faith is in the diuells for they belieue and tremble as Iames teacheth And therefore those Atheists Quâ—â—â—on credunt peâ—â—res sunt those prophane and obstinate scoffers against religion which will not belieue the scriptures nor acknowledge the truth of the things therein reuealed quam daemonts ad huc nec de mones imitartur August an episi Ioh. tract O. See postscript Sect 12. are worse then the diuels And if they be worse then diuells of hell they must needes be farre from entring into heauen The other kind of common faith is termed a temporary faith which is a certaine ape of iustifying faith yet is not the same for although it goe some degrees beyond an historicall faith yet it comes short of a iustifying faith not onely in regard of sinceritie and manner of apprehension but also in regard of the efficacie in internall and externall actes and in regard of the time of continuance This is called a temporary faith not onely for distinction sake to put a difference betwixt it and other kinds but also because it continueth but for a time as appeareth by this place For this is the faith here spoken of And although some Papists laugh at the very name which we giue it as if it were a new coyned tearme yet you see it is grounded on this text And they might also haue seene it taught by others if either they had read the writings of the ancient August de verarelig cap. 50. Bernard parâ— sâ—rm ser 1. fine epist 42. ad Henr. Senon archiepâ—â—cop to 2. col 63. or their malice against vs had not blinded their eyes Augustine giues the tytle and Bernard doth not onely giue it the like tytle in calling it sides sicla and comparing it to earthen vessells that are easily broken but likewise distinguisheth if froÌ„ the dead faith which is without good workes and from the tryed faith which endureth to the end And also describeth it at large by the very words of this my text This faith was in these Iewes who by the sight of Christs miracles at Ierusalem beleeued in him Ioh. 2.23.24 They are said to beleeue in his name and so doubt were perswaded non curabat corum vâ—rbaâ—â—â—c mouthatur corum â—pphâ—â—â—â—â—◠〈…〉 for 〈◊〉 mâ—xâ—sâ—igâ—â—â—â— coâ—â—oâ—â—ebat Sâ—â—â— did acknowledge that he was the Messiah to come yet Iesus did commit himselfe vnto them because he know them all and what was in them If he had seene a sound and permanent faith in them no doubt he would haue trusted them but because he saw their faith was neither sound nor constant he would not trust them he foresaw that for all their present proâ—ession they might forsake him afterward as the Capernaites did The faith also was in Simon Magus but quod non adhererent sibi constanter nec crat cor corum rectum cuÌ„ eo Ferus in Ioh. 2. Act. 8.13 Act. 21.23 who though before he had bene a notorious sorcerer yet hearing Philip preach did beleeue and was baptized and continued with Philip as a professour of the Gospell and wondered when he saw the great miracles which were wrought yet when he would afterward haue bought the gifts of the holy Ghost for money and haue made a marchandise of them Peter told him that he had neither part nor fellowship in that busines that his heart was not right in the sight of God that he was in the gall of bitternes and in the bond of iniquitie â—piphan cont hares lib. 〈◊〉 to 2. hares 21. Euseb hist â— 14. Niceph. 2.36 And after that if we may giue credit to humane writings and Ecclesiasticall hystories hee became a sorcerer againe and an open enemie to Peter and the rest of the Apostles and in a fearefull manner died at Rome This faith was in Iudas one of the twelue he vnderstood the misterie of the Gospell professed himselfe an Apostle of Christ preached the Gospell as well as other Apostles and for a long time was of honest behauiour yet Christ called him a diuell Ioh. 6.70 Ioh. 17.12 and the childe of perdition Afterward he betrayed his Maister for money and then hanged himselfe through desperation This faith was also in those who fell into the vnrecouerable sinne against the holy Ghost for they were enlightened had a taste of the heauenly gift were partakers of the holy Ghost Heb. 6.4.5 and tasted of the good word of God and of the powers of the world to come And yet they so sel away as they could not be renewed by repentance did crucifie againe the senne of God and made a mocke of him And this faith haue many others who heare the word acknowledge the truth of it hope to be saued by it make profession of it liue in outward obedience and receiue the Sacraments and yet in time of persecution proue Apostataes But that you may the better discerne the nature of this faith I will note the seuerall degrees of it for thereby you may clearely see how faire it doth agree with an historicall a iustifying faith and how faire it doth differ from them both There be sixe degrees of it 1. The first degree is illumination and knowledge These beleeuers haue a knowledge of Gods word especially in the chiefest poynâ—s of Gods will and worship in the fundamentall points of mans redemption and in the most necessary points of mans luetic Iudas could not haue beene a Preacher of the Gospell vnlesse he had knowne these things Christ would not haue sent him to teach these things to others if him selfe had beene ignorant of them Those which fell away to the fearefull sinne against the holy Ghost were before enlightned Vnlesse men know the truth they cannot beleeue it How shall they beleeue except they haue heard And herein this faith aâ—reeth both with an historicall and a iustifying faith Christ sayd of the Apostles Ioh. 1â— 8 They haue knowne surely that I came out from thee and haue beleeued that thou hast sent me Knowledge is the first step and degree to each kinde of faith And therefore those who be ignorant of the principles of Religion come so farre short of a true sauing and iustifying faith that as yet they haue not attayned to an hystoricall or temporary faith 2. The second degree is an assent to the truth of the Gospell They are infallibly perswaded that the whole doctrine of the Gospell is true and euery part of it that it teacheth vs the right way to heauen and that all things therin contained shal certainely be accomplished both for the condemnation of vnbeleeuers and for the saluation of beleeuers In regard hereof Christ saith He that receiueth his testimonie Ioh. 3.33 Rom. 7.16 hath sealed that God is true As Paul sayde I consent to the Law that it is good So this beleeuer will say I consent to the Gospel that it is good Yea he will auouch with the same Apostle 1. Ton. 1.15 This is
vnder hope that God will impute to him that belieueth in him who raised Iesus from the dead this Faith to his iustification and will not impute his sinnes to him An example whereof as he saith we haue in the cure of corporall discases which beareth an image of the inward cure For there Christ required a Faith whereby a man did belieue that Christ was endued with that power that he was able to heale him and trusted that such was his goodnes that he would cure him Cardinall Bellarmine after hee had written very much to prooue that Faith is only an assent to the truth of things reuealed and not an assurance or speciall application of the promises doth at last ouerthrowe all and yeelde to vs. her thus hee â—iâ—â—eth of vs (30) Rectè dicunt posse vnuÌ„quemque promissiones generales sibi applicare per fidem Nam quemadmodum fide catholica credâ— christuÌ„ mortuum esse pro omnibus ita cadem fide credo mortuum esse prome qui sum vnus ex omnibus De iustif lib. 1. cap. 11. Sect Denique quod dicunt they sâ—â—â—ghtly that euery one may by 〈…〉 to himselfe the generâ—ll 〈◊〉 For as I doe belieue by the Catholicke faith that Christ dyed for all So by the same faith I doe belieue that hee dyed for me who am one of them What need we any better witnes then hee who before was our greatest aduersarie Doth not this lay open the nature of Iustifying faith to bee the same that wee teach Is a particular application of generall promises no more then a bare assent to the truth of things reuealed By that faith whereby I beleeue Christ dyed in generall for all doe I also beleeue that hee dyed in particular for me And yet shall wee say that a speciall faith is a forged faith that it is against the nature of faith to apprehend and apply particularly to my selfe the promises of God and the merits of Christ Yet for all this the Cardinall will not graunt that any man is to beleeue the pardon of his owne sinnes in particular because the generall promises are not (31) De iustificat lib. cap. 11. sine absolute but conditionall euen with the condition of faith as we acknowledge And therefore demaundeth how a man can absolutely beleeue that his sinnes are forgiuen him seeing he caÌ„not learne by any worde of God that hee hath such a faith as is required for the obteyning of the pardon of sinnes And saith that none which beleeue are saued vnlesse they beleeue as they ought to beleeue But therein the Cardinall doth not onely contradict himselfe but likewise many of his fellowes who teach that there is but one faith at all that the dead and Catholicke faith are all one as was shewed before If some beleeue as they ought to beleeue and some beleeue not as they ought haue they all one and the same faith If some so beleeue as by beleeuing they shal bee saued and some so beleeue as by beleeuing they cannot be saued shall wee say they haue all one and the same faith Then may wee also say that Peter and Iudas had one and the same repentance The Cardinall here sheweth that they do indeede beleeue (32) Si reuera sicut oportet credant hoc est si fide habeant quae per dilectionem operatur De iustif 1.11 finâ— as they ought to beleeue who haue faith which worketh y loue Yet else-where he laboureth to prooue that (33) De Iustificut lib. 1. cap. 15. a true and Christian faith which by way of disposition iustifyeth the vngodlie may be separated from charitie and from other vertues How repugnant are these things one to another Againe hee that beleeueth may know that he hath faith otherwise Paul would not haue bidden the Corinthians to (34) 2. Cor. 13.5 proue themselues whether they wâ—re in the faith Augustine sayd (35) Fidem vâ—â—et quisque in cordâ— suo esse â—icrâ—au 〈…〉 esse 〈◊〉 credit De Trâ—â—t lib. 13. c. 1. Neâ— fidem qâ—â—squam hominuâ— videt â—â—alio sed vnusquisque in sâ—mâ—â—â—pso Ibid. cap. 2. Epist 1 12. cap. 4. Euery one doth see faith to be in his owne heart if he do belieue or not to be if hee doe not beleeue And that no man can see faith in another but euery one may see it in himselfe The Cardinall saith They beleeue as they ought who haue faith woâ—king by loue yet may a man easily know whether hee haue loue or not (36) In 〈◊〉 Ioh. tracâ—â— 5. Therefore sayd Augustine Let a man looke to his heart and see if he haue charitie and then let him say I am borne of God Yea let not any one aske another let eueriâ— one returne to his owne heart if he there finde brotherly charitie hee may bee sure hee hath passed from death to life Would hee haue sayd thus if a man could not haue knowne whether he had charitie or not Michael Medina as Sixtus (37) Bibliothec sanâ—t lib. 6. amict 215. Senensis testifyeth in defending Ferus against Soto saith There is no man which doubteth but that wee may know true loue and faith to be in vs. Seeing then that by charitie a man may know as the Cardinall teacheth whether hee beleeue as hee ought to beleeue and seeing a man may know whether he haue charitie or not hee may also know whether hee beleeue as he ought and if he beleeue as he ought then by the Cardinals owne confession he may particularly apply to himselfe the generall promises and certainely beleeue that his owne sinnes are pardoned And to conclude this poynt seeing this speciall faith hath such testimony not onely from the diuine Scriptures but likewise from the ancient Doctors of the Church and also from the late Romish writers doe not condemne it as hereticall but seeke earnestly for it as the speciall meane of your saluation SECT VIII THere remaineth another point to be considered touching the persons that be endued with a iustifying faith I taught that it is proper to the Elect. Notwithstanding I knowe that Cardinall Bellarmine goeth about to confute Caluine De Iustificat lib. 3. cap. 14 for holding that Faith and true righteousnes is proper to the Elect Yet doth he not bring any one argument to proue that it is not proper to them but onely laboureth to proue that faith may be lost Touching this point we will acknowledge that the best faith which many of the popish prelates doe teach is common both to the reprobate and Elect. The reprobate may giue an assent to the truth of things reuealed as well as the Elect. But there is another faith besides that and more excellent then it as I haue proued before and that is peculiar to Gods Elect. No maruaile though those papists who knowe it not or will not acknowledge it doe hold that there is no faith peculiar to Gods Elect. If they knew the nature of a iustifying faith they
saying Let vs distinguish what faith we owe to the History or Historicall sense what faith we owe to the vnderstanding or mysticall sense and which is a stedfast faith whether Historicall and temporall or spirituall and eternall Ferâ—â— a learned preaching Fryer vseth the tytle and maketh this faith to be the same with the popish vnformed faith for writing of the Centurions faith he faith (16) Non hic loquitur de hiâ—torica aut informi side sed de si lucia miserâ—cordie c. Comment in Ioh. 8. This is not spoken of an Historical or Vnformed faith but of a confidence of mercy to bee shewed through Christ SECT XI AS there is some difference betwixt vs our aduersaries touching the name so is there greater difference betwixt vs touching the thing Namely whether this hystoricall and dogmaticall faith be the selfe-same with Iustifying faith or whether it be a distinct kinde of it selfe differing from a iustifying faith Many of our aduersaries make them both one The (1) Annot. in Rom. 4.24 Sect. 9. Rhemists say that the Faith which was reputed for Iustice to Abraham was his beliefe of an Article reuealed vnto him by God that is to say his assent and credite giuen to Gods speeches And that iustice shall be reputed to vs by belieuing the articles oâ— Christs death and Resurrection not by any speciall faith And that the Catholicke Faith is that wherewith wee belieue the articles of the Faith which onely iustifieth And Bellarmine alleadgeth much to proue (2) Dâ—â—â—stifâ— lib. 1. cap. 6.7.8.9 that faith which iustifieth is neither Fiduâ—â—a nor Notiâ—â—a but onely an assent to the trueth of those things which God hath reuealed And in very truth the Papists must hold that either this faith iustifieth or none at all because they teach no better ordinary faith then this as appeareth by theyr treatises of faith (3) Tollet instruct sacerd lib. 4. cap. 1. Coster enchirid c. 4. de side initio But it may euidently appeare that this is not the faith which iustifieth vs. There is another faith aboue this and farre more excellent then this and much differing from this which doth iustifie vs alone none other but it I will declare the difference betwixt them that so you may perceiue that they bee not one and the same 1. First In Sect. 7. they differ in their nature For I proued before that by the iustifying faith a Christian doth apprehend and particularly applye to himselfe all the Promises of Gods mercies and of Christes merites Gods the pardon of his sinnes and the saluation of his soule But the Papists themselues acknowledge that this faith is of another nature onely an assent to things reuealed Compare that which I wrote before touching the nature of a true iustifying faith with that which the Papists teach to be the nature forme of this faith and you may see great difference 2. They differ in their essentiall degrees and therefore cannot be the same faith in speciâ— I knowe that magis and minus noÌ„ diuersificant speciem more and lesse doe not alter the kinde as the Logicians speak Yet the want of the true vnderstanding of that Axiâ—me and of applying it aright to the matter in question hath caused some papists to erre in confounding different kindes of faith It is true in accidentall but not in substantiall and essential degrees for there be degrees of both sortes There be accidentall degrees as degrees of quantitie quantitatis continue quantitatis discretae A great horse is of the same kind with a litle horse And the greatest number of the same species with the least There be also substantiall and essentiall degrees as appeareth in the faculties of the soule The sensitiuâ— facultie is a degree aboue the vegetatiue and the reasonable facultie another degree aboue the vnsensitiue These being substantiall and essentiall Degrees doe alter the kinde though not in the same indiuiduo yet in diuers So as that creature which hath an higher degree is of an other kinde then that which hath a lower degree Faith hath the like degrees Some be accidentall and respect the quantitie of Faith So there is (4) Math. 6.30 â— 26.14.31 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a little faith or weake assurance And (5) Heb. 10.22 Rom. 4.20 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a full assurance and strong faith And so faith is saide to be lesser and greater (6) Extensiue quando plura crâ—dibilâ—a cognoscuntur ereduntur explicite Intensiue quando credibilia clâ—â—ius cognoscuntur firmius seruentâ—â—â—teâ—entur Iâ—ra in Luc. 17.5 both extensiuely when more credible things are knowne and belieued expressely as may be seen in belieuers who know much And intensiuely when credible things are more clerely knowne and more firmely and feruently held There be also substantiall and essentiall degâ—ees of faith which respect the substance and forme the nature and naturall properties of it When one belieueth all that another doth and also more and that in an other mannâ— â— and forme So he that hath a iustifying faith belieueth all things that hee belieueth who hath an historicall or dogmaticall faith and that in the same manner Yet doth he belieue more also and after another manner He doth not only belieue that all things written in the scriptures be true but likewise belieueth that God will performe his generall promises in particular toward him for the pardon of his sinne and the saluation of his soule The one of thesâ— is credere Deo to giue credite to God the other is credere in Deum to belieue in God Augustine thus said of them (7) Si creditis in cum creditis eâ— Non autem contiâ—â—o qui credit eâ— credit in eum Nam demones credebant eâ— non credebant in cum In Ioh. 7. tract 29. If yee belieue in him ye giue credite to him But not alwayes he that giueth credit vnto him belieueth in him For the Diuels giue credite to him yet did not belieue in him Yea all papists do freely acknowledge a substeÌ„tiall differeÌ„ce betwixt these two in the very forme manner of belieuing And therfore some do make of them 2. seueral kindes of faith as before I proued Others say that there is no such degree aboue dogmaticall-faith which before I confuted And which here by the testimony of Augustine is conuinced 3. They differ in their obiects for the one respecteth the truth of God shewed in things reuealed the other respecteth the mercy and goodnes of God in Christ offered to penitent sinners Bernardinus de Senis (8) Ex parte cius quod creditur hoc est reâ— creditae accipitur differentâ—â— hoc mado Nam Deâ—s â—â—â—lulâ—â—ate fider tribus modes accipitur primo vt veritas 2. vt potestas 3. vt bomtas Secundum priâ—um modum credere Deo s per comparationem ad veritatem hoc est vâ—ra esse quae dâ—â—it 2. modo credere Deum c. De
beleeueth shall not be confounded because they doe not put their hope in him Now who that hath any vnderstanding in Religion will say that the faith which is able to saue a mans soule and the faith which is not able to saue a mans soule are both one in kind in nature and substance And that those who are tormented in hell can truely say that while they were on earth they had the very same faith which brought the Saintes to the Kingdome of heauen By that which hath bene spoken touching this point you may vnderstand what a kinde of faith is taught by the greatest Doctors in the Romish church what is the best faith which they require of the people euen an hystoricall faith to giue assent to the truth of things reuealed Which faith as hath bene prooued may be in wicked men in Reprobates in men out of the state of grace in men that shall goe to hell Yea such a faith as is found in the very diuels of Hell What saluation can be obtained in that Church whose preachers teach no better faith Who would be ledde by such guydes I knowe that they would make a difference betwixt the faith of their right Catholickes and the faith of diuels because the one hath Charitie alwayes accompanying it the other wanteth Charity But they might consider that according to their doctrine this maketh no essentiall but a meere accidentall difference Seeing they teach that the same assent to the truth of things reuealed is in some with charitie and in others without charitie in cuideÌ„tly appeareth that according to their doctrine Charitie is not a proper immediate necessary and essentiall propertie of it but meerely accidentall Indeed wee hold that Charitie is a proper necessary effect of a iustifying faith so as faith is no sooner wrought in the heart of any but forthwith hee is endued with loue (45) Vel quòd vna esset de ratione altâ—â—s vâ—l quod vna necessariò nasceretur ab altera c. Licet chaâ—tas oriatur ex fide tameÌ„ non oritur vt propria passio quae necessariò fluâ—t a subiecto sed vt virtus adquam alia disponit inclinat De Iustif lib. 1. cap. 15. Sect quintum argum He cannot but loue him in whom he belieueth and of whose loue and fauour he is perswaded And therefore charitie though it do not make yet it may declare the essentiall difference and the nature of this faith But seeing it is no such necessary effect of their assenting faith it can neyther make nor declare any essentiall difference of it And therefore he who wanteth charitie may haue the same faith in substance that hee hath who is endued with Charitie Bellarmine going about to proue that true faith meaning theyr assenting faith may bee separated from loue draweth one Argument from the proper reason nature of them both If they cannot be seuered saith he 46 It is eyther because the one is of the reason or being of the other or that the one doth necessarily arise from the other Not the first because Faith charitie are not one vertue but two And besides that haue diuers subiectes actes and obiectes For faith is in the vnderstanstanding Charitie in the will Faith belieueth charitie loueth Faith respecteth the first trueth Charitie the chiefe good Not the second because although charity arise of faith yet it doth not arise as a proper passion which doth necessarily flowe from the subiect but as a vertue vnto which an other doth dispose and encline And Thomas Aquinas saith Seeing (47) Cum charitas fit extra essentiam fides per eues aduentum vel recessum non mutatur substart ea eius In Ron. 1 â—ect 6. Charitie is without the essence of faith by the comming or departure of it the substance of faith is not changed And although Bellarmine holde with the school-men that Charitie is the forme of faith yet he (48) Formam esse extrinsecam no intrinsecaÌ„ que det illâ— won vt sit sed vt moueatur De Iustif lib. 2. cap. 4. tteacheth that it is an outward not an inward forme And such a forme as doth not giue beeing vnto it but motion Howe then can it make it make any essentiall differeÌ„ce betwixt that faith which hath it and that faith which wanteth it I know that the Fathers do sometime note loue as a difference betwixt the faith of Christians and diuels and betwixt the faith of good Christians and bad Yet do they not make it the onely difference betwixt them they teach an essentiall diffeteÌ„ce by belieuing in God with trust and confidence Againe they might better make it a difference of theyr faith then the Papists can make it a difference of the faith which they teach because it was a necessary and proper effect proceeding from that their faith not from any other For those that do so belieue in God with hope and confidence of his mercie and goodnes towards them cannot but loue him But papists haue no such confidence nor assuraÌ„ce in their faith which should make them to loue God they may haue all theyr faith without loue And therefore loue cannot distinguish it essentially from the faith of diuels So then to shut vp this point it still remaineth apparent that in the nature and substance there is no difference at all betwixt popish assenting faith and the faith of diuels And surely those that now content themselues with such a faith as is no better in substance then the faith of diuels may iustly feare least hereafter they shall haue no better estate in substance then the deuils haue SECT XII THe last kinde of faith which I mentioned I called a Temporary faith which differeth from a dead faith because while it lasteth it bringeth forth outward fruites And yet is not the same with a iustfying faith because it commeth short of it by many degrees doth not saue any and continueth not vnto the end This faith is scarce knowne to the papists very fewe of their writers make any mention of it Yet lest any should thinke that it is a new coyned tearme and a newly inuented faith I will shew what authors write of it Augustine long agoe (1) Quae sit stabilis fides siuchistorica temporalis siue spiritualis aeterna De verarelig cap. 50. vsed the name and tytle together with the name of Historicall faith as before I declared Bernard (2) Mittunt nos ad quandam fidei trifariam diutsionem vt dicatur sides mortua sicta probata c. Fictam aute ego arbitvor illam vocari fidem quae suscepta quidâ—m excharitate vita moueri inchoat ad bene operandum sedâ—n perseâ—â—â—ns defiâ—it moritur tanquam abortiua Eo vtique 〈◊〉 sictam dixerim nominatam quo vasasiâ—ulâ— vocamus fiâ—â—tâ—â—â— ron quia vâ—delâ—cet vtilia non sint quamdâ—â—â—â—rant scu quâ—a fraâ—â—lia cum sint diu minime durant De hac siâ—â—â—
all things spoken and written against the Doctrine of your moderne Priestes If you vouchsafe to reade our writings you commonly giue no more fauourable Censure of them then Iulian the Empetour gaue of the ancient Fathers bookes who thus said of them Soâ—â—◠〈…〉 I read I vnderstood I condemned And we might iustly answere you as Basil and other Learned Byshops answered him Thou hast reade but not vnderstood 〈…〉 for if thou hadst vnderstood thou wouldest not haue condemned Some of you are like those men whereof the Apostle Iude spake who condemne those things which they knowe not Ibid. Others of you knowe and vnderstand more Iude. 10. yet reiect all things as erroneous and hereticall which you knowe to be contradictorie to the positions of your popish priests Yea many of you be such vnequall iudges that although you canot but approue almost all points in the booke yet if there bee but one only thing which you distaste you presently condemne all the rest for it And take it to be as a leafe of Coloquyntis which marreth a whole messe of pottage and as a dead Flye that spoyleth a whole boxe of oyntment In regard whereof I may iustly feare your sharpe and bitter censures of these my Sermons now put foorth to open sight I can expect no more indifferencie and fauour at your hands theÌ„ others my betters haue formerly found NotwithstaÌ„ding as often heretofore I haue laboured by many meanes to giue you satisfaction in your doubtes and demandes both by priuate conference with diuers of the Layetie by seuerall answeres made to the writings of the learned on your side and also by open disputations with your priests as some of you cannot denie if you would testifie truth So would I now giue you full contentment if any reasonable thing will content you for all such exceptions which I thinke you wil take against these Sermons Whereas the learned on your side doe charge vs that in our sermons and writings we interpret the Scriptures according to our owne fancies and priuate conceits and not according to the vniforme sense giuen by the Fathers and the common exposition of the Church and thervpon would perswade you not to heare or reade or belieue any thing which wee proue by the scriptures I will make it apparant that in those points of controuersy touched in these sermons and confirmed by seuerall texts of scripture I haue the consent of the ancient Fathers and also of manie of your owne late wryters Cardinall Bellarmine acknowledgeth that before the Pelagian heresie arose the Fathers did not exactly handle the question of Praedestination by grace Degra lib. arbur libâ—â— cap. 11. initâ—o but onely when occasion was offered did briefly set down their opinions And that Chrysost did not plainly preach preueÌ„ting grace because at that time they were not risen vp Ibid. lib. 6. cap. 6. which denyed it As if the Fathers did speake and write plainely fully of those poynts onely which were controuerted and impugned in those dayes Now it is certaine that few of those poyntes which I mentioned were called into question in their dayes There were many controuersies de co quod creditur non de co quo creditur as the M. of Sentences Lumb sent lib. 3. dâ—st 23. c. out of Augustine distinguisheth of the things to bee beleeued or of the obiect of faith yet not of the habite of faith or of the gift or qualitie whereby wee beleeue And therefore the trueth is not to be gain-sayed though we could not produce very pregnant and plentifull testimonies out of their writings touching the nature and kindes of faith Nowithstanding they haue not left themselues without witnes in that they do vpon occasions declare their iudgements therein which serue to confirme the trueth on our side These testimonies of theirs and the testimonies of your owne Doctors I did forbeare to recite in the Pulpit or write in the copie of the Sermons that so I might auoyde tediousnes Yet hauing diligently perused them and hoping that they would be of force with some that duly consider them I thought good to set them apart by themselues and to adde them as a postcript after all SECT II. WHereas I taught that the word of God is the spirituall seede which must bee sowne in our heartes to make vs fruitfull in all good workes And that Preachers ought to teach and people ought to heare and receiue nothing but the word and did limit the word to the word written I know it crosseth the doctrine of some in your Church and therefore may perhaps be misliked by you First your countrey-man Doctor Stapleton Promptuar in Dominica sexagesim writing a Postill for the instruction of Popish Preachers could not finde in all this Parable any poynt to bee obserued against vs but onely this that the word is the seed And will haue To the same effect the Rhemists not the worde written but the worde preached to be the seede Yea he maketh two words of God the one written write Aâ—â—ot on 1. 〈◊〉 2 1◠〈◊〉 2. the other preached and therby would confute vs who hold that nothing is the word of God but that which is written in the Scriptures of the Olde and New Testaments But theâ—in that great Doctor declared himselfe neither to know what the Scripture is nor what true preaching is noâ— what we hold to be the word of God â—ast what is the Scripture or written word of God It is not the letters and â—illables that be written in bookes but rather the true sense and meaning of them 〈…〉 1. â—â—româ— sayd Nâ— putemus in verbâ—â— scripturatrum esse euangelium sed in sensiâ— Let vs not thinke the Gospel consisteth in the Scriptures but in the meanne Non in 〈…〉 in medvlla non in sermonum folus sâ—d in radice rationis Not in the outward 〈…〉 but in the marrow not in the◠〈◊〉 of beech 〈…〉 4 〈◊〉 4. but in the roote of reason Cardinall Bellarmine woulde haue vs mark that there be two thinges in the Scripture the words written and the sense in them included the wordes are as the sheath the sense is the sword of the spirit As it is a rule among Lawyers that not the bare wordes but the meaning of the wordes is the Law So is it a rule among all Diuines that not the bare words but the true meaning of the words is the Scripture And the reason is Quicquid in duâ—â—â—o sermine neque ad morum honestatem neque ad sideâ— veritatem proprie referrâ— potest â—iguratum esse cognoseas De Doctr. chr lib. 3. cap. 10. Sixt. Biâ—â— other lib. 3. 〈◊〉 Bellar. deverlo Dâ—t lib. 3. cap. 3. because the very words taken properly after their naturall and Grammaticall signification may sometime breede error and then they are not to bee taken properly but figuratiuely According as Augustine well taught That whatsoeuer in the word of
5. annot 36. Est fides qua creditur quicquid credendum est baec est virtus theologica Altera quae considâ—nua quâ—dam est seiliâ—â—t qua credimus quod denâ— it dominus â—i quod ab co petimâ—s Stollain Luc. 5. to cap. 145. whereby we beleeue and doe assent to the doctrines reuealed and propounded by the Church to be beleeued which Cyrill called a dogmaticall faith There is another kinde of faith whereby we doe not onely assent to the doctrines but also doe beleeue that the things which we aske to be done shall be accomplished by God which we call an assurance Stella also as plainely maketh two kindes of Faith There is a faith saith he whereby we beleeue whatsoeuer is to be beleeued and this is a theologicall vertue There is another faith which is a certaine confidence to wit that whereby we beleeue that the Lord will giue vs that which we aske of him I could produce more witnesses speaking to the time purpose but I spare them till I come to speake of the seuerall kindes by themselues yet consider that not onely the ancient Fathers but likewise some great Clearkes in the late Romish Church haue made diners kindes of faith Why then should we be condemned as Heretikes for teaching the same SECT VII LEt vs now come to the seuerall kinds of faith in particular And let vs first coÌ„sider a little touching iustifying faith It may be you will mislike two things in that description oâ—â—t which I set downe in one of the precedent sermons The one respecteth the nature of it the other respecteth the persons that be endued with it because some of your side teach contrary therevnto 1. Touching the nature of it I shewed that by it a Christian doth apprehend and apply to himselfe all the promiâ—â—s of God in Christ and all the merits of Christ for his present iustification and for his future saluation I know it as well as you that many of your learned meÌ„ teach the contrary and therefore I â—eare that you will râ—â— or beleâ—ue them then â—â— The Rhemists say Annot. on Rom. 3. Sect. 7. that to apprehend Christs rightâ—ousnes by faith is a 〈…〉 apprehension of that which is not And that it is a false faith And afterward Annot. on Hebr. 11. Secâ— 6. that the Apostle 〈◊〉 not speciall faith the forged faith of Protestants whereby euery one of these new Sect-maâ—â—ters and their followers as it pleaseth them in the meeknes of their spirit to tearme vs beleeue their sinnes are remitted and themselues shall be saued Annot. on Iam. 2.26 Sect. 1. And else-where that a speciall faith is a forged faith that nâ—ther Paul nor Iames nor any other sacred writer euer knewe or spake of any such faith Cardinall Bellarmine maintaineth that Faith is neither Fiducia De iustificat lib. 1. cap. 5.6.7 an issurance of Gods mercie or the Pardon of a Man 's owne sinnes nor yet Notitia acknowledge of such thinges but but onely a firme and certaine assent to the truth of those things which God hath propounded to be deliuered Promptuar catholan feriaâ— 5. hebdâ— 1. Quadragesâ— Doctor Stapleton calleth them Heretickes who place the whole nature propertie vertue and greatnes of faith in a particular applicatiâ—n of Gods generall promises to Belieuers Indeed that which they say is true if there were no other faith taught in the word not wrough in the hearts of Christians then that which is generally taught and found in the present Romane Church But they which vnderstand the word aright and are iustified by Faith do know and feele another kinde of faith farre surpassing that Bellarmine doth much wrong vs and more trouble himselfe in this point then needed Haeretici restringunt ad solâ—m promissionem miserecor diae specialâ—s De iustif lib. 1. cap. Sect. Itaque tribus He saith that they differ from vs in the obiect of iustifying faith because we whom he commonly calleth by the name of Heretickes doe restraine it to a sole promise of a speciall mercy And afterward spendeth many chapters in prouing that the obiect of a iustifying faith is not a speciall mercy De iustificat lib. 1. cap. 8.9.10 but all things which God hath reuealed For we doe not hold that the promise of a speciall mercy to a man in particular is the obiect of a true iustifying faith vnder the new testament we finde none such made to any of vs The generall promises of mercy in Christ are the material obiects which being indefinitly propounded it is an acte of faith to make a true Christian to apply them particularly to himselfe But to come to the matter now in question It may easily be proued that a iustifying faith is not onely an assent to the truth of things reuealed in the word but likewise an apprehension and particular applying of the generall promises of Gods mercies and Christs merits for the remission of sinnes In the scriptures faith is called a receiuing of Christ Ioh. 1.12 Gal. 3 14. And a receiuing of the promise Can there be a receiuing of a thing without application was Christ receiued generally of all together for all together and not particularly by euery one for himself When Thomas saide to CHRIST My God and my Lordâ— Did not he especially and particularly applye Christ and his benefites to himselfe who was GOD and Lorde to all true Christians Yet Christ gaue it the name and Tytle of Faith Ioh. 20.29 saying vnto him Because thou â—â—st â—â—ene nice thou belieuest And maketh that his saith the very same with their faith who were blessed for belieuing Gentiasidem prâ—at â—t 〈◊〉 commendat 1 Ioh. 20. Tract 121. Gaâ—â—â—â— 20. when they had not seene Yea with the faith of Gentiles For Augustâ—â— thâ—nked he did thereby preach and commend the faith of the Gentiles When Paul saide Christ hath loued me and giuen himselfe for mee Did hee not applye particularly to himselfe Christ and his benefites yet this hee did by that faith whereof hee spake immediately before euen by that faith in the Sonne of God whereby he then liued Is not Christ that bread which must nourish our soules and is not Faith the eating of him as himselfe declare that large loh 6. Whervpon * Quid paras dente ventrem crede maducasti 〈◊〉 tract 25 Crâ—dere in Christum est 〈…〉 pani vt 〈◊〉 â—â—â—ct 26. Augustine said What preparest thou thy teeth and thy belly belieue thou hast eaten And can there be any eating vnlesse there be be a speciall Application of the meate to the person that is fedâ— Doth not euery one pray in particular for speciall mercie And is not euery one to belieue that what he asketh he shall obtaâ—ne And certaine it is that whosoeuer doth worthilie by Faith receiue the sacrament of the Lords supper hee doth by faith particularly receiue Christ and all his benefites and particularly applyeth all the
deest vsurpo milâ—â— ex vâ—seribus domini quoniam miseric or dia effluunt In cantic serm 61. medio But that Came was not of the members of Christ nor had any thing to do with the mâ—rit of Christ that he might presume the same to be his he would haue called that his owne which was Christs as the member doth that which is the heades Thereby teaching that the true beleeuer being a member of Christ doeth call that his owne which is Christs and doth without sinne presume that the merit of Christ is his in particular And therefore in the next words he saith thus of himselfe Whatsoeuer is wanting vnto me from my selfe I boldly take it vnto me out of the bowels of the Lord Iesus because they flow out with mercy Let vs descend to the Popish writers we may finde many of them to iumpe with vs herein Ferâ—s was commended by Sixtus Senâ—nsis to be (13) Biblioth sanct lib. 4. in Iohan Ferus p. 265.14 Non enim semper sides est quod nos fidem dicimus fidem nos dicimus assentire ys quae diuinâ—s scripturis produntur quae ecclesia credenda proponit ComeÌ„t in Mat. 8. lib. 2. a man excellently learned in the diuine Scriptures whose equall in the office of preaching the Gospell the Catholicke Churches of the Germaines haue not in this our time Yet doeth hee in many places condemne the Popish description of faith and approue ours (14) Secundum scripturaâ— fides non aliud est nisi fiducia miserecordiae diuine promissae in Christâ— ibid. Non apprehenditur manu corporis sed manu cordis quae est fides Ferus in Ioh. 3.16 That is not alwayes faith whith we call faith we call it faith to assent to those things which be deliuered in the diuine histories and which the Church propoundeth to be belieued The Scripture speaketh farre otherwise of Faith For according to the Scriptures faith is nothing else but a confidâ—ce of Gods mercy promised in Christ And he bringeth Abrahams example for proofe thereof And of this faith saith hee mâ—ntion is made in the Gospell where it is sayd Hee that beleeueth in the Sonne of God shall not bee condemned The faith which the Scripture commendeth is no other thing then to trust to the fâ—â—e mercy of God this is the true faith whereby the iust man liueth this alone is it which God requirâ—th 〈◊〉 An example of this faith we haue in the Centurion for we do not read that he rehearsed the Articles of faith but that he came to Christ with great trust These wordes make so much for vs that Sixtus Senensis (15) Bibliothec sanct lib. 6. annot 43. sayd of them that hee seemeth to allude to the error of them who teach that iustifying faith is nothing else but an assurance of Gods mercy forgiuing our sinnes through Christ And Dominicus Soto tooke vpon him to confute him in that poynt but Michael Medina defended him against Soto And else-where he speaketh as fully for vs (16) Sed est certa firmâ— staâ—â—li fiducia Christum omniâ—g 〈◊〉 is bona complecti cisque toto corde tota anima totâ—que viribus inhaerere In Ioh. 6.29 To belieue in Christ saith hee is not to know his works for Sathan knoweth this neyther is it to remember or thinke with himselfe that Christ hath suffered and risen againe for euen vngodly men remember these things and thinke of them and yet are made nothing better But it is with certaine sure and stedfast trust to take hold of Christ and all his benefits and to sticke to them with all the heart all the soule and all the strength Pighius in his booke of controuersies dedicated to the Pope Paulâ—s 3. doth teach that although Faith as it is vsually taken by ecclesiasticall writers bee that habite of the minde whereby we do certainly and without any doubting assent to those things which for our saluation are reuealed of God to his Church (17) Hâ—â—e fideâ— rationis mentsque assâ—â—siâ— quo pâ—rfeâ—tasides dâ—â—i possit adtuncta esse debâ—t eâ—â—â—m animâ— cerâ—a quaedâ—m firmaque fiduâ—ta qua Dei verbo veritatiâ— itain nititur it a fidit fidelis anima vt absque vlla haesitatione quicquia illudsit velut si manibus teneret certum habeat c. Controuers 2. de fidet Iustificat fol. 40.41 in 80. Paris 1542. Yet vnto this faith assent of reason and the minde that it may be called a perfect faith there ought also to be adioyned a certaine sure and firme trust of the heart whereby the belieuing soule doth so stay vpon trust to the worde and truth of God that without all doubting whatsoeuer it is he hath it as sure as if he held it in his handes And hee further addeth that this is the Faith and not that assent of reason which the Lord euery where required of them whome hee vouchsafed to heale Of that he spake when he saide Daughter be of comfort thy Faith hath made thee whole And this is the same Faith which maketh prayer effectuall which Christ and Iames require in them that pray Didacus Stella (18) Enarratan Luc. 5. Imò etiamsi peteret illa dimitti si non confideret certissi ne crederet illa sibi aâ—mittenda â—unquam dimitterentur hauing distinguished of faith that there is one to belieâ—e whatsoeuer is to be belieued called a Theological vertue another is a Confidence by which we belieâ—e that the Lorde will giue whatsoeuer we aske He saith that without this faith 1. this Confidence our sinnes cannot be forgiuen For although a man belieue all thinges contained in holy Scriptures to be true and all things which the Church belieueth yet if he shuld not trust and most certainly belieue that they shall be forgiuen him they should neuer be forgiuen him And saint Iames saith Let him aske in faith nothing doubting To the like purpose doth he afterward distinguish of faith describe the later kinde saying (19) Fides dupliciter accipitur Vno modo pro habitu credendi secundum quam assentimur veritatibus sacrae scripturae c. Alia est fides quae considentia vocatur qua petit aliquis a Deo confidenter sperans credens certissime se consequuturum a Domino id quod postulat quae fides necessarià est â—â—anti alias nihil vnquam impetrabit Enarratan Luc. 7. Faith is taken two wayes One way for the habite of belieuing according to which we doe assent to the trueths of the Scripture And this is the Faith without which it is impossible to please God And this is one of the three Theologicall vertues 1. Cor. 13. And by this faith a belieuer differeth from an Infidell There is another faith which is called a Confidence whereby a man asketh of God confidently hoping and belieuing most certainly that he shall obtaine of the Lord that which he asketh Which faith is needefull for him that prayeth otherwise
hee shall neuer obtaine any thing If this be the faith requited of them that pray aright it is the faith of all Gods Saints and of them which are iustified for they pray often and are heard And if this man write truely then those who teach and haue no other faith then an assent to the truth of things reuealed can neuer obtaine pardon of their sinnes nor haue their petitions graunted Tollet taught (20) Hoc in loco non accâ—pâ—â—ur fides proment is assenâ—u sed pro voluntatis fidâ—câ—â— vt recie Euthymius quae signâ—sir at â—o frequens est in scripturis In Luc. 12. anâ—oâ— 52. and that out of Euthymues that Faith in many places of scripture is takeÌ„ Not for the assens of the minde but for the assuraÌ„ce of the will Iâ—nsentus also writeth the same (21) Proâ—de reâ—issime vt apparet dicâ—tur namine fideâ— in euangeliâ—s cum eâ— trâ—buitur aut falus aut consecutâ—â— ommum quae volumus complecti vtrumque assentum illum â—orâ—â—â— ia credendis de Deo aâ— Christo fidâ—â—â—m ex â—â—â—es boâ—â—tate conceptam c. Concord Euang cap. 32. Therâ—â—â—â—â—â—â—st rightly as appeare that may be saide a 〈◊〉 by thâ— name of Faith in the Gospells whâ— saluation or the obtaining of those things which wee desire is ascribed vnto it both these are comprehended both that firme assent in things to be belieued concerning God and Christ and also a Confidence conceyned from his goodnesse c. For these two doe so clâ—auc together that neyther can there be any Confidence without Credulitie neyther can Credulitie without Confidence obtayne any thing of God And to the same effect afterward thus (22) Haec duo nempe credulâ—tas fiduciasimul videntur includi in nomine sides cum subditur diâ—â—sse dominâ—Ì„ secundum fidein vestram siaâ— vobis vt sit sensâ—s sicut creditis me posse vos sanare ob hoc confiditis mâ— curatur is vos ita fiat vobis Concord Euang. cap. 35. These two to wit Credulity and Confidence seeme to be included together in the name Faith when it is set downe that the Lord said According to your Faith be it vnto you That the meaning may be As ye belieue that I can heale you and for this doe trust that I will heale you So be it vnto you If then by the testimonie of these Authors Faith bee often so taken in the Scriptures And if this be the only Faith whereby we obtaine such things at the handes of God Why should wee be condemned as Hereticks for teaching such a faith Ought not we to haue such a faith in Christ for the saluation of our soules that those men had in him for the curing of their bodyes Though Stapleton denie this speciall Confidence yet hee acknowledgeth (23) propter haue fidem vtramque internam externam sanitatem dedit Promptuar domini 18. post pentecost that for one and the same faith Christ gaue them both outward inward health Paulus Burgensis saith that Abraham by the Faith which was imputed to him for Righteousnes did not onely belieue that he should be the Father of many Nations but rather that he his seed should obtaine euerlasting life in heauen In Genes 15. Addit 2. The Diuines of Colone taught that (24) Per fidem verbi Dei operantis in nobis veram contritionem penitentiam est iustificaâ—â—er tanquaÌ„ per causam quaÌ„dam praeparatiuam dispositiuam Persidemautem qua absque dubitatione firmiter confidemus nobis peccata nostra propter Christum esse dimissa instisicamur tanquam per causam susceptiuam Antididag Coloniens de instificat hom fol. 21. through the faith of the word of God working in vs true Contrition and Repentance and other works of preuenting grace we are iustified as by a certaine cause preparing and disposing vs. But through the Faith whereby without doubting we doe firmely trust our sinnes are forgiuen vs through Christ wee are iustified as by a cause receiuing it And also adde further that the (25) Non quomodo extranos in ipso est sed sicut quando â—adâ—â—n nobis dumtamen fide apprehenditur ad iustitiâ—â—n importatur ibid. Righteousnes of Christ is the cause of our Iustification not as it is out of vs in him but as and when the same is imputed vnto vs for Righteousnes yet so that it be apprehended by faith Cassander who was so highly esteemed for learning and wisedome that two Romane Emperors Ferdinand and Maximilian 2. sent to him for his aduise howe to compound the controuersies in religion approueth their opinion saith that (26) Consiâ—tat art 4. Booke was greatly commended of all the Learnedst diuines through Italy France as a Booke that excellently relateth the summe of the Ancients opinion touching religion out of whose writings the booke is as it were confirmed And with great approbation citeth these words out of it (27) Fatemur verum esse ad iustificationem hominis omnino requiri vt homo certo credas non tantum generaliter quòd propter Christum vere paenitentibus remittantur peccata sed quòd ipsi homini remissa sint propter christum per fidem ibid. Wee confesse it to be true that it is altogether required for the iustifying of a man that a man doe certainly belieue not onely generally that for Christ sinnes be forgiuen to them that be truely penitent but also that they be forgiuen to the man himselfe for Christ by faith Hee also alledgeth out of the Ratisbone booke these words (28) Vocamus fâ—â—m viuam motum â—paritus sanâ—â—â— quo vere poratentis â—riguntur ad Denum vere apprehendunt miserecordiam in Christ to premissâ—m vt â—am vere sentiant quod remissionem peccatorum reconeâ—liationem proptâ—r mâ—ritum christi gratuata Dei bonitate acceperunt c. Ibid. We calâ— a liuely faith a motion of the holy Ghost whereby they who truely repent are lifted vp to God and doe truely apprehend mercie promised in Christ that now they truely perceiue that they haue through the fieâ— goodnes of God receiued remission of sinnes and reconciliation for the merits of Christ and doe crye Abba Father And therevpon hee inferreth that rightly agreeabâ—y to the scriptures it is saide that this is the nature of a Iustifying Faith that it perceiue that feeling of Gods fauour which the holy Ghost worketh in vs. And further addeth that to obtaine Iustification (29) Adâ—â—â—tificationem consequendam requiritur talis fides 〈…〉 exâ—â—â—plo Aâ—raâ—â— ad promissionem Dei non 〈◊〉 per disâ—â—dentiam sed praeter spem in spem credat 〈◊〉 credenti in â—â—m qui siscitat Iesum a mortuis in putaturtim â—anc sidem ad iustificationem peccata nâ—n imputaturim Cassâ—nda ibid. p 13. Such a Faith is required whereby a man after the example of Abraham doth not doubt of the promise of God through distrust but aboue hope belieueth
de ratione vere fidei choritatis est permaneniâ—a constantia c. Apud Sext. Senens biblioth lib. 6. annot 214. According to Christian veritie faith he onely that is to be iudged a true faith which hath the efficacy of obtayning saluation According to that Hee that beleeueth in mee hath eternal life And afterward he addeth That true faith indeede doth consist with true loue but that onely is called true loue by a moral truth which hath perseuerance and continuance And that the Scripture neuer called the faith of them who beleeue for a time to be true saith And that those who are damned neuer had true faith And in conclusion he asked Soto whether he is to be called faithfull or a friend who should be ioyned vnto him for an houre by frieÌ„dship and faith which if he will not say because continuance and constancie is of the nature and being of true faith and charitie then cannot such offenders be called true beleeuers in Christ Cardinall Bellarmine holdeth against some who then liued that Christ did not onely (31) Orauit dominus paulo post pro perseuerantia ommum apostolorum imo etiam omnium electoruÌ„ Ioh. 17. Pâ—ter sancte serua eos in nomine tuo quos dedisti mihi De Rom. Pontif. lib. 4. cap. 3. sect altera expositio pray that Peter might continue in faith and in the fauour of God vnto the end but that he also prayed a little after for the perseuerance of all the Apostles yea also of all the elect Ioh. 17. Holy Father keepe them in thy Name whom thou hast giuen me How then can the faith of any of the elect fayle Shall wee thinke that Christs prayer was not heard Doth not he elsewhere acknowledge that the Father heard him alwaies Was his prayer ectuall against the losse of grace and faith by sinne and not against the losse of them by Infidelitie Then was his prayer heard but in part How can they prooue that difference SECT XIIII IN prosecuting this point I produced Peter for an example who though he denyed his Maister with an oath vâ—t still kept faith in his heart And lest any should thinke that this â—â—s a speciall priuiledge in Peter I sâ—ewed that (1) Ioh. 17.20 Christ prayed for others as wel as for him Now if there bee any who imagine that Christ prayed for them after a different maner and to another end let them remember what I alleadged before out of Augustine touching Christ praier for all the elect namelie (2) De Corrept grat cap. 12. That Christ praying for them that their Faith might not fayle without doubt it shall not fayle vnto the end and therefore shall continue vnto the end neyther shall the end of this life find it otherwise then remayning But because that (3) De Iustificat lib. 3. cap. â—4 Bellarmine and others doe teach that Peter did quite loose his faith and the righteousnes thereof I will let you see the testimonies of all sorts of writers to the contrary Tertullian (4) Sed cur petrum ob vigorem fides Aduers Marcion lib. 4. said his name was changed and he was called Peter for the strength of his faith but he ill deserued that name and Christ erred in giuing him a name not agreeable to his nature if hee quite lost his faith Againe hee speaking of Christs prayer for him thus saith of those words That thy faith might not fayle (5) Ne deficeret fides tua id est ne tantum diabolo permitteretur vt fides periclitaretur quo ostenditur vtrumque apud Deum esse concussionem fidei protectionem cuÌ„ vtrumque ab co petitur Et vtique filius Dei protectionâ— fidei habet insua potestate c. De fuga in persecut that is that so much might not be permitted to the Diuel that his faith might be endangered Whereby it is shewed that both are with God both the shaking of faith and the protection seeing both are asked of him The shaking is from the Diuel the protection is from the Sonne And surely the Son of God hath the protection of faith in his owne power which hee asked of his Father of whom hee receiueth all power in heauen and earth If his faith was not endangered by the diuel but protected and kept safe by God through the prayer of his Son how can any truely say that hee lost his faith Hillary (6) Comment in Psal 52 4. taught as is testifyed by (7) Biblioth sanct lib. 5. annot 181. Sixtus Sâ—nensis that Peter in denying his Maister lost not the firmenesse of his faith because although through the tâ—embling of hiâ— flâ—sh which he could not brydle his tongue buâ—si forth into the deniall of Christ yet a firme faith of confessing Christ vnto Martyrdome did not depart from his heart I might also vige that which not onely he (8) In Math. can 20. See Six Senâ—ns biblioth lib. 6. annot 160. elsewhere but likewise Ambrose (9) Comment in Luc. 22. lib. 10. together with him hath written in excuse of Peters denyall That he denyed him not to be God but denyed that he was only a man Though (10) See Sixt Sâ—nensbiblioth li. 6 annot 160. Hâ—â—rony in Math. 26. Theophylact. in Luc. 22. lerorac Theophylact do confute them because so to excuse the Apostle were to make his Maister a lyar who told him before that hee should that night denie him thrice Yet doth (11) In Luc. 22.32 in Math. 26.75 quanquam possumus Hilarium Ambrosium ab errore benigna interpretatione liberare Mâ—ldonatus excuse them both And thereby they plainely declared that they were farre from thinking that hee lost his faith Augustine alleadged the prayer of Christ for Peters faith against the Pelagians who held that man could not continue in grace and in faith vnlesse mans free will did concurre with Gods grace Dare thou say that Christ praying for Peter that his faith might not faile that it should haue failed (12) An andebis dicere etiamrogante christo ne deficeret fides petri defecturam fâ—isse fi petrus eam dâ—fiâ—ere voluisset c. Sed quia praeparatur voluntas a domino ideo pro illo non possit esse inanis oratio quando rogauit ergo ne fides eius deficeret quid aliud rogauit nisi vt haberet in fide liberrimam fortissimam inuictissimaÌ„ perseverantissimam voluntatem De corrept grat cap. 8. if Peter would haue had it to faile that is if hee would not haue had it to continue vnto the ende As if Peter any way willed any other thing then Christ prayed for him that he might will But because the will is prepared of the Lord therefore his prayer for him could not be in vaine Therfore when he prayed that his Faith might not faile what else asked he but that hee might haue in faith a most free a most strong a
blade but neuer to beare a ripe eare So they who haue hearts altogether hardened will not heare or at least not receiue the word of God at all into any part of their hearts but those who haue hearts partly soft and partly hard may receiue the word and retaine it for a time but will neuer bring forth the fruites of it Wherefore the holy Ghost saith in the Psalmes and it is applyed by the Apostle Psal 95.7.8 to the hearers of the Gospell To day if ye will heare his voyce harden not your hearts Heb. 3.7 Because the hard hearted can neuer he are the word of God so reuerently and effectually as they ought to doe the Lord biddeth vs not to harden but to soften our hearts if we will heare his voyce The harder the heart is the more vnprofitable shall be the hearing the softer the heart is the more profitable shall the hearing be Againe this hardnes will cause men to deny the word in time of tentation The moysture and softnes aboue is the cause of receiuing the word with ioy and beleeuing for a time but the hardnes and drinesie below is the cause of reuolting afterward When Gods hand was heauie on Pharoh he somewhat relented humbled himselfe and confessed his sinne but as soone as it was remoued here-turned with the dogge to his vomit and became as obstinate as euer he was before So if a mans heart be mollified onely in part he may relent while he heares the word and may embrace it with peace but in time of persecution may grow as hard as euer he was before euen as yron is soft in some measure while it is in the fire but becommeth hard againe when it is cold Let vs not therefore content our selues with an vpper softening but see that our hearts be softened to the very bottome that they may melt like waxe at the fire 2. King 22.19 as good king Iosiahs heart did when he heard the lawe read I knowe that none of our hearts are so lost as they should be But if thou fee-lest thine owne hardnes doest mislike it desirest earnestly that it may be more and more mollified and doest vse all good meanes for the further mollifying of it thy heart either is alreadie or shall be within a while so softened as it may receiue the word profitably to thy saluatioÌ„ If Goates blood being warme can soften the hard Adamant Gortandâ—â—pl mart doubt not but the blood of Christ can sufficiently mollifie thy heart though it were as hard as a rocke If thou pray earnestly vnto God to take away the stony heart of thy body Ezek. 36.2 and to giue thee an heart of flesh be assured that he will performe it seeing he hath promised it by his holy Prophet 3. Let vs now come to the third propertie of these hearers They belieue for a time Mathew and Marke say they endure for a season that it they endure in their with out a while They doe belieue yet not long But it is to be considered what kinde of faith this is Though the Papists teach that there is but onely one kinde of faith See postscript Sect. 4. Sect. 5. Sect. â— yet may we find many seuerall distinct kindes thereof in the holy scriptures There befoure kindes of faith One is proper and peculiar to Gods elect and to the regenerate The rest are common both to the elect and the reprobate That which is proper and peculiar to the elect is a true iustifying faith See postscript Sect. 7. Sect. 8. whereby a man doth apprehend and apply to himselfe all the promises of God in Christ and all the merits of Christ for the pardon of his sinne and the saluation of his soule Tit. 1.1 This is called by S. Paul the faith of Gods Elect because onely they and all they be endued with it And therefore it is said Act. 13.48 that as many as were orduned to eternall life beleened Though all of them doe not receiue it at the same time but some sooner sâ—me later yet is there not any of the I 〈◊〉 but at one time or other they doe receiue it This is called an vnfayned faith 1. 〈◊〉 1.5 〈◊〉 or a faith without dissimulation or hypoâ—â—â—e because it is not counterfaited and is a faith in deed and in truth and is seated not in the tongues or the head but in the bottome of the heart This faith is said to purifie the heart Aâ—â— 15.9 〈◊〉 13.10 and is called the faith of the Saints because none haue it but those who be sanctified By this faith are we now iustified without the workes of the law and by this Rom. 3.2 must we be saued as the Apostle proueth at large in his Epistles â—phâ—â— 2.8 But this is not the faith here spoken of Againe there be other kindes of faith See postscript Seâ—l 9.1 Cor. 1â— 2 which be common both to the Elect and reprobate And these are either extraordinarie or ordinarie Extraordinarie as the faith of working miracles whereof the Apostle speaketh saying If I had all faith so that I could remoue mountaines and had not loue I were nothing Iudus the childe of perdition had this faith as well as the rest of the Apostles for he wrought miracles as well as they And many shall say to Christ haue not we in thy name cast out diuells and by thy name done many great miracles to whom he shall answere I neuer knew you depart from me Math. 7.22 ye workers of iniquitic This was extraordinarie giuen to some fewe at the first preaching of the Gospell but hath ceased long agoe The ordinary kindes of faith which may be found in the reprobate are two in number See postscript Seâ—l 10. Seck 11. The one is called an hystoricall the other a temporarie faith The one I say is called an hystoricall faith or a dogmaticall because it is a bare knowledge and acknowledgment of the historie of the scriptures and of the things written therein concerning God his workes his promises and concerning Christ his merites and benefites without any apprehension of the things knowne and acknowledged Ioh. 5.46.47 This is the faith whereby men beleeue Moses and his writings Act. 26.27 This is the faith which Paul would needes fasten on Agrippa 〈◊〉 1.1 August dâ—tâ—â—p to beleeue the Prophets This is not fides qua credimus in deum sed qua credimus deo id est credeâ—e vera esse quae loquitur â—orm 181. Creâ—ere veâ—â—â—â—â—e 〈…〉 mulâ—◠〈◊〉 possunt August 〈◊〉 Iam. 2.19 It is not the faith whereby we belieue in God but the faith whereby we belieue God that is whereby we belieue all things to be true which he speaketh And so differeth very much from a iustifying faith This faith is sound in the vnregenerate They may belieue all things to be true which are written though they little regard them yea this
vnto his father because that although he had hid these thinges from the wise and men of vnderstanding yet he had reuealed them vnto babes Though some of his hearers in Capernaum tooke offence at his doctrine of eating his flesh Ioh. 6.66.68 drinking king his blood and from that time went backe and walked with him no more Yet the Apostles would not forsake him but fâ—ely ackdowledged that they would neuer leaue him because he had the words of eternall life and they did beleue that he was the Christ the Sonne of the liuing God When he preached in the Temple at the Feast of the Tabernacles Ioh. 7.40.41.43.46 there was dissention among his hearers Some sayde Of a truth this is the Prophet Others sayd This is the Christ Some sayde Shall Christ come out of Galilie Others said Neuer man spake like him At another time some that heard him saide hee had a Diuell and was mad Ioh. 10.20.21 and blamed men for hearing him any longer Others said These are not the wordes of one that hath a Diuell Can the Diuell open the eies of him that was borne blind Such diuersity of hearers had Christ his worde did not worke alike in all that hard it Some waxed worse some were made better by hearing of it The like effect was seene in Pauls hearers When he and Barnabas preached at Iconium â—â—â— 14.1.2 â— a great multitude both of Iewes and Graecians beleeued though there were some vnbeleeuing Iewes that stirred vp and corrupted the mindes of the Gentiles against the brethren In that deuision of the Citie though some were with the Iewes yet some were with the Apostles Act. 17.32.34 And when he preached at Athens some mocked him for his doctrine of the Resurection some would heare him againe as if they were not fully resolued but desired to be further instructed yet certaine men did cleaue to Paul beleeued as Denys a Iudge of Mars Streete Damaris a woman and others with them And thus it pleaseth GOD still to blesse the Ministerie of his seruants Though they cannot conuert all yet they doe conuert some they doe not altogether lose their labour As there is no field so barren but if it be sowne some seede will come vp and yeeld encrease so is there no place or congregation so bad but if the truth be there sincerely taught it will in time winne some Though some continue obstinate and remaine as ignorant as Popish and as prophane as euer they were before they heard Yet Wisedome shall be iustifyed of her children as many as are ordayned to eternall life shall beleeue Some shal be called and by hearing shall grow in knowledge in grace and obedience This may comfort and encourage vs in our labours Though it bee some griefe to see many non proficients who heare much and are neuer the better yet if it please the Lord to giue some happie issue vnto our labours that wee edifie some though not all that wee profite a few though not many wee should therewith be content and praise the Lord for it If indeede wee should conuert none at all yet must wee not faint but still continue our paines and expect a reward at the Lords hands for he will reward our laboures though we should do others no good thereby And therefore the Prophet sayd Isai 49.4 I haue laboured in vaine I haue spent my strength in vaine and for nothing but my iudgement is with the Lord and my worke with my God It is not our worke but the Lords worke 1. Cor. 3.6 to conuert soules Paul may plant Apollos may water but it is God that giueth the encrease Wee haue receiued and taken vpon vs Curam non curationem Bernard de consider lib. 5. cap. 3. A care and a charge not a curing Non est in medico semper releuetur vt ager It is not in the power of the Physition to cure his sicke patient at his pleasure Euery one of vs shall receiue a reward 1. Cor. 3.8 Secundum laborem non secundum prouentum according to his labour not according to his fruit As Bernard well obserued 1. Cor. 15.10 And therefore Paul sayd not I haue profited more then all but I haue laboured more then they all And rather reioyced in the abundance of his labours then in the fruitfulnesse of his laboures 2. Cor. 11.23 It a quaso fac â—â— quod tuumest Nam Deus quod suum est satis obsque tua solicitudine anxietate curabit Doe then I pray thee that which is thy office and dutie God will haue care enough of that which belongeth vnto him sayd the same Bernard But if we conuert and edifie some by our poore Ministerie we may comfort our selues by them and say of them as Paul did of the Corinthians 1. Cor. 9.2 Yee are the seale of our Apostleshippe in the Lord. And as hee did of the Thessalnians 1. Thes 2.19 What is our hope or ioy or crowne of reioycing Are not euen you it in the presence of our Lord Iesus Christ at his comming When wee sow good seede in the Lords field the enuious man soweth tares Wee must not looke that in a populous congregation all should be good and true hearers If some onely be good and profitable hearers let vs praise GOD for them and pray vnto him dayly to encrease their number But to come neerer to the properties of these hearers in particular In the description of them and by comparing them with the former hearers wee may easilie perceiue that in some thinges they doe agree with them in some thinges they differ from them and doe much excell them There were some commendable thinges in diuers of the former hearers and would haue wrought good in them if they had beene well vsed In these things doe these good hearers agree with them They haue the selfe-same things though in a better maner and with better vse 1. They agree with them in that they heare as well as the rest All the persons spoken of in this Parable are hearers both good and bad and they all heare one and the same doctrine though not after one and the same maner nor with the like efficacy and fruit z And therefore those which refuse to heare eyther through error as our Recusants or through contempt and negligence as some carelesse and carnall people are so farre from beeing the ground here mentioned as that they are worse then the bad ground spoken of before There cannot be any goodnesse in their hearts nor yet in their liues Can any field yeeld a good crop of corne at haruest which was not sowne at the seede time They are worse then many reprobates haue beene and are How then can they looke to be as good as the Elect are and shall be 2. They agree in the vnderstanding of the word for it is sayd in Mathew He that receiueth seed in good ground Mat. 13.23 is
promises of Gods mercies in him Bellarmine confesseth De sacram inâ—g ner lib. 1. cap. 2. that they agree with vs that Faith is necessarily required for the profitable receiuing of the Sacrament And is there not an Analogie betwixt the signes and the thing signied Looke then how wee receiue the outward Signes so must wee by faith receiue the thing signified As therefore euerie one doeth particularly with his owne hand receiue to himselfe and for himselfe the outward signe So euery one that belieueth doth particularly receiue to himselfe and for himselfe Christ and all his benefites Let vs come to the Fathers It may be some of you will neither yeeld to scriptures alleadged by vs nor yet to any reasons vnles you may heare the Fathers speake as we doe (1) Noncredit in Deum qui non in eo solo collocat totius falvitatis suae fiductam De duplici Martyr Sect. 40. That godly Martyr Cyprian said that although a man daily rehearsed all the articles of the creede Yet he doth not beleeue in God who doth not place in him onely the assurance of his whole felicitie he holdeth that faith is a confidence or assurance and not in generall of the happines and saluation of all Gods children but in particular of his owne happines This his assertion doth so gall the Papists that (2) Est etiam hoc caute legendum Annot in Cypr Pamelius said it must be read warily because he knewe that if it were reade in the very sense which the words did beare and the author meant without some corrupt glosse contrary to his meaning it would iustifie our doctrine of faith and make most of the popish crew who haue no confidence of their owne saluation but an assent to the truth of Gods worde to be a company of vnbelieuers The same Father saith (3) Quanti illuc fidei capacis afferimus tantum gratiae inundantis haurimus Epist. 2. That how much Faith we bring thither to receiue so much we draw of Gods ouerflowing grace This is appointed of God saide (4) Hoc constitutum est a Deo vt qui credit in Christum saluus sit sine opere sola fide gratis accipiens remissionem peccatorum in 1. Cor. 1. Ambrose that hee who belieueth in Christ should bee saued without works by faith only receiuing freely the remission of sinnes To the like effect speaketh Hesychius (5) Gratia ex miserecordia proebetur fide comprehenditur sola sine operibus In Leuit lib 4. cap 2. Grace of mercie is both offered and also apprehended by faith alone without workes (6) Quomodo in coelum manum mittam vt ibi sedentem teneam fidemmitte tenuisti In Ioh. 11. tract 50. Augustine maketh Faith the hand whereby euery one must lay holde of Christ now sitting in Heauen Is not that more then a bare assent to thinges reuealed Is not this a speciall Application When the same Father stirred vp his owne soule with these wordes (7) Dâ—â—at anima oranino secura dicut De is mâ—us eâ— tu qui dicit animâ— nostra â—alâ—â—â—â—a go sum dicat sâ—cura non fâ—câ—eâ— inâ—â—â—â—am cum hâ—r dixerit im 〈◊〉 si no 〈◊〉 In Psa 32. 〈◊〉 2. Let my soule say yea let it altogether confidently say Thou art my God who doth say to my soule I am thy saluation c. Did hee not in particular appropriate and apply to himselfe the generall fauours and mercies of God and made him who was God ouer all to be his God in particular And when he sayd (8) Eâ—â—e creâ—imus in 〈◊〉 queâ—â— side acâ—pimus In â—â—â—pâ—ndo nâ—uâ—â—us quid cogiteâ—â—◠〈◊〉 uÌ„â—â—â—pimus in cordesâ—ginâ—mur De verb. Dâ—m sâ—rm 33. Behold we belieue in Chriâ—t whom we receiue by faith In receiuing we know what we thinke we receiue a little and are fed in the heart he shewed the nature of faith to be rather an apprehension and application then an assent Chrysâ—stome writing of the promises made to the Patriarches and of the maner how they receiued them saith thus (9) 〈…〉 de ys coÌ„ceperunt siâ—u â—am prâ—ul 〈…〉 â—uatuor generationâ—◠〈◊〉 Tam 〈◊〉 deâ—psâ—â—â—â—at â—s pâ—râ—iâ—aâ—â—â— vt â—tiam eas sal 〈…〉 〈…〉 â—si expectare ◠〈…〉 Sâ—erâ—◠〈…〉 aâ—â—â—pisse nobâ— quoqu◠〈…〉 11. 〈◊〉 23. Theophilact on 〈◊〉 16. Neâ— vere hum◠〈◊〉 cognotâ—onâ— sidem hoc loco dicit sed eam quae nihil haesit aÌ„s sacit vt futura tam certa habeamus quam habemus praesentia They did by faith alone conceiue a certaine assurance of them seeing them a farre off before foure generations they had such a certain perswasion of them that they did euen salute them as Sea-faring men doe a farre off see the Cities desired which they salute before they enter unto them Thou sâ—est that this they receiued is to expect and haue confidence of them If therefore to haue confidence is to receiue We also may receiue them Wherein he declareth the nature of faith not to consist onely in an assent giuen to the truth of things reuealed but a confidence and assurance of the promises of God made to man And that by this confidence beleeuers are saide to receiue the promises And that as they then receiued the promises by that their confidence so also we now by the like confidence are to receiue them Damascen expounding the Apostles description of faith that it is the ground of things hoped for hath these words (10) Indubitabilis imudic abilis spes tam corum quae a Deo nobis premissa sunt quam assâ—cutionis nostrarum petitionum De orthodox fide 4.11 Faith is an vndoubted and uniudge-able hope as well of those things which are promised vs of God as of obteyning our petitions If then any man may particularly aske the forgiuenes of his owne sinnes and the saluation of his owne soule he may in particular beleeue that his owne sins shall be pardoned his owne soule saued Bernard is plentifull this way thus he saith If thou beleeuest that thy sinnes cannot be blotted out but by him against whom onely thou hast sinned thou doest well but yet adde more that thou also beleeue this that thy sinnes are forgiuen thee by him Is not this a speciall faith Is not this more theÌ„ an assent in (11) Sed adde adhuc vt hoc credas quia per ipsum tili peccata donantur In annunciat Mariae serm 1. initio generall to things reuealed Is not this the faith so much impugned by our late papists And for a speciall application of Christs merits vnto vs for the pardon of a mans owne sinnes and the saluation of his owne soule he speaketh as plainely (12) Nisi quâ—d non erat dâ— membris Christi nec pertinebat ad euin De christs merito vt suum praesumeret suum diceret quod illius esset tanquamrem capitis membrum Ego vero fidenter quod ex 〈◊〉 mihi