayeth thus Succedant uictimae triumphales in locum ubi Christus hostia est sed ille super altare qui pro omnibus passus est â—sti sub altari qui illius redempti sunt passione Let these triumphynge sacrifices meanynge the bodyes of the martyrs go into y t place where Christe is a sacrifice But Christe is a sacrifyce aboue the aultare who suffred for all men these two vnder y e aultare that were redemed by his passion Of this place I note my purpose whiche is that the sacrifice of the Churche and newe Testament is the verye reall bodye and bloude of our Sauiour Christ which is also testified by Chrysostome in his homelye he wryteth of the praise of GOD in these woordes Vereamini mensam quaue desuper uictima illa iacet Christus scilicet qui nostri causa occisus est feare and reuerence that table aboue y t which lieth that sacrifice that is to saye Christ whyche for oure cause was slayne By which wordes Chrysostome declareth his faythe that the sacrifice of y e churche is Christ and also that christ is not onely in heauen as some men damnably beareth you in hand but is placed lyinge aboue y e table of the aultare as y e substaunce of our sacrifice And in an other homely he writeth Mensa mysterijs instructa est et agnus dei pro te immolatur The table is furnished with mysteries and the lambe of god for the is offered teachinge vs that the holye mysteryes wherewith the table of our aultare is furnyshed be the body bloude of Christ that is to saye the lambe of god which is also then offered for vs. Saint Augustyne is full of such saynges as writinge of his mothers deathe howe that he wepte nothinge for her all the tyme the Masse was sayde for her soule which he expresseth by these wordes Cum offerrâ—tur pro ea sacrificium praecij nostri When the sacrifice of our pryce was offered for hyr I leaue out all the rest of the sentence contented to alledge onely this that proueth the sacryfice whiche is offered by the priest for the deade to be our pryce which is and can be nothinge else but the bodye bloude of Christ which he gaue vpon the crosse as the pryce of our redemption But playnest of al he writeth in a booke intituled Liber Sententiarum Prosperi which booke is alledged of Gratian in the decrees in these wordes Hoc est quod dicimus quòd modis omnibus approbare contendimus sacrificiuÌ„ Ecclesiae duobus confici duobus constare uisibili elementorum specie inuisibili Domini nostri Iesu Christi corpore sanguine Sacramento re Sacramenti id est corpore Christi This is that we saye that we labour to proue by al meanes that the sacrifice of the church is made and consisteth of two thinges of the visible fourme of the elementes and of the invisible bodye bloude of our Lorde Iesus Christ bothe the outwarde Sacrament and y e thinge or substaunce of y e Sacrament that is the bodye of Christ. These wordes nede no declaringe but poyntinge and for that cause why shoulde I tarye in this point any longer seing that our bokes be full of suche like aucthorities Therfore as I began seinge the substaunce of our Sacryfyce of the new Testament is the very reall and naturall bodye of Christe if this bodye be not present in the SacrameÌ„t as the enemyes of Christes crosse the destroyers of our faythe falsely pretend then be we christen men lefte all together desolate without any sacrifyce priuaâ—e vnto vs for bothe the sacrifice of Christe vpon the crosse and also the inwarde sacrifice of mans hearte be not priuate but common to vs to all faythfull men from the beginning of the worlde to the last end And furthermore seinge a sacrifice is an outwarde protestation of our inward faithe deuotion if we christen men now haue no sacrifice priuate vnto vs then be we the moost miserable men that euer were beinge without any kynde of religion For take awaye our sacrifice and take awaye our religion as S. Cyprian confutinge the carnall
the degrees and specialties of sanctification whyche be many for some thinges be holy not for any holines that is in them but for that they be brought to the churche and dedicate to some holy vse as is the temple of God the vestures about the aultare and other thinges vsed in Gods seruice whyche thynges too steale and conuey is sacrilege and amonges those thynges there be degrees of holynes as saynt Augustyne sayeth Quod accipiunt Catechumeni quamuis non sit corpus Christi sanctum est tamen sanctius quà m cibi quibus alimur Holye breade whyche those that be learners receaue although it be not the body of Christe yet it is holy and more holye then the meate with which we are fedde dayly which also is sanctified by the word prayer There is also holines a qualitie a vertue and gift of God makynge him in whome it is acceptable in the sight of god The soule of man is likewyse sanctified and holye because it is that substaunce and subiect wherin holines consisteth and dwelleth beyng a vessell created to gods ymage and prepared to receaue gods gift of saÌ„ctification and holines And the bodye of a godlye man is also sanctified and holy because it is the membre of Christ the temple of the holye ghost and the house and tabernacle of the soule replenyshed with gods grace and sanctification and for this reason we haue in reuerence and estimation the reliques and bodyes of holy martyrs and coÌ„fessors whyche beynge members of Christ were also pleasinge sacrifices to almightie god eyther for austeritie of lyfe or for sufferynge of vndeserued deathe for the fayth or in the quarell of Iesus Christe oure Lord. The sacramentes of Gods churche be iustly called holye because they be the instrumentes wherby God doth worke holines in the soule of manne and be as causes of the same by Christes owne ordinaunce and institution But aboue all other this Sacrament of the aultare is holy beyng as Chrysostome sayde not only a thyng sanctified but the very sanctification it selfe for in that it is the body of Christ by consecration wherevnto is annexed y e godheade by vnitie of person it must nedes be holines it self not in qualitie but in substance seing whatsoeuer thinge is in God is also God who for hys simplicitie receaueth no qualitye into him selfe but is the author and principal cause of all good qualities and graces giuen to manne Wherfore thys place of Chrysostome that calleth it sanctification it selfe â–ª can not be auoyded by no figuratyue speaches nor suche lyke cauillations The same Chrysostome in hys epystle to Innocentius Bysshoppe of Rome wryteth of the maner of the persecution in hys time not vnlyke to thys of ours Nam sanctuarium ingressi sunt milites quorum aliquos scimus nullis initiatos mysterijs uiderunt omnia quae intus erant quin sanctissimus Christi saâ—guis sicut in tali tumultu contingit in praedictorum militum uestes eflusus est The souldiers came violentlye into the holye place of whome we knowe that some were not baptized and there they sawe all thynges that were within and the most holy bloude of Christ as chauncheth often in suche a tumult was shedde vpon the garmentes of those souldiers Here I marke that he sayth not the figure or signe of christes bloude but the most holy bloude an other inferiour creature can not be moste holye Also I marke that thys most holye bloude was reserued there in the holye temple and was not onlye in heauen to be receaued by fayth of the faythful but also was in the temple and violently handeled of the vnfaythfull beinge there contemned abused and spilt vpon their garmentes Doeth not this barbaricall violence and externall situation of the most holy bloude of Christ proue a reall presence of the same in the Sacrament Gregorye Nazianzene speaketh after the like maner howe that the Arianes would not suffre the Catholikes to praye in theyr temples but troubled them and killed theÌ„ and mingled Christes mystical bloude wyth the bloude of the catholike priestes whych they slew and so forth whereby we vnderstande a reall presence of Christes bloude by that violence that was shewed vnto it of the heretikes part though Christe were there after that sort that he could suffre no violence of his part We reade in saynte Hyerome and in diuerse other Ipse conuiua conuiuium comedens et qui comeditur that Christe is both the eater of the feast and the feast it selfe both the eater and the meate that is eaten Wherby we vnderstand that Christ gyuyng hys bodye and hys bloude to hys discyples dyd receaue the same him selfe before And as Chrysostome wryteth that lest hys disciples shoulde haue bene troubled and offended hearyng hym saye This is my bloude dryncke ye all of thys as y e Caparnaites were before â–ª and so shuld abhorre to haue droncke of the same Christ dyd fyrst drynke of the same cuppe before them that he myght by hys example induce hys disciples to drynke lykewyse And Hesichius sayeth Ipse dominus primus in coena mystica intelligibilem accepit sanguineÌ„ atque deinde calicem Apostolis dedit Our Lorde hym selfe in the mistical supper first drank hys owne bloude that was not sene but vnderstanded then gaue the cuppe to hys Apostels By thys facte of Christ we maye learne that in the cuppe was verely and reallye Christes owne bloude for yf christ did eate hys body drank his bloude but in figure then he dyd eate and drynke it before after that maner in the typical and legall supper then how can thys mysticall supper be the trueth and the other the fygure yf thys be but a figure likewise And then why shuld the Apostle be affrayed to do that nowe they were wont to do alwayes before It was no newe thing worthy the newe Testamente to eate drynke Christe in a fygure and therfore it is certayne that Christ in hys mysticall supper dydde not eate and drynke his body and bloude onlye fyguratiuely And yf ye wyll saye that he eate it and dranke it spiritually onlye then ye must say that Chryst dyd eate it by fayth for spirituall eatyng is beleuyng And yf ye saye Christ dyd beleue then it foloweth y t Christ was not God Who hath perfyte knowledge of all thinges by syghte and not vnperfecte knowledge by fayth as we haue seing as through a glasse in a darke rydle And surelye they harpe muche vpon thys string for this heresy agaynst the presence of Christ in the sacrament is an hygh way leadyng to the other heresy that Christ is not God as is proued by diuerse wayes and argumentes into which pitte diuerse be fallyng by thys meanes yf God do not put vnder hys hande to staye them betimes for yf they continue long in this they wyll fall into the other no remedye whereof we haue already seene experience Then yf
Israell The lyke sayinges he hath wrytynge vpon the .106 Psalme and in hys booke contra aduersarium legis lib. 1. ca. 20. which I omit lest I shuld be tedious to you and to curiouse in so playne a matter Ye haue heard the thynge proued by the Gospell by the Prophet now heare the profe of the figure taken oute of the lawe The Psalme sayeth Tu es sacerdos in aeternum secundum ordinem Melchisedech Thou art meanyng Christ a prieste after the ordre of Melchisedech Melchisedech was a priest of the moste hygheste God as appeareth bothe by hys wordes and factes in that he blessed Abraham and also receaued tythes of hym whose oblation was breade and wyne whych he offered to God meeting with Abraham comming from the spoyle of the kinges As for suche fonde cauillations as some make for that the booke sayeth non obtulit â—ed protulit I let passe as thinges nothyng furthering their purpose nor yet hynderynge ours Thys is playne by Saynt Paule that euery Bysshoppe and priest is ordeyned to offre sacrifice If Christe our sauioure be a priest and that after the ordre of Melchisedech as the Psalme and S. Paule do witnes then it must nedes folowe that Christ hadde some thynge to offre whyche is nothynge but hym selfe and to no creature but to god whith he was hym selfe seynge euerye sacrifice is that honoure that is due only to God And that he offered him selfe after the ordre of Melchisedech whych must be vndre the formes of breade and wyne For that was the ordre and maner of Melchisedech Whyche kynde of offerynge he neuer made excepte it were in his last supper and for that cause and reason we may conclude that Christ in hys supper dyd offre hym selfe to hys father for vs not by sheddyng of hys bloude by death whyche was the ordre maner of Aarons offerynge but wythout sheddyng of hys bloude vndre the fourmes of breade and wyne whyche was the ordre of Melchisedech And that thys is not my priuate collectioÌ„ but the mind of all the aunciente fathers I shall wyth youre patience recite their sentences Saynte Cyprian sayeth Qui magis Sacerdos Dei summi quaÌ„ Dominus noster Iesus Christus qui sacrificium Deo patri obtulit obtulit hoc idem quod Melchisedech id est panem uinum suum scilicet corpus sanguinem Who is more the Prieste of the hyghest GOD then our Lord Iesus Christ who offered a Sacryfyce to GOD the father and offered the same that Melchisedech dyd that is to saye bread and wyne that is to saye his body and bloude And a lyâ—le after he sayeth qui est plenitudo ueritatem prae figuratae imaginis adimpleuit Christ whych is the fulnes fulfilled the truth of thys ymage that was figurate before By these places of Cyprian we learne â–ª that Melchisedech hys offeryng were figures of Christ and hys offering in his supper and lyke as Melchisedech offered bread and wine so Christ being the truth offered hys bodye and bloude vnder the formes of breade and wyne And lest any man shuld be offended wyth that Cyprian sayeth hoc idem quod Melchisedech the same that Melchisedech Heare what S. Hierome sayeth more playnly Quomodo Melchisedech obtulit panem uinum sic tu offeres corpus tuum sanguinem uerum panem uerum uinum Lyke as Melchisedech offered breade and wyne so thou shalt offre thy body bloude y e true bread the true wine The other was the figuratiue breade and wyne thys is the true breade and wyne the trueth of that figure not the same in substaunce but y e same in mysterye The same S. Hierome among hys epistles hathe an epistle of the godly matrone Paula ad Marcellam wherin be these wordes Recurre ad Genesim Melchisedech regem Salem Huius principeÌ„ inuenies ciuitatis qui iam tunc in typo Christi panem uinum obtulit et mysterium Christianum in saluatoris sanguine corpore dedicauit Returne sayeth Paula to the booke of Genesis to Melchisedech the kynge of Salem thou shalte finde the prince of that citie whych euen then in the figure of Christe offered bread and wine and did dedicate the mistery or sacrament of the Christians in the bloud and body of our sauiour Marke in thys most manifest place the oblation of the figure â–ª whyche is breade and wyne and the oblation of the trueth whyche is the mystery of vs Christen men the bodye and bloude of oure Sauioure Christ. And it is to be noted what is meant by this word ordre whych S. Hierome expoundeth thus Mysterium nostrum in uerbo ordinis significauit nequaquam per Aaron irrationabilibus uictimis immolandis sed oblato pane uino .i. corpore et sanguine Domini Iesu. By thys worde ordre he did signifye and expresse oure mysterye not by offerynge of vnreasonable and brute beastes as Aaron did but by the oblation of breade and wyne that is to saye the body and bloud of our Lord Iesus After this fathers mynde order is taken for the maner of offeryng not by sheddynge of bloude but vnbloudelye as we offre Christes bodye and bloude in oure misterye For Christes offering concerning the substaunce of it was but one but concernyng the ordre and maner it was diuerse vpon the crosse after the ordre Aaron in the supper after the ordre of Melchisedech For so S. Augustyne sayeth Coram regno patris sui id est Iudaeorum mutauit uultum suum quia erat ibi sacrificium secundum ordinem Aaron postea ipse de corpore sanguine suo institu it sacrificium secundum ordineÌ„ Melchisedech â–ª Before y e kingdome of hys father that is to saye the Iewes he chaunged hys countenaunce for there he was a sacrifice after the ordre of Aaron and afterwarde he dyd institute a sacrifice of hys bodye and bloude after the ordre of Melchisedech Marke the diuersitye and distinction of these two offerynges of Christe not in substaunce but in ordre that is to saye the maner and that christ dyd institute the sacryfyce of hys bodye and bloude to be offered of vs after y e ordre of Melchisedech whych thynge he expresseth more playnly in an other booke expoundynge a place of Ecclesiastes Non est bonuÌ„ homini nisi quod manducabit bibet sayinge thus Quid credibilius dicere intelligitur quà m quodad parti cipationem mensae huius pertinet quaÌ„ sacerdos ipse media tor noui Testamenti exhibet secundum ordinem Melchisedech de corpore sanguine suo Id enim sacrificium successit omni bus illis sacrificijs ueteris testamenti quae immolabaÌ„tur in umbra futuri What is more credible we shuld thinke he ment by those woordes then that perteyneth to the participation of this table whych Christ him selfe a prieste and mediatour of the newe Testamente
dothe exhibite after the ordre of Melchisedech of his body bloude For that sacryfyce did succede all the other sacrifices of the olde Testament whiche were offered in the shadowe of thys to come What can be playner then this to shew the figure of our mysterye to be abrogated and the trueth whyche is oure sacrifyce in the bodye and bloud of Christe in forme of breade and wyne to succede But to ende thys matter heare one place playnest of al whyche Oâ—cumenius hathe vpon thys place of Saynte Paule Tues sacerdos inaeternum c. in these wordes Significat ser mo quod non solum Christus obtulit incruentam hostiam siquidem suum ipsius corpus obtulit uerum etiam qui ab ipso fungentur sacerdotio quorum Deus pontifex esse diguntus est sine sanguinis effusione offerent Nam hoc significat inaeternum Neque enim de ea quae semel à deo facta est oblatio hostia dixisset inaeternum sed respiciens ad praesentes sacrificos per quos medios Christus sacrificat sacrificatur qui etiam in mystica coena modum illis tradidit huiusmodi sacrificij The word meaneth that not only Christ offered an vnbloudy sacrifice for he offered hys owne body but also that they whyche vnder hym vse the function of a priest whose Bishop he doth vouchesafe to be shall offre wythout sheddinge of bloude For that signifyeth the word euermore For coÌ„cernyng that oblation and sacrifice whych was ones made of God he woulde neuer saye euermore But hauynge an eye to those priestes that be nowe by whose mediation Christ doth sacrifice and is sacrificed who also in hys mysticall supper dyd by tradition teache them the maner of such a sacrifice This authoritie yf it were any thinge doubtful I woulde stande in it to open such poyntes as were conteined therin but beinge so manifeste as it is it neadeth nomore but to desier the hearer or reader to weye it he shal see this matter we goo aboute to proue fully resolued bothe by the institution of christe in his laste supper and also by the figure of Melchisedech in the olde lawe This aucthorities althoughe there be many moo yet I thinke them sufficiente and I thinke therby the matter sufficiently proued Other Scriptures there be thoughe not so plaine yet they conteyn an argument to proue y e same as this of Saynt Paule Non potestis participes esse mensae do mini et mensae daemoniorum ye can not be partakers of our lordes table and the table of diuels The word table here is taken for the meate of the table For men be not partakers of the material borde but of the meate that is ministred vpon the bord Nowe y e table of deuyls is taken for that meat that is offered to Idols in whyche dyuels dyd reigne and therfore that meate was called in greke Idolothyton meate offered to Idols Nowe this is certeyn by al good learning that in euery coÌ„parison there muste neades be a proportion similitude wherin the thinges compared muste agree â–ª then wheras these two tables be compared in offeringe and eatinge it must nedes folowe that yf the table of dyuels be a very sacrifice made to diuels in dede the table of our lorde likewise muste be a sacrifice offered to our lorde in dede And yf our lordes table be a very sacryfyce made to hym by vs then haue we oure purpose proued and confessed The lyke argumente maye be made of the word aultare in S. Paule Habemus altare de quo edere non habent potesta tem qui tabernaculo deseruiuÌ„t We haue an aultare of whych they may not eate that serue the tabernacle If aultare and sacrifice be â—o annexed together that the one can not be without the other then when saynte Paule sayeth we haue an aultare speakynge also of the eatynge of that aultare he must nedes meane the sacrifice made vpoÌ„ the aultare so that oure Sacramente before we eate it is also a sacrifice For so dothe Theophilactus take this place Et nos inquit obseruationem habemus haud tamen in esculentis hisce fed in ara siue in hostia illa incruenta et cor pori uitam elargiente And we also haue an obseruation yet not in these common meates but in our aultare or vnbloudye sacrifice whyche gyueth lyfe to our bodyes Here we maye see that he meaneth by the aultare the vnbloudy sacrifice of Christes body whych beinge eaten of vs corporally in the Sacrament gyueth lyfe to our bodies Moreouer yf tyme would serue me I could make an argument of Daniels Prophecye of the comminge of Antechrist â–ª because he sayth that in that tyme the continual sacrifyce shall be by Antechriste taken awaye per tempus tempora dimidium temporis by y e space of three yeares and an halfe as many take it Whether thys shal be done al Christendome ouer at one time or in euerye particulare region at diuerse times â–ª it is not certeynlye knowen to vs and therefore I wyll not certeynly determine it But this is certeyne that Antechriste can not take awaye the sacrifice of Christe vpon the crosse â–ª whych was but ones made shall neuer be iterate nor frustrate Nor he can not take awaye the inward spiritual sacrifice of mans heart whyche then shal flourishe most of al iâ— the elect For why shulde they then flye to the mountaynes â–ª as the booke sayeth but that for the vehemencye of the persecution they might more feruently do spiritual sacrifice to almightie God Therfore it foloweth that the sacrifice of Christen men is suche an one as maye be taken away by Antechrist whiche in my iudgement canne be nothynge els but the sacrifice of the Masse or elles let them tell what other sacrifice it is besyde the Masse Ye see now what Scriptures I haue broughte to proue the oblation of Christes body in the Masse to be the sacrifice of the Churche and newe Testament whych hath bene assaulted many wayes of many men But to the oppugnatioÌ„ of it they neuer yet to this houre alledged anye one direct scripture nor doctor nor good reason They haue gone aboute it and by tyrannye in some places they haue preuayled for a time but alwayes trueth the doughter of tyme hath ouercomed Some scriptures they abuse what thei be ye shal heare They alledge saynt Paule to the Hebrewes Semel oblatus est ad multorum exhaurienda peccata Christ was ones offered to take away the sinnes of manye Vnica oblatione consuÌ„mauit inaeternum sanctificatos Wyth one oblation he hathe perfited for euermore all that be sanctified These be the Scriptures they alledge agaynst the Masse they saye Christes oblation is perfyte no man can offre Christe but him selfe whych he dydde but ones and neuer but ones as thoughe we shoulde saye that Christ was crucified twyse or often times To this obiection of theirs we
eares of all men is the essential grace of Christes bodye and bloude to be there presente it foloweth I saye that Christ by these wordes as by a conuenient instrument worketh inwardlye in that he gaue to his disciples y ◠reall presence of his owne body and bloud as Eusebius Emesenus sayth Fide aestimandi non specie nec exterioris censenda est uisu sed interioris hominis affectu To be estemed by fayth not by the outwarde forme and not to be iudged by the sight of the outward man but by the affection of the inward man Thirdly we maye considre that these wordes be the performance of a former promise where Christe as it is wrytten in the .6 Chapiter of S. Iohn promised to giue vs y e same fleshe to eate that he woulde giue to the deathe for the life of the worlde sayinge Panis quem ego dabo caro mea est quam ego dabo pro mundi uita The breade which I shal giue vnto you is my fleshe whiche I shal giue for the lyfe of the world Whiche promise we neuer reade that Christ whiche is y e verye trueth and can not lye did euer at any time performe but in his last supper when he gaue his bodye and bloude to his disciples and to promise his fleshe to giue bare bread and not his fleshe is no performyng but a breakynge of hys promise and a deludynge of them to whome he made the promise for as for the interpretation whiche some menne make of Christes wordes that he wyl gyue his fleshe to vs to be eaten spirituallye by sayth is but a vaine and feined glose for that text And although Christ do so gyue it to be eaten by faythe yet we maye not exclude one trueth by an other trueth as sophisters do For Christ gaue his fleshe to vs to be eaten spirituallye by fayth euer from the beginning of the world also at that presente when he spake those wordes so that it were a very vayne thyng for Christe to promise to gyue a thyng which he euer before also at that present and euer after continually doth giue But it was neuer so taken of any good auncient aucthor which al with one consent doo expounde this text of Saynt Iohn of the giuing of his flesh in his laste supper vnder the forme of bread and therefore Cirillus wryteth that oure sauiour Christ dyd not expounde and make plaine the maner of the misterye and the performaunce of this his promise to them that asked the vnfaythful question Howe withoute fayth but to his disciples that beleued him and asked no such question of hym he declared the maner of it in his last supper Wherfore we may wel conclude vpon this circumstance that Christes fleshe is verelye present in the Sacrament to be giuen vnto vs because he promised before that he wold giue vs the same fleshe for our foode that he would gyue on the crosse for our redemption The tyme also is to be considered that he spake these wordes the nyghte before he suffered death at which tyme and the next daye after he ended and fulfilled all fygures saying on the crosse Consummatum est All figures shadowes be ended and expired whyche was no tyme then to institute and beginne newe figures It is likely or probable that our Sauiour Christ then enteryng into his agony and beginnynge his passion accustomynge commonlye before to teache his disciples in playne wordes without parables or figuratiue speaches woulde then so lightly behaue him self as to delude his choysen and intierlye beloued disciples in callyng those thynges hys bodye that is gyuen for them his bloude that is shedde for them whiche were neyther his bodye nor his bloude but bare breade and wine Or is there any religion in oure christen fayth in nycknanamyng thynges or callynge thē otherwyse then they be Yf any man thynke him self able to aunswere that because Christ sayd he was a vyne he was a doore beynge neyther vyne nor doore that man semeth to me not substantiallye to waye the woordes speaches of scripture For lette him considre thoroughoute all the Scripture wheresoeuer he shal find that Christ spake any thing of him selfe by woordes of oure common speache for the godhead and the properties of the god heade be ineffable and can not be expressed to our capacitye but by woordes and names of worldly and naturall thinges here among vs. He shall alwayes fynd that Christe was a better and more syngulare thyng then the worde dyd properlye signifye that was attribute vnto him and to make thys matter more playne by examples Where Christe sayde I am the way he meant not that he was the waye that leadeth to the city or to some other place but that he was a more excellent waye A waye that leadeth to the father to heauen to euerlastyng lyfe When he sayde he was the doore he meante not that he was the doore of the shepefold here in earth but a farre better doore the doore of the churche the spirituall shepefolde by the which doore who soeuer entreth shall be saued Also calling him selfe a vine he meant that he was the spirituall vyne whereof all christen men be braunches better then suche a vine as groweth in the fieldes And lykewyse by that he calleth himselfe the lighte we vnderstande that he was not the sensible light of this world but the heauenlye lyghte ▪ that neyther by course is chaūged nor by shadowe is darkened So that it maye be obserued for a rule when Christe dothe attribute the name of anye sensible creature to hym selfe euer the vnderstandyng exceadeth and excelleth the word in dignitie And yf this be true in all kind of teaching and doctrine shall we now in the high misteries and sacramentes of God come from the hall to the kitchin from the better to the worst y t where Christ sayeth This is my body we shall vnderstande that it is breade a worse thinge then his bodye This is my bloude that is to saye wine a worse thing then his bloude These be fonde false gloses neyther true nor likely nor yet tolerable Wherefore leauynge oute a great many other circumstancies that woulde serue verye well to set forth the trueth of this doctrine I shall conclude thus seing S. Mathew sayth in playne termes it is my body it is my bloude S. Mark sayth it is my body S. Luke sayth it is my body S. Paul sayth it is my body S. Iohn sayeth it is my fleshe shall we nowe fyftene hundreth yeare after them handle the matter so finelye and waye the scripture so substantiallye that we shall affirme the contradictorye to be the true sense saying this is not my bodye this is not my bloude but a figure a signe of my bodye bloude These euidēt scriptures moue me to continue styll stedfast in that fayth I was borne in not to be moued wyth vayne
Christ dydde eate his body drynke his bloude in the mysticall supper neyther figuratiuely as he did in the paschall lambe nor yet spirituallye as we do by fayth then it is certayn that he eate it only sacramentally whyche is not only in signe as the sacramentaryes expounde the worde but in truth vnder a sacramēt wherof the substaunce is the reall and natural bodye and bloude of Christ our lord After thys sorte wryteth Chrysostome of Dauid sayinge thus Non contigit Dauid gustare talem hostiam neque particeps fuerat sanguinis dominici sed legibus imperfectioribus educatus neque tale quicquam exigentibus tamen ad euangelicae philosophiae fastigium peruenit animi moderatione It neuer chaunced to Dauid to tast of suche a sacrifice nor he was not receauer and pertaker of our Lordes bloude but being broughte vp vnder lawes not so perfecte and requiringe no suche thyng yet by the moderation and tēperaunce of his owne mynde he came to the hyght of all euangelicall diuinitye Here is playne that Dauid didde neuer taste and receaue Christes bloude as we do in the gospell and yet Dauid did receaue Christes bloude figuratiuely being partaker of the sacrifices of the old law which were figures of christes bloud and also he dyd drynke of the same bloud spirituallye as we do whose fayth was as good or rather greater then ours Therefore there remayneth one other way that we drinke of it which was not graunted vnto him that is to say verely and really in the sacramēt To auoyde this place well they must haue moo solutions then they haue inuented yet for neyther figuratiuelye nor spirituallye will serue it were beste for them to yelde to the trueth and confesse that it is there really the very same substaunce of his bloude y t was shedde vpō the crosse thoughe not in that forme for the relief of our weake nature whyche els could not susteyne it And further then this S. Augustyne sayeth Si dixerimus Catechumeno credis in Christo respondit credo et signat se cruce Christi portat in fronte non erubescit de cruce domini sui ecce credit in nomine eius Interrogemus eum manducas carnem filij hominis bibis sanguinem filij hominis nescit quid dicimus quia lesus non se credidit ei Yf we shall saye to one y e learneth professeth our fayth being yet not baptized doeste thou beleue in Christe he aunswereth I beleue and he dothe signe him selfe with the crosse of Christ he beareth it in his forheade and is not ashamed of the crosse of hys Lord Loo be beleueth in hys name But lette vs aske hym doeste thou eate the fleshe of the sonne of man and drinke the bloud of the sonne of man he can not tell what we saye for Iesus hathe not beleued committed him selfe to hym Besyde other thynges that may be fruytfully gathered of thys place for oure erudition I note but this one that a mā beleuyng in Christ professing the fayth of Christe wyth hys word and worke and for that cause eateth Christes fleshe drinketh his bloude spirituallye yet he wote not what the eatyng of Christes fleshe meaneth whereof Christ spake in the .6 of saynt Iohn But we that be baptized are admitted to oure Lordes table we know by our experiēce what it is to eate Christes flesh and to drinke his bloude for to vs Christ doth truste gyue him selfe to the other that beleue as wel as we he doth not committe him selfe Wherby I conclude beside the spirituall eating of Christ by faith there is also a real eating of him in y e sacrament by the seruyce of oure bodies to the confirmation in grace and sanctification both of oure bodies and soules And concernyng the drinkyng of Christes bloude reallye ▪ S. Cyprian writeth an other argument whyche I thynke can not be auoyded by anye figuratiue speaches he sayeth thus Noua est huius Sacramenti doctrina scholae euangelicae hoc primum magisterium protulerunt doctore christo primum haec mundo innotuit disciplina ut biberent sanguinem Christiani cuius esum legis antiquae authoritas districtissimè interdicit Lex quippe esum sanguinis prohibet Euangelium praecipit ut bibatur c. Origen also wryteth thys same thyng very playnly vpō Numeri hom 16. The Englyshe is this of Cyprian The doctrine of this Sacramente is newe and the euangelicall schoole taught this lessō first of all this discipline was neuer knowē to the worlde before oure mayster Christ who was the firste teacher of it that Christen menne shuld drynke bloude the eating of which bloude the aucthority of the olde lawe dothe mooste strayghtly forbidde for the law forbiddeth the eating of bloud the gospell cōmaundeth bloude to be dronken c. Now this is most certeyne that the lawe dyd neuer forbyd the drinking of Christes bloud figuratiuely but dyd cōmaund drinke offeringes whych were figures of this bloude and the Iewes drank of the water that came forth of the stone whyche was a figure of the bloude that came foorthe of Christes syde which bloud as Chrysostome sayth is in our chalyce Id est in calice quod fluxit è latere illius no◠sumus participes y e same thinge is in the chalyce that slowed oute of Christes syde and we are partakers of the same Nor the law dyd neuer forbyd the drynking of christes bloude spyrytuallye by fayth but sette forth the fayth of Christ beyng a scholemayster to Christ poyntynge to hym in whome they shoulde beleue and receaue all grace But to make short the lawe forbadde the externall and real drynkyng of bloude whych the gospell commaundeth sayinge excepte ye eate the fleshe of the sonne of man and drynke hys bloude ye shall not haue lyfe in you and drynke ye all of thys Thys is my bloude of the new Testament Therfore it foloweth necessarelye that the drynkyng of thys bloude is not figuratiuely nor yet only spirituallye but reallye by the seruyce of our bodyes ▪ as Chrysostome sayeth Si uiderit inimicus non postibus impositum sanguinem typi sed fidelium ore lucentem sanguinem ueritatis Christi templi postibus dedicatum multo magis se subtra hit Yf oure enemye the deuyll shall see not the bloude of the figuratiue lambe sprynkled vpon the postes but the bloude of Christe the trueth shynynge in the mouth of the faythful much more he wyll runne away There is a place of the prouerbes whych as diuerse authors do expounde maketh much for the real presence of Christes bodye and bloude in the Sacrament the place is this after the greke whych these authors folowed Cùm sederis ad mensam potentis sapienter intellige quae apponuntur mitte manum tuam sciens quia talia te oportet praeparare When thou sytteste at the table of a great man vnderstand wysely what thinges are set before thee and
putte to thy hand knowynge that thou must prepare such lyke thinges agayne S. Augustyne vpon saynt Iohn and Chrysostome vpon the Psalme and Hesichius and other moo whose wordes it were to longe to reherse in Latyne do expounde this place of the prouerbes thus Who is this great man but Iesus Christ our lord gods sonne and what is the table of this great maÌ„ but where is receaued his bodye and his bloude that hath giuen hys life for vs And what is to sytte at that table but to come to it humbly and deuoutly what is to considre and vnderstande wisely what thinges be sette before thee but to discerne the body bloude of Christe to be set there verelye in trueth and to knowe the grace vertue and dignitie of theÌ„ and the daunger for the misusyng of them and what is to put to thy hande knowynge that thou muste prepare suche like agayne but to eate of them knowynge that christen men in the cause of Christ and defence of the trueth are bounden to shedde theyr bloude and spend their lyues for their brethren as christ hath done the same for vs before that lyke as we haue receaued at Christes table hys bodye and his bloude so oughte we to giue for our brethren our bodyes and bloude Thys comparyson of taking giuing the like agayne auoydeth all the triflynge cauillations of these figuratiue speaches that the simple peoples heades be combred wythal Here is no place for eatyng only by fayth for the martyrs dyd not only beleue in Christe but also in very dede gaue theyr bodyes and shedde their bloude really for Christ. I nede not stande longer in so playne a matter although I could alledge muche more oute of al the auncient fathers yea more playner then these I haue touched yf any can be playner If I did but tel the bare names of the Sacrament whyche the authors gyue it I shuld proue manifestlye that it were the very body and bloude of Christ not breade and wyne Ignatius calleth it Medicamentum immortacitatis antidotum non moriendi a medicine of immortalitye a preseruatiue agaynste deathe Dionisius Ariopagita S. Paules scholer calleth it hostia salutaris the sacrifice of our saluation Iustinus martyr sayeth it is caro sanguis incarnati Iesu the fleshe bloud of Iesus incarnate whyche names be gyuen to it of the scripture and all other wryters Origen calleth it Panis uitae dapes saluatoris epulum incorruptum Dominus the breade of lyfe the deynties of oure sauioure the meate that is neuer corrupted yea our Lorde hym selfe Cyprian calleth it SanctuÌ„ domini the holy one of God gratia salutaris the sauyng grace Cibus inconsumptibilis the meate that can neuer be coÌ„sumed Alimonia immortalitatis the foode of immortalitye Portio uitae aeternae the portion of eternal lyfe Sacrificium perpes holocaustum permanens a coÌ„tinual sacrifice an offerynge alwayes remaynynge Christus yea he calleth it Christ The greate general counsell at Nice calleth it Agnus Dei qui tollit â—eccatum mundi the lambe of God that taketh awaye the synnes of the world Optatus an olde author gyueth it diuerse names as in this sentence Quid tam sacrileguÌ„ quà m altaria Dei frangere radere remouere in quibus uota populi membra Christi portata sunt unde à multis pignus salutis aeternae tutela fidei spes resurrectionis accepta est What is more sacrilege then to breake the aultares of God as the Donatiâ—tes dyd or to scrape them or to remoue them vpon the whych aultares the vowes of the people y t is to saye the members of Christ are borne from whych aultares also the pledge of eternall saluation the defence and buckeler of fayth and the hope of resurrection be receaued Hilarius calleth it cibus dominicus our Lordes meate uerbum caro the worde made fleshe S. Basyll in hys Masse calleth them sancta diuina impolluta immortalia supercelestia uiuifica sacramenta Holy Sacramentes godly pure vndefyled immortall heauenly and gyuyng lyfe What wyttelesse and vngodlye man woulde gyue these names to breade and wyne S. Ambrose calleth it gratia dei the grace of God not an accidental grace receaued of God into mans soule but the very reall Sacrament he calleth the grace of God the whych hys brother Satyrus being vpon the sea and hys shippe broken sekyng for none other ayde but onelye the remedy of fayth and the defence of that Sacrament toke thys grace of God of the priestes and caused it to be bounde in a stole whych he tied about his necke and so trusting in that committed hym selfe to the waters by vertue whereof he escaped drownyng and afterward of a catholike Bysshop he receaued that same grace of God wyth hys mouth Chrysostome O wyth what eloquence doth he vtter thys matter heare but thys one place Ipsa namque mensa animae nostrae uis est nerui mentis fiduciae uinculum fundamentum spes salus lux uita nostra The very table sayeth he meanynge the meate of the table is the strengthe of our soule the synewes of oure mynde the knotte of our trust the foundation oure hope oure health oure lyght and our life What names what effectes be these and in an other Homelye he calleth it Rex coeli Deus Christus The kyng of heauen God hym selfe Christ which he sayth goeth into vs by these gates dores of our mouthes Cyrillus calleth it sanctificatio uiuifica The very sanctification that gyueth lyfe And S. Augustyne calleth it Praetium nostrum The pryce of our redemption whych Iudas receaued What shuld I trouble you any longer in so playn a matter Why shoulde these holye fathers deceaue vs by callinge this Sacramente w t so gloriouse and highe names yf they meante not so but that it was but breade and wyne they lacked no grace that had so muche grace as to shedde their bloud for christes fayth they lacked no wytte nor eloquence to expresse what they meant Thus dyd they wiâ—h one consent after one maner alwayes speake and wryte by whose playne preachynge and wrytinge the whole worlde of Christendome hathe bene perswaded and establyshed in this fayth of the real presence these fiftene hundreth yeres If they haue seduced vs meaning otherwise then they wrote then may we iustly say that they were not martirs confessors in dede but very deuyls errynge them selues and bringynge other also in erroure But good people the truth is they erred not but taught vs as they beleued the very truthe confirmyng and testifyinge that faythe whyche their bloud y t they had taught with their mouthe And yf there be anye errour it is in vs that for the vnlearned talkinge and wytlesse sophistical reasonyng of a fewe men will headlinges destroye our soules forsaking not coÌ„tinuing in that faythe whyche was taught by the mouth of christ â–ª sealed with his
to do and therefore some of them blynded by their owne foolyshe suspicion conceaued and publyshed amonges other as it was most likely vnto them that we in oure secrete misteries did kil yonge chyldren eatyng their fleshe and drynkyng their bloude therevpon accused certayn before the magistrates of thys haynouse crime whiche they coulde neuer trye oute to be true as they dyd accuse But for oure purpose it appeareth plainly that we wold neuer haue kept our mysteries so secrete yf they had bene but ceremonies of eatynge of bread wine nor they would neuer haue accused vs of such beastly and vnnatural crimes beyng men of such reason learnynge and equitie as they were yf there hadde not bene some trueth in theyr accusation whyche in dede was true for the substaunce of that they alledged but not for the maner of the thinge for it was is true that we in oure mysteries eate fleshe drynk bloud but yet we do not kyl and murdre younge children and eate theyr fleshe and drynke theyr bloude And therfore I alledge the sayinges of Tertullian and Eusebius the whych is also in Origen the .6 booke contra Celsum to declare the accusation of the gentiles agaynste vs concernyng the eatyng of fleshe and drynkynge of bloud whyche could neuer haue commed into theyr heades so too haue done yf there had not bene a trueth in that matter whych they by theyr reason could neuer see otherwise then they alledged which we by our fayth do playnly see and know as it was ordeyned by Christ oure Lorde And for that cause Tertulliane dyd cast in a vayn word sayinge that we were accused of the sacrament of kyllyng of children whych word Sacramente standeth there for no purpose but to declare vnto vs that this their accusation dyd rise for lacke of the true precyse knowledge of our Sacrament whyche is true concerning the eatyng of fleshe drynkynge of bloude but not true concernyng the kyllynge and murderyng of chyldren And yet afterward our mysteries as they came in more knowledge amonges the gentiles so they came into more contempt for when the multitude of Christen men were so increased that they cared not who did looke vpon them in the time of theyr mysteries beinge out of feare of any externall violence and persecution then the gentyles seyng them knocke and knele make adoration to the Sacramentes not knowyng them to be anye thinge els but as their eyes senses and reason dyd iudge that is to saye breade wine as oure Sacramentaries do nowe beynge blynded nowe with heresye as they before were with infidelitye then I saye they sayde that we dyd not worshyppe and adore one God as we pretended but many gods as they were accustomed for they sayde as saynte Augustyne wryteth that we dyd worshippe Ceres and Bacchus the goddes of corne and wyne takyng our Sacramentes to be nothyng els but bare bread wine as the Sacramentaries do and not to be Christe oure Lord God his flesh and his bloude as al true faythful men do whyche appeareth by the adoration of them the whych adoration we learne y t it was done to the Sacramentes froÌ„ the begynnynge as is proued by the testimonies of our enemies the gentiles as S. Aâ—gustyne reporteth And also by their adoration we learne y â— the thynges whyeh they dyd adore were not simple creatures but Christes body and his bloude vnited to the seconde person in Trinitie S. Basyll beyng asked wyth what feare persuasion fayth and affection we shuld come communicate the bodye and bloude of Christ aunswereth thus Concernyng the feare we haue the saying of the Apostel He that eateth and drynketh vnworthelye eateth and drynketh his iudgemente and damnation What fayth we shuld haue the wordes of oure Lorde do teache who sayd This is my boâ—y whych is gyuen for you do this in my remembraunce And Hesichius sayeth likewyse Sermo qui prolatus est in dominicum mysterium ipse liberat nos ab ignoraÌ„tia The wordes of Christ whych were spoken vpon oure Lordes mysterye they deliuer vs froÌ„ ignorauÌ„ce that is to say they teache vs what fayth what estimation we shuld haue of them Nowe excepte they be taken as they sound to euery man although he be vnlearned and not instructed in oure fayth before thei could not teache vs what fayth we shoulde haue concernynge the Sacramentes and therfore in that they be wordes whervpoÌ„ we must learne our fayth whyche deliueâ— vs from ignoraunce what y e thinges be that be deliuered for that cause they must be taken as they sounde that is to say that the sacramentes deliuered be the very body bloude of Christ that gaue them Chrysostome sayth Quod sacerdos de manu sua dat non solum sanctificatum est sed etiam sanctificatio est That thyng that the priest doth gyue out of his hand is not only a thyng sanctified but it is sanctification it selfe Therfore our Sacrament must not only be an holy thing as they sayd holy breade and holy wyne but it muste be the substaunce of holines making all other thynges holy And here I thinke it worthy to be noted and to be opened somwhat vnto you wyth what sophistrye and vnlearned folye they deluded the saÌ„ctification and consecration of this Sacrament Children at the vniuersitie can tell that it is a deceytfull waye of reasoning by a generall description to exclude and dryue awaye a speciall and singulare definition as they dyd in this case For they sayd that the consecration of the sacrament was no more but an appoyntynge of bread wine to an holy vse which vse they sayd was to signifye vnto vs Christes body that is in heauen and therefore some sayd that the bread was consecrate when the paryshe clerke did bring it to the churche and set it vpon the table and these were no small men but our greatest bishops God forgiue it them other sayd it was not consecrate tyl the wordes of Christ were spoken but yet they noted that the Priest should not looke at the breade in the tyme of the pronouncyng for this ende be lyke that they shuld not be deceaued and that God shoulde worke no more then it pleased theÌ„ that their doctrine might some waye be true And therefore they sayde euery man and woman might consecrate speake the woordes as wel as a priest but thei neuer redde what Arnobius sayeth Quid tam magnificuÌ„ quam Sacramenta diuina conficere et quid tam perniciosum quam si ea is conficiat qui nullum sacerdotij gradum accepit what is so excellent then to consecrate the sacramentes of God and what is so pernicio use then yf he do consecrate that hath receaued no ordre and degree of priesthode And as they erred in the time and person so they erred in the nature of the consecration making thys of the same sort that al other coÌ„secrations be receauynge the general description and denyinge
saluation for all godes giftes not onely in our wordes but also in deade the verye oblation it selfe is a reall geuynge of thankes to god as Chrisostome sayeth Quod erat apud eum omnibus preciosius unigenitum pro nobis filium dedit cum essemus inimici nec dedit solum sed et nostram mensam fecit illum omnia faciens ipse pro nobis donādo uidelicet gratiarum actores ipsa donorum suorum ubertate faciendo c. That thing that was with him most preciouse of all hys onelye sonne he hathe geuen for vs euen when we were his enemies and not onelye hathe geuen hym for vs but also hathe made hym our table doynge hym selfe al thinges for vs bothe rewarding vs and also with the plentye of his giftes makynge vs geuers of thankes and because man in many thinges is vnthankefull to God he in all thynges taketh vppon hym our person supplieth that we ought to do and euen by the very nature of the sacrifice whiche is his bodye styrreth vs to continuall geuing of thankes for all his benefites so that our sacrifice being Christes bodie is both a singular gift of God and also is a real geuinge of thankes for all his other giftes By this it euidētly appeareth that nothing doth more exercise our faith in y e knowledge of our selfes god nothinge doeth more encrease our charitie hope in y e mercie of God then the masse Where as Iob was wont to do for his children y e churche of god our mother being careful for al her children lest any of thē by negligēce infirmitie or wylfulnes haue offended daily prayeth and maketh sacrifice for thē by that moste acceptable sacrifice of her husbandes bodie bloude doeth mitigate almightie god doth multiplie distributeth vnite Nothing more setteth forth the benefite of Christ because in this sacrifice of the masse we protest to haue al thinges by Christ redemption remission sanctification and saluation and doe aske and begge of God al goodnes by Christ knowledginge that we haue nothynge to set agaynst the wrathe of God but the passion of Christ which after this maner by this solemne representatiō as Christ hath instituted we daylye renewe y t it might be cōtinually celebrate by mistery that ones was offered for our ransome that because the effecte of mās redēption ceaseth not but is to euery one in his time applied by cōtinuall successiō so also y t the sacrifice of this redēption should neuer cease but be alwayes to all men present in grace and alwayes lyue in perpetuall memorye The other obiectiōs I wil but shortly touche for thei be of no strēgth nor authoritie one is this Ther is no mention nor no one worde of any oblation in the supper ergo Christ made no oblatiō there a goodly reason So there is no mention made neyther of Christes owne mouth nor of any the euangelistes concerning the oblacion of y e paschal lambe yet we know most certenlye by the olde testament that the paschall lambe was neuer eaten but it was offered before which we are sure Christ did obserue literallye tyll the trueth of that figure were established And also what is more sure then that Christ offered him selfe vpon the crosse and yet neyther Christes owne wordes nor any of the foure euangelistes writyng the story of the passion make anye mention in playne and expresse termes of oblation or offerynge Though we know it by other scripture sufficientlye But their collectiō is al false they shuld haue cōcluded thus ergo if ther any oblatiō it is reall not vocalle so it is in dede therfore Christ saied Hoc facite doe this as ye see me doe But in the forme of oure masse there be expresse wordes of offering for y e rude ignoraunt for y e euidence of y e trueth Vnde memores nos domine c. wherfore we thy seruauntes people beynge mindfull of thy sonne Christe our lord of his blessed passion resurrection glorious ascention do offer to thy most excellent maiestie of thy rewardes giftes this pure sacrifice this holy vndefiled sacrifice the holy bread of euerlastynge life the cup of perpetual saluation There be also other wordes of oblatiō folowing these wordes S. Basyll hath thē Chrisostome S. Ambrose the generall counsell holden at Ephesus the latest of these was M.CCC yeares ago that it might appeare that it is not newlye brought in as they wold sclaunder it but y e most auncient thing in all the masse Thei reason also thus It is a commemoratiō ergo no sacrifice as who saye the paschaliābe being the figure of this was not bothe a commemoration a sacrifice for the lambe was instituted to be offered for a memorie of y e delyueraunce of the Iewes from the swearde of the angel that smote the first be gotten of the Egiptians therfore y e Iewes kept this word of offering the lambe for a statute for them their childrē for euermore Euen so thys lambe of God that lyeth vpon the table of our aultar is a sacrifice offered of vs in commemoration of oure deliueraunce from the deuyl by the death of Christe In the olde testament the first lambe offered before ther deliuerie and the lambe whiche was offered euery yeare after in memorye of the same delyuerye were verye reall lambes in dede of one nature and condicion euen so the lambe of god beinge Christ whiche Christ him self offered in his supper there institutinge before his death what we shuld cōtinually do after his death and y e lābe of God which we offer nowe in memorie of oure deliueraūce be very real lambes of god in dede yet not diuers in numbre as the other wer but al one in numbre nature condicion and dignitie As Chrisostome saieth we offer daily in cōmemoratiō of his death y e sacrifice is one not many Nor we do not offer one lambe now to morow another but alwayes the very same or els because it is offered in many places is there many Christes No forsoth but one Christ euery where here ful Christ and there full Christ one body And so forth The lyke argument they make agaynst y e real presence It is a sygne ergo not the thynge whereof it is a sygne The folyshnes of thys reason eueri baker cā tel who setteth one loofe vpon hys stall to sygnifye there is breade to sell wythin hys house Whyche lofe is both a signe of bread to be sold and also is very bread to be solde it selfe of the same bakyng the other is Euen so the body of Christ in the Sacrament is Christes very body in dede and also a signe of the same bodye as Saynte Augustyne sayeth Carne sanguine utroque inuisibili spiritu ali intelligibili signatur uisibile Domini nostri Iesu Christi corpus palpabile plenum gratia omnium uirtutum diuina
churches or in other realmes This argument of CoÌ„munion was neuer â—eard of in the worlde before Martyne Luther who was y e first father of it and the first man that euer wrote agaynst priuate masses as he calleth theÌ„ â–ª And wher learned Luther that lesson euen of the deuyl not because al euyl coÌ„meth by the suggestion of the deuyll but I meane y t Luther had a vision of the deuyl and saw hym wyth hys corporall eye beynge wakyng of whom he learned al that he hath pestilently spoken agaynst the holy masse And lest men should say I lied vpon Luther here is his owne boke Ex orete iudico serue nequam We maye Iudge hym by his owne mouth and his owne hand writynge The title of his boke is of priuate masse I shal read you a peice of it that the trueth of my sayinge maye appeare These be hys very wordes I shall make confession before all you reuende and holy fathers geue me I pray you a good absolution It chaunced me once about midnight sodenly to awake than the deuyl SathaÌ„ began with me this disputation Heare sayd he doctour Luther very wel learned thou knowest thou hast said priuate masses xv yeres almost daily What if such priuate masses be horrible ydolatry what if there wer not preseÌ„t the bodye and bloud of Christ but thou haddest honored onely bread and wine haddest caused other to honor it to whoÌ„ I answered I am an anoynted priest haue receyued vnction coÌ„secration of a bishoppe haue done al these thinges by commaundement obedience of mine elders â–ª Why shuld not I coÌ„secrate wheÌ„ I haue pronuÌ„ced y e wordes of Christ haue said masse iÌ„ earnest this thou knowest All this sayde he is true but y e turkes gentiles do likewise al things in their teÌ„ples of obedieÌ„ce in earnest The priestes of Hieroboam dyd all they dyd of a certayne zeale intent againste the true priestes in HierusaleÌ„ â–ª What yf they orderynge and consecratynge wer false as the priestes of the Turkes and Samaritans were false and their seruyce of god false and wycked First sayd he thou knowest thou haddest than no knowledge of Christ nor true fayth and for faythe thou waste no better than a Turke For the Turke and all the deuyls also beleue the storye of Christ that he was borne crucified and dead â–ª c. But the Turke and we dampned sprites doe not truste to hys mercy nor haue not hym for a mediatour and sauiour but feare hym as a cruell iudge Such a fayth and no other haddest thou when thou receyuest vnction of y e byshoppe and al other both they y t dyd annoynct and were annoyncted thought so and no other wise of Christe â–ª Therefore ye fled from Christe as a cruell iudge to blessed Mary and y e sainctes they wer mediators betwene you Christ. Thus was Christ robbed of his glory â–ª This neyther thou nor no other papist can deny I wold reade more of this boke but for troubling you He y t lyâ—t to knowe what maye be sayd against priuate masse let hym learne here of y e deuil ynough For here is al that hath yet bene sayde of any other and more to The deuyls derlinges wer ashamed to say halfe so much as their father Sathan lest they shulde be called blasphemous lyers as he is But by this boke Luthers owne confession set forthe in prynt by him selfe to y e world ye maye knowe that the deuyll was the first y t euer barked agaynste y e sacrifice of the churche whiche is the masse knowing that his kyngdome of sinne and iniquitie coulde not stand if this sacrifice most aduersarie to it were not defaced and destroyed But what colour had Luther to publishe this shall we thynke he was so madde as to father that vpoÌ„ the deuyll that he woulde haue persauded for trueth to the worlde I shall tell you shortlye hys fonde deuyse in thys poynte as it foloweth fyue or sixe leaues here after He sayeth he knoweth the deuyl is a lyer but he saieth hys lyes be craftye he vseth to alledge a trueth whyche can not be denied and wyth that to colour hys lye which he persaudeth And therefore sayeth he the deuyll lyeth not when he accuseth as that I had committed horrible Idolatry in sayinge priuate masses but the lye is when he dyd afterwarde tempt him to dispayre of gods mercy But saith Luther I wyll not dispayre as Iudas dyd but amende that I haue done amysse neuer saye priuate masse agayne O what a cloke of mischiefe is this al grounded of lyes and falshode He sayth the deuyll lyeth not when he accuseth If that be true then he sayd true when he saide that Luther being a preacher manye yeares neuer had true fayth in Christ tyl he fel from the masse nor neuer trusted in Christes mercy nor neuer toke hym for a sauiour but a cruell iudge Of this the deuyll dyd accuse him whether he was a lyer herein or no iudge you Also in hys accusation he sayde the body and bloude of Christ wer not present in the sacrament when suche annoyncted priestes dyd consecrate and that they honored onely bread wine with many other damnable lyes and heresyes whiche whoso shall read the boke maye fynde in great plentie and yet by Luthers principle the deuyl neuer lyeth when he accuseth Now because y e tyme is farre past shortly to conclud I shal most humblye beseche you to consider and regarde the saluation of your soules for the whiche Christe Gods sonne hath shed his preciouse bloud which saluation canne not be attayned w toute knowledge confession of gods truth reueled to his holy church by her to euery membre of her childe of god whose sentence and determination is sure certen as procedinge froÌ„ the pyller of trueth the spirite of god by whoÌ„ we be taught and assured in goddes owne word that in y e blessed sacrament of the aulter â–ª by the power of the holy gost working with gods word is verely really present the bodye and bloud of our sauiour Christe vnder the formes of bread wyne whiche is by Christes owne commaundement example offered to almightye god in sacrifice in commemoration of Christes passion and death wherby the membres of the churche in whose fayth it is offered bothe they that be alyue and departed perceyue plentuouse and abundaunt grace and mercye and in al their necessities and calamities releife and succur â–ª Our moste merciful father graunt vs to persist stedfast constant in the true catholike faythe and confession of this most blessed Sacrament and sacrifice and with pure deuotion as he hathe ordayned to vse frequent this holye misterye of vnitie reconsiliation that we maye therby remayne in him and he in vs for euermore To whome be all glorye and prayse wyth out ende AMEN ¶ Imprinted at London in Paules churche yarde at the sygne of the