à notis conspicitur taâ—â—tsi sensui gustus vinum esse videatur non tamâ—â— vinum sed Sanguin in Christi esse which latter words are afore related Doe not then consider it as bare Bread or bare Wine for it is the Body and Bloud of Christ according to the word of our Sauiour himselfe For though sense may suggest this to thee yet let thy faith so confirme this as that thou iudge not the matter from thy tast And againe after Hoc sciens c. This knowing and accounting it as most certaine that this Bread which we see is not Bread though our Tast do tell vs that it is Bread but it is the Body of Christ and the Wine which we behould though it seemeth wine to our sense of Tast yet it is not Wine but the Bloud of Christ. And can any Catholike at this time speake more plainly then are the sayings of this Father One who is most ancient learned and of whose booke from whence these testimonies are produced there was neuer any doubt made S. Cyprian serm de Coena Dom. Panis iste queÌ„ Dominus Discipulis porrigebat non effigie sed natura mutatus Omnipotentia Verbi factus est Caro sicut in persona Christi Humanitas apparebat latebat Diuinitas ita Sacramento visibili ineffabiliter diuina se infudit Essentia This Bread the which our Lord gaue to his Disciples is changed not in outward appearance but in substance and by the Omnipotency of the Word it is made Flesh And as in the Person of Christ the Humanity did appeare and the Diuinity did lye hid so in the visible Sacrament the diuine Essence hath ineffably infused it selfe But what Omnipotency is required to giue a signification to any substance Or if the Change be only by adding a new signification how can the Bread be said to be changed non effigie sed natura Lastly the Diuinity was truly and really latent in Christs Humanity therfore the Body and Bloud must be truly and really latent vnder the formes of Bread and Wine which to be Cyprians meaning appeareth euen by the word Ineffabiliter there added by him but what difficulty or mysterie is it that Bread should signify Christ Tertullian l. 2. ad Vxorem where speaking of Christian Women that are married to Gentiles and shewing that such marriages are hurtfull to the receauing of the Blessed Sacrament thus saith Non sâ—iet Maritus c. The Husband shall not know what thou doest tast before all other meates and if he did he belieueth not the Bread to be him whom it is said to be Which wordes do euidently imply a Change of the Bread into the Body of Christ Irenaeus lib. 4. contra Haereses cap. 34. disputing against such Heretikes as denyed Christ to be the Sonne of the Creatour thus disputeth Quomodo autem constabit ijs c. How shall it be made euident to such men that Bread wherupon thankes are giuen to be the Body of Christ and the Cup the Bloud of him if they will not acknowledge him to be the Sonne of the Maker of the World That is the Word of him by the which Word the Wood doth fructifie the Springs do flow who first giueth a kind of grasse then an Eare of corne lastly the Eare full of wheate Heere we are to obserue that Irenaeuâ— proueth Christ to be the Creatour from this that Bread by force of Consecration is made the Body of Christ therfore he belieued that Bread was really and truly changed into the Body of Christ and not only in signification for it is not an imposition of a new signification but a true and reall chang which necessarily requireth Gods Omnipotency OF THEIR TESTIMONIES CONTEYNING The Comparisons of the Eucharist with other Great Mysteries CHAP. IIII. A THIRD point which indeed is the CeÌ„ter wherin the Lines of diuers such passages doe meet manifesting the Fathers beliefe heerein may be the Obseruation of their Comparisons of the Eucharist with other things Thus they compare it with the Paschal Lambe with the Manna with Panis Propositions teaching that it doth transcend all these as much as a Diuine and inconsumptible substance excells a terrene and corruptible the Body the shaddow and the Truth the Figure But if Christs Body be heere only by representation then is the Eucharist a thing corruptible a shadow and a meere Figure and then may our Sauiour worthily vse towards them the expostulation in Esay Cui a Cui comparastis me Esa 46. comparastis me Others also in regard of the sublimity therof compare it with the Creation as I touched before where not to insist in other points we find that by force of the Creation all Creatures are conteyned in the Creatour for in ipso viuimus c. and by force of this Sacrament the Creatour is conteyned after a peculiar manner vnder the formes of some of his meanest Creatures Some likewise do teach besides other such comparisons that Christ in the Sacrament is to the eye of the soule as when Angells by assuming bodyes appeared to Men though these being spirituall seemed corporall and Christ being Corporall appeareth heere only as spirituall Finally diuers of them seeme to equall it with the Mysterie of the Incarnation and one Father resembleth the difficulty herein to that where Christ being as well God as Man was borne of a Woman and a Virgin Now if the chiefest obscuritie in the Eucharist doth rest in Types Representations and Resemblances how cold disproportionable dissorting yea absurd and false are the comparisons heere made with those former stupendious Mysteries of Christianity and particulerly of the Incarnation Where to omit all other passages therof aboue our capacity we find the Vine to bud out of the Branch the Ocean to flow from a shallow Riuer and the Sunne to borrow it light from a small Starre First then occurreth S. Leo serm 7. de Passione Dom. who thus saith Vt ergo Vinbrae c. That therfore the Shaddowes might giue place to the Body and Images or ResemblaÌ„ces to the presence of the Truth the ancient obseruation is taken away by a new Sacrament the Hoast is changed into an Hoast bloud excludeth bloud and the Legall Solemnity whiles it is changed is fulfilled and accomplished S. Augustine l. 3. Trinit c. 10. Illas etiam Nubes c. What man knoweth how those Clouds and Fires were made which the Angells assumed and tooke on to signify what they were to deliuer or speake yea though our Lord or the Holy Ghost appeared in these formes Euen as Infants knew not that which is placed vpon the Altar and consumed after the celebration of Piety is finished how it is made and by what meanes it is vsed in Religion And if they neuer learned either by their owne experience or of others and should neuer see the formes of those things but in the celebration of Sacraments when it is offered giuen and said to them by most graue authority
takest not the Sonne of any Prince being but a Man but the only begotten Sonne of God art thou not affraid and doest not thou cast from thee the care of all secular things But if Chrysostome did heere speake of Christ only in Signe and representation the comparison should haue bene made only between the Image or Picture of the Kings Sonne and not with the Sonne himselfe And Homil. ad Neophytos Sicut Regnantium statuae c. Euen as the Statuaes or Images of Princes haue bene accustomed to succour such as haue fled to them for Sanctuary and this not because they are made of brasse but in that they doe beare the Image of the Prince euen so that bloud did free meaning that Bloud of the Lamb in the old Testament which was sprinkled vpon the Posts to free the Israelites from the striking Angell not because it was bloud but because it did figure out the comming of this Bloud But now if the Enemy shall see not the bloud of the Type cast vpon the postes or walles but the bloud of Truth shining in the mouthes of the faithfull he will much more withdraw himselfe from hence For if the Angell gaue place to the Example how much more will the Enemy be terrified if he shall behould the Truth it self In which place we see that Chrysostome placeth the truth of the Bloud not in the mind but in the mouths of the Faithfull And Homil. 51. in Matth. O quet modo dicunt c. O how many doe now say I would see the forme of Christ and his fauour I would see his vestments and euen his shooes Now thou seest him thou touchest him thou eatest him Where he meaneth that we see feele and eate Christ truly and really vnder those formes of Bread and Wine which are properly seene and touched Againe he saith in the same place that there was neuer Shepheard who fed his shep with his owne flesh as Christ did and that diuers Mothers are to be found who deliuer ouer their Infants to others to be noursed contrary to the procedings of our Sauiour which comparisons can haue no fitting proportion if we eate the Body of Christ only in Figure and signe Lastly to omit for breuities sake diuers others of his similitudes he thus writeth Hom. 2. ad Pop. Antiochenum Helias melotem c. Helias did leaue to his disciple his vestement but the Sonne of God ascending to Heauen did leaue his flesh But Helias by leauing it was disuested thereof whereas Christ leauing his flesh to vs yet ascending to Heauen there also hath it So frequent is this holy Father in Comparisons and Similitudes all brought in to shew the excellency of that thing which we receaue in the Sacrament of the Eucharist which if it were not the body and bloud of Christ then were these comparisons most cold and disproportionable Gaudentius Tract 2. de Exodo teacheth that the Iewes had not all one Paschal Lambe but diuers in that euery family did kill it peculiar Lambe but that among the Christians one and the same Lambe to wit the body and bloud of Christ is offered vp and eaten in all the Churches Which words signify that the body of Christ is not offered vp only in representation since in that sense the Iewes had one and the same Lambe in that all their Lambs did signify one Lamb to wit Christ S. Basil l. 2. de Baptismo c. 2. thus writeth Si tales minae c. If such threats be ordayned against those who come rashly to such holy things as are sanctified by Man what shall we say of him who is temerarious and rash towards such and so great a Mysterie For by how much Christ is greater then the Temple according to the voyce of our Lord by so much it is more greiuous and terrible rashly to touch the body of Christ in impurity of soule then to approach to Rammes or Bull◠c. But this saying of S. Basil cannot be true except the body of Christ be really in the Eucharist For betweene Christ and the Rammes sacrificed by the Iewes the difference is infinite but betweene those Rammes signifying Christ and bread figuring our Sauiour the difference is but small S. Ambrose lib. de Mysterijs initiandis c. 9. teacheth that a more excellent meate is giuen to vs in the Eucharist then euer the Manna was to the Iewes The like he hath l. 4 de Sacramentis c. 3. 4. 5. But Manna was both for substance and signification as is proued afore better then bread only representing the body of Christ Againe lib. 6. de Sacramentis c. 1. Sicut verus est Filius Dei c. Euen as our Lord Iesus Christ is the true Sonne of God not as Men are his Sonnes by grace but as a Sonne of the Substance of the Father so it is true Flesh euen as himselfe said which we take Out of which sentence it followeth that as Christ is truly and really the Sonne of God So is that which we take in the Eucharist the true body and bloud of Christ Againe lib. de Mysterijs initiandis c. 9. he proueth the same from the mysterie of the Incarnation in these words Liquet quod praeter naturae ordinem Virgo generauit hoc quod conficimus Corpus ex Virgine est Quid hic queris Naturae ordinem in Christi corpore cùm praeter naturā sit ipse Dominus Iesus partus ex Virgine It is manifest that a Virgin brought forth a Sonne beyond the course of Nature And this Body which we make proceedeth from the Virgin Why doest thou heere expect the course of Nature since our Lord Iesus is borne of a Virgin aboue nature But if the Bread did only signify our Sauiours Body in the Eucharist this proofe of S. Ambrose had bene superfluous S. Hilarius lib. 8. de Trinitate speaking of the Truth of the Body and Bloud in the Eucharist thus concludeth An hoc veritas non est c. What is not this Truth Let it not be a truth to those who deny Christ Iesus to be true God Thus Hilarius heere proueth the Mysterie of the Eucharist by the Mysterie of the Trinity S. Athanasius as he is cited by Theodoret in 2. Dialog thus writeth Corpus est cui dicit c. It is a Body to whom it was said Sede à dextris meis of which Body the Diuells with all the wicked Powers as also the Iewes and Grecians were Enemies by meanes of which Body Christ was both the High Priest and an Apostle and this Body is specified in that Mysterie which is deliuered to vs when himselfe said This is my Body which is deliuered for you and the bloud of the New Testament not of the Old which is shed for you But Diuinity hath neither a Body nor Bloud Heere he proueth that Christ hath a true Body in that Christ as an High Priest gaue his Body to vs in those wordes Hoc est Corpus meum but if
his true body were not deliuered to vs therby his reason would proue nothing against the Heretikes denying the Truth of his Body in that it might be replyed that the Eucharist was but a Figure of the apparent and seeming body which they taught that Christ had S. Cyprian sermone de Coena Domini saith Coena disposita c. The Supper of those sacramentall Banquets being prepared the Old and New Institutions did there meete togeather and the Lamb which the Ancient Tradition proposed being spent the Maister gaue to his Disciples an inconsumptible meate Heere by the words Cibum inconsumptibilem cannot be vnderstood the Body of Christ as it is eaten by Faith because in that the Iewes by their Paschall Lamb had that meate to wit by representation as well as we Christians Neither by the said words can be vnderstood the Bread in the Eucharist because Bread is as well consumptible and to be spent as a Lambe is In the same Sermon he also saith of which place I haue entreated before Sicut in Persona Christi c. Euen as in the Person of Christ his Humanity appeared but his Diuinity was hid or latent so in the visible Sacrament the Diuine Essence doth ineffably infuse it selfe From which words the truth of the Doctrine of the Eucharist is proued from the Mystery in the Incarnation Origen homil 7. in Lib. Numeri Tunc in enigmate erat Manna cibus nunc autem in specie caro verbi Dei est verus cibus sicut ipse dicit Quia caromea est verè cibus Then to wit in the Old Law the Manna was meate obscurely Enigmatically but now indeed the Flesh of the Word of God is true meate euen as himselfe said Quia caro mea verè est cibus But the Manna was the body of Christ tropically and figuratiuely Tertullian lib. de Idololatria thus saith Prâ—h Scelâ—â—l semel Iudaei c. O Villany the Iewes once offered violence vnto Christ but these Men dayly do wrong his body O that their hands might be cut off In which place he inueigheth against certaine men who made such Priests or at the least Deacons which were artificers or makers of Idolls But if Tertullian had thought that there were only Bread in the Eucharist representing the Body of our Sauiour he would not compare such as handled the Sacrament vnworthily with those which crucified Christ Where also we are to note that he there speaketh not of such who with affectation and intended purpose did wrong Christ by violating the Sacraments but of those only who being sinners dared to deliuer the Sacrament to the Communicants Irenaeus l. 4 contra Haeres c. 34. Quemadmodum qui est à terra panis percipiens vocationem Dei iam non communis Panis est sed Eucharistia ex duabus rebus constans terrena caelesti sic corpora nostra percipientia EucharistiaÌ„ iam non sunt corruptibilia spem resurrectionis habentia Euen as the Bread proceeding from the Earth receauing the inuocation of God is not now common Bread but it is the Eucharist consisting of two things to wit a terrene thing and a celestiall thing so our Bodyes receauing the Eucharist are not corruptible as hauing thereby the hope of rising againe Where Irenaeus maketh a Comparison betweene the Eucharist and the Article of the Resurrection But our Body really truly after the Resurrection shall become immortall and not in signification only therefore the Bread is truly become the Body of Christ and not in signification only Now how the Eucharist may be termed terrena see S. Augustine and S. Ambrose in the sixt chapter of this 2. Tract S. Iustinus Martyr in Apolog. 2. ad Antoninum Imperatorem saith Non enim vt communem Panem neque communem Potum haec sumimus Sed quemadmodum per Verbum Dei Incarnatus Iesus Christus Saluator noster carnem sanguinem pro salute nostra habuit sic etiam per preces Verbi Dei ab ipso Eucharistiam factum cibum ex quo sanguis carnes nostrae per mutationem aluntur illius Incarnati Iesu carnem sanguinem esse edocti sumus We do not take these as common Bread and common Drinke but as Iesus Christ our Sauiour being Incarnated by the Word of God had flesh and bloud for our health saluation euen so we learne that through the prayers of the Word of God that meate whereby our bloud and flesh are nourished through the alteratioÌ„ therof being made the Eucharist is the Flesh and Bloud of Iesus who was incarnated In which wordes there is a comparison betweene the Eucharist and the Incarnation of Christ and he proueth the Catholike doctrine of the Eucharist from the Mysterie of the Incarnation inferring that by the same power the Bread might be made the Body of Christ by the which power God was Incarnated but if he did vnderstand that the Bread was the Body by representation only then in vaine is brought the Example of the Incarnation since it is no Miracle that Bread should signifie the Body of Christ Add heerto that Iustinus Martyr if he did meane the Body only in signe had reason to explane himselfe to the Emperour in that he heere did write an Apology for the Christians to whome besides other crimes it was obiected that in the mysteries of their Religion they did eate Mans flesh OF THEIR TESTIMONIES CONFESSING The inexplicable greatnesse of this Mysterie CHAP. V. THE fourth Classis may conteyne such passages of the Fathers wherin is acknowledged a Supreme Mysterie in the Eucharist For first they teach that it transgressing the bounds of humane capacity is to be apprehended only by faith Thus aduancing the dignity and worth of faith as being able to vnderstand that which the vnderstanding of which Faith is but an Act cannot naturally vnderstand So cloudy darke is that Faculty of the mind except the mysts therof be dispelled and diffipated by the illuminating beames of Gods grace Hence it ariseth that they are very frequent in their exhortations that we should not fluctuate in any vncertainty of Iudgment but assure our selues by disclayming from sense humbling our Iudgments and voyding our minds of all preiudice of opinion of the infallible Truth therof since it is wrought by the vertue of his words who is Truth it selfe a Veritas Via Iohn 14. Ego sum Veritas Via So well those holy Doctours did know that the more Chrystalline cleare the chiefest faculties of our Soules are become and the more polished freed from all naturall blemishes the glasse therof is the more perfectly we may behould this high Mysterie since during our exile heere all such abstruse difficulties we do but see as it were per b Per speculum 1. Cor. 13. speculum in aenigmate But when we are arriued by meanes of death into our Countrey for Heauen is the soules proper Orbe then all such heauenly mysteries being now ouer
id est animam c. He that laid downe a greater thing for thee to wit his soule why should he disdayne to deliuer to thee his Body Therfore let vs Priestes as well as others heare how admirable a thing is graunted to vs Let vs heare I beseech you and let vs tremble therat for he hath deliuered his Flesh to vs he hath laid downe himselfe to be sacrificed And the same Father l. 3. de Sacerdotio O miraculum ô Dei benignitate c. O the Miracle ô the goodnesse of God! He that sitteth aboue with his Father euen in the very same instant of tyme is handled with the hands of all and deliuereth himselfe to such as are willing to entertaine and imbrace him Gaudentius tract 2. in Exod. saith Quod annuntiatum est credas c. Thou maist belieue that which is shewed thee for that which thou takest is the body of that Heauenly Bread and the bloud of that sacred Vine for when he deliuered conseerated Bread and Wine to his Disciples he said Hoc est Corpus meum Hic est Sanguis meus Let vs belieue him whom heretofore we haue belieued for Truth knoweth not to lye S. Ephrem lib. De Natura Dei minimè scrutanda c. 5. thus writeth Quid scrutaris inscrutabilia Si ista curiosè rimaris iam non fidelis sed curiosus vocaberis Esto fidelis atque innocens participa immaculato corpori Domini tui fide plenissima certus quòd agnum ipsum integrum comedis Why doest thou search things which are inscrutable If thou doest weigh these things curiously then thou shalt be called not faithfull but curious Be thou Faithfull and Innocent participate thou of the immaculate Body of thy Lord being assured through a most strong faith that thou doest eate the very whole Lambe it selfe And the same Father after in the said booke Hoc sanè excedit omnem admirationem c. This verily exceedeth all Wonder all Thought and all Speach which the only Begotten Sonne of God Christ our Sauiour hath performed to vs. He hath giuen to vs fire and the spirit to eate and drinke to wit his Body and Bloud Heere the Myracle exceeding Mans capacity the difficulty of belieuing it and the inscrutablenesse therof do proue that the Eucharist in his Iudgment was not only materiall bread signifying the body of Christ S. Gregorie Nazianzen Orat. 2. de Paschate thus writeth Absque confusione dubio come de corpus sanguinem bibe si saltem vitae desiderio teneris neque sermonibus qui de carne habentur fidem deneges neque ob passionem offendaris Constans esto firmus stabilis in nulla re propter Aduersariorum sermones fluctues Eate his body and drinke his bloud without any confusion or doubt if at least thou haue any desire of health neither deny thy faith herein for any speaches which may proceed of flesh neither be thou scandalized by reason of his Passion Be thou constant firme and stable neither fluctuate nor doubt thou by reason of any speaches of the Aduersaries where we are to note that he persuadeth his Reader to this so great a Mystery though the Aduersaries to wit the Gentile Philosophers doe scoffe thereat meaning in that the Christians belieued that they did eate the Flesh of Christ which cohortation of Nazianzene were needlesse if only we doe eate the flesh of Christ in signe and Figure S. Gregorie Nyssene Orat. Catechetica c. 36. 37. thus writeth Considerandum est quomodo fieri queat vt cùm vnum illud corpus assiduè per totum orbem terrarum tot fidelium millibus impertiatur totum cuiusque perpartem euadat in seipso totum permaneat It is to be considered how it can be effected that that very one same Body can dayly throughout the whole world be distributed to so many thousands of the faithfull it notwithstanding remayning whole in it selfe and whole or entyre in euery part But this were idely demanded if the Body of Christ were eaten only in signe since there is no difficulty in apprehending the eating of it in signe and figure S. Ambrose l. 4. de Sacramentis c. 5. saith Deinde ipse Dominus Iesus testificatur nobis quòd corpus suum accipiamus sanguinem numquid debemus de eius fide tâ—stâ—ficatione dubitare Et infra Dicit tibi Sacerdos Corpus Christi tu dicis Amen Hoc est verum Quod confitetur lingua teneat affectus Furthermore euen our Lord himselfe doth testify vnto vs that we take his Body and Bloud What ought we to doubt of his credit and testimony And afterwards The Priest sayth to thee The Body of Christ thou sayst Amen This is true therefore let thy affection hold that which thy tongue confesseth The first Councell of Nyce as it appeareth in the Acts of the said Councell thus saith Item etiam hic in diuina Mensa c. Furthermore in this diuine Table let vs not only with humility consider the Bread the Cup but lifting vp our mind in faith let vs vnderstand that in that sacred Table there is placed that Lambe of God who taketh away the sinns of the world that he is vnbloudily sacrificed by Priests and we truly taking his precious Body Bloud do belieue the taking therof to be a signe of our Resurrection and therfore we take not in a great quantitie but in a small that therby we may know it to be taken not for society but for sanctification In these words the CouÌ„cell perswades vs that we should not rest in the formes of Bread Wine as if nothing were there else but that we are to consider that there is the true Body and Bloud of Christ though to our Eye it seemeth otherwise Now that this is the meaning of the CouÌ„cell appeareth First because it there teacheth that we do take Preciosum Corpus eius verè his precious Body truly where the word Verè doth beare an opposition to that which is in Figure Secondly in that the Councell saith that the Lambe of God is sacrificed by Priests vpon the holy Table which wordes cannot extend to Christ as he is in heauen only Thirdly in that the Councell saith that we are to apprehend by faith that the Lambe of God is placed vpon that holy Table therfore the Councell did teach that Christ himselfe was vpon the Altar and not only in Heauen as our Aduersaries do hould So forcible and strong is this graue Testimony of so Ancient and Reuerend a Councell in defence of our Catholike doctrine heerin OF THEIR TESTIMONIES EXPRESSING The effect of the Eucharist and the veneration exhibited to the same CHAP. VI. THE fifth Mount of the Fathers Authorities in this Controuersie is gathered or heaped togeather out of such their Sentences coÌ„teyning the Effect Vertue and Energy of the Eucharist as also their care reuerence and veneration exhibited to the same Concerning the first point they teach that it is the
Secondly by reason that in regard of the presence of the Accidences the worth and merit of our faith is increased Thirdly they being absent it would be a horrour to Mans nature to eate Mans flesh Fourthly if they were absent then this Proposition Hoc est Corpus meum could not be true since then the whole should be so changed into the whole as that nothing should remayne common to both the Termini of this Conuersion Reasons drawne in like sort from Conueniency for they are strange Mathematicians since of all the seuerall Aspects which may be borne to the Sunne of Gods Church for in sole posuit Tabernaculum suum they approue and allow only a meere Diametricall Opposition thus grauely esteeming themselues to be so much the neerer to the Truth by how much they are further of from the p The pillar and foundation According to that Columna Firmamentum Veritatis Tim. c. 3. Pillar and Foundation of Truth THE CONCLVSION HEERE now Good Reader for to thee only I will turne my pen since my humble thoughts dare not presume to direct any further speeches vnto his Maiesty thou hast this meane and impolished discourse in regard of the Subiect whereof all Pens yea the tongues of Angells are to be reputed most vnworthy from hence thou mayst according to my Method be instructed of two things First of the Possibility of this great Mystery Secondly of the Authorities both humane and diuine prouing that what herein by Gods Power may be performed the same was through his Diuine Godnesse and pleasure in the Institution of the Eucharist actually effected And concerning the first Point we are to conceaue that as in the firster part hereof it is demonstrated that God is Omnipotent so doth our Christian Faith teach vs that he is a he is iust Psalm 11. iust Through his Omnipotency he is able to performe what he promiseth Through his Iustice he promiseth nothing but what he will performe Both these drawing equally togeather in him for he hath b For he hath promised Answerably to that of S. Iohn 6. Pauis quem ego daho caro mea est pro mundi vita promised by the infallible Oracle of his written word that he would giue his sacred Body and Bloud to eate and drinke may warrant vs of the Truth of this high Mysterie In the second Part to conuince that Christ at his last Supper performed what afore was prooued that he was able to accomplish thou hast set downe all the chiefest Authorities drawne from Gods sacred word the answerable Prophesies of the Ancient Iewes herein the beginning and progression of the Sacramentarian Heresy particulerly displaied the wrested testimonies of Scriptures alledged to the contrary fully and satisfyingly answered the stupendious Miracles wrought in proofe hereof recorded and lastly to omit other short insertions the Fathers Iudgments in the same as also in the particuler manner of Transubstantiation most aboundantly manifested both by their owne expresse sayings and by the plaine acknowledgement of our Sacramentaries It now remaineth that vpon the mature deliberation of the former Premisses thou consider seeing with the c VVith the Psalmist Psalm 24. Psalmist Thou hast not receaued thy soule in vayne to which side thou intendest to subiect thy iudgement herein That is whether thou wilt imbrace the Sacramentaries opinion notwithstanding it is impugned by all forcible Proofes whatsoeuer or that thou wilt be content with all humble resignation of thy owne spirit to impath thy selfe in the way of reuerend Antiquity and to follow their iudgements who in Faith and doctrine followed the Apostles I meane the Iudgments of those Primitiue Fathers Men remarkeable for Learning since their owne Labours left as MonumeÌ„ts to Posterity are sufficient witnesses therof Men of most eminent vertue since God hath vouchsafed to seale their sanctity of life with the irrefragable testimonies of diuers d Great Miracles Examples hereof see recorded in diuers Authors and Historiographers great Miracles Finally men of a pure and vncorrupted Faith since they then liued when the Church of Christ was for her time but in her Infancy but for her perfection in her youth and full growth and therfore euen by the confession of our Sectaries could not with a ioynt consent teach any thing contrary to the doctrine of Christ and his Apostles And thus the maine drift of these precedent Passages for this is the Issue of the matter chiefly intended by me and heere it resteth resolues to this one poynt to wit whether a Man desirous of his owne saluatioÌ„ should in this high and most reuerend Mysterie vpon the true or false beliefe wherof depends his soules interminable weale or woe run one and the same lyne of faith with Augustine Hierome Chrysostome Epiphanius the Gregories the Cyrills Basil Ambrose Hilary Athanasius Cyprian Irenaeus Ignatius and the like or with Zuinglius Caluin and Beza But now since we are Christians and are to belieue in Christ not in outward sense Let vs turne our pen from all disputable Points of the matter and acknowledging the certainty admire Gods incoÌ„prehensible Goodnes therin for as the Heauens spend their Motions by distributing their Heat Light other vertues to the earth so the Creatour of the Heauens hath vouchsafed the Influence of his Grace by bestowing himselfe in this most dreadfull Mysterie vpon Man the Earths chiefest creature Thus by receauing his sacred Body and Bloud we containe him within our selues whom the Heauens caÌ„not containe and inclose him in our breasts who in himselfe incloseth all this ALL. In like sort at this celestiall Table we feed on him who giues himselfe aswell to thousands as to one and yet euery one receaues as much therof as those thousaÌ„ds who equally imparteth himself to good bad and yet they both partake therof with most vnequall Effect To be short who e Commanding euery one According to those words Iohn 6. Nisi manducaueritis carnem filij Hominis biberitis eius sanguinem non habebitis vitam in vobis coÌ„maunding euery one to eare of his flesh and drinke of his bloud is much offended with diuers men communicating therof and yet commaundeth nothing wherwith he is offended for it is the Vnpreparation not the Participation which displeaseth him which Point cannot seeme strange to vs Christians for we read that the f The Incircumcised Exod. c. 12. Vncircumcised could not eate the Phase Which Phase or Paschall Lambe since g Typically it represented Hereof S. Augustine l. 2. contra â—teras Petiliani c. 37. Aliud est Pascha quod Iudaei de ave celebrant aliud quod nos in corpore sanguine Domini accipimus typically it represented the Eucharist could not be eaten but with gyrded loynes and shooes on their feet which figure out in our Lords Supper our holy desires with vnleauened bread wherby is shaddowed our azimous and pure intentions finally with the mixture of certaine bitter hearbes signifying sharp compunction for our former Impieties so necessary it is for our soule to be cloathed with her wedding garment when she presumeth to come to so great a banquet And now to draw to an end of that which in it selfe is endlesse since Gods Power and Goodnesse are in the Institution of this Sacrament paralell one to the other that Mans vnderstanding caÌ„not penetrate into the depth of eyther of them for betweene things finite and infinite there is proportion only in disproportion let vs admire his Power as being able to effect so great a worke Let vs admire his Goodnes as being willing to worke it far Mans benefit and in a deep and silent CoÌ„templation of both for words are defectiue herein let vs conclude with that Graue and Reuerend h Reuerend Father Ephrem lib. de Natura Dei minime scrutandae c. â— Father Ignis immortalis sunt Mysteria Christi noli temerè ea perscrutari ne in ipsorum perscrutatione comburaris a He is iust Psalm 11. b For he hath promised Answerably to that of S. Iohn 6. Pauis quem ego dabo caro mea est pro mundi vita c VVith the Psalmist Psalm 24. d Great Miracles Examples hereof see recorded in diuers Authors and Historiographers e Commanding euery one According to those words Iohn 6. Nisi manducaueritis carnem silij Hominis biberitis eius sanguinem non habebitis vitam in vobis f The Incircumcised Exod. c. 12. g Typically it represented Hereof S. Augustine l. 2. contra â—teras Petiliani c. 37. Aliud est Pascha quod Iudaei de â—ue celebrant aliud quod nos in corpore sanguine Domini accipimus h Reuerend Father Ephrem lib. de Natura Dei minimè scrutanda c. 5. FINIS