Of the GOVERNMENT OF CHURCHES A discourse Pointing at the Primitive Form Printed by Roger Daniel Printer to the Universitie of Cambridge 1641. To the most Gracious JAMES Duke of Lennox Earl of March c. L. Warden of the Cinque Ports Knight of the most Noble Order of the Garter and one of his Majesties most Honourable Privie Counsel his very good LORD MAy it please your Grace The advantage this slight worthlesse piece aimeth at in this addresse is of great consequence but of a civil and moderate nature It is no marvel if it desire to go forth under so great a Name that is not like to appear considerable to the world otherwise But the Countenance it demandeth is according as the cause may deserve more it must not expect from your Justice lesse it cannot expect from your Goodnesse If it fail of the Truth it is a Child rebellious to the Fathers intentions and according to the Law of Moses here he bringeth him forth to receive his doom If it have any thing considerable in a Cause wherein the world is so well informed long since my suit is that from your Graces hands it may be derived to the publick The Lord of Heaven and Earth blesse your Grace with happinesse of this life and of that which is to come So prayes Your Graces most humble Chaplain HERBERT THORNDIKE To the Lovers of Peace and Truth THat style must serve me for a Preface to this short discourse The love of Peace and Truth my hope is hath made some Impression in the reasons whereupon it proceedeth And it were a wrong to the world to think that those marks can be offensive My purpose was to contribute towards the true meaning of the Scripture in these matters If I have failed of it the attempt will deserve your excuse But my heart telleth me not that I have set any Text on the rack to make it confesse more then it means Ecclesiasticall writers I have for the most part stripped of the authoritie which their years merits in the Church have wonne and produced them as witnesses at the Bar of common sense to make evidence from the Historicall truth of their sayings The meaning of them is for the most part either translated by their words or expressed in the current of my discourse Sometimes it is left to every mans apprehension to value for when all is done men must and will be judges for themselves H. T. Faults escaped Pag. 16. line 18. ac providè reade ac proinde p. 34. l. 5. expressed r. expresseth p. 58. l. 3. because r. became p. 62. l. 19. these r. those l. 21. these r. those p. 83. l. 20. Synagogues r. Synagogue p. 85. l. 14. after else adde And the chief causes in Religion brought to no Court but this p. 87. l. 19. after writeth adde In Hilcoth Sanedrin cap. 1. p. 102. l. 9. those r. these p. 114. l. 10. Baptist r. Baptismo p. 119. l. 5. dispersing r. dispensing p. 129. l. 1. Tertullian r. Tertullian p. 131. l. 13. Toreh r. Joreh p. 140. l. 22. some r. sound p. 147. l. 24. alwayes r. alwayes p. 151. l. 5. after heart adde being p. 183. l. 11. and r. of CHAP. I. The Apostles eye-witnesses of our Lord and eare-witnesses of his doctrine S. Paul an Apostle Many personall qualities in them They were Governours of Churches HE that desireth to espie light at a narrow hole must lay his eye near if he mean to discover at large So must he be curious in considering the Scriptures that meaneth to discern those things that are not declared there at large but are collected by circumstance or consequence especially in matters which we view at this distance of time which representeth to us things done then through a mist of succeeding custome Those that seek for mines have their virgula divina a rod which they hold even-balanced over the place where they hope for a vein which if it hit right the rod of it self bendeth towards the earth Our Lord in the Gospel commandeth us to search the Scriptures as men would seek for mines or treasure let us keep an even balance of judgement not bowing but as the vein of truth swayeth it for if we put the grains of affection and prejudice into the gold-scales which we weigh nice truths with no marvel if the lighter go down Now because the question concerneth the Apostles time and the next to it and the purpose is to represent the form pointed at in Scripture by comparing it with such passages of historicall truth and primitive practice as shall seem best to expresse it let us in the first place consider the nature of their charge that it may appear how farre the Church reteineth a succession of it For true it is divers personall qualities are requisite in an Apostle because they were to preach the Gospel to all Nations They must be men to witnesse those things they had seen our Lord do those words they had heard him speak upon their own knowledge and therefore men that had conversed with him from the beginning of his doctrine It is that S. Peter required at the choice of Matthias Acts i. 21. Of these men that have companied with us all the while that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us must one be ordained for a witnesse of his resurrection with us It is that the same Apostle challengeth 1. Pet. v. 1. The elders which are among you I exhort who am also an elder and a witnesse of the sufferings of Christ He condescendeth to the rank of Presbyters when he saith who am also an Elder but he voucheth the priviledge of an Apostle when he addeth and a witnesse of the sufferings of Christ And his fellow-Apostle of the Gentiles to the same purpose 1. Corinth ix 1. Am I not an Apostle am I not free have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord as if to be an Apostle required one that had seen the Lord which was supplyed to him by his raptures and visions as the hearing his doctrine was supplyed unto him by that revelation by which he avoucheth to have received his Gospel in the beginning of his Epistle to the Galatians This is that God had provided for satisfaction of common sense men that could witnesse upon the credit of their eyes and eares what they published But it required greater matters to convince the world of those things which reason could not evidence The gifts of the holy Ghost for knowledge for language for miracles for all the like were requisite in a marvellous nature for those that undertook to preach the Gospel to all nations This was the Apostles charge and the power this charge importeth the indowments it requireth are personall wherein no man pretendeth to succeed the Apostles But the execution of this charge reason telleth us must needs proceed and experience of that which is written telleth us it did proceed according to the exigence of their severall
habuit sine quorum consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesia This is as much as can be demanded when we heare that nothing was done in the Church to wit by the Bishop without the advice of his Presbyters The same is affirmed by S. Hierome upon Titus i. 5. Antequam Diaboli instinctu studia in religione fierent diceretur in populis Ego sum Pauli ego Apollo ego Cephae communi consilio Ecclesiae gubernabantur In that S. Hierome thinketh there were no Bishops till Churches were forced to that course to avoid schismes it hath been shewed he is not in the right But in that he affirmeth that at first Churches were governed by common advise we may well heare him speak in so good company of witnesses Last of all S. Cyprian having said once for all Epist 6. Quando à primordio Episcopatûs mei nihil statuerim sine consilio vestro Presbyterorum Diaconorum sine consensu plebis meae privatá sententiâ gerere how well he observed it is yet to be seen in the passage of divers businesses related in his Epistles Out of which the like is to be conceived of the Presbyters of Rome by those things that are touched there And this is the true reason why many times especially among the most ancient Church-writers Bishop and Presbyters both are comprised in the same styles and names not because there were then no Bishops as some men imagine but because both States concurred in the same office Clemens in the Epistle aforesaid pag. 54. speaking of the Ministeries instituted by the Apostles saith thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is They made the first-fruits of believers Overseers and Ministers that is Bishops and Deacons of those that should believe It seemeth indeed that Clemens calleth the Presbyters Bishops because as yet there was no other Bishop there as was proved afore for so the word is used in S. Pauls Epistles and the Acts of the Apostles for the same reasons as hath been said But in Ignatius his Epistle to Hero his Deacon at Antiochia you have these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Do nothing without the Bishops that is without the Presbyters who were indeed Bishops in Ignatius his absence when this is pretended to be written And be he who he will be that writ it I believe it will not often be found that Presbyters are called Bishops in any monument of Church-writers after this time unlesse it be in these words of Tertullian De praescript c. 3. Quid ergò si Episcopus si Diaconus si vidua c where putting the Deacon next to the Bishop he seemeth to comprise the Presbyter with him in the same style For afterwards the name of Bishops became appropriate to the heads of Presbyteries as we heard S. Hierome say of the Presbyters at Alexandria that the head whom they chose themselves out of their own number they named BISHOP of Alexandria Otherwise as it is well known that the name of SACERDOS is common to both estates in regard of the offices of Divine service which were performed by both so in regard of the government of the Church common to both are they many times comprised together in the common style of PRESBYTERS the name of their age or ANTISTITES 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 PRAEPOSITI and the like the names of their charge For as the Apostle maketh himself an Elder when he writeth to them in this style 1. Pet. i. 5. The Elders I exhort who am also an Elder so is the like to be observed in that well-known passage of Clemens Alexandrinus related by Eusebius Eccles hist iii. 23. concerning the youth which S. John the Apostle commended to the Bishop of a certain place Clemens proceeding in the relation addeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the Elder saith he taking the youth home to his house c. calling him a Presbyter whom he had named a Bishop but just afore So Tertullian Apologet. c. 39. describing what was wont to be done in the Assemblies of Christians addeth Praesident probati quique Seniores honorem non pretio sed testimonio adepti not meaning to tell us that there was no Bishop to be seen at these meetings for in his book De praescript where he nameth Polycarpus whom we alledged afore cap. 32. Bishop of Smyrna he speaketh as much of Bishops that succeded the Apostles in the rest of the Churches of their planting but comprising both ranks and estates in one name of ELDERS And that upon the reason specified in the Commentaries under S. Ambrose his name upon 1. Tim. iii. 8. where he giveth the reason why the Apostle passeth straight from Bishops to Deacons Because saith he every Bishop is a Presbyter though every Presbyter is not a Bishop who is the chief of Presbyters And the true S. Ambrose Offic. i. 20. Viduarum virginum domos nisi visitandi gratiâ juniores adire non est opus hoc cum Senioribus hoc est cum Episcopo vel si opus est cum Presbyteris With the Elders saith he that is with the Bishop or Presbyters Justine Martyr in his second Apology relating the orders of Christians in their Assemblies having spoken of reading the Scriptures Then saith he the Reader having done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ruler maketh a speech of instruction to the people exhorting them to imitate what was read And again of the Eucharist Then saith he bread and wine is offered to the Ruler 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Was it the Bishop alone or the Presbyters alone that preached and celebrated the Eucharist Sure both did it and the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was chosen on purpose by Justine to comprise both The same is to be observed in the words of S. Augustine Hom. ult ex quinquaginta cap. 11. Veniat peccator ad Antistites per quos illi in Ecclesia claves ministrantur à Praepositis sacrorum accipiat satisfactionis suae modum ANTISTITES in Ecclesia is not the Bishop alone but the Bishop and the Presbyters Hegesippus in Eusebius Eccles hist iii. 20. relateth how some of our Lords kindred were brought afore Domitian upon suspicion of danger to the State in regard of their title to the Kingdome but dismissed by him upon notice of their profession of life in tilling their grounds with their own hands tried by the hardnesse of them which it had wrought These saith Hegesippus were hereupon chosen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be leaders of Churches as both Cousins of our Lord and his witnesses comprehending both Bishop and Presbyters in one title As in Ignatius ad Trall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is put in one word to expresse Bishops and Presbyters both as the circumstance of the place will evidence To this we must adde the words of Ireneus iv 43. Wherefore saith he it behoveth us to obey the Elders that are in the Church which have received according to the Fathers pleasure the certain grace of truth with
the succession of their Bishoprick And again iii. 3. he speaketh of the tradition coming from the Apostles which had been preserved in the Churches through the succession of Presbyters Ireneus that is wont to appeal to the succession of Bishops to evidence that which the Church then believed to have come from the Apostles here referreth himself to the Presbyters for the same purpose affirming that they succeeded the Apostles without doubt calling the Bishops by the name of PRESBYTERS in regard of the office common to both Thus are both ranks comprised in one name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the first Canon of the Councel at Antiochia where we reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where we are not to conceive that Deacons are reckoned among the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as hath been mistook but the sense is to be directed by distinguishing the words thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reckoning the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as well Presbyters as Bishops neither more nor lesse then ANTISTITES in Latine which we had in S. Augustine before And thus you have both ranks comprised in the same style of PRAEPOSITI in S. Cyprian and of PRAESIDENTES in Tertullian The first Epist 62. Et cùm omnes omnino disciplinam tenere oporteat multò magis Praepositos Diaconos curare hoc fas est The other De Cor. mil. c. 3. Eucharistiae Sacramentum nec de aliorum manu quà m Praesidentium sumimus CHAP. VIII What pattern this Government might have in the Synagogue Aaron and his sonnes Correspondence of the Sanedrin with the Bishop and Presbyters BEfore we leave this point it will not be amisse to take notice what pattern the Apostles might have for this form of government in the Synagogue For when our Lord in the Gospel Matth. xviii 17. giveth his Disciples in the case of private offenses the rule Dic Ecclesiae it is to be supposed he reflecteth upon some Bench to which that people were wont to resort with their causes otherwise what could the hearers understand by these words intimating that his will was the Church which he was now founding to be provided of the like Neverthelesse in regard this Church was intended a mere spirituall State to be cherished and nourished in the bosome and entrails as it were of all Common-wealths there must no comparison be made in that which concerneth the temporall state of that people Let us see then Moses his charge Deut. xvii 8 9. thus we reade If there arise a matter too hard for thee in judgement between bloud and bloud between plea and plea between stroke and stroke being matters of controversie within thy gates then shalt thou arise and get thee up into the place which the Lord thy God shall choose and thou shalt come unto the Priests and Levites and to the Judges that shall be in those dayes and enquire and they shall shew thee the sentence of judgement He that readeth here on the one side two sorts of persons the Priests and Levites for one and the Judge that shall be in those dayes on the other side two sorts of causes one concerning Ceremonies of the Religion in force the other the civil Laws of that people hath cause to think that the meaning of this law is that they should resort to severall persons according to the differences of their causes Especially being indifferent in the words to translate it thus Thou shalt come to the Priests the Levites or to the Judge that shall be in those dayes as after verse 12. it is read Had it been thus the correspondence had been clear between the high Priest and his inferiours in the Synagogues and the Bishop and his Presbyters in the Church But the practice of the Nation beareth it otherwise In which we must believe their Doctours when they tell us that the whole passage as well that of the Priests and Levites as that of the Judge that shall be in those dayes is referred to the Sanedrin whereof R. Isaack Abartincell giveth his reason in his Commentaries upon that place Because that Court for a great part consisted of Priests and Levites and therefore had the hearing of all sorts of causes And though they were brought hither from lower Courts whereof there was one of three and twenty persons in every place which conteined one hundred and twenty families one of three in lesse places by the Judges themselves as the Ebrew Doctours will have it arguing from the words THOU SHALT ARISE Thou that findest a matter too hard for thee in judgement shalt arise yet can we compare the Consistory of the Church with no Court but this First because all mother-Churches in mother-Cities are absolute in their rule so farre as the Scripture hath appointed it otherwise then as the law of love tieth Christians to assist one anothers necessities our Lord and his Apostles having instituted no other judicatories in spirituall matters but one of these Presbyteries in each Church and many of them in severall Churches when the matter required common advise And again because Jerusalem was the onely seat of the whole State of Religion and Justice both in that people sacrifices being done no where else Well then as Ignatius in one of his Epistles distinguisheth two parts of the Bishops office 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to rule the Church and to perform Divine service so must we inquire the correspondency of the Church with the Synagogue in both respects reflecting from the Bishop and Presbyters in regard of Divine service to be performed by their hands upon Aaron and his sonnes or the high Priest and the rest as S. Hierome hath done before us writing in these terms Epist ad Euagr. Quod Aaron filii ejus atque Levitae in templo fuerunt hoc sibi Episcopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicent in Ecclesia But in respect of Government and Discipline whereof our Lord speaketh in the Gospel aforesaid we must reflect upon the Sanedrin as the same S. Hierome hath done in another place upon the first to Titus saying of Bishops in respect of their Presbyters Imitantes Moysen qui cùm haberet in potestate solus praeesse populo Israel septuaginta elegit cum quibus populum judicaret So then Moses his Spirit is taken and divided upon seventie Elders to help him to bear the charge of the people Num. xi 25. The same thing is done when the Apostles ordain Presbyteries by imposition of hands Therefore we see the Spirit of Prophecy rest upon the Presbytery by which Timothy was ordained as well as upon that of Antiochia no otherwise then it did upon Moses his Sanedrin Num. xi 26. To continue and procure the continuance whereof upon their successours it was that this Court sate in the Temple as the old Ebrew Doctours observe it is said Thou shalt go up to the place which I shall choose signifying that the Temple in which the holy Ghost dwelt occasioned the influence of it upon the Court that
but under two or three witnesses Them that sinne rebuke before all that others also may have fear But having hitherto shewed that our Lord in the Gospel hath appointed matters of particular offense to come before the Consistory of Bishop and Presbyters That the Apostles themselves in divers matters belonging to the Government of the Church used their assistance That in the Primitive times of the Church even under the Apostles matters of Censure and Ordination both were wont to passe by the Presbyters but in the Assemblies of Christian people Let me referre this to al indifferent persons to judge whether the same course of proceeding were in likelyhood observed in the censure of Presbyters The Apostles direction regulating what information to admit is directed to Timothie alone for the meaning is not that two or three should be present when it is put in but that it should not be admitted but as the Syriack translateth it upon the mouth that is the word of two or three witnesses But the censure of reproof is prescribed to passe in the congregation when he saith them that sinne that is them that are found in fault rebuke before all that others may have fear no otherwise then the censure of the Apostle did and was prescribed to do 1. Cor. v. 4. 2. Cor. ii 6. and therefore we are to think that the examination of such causes must passe as others of like nature by him with the Presbyters to whom the Apostle had assigned a charge of governing the Church there Acts xx 28 35. So the keyes of the Church given to S. Peter and to the Apostles were neverthelesse intended to be exercised by the Church as hath been said So the charge of excommunicating Hereticks is directed to Titus alone Titus iii. 10. But we have no reason therefore to imagine that Titus is directed to proceed otherwise in it then we know the Church was wont to proceed in Censures of that nature according to that which hath been said And so it is in the case that followeth a little after verse 22. Lay hands suddenly on no man neither be partaker of other mens sinnes where the rule of Ordinations is directed to Timothy alone yet have we no cause to believe that it was practiced by him otherwise then according to the form aforesaid joyning with him the Ptesbyters in imposition of hands as was practiced by the Apostle The eminence of their place is to be acknowledged because the Apostles instructions for managing these matters are directed to them alone But their course of proceeding must be measured by that which we know otherwise CHAP. XIV Retaining the primitive form Bishops cannot be abolished How Aerius is counted an Heretick All displeasure against Bishops occasioned by defect of Presbyteries To what purpose they might be restored THat which hath been said being intended to represent the form delivered in Scripture by the agreement of Historicall truth and primitive practice concerneth no more as every man sees then the government of Mother-churches contained in Mother-cities Because that is all the Scripture hath expressed But what influence and effect this ought to have in the present state of the Church now that Dioceses are divided Churches built and congregations assigned is not for a private person to particularize unlesse he meant to build Churches as some men do Castles in the air Let it be enough to say thus much in generall which every man must think that believeth what hath been said to be true that he that aimeth at the Primitive form and that which cometh nearest the institution of our Lord and his Apostles must not think of destroying Bishops but of restoring their Presbyteries Were it but an humane Ordinance of yesterday established by due course of right let me be bold to say that if Aerius withdraw his submission to it he must come within Epiphanius his list of Hereticks not understanding an Heretick in S. Augustines sense wherein Tertullian in his book de praescript went afore him to be none but he that will not believe some point of doctrine necessary as the means of salvation to be believed but according to the latitude of the word taking all to be Hereticks that make Sects and assemble themselves apart besides the Church of God lawfully settled This sense is used in Can. 6. Conc. 1. Constantinop where they are counted Hereticks that hold the sound faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And this latitude it seemeth Epiphanius comprised because he reckoneth the Quartadecimani in the roll of Hereticks These when the position whereupon the separation is grounded is not of weight setting their separation aside to separate them from the invisible Church are since according to the Authors named afore by a proper term called Schismaticks though Hereticks in the proper sense separate no lesse then they do And of this crime my earnest desire is that those which have separated themselves from this Church of England upon this quarrel of government by Bishops or the like unjust or unsufficient causes may stand acquitted though how they will acquit themselves of it I cannot yet perceive But if the rank of Bishops over their Presbyters be not onely a just humane Ordinance but estated in possession of sixteen hundred years without deceit or violence at the beginning let me have leave to think it will be hard to shew a better title of humane right for any estate upon the earth How much more when the possession is avouched to have been delivered from the hands and time of the Apostles must it needs seem strange that the successours of their place should be destroyed by the sons of their faith Be it pardonable for our neighbours and Brethren of the reformed Churches abroad to have overseen the succession of the Apostles because they could not discern it as they found it blended with such abundance of accessories especially in the persons of men that hated to be reformed But among us there hath been time to plead the right to the quick and though not without eagernesse of debate which interesse breedeth yet alwayes with advantage to the true tenure And among the multitude of speech that this time hath bred we have heard little or nothing as yet of new reasons to quell the cause with So that before advancing new plea the old right descending from such hands standeth now in as good terms as ever heretofore As for the point of peace within our selves and correspondence with our neighbours be it considered how large S. Hierom of all Church writers least favourable to the Order as he that found himself pinched with the Bishop of Jerusalem hath been neverthelesse in acknowledging that the peace of particular Churches could not be preserved without it To which we must adde the remembrance of so many happy dayes as this Church since the Reformation hath seen without such ruptures as have fallen out in other parts by the benefit of it among a people alwayes observed to be of all