labour that they may be strengthened by piety and godliness yet will I not enter upon a particular enumeration of Gods communicable Properties I have been too long already upon this argument much less upon a particular explication of them for it will be sufficient for my purpose which is the advancement of the true Religion in the hearts and lives of men if I briefly insist onely upon these three to which all the rest may be reduced and they are Truth in his Understanding Goodness in his Will and Purity in his Action for we cannot better consider Gods Activity then in the Purity of his Action unto which we must also annex a short discourse of Liberty as belonging to all three that is to say to Understanding and Will and Action And these three Properties of Truth Goodness Purity as they are eminently in God and evidences of his perfection so are they also eminent in Religion the service of God And first of the Truth of God and of Religion God is true by a metaphysical and by a moral Truth First By a metaphysical Truth as having the true knowledge of all things Psa. 139. 2. thou understandest my thoughts long before God understandeth our thoughts before they are the angels not when they are and therefore they are defective in truth because defective in understanding for Truth metaphysically is a conformity of the thing with the understanding and accordingly our blessed Saviour is particularly called the Truth as being the Omniscient Wisdome of God and the eternal Understanding of the Father even as the holy Ghost is the eternal Love both of Father and Son Secondly God is True by a moral Truth as having his Affection Expression Action agreeable to his knowledge and that in three respects 1. As Truth is opposed to Falshood for God neither wills nor speaks an untruth 2. As Truth is opposed to Dissimulation for God neither dissembleth nor deceiveth 3. As Truth is opposed to Inconstancy for God changeth not his judgement in truths declared or determined he changeth not the event in truths foretold or prophesied for in promises he keeps his word and his truth if man perform the conditions in threats he may not keep his word and yet keep his truth because they are but conditional And as for deceiving the Prophets Ezek. 14. 9. and 1 King 22. 23. we generally and truly answer Tradit diabolo decipiendos he delivereth them over to the devil to be deceived by him so saith the Text Because they received not the love of the Truth that they might be saved for this cause God shall send them strong delusions that they should beleeve a lie that they all might be damned who beleeved not the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness 2 Thes. 2. 10 11 12. a text that gives us a fearful but yet a full account of all those strong delusions among men which led directly to the Father of lies the first step was a voluntary unrighteousness in not loving the truth the second step is a strong delusion in beleeving a lie the third step God keep them from treading in that who have trodden in the two former is a necessary damnation both for not loving the truth and for having pleasure in lies but still God is true though every man be a liar for God deceiveth the Prophet Ez◠14. 9. as he hardeneth the heart Exod. 10. 1. permissivè non efficienter permissively no◠efficaciously by not inhibiting or not purging those ill qualities that are already is the heart not by infusing any ill qualities into it and therefore though he saith I have hardened Pharaohs heart yet he saith unto us Harden not your own hearts and accordingly he threatneth in Ezekiel to destroy such a prophet from the midst of his people whose heart was hardned so fa◠as to deceive himself and others whereas he could not in justice destroy him onely for being that which himself had made him nay this permission is most plainly set forth in that parable of 1 Kin. 22. for all that God doth there is onely to let the evil spirit go forth that is not to inhibite him from going and deceiving not to send him down from heaven For it is evident that the evil spirit never did and never can come into heaven again since he was first thrown down from thence And thus briefly God is True Metaphysically and Morally Metaphysical truth consisting in the right apprehension of things as they are in themselves Moral truth in the right affection and profession of things as they are apprehended and this profession is either in word by veracity or in action by sincerity or in continuance of action by constancy so that moral truth is opposed to falshood because 't is the same with reality to dissimulation because 't is the same with sincerity and to wavering and floating because 't is the same with certainty And this same metaphysical and moral truth is also in Religion passing from the Master into his service for the Father seeketh such to worship him who worship him as he is that is who worship him in spirit because he is a Spirit and who worship him in truth because he is the Truth S. John 4. 23 24. The worship in spirit points at the metaphysical truth of Religion which requires a true apprehension of God the worship in truth points at the moral truth of Religion which requires an Affection Profession Action agreeable to that true apprehension and for both these hath our own Church taught us to pray Collect 7th Sunday after Tri. Graff in our hearts the love of thy Name Increase in us true Religion nourish us with all goodness and of thy great mercy keep us in the same Do you look for the metaphysical Truth of Religion 'T is in the knowledge of Gods Name which must be presupposed before the love of it since no man can love what he doth not know that you know God by his true Name such as himself hath proclaimed Exod. 32. 5 6 7. or that you apprehend God as he is not set up to your self an idol in stead of God as do all those who worship not the Father by the Son in the unity of the Spirit Again do you look for the moral truth of Religion 'T is in the love of Gods Name that you love him according to your knowledge or that you have your affection agreeable to your apprehension for to know God and not to love him is in effect to proclaim you do not truly know him since the same God is the first Truth and ground of our knowledge and also the last good and cause of our love and you may here likewise finde this moral truth of Religion in all respects First in its Reality for it is the very true Religion opposed to falshood or superstition 't is indeed Gods Name Secondly in its Sincerity or Fidelity for it is all Goodness not onely in the tongue but also in the heart
foundations because they joyn the soul to him which cannot be properly said of any man whatsoever nor of all the congregations of men in the world not of S. Peter himself and much less of his successours and if it be said cannot be justified by any good Logick or good Divinity much less by that distinction of Fundamentum primarium and secundarium of a primary and a secondary foundation which distinguisheth a numerical identity from it self with too much subtilty and too little truth calling that a secondary foundation which is indeed a piece of the building and therefore they that teach Post Christum fundamentum est Petrus nisi per Petrum non pervenitur ad Christum Bellarm. in praefat in libros de summo Pontifice do mistake a pillar for the foundation to be a pillar in Gods house is a more glorious title then is given to any angel and carries with it a burden too heavy for any man who hath not the extraordinary assistance of the Spirit of God and therefore the Holy Ghost thinks it enough to call S. Peter a pillar leaves it for Christ alone to be the foundation James Cephas that is Peter and John who seemed to be pillars Gal. 2. 9. Cephas was a pillar and Iames and Iohn were no less pillars then Cephas or Peter and consequently their successours no less pillars then his successours but neither of them was a foundation properly so called vide Field pag. 478 479. that is too high an attribute for any man since he cannot work upon the soul by his own power and virtue to unite that immediately unto Christ for he is the onely foundation that sustains the whole building and faith and repentance are called foundations by S. Paul onely as settling and establishing us in Christ which is not possible for any man or angel to do who can work onely instrumentally towards these by instructing the understanding and exciting the will but cannot do the work of them and therefore cannot so much as reductively or instrumentally be called foundations And this is agreeable with Bonaventure's distinction in lib. 4. sent dist 22. qu. 1. Fundamentum dicitur dupliciter uno modo locus in quo aedificium stabilitur alio modo dicitur fundamentum illud secundùm quod res locatur in suo sustentaculo A thing may be called a foundation in two respects either that it self sustains the building so Christ is the onely foundation or that it causeth us to be sustained by the foundation and that is done three ways either by removing the impediments that keep us from it or by placing and settling us on it or by confirming and strengthening us in it In the first consideration Repentance is a foundation because it removes away our sins that keep us from Christ in the second consideration Faith is a foundation because it placeth fixeth our souls on Christ that is to say A faith working by love whence the Apostle saith That we are rooted and grounded in Christ through love as well as through faith Eph. 3. 17. for a faith that is without love is a faith of devils which will nor invite Christ to come to us much less to dwell with us and least of all to dwell in us The Solifidian as he will have his faith to dwell without love so he must be contented himself to dwell without Christ. And lastly in the third consideration the Word and sacraments may be called foundations because they are the means to confirm and strengthen us in Christ All these may in several respects be called Foundations for all these have an immediate influence upon the soul of man by reason of the grace which accompanies them which influence no man possibly can have and therefore no man justly can claim But all these which are called Foundations have as I said an immediate influence upon our souls to make us rise with Christ our Foundation and seek those things which are above where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God Col. 3. 1 2. for as all the material building tendeth downwards because the foundation is below so all the spiritual building tendeth upwards saith the same Seraphical Doctour because the Foundation thereof is above even on the right hand of the Majesty on high Heb. 1. 3. Wherefore we have need of a strong repentance to raise us up from earth that we may detest and forsake our own unrighteousness and we have need of a strong faith to raise us up to heaven that we may lay hold on our Saviours righteousness not onely in our confidences but also in our consciences not onely in our applications but also in our affections not onely by our persuasion but also by our imitation A thing that is easily said but not so easily done for he that will make sure of a true faith must make sure of beleeving at least in the preparation of his minde all the truths that God hath revealed as well as all the mercies that God hath promised or Christ hath purchased And he that will make sure of a true repentance must make sure of bewailing at least in the preparation of his minde and the desire of his soul all those sins which he hath committed and of so bewailing the sins he hath committed as not wilfully to commit the sins he hath bewailed he that hath made sure of this faith and of this repentance hath taken the right way to make sure of his religion to serve God not our of custom but out of conscience not of hypocrisie but out of integrity not onely in the communion of men but also in the communion of saints and this man alone can come to make sure of his salvation We take now a contrary course every man makes sure of his salvation but no man makes sure of his Religion is not Christ Jesus the same yesterday and to day and for ever as it is said Heb. 13. 8. how is it then that we are not the same Christians yesterday and to day and for ever and yet we talk of nothing more then of going to Christ whiles we do nothing less then draw neer him Had we looked after Christ in Christs own Church we should certainly have found him and had we once found him we should not so willingly have left him Had we seen Christ in the exercise of our Christian Religion we would certainly have communicated with him and had we once communicated with him we would not for the advantages or disadvantages of this world have so easily forsaken his communion It is to be feared that either we professed our Christianity as hypocrites and so were not sure of our Religion or that we are fallen from our profession as apostates and cannot make sure of our salvation I speak this out of the love of truth and their souls who are my brethren and therefore hope it will offend none that either love the truth or the brotherhood and must not be affrighted if it do
aliis scientiis whether the manner of knowing divine truths be more certain in Divinity then the manner of knowing natural truths is in other sciences he answers it is more certain and he gives these three admirable reasons for his answer 1. Quia certior est modus sciendi per inspirationem quà m per humanam rationem because the way of knowing by divine inspiration is much more certain then the way of humane ratiocination or collection since the one is subject to errour the other not and all divine truths are made known to us by inspiration as appears 2 Tim. 3. 16. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine for reproof for correction for instruction in righteousness I may not take any doctrine for an instruction in righteousness which I cannot prove was first taught by inspiration of God and if it be taught of God it may be found in the Scripture which is Gods word 2o. Certius est quod scitur testimonio Spiritûs quà m quod testimonio creaturarum That is more certain which is known by the testimony of Gods Spirit then of the creature But all that we know in Divinity is known by the testimony of Gods Spirit as saith S. Peter 2 Pet. 1. 21. For the prophesie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost in Divinity we appeal to the undoubted testimony of God the holy Ghost and can say Veni Creator whereas in all other sciences we can go no higher then the testimony of the creatures 3o. Quia certius est quod per modum gustûs quà m quod per modum visûs A man is more sure of that which he discerns by his taste then of that which he discerns onely by his sight for what he discerns by his sight he knows onely speculatively and perchance to his great discontent but what he discerns by his taste he knows also experimentally and if the thing be good not without great delight and from these premises he proceeds to this dogmatical conclusion or determination Est certitudo speculationis est certitudo experientiae vel est certitudo secundùm intellectum secundùm affectum vel quoad hominem spiritualem quoad hominem animalem Dico ergò quòd modus Theologicus est certior certitudine experientiae quoad affectum quia est per modum gustûs Psal. 118. Quà m dulcia faucibus meis eloquia tua quamvis non certior quoad speculationem intellectûs quae est per modum visûs item certior est homini spirituali quamvis incertior animali 1 Cor. 2. Animalis homo non percipit ea quae Spiritûs Dei sunt There is a certainty of speculation and there is a certainty of experience there is a certainty that proceeds from the understanding there is a certainty that proceeds from the will and affections Lastly there is a certainty of the spiritual man and there is a certainty of the natural man I answer then that the manner of knowing Theological or Divine truths is more certain then the manner of knowing any other truths if we look upon the certainty of experience which proceedeth from the will and affections because that certainty is by way of tasting Hence the Psalmist saith How sweet are thy words unto my taste yea sweeter then honey to my mouth although it be less certain if we look upon the certainty of evidence which proceedeth from the understanding because that certainty is onely by way of seeing And none of us all is so quick-sighted in spiritual as in natural things and hence it is that this certainty of divine truths which is very great in the spiritual man is little or none at all in the natural man Because the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God for they are foolishness unto him neither can he know them because they are spiritually discerned 1 Cor. 2. 14. The sum of all is this The certainty that is to be had of the Christian Religion is greater then the certainty that is to be had of other truths but it must be in a subject rightly qualified that is First in a man of holy affections who lives not after the flesh but after the Spirit else his profaneness will beguile him Secondly In a man of holy resolutions that desires not to satisfie his curiosity but his conscience not to provide for his temporal but for his spiritual interest else his hypocrisie will deceive him Thirdly in a man of holy intentions that steers not his course to heaven by the Cynosure of his own reason and much less of his own humours but is wholly guided by Gods authority for none but Gods authority ought to sway in Gods cause else his perversness will defraud him of his certainty for those men that are guilty of hypocrisie come short of it those that are guilty of profaneness go beside it those that are guilty of perversness go against it for as it is concerning Religion it self so is it also concerning the certainty that accompanies it the profane person goes beside it the hypocrite comes short of it the perverse person goes against it onely the sincere meek good man obtains it he that is sincere without hypocrisie meek without perversness good and honest without profaneness and debauchery The same seed is sown in several grounds but from some the sower hath not so much as his seed again from other he hath great increase The spiritual seed is the word of God the rule of Religion And as for this word some of it falls by the way-side that is among profane and vicious persons such as are in the high-way of perdition where it is troden under foot and the fowls of the air irregular and extravagant fancies and desires devour it some of it falls upon a Rock where it can have no root nor moisture for onely the mere out-side is earth the rest is all stone that is among hypocrites and dissemblers who hear the word with joy and for a time beleeve but in time of temptation fall away for temporary beleevers as they beleeve with the times so also they beleeve but for a time and soon fall away from their belief Lastly and some of it falls among thorns that is among perverse and refractory men for such are called briers and thorns Ezek. 2. 6. men of a wilfull Religion and therefore in truth men of no Religion since Religion depends not upon mans but upon Gods will and here the word must needs be choaked for a man that gives himself to be governed by his own will cannot possibly submit himself to Gods will or at least not for Gods sake but onely for his own sake and a Religion that is not for Gods sake is certainly not of Gods making and consequently though it may be of a great growth as we find by sad experience yet it cannot be of a long
to restitution which is an act of justice that it be either twofold or fourfold Therefore the duties themselves are onely commanded in the Gospel but the manner of their performance is not under command And this is the first distinction or difference betwixt the substance and the exercise of Religion that the substance of Religion is all immediately from God but the exercise of Religion in many things depends upon the authority of man Secondly The substance of Religion requires an infallible or a Theological certainty grounded onely upon the word of God but the exercise of Religion is contented with a moral certainty depending upon the testimony of man Which being a proposition of great extent yet of greater consequence shall accordingly be first divided and then explained I say therefore The substance of Religion that is any thing of Faith Hope or Charity requires an infallible or Theological certainty grounded onely upon the word of God Here Dubius in fide infidelis est is a sure rule he that doubts in the faith is an infidel and again Certitudo unius partis tollit probabilitatem alterius is another excellent rule The certainty of one part takes away the probability of the other As the certainty of Christs institution of both kinds in the holy Eucharist takes away the probability of receiving in one kinde after his institution the certainty of praying in faith to God the Father Son and holy Ghost takes away the probability of praying in faith to any but the blessed Trinity But the exercise of Religion is often content onely with a moral certainty nor indeed can we have any other certainty either of times places or persons but meerly moral and humane Here the rule is good Non est opus infallibili certitudine sed sufficit moralis humana quae secum patitur haesitationem suspicionem de contrario In such cases there is no need of a Theological or infallible certainty but it sufficeth that we be guided by a moral or humane certainty which allows of many doubts and suspicions to the contrary as for example that God is to be praised for the nativity of his Son is grounded upon Theological certainty for the angels sang praises to him for it S. Luke 2. But that he is to be praised for it on the twenty fifth day of December is grounded onely upon moral certainty because antiquity hath accounted that for the very day of his nativity And it is no wonder that we can have no better assurance of Christmas day since we can have no better of the Lords day which we are sure is of apostolical imitation if not of apostolical institution for we cannot be otherwise assured that we keep not the second or third or fourth day in stead of the first day of the week but onely from humane testimony and yet he that should have no better assurance of the resurrection of Christ whereon is grounded the duty of the day would scarce deserve to be thought or called a Christian. Time place and person may admit of doubts but faith hope and charity admit of none the reason is these latter are of the pure substance the former belong onely to the exercise of religion Thirdly the substance of religion is unchangeable but the exercise of Religion hath passed under a great and notorious change it was the same faith hope and charity that saved the Jew which now saveth the Christian but the way of exercising all three of them was much different in the Jewish and in the Christian churches Aquinas in his 22 ae q. 2. ar 7. determines this question affirmatively Utrum explicitè credere mysterium incarnationis Christi sit de necessitate salutis apud omnes whether explicitely to beleeve the mystery of the incarnation of Christ be necessary to salvation in regard of all men and he thus demonstratively proves his determination Illud propriè per se pertinet ad objectum fidei per quod homo beatitudinem consequitur via autem hominibus veniendi ad beatitudinem est mysterium incarnationis passionis Christi Dicitur enim Act. 4. Non est aliud nomen datum hominibus in quo oporteat nos salvos fieri ideo mysterium incarnationis Christi aliqualiter oportuit omni tempore esse creditum apud omnes That properly and of it self belongs to the object of faith by which a man obtains eternal blessedness but the way for a man to come to bliss is the mystery of the incarnation and passion of Christ for so it is said Act. 4. 12. There is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved therefore the mystery of Christs incarnation was to be beleeved in some sort at all times and of all men that were to be saved And he tells us that the Romane histories make mention of a man taken out of his grave in the time of Constantine the great with a plate of gold upon his breast wherein these words were engraven Christus nascetur ex virgine ego credo in cum O Sol sub Irene Constantini temporibus iterum me videbis Christ shall be born of a virgin and I do beleeve in him O Sun in the time of Irene and Constantine thou shalt see me again This he brings as a proof that such of the Gentiles as were saved did beleeve in Christ. The proof perchance may be questionable but the doctrine cannot be so for even Adam in his innocency had an explicite faith in the incarnation of Christ as the onely means to bring him to the consummation ofglory though happily not till after his fall he had an explicite faith in the passion and resurrection of Christ to deliver him from the guilt and punishment of his sins And if the explicite belief of the mystery of Christs incarnation be so necessary to salvation we are little beholding to those men who forbid the commemoration of that mystery and the testification of that belief but however thus we see Omnes sideles usque ab Adamo re quidem ipsâ Christianos fuisse saith Eusebius lib. 1. cap. 1. That the Christian Religion was always the same in substance though not in exercise and the same Religion both of Jew and Christian Ratione objecti formalis non ratione objecti materialis in regard of the formal though not in regard of the material object of faith the same God worshipped by them both if they were true worshippers and with the same acts of faith hope and love to beleeve in him to trust in him and to obey and serve him but yet a far different form and manner of profession of faith and exercise of worship And thus Justin Martyr cleareth the truth of the Christian Religion to Tripho the Jew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We do not think you had one God and we have another nor do we trust in any other God but yours for there is no other even the God of Abraham of
is our best policy and our best security This is to make haste in times of persecution for Religion and this he will not do who truly beleeves in Christ and because such haste commonly ends in confusion the Greek interpreters Saint Paul from them in stead of shall not make haste do thus render the words shall not be confounded Rom. 9. 33. A good Christian will make no such haste as tends onely to shame and confusion because he beleeves in Christ and therefore will patiently wait his leisure and zealously follow his example that is he will profess Gods truth maugre all the oppositions of malicious all the scorns and reproaches of ungodly and profane blasphemers for so Saint Chrysostome saith our blessed Saviour made his profession and he hath good ground for saying so as have generally all the fathers for what they say though our upstart Divines come most commonly with an Ipse dixit a proof rather of their confidence then of their doctrine such a proof as is not indurable in sound Philosophy and much less in sound Divinity for Saint Iohn had said so much before him S. Iohn 18. 37. To this end was I born and for this cause came I into the world 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not onely to be a witness to the truth but also to be a martyr for the truth This was our Saviours profession concerning himself not onely as he was personally Christ but also as he was mystically so and in that regard must needs concern every Christian who is a part of his mystical body for it was an excellent determination of the Feudarie law si in praelio Dominum non mortuum nec ad mortem vulneratum reliquit Vasallus Feudum amittit Cataneus in Feudo If the fee-farmer or copy-holder leave his lord in the battle being wounded but not dead nor having his deaths wound he is to forfeit his fee-farm or copy-hold because of his detestable unthankfulness This rule will much concern us Christians if we seriously consider it and if not it will concern us so much the more For we all hold the right of our inheritance to heaven as it were by copy from our blessed Saviour whom God hath appointed heir of all things Heb. 1. 2. This our Lord is often wounded Acts 9. 4. why persecutest why woundest thou me but cannot be wounded unto death for he is our almighty God blessed for ever Rom. 9. 5. If we run away and leave him in the battels or rather the uproars and counter-scuffles of wicked ungodly miscreants for man can have no title to a just war against his Maker and much less against his Redeemer we shall forfeit our copies and perchance may loose our inheritance Nor let us think to excuse our selves by saying we took them who grievously wounded our Lord for his friends because of their specious and godly pretenses not for his enemies for it is all one as to our sin if we leave him and shall be all one as to our punishment whether he be wounded by his enemies or by his friends for himself owneth to be wounded by his friends as well as by his enemies Zech. 13. 6. and one shall say unto him what are those wounds in thy hands nay in thine heart Lord for our profaneness hath more pierced thine heart then their nails pierced thine hands then he shall answer Those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends that is such men as pretended to be my friends saying they would advance the glory of Christ the purity of the Christian Religion for he that was wounded for our transgressions Isa. 53. 5. is still so wounded by transgressours as our transgressions do wound us some wound us as enemies that appear in their own hostile colours some as friends that carry a pretence a shew of righteousness If we leave him in his wounds we forfeit our copies and let go our interest to heaven for thar of Saint Mark 14. 50. and they all forsook him and sled was before his title to his Lordship had been fully cleared and therefore obtained pardon but now if we forsake him and slee neither will his mercy pardon us nor can our own consciences admit his pardon untill we return again for if we will needs forget him why should we think he will remember us and we may forget him not onely by letting him slip out of our memory but also by letting him slip out of our commemoration it is Ezra's observation upon the words of the Preacher Eccl. 9. 15. yet no man remembred that same poor man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not onely to remember in the minde but also to commemorate with the mouth and so it is said no man remembred that poor man because no man spake honourably of him so is it with us if we commemorate not our Saviours merits and mercies we forget them and therefore if we profess not his truth we may not be thought to remember it for we cannot but know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ that though he was rich yet for our sakes he became poor that we through his poverty might be made rich 2 Cor. 8. 9. He is that poor man who by his wisdom hath delivered the city of God and in it our souls Oh let it never be said Through our fearfulness and much less through our unthankfulness that we did not remember that poor man Secondly this profession is such as we may not be ashamed of after the way which they call heresie Here was a course taken to make Saint Paul ashamed as well as afraid for he was not onely questioned for his life to make him afraid but he was also questioned as if he had been a delinquent or malefactour to make him ashamed of his Religion he was publickly indicted at a grand Sessions as if he had been some felon or murderer and Tertullus would fain perswade his judges that he and his complices were able to prove the indictment v. 5. For we have found this man a pestilent fellow Graetè 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a meer plague or pestilence as ready to infect our souls as the plague is ready to infect our bodies a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world it was they were the movers of the sedition though the Apostle was accused for it and a ring-leader of the sect of the Nazarens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that stood in the first rank or file as ready both to maintain promote the sect We may in brief say with S. Chrysostome that they did seek to make him odious for his disaffection as well as contemptible for his Religion accordingly used all cunning artifice that they might so do therefore they said they found him as if he had been some run-away whereas he was no less then seven whole days together in the temple but their chiefest spite was against his Religion and
was builded these many years agoe we desire not to lay one stone more nor one stone less then was anciently laid onely we are not willing to mistake a false for a true Antiquity Id verum quod primum that is the truest which was the first And it was our Blessed Saviours own way of reasoning Non sic fuit ab initio It was not so from the beginning and yet it had been so for a very long time before Secondly S. Paul had the comfort of his Religion in that he worshipped the God of his Fathers for his Religion entitled him to the same God his Fathers had before him who had shewed great mercy to them and had promised to shew mercy to their children for their sakes the Jews had comfort in their Fathers when they had not in themselves Moses useth three Arguments why God should not destroy the children of Israel for their Idolatry Exod. 32. 11 12 13. The first was his former benefits lest they should seem to be lost and thrown away The second was his own glory lest that should be obscured and his Name blasphemed and neither of these two Arguments prevailed his former goodness had been too much abused his after glory might be otherwise repaired But then follows his third Argument his Promises to the Fathers and that prevails then immediately saith the Text And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people ver 14. Gods veracity is indispensable and must be indisputable And thus Jarchi glosses upon this third Argument If they have sinned against all thy Ten Commandments yet remember Abraham was upright in his Ten Temptations let Ten go for Ten nay more If thou hast purposed to burn them or kill them or banish them yet remember Abraham and Isaac and Israel thy servants thou wilt not do it Remember that Abraham at thy command exposed himself to burning when he went to Ur that is Fire in the Chaldeaens Isaac exposed himself to killing Jacob exposed himself to a long Banishment to a wearisome Pilgrimage And thus God himself comforted Hezekiah Thus saith the Lord the God of David thy Father I have heard thy prayer I have seen thy tears Is. 38. 5. So willing so ready is God to shew mercy that he will find a cause to shew it to the Children for their Fathers sake when he cannot for their own doubtless it is to teach them not to trust in their own righteousness if they be righteous nor to distrust his mercy when they have been captivated under the dominion of sin unrighteousness And thus much concerning the worship of God the first substantial part of S. Pauls Religion The second substantial part thereof still remains undiscussed and that is his Faith Concerning which we may observe two things First That it was the Catholick Faith Secondly the Proof that it was so First That his Faith was the Catholick Faith Beleeving all things A Christians Faith may be called Catholick in a two-fold respect either essentially or accidentally essentially in the substance of it when he beleeves all those Christian Truths that God hath revealed as necessary to salvation and beleeves them because of Gods Revelation for as the second Epistle of Saint Iohn is called a Catholick Epistle though writ to a private person because it is Catholick or universal in its Instructions though it be onely particular in its occasion so is the true Faith the Catholick Faith though it may be continued onely among some few true Beleevers for what hath been already may be again and this case hath been in the days of Athanasius because it is universal in its Obligation though perchance almost singular in its Profession And in this sense the Catholick Faith and the Christian Faith are both one whence Athanasius calls that the Catholick which others have called the Christian Faith although he insist most upon the true doctrine concerning the Blessed Trinity even as the Imperial Edict cited in the Code in the Title de summâ Trinitate Fide Catholicâ gives the name of Catholicks to those Christians who had a right belief concerning the holy and undivided Trinity not onely as we may suppose because the chiefest hereticks of those daies had erred in that doctrine but also because they who erred not in it could not easily erre in denying any Fundamental of the true Christian Faith And thus Aquinas very briefly and plainly tels us what is this Christian or Catholick Faith even that Faith which brings us here to the saving knowledge and will bring us hereafter to the blessed enjoyment of our Saviour Christ. Credibilia de quibus est Fides secundum se quae directè ordinant ad Vitam Aeternam Nam Fides est principaliter de his quae videnda speramus in patriâ Heb. 11. 1. Ut Incarnatio Christi Trinitas At alia sunt de quibus non est Fides secundum se sed solum in ordine ad priora sc. ad manifestationem eorum ut quòd Abraham habuerit duos silios 22 ae qu. 1. Those truths do properly and of themselves belong to the Christian Faith which do immediately and directly order and dispose the beleever to eternal life for Faith is principally of those things which we hope to see and enjoy in heaven Heb. 11. 1. such as are the Incarnation of Christ and the Mystery of the Blessed Trinity But there are other truths which do not properly and of themselves belong to the Christian-Faith but onely in order to these to wit as far as they conduce to the manifestation of them as that Abraham had two sons As for the first of these they are to be explicitly beleeved of all Christians alike As for the second it sufficeth if they be implicitly beleeved by those who have not the means of an explicit Faith concerning them so that we may thus gloss S. Pauls words Beleeving all things that are written viz. either explicitly or implicitly all things explicitly that are revealed to me and all things implicitly that are revealed in the Text For every good Christian hath a preparation of his soul to beleeve whatsoever is contained in the whole word of God and a resolution of his soul to beleeve it as soon as it shall appear to him to be so Thus again the same Angelical Doctour Nam Fidei objectum per se est per quod homo heatus es sicitur per accidens autem secundariò omnia quae in sacrâ Scripturâ Divinitus traditâ continentur 22 ae qu. 2. art 5. The object of Faith essentially in and of it self is that which brings a man to the beatifical Vision for Faith is to end in Vision as Hope in Comprehension and Charity in Fruition But the object of Faith accidentally and secondarily is whatsoever is contained in the holy Scriptures that have been delivered to us from God As for the first every Christian is bound to beleeve them by an actual and
explicit consent or perswasion and say with S. Peter S. Joh. 6. 69. We beleeve and are sure that thou art that Christ the Son of the living God We beleeve and are sure of this all alike Superiours and Inferiours but as for the second a virtual consent is sufficient which is not in the perswasion but onely in the preparation of a good Christians soul whereby he is ready to beleeve whatsoever shall appear to him to be contained in the holy Scriptures so that we may not unfitly say that S. Pauls Profession here sets one rule for a Christian man and another rule for a Christian Divine to beleeve all things in the Law and in the Prophets For though both beleeve all things yet the Christian man beleeves many things by an Implicit which the Christian Divine who hath a greater measure of knowledge is bound to beleeve by an Explicit Faith for it is without all dispute that God requires not the same degree of Faith in all alike neither extensively nor intensively but to whom much is given of him much is required Wherefore this is the Catholick Faith essentially a Faith that delivers and contains either explicitly or implicitly all that God hath revealed to man for his salvation Again The Faith may be called the Catholick Faith accidentally not in regard of the substance but in regard of the extent and diffusion of it as when we beleeve those Truths which have been beleeved at all times in all places and of all men that professed the Faith of Christ Quae ubique semper ab omnibus credita est as saith Lirinensis And in this sense Faith is but accidentally Catholick For it is but an accident of the Christian Faith that it be thus generally received or professed and therefore we finde that in several ages of the Church the Christian Faith hath not met with this reception or profession I told you of Athanasius before another will tell you that when our Saviour Christ was put to death True Faith remained onely in the Blessed Virgin Fides in solâ Virgine remansit so Picus Mirandula and long before him Bonaventure seems to have been of the same opinion who gives this reason why the Saturday was more peculiary devoted to the honour of the Blessed Virgin because that in Her alone was the Faith of the Resurrection during that Sabbath or Saturday which Christ passed in the Grave Indubitantèr credendum est quòd Virgo Maria semper in side stetit Unde discipulis non credentibus dubitantibus ipsa fuit in quâ sides Ecclesiae remanserat solida inconcussa ideo diem sabbati solennizat in honorem ejus omnis Ecclesia Bona in 3. sent Dist. 3. 13. He saith all the Disciples had lost the Faith as loath that S. Peter should go alone and that all the Church did solemnize Saturday in honour of the Virgin Mary who onely had not lost it but he means surely his own Church which he looked upon as all for it will be hard to prove that any other Christian Church ever had this belief or this practise but onely the Latine Church and that Church hath had both a long time hath accordingly instituted and appointed the Office of the Virgin Mary to be said every week on Saturday as the Office of the Trinity on Sunday of the Angels on Munday of salus Populi on Tuesday of the Holy Ghost on Wednesday of the Venerable Sacrament on Thursday and of the Holy Cross on Friday Missae votivae sive commune in missali secundum usum sacrum And the Rubrick gives this for the reason of that Institution Quia Domino crucifixo mortuo Discipulis fugientibus de Resurrectione desperantibus in illâ solâ tota fides remansit Because while the Lord Christ lay dead and buried the Disciples being all fled and despairing of the Resurrection his Virgin Mother alone retained entirely the Christian Faith It is not my purpose to examine the truth of this relation nor the use that hath been made of it I onely ask the Question was not the Catholick Faith the same then when it had so few Professours as it was afterwards when all the Disciples professed it and by their Preaching caused the whole world to profess it If it were not the same Faith then was the Blessed Virgin saved by one Faith and we by another plainly against the Text one Lord one Faith Eph. 4. 5. We must therefore say it was the same Faith then which is now the very same Catholick Faith but essentially in the substance or perswasion of it not accidentally in the extent or profession of it the same essentially for it beleeved all things in the Law and the Prophets though not the same accidentally for there was not the same profession of that belief For it is the same spirit of Faith whereby one beleeves and whereby many beleeve as plainly S. Paul declareth We having the same spirit of faith as it is written I beleeved and therefore have I spoken We also beleeve and therefore speak 2 Cor. 4. 13. Take I in the singular or We in the plural 't is the same spirit of faith in many and in few beleevers We also beleeve and therefore speak There is no speaking no praying without this Faith and there can be no wilfull neglecting either Time or Means or house of prayer with it If we beleeve we will speak If we will not speak it is because we do not beleeve God takes it for an honour to be trusted he that trusts him most honours him most For he most beleeves both his All-sufficiency and his All-efficiency In thee O Lord do I put my trust deliver me in thy Righteousness Psal. 71. 1 2. O happy man who can pray to be delivered in Gods Righteousness when he cannot in his own for surely God will always be righteous though men seldome be so if we make him our trust he will not fail nor deceive his trust therefore he that trusteth most honoureth most because he beleeveth most and he that beleeveth most prayeth most for as he that beleeveth speaketh in his heart the assent being nothing else but the internal word of the minde so he that speaketh in his heart speaketh also with his tongue the expression of the mouth being nothing else but the external word of the heart by the internal word a man speaketh so as to hear and understand himself by the external word he speaketh so as that others may hear and understand him For with the heart man beleeveth unto righteousness and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation Rom. 10. 10. Are you for the belief and why should you not also be for the confession Are you afraid to lose the righteousness of God for want of Faith and why should you not be afraid to lose the salvation of God for want of the Confession If we did look upon the profession of Religion as an act of Faith as we ought
dominion Both these grand factions from several principles inferring one and the same conclusion because both by their additions deprave the truth of the Text so that if we will needs allow that our glosses may be additions to the rule we must of necessity overthrow the rule and by not allowing Religion to be all-together at once we shall come to make it none at all It is not to be denied but Religion hath had and may have additions in regard of men but not in regard of it self Si de prophetia loquamur in quantum ordinaturadfidem Deitatis sic quidem crevit secundùm tres temporum distinctiones scil ante Legem sub Lege sub Gratia non autem quatenus per eam humanum genus in suis operibus dirigitur saith Aquinas 22 ae qu. 174. art 6. Prophesie may be said to have received increase as to Articles of Faith towards God for he hath revealed himself more fully under the Gospel then under the Law and more fully under the Law then before it but not as to duties of life either towards God or towards man The Christian knows and beleevs more then the Jew because Christ is more fully revealed unto him then to the Jew but yet Christ is still the same to both The same yesterday and to day and for ever Heb. 13. 8. The same before the Law yesterday Under the Law to day and under the Gospel for ever One Christian may know and beleeve more then another nay more then himself for as he increaseth in years so also in knowledge and faith yet the truth of the Christian Religion is but one and the same at all times onely more fully understood at one time then at another for which reason God requires a preparation of minde in every true beleever to be ready to beleeve more when it shall be revealed to him to be Gods truth and to do more when it shall appear to him to be for Gods glory The first part of this position concludes it impossible that there should be any certain catalogue of the fundamentals of Faith not onely for all men but also for one and the same man at all times because that may be revealed to one which is not to another nay to one man at this time which was not at that time The second part of this position concludes it necessary that the Evangelical Counsels should sometimes become a piece of the Law namely If the case be put that a man can in any of those particulars of Voluntary poverty Obedience or Chastity shew or exercise more fully and sincerely his love of God and therefore saith S. Hieroms gloss upon S. Matth. 19. 20. All these things have I kept from my youth up Mentitur adolescens The young man lies for if he had indeed kept this Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self he would not have been grieved for being commanded to sell all and give it to the poor no more then he was grieved for keeping all unto himself And Origen tells us it was written in some other Gospel that he had met withall in Hebrew but sure not of sufficient authority to discountenance the Greek for Aquinas that tells us this storie saith Si placeat alicui suscipere illud If any man please to receive it That when the young man began to scratch his head at this saying the Lord replied unto him How doest thou say thou hast kept the Law which requireth to love thy neighbour as thy self and behold many of thy brethren the children of Abraham are ready to die for hunger upon the dung-hill whiles not onely thy bodie but also thy house is full even to superfluitie Aquin. 22 ae qu. 189. art 1. resp ad 1. We must therefore say with Gulielmus de sancto Amore in libro de periculis Ecclesiae Paupertatem praecipit non actualem sed habitualem scil si gloria Christi id postulârit ut cùm ait Luc. 14. 26. Si quis venit ad me non odit patrem non potest esse meus discipulus non praecipit parentes contemnere sed tantùm si Christo se opponant That this is not a counsel but a command whereby our blessed Saviour commandeth though not actual yet habitual povertie though not a real yet a ready forsaking of all if the glory of Christ should so require as when he saith S. Luk. 14. 26. If any man come to me and hateth not his father he cannot be my disciple the command is but conditional to wit If his father oppose his Saviour there he must go from the one to come and cleave to the other And so Aquinas himself states this question saying Nullus est actus perfectionis sub consilio cadens qui in aliquo eventu non cadat sub praecepto quasi de necessitate salutis existens 22â—e qu. 124. art 3. ad 1. There is no act of perfection under an Evangelical Counsel but may in some case fall under a precept as being necessary to that mans salvation And in this particular case of voluntary poverty he saith thus Abrenunciatio propriarum facultatum in actu est quoddam perfectionis instrumentum sed secundùm praeparationem animi pertinet directè ad perfectionem 22 ae qu. 185. ad 2. For a man to renounce his property actually that he may betake himself wholly to meditation and prayer doth conduce instrumentally to perfection but for him to renounce it potentially in the preparation of his minde doth appertain directly to perfection that is to the perfection of Christianitie and so in effect he saith thus much He that will not part with his estate when Christ calls for it is far from shewing himself a good Christian. How little this precept is now observed by those who see their poor brethren readie to starve for Christ both at home and in forein countreys and yet neither lay their miseries to heart nor lay their hands to their relief Christ doth now see and will hereafter judge when he will not onely say Depart ye cursed to those that made them hungry thirsty and naked but also to those that let them continue so St. Mat. 25. 41 42. and good reason for such men forget their brother Ioseph in the pit sitting down to eat and drink while he is ready to perish they forget themselves and renounce their own bowels they forget their God and renounce his commandments not onely as enforced by right of dominion for being Lord of all he might call for all without shewing any other cause for it but also as being enforced by the light of reason for it is observable that Saint Paul useth more arguments to stir up the Corinthians to a liberal contribution for the poor Saints at Jerusalem then he useth to the stirring them up to any other Christian duty whatsoever for he hath concerning this duty almost two whole chapters together 2 Cor. 8 and 9 chap. and almost as many arguments as verses in those
with us so that the best way to serve him cordially is to serve him with eye-service considering that he always looks upon us and therefore we ought always to act as in his presence Excellently the Casuist Reiginaldus Adjumenta operandi bonum in ordine ad nosipsos sunt consider are Christum ut mandantem spectantem adjuvantem The main helps that encourage any man in regard of himself to do that which is good is the consideration of Christs presence as if he were actually standing by him to command to observe and to assist him that he commands me to obey observes me in my obedience and assists me in obeying whosoever truly hath this consideration of Christ cannot but have his heart full of true Christianity and he that hath his heart full cannot have his mouth or his hand empty for out of the aboundance of the heart not onely the mouth speaketh but also the hand acteth and worketh But Gods Infinitie though it most appear to us in his Omnipresence yet is it the immediate property of his essence which being a pure act or form admits of no materiality to limit and to confine it and so also are the duties of Religion in some sort infinite in their very essence for nothing is proportionable to God but what is infinite and like himself and therefore it is said Be ye perfect even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect St. Mat. 5. 48. God justly requires a perfection of degrees in all duties of Religion though he graciously accepts a perfection of parts it is well for us that the truth and sincerity not the measure and degree of our faith or repentance puts us in the state of salvation for else we should not onely be always doubtfull of that state but also very often come short of it and yet in truth our faith and repentance and obedience is infinite as it is in Gods acceptance though not as it is in our performance for though it be performed in much unrighteousness yet it is accepted in an infinite righteousness even the righteousness of the eternal Son of God 3. Communicatione essentiae Thirdly and lastly God may be said to be infinite in the communication of his essence which he hath communicated in an infinite variety to infinite sorts of creatures which all have their being onely from him So also Religion is infinite in this respect that it can never be enough communicated he that is truly converted himself will make it his whole work to strengthen his brethren according to that advice of our blessed Saviour St. Luke 22. 32. which having been given to St. Peter in his own person cannot but more peculiarly belong to all his successours then many things else that are more zealously claimed by most of them and how then may the Scriptures be denied to the people in a tongue they know or prayers be obtruded to them in a tongue they know not since the Scripture communicates Religion from God to man and prayer expresseth the desire of that heavenly communion Wherefore that of the Trent Council Sess. 22. cap. 8. Nè tamen oves Christi esuriant pastores frequenter aliquid in missâ exponant c. Least the flock of Christ should be hunger-starved the priâ—st ought often to expound the missal is in effect a tacit Confession that though Religion ought to be effectually communicated to the people to feed their souls unto the full yet they are resolved it must not be so but that they shall still wholly depend upon the priests for a little broken bread whereas all that know good to be naturally diffusive of it self most willingly acknowledge that Religion the greatest good of this world and the onely practise of the next the more it hath of goodness the more it ought to have likewise of the diffusion The third incommunicable property of God is his Immutability for as God changeth not in his essence I AM hath sent me unto you Exo. 3. 14. so he changeth not in his government or dominion of souls I am the Lord I change not Mal. 3. 6. he changeth not as our Lord and we cannot pretend to change as his servants for Religion hath also its share in this Immutability in which sense I perswade my self Iustin Martyr called Abraham a Christian and Socrates too though a heathen yet observing some of that righteousness all which we Christians do or should observe and he proves that the Christian Religion is that whereby God was then and is now truly worshipped and glorified what the heathen had of idols they had of Paganisme what of moral duties or of reasonable service they had of Christianity for there is no reason why the martyrs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may not agree with the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 12. 1. So likewise the Iews and the Christians have the same Religion in substance though not in ceremonies or circumstance or the old Testament could not be brought so appositely to prove the doctrines of the New or Moses have been said to bear the reproach of Christ Heb. 11. 26. and so likewise all Christians have one and the same Religion though they have many different professions the Christian Religion being altogether unchangeable one and the same in all places and at all times and what is otherwise will be found either to be superstition or faction or matter of order but in no case matter of Religion it being impossible that what is truly Christian in one place or time should be made either Antichristian or Unchristian in another And this property of Immutability Religion partakes in a higher degree then the sublimest spirit in the highest order of Angels for they are all changeable by a power without them though not by a power within them but Religion is not so God himself cannot make another Religion or service of himself then that which he hath already made I mean as to the substantial and internal nature of holiness consisting in the immediate duties of Religion Aliquid dicitur mutabile dupliciter uno modo per potentiam quae in ipso est altero modo per potentiam quae est in altero Aquin. par 1. qu. 9. what is absolutely unchangeable cannot be changed by any power either within or without it self so is God so is the service of God Religion which God cannot change no more then he can change himself that is no more then he can change his truth that taught it his justice that prescribed it his excellent majesty that still requireth it his infinite mercy that still accepteth it for it was Gods own Spirit that spake those words by the mouth of Gamaliel Acts 5. 38 39. If this counsel or this work be of men it will come to nought but if it be of God ye cannot overthrow it and upon serious examination we shall finde it most true in our Christian Religion what hath been either in the doctrine or practise thereof meerly the counsel
and in the hand as Truth is opposed to Dissimulation or Hypocrisie Thirdly in its certainty or perseverance And of thy great mercy keep us in the same as Truth is opposed to uncertainty or to levity and inconstancy Religion then hath and must have a two-fold truth the first consists in a right apprehension whereby we believe the thing as it is the second in a right affection profession and action whereby we love and profess and do the thing as we beleeve and there cannot be a more religious prayer invented by the wit of Piety nor a more affectionate prayer practised by the zeal of Charity then that which is so remarkable both for its Piety and for its Charity in our own Church Collect 3. Sunday after Easter Almlghty God which shewest to all men that be in errour the light of thy Truth to the intent that they may return into the way of Righteousness there 's its piety towards God rightly descanting upon Gods intent in shewing the light of his truth to make men righteous not to make them inexcusable These things I say that ye might be saved S. Joh. 5. 34. not onely convinced saith our blessed Saviour and yet he spake to those who had not the love of God v. 42. Grant unto all them that be admitted into the fellowship of Christ Religion that they may eschew those things that be contrary to their profession and follow all such things as be agreeable to the same there 's its charity towards men affectionately desiring that as they have a Christian Communion so they may also have a Christian conversation lest their unchristian conversation destroy and disanull their Christian Communion which without doubt it hath done already in many ages of the Church and will do still to the worlds end unless God in his mercy fill our hearts more and more with this true piety towards himself and with this true charity one towards another And for this cause the Commandments are in the judgement of some Divines accounted practical Articles of the Christian Faith because if these be left out in our conversation what is true in it self of our Creed is as it were false to us since either our profession gives the lye to our apprehension and affection or our action to our profession for this is the difference betwixt speculative and practical truths speculativè practicè credibilia those things that we must believe speculatively and those that we must believe practically the first which are summed up in the Creed are truly believed if there be a conformity of the thing with the Understanding but the second which are summed up in the Decalogue are then onely truly believed when there is a conformity of the affection and of the profession and of the action with the belief thus they that worship Images do expunge the second and they that resist Magistrates do expunge the fifth Commandment if not out of their books yet at least out of their Faith in their Books they may be true believers but in their Lives they are in these particulars little less then Infidels Now see in what a miserable condition is the irreligious miscreant who so beleeves as to make void his own faith and so receives the truth as to make the truth it self a lie to him either for want of a sanctified affection in not loving it or for want of a sanctified action in not practising it and hence we may likewise see and must confess that not he who knows most of the doctrine of Faith is the best Beleever but he that most loves what he knows in speculatives and he that most practises what he knows in practicks so that a great Scholar may fully know the truth and yet to him it may be as a lye because he loves it not for to him it is what he desires it should be contrariwise an ignorant peasant may not fully know the truth and yet to him it may be the saving truth because he loves it for what is wanting in his head is made up by his heart O my soul glory not in the knowledge of Christ but in the love of that knowledge glory not in thy learning if thou art Mistress of any but in thy Religion to which thou oughtest to be a servant learning may make a man wise to ostentation but 't is onely Religion can make him wise to salvation Do not then with Pilate ask thy Saviour what is truth and then go away without his answer much less mayest thou turn to those Jews that help to crucifie him for if thou know these things happy art thou not because thou knowest them but if thou do them thy happiness consists not in knowing Christ but in practising him nor is it possible for a man to be long defective in his practise and not to be defective also in his knowledge since what is sinfull in the deliberate action is sinfull in the will and what is sinfull in the will is erroneous in the judgement or understanding and this is the reason that a man may be a heretick not onely in credendis but also in agendis not onely in Articles of Faith but also in Duties of Life nay indeed he cannot easily be a heretick in the Duties of Life and still remain truly Orthodox in the Articles of Faith as for example he that prays to a Saint or Angel in stead of God directly overthrows the first Commandment but indirectly also the first Article of his Creed I believe in one God for Prayer is a Sacrifice that may be offered onely unto God again he that wilfully dishonours his Governours whom God hath set over him directly overthrows the fifth Commandment but indirectly also the ninth Article of his Creed I beleeve the Holy Catholick Church the Communion of Saints for being a Lover of division he is not a true beleever of that Communion and this we may take for a general doctrine fitter to be received then opposed First that any practical errour which is against our duty towards God doth tend to a speculative errour against some part of the Creed which concerneth God as he that doth not honour God as God doth in effect deny him to be maker of heaven and earth therefore saith the Psalmist O come let us worship and fall down and kneel before the Lord our maker as if we could not truly beleeve him to be our maker if we will not worship him with all possible reverence and fear Secondly that any practical errour which is against our duty towards our neighbour doth tend against some Article of the Creed that hath relation to men as he that will not be subject to the authority of his lawfull governours Civil or Ecclesiastical doth in effect deny The Catholick Church and the Communion of Saints Thirdly and lastly that any practical errour against the duty which a man oweth unto himself doth tend against some Article of Faith that concerns himself as he that is a common
countenance any in sin and in impenitency and yet even this severe Bishop in his greatest strictness for Church discipline though he would not allow the Martyrs and Confessours to be too importunate for the over speedy reconciliation of notorious offenders in which he had also the approbation of the Clergy of Rome yet if an offender had been overhastily reconciled he would not by any means make void that act of mercy thus we read that when the Bishop Therapius had given the peace of the Church to Victor the Presbyter for the Bishops were in those dayes the governours in chief if not in whole of the Ecclesiastical Communion before he had made publick satisfaction for his offence though S. Cyprian and his collegues were much troubled that he had so hastily received him into the Communion of the Church nullâ infirmitate urgente when as no dangerous sickness of his had called for a dispensation of the Canon yet they would not revoke that act of grace that had been done by Therapius but let Victor still enjoy the benefit of it thereby shewing that the true Religion though it stand much upon the exactness of Justice yet is much more delighted in the exercise of Mercy the words of S. Cyprian and his fellow Collegues met together in a Synod meerly about Church-discipline are very remarkable Sed librato apud nos diu consilio satis fuit objurgare Therapium collegam nostrum quod temerè hoc fecerit instruxisse ne quid tale de caetero faciat pacem tamen quomodocunque a sacerdote Dei semel datam non putavimus au-ferendam Cyp. Ep. 59. cum Pam. after we had taken long and full advice about this business we thought it enough to reprove Therapius our Collegue that he had done this rashly and require him to do so no more but the peace which had been given by a Priest intrusted of God to give it though given after never so ill a manner we did not think fit to take away again and therefore declare that Victor shall still enjoy the communion of the Church But what do I speak of Mercy above Justice in the true Religion when she would not call for Justice at all were it not that she might shew Mercy for thus she proceeds to deliver a sinner to Satan that she may keep him from hell as faith the Apostle 1 Cor. 5. 5. to deliver such a one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus true Religion would not exercise that Justice which is for the destruction of the flesh were it not to make way for that Mercy which is for the salvation of the spirit therein resembling God himself who thrusts men away from him meerly out of the necessity of Justice but embraceth and receiveth them from his incessant desire and delight of shewing mercy CHAP. VIII The assurance we have of Religion in that it maketh us reverence and fear God ascribing the honour due unto his Name and of the ten proper Names of God collected by S. Hierome HE that is willing to expostulate with God can never be unwilling to offend him for it is impossible that man should ever be dashed out of countenance by the consideration of any sin who is resolved to justifie and maintain all his sins such a man is more fit for the School of the Peripateticks then for the School of the Prophets because he is made rather for disputation then for devotion and truly this is the chiefest reason that we can alledge for the continuance of all those grand miscarriages that are in the practise of Religion whether by way of superstition or of profaneness that men wedded to their own corrupt practises are in a manner resolved to expostulate with God rather then to comply with him 't is such a Clergy humour as this which the Prophet Malachi complaineth of Mal. 1. 6. saying unto you O Priests that despise my Name and ye say wherein have we despised thy Name they would needs be disputing when they should have been repenting for all this while they did neither honour God as a Father not fear him as a Master for so saith the Text a son honoureth his father and a servant his master if then I be a father where is mine honour if I be a master where is my fear saith the Lord of hosts unto you O Priests that despise my Name It is a foul shame for any to despise Gods Name but most especially for those who are most bound to glorifie it that is for his Priests who are peculiarly consecrated to serve God and therefore ought to be more particularly devoted to his service no man may securely contemn Religion but he least who is entrusted to teach it for what he is entrusted to teach he is much more commanded to practise and truly this is the proper work of Religion which the Prophet here cals for to glorifie the Name of God that is to honour God as a Father and to fear him as a Master for without this honour and this fear we cannot take God for God but it is the work of Religion to make man take God for God and how can that be but by acknowledging and professing his Verity Omnipotency Goodness and Excellency so that the work of Religion most especially consists in Faith Hope Charity and Reverence or holy Fear for by Faith we acknowledge Gods eternal truth or Verity by Hope his Omnipotency by Love his allsufficient Goodness and by Fear or reverence his Soveraign Majesty or supertranscendent excellency Thus he that beleeveth in God acknowledgeth God to be God because he acknowledgeth him to be the first Truth or chiefest Verity he that hopeth in God acknowledgeth God to be God because he relyeth on his Omnipotency he that loveth God with all his might acknowledgeth God to be God because he taketh him for the chiefest good being wholly satisfied with his allsufficiency and lastly he that feareth God with all his might acknowledgeth God to be God because he taketh him for the Soveraign Majesty or for the greatest excellency wherefore God is truly to be honoured as a Father by Faith Hope and Charity and to be honoured as a Master by Fear and Reverence and the true Religion reacheth us to honour God both as a Father and as a Master as a Father by beleeving in him for shall not a Son beleeve his Father though all others beleeve him no further then for his honesty yet his own Son is bound to beleeve him also for his authority again to honour him as a Father by hoping and expecting a blessing from him and more particularly our inheritance for as faith looks to the promise so hope looks to the thing promised and we can never look upon God too much and much less can we look for too much from him For if we being evil know how to give good gifts to our children how much more
but also the life S. John 14. 6. And so also are his words S. Iohn 6. 63. The words that I speak unto you they are spirit and they are life no parting Christs words from Spirit nor Spirit from life and again verse 68. Thou hast the words of eternal life Let nothing go for Christs word which is not spirit and life and so spirit as to give life wherefore if you see a Religion a fraught with beads pictures crucifixes and such outward ordinances be afraid of it for these and the like are mens carnal inventions meer carnal images this is not Religion but superstition Again if you see a Religion fraught with envy malice hatred uncharitableness spiritual pride perversness profaneness licentiousness disobedience novelty singularity be afraid of it for these and such like are mens carnal practises carnal imaginations this is not Religion but faction such as the Apostle casteth down 2 Cor. 10. 5. And the prophet seems to prophesie against Ier. 43. 13. For what are the images of the house of the sun amongst us but the humorous imaginations of those that abuse the light of the Gospel And this trial or proof of the true Religion is substantial it concerns the very nature and essence of it even as to be a spirit is the very nature and substance of God there are other proofs that are also essential proofs of the true Religion though they be not taken from the substance of God but from his properties and so that is the truest Religion whose properties come nearest to the properties of God I will give you a short scheme of both together that seeing God himself in your Religion you may love it with all your soul with all your minde and with all your strength because so you are bound to love your God God cannot be known any further in his substance then that he is a Spirit and so accordingly is the substance of the true Religion wholly spiritual But the greatest knowledge we have of God the onely eternal Spirit is by his properties and by his attributes his properties are internal perfections belonging to him as a Spirit meerly in regard of himself as Simplicity Immutability and the like his attributes are as it were external perfections belonging to him in regard of his creatures as he is the God of the spirits of all flesh as Mercy Justice Liberality and the like or if you desire not to distinguish between Gods properties and his attributes you may say that the properties of God are either such as remove from him all kinde of imperfection that is in the creature as Simplicity which removes from him composition Immutability which removes from him Changeableness Immensity and eternity which remove from him Circumscription or Confinement the one of place the other of time and these are called incommunicable properties because they are not communicable to any creature Or the properties of God are such as do assign to God all manner of perfection First in his understanding as Wisdome and Truth Secondly In his will as Goodness and Liberty Thirdly In his power of action as Omnipotency and these are called communicable properties because they are communicated to the creature and are to be found in the creature though in a proportion and perfection infinitely short of what is in the Creatour God blessed for ever Thus angels and men have Truth and Goodness and Power though not an Unerring truth not an All-sufficient goodness not an Almighty power but they have not Simplicity Infinity Immutability Eternity which are the incommunicable properties And herein consists the supereminencie of the true Religion above any creature whatsoever that it shareth even in these incommunicable properties of God even in his Simplicity Infinity Immutability Eternity And first it shares in his Simplicity now the Simplicity of the divine essence is such that it admits of no composition at all neither Physical composition of matter and form nor Logical of subject and accident nor Metaphysical of act and power whereas the purest spirits that are admit of Logical and Metaphysical composition though not of Physical God onely excepted who admits of neither So Aquinas pr. part qu. 40. Propter divinam Simplicitatem est duplex identitas in divinis eorum quae in rebus creatis differunt quia enim illa excludit compositionem subjecti accidentis quicquid attribuitur Deo est ejus essentia quia autem excludit compositionem formae materiae in divinis idem est abstractum concretum Because of the simplicity of the divine essence there is a twofold identity in God which is not in any creature First an identity of essence and attributes because there is in him no composition of substance and accident Secondly an identity of abstract and concrete because there is in him no composition of form and matter and all action proceeding from form it is evident that he who is the agent in and of himself can be nothing else but a pure form without any mixture of any matter Nam quod est primò per se agens patet quòd sit primò per se forma 1 par qu. 3. art 2. So likewise Religion admits of no compositiou but must still remain in its own Simplicity for 1. There is in Religion no Physical composition of matter and form some will make Decency the accidental form of Religion others the Evangelical counsels the essential form and perfection of it but both are mistaken for the same holiness is the Religion of the Christian that was of the Jew though not the same beauty of holiness There is no separating the essential matter of Religion from the essential form of it and what is not intrinsecally holy that is both materially and formally cannot properly be said to be a substantial part of Religion Some look upon faith hope and charity as the formal part upon the other duties of the Decalogue as the material part of Religion but indeed such considerations are meerly notional they are not real for no man can reject an article of faith but he must also reject a commandment nor can any man wrong any commandment but he must also wrong an article of faith thus can you not expunge or deprave any commandment that contains your duty towards God but you must expunge or deprave some article of faith concerning him so also of the second table he that depraves any one of those commandments depraves those articles of faith that concern the Catholick Church and the Communion of Saints Lastly he that denies or depraves that part of Gods law which concerns himself without any relation to his neighbour doth also deny or deprave some of those articles of faith that concern himself as The forgiveness of sins the resurrection of the body and the life everlasting As for example you cannot think that any common drunkard or unclean person doth so much as seriously consider much less truly believe the Resurrection of his body
which he doth continually defile with with his intemperances and uncleanness And this truth being granted which is not to be denied and scarce to be disputed it must needs follow that 't is impossible there should be an absolute infallibility of Faith in any man till there be in him an absolute impeccabilitie of life for from the corruption in manners will proceed the corruption in doctrine and from corruption in doctrine corruption in manners so that the doctrine cannot be the form and the duty the matter of Religion since the false doctrine corrupts the duty and the defective duty corrupts or depraves the doctrine and we must allow the substance of Religion to be altogether incorruptible and because there can be in it no corruption 't is evident there is in it no Physical composition Secondly There is in Religion no Logical composition ex subjecto accidente for no part of it but is substantial and essential Faith can no more save without good works then good works can be without faith It seems the man had faith who came running to kneel to our blessed Saviour and to ask him What he should do to inherit eternal life sure a better faith then any of our Solifidians have who neither run nor kneel nor ask yet our Saviours answer is Thou knowest the commandments S. Mark 10. He saith not Thou knowest the faith in Christ and yet without doubt he included it but so it is Christ himself teaching us to go to heaven by obedience doth plainly shew there can be no true faith without it and Bona opera sunt perniciosa ad salutem is a most pernicious blasphemous doctrine though Amsdortius broach'd it out of zeal to the doctrine of Justification by faith in Christ and out of opposition to the merit of condignity in good works for 't is not the right way to build up faith by pulling down obedience since the Apostle himself telleth us that the truth of the Gospel was made known to all nations for the obedience of faith Rom. 16. 26. and 't is evident that faith it self is an act of obedience and a duty enjoyned in the first commandment so that we cannot take away faith from obedience but we must take away obedience from the first and great commandment that most requires it which will not be so much as good Judaisme and therefore sure cannot be good Christianity for the Jews did of purpose in their doctrine as it were entangle the commandments one with another to shew that one could not be violated alone and that our obedience was alike due to all therefore did they teach that the preface I am the Lord thy God was directly on the other side answered by the sixth commandment Thou shalt do no murder for he that kills a man destroys the image of God The first commandment it self Thou shalt have no other gods but me was directly answered by the seventh Thou shalt not commit adultery for idolatrie is a spiritual fornication The third for it seems they looked on the second as included in the first Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord thy God in vain was answered by the eighth Thou shalt not steal for he that will be a thief will not stick to forswear himself The fourth Remember that thou keep holy the sabbath day was answered by the ninth Thou shalt not bear false witness for he that will not keep the sabbath doth bear false witness of God that he did not rest on the seventh day The fifth Honour thy father and thy mother was answered and as it were seconded by the tenth Thou shalt not covet for he that gives the reins to his concupiscence shall beget a son that shall dishonour and disobey him Salomom Iarchi in Cantic cap. 4. v. 5. Thus did they make one commandment not onely as a second to vindicate and avenge but also as a principle champion to fortifie and strengthen another that we should pay the readier obedience to them all for they did not this to confound our dutie towards God and our duty towards our neighbour but to shew that though these several duties might be distinguished yet they might not be divided nor separated for that no one commandment of the Moral Law was accidental but all alike substantial in that obedience which God doth now require and will hereafter reward so that there is no composition of Subject and Accident in Religion Thirdly and lastly There is in Religion no Metaphysical composition ex actu potentia of act and power for though this Metaphysical composition is in the Angels yet 't is not in Religion 'T is in the Angels for they have not all their essence and perfection together but as it were successively some after other so that in this respect Religion hath a prerogative above the Angels and therefore may not stoop down so low as to worship them for that hath its whole perfection altogether the Old the New Testament differing onely in modo not in re for the same Faith Hope and Charity saved Abraham that still saveth us and hence it is evident that all is either superstition of faction which cannot consist and be maintained without addition to the text the onely rule of Religion though it pretend not to be addition but onely exposition or declaration As for example When Christ hath said Drink ye all of this that the Laity or Clergy not administring are not bound to drink of it may pretend to be a declaration of the Church Ecclesia declarat nullo divino praecepto Laicos aut Clericos non conficientes ad bibendum obligari Concil Trid. Sess. 21. cap. 1. but it is indeed a depravation of the truth by way of addition Again when God hath said Thou sh'alt not worship any graven image for any man to say Thou shalt not worship the graven image of Venus or Bacchus or Jupiter but thou mayst worship the image of Christ and of the saints seems to be a declaration but is indeed a down right depravation by way of addition and yet this is the fleight whereby Baronius endeavours to elude the second commandment and why may not we as well say Thou shalt not kill that is Thou shalt not kill a Romane Catholick but thou mayst kill an heretick Thou shalt not steal that is Thou shalt not assault or invade the property of a brother one of the godly party but thou mayst of one that is a malignant or a reprobate and yet not be guilty of stealing In a word to instance in the fifth commandment which hath been alike trampled upon by the two grand factions of Christendome Honour thy father and thy mother saith God that is If he be not an heretick saith the one side for then he may be excommunicated deposed and killed If he be not a reprobate saith the other side for then he may be dishonoured and disobeyed and destroyed for having no share in grace he hath no right to